8th ESLS RF Meeting – September 2004 RF System 1/23 Storage Ring RF System F. Perez.
Nov. 28, 2003RF System Overview, K. Akai1 RF System Overview Contents: ◆ High beam current and...
-
Upload
milo-williams -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Nov. 28, 2003RF System Overview, K. Akai1 RF System Overview Contents: ◆ High beam current and...
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 1
RF System Overview
Contents: High beam current and measures Construction Damping ring RF system Crab cavity Impedance-related issues
K. AkaiNov. 28, 2003SuperKEKB mini workshop, KEK
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 2
High beam current and measures
• Strong longitudinal instability due to a large detuning, even with ARES and/or SCC. Growth rate = (0.3 ms)-1
– Reduce the growth rate to (1.6ms)-1 by modifying the ARES.– Improve the -1 mode damper to increase gain. – The -2 mode also needs to be cured.
• Large HOM power in each cavity– Improve HOM dampers– Reduce loss factor (ex. Large beam pipe radius in SCC section)
• Large RF power to beam (4 times as high as KEKB)– Change to 1 ARES/1 klystron configuration– Double the number of RF stations
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 3
Modify the ARES in LER
• Modify the A- and C- cavity (S-cavity is not changed)– So that the total stored energy is increased.– To reduce the growth rate by reducing the detuning
frequency. – To reduce the load to the C-cavity damper.– For example,
exsisting modifiedEnergy ratio 1:9 1:15Detuning (kHz) 65 45Growth time (ms) 0.3 1.6C-damper power (kW) 41 26
Details will be given by Kageyama’s talk.
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 4
Feedback with comb filter for the -1 mode
• Successfully operating in KEKB.• Much higher gain (〜 30dB) required for Super-B.• The -2 mode filter will be added.
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
508.791508.790508.789508.788508.787
Frequency [x106 Hz]
Feedback on/off (Ib = 890 mA, Detuning -60 kHz)BW = 1kHz, Gain = 15 dB
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
4.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.50
Time [Sec]
Feedback on/off (Ib = 1.0 A, Detuning -60 kHz)
Feedback off
Beam Abort
Σ
Beam
Circulator CavityKlystronRF Input
LPF
LPF
frffrf
PickupElectrode0˚
0˚
0˚
-90˚-90˚
0˚0˚
-90˚-90˚
0˚0˚
0˚
Filter
Block diagram of the -1 Mode Damping System
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 5
ARES HOM power
0.1
1
10
100
0.1 1 10
2 x GBP (Nb=1224, BL=7mm)2 x GBP (Nb=4896, BL=4mm)2 x GBP (Nb=4896, BL=3mm)4 x HOM WG (Nb=1224, BL=7mm)4 x HOM WG (Nb=4896, BL=4mm)4 x HOM WG (Nb=4896 BL=3mm)
HOM Power (kW)
Beam Current (A)
HOM WG Loads /CavityHPT verification up to 26 kW (KEKB)
GBP Loads /CavityHPT up to 2 kW (KEKB)
HOM WG~80 kW
GBP ~20 kW
HOM WG~14 kW
SuperKEKBHER 4.1 AGBP~3.4 kW
SuperKEKBLER 9.4 A
T. Kageyama
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 6
SCC HOM power and beam pipe
• Present HOM dampers in KEKB have been operated up to 10 kW/cavity.
Beam pipe diameter 150 mm (present) 220 mm (enlarged)
Loss factor for 3mm bunch (Furuya)
2.46 V/pC 1.69 V/pC
HOM power for 4.1A, 5000 bunches
83 kW/cavity 57 kW/cavity
Influence to other groups
No change Replace chambersLarge bore magnetsDevelop gate valves
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 7
SCC HOM damper
• The beam pipe diameter should be changed to 220 mm to reduce the loss factor.
• The present HOM damper will be bench tested to see its power limit.
• The point is effective cooling, surface temperature, and outgassing.
• If SBP side damper works at 20kW, the present dampers may be used for Super-KEKB. If not, modification or new design of dampers is necessary.
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 8
RF parametersRing LER HERBeam current (A) 9.4 4.1Wiggler magnets yes (half) noEnergy loss/turn (MeV) 1.2 3.5Loss factor, estimated (V/pC) 40 50Radiation loss power (MW) 11.3 14.3Parasitic loss power (MW) 7.1 1.7Total beam power (MW) 18.4 16.0Total RF voltage (MV) 14 23
(Total)Cavity type ARES ARES SCC ARES / SCCNo. of cavities 28 16 12 44 / 12Voltage /cav. (MV) 0.5 0.5 1.3Loaded-Q value (x10E4) 2.4 2.4 4.0Beam power /cav. (kW) 650 650 460Wall loss /cav. (kW) 233 233 -Detuning frequency (kHz) 45 20 74
Klystron power (kW) 930 930 480No. of klystrons 28 16 12 56Total AC plug power (MW) 42 24 10 76
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 9
Other R&D’s
• Input coupler– surface treatment, cooling, protection
• Control and feedback– much higher gain needed for the comb filter damper– digital system
• Beam tests– ARES (modified cavity)– Crab cavity @Nikko– SCC for positron beam?
