Next Steps Work Group - Amazon S3 · Percent Proficient . Percent Proficient Target . Notes . AY...
Transcript of Next Steps Work Group - Amazon S3 · Percent Proficient . Percent Proficient Target . Notes . AY...
2:00 Welcome and Overview of Call Steve Klein
2:05 Open Space & Updates:
■ Office of Career, Technical, andAdult Education (OCTAE) - Division of Academic and TechnicalEducation (DATE) updates
OCTAE-DATE Staff
2:10 How Are We Doing?: State Assessment Sharon Miller, OCTAE, DATE
and ESSA Indicators 1S1 and 1S2 Cathie Raymond, Arizona Department of
EducationLuke Rhine and Melvin D’Souza, Delaware
Department of Education
2:35 You Want It When?: Preparing for andSurviving the CAR Submission Process
Steve Klein, RTI International
2:55 Closing OCTAE-DATE Staff
3:00 Adjourn
Next Steps Work Group
Agenda
July 12, 2018
Next Steps Work Group
• Your observations needed on the Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) submission process: – For veteran submitters: What are some tips you can share with the larger group? – For those newer to the process: What are some questions you have or challenges you
face in the CAR submission process?
We will discuss the question in the second portion of the call.
Next Steps Work Group
How Are We Doing?: State Assessment and ESSAIndicators
Presenters:
Sharon Miller, Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education: U.S. Department of Education Cathie Raymond, Arizona Department of Education Luke Rhine and Melvin D’Souza, Delaware Department of Education
Percentage of CTE concentrators meeting State-established reading/language arts standards
Average Target Average Performance 3 Year Performance Average
100.00%
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
62.84%
80.19%
66.38%
74.82%
67.44%
75.31%
69.74%
75.09%
70.70%
76.96%
70.51%
77.48%
66.90%
72.69%
63.67%
70.91% 70.91%
60.88%
68.16%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Percentage of CTE concentrators meeting State-established mathematics standards
Average Target Average Performance 3 Year Performance Average
100.00%
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
55.11% 54.05%
58.93% 59.56% 59.66% 63.20% 63.97% 62.97%
58.84%
77.32% 79.98%
69.92%71.29% 71.90%
69.85% 65.37% 64.82%
60.87% 63.69%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
1S1 and 1S2 Indicator Performance - Arizona
Years Performance measure State adjusted level of performance (SALP)
90 percent Actual
Academic Year (AY) 2013-14
1S1 86.00 77.40 96.51
1S2 75.00 67.50 89.10
AY 2014-15
1S1 88.00 79.20 96.50
1S2 79.00 71.10 87.38
AY 2015-16
1S1 30.00 27.00 26.81
1S2 30.00 27.00 15.37
AY 2016-17
1S1 28.00 25.20 29.34
1S2 17.00 15.30 28.05
1S2 Indicator Performance - Delaware
# Proficient
# All Students
Percent Proficient
Percent Proficient Target
Notes
AY 2014-15
CTE 3,462 4,426 78.2 70.2 • 1S2 data reported for seniors taking assessment two years prior • Assessment = Delaware Comprehensive Assessment System (DCAS) • CTE = CTE concentrators in their primary CTE program. Number may
be less than all CTE concentrators who may have taken assessment All students
6,382 9,223 69.2 70.2
AY 2015-16
CTE 887 4,343 20.4 70.2 • 1S2 data reported for seniors taking assessment one year prior • Assessment = Smarter Balanced • Drop in proficiency expected as multi-state normed Smarter
Balanced test is more rigorous than DCAS All students
1,752 7,520 23.3 70.2
AY 2016-17
CTE 1,626 5,984 27.2 20.5 • Starting 2016-17, denominators of 1S1 and 1S2 changed to reflect all CTE concentrator seniors exiting in reporting year (before, denominator was CTE seniors taking assessment two years prior).
• Assessment = SAT taken in prior year (paid for by Delaware schools and taken by nearly all students)
• 2016-17 is a new base year for sub-group comparisons
All students
2,619 8,793 29.8 20.5
1S2 Indicator Performance - Delaware
Next Steps Work Group
You Want it When?: Preparing for and Survivingthe CAR Submission Process
Presenter:
Steve Klein, RTI International
CAR Submission Resources
CAR Submission Resources
CAR Submission Resources
User guide can be found here: https://s3.amazonaws.com/PCRN/docs/CAR_User_Guide_2017.pdf
Your CAR Observations
– For veteran submitters: What are some tips you can share with the larger group? – For those newer to the process: What are some questions you have or challenges you
face in the CAR submission process?
Please indicate that you would like to share using the “Raise Hand” function and wait for the moderator to call on you.
Next Steps Work Group
• Thank you to the 2017-18 NSWG Planning Team and members! • Evaluation and next year’s topics:
https://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/4416803/2017-18-NSWG-Evaluation
• Interested in becoming a 2018-19 NSWG Planning Team member?Contact Rebecca Moyer: [email protected]