12 September 2017 87 Robert Street, Como

Page 4 Encycle Consulting Pty Ltd

6 Ongoing communication and management

6.1 Management

The building caretaker will be responsible for overseeing the waste management systems. The

caretaker will be trained and informed about their responsibility to work closely with the private

service provider and City of South Perth regarding the schedule for collection and presentation

of bins. The staff member will be responsible for maintaining the bin store in a clean and tidy

condition at all times and ensuring bins are washed regularly.

6.2 Communication

All residents will be made aware through a body corporate document (or equivalent) of the

waste and recycling systems and how they should be used. An Operational Waste

Management Plan suitable for presenting to building users, including how the plan should be

communicated will be developed and implemented during both the initial occupation and

ongoing management of the building.

Building management will be responsible for the continuing education of residents on correct

segregation of waste and recyclables.

Bin storage requirements

Bin store location and

amenityInternal transfer

Collection and vehicle access

Communication and

management

Public Consultation Submissions

Property Location: Lot 5 (No. 87) Robert Street, Como Development Description: Proposed 23 Multiple Dwellings within a 6

Storey plus Basement Building DAP Name: Metro Central JDAP Applicant: MJA Studio Owner: ABN Projects Pty Ltd Value of Development: $7.2 million LG Reference: 11.2017.233.1 Responsible Authority: City of South Perth DAP File No: DAP/17/01250 Report Due Date: 22 September 2017 Application Received Date: 29 June 2016 The City of South Perth mailed out consultation notices to the owners and occupiers of the properties shown in the following map:

Two submissions were received. Submission 1: Changes to the City of South Perth Town Planning Scheme No.6 Amendment No. 47 is basically to suit Council/Government/Developers. My personal belief is that this should have been put forward to a vote of ratepayers due to the abolishment of the R Codes in the CBACP area, but then I guess when the Community Engagement Report prepared by the City of South Perth in April 2007 says and I quote “The intention was not to seek community approval for plans or concepts, but rather to explore attitudes and preferences for the future of the precinct” then in the same report it states the level of support for the following land uses “ 62% strongly oppose “. What happened to democracy !!!!!!

Public Consultation Submissions | Page 1

I have very grave concerns regarding a 23 Multiple Dwellings in a 6 Storey Building plus 1 Basement Level 1) 4.0 metre setback from my rear boundary 2) Almost 20 meters in height 3) 10 balconies with no obscure glass looking directly over my property. (are you

serious how would you like this ?) 2) Exhaust fumes from the 48 car bays, more importantly the basement bays 3) Sheet piling to dig basement carpark (vibration & damage) 4) It’s not in keep with the immediate area consisting of single/ two storey homes

and units which we can call low scale residential 5) The area is basically fully developed apart from a few full size blocks. (trying to

get owners to amalgamate blocks is a joke) 6) Overshadowing. (east/west direction) 7) Noise pollution 8) Loss of resale value (who would purchase a property with this monstrosity

looking straight back at you) Why as a landowner who pays rates & taxes has their rights totally abolished in the CBACP area. I call this Government bullying. I have a pool & entertaining area that will be rendered totally useless so that is why I totally object to this development and will do everything I can to stop this outrageous violation of PRIVACY. I have engaged in a Lawyer to look into the legality of this and will go to SAT & Supreme Court if it comes to that. This is quite & family orientated area and should not be change due to some wacky vision of a few. Submission 2: We object to the above proposal with the following reasons (a) The proposal 6 storey apartment building will probably become the highest

building in the street if it was constructed. This proposed-to-construct building, even if the height is within the allowed limit, will not be in the harmony with the vicinity in the area;

(b) The proposed building will also be a threat of intrusion to the privacy of other residents, especially those live nearby, in the area;

(c) The construction of a multiple storey building plus a level of basement will have a high chance of affecting the foundation and building structure of the houses adjacent to it. We concern that the building / land structure will be affected which include: (i) the structure of the retaining wall of the houses, and (ii) the soil structure, as well as the drainage of the underground water, which

may lead to the death of the plant and endanger the environment; (d) other than imposing pressure in the existing public utilities, such as the supplies

of water, gas and electricity to the resident in the area, the newly increased 23 dwelling places means that 23 families will live in the area, which will also increase the flow of people and traffic around the area; as a result, the tranquillity and comfortability of our living environment will be affected;

(e) although it is proposed that 48 carparks will be built probably for the residents of the building, it is a possibility that the number of the proposed carparks are not sufficient to cater for their visitors; as such, the availability of the carparks around the area will be less in future.

