National Response Department Team Coordination Training

67
National Response Department Team Coordination Training

description

National Response Department Team Coordination Training. Risk Management. PART 1: Risk Management. Risk Management Cont’d. Operational Risk Management (ORM) applies to everyone in the Coast Guard - Active Duty, Reserve, Auxiliary and Civilians. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Page 1: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Page 2: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Risk Management

PART 1: Risk Management

Page 3: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Risk Management Cont’d

Operational Risk Management (ORM) applies to everyone in the Coast Guard - Active Duty, Reserve, Auxiliary and Civilians. 

It standardizes and formalizes the Coast Guard’s ORM policy, Crew Resource Management (CRM) for aviators and TCT for surface operators.

Page 4: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Risk Management Cont’d

Operational Risk Management (ORM) applies to everyone in the Coast Guard - Active Duty, Reserve, Auxiliary and Civilians.

ORM consists of:• TCT• Briefing• De-Briefing

 

Page 5: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Risk Management Cont’d

Risk Management asks, and answers, these questions:

What hazards exist?

How can the mission be completed safely?

Ultimate goal is to reduce:• mishaps• injuries Hazard

• damage

Page 6: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Risk Management Cont’d

Risk Management boils down to: 

• Humans make errors• Mishaps are preventable• Training is essential for mishap prevention• TCT is an important tool for improving team

performance

Page 7: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

The Team

Risk Management reduces injuries and mishaps.

Team Coordination Training (TCT) is a training program aimed at improving the way we look at risk and work as a team.

Page 8: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

The Team

Team Coordination (TC) is a tool to prevent risk by employing seven critical elements.

The TEAM concept focuses on group activities to accomplish goals.

Page 9: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

The Team Cont’d

As part of Team Coast Guard, the Auxiliary must work together to prevent injuries while achieving the goal.

The goal must be consistentwith the Coast Guard’s corevalues and mission objective. The Team

Page 10: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

The Team Cont’d

Human error continues to be the most significant cause of U.S. Coast Guard mishaps.

60-65% of cutter and boat navigation mishaps have had human error as a contributing cause.

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Page 11: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Mishap causes include:

Poor judgment (67%), such as:•Unknown / misunderstood situation•Loss of situational awareness•Inadequate assessment of risks•Improper GO / NO-GO decisions•Incorrect information in decision making

The Team Cont’d

Page 12: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

The Team Cont’d

Mishap causes (cont’d):

Inattention (16%), failure to: •Monitor information displays•Maintain a proper lookout•Use proper technique

Page 13: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Mishap causes (cont’d):

Ineffective Supervision (5%):

•Lax enforcement of standards / procedures•Not verifying job done correctly•Lack of oversight

The Team Cont’d

Page 14: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

The Team Cont’d

Although there are no specific statistics regarding mishaps or casualties in the Auxiliary, active duty Coast Guard statistics can be used to better understand the nature and scope of the problem.

Page 15: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

CG Small Boat Mishap Rate

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Rate per 100,000 patrol hours

Page 16: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

1. Leadership2. Mission Analysis3. Situational Awareness4. Adaptability and Flexibility5. Communication6. Assertiveness7. Decision-making

Team Coordination

Part 2: Team Coordination

The 7 elements of TC are:

Page 17: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination TrainingResponse Directorate

Leadership

Page 18: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination TrainingResponse Directorate

Effective Leaders exhibit:•Courage•Confidence•Competence

Leadership is not just about giving orders.

Effective Leaders find ways to obtain the willing participation of others towards accomplishing a goal.

Leadership

Page 19: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Leadership Cont’d

Leaders inspire and motivate others while managers give detailed directions to complete tasks by virtue of their position.

Effective leaders earn the trust, respect, confidence, and loyalty of team members under their supervision.

Team Coordination TrainingResponse Directorate

Page 20: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Leadership Cont’d

• Leaders create an atmosphere of openness and trust within the team.

• ALL team members, including leaders, should be approachable; suggestions from crew or a distressed vessel are thoughtfully accepted and acted upon if appropriate.

• It is a courtesy to say “thank you” for all suggestions.

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Page 21: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination TrainingResponse Directorate

Effective leaders:

•Update crew on mission progress

•Balance workload among crew members

•Ensure the crew is fully qualified

•Provide feedback on performance

Leadership Cont’d

Page 22: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

In Summary, effective leaders:

•Make good decisions in a collaborative, team environment.

•Have the courage to make the right decision, even if unpopular.

•Exhibit confidence based on experience and ability.

•Are competent, well prepared and mission oriented.

Leadership Cont’d

Page 23: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Mission Analysis

Page 24: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

The process by which operating and contingency plans are developed to safely and effectively accomplish the mission.

