Oozing out knowledge in human brains to the Internet Lada Adamic School of Information University of...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Oozing out knowledge in human brains to the Internet Lada Adamic School of Information University of...
Oozing out knowledge in human brains to the Internet
Lada AdamicSchool of InformationUniversity of Michigan
http://www.ladamic.com
Oozing out knowledge
Knowledge In ``Knowledge search is like oozing out knowledge in human brains to the Internet. People who know something better than others can present their know-how, skills or knowledge''
NHN CEO Chae Hwi-young
“(It is) the next generation of search… (it) is a kind of collective brain -- a searchable database of everything everyone knows. It's a culture of generosity. The fundamental belief is that everyone knows something.” -- Eckart Walther (Yahoo Research)
can we identify experts?
fragment of the Java Forum Q&A network
Zhang, Ackerman, Adamic, WWW 2007
ego-network structure of a technical forum
programming
Adamic et al., WWW 2008
network structure of a discussion forum
politics
8
Marc Smith: “This proves that marriage is more like wrestling than like programming”
Image: Eytan Bakshy
What can the network structure of Q&A forums tell us about interactions?
programming marriage wrestling
Does focusing more narrowly correlate with higher quality contribution?
vs.
num
ber o
f use
rs in
cat
egor
y(>
40
repl
ies
tota
l)
correlation between focus & % best
music
diseases and conditions
languages homework help
math
biology physics
chemistry
Yes, for technical/factual categories
Does focusing more narrowly correlate with higher quality contribution?
11
mor
e fo
cus
->hi
gher
qua
lity?
patents
papers
WikipediaQ&A
Adamic et al., First Monday 2010
persistence and quality
• even the most active users have intermittent activity• intermittency negatively correlated with quality
Nam, Ackerman, Adamic, CHI 2009
Why?
• What motivates users to answer hundreds to thousands of questions?
• From interviews of Naver (Korean Q&A site) participants– Altruism– Learning– Hobby– Business– Points
what to answer?
• filling in the blanks: users select unanswered questions• correcting others: last answer picked as best most often
Many answers you can get for free…What do you need to pay for?
TaskCN: popular Chinese Witkey site
Jiang, Adamic, Ackerman, ICWSM 2008, EC 2009
Taskcn knowledge sharing community
• Askers offer cash rewards for best “solution” to task
How virtual points & real bucks influence participation in Q&A forums
users learn to choose less competitive tasksav
. # o
f com
petit
ors
in ta
sk
log(
inte
rval
) bet
wee
n w
ins
Field experiment
• Crowdsourcing: 120 translation tasks– all pay auction mechanism: participants
contribute solutions, only 1 is selected to receive payment
– price treatment: high, low– shill treatment: enter in our own solution as a
user with or without prior success
• results– monetary incentives incentivize spam
(85% are machine translations)
– higher pay yields better contributions
– shills discourage other quality contributions
Liu, Yang, Adamic, Chen
Q: can collaborative work yield better solutions than individual efforts?
– individual ideas & exploration– merging the best– e.g. Netflix prize
Q: what is the role of “community” in retaining workers?
for more info• Crowdsourcing and knowledgesharing: strategic user behavior on TaskCn
Yang, J., Adamic, L., Ackerman, M.S., EC2009• Questions in, KnowledgeIn?
Nam, K., Ackerman, M.S., Adamic, L., CHI 2009
• Competing to share expertise Yang, J., Adamic, L., Ackerman, M.S., ICWSM2008
• Examining knowledge sharing on Yahoo Answers Adamic, L., Zhang, J., Ackerman, M.S., Knowledge Sharing and Yahoo Answers: Everyone knows something, WWW’08
• ExpertiseRank algorithms and evaluations Zhang, J., Ackerman, M.S., Adamic, L., Expertise Networks in Online Communities: Structure and
Algorithms, WWW’07
Lada Adamic [email protected]://www-personal.umich.edu/~ladamic