CONSULTANTS

8, De - Ba ng ler St. P.O. Box 1243,

Gb oko

+ 234-808-080-2046

E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m +234-703-430-2486

Niche:

A Model of Energy Transfer

By Peter Anyebe

AGAPE

CONSULTANTS

30th December, 2013

View

my profile

WordPress

Google Me

Keywords: Niche, Society, Humans, Nature, Form,

Thought, behaviour, ‘Energy Transfer’

The niche is presented as the alignment of talent,

profession, and job; which is actually a vantage

position from where to view reality, uniquely

CONSULTANTS

8, De - Ba ng ler St. P.O. Box 1243,

Gb oko

+ 234-808-080-2046

E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m +234-703-430-2486

Niche:

A Model of Energy Transfer

By

Peter Anyebe

Humans are complex beings. Attempts to unravel the mystery of humanity must also

be complex. But to be accessible to several people, this complexity needs to be

presented in simplistic form. The following simplification underlies the assumptions

in all my works:

Society is the product of the activities of humans in nature.

In time however, society became a monster that makes

people; according to the norms, beliefs, mores, and values.

This conception is characterized by two, 2 features as follows:

To be adequately understood, humans need to be investigated within the

setting presented by nature and society.

While nature is relatively stable, to the extent that the atom, its unit of

analysis, can be modelled as a system; society is fluid, so that the family is

so varied that no two, 2 are the same.

Societal fluidity may be a feature that has been contributed mostly by humans. The

norms, beliefs, mores, and values differ for different societies. And within every

society, the individual members may understand these variables differently. Stephen

Hawking has ascribed the differences to genes and upbringing:

In any population of self-reproducing organisms, there will be variations

in the genetic material and upbringing that different individuals have.

These differences will mean that some individuals are better able than

others to draw the right conclusions about the world around them and to

act accordingly.

These individuals will be more likely to survive and reproduce and so their

pattern of behaviour and thought will come to dominate.

View my profile Google Me WordPress

Some of the variability may however have been contributed by nature. Physics has

observed that at the sub atomic level, predictability fails, as summarised by Hawking

in the following quote:

The uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics implies that certain

pairs of quantities, such as the position and velocity of a particle,

cannot both be predicted with complete accuracy. Following

Feynman, quantum mechanics deals with this situation via a class of

quantum theories in which particles don’t have well-defined

positions and velocities but are represented by a wave

The unpredictable, random element comes in only when the wave is

interpreted in terms of the positions and velocities of particles. But

maybe that is the mistake; maybe there are no particle positions and

velocities, but only waves

Thus the wave model reintroduces nature’s stability feature. It would therefore be

sufficient to describe phenomena as waves, by the two, 2 features including size and

location. Every human person has this capacity, being intuitive. But rationality is an

endowment that may not be as uniformly distributed. This means that even when

phenomena are adequately described, by the wave model, the interpretation of the

items will differ, according to how rational the individuals are. Albert Einstein has

distinguished between intuition and rationality in the following quote:

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift, and the rational mind is a faithful

servant.

We have created a society that honours the servant, and has

forgotten the gift.

It may therefore be sufficient to distinguish between people, according to how

rational they are. Rationality requires that the natural order, N-O is approximated

sufficiently. By the perception model of mind, PMM a mind that operates optimally

would reduce phenomena into the essential five, 5 items to describe them. It would

be sufficient however, to identify the four, 4 active components that describe the

objectives that must be attained, for the phenomenon to be. Two, 2 of these items

define the work that needs to be done, and the other two, 2 define the source of the

energy, for the work. Then the fifth, 5th item defines the exhaust, according to how

efficiently the four, 4 items operate. These four, 4 items define the N-O to

approximate the duality series in operations research as follows:

Maxima, Energy1

Minimax, Work2

Maximin, Work1

Minima, Energy2

This means that rationality is not necessarily out of the reach of humans. The niche

is presented here as a route, for the attainment of rationality. People become

rational, when they have attained their niche. The niche in this case is associated

with the alignment of talent, profession, and job. This would be evident in the

person’s scores on the factors Rn for rationality, and Pc for phenomenological

compression. Then, for people who have found their niche, it would be possible to

predict the factor-√n, for the performance at task by the standard procedure.

A factor is at work here that goes beyond the wave model. When the mind projects

itself on phenomena, it is the form of the phenomenon that is perceived. Forms

would therefore include the following tripod:

Work, L

Energy, F and

Exhaust, A

Then, until people are able to perceive forms, they cannot be predicted. The form is

the mental picture of the intuition that enters the mind. After it has been reduced

into the appropriate tripod, this is also reduced into the standard procedure series,

SPS, by fission. The typical SPS therefore comprises six, 6 items. The first five, 5

describe the object that is to be achieved, which is then the sixth, 6th item. Serially:

Fission releases energy, according to how efficiently it is done. If it is done so that the

form-tripod is reduced into the appropriate wave-components, then all of the energy

that is required to make the phenomenon, is released. And in this way, energy is

transferred from nature, through humans, to society, as the object is actualized.

3. Energy1, F1 Phenomenon

2. Work2, L2 6. Object, A2

1. Work1, L1 5. Exhaust, A1

4. Energy, F2

References: Literature

1. Thought Systems

2. The F-Scale:

A Measure of Personality as the Faith factor-F, which determines Internal Consistency and

Dependability

3. The Mind:

A Perception Model

4. The Model Human:

A Thinker and a Learner

5. The Natural Order:

Globalisation of HR Metrics to Optimise People Value for Sustained Organisational Growth and a

Liquefied Business Environment

6. The Identity Kit:

Toward a Cultural Revolution, Driven by a Precise HR

7. Performance Appraisal:

A Talent Management Platform for Sustainability and a Stable Society

8. The Standard Procedure Series:

A Phenomenology Model of Being that is the Basis for Performance Appraisal by the Sustainability

Model

9. The Hourglass:

The Shape of the Human Form

10. Endorsements, Consciousness, Productivity, and the Creation of Value

11. Environmental Determinism:

Toward a Work Culture that is the Secret Plan Nature has worked out via a Universal History

12. A Model Of Learning

13. The Value Creation Model

14. God:

The Breath that Fires the Equations that Describe the Universe

15. Philosophy in the 3rd Millennium:

The Meeting Point of Physics and Psychology

16. Precision:

Making the Best of the Information Revolution

Instruments

1. The Productivity Model

2. The Leadership Model

3. Bill of Health Index

4. Sustainability

5. Pc Recommend

6. Recommendations