Note of Region Wide Projects Hub Meeting 27.3.12
Transcript of Note of Region Wide Projects Hub Meeting 27.3.12
-
8/2/2019 Note of Region Wide Projects Hub Meeting 27.3.12
1/3
1
Note of Region wide Projects Hub meeting
Tuesday March 27th Lesser Town Hall Castle Douglas
Present: Ken Gouge (Chair), Rebecca Coggins, Leah Black, Tonia Lu, Finlay
Cooper, Alice Stilgoe, Malcolm Davies, Suzanne Davies, Pam Pumfrey, Peter
Renwick, Carolyn Yates, Valerie Heppel, Cliff Robertson, Lesley Sloan, Cate Ross.
Apologies:Paula Macdonald, Claire Thirlwall, Barbara Kelly, Karen Ward-Boyd,
Jan Hogarth, Jo Hodges, Lesley Rogers, Julian Watson, James Cox, Linda Mallet,
Heidi Wilson, Jenny Wilson, Anne Barclay.
1. Minute of the last meeting
Minutes of the last Region wide Hub meeting were discussed. Cliff Robertson
was concerned that the hubs were going to replace the activities previouslybeing undertaken by DG Arts. There was concern that the hubs do not
become organisations like DG Arts. There was a recognition that some of the
functions previously undertaken by DG Arts were still necessary and needed
to be fulfilled through the hubs. The notes of the previous meeting were
agreed.
2. Feedback from Proto Chamber
Feedback from the proto Chamber of Arts was discussed. It was suggested
that there is a lack of alignment between the councils Single Outcome
Agreement (SOA), Creative Scotlands (CS) Objectives and the D&G Arts
Strategic Objectives. It was agreed to recommend that the Chamber of Arts
look to creating a vision for the arts across the region which reflects the SOA
aims and CS objectives and outlines the entitlement to the arts that can be
expected by the people living in the region and how this is to be achieved.
This would in turn provide guidance for the work of each of the hubs.
Finlay reported some concerns from the Stewartry hub regarding the co-
opting of independent members from the arts sector to the Chamber. While
grateful to the particular individuals involved, and fully anticipating that theywould act in the best interests of the arts sector, various members of the
Region-wide Projects hub agreed that their preference was for these
representatives to be elected and accountable to the sector, and that a
mechanism to allow this should be put in place as soon as was possible. Ken
agreed to report this concern to the Chamber of Arts.
Following on from this Finlay, Cliff and Cate felt that the hubs should be
properly constituted from the outset in order to clarify voting rights,
membership and terms of reference. Ken suggested that the creation of aconstitution and terms of reference may be needed in the future but at this
-
8/2/2019 Note of Region Wide Projects Hub Meeting 27.3.12
2/3
2
time the relationships between the hubs and the council are at an early stage
of development and it would not be wise to attempt this task too soon.
Nevertheless it was agreed that terms of reference for the hubs would be
useful.
Lesley asked if the notes from the various hub meetings would be shared with
the other hubs. It was agreed to take this idea to the Chamber meeting.
Lesley also asked what how the membership of this hub connected to that of
the other hubs and region wide projects, and how information could best be
shared between them.
Cate suggested that a mapping exercise would help to identify other region
wide groups and issues and should be undertaken to inform the work of all the
hubs. It was agreed that this task had already been undertaken at the
Dalbeattie meeting and that the CABN project was also undertaking a
mapping activity for creative practitioners and therefore it could be a question
of updating this information and sharing it. The area hubs will be mapping
local arts provision.
3. Memorandum of Understanding
The draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was discussed. It was
explained that it had been drafted by the council and could be changed as
appropriate. It was felt that one of the early tasks for the Chamber is to redraftthe MOU in the light of feedback. Finlay suggested that a written constitution
would help to clarify the MOU.
However it was felt that in the section covering the Region Wide Hub needed
to list all the region wide projects. Also that the first bullet point should read
The Region Wide Hub will oversee the allocation of projects and resources in
order to ensure that they are appropriately shared across the region.
It was agreed that the third set of bullet points each should begin with a
doing word.
It was also agreed that the Key Tasks were not all key tasks and that this
section need to be redrafted.
Cate felt it would be helpful to have more regional hub reps on the Chamber.
The issue of potential conflicts of interest was raised by Cliff. It was agreed
that this is an issue for the whole hub process. It was agreed that it is
important to recognise this and to attempt to find ways to address it.
-
8/2/2019 Note of Region Wide Projects Hub Meeting 27.3.12
3/3
3
Again the question of a constitution was raised and it was suggested that the
hub seek agreement from the Chamber to convene a working group to draw
up a constitution. Finlay and Cliff offered to be part of such a group.
Ken stated that the council should consider servicing the hub meetings.
Accurate notes of these meetings are essential and it is not good practice to
ask a participant in the meeting to take the notes as it restricts their ability to
contribute to in the meeting.
4. Region-wide projects Hub Chair
At present Ken Gouge and Jan Hogarth are acting as joint chair of the group.
As Ken is a co-opted member of the Chamber, it will probably not be
appropriate for him to continue. Cate suggested that a vote be taken for the
position of chair. It was pointed out that at the previous meeting which had
been well attended the members had agreed that Ken and Jan should act aschairs. Ken informed the group that Jan would be attending the upcoming
Chamber meeting and that he had arranged to brief her prior to the meeting.
5. Rebecca led the feedback on the results of the Council meeting held on March
20th.
6. A brief update on the progress of the region wide projects was provided to the
group. The main issues arising from this:
If the partnership is going to work, council officers should make
attending the hub meetings a priority.
An issue was raised in relation to literature development and the recent Rural
Talent Hub application requested from Creative Scotland. It was agreed that
there had been a misunderstanding regarding the status of the bid for a share of
this funding that had been submitted via the proto Chamber from a new writers
group based in Wigtown. Key players in the area of creative writing talent
development in the region, such as the Literature Officer and other members of
the Literature Forum had not been fully consulted by the group. It was felt
appropriate that the 5,000 for literature allocated as part of the Rural Talent Hub
application should be discussed by the Literature Forum, where all key
organisations involved in literature development are represented, and that the
Literature Forum should agree how this money should be allocated in order to
meet the aim of the Rural Talent Hub and in line with the regions strategic plan
for Literature. Ken agreed to raise this at the Chamber meeting.