OBJECTIVESOBJECTIVES

6.6. To compare road safety in a selected To compare road safety in a selected number of case studies:number of case studies:

1.1. Identify good practice in both LICs and Identify good practice in both LICs and HICsHICs

2.2. Identify shortcomingsIdentify shortcomings3.3. Summarise lessons learnedSummarise lessons learned

6.6. Output: GRSP Guidance notes for those Output: GRSP Guidance notes for those involved in RSinvolved in RS

13 CASE STUDIES13 CASE STUDIES

Survey by letter/email/phone/face-to-face:Survey by letter/email/phone/face-to-face: OrganisationOrganisation PlansPlans FundingFunding Private Sector ParticipationPrivate Sector Participation

HICHIC Asia/PacificAsia/Pacific AfricaAfrica LACLACNZNZ Bangalore (Ind) EthiopiaBangalore (Ind) Ethiopia ChileChileSwedenSweden Bangladesh Bangladesh GhanaGhanaUKUK FijiFiji South AfricaSouth AfricaVictoria Victoria Indonesia Indonesia ZambiaZambia(Aus)(Aus)

ORGANISATION RECOMMENDATIONSORGANISATION RECOMMENDATIONS

GRADUAL APPROACHGRADUAL APPROACH

1.1. Define lead responsibility e.g. road Define lead responsibility e.g. road authorityauthority

2.2. Police and engineers work togetherPolice and engineers work together3.3. Begin with small NRSCs Begin with small NRSCs 4.4. Use subcommitteesUse subcommittees

5.5. Members chosen on commitment Members chosen on commitment

6.6. Resources are requiredResources are required

PLAN RECOMMENDATIONSPLAN RECOMMENDATIONS

1.1. Define budgetDefine budget

2.2. Address funding - key priorityAddress funding - key priority

3.3. Local staff to have lead role Local staff to have lead role

4.4. Identify opportunity rather than need Identify opportunity rather than need

5.5. Implementing organisations’ approval Implementing organisations’ approval requiredrequired

6.6. Performance indicators to be agreedPerformance indicators to be agreed

7.7. Annual work programmesAnnual work programmes

8.8. Donor assistance with implementationDonor assistance with implementation

FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONSFUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS

1.1. Funding requires technical specialistsFunding requires technical specialists

2.2. RS is a public sector responsibility - RS is a public sector responsibility - dedicated RS budget from Government/ dedicated RS budget from Government/ Road maintenance should fund activitiesRoad maintenance should fund activities

3.3. Road users should contribute to RS fundsRoad users should contribute to RS funds

4.4. Funds from traffic fines should contribute Funds from traffic fines should contribute to RSto RS

5.5. Funds should be setup to cover inter-Funds should be setup to cover inter-sectoral RS activitiessectoral RS activities

BUSINESS SECTOR RECOMMENDATIONSBUSINESS SECTOR RECOMMENDATIONS

1.1. Increase involvement of BS in promotion of Increase involvement of BS in promotion of RS and strategyRS and strategy

2.2. Use BS management skillsUse BS management skills

3.3. Encourage best practice e.g. risk Encourage best practice e.g. risk management/driver training management/driver training

4.4. Use H&S regulations to increase RSUse H&S regulations to increase RS

5.5. Match sponsors to RS activitiesMatch sponsors to RS activities

6.6. Promote BS awards to encourage RSPromote BS awards to encourage RS

NEXT STEPSNEXT STEPS

GRSP Information NotesGRSP Information Notes GRSP/WB Knowledge BaseGRSP/WB Knowledge Base DFID Transport LinksDFID Transport Links Weaknesses identified from current Weaknesses identified from current

study:study:

a) road user chargesa) road user charges

b) role of health sector in road safetyb) role of health sector in road safety

c) Guidance for Private Sectorc) Guidance for Private Sector

d) Insurance Industry researchd) Insurance Industry research