NEW INSTRUMENTS/CASE DISCUSSION
description
Transcript of NEW INSTRUMENTS/CASE DISCUSSION
1
NEW INSTRUMENTS/CASE DISCUSSION
Speaker M Jayasree
Moderators J Manju
Anju
2
Contents• Optical Coherence Tomography
• Microperimetry
• Multifocal Electroretinogram
• Glaucoma Diagnostics
GDx
HRT
GLAUCOMA OCT
HVF
3
OCULAR COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY
PRINCIPLE
•OpticalOptical involves light and optics Used for Optical biopsy of retina.
•CoherenceCoherence – two light beams of same wave length in phase. Uses principle of low coherence interferometry.
•TomographyTomography Tome/Tomo – Greek for section /cutting
4
SDOCTSDOCT
Resolution – 6 micronsResolution – 6 microns
Wavelength – 840 nmWavelength – 840 nm
3-D imaging3-D imaging
No movement artifactsNo movement artifacts
25,000 A-scans/second25,000 A-scans/second
Determining and visualizing structure that Determining and visualizing structure that absorb and scatter lightabsorb and scatter light
NoncontactNoncontact
NoninvasiveNoninvasive
5
IndicationsIndications•Retinal- macula and Optic nerve.
•Inconclusive FFAs- done together.
•Quantify extent of lesions ex-CNVM, thickness of macula.
•Quantify RNFL thickness around Optic nerve head.
6
7
PHOTORECEPTORSPHOTORECEPTORSRPERPE
CHORIOCAPILLARISCHORIOCAPILLARIS
NFLNFL
FOVEOLAFOVEOLA
GCLGCL
ELM
ONLONL
OPLOPL
INLINLIPLIPL
8
Hyper reflectivityHyper reflectivity
Above the NFLAbove the NFL
Posterior Hyaloid ,Epiretinal Membrane,Blood
In the NFLIn the NFL
Inflammation, Cotton Wool Spots, Inflammation, Cotton Wool Spots, Blood Vessels,Blood Vessels,
Flame Shaped HemorrhagesFlame Shaped Hemorrhages
In the nuclear and plexiform layersIn the nuclear and plexiform layers
Hard Exudates, Dot Blot HemorrhagesHard Exudates, Dot Blot HemorrhagesIn the RPE CC layerIn the RPE CC layer
Hyperpigmentation, CNVHyperpigmentation, CNV
In the sub RPE layerIn the sub RPE layer
Drusens, Blood, FibrosisDrusens, Blood, FibrosisIn the choroidsIn the choroids
Scar, TransmissionScar, Transmission
Hypo reflectivityHypo reflectivity
AbsenceAbsence
EdemaEdema
Cystoid spacesCystoid spaces
Fluid – serousFluid – serous
9
•NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE
•NORMAL FOVEAL CONTOUR WITH FOVEAL DIP
•INNER RETINAL RETINAL LAYERS ARE NORMAL
•NORMAL RPE CC COMPLEX
•FOVEAL THICKNESS
10
•NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE
•FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED
•THICKENED HYPERREFLECTIVE INNER LAYERS
•E/O SRF , SUGGESTIVE OF ACTIVE CNVM WITH CYSTIC SPACES IN THE INNER RETINAL LAYERS
11
•THICK ERM NOTED
•ALTERED FOVEAL CONTOUR
•LARGE CNVM, NO E/O SRF SUGGESTIVE OF SCARRED CNVM
12
•THIN ERM
•ELEVATED FOVEAL CONTOUR
•THICKENED AND HIGH REFLECTIVE MEMBRANE NOTED SUBFOVEALLY
•NO E/O SRF,SUGGESTIVE OF SCARRED CNVM
•SMALL DRUSENOID PED
13
• WRINKLED ILM
•ALTERED FOVEAL CONTOUR
•INNER RETINAL LAYERS ARE THICK AND CYSTIC SPACES
•THICKENED AND HIGH REFLECTIVE RPE-CC COMPLEX WITH MULTIPLE PED
14
•NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE
•FOVEAL CONTOUR ELEVATED AND THINNED
