NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

25
NGOs in Poland Last 20 years Kuba Wygnański KLON/JAWOR Association [email protected] Next 20 years

Transcript of NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

Page 1: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

NGOs in Poland

Last 20 years

Kuba Wygnański

KLON/JAWOR Association

[email protected]

Next 20 years

Page 2: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

Streams of data (coordinated by KLON/JAWOR)

• Demography and geography of the Third Sector (inventory on-line data base of currently aprox 150.000 institutions – since 1992)

• Annual (since 2002) omnibus survey of individulas (n=1000 -4000) Embedenes of social economy (voluntarism, philanthropy, ethical consumerism, generalized trust, perception of social economy)perception of social economy)

• Quantitive approach – biannual research stratified sample of 2000 - 4000 institutions of Third Sector – (in depth face to face interview) – last edition June 2008 , next October 2010

• Panel of experts – aprox 300 experts and practicioniers (snow ball) regular on-line survey

• Other KLON/JAWOR research in the past (JHU, NGO Sustainability Index, Civil Society Index – CIVICUS, Civicpedia -Open knowledge repository (data, reports, working papers, anthologies)

Page 3: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC
Page 4: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

Dynamic of demography of third sector

Page 5: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

Fields of activities of NGOs Percentage of

indications as the

single most important

field of activity in 2006

Percentage of

indications as one of

the fields of activity in

2006

SPORTS, TOURISM, RECREATION AND HOBBIES 39,20% 46,70%

CULTURE AND ARTS 12,80% 23,10%

EDUCATION AND UPBRINGING 10,30% 35,60%

SOCIAL SERVICES AND SOCIAL WELFARE 9,90% 20,50%

HEALTH PROTECTION 8,00% 16,80%

SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC LOCAL DEVELOPMENT 5,90% 13,40%

LABOUR MARKET, EMPLOYMENT AND PROFESSIONAL 2,30% 8,80%LABOUR MARKET, EMPLOYMENT AND PROFESSIONAL

ACTIVATION

2,30% 8,80%

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 2,20% 8,80%

PROFESSIONAL, EMPLOYEE AND 1,90% 3,90%

BRANCH ISSUES

LAW, HUMAN RIGHTS AND POLITICAL ACTIVITY 1,80% 6,90%

ACADEMIC RESEARCH 1,30% 5,60%

SUPPORT FOR INSTITUTIONS, NGOS 1,00% 9,50%

AND CIVIL INITIATIVES

RELIGION 0,80% 3,00%

INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES 0,60% 7,00%

OTHER ACTIVITIES 2,00% 4,70%

Page 6: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

Volunterism

Philanthropy

Page 7: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

11,5 11,8

14,215,9

21,3

15

20

25

Non-governmental organisations per capita, according to REGON data (2005)

7,8

0

5

10

Rural communes

urban 1-10 ths.

urban 10-20 ths.

urban 20-50 ths.

urban 50-100 ths.

urban exceeding 100

tys.Average number of organizations per 10 ths. inhabitants

Page 8: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

No employees in Ngos

0 74.5%

1-5 employees 18.1%

6-10 employees 2.5%6-10 employees 2.5%

11-20 employees 2.4%

More than 20 employees 2.4%

In total 100.0%

Page 9: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

PROBLEMS EXPERIENCED IN THE LIFE OF THE ORGANIZATIONS IN THE LAST TWO YEARS

Difficulties in raising funds or acquiring equipment indispensable for conducting

the activities of the organization

73

Lack of people willing to engage altruistically in the activities of the organization 56

Excessively complicated formalities related to use of resources from grant givers,

sponsors or EU funds

53,7

Excessive bureaucracy in the public administration 51,5

Unclear rules of cooperation between organizations and the public administration 37,7

Weariness of the organization’s leaders, burn-out of people engaged in its work 33,7

Defective regulations, or lack thereof, for the activities of the organization 30,4Defective regulations, or lack thereof, for the activities of the organization 30,4

Lack of access to reliable information important for the organizations 28,2

Difficulties in keeping good staff, volunteers 27,8

Too high tax burden on the organizations 19,4

Unfavourable image of NGOs in the public opinion and in the me-dia, distrust of

NGOs

16,9

Excessive control of the public administration 16,3

Lack of cooperation or conflicts in the NGO community 14,4

Competition from other NGOs 12,5

Conflicts with other institutions (not NGOs) 9,4

Conflicts, tensions within our organization 8,4

Abandonment of the mission for which the organization was created 6,3

Page 10: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

20,00%

25,00%

30,00%

35,00%

"Unhealthy change of diet" of third secor in Poland ?