• Operational plans must be preceded by information gathering such as:• Crew fitness • Mission specifics• Facility checklists• Weather forecast

Mission Analysis

Page 25: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Operational plans (CONT'D):

•Failure to gather accurate and comprehensive information and/or complacency affects the planning process and places the mission and crew at risk.

•Contingency planning is critical as operational plans may change once implemented.

Mission Analysis Cont’d

Page 26: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Mission Analysis Includes: • Complexity of mission • Environmental factors • Crew fitness / selection / training

Elements that impact Mission Analysis:

• Crew safety (Priority!!!)

• The mission

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Mission Analysis Cont’d

Page 27: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Operational Risk Management (ORM) plays an important role in Mission Analysis.

Always conduct a risk assessment with your crew prior to all patrols or missions. Green-Amber-Red (GAR).

Continually assess and update risk assessment throughout the mission with your crew.

GAR is a Team Coordination tool for ORM.

Mission Analysis Cont’d

Page 28: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

A GAR assessment is part of an accepted way to plan and prepare for a mission.

The other parts are Pre- and Post- Underway Briefs and the Pre-Underway Check List.

Areas of Responsibility (AORs) may use differing GAR tools to assess risk.

Mission Analysis Cont’d

Page 29: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Mission Analysis Cont’dSample GAR Worksheet

Use the GAR form approved in

your AOR.

There may be additional

explanatory pages to a form.

Page 30: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Mission Analysis Cont’d

• Accept no unnecessary risk

• Accept necessary risk only when benefits outweigh costs

• Make risk decisions at the appropriate level

• ORM is just as critical in execution as in planning

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Page 31: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Situational Awareness

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Page 32: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

•All team members are responsible for situational awareness, not just the coxswain

•Know what is going on all around, including aboard the vessel

•Plans are critical to success; be ready to change plans based on new information or situations

•Situational awareness is critical to good decision making

Situational Awareness

Page 33: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

How might we lose our Situational Awareness?

Identify as many barriers to maintaining good situational awareness as possible.

Name some ways to avoid these barriers and correct loss of situational awareness.

Situational Awareness Group Activity

Page 34: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Situational Awareness Cont’d

Barriers to situational awareness:•Confusion over / pre-occupation with task•Lethargy, fatigue, loss of focus•Complacency, inactivity, boredom •Neglect of proper procedure•Environmental factors, e.g.:

Weather Engine noiseSea state

Page 35: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Loss of Situational Awareness

Two-Challenge Rule

If a team member has two or more omissions or questionable actions, the individual is assumed to have lost situational awareness.

Immediate steps must be taken to re-establish a healthy, alert environment on board the facility.

Situational Awareness Cont’d

Page 36: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Loss of Situational Awareness may be prevented by:

•Including crew in initial mission analysis

•Rotating duties on a regular basis

•Training exercises such as man overboard & line throwing evolutions, etc.

•Varying the speed and direction of the vessel or aircraft when possible

Situational Awareness Cont’d

Page 37: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Adaptability

Page 38: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Effective team members including the coxswain adapt and are open to new information.

Adaptability - Able to react to changes in:•Environmental conditions•Mission factors or complexity•Crew fitness•Equipment failures, etc.

Adaptability

Page 39: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Leaders acknowledge that new information and/or crew input can change the mission.

All team members must maintain situational awareness so changes are quickly identified and prioritized.

Adaptability Cont’d

Page 40: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Leaders leverage everyone’s ideas and experience.

Leaders encourage team members to remain flexible and adapt to new conditions, ideas and challenges.

Adaptability Cont’d

Page 41: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Group Activity

•Adaptability means we are open to change •Take a few minutes now to identify the kind of new information that could cause us to change our operational plan•From where or what sources might that new information come?

Adaptability Cont’dSuggested Group Activity

Page 42: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Communication

Communication

is the KEYSTONE of

ALL Team CoordinationTeam Coordination Training Response

DirectorateThanks to Wikipedia

Page 43: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Words We Use

Nonverbals, BodyLanguage

How We Say Words,Sounds We Make

Communication Cont’d

Effective communication is:•verbal and/or non-verbal•clear and concise•understood

Page 44: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Leaders and crew have equal responsibility to ensure that thoughts and information are conveyed effectively.

A “feedback loop” is a simple method to ensure that transmissions are heard and clearly understood.

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Communication Cont’d

Page 45: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

The “feedback loop” acknowledges all communications by:•Repeating the message•Finding a non-verbal method of acknowledging the message, depending on the situation

Always ask for feedback or observe behavior to be sure that the message was received correctly.

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Communication Cont’d

Page 46: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Suggested Group Activity

Barriers to Good Communication

•Barriers can develop that short circuit or degrade the quality of communication.

