Opinions of administrators, teachers and students about...
Transcript of Opinions of administrators, teachers and students about...
I 6 JAN 2003
opIMoNS OF ADMIIUSTRATORS, TEACIIERS Ai\D STIJDENTS
ABOUT MANAGEMENT AT CHANAPOLLAKAI\ INSTITUTE
OF TECHNOLOGY NAKHONRATCHASIMA
FL.LT. SARAN INTAKULz
With complimentsof
fi$f, fiilurdu urfi rrnfiu ufi ern
A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FI]LFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIRBMENTS FOR
THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF EDUCATION
(EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT)
FACI.JLTY OF GRADUATE STIJDIES
MAHIDOL I.JNIVERSITY
ISBN 97+0+2607-7
COPYRIGHT OF MAHIDOL TJNIVERSITY
ffi
Ii
Tb{
Se\Js7-oo 2,
L.J-
I
I
I
I
I
l
Copyright by Mahidol University
Thesis
entitled
OPINIONS OF ADMIIVSTRATORS, TEACHERS AI\D STTJDENTS ABOUT
MANAGEMENT AT CHANAPOLLAKAI\ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NAKHONRATCHASIMA
ja"* !..htr-1.Fl.Lt.Saran IntakulCandidate
Major Advisor
. r. i tAAssoc.Prof. Sirichai Chinatangkul,Ph.D.Co-Advisor
fMbJ/Assoc.Prof.Thawatchai C"haijirachayakul"Ph.D.Co-Advisor
?or*- fJ-L- S l*;eLo-; cev"***5l..^o
)"ztLect.Dal{pat YosJ
Assoc.Prof.Rassmidara Hoonsawat-Ph.D.DeanFaculty of Graduate Studies
Assoc.Prof. Sirichai Chinatangkul;Ph.D.ChairMaster of Education Programms inEducational ManagementFaorlty of Social Sciences and HumanitiesCopyright by Mahidol University
Thesis
entitled
OPINIONS OF ADMINISTRATORS, TEACHERS AND STTJDENTS ABOUT
MANAGEMENT AT CHANAPOLLAKAI\ INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
NAKHONRATCHASIMA
was zubmitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies, Mahidol University
for the degree of Master of education @ducational Management)
on
October 31,
L+*tFl.Lt.Saran IdakulCandidate
Ph.D.Chair
2002
_|.*^.
Sii"L; 9L^^.^*L*'L-LAssoc.Prof. Sirichai Chinatangkul,
Hoonsawat,Ph.D.DeanFaculty of Social Sciences and HumanitiesMahidol University
{mLJ/A';;;.i;;;r.ilil;# 6n ii i'""n"v.mrPh.D.Member
Ph.D.DeanFaculty of Graduate StudiesMahidol University Copyright by Mahidol University
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to erdend e4pression of gratitude and appreciation to everyone
whose cooperation made this study possible.
My greatest appreciation is expressed to Dr.Dalapat Yossatorn for her final
zuggestion, encouragement and kind concern for the improvement of the study that
help me carry on the study.
Gratitude is also expressed to Dr. Sirichai Chinatangkul, Dr. Thawatchai
Chaijirachayakul and Dr.Padoongchart Suwanawongse who give me advice that help
me complete the study. Their zuggestions are crucial to the success of my shrdy.
Appreciation is expressed to Dr.Chalong Boonyanunta for his helpful
contribution and his encour4gement to finish the study.
Appreciation is enpressed to all respondents, adminisu'41s1s, teachers and
students of CTECH for the cooperation in responding to the questionnaire and
interview.
Finally, I am eternally indebted to my family. Their support is the key success
of this study. This research is dedicated to all members of my family.
SARA}.{ INTAKIJL
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, MahidolUniv. Thesis / iv
4038401 SHEMA4 : MAJOR:EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT; M.Ed.(EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT)
KEY WORDS : EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT/PRIVATE VOCATIONALEDUCATIONITECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION
FL.LT.SARAN INTAKUL : OPINIONS OF ADMINISTRATORS, TEACHERS
AND STUDENTS ABOUT MANAGEMENT AT CHANAPOLLAKAN INSTITUE OF
TECHNOLOGY NAKHONRATCHASIMA. THESIS ADVISOS: DALAPATYOSSATORN, Ph.D., SIRICHAI CHINATANGKUL, Ph.D., THAWATCHAICHAIJIRACHAYAKUL, Ph.D., PADONGCHAT SUWANNAWONGSE, Ph.D., I53 P.
ISBN 974-04-2607-7
The study aimed to ascertain the opinions of the administrators, teachers and
students on the management of Chanapollakan Institute of Technology Nakhonratchasima
It also examined the differences of opinions between the business students and the
engineering students and between the regular course and the special course students. The
respondents consisted of 2l adnrinistrators, 107 teachers and 348 students from the school
in the 2001 academic year. The study used both interviews and questionnaires as the study
instruments. The interviews began with the semi-stnrcnued or unstructured questions and
used criterion-based selection of interviewees.
The finding of this study showed that the respondents generally had a positive viewof the of the school. However in some aspects the respondents were notimpressed. These were arrangements for students to study according to their interest and
capability, library sendces, the appraisal system and the student service system. Business
adminishation students and Engineering students opinions were different in empowermentand participation" intemal audi! learner centered learning, integration of knowledge and
momle, life long leaming, suitable environment for leaming, cooperation with communityand parents, encouraging teachers to use action or classroom research to solve classroomproblems, the counseling system" the tansparency of finance system, the teamwork and
the encouragement to work. There were differences between the opinions of the regularcourse shrdents and the special course sfudents on most management areas except for the
following issues: life long learning, thinking abilrty, encouraging teacher to conductclassroom research and the sub-area of delegating jobs and responsibility.
It is recommended that the quallty assurance system should be developed andimplemented as a norrral cycle of work in the school. Cooperation with private sectorsshould be established further. The cuniculum should be more competency-based. It issuggested that the appraisal system of the staff must be varied according to the type ofjob.The students should participate more in the student activity management especially at thebeginning of the activities.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. Thesis / v
4038401 SIIEM/M : dlfllesl : nr:uimr:ffonr:drunr:f,nu1 ; f,u.lJ.
( nr:u?rr: f,onr:drunr:flnur)
rSoornrsronniard o^uvrqa : nlu6ot#utor{uiur: nE unsfnflnur fifisionr:u?rr:
{tuflo{I:{6uurnnlulatsusnnciuf un::rrfrrr (oPIMoNs oF ADMINISTRATORS,
TEACHERS ANID STUDENTS ABOI.TT MANAGEMENT AT CHANAPOLLAKAN INSTITI.'E OF
TECHNOLOGY NAKHONRATCHASIMA). nolsn::ilflr:nruqruivrurfiUuf, : narf,cxd uf,lr,
n.o. ffifu fiuvdrg:, Ph.D., risfu {uo^:nrurqn, Ph.D., e.lE{elfi qr::orNd, Ph.D., 153 P.
rsBN 97+04-2607-7
nr:?6'udfi5nqrJ:varrfrncoflnurnruFnr#uror{l?mr: oror:duasrindnurfifisionr:
uiur:srurorl:sriuurvrnluladsusnnduf, un::rryfirur unsflnsruJiuurfiuilnrrrufionXums
rindnu ruir r: q : fi 0 unclfnf,ns rritqnarm n: :r ti'tiodorlornilnfiuas nrnvt^tflu lourfi u{o
ryaluifnr:f,n u't 2s44 ornnrirudaodrsd'uldurifru?rr:,firu xu zl nu oror:d druau l0z nu uaso d o 6- iqY .i a a at 4 a C d,-uflrrnul tlu?u 348 nu R'r:?ouu rsrn:orfiofiorllllldouolilttasR'r:duRltsor n?lilngrl4ulnu?
frunr:r?rr:ludrusir{r tf.t o dru 6o nr:uimr:vi:hJ uiur:iinR'rt nr:tiu Unnln: rmnlulad
rfionr:f,nur uavdrufisnr:fnf,nur nanr:ifiunu'ir nrirufrrotirrrirulrqifinrrrun'tilotosionr:
u?fir:sruc,osl:sr€uuludrusiN'l unr{uuxdtu niu nr:ffn1#rinf,nurr5uusrrrun'lrrudolnr:
r?nr:ror#o{rdryo :uurlnr:il:sffiunrnnr:rlg^ri6{'ru ununl:u?nr:rinf,nur daunerrunntfrutot
rinflnuruirr:q:fiounsrinf,nsreil{Eerd'riln::runuirfin':rrunotfruusrnsirlfiufinrudru rsiu
nr: R:s orudluto (EMpowERMnvr) nr: n: eo aounrutu(INremul euon) nr: ti uuttuu{r3 uurfl u
drdq (LElnNen-cENTERED r.seRNrNc) nt:U:ot1n1:nlruf ttauqiln::ru(INrpcnenoN oF
KNowLEDGE AND MoRALs) nr:tiuufotixoiorfios (LnenNnrc rHRoucHour lm) il::utnlfllu
nr:riuu nrrrudarufioflo{EilsuuavffrJnn:os uastsrJuoltr:dfirJfnur (cornqsnmc svsrEu)
rfludu uuno'lnriu fnflnsrnrnilnfiuasnrnn^rsseirsfifin:rrun^otfiudNfiurflu6i':utraqi unr{utt . qQgd 4l ,, I t i --- a t a.Q-9-- ' ' - !^g-
:J1{911U rSU nr:'[Er lfiilR1:r:UUiOU't{grOrUO.r R'l:dOUR:slj?UR',l:nO R1:d{td:lJ l?l010',l:uvl'l
Ao q J o dl g?0u tu,yltt:uu tlju9lu
ornnnnr:iffuatrrJld'ir nr:dlfiunr:1#nr:rJ:sriur;arnrnrfl uri'ruudsororrruil:rdrlu
l:.rri uu n?: d$l{ n ?rru durfi ofruanru:J: vno:lnr:ludruoirq n::nisurua'n4n:l#aoondotv g 4 s . AY Itflun:rrudsrnr: uacrfl uu dnqor:fi niusirufinusiryrfrnuavail::nuclunr:fi ruu (cor"rpsrENcv
sasro) :yuunr:il:srfiunnnr:rJfrffinunr:ldiunr:fisrurt#rnrnun'ru unsn?:riuairul#rin
dnurfi rirudril uncfi unurvrrfl u {rirlurtufi'onr:rinf,nurCopyright by Mahidol University
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ABSTRACT@nglish)
ABSTRACT(Thai)
LIST OF TABLES
CHAPTER
I INTRODUCTION
Page
iii
iv
v
viii
l.l Background of the study
1.2 Conceptual framework
1.3 Research questions and objectives
1.4 Definitions of terms
II LITERATT]RE RBYIEW
2.1 Vocational education in Thailand
2.2 Pivatevocational education in Thailand
2.3 Vocational education management
2.4 \\e trend ofthe vocational education
2.5 Chanapollakan Institute of Technology
2-6 study of vocational education reform in various countries and
guidelines for Thailand
2.7 Related research
I
f,
I
8
1l
l3
l4
15
16
22
27
Copyright by Mahidol University
vll
CONTENTS (cont.)
CHAPTER
III METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research design
3.2 Population
3.3 lnstrumentation
3.4 Collection and analysis of data
IV RESI]LTS
4.1 Profile of respondents
4.2 Presentation of data relative to research questions
BIBLIOGRAPITY
APPENDIX
BIOGRAPITY
Page
32
32
32
37
v CONCLUSION, DUSCUSSION AI\D RECOMMEI\IDATTON
5.1 Conclusion
5.2 Discussion and recorlmendation
38
52
103
r07
t20
123
153
Copyright by Mahidol University
LIST OF TABLES
I
2
Table No.
4
J
6
7
8
Number of questionnaires sent and collected
Frequency distribution of administrators by age.
Frequency distibution of administrators by sex.
Frequency distibution of adminisfrators by highest education attainment.
Frequency disnibution of administrators by total length of service in adminisnation
Frequency dishibution of administators by length of service in the present position.
Frequency disfibution of adminisnators by the unit in the organization.
Frequency distribution of administrators by ntrmber of the zubordinate in the unit.
37
40
40
Page
4l
4l
42
43
u9 Frequency distributionofteachersby age. A
10 Frequency distribution of teachers by sex. 45
11 Frequency disnibution of teachers by highest education attainment. 45
12 Frequency distribution of teachers by total length of service in teaching. 46
13 Frequency distribution of teachers by length of service in teaching at present school. 47
14 Frequency distribution of teachers by teaching level. 48
15 Frequency distribution of students by age. 49
16 Frequency distribution of students by sex. 49
17 Frequency distribution of students by studying subject. 50
18 Frequency distribution of students by level of study. 51
Copyright by Mahidol University
tx
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table No. Page
70
7l
72
73
74
Frequency distribution of students by years of study.
Percent4ge of opinions of adminisfrators about general administratiou
Percentage of opinions ofteachers about general administration.
Percent4ge of opinions of students about general administration
Percent4ge of opinions of administrators about academic administration.
Percent4ge of opinions ofteachers about academic administration-
Percentage of opinions of shrdents about academic administration.
Percentage of opinions of administrators about finance administration.
Percentage of opinions ofteaohers about finance adminisfi'ation.
Percentage of opinions of students about fitance administration.
Percent4ge of opinions of administrators about human resource management.
Percentage of opinions of teachers about human resource management.
Percent4ge of opinions of students about human resource management.
Percentage of opinions of administrators about tecbnology and resource for learning.
Percentage of opinions of teachers about technology and resource for learning.
Percentage ofopinions ofshrdents about technology and resource for learning.
Percentage of opinions of administrators about student activity
5l
6l
64
69
2l
22
23
24
25
26
31
32
34
35
76
77
79
Copyright by Mahidol University
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table No.
36 Percentage of opinions ofteacher about student activity.
37 Percentage of opinions of students about student activity.
38 Chi-square ofthe opinions ofthe administratolg teachers and students crosstab with
each of general admini sfu'ation management area.
39 Chi-sqtrare ofthe opinions ofthe administrators, teachers and students crosstab with
eacl of academic management area
40 Chi-square ofthe opinions ofthe adminisfators, teachers and students crosstab with
each of finance system nanagemeat area.
4l Chi-square ofthe opinions ofthe administrators, teachers and students crosstab with
each ofhuman resource management area.
42 Chi-square ofthe opinions ofthe administratorg teachers and students crosstab witi
Page
each oftechnology and resowces forlearning management area. g6
43 Chi-square ofthe opinions oftle administratorg teachers and students crosstab with
each of student activity management area. g7
U Chi-square of the opinions of the business administration students and engineer
students crosstab with each of general administration management area. 88
45 Chi-square of the opinions of the business administration students and engineer
students crosstab with each of general academic management a^rea. g9
46 Chi-sErare of the opinions of the business adminisfiation students and engineer
students crosstab with each of general finance system management area. 9l
79
80
tl
Copyright by Mahidol University
xr
I.IST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table No, Page
47 Chi-square of the opinions of the business administration shrdents and engineer students
crosstab with each of human resource management area. 92
48 Chi-square of the opinions of the business administration students and engineer students
crosstab with each of technology and resources for learning man4gement area. 93
49 Chi-square of the opinions of the business adminisfi'ation students and engineer students
crosstab with each of student activity management af,ea. 93
50 Chi-square ofthe opinions ofthe regular course and the special course students crosstab
wittr each of general administration management area. 94
52
51
53
Chi-square of the opinions ofthe regular course and special coruse students crosstab
with each of academic management area.
Chi-sErare of the opinions of the regular course and special course students crosstab
with each of finance system management area.
Chi-square ofthe opinions ofthe regular course and special coruse students crosstab
witl each of human resource management area.
Chi-square of the opinions of the regular coruse and special course students crosstab
with each of technology and resources for learning management area.
Chi-square of the opinions ofthe regular course and special cowse students crosstab
with each of snrdent activity management af,ea.
98
99
98
55
100
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed" @ducational Managament) / I
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the study
The need for education reform has resulted from social, economic, politics and
tecbnological changes. These changes have affected counties all over the world
continuously. The globalizatio4 the Interne! the lower of trade banier, the
tnternattonalizafron of coopuates and privatization of the public sector enterprises is
the obvious examples of the changes. The development of the comnunication
technology seers to stimulate these. It provides the world to learn each other faster.
When learning the adaptation and changing are inwitablg the education system that
we require atthe present time is not like in the past or even not similar. The reason is
the rapid changes that we encounter almost in every aspect. The expectation of
education to serve them is more sophisticated, for instance, lifelong learning learning
tbroughthe Internet and home school encourage the new learning pattern
The economic crisis in Thailand since 1997 has urged Thai people both in
private and government sectors to rethink what we had done in the past in order to
find new way of management and working. The education especially vocational
education is the part that most of the people believe that will be the one that can
revive Thai economic fundamentally.
Apart from the crisis, Thailand has encountered a number of weak points in
term of competitiveness. Since 1998, the IMD (nternational Instihrte for Management
Development) has reported that Thailand had lower rank than its neighbors do.Copyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Srmlntakul Ifioduction/2
Among 4l countries comprised of countries in Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OBCD) and Newly Industrialized and Emerging
Economies, Thailand was ranked at the 33rd in 2000 report. IMD reported that
Thailand education sy$em could not serve the economic competitiveness of t.he
country and in term of technology and science we have been ranked at 47h or at the
last position These all stimulate Thailand to rethink about its education and
technology system.
Realizing the significant of the education reform" the Governments in many
countries begn to plan for it this includes reorganization and reengineering of
education services. The most practical way to do this is to formulate or dwelop the
National Education Act and implement it. The provisions in the Act should describe
generally about the education administ'ation both in national and in school levels and
other necessary processes.
In order to success in the reform, the educational management is one of the
66s1 important parts to be reformed. The conventional organization may be not
zuitable for the changes. The new theory of the educational management is inevitable.
There should be something that is flexible, something that allows learners to learn the
most oftheir ability and with convenient. This will effect all educational management
a^reasl, for instance, the general administration, tle academig financg human resource
6anagement, educational resources and student activity management.
After the promulgation of 1999 National Educational Act, it meats that the era
of Education Reform in Thailand has begun. The Provisions of 1999 National
Educational Act provides us with details that educators need to be concerned and
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed. @ducational N4anagement) / 3
study how to implement them. Many sections in the Act describe about the reform not
only in the structure of the educational organizations but also the learning pattern.
Most educators lave perceived the information about the Act and have been
wondered how to adapt the system and themselves to new system.
The management of the school is essential to the success of the
implementation of the Act. Apart from the Act, if it is consistent with the change.s, the
user will satisff the product of the school. At the school management level, the
adminisfi'ato1s are involved in using their authority that they have to manage the
schools. Teachers are the most important agents who provide teaching process in the
schools and shrdents are the ones who receive the education service from the two
above. So the opinions from the tbree groups of people who are involved in school
'mao4gementwill clari& how the school management is.
The vocational education 6anagement is one of the most interesting part of
education act implementation Vocational educators realize that rapid change in
economig social and political urge the education system to change the paradigm.
These changes also effect vocational education From now on educators must provide
education tlat serves the demand-side. The cooperation between the institutions and
private sectors or industries should establish in order to ask for the most wanted
c'urriculum that can produce a ready to work output The graduate needs more skills
and knowledge both in term of quality and quantity in order to survive in the real
world. It challenges all Vocational Education Administrators. The following are
reaso$l why we should make ourselves understood vocational education management.
Copyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Srmlnrakul Introduction/ 4
l. Vocational Education is crucial for country development. The graduates
can get into jobs directly and become the fundamental workforce of the country if
their knowledge and skill are consistent witl the demand.
2. The Provisions of 1999 National Educational Act has divided levels of
education into basic and higher education. But at the moment vocational education
provides both levels which are certificate level and diploma level respectively. It is
not obvious for vocational educators how to deal with the changes in both levels. For
instancg which level of education standards they need to follow or which education
committee they are under zupervision So the study of the Provisions of 1999 National
Educational Act should be done in order to clariS the intention of the Act upon the
Vocational Education Management and to realize how to implement it.
3. Vocational Education providers in Thailand are both Private and
Government instihrtions. These two management patterns are variously different, for
instance, organization structure, budgeting, personnel, entrepreneurship and especially
the management. The study ofthe details should be done.
4. After the promulgation of the 1999 National Educational Act, there are
approximately 23 following Educational Acts that are to amended and improved in
order to be harmonious with the new provisions. The Vocational Education Act and
Private Education Act are also on the list. At the mean timg the consideration of these
two Acts has not finished yet. It is hoped tlat conclusions and zuggestions of tlis
study may be useful for any committee, which contemplate these two Acts.
The zuggestions that has been developed from this study are not only for
educators but also students and all of institution stakeholders, for instancg parents and
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed" @ducational lvlanagunent) / 5
community leaders, because the participatory process is essential for educational
management.
1.2 Conceptual framework
Thevocational school management generally comprises of 6 areas an
following.
1. General adminisftation
2. Academic management
3. Finance management
4. Human resource management
5. Technology for education and learning management
6. Student activity management
In order to identiS fts management of each area more obvious, there are sub-
areas in each one. The topics are ascording to the provisions in the 1999 National
Education Act which are cleady defined in each area of management.
In the general administration area, there are five aspwts concerning
empowerment and panicipation, implementation of the information technology, the
cooperation with private sector and community, quality assurance system and internal
auditing.
According to aoademic management eighteen aspects could be divided as
learner-center learning integration of knowledge and morale, studying by student's
interest learning form real experiencg life long learning learner development in
using information technology, tlinking ability, zuitability of environment for learning
efficiency, sources for self study. Cooperation with community and parentq
Copyright by Mahidol University
FlLt Sarmlntakul Imoiluction/6
cooperation of private sectors in term of academic, providing leaming for community,
encouraging teacher for using action or classroom research to solve the classroom
problems, creating the cuniculum that serves and relates to the need of the
community, the various methods of assessment the various methods for study
selection, library service and counseling are also belong to this area of management.
For financial system management of the schoo! the general of the system and
the transparency are the zub-areas of the study. Human resource management of the
school can be divided into swen zub-areas of the study as, selectioq job allocation,
human resource development, motivatio4 teamwork, appraisal system and
encouragement.
Technology for education and learning 6anagement has three interesting areas
as the teaching media dwelopmenq E-learning system and building and services
management. Shrdent activity management is the last aspect with tnro areas as general
ofthe system and welfare and student services.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed. @ducational Ivlanagement) / 7
Conceptual Framework of the study.
Perceptions of administrators
about school management
Perceptions of teachers about
sshool management
Opinion of administrators,
teachers and strden8 about
ssfoogl rnanagemenL
Perceptions of shrdents about
schmlmanagement
Copyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Sumlntakul Ifroduction/8
1.3 Research Questions and Objectives
Questions
1. What are the opinions of the administrators, teachers and students about the
management of the school?
2. Are there differences among the opinions of administrators, teachers and
students about the management of ttre school?
3. Are tlere differences between the opinions of engineering shrdents and
business administration students about the school man4gement?
4. Are there differences between the opinions of the regular coruse students
and the special course students about the school management?
Objectives
l. To study the opinions of the administrators, teachers and shrdents about the
management of the school.
2. To compare the opinions of adminisfi'ators, teachers and sfudents about the
management of the school.
3. To compare tle opinions of engineering students and business
adminisnation students about the school rDanags6.r1.
4. To compare the opinions of the regular course students and the special
course sfirdents about the school management.
1.4 Definitions of tems
"Opinion" is a belief or judgement about something, not necessary based on
fact or knowledge.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Idahidol Univ. M.Ed. @ducational Managunent) / 9
"Administratoft refers to the director, vice-director, manager, head of
department and head of zubjects of the school.