% of total income of the third sector 2003-2007 Central and regional govrnment

Local government

For profit econimic activity

Cost recovery (non-profit)

economic activity

Membership fees

0,00%

5,00%

10,00%

15,00%

2003 2005 2007

Corporate philanthropy

Individual philanthropy

UE Funds (part. European Social

Fund)

1% allocation of Personal

Income Tax

Page 11: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

Unique third sector „devices” in Poland

• Law on Public Benefit and Volunteerism

– Council of Public Benefit

– Regulated by open, transparnet access to public funds

– 1% allocation (aprox. 120 mln Euro in 2010– more then 8 million

taxpayers)

– Inforcement of local compacts

– Public Benefit Organizations

– Rights and obligations of volunteers– Rights and obligations of volunteers

• Other legal devices

– Subsidiarity – beeing „rooted”in Constitution (1997)

– Law on Social Cooperatives (2005)

– New Law on Social Enterprises 2010

– Stron relations with parliament (all party groups on NGOs since 1993)

Page 12: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

DO WE HAVE A PROBLEM?

Page 13: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

Everyday Democracy Index DEMOS 2007

Page 14: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

Polish context (societal - challanges)

• Helplessness of individuals (elements of homo sovieticus syndrome ) vs

overenterprenurial individuals. Resentments and nostalgia of socialist era

• Identity crisis ? (Winers ? Loosers ?)

• Dominant strategy of Individual survival (low social capital) and civic apathy

• Ad hoc eclectic collection of policy ideas – lack of solid concept of social policy

• „Blind State” - Lack of evidence base policy and proper policy cycle – hypertrophy

of data lack of diagnosis

• „Big Weak State” (institutional „bulimia” of state, local administration competing • „Big Weak State” (institutional „bulimia” of state, local administration competing

for political mandate with CBOs).

• Sectoral and policy „tunnels” – lack of horizontal coordinations

• Market proselytism – dominant bi-polar model of service delivery

• Low level of public debate (ambivalnet role of media)

• Adversarial concept of relations of State and Civil Society

• Shallow concept and practice of volunteerism and philanthropy

Page 15: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

My personal list of third sector challenges

• Identity of third sector

• Lack of understanding of own cultural / political

roots , traditions, dependecies

• Lack of sufficient self – reflection

• Leadership

• Allienation / bureacracy / lack of strong civic base

• Anachronism - we need not only reflection about

last 20 yeras but also about next 20 years

• Lack of stability – week institutional base - hazard of

„grants lotteries „

• Dependence on government money (is there a life

after Big Goverment (?)) 15

Page 16: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

Challanges II

• Lack of „dreams”

• Small scale of activities

• Abandoned „big, old structures” - necessary „scalling factor”

• Ambivalent role of UE funds (ESF - „kiss of death”(?) )

• Lack of distillation and diffusion of good practices• Lack of distillation and diffusion of good practices

• Isomorphism / lack of innovations / oportunism

• Low social capital / lack of involvement / weak civic

“performance”

• Integrity and trust of third sector

• To big expectations about role of regulatory framework

• Naive approach to time needed to „rebuild” civil society

Page 17: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

LEVIATAN – CHAMELON

CHANGING ROLE OF THE

GOVERMENT

Page 18: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

BIG PICTURE – Governance shift

Hierarchies Networks

Separation of policies and services in public administration

horizontal, territory based approach

Traditionlal (triangle) Social Dialogue Civic Dialogue (policentric)

Row Steer Serve

Separation of public and private domain “fuzzy” logic of public / private / civic

“Gifts” Grants Contracts Partnership agreements

Welfare State Welfare Society

Page 19: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

Citizenship, civil society and governance, Taylor, Deakin

Page 20: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

Modes of relations Gov – CSO

What is PARTNESHIP- Beyond platitudes

Source: Brimnkerhoff .J

Page 21: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

New possible systemic initiatives

• Civic Foresight

• Civil Renewal Strategy – Polish version

• Strategy for development of social capital

• New Compacts / Pacts (around social • New Compacts / Pacts (around social

economy, calture …)

Page 22: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

Polish strategy for development of

civil society (beyond NGOs)

What is civil society ? 5 pillars of civil society –

beyond third sector

– Active citizenship (horizontal citizenship- civil)

– Strong local communities – Strong local communities

– Strong third sector

– Enabling state (vertical citizenship – civic)

– Social Economy (vehicle of independence)

White Book – Polish Strategy for Civil Renewal

(2030 perspective )

Page 23: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC

Will you drop in ?

• National Forum of Nongovernmental Iniatives

• Since 1994

• Next September 2011 (during Polish UE

Presidency)Presidency)

• Welcome

Page 24: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC
Page 25: NGOsin Poland Last 20 years Next 20 years - FDSC