Public Consultation Submissions | Page 2

Canning Bridge Activity Centre Plan Design Review Panel Comments

Property Location: Lot 5 (No. 87) Robert Street, Como Development Description: Proposed 23 Multiple Dwellings within a 6

Storey plus Basement Building DAP Name: Metro Central JDAP Applicant: MJA Studio Owner: ABN Projects Pty Ltd Value of Development: $7.2 million LG Reference: 11.2017.233.1 Responsible Authority: City of South Perth DAP File No: DAP/17/01250 Report Due Date: 22 September 2017 Application Received Date: 29 June 2016 The proposal was referred to the Canning Bridge Activity Centre Plan Design Review Panel as a pre-lodgement item in May 2017. Design Quality Principles (a) Character

• The panel acknowledge a visual reference to the 1930’s and 40’s in the curved balcony forms which provide a subtle reference to the project’s broader historical context.

(b) Continuity and Enclosure • Not discussed

(c) Quality of the Public Realm

• The entry is clear and accessible however might benefit from the inclusion of an accessible planter/green space in front of the resident lounge.

(d) Ease of Movement • Lots of congestion noted with apartment entries located in close proximity to

each other. Ground floor lift access could be improved with a more direct and linear approach assisting with way finding and the delivery of furniture etc

(e) Legibility • Some concern was noted over the ground floor height appearing quite

compressed.

(f) Adaptability • Not discussed

(g) Diversity

• Not discussed

(h) Sustainability • Not discussed

Canning Bridge Activity Centre Plan Design Review Panel Comments | Page 1

(i) Where the proponent is seeking a development bonus under Clause 21 of CBACP:

The extent to which exemplary design is proposed as part of the development – detailed comment is required to illustrate how exemplary design has been achieved.

(j) General Comment

• Presentation was good as it indicated a well-conceived scheme and presented an elegant architectural solution.

• Air-conditioning condensers to be located in stores or at a central area on roof and not to be located on balconies

• Applicant was requested to provide a shadow diagram. • Some concerns noted around the centrally located 1 bedroom apartments as

they may eventually be compromised once the neighbouring sites are developed.

Design Assessment

(a) Strengths of the proposal

• Supportive of the lobby projection into the side setback as it serves architecture purpose.

(b) Suggested improvements to the proposal

• Applicant to consider the location of the bin store, as it takes up potential lobby space.

• Applicant to consider a courtyard space to allow an added visual connection between street and residential lounge.

• The ground floor looks compressed in height. Proponent to explore the possibility of raising the height to present a more generous lobby height and entry.

• Potential issues with buildings that float over car bays; rear car bays are exposed, therefore some degree of protection is important, especially with balconies located above.

• Rear balcony to maintain a 4 metre setback. • Whilst the panel support the curved form of the front balcony it may be

advantageous to set the shallow dimension back further so that an ‘average’ of 4 meters can be achieved if possible to avoid planning issues associated with precedent.

