January 22, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona

Oasis Data MiningOasis Data Mining

January 22, 2008January 22, 2008

Presented by: Patrice BleauPresented by: Patrice Bleau Bombardier AerospaceBombardier Aerospace

January 22, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona

Mandate from Sept 18-19 2007;Mandate from Sept 18-19 2007;

Determine the data currently available and present potential report that can be extracted from download of the Oasis database.

January 22, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona

AAQG RMC Sub-Team members;AAQG RMC Sub-Team members;

• Susie Neal, Goodrich Corp.,Susie Neal, Goodrich Corp.,• Carl Blazik, SAI Global,Carl Blazik, SAI Global,• Lori Scheid-Gillepsie ANAB,Lori Scheid-Gillepsie ANAB,• Patrice Bleau, Bombardier Aerospace Patrice Bleau, Bombardier Aerospace

AAQG RMC Contributors;AAQG RMC Contributors;• Jay Myers, SAEJay Myers, SAE• Tim Lee, BoeingTim Lee, Boeing

January 22, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona

Reports identified to be generated Reports identified to be generated from Oasis massive data downloadfrom Oasis massive data download

• 1) Analysis of Assessment Data:

• Number of Major NC’s by clause of Standard 9100/9110;

• Number of minor NC’s by clause of Standard 9100/9110.

January 22, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona

Assessment DataAssessment Data

AS9100 AMA 4.1 MA 4.2 MA 4.3 MA 5.1 MA 5.2 MA 5.3 MA 5.4 MA 5.5 MA 5.6 MA 6.1 MA 6.2 MA 6.3 MA 6.4 MA 7.1 MA 7.2 MA 7.3 MA 7.4 MA

33 39 13 6 1 8 15 1 33 4 24 0 0 2 9 10 47

Minor 4.1 mi 4.2 mi 4.3 mi 5.1 mi 5.2 mi 5.3 mi 5.4 mi 5.5 mi 5.6 mi 6.1 mi 6.2 mi 6.3 mi 6.4 mi 7.1 mi 7.2 mi 7.3 mi 7.4 mi90 1019 96 13 1 59 116 55 193 14 273 62 15 48 163 107 743

AS9100 BMA 4.1 MA 4.2 MA 4.3 MA 5.1 MA 5.2 MA 5.3 MA 5.4 MA 5.5 MA 5.6 MA 6.1 MA 6.2 MA 6.3 MA 6.4 MA 7.1 MA 7.2 MA 7.3 MA 7.4 MA

57 166 22 25 2 9 54 10 134 9 70 14 3 7 34 28 208

Minor 4.1 mi 4.2 mi 4.3 mi 5.1 mi 5.2 mi 5.3 mi 5.4 mi 5.5 mi 5.6 mi 6.1 mi 6.2 mi 6.3 mi 6.4 mi 7.1 mi 7.2 mi 7.3 mi 7.4 mi396 5487 352 53 17 236 626 235 1249 49 1624 459 149 246 876 579 4182

AS9110 MA 4.1 MA 4.2 MA 4.3 MA 5.1 MA 5.2 MA 5.3 MA 5.4 MA 5.5 MA 5.6 MA 6.1 MA 6.2 MA 6.3 MA 6.4 MA 7.1 MA 7.2 MA 7.3 MA 7.4 MA

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Minor 4.1 mi 4.2 mi 4.3 mi 5.1 mi 5.2 mi 5.3 mi 5.4 mi 5.5 mi 5.6 mi 6.1 mi 6.2 mi 6.3 mi 6.4 mi 7.1 mi 7.2 mi 7.3 mi 7.4 mi0 20 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 0 9 0 1 0 3 1 13

