News on time calibration
description
Transcript of News on time calibration
News on time calibration
Collaboration MeetingAmsterdam, 22-26 Nov 2010
Agustín S. LosaIFIC (CSIC – Universitat de València)
Outline
• OB system status • The new time calibration – Autobinning: Increasing chances for a good fit– Intra-Line calibration: T0s
• “Old way” vs “Automatic Calculation”• First floors calibration
– Inter-Line calibration: Time offsets• Laser OB• LED OB
• Conclusions• To-Do List
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 2
Status of the OB system
• Current list of Optical Beacon not working – LED: L11F2, L11F21, L12F15 Laser: L7F0– No new dead OB, after the reconnection of lines 6 and 9– OB of L10F2 recovered
• Reminder: Optical Beacon of line 9 on floor 21 needs “EN_ACQ =0” when this Beacon is not flashing
• Special beacon for optical properties on L6F2 works: – The 6 LEDs of the TOP group emit light at 385, 400, 440, 470, 505 and 518 nm
• New RunSetups for OB runs have been created after the reconnection, still LED calibration runs no taken
• New RunSetups for OB runs will be created before HV tunning
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 3
“Old way” T0 Calculation (Reminder)
storey 2
storey 9
storey 15
storey 21
Line 1 1) Flash OMs by an optical beacon 2) Plot the distribution of hit arrival times for each ARS 3) Fit such distribution with a Gaus or Gaus @Exponential
function4) Determine Tpeak , the time of the function peak
T0 = ClockPhase + TPeak 22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 4
“Old way” vs “Autobinning”
So far the analysis of data to extract the T0 have been carried on “manually” in an iterative way
With the new method, refitting with different bin size of the 1800 histograms is made automatically and human inspection is replaced by a visual quick cross-check of 30 images per sector.
No
Yes
Fill histogram
Fit histogram
VisualInspection:
Success
Choose binning
Exit
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 5
No
Yes
Fill this histogram
Fit this histogram with a Gaus@Expo
Bin Size > 4 ns
Create a histogram with 0.2 ns bins
Increase histogram bin size by 0.2 ns
Choose the binning which maximizes PFit with 0.08 <
PFit < 0.95
Autobinning
NEW
Autobinning: Increasing chances for a good fit
• Fit all the time histograms with an automated method:– Fit to the convolution of a Gaussian and an exponential– Try different bin sizes (from 0.2 ns to 4 ns, in 0.2 ns steps)– Choose the fit with the best P(χ²)
• This method increases significantly the odds to have a good fit
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 6not autobinned (0.2ns) autobinned (1.4ns)
Autobinning: Increasing chances for a good fit• Final fit using a colour code to help in the visual check:
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 7
PurpleOB-OM angle > 120°
Green ( Blue )OK (hits-signal / flashes > 1)
Yellow Fitted more than 50ns
CyanDifferent amplitudes >75%
Brown(hits-signal / flashes) < 0.01
RedMax statistic < 50 hits
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 8
Example of visual check for sector #3 of line 2 flashed from the L07 F15ARSARS0
ARS1
ARS2
ARS3
ARS4
ARS5
FLOOR
F11 F12 F13 F14 F15
F13 OM1
L8
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L10L9
L11L12
The new time calibration
• Scheme of the automatic calibration:
– Human intervention only needed at the end of the process to check the output
run file & calibration
(time & alignment)
Build time OB-OM
histogramsTpeak
T0s
Time offsetsProcessing run Autobinning
Intra-Line
Inter-Line
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 9
• Early photon region– Section #1: Floors 4-10 with the OB on floor 2– Section #2: Floors 11-16 (11-17) with the OB on floor 9– Section #3: Floors 17-22 (17-23) with the OB on floor 15– Section #4: Floors 23-25 with the OB on floor 21
• Photoelectron level region (under study)– Section #0: Floors 1-3 (1-8) with an OB of other line (Laser or
LED)
Intra-Line(obtaining new T0s)
• Use the obtained T100s by autobinning to calibrate by “sections” (≠ sectors):
•
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 10
Intra-Line Example of sections #1-4 for line 1
(2 runs of 25/02/08, period of 10L)
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 11
Section #2Floor 11-16 (11-17)
Section #1Floor 4-10
Section #3Floor 17-22 (17-23)
Section #4Floor 23-25
Intra-Line“Old way” vs “Autobinning”
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 12
Comparison of both methods with the distribution of the
T0s obtained by the “Old way” minus the ones obtained by the “Autobinning” in the period 10L.
