Optimizing Magnetic Shielding vs. Cryogenics
-
Upload
jada-shepard -
Category
Documents
-
view
44 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Optimizing Magnetic Shielding vs. Cryogenics
![Page 1: Optimizing Magnetic Shielding vs. Cryogenics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56813095550346895d967039/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
XFELX-Ray Free-Electron Laseri
Optimizing Magnetic Shielding vs. Cryogenics
![Page 2: Optimizing Magnetic Shielding vs. Cryogenics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56813095550346895d967039/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
XFELX-Ray Free-Electron LaseriConfigurations ILC (~16 000 cavités)
![Page 3: Optimizing Magnetic Shielding vs. Cryogenics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56813095550346895d967039/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
XFELX-Ray Free-Electron LaseriConfigurations ILC (~10 000 cavités)
![Page 4: Optimizing Magnetic Shielding vs. Cryogenics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56813095550346895d967039/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
XFELX-Ray Free-Electron LaseriConfigurations ILC (~10 000 cavités)
![Page 5: Optimizing Magnetic Shielding vs. Cryogenics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56813095550346895d967039/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
XFELX-Ray Free-Electron LaseriDouble Blindage
![Page 6: Optimizing Magnetic Shielding vs. Cryogenics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56813095550346895d967039/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
XFELX-Ray Free-Electron LaseriDouble Blindage
![Page 7: Optimizing Magnetic Shielding vs. Cryogenics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56813095550346895d967039/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Cryonomics
05/12/2011 O. Napoly 7
If I am allowed to extrapolate the 75% increase of Q0 shown by E. Kako with a double magnetic shielding, to ILC cavities with Eacc = 31.5 MV/m
and with the assumptions: grid power = 0,15 € /kWh@300 KCoP(2K) = 700 W/Wmagnetic shield = 1000€ / cavitycryogenics = 1 M€/100 W@2K
Q0 = 8 1010 (RDR )
€
Pdyn. = 9.6 kW@2K , 6.7 MW @ 300 K Pdyn. = 5.5 kW@2K , 3.8 MW
Q0 = 1.4 1010
€
![Page 8: Optimizing Magnetic Shielding vs. Cryogenics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56813095550346895d967039/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
XFELX-Ray Free-Electron LaseriMagnetic Shielding
Magnetic shields are qualified by the excellent dynamic cryogenic performance of XM-3
Produced by MecaMagnetic from Aperam/Cryophy 1mm sheets
![Page 9: Optimizing Magnetic Shielding vs. Cryogenics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56813095550346895d967039/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
0 4,000,000 8,000,000 12,000,000 16,000,0001E+10
2E+10
3E+10
4E+10
AC114 AC156 AC146 AC154AC157 AC158 AC151 AC152
Eacc [MV/m]
Qo
9J. Sekutowicz, Towards More Flexibility in Operation of the XFEL Linac, DESY, October 25th, 2013
XM-3 cavities: vertical tests at 2K (7 Large Grain +1 Fine Grain cavity)
2. cw and lp operation; 3 experiments c. Dynamic heat load for Large Grain Cryomodule
Measured dynamic heat load
![Page 10: Optimizing Magnetic Shielding vs. Cryogenics](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062314/56813095550346895d967039/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
XFELX-Ray Free-Electron LaseriConclusion
Increasing Q0 of ILC cavities by whatever means, is GREEN
Better magnetic shielding is one possible cost efficient way.