New developments of targeted therapy in nsclc
-
Upload
lihua-jiao -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
1.469 -
download
4
Transcript of New developments of targeted therapy in nsclc
New Developments in Targeted Therapy in
Lung Cancer Andrea Wang-Gillam MD, PhD
Division of OncologyWashington University School of Medicine in
St. Louis
Jemal, A. et al. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277-300
Incidence of Mutations in Lung Cancer
Mutation found in 54% (280/516) oftumors completely tested (95% CI 50-59%)
Kris MG, J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: Abstr CRA 7506
Targeting EGFR
Ciardiello F, N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1160-1174
EGFR Mutations
Sharma S, Nature Rev Cancer 2007;7:169-181.
Mok T, ESMO 2008.
IPASS: Study Design Patients
• Chemonaive
• Age ≥8 years
• Adenocarcinoma histology
• Never or light ex-smokers*
• Life expectancy ≥12 weeks
• PS 0-2
• Measurable stage IIIB/ IV disease
Gefitinib(250 mg /
day)
Endpoints
Primary
• Progression-free survival (non-inferiority)
Secondary
• Objective response rate
• Overall survival
• Quality of life
• Disease-related symptoms
• Safety and tolerability
Exploratory
• Biomarkers
– EGFR mutation
– EGFR-gene-copy number
– EGFR protein expression
• Never smokers, <100 cigarettes in lifetime; light ex-smokers, stopped ≥15 years ago and
smoked ≤10 pack years
Carboplatin(AUC 5 or 6) /
paclitaxel(200 mg / m2)3 weekly X 6
1:1 randomization
IPASS
Mok TS, N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 947-957
RR CP – 23.5% Gef – 1.1%
RR CP – 47.3% Gef – 71.2%
Randomized Studies on First Line EGFR TKI in Patients with EGFR
MutationAuthor Study N (EGFR mutation) RR (TKI vs
chemotherapy) Median PFS
(months)
Mok IPASS 261 71.2% vs 47.3 9.8 vs 6.4
Mitsudomi WJTOG 3405 177 62.1% vs 32.2% 9.2 vs 6.3
Maemondo NEJGSG002 228 73.7% vs 30.7% 10.8 vs 5.4
Zhou OPTIMAL 154 82% vs 36% 13.1 vs 4.6
Rosell EURTAC 174 58% vs 15% 9.7 vs 5.2
Mok TS, New Engl J Med 2009 Mitsudomi T, Lancet Oncology 2010Maemondo M N Engl J Med 2010Zhou C, Lancet Oncol 2011Rosell R, Lancet Oncol 2012
First-line EGFR TKI improves ORR and PFS compared to chemotherapy
Prevalence of Mechanisms ofResistance to EGFR TKIs
Nguyen KSH, Clin Lung Cancer 2009; 10: 281-289
Mechanisms of Resistance to EGFR TKIs Repeated Biopsy Study
Sequist LV, Sci Translat Med 2011, 3: 75ra26
Irreversible TKIs Reversible TKIs such as erlotinib, gefitinib and
icotinib are competitive inhibitors of ATP, blocking its binding to the TK domain of the EGFR.
The presence of T790M mutations increase the ATP affinity by approximately 5 fold compared to the initial EGFR mutation alone, decreasing the TKI efficacy.
Irreversible TKI inhibitors bind covalently with the Cys 797 at the ATP-binding cleft of mutant EGFR, providing a prolonged EGFR inhibition.
Preclinical studies have shown activity for irreversible TKIs in cell lines resistant to gefitinib.
LUX-Lung 1
Randomization 2:1(Double Blind)
Oral afatinib 50 mg once daily
plus BSC
Oral placebo once daily plus BSC
Primary endpoint: Overall survival (OS)Secondary: PFS, RECIST response, QoL (LC13 & C30), safety
• Radiographic assessments at 4, 8, 12 wks and every 8 wks thereafter
• Exploratory biomarkers:Archival tissue testing for EGFR mutations (optional; central
lab)Serum EGFR mutational analysis (all patients)
Patients with:• Adenocarcinoma of the lung • Stage IIIB/IV • Progressed after one or two lines of chemotherapy (incl. one
platinum-based regimen) and ≥12 weeks of treatment with erlotinib or gefitinib
• ECOG 0–2 N=585
LUX-1: PFS by Independent Review
Miller VA, Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 428-538
LUX-Lung 2Afatinib in EGFR
Mutants Phase II study 129 patients
1st line 61 patients2nd line 68 patients
Afatinib 40 mg or 50 mg daily
LUX-Lung 2 – PFS and OS
Yang JC, Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 539-548
LUX-Lung 2 EGFR Exon 19 del Response
Yang JC, Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 539-548
Role of Afatinib – LUX-7
Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01466660
ALK Pathway
Shaw AT, Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17: 2081-2086
Crizotinib
Phase II trial Approximately 1500 patients
screened for ALK rearrangements 82 patients with advanced disease
enrolled Crizotinib 250 mg twice daily
Kwak EL, N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1693- 1703
Crizotinib
Kwak EL, N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1693- 1703
Crizotinib
Kwak EL, N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1693- 1703
Median PFS 9 months
New ALK Inhibitors
AP26113
Camidge DR, Proc Am Soc Clin Onc 2013 Abstr 8301
Targeting KRAS MutationSelumetinib (MEK inhibitor)
Jane PA, J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: Abstr 7503
Targeting KRAS MutationSelumetinib (MEK inhibitor)
Jane PA, J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: Abstr 7503
First prospective trial to demonstrate a clinical benefit from targeted therapy in patients with KRAS mutation
New Mutations
Bergethon K, J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 863-870Kohno T, Nat Medicine 2012; 18: 375-377
ROS-1
Shaw AT, J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: Abstr 7508
BRAF Mutation
2% of lung cancer (V600E, and non-V600E)
Exon 11 & 15 Poor prognostic marker
BRAF InhibitionDabrafenib
Planchard D, Proc Am Soc Clin Onc 2013 Abstr 8009
Dabrafenib in MelanomaPhase 3 Study BREAK-3
Planchard D, Proc Am Soc Clin Onc 2013 Abstr 8009
FDA approved on 5/29/13
BRF113928 Design
Planchard D, Proc Am Soc Clin Onc 2013 Abstr 8009
Dabrafenib in NSCLCMaximum Reduction in
Stage 1PR 40%SD 20%PD 30%NA 10% - SAE prior to assessment
First 20 patients
Planchard D, Proc Am Soc Clin Onc 2013 Abstr 8009
Dabrafenib
Planchard D, Proc Am Soc Clin Onc 2013 Abstr 8009
GPS testing is done at Wash U
Questions?