•HYPER REFLECTIVE INNER LAYES
•CSR
•SEROUS PED
15
•NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE
•FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED
•HEMORRHAGIC PED
16
•WRINLED ILM
•FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED
•CYSTIC SPACES IN THE INNER RETINAL LAYERS
•SEROUS AND FIBROUS PED
17
•INCOMPLETE POSTERIOR VITREOUS DETACHMENT
•FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED
•FIBROVASCULAR PED
18
•INCOMPLETE POSTERIOR VITREOUS DETACHMENT
•FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED
•DRUSENOID PED
19
•NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE
•FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED
•HARD EXUDATES IN THE INNER RETINAL LAYERS
•NORMAL RPE CC COMPLEX
20
•NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE
•FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED
•DIFFUSE HARD EXUDATES IN THE INNER RETINAL LAYERS
•NORMAL RPE CC COMPLEX
21
•NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE
•CSME CME FOVEOLAR DETACHMENT
•THICKENED HYPER REFLECTIVE CYSTIC SPACED INNER LAYERS
•NORMAL RPE-CC COMPLEX
22
•NORMAL VITREO RETNAL INTERFACE
•FOVEAL CONTOUR ELEVATED/THINNING
•NEURO SENSORY DETACHMENT
•SRF, SUGGESTIVE OF CSR
•NORMAL RPE COMPLEX
23
•ERM WITH ILM FOLDS
•FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED
•INNER RETINAL THICKENED
•NORMAL RPE CC COMPLEX
24
•ERM WITH WRINKLING ILM
•LAMELLAR MACULAR HOLE
•THIN INNER RETINAL LAYERS
•NORMAL RPE COMPLEX
25
•FULL THICKNESS MACULAR HOLE WITH OPERCULUM
26
•COMPLETE POSTERIOR VITREOUS DETACHMENT
•VITREOUS TRACTION RELEASED
27
•NORMAL VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE
•FOVEAL SCHISIS
•THINNED CYTIC SPACES INNER LAYERS
•RPE ALTERED
28
•FOVEAL CONTOUR ALTERED
•OPTIC DISC PIT
29
•OPTIC DISC PIT MACULOPATHY
30
•VITREO MACULAR TRACTION
31
Case 1
• DATE OF VISIT 22/08/08
• BCVA OS 6/36, N36
• SL OS WNL
• FUNDUS OS CNVM, SUB RETINAL HEAMORRHAGE
•OCT OS E/O SRF , SUGGESTIVE OF ACTIVE CNVM WITH CYSTIC SPACES IN THE INNER RETINAL LAYERS
OS INJ AVASTIN GIVEN THRICE
PRE TREATMENT
POST TREATMENT•DATE OF VISIT 22/11/08
• BCVA OS 6/12, N8
• SL OS WNL
• FUNDUS OS SCARREDCNVM,
•OCT OS NO E/O SRF , SUGGESTIVE OF SCARRED CNVM WITH CYSTIC SPACES IN THE INNER RETINAL LAYERS
32
PROGNOSIS HOLE FORM FACTOR
•HFF > 0.9 - 100 % PRIMARY CLOSURE
•HFF = 0.5 - 67 % PRIMARY CLOSURE
•HFF < 0.5 - Poor closure rates
•HIGHER HFF - BETTER POST OP VA
33
CASE 2•DATE OF VISIT (25/09/08)
•BCVA OS 6/48(ECC VIEW), N24
•S/L OS NO ABNORMALITY
•FUNDUS OS FTMH
•OCT OS FULL THICKNESS MACULAR HOLE WITH COMPLETE PVD
PRE TREATMENT
S/P VIT+C3F8 UNDER GA POST TREATMENT
•DATE OF VISIT (6/12/08)
•BCVA OS 6/12+, N8
•S/L OS WNL
•FUNDUS OS
•OCT OS
34
Multifocal Electroretinogram (mfERG) in Retinal Disorders
35
Multifocal electroretinogram
• Simultaneous recording of focal retinal responses
• Offers direct, objective and topographical mapping of central 36-
40º of retinal function
• Cone driven responses
• Fovea, Para fovea and near peripheral photopic retina function can
be evaluated.
