NARAIL SUB-PROJECT AREAsouthwest.bwdb.gov.bd/files/report/aafbfd579fe... · define the sub-unit as...

FINAL DRAFT

MAY 2011

DHV, The Netherlands

In association with DevCon Bangladesh Kranti Bangladesh DPM Bangladesh

Institutional Strengthening and Project Management

Technical Report No. 26

Subunit implementation plan SWN-8, TULARAMPUR SCHEME

NARAIL SUB-PROJECT AREA ADB Loan 2200-BAN(SF) / GON Grant 0036 BAN

SOUTHWEST AREAIntegrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project

Bangladesh Water Development Board



Acronyms and Abbreviations ADB Asian Development Bank

BRAC Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee

BRDB Bangladesh Rural Development Board

BWDB Bangladesh Water Development Board

CDSP Char1 Development and Settlement Project of BWDB

DAE Department of Agricultural Extension

DWA Department of Women Affairs

XEN Executive Engineer (BWDB or LGED)

FAP Flood Action Plan

FCD Flood Control and Drainage

FCDI Flood Control, Drainage and Irrigation

DFID Department for International Development

GB Grameen Bank

BISCIC Bangladesh Small and Cottage Industries Corporation

GOB Government of Bangladesh

GPWM Guideline for Participatory Water Management

IGA Income Generating Activities

IWMP Integrated Water Management Implementation Plan

LEP Livelihood Enhancement Perspectives

LGED Local Government Engineering Department

MPE Marketing Promotional Enterprises

MOWR Ministry of Water Resources

NGO Non Government Organization

NWP National Water Policy

NWMP National Water Management Plan

PMO Project Management Office

PPTA Project Preparatory Technical Assistance

PRRA Participatory Rapid Rural Appraisal

PRS Poverty Reduction Strategy

RF Resettlement Framework

RP Resettlement Plan

RRP Report and Recommendations of the President to the Board of Directors, ADB

SIP Sub-unit Implementation Plan

SMO Sub-project Management Office

SSWRDSP Small Scale Water Resources Development Sector Project

SWAIWRMP South West Area Integrated Water Resource Management Project

TL Team Leader

TNA Training Need Assessment

UNO Upazila Nirbahi Officer

UP Union Parishad

UNDP United Nations Development Programme

WMCA Water Management Cooperative Association

WMG Water Management Group

WMO Water Management Organization

WMF Water Management Federation

WRMF Water Recourse Management Families

XEN Executive Engineer (BWDB or LGED)

GLOSSARY Beel Low-lying depression on the floodplain that generally retains

water throughout the year Baor Water body similar to an ox bow lake Jalmahal Water bodies leased only by Government – a “water estate” Khal Canal Kharif Summer season or summer crop Rabi Winter season or winter crop Union Parishad Lowest level of administrative organization

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB

SWN-8, Tularampur Scheme Page - i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………….………1

2.0 PROJECT HISTORY ……………………………………………………………………1-4

3.0 SUB PROJECT OVERVIEW ………………..…………………………………………..4-5

3.1 SIP Formulation …………………………………………………………………………………4

3.2 Location ………...……………………………………………………………………………….4

3.3 Topographic Data ……………………………………………………………………………….4

3.4 Climate …………………………………………………………………………………………..5

3.5 Communications / Road …………………………………………………………………………5

4.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ………………………………………….………………...……5-15

4.1 Proposed Interventions ……………………………..…………..……………….……….............5

4.2 Land Types………………….…………..…………………………….……….…………………6

4.3 Hydrologic Characteristics…………………………………………………………..…...........6-7

4.4 Agriculture…………………………………………………………………….………………...7

4.5 Fisheries…….……………………………………………………………….…………..…....11

4.6 Environment …………………………………………………..……………………..……….11

4.7 Surface Water……..…………………………………………..……………………..……….11

4.8 Socio Economy ……………………………………………….………………………….12-14

4.8.1 Stakeholders ………………………………………..…………………………..….12

4.8.2 Peoples Participation ……………………………………….…………………..…12

4.8.3 Training ……………………………………………………………………..………14

4.8.4 Gender and Livelihood ………………………………………..……………..……14

4.8.5 Collective Action Plan (CAP)………………………………………………….14-15

5.0 O & M ISSUES ……………………….………………………..……….……..………..15-16

6.0 FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS……….…………….…….16

7.0 MULTI - CRITERIA ANALYSIS ………………………………….……...…………….…17

8.0 TABLES ……………………………………………………………………....……..….18-31

Table - 1 : Land type analysis ……………………………………………………….……………..18

Table - 2 : Land use changes ……………………………………………………………………....19

Table - 3 : Household farm size distribution and occupation distribution ……….….…..……...20

Table - 4 : Production by land type impacts on SIP Agriculture ………………….…….……….21

Table - 5 : Total, Cereal and high value crop production Impacts on project area.......……… 22

Table -6 : Financial and Economic Impacts on SIP Agriculture ……………….…….………….23

Table -7 : Financial and Economic Impacts on SIP Fisheries ……………..……………..…… 24

Table - 8 : Cost Estimates of Proposed Works ………………………………..….………………25

Table - 9 :Annual O & M Cost ………………………………………………………………………25

Table -10: Crop Production Summary ……………………………………………………….…….26

Table -11: Fish Production Summary ……………………………………………………….……..26


SWN-8, Tularampur Scheme Page - ii

Table -12: Economic Sensitivity ……………………………………………………………..……..26

Table -13: Financial Cash Flow ……………………………………………..…………….…..…...27

Table -14: Economic Cash Flow …………………………………………………...…..….……….28

Table -15: Multi-Criteria Analysis ……………………………………………………………..…....29

Table -16: Elevation, Area & Storage on SIP Area ………………………………..……..………30

Table -17 : Observed data river water salinity impact…….…………………...……………....…31

9.0 CHARTS ………………………………………………………………………………...19-31

Chart - 1 : Land use changes ……………………………………………………….………...19

Chart - 2 : Farm size distribution …………………………………...…………….………….20

Chart - 3 : Occupational distribution of households ………………………………..………..20

Chart - 4 : Total, Cereal and high value crop production Impacts on project area……………22

Chart - 5 : Potential open water fish production gross impacts ………………………..…….24

Chart - 6 : Area-Elevation-Storage Curve ………………………………………..…………..30

Chart -7 : Observed data river water salinity impact curve.………………………..…………31

10.0 FIGURES

Figure – 1: Chenchuri beel Sub Project Map……………………………….…..……………..2

Figure – 2: SWC-13 Map……………………………………………..……………...………….3

Figure – 3: Crop Calendar……………………………………………..……….……………9-10

Figure – 4: SWC-13 WMG Map…………………………………….……………..…………..13

11.0 ANNEXES

Annex-A: Agriculture

Annex-B: Fisheries

Annex-C: Environment

Annex-D: Socio Economy, Gender and Livelihood

Annex-E: Water Management Organization (WMO)

Annex-F: O & M

Annex-G: Hydrology

Annex-H: Training


SWN-8, Tularumpur Scheme 1

SWN-8, Tularumpur Scheme

1. INTRODUCTION The Narail Sub-Project is located in Narail and Kalia Upazila of Narail district and Abhoynagar Upazila of Jessore districtcovering a gross area of 31,600 ha (23,384 ha net). The Sub-Project lies between Latitude 22055I N and 23017l N and longitude 89022l E and 89035l E and is bounded by Chitra River to the north east Nabagonga river to the east-south, Afra khal to the west and Bhairab River to the west and south. The pre-feasibility study of the Sub Project was done in 1993 under FAP-4, South-west Area Water Resources Management Project. The study proposed compartmentalization as water management strategies. During feasibility study of the SP under feasibility study of South-west area Water Resources Development Project in 1998, it was felt that integrated development of agriculture, Fisheries and navigation are needed as per desire of the people of the SP area. These objectives can be met through engineering works including rehabilitation and limited construction of embankment, improvement of irrigation and drainage channels, bank protection works and rehabilitation and limited construction of structures. To reduce poverty through increasing food production and creating employment generation South-west Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project (SAIWRPMP) has been taken up by BWDB in 2005, where people’s participation shall be ensured in planning, design, implementation, monitoring and O & M of the project. The total area under the project (SAIWRPMP) covers an area of 100,000 ha. Two sub-projects (i) Chenchuri Beel sub-project and (ii) Narail sub-project covering 57,000 ha of land has been taken up for immediate implementation. This was prepared through a Project Preparatory Technical Assistance (PPTA). The rest 43,000 ha area of the project will be implemented after feasibility studies from amongst 11 Nos candidate sub-projects preliminary identified in the PPTA study. Considering the hydrological boundary, the Narail Sub-Project has been divided in to the 25 Nos Sub-unit Implementation Plan (SIP) for better Operation and Maintenance of the Sub-Project ( Figure-1). SWN-8 Tularumpur Scheme, lD No SWN 8, in compartment No.2 of Narail Sub-project has a gross area of about 3811 ha and net cultivable area about 2858 ha ( 75% of gross area ) ( Figure-2). 2. PROJECT HISTORY

Following the consecutive disastrous floods of 1987 and 1988, the Government of

Bangladesh initiated a five-year study programme namely Flood Action Plan (FAP)

comprising 26 components that included five regional studies.The South West Area Water

Resources Management Project (SWAWRMP) was one of the regional studies, namely FAP-

4, carried out at pre-feasibility level between 1991 and 1993 with ADB and UNDP assistance.

The study identified 30 sub-projects (SP) and prioritized them in terms of need,

implementation period, rate of return and social and environmental impacts. As a result of the

analysis, seven SPs covering about 250,000 ha, were recommended for carrying forward to

feasibility level study and detailed design. The recommendation included the Narail and the

Chenchuri Beel sub-projects.

Subsequently, the South West Area Water Resources Development Project (SWAWRDP)

was initiated as a follow up to conduct feasibility studies of the recommended seven SPs in

order to select the best alternatives for detailed design and implementation. The study,

carried out during 1996-1997 with ADB assistance, showed that the Narail and the Chenchuri

Beel sub-projects stood out as first and second respectively in priority ranking.



Figure – 1 : Narail sub-projects Map



Figure – 2 : SIP SWN-8, Lularampur Scheme Map



The present South West Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management

Project (SWAIWRPMP) is the ultimate outcome of a Project Preparatory Technical Assistance

(PPTA) of ADB executed during 2003-2004.It was decided to divide the selected Sub Projects

into smaller hydrological units for IWMP formulation and efficient implementation as

independent schemes. In the process the Narail Sub Project was broken down to 25 smaller

sub-units.

However, after detailed scrutiny it was found that the scheme boundaries were often

geographical borders defined by roads with open culvert/bridge requiring modification to

define the sub-unit as a hydrological entity as far as practicable.

3. SUB PROJECT OVERVIEW 3.1 SIP Formulation

For the purpose of sound and effective implementation and management system, each sub-project area (FCD/I scheme) will be divided into independent hydrological sub-units (as far as possible) as a unit of implementation. The Consultant Team are now reviewing these and in consultation with the BWDB, beneficiary and LGED (if required) are revising/ modifying the plan and design as necessary. The IWMPs will be implemented on the basis of individual Sub-unit Implementation Plans (SIPs) and will follow the steps described below with the engagement of NGOs, Community Based Organizations (CBOs) and private service providers. To assure a manageable implementation of the various stages, the individual sub-units in any sub-project will be grouped in batches ( Batch-1, 2 & 3). The Consultants, in consultation with the relevant stakeholders, will prepare 4 (four) sample SIPs from Narail sub-project. The preparation of the remaining SIPs will be outsourced to a Firm, to be procured by the BWDB, PMO and trained for the purpose by the ISPMC. Related documents (especially the EIA, EMP and RP) would be prepared by the Firm/NGO staff under the guidance and supervision of PMO/SMO/Consultant. The same procedure will be followed for the implementation of IWMPs for the additional sub-project areas to be selected. The original concept of preparing the balance SIPs were by NGO / Firms, now have been changed and being implemented through ISPM Consultants / PMO with the help of Facilitators, Research Assistants and Planning Engineers.Batch-3 contents 5 SIPs ( 3 in NSP & 2 in CSP, both cluster ) are being prepared jointly by ISPM/PMO. Now previous draft SIP report ( 8 nos ) will be review new style as batch-3, SWN-8 is one of them. 3.2 Location The Sub-unit is bounded by an imaginary line joining the cluster of villages namely Kismet Durgapur, Narayanpur, Abason Prokalpo, Daljitpur and Dhonda on the north, by the Chitra river on the east, by Narail-Pantita road on the south, by the Afra-Bhairab river on the west and the Chamrul-Durgapur road on the northwest This boundary deviates from the original one given in the PPTA on the basis of satellite interpretation of the maion drainage system, see figures 8-1A and 8-1B. Located in Shahbad, Narail Pourshobha, Tularampur and Mulia Unions partly or wholly, the area is spread over 22 villages 3.3 Topographic Data The topography ranges from nearly 2.0 m PWD in the southwest with to over 3.0 m PWD in

the north and about 4.0 m PWD in the east. The land generally slopes from northeast towards

southwest with rather steep slopes near the northern and eastern boundaries. But from near

the middle part of the area the slope flattens out in both southerly and westerly directions and

the southern half of the sub-unit thus represents a floodplain dominated by the lands with

elevation between 2.00 m and 2.50 m PWD.



3.4 Climate The project area belongs to the coastal zone with extreme tidal influence. The nearest climatic stations of the sub-project, are Jessore (E-17) and Khulna (E-20) and the nearest rainfall station to the project area is located at Narail (R-461). Project area experiences two distinct seasons such as, Monsoon season and Dry season. Monsoon season, lasting during July to September, is characterized by high temperature, heavy rainfall and high humidity. Dry season during November to March has moderate cool dry weather with little or no rainfall. Pre-monsoon period and Post monsoon period are two truncation periods (comparatively of shorter duration) that separate the monsoon and the winter seasons. The pre-monsoon period is again associated with nor-wester and cyclone storms while post monsoon period is fairly smooth with declining temperature, humidity and storms frequency. It may be added that the project area occasionally suffers from the devastation of severe cyclone storms accompanied by high tidal surges generally during the beginning and the end of monsoon season in the month of May and October. The pre-monsoon rainfall, Annual maximum water level are furnished in Annex – G.

3.5 Communications / Road

The Sub-unit is criss-crossed by a number of metalled and unmetalled roads belonging to

national, regional, upazila and union categories. Prominent among these are:

- Narail-Tularampur metalled road (national level) in east-west direction for about 9.2

km upto Afra khal passing through the southern half of the Sub-unit with 8 culverts on

it; and

- Narail-Pantita metalled road (union level) in south-westerly direction for about 7 km

forming the southern boundary of the Sub-unit with 6 culverts on it.

The main transport on these roads is generally by motor vehicles, rickshaw and rickshaw van or on foot. Small country boats are also used for communication on the internal khals or canal, particularly in the beel areas and during the monsoon season. River transport forms an important link to the peripheral parts of the Sub Project area and its surroundings. There have no road/ embankment to be rehabilitated.

4. IMPACT ASSESSMENT 4.1 Proposed Interventions

The existing infrastructures in the sub-project have been implemented in 1985-86 under programme of DFC-I project. The sub-project area is protected from annual flooding by embankment around most of its periphery. The Regulators are located on the peripheral embankments along Chitra and Nabaganga rivers. Most of the existing drainage channels and khals have been silted up thus reducing the hydraulic capacity of the drainage system as a whole. It is necessary to Re excavation. Due to better performance of this sub project repair and rehabilitation of the facilities, some new construction / rehabilitation works are proposed as shown below:

Construction of Tolarampur Ragulator………………………….1Vent - 1.52m X 1.82m

Thorough rehabilitation of Mulia Ragulator……….……………3 Vent - 1.52m X 1.83m

Re excavation of khal ……………………………………..…….16.90 km earthwork (Mulia-7.90 km, Tularampur-2 km, Sitarampur-2.50 km, Zia-4 km, Nayanpur-Trimohoni khal-0.50 km = 16.90 km)

Construction of Foot Bridge………………………………….….3 Nos

Bridge……………………….………………………………….….1 No

WMG Office ……………….………………………………..…….2 Nos

Supply of Deep Tubewells (DTW)………………………...…….7 Nos



Location of Foot Bridge / WMG Office and Deep Tubewells (DTW). Will be selected as per WMG/WMA resolution. The above Interventions cost is shown in table- 8.

4.2 Land Types

Land Classification in planning of BWDB projects is carried out in relation to average flooding for three conditions:

i) pre-project when interventions to modify the flood regime are yet to be put in place;

ii) post-project when facilities are installed and are in operation. The post-project scenario depicts the modified condition of the area for future planning.

iii) without FCD, when the system deteriorates to the extent that there will be free flow between the river and the beel areas.

The sub unit area SWN-16 put down (i) & (ii) condition. The basin or sub unit area water level does not depend only river water level. It depends on the internal water level and also proposed & existing interventions. Inadequate internal water level data we had putted gauge inside the SIP area, 20 years (1987 to 2007) rainfall data analysis have done, calculate drainage modulus and also checked the size of regulator. Considering all circumstances the internal water level at monsoon govern 2.98 mPWD which is shown annex-G, hydrology part.

The Pre-Project water level with in the project is 2.98 mPWD, then the land type pattern

would be :

Fo land (0-.3 m flood) -el. 2.98 m and above;

F1 land (0.3 -.6 m flood) -el. 2.98 m down to 2.68 m;

F2 land (0.9-.1.80 m flood) -el. 2.68 m down to 2.08 below

F3 land (>1.8 m flood) -el. 1.18 m and below

After rehabilitation of all required intervention the internal water level will be 2.68 mPWD, then

the land type pattern would be :

Fo land (0-.3 m flood) -el. 2.68 m and above;

F1 land (0.3 -.6 m flood) -el. 2.68 m down to 2.38 m;

F2 land (0.9-.1.80 m flood) -el. 2.38 m down to 1.78 below

F3 land (>1.8 m flood) -el. 0.88 m and below

The Pre-Project & Post-Project land type and percentage of land change are shown in Table-1 & chart-1 and also are presented in Annex-G. 4.3 Hydrologic Characteristics Based on topography, drainage of the sub-unit occurs from north to south and ultimately from

northeast to southwest governed by stages of Afra river.

Three beels (Kandor, Banshtolar and Patiyar beels) are located near the northern boundary.

These beels are fed by the runoff generated from higher areas in the north. The Kandor and

the Banshtolar beels are interconnected and they jointly discharge into the Patiyar beel in the

southeast through Alukdia khal (not shown in map). The Mulia khal is the main artery of the

sub-unit to evacuate the drainage. Originating in the Patiyar beel it flows southwards and

receives flow from the Narayanpur-Trimohini khal from the west at Nayanpur through LGED



Check Structure CK-1. Another depressed area in the northeast corner of the area locally

called Horer beel, discharges overland flow into Durgapur khal which carries the flow

westwards through local depressions of Bharatir beel and Patharghata beel. It ultimately joins

the Mulia khal at Chandpur just south of Nayanpur. Thus the entire load of the sub-unit falls

on the Mulia khal which crosses

the Narail-Tularampur road and flows towards Afra river through the 3-vent regulator in the

southwest corner. At the road crossing, the Tularampur khal takes off from Mulia khal and

flows westwards to Afra river by the northern side of the road. Another khal called Hizaldanga

(from Mahajon and Bishnupur in the north) crosses the road at Sitarampur and joins the Mulia

at Banshvita. Near the southern boundary, the Zia khal originates from village Goalbari and

runs westwards parallel to the Narail-Pantita road. It looks like a borrow-pit that deviates in

northwesterly direction after a while towards Mulia before meeting the Mulia khal.

It is obvious from Table-1 that about 50% of the area belongs to F1 and F2 category implying

drainage congestion, of course to varying degrees from depths of 0.3 m to over 0.9 m

annually. Apparently, the Mulia-Patharghata Scheme (4,600 ha) was implemented by BWDB

in 1981 with the installation of a 3-vent regulator (Mulia Regulator) on the outfall of Mulia khal

into Afra river near Baliadanga village to alleviate the problem. The situation may be surmised

to have been worse in the without-project scenario, (pre-1981).