Canning Bridge Activity Centre Plan Design Review Panel Comments | Page 2

Department of Biodiversity, PARKS AND Conservation and Attractu of South WILDLIFE

SERVICE GOVERNMENT OF

WESTERN AUSTRALIA Folder No. i i - ø2O/? Your ref 112017.233.1

Our ref. 2017/003179

- 1 AUG 2017 Enquiries: Gabrielle Shepherd Phone: 92780910

[]BS DCE EEH CBLC Email: gabhelle.shepherd@dpaw.wa.gov.au

Mr Geoff Glass rRPS DCC DGA 0 CEOLI MAYOR

Chief Executive Officer s D E l DHR 0 RAND City of South Perth Cnr Sandgate Street and South Terrace SOUTH PERTH WA 6151

Attention: Cameron Howell

Dear Mr Glass

CLAUSE 30A(2)b(ii) - PROPOSED MULTIPLE DWELLING - SIX STOREYS PLUS ONE BASEMENT LEVEL - LOT 5 (87) ROBERT STREET, COMO

Thank you for providing the Swan River Trust (the Trust) with the opportunity to comment on the above development application received on 7 July 2017.

It is understood that the above application has been referred in accordance with the requirements under Clause 30A(2)b(ii) as the proposal is likely to affect waters in the Swan Canning Development Control Area (DCA).

The Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (the Department) understands that the basement car park will require excavation to a depth of approximately 5.Om across the site. According to the Perth Groundwater Map published online by the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, the depth to the water table through the centre of the subject site ranges from approximately 8.Om to lOOm below surface level, meaning that the water table is unlikely to be affected by the development.

It is noted that there have been no specific areas set aside for stormwater management, and no information submitted regarding how stormwater is proposed to be managed. However, there appears to be areas that may be able to be used for this purpose. It is expected that stormwater management will be addressed in accordance with WSUD principles and Policy 49 - Planning for stormwater management affecting the Swan Canning Development Control Area.

The Department has assessed the application on behalf of the Trust, and you are advised that there are no objections to the proposal, subject to the following conditions:

The applicant shall notify the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, in writing not less than seven (7) days prior to the commencement of works.

2. Unless agreed in writing by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, no development shall commence until all plans requiring approval by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions have been submitted and approved.

3. The applicant is to ensure that any dewatering activities that may be required during or after construction comply with the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and

Rivers and Estuaries Division Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983

Phone: (08) 9219 9000 Email: rivers.planningdbca.wa.gov.au www.dbca.wa.gov.au

D-17-62213

Attractions Policy No. 50 - Planning for dewatering affecting the Swan Canning Development Control Area (Advice Note 1).

4. Prior to submitting the application for a building licence, the applicant shall prepare and have approved, a stormwater management plan to the satisfaction of the City of South Perth on the advice of the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (Advice Notes 3 & 4).

5. All approved management plans are to be implemented by the proponent.

ADVICE TO APPLICANT The applicant is advised that the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions has dewatering effluent discharge standards which are required to be met (refer to Policy 50 - Planning for dewatering affecting the Swan Canning Development Control Area). The Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions should be contacted for further advice. The applicant is also advised that if site-specific investigations reveal that appropriate and technically feasible dewatering disposal options are limited, consideration may need to be given to modifying the building design and the extent of the below-ground levels/infrastructure.

2. The applicant is advised that the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions preferred method of construction to reduce the volume of dewatering effluent is the "bathtub method" - i.e. secant piles or similar to create impervious walls and floor prior to excavation of the site.

3. The stormwater management system should be designed in a manner that will enhance the environmental quality of the river through the use of water sensitive urban design. Stormwater runoff from constructed impervious surfaces generated by 1 year, 1 hour average occurrence interval (ARI) events (approximately a 15mm rainfall depth) should be retained and/or detained on the lot (refer to Policy 49 - Planning for stormwater management affecting the Swan Canning Development Control Area).

4. The applicant is advised that the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions is unlikely to support the connection of subsoil drains, if required, to the local government stormwater system and the river without treatment prior to discharge.

5. Notification of commencement of works can be emailed to rivers. plan ninq(ädpaw. wa.qov.au

If you have any queries regarding this matter, please contact Gabrielle Shepherd, Planning Officer, on 9278 0910. In all correspondence please quote the above reference number.