"Managementtt refers to the control and making of decision in six areas of
management in the school as general administration, academic managemenf finance
management, human resource managemen! technology for education and learning
management and student activity 6anagement.
*National Education Act'means Thai National Education Act that was
promulgated in 1999, commencing the era ofEducation Reform in Thailand.
"Education'means the learning process for personal and social development
through imparting of knowledge; practice; training; transmission of culture;
enhancement of academic progress; building a body of knowledge by creating a
learning environment and society with factors available conductive to continuous
lifelong learning.
'InstitutionD means education institution that provides both basic and higher
education levels.
"Vocational educationD means education relating to the qualification and
preparation needed for a particular job. It provides both basic and further education
and format non-formal and informal education.
'Private Vocational School' means private school that provides vocational
education.
' .'Educatoft mea$t professional personnel with major responsibilities for
management both outside and inside educational institution for instancg schools,
college and education service area.
Copyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Samrnnku[ Irtroduction/ l0
*Regular course student" mearN student who sfudies in daytime from
Mondayuntil Friday.
ttSpecial course studentot me4ns student who studies on weekend. classes
from Friday evening until Sunday.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed" @ducational Management)/ ll
CHAPTER II
LITERATT'RE REVIEW
2.1 Vocational Education in Thailand
There are more than 800 vocational education institutions (public/private) all
over the country and there are at least 9 ministries which are responsible for human
resource dwelopment. This can provide variety of cunicular and different forms of
training to suit target groups. The Ministry of Education (MOE) is responsible most of
the formal vocational education There are tlree departments in the MOE tlat provide
vocational education
l. Deparment of Vocational Education.
2. Rajamangala Institute of Technology.
3. Office ofPrivate Education Commission
Even though there are many institutions, which are responsible for vocational
education in Thailand but there are still problems ttrat occ-ur and can be described as
follows:
1. There are lack of proper competency standards and assessment both in
term of core competencies and each occupation field competencies. These cause
confusion not only t.he students but also the staffto realize ttre ultimate goal after they
have completed the course. The metlods for assessing tle competence are also
important. Actually, the industry and commerce a.re supposed to be the main
organization to make and develop these competencies.
Copyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Srmlnalol Lit€ratrneREview/ 12
2. Most of vocational education curric.Lrlums come from the institutions
especially Rajamangala Institute of Technology and Department of Vocational
Education (DO\E). There is limitation for industry and commerce sector that would
like to join in drawing up the curriculum. Most of the staff believes that institutions
should have a major role in produce them. And if private sector or even private
vocational school would like to create the c-urriorlum, the processes are very
complicated and take times, for instance, diploma curriculum may need 2 years to be
allowed to teach in the institutions. These patterns of curric-ulum making can not catch
up withthe changing of tle global economy.
3. The country does not have a master plan for human resource
development. Therefore, the vocational education is more institution-driven than
industry and commerce-driven. They lack of researches that identi$r the trend of new
job that can be the guidelines for tle student to study and for educator to provide
zuitable education.
4. one of the 66gt important problems in vocational education is that it fails
to formally recognize itself within the indushies or in the services. There is liule
private enterprise interesting in cooperation with vocational education institutions so
the students do not have chances to learn in the real work environment. Actually, the
students should spend zubstantial of their time in the work place, rotating with other
shrdents. The apprenticeship program is very limit and does not zustain. The patterns
that the private sectors cooperate with education institution are limited, for instancg
the dual vocational training the short term training of studentq the apprenticeship
program. Majority of these kinds of cooperation are only between private sectors and
government vocational institutions.Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies,lvlahidol Univ. M.ErL @ducational Managemem)/ 13
5. Vocational education providers are not treated equally. For instance, the
matter of nomenclature, the private institutions can only be named themselves school
but the government institutions that provide tle same education level can be named
college. If we would like to have more vocational education providers in term of
quality and quantity we need to set up "level playing field"@eter Fleming).
6. The economic recession in Thailand make it diffrcult for develop
vocational education in term of R&D projects and resources investment.
2.2 Pfrv ate Vocational Education in Thailand
nivate Vocational Schools in Thailand are located in all over the couffiy, in
wery provinoes. The number of private vocational institutions is quite higb, about
370. This shows their intere* in participating in vocational education They provide
about 200,000 seats for the new students each year. This nmber is almost equal to
what the Government Vocational Schools can do. They provide the Diploma and
Certificate levels that accept the M.3 and M.6 ( grade 9 and 12 ) students. Most of
them are located in Bangkok and the nearby provinces. The ovmers of the schools"are
usually former teachers in the government schools or institutions. The organization
pattern is mostly a Family Business.
There is an association that alnost all the private vocational schools unit
together called the Private Vocational School Association of Thailand. This
organization acts as the representative of the schools in many roles such as cooperate
with the Minisry of Education, providing skill competition of tle students, teachers
development, arranging the annual conference of the association and promoting
academic functions in the schools.Copyright by Mahidol University
FLLL Srmlntakul LiteraffieREview/ 14
Legally, at the moment, the schools a^re under the zupervision of the Office of
Private Education Commission , Ministry of Education but the private vocational
schools have.autonomy to arrange the education for the students as well. They are
free to choose the appropriate cuniculum for the school. Most of them are by
Deparhent of Vocational Education and Rajamangala's curriculum. At the moment
the Office of Private Education Commission's curric.ulum itself is in the development
phase. After the total implementation of the National Education Act in august 2002,
the basic education level will be in tle zupervision of the new organization "The
Local Education Authority'' and higher education will have National higher education
committee to zuperintend. The schools receive about l1Yo of tuition fee per student
from the Government in basic education or at certificate level so almost the school
budget is from the educational fee . They have independence in recnriting the sta$,
sefiing tle salary system, the appraisal system, the evaluation system including the
quality assurance system"
Though the autonomy of the private vocational schools is practical, there is
weakness in supervision process of the government the variety of the school has
emerged. Some are running with Wality some are not . Generally, it's not fare for the
shrdents to study without standard . The Erality assurance is one of the question topics
that need the answer. For this reaso4 the Ministry of Education has initiated tie
program for the private sectors thatwill zupportthe quality assurance system.
2.3 Vocational Education Management
Management ofvocational education in schools or colleges level are different
aocording to the policy of deparhentthat responsible forthem. Deparhent ofCopyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, lvlahidol Univ. M.Ed" @ducational Management) / 15
Vocational Education frames the colleges in their authority to have fours departments
as education supporting, student activity, plan and development and academic
departments. All Rajamangala Institutes of Technology have arrange four departments
in the institution as general administratioq academic, education service and student
activity department.
The organizations in the private vocational schools are different and flexible
according tothe providing subjects and other internal and external factors and can be
adjusted regularly by the change of the situation But generally, there are academic,
building and site managemenf sttrdent activity and general management departments.
The administrators of the private vocational institution are generally aware of
the changes and try to study how to adapt their management in order to provide the
higb quality of service for the shrdents. There are projects tlat encour4ging from the
Government for instancg the pioneer vocational school reform, that comprise of the
18 private vocational schools all over the coutry leaded by the Office of National
Education Commissiou The institutions themselves are also proactive for tiis. They
try to reform departments and subsystems in the organizatiea. In the government
institutions, there are movements in the reform, for orample the constnrction of the
new curriculum that serve the social changes and the new education law.
2.4 The trend of the vocational education
At the moment, there are at least tlree organizations that are drafting the new
Vocational Act. This Act will reengineer the vocational education providing in
Thailand. The new pattern will be more demand- driven. There will be more
involvement of industries and commerce in vocational education and training. TheCopyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Srmlnakul Lit€rafineRwiew/ 16
cooperdion between education and private sector may establish in various ways, for
instance, creating of curriculum, competency standard setting and apprenticeship
programs. There should be more curicula in all fields. And the people who already
graduate in any degree, diploma" and certificate may come back for in the
field that they are interested in or would like to work in the future. The students who
study in this field can continue studyrng up to degree levels and become technicians
after graduation This will promote and motivate students to snrdy vocational
education continuously and their competencywill be developed firmly.
There will be more cooperation among tie government instifirtions, private
institutions and private sectorsn in term of networking and sharing ofthe resources and
information, for instancg human resoruce and facilities.
The staff that teach in the vocational education will be more varied. The
e4perienced workers in the industries or commerce may join in the student training
programs in their field so the knowledge and skill that students get will be modern
and can be prompt practiced in the workplace after the graduation. There will be more
motivation for private enterprises that would like to join in education, for instancg tor
reduction system and zupport in the firrther investment from the Board of Investment.
2.5 Chanapollakan Institute of Technolory
Chanapollakan Instihrte of Technology is a private vocational school located
in Nakhon Ratchasima province. The Institution has provided the educational service
since 1994. At the momen! there are 3,100 students studyrng in business
administration, computer, hospital administration, accounting and engineering both in
daytime and evening class. The students' ages are between 15 to 50, mostly are 16 toCopyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, I!4ahidol Univ. M.Ed @ducational Managerrent)/ l?
22. I+bout 30 yo of the students are depend on the Government's loan. Half of them
graduated M.3 and M.6 in this province and nearby. Others come from almost every
provinces in the northeastern part of Thailand. There are 159 lecturers (5 are
foreigners), 20 staff and 30 workers working in the institute. The lecturers obtained
their degree in bachelor degrees to doctoral degrees. Many of them used to be the staff
in the Government Vocational College. In addition, there are guest lecturers from
Government University and college both in engtneering and business field.
The institute has four boards response for the administration jobs as follow:
l. Administration board. This board comprises of the representatives of the
parentq teachers, communities, industry, commerce, o\ilner of the institution and
government officer. The jobs ofthis committee areto consider and approve the school
plan (School Charter) that was prepared by the General Administation board.
2. General administration board. This board comprises of the owner, the
direaor, vice director and the Head teacher. Its responsibilities are to create the school
plan in duration of shorq medium and long term. In addition, they are to monitor the
work in progress following tle approved plan with effrciency.
3. Coordinating board. Thetasks of this board areto set out a department
plan and estimate the budget and resources that are needed in order to facilitate the
projects. This committee consists of all the heads of the departments and the vice-
director who is the chairman.
4. Academic committee. The tasks are to maks decision on the academic
matters. For instance, curriculum developmenq teaching method, supervision systern,
Copyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Sarmlntakul Literature Rwiew / 18
evaluation and assessment system- The heads of academic departments are the
members of the committee.
After the reorganization of the institute in the beginning of the academic year
1998, CTECH has two major parts of works. One is responsible for academic works
and another is for service works. The academic work groups are directly under the
supewision of the Principal. They are divided into four groups as follows.
l. Business administration groups: consisted of Computing, Hospital
adminis;tration and Accounting.
2. Engineering groups: consisted of Automotive, Electronics, Electical,
Constnuction, Architecture and Computer Technology.
3. Tourism industry and services group. Foreign language for tourism and
services is the only one department in this group.
4. Academic zupport groups: Sciences, Social Religiong Languages, etc.
Service work groups are directly under the zupervision of the vice-director
and consist of general administration, Financg Human resource, Research-Quality
assurancg Building and site managemenl Shrdent's activities, Public relations,
Information technology center, CTECH plus and Disciplinary department.
Missions of the Subsystem
l. Academic Groups (Engineering, Business administrationo Tourism industry
and services and Academic support group)
Responsibilities are:
l. Setting out, developing and maintaining the curriculum.
2. Arranging the students for classroom.Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed. @ducational Management) / 19
3. Developing time tables.
4. Responsible for tle student's assessment and evaluation.
5. Conducting the staffdevelopment of the institution.
6. Responsible for the supervision ofteaching.
2. Administration
Responsibilities are:
1. Receiving sending searching draft, responding letters and documents.
2. External and internal co-ordination
3. Preparing for the meeting ofthe four committees.
3. X'inance
Responsibilities are:
l. Making a financial plan.
2. Organiang the accounting system.
3. Report the finance situation to the administrator.
4. Human resource
Responsibilities are:
Orgnni-ing the human resource management work zuch as recruitment of the
staff, orientation of the organization" discipling salary, pre-in service fraining,
termination of employment work permit and VISA and benefit.
5. Research and Quality Assurance
Responsibilities are:
l. Conducting research projects.
2. Evaluating tle staffs performance.Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Sannlntakut Literatre Rwiew/ 20
3. Surveying the attitude of studentg parents and community about college's
administration performance.
4. Dweloping of the international relationship.
5. Responsible for the both Internal and Quality Assurance projects, for
instancg drafting the School Charter or plan, accreditation.
6. Building and Site management
Responsibilities are:
l. Constructing and maintaining oftle building and school areas.
2. Controlling tle communication system (Telephone, Radio)
l. lrdanaging of the non-academic workers.
4. Maintaining of the facilities (water, electricity, lift" light system, electrical
eEripmenl automotive) and teaching media.
7. Student's Activities
Responsibilities are:
l. Encouraging and zupporting the student's activities.
2. Providing healti service.
3. Providing general service zuch as cantee4 shop, and drinking water.
4. Coordinating about the Alumni activities.
8. Public Relations
Responsibilities af,e:
l. Advertising the institution information in various media and method.
2. Cooperating with the local community.
3. Marketing. Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed. (Educarional N4anagement) / 2l
4. Informing the students about work place and further study.
5. Producing the semester journal and yearbook.
6. Providing internal information system.
9. Information Technology Center
Responsibilities are:
l. Maintenance of the information technology equipment in the school
2. Planing for information technology resource used in the school.
3. Organizing ttre information and database ofthe school.
4. Encouraging and training school personnel in using the information
technology eEripment effi ciently.
10. C-TtsCE Plus
Responsibilitiels are:
l. Arranging the evening and weekend classes.
2. Allocating the staff and teachers for the classes.
3. Coordinating with other departments in orderto manage the classes.
11. Head of Director oflice
Responsibilities are:
l. Secretary work to the Director.
2. Receiving, sending, searching and drafting letters and documents for the
director.
3. Maintaining of external and internal co-ordination.
4. Preparing for the meeting that the Director participates.
Copyright by Mahidol University
FlJ.t Sarmlntakul LiteratnreRsview/22
12. Disciplinaqy department
Responsibilities are:
l. Controlling the student's discipline.
2. Responsible fortle morning assembly ofthe students.
l. faking care of the transportation for the students.
4. Coordinating with the student's paf,ent.
5. Responsible for the student's home visit.
CTECH began 1e implement the information technology in order to control
and update the databases of the school. The databases of the school comprises of
information of students such as history financial academic and service information-
The library database is arranged in order to serve the students and staffto seaf,ch for
information
2.6 Study of Vocational Education Reform in various countries and guidelines
for Thailand.
Siripun Chumnum (2000: 6+79).studied the Israel Vocational and Technical
Education reform. It was a document research and the scope of the study was on the
administration system, teaching training quality and standard, cooperation betvyeen
government and private sectors and the mobilization of the resources for vocational
education and training. The findings of zuch research were as followings:
l. At the beginning time when Israel established the country, Israel's
vocational education was emphasized on Agriculture because they lacked of tle
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, N4ahidol Univ. M.Ed. @ducational Managemeft) 123
resouroes. They could develop the agficultural system for the country effectively.
Since the beginning of era of the information age, the significant of the technology
has been realized. The vocational educator of the country had developed the
cuniculum by adding the technology zubjects for instance, computer and controt
electronics and mechanical hardware integrating into every field of vocational
education.
2. The important strategies for vocational education reform can be
described as following:
- Emphasizing of agricultr:ral technology or agro-industry that can
increase the productivity.
- Integration oftechnologyto all education levels.
- The dividing of the learners in to groups by their academic point
average.
- The selling up of Apprenticeship program for all the youths who could
not attend the formal education Apart from the flaining, reading and writing ability
are added witl closed supervision
- The significant of the readiness of laboratory and training centers in
order to allow the student to create new projects or innovation effectively.
- The standardization of the national vocational qualification all over the
country.
- "Tomorrow 98" Program that helped to dwelop, expand and revive the
scientific teaching especially in the laboratory. This had strengthened the human
resource of the country in term of being technological mind.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Sarmlntalul Literatue Review / 24
3. The suggestion for Thai system. The Israel vocational education system is
similar to Thais that the beginning is at the upper secondary level. The points that may
be adapted to Thai context are:
- Encouragement the use of technolory in agriculture to produce the new
generation for the agricultural workforce who has good science and technology
background and can implement technology in orderto gain more productivity.
- Integrating the technology, mathematics and science in all levels of
education. The areas of development should include curriorlum, teacher tlaining,
equipment and teaching methods.
- Setting various curriculums according to the learning ability of the
students. And they must be flexible for most of tle students.
- Establishing the motivation of Apprenticeship progranr
- The Quality control is also important. The non-government
organizations should be tle ones that take care tlis matter.
Siripun Chumnum (2000: 90-ll4)also studied the vocational education
reform in the United Kingdom- This study had the same scope and method as the
Israel's study. The findings are following:
l. The United Kingdom Technical and Vocational Training has the basic of
the technological knowledgg plus fte linking with private sectors and industries. The
curriculum is very flexible and leads to the test for General National Vocational
Qualifications (GNVQs) and Business and Technical Education Council. Most of the
programs are corlmencing in ttre Technical College and Agricultural College. They
emphasize the continuing between education and the job.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed @ducational Management\ | 25
2. The cooperation of the private sectors and the institutions is closed
especially in the curriculum setting, the Vocational Qualification and the exchanging
of the information. There are three organizations that are responsible for this
cooperation. They are the National flaining organizatioq the Trade Union Congress
and Training and tle Private Sector council. The policy and projects of the
cooperation from the private sectors are Partnerships, Compacts, Individual Learning
Accounts, Investing on labors, Workplace Learning Initiativg University for Industry,
Training for work, Job seekers and Modern Apprenticeship and the New Deal.
3. The quality control of standard and Grouping of the Trade. There are
hro Qualification standards. First the General National Vocational Qualifications
(GI'[VQ$ and second the National Vocational Qualifications (NVQs). There are non-
government organizations that certi$ the Eralification. There are five levels of tle
qualification
4. The Reform of vocational Education in the U.IC was under drastic
change in the past l0 years. The Key strategies for zuccess are following:
- The Unity of the policy and the strong link between education and the
employment.
- The siguificant of private sectors in the human resource development
function.
- The freedom of the institution in term of administration and cooperation
with the communiw.
- The standard of the evaluation and qualification system.
- The external Quality Aszurance from non-government organizations.
5. The Advice for Thai Vocational and Training Education System.Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Sranlntakul Literature Rsview/ 26
- To stress on the important of the private sectors and trade union
organizations.
- Set freedom in management forthe institutions.
- Establish the National Vocational Qualifications (NVQs) and standard.
- The Quality Assrance system forthe institutions.
- Set up the communication network in order to link between demand and
supply.
Sawat Udompoj (2000: 52-57) studied The Vocational Education and Training
Reform in the United State of America. The U.S.A has reformed its education
continuously since 1957. The parliament has passed important education law tlat can
Ss imFlemented throughout the country. The Vocational Education and Training
system are fundamental to the basic education in the form of 'Career Education'.
Similar to the U.K. and Israel system that they stress on the cooperation of the private
sectors. The country use the Education Act as the key of the reform, for instancg the
Apprenticeship Act and the Workforce Investment Act that reform the pattern of
vocational education of ttre counfry. The U.S.A system is emphasizing on the post-
secondary vocational education Secondary level should be responsible for
preparation and searching the appropriate continuing education for each student.
The Strategy for strccessful reform in the U.S.A. is tlat they use the Education
reform policy to lead the development of the counry and they have researoh and
development process for gathering information in order to solve the short and long-
term problems. The status of the vocational institution in the community is competent
and it can lead the community in term of solving career problems. The national
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.EIL @ducational Managemert) I ?il
qualification is international recognized. The American workforce can work
effectively all over the world.
The zuggestion for Thailand Vocational Education Reform is to encourage its
people about the important of the education to the dwelopment of the country
especially Vocational Education that is career education. Sawat stressed that Thai
Vocational Education systep should be specific in each trade after post secondary
level like American system tlat they have community collegg Technical college in
post secondary level. The Vocational institution should be accredited as the Further
or ffigher Education. The Academic and administration independence must be
concerned
The Thai Crovernment should have a special urgent policy to dwelop the high
skilled workforce for the coufiry. The mobilization of the resourcqs to the education
must be done for high quality of service. The Institution itself should have link with
its community and initiate the zuitable caf,eer education
2.7 T\e Related Research
Study about the opinions of education management
Theidaporn Laovisaskul (2001: Abstract) studied the parents' opinions
regarding the administration in the private schoot Phuket province. The study
examine tle opinions in 6 areas sf management as academic, human resource, student
activi8, building general administration and finance and community relationship.
$ample groups were parents of tie student in the school. She found that the opinions
of parents were at moderate level. Career of parents influenced no different inCopyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Srmlnlakul Litenture Review / 28
administration of the school. There were suggestions that school should establish the
administration committee and study the satisfaction of the parent in quality of school
and development ofthe children in all aspects.
Pana Buajoom (2001: Abstract) studied the students' opinions in short
vocational courses regarding teaching performance at Phuket Polytechnic College
Under ttre Division of Industrial and Community Educatio4 Deparhent of
Vocational Education. The concept of study was about the academic management in
term of teaching preparatio4 plaq teaching process and assessment. Sample groups
were students in the short vocational course with straffied sampling techniEre
according to sex, 4ge and group of zubject. Rezults of the snrdy were that the opinions
of t.he student according to the teaching were in high level. The students according to
age and sex variable were not different in term of opinion on general teaching
adminis;tration. The student groups of zubjects were different according to opinion on
teaching but not different in teaching preparation and assessment. There were
zuggestions about the teaching equipment that should be in good condition with well
maintenance.
Varissara Khamsaena (2000: Abstra4 studied the business administration
students' opinions regarding instructional management of the principles of economics
subject in vocational colleges under the Deparhent of Vocational Education. The
groups sf sample were shrdents in the vocational college in Udonthani, Loie, Nongkai
and Khonkan province in Northeast of Thailand. She found that in term of content of
the subject, student believed that the value and theory content could not be
implemented in the real situation Students agreed that during teaching teacher did
not open a chance for qr:estion and answer and let the student to share the opinionsCopyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed @ducational lvlanagement) / 29
enough. According to assessment method student commented that there should not be
only multiple choices for questions. She also found that student from Accounting,
Marketing and Computing had opinions different in term of the evaluation of the
career and daily life application. The suggestion from ttre study were teacher should
find more knowledge in the community and use varied teaching media in order to
encourage learning of students.
Sumran Thammachote (2000: Abstra@ studied work performance for quality
assurance and accreditation in private vocational-business administration school in
Hatyai. Sample groups were personnel from the vocational school in I{atyai. The
objective of the study was to know the level of work in the qrrality assurance and
accreditation that frame by the Office of Private Education Commission, Ministry of
Education He found that the personnel work in the area in high level of work load.
Pqsonnel that had different experiences perform in the same situation except for the
human resoruce management and building management. Personnel tlat were not in
the same college perform in different both in term of general and details of work.
There were suggestions that apart from experiencg knowledge and performance
should be concerned in the promotion of personnel and the quality as$uance work
should be expanded to the other management area in order for external evaluation in
the future.