•What kinds of barriers may exist that we can overcome with a little thought ?

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Page 47: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Suggested Group Activity

Some Barriers might be:•Failure to close the feedback loop•Distracting “background noise” such as engine, wind and other physical environmental factors•Over-complicating the message. Use the KISS method if possible (Keep It Simple Stupid)•Fatigue

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Page 48: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Assertiveness

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

General Patton in 1943

Page 49: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Assertiveness:

Ability of individual team members to state and maintain a position that may be unpopular, or counter to a position taken by others, unless (until) convinced by facts and logic, and not based solely on the authority or personality of others.

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Assertiveness

Page 50: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Be assertive, but not aggressive.

• The aggressive person seeks to bully his/her way through situations for their own ego or self image.

• An assertive person cares more about the “mission” than their ego.

Attempt to communicate concerns without offending those who disagree.

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Assertiveness Cont’d

Page 51: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Summary:

•Ask task-related questions•Suggest positive alternatives•State opinions calmly but firmly•Avoid letting perceived authoritative differences threaten mission performance•Avoid conflict, focus on mission

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Assertiveness Cont’d

Page 52: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Decision Making

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Which one,Which one??

NiagaraFalls

Thanks to Wikipedia

Page 53: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

What are the basic steps that might be taken in the decision making process?

Decision Making Group Activity

Page 54: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Decision making should include:

1.Defining a problem or condition 2.Seeking information3.Analyzing & verifying desired outcome4.Identifying possible alternatives5.Selecting appropriate alternative6.Implementing and examining results7.Adjusting actions according to results

Decision Making Group Activity

Page 55: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Making good decisions is the heart of Team Coordination.

Decisions may impact team safety and mission success.

The first six elements of TC prepare us to make better decisions.

The decision making process is a continuous evaluation of these steps throughout the mission.

Decision Making Cont’d

Page 56: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

The decision making process can take 20 seconds for routine decisions or 20 months for complex problems.

The process is the same - the depth of analysis and degree of complexity is always changing.

Decision Making Cont’d

Page 57: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

GAR Model 

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

GAR was 14 when they left What is GAR now?

Page 58: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Green-Green-AmberAmber-Red-Red ModelModelWhat is the level of risk?

Is the level of risk manageable by the unit?

0 23 44 60

GREEN(Low Risk)

GO, no change in control is

required

AMBER(Caution)

GO, with adjustment of

controls for risk

RED(High Risk)

NO GO, beyond normal

operating limits

Page 59: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

SUPERVISION: Coxswain’s experience, factoring in OPCON/OGA’s oversight for mission

PLANNING: amount of information available, time and equipment needed

CREW SELECTION: experience level of crew, trainees?

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

GAR Considerations

Page 60: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

CREW FITNESS: physical and mental state of crew

ENVIRONMENT: factors affecting personnel and performance of facilities

EVENT / EVOLUTION COMPLEXITY: time required and difficulty for the mission.

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

GAR Considerations Cont’d

Page 61: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

GARGAR is broken down into 6 categories and scored 0 (low or no risk) to 10 (high

or catastrophic risk)

SupervisionSupervision Rate 0-10Rate 0-10 33

PlanningPlanning Rate 0-10Rate 0-10 33

Crew selectionCrew selection Rate 0-10Rate 0-10 44

Crew FitnessCrew Fitness Rate 0-10Rate 0-10 33

EnvironmentEnvironment Rate 0-10Rate 0-10 22

Event ComplexityEvent Complexity Rate 0-10Rate 0-10 33

TOTALTOTAL 1818

For Example:

Page 62: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination

In summary:

Team Coordination is one of the tools of Risk Management.

Risk Management is a way of asking these questions:

•What hazards exist? •How can the mission be completed safely?

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Page 63: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

In summary (Cont'd)

Risk Management can be a simple system of using common sense to avoid errors, or it can be complex methodology that must be employed in larger scaled operations.

The ultimate goal is the same:•Reduce mishaps, injuries and damage•Achieve mission goals

Page 64: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Team Coordination is a method used to implement Risk Management.

Team Coordination is comprised of these 7 elements:1. Leadership2. Mission Analysis3. Situational Awareness4. Adaptability and Flexibility5. Communication6. Assertiveness7. Decision-Making

Team Coordination Training - Review

Page 65: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination – Review Continued

• The Green-Amber-Red (GAR) form is a tool to determine what risks may be present and calculate the extent and seriousness of those risks.

• Good decisions reduce or eliminate those risks while keeping everyone safe while accomplishing the mission.

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Page 66: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate

Final Questions or Comments?

Page 67: National Response Department Team Coordination Training

Thank You

Thank you for your participation in the

Team Coordination Training.

Team Coordination Training Response Directorate