Yours sincerely

Glen McLeod-Thorpe Manager, Statutory Assessments As delegate of the Swan River Trust Under Section 288(2) of the SCRM Act 2006

27 July 2017

D-17-62213

Application for Planning Approval Requiring Engineering Comments

TO: Engineering Design

FROM: Mr C B Howell Senior Planning Officer, Development Services

DATED: 7 July 2017

PROPERTY ADDRESS: Lot 5 (No. 87 Robert Street Como

PROPOSAL: 23 Multiple Dwellings In A 6 Storey Building Plus 1 Basement Level

APPLICATION DATE: 30 June 2017

ID NUMBER: 11.2017.233.1

PLAN LOCATIONS: D-17-54688 (Report D-17-54686, application form D-17-53056)

GENERAL COMMENT: Yes

VEHICLE MOVEMENTS: Yes ONSITE PARKING: Yes STREET TREES: Yes CROSSOVER DESIGN: Yes VERGE TREATMENTS: No GROUND LEVELS: Yes LOWEST POINT OF STREET:

(DRAINAGE ISSUE) Yes

BUS STOP RELOCATION: No OTHER:

ENGINEERING COMMENTS IN RELATION TO ABOVE:

Stormwater drainage Localised discharge into the subsoil is the required method of disposal of stormwater. As a five level development the contributing area for the calculation of stormwater will be the plan area of the site plus 50% of the greater wall area i.e. 1350 square metres being site area 900 square metres plus 50% of wall area (48 metres by 19 metres). The number and size of soak wells is to be determined by a consulting hydraulics engineer using the contributing area multiplied by an industry acceptable coefficient (considered to be 0.0133 for approximately 18 cubic metres. The soak wells will have sealed lids to ensure no contaminated water enters the soakage area. The bottom of the soak well is to be a minimum of 500mm above the highest winter water table level. Crossing The crossing at 5.6 metres satisfies the general width requirements of the site i.e. not more than 40% of the property frontage and 500mm off the side boundary. Construction will be by separate application to Engineering Infrastructure. A crossing inspection fee is payable at the time of construction. The footpath in Robert Street is to be replaced by the builder at the end of construction to levels established by Engineering Infrastructure. The minimum standard for the footpath will be 1800mm wide off the property boundary (compare to 1500mm wide located 300mm off the property boundary). The minimum standard of path will be grey concrete although an alternative material of choice could be selected for path and crossing. If grey concrete is the material of choice for the footpath, then the path is to be constructed continuous through the crossing. The crossing and internal driveway are to be constructed separately.

1/3

Application for Planning Approval Requiring Engineering Comments

Ramp gradient/parking layout All parking bays are located in the basement car parking area. The bay module satisfies the minimum standard set by AS2890.1 (Off street parking) but is less than that required in TPS6. The minimum standard for the B85 vehicle is maintained for aisle width and “blind aisle” extensions. Ramp gradients at 1:20 (two long ramps) and one short ramp at 1:8 as connections between basement levels are all satisfactory. Waste collection In general waste collection will be on site. No bins are to be placed on the verge for collection. Collection vehicle must access and depart the site in a forward direction. There must be provision on site for the waste collection vehicle to turn around or be turned around i.e. turntable installed in aisle. Provision must be made for both recyclables and for general waste. Additional comment will be provided by the Coordinator Environmental Health Services in association with the Waste Coordinator. Construction management plan A Construction Management Plan (CMP) will be required to be submitted to Engineering Infrastructure for approval. The CMP will address all of the following in order. This list is not exhaustive and may require other matters not listed to be considered. The CMP will provide as a minimum: • An appropriately detailed Traffic Management Plan (TMP) that is endorsed by an accredited

Road Traffic Manager (RTM); • The Traffic Management Plan that ensures no works including substantial deliveries of building

materials are undertaken during the peak morning hours (7am to 9am); • Details of how and where building materials will be stored before use on site as only the Park

Street verge will be potentially available; • An acknowledgement that excavation works (within 3 metres of the road edge) will require

‘work zone barriers’; • Detailed analysis of how the adjacent road network will best operate during construction; • Project time-lines with appropriate mile-stones (to allow for appropriate coordination and

communication to surrounding stakeholders); • Details of proposed treatments for through traffic and construction vehicles in and around site

(to allow Ranger Services and Traffic & Design jointly coordinate the best parking outcomes); and

• The proposed route for trucks servicing the site including lay over areas where required (to allow Ranger Services and Traffic & Design jointly coordinate the most appropriate routes for trucks).