Another filed of the study that involve the school management is study about
shrdent activity. Pornsawat Lertvitayavivat (1999: Abstract) studied students'
opinions towards the administration of students' activities in one private school within
Songkhla province. The groups of sample were students in the school. Sampling
technique were stratified according to level of education and simple random. TheCopyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Srmlntakul Literatre Rsview / 30
concephral frameworks of student activities were student activity arangement,
counseling disciplinary matter and services. He found that the opinions of shrdents in
general student activities management was in high level but for counseling and
discipline were in moderate level. There were $ggestions that the school should
establish the curriculum committee in order to make the curriculum that relevant to
the need of tle shrdents and encourage students to play major role in shrdent activity
management. The counseling teacher should attend in professional development and
arrange for more time that serves the need of the students.
Iirapod Sunadvanitkul (1989: Abstract) studied the opinions of administrxlug
and teachers on the human resoruce management of private vocational school. It was
study about 6 af,eas of human resource management as plnnning, selection,
developmen! appraisal and retirement. The results of the shrdy showed that the
administrator had better opinions than teachers about human resource management.
The adminisfrators and teachers in provinces had better opinions than Bangkok and
the administrators and teacher in large school had better opinions than small school
except for the selection.
William A. Krei (1998: Abstra@ studied the role of vocational education
directors according to Washington State learning goals. Information gathered
charaderued that School-to-work program such as Tech-Prep and Running start
could [s a link between the tenth grade assessment and high school graduation. This
study found evidence that vocational education directors are developing programs to
ensure that vocational education makes the necessary adjustments to the cunicula to
contributeto the overaJl reform effort fortle state ofWashington.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed @ducational lManagunent) / 3l
The TAFE NSW (2001: I l-19), which is the largest vocational institution in
Australia, has reviewed process and policy of the institution in order to make new
reconunendation for it. There are five themes recur from the review as following;
l. There is the need for changing the product (Cuniculum, teaching)
system to be diversity, innovative and flexible to the local in order to respond for the
economic and social change pressure.
2. The changing context for vocational learning. Changng of customer
needs, the industry stnrcture and technology are affecting the product. The new
technology is attacking the way learning can be facilitated 6d managed.
3. The new model of the quality is more dependent on the teaching
learning and assessment services delivered to the cuslomer.
4. The value is the fourth theme. The institution system is not as collection
of the documents, resouroes, policies, committees, guidelines and procedures but as
an integration of the value chain there are four primary activities: curriculum;
teaching learning and assessment resources; professional development; and teaching
learning assessment and student zupport.
5. The change process itself has made it difficult for the organization to
plan for the need of the customer in the future.
Fromthe literatures, they showed the importance of perception of the opinions
of people who involve in the educational management. The opinions reflex what they
believed and were effected from management. So the researcher is interested in study
the opinions especially from administrators and teachers who are the person who
provide the education services and students as the customers or person who accept the
services. Copyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Srm Iniakul Methodologr/ 32
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the research desigq the methodology, the instrument
used for collecting the information and the t:me frame of the study.Data collection
and analysis are also described.
3.l Research Design
The design of research in this study was mainly research. It
emphasized on the holistic description. The data collected from the interviews and
questionnaire was analyzed according to the objectives ofthe study.
3.2 Population
The population of this study consisted of 3 groups as being sdminis6'41sss,
teachers and shrdents of Chanapollakan Instihrte of Technology. The number of the
administrators, teachers and students are2l, 120 and 2,683 respectively.
3.3 Instrumentation
Since tlis part of study was qualitative so the non-probability sampling
techniEre was the method of choice. The purposeful or criterion-based sampling
technique was used for the interview. The individual or group interview was used
with selected sample. The interview stnrcture was semi-strucfured or unstrucfured
pattern- The outlines of the interview were set for confining the question to ask theCopyright by Mahidol University
ffiFac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ert @ducational Management\ I 33
interviewee. The outlines were different according to groups of people and areas that
are being asked about. During the intervieu', the researcher probed interesting point
deeply in order to gain more information tlat the interviewee knew. The tape recorder
was used by the preference of tle interviewee.
The criteria for selecting the sample for interview in each goup are as follows.
l. Studlent: They must be representative of their class without discipline
problems and gain average to high score in the examination.
2. Teacher: They used to receive the annual teacher award ofthe school or
listed in the leader teacher progran They must not be in the probation period.
3. Administrator: They are or used to be head of the deparhents at least 3
years consectrtively.
The numbers of interviewee adminisfi'ators were 6. Teachers were 6 and the
sttrde,lrts were I l. Among the shrdents 9 were the regular course students and 2 were
the special course strdents. And all of the students intemiewee, 6 were business
administration students and 5 were engneering students.
Types of questions used in this research could be divided into 5 groups as
l. Hypotletical Questions. The Erestions were asked for what the
respondent might do or what it might be like in a partictrlar situation; uzually begins
with'What if' or "Suppose".
2. Devil's Advocate Question. The questio$r were asked in order to
challenge the respondent to consider the opposing view.
' 3. Ideal Position Question. The questioffr were asked for the respondent to
describe the ideal situation.
' t 35€* b+dCopyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Sran Idakul Methodology / 34
4. Interpretive Question. The qtrestions were asked for advances tentative
interpretation ofwhat the respondent has been saying and asks for reaction.
5. Probe Question. Ask deeper to find more information
The examples of the questionused in the interview axe as following.
General Admini su'ation questions.
l. What is the process before a decision 6aking?
2. What do you think about the information technology that uses in the
administration?
3. How the private sector or other organizations cooperate with school?
4. How school should perform in ordelto getthe cooperation from tle
private sectors?
5. 'What do you feel aboutthe Qualiry Assurance of the school?
6. What is aboutthe Internal Audit system of the school?
Academic man agement questions.
l. How is the teaching and learning system?
2. What do you believe aboutthe learner centered learning?
3. What is about learner centered in CTECH?
4. What do you think about learning from real experience that school
provides?
5- How is the classroom research in school?
6. How school provides thinking skill practice for students?
7. What do you feel about the examination?
8. What is aboutthe library?
9. \{hat is your plan after finished? (student) rCopyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed.@ducational Management) / 35
10. What do you think about teaching media?
I l. How the school cooperates with the community and private sectors?
12. When there is a problem student asking for help from whom?
13. What is the Counseling system ofthe school?
Finance system management questions.
What do you think about the finance system of the school?
Human resource management questions.
l. What are the recnritment and selection systems of the school?
2. What do you think about the Human Resource Management of the
school?
3. What do you feel about the Appraisal system?
4. Howthe school motivates personnel to work?
5. How about the Human Resource Dwelopment?
Technology and resources for education man4gement questions.
l. Howthe Teaching media ofthe school improved?
2. What do you think aboutE-learning?
Student Activity management questions.
l. What is about the student activity in the school?
2. How aboutthe student club runs?
Apart from the interview, tlere was a questionnaire as the tool in the study.
The use of questionnaire depended on the timg availability and convenient in term of
collecting and interpreting of the information. The questionnaire was developed from
tle concept of the 1999 National Education Act and the m4nagement in the school atCopyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Srm Idakul Methodology / 36
the present time and then the expert in this field examined it. They consist of trro
parts. Part I focused on the personal profi.le of the respondents, for instancq age,
education background number of years of experiences in teaching or administration
and studying or teaching zubject. Pait 2 focused on the opinions of the respondents
about the management of the school. There were descriptions in each of the answer in
ords to minus the bias or mizunderstanding of the respondents. The trial for testing
the reliability and validity of the Erestionnaire was done by using the alpha
coefficient. The reliability of the questionnaire that separated to academic and
academic zupport administration are as following:
l. According to the administrator and teacher respondents, the reliability of
academic questions and academic zupport questions (general administratio4 finance,
human resourcg technology and student activity) are 0.80 and 0.89
2. According to the student respondents, the reliability of academic
questions and academic zupport Erestions are 0.89 and 0.91
All of the adminisnators and teachers were asked to answer the questionnaire
but there was sampling from students. The sa-ple size was calculated from the
formula of Slovin as.
Slovinformula n : N/l+N*(e)2
N: population, n: sample size, r desired margin of error (0.05)
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed"@ducational Management) / 37
3.4 Collection and Analysis of Data
The student samples were collected from each group of zubject by proportion
of the calculated sample size. In this study, there were high return rates of the
questionnaire. The numbers of questionnaires sent and collected are shown in table l.
Table I Number of questionnaires sent and collected.
Group Sent Collected Percent
Administrators
Teachers
Students
2l
t07
2l
r20
348
100
89.17
100348
489 476 9734
Collected Erestionnaires were 21,lA7 and 348 for the administrator, teachers
and students and could be calculated as 100, 89.17 and 100 percent of each group of
the sample size. The average of collected Erestionnaire was97.34 percent.
There were two parts of collecting tle information. The first was to collect
from the qualitative method and the second was the Erantitative method. After
finishing the collection the analysis of tle data from both methods was beginning.
The information was analyzed in order not only to answer the research questions but
also zuggesting the practical and appropriate way for management of the vocational
institution especially the private one.
According to qualitative method, after each day ofthe interview, The collected
information has been sorted and rearranged according to each of management areas.
Copyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Strm Iffikul Methodolory/3E
There was an analysis of the information from the interview in order to pick up the
interesting point and was used for probing with the next interview.
In the analysis of the quantitative results, the freErency distribution in terms of
percentages was used for classification of respondents' regard to the personal
information and Erality of each 6anagement area. The test of significance differences
in opinions about management between groups of the respondents was the non-
paramefric test Chi-square.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.E<t.@ducational Management) / 39
CHAPTER IV
RESULTS
This part presents tle data collected from the study. The interpretation and
analysis of it are also in this part. The organization of the presentation of data follows
the sequence of the statement ofthe Erestions of the study in part l. The first section
of this part is the profile of the respondents and the second section is presentation of
the data collected from the questionnaire and interview.
4.1 Profile of Respondents
The respondents were administrators, teachers and sfirdents. The profiles of
the administrator are age, sex, highest education attainmeng total length of serrrice in
administration, length of serrrice in the present positioq level and character of the unit
and number of the subordinate colleague in the unit. The profiles of the teacher are
agg se4 highest education attainment total length of service in teaching length of
service inteaching at present schoof teaching level and teaching subject. The profiles
of the studentinclude 4ge, s€x, studyrng zubjec! years of study. The distribution of
freqnencies and percent4ge of the administrators, teachers and students are presented
intable 2.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Srmlntakul
Administratorst personal information
Table 2 Frequency distribution of adminis6atols by age.
Re.sul8, Data Prese, ation md Analysis / 40
Age(years) Number of Respondents Percentage
20-30
3140
4l-50
5l and over
5
l0
4
2
23.8
47.6
l9
9.6
Total 100
As shown in Table 2, frve (5) ow of twenty-one (21) or 23.8Yo of the
administrators are in the age range of "20-30" years old. Ten (10) out of twenty-one
(21) or 47.6% of the administrators are in tle age mnge of "31-40" years old. Four
(4) out of twenty-one (21) or l9o/o of the administrators are in the 4ge range of "41-
50" years old. Two (2) or 9.6Yo are in the €e range of 5l and over. It shows that the
biggest number of the adminisfiators in the study is in the range 3l to 40 years old.
Table 3 Frequency distribution of administrators by sex.
Sex Number of Respondents Percentage
2l
Male
Female
l0
ll
47.6
52.4
Total 100
As shown in the Table 3, ten (10) or 47.6% of twenty-one (21) administrators
are male. Eleven (l l) or 52.4yo are female.
2l
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Iv{ahidol Univ. M.Ed(Educational Management) / 4 I
Table 4 Frequency distribution of administrators by highest education attainment.
Education
Diploma
Bachelor's Degree
Master Degree
Doctoral Degree
Other
I
l5
5
0
0
4.8
7t.4
23.8
0
0
Total 100
As shovm in Table 3, one (1) ow of twenty-one (21) or 4.gvo of the
adminisfrator finished Diploma level. Fifteen (15) out of twenty-one (21) or 7l.4To of
the administrators finished their Bachelor's Degree. Five (5) out of twelrty-one (21) or
23.8% of the administrators finished their master degree. It shows that most of the
administrators finished Bachelor's Degree.
Table 5 Freqtrency distribution of administrators by total length of service inadministration
Length of service inNumber of Respondents Percentage
2l
l-5
6-10
I l-15
t6-20
and over
9
5
I
2
0
4
42.9
23.8
4.8
9.5
0
t9
2l
no
TotaI 2t 100
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Sa,m-Irrtekul Resrilts, Data Presentdion md Anatysis / 42
As shoum in the Table 5, nine (9) of the twenty-one (21) administrator
respondents or 42.9Yo have had I to 5 years e4perience in administration senrice. Five
(5) of the twenty-one QD administrator respondents or 23.8Yo have had 6 to l0 yeaf,s
experience in adminisfi'ation service. One (l) of the twenty-one (21) administrator
respondents or 4.8Yo has had l l to 15 years experience in administration service. Two
(2) of the twenty-one (21) administrator respondents or 9.5Yo have had 16 ts Z0 years
e4perience in adminishation service. The data in the Table 4 indicates tlat almost
three-fourth of the administrator respondents has less than l0 year's experience in the
administration service.
Table 6 FreErency distribution of adminisfiators by length of service in the position
Length of sen'ice inNumber of Respondents Percentage
present position (years\
l0
5
I
0
5
l-3
4-6
7-9
l0 and over
no response
47.6
23.8
4.8
0
23.8
Total 100
As shown in the Table 6, ten(10) of the twenty-one (21) adminishator
respondents or 47.6%o have had I to 3 years in their present position. Five (5) of the
twenty one (21) administrator respondents or 23.8Yo have had 4 to 6 yeaf,s in their
present position. One (l) of the twenty-one (21) administrator respondents or 4.8%
has had 7 to 9 yeaf,s in their present position. Two (2) of ttre twenty one (21)
administrator respondents or 9.5% have had 16 to 20 years in their present position.
2l
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed"(Educational Management) | 43
The data in the Table 6 Indicates jnat almost three-fourth of the administrator
respondents have less than 6 years e4perience in the present position.
Table 7 Frequency distribution of administrators by the unit in the organization.
Character of the unit Number of Respondents Percentage
Sector
Academic Sector
Department
Group of subject
Unit
No response
6
2
6
5
2
0
28.6
9.5
28.6
23.8
9.5
0
Total 2l 100
As shovm in the Table 7, six (6) of the twenty-one (21) administrator
respondents or 28.6Yo manages the sector in the organization. Two (2) of the twenty-
one QD administrator respondents or 9.5yo manage the department in the
organization. Five (5) of the twenty-one (21) administrator respondents or 23.8Yo
menage the group of subject in the organization Two (2) of the twenty-one (21)
administrator respondents or 9.5% manage the unit in the organization.
Copyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Srmlntakul Results, Data Presentation mat Analysis / 44
Table t Frequency disfribution of administrators by number of the subordinate in tieunit.
Subordinate colleague
in the unitNumber of Respondents Percentage
l-50
5l-100
l0l-150
15l and Over
no response
17
0
I
I
2
8l
0
4.8
4.8
9.4
Total 100
As shovm in the Table 8, seventeen(I7) of the twenty-one (21) administrator
respondents or 8lolo have I to 50 nrbordinates. One (1) of the twenty-one (21)
administrator respondents or 4.8Yo has 101 to 150 and Over 151 subordinates in the
unit.
Teacherst personal information
Table 9 Frequency distribution ofteachers by age.
Age(years) Number of Respondents Percentage
2l
20-30
3140
4l-50
5l and over
no response
56
36
52.3
33.6
10.3
2.8
0.9
ll3
I
Total 107 100
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Shadies, Mahidol Univ. M.Erl(Educational Management) / 45
As shown in Table 9, fifty-six (56) out of one hundred and seven(107) or
23.8yo of the teachers are in the age range of "20-30" years old. Thirty-six(36) out of
one hundred and seven(107) or 33.6Yo of the teachers are in the age range of "3140'
years old. Eleven(ll) out of one hundred and seven(107) or lO.3Yo of the teachers are
in the age range of "41-50" years old. Three(3) or 2.8Yo are in the age range of 5l and
over. It shows that the biggest number ofthe teachers in the shrdy is in the range 20 to
30 years old.
Table 10 Frequency distribution of teachers by sex
Sex Number of Respondents Percentage
Male
Female
No response
54
52
s0.5 '
48.6
0.9
Total 107 100
As shoum in the Table 10, fifty-four (54) or 50.5% of one hundred and seven
(107) teachers are male. Fifty-two (52) or 48,6yo are female.
Table 11 Frequency disfibution ofteachers by highest education attainment.
Education Number of Respondents Percentage
Diploma
Bachelor's Degree
Master Degree
ll 10.5
85
0.9
9l
I
Copyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Sarmlnakul
Table 1l (Continued)
Rssults, Data Presedationmd Analysis / 46
Education Number of Respondents Percentage
Doctoral Degree
Other
No response
0
0.9
2.7
0
I
3
Total to7 100
As shown in Table ll, eleven (ll) out of one hundred and seven (107) or
10.5% of the teachers finished Diploma level. Ninety-one (91) out of one hundred and
seven (107) or 85Yo of the teachers finished their Bachelor's Degree. One (l) out of
one hundred and seven (107) or 0.9Yo of the teachers finished master degree. It shows
thatthe most of the teachers finished Bachelor's Degree.
Table 12 Frequency distibution of teachers by total length of service in teaching.
Length of service in
teaching (years)Number of Respondents Percentage
l-10
ll-20
2t-30
3l-40
4l and over
no resporNe
86
l0
I
2
0
8
80.4
9.3
0.9
1.9
0
7.5
Total 100
As shown in the Table l2,EiSty-six (86) of the one hundred and seven (107)
teacher respondents or 80.4Yo have had I to l0 years experience in teaching. Ten (10)
to7
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Shdies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed"@ducational Managemert) | 47
ofthe one hundred and seven (107) teacher respondents or 9.3Yo have had ll to 20
years experience in teaching. One (l) of one hundred and seven (107) teacher
respondents or 0.9% has had 21 1o 30 years e4perience in teaching. Two (2) of one
hundred and seven (107) administrator respondents or 1.9% have had 3l to 40 years
experience in teaching. The data in tle Table I I indicates more than three-fourth of
the respondents has less than l0 years e4perience in teaching.
Table 13 Frequency distribution ofteachers by length of service in teaching at presentschool.
Length of teaching inNumber of Respondents Percentage
present school (years)
7-9
l0 and over
no responsie
28
42
28
3
6
l-3
4-6
26.2
39.3
26.2
2.8
5.5
Total t07 100
As shown in the Table 13, twenty-eight (28) of the one hundred and sevbn
(107) teacher respondents or 26.2Yo have had I to 3 years in teaching at the school.
Forty-two (42) ofthe one hundred and seven (107) teacher respondents or 39.3% have
had 4 to 6 years in teaching at the school. Twenty-eight (28) of tle one hundred and
seven (107) teacher respondents or 26.2Yo have had 7 to 9 years in their present
position. Three (3) ofthe one hundred and seven (107) teacher respondents or 2.8%
have had l0 years and over in teaching at the school. The data in the Tablel2
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Sarmlntakul Itesults, Data Prese,fiationand Anafysis / 48
indicates that about three-fifth of the teacher respondents have less than 6 years in
teaching in the school.
Table 14 Frequency distribution ofteachers by teaching level.
Teaching level Number of Respondents Percentage
Certificate
Diploma
Certificate and Diploma
No respgnse
l5 l4
t2.l
72
1.9
l3
77
2
Total L07 100
As shoum in the Table 14, fifteen (15) of one hundred and seven teacher
respondents or l4%o teach in certificate level. Thirteen (13) of one hundred and seven
teacher respondents or l2.lYo teach in diploma level. Seventy-seven (77) of one
hundred and seven teacher respondents or 72Yo teach in both certificate and diploma
level. The data in the Table 13 indicated that most of the teachers teach in both
certificate and diploma level.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ.
Studentst personal information
Table 15 Frequency distribution of students by age.
M.Ed.@ducational Management) / 49
Age(years) Number of Respondents Percentage
15-2a
2t-25
26-30
3l-35
36 and over
no resporute
218
99
22
7
2
0
62.6
28.4
6.3
2.0
0.6
0
Total 348 100
As shown in Table 15, two hundred and eighteen (218) out of tlree hundred
and forty-eight (348) or 62.6To of student respondents af,e in the 4ge range of "15-
20' years old. Ninety-nine (99) out of tlree hundred and forty-eight (348) ot 28.4o/o
of student respondents are in the age range of *21-25" years old. Twenty-two Q2) o8
of tlree hundred and forty-eight (348) or 6.3Yo of student respondents are in the age
range of "26-3C' years old. Swen (7) or 2Yo are in the age range of "31-35" years
old. Two Q) u" 36 and over. It shows that the biggest number of the shrdents in the
study is in the range 15 to20 years old.
Table 16 Freguency distribution of students by sex.
Sex Number of Respondents Percentage
Male
Female
154
t94
44.3
55.7
Total 100
Copyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Samlnrakul Results, Data Prese, rlation and Anafysis / 50
As shown in the Table 16, one hundred and fifty-four (154) or M.3Yo of three
hundred and forty-eight are male. One hundred and ninety four (19a) or 55.7o/o are
female-
Table 17 Frequency distribution of students by studying zubject.
Subiect Number of Respondents Percentaqe
Business computer
Accounting
Hospital business
Automotive
Electrical
Elechonics
Constnrction
160
n46
7.8
8.6
18.4
7.5
I1.5
0.3
30
64
26
40
I
Total 100
As shovm in Table 17, one hundred and sixty (160) out of tiree hundred and
forty-eigbt (348) or 46To of student respondents study Business computer. Twenty-
seven Q7) out of three hundred and forty-eight (348) or 7.8%o of student respondents
study Accounting. Thirty (30) ow of tbree hundred and forty-eight (348) or 8.6% of
shrdent respondents study Hospital business. Sixty-four(64) or 18.4% study
Automotive. Twenty-six (26) or 7.5Yo study Electrical. Forty (40) or ll.5% of the
respondents study Electronics. One studies Constnrction It shows that the biggest
number of the students study Business computer.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed.@ducational Management) / 5I
Table 18 Frequency distribution of students by level of study.
Level of study Number of Respondents Percentage
Certificate 6l t7.5
Total 348 100
As shown in the Table 18., sixty-one (61) or 17.5% of three hundred and
forty-eight study in certificate level. Two hundred and eighty seven Q87') or BZ.SYo
study in diploma level.
Table 19 FreErency disfibution of sfirdents by years of study.
Years of study Number of Respondents Percentage
24.4
2t.6
8
34.5
I l.s
85
75
28
t20
40
I
2
3
4
5
Total 348 100
As shown in Table 19, eighty-five (85) out of three hundred and forty-eight
(348) or 24.4Yo of student respondents shrdy in first year. Seventy-five (75) out of
tlree hundred and forty-eight (348) or 21.6% of student respondents study in second
year. Twenty-etghty (28) out of three hundred and forty-eight (348) or SYoof student
respondents study in third year. One hundred and trnrenty (120) or 34.5Yo study in
fourth year. Forty (a0) or ll.syo study in fifth year. It shows that the biggest number
oftle students study in fourth year.Copyright by Mahidol University
p1.tr1 geren Intekul Rsults, Data Fresertation md Anatysis / 52
4.2 Presentation of Data relative to Research Questions
In this section, the data is presented within the framework of the research
questions. The percentage of the respondents' opinions in each field of management is
elaborated in table. The first research question was developed in order to identi$ the
opinions of administrators, teachers and students about management of the school.
The second research question, differences among ttre opinions of administrdo$,
teachers and students about management of the school were compared with
Nonparametric test Chi-square. The third research question, differences between the
opinions of engineering and business administation shrdents about the school
man4gement were clarified with Nonparamefric test Chi-square. The fonrth research
questioq differences between the opinions of regular and special course students
about the school management were identified with Nonparametric test Chi-square.