Only 24 out of 914 show a difference bigger than 1 ns.
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 13
Intra-LineCalibrating the Section #0: LEDs vs Laser
Laser OB ( L8 F0 ) LED OB ( L2 F2 )
Example of a comparison (same set of runs as before) of line 1 section #0 calibration with L2F2 LED OB and Laser Beacon on line 8
L1 L2
L3 L4 L6L5
L7 L8 L10L9
L11 L12
L1 L2
L3 L4 L6L5
L7 L8 L10L9
L11 L12
Line 1
Inter-Line(Time offsets between lines)
• For each fitted OB, Laser or LED, T100s are analyzed– Possibility to study the evolution in time along the given period– All available Laser and LED calibration runs in a given period can be used– Possibility to use the LED OB as a cross-check for the time offsets (under
study)• The whole computing time in my PC is about ~1 day per period• The short-term goal is to compute time offsets for all the periods:
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 14
5 Lines 10 Lines 12 Lines HV L10-L12+offsets HV
29/Jan/2007 07/Dec/2007 30/May/2008 13/Aug/2009 07/Nov/2009 13/Nov/2009 13/Jul/2010 Today
#1 #2 #3 #5#4 #6 #7
~10 monthsARS_T0_VERSION
10.746.202
~7 monthsARS_T0_VERSION
16.703.02654.497.693
~15,5 monthsARS_T0_VERSION
16.722.42954.497.694
~3 monthsARS_T0_VERSION
35.045.03655.212.410
~5 daysARS_T0_VERSION
36.934.336
~8 monthsARS_T0_VERSION
37.347.048
~4,5 monthsARS_T0_VERSION
53.408.684
DurationARS_T0_VERSION
NO OFFSETSWITH OFFSETS
Line 1
Line 2
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
Example of inter-line with Laser for the time offsets of period 10L
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 15
Line 8
Line 10
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
Example of inter-line with Laser for the time offsets of period 10L
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 16
Inter-Line“Old way” vs “Autobinning”
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 17
Line Old way Autobinning1 -2.1 -2.12 -1.9 -2.13 0.8 0.54 ---- ----5 -2.4 -2.26 -0.9 -0.97 -0.2 -0.38 7.1 7.59 1.0 0.8
10 -1.6 -1.311 ---- ----12 ---- ----
Comparison of both methods for the time offsets of period 10L, made with 12 Laser runs from 25/02/2008 to 12/05/2008
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
Line 1
Line 2
Example of inter-line with LED-OB 1025 (L9 S2)with only one run (OB 1081) (25/02/08)
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 18
Conclusions
• The new automated method for the time calibration is ready.• The method searches the best bin size to fit the hit arrival time
distributions automatically. • More than 1800 histograms fitted.• The method is fast and reduces significantly visual inspection.• Results are compatible with the “old way” method.
• No dead OB after reconnection and recovery of the L10F2• Special beacon for optical properties on L6F2 works and is
ready.
