NRC Form 555 Summary of Negotiations J5645 w/ Attach. (38 ... · .COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK...

41 NRC FORM 555 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION JOB CODE(6-1998)NRCMD 11.7

SUMMARY OF NEGOTIATIONS J5645

NAME OF LABORATORY NRC OFFICE NRC DIVISION

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) NMSS SFSTPROJECT TITLE

International and Domestic Transportation Safety Regulatory Program Support

SUMMARY OF ISSUES DISCUSSEDAPPROACH

ORNL will review, evaluate, develop, and revise international and domestic transportation safety regulations and guidance,transportation environmental impact reports, NUREG reports, and any supporting documents. Participation inCoordinated Research Projects, international meetings, and conferences will also be provided.

SCOPE

ORNL will provide technical assistance services to support transportation safety programmatic needs.

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

Proposed personnel possess experience with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the development ofcurrent and previous IAEA, Department of Transportation (DOT), and NRC transportation safety regulations and guides.In depth knowledge of radioactive material and process is necessary.

TRAVEL

Travel to NRC headquarters to discuss requirements and progress, trips to IAEA meetings, and public meetings is requiredduring the performance period.

SCHEDULE

Proposed schedules for the project deliverables are acceptable as they meet the NRC's needs.

SUBCONTRACT/CONSULTANT EFFORT

Database and programming technical suport may be required. If necessary, NRC will review proposed support andapprove.

REPORT REQUIREMENTS

Various letter reports, domestic transportation schedules, charts summarizing NRC and DOT transportation safetyregulations, and draft and final reports covering all findings will be submitted in accordance with the SOW.

OTHER DELIVERABLES

Monthly letter status reports summarizing both technical and financial status information.

ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST

ORNL didn't provide all required info. in their 9/2 proposal, therefore revisions were requested to section 11 of theproposal based on language approved by NRC's OGC. SNL completed the changes and there are no COI concerns. IfORNL does perform similiar work the NRC will be informed of all effort.

NR OR 5 I6198 FOIPINA S i oma esge sngn-r-NRC FORM 555 (6-1998) FOR OPTIONAL USE T hisiorm Was designed using Inl-ormýL

C-/;ý-

SUMMARY OF ISSUES DISCUSSED (continued)

MATERIALS

None

EQUIPMENT PURCHASE

No capital equipment purchases are anticipated.

REQUIRED START DATE

09/09

SPENDING PLAN

Submitted spending plan has been reviewed and is accepted.

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OR TELECOMMUNICATIONS COORDINATION

None

COST

The $805K proposed for the project is determined fair and reasonable based on a comparison to the IGCE of $790K andcosts proposed under the previous agreement with ORNL for the same services. ORNL.

W THE PROPOSED COSTS WERE CONSIDERED REASONABLE, GIVEN THE SKILL MIX, LEVEL OF EFFORT REQUIRED AND DEGREEOF COMPLEXITY INVOLVED IN THE PROPOSED EFFORT. NO EXCEPTIONS WERE TAKEN TO THE NRC SOW.

F1 THE ITEMS NOTED ABOVE WERE DISCUSSED AND/OR CLARIFIED WITH THE DOE LABORATORY.

Z THE FOLLOWING CHANGES TO THE NRC SOW WERE AGREED UPON.

SOTHER COMMENTS

ORNL has performed the same type of work for the NRC for many years and has used some of the same personnelIn addition, the PM has worked on other NRC projects. Proposed direct labor, overhead, G&A, & FAC costs for thifollow-on agreement are consistent with those under the prior agreement.

SIGNATURE(Printed or Typed Name) SIGNATUR, DATE

Penelope Kinney 09/13/2009

EVALUATION OF PROPOSALSL

REVIEW TECHNICAL SUBSTANCE JOB CODF TASK 4r • 1 (6I Does the technical proposal meet the requirements stated in the SOW and isthe work ,..jposed consistent with NM SS program needs?

YESI A N01 I N/All •

2. Are the work methods suggested in the proposal appropriate to meetingthe requ~i•ments of the SOW?

YESI VI Nci I NIA !3. Does the proposal adequately discuss anticipated difficulties and problem areas

as well as recommended resolutions?

YESI I N Ol I NWAR /I4. Are the schedules and reporting requirements stated in the proposal reasonable

and consistent with the requirements of the SOW?

YES I V4( N01 I N/Al I

REVIEW COSTS

1. Do proposed costs appear reasonable in all categories?

YESI VI NO I N/Al 1-J

2. Are personniel proposed appropriate to carrying out the task outlined in the SOW?

Y E S IA NoI I- N/Al

3. Is the total number of labor hours proposed reasonable with respect to therequirements of the SOW?

YESIVI N(A I N/Al I4. Are the travel estimates proposed reasonable WRT the requirements of the SOW?

YESI "I/ NCII I N/Al I

5. Are the estimates of subcontractor/consultants efforts reasonable?

YESIIA' N O I N/Al IREVIEW FOR COMPLETENESS

1 . Is the administrative information in the proposal correct?

YES IV1 NOI I N/Al I2. Are the staff efforts and cost sections complete?

YES VI NCO I N/Al I3. Are task schedules complete?

YESIVI No0 I N/Al I1. Is the proposal responsive to all the requirements of the SOW?

YESIV(f NOd I N/Al I3 . Is there any conflict of interest in the performance of the task by the Lab?

YES1 I N 0 V/I N/Al *

;ERTIFICATIONS (check box that applies)

certfy that the task proposal is acceptable

certify that the prosposal is acceptable withminor modifications

certify that the proposal is unacceptable

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY.MANAGED BY UT-BATTELLE FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

NRC Programs

P.O. Box 2006Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6162

Phone; (865) 576-8130Fax: (865) 241-4069

Internet: [email protected]

September 2, 2009

Ms. Penelope KinneyOffice of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionMail Stop EI-D2MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms. Kinney:

Project and Cost Proposal for FY 2009 "International and Domestic Transportation Safety RegulatoryProgram Support," (Interagency Agreement DQE No. 1886-V173-09, JCN J5645)

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has prepared the subject Project and Cost Proposal and issubmitting it as a final proposal unless negotiations deem a revision to be necessary. This proposal is beingsubmitted in response to the Statement of Work and Request for Proposal dated August 5, 2009.

Consistent with the Department of Energy's (DOE) full cost recovery policy, DOE collects, as part of itsstandard indirect cost rate, a Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) cost levied on allmonies received at the laboratory. The estimated amount of LDRD costs is identified in the proposal costestimate section. The DOE believes that LDRD efforts provide opportunities in research that are instrumentalin maintaining cutting edge science capabilities that benefit all customers of the laboratory. The Departmentwill conclude that by approving and providing funds to DOE to perform work under this proposal, youacknowledge that such activities are beneficial to your organization and consistent with appropriation acts thatprovide funds to you.

Questions relative to this proposal should be directed to me as the ORNL Program Manager at(865) 576-8130.

Sincerely,

Julie J. SimpsonManager, NRC Programs

c/enc: L. D. Aloisi S. R. Martin, Jr., DOE-OROR. G. Baker P. N. RaderD. C. Christensen R. R. RawlT. R. Hope, DOE-ORO C. T. Rice (File-RC)R. A. Martin D. J. Sams

PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

NRC FORM 189 (Part 1) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE PROPOSAL SENT

(o6-98) 09/02/09

NRCMD 11.7 DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND X NEW FY 2010

COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK REVISION NUMBER

PROJECT TITLE JOB CODE

International and Domestic Transportation Safety Regulatory Program Support J5645NRC OFFICE NRC B&R NUMBER

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards 95015366270DOE CONTRACTOR NRC BOC CODE

UT-Battelle, LLC 253D

SITE Oak Ridge National Laboratory CONTRACTOR ACCOUNT NUMBER

Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831 41WV18501COGNIZANT PERSONNEL ORGANIZATION TELEPHONE NO. DOE B&R NUMBER

40 1001 05NRC PROJECT MANAGER PERIOD OF PERFORMANCEJohn R. Cook NMSS/DSFST (301)492-3318OTHER NRC TECHNICAL STAFF PROJECT START DATE

Penelope M, Kinney NMSS/PBPA (301) 493-3248 9/14/2009

DOE PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT END DATE

S. R. Martin, Jr. DOE-ORO (865) 576-4522 11/30/2011LABORATORY PROGRAM MANAGER

J. J. Simpson ORNL/NTPO (865) 576-8130LABORATORY PROJECT MANAGER

R. R. Rawl ORNL/GSNP (865) 574-6461PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR(S)

R. R. Rawl ORNL/GSNP (865) 574-6461KEY PERSONNELMATT FELDMAN ORNL/GNSTD (865) 946-1291MARK HAWK ORNL/GNSTD (865) 946-1275PAT SCOFIELD ORNL/EPWSD (865) 574-7354

STAFF YEARS OF EFFORT FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013

DIRECT SCIENTIFIC/TECHNICAL 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.2

OTHER DIRECT (INCL. SUBCONTRACT SUPPORT) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

TOTAL DIRECT STAFF YEARS 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.2

COST PROPOSAL (Round to Nearast Thousand S)

DIRECT LABOR (SCIENTIFIC/TECHNICAL) 46 294 112 59

OVERHEAD (INCLUDED IN DIRECT LABOR)

MATERIALS/SERVICES 2 12 5 3

TRAVEL FOREIGN 0 6 3 3

DOMESTIC 0 6 6 6

SUBCONTRACT(S) 0 0 0 0

OTHER DIRECT 0 0 0 0

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES* 20 125 48 26TOTAL ESTIMATED LABORATORY 68 443 174 97

PROJECT COSTFEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGE 2 13 5 3

TOTAL DOE PROJECT COST 70 456 179 100

CARRYOVER FROM PRIOR FY 0 100 100 100

CARRYOVER TO NEXT FY 100 ]00 100 0

TOTAL FUNDING REQUIRED 170 456 179 0

*Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) cost included. See Section 13 for details.

NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 1 OF 18

NRC FORM 189 (Part 2) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION JOB CODE

J5645

NRCMD 11.7 DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND DATECOST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK 9/02/2009

FOR PROJECTS, EXCLUDING TASK ORDERS AND TASK ORDER AGREEMENTS

PROJECT TITLE International and Domestic Transportation Safety Regulatory Program Support

DOE PROPOSING ORGANIZATION

UT-Battelle, LLCOak Ridge National Laboratory

ESTIMATED COST BY TASK ($K)

TASK I TASK 2 TASK 3 TASK 4 FAC

120 125 340 197 23

TASK 6 TASK 7 TASK 8 TASK 9 TASK 10

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

A NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION IS PROVIDED ON EACH OF THE FOLLOWING TOPICS IN THE ORDER LISTED.

1. OBJECTIVES OF PROPOSED WORK 8. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE

2. SUMMARY OF PRIOR EFFORTS 9. SUBCONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT AND MAJOR PROCUREMENTINFORMATION*

3. WORK TO BE PERFORMED AND EXPECTED RESULTS 10. SPECIAL FACILITIES, IF REQUIRED

4. PROPOSED PERSONNEL - INCLUDE RESUMES 11. CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST INFORMATION

5. MEETINGS/TRAVEL 12. CLASSIFICATION OR SENSITIVITY, IF APPLICABLE(e.g., safeguards, proprietary, other)

6. NRC FURNISHED MATERIALS 13. ADDENDUM: (A) INTERPRETATIONS OF STATEMENT OFWORK, (B) COST INFORMATION, AND (C) SCHEDULE

INFORMATION

7. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTS 14. SPENDING PLAN

* PROJECTS WITH COST-TYPE SUBCONTRACTS CANNOT BE CLOSED OUT UNTIL REQUIRED DCAA AUDITS HAVE BEEN CONDUCTED.

SIGNATURE - APPROVAL AUTHORITY DATE

9/02/2009

J. J. Simpson, Manager, NRC Programs

NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 2 OF 18

NRC FORM 189 (Continued) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION JOB CODE

(06-98) J5645NRCMD 11.7 DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND DATE

.COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK 9/02/2009


1. OBJECTIVES OF PROPOSED WORK:

The objective of this agreement is to support the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) safety mission in the transportation ofradioactive materials. The specific support activities required include:

* Development, review and revision of international [e.g., International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)] transportation safetyregulations and guidance, including development, review and comment of related documents, participation in CoordinatedResearch Projects (CRP), international meetings or conferences, or other activities.

• Development, review and revision of domestic transportation safety regulations and guidance, other supporting documentsand activities, including those addressed in the Department of Transportation (DOT)/NRC Memorandum of Understanding(MOU).

" Development, evaluation or review of transportation environmental impacts, including statements and assessments, andexpert peer review of NUREGS and other reports.

* American National Standards Institute (ANSI) N14 Committee activities.

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) shall provide technical assistance necessary for the NRC to satisfy transportation safetyprogrammatic needs. Since the NRC provides significant support for international and domestic transportation safety regulation,specialized technical assistance in fulfilling its obligations is required. This includes support of compatible or adjunct domestictransportation safety regulatory activities. The assistance needed under this agreement is recurring; however, specific needs interms of subject area or level of effort required cannot be forecast in advance. Therefore work will be identified under tasks asthe needs develop.

2. SUMMARY OF PRIOR EFFORTS:

ORNL has provided transportation-related technical support to NRC on several occasions. Under B0009 Task 23, a study ofspent fuel cask contamination and the resulting worker and public doses was performed to support NRC participation in theIAEA CRP on contamination. Under J5504, technical support has also been provided in the analysis of radiation doses related tothe transportation of naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) and related material. Technical support has also beenprovided at IAEA meetings and related activities, the N 14 standards development activities, and evaluation of accident andincident information.

3. WORK TO BE PERFORMED AND EXPECTED RESULTS:

Background

The roles of DOT and the NRC in the regulation of the transportation of radioactive materials were described in a MOU signedon June 8, 1979. Generally, the DOT is responsible for regulating safety in transportation of all hazardous materials, includingradioactive materials, and the NRC is responsible for regulating safety in receipt, possession, use, and transfer of byproducts,source, and special nuclear materials. The NRC reviews and approves or denies approval of package designs for fissile materialsand for other radioactive materials (other than low specific activity materials) in quantities exceeding Type A limits, as defined in10 CFR Part 7 1.

The MOU recognizes DOT as the national competent authority with respect to the administrative requirements set forth in theregulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Materials of the IAEA. Under the MOU, the NRC is responsible for providingto the national competent authority (DOT) technical support and advice pertaining to the transportation of radioactive materials.The DOT also acts as the representative of the United States to the IAEA and other international groups on matters pertaining tothe administrative and safety regulatory aspects of the transportation of radioactive materials. Under the MOU, the NRC isresponsible for providing technical support and advice to the DOT in this capacity.

NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 3 OF 18


(06-98) J5645

NRCMD 11. DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND DATE

COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK 9/02/2009


The ANSI N 14 Committee engages in the development of industry standards that benefit radioactive material packaging andtransportation safety. NRC is supporting the continuing operation of this Committee to preserve accrual of these safety benefitsto the transport community.

NRC engages in research activities to support the international and domestic transportation safety regulatory programs.

Therefore, the NRC requires technical support in this regard.

Summary

All work under this agreement will be assigned on a task basis. The assistance needed under this agreement is recurring;however, specific needs in terms of subject area or level of effort required cannot be entirely forecast in advance. Currently theNRC has identified work under the following tasks. Additional tasks with work requirements or revisions to the tasks below willbe incorporated via modifications to this agreement as new needs arise. Proposals will be requested for any new work.

Task 1: International Transportation SafetyORNL shall develop draft revisions and review and comment on proposed revisions to the international (e.g., LAEA) radioactivematerial transportation safety regulations, guidance and related documents. ORNL shall also prepare materials for and participatein the CRP, international meetings or conferences, or other activities. ORNL shall provide support for international regulatoryand guidance changes related to radioactive material transportation safety and security, including preparation of rule andguidance text and impact assessments for Subtasks I and 2 below.

Subtask I Package surface contamination support

A proposal for package surface contamination limits has been developed for TRANSSC that is dose-based, radionuclide-specific,and provides relief for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) package surface contamination, yet still retains the 4 Bq/cm2 (beta and gammaemitters) and 0.4 Bq/cm2 (alpha emitters) values for those member states with commitments to these values. This task involvescoordination among parties including the United Kingdom's (U.K.) Health Protection Agency (HPA) and member states toconfirm dose-based contamination limit values and capping rules. The practicality and complexity (or ease of) implementing therecommendations and methodology proposed for this proposal should be addressed. The evaluation should include identificationand resolution of possible issues and problems. The results of these analyses shall be presented in letter reports, technical papersand presentations as needed to support the presentation of results to IAEA and other forums.

Estimated Completion Date: TBD by IAEA

Estimated Level of Effort: 2 staff-weeks

Subtask 2 NORM

The apparent double standard related to exemptions for shipments of natural ores or NORM as compared with materials that areintended to be processed for their radionuclides shall be evaluated under this subtask and the basis for a similar exemption formaterial with equivalent risk shall be developed by QRNL. Evaluation results shall be provided in letter reports and submitted tothe NRC Project Manager. This subtask includes detailed analysis of the exposure scenarios and treatment of daughter productsin setting the exemption values, particularly to determine if the exposure scenarios are appropriate for: Th-natural, U-natural, amixture of radionuclides representative of pipe scale, and a mixture of radionuclides typical of a rare earth ore. ORNL shalldetermine if there is any adequate risk-basis or other bases for differentiating between materials that are intended for processingto use their radionuclides and other materials, taking the daughter products into account in both cases.

NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 4 OF 18


(06-98) J5645

NRCMD11.7 DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND DATE



ORNL shall provide support for NRC participation in the IAEA CRP on exemptions for low level NORM materials. Technicalanalysis shall be performed as described in the U.S. proposed research agreement entitled "Evaluation of Public and WorkerDoses due to the Transport of Low Level Material." This effort includes preparing for and participating in one or more foreignmeetings related to the CRP. Results shall be documented and reported to the IAEA CRP and may include one foreign trip.



Subtask 3 AI/A2 values

The general transportation safety aspects for radioactive materials in transit shall be reviewed by reconsideration of the Al/A2values, based on revision of ICRP dose coefficients and other factors. This work may also include review and possible revisionof the Q-system, and contributing to the development of computer codes to calculate A I/A2 values. This subtask may requirecoordination with the U.K. HPA. ORNL shall provide support for international regulatory and guidance changes regardingAI/A2 and exemption values, including preparation of rule and guidance text and impact assessments. One foreign trip may berequired to support this subtask.



Task 2: Domestic Transportation SafetyORNL shall develop, review and revise domestic radioactive material transportation safety regulations and guidance, and othersupporting documents and activities, including those addressed in the DOT/NRC MOU.

Subtask I ORNL shall support the current NRC rulemaking activity for compatibility changes to 49 CFR and 10 CFR and forother domestic regulatory changes, including preparation of rule and guidance text and impact assessments.

Estimated Completion Date: November 30, 2011


Subtask 2. ORNL shall update and provide laminated charts that summarize domestic radioactive material transportation safetyrequirements for NRC and state inspectors.

Estimated Completion Date: June 30, 2010


Subtask 3 ORNL shall update NUREG-1 660 "U.S.-Specific Schedules of Requirements for Transport of Specified Types ofRadioactive Material Consignments" (January 1999) based on the most recently published IAEA Schedules and DOTregulations.

Estimated Completion Date: September 30, 2010

Estimated Level of Effort: 6 staff weeks

NRC FORM 189 O10-93) PAGE 5 OF 18





Task 3: Transportation Impact AssessmentORNL shall develop, evaluate or review transportation environmental impacts, including statements and assessments, and shallconduct expert peer reviews of NUREGs and other reports.

Subtask I Expert Peer Review of Draft NUREG on Spent Fuel Transportation Risk

ORNL shall convene a panel of internationally recognized experts on spent fuel transportation to review, assess, and providecomment on the Sandia National Laboratory (SNL) Draft NUREG on Spent Fuel Transportation Risk Assessment, and, at therequest of the NRC Project Manager, review and provide comment on SNL proposed responses to public comments on the DraftNUREG. The panel member's areas of expertise shall include structural, mechanical, thermal, materials, spent fuel compositionand behavior, finite element modeling, analytical codes including PRQNTO, PRESTO, and MELCOR and transportation riskassessment codes including RADTRAN and RISKIND.

The Panel shall commence its review of the Draft NUREG once the document has been provided by the NRC Project Manager.The Panel shall consider previous related efforts for background and context for its review. In conducting its review, the Panelshall determine whether the assumptions are appropriate and whether the results are accurate, and may include verification ofinput and output values. Full confirmatory analyses are not required but may be performed if deemed necessary. The Panel shallcomment on the Draft NUREG technical bases, assumptions, summaries, results and comparisons, including identification of anyerrors of commission or omission. Text clarity, cohesiveness, conciseness, and overall accessibility to content for members of thepublic, including the layout, figures, tables and diagrams must also be addressed. An overall assessment of comments pertainingto individual factors or values that could understate or overstate actual likely spent fuel transportation risks shall be discussed.Members of the Panel shall participate in a meeting at SNL to identify, discuss, and resolve comments on the Draft NUREG.Assistance from the Panel may be required to support a public meeting on the Draft NUREG. If this support is necessary theNRC Project Manager will request assistance at least sixty calendar days in advance of the meeting.

At the direction of the NRC Project Manager, the Panel may also be asked to review and comment on SNL's proposed responsesto public comments to ensure comments have been appropriately binned and/or combined, that issues have been properlycharacterized and/or summarized, and that responses are clear, complete, and have a sound technical bases. The Panel shallprovide its comments to the NRC Project Manager.

Estimated Completion Date: January 11,2011


Subtask 2 Transportation Incident Database

ORNL shall determine the feasibility of developing and maintaining a capability to produce U.S. data entry to IAEA'sEVTRAM, and produce reports on annual U.S. radioactive material transportation incidents and accidents. This subtask has thefollowing three subtasks:

Subtask 2.1 Conduct a scoping study to determine the requirements to establish the database: 1) examine data needs; 2) identifydata resources; and 3) identify/resolve compatibility issues and other potential problems. Issues to address include how toexpand/supplement the 40 data fields collected in Hazardous Materials Incident Reports (HMIR) to satisfy the 80 data fieldsrequested by IAEA. Once identified, proposed solutions to those issues shall be developed. Also, for accidents involving Type Bor fissile packages, approaches shall be identified on how to collect information on accident forces that currently are not capturedby DOT or IAEA. The Department of Energy's Transportation's Radioactive Material Incident Reports (RMIR) and the NuclearMaterial Event Database (NMED) should be considered as possible starting points. (Note: no actual data collection, analysis, etc.is to be conducted in this phase); and 4) provide an estimate of the costs to establish and maintain a database annually.



NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 6 OF 18





Subtask 2.2 Establish a test database using input from information provided to DOT via HMIR and other sources as identified in

Phase 1. Provide a presentation on test results to the Project Manager.

Estimated Completion Date: September 30, 2010

Estimated Level of Effort: I-staff week

Subtask 2.3 Upon approval from NRC, conduct ongoing effort to collect the incident information and add it to the database,provide the U.S. input to EVTRAM electronically, and prepare annual summary reports as a metric of radioactive materialtransport safety.


Estimated Level of Effort: I-staff week

Task 4; Development of National Consensus StandardsORNL shall ensure the operation of the N 14 Committee as an ANSI accredited Standards Development Organization. N14 shalldevelop and maintain ANSI approved standards for the packaging and transportation of radioactive material, including SNF.

The N14 Committee shall perform specific activities to ensure the continued functioning and accreditation ofNl4. Specifically,N14 shall continue to:

1. Provide management and administrative functions required for proper initiation of all new N1 4 standard projects; circulatingstandards for balloting; ensuring proper handling of balloting results and comment resolution; formal submission ofapproved standards to ANSI for final compliance with these procedures; and performing other activities required to maintainN 14's accredited status with ANSI;

2. Assist ANSI in the performance of periodic audits of N14, including providing records and information as needed;3. Organize and host the annual N1 4 Committee and N14 Management Committee meeting;4. Initiate the development of new standards or the revision of existing standards that are of particular interest to governmental

and industry bodies involved in spent fuel packaging and transportation activities;5. Provide easy access to N14 standards, both electronically and in print; and6. As requested by the NRC Project Manager, initiate the development of specific standards related to spent fuel packaging and

transportation.

The N 14 Committee shall be continued as an ANSI accredited Standards Development Organization. N 14 shall:

I. Respond to ANSI audit findings, identify any revisions needed to its operating procedures, and implement these revisions;2. Ensure the timely revision and maintenance of standards related to radioactive material packaging, particularly those related

to spent fuel transportation;3. Establish web-based access to the N14 standards;

ORNL shall prepare all draft and final products in an appropriate format. All reports shall be edited and reviewed by ORNL andchecked in accordance with the quality assurance requirements addressed under Section 13. Within the schedule identified underSection 6 and after receipt of NRC comments, the performing organization shall revise the draft report, incorporate the resolutionof comments, and submit a camera-ready copy and an NRC-compatible, electronic media copy of the final report.



RESEARCH QUALITY

The quality of NRC research programs are assessed each year by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. Within thecontext of their reviews of RES programs, the definition of quality research is based upon several major characteristics:

NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 7 OF 18


(06-98) J5645

NRCMD 11.7 DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND DATE



Results meet the objectives (75% of overall score)Justification of major assumptions (12%)Soundness of technical approach and results (52%)Uncertainties and sensitivities addressed (11%)

Documentation of research results and methods is adequate (25% of overall score)Clarity of presentation (16%)Identification of major assumptions (9%)

It is the responsibility of ORNL to ensure that these quality criteria are adequately addressed throughout the course of theresearch that is performed. The NRC project manager and technical monitor will review all research products with these criteriain mind.

4. PROPOSED PERSONNEL:

ORNL shall assure that the principal investigator is a nationally and internationally recognized radioactive material technicalexpert. The principal investigator shall be a scientist or engineer with in-depth experience in IAEA, U.S. DOT and NRCresponsibilities, internal organizations and their functions and rulemaking activities. In particular, the principal investigator shallhave experience in the development of current and previous IAEA, U.S. DOT and NRC transportation safety regulations andguides. The principal investigator shall have demonstrated recent IAEA experience.

The principal investigator must possess outstanding oral and written communication skills. The principal investigator shall eitherperform or provide technical oversight and continuity over all work performed on this project.