A question may arise as to why Tularampur khal that branches out from Mulia khal near the

road crossing was not considered to carry any part of the total load. There could be several

reasons. For example, in the first place, the ventage was perhaps found adequate to drain the

area and it might be expensive to split the ventage and build more than one structure.

Secondly, the Mulia khal followed the natural gradient from northeast to southwest whereas

the Tularampur khal was aligned horizontally in east-west direction with its tail-end passing

through patch of high land (F0) near Tularampur at outfall that might render it inefficient.

However, current hydrological studies have shown that two additional vents are essential for

efficient drainage of the entire basin.

Nevertheless, local people reported that the system worked well for some time (not specified)

after implementation, but due to sustained lack of upkeep the facilities created have become

redundant and the system has lost efficacy. Although all the khals have badly silted up, the

northern and eastern boundaries being at higher elevation, generated runoff flows almost

unimpeded to southwest to remain congested in the southern part of the area which is flatter

without noticeable gradient. The situation has been further compounded by the malfunctioning

of the 3-vent Mulia regulator which has brought about a nearly free-flowing condition with

respect to the river. In other words, the system has suffered a regression towards the pre-

project scenario.

4.4 Agriculture Assessment of the existing situation of agriculture in the project area has been based on production, yield and other data collected from the respective Upazila Agriculture Offices, supplemented by participatory appraisal surveys, through Focus Group Discussion ( FGD ) in the field and interviews with farmers, village leaders and other knowledgeable persons about agricultural activities in their areas. Developments in agriculture expected to result from the implementation of the proposed project are based on the present situation in the area and a careful consideration of the expected impact of the proposed engineering works on physical conditions in the project



areas. The major impact of these works will be on the basis of lands, benefiting from irrigation, flood control and drainage and ensuring safety of land and homestead from erosion and inundation. By Focus Group Discussion (FGD) the river water of the areas become saline which creates problem for irrigating during pre monsoon cropping. Thus test of river water was carried out from Dec. ’09 to Jun. ‘10 at various locations of existing regulator. The observed river water salinity are shown Table – 17 & Chart- 7.The salinity of this area is controlled by the Mulia and Barendra regulator. Needs a action plan through WMG / WMA for appropriate O & M of the regulators according to threshold (tolerance) value. Threshold (tolerance) value for rice is => 2.0 PPT.In Figure-4 shown pre-project and post-project Crop Calendar according to land type and cropping pattern, Sub project area hydrograph and also show this area observed salinity impact. Cropping pattern, production etc are furnished in Annex – A. The main sub-project benefit (positive impact) is increased agriculture production (Table 4 & Table 5), specially an overall increase of 14174 MT, 6746 MT for cereals; production of non-cereal will increase by 7428 MT and cash crop (Aromatic rice,Maize,Vegetables and Soybeans ) by 11255 MT as shown in Table-5. Crop intensity Pre-Project is 202% and Post-Project will be achieved 243 %. Table-10 shows the crop production summary, Table 6 illustrates crop area, yield, production, and value of production by land type under both pre and post sub-project conditions.



Figure-3 : Pre Project and Post Project Crop Calendar & Cropping pattern Carry on



Figure-3 : Pre Project and Post Project Crop Calendar & Cropping pattern



4.5 Fisheries Fisheries are an important sub-sector contributing to the socio-economic activities of the Narail Sub project area. Table 7 and Chart 5 show the estimated potential open water fisheries impacts, in terms of habitat, yield and production changes. As FCD sub-project the structure will remain closed during monsoon and open water fisheries will be reduced. There is negative impact on fish production. Capture fish product is decreases and culture fish product is increases due to sub-project intervention. From Table-7 & chart-5 and Table-11 it is seen that culture fisheries will be increased from 292.21 MT to 517.80 MT ie. by 224.89 MT however capture fisheries will be decreased from 60.28 MT to 10.44 MT ie. by 49.84 MT, after rehabilitation of the SIP. Some habitat expansion / improvement will be achieved through water retention in the beel and khal. Training program for culture fish practices will be provided to WMG / WMA. Also, improvements in fish production will depend substantially on efforts directed towards stocking and expanding pond aquaculture and cooperative aquaculture in the khal and in the beel. Residual impacts on subsistence fisheries (primarily landless and small / marginal farmers) are expected to be partially or entirely compensated by positive employment and nutritional impacts associated with increased agricultural activity and production. Fishing / navigation as a primary occupation is reported to be insignificant of sub-project residents. There may be a need for the WMG / WMA to address the need for rehabilitation of this group. 4.6 Environment The sub-unit reflects the typical scenario of rural areas near coastal zone where lack of rapid industrialization including brick-fields and salt water shrimp cultivation is yet to cause any pronounced degradation of environment. Of course, some downslide has occurred but that is comparable to the general pattern and the observed changes are indeed, less alarming than those found in many other locations of the coastal belt. For example, siltation of khals and creeks under tidal influence is a common phenomenon near the coast which has been exacerbated by the reduction of upland flow in the Ganges. It has also caused migration of some aquatic animals while in fishery and forestry sectors many exotic varieties have replaced the indigenous species purely for commercial reasons. The environmental study has examined the following environmental components:

physical;

biological;

human and economic; and

quality of life. The study has been carried out in three phases as below and are presented in Annex-C.

initial environmental assessment (IEE);

environmental impact assessment (EIA); and

environmental management plan (EMP). 4.7 Surface Water The availability of surface and ground water was assessed from TR-15 of MPO and FAP 4 reports. Annex-G of Hydrology are presented the water level in the area. Moreover invert level of the regulators in peripheral embankment are quite low (-0.60 mPWD), allowing 1.00 m to 2.11m depth of water availability during dry season. Water can be made available in the khals through the regulators during each high tide, which can be stored in the khal for dry season irrigation by closing the C/S lift gate.



4.8 Socio Economy 4.8.1 Stakeholders Located in Mulia & Kolora (2) Unions and Narail Pourashova under the Narail Upazila, the sub-unit area is spread, partly or wholly, over 13 villages of Narail District. The population is estimated as 14667 with a sex-ratio of 151 males per 149 females as against the national average of 106.6.The proportion of functionally landless people (owning < 0.2 ha) stands at 47% of the population. The number of households (HH) stands at 2855 with agricultural farming as the predominant means of income. The number of female headed households is about 3% and they are mostly poor. The Farm-size distribution and the occupational pattern are presented in both Tabular form and Graphics in Table 3, Chart 2 and Chart 3.

About 312 nos traditional fishermen households exists in this sub–unit area since about 7th generation, all are of Hindu religion and social order is in the name of Rajbongshi. Now most of the fishermen have changed their profession in course of time due to lack of open water fish in the river, beel and khals having less availability of fish due to over fishing. Most of the fishermen are now engaged in agriculture, catching fish in the beel during monsoon, some time caching fish in Gher (Close water fishing inland) on hire and fish trading. Most of the fishermen families are becoming affluent day by day; they are taking education and trying to live a better life. 11 nos. traditional fishermen households Hindu by religion, having social order of Rajbongshi, Village: Tularampur & Mulia, now they are doing private and Govt. service. As per field data about 60% of professional fisher men are connected with agriculture, they catch fish in the beel during monsoon and also catch fish in Gher (Close water fishing) on hire; about 28 % of traditional fishermen are engaged in culture fish production and fish trading; and about 12% of traditional fishermen are fishing in khal and river, fishing in beel during monsoon and fishing in Gher (Close water fishing) on hire. In this area 50 nos. Muslim poor people and 186 nos Hindu fishermen are also catching fish in beel area during monsoon period, actually they are daily labourers, Rikshwa pooler etc. They have been shown as part time fishermen. So there have no adverse impact in the traditional Hindu fishermen community.

Sustained lack of O & M has led to deterioration of FCD projects to such an extent that those have been rendered dysfunctional and need thorough rehabilitation with the inclusion of IWRM. One of the fundamental objectives of the SWAIWRM project is, therefore, to formulate restoration plans for the under performing schemes through participatory process with the ultimate aim of gradual transfer of O & M responsibilities to the Stakeholders/Beneficiaries. Associated with this is the important aspect of the beneficiaries' contribution to O & M in order to induce the sense of belonging and ownership of the scheme among the stakeholders. 4.8.2 Peoples Participation In order to involve stakeholders, public consultations would be held from grassroots at village upto Union, Upazila and District level involving stakeholders, local elites, LGIs, line agency and government representative. Instead of making a presentation, problem identification and the perceived solution there to would be extracted from the stakeholders through extensive and intensive dialogue. It ultimately leads to the realization of the need to form WMOs for sustainability of implemented schemes. The entire process would follow guidelines provided in the GPWM. This sub unit area is located in Mulia & Kolora (2) Unions and Narail Pourashova under the Narail Upazilas, the sub-unit area is spread, partly or wholly, over 13 villages of Narail District. So far, consultation meetings are to be held in all villages and ultimately at the union level. Proceedings of all the meetings will be duly minuted along with the list of participants. Meanwhile, training needs for WMO members have been identified, training modules formulated and annual training plan prepared. All relevant detail about villages and procedures for WMO forming to ensure participatory planning, implementation through O & M and monitoring in the long-run. 7 Nos WMG will be formed; they will be registered in WMG with the Doc (with MOU) and look after future O & M of the water infrastructure. In Figure-4 WMG is shown.



Figure – 4 : SIP SWN-8, Tularampur Scheme WMG Map



4.8.3 Training It needs to be stressed that rehabilitation of dilapidated project facilities is not the only means to an end; training of the stakeholders (EAs) and beneficiaries) in all domains is an equally essential project component in order to realize the stipulated benefits as well as to ensure sustainability. Therefore, provision has been made to cater to the needs of training and demonstration including necessary physical works in the spheres of Agriculture, Fisheries, Environment, Gender and Livelihood and WMO. Detailed training plan on each subject has been prepared spanning 2009-2010, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 with the expectation of continuity beyond and are presented in Annex-H. 4.8.4 Gender and Livelihood Gender and livelihood are two complementary aspects of the SWAIWRPM project. The gender aspect relates to involvement of women in water management organizations. At least 30 per cent of the seats of the managing committee of the WMG and WMA shall be allocated for women as per the Guideline for Participatory Water Management (GPWM). This project got a chance for livelihood enhancement. Crop and fish cultivation through better water resource management are the important and major livelihood enhancement activities for the poor which can only be ensured after the successful implementation of proposed scheme. Especially the poor are interested to participate in construction and maintenance of water structure through LCS. It will increase their income. Women members of the poor household are interested to have skills on home based jute works, duck rearing and puffed rice making, sweet rice ball (Moa), sesame toffee, pressed rice etc to undertake IGA and are presented in Annex-D. 4.8.5 Collective Action Plan (CAP) Collective Action Plan (CAP) of the Sub-unit Implementation Plan (SIP) will be prepared after formation of Water Management Group (WMG) and Water Management Association (WMA) with consultation with WMG members. The related (Agriculture, Fishery, O & M and Gender & Livelihood etc.) information for the CAP will be collected by the Facilitators through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) from the WMG members. Farther additional information will be collected through “Walk Through” jointly by the Project Management Office (PMO), ISPMC, Facilitators and the WMG members. After collection and analyzing the data the CAP of the SIP will be prepared. The CAP may be on the following fields:

(A) Agriculture:

i) Soil test for acidity, Alkalinity and PH and water test for Salinity are needed. These tests can be done by WMG through DAE or other sources. A kit for Water Salinity test may be provided to each WMG.

ii) Procurement of quality seeds and fertilizers may be done by WMG from the dealers and distribute the same to the beneficiaries centrally.

iii) In order to minimize the organic matter in soil, demonstration on compost preparation could be practices at the farmer’s field.

iv) Infrastructures development needs to be planned to minimize the scarcity irrigation water.

v) Training Farmers need training on modern methods of crop production, cultivation of High value crops (HVC), Training on IPM / ICM and practical training through establishment of demonstration plots on different crops and varieties.



vi) Marketing WMG can take initiatives to sell their products collectively to a big business centre.

(B) Fisheries:

i) To enhance fisheries production each WMG may be provided with a kit for water quality test and Fisheries Sub-committee of WMG can take initiatives for soil testing from BFRI, Jessore.

ii) WMG can procure quality fry / fingerling from the reputed hatchery and distribute the same to the beneficiaries.

iii) To minimize the shortage of organic fertilizer in pond for increasing productivity, cow dung / compost to pond can be practiced. Additional amount of compost need to be provided to fish pond.

iv) Use of high doses of pesticides to be discouraged through practicing IPM / ICM.

v) Training Rigorous training need to be imparted to enhance knowledge on modern methods of production and also high value fish, establishment of demonstration pond would help the farmers for increasing fish production and dissemination of technology.

vi) Marketing WMG can take initiatives to sell their fish collectively to a big business centre.

(C) O & M

i) Construction of new regulator Tularampur. ii) Repair of Mulia regulator and Nayanpur Check structure. iii) Re excavation of khals : Tularampur (4.0 km), Zia (4.0 km), Mulia (8.5

km), Hizolanga/Sitarampur (3.45 km), Nayanpur Alokdia (1.00 km) & Nayanpur-Trimohoni (0.5 km).

iv) Foot bridge /culverts (new ) 4 nos,WMG office building (new) 3 nos,Tube wells (new) 11 nos.

Training a) WMA members shall have to be trained for operation of the structures for

proper Water Management. b) BWDB officials should also be given the same training. c) Training on maintenance is also be imparted to both WMG and BWDB

officials. d) Gate operators should be trained regarding gate operation including practical

training at their respective gate sides. e) The topics of training may be (i) maintenance need assessment (ii) type of

maintenance work (iii) role and responsibility of each party (iv) maintenance schedule (v) budgeting and (vi) monitoring.

The identified Collective actions will be transformed into implementation plans to be supported under the project. The names of the facilities to be managed by WMG/WMA will be specified in the CAP 5. O & M ISSUES Inadequate budgetary allocation is a major factor for the lack of upkeep of FCD projects ultimately rendering them dysfunctional to such as extent that necessitates thorough rehabilitation. It is, indeed, time that concerned parties (Beneficiary, PAP, BVVDB, Donors etc.) adopt a policy that this shall be the major rehabilitation. Another major factor behind this is lack of stakeholder-participation in project activities.



It is well established that active stakeholder-participation is a 'must' for sustainability of FCD projects and now stakeholder-involvement in entire life cycle of any water development project from identification through O&M has been made mandatory in the National Water Policy (NWPo). The ultimate objective is to gradually transfer the O&M responsibilities to the stakeholders reducing pressure on the government exchequer where the line agencies of the government would play the role of facilitators. However, their services would still be needed in case of major works requiring capital investment.With this end in view, the rehabilitation of the sub-unit has been planned by incorporating the concepts of IVVRM and stakeholder participation in order to ensure last rehabilitation and sustainability.To that end, the Project requires formation of VVMOs by beneficiaries on the basis of villages or clusters thereof with at least 70% enrolment of whom about 30% are to be women. To demonstrate their willingness each VVMO is required to make on upfront contribution to the capital investment equivalent to one year O&M costs. Maintenance requirement of FCD schemes are generally classified as: Preventive : Undertaken throughout the year that includes minor repairs of embankments, removal of weeds, water hyacinths etc. from khals and greasing, painting, minor repairs of and removal of debris from hydraulic structures; Periodic : Requiring greater resources than preventive maintenance based on checklist prepared at the end of each monsoon that includes resection of dykes, re-excavation of khals and larger repair of structures such as partial or full replacement of gates, hoist, rubber seals etc. ; and Emergency Repair: Unforeseen and unpredictable caused by sudden massive floods or events like cyclone leading to breach or overtopping of embankment and/or severe damage to structures. The preventive/routine maintenance, in its entirety, appears the responsibility of-the V\/MGs while the periodic maintenance might see a mix of involvement and cost-sharing. On the other hand, in case of emergency the VVMGs might be conveniently engaged with their physical labour as part of the contribution in kind / borne by BWDB. However, a Maintenance Plan for the Sub-unit (SWN-8) has been formulated where responsibilities have been delineated and costs for periodic maintenance worked out as shown in Table 9.The total cost of preventive and periodic maintenance for SWN-8 has been estimated as Tk.11.004 lac per annum of which WMA share would be Tk. 2.38 lac with BWDB bearing Tk.8.624 lac. The WMA / WMG share comes to Tk. 47/ha/year and are presented in Annex-F. 6. FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS The PRA examined three questions related to sub-project (here SWN 8) viability and sustainability: (i) Is there broad popular support for this sub-project, (ii) Is there any opposition to the sub-project, (iii) Is the sub-project socially acceptable, (iv) Is there any negative environmental impact and (v) Are the beneficiaries willing to form in to a WMG / WMA, pay O & M contribution, assist with land acquisition and take full responsibility for the operation and maintenance. In relation to these questions, the findings of the CAP and work through (One Go) are: People activity supported the sub-project. There is no opposition. Socially acceptable No adverse impact on environment. The beneficiaries expressed willingness to form WMG / WMA, pay O & M contribution, assist with land acquisition and to take full responsibility for O & M after the sub-project is complete.



This sub-project (SIP-8) passed each of the standard social, environment and economic viability tests used for SAIWRPMP sub-projects. The relevant financial and economic information is presented in tables 10 through 14. The status of the sub-project relative to the SAR sub-project selection / acceptability criteria is shown in Table 15. As such the sub-project is socially acceptable, technically economically viable and economically feasible. Considering people demand and lower development cost (Benefit-Cost ratio 8.86, Table-14) and high economic (68.00%, Table-14) and financial (60.57 %, Table-13) rate of return, it is recommended to implement the SIP. The economic sensibility has been shown in Table-12. All residual adverse environmental impacts of the sub-project are expected to be either not significant, or acceptable under the circumstances except reduction of capture fisheries. There is also no adverse impact on the eco-system. 7. MULTI - CRITERIA ANALYSIS In addition to the economic sensitivity tests, a preliminary exercise of Multi-Criteria Analysis has been performed with available data an insight gained through PRAs. The result is presented as a matrix in Table 15 which shows the proposed scheme is technically feasible, economically viable and socially acceptable.

Sou

thw

est A

rea

Inte

grat

ed W

ater

Res

ourc

es P

lann

ing

and

Man

agem

ent P

roje

ct

BW

DB

SIP

Num

ber

:S

WN

-8, T

ular

ampu

r Sch

eme

U

nion

:M

ulia

& K

olor

a D

istri

ct :

Nar

ail

Upa

zila

:N

arai

l G

ross

are

a of

SIP

::

3811

.40

2.98

m P

WD

2.68

m P

WD

Land

Typ

eFl

ood

dept

h (m

PW

D)

Are

a (h

a)La

nd T

ype

Are

a (h

a)

1.50

0.00

Not

floo

ded

2.98

1348

.78

Not

floo

ded

1866

.38

1.75

7.23

F0, (

0.0-

0.3)

2.68

517.

60F0

, (0.

0-0.

3)84

2.46

2.00

204.

79F1

,(0.3

-0.9

)2.

0815

76.0

2F1

,(0.3

-0.9

)10

71.6

22.

2571

7.95

F2,(0

.9-1

.8)

1.18

369.

00F2

,(0.9

-1.8

)30

.94

2.50

1457

.58

F3,>

1.8

0.00

F3,>

1.8

0.00

2.75

2134

.58

3.00

2491

.14

3.25

2864

.57

3.50

3088

.63

3.75

3319

.92

F0, (

0.0-

0.3)

=18

66.3

8ha

48.9

7%

F0, (

0.0-

0.3)

=ha

71.0

7%

4.00

3539

.16

F1,(0

.3-0

.9)

=15

76.0

2ha

41.3

5%

F1,(0

.3-0

.9)

=ha

28.1

2%

4.25

3659

.62

F2,(0

.9-1

.8)

=36

9.00

ha9.

68%

F2,(0

.9-1

.8)

=ha

0.81

%4.

5038

11.4

0F3

,>1.

8=

0.00

ha0.