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 19
To-Do List• Intra-Line calibration:
– Apply automatic method to all the LED calibration sets– Compute new T0s after HV tuning– Study unstable PMTs– Calibrate the first floors
• Inter-Line calibration:– Obtain time offsets for all periods– Study time offsets evolution along all periods– Use LED-Beacons as a cross-check for the time offsets
• Start to use the Special beacon for optical properties on L6F2 with different wavelengths and the Nanobeacons on L9F1
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 20
Thank youfor your attention
PLEASE STAND BYBACK UP
Laser OB – Offsets 10L
Laser OB - Offsets
• One only run
Line 1
Line 2
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 38
-1.0ns
-1.0ns
Line 3
Line 4
L5L1 L2L3 L4 L6L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 39
-1.0ns
-1.0ns
Line 5
Line 6
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 40
-1.0ns
-1.0ns
Line 7
Line 8
L7 L8
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5
L10L9L11L12
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 41
-1.0ns
-1.0ns
Line 9
Line 10
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 42
-1.0ns
-1.0ns
LED OB - Offsets
• One only run
Line 1
Line 2
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 44
Line 3
Line 4
L5L1 L2L3 L4 L6L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 45
Line 5
Line 6
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 46
Line 7
Line 8
L8
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L10L9
L11L12
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 47
Line 9
Line 10
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 48
Use of LED OB (under study)Inter-Line with LED(only 1 run for OB)
LCM 1081 LCM 1025Line Autobinning Laser LED L9 S2
1 -2.1 -2.1 -2.8 (*)2 -2.1 -2.0 (*) -2.5 (*)3 0.5 0.3 0.94 ---- -0.8 (*) -1.8 (*)5 -2.2 -2.5 -2.86 -0.9 -1.3 -0.6 (*)7 -0.3 -0.7 2.18 7.5 7.2 (*) 6.09 0.8 0.4 5.8 (*)
10 -1.3 -1.8 0.6 (*)11 ---- ---- ----12 ---- ---- ----
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 49(*) These time offsets have been obtained with low statistics
Inter-Line(Time offsets between lines)
• For each fitted OBs, Laser or LED (under study), T100s are analyzed– One set of time offsets values obtained for each OB: posibility of combine all that info for
an unique time offsets (under study)– Posibility study of evolution in time along the given period (under study) – All available Laser runs (LED calibration runs also under study) in a given period can be
used• The whole computing time in my PC is about ~1 day per period• The short term goal is to compute time offsets for all the periods without them
(blue ones):
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 50
5 Lines 10 Lines 12 Lines HV L10-L12+offsets HV
29/Jan/2007 07/Dec/2007 30/May/2008 13/Aug/2009 07/Nov/2009 13/Nov/2009 13/Jul/2010 Today
#1 #2 #3 #5#4 #6 #7
~10 mounthsARS_T0_VERSION
10.746.202
~7 mounthsARS_T0_VERSION
16.703.02654.497.693
~15,5 mounthsARS_T0_VERSION
16.722.42954.497.694
~3 mounthsARS_T0_VERSION
35.045.03655.212.410
~5 daysARS_T0_VERSION
36.934.336
~8 mounthsARS_T0_VERSION
37.347.048
~4,5 mounthsARS_T0_VERSION
53.408.684
DurationARS_T0_VERSION
NO OFFSETSWITH OFFSETS
2007:OFF:V2.1 2008:V2.7 2008:V2.9 2009:V3.0 2009:L12:V6.0 L8clock 2009:V3.1 2010:V3.1 ------------
Intra-Line – T0s(old)
Line 1
Section #4St (21)23-25
Section #2St (9)11-16(17)
Section #4St (15)17-22(23)
Section #1St (2)3-10
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 52
Line 2
Section #4St (21)23-25
Section #2St (9)11-16(17)
Section #4St (15)17-22(23)
Section #1St (2)3-10
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 53
Line 3
Section #4St (21)23-25
Section #2St (9)11-16(17)
Section #4St (15)17-22(23)
Section #1St (2)3-10
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 54
Line 4
Section #4St (21)23-25
Section #2St (9)11-16(17)
Section #4St (15)17-22(23)
Section #1St (2)3-10
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 55
Line 5
Section #4St (21)23-25
Section #2St (9)11-16(17)
Section #4St (15)17-22(23)
Section #1St (2)3-10
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 56
Line 6
Section #2St (9)11-16(17)
Section #4St (15)17-22(23)
Section #1St (2)3-10
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 57
Line 7
Section #4St (21)23-25