X'irst research question :
What are the opinions of administrators, teachers and students about
management of the school?
Opinions about general administration
Table 20 Percentage of opinions of administrators about general administration.
Percentage of respondentst opinions
Field of management Dontt No
know response
General administration
l. Empowerment and
participation
023.8 61.9 14.3
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ.
Table 20 (Continued)
M.Ed"@ducational Management) / 53
Percentage of respondentst opinions
Don't NoFieldofmanagement | 2 3 4
know response
2. 1[s implementation of 0 42.9 42.9 14.3 0 0
information technology
3. The cooperationwith 4.8 n.6 42.9 4.8 0 0
private sector and
community
4. Qualityhssurance 0 38.1 23.8 38.1 0 0
5. Internal Audit 0 19 52.4 28.6 0 0
As shown in the table 20 , the administrator respondents generally agree that
the empowerment and participation, the imFlementation of information technology
and the cooperation with private sector were ranked in moderate quality. Except for
the quality assurance system and internal audit management that were higher af 38.l%o
and28.6% atthe 46 quality rank.
Copyright by Mahidol University
FLLI Srmlniekul Rssults, DataPrese, ationaodAnatysis/ 54
Table 2l Percentage of opinions ofteachers about general administration.
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
Field of management Dontt No
kmow response1234
General administration
l. Empowerment and 3.7 42.1 47.7 6.5 0 0
participation
2. The implementation of 5.6 40.2 44.9 9.3 0 0
information technology
3. The cooperation with 2.8 4l.l 46.7 7 .5 1.9 0
private sector and
community
4. Quality Assurance 0 16.8 52.3 28 1.9 0.9
5. Internal Audit 0.9 18.7 58.9 18.7 2.8 0
As illustrated in the table2l, tle teacher respondents generally agee that the
empowerment and participation" the implementation of information technology and
the cooperation with private sector were ranked in moderate quality. Except for the
quality assurance system that ranked highq at 52.3Yo and 28% in 3'd and 4t quality
rank and internal audit management were also higher than the fust tbree at 58.9% and
ll.7Voin 3d and 4ft quality rank.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Mahidol Univ. M.Ed@ducational Management) / 55
Table 22Percentage of opinions of students about general adminisfalitt.
Percentage of Respondents' opinions
Dontt NoF'ieldofmanagement | 2 3 4
know response
General administration
l. Empowerment and 7.5 29.3 36.5 4.3 1.4 2l
participation
2. The implementation of 6.3 37.4 39.1 9.2 1.7 6.3
information technology
3. The cooperationwith 5.2 35.9 32.8 16.4 2.3 7.5
private sector and
community
4. Quality Assurance 3.7 n3 40.8 l2.l 5.2 10.9
5. Internal Audit 2.9 15.8 3a.2 n.6 5.2 33.3
As depicted in the table 22 , the student respondents rated the general
administration in moderate to high quality of management especially the cooperation
with private sector and community that lanked high as 32.Syo and l6.4Yo at 3d and 4s
quality rank and quality assurance system that ranked higher at 40.8Yo and ll.lYo at
3d and 4t quality rank. But the students seem to not understand the internal audit
management. They arurwer 'don't know' 5.2Yo and there were no resporne at high
number as33.3Yo. Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Sranlnlakul
Finding from interview
General Administration
Results, Data Presentation md Analysis / 56
According to the empowennent and delegation of power, when there were
need to make a decision in any topic there will be a meeting that arrange in order to
find the resolution. The members in the team or in the meeting can describe their
opinions and find the conclusion together. The subordinates can propose their ideas to
the zuperior according to their responsibility.
The administrators have mentioned about empowerment and delegation of the
power of the school maragement, which were at high level. Anyway some of tlem
noted that sometimes there was skipping line of tle management especially when
urgency was needed. For the use of information technology in the school
management there was enough hardware for service but tle most important factors
for zuccess was the implementation ofusing it. Some of tle adminis6aler and teacher
were not familiar with the technology and they preferred to manage or teach in the
ordinary way
About the cooperation with the private sectors, school sent the strdent to
train in the outside organization as short period of tlree months. There were Dual
Vocational Training system (DVD that let tle students to str:dy academic and theory
subjects at school then work and fain in reat sihration at the company, for instancg
t.he automotive students and hospital business administration students engaged in the
car service center and hospital. The way to gain more cooperation from the private
sector or the community is to concern about the benefit that they could receive from
the schoot for example if they join the school in training the student they can have a
chance in selecting t.he competence workers in the futrue. Anotler way is to scheduleCopyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Ivlahidol Univ: M.Ed-(Educational Management) / 57
the training time that is convenient for the company to join. The DW students
believed that they could gain more orperiences and improve more competence in
joining this program compaf,e to the ordinary one. And they could adjust their
attitudes to work in the field, for instance tle responsibility, human relationship and
honesty. [a administrator respondent assumed that there may be more cooperation
with the private sectors if tle school ask for tie staff in it to be a part time teachers
because they will be more understand and familiar with the school.
For the Quality Assurance Management of the school there was
accreditation of ttre school from the academic year 2001 to 2005 by the Minisfy of
Education, which was the internal one. Anlmay the process was not continuous. The
quality assurance system was very active in the evaluation period and it would slow
doum after that. It was not in the normal cycle of working in the school. The Internal
Audit was limit to the finance. There was no audit in other work areas and tlere was
no stafftlat seriously takes responsibility in the job.
As consider the data from questionnaire and interview, they showed some
differences. For instance, the quality assurance was rated high from all respondents
but the interview showed that it was active only before and when the evaluation team
anived. It was not consistent process. And for internal audit, interview showed that
respondents seem to understand in the finance intemal audit not for the general of the
projects in the school.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Strmlntakul Rssults, Data Prese,nation and Analysis / 58
Opinions about academic administration
Table 2fl Percentage of opinions of administrators about academic administration
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
Field of management Dontt No
know response32
Academic
l. Learner centered learning
2. Integration of knowledge
and morale
3. Studying by students'
interest
4. Learning form real
orperience
5. Life long learning
6. Learner development in
using the information
tecbnology
7. Thinking ability
28.6 47.6 23.8
28.6 61.9 9.5
4.8 42.9 33.3 l9
4.8 38.1 52.4 4.8
9.5 28.6 61.9
t4.3 28.6 s1.l
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.89.5 47.7 19 9.5 9.5
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, t\4ahidol Univ.
Table 23 (Continued)
M.Ed.@ducational Management) / 59
Percentage of Respondents' opinions
Field of management Dontt No
know response1234
8. Suitable environment for 4.8 28.6 52.3 14.3 0 0
learning efficiency
9. Sources for self study 19 28.6 38.1 14.3 0 0
10. Cooperationwith 4.8 28.6 61.8 4.8 0 0
community and parents
ll. Cooperation ofprivate 0 6l.9 28.6 g.S 0 0
sectors inte,rm of academic
12. Provide learning for 9.5 28.6 61.9 0 0 0
community
13. Encouraging teachers for 0 14.3 28.6 S7.l 0 0
using the acXion or classroom
to solve the classroom
problems.
14. Creating the cuniculum 9.5 47.7 t9 9.5 9.5 4.g
that serves and relates to tle
need of the community.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Samlilakul
Table Zl (Continued)
Results, Data Presedation and Anatysis / 60
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
Field of management I)on't No
how response1234
15. Thevarious methods of 4.8 28.6 52.3 14.3 0 0
assessment
16. The various methods for lg 28.6 38.1 14.3 0 0
study selection
lT.Library service 4.8 28.6 61.8 4.8 0 0
18. Counseling 0 61.9 28.6 9.5 0 0
As shown in the table 23. The adminisfi'ators' opinions on academic
management of the school were satisfactory about the management quality except for
the items learning by preference that rated at ld and 2"d quality rank at 4.8Yo and
z.goA,learning tlroughow life that rated at l$ and 2"u q,rulity rank at 9.5Yo and
28.6yo, thinking ability that rated at ld and 2"u q,rality rank at 9,5Yo and 47.7Yo, c,o
operation with private sector that rated at 2d qllality rank at 6l.gyo, create the
curriculum that serve the community that rated at l$ and 2d qualrty rank at 9.5Yo and
47.7% and the counseling that were ranked at f quality rank at 6l.9%.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, tr4ahidol Univ. M.Ed.@ducational Management) / 6l
Table 24Percentage of opinions ofteachers about academic administration.
Percentage of Respondents' opinions
Field of management Don't No
know response32
Academic
l. Learner centered learning
2. Integration of knowledge
and morale
3. Studying by students'
interest
4. Learning formreal
experience
5. Life long learning
6. Learner dwelopment in
using the information
technology
7. Tbinking ability
8. Suitable environment for
learning efficiency
0.9 20.6 70.1 7.5
1.9 2t.5 59.8 15.0
23.4 16.8 30.8 28 0.9
0.9 t8.7 55.1 25.2
7.5 32.7 48.6 10.3 0.9
28 55.1 t4
10.3 60.7 25.2
23.4 6t.7 t2.l
00.9
01.9
1.90.9
3.7
1.9 0.9
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Srmlntakul
Table 24 (Continued)
Re.sults, Data Presedationmd Anatysis / 62
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
X'ield of management Don't No
know response1234
9. Sources for self study 0.9 28 58.9 ll.2 0 0.9
10. Cooperationwith 6.5 40.2 37.4 9.3 4.7 1.9
community and parents
ll. Cooperation of private 0 35.5 48.6 17.2 3.7 0.9
sectors in term of academic
12. Provide learning for 9.3 33.6 43 6.5 6.5 0.9
community
13. Encouraging teachers for 1.9 7.5 58.9 30.8 0.9 0
using tle action or classroom
to solve the classroom
problems.
Copyright by Mahidol University
mFac. of Crrad- Stldies, lvlahidol Univ.
Table 24 (Continued)
NI.EIL (Educational ]vlmagement) / 63
Percentage of Respondents' opinions
Field of management Don't No
know response32
14. Creating the curriculum
that serves and relates to the
need ofthe community.
15. The various methods of
assessment
16. The various methods for
study selection
17. Library service
18. Counseling
9.3 42.t 33.6 3.7
2.8 37.4 44.9 t4
6.5 25.2 50.5
10.3 39.3 44.9 4.7
0.9 36.4 47.7 l5
1.99.3
00.9
8.48.4
0.9
0.9
0
As shoum in the table24. The teachers' opinions on academic management of
the school were satisfactory about the management quality except for the items
learning by preference that rated at l$ and 2"u q.rolity rank at 23.4% and 16.8%,
cooperation with community and parent that rated at ld and 2d qualrty rank at 6.5Yo
and 40.2%o, create the cuniculum that serve the community tlat rated at l$ and 2d
quality rank at 9.3Yo and 42.lYo, and the library service that were ranked at ls and 2d
quality rank at 10.3% afi39.3%.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Sranlntakul Results, Data Preseddion md Analysis / 64
Table 25 Percentage of opinions of students about academic administration.
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
Field of management I)on't No
know rcsponse32
Academic
l. Learner centered learning
2. Integration of knowledge
and morale
3. Studying by students'
interest
4. Learning form real
e4perience
5. Life long learning
6. Learner development in
using the information
technology
7. Thinking ability
8. Suitable environment for
learning efficiency
37.1 44.5 7.5
32.2 42.5 13.8
15.2 17.2 26.7 33 2
I1.8 27.3 37.4 t7.2
2.9 29.3 47.1 14.4 2.9
4.9 33 42.2 t4.4 2.6
4.6 17.2 46.8 26.7
2.9
2.94.34.3
5.8
4.3
3.4
2.9
2.6
2.6 t7.5 11.8 5.7 4.3
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crad- Studies, lvfahidol Univ.
Table 25 (Continued)
I4Ed. (Ealucational trdmag€metrt) / 65
Percentage of Respondents' opinions
Field of management1234
9. Sources for self shrdy 4.3 31 37.9 15.5 6.3 4.9
10. Cooperationwith 12.4 30.5 24.7 8.6 5.7 l8.l
community and parents
ll. Cooperation of private 4.3 25.6 33.6 8 6.9 21.6
sectors in term of academic
12. Provide learning for 12.4 21.8 29.6 9.2 6.6 20.4
community
13. Encouraging teachers for 6.3 29.3 32.5 10.6 3.7 17.5
using the action or classroom
to solve the classroom
problems.
14. Creating the curriorlum 8.3 28.4 27.6 7.8 4.6 23.3
that serves and relates to the
need ofthe community.
15. The various methods of 4.9 25.6 34.5 21.8 4.3 8.9
assessment
I)on't No
know response
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Srmlnukul
Table 25 (Continued)
Results, Data Preseilationand Analysis / 66
Percentage of Respondents' opinions
Field of management Dontt No
know response3
16. Thevarious methods for
study selection
17. Library service
18. Counseling
4.9 23.6 37.4 17.5
2t.6 35.6 26.7 7.2 2.9
12.6
6
l.l n 31 26.1 6.3 8.3
As shown in the table 25. The shrdents' opinions on academi6 management of
the school were satisfactory about the management quality except for the items
learning by preference that rated at ld and 2* qrrolity rank at 15.2% and l7.2Yo,
cooperation with community and parent tiat rated at 1$ and 2"d qualrty rank at l2.4yo
and 30.5%, and the library service that were ranked at ls and 2"d quality 6nk at
21.6% and35.6Yo.
Finding from interview and observation
Academic administration
There were several important findings in the academic management of the
school, for instance the curriculuq teaching media" learning method, the assessment,
the learning throughout life, the counseling system and the library services. The
Curriculum used in the school are from the Department of Vocational Education
(DO\D) Miniry of Education which were not approved from the private enterpriseCopyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Studies, fvlahi<tol Univ. lvlEd@rlucational Management) / 67
and some of them are out of date. The curriculum development from the user of the
product was take times and probably can not catch up with the rapid change of the
tecbnolory. Even the change from the school level was too complicate to zuccess in
short period of ':me. Staffs were trying to implement the learner centered leaming
but they did not understand clearly about the method. Some staffjust ordered students
to study by themselves without enough zupport or facilitation. Some zubjects were
need combination of teaching in order to gain the students' interest. Anyway the trend
ef implement this was positive. Apart from this, there was leading teacher project that
encouraged teacher to implement the new ideas of teaching. Teachers were volunteer
to participate for two yeaf,s continuously. The first year there was only one teacher
and the second year there were nine of them. Teachers seemed to join more in this
project and improve themselves faster than ever. There were too many of added up
periods for the studenq for instance sport and English classes. This occupied most of
the students' time so they had not enough t'qre to shrdy by themselves. Special course
shrdents mentioned about the inappropriate of the syllabus that sometimes tle
students learned the more advance zubject before the fundamental one. The reason
was the number of the student in the class was not enough and there was merging
between the classes.
Teaching media were enough but the vadety of them was limited to some
medi4 for instance the transpa^rency film- The media that teacher or student invent
was small in number. The innovation was rarely seen in the school. It was also found
that teacher familial to use ordinary media more than the new one.
There iyag implementation of the school policy about encouraging all staffto
conduct classroom research but generally the staff were not understand the metlodCopyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intakul Resul$ Data Presentation and Analysis / 6E
enough to perform a good quallty research. They were not confident enough about
research methodology and how to report it. There was a seminar in this topic in order
to help the staff but there was confusion, for instancg the example of the action
research should be more clear and varied. The advisor to the staffwho conducted the
research should clearly understand about the research metlodology and the most
important factor was the available time of the advisor.
There were two main methods of teaching supervision in tie schoot Buddy
system and Clinical supervision. Generally the strpervision could not help tle
teacher effectively. The motivation and time were the main reasons. The selection of
the buddy was the key success of tlis method. Some teacher in buddy system did not
tell the weak points to his or her partner because there was too much consideration of
another's feeling. And the inexperience staff could not help the partner. About the
clinical zuperrisio4 tle time in term of availability and matching was the key
sucoess. Sometimes the supervisors were not available at tle same l"ne so tie
supervision could not be happened. All respondents believed that the zupervision
would improve the quality of teaching learning and the development of the method
need to be done.
In the assessment the students commented that some staffs described too
much about the details of the testing so the student who just concentrated in the final
period could score the same or better than the shrdent who continue focused on the
zubject. The examination of the school was focus too much on the theory. There was
not enough practical testing. They believed that regularity of practical testing would
keep the student active and develop them effectively. The practical testing can
separate the proficient student and the negative one efficiently.Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Strdies, lvlahfulol Univ. Nfi.Ed.(Educational tvlanagement) / 69
The Stgdent Respondents would like to study via the Internet or E-leaming
but generally they believed that E-learning could not replace the ordinary. The
reasofft are the environment and the need of social interaction but it could support and
fulfill the system when there was limitation of the ordinary one, for instance the
distance from home to school. The library had not enough books in term of books pa
item especially the books that zupport the main zubject for instance computu,
accounting and engineering. Abow half of the counseling staff did not know their
students. Some shrdents did not trust the staffs. They were aware about the
confidential. The counseling system was more reactive than proactive and this caused
no prevention of the problem just the correction of the problem.
Generally, administrators, teachers and student were moderate satisff with
academic management of the school except for study by students' interest or what
student would like to learn and library service that majority of them felt negative with
those two areas of management.
Opinions about Finance administration
Table 2fPercentage of opinioas sf adminisfiators about finance administration.
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
Field of management Dontt No234
know response
Finance
l. Finance system 4.809.5 l9 47.7 l9
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Saran Intakul
Table 26 (Continued)
I{esults, Data Presentation and Analysis / 70
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
Field of management Don't No
know response32
2. Transparency of finance
system
23.8 61.9 9.5 4.8
The adminishator respondents rated the finance system i" high quality
especially the fiansparency of the system that rated w 6l.9Yo and 9.5Yo at 3d and 4t
quality raok.
Table 27 Percentage of opinions ofteachers about finance adminishation
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
X'ield of management I)ontt No
know response32
Finance
l. Finance system
2. Transparency of finance
system
5.6 23.4 t4 tz.r
31.8 34.6 15.9 15.9
The teacher respondents rated the finance system in high quality especially the
fiansparency of the system that rated as34.6Yo and l5.9Yo at 3d and 46 quality rank.
1.9
1.9
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Snrdies,lvlahialol Univ. M.Ert@rfucational lvlanagement) / 7l
Table 28 Percentage of opinions of students about finance administration.
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
Field of management Dontt No
kmow response1234
Finance
l. Finance system 7.2 17.2 22.7 7.2 6.9 38.8
2. Transparency of finance 6.3 22.7 17.8 6.6 6.3 40.2
system
The students \lrere not perceived clearly with the management of the finance
system. They rated it ate .9%o as don't know and there were 38.87o no resporNe.
Findings from interview
Finance system administration
The system was fast. There was no serious mistake. The respondents believed
in the transparency of the system. The Student respondents did not know the process
in this management area.
Overall the finance system were effective with transparency. Students seem to
not understand in the system.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intakul Results, Data Presentation and Anatysis / 72
Opinions about Human resource management
Table 29 Percentage of opinions of administrators about human resourcemanagement.
Percentage of Respondents' opinions
Field of management Dontt No
kmow response2
Human r€$ourcemanagement
1. Selection 4.8 23.8 47.6 23.8
4.8 19 47.6 19 4.8
28.6 47.6 23.8 0 0
9.5 28.6 42.9 14.3 4.8
28.6 57.t t4.3 0
14.3 38.1 33.3 14.3
t4.3 t9 429 23.8 0
0
4.8
3.
4.
Delqgating job and
responsibility
Humanresourcs
dwelopment
Motivation
5. Teamwork
Appraisal system
Encouragement
0
07.
In table 29, rtis found that the administrator rated moderate Erality about the
personnel management exc{ for the motivation to work that rated as 9.5% and
28.6Yo at l$ and 2"d quality rank and appraisal system that were rated low as l4.3Yo
and 38.1% at ls and 2"d Erality rank.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crad- Studies, N{ahidolUniv. MEtt(Educational lvlmage,ment) / ?3
Table 30 Percentage of opinions ofteachers about human resource management.
Percentage of Respondents' opinions
Field of management Don't No
lsrow responsc32
t.9
2.82.
Human resource management
1. Selection
Delegating job and
responsibility
Human resource
development
Motivation
5. Teamwork
Appraisal system
Encouragement
ll.2 299 46.7 10.3
3.7 24.3 55.1 t4
1.9 25.2 54.2 18.7
6.5 27.1 43.9 22.4
0.9 24.3 58.9 t4 1.9
10.3 45.8 29.9 t2.t 1.9
2.8 43 44.9 9.3 0
3.
4.
7.
In table 30, it was also found that the teacher rated moderate quality about the
personnel management except for tle appraisal system that was rated lower as 10.3%
and 45.8Yo at le and 2"d quality rank.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Saxanlntalarl Itesults, Data Presentationand Analysis / 7a
Table 31 Percentage of opinions of shrdents about human resource management.
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
Field of management Dontt No
know response32
Human resource
management
l. Selection
Delegating job and
rasponsibility
Humanresource
dwelopment
Motivation
5. Teamwork
6. Appraisal system
7. Encoru4gement
4.9 22.4 19.8
3.4 t7.5 27.9
8.9
10.3
37.1
36.5
24.4
21.6
25
23.6
19.5
6.9
2.
3.72.63.
4.
n 28.2 t4.l
5.2 20.4 33.3 15.5
4.3 t4.4 39.9 10.9 5.5
1.4 31.6 26.t tz.t 5.2
3.2 t7 36.5 16.1 7.8
As shown in table 31, it was found that the students are not involved in the
personnel 6anagement. They generally response as don't know and no responsg for
instance, the selection and arrange personnel for job were rated as no response at
37 .lYo and 3 6.5Yo respectively.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crad- Studies, N{ahidol Univ.
Finding from inten'iew
Human resource management
MEIL (Educational Manage,ment) / 75
The selection of the staffwas very effective with merit system. There were
paper examination, intenriew and teaching demonstration as the selection methods.
The human resource development was one of the advance processes. There were
scholarships for staff to continue learning in the higher level of education
continuously, for instance in master degree. And school also sent staff to join the
academic and professional development conferences regularly.
The assignments of job to staffin term of temporary project were not enough
understanding both administrator and staff. The job descriptions were not rwiewed
regularly so the functions were not clear sometimes.
was not enough.
The appraisal system in approximately 50%
discriminate the effective staff from tle negative one.
reason.
The motivation to work
of departments could not
It may from the following
l. The intention to evaluate the zubordinate of the zupervisor.
2. The confusion between the personal and the duty.
3. The leakage of the evaluation information into public so the head of
department was not brave enough to directly evaluate their staff
There was not enough explanation for the head of the department how to
perform evaluation oftheir subordinate. The evaluation from student about teaching is
controversial. Some believed that it was fair and follow the trend of 1999 national
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intalcul Results, Data hesedation and Anatysis / 76
education act that need cooperation from student but some commented that the
student ideas may be bias.
Generally, respondents believed that human resource management of the
school is effective and valuable for the professional development but in the appraisal
area there were some argument abow the performance of evaluating staff. Studentg
like the opinions in finance system, seem to not understand tlis area.
Opinions about technolory and resource for learning management
Table 32 Percentage of opinions of adminisfators abouttechnology and resource forlearning.