00%

F3,>

1.8

=ha

0.00

%To

tal

=38

11.4

0ha

Tota

l=

ha

Tabl

e - 1

: La

nd ty

pe a

naly

sis

2.68

2.38

1.78

0.88

1102

.56

30.9

40.

00

1945

.02

0.00

1071

.62

3811

.40

30.9

40.

00

2708

.84

2462

.62

1945

.02

369.

00

Land

Typ

e (%

)La

nd T

ype

(%)

Ele

vatio

n (m

PW

D)

Cum

ulat

ive

A

rea

(ha)

Cum

ulat

ive

A

rea

(ha)

Pre

-pro

ject

ave

rage

ann

ual W

L (M

onso

on )=

Pre-

proj

ect M

onso

on C

ondi

tion

Post

-pro

ject

Mon

soon

Con

ditio

n

Pos

t-pro

ject

ave

rage

ann

ual W

L (M

onso

on )=

Cum

ulat

ive

A

rea

(ha)

Floo

d de

pth

SW

N-8

, Tul

aram

pur S

chem

e

18

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project BWDB

Land Type Pre-project area (ha)

Post-project area (ha) Change (ha) Change (%)

F0 (d<0.3m) 1866 2709 842 45%F1 (0.3m<d<0.9m) 1576 1072 -504 -32%F2 (0.9m<d<1.8m) 369 31 -338 -92%F3 (d>1.8m) 0 0 0Non-cultivated lowland 179 179 0 0%Of which perm waterbody 0 0 0Floodplain fish habitat (F2+F3) 369 31 -338 -92%GROSS AREA 3811 3811 0 0%Net area=75% of Gross area 2859 2859 0 0%

Table - 2 : Land use changes

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Hectares

Chart - 1 : Land use changes

Pre-project area (ha) 1866 1576 369 0 179 0 369

Post-project area (ha) 2709 1072 31 0 179 0 31

F0 F1 F2 F3 Low Non-cult.

Permanent water

F/p fish habitat

SWN-8, Tularampur Scheme 19


Table 3 : Household farm size distribution and occupation distributionFinancial

Area - Occupation PercentFarm size distribution according to farmers inside the subprojectFunctional Landless < 0.2 ha 42%Marginal 0.2 to 0.5ha 21%Small 0.5 to 1.0 ha 18%Medium 1.0 to 2.0 ha 14%Large>2.0 ha 6%Household occupation according to landless inside the subprojectFarmers >0.21 ha 39%Day laborers 23%Fishers & Pertial Fisherman 5%Trade transport etc. services 11%Other 22%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Chart 3: Occupational distribution of householdsaccording to landless inside the subproject

Percent 39% 23% 5% 11% 22%

Farmers >0.21 ha

Day laborers Fishers & Pertial

Trade transport etc. services

Other

0%

20%

40%

60%

Chart 2: Farm size distributionaccording to farmers inside the subproject

Percent 42% 21% 18% 14% 6%

Functional Landless < 0.2

Marginal 0.2 to 0.5ha

Small 0.5 to 1.0 ha

Medium 1.0 to 2.0 ha

Large>2.0 ha



Table 4: Production by land type impacts on SIP Agriculiture

Area (ha) Yield (t/ha)

Production (mt) Area (ha) Yield

(t/ha)Production

(mt)F0 1400 2032HYV Boro 350 5.1 1785 442 5.1 2254.2 469.2 137.36%B Aus 590 1.2 708 300 1.2 360 -348Wheat 210 2 420 435 2 870 450Pulses 380 2.8 1064 300 2.8 840 -224Vegetables(W) 250 17 4250 0 0 0 -4250Mustard 210 1.5 315 210 1.5 315 0Jute 460 2.5 1150 435 2.5 1087.5 -62.5HYV T Aman 130 3.5 455 1662 3.5 5817 5362LT Amon 560 2.2 1232 0 2.2 0 -1232T Aus 0 0 0 275 2.2 605 605Vegetables(S) 0 0 0 855 15 12825 12825Maize 0 0 0 370 5.5 2035 2035

Sub - Totals 3140 11379 5284 27009 15630F1 1182 804Pulses 280 2.8 784 0 2.8 0 -784 -18.92%Jute 485 2.5 1213 410 2.5 1025 -187.5HYV T Aman 205 3.5 718 563 3.5 1970.5 1253B Aus 432 1.2 518 0 0 0 -518Wheat 210 2 420 240 2 480 60Mustard 222 1.5 333 0 0 0 -333Hybrid Boro 265 5.5 1458 0 0 0 -1457.5LT Amon 265 2.2 583 0 2.2 0 -583Soybean 0 0 0 190 2 380 380HYV Boro 0 0 0 150 5.1 765 765Aromatic rice 0 0 0 53 5 265 265

Sub - Totals 2364 6026 1606 4886 -1140.4F2 277 24B Aman 276 1.5 414 23 1.5 35 -380 -76.11%Pulses 0 2.8 0 23 2.8 64 64.4

Sub - Totals 276 414 46 99 -315Totals 5780 17819 6936 31993 14174

Total production increase = 14174 MTPre-Project cropping Intensity = 202%Post-Project cropping Intensity = 243%

% IncreaseCropPre-Project Post-Project Increased

Quantity (mt)



CROP Pre-Project Production (mt)

Post-Project Production (mt)

Increased Quantity (mt) % Increase

CerealHYV Boro 1785 3019.2 1234.20 69%B Aus 1226 360 -866.40 -71%Wheat 840 1350 510.00 61%HYV T Aman 1173 7787.5 6615.00 564%LT Amon 1815 0 -1815.00 -100%T Aus 0 605 605.00 100%Maize 0 2035 2035.00 100%Hybrid Boro 1458 0 -1457.50 -100%B Aman 414 34.5 -379.50 -92%Aromatic rice 0 265 265.00 100%

Sub - Total : 8710 15456 6746 77%Non CerealPulses 1848 904 -943.60 -51%Vegetables(W) 4250 0 -4250.00 -100%Mustard 648 315 -333.00 -51%Jute 2363 2113 -250.00 -11%Vegetables(S) 0 12825 12825.00 100%Soybean 0 380 380.00 100%

Sub - Total 9108.5 16536.9 7428 82%High valu CropsAromatic rice 0 265 265.00 100%Maize 0 2035 2035.00 100%Vegetables(W) 4250 0 -4250.00 -100%Vegetables(S) 0 12825 12825.00 100%Soybean 0 380 380.00 100%

Sub - Total 4250 15505 11255 265%

Total : 17819 31993 14174 80%

Table 5: Total, Cereal and high value crop production Impacts on project area

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

Tons

PRE-PROJECT 17818.90 8710.40 4250

POST-PROJECT 31993.10 15456.20 15505

TOTAL (mt) CERIAL (mt) HIGH VALUE CROPs (mt)

Chart 4 : Total, Cereal and High valu crop production Impacts on project area


Sou

thw

est A

rea

Inte

grat

ed W

ater

Res

ourc

es P

lann

ing

and

Man

agem

ent P

roje

ct

BW

DB

Cro

pA

rea

(ha)

Yie

ld

(t/h

a)Pr

oduc

tion

(t)

Fina

ncia

l (T

k/ha

)E

cono

mic

(T

k/ha

)Fi

nanc

ial

(Tk)

Eco

nom

ic (T

k)A

rea

(ha)

Yie

ld

(t/h

a)Pr

oduc

tion

(t)

Fina

ncia

l (T

k/ha

)E

cono

mic

(T

k/ha

)Fi

nanc

ial (

Tk)

Eco

nom

ic (T

k)Fi

nanc

ial (

Tk)

Eco

nom

ic

(Tk)

F014

0020

32H

YV

Bor

o35

05.

117

8523

242

4287

78,

134,

700

15,0

06,9

5044

25.

122

54.2

2324

242

877

10,2

72,9

6418

,951

,634

2,13

8,26

43,

944,

684

B A

us59

01.

270

890

0017

742

5,31

0,00

010

,467

,780

300

1.2

360

9000

1774

227

0000

053

2260

0-2

,610

,000

-5,1

45,1

80W

heat

210

242

010

821

2200

02,

272,

410

4,62

0,00

043

52

870

1082

122

000

4707

135

9570

000

2,43

4,72

54,

950,

000

Puls

es38

02.

810

6443

8814

100

1,66

7,44

05,

358,

000

300

2.8

840

4388

1410

013

1640

042

3000

0-3

51,0

40-1

,128

,000

Veg

etab

les(

W)

250

1742

5041

169

4359

910

,292

,250

10,8

99,7

500

00

00

00

-10,

292,

250

-10,

899,

750

Mus

tard

210

1.5

315

3519

1230

073

8,99

02,

583,

000

210

1.5

315

3519

1230

073

8990

2583

000

00

Jute

460

2.5

1150

1528

024

171

7,02

8,80

011

,118

,660

435

2.5

1087

.515

280

2417

166

4680

010

5143

85-3

82,0

00-6

04,2

75H

YV

T A

man

130

3.5

455

1514

921

545

1,96

9,37

02,

800,

850

1662

3.5

5817

1514

921

545

2517

7638

3580

7790

23,2

08,2

6833

,006

,940

LT A

mon

560

2.2

1232

1054

321

236

5,90

4,08

011

,892

,160

02.

20

1054

321

236

00

-5,9

04,0

80-1

1,89

2,16

0T

Aus

00

00

00

027

52.

260

515

172

2686

941

7230

073

8897

54,

172,

300

7,38

8,97

5V

eget

able

s(S)

00

00

00

085

515

1282

565

500

6877

556

0025

0058

8026

2556

,002

,500

58,8

02,6

25M

aize

00

00

00

037

05.

520

3512

000

1500

044

4000

055

5000

04,

440,

000

5,55

0,00

0T

otal

s31

4011

379

4331

8040

7474

7150

5284

2700

8.7

1161

7472

715

8721

009

7285

6687

8397

3859

F111

8280

4Pu

lse s

280

2.8

784

4,38

814

,100

1228

640

3948

000

02.

80

4,38

814

,100

00

-1,2

28,6

40-3

,948

,000

Jute

485

2.5

1212

.515

,280

24,1

7174

1080

011

7229

3541

02.

510

2515

,280

24,1

7162

6480

099

1011

0-1

,146

,000

-1,8

12,8

25H

YV

T A

man

205

3.5

717.

515

,149

21,5

4531

0554

544

1672

556

33.

519

70.5

15,1

4921

,545

8528

887

1212

9835

5,42

3,34

27,

713,

110

B A

us43

21.

251

8.4

9000

1774

23,

888,

000

7,66

4,54

40

00

00

00

-3,8

88,0

00-7

,664

,544

Whe

at21

02

420

10,8

2122

,000

2272

410

4620

000

240

248

010

,821

22,0

0025

9704

052

8000

032

4,63

066

0,00

0M

usta

rd22

21.

533

33,

519

12,3

0078

1218

2730

600

00

00

00

0-7

81,2

18-2

,730

,600

Hyb

rid B

oro

265

5.5

1457

.532

,580

65,4

5586

3370

017

3455

750

00

00

00

-8,6

33,7

00-1

7,34

5,57

5LT

Am

on26

52.

258

310

,543

21,2

3627

9389

556

2754

00

2.2

010

,543

21,2

360

0-2

,793

,895

-5,6

27,5

40So

ybea

n0

00

00

00

190

238

032

,000

33,6

0060

8000

063

8400

06,

080,

000

6,38

4,00

0H

YV

Bor

o0

00

00

00

150

5.1

765

23,2

4242

,877

3486

300

6431

550

3,48

6,30

06,

431,

550

Aro

mat

ic ri

ce0

00

00

00

535.

026

534

,863

64,3

1618

4773

934

0872

1.5

1,84

7,73

93,

408,

722

Tot

als

2364

6026

30,1

14,2

0858

,075

,919

1606

4885

.528

,804

,766

43,5

44,2

17-1

,309

,442

-14,

531,

703

F227

724

B A

man

276

1.5

414

6,97

016

,338

1923

720

4509

288

231.

534

.56,

970

16,3

3816

0310

3757

74-1

,763

,410

-4,1

33,5

14Pu

lses

02.

80

4,38

814

,100

00

232.

864

.44,

388

14,1

0010

0924

3243

0010

0,92

432

4,30

0T

otal

s27

641

4.0

1,92

3,72

04,

509,

288

4698

.926

1,23

470

0,07

4-1

,662

,486

-3,8

09,2

14

Uni

t Val

uePr

oduc

tion

Tabl

e 6:

Fin

anci

al a

nd E

cono

mic

Impa

cts

on S

IP A

gric

ultu

re

Post

-Sub

proj

ect

Pre-

Subp

roje

ctU

nit V

alue

Prod

uctio

nN

et In

crem

enta

l

SW

N-8

, Tul

aram

pur S

chem

e

23


Table 7: Financial and Economic Impacts on SIP FisheriesPre-Project

Financial (Tk/ha)

Economic (Tk/ha)

Financial (Tk/ha)

Economic (Tk/ha)

Capture Canal/Khal 8.70 95 0.83 4275 214 37193 1862Floodplain 360.00 163 58.68 7335 367 2640600 132120Borrow pit 4.40 175 0.77 7875 394 34650 1734

Sub-Total 60.28 2712443 135716CulturePond 160 1479 236.64 66555 46589 10648800 7454240Rice-Fish 64 715 45.76 32175 22523 2059200 1441472Nursery 3.3 2540 8.38 114300 80010 377190 264033Borrow pit 2.5 850 2.13 38250 26775 95625 66938Sub-Total 292.91 13180815 9226683

Post-Project

Financial (Tk/ha)

Economic (Tk/ha)

Financial (Tk/ha)

Economic (Tk/ha)

Capture Canal/Khal 5.70 95 0.54 4275 214 24368 1220Floodplain 15.00 163 2.45 7335 367 110025 5505Borrow pit 2.20 250 0.55 11250 563 24750 1239Sanctuary 2.00 700 1.4 31500 1575 63000 3150Beel stockig 5.00 1100 5.5 49500 2475 247500 12375

Sub-Total 10.44 469643 23489CulturePond 162 2500 405 112500 78750 18225000 12757500Nursery 4.00 2800 11.2 126000 88200 504000 352800Rice-Fish 70 1200 84 54000 37800 3780000 2646000Borrow pit 4.5 1800 8.1 81000 56700 364500 255150Canal/Khal 2.00 1250 2.50 56250 39375 112500 78750Cage 0.37 350 7.00 15750 11025 5828 4079

Sub-Total 517.8 22991828 16094279

Net Incremental

Financial (Tk/ha)

Economic (Tk/ha)

Capture -49.84 -2242800 -112227Culture 224.89 9811013 6867596

Total: 175.05 7568213 6755369

Area (ha)HabitatUnit Value Production ValueProduction

(MT)Yield

(kg/ha)

Unit Value Production Value

HabitatProduction ValueProduction

(MT)

Habitat Area (ha) Yield (kg/ha)

Production (MT)

0

200

400

600

tons

Chart 5: Potential openwater fish production gross impact(prior to mitigation/compensation)

Pre-Project 60.28 292.91

Post-Project 10.44 517.8

Capture Culture



Table 8: Cost Estimates of Proposed Works

Sl. No. Quantity Unit Rate in Taka Financial Cost

Conversion Factor

Economic Cost

(a) 1Vent - 1.52m X 1.82m Tolarampur Ragulator

1 Number 12673000 12673000 0.90 11405700

Sub- Total : 12673000 11405700

(a) 3 Vent - 1.52m X 1.82m Mulia Ragulator

1 Number 4800000 4800000 0.90 4320000

Sub- Total : 4800000 4320000

Re-Excavation of Drainage Canals (Khal) including 2m width brick masonry

(a) Mulia, Tularampur, Sitarampur-Hizoldanga, Zia, Nayanpur –Alokdia, Nayanpur-Trimohoni

12 km 544000 6528000 0.90 5875200

(b) Total channel (Khal) length 16.90 km, at least 25% of channel will be excavated by LCS, it may be increase

4.90 km 544000 2665600 0.90 2399040

Sub- Total : 16.90 km 9193600 2399040

(a) Foot Bridge/Boxculvert 3 Number 1455000 4365000 0.90 3928500

(b) Bridge 1 Number 3000000 3000000 0.90 2700000

(c) WMG Office 2 Number 700000 1400000 0.90 1260000

(d) Deep Tube well 7 Number 70000 490000 0.90 441000

Sub- Total : 9255000 8329500

12190000 12190000

4000000 4000000

3592160 26454245388240 3968136

Sub- Total : 25170400 2280356061092000 49257800

Table 9:Annual O & M CostStructure( Taka )

Khal( Taka )

Financial Cost

Conversion Factor

Economic Cost

95200 142800 238000 0.90 214200573300 289100 862400 0.90 776160668500 431900 1100400 990360

Contigency for price ( 10% of civil cost )Contigency ( 15% of civil cost )

Total Project Cost :

Training to Water Management Group (WMG) for Agriculture, Fishery, and Livestock

5

Investment cost for enhancement of Agriculture, Fishery, and IGA

0Total :

Cost Sharing

WMABWDB

Embankment( Taka )

00

Components

Rehabilitation of Existing Regulatots

3

2

4

Bridge/Foot Bridge/ Box culvert/ WMG Office/ Deep Tube well

1

Construction of Regulatots



Table 10: Crop Production Summary

Financial (Tk) Economic (Tk)

HYV Boro 5624564 10376234

B Aus -6498000 -12809724

Wheat 2759355 5610000

Pulses -1478756 -4751700

Vegetables(W) -10292250 -10899750

Mustard -781218 -2730600

Jute -1528000 -2417100

HYV T Aman 28631610 40720048

LT Amon -8697975 -17519700

T Aus 4172300 7388975

Vegetables(S) 56002500 58802624

Maize 4440000 5550000

Hybrid Boro -8633700 -17345576

Soybean 6080000 6384000

Aromatic rice 1847739 3408721.5Totals 71,648,169 69,766,453

Table 11: Fish Production Summary

Financial (Tk/ha) Economic (Tk/ha)

Capture -49.84 -2242800 -112227

Culture 224.89 9811013 6867596

Total: 175.05 7568213 6755369

Table 12: Economic Sensitivity

Scenario Base Case Cost Increase 10%

Cost Increase 20%

Benefits Decreased 20%

Base case 68.0% 63.6% 60.2% 59.7%Construction delayed two years 45.6% 43.4% 41.5% 41.3%Delay full benefits three years 50.1% 47.4% 45.0% 45.0%

Incremental ProductionCrops

Habitat Production (MT)Production Value



Table 13: Financial Cash Flow

FisheriesPhasing Costs Phasing Costs Phasing Benefits Benefits

1 0.2 12218400 0 0 0 0 0 -12218400

2 0.5 30546000 0.2 198072 0 0 0 -30744072

3 0.3 18327600 0.7 693252 0 0 0 -19020852

4 0 1 990360 0.5 35824085 7568213 42401938

5 0 1 990360 0.75 53736127 7568213 60313980

6 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

7 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

8 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

9 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

10 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

11 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

12 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

13 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

14 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

15 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

16 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

17 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

18 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

19 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

20 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

21 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

22 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

23 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

24 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

25 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

26 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

27 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

28 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

29 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

30 0 1 990360 1 71648169 7568213 78226022

FIRR : 60.57%

Year O & M Cash FlowAgricultureInvestmentProject cost Project Incremental Benefits



Table 14: Economic Cash Flow

FisheriesPhasing Costs Phasing Costs Phasing Benefits Benefits

1 0.2 9851560 0 0 0 0 0 -9851560

2 0.5 24628900 0.2 198072 0 0 0 -24826972

3 0.3 14777340 0.7 693252 0 0 0 -15470592

4 0 1 990360 0.5 34883226 6755369 40648235

5 0 1 990360 0.75 52324839 6755369 58089848

6 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

7 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

8 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

9 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

10 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

11 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

12 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

13 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

14 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

15 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

16 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

17 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

18 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

19 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

20 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

21 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

22 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

23 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

24 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

25 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

26 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

27 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

28 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

29 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

30 0 1 990360 1 69766453 6755369 75531462

NPV ( In Lac ) : BDT4,005EIRR : 68.00%Benefit - Cost Ratio : 8.86

Year O & M Cash FlowAgricultureInvestment

Project cost Project Incremental Benefits



Table 15: Multi-Citeria Analysis

Sl. No. Components UnitRating of impacts

1 Economic

a EIRR % 68.00% P

b NPV Lac 4,005BDT P

c Benefit - Cost Ratio 8.86BDT P

2 Financial

a Total project cost Lac 610.92BDT P

b O & M cost Lac 11.00BDT Pc WMA cost Taka / ha 47BDT P

Sl. No. Components Unit Pre-Project Post-Project Increment

3 Quantitativea Cereal M. Ton 30225 42670 12445 Pb Non-cereal M. Ton 9938 23546 13608 Pc Total production M. Ton 40163 66216 26053 Pd Fish M. Ton 957 1025 67 P

4 Qualitative4.1 Physical Environment

a Erosion -1 -1 0 NC

b Salanity -1 +1 +3 P

c Surface water quality -1 -1 +3 NC4.2 Biological/ Ecological

a Bio-diversity conservation ( Crop species ) -2 -3 -1 Nb Bio-diversity ( aquatic species ) -2 -3 -1 Nc Fish ( Culture ) 2 5 3 Pd Fish ( Capture ) -2 -3 -1 N

4.3 Quality of life

a Income distribution +1 +4 +3 P

b Nutrition -1 +1 +2 P

c Ttansport system +1 +2 +1 P

d Potable water supply & sanitation -1 +1 +2 P

e Health and disease vectors -1 +1 +2 P4.4 Social impacts

a Impact on Women -2 +1 +3 Pb Impact on Fishermenc Social conflicts -1 +1 +2 Pd Poverty alleviation -1 +2 +3 Pe Acceptance by population -1 +1 +2 P

Rating of impacts(+) Positive trend = P(-) Negative trend = N(0) No change from baseline situation =NC

Look up


Sou

thw

est A

rea

Inte

grat

ed W

ater

Res

ourc

es P

lann

ing

and

Man

agem

ent P

roje

ct

BW

DB

Tabl

e -1

6: E

leva

tion,

Are

a &

Sto

rage

on

SIP

Are

a

Elev

atio

n (m

PWD

)C

umul

ativ

e A

rea

(ha)

Stor

age

(h

a-m

)1.