36
mfERG Stimulus
• Display contains array of hexagons-
• Commonly used 103 hexagonal
array
• Scaling basis - Photoreceptor
density
• Produce local retinal responses of
equal amplitude
• Flickers according to pseudorandom
binary m-sequence
37
1.6 °
1.6°- 6°
6°-11.4°
11.4°-18.2°
18.2°-26.2°
26.2°-35°
• Waveforms grouping according to different retinal eccentricities
• Subtends 35° horizontally and 31° vertically – viewing distance 53cm
• The responses obtained from six zones
38
MultiplotTrace Array
First order kernel responses- Interpretation
39
mfERG Components
• N1 – First negative trough
• P1- First positive Peak
• Origins
Cone Photoreceptors
Dominated by on and off bipolar cells
N1- IT
P1-IT
P1- AMP
N1-AMP
Parameters
40
• Degenerative photoreceptor disease
Larger delay in implicit times
• Local lesions damaging INL
Larger reduction in amplitudes
• Damage to NFL or GCL
No reduction or delay
Interpretation
41
Clinical applications
• To distinguish retinal diseases from optic nerve disease
• Details extent of lesion
• Sensitive indicator for retinal drug toxicity
• Post-operative management following V-R surgery
• Assess sub-clinical retinal changes in DR
42
Case 1
Stargardt’s disease Few yellowish flecks at the macula
43
Fullfield ERG
44
Multifocal ERG – Trace array
45
Multiplot
Crater like defect - MfERG delineates the macular pathology
46
Case 2
Cone Dystrophy
47
Fullfield ERG
48
Multifocal ERG – Trace array
49
Multiplot
50
Case 3
51
Fullfield ERG
Retinitis Pigmentosa
52
Multifocal ERG – Trace array
53
MultiPlot
54
Case 4
JUVENILE RETINOSCHISIS
55
Case 5
Fine RPE stippling in normal looking fundus – Chloroquine toxicity
56
57
58
59
MICROPERIMETRY
•It is an instrument for fundus related perimetry - assess the central visual field and correlates the findings directly to the fundus location
•Captures patient’s retina and simultaneously projects light stimuli on to the retina
•Stimuli have been projected and the operator customizes the pattern of stimuli according to the retinal disease
•Easily adapted to the different diseases of macula
•Assess also the patient’s fixation site and stability of fixation over time as stable, relatively unstable and unstable
•With or without pupillary dilation (if undilated pupil size min 4mm required)
•Persons who have low vision or fixation problems, the stimulus can be made thicker or larger – also the fixation target may be chosen as either single cross, four crosses or circle, any color , any size
60
Comparison with HVFMICROPERIMETRY
• Even a small central, paracenral scotoma
can be detected, understand and assess
macular disease
• Fixation location is assessed
• Direct corelation between threshold values
and retinal sensitivity in decibels
• Operator decides the stimuli location and
time interval between the stimuli
• Gives best results especially in cases of
vitreo retinal surgeries(pre and post),
before and after PDT THERAPHY, easily
detects the defect is in the retina or visual
pathway
HVF
• Macular program available but
relatively small central scotoma
may be missed
• Cannot be assessed
• Similar but logarithmic values in
apostils
• Cannot be done
61
Fixation cross, at the macula
Retinal sensitivity in decibels
62
Fixation target four crosses
Filled green square better sensitivity
Filled yellow square moderate sensitivity
Filled red square poor retinal sensitivity
Empty square stimulus not seen
MAP REPRESENTATION
63
•operator decides when and where to project each stimulus on the tracked retinal image and its corresponding initial intensity in manual micro perimetric exam
•In a semi-automatic exam the operator shall define a polygonal area on the tracked image and the number of stimuli inside the selected area.
•In an automatic exam the stimuli are proposed following a pattern chosen from among the pre-determined or customized by the operator.
64
Clinical applications of micro perimetry
• ARMD/AMD(atrophic and neovascular)
• EARLY AMD
• DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA
• VITREO RETINAL INTERFACE DISORDER
• LOW VISION PATIENT
• MACULAR HOLE CYST
• TOXIC MACULOPATHIES
• CSR
• HEREDITORY RETINAL DYSTROPIES(RP, STARGARDT’S DISEASE,BEST’S
DISEASE)
65Thank You
66
PRE POST MICROPERIMETRIC IMAGEYET TO BE PASTED