New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) By Shaquille Stanley Victor Baquerizo.
-
Upload
veronica-lawrence -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
description
Transcript of New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) By Shaquille Stanley Victor Baquerizo.
![Page 1: New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) By Shaquille Stanley Victor Baquerizo.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062401/5a4d1b237f8b9ab0599964c3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985)
ByShaquille StanleyVictor Baquerizo
![Page 2: New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) By Shaquille Stanley Victor Baquerizo.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062401/5a4d1b237f8b9ab0599964c3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Constitutional Issue
• New Jersey v. T.L.O. case violated the 4th amendment, which protects people from having their get their stuff searched without probable cause
![Page 3: New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) By Shaquille Stanley Victor Baquerizo.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062401/5a4d1b237f8b9ab0599964c3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
New Jersey
• Mr. Choplick, the principle of Piscataway High School, who was representing New Jersey
• Mr. Choplick has searched a student’s property without the use of a search warrant.
• Although he found marijuana and rolling paper, he didn’t have the right to search T.L.O’s stuff
![Page 4: New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) By Shaquille Stanley Victor Baquerizo.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062401/5a4d1b237f8b9ab0599964c3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
T.L.O.
• A student of Piscataway High School• T.L.O. and friend were caught in the
bathroom smoking• T.L.O. denied it, principle searched her
stuff without permission• Violated the 4th amendment
![Page 5: New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) By Shaquille Stanley Victor Baquerizo.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062401/5a4d1b237f8b9ab0599964c3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Background • The principle, Mr. Choplick searched
T.L.O’s purse because her and her friend were caught in the bathroom smoking and she denied it.
• Mr. Choplick has found cigarettes and rolling paper, a pipe, marijuana, and a roll of money. All this in the supreme court was rendered useless since it was found by violating the fourth amendment.
![Page 6: New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) By Shaquille Stanley Victor Baquerizo.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062401/5a4d1b237f8b9ab0599964c3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Key Points
• The 4th amendment has to be respected even in public schools.
• If evidence is found violating an amendment it is considered useless
• Just because you are under aged you still have all your rights.
![Page 7: New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) By Shaquille Stanley Victor Baquerizo.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062401/5a4d1b237f8b9ab0599964c3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Court Opinions
• There was a probable cause to search T.L.O.’s purse since smoke was found in the bathroom when she was there. This is allowable since they have evidence,
![Page 8: New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) By Shaquille Stanley Victor Baquerizo.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062401/5a4d1b237f8b9ab0599964c3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Significance
• Now that this case had taken in effect, public schools need to have a search warrant in order to search through a student’s stuff such as a locker or book bag.
![Page 9: New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) By Shaquille Stanley Victor Baquerizo.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062401/5a4d1b237f8b9ab0599964c3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
My Opinion
• It is fair that the evidence of rolling paper and stuff was not held against T.L.O. because they were only searching for cigarettes. There was a probable cause to search her stuff only for cigarettes. The supreme’s decision was right
![Page 10: New Jersey vs. T.L.O. (1985) By Shaquille Stanley Victor Baquerizo.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062401/5a4d1b237f8b9ab0599964c3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Work CitedWebsite 1:
http://www.infoplease.com/us/supreme-court/cases/ar24.htmlWebsite 2: www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/tlo.htmlWebsite 3: www.supreme.justia.com/us/469/325/case.html