500.

000.

00

1.75

7.23

0.90

2.00

204.

7927

.41

2.25

717.

9514

2.75

2.50

1457

.58

414.

69

2.75

2134

.58

863.

71

3.00

2491

.14

1441

.93

3.25

2864

.57

2111

.39

3.50

3088

.63

2855

.54

3.75

3319

.92

3656

.61

4.00

3539

.16

4513

.99

4.25

3659

.62

5413

.84

4.50

3811

.40

6347

.72

Cha

rt -

6 : A

rea-

Elev

atio

n-St

orag

e C

urve

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

050

010

0015

0020

0025

0030

0035

00

Are

a (h

a)

Elevation (mPWD)

050

010

0015

0020

0025

0030

0035

0040

0045

0050

0055

0060

0065

00

Stor

age

(ha-

m)

Are

a-E

lvat

ion

Sto

rage

-Ele

vatio

n

SW

N-8

, Tul

aram

pur S

chem

e

30

Sou

thw

est A

rea

Inte

grat

ed W

ater

Res

ourc

es P

lann

ing

and

Man

agem

ent P

roje

ct

BW

DB

Tabl

e - 1

7 : O

bser

ved

data

rive

r wat

er s

alin

ity im

pact

Tota

l Dis

saol

ved

Sol

ids

( TD

S )

mea

sure

d in

Par

ts P

er T

hous

and

( PP

T )

Thre

shol

d va

lue

for r

ice

is 2

.0 P

PT

NS

P

Reg

ulat

orN

ame

of R

iver

9 D

ec,

2009

25 D

ec,

2009

06 J

an,

2010

22 J

an,

2010

1 Fe

b,20

1011

Feb

,20

1021

Feb

,20

101

Mar

,20

1011

Mar

,20

1021

Mar

,20

10

1 A

pr,

2010

11 A

pr,

2010

21 A

pr,

2010

1 M

ay,

2010

11 M

ay,

2010

21 M

ay,

2010

1 Ju

n,20

1016

Jun

,20

10

Mul

iaA

fra

0.31

0.33

0.35

0.43

0.46

0.5

0.58

0.58

0.98

1.27

4.07

5.89

6.68

7.33

7.73

7.17

6.85

3.06

Tula

ram

pur

Afra

0.31

0.3

0.34

0.4

0.44

0.5

0.51

0.54

0.82

1.18

3.15

4.76

6.09

6.97

7.12

6.67

6.22

2.6

Bar

endr

aA

fra

0.35

0.33

0.36

0.42

0.45

0.5

0.56

0.59

0.99

1.33

4.23

5.98

6.58

7.17

7.79

7.35

6.92

3.59

Sin

gia

Chi

tra0.

270.

350.

420.

490.

510.

280.

520.

551.

111.

924.

66.

787.

558.

138.

628.

027.

130.

8

Kho

roria

Chi

tra0.

250.

240.

230.

280.

310.

380.

50.

531.

993.

145.

927.

968.

899.

239.

329.

6510

.48

3.22

Jam

rilda

nga

Chi

tra0.

880.

540.

560.

320.

350.

560.

920.

992.

893.

856.

367.

959.

289.

7810

.18

10.6

810

.28

4.05

Per

uli

Chi

tra0.

240.

30.

310.

320.

340.

550.

780.

822.

884.

356.

168.

689.

5510

.15

10.3

910

.14

10.4

33.

95

Ran

agat

iB

haira

b0.

630.

560.

520.

460.

920.

991.

621.

692.

764.

77.

718.

699.

810

.42

10.6

610

.99.

174.

57

Ram

naga

rM

ajud

khal

i0.

190.

971.

151.

340.

740.

821.

651.

773.

824.

577.

28.

829.

5810

.08

10.5

810

.69.

115.

28

Sid

hipa

sha

Maj

udkh

ali

0.86

0.9

1.02

1.19

0.85

0.97

2.1

2.18

3.33

5.37

6.58

8.84

10.1

310

.73

10.4

311

.29.

244.

62

Cha

rt -

7 : O

bser

ved

data

rive

r wat

er s

alin

ity im

pact

cur

ve

0123456789

9 Dec

, 200

9 25 D

ec, 2

009 06

Jan,

2010

22 Ja

n, 20

101 F

eb, 2

010 11

Feb, 2

010 21

Feb, 2

010

1 Mar,

2010

11 M

ar, 20

1021

Mar,

2010

1 A

pr, 20

1011

Apr, 20

1021

Apr, 20

101 M

ay, 2

010 11

May

, 201

0 21 M

ay, 2

010

1 Jun

, 201

0 16 Ju

n, 20

10

Tim

e

Parts Per Thousand

Mul

ia

Bar

endr

a

SW

N-8

, Tul

aram

pur S

chem

e

31

Appraisal Data

Annex – A

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-A


Tularampur Scheme (SWN-8)

AGRICULTURE Summary The gross area of SWN-8 is 3811 ha. According to PPTA net cultivable area (NCA) has been

estimated at 75% of the gross area for Narail Sub-Project. On that basis, the NCA has been

calculated at 2858 ha with a present cropped area of 5780 ha yielding a cropping intensity of

202%. Future total cropped area has been estimated at 6936 ha yielding a cropping intensity of

243%. Production of Cereal crops will be increased by 6079 MT after rehabilitation.

Based on the hydrological analysis of the land area under the SIP have been figured out as

F0,F!,F2 & F3 as per present & future governing water levels on which total cropped area,

cropping pattern, cropping intensity and total production have been estimated.

Data furnished in the report are based on the agricultural information collected from the field

(SIP area) through personal interview from sampled respondents with structured questionnaires

and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) by the hired enumerators.. Moreover, for authentication,

the secondary data from the local DAE office have been consulted.

A total of 11-Water Management Groups (WMGs) have already been formed in the Sub-Unit

and data for Collective Action Plan (CAP) have also been collected from the WMG-members

through Focus Through Discussions (FGDs) and Walkthroughs.

Present Agriculture

The present agriculture in the sub-unit is hampered by poor drainage, resulting in water logging

in the lower areas during the wet season. Conversely, the higher areas suffer from water

shortage especially during the pre-monsoon season.

Present cropping pattern and production have been provided in Tables 3 and 4. Agriculture in

the sub-unit is dominated by rice cultivation covering 54% of the total cropped area followed by

Jute (16%), Pulses (12%),Wheat (7%),Oilseeds(7%) and Vegetables (4%).

Annual present production of rice has been calculated as 7870 MT and wheat 840 MT. Thus,

annual cereal production is 8710 MT.



Future Agriculture

Future cropping pattern and production have been provided in Tables 5 and 6. Future

agriculture under changed scenario shows that rice covers 50% of total cropped area followed

by Jute (12%), Vegetables (12%), Wheat (10%), Maize (5%), Pulses (5%), Soybean (3%) and

other Oilseeds (3%) with an estimated cropping intensity of 243% and total cropped area of

6180 ha. Among the crops high value crops (Aromatic rice, vegetables, maize and soybean)

will be covered around 21% of total cropped area of this SIP.

Annual production of major crops (cereals) have been estimated as 14789 MT of which rice will

be 11404 MT, wheat will be 1350 MT and maize will be 2035 MT. Thus, Cereal production of

the Sub-Unit has been estimated to be increased by 6079 MT after rehabilitation.

To facilitate this shift the DAE, NGOs and the Project will provide extension support to the

farmers in the form of improved agricultural techniques, integrated pest/crop management,

home gardening (for women), etc. Detailed agricultural activities for the SIP have been

furnished along with the estimated budget provisions in the form of training, demonstrations,

agricultural fairs, motivational tours, nursery development, etc. Further, a Bar diagram (Figure

3) has been shown to spell out various activities for agricultural development in the Sub-Unit

area throughout the entire Project period.

A budget has been reserved for an amount of BDT 60.55 million for the agricultural

development programs for the total project under implementation. The agricultural development

(enhancement) activities of the SIP has been estimated at BDT 14.36 Lacs for the entire project

period.



1.0 Description

The gross area of SWN-08 is 3811 ha. According to PPTA net cultivable area (NCA) has been

estimated at 75% of the gross area for Narail Sub-Project. On that basis, the NCA has been

calculated at 2858 ha with a present cropped area of 5780 ha yielding a cropping intensity of

202%. Future total cropped area has been estimated at 6936 ha yielding a cropping intensity of

243%. Production of Cereal crops will be increased by 6079 MT after rehabilitation.

Based on hydrologic analysis, the land area under the SIP have been figured out as F0,F!,F2 &

F3. As per present & future governing water levels on which total cropped area, cropping

pattern, cropping intensity and total production have been estimated.

Data furnished in the report are based on the agricultural information collected from the field

(SIP area) through personal interview from sampled respondents with structured questionnaires

and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) by the hired enumerators.. Moreover, for authentication,

the secondary data from the local DAE office have been consulted.

A total of 11- Water Management Groups (WMGs) have already been formed in the Sub-Unit

and data for Collective Action Plan (CAP) have also been collected from the WMG-members

through Focus Group Discussion (FGDs) and Walkthroughs.

1.1 Present Agriculture

The Tables and items below are the compiled information on the agricultural data of the SIP-

area, which to be considered as Present Agriculture:

Table-1: Crops & Varieties cultivated during various seasons

Seasons Crops Crops & Varieties

Rabi Kharif-1 Kharif-II

Paddy Wheat Pulse Mustard Paddy Jute Seasome(Oilseeds) Paddy

Boro: HYV – BR-28, BR-29. Hybrid--Hira,Tia,ACI,Moyna, Aloron,Jhalak,etc. Aus: Ratul,Gambhur--local varieties. Amon: Jabra,Urichedra, ,Sona Digha, Lal Digha—Local varieties.



Table-2: Per ha Yield of Major crops

Crops Variety Average Yield per ha (MT)

Paddy Aus (Local) 1.2

Amon (Local) 1.5

HYV Boro 5.0

Hybrid Boro 5.5

Pulse 2.8

Mustard 1.5

Wheat 2.0

Jute 2.5

The present agriculture in the sub-unit is hampered by poor drainage, resulting in water logging

in the lower areas during the wet season. Conversely, the higher areas suffer from water

shortage especially during the pre-monsoon season.

Present cropping pattern and production have been provided in Tables 3 and 4. Agriculture in

the sub-unit is dominated by rice cultivation covering 54% of the total cropped area followed by

Jute (16%), pulses (12%), Wheat (9%),Oilseeds(7%) and vegetables (4%).

Annual present production of rice has been calculated as 7870 MT and wheat 840 MT. Thus,

annual cereal production is 8710 MT.

Table - 3: Present Cropping Pattern by Land Type

Land type and flood

depth

Cropping Pattern No. of Crop

Net area (ha)

Cropped area (ha)

Rabi Kharif - I Kharif - II

FO (0 - 30 cm)

Pulses B. Aus HYV T. Aman 3 130 390

Winter Vegetables

B. Aus 2 250 500

Wheat B. Aus LT Aman 3 210 630

Oilseeds Jute 2 210 420

Pulses Jute 2 250 500

HYV Boro LT. Aman 2 350 700



Sub-total 1400

3140

F1 (31 - 90 cm)

Pulses Jute- 2 280 560

Jute HYV T Aman 2 205 410

Wheat B. Aus 2 210 420

Oilseeds B. Aus 2 222 444

Hybrid Boro LT.Aman 2 265 530

Sub-total 1182 2364

F2 (91 - 180

cm) B. Aman Cont’d 1 276 276

Sub-total 276 276

Grand total 2858 5780

Cropping Intensity - 202%

Table - 4 furnishes the existing crop wise area, yield and total production which need to be improved

through the required development of infrastructures, re-excavation of khals etc. through which

agricultural production will obviously by increased.

Table - 4 : Present Agriculture with different crops and their production by Land Type

Total Cropped

area

Net cultivated

area Cropping intensity

Land type and

flood depth

Name of Crop

Area (ha)

Average Yield

Total

production

(ha) (ha) (%) (mt/ha) (mt)

5780 2858 202 FO

(0 - 30 cm)

HYV Boro 350 5.1 1785

B. Aus 590 1.2 708

Wheat 210 2 420

Pulses 380 2.8 1064

Vegetables 250 17 4250

Oilseeds 210 1.5 315

Jute 460 2.5 1150

HYV T.Aman 130 3.5 455

L. T. Aman 560 2.2 1232

Sub-total 3140 11379

F1

(30 - 90 cm)

Pulses 280 2.8 784

Jute 485 2.5 1212.5

HYV T. 205 3.5 717.5



Aman

B. Aus 432 1.2 518.4

Wheat 210 2 420


Hybrid Boro 265 5.5 1457.5

LT Aman 265 2.2 583

Sub-total 2364 6025.9

F2 (91 - 180

cm) B. Aman 276 1.5 414

Sub-total 276 414

5780 2858 202 Grand total 5780 17818.9

Annual Rice production is calculated at 7870 MT and Wheat production is 840 Mt. Thus annual Cereal production is 8710 MT.

Extracts from the collected data i.e. Existing conditions of the Area: Regarding availability of seeds, 43% farmers are satisfied and other 57% have opined that the condition is good. Following steps could be taken for better availability of seeds.

1.1.1 Steps for seed availability

1. Own collection. 2. Farmers should get directly from the Government. 3. Supplying of good seeds by BADC. 4. To arrange training on production and preservation of seed. 5. To take measures on timely and easily availability of seeds.

From the gathered data, it is known that 48% of the land are being irrigated through STWs and LLPs. Following are some of the problems for using irrigation facilities.

1.1.2 a Problems of using irrigation facilities

1. Low water discharge through Swallow Tube Well during dry season. 2. High price of Diesel. 3. Due to Physiographic position 100% land is not equally levelled. 4. Irrigation cost is high. 5. Most of the farmers do not own STW

For further expansion of irrigation facilities, following points may be taken into consideration.

1.1.2 b Steps to improve irrigation facilities

1. To remove water by digging canals 2. Reducing the price of Diesel. 3. Electricity supply should be regular. 4. To arrange all irrigation facilities by electricity. 5. Reducing the price of water. 6. Reducing the price of fertilizer.



.1.1.3.a Water Salinity

In the SIP-area, there exists some amount of water salinity but within permissible limit.

1.1.3.b Ways to mitigate Water Salinity

To check the entrance of saline water from the river into the khals by repairing or installing regulators.

Use of saline tolerant rice varieties.

Embankment need to be repaired.

To test water salinity regularly for controlled entry of water.

1.1.4.a Soil salinity

Soils of the SIP areas are quite fertile and responsive to addition of fertilizers as per characteristics of Gangetic alluvium. There is a common complain of soil salinity problem at the lower areas-beel areas.

1.1.4.b Ways to mitigate soil salinity

Awareness raising among the farmers

Soil testing

Cultivation of salinity tolerant rice varieties

Check the entrance of saline water from the river into the khals by repairing regulators.

Embankment to be repaired.

1.1.5.a Extent of Fertilizer Use

Farmers are generally using over doses of chemical Fertilizers because of lack of adequate knowledge about proper doses of Fertilizers and training on crop-wise Fertilizers application.

Farmers are not also using Compost/Organic Fertilizers/Green manures..

1.1.5.b Reasons for not using Compost/Organic Fertilizers

Lack of domestic animals/cows.

Cow dung is used as fuel due to scarcity of firewood.

Less awareness and lack of knowledge of Compost preparation

Farmers have no ideas about Green manure.

1.1.6.a Use of Insecticides

Farmers are using moderate doses of insecticides. They do not possess adequate knowledge on the required doses of fertilizer application.

1.1.6.b Practice of IPM/ICM by the Farmers

Farmers have no knowledge on IPM/ICM and that is why they do not practice. Extension activities in this regard need to be geared up.



1.1.7.a. Marketing Problems of the Farmers

Farmers have poor knowledge on processing, value adding, wholesaling as well as

retailing of their farm products.

Lack of marketing organizations.

High transportation costs increases the price of rural farm products due to poor

communication facilities.

No farmers’ organization at the Upazila and District level and no mechanism to create

marketing channels of rural products.

1.1.7.b. Suggestions for development of better Marketing Facilities

Crops to be selected through market assessment and demand.

Provision of training on processing, grading, packaging to ensure higher price of the

products.

Access to affordable product transportation services for farm products.

Organize and development of marketing groups and channels and their bargaining

capacity to be developed so that their products may enter to the higher value market.

Development of marketing organization at WMA level.

In general, the following problems are being identified which hamper better crop production. If

these problems could be solved, more production could be achieved.

1.1.8 Topics of Training: Data on training reveal that 70% of the farmers did not receive any

training. Most of the farmers are interested to get training on different aspects of agricultural development. Of them, following topics may be taken into consideration

1. On IPM 2. Cultivation of Winter Vegetables 3. Compost Preparation 4. Fertilizer and Water Management. 5. Uses of fertilizer and removal of pests.

6. Production and Preservation of good seed

7. Cultivation of HYV Rice

8. Application of Pesticides

9. Fisheries

10. Livestock.

1.1.9. a Problems of crop production : The following problems are being identified which

hamper better crop production. If these problems could be solved, more production could be

achieved.

1. Water logging.

2. Flooding is the major problem.

3. Excessive rain creates the problem.

4. Irrigation related problems.

5. Low supply of fertilizer.



6. Low water discharge through Swallow Tube well during dry season.

7. Lack of quality seeds.

8. No electricity for irrigation.

9. High price of Diesel.

10. High price of Fertilizer.

Following points need to be considered to mitigate the production problems through the project

activities and regular programme of DAE.