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
Field of management Don't No
how response
Technologl and resource for
learning
l. The media development
2. EJearning
3. Building and services
n.8 38.1 33.3
47.6 28.6 9.5
4.8 47.6 23.8 l9
4.8
4.8
4.8
9.5
Table 32 showed that administrator respondent rated about the technology and
resource for learning as moderate. The quality of management of E-learning was low
as 9.5Yo and 47.6Yo at ld and 2t quality rank and building and services were low as
4.8Yo and 47.6% at ld and 2d quality rank.Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Strdies,Ivlahidol Univ. tvl"Ed" @duetional Management) / 77
Table 33 Percentage ofopinions ofteachers about technology and resource forlearning.
Percentage of Respondents' opinions
Field of management Dontt No
lmow response1234
Technologr and resource for
leaming
l. The media development 3.7 33.6 48.6 l2.l 1.9 0
2. E-learning 3.7 58.9 30.8 2.8 3.7 0
3. Building and services 4.7 51.4 32.7 8.4 2.8 0
Table 33 showed that teacher respondent rated about the technology and
resource for learning as moderate. The quality of management of E-learning was low
as3.7Yo and 58.9% at l$ and 2d qualrty rank and building and services were low as
4.7Yo and 5l.4yo at l$ and 2d quality rank.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Saran Intakul Resultq Daia Presedationand fuialysis / 78
Table 34 Percentage of opinions of students about technology and resource forlearning.
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
Field of management Dontt No
know response1234
Technologl and resource for
learning
l. The media development ll.5 31.9 31.9 12.4 6.6 5.7
2. E learning 4.9 40.2 29.9 9.2 6.6 9.2
3. Buitding and services 10.3 38.8 23.6 10.1 6.3 10.9
Table 34 showed about the technology and resources for learning. Student
respondents rated these as moderate to low quality, for instance, the quality of E
learning management are rated at 2d level of quality at 40.2Vo.
Finding from inteniew
Technolory and resource for learning
The development of the teaching media and other information technology
were sluggish and not enough- Student would like to learn through the Internet. They
believed that it would enhance their capability anyway they would like to meet their
staff and other students in order to share ideas and practical training. Teachers
commented that the ordinary teaching was needed because it could provide the
attitude adjusting and establish appropriate work habit for the students.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crrad" Strdies, Ifahidol Univ.
Opinions about student activity managemenl
Iv[.Ed" (Educational lvlmagement) / 79
Table 35 Percentage of opinions of administrators about student activity.
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
Field of management I)ontt No234
know response
Student activity
l. General Student activity
2. Welfare and student service
47.6 33.3 14.3
9.5 52.3 23.8 4.8 4.8
4.8
4.8
As shown in table 35, the student activities were ranked from adminisffator
respondents in moderate to low quality especially the welfare and student service
were low as9.5Yo and 52.3Yoat l$ and 2"d quality rank.
Table 36 Percentage of opinions ofteacher about student activity.
Percentage of Respondents' opinions
Field of management Dontt No234
know response
Student activity
1. General Student activity
2. Welfare and student
service
0.9l51.9
0.93.7
32.7 48.6
53.3 27.1
0.9
l5
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Samnlntalerl ltesults, Data Pre.sentation and Analysis / 80
As shown in table 36, the shrdent activities were ranked from teacher
respondents in moderate to low quality especially the welfare and student service
were low as l1%o and 53.3%o at l$ and 2"d quality rank.
Table 37 Perce,ntage of opinions of sfirdents about student activity.
Percentage of Respondentst opinions
Field of management Don't No
how response3
Student activity
l. General Student activity
2. trIelfare and student
serrrice
17.5 10.6
t4.4 38.2 29.9 7.8 3.2 6.6
28.26.6
As shown in table 37, the studelrt activities were ranked from student
respondents in moderate to low quality especially the welfare and student service
were low as l4.4Yo and 38.2Yoat l$ and 2d Erality rank.
Finding from interview
StudentActivity
Students played minor role in tle student activities administration Teachers
often organized activity for the student sometimes the shrdent feel lack of motivation
to commence the activrty. They think that they were forced to do activity not from
their own thinking. The full time of learning in a day was obstacle to the student
activity. Students did not have enough time to join and create activity. Student clubCopyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Gtad Strdies, N{ahidol Univ. M.E<L@ducational Mmagement) / 8l
or organization was as in beginning stage some of the committee did not recognize
their function and role. They just help the staffto complete the activities.
There were too many activities in the second semester for instance sport day,
skill competitio4 CTECH football cup and tradition activities. Students commented
that they did not have enough time to snrdy efficiently in the second semester.
School encouraged the student to play sports continuously for instance anti-
dnrg sport that combined more than 5 sports for student to join. For sport day activity
shrdent would like to be in the same color as in the same classroom. They did not
want to be split in the same classroom because they feel more fun with familiar
friends.
Generally, student activity was moderate in qualif in the respondents' point
ofviews but for students' opinions, they would like to have more welfare and time to
join the various activities.
Second question:
Are there differences among the opinions of administrators, teachers and
students about management of the school?
Table 38 Chi-sErare of the opinions of the administrators, teachers and studentscrosstab with each of general administration management area-
General administrationLevel Degree criticalof Sig. fr"So- valuex2
Sig.
l. Empowerment and participation 4.751 .05 2 5.99 NS
2. ffos implementation of
information technology
.050.427 5.99 NS
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Saran Intakul
Table 38 (Continued)
Rssults, Data Presentation and Analysis / 82
General administration , Lever Degree criticalx- of Sig. rr..tjo- valuesig'
3. The cooperation witl private
sectors and community
4. Quality Assurance
5. Internal Audit
0.306 .05 2 5.99 NS
16.494
7.568
.05
.05
5.99
s.99
s
s
2
2
As shovm in Table 38. , there were significant'relationship between the tlnee
groups of the respondents (administratory teachers and students) and their levels of
opinions with respect to quality assurance and internal audit management of the
school at the level of significant (a) 0.05.
Table 39 Chi-square of tle opinions of the adminisfators, teachers and studentscrosstab witl each of academic management area
Academic management
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical Sig.
valuef
l. Learner centered learning
2. Integration ofknowledge and
morale
3. Studying by students' interest
20.739
9.894
.05
.05
s.99
s.992
3.895 .05 5.99 NS
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crad" Sfirdies,lvlahidol Univ.
Table 39 (Continued)
lvl"Ed.(Edumtional Manage,ment) / 83
Academic management
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
x2Critical
value
sig.
4. Learning form real e4perience
5. Life long learning
6. Learner development inusing the
information technolo gy
7. Thinking ability
8. Suitable environment for
learning effrciency
9. Sources for self study
I 0. Cooperation with community
and parents
I l. Cooperation of private sectors
in term of academic
12. Provide learning for community 1.358
13. Encouragng teachers for using 51.906
the action or classroom to solve the
classroom problems.
s.99
5.99
5.99
NS
NS
5.99
5.99
NS
NS
5.99
5.99 NS
2 5.99 NS
5.99
5.99
NS
25.804
0.805
5.928
5.318
0.t37
8.255
2.281
1.662
.05
.05
.05
S.05
.05
.05
.05
.05
2
2
2
.05
2
2.05
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intalol
Table 39 (Continued).
Rqsults, Data Presentation and Analysis / 84
Academic management
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical Sig.
valuex2
14. Creatingthecurriculumthat 3.430
serves and relates to tie need of the
community.
5.99 NS
0.557 .05 2 5.99 NS
1.155 .05 2 5.99 NS
.05
15. The various methods of
assessment
16. The various methods for study
selection
lT.Library service
18. Counseling
12.2t4
5.002
.05
.05
s2
2
s.99
5.99 NS
As shown in Table 39, there were significant relationship between the tbree
groups of the respondents (administrators, teachers and student$ and their levels of
opinions with respect to leamer centered learning integration of knowledge and
moralg learning from real e4periencg sources for self shrdy, encouraging teacher for
using the action or classroom research to solve the classroom problem and library
service at the level of significant (a) 0.05.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Cr'rad- Studies, I{ahidol Univ. lvlE<t@ducdional lvlmage,ment) / 85
Table 40 Chi-square of the opinions of tle administrators, teachers and studelfscrosstab with each offinance system management af,ea.
Finance system
Level Degree
f of Sig, of
freedom
Critical Sig.
value
l. Finance system 4.903 .05 s.99
5.99
NS
2. Transparency of finance system 10.207 S.05
Table 40. presents that there was significant relationship between the tlree
groups of the respondents (administrators, teachers and students) and their levels of
opinions with respect to fiansparency of finance system at the level of significant (cr)
0.05.
Table 41 Chi-sErare of the opinions of the administratorg teachers and studentscrosstab with each of human resource management area.
Human resource management x2
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical Sig.
value
1. Selection
2. Delegating jobs and
responsibility
3. Human resource dwelopment
4. Motivation
7.538
2.893
10.405
0.887
.05
2.05
.05
2.05
s.99
5.99
5.99
5.99
NS
s
s
NS
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intakul
Table 41 (Continued)
Results, Data Preseilation and Analysis / 86
Human resource management x2
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical Sig.
value
5. Teamwork
Appraisal system
Enbouragement
0.965
r.731
4.272
.05 s.99
5.99
s.99
NS
NS
NS
6.
7.
.05
.05
As shovm in Table 41. , there were significant relationship between the three
groups of the respondents (adminisfators, teaghers and students) and their levels of
opinions with respect to selection and human resource dwelopment at the level of
significant (a) 0.05.
Table 42 Chi-sErare of the opinions of the administrators, teachers and sadentscrosstab with each of technology and resources for learning 6anagement area.
Technolory and resouroes for
leaming managementf
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical Sig.
value
1. The media development
2. E-learning
3. Building and services
9.7t2
2.980
0.534
s.05 5.99
s.99
5.99
NS
NS
.05
.05
As shown in Table 42, there were significant relationship between the tlree
groups of the respondents (administrators, teachers and students) and their levels ofCopyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Studis,lvlahidol Univ. M.Ert @rlucational lvlmage,nmt) / 87
opinions with respect to teaching media development at the level of significant (cr)
0.05.
Table 43 Chi-square of the opinions of the administrators, teachers and studentscrosstab with each of student activity management area.
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical
value
sig.Student activity management t
l. General Student activities
2. Welfare and student service
NS
.05 NS
As shown in Table 43. , tlere was no significant relationship between the three
groups of the respondents (administrators, teachers and shrdents) and their levels of
opinions with respect to student activity management area at the level of significant
(a) 0.0s.
Administrators, teachers and students believed in the same way for some areas
of management except for in some topics, for instance in the academic management
area and finance area students did not know about the system and also some iszues in
the human resource management that students did not involve and eng4ge in ttre area
so they did not know.
2.828
3.393
.05 5.99
s.992
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Saran lntakul Resul$ Data Presentationand fualysis / 88
Third question:
Are there differences between the opinions of business and engineering students
about the school management?
Tabte 44 Chi-square of tle opinions of the business administration students andengineering students crosstab with each of general administratiea 64n€otnent area.
General administration fLevel Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical Sig.
value
l.' Empowerment and participation 12.189 .05
9.t34 .05 4
7.559
4.608 .05 4
9.49
9.49 NS
9.49 NS
9.49 NS
s
2. The implementation of
informationtwhnology
4.053.
4.
The cooperdion with private
sectors and community
Quality Assurance .
5. Internal Audit 9.746 .05 4 9.49 S
As shovm in Table 44. , there were significant relationship between the two
groups of the respondents @usiness and engineering snrdents) and their levels of
opinions with respect to empowerment and participation and internal audit at the level
of significant (cr) 0.05.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Cirad- Strdis, lvlahiilol Univ. lvf"Erl(Erlucational Managemeirt) / 89
Tabte 45 Chi-square of the opinions of the business adminisff'ation students and
engineering students crosstab witl each of general academic management area.
Academic management
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical Sig.
valuef
l. Learner centered learning
2. Integration ofknowledge and
morale
3. Studying by students' interest
4. Learning form real orperience
5. Life long learning
6. Learner development inusing the
information technolo gy
Z. Thinkine ability
8. Suitable environment for
learning efficiency
9. Sources for self study
19.875
9.655
9.297
7.805
t0.231
7.tll
8.570
t7.533
8.561
.05
.05
.05
.05
9.49
9.49
9.49
9.49
9.49
9.49
NS
NS
NS
9.49
9.49
NS
9.49 NS
s
s
4
4
.05
.05
s4
4.05
s
4
4.05
.05
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intakul
Table 45 (Continued)
Re.sults, Data Presentation and Anatysis / 90
Academic management
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical
value
sig.f
I 0. Cooperation witl comnunity
and parents
I l. Cooperation of private sectors
in term of academic
12. Provide learning for community
13. Encouraging teachers for using
the action or classroom to solve the
classroom problems.
14. Creating the currictrlum that
seryes and relates to the need of the
community.
15. The various methods of
assessment
16. The various methods for study
selection
17. Library service
18. Counseling
9.49 S
9.49 NS
9.49
9.49
NS
9.49 NS
4 9.49 NS
9.49 NS
9.49
9.49
NS
46.841
5.767
4.9t1
t2.039
.05
.05
1.623
8.481 .05
9.039 .05
5.t73
26.488
.05
4.05
4
4
4.05
S4
4.05
.05 SCopyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crad- Sudies, Iv[ahidol Univ. fr{.Ed.@ducational Mmagement) / 9 I
As shoum in Table 45. , there were significant relationship between the two
groups of the respondents (business and engineering students) and their levels of
opinions with respect to learner centered learning integration of knowledge and
moralg life long learning zuitable environment for learning efficiency, cooperation
with community and paf,ents, encouraging teacher for use the action or classroom
research to solve the classroom problems and counseling at tle level of significant (cr)
0.05.
Table 46 Chi-sErare of the opinions of the business administration students and
engineering students crosstab with each of general finance system man4gement area.
Finance system
Level Degree
X2 of Sig. of
freedom
Critical Sig.
value
1. Finance system 5.43t .05 9.49
9.49
NS
2. Transparency offinance system 15.183 s4.05
As shoum in Table 46 , there was significant relationship between the two
groups of tle respondents (ousiness and engineering students) and their levels of
opinions with respect to transparency of finance system at the level of significant (a)
0.05.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intalcul Results, Data Presentationand Analysis / 92
Table 4? Chi-square of the opinions of the business administration students and
engineering students crosstab with each of human resource management af,ea.
Human resource management fLevel Degree
of sig. of critical sig'
freedom value
1. Selection
Delegating jobs and
responsibility
3. Human resoruce dwelopment
4. Motivation
5. Teamsrork
Appraisal system
Encouragement
2.785
2.971
4.002
2.303
t7.948
7.953
10.2t2
.05
.05
.05
.05
9.49
9.49
9.49
9.49
9.49
9.49
9.49
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
4
4
4
S
4
4
.05
7.
.05
.05
As shown in Table 47,there were significant relationship between the two
groups of the respondents (business and engineering sfirdents) and their levels of
opinions with respect to teamwork and encouragement at tle level of significant (cr)
0.05.
Copyright by Mahidol University
#F M-Ed.@ducational lvlmag€meil) / 93
Table 48 Chi-square of the opinions of the business administration students and
engineering students crosstab with each of technology and resources for learning
6anagement area.
Technologr and resources for
learning managementN2
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Criticai Sig.
value
l. The media development
2. E-learning
3. Building and services
0.51I
7.5n
2.780
4
4
.05
.05
.05
9.49
9.49
9.49
NS
NS
NS
As illustrated in Table 48 , there was no signifrcant relationship between the
two groups of the respondents (business and engineering students) and their levels of
opinions with respect to technology and resoluces for learning management area at
the level of significant (cr) 0.05.
Table 49 Chi-square of the opinions of tle business administration students and
engineering students crosstab with each of student activity management area.
Student activity management tLevel Degree
of Sig. of critical sig'
freedom value
l. General Student activities
2. Welfare and student service
3.903
7.088
9.49
9.49
NS.05
4.05 NS
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intakul I{esults, Data Presenlationond Analysis / 94
As illustrated in Table 49, there was no significant relationship between the
two groups of tle respondents (business and engineering students) and their levels of
opinions with respect to in student activity management area atthe level of significant
(ct) 0.0s.
In the comparison of the business md sngineering students' opinions on
management of the schoot there were different in some area of management for
instance general adminisration, academic management, finance system and human
resoluoe management. There was no different in technology for learning and student
activity man€ement that the opinions were relatively the same for business students
and engineering students.
Fourth question:
Are there differences between the opinions of the regular course and the special
oourse students about tle school management?
Table 50 Chi-square of the opinions of the regular course and the special course
students crosstab with each ofgeneral administration management af,ea.
General administration
Level Degree
f of Sig. of
freedom
Critical Sig.
value
l. Empowerment and participation 14.268
2. 1[s implementation of
information technology
S
s
.05 9.49
9.4922.747 .05
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad" Snrdic, lvlahftlol Univ.
Table 50 (Continued)
Nf.E<t@ducational Management) / 95
General administration
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical Sig.
valuef
3. The cooperation with private
sector and community
4. Quality Assurance
5. Internal Audit
22.484 .05
t2.051
17.854
s
S
4
4
9.49
9.49
9.49
.05
.05
As depicted in Table 50 , ttrere were significant relationship between the two
groups of the respondents (regular and special cowse shrdents) and their levels of
opinions witl respect to all general administration management area of tle school at
the level of significant (a) 0.05.
Table 51 Chi-square of the opinions of the regular course and special course students
crosstab with each of academic management area.
Academic management
.Level Degree
x' of sig. "t critical
valuefreedom
sig.
l. Learner centered learning 28.359 .05
2. Integration of knowledge and morale 21.466 .05
s
s
s
s
4
4
4
9.49
9.49
9.49
9.49
3. Studying by students' interest
4. Learning form real experience
22.262
23.028
.05
.05
Copyright by Mahidol University
FILL SaranIntakul
Table 5l (Continued)
Re,sults, Data Presentation and fuialysis / 96
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical
value
sig.
Academic management x2
5. Life long learning
6. Learner development in using the
information technology
7. Thinking ability
8. Suitable environment for learning
efficiency
9. Sources for self study
.10. Cooperation with community and
parents
11. Cooperation ofprivate sectors in
term of academic
12. Provide tearning for community
13. Encouraging teachers for using tle
action or classroom to solve the
classroom problems.
4.966
12.516
8.020
22.328
.05
.05
zp.ogg
49.407
.05
.05
31.891 .05 4
32.003
8.475
.05
s4.05
.05
.05
s
4
4
9.49
9.49
NS
9.49
9.49
NS
9.49
9.49
9.49 S
9.49
9.49 NS
s4
s4
s4
4
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Cirad Studieg lvlahidolUniv.
Table 51 (Continued)
Ir4Ed (Educational Management) / 97
Level
of Sig.
Degree
of
freedom
Critical
value
sig.Academic management f
14. Creating the cuniculum that 22.361
serves and relates to the need of the
community.
12.493 .05
18.438 .05
t6.717
30.468 .05
9.49 S
4 9.49 S
4 9.49 S
9.49
9.49
.05
15. The various methods of
assessment
16. Thevarious methods for snrdy
selecfion
17. Library service
18. Counseling
s
s4
.05
As depicted in Table 51, there were significant relationship between the tn'o
groups of the respondents (regular and special course students) and their levels of
opinions with respect to almost all academic management area of the school at the
level of significant (a) 0.05 except for life long learning lhinking ability and
encouraging teacher to use classroom research.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saranlntakul Results, Data Presentation and Analysis / 98
Table 52 Chi-square of the opinions of the regular course and special course students
crosstab with each of finance system management area.
Finance system
Level Degree
x' of sig. "t critical sig'
valuefreedom
l. Finance system 30.t02 .05
2. Transparency offinance system 39.023 .05 S4
9.49
9.49
As depiced in Table 52, there were significant relationship between the two
groups of the respondents (regular and special course snrdents) and their levels of
opinions witi respect to all finance system management area of the school at the level
of significad (ct) 0.05.
Table 53 Chi-square of the opinions of the regular coruse and special course students
crosstab with each of humilllssource man4gement area.
Human resource management
Level Desree
x2 of sig. "t critical sig'
freedom value
l. Selection 2t.541
8.4992. Delegating jobs and
responsibility
9.49
9.49 NS
4
.05
.05
3. Human resource development 14.8M .05 9.49 S
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crrad- Studies, lvlahiitol Univ.
Table 53 (Continued)
M.Ert @dncaional Management) / 99
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical
value
sig.Human resource management t
4. Motivation
5. Teamwork
s
S4
S.05
S47.
15.758
13.380
t2.0t4
t8.694
.05
.05
9.49
9.49
9.49
9.49
Appraisal system
Encouragement .05
As illustrated in Table 53, there were significant relationship between the two
groups of the respondents Gegular and special course shrdents) and their levels of
opinions with respect to almost all human resource management area of the school at
the level of significant (a) 0.05 except for delegating for jobs and responsibility.
Table 54 Chi-square of the opinions of the regular counle and special course students
crosstab with each oftechnology and resources for learning management area.
Technologl and resources for
Iearning management
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
f Critical Sig.
value
l. The media development
2. E-learning
2s.429
18.807
.05 9.49
9.49
s
s4.05
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intakul
Table 54 (Continued)
Results, Data Presentationand Analysis / 100
Technology and resources for
learning management
Level Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical
value
sig.x2
3. Building and services 15.704 9.49 S
As depicted in Table 54 , there were significant relationship between the two
groups of the respondents Gegular and special course students) and their levels of
opinions with respect to all technology and re$ources for learning management area of
the school atthe level of significant (a) 0.05.
Table 55 Chi-sErare of the opinions of the regular course and special course studentscrosstab with each of student activity management area.
.05
Student activity management tLevel Degree
of Sig. of
freedom
Critical Sig.
value
l. General Student activities
2. Welfare and shrdent service
19.061
25.561
.05 9.49
9.494.05
As depicted in Table 55 , there were significant relationship between ttre two
groups of the respondents (regular and special course students) and their levels of
opinions with respect to all student activity man4gement areas of the school at the
level of significant (a) 0.05.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Studies, lvlahidol Univ. lvlEd.(Educational Mmagement) / l0l
Almost all area of management, regular and special course shrdents believed
in different way except for some areas in academic as learning tlroughout life and
thinking ability and human resource management af,ea as arranging people for job that
their opinions were relative.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intal$l Conclusion, Dissussion and Recommendation / 102
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION, DISCUSSION
AIID RECOMMEI\DATION
This part discusses the summary of findings and conclusions drawn from the
opinio$r of the administrators, teachers and students of Chanapollakan Institute of
Technology Nakhonratchasima. .The recommendations are also discussed in the final
section of this part for the purpose of implementation and continuing research"
This research aimed to shrdy the opinions of the people who were involved in
the school management. The opinions were drawn from the respondents through the
interviews and the questionnaires. The focused topics included the six majorworks of
the vocational education managemen0, whichwere general adminisfation, academics,
finance, human resource, technology and educational resources for learning and
student activity man4gement. The comparisons of opinions between groups of
respondents' were also accomplishe'd, for instancg administrators-teachers-students,
business administration students-engineering students, and regular course students
and special course students.
The questionnaire was dweloped by the researcher within the main area of
vocational education management that was consistent with the provisions of the 1999
National Education Act. It was dweloped under tie zupemision of tle research
supervisors and tested for reliability. There were 348 shrdents, 107 teachers and 2l
administrators respondents. The information was analyzed with the computer as
percentage and Nonparametric test Chi-square and then displayed in tables.Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, lvlahfulol Univ. lvlEd(Educational lvtmagemmt) / 103
The Interview was also tie research instrtrment. I I students, 6 teachers and 6
administrators had been asked to gle the information about the school administration
The semi-structured qtrestions were used. Probing of the information during the
interview was done in order to gattrer more information. The analysis of the
information was done during the process of the interrriew and the kelmords from the
information were established. The keywords led the researcher to gather the
information for the next respondents.