Richard R. Rawl will be the project manager and principal investigator. Pat Scofield, Matt Feldman, and Mark Hawk shall assistRichard Rawl.

5. MEETINGS/TRAVEL:

One trip to Rockville, MD for staff from ORNL is anticipated to consult with NRC technical staff on Tasks I and 2 during eachyear will be required. Foreign travel may be required each year in support of Task 1. Approval from the NRC is required priorto each foreign trip and a trip report shall be submitted to the Project Manager with a copy to the Technical Assistance ProjectManager.

Task 3 includes 3 person-trips to review the SNL draft NUREG, and to identify and resolve peer and public comments. Task 3may include 3 person-trips to support a public meeting on the draft NUREG. Task 3 may also include I foreign trip for a foreignexpert to participate in a peer review, comment and resolution process. Approval from the NRC is required prior to each foreigntrip and a trip report shall be submitted to the Project Manager with a copy to the Technical Assistance Project Manager.

Task 4 may require 3 person trips of 3 days each for N14 meetings in Washington, DC.

6. NRC FURNISHED MATERIALS:

None.

7. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROJECTS:

This project builds and expands on previous work completed under Job Code J5504, particularly for Task 1, Task 3 subtask 2,and Task 4.

NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 8 OF 18


(06-98) J5645

NRCMO11.7 DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND DATE



8. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULE:

8.1. Technical Reports

ORNL will provide the following technical reports:

Task 1. Subtask IProvide a response to comments on the IAEA change proposal on package surface contamination limits in TS-R-l and relatedguidance in TS-G-1.1.Estimated Completion Date: TBD by IAEA

Task 1. Subtask 2Provide a.letter report on the development and execution of the U.S. (NRC) NORM research plan.Estimated Completion Date: December 31, 2009

Task 1. Subtask 3Provide a letter report summarizing revised A,/A 2 values, other work completed, and any codes developed.Estimated Completion Date: June 30, 2010

Task 2. Subtask IProvide letter reports as requested.Estimated Completion Date: November 30, 2011

Task 2. Subtask 2Provide updated laminated charts summarizing NRC and DOT transportation safety regulations.Estimated Completion Date: June 30, 2010

Task 2. Subtask 3Provide a final copy of the domestic transportation schedules.Estimated Completion Date: September 30, 2010

Task 3. Subtask IProvide a letter report with Peer review group questions to SNL.Estimated Completion Date: April 30, 2010

Provide a letter report with Peer review preliminary findings.Estimated Completion Date: June 1, 2010

Provide a letter report with Peer review final findings.Estimated Completion Date: July 6, 2010

Provide a letter report on responses to public comment.Estimated Completion Date: January 11, 2011

Provide a letter status report of all 3 subtasks.Estimated Completion Date: November 15, 2011

Task 4. Development of National Consensus StandardsProvide management and administrative functions. This includes hosting meetings, conducting audits, and providing access toN 14 Commmittee Standards and documents. This is an ongoing task, with a continuing annual level of effort.Estimated Completion Date: November 30, 2011

During the performance period, NRC staff may visit ORNL for progress review meetings. For any meetings, ORNL will takemeeting notes and distribute to NRC.

NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 9 OF 18


(06-98) J5645

NRCMD I1.7 DOE LABORATORY PROJECT AND DATE



For all draft and final reports delivered under this agreement, ORNL will assure that an independent review and verification of allnumerical computations and mathematical equations and derivations are verified by qualified personnel other than the originalauthor(s) of the reports. If ORNL proposes to verify/check less than 100 percent of all computations and mathematical equationsand derivations in the report(s) (such as might be the case when there are a large number of routine, repetitive calculations),ORNL must first obtain written approval from the NMSS Project Manager. Computer generated calculations will not requireverification where the computer program has already been verified. The NMSS Technical Project Manager has the option ofauditing all documentation including project correspondence, drafts, calculations and unrefined data.

In addition, all reports, including those which do not contain numerical analyses, must be reviewed by ORNL's management andapproved with two signatures, one of which is for ORNL's management at a level above the program manager.

When revisions for the reports are issued, a section must be included in the revised report to document dates, reasons for, and thescope of all changes made since the issuance of the first ORNL approved report.

NRC has the option of appointing a Peer Group to review the draft report and make changes to the final report. ORNL mayrecommend candidates for the Peer Group for approval by the NMSS Technical Project Manager. On the occasion of dissent inthe content of the final report, the dissenting party will have the option of stating its viewpoints and findings in a section of thereport. Alternative Quality Assurance plans should be submitted for NRC review and approval.

8.2. Monthly Letter Status Report (MLSR)

ORNL will submit a MLSR by the 20t" day of each month to the NRC Project Manager with copies to the Technical AssistanceProject Manager and Spent Fuel Project Office Program Coordinator.

The MLSR will identify the title of the project, the job code, the principal investigator, the period of performance, and thereporting period. It will include a summary of each month's technical progress, list monthly spending, total spending to date, theremaining funds, and will contain information as shown in the NRC Management Directive 11.7. Any administrative or technicaldifficulties that may affect the schedule or costs of the project shall be immediately brought to the attention of the NRC projectmanager.

NRC is in the process of implementing a new document management system, Agency wide Documents Access and ManagementSystem (ADAMS). For the present, the Department of Energy (DOE) mail will not be placed in ADAMS. All documents mailedfrom DOE to NRC (e.g., letters, technical reports, NRC Form 189s, MLSRs, and other mail) should have "Addressee Only" onthe envelope to keep it from being entered into ADAMS. Send mail for the addressee and cc's as separate mailings. NRC Form173 will be accepted by the Office of the Chief Financial Officer with or without the "Addressee Only" designation.

NEW STANDARDS FOR CONTRACTORS WHO PREPARE NUREG-SERIES MANUSCRIPTS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) began to capture most of its official records electronically on January 1, 2000.The NRC will capture each final NUREG-series publication in its native application. Therefore, please submit your finalmanuscript that has been approved by your NRC Project Manager in both electronic and camera-ready copy.

All format guidance, as specified in NUREG-0650, Revision 2, will remain the same with one exception. You will no longer berequired to include the NUREG-series designator on the bottom of each page of the manuscript. The NRC will assign thisdesignator when we send the camera-ready copy to the printer and will place the designator on the cover, title page, and spine.The designator for each report will no longer be assigned when the decision to prepare a publication is made. The NRC'sPublishing Services Branch will inform the NRC Project Manager for the publication of the assigned designator when the finalmanuscript is sent to the printer.

For the electronic manuscript, ORNL shall prepare the text in Microsoft Word, and use any of the following file types for charts,spreadsheets, and the like.

NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 10 OF 18


(06-98) J5645




File Types to be Used for NUREG-Series Publications

File Type File Extension

Microsoft®Word® .doc

Microsoft® PowerPoint® .ppt

Microsoft®Excel xIs

Microsoft®Access .mdb

Portable Document Format .pdf

This list is subject to change if new software packages come into common use at NRC or by our licensees or other stakeholdersthat participate in the electronic submission process. If a portion of your'manuscript is from another source and you cannotobtain an acceptable electronic file type for this portion (e.g., an appendix from an old publication), the NRC can, if necessary,create a tagged image file format (file extension.tif) for that portion of your report. Note that you should continue to submitoriginal photographs, which will be scanned, since digitized photographs do not print well.

If you choose to publish a compact disk (CD) of your publication, place on the CD copies of the manuscript in both (1) a portabledocument format (PDF), (2) a Microsoft Word file format, and (3) an Adobe Acrobat Reader, or, alternatively, print instructionsfor obtaining a free copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader on the back cover insert of the jewel box.

9. SUBCONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT AND MAJOR PROCUREMENT INFORMATION:

DOE PROPERTY

In accordance with Management Directive 11.7, Part 9, Section 9.1.2 the laboratory proposal must include a description of theproperty required for project performance that has an estimated acquisition cost of $500 or more. The proposal must also identifythe potential development of NRC-funded software with a useful life of 2 years or more and a development cost of $500 or moreduring the project. NRC-funded software is software specifically developed for NRC by the laboratory and is generally thedeliverable for the project.

After the NRC reviews the list of property and NRC-funded software included in the laboratory proposal, any questionsregarding the acquisition of property or the development of NRC funded software will be addressed with the laboratory duringnegotiations. After negotiating project terms and conditions, NRC shall issue an NRC Form 173, "Standard Order for DOE Workauthorizing the work and approving acquisition of property or development of NRC-funded software.

Laboratories shall submit a written request to the NRC project manager for approval to develop additional NRC-funded softwareor purchase additional property with an estimated acquisition cost of $500 or more after work initiation. The project managershall approve or disapprove the acquisition or development of any additional items in writing.