1.1.9. b Steps to mitigate those problems

1. Re-excavation of canal to prevent water logging.

2. Deposition of excessive rain water should be removed quickly.

3. Improving the irrigation system and water management.

4. Reducing the price of diesel.

5. To ensure enough electricity supply for irrigation.

6. Drain out excessive rain water

7. Reducing the price of Fertilizer.

8. Using the improved technology in agriculture.

9. Performing the duties of agricultural officers/staffs through close contact with the

farmers to make aware of soil quality, uses of seeds and fertilizers, techniques of pest

control etc. i.e. technology dissemination

People are expecting better production and livelihood from this project. Project intervention will

hopefully fulfil their aspirations through their active participation. Some of their expectations are

furnished below:

1.1.10 Expectations from this project for better crop production

1. A regulator needs to be built at Tularampur.

2. Mulia Flood wall to be constructed at Mulia.

3. Re-excavation of 5-khals at different locations of about 15 km canal.

4. To set up deep Tube well.

5. If this project is implemented the water logging problem in beel will be removed and

more land will be taken under cultivation.

1.2 Future Scenario

Under the changed scenario after rehabilitation, the total cropped area of the SIP will be 6936

ha yielding a Cropping intensity of 243%.

Future cropping pattern and production have been provided in Tables 5 and 6. Future

agriculture under changed scenario shows that cereal crops ( rice, wheat and maize) cover

65% of cropped area followed by Jute (12%), Vegetables (12%), Pulses (5%), soybean (3%)

and Oilseeds (3%). Among these the high value crops cover around 21% of total cropped area

of this SIP.



Production of major crops (cereals) has been estimated as 14789 MT of which rice will be

11404 MT, 1,250 MT of wheat and 2035 MT of maize will be produced annually. Thus, annual

Cereal production will be increased by 6079 MT.

Table - 5: Future after Rehabilitation: Cropping Pattern by Land Type

Land type and flood

depth

Cropping Pattern

No. of Crop Net Area

(ha) Cropped area (ha) Rabi Kharif - I Kharif - II

FO (0 - 30 cm)

Winter Vegetables T.Aus HYV T. Aman 3 275 825

Oilseeds Summer

Vegetables HYV T. Aman 3 210 630

Wheat Jute HYV T. Aman 3 435 1305

Pulses B.Aus HYV T. Aman 3 300 900

Winter Vegetables Maize 2 370 740

HYV Boro HYV T. Aman 2 442 884

Sub-total 2032 5284

F1 (31 - 90 cm)

Wheat Jute 2 240 480

Fallow Jute HYV T. Aman 2 170 340

Soybean HYV T. Aman 2 190 380

HYV Boro HYV T. Aman 2 150 300

Aromatic rice HYV T. Aman 2 53 106

Sub-total 803 1606

F2 (91 - 180

cm) Pulses B.Aman Cont'd 2 23 46

Sub-total 23 46

Grand total 2858 6936

Cropping Intensity =243% Table - 6 furnishes the future crop wise area, yield and total production which need will be improved through the required development of infrastructures, re-excavation of khals etc. through which agricultural production will obviously by increased.

Table - 6 : Future after Rehabilitation : Crops with their Production by Land Type

Total Cropped

area

Net cultivated

area Cropping intensity

Land type and

flood depth

Name of Crops Area (ha)

Average Yield

Total production

(ha) (ha) (%) (mt/ha) (mt)

6936 2858 243

FO (0 - 30

cm)

B. Aus 300 1.2 360

T .Aus 275 2.2 605

Jute 435 2.5 1087.5

HYV T. Aman 1662 3.2 5318.4


Vegetables 855 17 14535



Pulses 300 2.8 840

Maize 370 5.5 2035

HYV Boro 442 5.1 2254.2

Wheat 435 2 870

Sub-total 5284 28199.1

F1 (31-90

cm)

HYV T. Aman 563 3.2 1801.6

Jute 410 2.5 1025

Wheat 240 2 480

Soybean 190 2 380

HYV Boro 150 5.1 765

Aromatic rice 53 5 265

Sub-total 1606 4716.6

F2 B. Aamn 23 1.5 34.5

(91-180

cm) Pulses 23 2.8 64.4

Sub-total 46 98.9

6936 2858 243 Grand total 6936 33014.6

Annual Production of Rice is estimated as 11404 MT Wheat is 1350 MT and maize is 2035 MT. Thus, annual Cereal production will be 14789 MT. Therefore, annual Cereal production will be increased by 6079 MT.

2.0 Future Agricultural Development Programs

After collecting, compiling and analysing the data based on existing agriculture conditions and

discussions with the farmers of the sub-unit; following agricultural development programs have

been planned for implementation by the project.

2.1 Demonstration Programs

Demonstration is an important method for extension of improved agro-technology of various

crops. Major objective of the demonstration is to introduce new crops and improved technology

with a view to increasing productivity and thereby income of farmers. Modern varieties of crops

and other technologies developed by various National Agricultural Researches (NARs)

Institutes are disseminated to farmers through demonstration. The extension of Agricultural

Services should be widely facilitated so that farmers can obtain advice and support when they

want to try new crops to increase cropping intensity and production. Demonstration farms/trials

plots will be established in sub-project area.

Following detailed Demonstration Programs have been formulated for the SIP for the

entire Project period.



Technology Demonstrations for FY 2009-2010, 2010-11, 2011-2012 (for 3- years):

Technology Units Farmers Number

Unit Cost Demo.

Cost (Tk.) Cost for field

day

Remuneration for the

Supervising Officer *

Total Cost (Tk.)

No. Area Male Female (Tk.)

1. Demo. on compost preparation 3 Nos. 1 dcm. each

2 1 3,000/- 9,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo.

33,000/-

2. Varietal Demo. of Boro (BR-50) 4 Nos. 33 dcm. each

4 - 2,500/- 10,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo.

42,000/-

3. Demonstration of Urea Super Granules (GUTI’ Urea) to Boro

10 Nos. 33 dcm. each

10 - 2,500/- 25,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo.

105,000/-

4. Demonstration of Summer Tomato 6 Nos. 33 dcm. each

3 3 3,000/- 18,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo.

63,000/-

5. Demonstration on Sex Pheromones 10 Nos. 33 dcm. each

7 3 3,000/- 30,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo

1,10,000/-

FY 2009-10

TOTAL 33 Nos. 26 7 92,000/- 3,53,,000/-

1. Varietal Demo. of Aus (BR-42) 5 Nos. 33 dcm. each

5 - 2,500/- 12,500/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo

52,500/-

2. Varietal Demo. of Wheat (BR-42, Bijoy, Prodip)

5 Nos. 33 dcm. each

5 - 3,000/- 15,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo

55,000/--

3. Demonstration of Potato (BARI-25) 12 Nos. 33 dcm. each

12 - 5,000/- 60,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo

1,56,000/--

4. Demonstration of Soybean 10 Nos. 33 dcm. each

10 - 2,500/- 25,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo

1,05,000/-



Technology Units Farmers Number

Unit Cost Demo.

Cost (Tk.) Cost for field

day

Remuneration for the

Supervising Officer *

Total Cost (Tk.)

No. Area Male Female (Tk.)

5. Demonstration of Tomato variety (BINA Tomato-5)


8 2 3,000/- 30,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo

1,10,000/-

FY 2010-11

TOTAL 50 Nos. 40 2 1,64,000/- 4,78,500/-

1. Varietal Demo. of Boro (BR-47) 4 Nos. 33 dcm. each

4 - 2,500/- 10,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo

42,000/-

2. Demonstration of Onion variety (BARI-3)


5 5 2,000/- 20,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo

1,00,000/-

3. Demonstration on Soybean Production


5 5 2,000/- 20,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo

1,00,000/-

4. Demonstration of Summer Vegetables (Kakrol)


5 5 2,000/- 20,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo

1,00,000/-

5. Demonstration of Maize Production 10 Nos. 33 dcm. each

7 3 3000/- 30,000/- 5,000/- each for 100 farmers

3,000/- per demo

1,10,000/-

FY 2011-12

TOTAL 44 Nos. 26 18 1,00,000/- 4,52,000/-

* One field level officer will supervise each demonstration intensively throughout the whole crop season (approx. 3-months).

Summery of cost for Demonstration :

1. Cost for the FY 2009-10=Tk.3,53,000/-

2. Cost for the FY 2010-11= Tk4,78,500/-

3. Cost for the FY 2011-12 =Tk. 4,52,000/-



Total Tk. 12,83,000/-



2.2 Training programs for farmers

Human resources development through training of farmers, officials and trainers will be

provided under the Agricultural Extension Component.

The farmers will be trained by DAE/Livestock/Fishery staff after getting TOT from the Project.

Training will be provided to the farmers for integrated pest management to minimize the

negative impact of agro-chemicals on the environment. The use of compost will also reduce the

possible negative impacts on the environment. Agricultural extension focusing on home

gardens to women for increased production of vegetables will be provided.

A detailed Training Plan along with the cost estimates have been formulated for

the beneficiaries of the SIP is presented below:



Detailed Costing of Training for FY 2009-2010, 2010-11, 2011-2012 (for 3- years):

Sl. No.

Topic of Training Participants Number of Participants

Tra

inin

g A

llo

wan

ce/

da

y (

A)

No

. o

f

tra

ine

e (

B)

No

. o

f d

ay (

C)

Tra

inin

g A

llo

wan

ce

(to

tal)

(A

XB

XC

) =

D

No

. o

f sessio

n

(E

)

Ho

no

rari

um

rate

/ sessio

n (

H)

No

. o

f g

rou

ps

(G

)

To

tal

ho

no

r ra

ruim

(EX

FX

G)

= H

Tra

ns

po

rt

su

pp

ort

(I)

To

tal

Tra

ns

po

rt

(BxI)

= J

Ven

ue

ch

arg

e (

K)

Mis

c. (L

)

GR

AN

D

TO

TA

L=

(D+

H+

J+

K+

L)

(Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.)

1. Training on Soybean Production

Water Management Group (WMG) Members

40 =(M 30 + F 10) 200 40 2 16000 10 400 2 8000 100 4000 300 500 28800

2. Training on Plantation Activities

Poor & Vulnerable Women of the Beneficiaries

50= (M0+ F 50) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

3. Vegetables Gardening

-ditto- 50 =(M 0 + F 50) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

4. Fruit Trees (Quick growing) Plantation

-ditto- 50 =(M 0 + F5 0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

5. Seed Production of HYV Rice


50 =(M 40 + F 10) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

6. Compost Preparation -ditto- 50 =(M 40 + F 10) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

7. Poultry , Goat, Cow rearing

Poor & Vulnerable Women Beneficiaries

50 =(M 30+ F20) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

FY 2009-10



Sl. No.


Tra

inin

g A

llo

wan

ce/

da

y (

A)

No

. o

f

tra

ine

e (

B)

No

. o

f d

ay (

C)

Tra

inin

g A

llo

wan

ce

(to

tal)

(A

XB

XC

) =

D

No

. o

f sessio

n

(E

)

Ho

no

rari

um

rate

/ sessio

n (

H)

No

. o

f g

rou

ps

(G

)

To

tal

ho

no

r ra

ruim

(EX

FX

G)

= H

Tra

ns

po

rt

su

pp

ort

(I)

To

tal

Tra

ns

po

rt

(BxI)

= J

Ven

ue

ch

arg

e (

K)

Mis

c. (L

)

GR

AN

D

TO

TA

L=

(D+

H+

J+

K+

L)


TOTAL 340 14 136000 14 56000 34000 2100 3500 231600

1. Maize Cultivation Water Management Group (WMG) Members SIP area

50 =(M5 0 + F 0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

2. Soybean Cultivation -ditto- 50 =(M 5 0+ F 0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

3. Winter Vegetables Production

-ditto- 50 =(M 40 + F1 0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

4. Summer Vegetables Production

-ditto- 50 =(M40 + F 10) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

5. Integrated Crop Management (ICM)


50 =(M5 0 + F 0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

6. Compost Preparation -ditto- 40 =(M 40 + F 10) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

FY 2010-11

TOTAL 300 12 256000 12 48000 30000 1800 30000 202800

1. Frruit Trees Management

WMG Committee Members and other Beneficiaries

50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800



Sl. No.


Tra

inin

g A

llo

wan

ce/

da

y (

A)

No

. o

f

tra

ine

e (

B)

No

. o

f d

ay (

C)

Tra

inin

g A

llo

wan

ce

(to

tal)

(A

XB

XC

) =

D

No

. o

f sessio

n

(E

)

Ho

no

rari

um

rate

/ sessio

n (

H)

No

. o

f g

rou

ps

(G

)

To

tal

ho

no

r ra

ruim

(EX

FX

G)

= H

Tra

ns

po

rt

su

pp

ort

(I)

To

tal

Tra

ns

po

rt

(BxI)

= J

Ven

ue

ch

arg

e (

K)

Mis

c. (L

)

GR

AN

D

TO

TA

L=

(D+

H+

J+

K+

L)


2. Application of Balanced Fertilizer for Boro Production

-ditto- 50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

3. Fertilizer Management for Boro

-ditto- 50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

4. Water Management for Boro

-ditto- 50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

5. Pest Control for Boro -ditto- 50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

6. Pest Control for Winter Vegetables

-ditto- 50=(M50+F0) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

7. Post-harvest Technology of Rice

-ditto- 50=(M0+F50) 200 50 2 20000 10 400 2 8000 100 5000 300 500 33800

FY 2011-12

TOTAL 350 14 140000 14 56000 35000 2100 3500 236600

Summery of cost for Training : 1. Cost for the FY 2009-10=Tk.2,31,600/-

2. Cost for the FY 2010-11= Tk 2,02,800/-

3. Cost for the FY 2011-12 =Tk. 2,36,600/-

Total Tk.6,71,000/-

19

2.3 Agricultural Fairs

Agricultural fair is one of the most important and effective method which disseminate modern

technology at the shortest possible time. It helps the people as well as farmers to know the

latest agricultural technologies. Agricultural fair also creates a liaison with other development

organizations. The objective of the fair is to disseminate agricultural technologies of the farmers

in a short time.

At least one agricultural fair will be arranged annually at the Sub-unit area during winter season.

- Budget for one agricultural fair will be Tk 80,000/-

- One agricultural fair will be organized in each SIP area where the farmers will be able

to show and see different products.

2.4 Farmers’ Motivational Tours

Motivational Tour is another aspect to enrich the farmers’ knowledge by sharing their

experiences with other successful farmers and visits to renowned agricultural research

and development institutes.

Budget for one batch of Motivational Tour will be Tk. 75,000/-

- Motivational Tour will be conducted in batch of 30 farmers.

- One batch of farmers (30) will be selected from each SIP area.

2.5 Nursery Development

Agriculture Nursery is another tool for dissemination of different extension messages. Major

objectives of the nursery will be to enhance production of vegetables, spices and fruits, and

thereby reduce malnutrition problem of people. Farmers will be able to purchase seed, saplings

and seedlings of the above noted items from the nursery at reasonable price. They will be also

able to receive free advice from the DAE staff for establishment of nursery.

At least one nursery need to be established in each SIP. A complete guideline will have to be

prepared for management of the nursery by the Resource persons. The cost of all inputs will

be borne by the project.

The total cost per nursery may be estimated at Tk.75,000/-

2.6 Total estimated cost:

Total cost of expenditures for Agricultural activities in the SIP for the entire Project

period will be as per following break-up:

a. Total Demonstration cost = Tk. 7,69,000/-

b. Total Training cost = Tk. 4,37,000/-

c. Cost for Motivational Tour = Tk. 75,000/-

d. Cost for Agricultural Fair = Tk. 80,000/-

e. Cost for Nursery Development = Tk. 75,000/-

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

TOTAL = Tk.14,36,000/-

(Total Taka Fourteen lacs Thrty-Six thousand will be spent for different agricultural

activities at the SIP area)

19

2.7 Summary of Future Agricultural Activities:

Future Agricultural activities at SWN-16 area can be summarized by the

following Bar diagram:

Items 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

1. Training : a) Farmers’ Training b)

2. Demonstrations of crops &

Varieties

3. Farmers’ Motivational Tours

4. Agricultural Fair

5. Seed production

activities

6. Nursery

Development

7. Devt. of Marketing Facilities

19

3.0 Collective Action Plan (CAP) During FGDs, following initiatives were recorded from the WMG-members and they are agreed

to work collectively under the supervision of the Senior Facilitators and Community Facilitators

which can be summarized by the following Table:

WMG Name/No./

Village.

List of Initiatives Training topics Remarks

Boishakhi/

S-8/1/

Tularampur

1.Soil testing

2.Water salinity test

3.Procurement of quality Seeds

and Fertilizers

4.Establish demonstration plots

5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop

Management ( IPM/ICM)

6.Cultivation of High Value

Crops

(HVCs).

7. Collective Marketing.

a. Compost preparation

b. Fertilizer and Water

Management

c. Vegetables production

d.IPM/ICM

e. Soybean production

f. Seed preservation

g. Nursery development,

Balaka /

S-8/1/A/

Chamrul,Batenga

1.Soil testing



and Fertilizers





Crops

(HVCs).



management

c. Vegetables

production

d.IPM/ICM


Borsha/

S-8/2

Gopikantopur,

Sadanandakhati.

1.Soil testing



and Fertilizers




6. Vegetables Production

7. Fertilizer Dealarship.

a. Vegetables production

b.IPM/ICM

c. Soybean production

d. Seed preservation

e. Nursery development,

Sraboni/

S-8/3

Bishnopur,Shahidpur,

Mohazon.

1.Soil testing



and Fertilizers





Crops



management

c.. Vegetables

production

d.IPM/ICM




19

(HVCs).

7.Collective Marketing.

Sapla/

S-8/4

Chanpur, Nayanpur.

1.Soil testing



and Fertilizers





Crops

(HVCs).




management

c.. Vegetables

production

d.IPM/ICM




Mollika/

S-8/5

Sitarampur,

Hizoldanga.

1.Soil testing



and Fertilizers







management

c.. Vegetables

production

d.IPM/ICM



Jaba/

S-8/6

Bansvita.

1.Soil testing



and Fertilizers







management

c.. Vegetables

production

d.IPM/ICM




Hoimonty/

S-8/7

Durgapur,

Bahirdanga..

1.Soil testing



and Fertilizers





Crops

(HVCs).




management

c.. Vegetables

production

d.IPM/ICM




Agrani/

S-8/8

Durbajuri,Ichorbaha.

1.Soil testing



and Fertilizers






management

c.. Vegetables

production

d.IPM/ICM


19


Crops

(HVCs).


f. Nursery development,

Falguni/

S-8/9

Saliarvita,Baliadanga,

Mulia.

1.Soil testing



and Fertilizers





Crops

(HVCs).




management

c.. Vegetables

production

d.IPM/ICM




Chaity/

S-8/10

Bonogram,Goalbari,

Nanikhir,Dakkin

Narail.

1.Soil testing



and Fertilizers







management

c.. Vegetables

production

d.IPM/ICM


f. Nursery development,

‘CAP’ Opportunities explored by WMG –members: After organizing Focus Group

Discussions (FGD) with the Water Management Group (WMG) members, following activities

have been identified in order to implement with the initiatives of the WMG-members

collectively.

1. Soil testing:- WMG- members given the responsibilities to the Agriculture sub-

committee to test their soil in order to have ideas about acidity, alkalinity, soil PH. and

other nutritional status of soil.

Agriculture sub-committee of the WMG will collect soil samples from the interested

farmers’ field with the assistance of the Facilitator and take necessary measures to test

the soil by the Department of Agricultural Extension(DAE) or Soil survey Resources

Institute(SRDI).

In doing so, Farmers will be able to select different crops and varieties suitable for their

land. They will discuss the results of soil testing In WMG-meetings and plan their crops

to be cultivated during the next season.

Further, through soil testing, the nutritional condition of the soil especially the macro-

nutrients (N,P,K,Zn) status can be measured and Farmers will be able to plan for

recommended fertilizer doses for different crops.

2. Water salinity test:- Each WMA will be provided with a water salinity test kit by which

WMG-members will be able to test water of their locality in order to know the salinity

level. After knowing the salinity level during the pick-time of the season ,they can decide

19

to cultivate some saline –tolerant varieties of rice. Thus Farmers can mitigate the crop

losses.