5.1 Conclusion
5.1.1 Personal data of the respondents
Administrators
Most of the administators of the school were between 3l4O years of age at
47.60/o.7l.4oA of them obtained Bachelor Degree. The total length of the services in
administration were between l-5 years at 42.9% and the length of services in present
position was l-3 years at 47.6Yo. SlYo of them had the subordinate between l-50
persons.
Teachers
Most of ttre teachers in the school were between 20-30 years of age at 52.3%.
85% of them obtained Bachelor Degree. The total length of services in teaching were
between l-10 years af 80.4% and length of services in present school was 4-6 years at
39.3yo.72Yo of themteach in both certificate and diploma levels.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Inbkul Conclusion, Discussion and Recommendation I lM
Students
Most of the student respondents were between 15-20 years of age at 62.6%.
Female students were more in numbers at 55.7Yo. Business computer students were
the most prevalence Lt46yo and in diploma study level at 82.5yo
5.1.2. Opinions of the respondents
5.1.2.1 Opinions of administratorsn teachers and students,
The adminisfrator and teacher respondents agreed that the empowermen! the
implementation of information technology and the cooperation with private sectors
were ranked in moderate Watity. In the area of Erality assuran@ system and inte,rnal
audif 6anagement they wsrs high in ryality. Students also feel positive in tiis area of
management but they seemed not to nnderstand about internat audit system of the
school.
The administrators were satisfied with academic man4gement of the school
except the arrangement of studying according to students' interest and capability.
Teac,hers' opinions on academie management of the school were ranked as moderate
quality except for the arrangement for the learners to learn according to their interest
and capability, cooperation with community and parent and create the c.uniculum that
serve the community. The student respondents' opinions on academic man4gement of
the school were also ranked as moderate. Except for topic 'studying by student's
interest', cooperation with community and parents, create the c'urriculum that serve
the community and the library service that were ranked low. Students would like to
learn through the Internet and they would like school to improve assessment method
and counseling system. Advisors did not know each of their students enough to pickCopyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crad- Studies, MahidolUniv. fvf.Ed.(Educational lManagement) / 105
up the student's problem before it happen. Apart from this, the interview showed that
the cuniculum that used in the school was not relwant to the private enterprises'
need. Learnered center learning was in the beginning 6f implementation without
enough support or facilitation for the students. Classroom or action researches that
were conducted by the teachers were lack of enough understanding. Teachers did it
because they were forced to do from the adminisfrators.
The finance systemwere rated in high quality especially the transparency of the
system relative to administrators and teachers' opinions but student did not know
accurately how the system work. to human resoluce managemen!
administrators' and teachers' opinions were moderate to high qualiry exoept tle
motivation and appraisal systen The administrators and teachers believed that
appraisal system was not fair. The teaching evaluation from students was confioversy.
Some teachers supposed that students might lack of intention or be bias evaluating
ttrem.
Respondents felt that technology and resources for learning were being
dweloped slowly. Student wanted to study via the Internet, anyway teacher believed
that the ordinary teaching was still necessary because it could shape the students'
behavior and attitudes.
The student activities were ranked in moderate to low quality especially the
welfare and snrdent services. In additio4 it was found that students did not have
enough t:me to join the students' club or students' organization. They spent most of
the time in the classroom. There were large numbers of activities in one academic
year but most of them were activities that arrange annually, for instance, sport day,
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intalcul Conclusion, Discussion and Recommendation / 106
Buddhist's day. Shrdents wanted more services, for instancg drinking water and rest
area.
5.1.2.2 Differences of opinions of administrators, teachers andstudents.
The major differences among the opinions of administratorg teachers and
students were that tle student respondents have no ideas about the questions more
than the prwious twq for instance, the internal audit system, finance system, t"he
cooperation with the community and the hunan resouroe management system"
Most of the opinions were in moderate rank. In general administration area of
management there were signifisantly different in tle quality assurance and internd
audit management af,ea According to academic management, learner centered
learning learning according to shrdents' interesq learning from real experience,
sources for self study, encouraging teacher for using the action researoh to solve
classroom problems and library service were significantly different amotrg groups of
respondents' opinions.
Opinions of groups of respondents forEansparency of the finance system were
different because of students did not know about the finance system processes. The
selection and human resource dwelopment management were also different. There
were different in the opinions of the respondents in media development ma.nagement.
There were not different for student activity management.
5,1.2.3 Differences of opinions of engineering students and business
administration students.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Sodies, fr{ahidol Univ. M.E<L(Eftrcational Management) / 107
Generally, the differences between the opinions of business administration
students and engineering students were not many topics. These were the topics tlat
differences were obviously seen. Empowerment and participation, internal audit,
learner centered learning integration of knowledge and moralg life long learning
zuitable environment for learning efficiency, cooperation with community and
paf,ents, encouraging teachers for using the action or classroom research to solve
classroom problems, counseling system" transparency of finance system, teamwork
and encour4gement.
5.1.2.4 Differences of opinions of regular course students and
special course students.
There were differences between the opinions of the regular course students
and special course students on several management areas. In general adminisfi'atiga
management areas, all zub-areas were different. Almost every man4gement areas in
academic were different in opinions except life long learning, thinking ability, and
encouraging teacher to conduct classroom research. Opinions for finance system,
technology and resources for learning and snrdent activity management were different
according to regular course students and the special course shrdents believed. For the
human resource managemenf the groups of respondents' opinions were different in
the sub-area of delegating jobs and responsibility.
5.2 Discussion and Recommendation
Education service like otier businesses that sustomer or students are involved
in almost every process in the service. During the service administrators and teachersCopyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Saranlntalsl Conclusiorq Discussion and Recommendation / 108
need to ooncern about the balance of the short-term and long-term goals of the
customer. Anyway it is value to understand tle needs of them. Adminisfiators and
teachers are also the most important parts in the service. The opinions of them are
cnrcial for the success of the institution. The perceptions of the teachers should be
concerned. If teachers feel embarrassed from too much control of their work this may
obstruct the innovative ideas for the school. Ronald Barnett (1992) commented that
"the concept ef management, in some serNes of its at least, turns out to be
problematic, when applied to an academic institution The main activities of the
institution - its teaching scholarship and research - are not 'managed' by the senior
personnel in the sense of being directed and controlled by them'. So the balance
between leading and -ana€ing should be considered in school management and tlis
will promotethe school progress effectively.
Generally, in this study, adminisfrators, teachers and studelrts were moderately
satisfied with the management of the school and they concerned about the new patt€rn
of learning in tie school that administrating teaching and learning processes need
adaptation to catch up the changes of technology, social and culture of sociery. For
instance, they concerned about life long leaming learning in the real situation and
using of technology for promote learning.
5.2.1 General Administration
l. The empowerment of the school man4gement was recognized and
implemented but it was lack of effective internal audit system- It is important to
implement the internal audit to all areas of manags6sal not just in the finance system.
The participation in management was alse important consistent to the study ofCopyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad" Studies, MahfulolUniv. M.Ed" @ftrcational lvlmage,ment) / 109
Theidaporn Laovisaskul (2001: Abstract) that suggested to establish the
administration committee or school board in order to gather tlie opinions from all
stakeholders of the school. Utai Boonprasert (1999: 5-6) concluded that this tSpe of
management concenffate on participation and self-management. He emphasized that
the community should be integrated in school management in order to gain the real
demand and use the resources in the community for learning purpose. It is
recommended that the school should study the implementation of school-based
management for the private school. There may be zuitable tlpe of the school-based
nanagement that corresponds with the private vocational education.
2. The lack or the sluggish in receiving of fundamental information
effected the school delay in solving ttre problems. In order to improve this, the
information technology for administration of the school should !s implemented as
soon as possiblg for instance students' academic history. These will give cnrcial data
for any person who would like to use it for monitoring the progress of students and
effective decision making. The implementation must be comprised of the
understanding practicing and encouraging of the statrin order to use the information
technology effectively.
3. The cycle of quality assurance system was not established in the school.
School has accredited from the Office of Private Education Commission but after the
period of evaluation the system seemed to be ignored by most of the staff, for
instancg tiere was delay in reporting the annual report of departments. There should
be effort to promote the quality assurance as normal cycle of work for everyone fiom
students through administrators. The rearpn why the staffs ignored the quality
assurance system cycle may be the insufficient time. Teachers were teaching at tieCopyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intakul Conclusion, Discussion and Recommendation / I l0
same time of doing quality as$uance iszues so after the evaluation they seemed to
fade out this job. This was harmonious with the study of Sumran Thammachote
(2000: Abstract) that the personnel who worked in this area of management was
working in high workload especially when the external quality assurance was
encountering. Anyway quality assurance is the job that wery organizations can not
deny. It shows the responsibility that the organizations provide for the community and
quarantine that tleir services and products of them are in acceptable ryality. It is
recommended that there should be a unit in the organization that responsible for the
quality assurance job apart from academic m4nagement in order to organize ttris work
to all units in the instihrtion There should be clarification that the quality assurance is
inside wery job and one should implement it with normal cycle ofwork
4. The differences of opinions in quality assurance and internal audit may
oome from the level of understanding and involvement in these two areas of
management. Students showed ttrat they did not know about them and they act minor
role since preparation for evaluation till present ofthe information
5.2.2 A,eadlemic Mana gem ent
Some parts of the academic work system are indistinct in term of job
delegation and there were curricula that had little improved for many yeaf,s. There
should be reviewed of the procedures and come up with the new one that served with
the nslv policy and society demand. It was consistent with the study of Varissara
Khamsaena (2000: Abstract) studied the business adminisfiation students' opinions
regarding instnrctional man4gement. Student believed that the value and theory
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Strdies, lv{ahialol Univ. lvlEd.(Educational Managemmt) / I I I
content could not be implemented in the real situation. Following yyffs imFortant
issues about academic management that should be discussed in this study.
l. The relationship between the sohool and private sectors were zuperficial.
Most of tie cooperation was the acceptance of tle student to frain in the organization
There was no permanent link with the company. The cooperation that identified to be
the most effective is the links with private hospital and the car service center which
accepted students to train in the Dual Vocational Training system at their workplaces.
Sam Shaw (2001) the president of Northern Alberta Institute of Technology, Canada
commented in the conference that the private sectors and organization could take part
in the school management as
1. Dwelop the curriculum or create the new one.
2. Teaching new technology to students and teachers if their staff
are ready.
3. Allow the snrdents to use the resources in the company, for
instancg tle equipment in the factory.
The need assessment should be done in order to identify what exactly the
community need. The needs of workforce are always change so vocational education
that produces the workfsrce directly should be aware of this and try to gather the most
update information and create the quiculum that serve the need. Beyond thaq the
institution should study the forecast of the workforce in the future in order to plan for
the change. This may presume curricula that can serve the future then ttre institution
could offer this to the community and invite the students who would like to learn
more advance skills that correspond with the jobs in the future to enroll in the
institutions. It is recommended that the vocational education should find the way forCopyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Safian Intakul Conclusion, Discussion and Recommendation I ll2
gaining more cooperation from the private sectors. In the school level, the linkage
between the school and private sectors should be established. The e4perienced worker
could be the teacher for practical learning. The key strategy for school to gain the
cooperation is that school must identiS the private sectors' benefit from being
cooperated. The most obvious example for these is that school can help the private
sectors to reffain their staff. After the first cooperation school can introduce the ideas
sf linkage to the private setors. For the government levet tle must be
encouragement and motivation for the private sectors that join the education
continuously, for instance, reduction of tax, inveshent promotion and government's
rewarding. At the same time the government should support the company that set up
the training system in its workplace, for instance, arransng Eralified teacher and
monetary zupport for teaching media
According to the information form the Dual Vocational Training Students'
information. There was more advance in term of competencies and skills of the
students. This must be from the high chance of sttrdents to practice continuously in
the real work situation and under closed s;upervision from the experienced personnel
in the workplace. So this system should be promoted and we should try to encourage
and facilitate the private enterprise to join tle progran The reflections of private
sectors about accepting the student for training must not be neglected. They should be
considered and adapted to the plan
2. As teacher and administrator respondents concerned that the teaching
zupervision was crucial to quality of academic work in the school so the system must
be developed. There were two types of teaching zupendsion that implemented in the
school. They were clinical zupervision and buddy system zupervision. But problemsCopyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crad- Shdies, MahitlolUniv. tvlEd@ducational Mmage'ment) / I 13
from this were identified from the information. The improvement of teaching was not
as high as it should be after the supervision. For the clinical ong the time was the
major problem. It is recommended that there must be firm appointment of the
zupervision committee in order to join and comment after the teaching. If someone is
not sure about his availability he should withdraw from the zupervision. Time can be
arranged as every afternoon is the zupervisions time so there will be no other interfere
activity. And the pre-teaching and post- teaching observation conference should be
intensive in order to come up with tie zuggestion for the teacher. According to the
buddy system the method of matching and strategy for feedback to partner must be
confirmed in order to precisely inform weak points to partner.
Both methods need clarification and affirmation from administrators to the
teachers that the purpose of supervision is not for waluation and it is tle zupportive
service of the school to promote the professional development of the teachers.
3. As the respondents concerned that the classroom research could solve the
problems in the classroom and helped students to learn effectively. School forced
teacher to conduct at least one research per person. This effected the quality of the
research. Some of the staffcould not do research by themselves. They asked for help
from their friends instead of study themselves. It is recommended that the
encouragement for conducting research should $s sqmmenGed, for instancg setting up
a workshop seminar for tlis, asking for research advisor from inside and outside the
institution and rewarding the annual best classroom research in the school. At the
same time school should try to identif that the classroom research is part of teaching
processes not ao extraordinary one for teachers.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Saran Intakul Conclusion, Discussion and Recommendation / I 14
4. Counseling for students is very important to the achievement of the
students. The school had about half of totd students that came from other provinces
so the students were away from their family. The zupportivs seunssling program will
help the students to adapt themselves to ttre system. Some of staffwho assigned to be
advisors of students were not responsible for their duties. The monitoring processes
should !s implemented in order to gain more effrciency, for instance, t.he monthly
report of the advisory work, the portfolio of the students, the critical students tlat
need closed zupport.
It is important to conduct this job as proactive not reactive. Advisors should
early detect the students' problems and help them before the problems are expanded.
The individual differences should be recognized from the advisor so the problems
could be solved directly. Apart from this process, the home visiting should be
launched in order to know the real situation and information from the students and
their family.
The cooperation of the three units in the school should be established in
order to share the information and solve tle students' problem together. The tbree
units are Advisor, Discipline department and Counseling department. The pattern of
the cooperation could be like the diagram.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Studies, lvlahidol Univ. M.Ed" (Educational Manage,mot) / I I 5
In this diagram the students and parents are the center of cooperation. When
Advisor, discipline staffand counseling staffdetect the students' problems they must
share the information and work togetler in order to find the best resolution to the
problems.
5. Vocational education emphasizes on the skills sf the students in order to
confirm that the students are competence. It is recommended that the majority of
assessment should be practical. This may take times and resources but it is worth to
assure that the graduate students are competence. Orrriculum that may develop in the
future should be the one that corresponds with the need ofthe private sectors and rely
onthe competency as 'competency based cunicrrlum' and also the evaluation should
be 'competency based evaluation'. This was consistent with the study of William A.
K (1998: Abstract) This study found evidence that vocational education directors are
developing prograrns to ensure that vocational education mak65 the necessary
adjustments to the cunicula to contribute to the overall reform.
6. The library services were commented from the respondents about good
service and the positive trend. But the only one negative comment was the lack of
books that correspond witl the zubjects. Librarian should ask for the category and
nomenclafire of books that required from the students and teachers and then allocate
the budget to buy them. It is also recommended that the library should gather the
opinions from all users especially the special course students that when is the most
convenient time to use library service.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Sararlntakul Conclusio4 Discussion and Recommenddion / I 16
5.2.3 Finance system management
Generally, the respondents did not know about the finance system. There
should be more public relation for everyone especially the students to know how the
finance system of the school works and how fransparency of the system is. Most of
the shrdent would like to know about the details of the education fee so tlis must be
clarified too. It is recommended that the adaptation of the accounting system should
be done for the change ofthe system according to tle National Education Act.
5.2.4 Human resouroe management
Generally, the human resourbe management ofthe school is admitted from the
respondents especially the recruitment and the human resource dwelopment prccess.
But the staffappraisal or waluation program is negatively commented. The opetrness
and participation of the process are needed for beter appraisal system- So this part of
the system should be rwised because the system will be the important part of the
feedback process in order to improve the capability of the personnel.
Webb, L. D (1994: 187-189) described that the erraluation mtrst be matching
with the evaluation purposed. For instancg if the purpose of the evaluation is staff
dwelopment tle formative evaluation should be the most appropriate method
because it is an ongoing method and the main purpose is self-improvement of the
person being evaluated. But if the purpose is promotion so the summative is the most
suitable method.
The data collection method is also important. The confidential of the result
should be intended in order to enstue the waluator that the report will be read with the
person who authorized. The method of collecting the information should be moreCopyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad" Strdies, Nfahidol Univ. tr[.Ed.@ducational lvlmagement) / I l7
two-way communication between the evaluator and the waluated person. This will
give a chance for gathering more information.
5.2.5 Technolory and resources for education management
The respondents 4gree that it was important to implement the information
technology for education especially the Internet. The E-learning was at the beginning
stage of the school. It was necessary to dwelop this technology as a supportive
method for the radition teaching method and in the futue it may replace in some
zubjects that the social interaction is not reErired. Anyway the need for attitude
adjustment and social interaction are still needed from the student so the E-learning
may not adequately fulfill this. It is recommended that the learning tbrough
information technology should be implemented as soon as possible. The level of
imFlementation should be identified from further study.
5.2.6 Student Activity management
Lack of participation was a problem in student activlty management of the
school. This may from the insufficient share of vision between students and teachers.
It is recommended that the shrdent mug be the leader in the activities. Teacher should
be the facilitatorto the project. The student club or organization could be the center of
the activities and he$ the students to do activity that they are really interested.
Allocation of the budget is also important to make the student comfortable to conduct
the activity as they propose.
There were a lot of activities in the second semester and these effected the
quality of learning in many srbjects. School should transfer some of the activities, for
instance, the,sport day, to the first semester.Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran IntakulConclusio4 Discussion and Recommendation / I l g
Ac'tivity should be emphasized and followed by person who is involved. It candistract the student from abuse activity and drug. At the sam.e timg it will promotehealth in case of sport activity.
There were differences of the opinions of t.he regurar course students and thespecial coruse students' This may from the differences of tle patton and time forstudy' for instancg the special course students commented that the school providesmore flexible and by their interest but the regular think diffslsatly. School allows thestudent to hansfer the credit from prwious institute beca'se many of them used tostudy in the system before stop learning.
5.3 Further Research Recommendation
There should be continuing researches in some man4gement areas asfollowing;
l' The need assessment of the private sectors and community about thetlpe of education or curriculum that they would like to study. The futue jobs are
interesting.
2' The study about quatity assumnce processes of the school that can serve
for the external quality assurance should be done in order to find the best way prepare
for tie €xternal evaluation.
3. study to find out the most appropriate pattern of counseling for the
vocational students.
4' comparative study between the achievement of the ordinary and DualVocational Tiaining Students in zubjects.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, lvlahidol Univ. lvlErl(Educational lvlmagemmt) / I 19
5. Study of competencies in any field that taught in the school should be
conducted in order to come up with competencies in term of competencies based
cuniculum and competencies based evaluation.
6. Study the appraisal system that serves the purpose of the institution
especially feedback for teaching.
7. Comparative study of the learning patton between the EJearning and
traditional one. This will give the guidelins fo1 implementation of the information
technology.
8. Study the students' leadership in the shrdent activity management. This
will get to tle point that how to develop and encourage the student to actively
participate in the student activity 6anagement.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran lntakul Bibliography / 120
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Barnett, R. (1992). Improve Hisher Education : Total Qualitv Care. Open university
press, London.
Bhumirat, C.(2001). Vocational Education Reform in Thailand [Online],
htp//www.onec.go.th.
Bhumirat, C. (2000). Life long leaming: bridge to the future. In The report of Second
International Congress Technical and Vocational Education (pp l-37),OfEce
of National Education Commission.
Buajoom, P. (2001). A study of the Opinions of Students in Short Vocational cornses ,
Reeardine Teachine Performance of the Teachers at Phuket Polytechnic
College Under the Division of Industrial and Community Education.
Deparfinent of Vocational Education. M.ed thesis in Education
Administration" Thaksin University.
Chanapollakan Institute of Technology (1997). School charter and development plan
1997-2000.
Chiangkul, W. (2001). How to reform the Education and for who for what?. Office of
National Education Commission.
Chumnum, S. (2000). Strategies for success: Guidelines for Thai Vocational
Education. In The Reform of Vocational and Training in the State of Israel
Qry 64-7 9), Offi ce of National Education Commission.
Chumnum, S. (2000). Strategies for success: Guidelines for Thai Vocational
Education. In The Reform of Vocational and Training in the United Kinedom
(pp 90-l l4). Office of National Education Commission.Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Matridol Univ. M.Ed. @ducational Management) / l2l
Fleming, P. National Framework for Technical and Vocational Education in Thailand,
paper presented at Seminar on 20 December 1999 to members of the Office
of Education Reform.
Fleming, P. (2000). Vocational Education Reform, Education fair.
Kaewdang, R. (2000). Reform Thai Education, Bangkok : Matichon press, .
Khamsaena" V. (2000). The Business Administration Students' Opinions Regardine
Instnrctional Management of the Principles of Economics Subject in
Vocational Colleges-under the Deparhnent of Vocational Education. M.ed
thesis in Education Administration, Khonkan University.
Lertvitayavivat, P (1998). A Studv of Students' Opinions Towards the Adminisnation
of the Students' Activities in Sanethonwitaya School in Songkhla Province.
M.ed thesis in Education Adminishation, Thaksin University.
Laovisaskul, T (2001). A Study of Parents' Opinions Regarding the Administration of
Khajomkiatsuksa. Phuket Province. M.ed thesis in Education administation,
Thaksin University.
Meniam, S.B. (1998). Oualitative Research and Case Study Applications in
Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Office of the National Education Commission. (1999). National Education Act of
B.E. 1999. Bangkok, Thailand.
Office of the National Education Commission. (2001). A summa{v of National Higher
Education Reform Roadmap. Bangkok : Office of Higher Education Reform
ONEC,
Office of the National Education Commission. (2000). lnternational Competitiveness
2000. Bangkok, Thailand.Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran lntakul Bibliography / 122
Office of the National Education Commission. (2000). The Competency of Thailand
Education in 2000. Bangkok, Thailand.
Office of the National Education Commission. (2000). Guideline for Intemal Quality
Assurance. Bangkok, Thailand.
Office of the National Education Commission. (2000)The Report of the Advance in
Education Reform in the 2 years interval Gp 9-67), Bangkok, Thailand.
Thammachote, S. (1999). A Study of Work Perforrrance to Ouality for Ouality
Assurance and Accreditation of Personnel in Private Vocational-Business
Administation School in Hatvai. M.ed. thesis in Educational Management,
Thaksin University.
The TAFE NSW Review Committee, (2001). A new world for vocational leaming,
Review of product research and development within TAFE NSW (ppl l-19),
New South Wales, Aushalia.
Udompoj, S. (2000). Strategies for success in vocational education: Suggestion for
Thailand, The Reform of Vocational and Training in the United State of
America (pp 52-57)=Offrce ofNational Education Commission, .