DOE Laboratories shall report property, including software, with an acquisition cost of $500 or more in the monthly letter statusreport in the month the property or software was acquired. DOE laboratories shall provide a copy of all monthly letter statusreports to the regular distribution. DOE laboratories shall provide the information listed in Management Directive 11.7, Part 9,Section 9.1.2, for each item reported as appropriate, in the monthly letter status report.

A transportation incident database will be developed as part of Task 3.

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) RESOURCES

Not applicable. No IT resources are proposed.

NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 11 OF 18


(06-98) J5645




A. Subcontractor/Consultant Information

Database and programming technical support may be obtained from a subcontractor (as needed).

B. Equipment Purchases

No capital equipment purchases are anticipated under this project.

C. Major Procurements

None anticipated.

10. SPECIAL FACILITIES, IF REQUIRED:

No special facilities are required for the project.

11. CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST INFORMATION:

There are no known relationships between this organization and its employees or subcontractors with industries regulated by theNRC and suppliers thereof that might give rise to an apparent or actual conflict of interest regarding the work described in thisproposal.

The ORNL personnel listed in Section 4 perform work for industry and other Federal agencies in transportation safety areas suchas package performance testing and implementation of NRC regulations. However, these personnel do not support industry orother Federal agencies in the task areas included in this proposal with the exception of Task 4. Other Federal agencies maycontribute to the funding of ANSI N 14 activities (Task 4) in order to ensure the committee's completion of its responsibilities.

12. CLASSIFICATION OR SENSITIVITY, IF APPLICABLE (e.g., safeguards, proprietary, other):

This work is expected to be unclassified and not sensitive.

NRC INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY TRAINING (AUGUST 2003)

Not applicable.

13. ADDENDUM:

A. Interpretations of Statement of Work:

This form 189 is consistent with the SOW for J5645 dated August 6, 2009. No exceptions were taken to the SOW.

NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 12 OF 18

NRC FORM 189 (Contnued) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION JOB CODE

(06-98) J5645




13. (B) Cost Information

Estimated Cost Schedule (SK)

PriorYears 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total

Task ) 18 80 14 8 120

Task 2 12 101 5 7 125

Task 3 20 201 68 51 340

Task 4 18 61 87 31 197

Subtotal 68 443 174 97 782

Federal Administrative Charge 2 13 5 3 23

Total (Costs) 70 456 179 100 805

Carryover from Prior Year 0 100 100 100 0

Carryover to Next Year 100 100 100 0 0

Total (Funding) 170 456 179 0 805

Footnote continued from Page 1:

General/Administrative Expenses include the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) charge. LDRD is the DOELaboratory Directed Research and Development charge. The LDRD is a normal component of DOE laboratory overhead chargesto both DOE programs and reimbursable work performed for other federal agencies. It is shown above as a component of theTotal Estimated Laboratory Project Cost. The FY 2002 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Conference Report (HR107-258) requires DOE to notify federal sponsors that the Department charges LDRD.

Prior 2009 2010 2011 2012 TotalYears

Est. LDRD ($K) 1.36 8.86 3.48 1.94 15.64

NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 13 OF 18


(06-98) J5645




13. (C) Schedule InformationSubtask/Milestone Schedule

FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 BEYOND

Subtask/Milestone 1 12 3 4 I 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 FY 2008

Task I Subtask 1 Package surface contamination

support (TBD by IAEA)

Task I Subtask 2 NORM (TBD by IAEA)

Task ] Subtask 3 AI/A2 values (TBD by IAEA)

Task 2 Subtask I A

Task 2 Subtask 2

Task 2 Subtask 3

Task 3 Subtask I Expert Peer Review of Draft

NUREG on Spent Fuel Transportation Risk

Task 3 Subtask 2 Transportation Incident DatabaseSubtask 2.1

A

A

Task 3 Subtask 2 Transportation Incident DatabaseSubtask 2.2

I I 1A

Task 3 Subtask 2 Transportation Incident Database

Subtask 2.3

Task 4 Development of National Consensus Standards

NRC FORM 189 (10-93)

PAGE 14 OF 18

PAGE 14NRC FORM 189 (10-93) OF 18

RC FORM 189 (Part 3) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION JOB CODE

(10-93) 14. SPENDING PLAN J5645

NRCMD 11.7 FY 2009 MODIFICATION NUMBER

(if applicable)

NAME OF LABORATORY PERFORMANCE PERIOD

Oak Ridge National Laboratory FROM TO

9/14/2009 11/30/2011

TIfLE OF PROJECTInternational and Domestic Transportation Safety Regulatory Program Support Toai..• f.•dprooel or

o at $805Kof proooOIaubm~son.

ESTIMATED COST AND COMPLETION BY MONTH

COST ELEMENT OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH

DIRECT COST ($k)

INDIRECT COST ($k)

TOTAL CUM. COST ($k)

PROJECT COMPLETION (%)


COST ELEMENT APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER

DIRECT COST ($k) 70

INDIRECT COST ($k) 070

TOTAL CUM. COST ($k)


NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 15 OF 18




(if applicable)


Oak Ridge National Laboratory FROM TO9/14/2009 11/30/2011

TITLE OF PROJECTInternational and Domestic Transportation Safety Regulatory Program Support Totalf ,iopos"costs of proposoO

of prowolal.ubtma•.n.



DIRECTCOST($k) 50

INDIRECT COST ($k) 0

1 20172024273 2TOTAL CUM. COST ($k) 120 170 205 240 276 3_ 2

PROJECT COMPLETION (%) 15



DIRECT COST ($k) 36 36 35 35 36 36

INDIRECT COST ($k) 0 0 0 0 0 0

348 384 419 454 490 526TOTAL CUM. COST ($k) .....

44855661 65PROJECT COMPLETION (%/) 4 25

NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 16 OF 18



NRCMD 11.7 F 2011 MODIFICATION NUMBER(if applicable)



9/14/2009 11/30/2011

TITLE OF PROJECTInternational and Domestic Transportation Safety Regulatory Program Support o m.

~ $805Kossof P MPM1 edpro~ltoro



805088DIRECT COST ($k) 50 50 7 8

INDIRECTCOST($k) 0 0 0 0 0 0

576 626 633 641 649 657TOTAL CUM. COST ($k) _______ ______

72 78 79 80 81 82PROJECT COMPLETION (%) 72 78 79 _ 80 ______1_82



88888 8DIRECT COST ($k) 8 8 8 8

INDIRECT COST ($k) 0 0 0 0 0

TOTALCUM. COST($k) 665 673 681 689 697 705

83 84 85 86 87 88PROJECT COMPLETION (%)834856

NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 17 OF 18




(if applicable)



9/14/2009 11/30/2011TITLE OF PROJECT

International and Domestic Transportation Safety Regulatory Program Support rosts oMreproject 0,•.0is mo $805K

of proposal



DIRECT COST ($k) 50 50

INDIRECT COST ($k) 0 0

TOTAL CUM. COST ($k) 755 805

PROJECT COMPLETION (%) 94 100



DIRECT COST ($k)

INDIRECT COST ($k) ....

TOTAL COST ($k)


NRC FORM 189 (10-93) PAGE 18 OF 18

RICHARD R. RAWL

Telephone:)(6)Email: [

EXPERIENCE

1999-present OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYSenior Research and Development Proeram Manager

* Serving as manager of the ORNL Global Threat Reduction (GTR) program supporting theNational Nuclear Security Administration (NA-21). Responsibilities include:- developing and strengthening relationships with GTR sponsors- developing new projects and program areas, including fostering synergy between

projects and ORNL organizational elements to grow the overall program to over $24M(FY 2009)

- providing program management (budget and schedule performance) for ORNLactivities, including working with multiple project leaders and supervising theprogram's administrative assistant to assure fiscal performance

" Providing technical support to the GTR program related to:- development of transport and facility security guidance for radiological and nuclear

materials, including contributing to the preparation of International Atomic EnergyAgency (IAEA) guidance and recommendations documents

- development of security-related regulatory infrastructure assessment protocols andperforming assessments (Bulgaria, Iraq, Mexico, the Philippines, and Thailand)

- development and delivery of transport security awareness and detailed training courses(Bulgaria, China, Iraq, Mexico, Peru, the Philippines, and Thailand)

- in cooperation with the IAEA, development and delivery of a pilot transport securitytraining course in Beijing, China and regional courses in Africa, South America andSoutheast Asia

" Providing regulatory and security technical support and analysis to DOE, Department ofTransportation (DOT), Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), IAEA and privateindustry.

* Serving as Chairman, American National Standards Institute Committee N14 "Packagingand Transportation of Radioactive and Non-nuclear Hazardous Materials".

1995-1999 INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCYHead, Transport Safety Unit

* Managed and led the IAEA Transport Safety Program, including regulatory policydevelopment and relationships with Member States and other international organizations.

" Served as a technical resource on radioactive materials transport safety matters, includinganalysis of regulatory requirements and liaison with other regulatory bodies.

" Served as Secretariat for the senior IAEA Transport Safety Standards Advisory Committeeand numerous technical committees, including those revising the transport regulations.