3. Procurement of quality Seeds and Fertilizers:-Agriculture sub-committee of the WMG

will explore the seasonal requirements of seeds and fertilizers for a season and communicate

with the respective organizations (like BADC, DAE, commercial seeds and fertilizer

agencies, etc.) by providing indent ahead of time. They will take delivery of the materials

centrally on behalf of the WMG and distribute the same to the WMG-beneficiaries according

to their requirement. Thus individual carrying costs can be minimized and less chance of

adulteration of inputs could be ensured.

Through discussions and decisions at WMG-meetings, they can use the WMG –fund for

the procurement of required inputs. Thus, Farmers can get the inputs timely and with the

reasonable prices at their door-steps.

Further, some of the WMG will try to allocate Seeds and Fertilizer sub-dealership from the

Govt. organizations.

4.Establish demonstration plots: Project will conduct some demonstrations at the Farmers’

field in introducing new crops and varieties. WMG will adopt those with the technical

assistance from DAE and Project. WMG decide in the meeting to materialize the program

through sub-groups by taking lease of land and sharing the benefits by the WMG –

members. In this way, farmers will be able to know the technology jointly and economic

benefits. Through demonstrations, new technology will be adopted and practiced in the area.

Collective demonstrations by the WMG-members will be encouraged.

5.Practice Integrated Pest/Crop Management ( IPM/ICM):-WMG-members will decide

collectively for not using any pesticides in their crop field. It is rarely impossible to practice

IPM/ICM individually ,it must be a collective effort. WMG-members will decide at which

area and which crop field will be taken for IPM/ICM. By practicing IPM/ICM, Farmers can

reduce the cost of cultivation without using insecticides in the crop field. Thus, the produced

crops will be considered as non-hazardous for human consumption.

6. Cultivation of High Value Crops (HVCs): Some vegetables, Maize, Soybean are being

considered as HVCs which can be introduced at the WMG-areas. As these are somewhat

new crops in the area, there might be little risk for cultivation. So, it is decided at the WMG-

meetings to cultivate some HVCs collectively on the part of WMG.

WMG can take a piece of land on lease and cultivate some HVCs and take the benefits to

WMG-fund.

7. Collective Marketing: Farmers normally sale their products individually at the nearest

markets where they generally sale at lower prices. But if the WMG take the initiatives to

collect seasonal agricultural commodities and store at the custody of the Executive

Committee and communicate with the wholesale/retail markets and bargain with them

for higher prices. Thus, by collective marketing, individual farmers can get better prices

at a time and can plan for next season’s cropping practices.

Topics of Training asked by the WMG-members: The following training topics were

selected by the WMG –members thr4ough which they can be equipped with knowledge and

techniques for better agr4icultural production:-

19


b. Fertilizer and Water management

c. Vegetables production

d. IPM/ICM



g. Nursery development, etc.

Training modules will be developed and supplied to the participants during the training

programs.

List of topics for Training Modules: 1. Integrated Pest/Crop Management (IPM/ICM).

2. Soybean Production.

3. Maize Production.

4. Aromatic Rice(BRRI dhan-50- Banglamoti).

5. Summer Tomato.

6. Saline tolerant Rice (BRRI dhan-47).

7. Methods of Agricultural Extension and Communication with Farmers.

8. Winter Vegetables Cultivation.

9. Fruit Trees Nursery Development.

10. Rice-cum-Fish Culture.

Annex – B

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-B


Tularampur Scheme (SWN-8)

FISHERIES Summary Traditionally FCD schemes have been designed on the basis of mainly agricultural considerations and thereby often clashed with the interests of fishermen. Beels are important breeding ground for river fish and regulators that check the flood waters entering the beel also block the way of spawning fish. To mitigate the negative effect, the gate of the regulator often used to be left ajar or intermittently opened and closed. This was at times a source of tension within/between the communities. That is why the fisheries interest are now better incorporated in the sub-unit implementation plan, and consent of concerned parties is a strict condition for implementation of the plan. The present fish production in the SIP area SWN-08 can be distinguished in fish capture in (large) open water bodies, and fish culture in (smaller) ponds and gher. Captured fisheries covers about 1.63 fold larger area than cultured fisheries but yield is less than 4.86 times lower (Table-1). There is also a scope for Daudkandi-styled community based fisheries management practice which can significantly increase the production per unit beel area. The productivity of cultured fish in ponds in the area is only 49 % of the national average, mainly because of absence of improved aquaculture know-how as evidenced by the very poor number of trained farmers. Inadequate supply of quality inputs (fertilizers, fingerlings, etc.) is another reason. Bringing the production to the national average level would require training (to be provided by DoF targeting about 10% of the farmers in the area) and quality inputs like seed fertilizer and feed (to be provided by the farmers). Presently rice-fish (gher) cultivation is being practiced but has scope for improvement, especially for the poor when introduced in the sharecroppers fields. Relatively novel is the proposal for stocking of fingerlings by poor fishermen/land less in order to sustain fishing in the beels and khals. The approach can also be used to mitigate the bio-diversity concerns by stocking endangered species, if any, in the sanctuaries and/or dug-out water bodies thereby increasing the possibility of their survival and propagation. A comprehensive conservation effort for bio-diversity is, however, above the scope of the SIP and should be taken up by DoF at the national level. Due to project intervention, area of floodplain will be reduced but production through floodplain,/ beel fish culture, canal fish culture and fry stocking in beel will be increased gradually. Economic return is mainly attributable to the big floodplain beel area, where production cost is almost nil. Increase production (about 77 %) from culture fishery (292.91 MT in 2010-11 to 517.80 MT in 2013-14) can only be attained if the inputs given are optimal and proper training imparted.



Present and Future Fisheries Current situation The sub unit command area has both culture and capture fisheries firmly rooted in the local socio- economic life style. As apparent from table below (Table 1), culture fishery is the dominating one as far as production rate and total production are concerned although area wise capture fishery occupies more area than culture fisheries. Rice- fish (gher) production areas are mentionable and its production is also remarkable. Local people also started fish culture in borrow pit. About 2.50 ha areas of borrow pits are now under the local people for culture. Present total annual fish production (2010-11) in the sub unit is estimated as 353.19 MT. Table 1: Present fisheries situation in the Sub-Unit - 8 command area

Fisheries Present (July ’10– June ’11)

Area (ha) Production Rate Production Value*

(kg/ha) (MT) (Lac Tk.)

A. Culture

1. Pond 160.00 1479 236.64 248.47

2. Nursery 3.30 2540 8.38 10.89

3. Rice-Fish (gher)**

64.00 715 45.76 48.05

4. FP beel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

6. Borrow pit 2.50 850 2.13 2.24

7. Canal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

8. Pen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

9. Cage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

10. Khas pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total: A 229.8 292.91 309.65

B. Capture

1. Public low land 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2. Canal 8.70 95 0.83 1.04

3. Floodplain/Beel 360.00 163 58.68 73.35

4. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5. Borrow Pit 4.40 175 0.77 0.81

6. Sanctuary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

7. Beel stocking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total: B 373.1 60.28 75.2

TOTAL: A+B 602.90 353.19 384.85



* Fish Tk. 105.00/kg, Fingerling Tk.130/kg av and capture beel and sanctuary Tk.125/kg, as they contain shing, magur, koi ,etc.(at 2010 price) ** Only fish

Culture fishery In the culture fisheries, pond fishery is always considered to be one of the most important fisheries for significant increase in total fish production and also to offset any adverse effect of FCD/I activities on natural floodplain fish production. Here, in the pond fishery, the average fish production rate, 1479 kg/ha, is much lower than the national average (FRSS, DoF 2008-2009) which is 2,991 kg/ha, with significant scope for increase in production rate. No formal Beel culture is practiced although with individual initiatives pockets of low areas in the beels have completely been transformed into ‘ghers’ or impounded water bodies. As such, these impounded water bodies have been included under pond category. Development of an array of local nurseries catering to the needs of local demand for quality (healthy and of required size) fingerlings is now becoming a pre-requisite for the local culture fisheries to have a strong footing. Supply of fingerlings from the local sources is not adequate. After pond, rice-fish aquaculture is the next important culture fishery in the SIP area as far as area is concerned. Production rate is good with scope for further improvement. This fishery can be a pro-poor activity if introduced in the share croppers’ rice field. The only other culture fishery presently in use in the area is aquaculture in borrow pits. Borrow pits are officially supposed to belong to the LGED as they have constructed the roads alongside of which borrow pits are situated. Without getting any information from them, eye estimation was made to figure out present borrow pit areas and uses. Most of the areas are under private use.

Capture fishery In the capture fisheries, area-wise important is floodplain fishery where production rate (163 kg/ha) is much lower than the national average (310 kg/ha). Canals are there with some productivity. Most of the canals are silted and require rehabilitation support not only as a measure to facilitate irrigation but also to allow natural fishes to grow. Future fisheries To free the local people of the curse of mal-nourishment, they need more fish in their diet which can be made possible only by producing more fish in a sustainable way and making it affordable to poor including the fishermen and the disadvantaged people, especially the womenfolk. Considering the prevailing local situation and the potential opportunities that the project can create, a number of measures have been proposed for the production increase both in culture and capture fisheries (Table 2 below). An overall annual increase of 106 MT of fish, worth Tk. 183 lac, is achievable once the proposed fisheries activities are in place, at the end of the project period. As expected, most of this annual incremental production, about 77 %, will come from culture fishery source alone. Now this production increase is largely dependent on supply of quality inputs in appropriate quantities, following the project training guideline, into the production systems. Sudden exorbitant increase of some of the inputs may significantly deter the process thereby affecting the production rate. This type of price climb may severely constrain the farmers in using necessary inputs.



Table 2: Future fisheries production scenario after the implementation of fisheries programme

Fisheries

Future (July ’12 – June ’13)

Area (ha) Production Rate

kg/ha/yr Production

(MT) Value*

(Lac Tk.)

A. Culture

1. Pond 162.00 2500 405.00 425.25

2. Nursery 4.00 2800 11.20 14.56

3. Rice-Fish (gher)** 70.00 1200 84.00 88.20

4. FP beel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

6. Borrow pit 4.50 1800 8.10 8.51

7. Canal 2.00 1250 2.50 2.63

8. Pen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

9. Cage (20cage) 0.37 350kg/cage 7.00 7.35

10. Khas pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total: A 242.87 517.8 546.5

B. Capture

1.Public low land 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2. Canal 5.70 95 0.55 0.69

3. Floodplain/Beel*** 15.00 163 2.44 3.05

4. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5. Borrow Pit 2.20 250 0.55 0.58

6. Sanctuary 2.00 700 1.40 1.75

7. Beel stocking 5.00 1100 5.50 5.78

Total: B 29.9 10.44 11.85

TOTAL: A+B 272.77 528.24 558.35

Fish Tk. 80.00/kg, Fingerling Tk.130/kg av and capture beel and sanctuary Tk.100/kg, as they contain shing, magur, koi ,etc.(at 2008 price) ** Only fish *** Floodplain will be reduced due to project intervention and this land will be used for agriculture production especially for rice MT: Metric ton

Culture fishery If the ponds presently ‘not under culture’ (mostly new ponds) are brought under aquaculture then there is a possibility of slight area increase (horizontal expansion of aquaculture). However, the major boost is expected from a possible significant increase in pond productivity rate – from 1,479 to 2,500kg/ha (national average is 2,991kg/ha). The quality of water and soil can easily support this increase. To achieve this fit, it will require adequate training and use of quality physical inputs including seed, fertilizer and feed. While the project will provide the training, the farmers are required to take care of other inputs.



Participants of some of the Union Level Consultation Meetings (ULCMs) have expressed their strong demand for required amount of inorganic fertilizers to be collected for aquaculture from the appropriate sources and then to be distributed among the WMG members first. Training on compost manufacture can greatly reduce the pressure on cow dung an organic fertilizer as well as the inorganic fertilizers. This can also ensure better and maximum use of some locally available natural raw materials while providing employment to a few poor. Another important issue is ensuring dissemination of technological knowledge to all the local farmers including the farmers not directly trained by the project through the trained farmers as well as the WMO. Nursery area would be increased with a view to producing more quality fingerling locally. And it would be done by developing more efficient nursery operators. An increase in rice-fish aquaculture area has been proposed. A clear picture of rice field areas currently under IPM (Integrated Pest Management) control, or would be in near future, could not be ascertained from the local agricultural offices. But potentiality is there to increase the present production rate to some extent. Some parts of the beel area can be used for the introduction of Daudkandi styled community based fisheries management practices in the area which can significantly increase fish production by organizing local people into an effective fish producing team. If properly organized, this can also be turned into an enterprise sort of effort where even a poor man can have his/her share. Both the Department of Fisheries and the NGOs have to take great initiatives for this to happen. But this is a proven, time-tested practice. Production can gradually reach as high as 1100kg/ha. Areas under borrow pits should be brought under culture and in the process poor people, especially the WMG Fisheries Members, should be given the borrow pits on lease. This was also a demand of the local people expressed during the ULCMs. Project may support this effort by extending support in the form of physical development (earth work) and training. Considering the overall activity load in different sub-units, cage culture is not going to be introduced here through project initiative.

Capture fishery River fishery can hardly be benefited by the present project activities. Scope is very limited. However, fishermen and their community members need support as they constitute the bulk of hard-core poor people in the rural society. Income generating activities (IGAs) and/or alternative IGAs have been proposed for the fishermen and their family members that will include activities like net making, fish processing, etc. Canal productivity is expected to increase slightly as a result of canal rehabilitation processes. Participants in all the ULCMs have demanded re-excavation of various canals criss-crossing their unions. Recently, fish sanctuary has established itself as an important fishery activity contributing significantly both to the fish bio-diversity and fish production. Development of an effective community management system is the key to success of this potential effort. Department of Fisheries has consolidated its techniques. Therefore, Upazila Fisheries Offices coupled with the NGO presence in the project is bound to help develop the system in a sustainable manner. One sanctuary is to be developed. The project will support the local fishermen by providing financial support for the development of the sanctuary and by providing management and maintenance training. It will be the responsibility of the fishermen to bear maintenance costs once it is fully developed and put into operation. Beel stocking is meant to support subsistence fishing by many local poor people that ensure their access to natural fishes. Production is boosted and sustained by fingerling stocking. No such effort was made earlier in the area and in the project a modest proposal has been included to introduce this type of fisheries activity. Experience of Fourth Fisheries Project (DoF) would be immensely useful here. Compared to the total beel area, the beel stocking area under the project may look very small. However,



considering the project budget limitation as well as the fact that most of the beel area belongs to F2 category (more than 90cm) the area considered may be justified. Table 3 provides the total fisheries scenario in concluding implementing years: areas, productivities, costs and benefits.

Economics

Economic premises

Costs and benefits calculated at December 2010 market prices.

Period covered is from July 2010 – June 2011(the present financial year) to July 2012 – June 2013 (the concluding financial year of the project).

Financing of the fisheries activities would entail both beneficiary and project contributions. Beneficiaries will be responsible for all direct inputs cost required for fisheries production, both culture and capture.

Project contributions will cover trainings, demonstrations, exchange visits and investment supports. Training costs exclude Training Module preparation cost.

Project investment supports are all one-time offer and will cover costs for earth works for borrow pits and beel culture, cost of cages in cage culture and construction of sanctuaries. All the

maintenance and operational costs are to be borne by the beneficiaries. Table 3 : The 4-year fisheries scenario – area, productivity, value and costs involved

Fisheries

Present(July 2010-June 2011) Future (July 2012-June 2013)

Area (ha)

Prod. Rate

Prodn. Value* Cost Area (ha)

Prod. Rate

Prodn. Value* Cost

kg/h (MT) (Lac Tk.)

(Lac Tk.)

kg/h (MT) (Lac Tk.)

(Lac Tk.)

A. Culture

1. Pond 160.00 1479 236.64 248.47 76.80 162.00

2500 405.00 425.25 145.80

2. Nursery 3.30 2540 8.38 10.89 2.84 4.00 2800 11.20 14.56 3.92

3. Rice-Fish (gher)**

64.00 715 45.76 48.05 29.44 70.00 1200 84.00 88.20 33.60

4. FP beel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

6. Borrow pit 2.50 850 2.13 2.24 0.90 4.50 1800 8.10 8.51 2.61

7. Canal 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1250 2.50 2.63 1.24

8. Pen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

9. Cage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 350kg/cage

7.00 7.35 4.25

10. Khas pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total: A 229.8 292.91 309.65 109.98

242.87

517.8 546.5 191.42

B. Capture

1. Public low land

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2. Canal 8.70 95 0.83 1.04 0.00 5.70 95 0.55 0.69 0.00



3. Floodplain/Beel

360.00 163 58.68 73.35 0.00 15.00 163 2.44 3.05 0.00

4. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5. Borrow Pit 4.40 175 0.77 0.81 0.00 2.20 250 0.55 0.58 0.00

6. Sanctuary 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 700 1.40 1.75 0.74

7. Beel stocking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 1100 5.50 5.78 1.80

Total: B 373.1 60.28 75.2 0.00 29.9 10.44 11.85 2.54

Total: (A+B) 602.90 353.19 384.85 109.98

272.77

528.24 558.35 193.96

Costs-Benefits: At a glance Table 4 provides information on costs to be incurred and the benefits to be gained from the fisheries activities in 2 financial years. Fisheries activities are divided under two broad categories: CULTURE and CAPTURE.

Cost estimates

Table 4 provides all cost estimates of the sub-unit -08 from July 2010 – June 2011 (the present financial year) to July 2013 – June 2014 (the concluding financial year of the project). Notes on these estimates:

Fisheries Production: Production costs are mentioned in Table 3. Full production is expected from final year, i.e., July 2013 – June 2014 FYs.

Foundation Training: The most important and the biggest contribution of the project to increase fish production in a sustainable manner is imparting training to the farmers and fishers. Production increase will result in two ways: firstly by horizontal means whereby new water areas are to be brought under different types of aquaculture requiring training for the new to-be farmers or entrants. Secondly, fish production increase is also possible by vertical means where the production rates of the used water bodies will increase. This will be achieved by providing training to the farmers in more effective and profitable technologies. Besides farmers, fishermen and their family members will also be trained. Fishermen play an important role not only in harvesting but also in post harvest activities. Since they constitute a part of the ultra-poor people in the society, specially the ethnic ones, wherever available khas ponds/beel areas, borrow pits/sanctuaries, etc., will be used to accommodate them. They will receive training from the project to do all these activities and also to maintain them. Female family members will be trained in income generating activities including net making, fish processing and compost preparation.

A total of 255 farmers, fishers and others will be trained (Foundation training for 230 and Advanced training for 25) (Tables 5 and 6 below). There are a good number of female pond owners who do not take active part in aquaculture as they are not trained. They are willing to take training and many of their family members are in favour of this move. Also there are scopes, other than aquaculture, where women can and should take part as those are very suitable for them considering their socio-economic situations. As many as 70 women (30%) of the total foundation trainees) will take part in the overall training programme in different useful subjects.

There are some activities that will specifically suit the very poor people in providing them with special employment opportunities. To name a few are borrow pit aquaculture, compost preparation, fish processing, beel stocking etc. These are going to add effective and sustainable dimension to the overall livelihoods aspect.

Suitable training modules will be prepared as and where necessary for the purpose.



Table 3 : Productive Costs, Productive Values and Benefits of fisheries activities at a glance

Fisheries

Present (July 2010-June 2011) Future (July 2013-June 2014 Incremental

Value Cost Benefits Value Cost Benefits Benefit

(Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.)

A. Culture

1. Pond 248.47 76.80 171.67 425.25 145.80 279.45 107.78

2. Nursery 10.89 2.84 8.05 14.56 3.92 10.64 2.59

3. Rice-Fish(gher) **

48.05 29.44 18.61 88.20 33.60 54.60 35.99

4. FP beel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

6. Borrow pit 2.24 0.90 1.34 8.51 2.61 5.90 4.56

7. Canal 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.63 1.24 1.39 1.39

8. Pen 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

9. Cage 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.35 4.25 3.10 3.10

10. Khas pond

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total: A 309.65 109.98 199.67 546.5 191.42 355.08 155.41

Table 3 Cont.: Production Costs, Productive Values and benefits of fisheries activities at a glance

Fisheries

Present (July 2010-June 2011) Future (July 2012-June 2013 Incremental

Value Cost Benefit Value Cost Benefit Benefit

(Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.)

(Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.) (Lac Tk.)

B.Capture

1. Khas low land 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

2. Canal 1.04 0.00 1.04 0.69 0.00 0.69 (-) 0.35

3. Floodplain/Beel 73.35 0.00 73.35 3.05 0.00 3.05 (-)70.30



4. Baor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5. Borrow Pit 0.81 0.00 0.81 0.58 0.00 0.58 (-)0.23

6. Sanctuary 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75 0.74 1.01 1.01

7. Beel stocking 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.78 1.80 3.98 3.98

Total: B 75.20 0.00 75.20 11.85 2.54 9.31 (-) 65.89

Total: (A+B) 384.85 109.98 274.87 558.35 193.96 364.39 89.52

Table 4: Year Wise detailed Cost estimates for enhancement of production which will be supplied by the Project

Cost item FY July 10 - June 11 (lac)

FY July 11 - June 12(lac)

FY July 12- June 13(lac)

FY July 13 - June 14(lac)

TOTAL(lac)

1. Trainings

1.1 Foundation training 1.20 1.15 2.35

1.2 Advanced training

1.25 1.25

1.3 Demonstration 2.50 2.20 4.70

1.4. Motivational tour 1.20 1.20

Sub-Total 1 2.50 3.40 2.40 1.20 9.5

2. Investment costs

2.1 Borrow pit development

1.20

0.80 2.00

2.2 Floodplain beel culture (CBFM),

1.50

1.00 2.50

2.3 Cage culture 1.50 0.70 2.20

2.4 Sanctuary 1.20 0.80 2.00

2.4 Farmer record books 0.50 0.50

2.5. Water test kit 0.80 0.00

0.80



Sub-Total 2 0.80 5.90 3.30 10.00

TOTAL (1+2) 3.30 9.30 5.70 1.20 19.50

Table 5: Foundation Training details

Trainee Topic Number Duration

A. Farmer Male Female Total

1. Fish Farmer Carp-Galda mixed culture 45 15 60 2 days

2. Fish Farmer Nursery operations 20 00 20 2 days

3. Fish farmer Mono-sex GIFT Tilapia culture

00 25 25 2 days

4. Fishers/ farmer Beel stocking 30 00 30 2 days

5.Rice –fish farmers

Rice –fish 25 00 25

6.Fish farmer Thai Koi 00 30 30

7. Fish farmer Sanctuary dev. 20 00 20

8. Fish farmer Beel stocking 20 00 20

Total (8 topics)

160 70 230

Advanced training: This will form a strong part of exit strategy. Once the project duration comes to an end, fisheries activities are supposed to continue as useful economic activities. However, technology keeps on changing, new farmers come in, geo-physical conditions of the water bodies keep changing and nature of consumer demand varies. All these require even more effort to keep fisheries activities going on to meet the ever changing challenges. To meet the challenges one most important factor would be to develop enough of quality farmers who can also act as local extension agents for the local new and old farmers maintaining close liaison with the Upazila Fisheries Offices (DoF). With an aim to developing such local supporting hands, the project is going to provide further training (advanced training) in some of the more useful subjects to the best farmers/fishers. It is expected that they will carry the advanced/up-to-date knowledge to the fellow farmers as well as apply to their own water bodies. This way, even after the completion of the project period, there will be some competent persons (25 nos.) to carry on the task of knowledge dissemination. Table 6 provides detailed information on this. Table 6: Advanced training details

Trainee Topic Nos. Duration

1. Best performers Carp-Galda mixed culture 5 2 days

2. Best performers GIFT farming 5 2 days

3. Best performers Thai Koi farming 3 2 days

4. Best performers Nursery management farming 3 2 days 5. Best performers Beel stocking 5 2 days 6. Best performers Sanctuary dev. 3 2 days TOTAL 25

Demonstration: As the motto goes ‘seeing is believing’, demonstration has always been regarded as one of the most effective tools in disseminating practical knowledge, especially the new ones. The fisheries programme, therefore, include some demonstrations of fisheries technologies with the expectation that the messages will reach not only to the direct project beneficiaries, but indirectly to many more. Following table (Table 7 below) provides a list of demonstrations. Project will bear all the inputs cost while the farmer will provide the suitable water body and do the field works.



Table 7: Details of technology demonstrations

Technology Units Farmer number Remarks

1. Major carp nursery 2 nos.

30 dcm each

2 M 0 F 2 Best in trainings and having suitable water bodies

2. Mono-sex GIFT Tilapia

6 nos.

25 dcm each


3. Thai koi culture 5 nos

20 dcm each


4. Beel stocking 2 nos 5 ha 5 M 0 F 5 Best in trainings and having suitable water bodies

5. Carp polyculture 4 nos 30- 40 dcm 4 M 0 F 4 Best in trainings and having suitable water bodies

6. Sanctuary 2 nos 2 ha 4 M 0 F 4 Best in trainings and having suitable water bodies

7. Borrow pit 2 nos 20-30 dcm 0 M 2 F 2 Best in trainings and having suitable water bodies

Total: 23 demonstrations

Motivational tour: Sharing of experiences can be a good means of getting better ideas and confirming the used ones. Exchange visits by the best performers to other places can enrich and consolidate their knowledge base. It also works as good and positive incentive for the better and hard workers. Project has therefore included exchange visits in its programme in the final implementation year. Motivational tour will take place involving other sub-projects areas beyond the present sub-unit area. Not only the farmers and fishers but also the concerned officials will get the opportunity of such types of motivational tour. Programme is as follows (Table 8). Both males and females will participate in the visits :

Table 8: Details of motivational tour

Participants Number Places of visits

1. Carp-Galda farmers 1 best farmers TBC (to be confirmed)

2. Thai koi 2 best farmers TBC

3. Nursery operators - Carp 1 best operators TBC

4. GIFT farmers 3 best farmers TBC

5. Sanctuary farmers 2 best farmers TBC

6. Beel stocking farmers 3 best farmers TBC

Total 15 persons

Mode of implementation Activities: In order to support increased fish production activities through environment-friendly and peoples’ participation, especially the poor fisherfolk of the locality, a number fisheries activities have been proposed and explained above. These are listed below for a quick look: 1. Fish production. It includes both culture and capture fisheries. There are traditional activities like

pond aquaculture and then there are new introductions like beel culture (community based fisheries management). These are meant to bring in more waters under aquaculture as well as to increase



productivity. Targets are set by the project. However, under favourable conditions (local demand, profitability, no major natural disaster, etc.) motivated local people may go for higher targets, horizontally and vertically as well.

Pond aquaculture – In the final year productivity rate is expected to reach 2500kg/ha/yr from present production of 1479 kg/ha/yr .New species introduction will also be tried during this period. There are Khas (govt. owned) ponds in the sub-unit area. Attempts will be made to recover this water area from the present occupiers, influential moneyed man, and give this to poor fishers.

Nursery – Efforts will be made to increase nursery area by 4.00 ha in 2012-3 FY. This is important to cope up with the increasing demand for quality seeds.

Rice-fish aquaculture – A significant increase in area is to happen from present position. Present production rate is moderate with the scope of future production rate.

Borrow pit – It will be a big challenge to bring in local poor, disadvantaged women and /or fishers into the use of borrow pits as a means of aquaculture. Properly constituted WMGs have to play a big and strong role here. Culture practice will start from this year. However, most important issue here is to get access to borrow pits presently under control of local influential persons.

Canal fishery – Actual rehabilitation/re-excavation works are expected to start in the next FY. Following the rehabilitation works the water is expected to support much more natural fish than before benefiting the local fishers. There is possibility that if canals are allowed for aquaculture the production within the canal will no doubt increase. More importantly, aquaculture is more prone to be captured by the local influential people. Better to leave it for natural production which will benefit not only the surrounding floodplains, especially during the flood season, also the poor fishers by ensuring their access to the natural water bodies. But some area may be arranged for genuine fisher and poor peoples of WMG members to sustain their livelihood.

Beel stocking – Again local fishermen will be identified and organized into a team for the purpose. They will fence an area for about 7 days for the fingerlings to acclimatize with the local situations and to allow them to grow a little bigger to avoid immediate predation. Then the fence will be taken off and used elsewhere. Once they are dispersed in the adjacent waters, organized fisher group will monitor and have the right to fish according to their own management rules. The project proposed 3 ha to be stocked in the 3rd FY (2011-12) and from 4th yr the fisher groups will take care of stocking and overall management.

2. Trainings

Foundation trainings will start immediately after the preparation of SIP report and it is planned to start in the year (January, 2011) FY of project implementation and will continue up to 2012-13 FY.

Advanced trainings, on the other hand, will be conducted in the concluding year or before the concluding year.

Demonstrations will be conducted, after the foundation trainings.

Motivational tour will be conducted in the concluding year of the project implementation period. 3. Investment activities. These will follow the time of use of particular water body. These are all one time support to develop the bases so that the poor fishers and women can carry on from there. An Endowment Fund/Revolving Fund for Tk. 9.50 lac (except record books) may be created for the purpose. WMO has to play an important role in administering the fund to ensure efficient use and transparency of the fund management.

Floodplain beel stocking (CBFM) in 2011-12 FY 3 ha and 2012-13 FY another 2 ha. The investment worth is Tk. 15,000 per ha, on an average, and will be used for the required earth works and fry purchasing only.

Borrow pit development. Average per hectare earth work support is Tk 15,000 and the works will start from 2011-12 FY ending in 2012-13 FY.



4. Monitoring and Evaluation, and Reporting of fisheries activities. As expected, this activity will stretch over the entire implementation period. To make it a participatory a well as more effective concerned officials will be trained on how to involve the farmers/fishers in the process. Table -11 below summarizes the incremental production, implementation period, responsible personnel

and trainings. Culture fisheries will contribute the lion share of increasing fish production (224.89 MT)in

the concluding year of the project completion. With an aim to developing such local supporting hands, the

project is going to provide further training (advance training) in some of the more useful subjects to the

best farmers/ fishers. Training will be provided through the DoF staff and specialists from their research

institutes, but may also be provided by the local private experts and NGO staff to the extent that existing

public institution staff resources are insufficient.

Table 11: The mode of implementation of fisheries related major activities

Activity Expected output Responsibility Timing

1. Fisheries programme

1.1 CULTURE Incremental production total: 224.89

Beneficiaries and project fisheries personnel

Final year of the project

1.2. CAPTURE Incremental production total: - (-) 49.84



Total Incremental production total: 175.05 MT



2. Trainings

2.1 Foundation training 230 (M 160 and F 70) project beneficiaries capable of practicing modern fisheries technologies

Project fisheries personnel

During FY of 2010-11,2011-12,& 2012-13

2.2 Advanced training 25 selected (best performers) farmers/fishers and others capable of carrying out task of technology dissemination beyond project period


Concluding year (5th FY)

2.3 Demonstrations

23 demonstrations on new and improved technologies making fellow farmers, other than the direct project beneficiaries), capable of handling new technologies


2nd half of 3rd year (2010-11) and 2nd half of 4th FY (2011-12).

3. Investment supports

3.1 Floodplain beel 5.00 ha floodplain beel area developed for aquaculture

Concerned beneficiaries and the project fisheries personnel

In 1st half of 2011-12 & 1st half of 2012-13 FYs.

3.2 Borrow pits 2.50 ha of borrow pit developed for aquaculture

Concerned beneficiaries and the project fisheries personnel

In 1st half of 2011- 12 FY .

4. M&E and Reporting Project implementation activities monitored, evaluated and reports prepared as when necessary


The whole implementation period



Following the MOU signed between the BWDB and the Department of Fisheries, a meaningful cooperation between these two organizations, especially in providing technological support to the project fisheries personnel as well as to the beneficiaries, is expected. Project NGOs as well as other NGOs operating in the region can provide useful suggestions and guidance in the way of consultation meetings with the project personnel regarding mainly the social aspects of the project objectives. Properly developed WMO will always be the key body for the effective and transparent implementation of the activities. Fishing Community / Dependable Community in SIP area

There are three types of fishermen like-full time fishers (professional fisher), part-time fishers and subsistence fishers. The professional fisher of the project area is mostly poor and deprived community. They are generally landless and have no alternative income source. There is less practice of family planning and sanitation system due to lack of awareness, financial capability that are very common for other poor peoples. The full time fishers catch fish for their livelihood round the year in surrounding rivers, khals and beels but from recent few years they catch fish from khal and beels only from July to mid January, when water is available in these areas, rest of the time they harvest fish from pond as a daily labour (tk.175-210 per day) or harvesting fish by share basis. Part time fisher catch the fish to maintain their family only September to December each year when fish are available in beels and floodplain and no work in their surrounding areas. A total of 58 House Holds (HH) of professional fishermen and 133 House Holds (HH) of part time fishermen are found during the FGD program and their present average income per year tk. 37,000.00- 45,000.00 and 22,000.00-28,000.00 respectively from fisheries. During FGD program, an opinion was passed from local peoples for professional fishermen to ensure their involvement in fishery enhancement program like sanctuary fishing, fry stocking in beel, leased out public low land water bodies to fisher. Also give them the top priority in alternative livelihood program and trainings to earn more money and employment opportunity. Mitigation measures for Professional fishermen:

Capture fisheries is declining due to decreasing water areas, destroying of the mother stock because of dewatering of the whole low land water bodies, obstacle of migration route, destruction of breeding and feeding grounds and over fishing etc. Professional fishermen will be affected no doubt, does not mean that all fishermen will be vulnerable, because river fishery is always open to all for fishing. But culture fisheries is increasing from last decades. Fishermen have also started changing their life pattern gradually for necessities and survivability. The continued improvement of fishery management in the area should receive the highest priority,

especially of those activities and/or policies that should take place despite interventions. Some of these

activities, including the following major special issues were identified during the study period in the project

areas and discussion held with concerned officials of the Upazila and stakeholders.

- Loss of Fisheries habitat : Local people has opined that the gradual loss of fish habitats has

created a lot of problems in the area, such as price hike of fish, less availability of fish as per

demand, loss of income source for fishery folk. So all these constraints need to be solved by

restoration lost fish-habitat.

- Transfer of profession: Profession change is also an issue in the project areas among the

fisherman community. Fish habitat loss is directly linked with profession change. Loss of fish

habitat means loss of fishing ground for fisherman. So the professional fisherman would be

involved in wet land management committee. In such circumstance the professional

fisherman are switching over to other profession like-richshaw pulling, earth-cutting and day

labourer.

- Conflict between fishermen and farmers: the operation of existing sluice gates create

problems between fishers and agricultural farmers. When one group is interested for water

other is not. The conflict of interest may be mitigated by suitable water management for the

area through WMG/WMA.



- Provision of supplementary stocking of all water bodies (like flood-plain, beels, khals, river

under the project area) with fingerlings should be adopted, this measure will increase open

water fisheries production and flourish the fish bio-diversity.

- Active participation of fisherman should be ensured in case of any water management

intervention under the project area.

- To boost up aquaculture development in the area, the modern aquaculture technology

(package) could be introduced in the project in close cooperation with DoF.

The following measures should be taken for their survival under enhancement program of the project.

By Khas water bodies : The fishermen can excess easily into Khas water bodies ( low land area). This land will be leased out for fishermen/ landless peoples under Fishery Sub Committee for a long term basis for fish culture. But khas pond water bodies (4.73 ha) and khas low land areas (25.14ha) are found during FGD program.

By fry rearing : Under Fishery Sub Committee, fishermen will take the private small water bodies for rearing fry. It is very profitable business and earn more money within 3-5 months. Because project will provide nursery management training for fry rearing to WMG members.

By beel stocking : Under the enhance plan, some low land area will be transferred into deep area to save mother fish as a mother stock to breed more fish and save the local variety of fishes. Some condition to be applied for land owners, such as, at least 10 years of those deep part and surrounding low land area must be under Fishery Sub Committee with involvement of fishermen. And land owners will take share or lease money per year of their lands for leasing out their land.

By Marketing Channel : Marketing is more profitable business than other work either in Fisheries or Agriculture products and others. A marketing channel will be developed especially for fishermen under fishery section or IGAs to create employment opportunity and earning more money. By demonstration pond : Under enhancement program, a lot of demonstration pond will be implemented to increase fish production through group wise approach and benefit will be shared among group members. Fishermen should take initiatives under this program.

By fish culture in canal : Due to project intervention, most of the canals will be re excavated for drainage congestion. Some of the canals will be used as a fish culture. Fishermen can involve themselves in such types of enhancement program under Fishery Sub Committee.

By IGAs program: Through IGAs , fishermen will take initiative to create employment opportunity like net making and other related activities for their livelihood. Wet - Land Management : Wet land conservation is very important for aquatic flora and fauna, and to enrich the bio-diversity. It is also important to landless and genuine fishermen for their livelihood and animal protein supply. During FGD program a discussions was made about the importance of Wet Land Conservation. All members realized it but most of the members prefer the crop production than bio-diversity and fish production. They also pass their opinion which is only possible in govt. khas land but no khas low land in SIP. Only few low land is available in scatter way. Before making a final decision especially for private wet land management, a detailed discussions will be needed with WMG members and local peoples (high/ medium /low land owners) to clear and concrete decision about inundation areas. A demarcation should be established in all low land areas, when, where and how much areas will be inundated or not. WMG members and local people will take proper concrete decision about wet land management.

Value addition The per capita consumption rate has shown in declining trend in recent years due to high population growth which is faster than the growth rate of fish production. It is becoming increasingly impossible to maintain the stable of foods, especially the animal protein. The prospects of adding value to by catch largely depend on the demand. Good quality raw material supplies are an essential pre requisite for any value added processing activity. Once the quality of raw materials get deterioration, there is no way to improve it by any means of preservation and processing. Improvement of handling of by catch can be done by sorting, de-heading and gutting during the catching. Although storage life inside ice, varies from



species to species. Iced fish was found fairly good for 8-10 days. All the species are not equally suitable for processing of various value added products. Difference flesh characteristics in a product may influence the quality and make the product unattractive to the consumers, in terms of appearance, flavor and odour. Training will be provided to WMG members through the DoF staff and specialists from Research Institutes. Marketing Much of the catch, particularly from fresh water both from culture and capture, is consumed locally by the local peoples or with in same thana or district. However there are areas which consume less than they produce and therefore have a surplus which can be exported to other areas of the country. Almost all fish traded internally passes through private channels. The market structure varies from area to area. Marketing Channels divides into four stages; primary market, secondary market, higher secondary market and final consuming market. The primary market: Here the fisherman sells to a mobile assembler, who may be known as a mahajan, a jogandar or a faria The Secondary Market: The assembler sells the fish in a wholesale market to local retailers {nickaries}. Local wholesale {Paikers}, or distributors who transport the fish to other districts {beparis or chalans}. The sale is normally carried out through the medium of a commission agent {arotdar} who conducts public auctions The higher secondary market: Fish consumed at a distance from the secondary market is transported by distributors {bepari or chalan} to other distribution markets, usually whole sale markets in districts towns. Here they sell to local retailers {nickaries} and whole sellers {paikers} through local aratdars. Training and extension program will be organized for WMG members to develop the marketing channel to get more price from their own products and to create employment opportunity. Summarized activities on strength and weakness of Directorate of Fisheries (DoF)

Sl.

No.

Issues Activities of DoF Activities of SW project

with line agencies

Remarks

01. Soil test of

pond

DoF generally do not go for

soil testing for fish culture in

pond, only they do the

some special cases.

WMG members will take

initiatives for soil testing for

increased production &

prevention of fish diseases

in ponds.

Mainly for intensive

fish culture and

prevention of

diseases.

02. Water quality

test of pond

DoF do water quality test in

problematic ponds (fish

diseases affected pond)


initiatives for water testing

for applying the lime,

organic and inorganic

fertilizer, and prevention of

diseases

Kit box of water

quality test need to

be provided to each

WMA level from

project

03. Quality fry /

fingerlings

Procurement

Farmers purchase

fry/fingerlings individually

from open market without

maintaining quality. DoF do

not involve in such type of

activities

WMG members will procure

quality fry / fingerlings from

the reputed hatchery / firm

by taking advice from

fisheries specialists (

project or DoF) collectively.

