National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

27
Developing Mathematics PD Sessions: Planning Conversations and Instructional Decisions that Lead to Improved MKT in District Leaders. National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011 Melissa Hedges, MathematicsTeaching Specialist, MTSD Beth Schefelker, Mathematics Teaching Specialist, MPS Connie Laughlin, Mathematics Instructor, UW-Milwaukee The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee Partnership Academy (MPA), is supported with funding by the National Science Foundation.

description

Developing Mathematics PD Sessions: Planning Conversations and Instructional Decisions that Lead to Improved MKT in District Leaders. National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011 Melissa Hedges, MathematicsTeaching Specialist, MTSD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Page 1: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Developing Mathematics PD Sessions: Planning Conversations and Instructional Decisions that Lead to Improved MKT in District Leaders.

National Council of Supervisors of MathematicsIndianapolis, Indiana

April 11, 2011

Melissa Hedges, MathematicsTeaching Specialist, MTSDBeth Schefelker, Mathematics Teaching Specialist, MPSConnie Laughlin, Mathematics Instructor, UW-Milwaukee

The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee Partnership Academy (MPA), is supported with funding by the National Science Foundation.

Page 2: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Session Goals

We Are Learning To…build Math Knowledge of Teaching (MKT) about proportional reasoning.

We will be successful when we can look at student work that will strengthen teacher content knowledge about proportional reasoning.

Page 3: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Questions we ask ourselves

What is the critical content idea that leaders needed to understand?

How much content can be explored in a 90-minute professional development session?

What learning experiences can be used to launch, explore, and summarize the content idea?

What connections can be made to current work?

Page 4: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

A decision-making process

Identifying the math to be discussed

Connecting to standards

Completing the task

Looking at student work to push thinking

Page 5: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Process of development

Identify the needListening to math leadersLooking at dataReviewing student work with teachers

Identify a Domain as outlined in CCSSDecide on the cluster of standards that

connects to the needNarrow the focus to specific standard(s).

Page 6: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Why focus on proportional reasoning?

Proportional reasoning has been referred to asthe capstone of the elementary curriculum andthe cornerstone of algebra and beyond.

Van de Walle,J. (2009). Elementary and middle school teaching developmentally.Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Page 7: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Connect to the CCSS

Narratives from grade 6 and grade 7Cluster statements:

Understand ratio concepts and use ratio reasoning to solve problems (6.RP.3)

Analyze proportional relationships and use them to solve real world and mathematical problems. (7.RP.2)

Page 8: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Never ending question….

What are teachers expected to know and do to make sure students develop proportional reasoning?

Page 9: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

A Definition of Proportionality

When two quantities are relatedproportionally, the ratio of one quantity to the other is invariant, or the numericalvalues of both quantities change by thesame factor.

Developing Essential Understandings of Ratios, Proportions & Proportional Reasoning, Grades 6-8. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2010, pg. 11.

Page 10: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Essential Understanding

A proportion is a relationship of equalitybetween two ratios.

3 girls to 4 boys is the same ratio as 6 girls to 8 boys

Page 11: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Essential Understanding

A rate is a set of infinitely many equivalentratios.

Page 12: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Cassandra’s Faucet

Cassandra has a leaky faucet in her bathtub. She put a bucketunderneath the faucet in themorning and collected datathroughout the day to see howmuch water was in the bucket.

Use the data Cassandra collected to determine how fast the faucet was leaking.

Time Amount of Water

7:00 a.m. 2 ounces

8:30 a.m. 14 ounces

9:30 a.m. 22 ounces

11:00 a.m. 34 ounces

2:00 p.m. 58 ounces

5:30 p.m. 86 ounces

9:30 p.m. 118 ounces

Page 13: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Engaging in a task

Complete the task Cassandra’s FaucetShare out your thinking with the person

next to you.In what way did you use proportional

reasoning in your thinking?Is your reasoning the same as your

partner’s reasoning?

Page 14: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

What should student work look like?

Turn and talk: In order to know if students understand proportions, what traits would you want to see demonstrated on their work?

Share out ideas with the whole group.

Page 15: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Cassandra’s Faucet Student Work

How did student’s make sense of the table?

What were the various entry points?What conclusions can you make about

how students are thinking as they engaged in purposeful struggle to understand rate?

Page 16: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Making decisions about using student work

Which papers would drive conversations around the big math ideas of proportional reasoning? Why?

Page 17: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Student work A

Page 18: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Student work B

Page 19: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Student work C

Page 20: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Student work D

Page 21: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Student Work E

Page 22: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Purposefully selecting student work

Student A – shows the start of proportional reasoning by using additive thinking

Student B – multiple equivalent rates and checking more than one time interval

Student C – multiple representations to prove an answer

Student D – a right answer, but explanation needs clarity

Student E – proportional thinking but with some assumptions

Page 23: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Think About…

Proportional reasoning may at first seemstraightforward, but developing anunderstanding of it is a complex processfor students.

How do we support ourteachers’ understanding of proportionalreasoning?

Page 24: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Deliberate decision-making process

Identifying the math to be discussed

Connecting to standards

Completing the task

Looking at student work to push thinking

Page 25: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Why pay attention to MKT?

“Knowing mathematics for teaching often entails making sense of methods and solutions different from one’s own and so learning to size up other methods, determine their adequacy and compare them is an essential mathematical skill for teaching…”

-D. Ball

Page 26: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Thank you for coming!

Melissa Hedges, MathematicsTeaching Specialist, Mequon-Thiensville School [email protected]

Beth Schefelker Mathematics Teaching Specialist, Milwaukee Public [email protected]

Connie LaughlinMathematics Consultant,

Milwaukee [email protected]

Page 27: National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Indianapolis, Indiana April 11, 2011

Thank You for coming!

Find the power point for this session on two websites:

NCSM conference website

Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership website: mmp.uwm.edu