Richard R. Rawl May 2007Page 1

" Directed development of all transport safety program elements, including advisorydocuments, transport emergency response guidance, research and development, andtraining.

" Provided liaison with other IAEA functional areas including waste management, nuclearsafety, radiation safety, legal and external affairs.

1985-1995 OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYTransportation Technologies Group Leader

* Developed a comprehensive transportation program to support a variety of DOE, NRCand DOT needs. Programs included applications of emerging technologies to improvepackaging and transportation activities.

" Provided wide-ranging transportation advice to several DOE program offices, NRC, andDOT, including technical, regulatory analysis, program management, and policy supportfor national and international activities.

* Developed technical and institutional programs to support DOE development ofoperational transportation systems in challenging areas, such as spent fuel and high-levelwaste.

* Served on senior advisory bodies such as the IAEA Standing Advisory Group on the SafeTransport of Radioactive Materials and the American National Standards Institute N 14Management Committee.

" Served as Chairman of two Revision Panels that developed the 1996 revision of theIAEA transportation regulations. This involved developing consensus solutions to aseries of complex technical issues with over 20 countries and international organizationsparticipating.

1978-1985 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. RESEARCH ANDSPECIAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION

Chief. Radioactive Materials Branch (1980-1985)" Developed and promulgated the DOT regulations for radioactive materials packaging and

transportation, including integration into modal requirements.* Developed and implemented policies related to radioactive materials transportation

safety, including interagency coordination and integration with other Federal agencies,such as the NRC, DOE, Environmental Protection Agency, Federal EmergencyManagement Agency, and Committee on Interagency Radiation Research and PolicyCoordination.

* Served as the U.S. Competent Authority for the international transport of radioactivematerials.

* Served as chairman of all the Revision Panels which developed the 1985 edition of theIAEA regulations on transport safety.

* Served as DOT representative to other Federal, State, local, and internationalorganizations on radiological safety matters, such as the interagency development ofFederal guidance on occupational exposure to ionizing radiation.

Richard R. Rawl May 2007Page 2

Health Physicist (1978-1980)* Provided technical support to the Radioactive Materials Branch in the development of

radioactive materials packaging and transportation safety requirements.* Provided technical expertise in developing the International Maritime Organization

emergency response schedules for the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code.

1974-1978 U.S. COAST GUARD HEADQUARTERS, HAZARDOUS MATERIALSDIVISIONChemical En2ineer

* Developed safety regulations governing the transportation of all classes of hazardousmaterials aboard ships and barges.

" Developed emergency response protocols for hazardous materials incidents.* Developed safety requirements for the shipboard use of hazardous materials, including

the first US regulations governing the shipboard use of fumigants.

1973-1975 DOW INDUSTRIAL SERVICES COMPANYService Engineer

* Headed service teams in the removal of operational deposits from process equipment,including project planning and performance.

• Provided analytical support for chemical operations, including advanced chelatingtechniques.

EDUCATION

M.S., University of TennesseeMajor" Indnutrial Frngineerin• (Engineering Management)(b)(6)

B.S., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,=Maior: Chemical Eneineerinn (with option in Nuclear Engineering)

(b)(6)

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS

American Institute of Chemical EngineersEditorial Board Member, International Journal of Radioactive Material TransportInstitute of Nuclear Materials Management

CLEARANCE(b)(6)

Richard R. Raw] May 2007Page 3

Matthew R. Feldman, P.E.(b)(6)

W. (865) 946-1291 H (b)(6)

Summary: Nineteen (19) years experience providing project management and project engineering support forDOE facilities, primarily in the field of transportation of nuclear materials. Managed technical tasks ranging fromplanning, designing, testing, and certification of multimillion-dollar nuclear package development efforts todetailed regulatory review of shipping package certifications prepared by outside organizations and developmentof SG-100, Design and Development Guide for NNSA Type B Packages. Recognized expert in the field oftransportation and storage of nuclear materials who is currently serving ASME as Topic Co-Organizer for theupcoming Pressure Vessel and Piping conference, ASTM through the development of Standard Practice E-2230and the Untied Nations (U.N.) International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as a mission expert involving thestorage and transport of radioactive materials in Latin American countries (Mexico, Peru, Chile, Brazil andArgentina).

Experience:

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), (operated by UT-Battelle, L.L.C. (2003 - Present)

Program Manager/Project Manager (2003-Present):

" Managed ORNL's support of the DOE EM-63 Packaging Certification Program. Led team appointedto assist applicant for the successful Hanford Unirradiated Fuel Package certification review.Assisted in effort to develop DOE Certificate for numerous packages based on previous NRCcertifications. Supported development and deployment of RFID Packaging Technology, currentlyupdating Radioactive Materials Packaging Handbook.

" Support of DOE NNSA Packaging Certification Division. Managed development of Safety Guide 100(SG-1 00) Design and Development Guide for NNSA Type B Packages and Safety Guide 600 (SG-600) Regulatory Compliance Testing of NNSA Type B Packages for the National Nuclear SecurityAdministration (NNSA) Packaging Certification Division (PCD) while also acting as primary author for3 chapters of SG-100 and all of SG-600. Hosted 2004 SG-100 Training Workshop and 2007 NNSAPackaging Workshop at the National Transportation Research Center, Knoxville, Tennessee. TheSafety Guides are available at: http://otac.doeal.gov/SafetyGuidesRpt.aspx.

" Manager ORNL Transportation Technologies Group Package Testing Program. Perform testsstipulated by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and theIAEA for the certification of radioactive materials transportation and storage packagings followingstringent Quality Assurance Program Requirements and includes pre-test and post-testdocumentation as well as certification support.

" Supported development of transportation system for DOE Office of Civilian Radioactive WasteManagement (OCRWM). Developing implementation plans, schedules and production processflows for transport of spent nuclear fuel from generator sites throughout the United States to theYucca Mountain Radioactive Waste Repository in Nevada.

BWXT Y-12, L.L.C. (formerly Lockheed Martin Energy Systems/Martin Marietta Energy Systems/Union Carbide

Nuclear Division, Oak Ridge, TN (1981 - 2003)

Project Manager/Project Engineer (1998-2003):

" Provide management and overall technical direction to the Y-12 Nuclear Packaging Program forpackage development and certification. Ensure compliance with DOE Orders and applicable Codesof Federal Regulations (Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Department of Transportation).

" Develop new Type B Fissile Material Shipping Packages. Responsible for overall technical accuracyof the project, design, design review, prototype procurement, testing, customer interface, regulatoryinterface, response to regulatory board review, budget, and schedule. Managed a team of -12people which successfully developed and certified the ES-2100 at a total project cost of -$3M.

" Prepared winning proposals for new package development and certification to be performed by Y-12Packaging Engineering in FY02-05 with total estimated costs of $3M (DPP-2), $10M (MD-1) and$6M (ES-3100), respectively.

* Certify new and re-certify existing Type B Fissile Material Shipping Packages. Responsible forannual budgets of $3 to $6 M and directing up to 15 full-time equivalent persons.

Matthew R. FeldmanPage 2

* Developed methodology for performing Transportation System Risk Assessments to authorizeshipment of hi-fidelity Joint Test Assemblies. Successfully applied methodology to 3 separateweapons systems.

" Act as Lead of the Y-12 SAFKEG 3940A Certification Review Team for U.S. Department ofEnergy/National Nuclear Security Administration/Packaging and Certification Division (NNSNPCD).

* Provide technical interface to Regulatory Authority (NNSNPCD) for certification of shippingpackages.

" Recognized technical expert for Type B shipping packages including participation as CommitteeMember in American Society for Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and American Society for Testingand Materials (ASTM).

Packaging Thermal Analyst (1995-1998)* Perform thermal analyses, finite element modeling, and technical support for Type B packaging

certification. Provide subject matter expertise to DOE/AL.

" Manage thermal certification testing of shipping packages, including rigorous furnace analysis andtesting to meet regulatory parameters.

" Provide analysis and resolution of issues involving thermal aspects of package and storage moduleperformance.

Heat Transfer and Process Modeling Analyst (1988-1995, 1981-1985)

" Conduct heat transfer modeling, including radioactive material shipping containers, using HEATING,PATRAN-P/Thermal heat transfer analysis programs, TKSolver computational code, andself-authored FORTRAN computer programs.

* Conduct computer modeling of various processing systems including Y-12 enriched uraniumoperations.

Education and Certifications:

M. S. Chemical Engineering,• University of Illinois, Champaign

B. S. Chemical Engineering, r__niversity of Tennessee, Knoxville

Registered Professional Engineer, State of Tennessee(b)(6)

United Nations Basic Safety in the Field Training

Recent Awards, Honors, and Memberships:

Board-of-Editors, Packaging, Transport, Storage and Security of Radioactive Material, 2004-present.

B83 JTA1A Performance Excellence Award Certificate from DOE/AL, 2001.

U.S. Patent 6,299,950 B1, Fireproof Impact Limiter Aggregate Packaging Inside Shipping Containers,October 9, 2001.