January 22, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona

Assessment Data cont’dAssessment Data cont’d

AS9100 A cont'd7.5 MA 7.6 MA 8.1 MA 8.2 MA 8.3 MA 8.4 MA 8.5 MA

40 15 5 102 25 10 41

7.5 mi 7.6 mi 8.1 mi 8.2 mi 8.3 mi 8.4 mi762 369 15 672 350 56

AS9100 B cont 'd7.5 MA 7.6 MA 8.1 MA 8.2 MA 8.3 MA 8.4 MA 8.5 MA

196 107 9 398 123 29 228

7.5 mi 7.6 mi 8.1 mi 8.2 mi 8.3 mi 8.4 mi 8.5 mi5765 2340 68 4304 1917 322 2715

AS9110 cont'd MA 7.5 MA 7.6 MA 8.1 MA 8.2 MA 8.3 MA 8.4 MA 8.5 MA

2 0 0 1 0 0 1

Minor 7.5 mi 7.6 mi 8.1 mi 8.2 mi 8.3 mi 8.4 mi 8.5 mi13 3 0 5 8 0 2

January 22, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona

Reports generate from Oasis massive Reports generate from Oasis massive data downloaddata download

• 2) Analysis / Oversight of CRB performance:

• Average score given• Average MA's and mi's• Score per CRB,

January 22, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona

CRB PERFORMANCECRB PERFORMANCE

ID # of AuditsTotal Major

Total Minor

Average Major

Average Minor

Score Total

Score Average

1 2 0 19 0.0 9.5 170.5 852 15 0 62 0.0 4.1 1376.6 923 508 68 1798 0.1 3.5 41968.6 834 106 10 404 0.1 3.8 9894 935 368 26 1421 0.1 3.9 30977.4 846 72 1 130 0.0 1.8 6915.2 967 685 26 1000 0.0 1.5 66804.8 988 1037 117 2203 0.1 2.1 94240 919 7 5 24 0.7 3.4 641.4 92

10 168 1074 1229 6.4 7.3 15629 9311 3 0 8 0.0 2.7 285 9512 8 0 13 0.0 1.6 787.1 9813 44 14 121 0.3 2.8 3936.2 8914 163 136 605 0.8 3.7 16076.4 9915 2 0 3 0.0 1.5 196.5 98

January 22, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona

Reports generate from Oasis massive Reports generate from Oasis massive data downloaddata download

• 3) Auditor Data:• Average score given;• Number of NC’s by AEA (Team leader) by clause

of Standards and categorization, i.e., Majors and minors.

OASIS currently does not capture who the lead auditor was it only captures who the AEAs were as listed by the CRBs. This data will not be available until completion of development project for Oasis database.

January 22, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona

Reports generate from Oasis massive Reports generate from Oasis massive data downloaddata download

• 4) Feedback Process:• How can a report be generated if

feedback consist of free text type of data?

Some of the data about the feedback is textual (the actual feedback) while other is controlled (controlled list/dropdown). Other data are also captured (i.e., supplier and cert number)

when the user selected to contact the CRB.

January 22, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona

FEEDBACK PROCESSFEEDBACK PROCESSFeedback ID Stat Reason for Contact Days Open

48 OPEN Data correction

83 OPEN Questions about the certificate

70 OPEN Questions about the certificate

27 CLOSE Questions about the certificate 5

49 CLOSE Data correction 97

142 OPEN Data correction

59 OPEN Data correction

80 CLOSE Questions about the certificate 110

78 CLOSE Data correction 67

163 CLOSE Data correction 031 OPEN Considerations for future audits

153 CLOSE Data correction 2

January 22, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona

FEEDBACK PROCESSFEEDBACK PROCESS

Feedback IDStat Reason for Contact Subject48 OPEN Data correction Complement on Summary

83 OPEN Questions about the certificate TW Metals - Wichita

70 OPEN Questions about the certificate Certifications

27 CLOSEQuestions about the certificate ICOP Cert Expiration

49 CLOSEData correction OAssi information details

142 OPEN Data correction Details in OAsis

59 OPEN Data correction Certificate issue date

80 CLOSEQuestions about the certificate Re-certification

78 CLOSEData correction Details on CAR in OASIS

163 CLOSEData correction Supplier name

154 OPEN Data correction Scoring Data

131 OPEN Feedback about the supplier Mängel im QM System

January 22, 2008 – Phoenix, Arizona

QUESTIONS?QUESTIONS?