Developer contribution Engineering Infrastructure has identified in excess of $5 million dollars of work required to public infrastructure additions for the area west of Canning Highway. Substantially the improvements relate to road widenings where parking and cycling requirements are in conflict, the construction of roundabouts to provide better intersection control and traffic signal upgrades to improve pedestrian connectivity across the major road. Based on the area affected within this sector a unit rate of $23 per square metre of development lot could be applied as a contribution.

2/3

Application for Planning Approval Requiring Engineering Comments

With a site area of 1,113 square metres the developer could be requested to contribute $25,600 for future Infrastructure Improvement works.

Name: LES CROXFORD

MANAGER ENGINEERING INFRASTRUCTURE Date: 25 JULY 2017

3/3

MEMORANDUM

To: Cameron Howell- Senior Planning Officer, Development Services

From: Ermiyas Bulli - Environmental Health Officer, Development Services

Date: 18 July 2017

Reference: RO1/87; 11.2017.233.1

Subject: Proposed 23 Multiple Dwellings in a 6 Storey Building plus 1 Basement Level – Lot 5 (No. 87) Robert Street COMO

Hi Cameron In assessing this proposal for Environmental Health related comments, the following applies; Waste Management ●It is noted in the Waste Management Plan (WMP) the volume of recycle waste is

not sufficient and was not calculated according to current City of South Perth Waste Management Guidelines. The City’s calculations require increased recycling volume and potentially increased services. However, the storage for the recycle and waste bins within the bin compound must be sufficient and shown on the plan.

Laundry

●There are no designated laundry locations for the following apartments;

1) Level1 - Apartment 2 2) Level2 - Apartment 7 3) Level3 - Apartment 12 4) Level4 - Apartment 16 & 17 5) Level5 - Apartment 20 & 21

● Laundries must be clearly identified on the plan for each apartment.

Noise generally All mechanical ventilation services, motors and pumps e.g. air conditioners to be located in a position so as not to create a noise nuisance as determined by the Environmental Protection Act 1986 and Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997. Car park Ventilation Car park ventilation to be designed to ensure that the carbon monoxide build up in the parking area does not exceed 50 ppm per hour in accordance with the Health Act (Carbon Monoxide) Regulations 1975. Regards Ermiyas Bulli ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

Location Plan and Images

Property Location: Lot 5 (No. 87) Robert Street, Como Development Description: Proposed 23 Multiple Dwellings within a 6

Storey plus Basement Building DAP Name: Metro Central JDAP Applicant: MJA Studio Owner: ABN Projects Pty Ltd Value of Development: $7.2 million LG Reference: 11.2017.233.1 Responsible Authority: City of South Perth DAP File No: DAP/17/01250 Report Due Date: 22 September 2017 Application Received Date: 29 June 2016 The location of the development site within the Canning Bridge Activity Centre is shown below:

Location Plan and Images | Page 1

Aerial Photograph (March 2017)

3D Survey (2016) – Facing West

Location Plan and Images | Page 2

3D Survey (2016) – Facing West

3D Survey (2016) – Facing East

Location Plan and Images | Page 3

3D Survey (2016) – Facing North

3D Survey (2016) – Facing South

Location Plan and Images | Page 4

3D Survey (2016) – Facing North West

3D Survey (2016) – Facing South West

Location Plan and Images | Page 5

3D Survey (2016) – Facing North East

3D Survey (2016) – Facing South East

Location Plan and Images | Page 6

Proposed View – Facing North West *Using the Applicant’s 3D Building Model

Proposed View – Facing South West *Using the Applicant’s 3D Building Model

Location Plan and Images | Page 7

Proposed View – Facing North East *Using the Applicant’s 3D Building Model

Proposed View – Facing South East *Using the Applicant’s 3D Building Model

Location Plan and Images | Page 8