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 10
Construction
• Before 2008– Construct 14 units of RF system
• To change to 1 ARES/1 klystron configuration– 2 RF stations for Crab crossing experiment @Nikko
• After 2008– Construct 18 units of RF system– Fabricate 10 more ARES’s– Fabricate 4 SCC’s– Construct RF system for Crab cavities
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 11
Schedule
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 201510 (20) 6 (12) 8 (8)
20 (20)10 (10) 8 (8)
20 (20)16 (16) 8 (8)
20 (20)20 (20)12 (12)
20 (20)24 (24)12 (12)
4.6 4.6 18.0 20.2 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 8.0 7.0 0.8
# Stations (# cavities)
RF system
FujiOhoNikko
14 Klystrons18 Klystrons8 sets of Power supplies16 sets of High power and Low-level systemCooling system
ARES-AC modify Prototype Beam test
ARES-AC modify 20 sets ARES (LER-Oho)
10 sets
SCC 4 sets
6 ARES install 4 ARES install 4 ARES install
4 SCC install
RF system for Crab exp.
2003. 9. 12003. 9. 5 revisedK. Akai
Super-KEKB Adiabatic Construction --- RF Group
6 sets of Power supplies14 sets of High power and Low-level systemCooling system
R&D for ARES-HOM damper SCC-HOM damper ARES-plating Couplers Control and Feedback
SCC beam pipe radius increase
ARES (LER-Fuji) assemble
RF system for Crab@Tsukuba
Total111.2
Cost for RF system (unit oku-en)Related InfrastructureConsruct (D4, D7, D8) Construct (D10)
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 12
New buildings to be constructed
Building for Power Supply (hight=5m)
Control room Schedule
D4 455 m2 (35m×13m) 170 m2 2005〜 06
D5 - -
D7 273 m2 (21m×13m) 100 m2 2005〜 06
D8 304 m2
(16m×13m+12m×8m)- 2005〜 06
D10 81 m2 (9m×9m) 50 m2 〜 2009
D11 - -
Total 1113 m2 320 m2
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 13
Cost estimation
• Total cost = 111.2 Oku-yen, including– 32 klystrons– 15 power supplies– Evaporative cooling system for klystron collector– 32 High-power and Low-level systems– 20 existing ARES’s to be modified– 10 new ARES’s for LER– 4 additional SCC’s for HER– RF system for Crab cavities– R&D and Beam tests
• Cost for related infrastructures such as buildings, electricity, cooling system are not included.
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 14
RF system for Damping Ring
• Base plan assumed– Same RF frequency as KEKB– Use ARES (full set)
• Construction– Fabricate a klystron and an
ARES cavity.– An existing power supply (B-
type) will be moved.– High-power and low-level
system: partly new, partly reused.
– Total cost is about 2.4 Oku-en. (Building is not included.)
• RF-related parameters
Bunch charge 2.5 nC
Number of bunches 4 (2x2)
Circumference 131.3 m
Beam current 23 mA
Energy loss/turn 0.073 MV
RF frequency 508.9 MHz
RF voltage 0.261 MV
Wall dissipation 42 kW
Beam power 1.7 kW
Number of cavity 1
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 15
Crab Cavity
• Currently being developed– Squashed cell + Coaxial pipe– All parasitic modes are
damped.
• New design for 10A beam– Squashed cell + Waveguides– Lower frequency mode needs
tuning and feedback.
Absorbing materialNotch filter
Absorbing material
Squashed Crab cavity for B-factories
Coaxial beam pipeCooling for inner conductor
(axial view)
inner conductor
"Squashed cell"
(K. Akai et al., Proc. B-factories, SLAC-400 p.181 (1992).)
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 16
Coupling impedance of new crab cavity
Zx
Z//
Zy
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 17
Impedance and loss factor
• Crabbing mode– R/Q = 41.4Ω, Q = 41100 (Type-I cavity: R/Q = 47.2)
• If NC, Vkick = 0.35 MV@Pc=72 kW• If SC, Vkick = 1.4MV
• Highest impedance of parasitic modes and loss factor• The impedance is reduced by a factor 8 〜 10 compared to Type
-I. • The loss factor is reduced by half.
unit Type- I Type- IIZT kÉ∂/ m 25 2.6Z/ / Å~f[GHz] É∂ 2050 290kloss@3mm V/ pC 1.23 0.56
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 18
Crab experiment in KEKB@Nikko
Type- I (SC)No. of cavities 1É—(transverse) 28msÉ—(longitudinal) 96ms
KEK B (LER)É¿crab=50mVÅ€=1.32MV
Total HOM power 23kWNo. of cavities 1É—(transverse) 26msÉ—(longitudinal) 440ms
KEK B (HE R)É¿crab=250mVÅ€=1.35MV
Total HOM power 6kW
For the crab crossing experiment in KEKB,beam instability is OK with present crab cavity.