DOE/AL Manager's Award, Model ES-2100 Package Certification Team, 2000.

DOE/AL Certificate of Achievement for DP Packaging Parallel Review Process Team, October 1999.

LMES Central Engineering Services Director's Award, September 1997.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Member of Pressure Vessel and Piping Division,Transportation and/or Storage of Radioactive Materials Committee, 1997-present.

ASME Piping and Pressure Vessel Conference, Session chair/vice-chairman. 2000-present.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Member of Committee E05 on Fire Standards,1998-present.


Publications:

M. R. Feldman, Development of Testing Methodologies for Onsite Radioactive Material StorageContainers, ASME PVP 2008 Conference, Chicago, IL, 2008.

M. R. Feldman, M. Barela, Safety Guide 600 - A Guide for the Testing of Small Fissile MaterialPackages, Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials (PATRAM '07), Miami, FL,October 2007.

M. R. Feldman, Developing Solutions to Regional Latin America's Spent Fuel Needs - Supporting theIAEA Mission, Proceeding of ASME PVP 2006 / ICPVT-1 1, Vancouver Canada, 2006.

M. R. Feldman, Thermal Testing of Type B Packages in Furnaces per ASTM Standard Practice E 2230,Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials (PATRAM '04), Berlin, Germany,September 2004.

M. R. Feldman, K.D. Handy, Comparison of Analytical and Physical Testing Results for the DPP-2Shipping Package, Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials (PATRAM '04), Berlin,Germany, September 2004.

Managing Editor of approximately 20 Safety Analysis Reports for Packaging (SARPs), typically 400-800pages each.

M. R. Feldman, et al, Standard Practice for Thermal Qualification of Type B Packages for RadioactiveMaterials, E 2230-02, ASTM, 2003.

M. R. Feldman, et al, Certification Testing for the ES-2 Shipping Package, Packaging and Transportationof Radioactive Materials (PATRAM '98), Paris, France, June 1998.

M. R. Feldman, Hypothetical Accident Condition Thermal Testing, Proceedings of the 1995 US. DOEDefense Programs 2 nd Annual Packaging Workshop, June 1995,

M. R. Feldman, Thermal Section of U.S. DOE, Office of National Defense Programs Safety Guide-100,Design Guide for Packaging and Offsite Transportation of Nuclear Components, SpecialAssemblies, and Radioactive Materials Associated with Nuclear Explosives and Weapons SafetyProgram, Oak Ridge, TN, 1994.

M. R. Feldman, Furnace Characterization for Horizontal Shipping Container Thermal Testing,ORNL/ENG-12, Oak Ridge, TN, May 1994.

M. R. Feldman, The Effects of Convection and Oxygen Presence on Thermal Testing of Thin-ShelledCelotexTM-Based Packages, Proceedings of the 1994 U.S. DOE Defense Programs PackagingWorkshop, May 1994.

J. P. Belk, M. R. Feldman, et al, Operation and Maintenance Guidance: A Procedures Manual for SolarDomestic Hot Water Systems at Camp Darby, ORNLIENGITM-41, Oak Ridge, TN, May 1993.

M. R. Feldman, Further Characterization of the B-1023 Furnace for Use in Hypothetical ThermalAccident Testing of Shipping Containers in Accordance with 10 CFR, Part 71, ORNLIENG-1 1, OakRidge, TN, February 1992.

M. R. Feldman, Characterization of the B-1023 Furnace for Use in Hypothetical Thermal AccidentTesting of Shipping Containers in Accordance with 10 CFR, Part 71, ORNL/ENG-10, Oak Ridge,TN, January 1992.

J. C. Anderson and M.R. Feldman, Effect of Gray-Body Interchange Factor and Radiating Temperatureon the Thermal Response of the DT-18 Shipping Container, ORNLJENGITM-37, Oak Ridge, TN,January 1992.

R. Alkire and M. Feldman, Initiation of Single Corrosion Pits on Pure Aluminum by Focused LaserIllumination, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 135, No. 7, July 1988.

M. R. Feldman, Artificial Initiation of Pitting Corrosion by Focused Laser Illumination on Aluminum andStainless Steel 304, Master's Thesis, University of Illinois, February 1988.


Presentations:

M. R. Feldman, Developing Solutions to Regional Latin America's Spent Fuel Needs - Supporting theIAEA Mission, Proceeding of ASME PVP 2006 / ICPVT-1 1, Vancouver Canada, 2006.

Argonne National Laboratory Training Course Application of the ASME Code to Radioactive MaterialTransportation Packaging, Invited Lecturer, Overview of SG-100 - Development of Type BPackaging for NNSA Certification and Type B Package Testing - Recommended Best Practices,June 2005.

PATRAM 2004, Thermal Testing of Type B Packages in Furnaces per ASTM Standard Practice E 2230,Berlin, Germany, September, 2004.

PATRAM 2004, Comparison of Analytical and Physical Testing Results for the DPP-2 ShippingPackage, Berlin, Germany, September, 2004.

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Packaging Certification Division (PCD) Safety Guide100 Workshop, Managed Workshop and lectured on Chapters 1 (Introduction and Overview), 3(Thermal) and 9 (Materials), National Transportation Research Center, Knoxville, Tennessee,September, 2004.

ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Design and Development of the DPP-2 ShippingPackage and Testing of the ES-2100 and DPP-2 Shipping Packages Cleveland, Ohio, July 2003.

ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Analytical Investigation of Containment Vessel FlangeSeparation During Impact Scenarios, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August 2002.

PATRAM 2001, The Use of Impact Analysis in the Development of the ES-2100 Shipping Package,Chicago, IL, September 2001.

ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, The Use of Impact Analysis in the Development of theES-2100 Shipping Package, Atlanta, GA, August 2001.

ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, DOE/AL Safety Guide-lO0, Design Guide ForPackaging and Offsite Transportation of Nuclear Components, Special Assemblies, andRadioactive Materials Associated with the Nuclear Explosives Weapons Safety Program,Revision 2, Seattle, WA, August 2000.

U.S. DOE 5 t Thermal Specialists Meeting, Certification of the E$-2100 Shipping Package, Albuquerque,NM, October 2000.

U.S. DOE 4 'h Thermal Specialist's Meeting, Thermal Analysis of the ES-2 Shipping Container,Albuquerque, NM, October 1998.

ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, "Update on the ES-2 Shipping Container" and"Thermal Analysis of the ES-2 Shipping Container," San Diego, CA, July/August 1998.

ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Development and Testing of the ES-2 ShippingContainer, Orlando, FL, July 1997.

Packaging and Transportation Special Interest Group Spring Meeting, Development and Testing of theES-2 Shipping Container, Washington, DC, June 1997.

3rd Transportation of Hazardous Materials Thermal Specialist's Meeting, Development and Testing of theES-2 Shipping Container, Albuquerque, NM, September 1996.

1995 U.S. DOE Packaging Design Guide Workshop, Instructor for Thermal Aspects of PackagingDesign, Gatlinburg TN, October 1995.

1995 U.S. DOE Defense Programs 2 nd Annual Packaging Workshop, Hypothetical Accident ConditionThermal Testing, Knoxville, TN, June 1995.

1994 U.S. DOE Packaging Design Guide Workshop, Instructor for Thermal Aspects of PackagingDesign, Gatlinburg TN, October 1994.

Transportation of Hazardous Materials Thermal Specialist's Meeting, The Effects of Convection andOxygen Presence on Thermal Testing of Thin-Shelled Celotex m-Based Packages, AlbuquerqueNM, June 1994.


U.S. DOE Defense Programs Packaging Workshop, The Effects of Convection and Oxygen Presence onThermal Testing of Thin-Shelled Celotex Tm-Based Packages, San Francisco, CA, May 1994.

U.S. DOE Thermal Specialist's Meeting, Characterization of Furnaces for Hypothetical Thermal AccidentTesting in Accordance with 10 CFR 71, Albuquerque, NM, October 1992.