Delors, J., et al. (1996). From basic education to university: Vocational guidance,
Learnine the Treasure Within (pp.l29-130)" Report to the IJNESCO of the
International commission on Education for the Twenty-first century.
Vonganutroj, P. (1999) The Management and Adminishation of Vocational
Education. Bangkok Software Technology House.
Webb, L. D. (1994) Human Resources Administration : personnel issues and needs in
education (pp. I 87- I 89).Maxwell Macmillan.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crad- Shdies,lvlahidolUniv. lvlEtL (Educ*ionallvlmagemem)/ 123
APPENDD(
A QI]ESTTOi\NATRE ON
OPIMONS OF ADMIMSTRATORSN TEACgN'tr1 AI{D
STT]DENTS ABOUT MANAGEMENT AT CHANAPOLI,AKA}'.{
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NAKHON RATCHASIMA
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Saran Intakul Appendix/ 124
Questionnaire of the Administrators opinions about management
at Chanapollakan Institute of TechnoloO 1"-Oa"1
Part I Personnel information. Please fill in the blank or sign { xthe item that most
relevant to your information
Age... ... ....years Sex...
Highest Education D Diploma lBachelor degreetr Master degree D other.
Number of years in total administration e4perience... ...
Number of years in present position.
Level of organization ! Sector ! Academic SectorI Deparhent tr Group of zubject tr Unit
Character ofthe organization U Academic I Academic Support.
Hstimation of number of subordinate
Parr2 Please read the Erestion and answer carefully and response by fill the sign / to
the item that closet to your opinions.
l. General Adminisfi'ation
2. Academic Management
3. Finance system
4, Human resource 6anagement
5. EducationalTechnology
6. Student Activity
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Sbdies, lvlahiilol Univ. M.Ed. (Educ*ional Nfmagemen) / 125
Questionnaire of the Teachers opinions about management
at Chanapollakan Institute of Technolog (C-IECE)
Paxt I Personnel information Please fill in the blank or sign { xthe item that most
relevant to your information
Age..........years Sex...
Highest Education ! Diploma trBachelor degree
D Master degree tr other...
Number of years inteaching experience
Number of years in teaching at present school..
Level ofteaching I Certificate D Diploma
! both Certificate and Diploma
Teaching zubjeq...
PartzPlease read the question and answer carefully and response by fill the sign / to
the item that closet to your opinions.
l. GeneralAdminishation
2. Academic Management
3. Finance system
4. Human resoruce management
5. EducationalTechnology
6. Sttrdent Activity Management
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Inblntl Appendix/ 126
Questionnaire of the Studentsf opinions about management
at Chanapollakan Institute of Technology (C-TECE)
Part I Personnel inforrration. Please fill in the blank or sign { atthe item that most
relevant to your information
Age.. .years Sex...
Group of zubjects
Eduoation level I Certificate tr Diploma Year
ParrzPlease read the qtrestion and answer carefully and response by fill the sign / to
the item tlat closet to your opinions.
l. General Administration
2. Academic Management
3. Finance system
4. Human resource management
5. Educational Technology
6. Shrdent Activity Management
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studies, Ivlahiilol Univ. IU.Ed @ducdimat Mmagemlefr) I ln
[flminis6sfieaArea
Answer
GeneralAdministration
4 3 2 I dontknoui
l.trmpowerment,
Delegation ofpovrer andparticipation inmanagement
highlevel ofemposrexmentandparticipation,personnel candwelop workwithoutwaitingfor theadministrator
medium levelofempowermentandpafiicipation,dwelopment ofwork needapprove fromtheadminishator
somewhatlevel ofempowermentandparticipation,committeeproposeproject toadministratorfor oermission
lowlevel ofempowermentandparticipatio4decisionmaking madeby theadministrator
2.Informationtechnology
Goodinformationsystemused inall operations.
Goodinformationtechnologyused in mostoperations.
Informationsystem nottullyfunctional andused in someooerations.
Problemswithinformationsystem. Used incertainoccasions.
3. CooperationwithPrivatesectors
Private sectorscooperate verywell in schoolactivitiesincluding all ofthe academicaf,eas.
Private sectorscooperateverywell in schoolactivitiesincluding someofthe academioareas.
Private swtorscooperate insome schoolactivities andsome aspectsof theacademicaf,eas.
lowlevel of;ooperationfrom privatewctors inrctivities andacademic areas
4.Qualityas$uance
Clearlysuccessful ininternalaszurance andthe rezults forthe preparationof externalas$uance.
Medium levelzuccess ininternalassurance.
Starting to usethe result ofinternalasnrrance forthe preparationofexternalassurance
Beginninginternalassurance andstartingpreparation forexternalpreparationassurance
No internalaszurance. Nopreparation forexternalassurance
t. Intsnaluditing
Obvious. Thereis a boardworking forthesystem andreportingcontinuouslv.
Obvious. Thereis a personworking andreporting thesystem in someoccasions.
Not clear. Norcmmitteeresponsiblemd no report.
No internalAuditingsystem
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intalol Appendix/ 128
AcademicManasement
4 3 2 I dontknow
l. childcenteredlearning.Studentsdweloplhrough theirfull potential.
Teacher knowshrdentindividually.Studentsdwelopthemselvesobviously.Teachers usechild centeredlearning as
principle forteachins
Teacher knowmost sfirdentindividually.Student involvein learningprocess
eachermostly teachby explaining.Student havesome
involvementsomehow.
Teacher notknowingstudentindividually.One waycommunicationin teachingprocess.
2. Integrationofknowledgeand morale
Integration ofacademiczubject andethics as well as
social inteachingDrooestl.
Focus theLeachingprocess onacademic.Mding ethicsand social inexha-
Teachingprocesses
foctrs mostlyon academicand addinglittle ethics andsocial.
feachingprocess focusall on academicnrbjects, noother areas.
3. Stude,nt
learn accordingto their interestand ability.
School provideselectivesubjectsavailable forstudents toselect to suittheir interestand abiliw
Students abletoselect theirinterest subjects
Studmtsrarelybe able torclect theirmterestsubjects
Sfirdents areforced to learnthe zubjects.
4. Shrdentsgetreal experiencee.g. form fieldfaining.
Most studentshave
cpportunity togo on excursionmd fieldlrainingsvstematicallv.
Most studenthaveopportunity togo on excursionand fieldtraining.
Some studentsare able to goon excursionand fieldtraining insome
occasions.
Most students0ave norpportunity ofxcursion andfield training atilI.
5. Establishingattitude inlong-lifelearningpattern
Students aresystematicallyestablishedIong-lifeteaning patternm their attitudemd it islwelopedcbvious.
Students arbsystematicallyestablishedlong-lifeleaning patternin their attitudeand it issomewhatdeveloned.
Students areestablishedlong-lifeleaning patternin their attitudein someoccasions andit is somewhatdevelooed.
Students arenrelyxtablishedlong-lifeleaning patternLn their attitude.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. dGrad- Studies, Nfiahialol Univ. IvLErt (Edncdional N(magemed) / 129
AcademicManasement
4 3 2 I dontknow
6, Students aredweloped inorderto be ableto useeducationtecbnology.
Schoolorganizes thesystem thatdevelop learnerlo use educationtechnoloryobviously andwstematicallv.
theredwelopment ofmost of learnersin orderto beable to useeducationtecbnology.
there isdwelopmentof some oflearners inorder to beable to useeducationtechnolopnr.
there is lack ofdwelopment oflearners inordsto be ableto use educatiortechnology.
7. Trainingmddwelopment o{thinkingprocess.
School alwaysprovidesshrdents withthinkingprocesstraining addedin normalteaching-learningprocess.
Schoolsometimesprovidesshrdents withthinkingprocess
training addedinnormalteaching-learningDrocess.
School rarelyprovidesstudents withhinking
proce$rtraining addedin normalteaching-learningprocess.
Sfirdents mostlydwelop theireqmthinkingskills.
8.
Arrangementof ahosphereand learningmaterials forsuitable andhigh qualitylearning.
High Waliryteachingmaterials and
leaningatmosphergsufficient for
qualityeducation.
Medium qualityteachingmaterials andleaningatmosphere,zufficient forprovidingqualityeducation.
Low quatityteachingmaterials and
leaningahospherg orinsufficient forprovidingqualityeducation.
Low qualityteachingmaterials andleaningatmosphere andinzufficient forprovidingqualityeducation
9. Library andself-studycenter
School providessufficient self-shrdy centerand materials.
School providesenough self-study centerand materials.
Inzufficient orlow qualityself-studycenter andmaterials.
Insufficient andtow qualityself-studycenter andmaterials
10.
Cooperationwithparentsand
community.
fhere areprojects withparents andcommunityregularly andsuccessfully
There areprojects withparents andcommunityregulady andsomewhatzuccessfullv
Ihere aresome projectswith parentsand
communityand somewhatsuccessfullv
Ihere is little orno cooperation.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intakul Appendix/ 130
AcademicManagement
4 3 2 I dontknow
I l.Cooperationwith industryand business interm ofacademiccooperation
Ihere areobviouslycooperation inall zubjects.
There areobviouslycooperation insome zubjects.
There arelimitation ofthecooperation,for instancevizualeducationonly.
There is little orno cooperation
12. Arrangingcourses forcommunity inoccasions.
Regularly Sometimes lerw very few ornoarrangement.
13. Promotingand zupportingteachers inconductingclassroomresearch-
There arethorougblyzupportingteacher forconductingclassroomresearch forinstance settingseminar,funding andresearchcontest.
Iheremoderatesupports forclassroomresearch
Ihere arerupports forclassroomresearch insometime.
There is little orno support.
t4.Establishing ofCurriculum forsolving of localproblem"
Therecontinuous andobviouscurriculumdevelopmentfor solvinglocal problem.
There iscurric'ulumdevelopment ingeneral
Iherenrrrisrrlumdwelopmentbut withoutdistinct andcontinuousDrocess.
There is nostrrriculumdevelopment.
15. There areyarious tlpesof studentevaluation e.g.observing porthlio and taskoutcome.
There arevarious tlpes ofevaluation inmost ofthesubjects
fhere areyarious tlpes ofevaluation insubjects
There arevarious tlpesin somezubjects orusel-2 methods inmost ofthesubiect.
fhere is onlyone method inmost ofthesubject.
16. Themethod ofstudentselection
Lhere are variedmethod andilready informfo the learner
There arevaried methodand somewhatclear.
Ihere islimitation inthe selectionbut somewhatclear
fhere is onlyoneway ofselection
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad. Studieq lvlahidof Univ. lvlEd. (Ealucdiond lvlamagment) / f 3 I
AcademicManasement
4 3 2 I dontknour
17. Libraryservice
Books andMagazine areenough both interm of Erantityand quality andhigh standard olservice.
Magazine areenough both interm of quantityand Erality andgood service.
Books andMagazine are
somewhatenough andmoderateservice.
Lack of serrticeimprovement
18. Counselingsystem
Goodorganization,advisorknowand understandshrdentsindividually,advice is lead tcsolve oroblem-
Mvisormderstandsshrdentgenerally.
Advisorunderstandsome studentsbwhas liuletime forshrdents.
Nounderstanding.Poor quality ofadvice.
FinancialSvstem
4 3 2 Idon'tknow
l. Financialand budgetingallocation
well organized,according to theregulation andreadv forused.
Organize(according to theregulation
somewhatorganized.
no system"
2.
Transparencyand clarity offinancial andbudgeting
Responsible bythe committeeand there is anexternalapproved withresulaf, report.
Responsible bypersonnel andthere is anexternalapproved withreport.
Responsibleby personnelwithoute*ernalapproved.
[o one lncharge and notrilNparency.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Saran Intakul Appndix/ 132
Humanresource
Manasement4 3 2 I
don'tknow
l. Recruitmentand selection
well organized,yarious methodaccording to thecharacter oftheworkforcgrunning bycommiuee witlmerit system-
organize[,various methodaccording to thecharacter oftheworkforce,running bycommitteewithmerit systembut sometimesDatronase.
organized,methodaccording tothe characterofthewortforce,running bypersonwithpaffonagesvstem-
poor organized,patronagesysterl
2. Delegationofjobs andresponsibility
Concerning theability andhowledge,suitablecirculation ofiob, bycommitte
Conce,rning theability andhowledggcirculation ofiob in occasio4by committee
lnterference ispresent,
running bypersoL
poor organized.
3. Humanresorucedwelopment
Regular,according topersonnel's'need andobviously$rccess.
Regular,according bypersonnel's'need andmoderatesuocess.
Occasion,according toonets need,
somewhatsuccess.
Littledwelopment.
4. Jobmotivation
Variousmethods, aimedtrc success inboth personneland
oreanization
Some methods,aimed tosuccess in bothpersonnel andorganization
Limitation ofmethods,aimed to$uccess in bothpersonnel orgrqanizatisa
Little or nomotivation,disciplines areused.
5. Teamwork Generallyfound, withfewproblems.
Generallyhund, withmoderateoroblems.
Moderatefound oftenproblems.
Rarely foun4conflictshappen
6. Appraisalsystem
Well organized,merit system,promotingprofessionaldwelopmentrunning bycommittee
Organized, fair,running bycommittee.
Organized,fair, runningby perso4sometimesdoubtfrrl.
Poor organizedrunning bypersonwho donot knowmformation,pvithout
lransDaf,encv.
7.
Encouragement
Obvious,uarinrrs methnd
Obvioug somemethods.
Not clear. NoencouragementCopyright by Mahidol University
mFac. of Grad- Studies, NfahidolUniv. N[.Ed (Educdional l{anagemeil) / 133
'""tYun*.S
ililTll,$BducationalIechnologr
4 3 2 t dontknow
l. Teachingmediadevelopment
Teaching mediaare regular andgeneraldweloped. Nenryatity mediaare construc'ledenoughquantity,promotion isobvious.
Teaching mediaare regular andgeneral
dweloped. Nemr
ryAity mediaare constnrctedenoughquantity,promotion ismoderatelys@tL
Teachingmedia aredeveloped.New media areconstnrctedpromotion issomewhatseerl.
Teaching mediaaf,e raredweloped. Fewmedia areconstucted, nopromotion isseerl.
2. EJeaningdwelopment
Obvious inevery subjects,accessible byall the learnersas needed.
Obvious inmost ofzubjects,accessible bymost ofthelearners.
Obvious insome zubjects,accessible bysome learners.
Not found
3. Facilitydwelopmentand
maintenance
Welt clearorganizedcontinuous, fast
,automaticwithout delav.
well organized,last.
Wellorganrze{some delay.
Poor organized,delay.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intakul Appendix/ 134
Studentactivity
4 3 2 Idon'tknow
l. Student clubactivities
Various.Shrdentscontinuouslyattend activityand produceobviousoutcome.
Various.Studentscontinuouslyattend activityand produceoutcome.
Someactivitiesprovided.Shrdents onlyattend activityinthecuniculum andno practicaloutcome.
Very littleactivityprovided.Students onlyattend activityinthecuniculum andno practicaloutcome.
2. Shrdentaffair andservices
Good studentservice systemthat studentshigtrly satisfiedwith.
Good studentservice systemcoverings mostsfirdents.Shrdent aresatisfiedwith.
Mediumquality servicecovering somesfirdents.Mediumsatisfaction.
No studentservice system-Services notcovering andsfirdents notsatisfied.
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crad- Sbdies, fvlahfutolUniv. lvl"Ed (Eilucdional lr{magement) / f35
m,ildoilcnunaufi o ulurfi saffunr:u3fi r:{rililo{fr{lr6uuludruoirll
6hnYu{u?nr:1
rirduo,r rililtroilo r rfi r?suuoao{eror{ no # r rfl unemsdsnrYanlrJ ms{eto u uuuaou
olo "uud
z rflu#r{lorfisaffunr:uinr:lusYrugir{1 6 dru louiitvo-uqomrfl l- 4 unc
{ro'binnu mlfiriru'ldfior:orua'on{ofilndrfisrffunatil6qtfiucrosdruurniiqorfiu.r
r {m losrtloduonoro / luriosriro3urs ribifmh{riruflor:otrth{o uasslou
:vffuqomrnnrilnarilAorfiumsrirulosil:rnornonfirfioos'leYdrnanrrio'udltf tft'*u,
qammnr:r?s ilRlrdourlorea r lyu{os r:r gio'lil
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saxan Intakul
noild I :rsasl6snuo{tdnou urrildolloltl
orq.........fl tfle|.........,.....
udiuounriFinulqf{qn U rlaa. trrl?qqrnt
tr rFrysuiln tr du1.
oiruz uil mqil:sdun rtdiln t:U?fi u{il{ fi ila ................ fl
tilruailiJmsil:sdunr:dunr:u?rn:1uefi ruildsiloqriu...............3
rsfrumrrriaurruduinrr !flru lars ltmun
Dnurn Etru
dnuarstornr.iautru nirrnrr [rtriuarluR'rtdou
'iruaufldrftriuritgrrlnsilrcilril... ......nil
n u, d z {rorirolrtur?r uoim,1frrsio'lil if
t. drunr:uirr:ria'hj
z. druimnu
3. drusuilrvruruunvnmtiu
4. drunr:uiulr{luqnoo
5. druriilsrn:uasrnnTuladrffonr:160uR1tdou
G. drufionrrrindnur
Appendix/ 136
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Sudies, fvlahfulol Univ. lvlEit (Ealucdional Nfimageme'fi) / 13?
uuudoltolrunarufi o tfi urdctrffun rfl?fl r:{ ril{o{frsr€u ulurir uvirtl
ldrtrYung)
r{rdrror uililGroilrrurfifisralsroo{erou eroud t rflunuasr6sErrYr'lrJmsffnouuulfdolf
olil noud z rflu#ebrdsrffunr:u3rn:ludrugil{1 6 dlu loaii:vfiuqolnrn 1- 4 ilns
{m'[ivrnu {ot#riru'ldfior:sr6on{ofiln#rdsofi'unarrufisrntrumsviruurnfiqarflus
r {ro lasriuoiuonolu / turiosriro3uts r{qtf ml#rirufiorranfr slo uasnou
:yffuqomrnsrrunerilfinrfiuc,osdrulosilnaornoofirfioos'leYilrflanrt?ffsf,tlfi*t 't
qamrnnr:Fsiln rifloill,osaortiuctosr:rsionlil
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intakul Appendix/ 138
noud I ?rsartduomsdnoiluuudouoril
orq.........fl tlIR...............
:y6'unr:finulf,{qa E rJaa. trrFcgrgrn€ U rf?ryqrlvr
tr 6u1.
oiruaililtosrl:vaunr:dunrmourYsilila ...............3
tflrurriilmsrl:saunr:dunr:aouluooruFlnutfloqrYu................ fl
rrd'ududrlrR'rtdolr Erjar. [rjaa. [ri'r rjar.rtacilae.
arlrirrdeou...........
,uud z {roriroruludruoirtlfrtgiolilif
l. firunrruiurrrtalrj
2. druirrnu
3. druruilrcilrorttnsnr:tiu
4. drunrru?mlr{luqnnn
5. druminurnruasmnlulndrdonr:riuilR'rtttou
6. drufionr:rinflnur
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Studies, Nfahidol Univ. tvlEd (Educdimal lvlanagemem) / 139
ulrlrdolrarrun?rilfi o t11il6srfiun r:u?nr:srilrlo{frt6a uluoYruoirsl
6rmYurTnGlnur)
te!-t
rirfrro.r mrildoilorufirfsvrlErao{erou eroufi r rifunsasrdsafianlililo{dnouuuudou
oln "uud
z rfl ufr {ordsan'unr:u?nr:ludrusir{1 6 dru loaf;i:rduqilRllt t- 4 uac
{ohinnu 1#r?n6insr'ldflorrsnr6on{ofilndrfissffunlu6ernlumt#niingrl#ilrnfi
qorrflos r {ro losriuoduonr,rn / luriosriroGurs ri'riitol#finGlnurfior:onrla{a
unsnautYffuqiln rilnrilnar ufi a nlufl orrin flnsrlErsrlnsornonfirdooc'ld$rruanrr
?ffsflilfr'exilrqornrilRr rrisunr:aauc,oseorriuc,osr:reiotlil
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Saxan Intalnil
noud I :ruasdsom{dnoilulludouolrl
Appendix/ l,$0
a io u 4cn.ul?Tlilnla{flnur
?a-
:seYil [rlat. f]rlaa. ffuflfi........
n o ild z {roriro r uludr ueirs yY.r giolil if
l. drunr:uiur:rtalrj
z. druirrnr:
3. druruilrsurorttnsRlttiu
4. drunr:uiu'rr{'rilqnnn
s. druniilsrn:unvmnTulntrdonrrri0uR'rt.rou
G. drufionrrrindnur
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Sbdies, Iv1ahfulol Univ. N[.Ed (Educdional N[magsme'm) / l4l
doriront :rffuqomrnld
ntludrunr:u?ur:
rfa'hl4 3 2 I
l. rslJllR'|'
n:crtudruto
rmsnrrfiriau
deru
fin'nnrvors
druroq.r ldtguunils
qnnnlunr:6nAO'Adil l0ts{tuttf'ttt taoAryilaue{111
arrurrniliu
rlqwrulnuhi
dorrofluinr:
duR'ltRtg0'10
druronodu
qnnnnuoi cs9rro{ r}f q
A9Ailtn1'nodil
lonlod'rrfiu
finfrulo nrr
rliurlqwru
douonrriu
:otornfl
uiur:
iinr:n:snru
drurolue{tsnililil{
nilsqnna
rcuorfo.rl#
fruimr:dn
fiulorflu
riaulnqi
nr:rliurJq.r
trudstro
nr:fior:tur
ornfruimr:
R'.ttRtu0'10
":eo'rul0n] {aoa
llt?t'trflndiloo Al0lilr50{
eirlrflurieu
lnqi
nrrlf
'gUUrvrnlulntarr
aurnarurlfr'luIA UAnlruaun{lil
dlttsltlldltla
dutltf,iln finsdoltR'tru'rHnil'l
lfflunrruiurroA{]il llluRrto{r
firsrucrr
aurnodd
unsfinrnirna
lrl#lunrr
uinrlfluriauluqi
firguuar:
aumn ucifir
hiaruqrni
ilacfinrrdr
nrnrrldrlr.r
tuuljdlt
durvtf,ii
iltgnr finr:
rirnrarurlflu
urlonre
rtncnhifnrou
3. narrdaru
fioriuaoru
ilrvnounr:
enruil:snou
nrrl#narrudau4d14il0tilu0t'hto
lufionr:rutt
n1{1 UnUt?ll
ilonrr?mnr:
nrilund'rr,'l
?rr
anruilrvnou
nrrlfnrrrulaqat?lmo lufl0
n::r uasdaru
iionrqiyrnr:
luarrrirrrdl
nllt6ltlJud?uqrtilq
dolll
il:snounrr
hflnarrldaru
fionrrueir
na: uasdail
frovrrsirr
nr:luurt
cruirr
dn'ru
il:snounrr
l#narruder
frorlou hifi
naruiarufio
ursivrnr:
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intrakul Appendix/ 142
{orimru :souflolRrfl1d
lttludrunr:u?rr:
rfrlrl4 3 2 I
+. nrrilrsfiu
flsrR'rllR'rt
dnsr
iinrrrhvfruqor
nrnnruluou
rfinrflunrn
drr$oodr.rfn
mu iinrrdrno
'lrlrliurlq.r.rru
rmvflnr:tniun
nrr ffiorjrsfiu
qilR1flR',rolroR
iinrrrJrvriu
qarnrnnrolu
ourfiotflunn
drr$orjru
nnr finrnir
nnhftliurlqtAa{lu uncttilil
nrln6srffio
ilrrrTuqotarn
R't0uoR
AattiltJRlt
rlrufruqor
nrnnrulu4A.r
unsiltotSlJtl
nrlniounr:Alry
tTtolttgRu
qorn'rnR'rs
uoR
hifinrr
rJ:vfiuqnr
n1fln'tslu
unshifinr:
rniurunu
rdorJrvf,u
qilnmR'ru
uoR
5. Rltnt?0
f,orrttnsRlt
neuqunrolu
fiorirrfnrou fi
norvriruuqunrt
lur3o.rfiodr.rAdnjult1{R1' tl
Rlflduot1CI
,i'nlR'lrslt?0
aouodr{sioA
mo{
de 49ilsnrou ilry
rirqrulurfot).