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 19
Crab cavity in SuperKEKB
Type- I Type- IISC SC NC
No. of cavities 1Å~2 1Å~2 2Å~2É—(transverse) 0.9ms 8.4ms 4.2msÉ—(longitudinal) 21ms 146ms 73ms
Super-KEKB(LER)É¿crab=170mVÅ€=0.7MV Total HOM power 214kW 97kW
No. of cavities 1Å~2 1Å~2 3Å~2É—(transverse) 2.7ms 25ms 8.4msÉ—(longitudinal) 107ms 763ms 254ms
Super-KEKB(HE R)É¿crab=300mVÅ€=1.2MV Total HOM power 44kW 20kW
Type-II has advantages for Super-KEKB, especially in LER.Type-I may be used in HER, if HOM absorber is OK with 50kW.
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 20
Impedance-related issues
KEKB @4mmin Design Report
Super-KEKB @3mm
Number of items Loss factor(V/pC)
Number of items Loss factor /item(V/pC)
Loss factor(V/pC)
Comment
ARES cavity 20 10.6 28 0.667 18.7Resistive-wall 3016 m 4.0 3016m - 6.5 CopperPhoton Masks at arc 1000 4.6 800 1E-8 8E-6 ante-chamberPumping slots at arc 10x1800 0.37 - 0.0019 ante-chamberPumping slots @straight + 800 +BPMs 4x400 0.79 4x400 +Masks at IP 1 0.08 1 + pendingIR chamber 1 0.29 1 + pendingRecomb. chambers 2 1.6 2 + pendingBellows 1000 2.5 800 4E-3 3.2Flange gap + 800 1E-4 0.08Gate Valve + 40 3.1E-3 0.12Feedback kickers + +Injection/Abort kickers + +Septum + +Movable masks + 16 1 16HOM absorbers (RF end) + 4 Å 0.5 Å 2 150É”Tapers (RF end) + 4 0.04 0.16 94ÅÃ150É”Tapers (others) + 72 3E-3 0.22Total 25.7+ 46.9+ tentative
(Suetsugu, Shibata, Stanic, Kageyama, Akai)
Loss factor of LER
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 21
Loss factor and Number of RF units
• Required number of RF units is expressed as:
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0 10 20 30 40 50
Pb=550kW/cav.Pb=600kW/cav.Pb=650kW/cav.
Loss factor except cavities (V/pC)
€
Ncav = U0Ib + TbkothersIb2
Pb0 −TbkcavIb2
€
€
Tb =1.965 ×10−9(s)Ib = 9.4(A)
U0 =1.2 ×106(V )
kcav = 0.67 ×1012(V /C)
€ €
€
Ncav = 11.3 + 0.174 × kothers(V / pC)Pb0(MW ) − 0.117
kothers is loss factor except cavities, andPbo is beam power by each unit.
28 unit
Nov. 28, 2003 RF System Overview, K. Akai 22
Instabilities due to RF cavitiesLER HERItem Freq.
(MHz) # cav. Growthtime
# cav. Growthtime
Cure
ARES-HOM 1850 28 5ms 16 47ms B-BSCC-HOM 1020 - 12 49ms B-BCrab (II) -HOM 1260 4 73ms 6 240ms B-BCrab (I) -HOM 410 - 2 102ms B-BARES - 0/pi modes 504 28 4ms 16 29ms B-BFundamental –1 mode 508.79 28 1.6ms 16+12 1ms RFFundamental –2 mode 508.69 28 20ms 16+12 21ms RFCrab (II) -Lower mode 390 4 4ms 6 20ms RF
LER HERItem Freq.(MHz) # cav. Growth
time# cav. Growth
time
Cure
ARES-HOM 633 28 4ms 16 33ms B-BSCC-HOM 688/705 - 12 12ms B-BCrab (II) -HOM 1360 4 4ms 6 8ms B-BCrab (I) -HOM 1050 - 2 2ms B-B
Only the fastest mode is listed in each item.Crab (II) and Crab (I) are alternative in HER.Beta_x@crab is assumed to be 170m in LER and 300m in HER.B-B means bunch-by-bunch feedback.RF means feedbacks in RF control system.
Longitudinal
Transverse