Section #2St (9)11-16(17)
Section #4St (15)17-22(23)
Section #1St (2)3-10
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 58
Line 8
Section #4St (21)23-25
Section #2St (9)11-16(17)
Section #4St (15)17-22(23)
Section #1St (2)3-10
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 59
Line 9
Section #4St (21)23-25
Section #4St (15)17-22(23)
Section #1St (2)3-10
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 60
Line 10
Section #4St (21)23-25
Section #2St (9)11-16(17)
Section #4St (15)17-22(23)
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 61
Calibrating Section #0 – T0s(old)
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 63
Line 1
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
Laser L2 S2
L1 Section #1
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 64
Line 2
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L5L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
Laser L1 S2
L2 Section #1
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 65
Line 5
L5L1 L2L3 L4 L6L7 L8L10L9
L11L12
Laser L3 S2
L5 Section #1
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 66
Line 9
L9L5
L1 L2L3 L4 L6L7 L8L10
L11L12
Laser L3 S2
L9 Section #1
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 68
Summary
• Step #2: Autobinning– Because of eventual imperfect measured signal different visual checks
are provided in function of the resulting fit
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 69
Yellow → If fitted window is bigger than 50nsCyan → If difference between fitted function amplitude and signal one supere the 75%Red → If bin with most stadistic has less than 50 hitsBrown → If (hits-signal/flashes) ratio is lower than 0.01Purple → If OB-OM angle is greatter than 120°
Blue → OK, but (hits-signal/flashes) ratio is greater 1Green → OK
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 70
t[obtaining run]<t[obtaining calibration]t[obtaining calibration]~10-20min/run
t[processing]~10min/20.000events-2OB-run
t[autobin 1 line] ~??min/run
Otras cosas…
• PENDIENTE: Estudio del “desgaste” de los LED-OB debido al biofouling– PENDIENTE: Estudio del alcance de algunos LED-OB a lo largo del tiempo.
• PENDIENTE: Estudio del alcance del láser– Primer estudio: Tres runes a distintas polarizaciones tomados el mismo día comparados
con varios de intensidad normal tomados en distintos momentos– Segundo estudio: 6 nuevos runes a distintas polarizaciones tomados el mismo día
comparados con uno de intensidad normal más antiguo– Se observa una posible dependencia de la pendiente del alcance con el día:• runes del mismo día pendiente muy similar• runes de diferentes días, pendientes dispares entre sí (incluso a la misma intensidad)
– ¿Variaciones en la opacidad del agua?: Se propone un estudio en el tiempo de lo mismo– PENDIENTE: Obtención de una relación precisa “Voltaje de la Polarización” vs “Intensidad
del Láser”: pendiente de obtenerse del análisis de los datos facilitados medidos en el laboratorio a la misma frecuencia
– Se pospuso indefinidamente antes de agosto en beneficio del autobinning
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 71
Primer Estudio
Segundo Estudio
1900
1950
2000
1975
2025
2075
2125
2175
Normal
Normal
Imágenes de archivo de los estudios realizados en su día22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 72
Run Polarization (V) I (µJ) Alcance 1% (m)31486 1900 0,24 209,049969 1925 0,33 207,331488 1950 0,36 240,549968 1975 0,42 228,731487 2000 0,48 252,549967 2025 0,54 241,349966 2075 0,66 249,049975 2125 0,77 257,149964 2175 0,88 263,040700 Normal 1,2 274,340878 Normal 1,2 277,039418 Normal 1,2 286,038567 Normal 1,2 283,0
Valores obtenidos para el alcance delláser al nivel del 1% del photoelectrón
(1 photoelectrón cada 100 flashes)
Alcance normaldel láser al 1%:
275-285 m
AjusteIntensidad vs Alcance
(I = c + b A)
b = 70 µJ/m
c = 202 µJ
A(12 µJ) = 1040 m
22-26 Nov 2010 Agustín S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 73
L1 L2
L3 L4 L6L5
L7 L8 L10L9
L11 L12
L1 L2
L3 L4 L6L5
L7 L8 L10L9
L11 L12
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 74
L1
L2
L3
L4
L6
L5
L7
L8
L10
L12
L1
L2
L3
L4
L6
L5
L7
L8
L10
L1222-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 75
St 2
St 3
St 1
St 4
St 5
St 6
St 7
St 8
St 9
22-26 Nov 2010 A. S. Losa – Amsterdam Collaboration Meeting 76