SOAK RIDGE NA'I'ION-,AL LABORAfORY

Global Nuclear Science and Technology Division'sTransportation Technologies Group

Mark HawkTelephone: 865-946-1275Facsimile: 865-574-3431Blackberry](b)(6)Internet: hawkmboml.aqov

Biographical information

Education

University of South Florida, Tampa, FloridaBachelor of Science Degree, Structures, Materials & Fluids,

Areas of Expertisellnterest

* Strong regulatory compliance knowledge relating to safety and security for packaging andtransportation of hazardous and radioactive materials

" Considerable knowledge of procurement and quality assurance programs used bygovernmental and private industry

" Corporate liability awareness related to transportation and packaging

Professional Experience

Oak Ridge National LaboratoryProject Engineer, October, 2001 - Present

• Professional experience includes 24 years in the packaging and transportation field,nineteen years of which were at Oak Ridge National Laboratory

" Responsibilities include managing projects associated with DOE EM, DOE RW andNNSA programs

" Coordinator for the DOE Packaging Management Council since 1995" Participates on DOE national task groups associated with standardizing activities

throughout the DOE complex" Participates in the Transportation Compliance Assistance Program that evaluates DOE

contractors to ensure DOT complianceI Participates in performing testing of various packagings to ensure DOT compliance for

UN Performance-Oriented Packaging requirements, Type A and Type B testing

Oak Ridge National LaboratoryManager of Programs Management, October, 1999 - October, 2001

" As DOE Packaging Management Council Coordinator, performs hazardous andradioactive packaging evaluations of DOE contractors through the DOE sponsoredTransportation

" Compliance Evaluation/Assistance Program (TCEAP), performs testing of hazardousmaterials packages and assists in Regulatory Analysis for the DOE NationalTransportation Program

• Responsible for managing of packaging and transportation projects Responsibilitiesinclude managing project managers as well as individually managing Lockheed MartinCorporate and DOE National Transportation Program/Packaging Council projects

" Participates on DOE national task groups associated with standardizing activitiesthroughout the DOE complex

* Responsibilities also include being the Operations' DOT Compliance Manager.Compliance Manager. Responsibilities include:

o Reviewing all off-site shipments of hazardous materials for DOT complianceo Issuing DOT regulatory interpretationso Point of contact for regulatory agencies

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, LMERManager of Packaging Operations, December 1993 - September, 1999

Responsible for ensuring the Lockheed Martin Energy Research and Lockheed MartinEnergy Systems (LMER/LMES) off-site domestic and international shipments ofhazardous materials (including radioactive materials and waste) were classified andpackaged in accordance with DOT, NRC, EPA, and IATA regulations, DOE Orders, andLM policies and procedures. Managed LMES/LMER Quality Assurance Program at thefive DOE Oak Ridge Operations sites for hazardous materials packaging, reviewed allpurchase requisitions that pertained to packaging and established QA Inspection Plansfor receiving inspections

Oak Ridge National LaboratoryPackaging Engineer, October 1991 - December 1993

* Ensured packaging compliance for hazardous and radioactive shipments from ORNL.Initiated a Quality Assurance Program for the procurement of hazardous and radioactivepackagings.

General Electric Company, DOE Pinellas Plant, Largo, FloridaManager, Weapons Packaging, May 1985 - October, 1991

* Provided packaging design and testing required for the nuclear weapons components

Patricia A. Scofield

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

B3uilding 4500-s, MS-63-1-3

P.O. Tox 2-008

Oak Ridge, Tennessee

(8(o5) 574-7354 scofleldpa@ornLgov

EDUCATION(b)(6)

Indiana University, Indianapolis IN 315. Environmental Health Science

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI M.. b)() adioloqical Health

Science

M'5- Industrial Health Science

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

1 q, - Pres. Senu/r 7"eehkima Stal , Envit-anxenta/ Proteetim' and Waste Services,

Air Compliance 4roup, UT-Satte/le, Oak R'dge National Laboratory

Conducts dose assessments associated with Oak Ridge Reservation activities, which

includes: Estimates of doses to humans from airborne avid waterborne exposure

pathways, doses to aquatic and terrestrial organisms, and impact of waterborne

chemicals on human health.

Member of the ORNL Emergency Response Cadre for plume modeling and

coordinator the ORNL Environmental Protection Officer Progqram.

Point of contact for the Environmental ALARA Program and member of the

Operations Assessment Program (environwentao.

Special Projects: Pose assessments for handling and disposal of NRC exempted

source and byproduct materials and development of an integrated remedia( worker

risk methodology to estimate health (radiological and chemical) and safety hazards

associated with environmental restoration activities. Developed hold For decay

requiremvents and radiological management of excavated soils subject area.

2. q qo -: q q$ I-ea/tA pAysia/Industr/ Hy gien. C/uM H'il Managed the Field

radioanalytica( laboratory and provided general health physics/industrial hygiene

support for the site characterization project at Paducah CGaseous Diffusion Plant,

Paducah, Kentucky.

j-qsq-2-qqo P4'$i'a/Sc!enztJt. EA POE, Envrnmental Meas1rements

Laboratory. Performed research and participated in multi-oreanization experiments

on the behavior of radon and thoron progeny behavior in indoor (field and

experimental) environments. Provided technical.swpport for on-site radon and

radon progeny intercomparison experiments.

2 q 87-- q 88 6yeg Rsearcher Mat/i~na/•//stuiate ofa Rad/ittin Protecttn,

Stockholm, Sweden. Performed experiments on radon progeny behavior in

experimental chambers and prepared a report on methods for evaluatingq radon

decay product behavior in indoor environments.

I q83-1q7 8(o Educattonal'Leave oaAbsence. Rockwell International ami Combustion

Engineering (Rockwell international sold the Environmental MIonitoring. and Service

Center to Combustion Engineering. in 1. 7 84).

I q 7 q -. q 8 3 member of rechnTca/Staff Rockwell Ineernat,,na6 Energy .Sstems

4roup and Envwronmental Mon'tort'g and Servi'ces Center, Canoga Park and

Camarillo, California. Hazardous waste manager for the decontamination avnd

decommissioning. of an US Army arsenal. Provided technical support for the

development of CERCLA radionuclide reportable quantities and assisted in a

functional analysis for the basalt repository progra,.

PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES

2008 -Pres. Member of Teawm revising POE Order 5400.5, US Departmlent of

Energy, Washington P. C.

1• q q 8- 2002- Member, 13iota Pose Assessment Committee, US Department of

Energy, Office of Environmeental Policy and Assistance, Air, Water, andRadiation Division,

2000 -2-001Member of Editoria( l3oard, Risk Excellence Notes, US Department of

Energy, Center for Risk Excelevnce.

1 q q - q q Coordinator and Division Representative, Shadow-A-Mentor Program,

Women in Science and Technology, Oak Ridgqe National Laboratory.

1*q5 Co -Organizer, Environmental Programs Working Ciroup for POE

Facility Contractors, Boulder, Colorado.

2Lqq3-J qq4Member, Non-Routine Work Operations Working 6roup, U.S.

Department of Energy, Washington D.C.

AWARPS/HONORS

2001. National Excellence Award from National Association of Environmental

Professionals for work associated with the POE Craded Approach for Evaluating.

Radiation Poses to Aquatic and Terrestrial Biota.

(b)(6)

PUBLICATIONS/REPORTS/PRESENTATIONS

Joves, P.S., and Scofield, P.A., "I&mplementation and Validation of a POE

Standardization Screening Method for Evaluating Radiation Impacts to 13iota at

Long-Term Stewardship Sites," Oak Ridge National Laboratory,

Oak Ridge, TN, ORNL/TMi-2003/76, March 2003.

Scofield, P.A. and Rowland, D. C., "Comparative Occupational Exposure and Safety

Risk Methodology," presented at the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and

Exposition, June 5, 2001, New Orleans, LA.

Sch•reider, S, Kocher, P.C., Kerr, C7.P, Scofield, P.A., O'Ponv ell, F.R., Mattsev, C.R.,Cotter, 5.4. Bogard, J.S., Bland, J.5., wiblin, C., "Systematic Radiological

Assessment of Exemptions For Source and Byproduct Materials," Division

of Risk Analysis and Applications, U.S. NRC, NUREGf-.-71-7, June 2001.

Scofield, P.A. and Teasley, N.A. Jr., "ORR Peer Hunt Monitoring Report," Oak Ridge

National Laboratory, ORNL/TM -1-371 q, September -q q q.

Contributor to the Oak Ridge Reservation Annual Site Environmental Report from

jqql- to Present.

"Air Dispersion Models: White Paper, Interrnal Use Only," Environmental

Restoration, Risk Assessment Program, for U.S. Department of Energy, August

1-qq5.

Travis, C.C., Scofield, P.A., and Blaylock, B.P., "Evaluation of Remediation Worker

Risk at Radioactively Contaminated Waste Sites," Journal of Hazardous Materials,

35, jqq3, pp 387-401-.

Hopke P.K., Cogofak, C.V., Scofield, P.A., Klemic, C., A., "The Measurement of

Radon Progeny Activity on Typical Indoor Surfaces," Radiation Protection

posimetrY, Volume 45, No. 1/4, 1-q72, pp 31-3-31-7.

Hopke P.K., et at, "The Measurement of Activity-Weighted Size Pistribution of

Radon Progeny: Methods and Laboratory fntercowparison Studies," Health P hsics,

Volume 63, No. 5, I.qq2., pp 560-570.

Scofield, P.A., "Radon Pecayj Product In-Door Behaviour -- Parameter,Measurement Method, and Model Review," National Institute of RadiationProtection, SSI-rapport 8 8 -07, Stockholm, Sweden, March I q 8 8.

NRC Form 555 Summary of Negotiations J5645 w/ Attach. (38 ... · .COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK...

Documents

Transcript of NRC Form 555 Summary of Negotiations J5645 w/ Attach. (38 ... · .COST PROPOSAL FOR NRC WORK...