firflunr:
rnilrcfio finrr
tduorl0{'til
rfluurrlonre
iinr:nrao
aouhifntn r< tlrou rilrJflvl
iufinrouluI Jrn'oIto.til nltJ
Rlflduot10
.llllR'ttqt?0
dou
hifi:vuunr:
nt?0rroil
unsRlrn?u
qrunrolu
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Studies, frfahfutol Unin N[.Ed (Educdional lvlanagemenr) / 143
doriroruv
?sauqB|Rul 1d
lt?ludru?rrnrr 4 3 2 I
r. rfiuflriuu"-lf,1nqilqeilae
lfif,riuu
rf,orur'ldnrru
frnunrn
ngff,nf,riuu
rflurraqnnn
unvfrriuufinr:
fiomsrirtfo
rou ngl#radn
nr:aoufrriuu
dr6'tydqo
9o 9anaa0nryrrsu
rfludeulnqjq4drilRflRU'tilf,?U
daulu
R'UU2UR'I'
16ounrrcou
snldol.r l9rs
R'ttuttCI10
niousnoo
rfluriruluqi
ue{rindnur
cur:ofnourtnsdar
uanrnarrufin
rululd
nEhiff,nfr
risu aou
Tnunrr
urru'rudhi
l#rindnurii
rieudaru dn
oltJ
z. nlunarrf{A
flBrfrruilncil
Rl'Ur$t1RltA!Ito{tf,'t{dl
nrreourfiu
druirrnrr
ruardruqar
rrriloistr:il,rur{od',,
flrnru
nr:eounlu
druirrnrrerAa
un? tililtotl9nluflsrsrtil
unvdtnru
nrrcourfiu
druirrnrr
udreoor
rum:nfrtdn
rlou
nrraour#u
dru?rrnr:
rnouurionruo
unsnhifinr:
qrorrnrrluAAIto{ou
l. hi'flr5ou
risunrrnarru
rrulonaru
nrin
AA A q99lt?ultaoR tilrydr5CIufllil150a 4 llt9lnoRttoil ta
niln?1iluou
uncnrruofo
9d4{r50uraon
riouldfirr
9,AA4rssurnoR
rEsulddou3
nt{
vvlAil{nilfl15uil
hirisurnilrsl4mdo'rilf,RU'ls O90n til
+. l#frrfuuld
tisuorn
rjrcaunrrof
si.r rdu nrr
f,nnu
f,r6oudauluqi
iilonrcrflsu
finuruasiNn
uuluaoru
ilrsnounr:
rflurcuu
f,riuuriau
lnqjfilonra
rTaudnur
rmsilnrrunrru
:crfiau
frr€ouur-r
riauldriou4 44f,RU',ll.tto?tR
{'luu'lil
Jonre
f,riuuriauq ttl rdr?rq rilil
Ionraflntru
rafofrsu
dnurms
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intakul Appndix/ 144
{orirourv
:soilflorRrn 1d
iltludru?nnr: 4 3 2 I
s. e9Nttcrnfiq99,.1 - Il?lflrt0utnYl
A9ocrs0uannoa
fiin
iinr:rlqnilrAdet50{Rlflrsua
nosof;?notir.t
rflursru ttnv
rindnurfinr:soAJ
rl9lru'r tlltto,{u
odr.rrflu
grJr::ru
dtolrunlruQnH{A4t9
Ito{tRlfl'CIuIdA
noons?nunso4 duRf,RUliln'tt
rf,orurluriortd
uq'tildiln?t
finmrlqnilrA4Ito{R'tflt0ut .laInaons?n
luurqlonre
unsfindnur
iinrrrYourcA JlillSO.lUlJ'l'{l
finrrrlqnihAdIto{R'lSttgu
fnnonfrin
rlsururnuioUl rdIiltl
6. finrr
fiorurf,riuu
h?arrluol#
rnnlulntnrr
mrf,nul
tJR'tt00rulJU
nl'fiorum?.|rl
dlillronuld
nrnTu-Intnr:
f,nurlffiufr
r€ouriaulnqj
otirqrflu
grltrrru
ltR'ttltotu'l
n?lild'Dt'lto
lunr:l#
rvrnluTn6nrt
nrrf,nurlf
fiufrrSoudru
lrqi
finrrrflom
n?1ild'm1t0
lunrrld
nrnluTn6
nrrnrrdnurqtu 9ArilRUflrruil
urttiau
crrnnrrrir
taiililnsnrr
rf,orurh?fr
disuldl#
nnIuTa6
rdonr:dnur
z. flnlff,riuu
flnfrnss
risxurn:suau
nrr6o
4 @ q9,9,ilRlroa rilrydl 4aIrgustRmnusv
T{gtu'rRrcil?u
nu6qeonq
ilYttR tljR'ttAItuutdilo
d e q99ilRlr0a rilfld4vtt0lI?{Rilnug
fisurn:suauad
R'.ltnotillllt'l{
Jonrc
A v q99,ilR1r0a rilfladvItuu?lRltRUg
fiwur
Rtsu?uR'ttAtJn9uo0nt{l
frriuur{orur
frnssuns
R'UIJ?1IR1'
findaunuro.r
rflurirulmqj
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crrad- Sbdies,lvlahfulol Univ. lvlEd. (Educdional Vlanagemem) / 145
{orirorru
:sailqomril 'ld
Yrflildru?rrnrr 4 3 2 I
s. iinr:f,n
u5r0'tRldrtnsA A ogodorlro tiltRn
4 stAaRlilrougiln
l|nstilil]s3ril
urr0'lR'rdlu4A
R'lflt0illtasflo4d
Rlflr0ilil9lold
R',lfluaulilu{
nodrniuf,qdJa
Rlilr0umilqol
R1lt
urrsmldlu
n1't60uilnsiGld3IOn1iltUlltl
qilnrtillu
nnl{ilasrfiu{
nodruiufrn4da
Rlflt01l1lll
qornT{
ur501n'rf,1u
nliliouttasAdddoR15ttsilil
;qorn,lrrnl
a t0rdilro tiltll0{
flodrmiufis4da
R1iltou?til
qun]rl
ilrrnnffilu
nlrr€suunsA4ddoR1flt01t1l
;qiln'riln'r
unshiriisr
nodrmiuo'nddd
RlflrUullll
qilnllr
s. nr:f,nl#ii
undrdnurdu
nfidasnunr
iinnriqdun{r
daunuro'rrliu
r?o.raryootir.t
fiornounsfi
qornTt
unrirdunnr
daunuro'rii,
@
fl0dun?r1|{
ilirurorunvqat
R'tlt
r9,9ililn{nun?lEltl | 4il liltllCI{llo
Adlf5oilqilnul
n1
uudsdun{rIt rdlrJtlru{1Io
dunsilqotnTr;
n1
to. iinrr
ilrscrunaru
daruiioriupr
ru flrlnnror
fiInrqnrrnarrulaor?ililoRilEil
9asul|as4un
nro{oril{t
arirrarounsdrlruugu!rilJ
fiInrtnrr
narildarufrsv9nilEiluuunsH
ilnn:owdr.tt
adrraruouns
rfinamilru
Rn't{
iiTn:.rnu
n?1ild?ilfio
rirqruruunv
frrJnn:o.rurr
ilnsrfiq?m
rlrunnrr
fiInrrnrr
nerrudarufio
f,uqrurunnr
flrlnnro.r
fioorurnnio
'hiiirns
tt. iinrudrrfroornanru
il:snounr:A
ilnsRlnqrRo
qndlilnrru
ludruirrnr:
nmqsfiod?il
fiolunuf,onr:
flnurodr.rfo&<
tou ilnsT?o{
lueiuivrrirtl
Rlnq5R0r?tl
iiolunrrfrn
nr:dnurodr.t
farou luurt
arrr?n
nlnqrnot?il
fiolunrrfrn
nr:flnur
sdr.r'firflq1u
ursdnuats
r,riunrrfNn
{]U 8{',ru
nrnq:fiohi
lfnarldauAilo
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intakul Appendix/ 146
rloriraru fsgtuqilnrTl lsl
YI'IUdru?trnr: 4 3 2 I
tz. finrrfrn
nrrriuuf-lf
f,uqurulu
Ionraeir.rl
A@llR't50aR1t
diuulfif,uquI
$uo01{
eirralo
iinr:finnrr
diuufl#riuqru
mrlulonret
nNdl
4eilR'rt0nR]'dtetvnsug runil
ITilUUU0U
tn5{
It r.{ alililn1109
d 949,R'r'rrCIua r?t
fiuqrruA.tt
?t50iluot
lrlR
tg. finrrrir
raiuldngldAso 3 o?00lutrutr0llA 9cr
ITtOilRrJrur|.r
lunr:risunrr
doll
iinrrd.rrrriruhioaoGl J
ngml?00rusila r &aIttuool{Yt?o{
niuf,onrrodAUuril ilqil?os
AIilRltil'sR20
flanffief,o
finrrrirmiruauo &
R'r'?00luutl
risuilrunnrt
niu finr: ou
ilJ
finr:ri{raiilauq !
Rlt?o0 tusu
risuluutIonrc ng
!uNnqil
iinrrriqairut 4tl14uoulfto mll
tn0
t+. finrrfloYh
d'truUo{ilfin
qnrdrdur
rfio.rfllilqnr
luqruru qfi
ilqgr#oGu
dvltR'ttlI0tu'luns
frnrlreirsuot
?lnRqnflottIU
og't{sot0uuns
'A9roluo{l
finrrfrorur
ilacf,odrerrc
1o{ildnqnt
nsrfluriru
lrqi
4vilR'ltflgtul
uasf,nr{r
d'rtvl,o{ildnlln t
qnflo{ilrfl lil
fqrouttnst
crl0n?'utooA
tuo,{
hifinr:
fiflurrnsf,n
r{rcrrgto.t
mfingor
15. R'.rt
rJrsrfiunnl#o^<C?!T?talR
ila]0uoR01R
nrresr rriu
f,trnn ufln
dsdfJ{lu nn
{'ru
ldnr:rJrsrfiu
nnotitmnrn
mnrsrfluriau
h,rqiluartr
tuavirreir'rl
finr:rJrsrfiu
anodrrmnrn
moruluerrrAI?slst1{dl
nrrilrvffiu
naila1R?fn10
rfluurtirra 619clil50 tlnllu{
r-t dl-2 ?finju
riaulmqj
ldnrr
ilrvrfiuan4 a.l.l
ItlU{?flO0?
rflurirulnqi
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Sbdies, lvlahiilol Univ' NI.EiL @ducdional lvlanag€me'ft) / la?
:sdilqomrn
nrrfrotiion
fiorratrorn
nrrdourfi0{adA?flas?
vAclR'rSnntaonil
ad4ilnlu?5 ilngil
n?ilsol0ulto
diln?t
eAdR',ttnolnoRilado q
?f01Rn ung
sar0uilon?t
nrr6'ot6ondr4 I 4oaJf,RU1nOil?nil
ltolRiln'lu
unsfrneufro
roudrldrrd.rl#9,d{ir5r,ulrt'ru
16. nlrf,odtt
Isnrarqirdrdaddnulnoil?5
IR1tlliln'lR
q9iln10 ilnc lrnaomdtstfiil
r?orerloun
nr:rliurlq.r
luv1n1dru
ilftdottnc
dssir.tr'ld
rfis{flo
f;i,f,ruau
urirdo arr
duttnudo
e{xlnoeir
n?t R'lt
uinteirtlno1flld
firrirdo er:
e'tt,,urdu
eirq noar
o., tf,ulrdlu
quRll{Uns
rjirror nrr
uinrreirrlii
rJ:vfrvrinrn
fiuritdo ar:Adlr ilasflo
e{rll orirtrfiut,
noriqludru
iliruruunrqot
nrn nr:uinr:I 4lt .q aoudlillrtvflll5
R'rflq{ilm
a17. RlrlltR'ltItilo{d{n
rjfnur'hir{r
loua.clo{nu
ro.r lfrir.lu'a
illtsll'tll lilq
iliohirilurc
unvnhilru
ufl.
oror:dr{r
loug.urtnu
hirfen'.r lfriruusrir'ld
luur{rfsr
uns'hirioufi
t?n]ilil uff.
oror:dl{r
loua.Iosria
hJ errurroh?
druuvrirc{rt1
ldodrfnmu
rflurcuu
ororrddrjfnur
rqlrloua. rflu
odtd nasdlu
rlsqnnn
eurr:nl#nr:
uusdrtdos
s{rq'ldodr.r
rflufrntou ufi
ilq?trld
18. rsuu{1ildr<ililtnu'l
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intalol Appndix/ 148
rlorirnrruv
:ugruqilnrn
1d
Yt:lu
drusu
il:sruroruas
nr1ilil
4 3 2 I
l. nuf,n
'silu{uil:surarttns
nrrriu
iltsltlJsot0u
qndornrrtrtfrn
nrrunsfinrrfin
rfiu{orynodr.r
dursuun$0ru
rirlrjl#
dilrsuu qn
domrrunf,n
nrruacfinr:
f,orfiufioqn
odNdu:cuu
ilon?t
AItJtsljlt ilnudedilRlt0qlRUIuo{anlilflil
n?5
f,.rhirflu
'UUU
z. narrlrjir
lcunsfinrou
t o{tsilu{tu
rhsuratilnc
nrriQu
iufiorsuTns4
nilsunna il
R1tn5?0do1l
o'tRR'ttuoRdo
ilasilR'ttu'lI
tdl.rocJo{n
odrrarirtero
iufinrouTns
qnna finrr
nt?0dolr0'lR
RlCIUOR UnC
iinrrdrrruo
{oqnlu
Ionrae{rr1
'UNNUOUs tlrraoqnnn ril
6lilR1'nt?{t
flolt0'tRR't0A9ilto
erfroluur.rI
ni'r
ln ra gru an ilsrufla
l| 14tilr,
narulrji.rla
drunr:u?rnr:
{rilunna4 3 2 1
1d
nflilt. nr:rTndon
qnnlnt
dt d-lljlttgulJil$a
It01t ililn]R
gEl
iln1u?5n1il
-JaRU0ts{'luYl9cano{Rlr 9r't[uu
stR1t tnonilc
qnnn 1.f,
ruuu9lru!rril
Altrsuu
ila'tRiln'lu
nilfrnuilvdy
{lUTnO{nltoa.lo'lllluR'lt 190
nilsqnnnJa
uNnr{ills d
rsuilEilnilR
rflu:vuu uei
hinnrnuarsAAoa?f qltuuRlt
Tnur;nna ii
ilqnrlu
:vuugrldruri
'hirflu:vuu
firfotnrrnlrn
{1uil1R
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Grad- Sbdies, N[ahidol Univ. fU.Ed (Edudional fvlmagement) / 149
{orimruv
rcatuqorRrfl'ld
nflilrhunr:u?nr:
{rilqnna4 3 2 I
2. nlrfrenu9r
11,1q{lU
f,olnofitrrilr,
0'tRn?lilqn?1il
arilrro rtnsii4
Rlrilrlur?uu
{]ilOri'r{rilil'ls
eir drrfiunrr
Inonuvqnnn
finlorsfior:orr
ornnrrrf
n?'nfd'|il'lro
irufiuilofroAdoildl ilRlt
rryuriuuno
na: drrfiu
nrrlnsnils
qnno
ao,f - Ailil00golt
ulltRR'r:
lI0't5u'ril'lR
a1lililR1tq
Inoqnnn
hirflurruu
3. nrrr[sur
qna'rnt
drrAilo0'Nnoluo{
nr{n]iln?lil
dornr: rtnsa"aC
rR9flnf,'ut0Tldrl
nJuIlJtssil
arrAuo0]t|notuo{
nr{nliln2lil
dornr: rfiq
nndrrioilru
Rn't,$
iirfluffiss
rflunrrunerru
dotnr:to.t
u'r{r{nnn
tfinnadrr$o
n.lltdiln?t
finrrriour
rlos ldrfin
nn
+. nrrg.rlolfla q-
uailn{1u
4 .qiln'lrg{ toila'rn
AAtilols?! {tl
Jvilrrqflam{ilo{
?to{nRfltnsd?u
n?
4!lun'rrg{ fir1r1{
adt?! {{urrQtt
nnil{ilo{lo{lnlv
Rfltnsd?iln?
.lqrJRlrg{ r0
01na q{
ilttqfln{0,{lJA
o{nRtilto
riauda
hiiinrrgrlo
nfoiirlos
l#ngrufiou
fqrluuru
5. Rlrril{llr
dlunorrr;nnn
rfluriaulnqi
unviiilqur
rlos
rfludrulnqj
fiiltgnrrhu
Rnl{
drdrllulr'l{Rtoldq4ililqiluJu
rJrs,fir
fios rfinnrr
{nuff.ro{
rfoul
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt Saran Inbkul Appendix/ 150
dorimur :rffuqomrn1d
Yt:l1lsirunt:u?mt:
{ruunna4 3 2 I
e. nrril:sffiu
nnnr:rlflri6
{'lu
rflurcuufn
rou qfitrrr
sirrfiunuTos!nilsqnnn fl{
rairul#rfinnr:
r{murru
rflu:vuu qd
r:rru drfiu
nrrlnsnus
qnnn
rflu:suu
s{rrfiunrr
Tnurtrnnn
urm$sfirio
esds
hirflu:cuu
rirffiunrr
Ioofrdhi
nnu{orya
hiIrJi.rla
z. nrrrirnirdrudqrirdr
1o
fifntou unrn
nnrogilunu
4v dils9t01t nju
u1,{oRUSts
hifrnroul'rdrlililR'r5rr{
aq A Jtfltil tutto{tu
drunYnsrn:
unsnrnlulaiiA4t
tfloR'tfl?glt
Rltdou
41d
n?lu
t. nr:fiorur
donrrriuu
Rlrdou
a-AilR'.ttilotllldo
clRlSttUUR'tt
aouodrrsioi &<
tllo{ttavil20{oAorda
tRnflo t14ilvtilt
thliltil'loillnsl.l a
qornmTo il
nrrriqairunr:vAr
flt'litfloo01{drtuugu!rril
iinrrfiorurdo
nr:16sunr:
eouotir{cioAA
tuo,{ilnstRoA o 'daJflo tl4illmYt{
ilirrorunrqnr
o'rndrJ'ru
nnrrfinrrri.r
rurirnr:e$n
douosrfioan
drr$orJru
nn,|{r
frnr:fisurA4rfloR'tSttuu
R'lrdouilasoicrj
tRodo t?flt1ldla4ilutil10n4to
jrr aflorRlflma il
nr:riqniu
nrraft.rdo
ilodiln?t
finrrfisur
donr:riuu
nrraguotir.t
,irfiortacrfin
dolurirlou
rurn hifinrr
riqeirunr:
afr.rdootir.r
fntou
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fac. of Crrad- Sardies, Nfahftlol Univ. M.Ed (Educdional lvlanagemem) / 151
cloriraru :sfiilqomrfl
1d
ltrltl
drunYnarn:
unsmnluladiatflonlfl:su
n1:dou
I
2. n]'r{flillAtcuilnl'ttgil
9rgmlurulru
AItntoil'lu
iiodrrfsrrtulu
qndlxlirl
raudriou
rnil]'orfid.t
unsl#ldrflu
iln6nunarru
dornrr
iirfluriauluqj
luerc,rivr
irq flriuu
r{rft1drflu
dauluqi
iilurrrreitr
in f,riuu
rfluursnriud
rq?rftuns1fi
{'tu
Irt rd dlililrslluu
3. nr:fisur
rmvdrqtinur
druornr:
au',rd
d dastttsljllilosa
Itou llnsnoA
luo{l
drrfiunr:'ld
odrrrant$alos
hidorronr:Lf,{R'l:
dlt: laslnJmn
Itosdlilltoo a !1 9nltultR'tt tn
rd0CIl{t?nlt?
dlailts1lllYl9
rirrfiunr:1d
nrrueirna: fi
narurirdr
fim
6.rhirflu
rsuu sirtfiu
nr:nrrufii fi
narilrir#r
ruasclofin
narnrioul
slrufionr:rYn
6inur4 3 2 I
ldlttlu
t. :suufio
Rttltultttl
rotfnf,nur
Ailn?u?la'lR
aAila10 uRf,Rg19rra
mlt?tjR0RtSllrrA
o0't{9totuo{
ilnutRofln,i'tlr
oul{sot0u
diln2]ililn1R
iln10 uR19rfRu1til'tt?tl
R0Rr:illlodtlA
n?iltnutRoflnJ
{'tut ll
fifionr:rno
eirnar rin
dnurrdrdau
fionrrru
tsTl'run'|il
ndnger:uav
rfionntruuc{
hifrerrou
4eilR0Rtttf9v
1IO0 UR
dnurr{rdaualR0Rttiloulil
'Aootlto{ttns
tRnnn{1ul9
ou't{5al0u
Copyright by Mahidol University
Fl.Lt. Saran Intal$l Appndix/ 152
{orirorn rcauquRrTl1d
YI?IUdrufionr:rTn
4flRHI
4 3 2 I
2. lvlJrfiti?16
n't'unsnl'h?
iltRlSnNdl
mqfnf,nur
dlailrvuumailos&d e4lt?o{t unf,Rul.1 1!liln?'ltlTl.lTlO l0
il1R
ci Jatftsuuilnuns
dlnsoilnqilruu
daulnqi rin
dnuriinmru
ir'qnolo
ddail'VUililN
rlrunal{uac
ldrfluur.r
riau rin
dnurfinerr
ff.rnolorjru
RAN
stlrdg{ tiltililtn r&tsljlt tilvr?
dvan{ unf,Ru1
hirnolosio
aiednrrunc
n'truin1'I
9l'lrldl
#0fi sr rifu 6u 1fi u a ffu n r :u?m rmdx t3s u
l.
2.
3.
IrA$o{oilrlor4nnruilnlol'tgtouuurrdouolil
Copyright by Mahidol University
FlIt Saran Intakul
NAME
DAT:E OF BIRIH
PI,ACE OF BIRIE
INSTITUTIONS ATTEI\IDEI)
POSMONAND OFFICE
M.Ed" (Educational Managementyl53
BIOGRAPIIY
Fl.Lt.Saran Intakul
2l August 1967
Sangkok, Thailand
Pramongkutklao Mlitary College of Medicing
1986-1991:
Medical Doctor.
Mahidol University, 1995-1996:
Master of Public Health Administration
Royal Thai AirForce Institute of
Aviation Medicing Medicat Councit
1995-1997:
Diplomate Thai Board ofPreventive
Medicine (Aviation Medicine)
Mahidol University, 1998-2002:
Master of Education (Educational
Management)
I 997-Preseng Chanapollakan Institute of
Technology, Nakhonratcahsima
Thailand.
Position: Manager
wd
Copyright by Mahidol University