WMG members

collectively will

procure quality fry /

fingerlings with

cheap rate.



04. Establish

demonstration

ponds

Learning by doing is more

effective-which is not

always practiced in DoF.

During 4th fisheries project

some demonstration ponds

were established in Narail

areas but within SIP area.

Some demonstration ponds

will be established on

different aspects under the

project among from WMG

members pond.

Dissemination of

technology in the

project area for

increasing fish

production.

05. Shortage of

organic

fertilizer in

pond for

increasing

productivity.

DoF do not take initiative

for such type of activities.

Project will introduce

adequate amount of

compost preparation to be

provided to fish pond for

increased fish production

To apply organic

fertilizer in pond for

increasing

productivity.

06. Massive use

of pesticides

in rice cum

fish culture/

surrounding

beels saving

the HYV rice

crop.

Farmers normally use

pesticides during pest

attacks without caring of

doses and quantity. DoF is

not involve in such types of

activities.

Use of high doses of

pesticides need to be

discouraged through

practicing IPM/ICM.

07. Training

No training is going on at

present on modern

methods of fish culture .

Rigorous training will be

provided to WMG members

on different aspects of

fisheries production by the

project with the help of line

agencies.

WMG members

will be skilled up

about modern fish

culture.

08. Cultivation of

High Value

fish like Sing,

Koi , Magur,

Pabda etc

Farmers have shallow

knowledge of valued fish.

DoF do not take initiative

about high value fish

culture in this area.

Project will take initiative

with help of DoF & BFRI to

introduce high value fish

culture in this area through

WMG members for

increased production and

benefit.

WMG members

will know about

high value fish and

its culture

technique.

09. Fish

production

Present fish production of

pond is an average of 1235

kg/ha/yr

Production will be

increased up to 2500

kg/ha/yr through

enhancement program

Fish production will

be increased due to

enhancement

program.



under the project.

10. Marketing

facilities

Farmers sell their fish at

nearby markets individually.

No initiative is taken by

DoF about the

development of marketing

system.


initiatives with the help of

project to sell their fish

collectively to big business

centres to get more

benefit.

Marketing system

will be established

through WMG

members

collectively.

11. Fry stocking

in beel

No such types of activities

are being taken up by DOF

Project will take initiative for

stocking through WMG

members to increase

production and more

income.

To create a

employment

opportunity and

income generating

activities.

12. Sanctuary

development

Few fish sanctuaries were

established in Narai district

during 4th Fisheries Project

but not in this SIP area. At

present no such types of

activities are found.

Project will established fish

sanctuary to conserve

threatened fish and to

increase production

through WMG members

activities.

To enrich the

biodiversity

13. Manpower No sufficient manpower to

conduct extension program

and other fisheries related

activities.

Project will supply the

sufficient manpower to

conduct extension and

fisheries related activities of

WMG/ WMA members.

14.

Monitoring &

Evaluation

At present there is no

monitoring system of DoF

on their fisheries activities

SW project will establish

monitoring system with

MIS data base to know the

project achievement .

WMG

members/Local

people / authority of

the project will

know the

achievement of the

objectives.



Activities at a glance, SWN - 08

SL.No

Activities 2010-2011

2011-2012 2012-2013

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

1 Fish production

1.1 Pond aquaculture (extension)

1.2 Nursery

1.3 Demonstration pond

1.4 Rice-fish

1.5 Floodplain beel

1.6 Borrow pit

1.7 Canal

1.8 Beel stocking

2 Training

2.1 Foundation training

2.2 Advance training

2.3 Motivational tour

3

Development of Marketing Facilities

4 Investment activities

4.1 Floodplain fish culture

4.2 Borrow pit repair

5 Monitoring & evaluation

5.1 Data collection

5.2 Data analysis

6 Reporting



Collective Action Plan (CAP) Fisheries Section, SWN- 08

During FGD, the following initiatives are recorded from the WMG members who expressed to work collectively. The list of planned initiatives and training required opted by the WMG / Members are listed below.

Name of WMG/

no./village

List of planned initiatives by groups

Training topics Remarks

Boishaki S-8/1 Tularampur

1.Demonstration ponds (2 no.) 2.Pond (extension) (5 no.) 3. Nursery (1 no. ) 4. Gher extension (2 no.) 5.Fry procurement (1 no. by 1 group.) 6.Marketing activities ( 1 no. by 1group.) 7.Beel stocking (1 place.by group). 8. Borrow pit (3 no. by 1group.) 9.Water and soil quality test 10. IMP activities (1 place by 1 group)

1.Carp-polyculture 2.Carp-Golda mix culture 3.GIFT culture in small size pond 4. Rice cum fish culture 5.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur & Pabda 6. Marketing activities 7. IPM training

Most of the WMG members are interested in training especially in carp-golda culture and sanctuary development.

Balaka S-8/1 A Chamrul & Betnga

1.Demonstration ponds (1 no.) 2.Pond (extension) (4 no.) 3. Nursery ( 1 no. ) group.) 4.Marketing activities ( 1 no. by1group.) 5. Beel stocking (1 no. by 1 group) 6. Borrow pit (3 no. by 1 group ) 7.Water and soil quality test

1.Carp-Golda culture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond 3.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur) 4. Beel stocking 5. Water test

Most of the WMG members are interested in training especially in carp-golda culture and beel stocking.

Barsha S-8/2 Gopigantopur & Sadanathokhari

1.Demonstration ponds (2 no.) 2.Pond (extension) (7 no.) 3.Fry procurement (1 no. by 1 group.) 4.Water and soil quality test

1.Carp-polyculture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond 3.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur) 4. Nursery management 5. water test & soil test

Most of the WMG members are interested in training especially in carp-golda culture and valued fish.

Sraboni S-8/3 Bishonopur , Shahidpur & ohazone

1.Demonstration ponds (2 no.) 2.Pond (extension) (8 no.) 3. Nursery (2 no.) 4.Fry procurement (1 no. by 1 group.) 5. Beel stocking (1 no. by 1 group) 6.Water and soil quality test & 7. IPM activities

1.Carp- golda culture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond 3.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur) 4. . Beel stocking 5. Water test & soil test 6. IPM training

Most of the WMG members are interested in training especially in carp-golda culture and beel stocking.

Sapla S-8/4 Chanpur & Nayanpur

1.Demonstration ponds (2 no.) 2.Pond (extension) (6 no.) 3. Nursery (1 no.) 4.Fry procurement (1 no. by 1 group.)

1.Carp-polyculture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond 3.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur) 4. Sanctuary development &

Most of the WMG members are interested in training especially in carp-golda culture and marketing.



5.Marketing activities ( 1 no. by 1group.) 6.Sanctuary development (1 no.by group). 7.Water and soil quality test

5. Marketing activities

Mollica S-8/5 Sitarampur & Hizoldanga

1.Demonstration ponds (2 no.) 2.Pond (extension) (4no.) 3. Nursery (1placy by 1group) 4. Gher extension (3 no.) 5.Fry procurement (1 no. by 1 group.) 6. Borrow pit (3 no. by 1 group ) 7.Water and soil quality test

1.Carp- Golda polyculture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond 3.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur) 4. Nursery management& 5. Marketing activities

Most of the WMG members are interested in training especially in nursery management and marketing.

Jaba S-8/6 Banshvita

1.Demonstration ponds (1no.) 2.Pond (extension) (3 no.) 3. Fish culture in canal(1 no. by 1 group) 4. Beel stocking (1 no. by 1 group) 5. Borrow pit (3 no. by 1 group ) 6.Water and soil quality test

1.GIFT culture in small size pond 2.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur) 3. Beel stocking & 4. Fish culture in canal

.

Haimothy S-8/7 Durgapur & Bahirdanga

1.Demonstration ponds (2 no.) 2.Pond (extension) (7 no.) 3. Gher extension (3 no.) 4.Fry procurement (1 no. by 1 group.) 5.Fry stocking in canal (1 no.by group). 6. Beel stocking (1 no. by 1 group) 7. Borrow pit (3 no. by 1 group ) 8.Water and soil quality test

1.Carp-polyculture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond 3.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur) 4. Fry & fish marketing & 5. Fish culture in borrow pit

Most of the WMG members are interested in training especially in valued fish culture and fish culture in Borrow pit

Agrani S-8/8 Durbajuri & Ichamoti

1.Demonstration ponds (3no.) 2.Pond (extension) (11 no.) 3. Gher extension (4 no.) 4.Sanctuary development (1 no.by group). 5. Beel stocking (1 no. by 1 group) 6.Water and soil quality test

1.Carp-polyculture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond 3.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur) 4. Sanctuary development 7 5. Water & soil test.

Most of the WMG members are interested in training especially in carp-golda culture and sanctuary development.

Falguni S-8/9 Saliarvita, Ratladanga & Mullia

1.Demonstration ponds (2 no.) 2.Pond (extension) (6 no.) 3. Gher extension (3 no.) 4. Borrow pit (3 no. by 1 group ) 5. Beel stocking (1 no. by 1 group 6.Sanctuary development (1 no.by group). 7.Water and soil quality test

1.Carp-polyculture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond 3.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur) 4. Sanctuary development 5. Water test 7 6. Fry stocking in beel

Most of the WMG members are interested in training especially in carp-golda culture, fry stocking in beel and sanctuary development.

Chaitii S-8/10 Bogram, Goalbari, Nanikhir & South Narail

1.Demonstration ponds (3 no.) 2.Pond (extension) (5 no.) 3.Nursery (2 no.) 4. Gher extension (2 no.) 5.Marketing activities ( 1 no. by1group.) 6.Sanctuary development (1 no.by

1.Carp-polyculture 2.GIFT culture in small size pond 3.Valued fish culture in pond (Thai koi, Sing, Magur) 4. Sanctuary development & 5. Marketing activities

Most of the WMG members are interested in training especially in carp-golda culture, marketing and sanctuary development.



1 group). 7. Beel stocking (1 no. by 1 group) 8. Water and soil quality test

Notes Demonstration ponds: Some demos will be conducted through WMG members collectively to introduce new technology on carp – polyculture, carp-golda mix culture, GIFT and valued fish like Thai koi and Sing fish. Learning by Doing process will be adopted and at the last harvesting day, a field day will be arranged for all WMG members and surrounding pond owners to observed the fish directly and hearing culture technology from pond operator directly. Such type of program will create a awareness and confidence among pond owners. Extension Pond: Most of the WMG members culture their ponds without proper technical knowledge, only they release fry without maintaining numbers and ratio and culture fish with out proper management. So production rate is very low. But after receiving training from project, members of WMG will be skilled on fish culture and production would be increased ultimately

Nursery pond: A few water area will be arranged for nursery management. Most of the members do not know how to rearing / culture fish fry. But huge demand the quality of fingerling in this area for fish culture in their ponds. After receiving the training on nursery management from the project, WMG members will start fry culture through “Learning by Doing” having facilitation from SF/ ISPMC Fishery consultant . These activities will be able to meet shortage of quality fry/ finger ling and ultimately will enhance the production of fish. Sanctuary development: Sanctuary is more important for conserve aquatic flora and fauna, and to enrich the bio diversity. WMG members are realized it and interested to develop sanctuary in their surrounding possible areas to safe the indigenous species as well as increase the production.

. Fish culture in Rice field: Surrounding members of beel are agreed to fish culture in monsoon period through community based management including dependable community to increase fish production in beel areas and create employment opportunity with facilitation from ISPMC/SF/ PMO. Fish culture in Borrow pit : A special group of women members of WMG mainly poor/ destitute women are agreed to fish culture in borrow pit to increase fish production. Women of professional fishermen will also be included in these activities.

Fry procurement : Sub committee members of WMG are agreed to procure the fry/ fingerlings collectively to safe time and money. They will supply fry/fingerlings with in WMG members and surrounding pond owners. They will do the work with the help of concern SF and CF through guidance of ISPMC.

.Beel stocking: Some WMG members are agreed to stock the fingerlings in the beel through community management to increase fish production and employment opportunity. At some part of Bangladesh, community based management fingerling stocking in beel has been successful in increasing (from 500 kg to 1200 to1800 kg/ha) fish production and employment opportunities.

Marketing activities: Under this SIP some WMG members are interested to develop the marketing channel to get an appropriate price from their commodities with the help of technical support of the project. Normally sale the fish in pond side or the nearest market where they get the low prices. But if WMG members and keep the harvested fish in store under own custody of marketing committee of WMG and communicate with whole sellers (Narail / Khulna or even Dhaka) and will be able to bargain with them for appropriate prices and marketing channel will be created. Water and soil quality test: Members of sub committee of WMG are interested to test water quality test of their ponds to increase production up to optimum level and minimize the production cost and prevent fish diseases. SF will facilitate concern WMG members to test their soil and water quality from BFRI or DOF. Or each WMA level will be provided a test kit by which each members will be able to know their test report with the help of SF/Consultant, After getting results which will be discussed among the members and advised them what to do. Thus by this collective initiatives, farmer will be benefited.

Trainings The above training topics were selected by WMG members through which they can equipped with knowledge and techniques for more fish production.

Annex – C

Annex-C

BWDB-SAIWRPMP Environment SWN-8 Tularampur

1

Environmental Aspects

Sub-unit implementation plan-8 of Narail Sub-project

Environment

FCD projects are implemented with the objectives of controlling flood and improving drainage of

an area, which bring some changes in water related ecology in the area mainly. Moreover,

many efforts have been planned to fulfill the project goal, some of which may also affect the

environmental quality of the area.

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management project SAIRPMP)

presently composed of rehabilitation of 2 FCD sub-projects (with minor support to surface

irrigation) namely Narail sub-project (NSP) and Chenchuri sub-project (CSP), which have been

subjected to further segmentation into sub unit implementation planning (SIP) areas, based on

hydrological unit mainly. Presently a report on the environmental situation of SIP-8 (SWN)

areas is under considerations (map enclosed).

A survey on the present environmental conditions of the SIP area has been undertaken that will

be used as base data, and the required measures have to be undertaken to safeguard the

environmental standards throughout project life and beyond.

The present data collection and monitoring plan is based on environmental issues that are

found during the preparation of EIA. Main Environmental Impacts include

Possible increase in agricultural pollution of soil/waste due to increased agriculture.

Reduce the natural grazing areas, likely to contribute to reduction of number of bovines.

Increase dependence on fuel wood (rather than cow-dung) for cooking.

Reduce the jungle area contributing to reduction of terrestrial biodiversity.

Lowering the ground water table by increased use of tube well water for irrigation and

reduced recharge potentiality.

Reduce the number and size of perennial and seasonal wetland areas affecting

livelihood of fisher folks, protein intake of poor people, aquatic flora and fauna, ground

water recharge etc.

Annex-C


2

Figure: Map of the SIP-8 NSP

Annex-C


3

1. Drinking Water:

Arsenic contamination is a living problem in the area. However, there is no report of

arsenocosis in the area; however, further investigation on the issue is required. The following

table shows the arsenic status of the SIP-8 areas.

No of Tubewells Arsenic contaminated % of Arsenic contaminated

870 182 20.92

It is observed from the field survey that 182 nos. of HTWs are arsenic contaminated out of

existing total 870 nos., which is about 20.92 per cent (on upazila basis it is 19.55 per cent).

It is found that test of the HTW water has been carried out by DPHE along with the assistance

of NGOs (Mainly BRAC and Proshika) during 2003 to 2006. Arsenic-contaminatd HTWs have

been marked red and people have been advised not to drink their water. According to Upazila

DPHE office about 20.18 per cent HTWs area infected with arsenic (3,212 nos. out of total

15,919 nos). It is also found that few people drink water from arsenic infected tube wells,

occasionally, where the safe water is not easily accessible.

2. Sanitation Facility

There exists different types of latrines in the area; their extents (of the surveyed samples) are

given in the following table:

Table- 1: Types of latrines in use in the area

Types of latrines Nos Per cent (%)

Pucca 163 9.64

Ring slab 1245 73.67

Open/kutcha 282 16.69

Total 1690 100.00

Source: Field data of survey villages

Most of the HHs (Approx. 87%) has hygienic sanitation facility, overwhelmed by ring slab

latrines (considered to be hygienic). But all ring slab latrines may not qualify for hygienic one.

Table- 2: Situation of Sanitation Facility

Name of Village No of

HHs

No. of Sanitation facility

with percentage

Comments

Bansvita 20 18 (90%) Sanitation facilities include ring

slab latrines* mainly, with few

pucca latrines. The remaining

unhygienic latrines are

composed of open latrines.

Bahirdanga 20 16 (80%)

Durbazuri 20 18 (90%)

Total 60 52 (86.66%)

Source: Field Survey; *All the ring slab latrines are not hygienic, as many of them have their

goose-neck broken, due to lack of awareness

Annex-C


4

About training of the local people on sanitation and hygiene it is found that some NGOs (mainly

BRAC and Proshika) have imparted some training to numbers of villagers. According to BRAC

their training issues are washing hand before and after taking food, before serving food, after

defecation and washing hand after washing the children post defecation. According to BRAC

Narail Upazila has 38,030 HHs, out of which 18, 278 HHs (48.06 per cent) have sanitary

latrines

It is found that wild defecation practice still exists among the male, although their number has

reduced due to training and motivational activities of DPHE and NGOs. It needs further

motivation through training.

3. Water Quality:

Laboratory analyses of surface water (ponds and khals) have been carried out recently based on

requirements of fishery production and the results are furnished below:

Table 3: Results of laboratory analyses of water samples of the NSP SIP # 08

Sa

mpl

e

no.

Date of

collectio

n

Location Disso

lved

Oxygen

(DO)

Biochemica

l Oxygen

Demand

(BOD)

Chemical

Oxygen

Demand

(COD)

pH Electrical

Conductivit

y (EC)

Turbidit

y

Sulphate

mg/l mg/l mg/l µs/m JTU %

1. 19.5.08 River Afra/

Kazla near

village

Korgram,

Upazila-Narail

4.9 31.8 192.0 7.15 600 3.38 0.10

2. 19.5.08 Pond at village

Korgram,

Upazila-Narail

5.8 25.1 240.0 7.03 69 31.56 0.29

3. 19.5.08 Jolar khal at

village Korgram

Upazila-Narail

6.1 10.0 220.8 7.47 639 15.05 0.12

4. 19.5.08 Pond at village 3.5 31.7 355.2 7.16 66 92.19 0.91

Annex-C


5

Bahirgram

Upazila-Narail

5. 19.5.08 Bhatoialir khal

at village

Bahirgram

Upazila-Narail

6.9 20.8 128.0 7.14 142 14.23 0.59


Bahirgram

Upazila-Narail

8.4 5.1 115.0 7.45 77 25.59 0.85

7. 20.5.08 Chitra river near

village

Shoroshpur

Upazila-Narail

6.5 4.3 158.4 7.08 70 3.93 0.26


Shoroshpur,

Upazila-Narail

4.3 31.9 326.6 7.29 88 11.89 0.37

9. 20.5.08 Banshtaler

Beel, at village

Charikhoda

Upazila-Narail

3.0 20.3 307.2 6.97 68 3.96 0.08

10. 20.5.08 Pond in village

Tujordanga

Upazila-Narail

5.7 13.0 336.6 7.26 95 9.20 0.18

11. 20.5.08 Tank

(Muchimukhi) at

village Alokdia

(or Dattaputi?)

Upazila-Narail

6.1 11.8 327.3 7.09 38 19.42 0.57


Narayanpur

Upazila-Narail

4.6 9.2 259.2 7.11 50 13.23 0.22

Permissible limit >5 For fish-

<6.0 and

for irrigation

<10

>50 6.5-

8.5

Upto 400 Up to 10 Up to .04

Water samples were analysed at site and in the laboratory of Department of Soil, Water and Environment, Dhaka University.

According to peoples’ opinion it is observed that surface water is polluted between August and

September due to retting of jute in the khals. It is also polluted during the dry season (February

to April), when many fish species die in the existing water bodies. According to the local people

fish death is caused by water pollution due to excessive use of chemicals for agricultural

practices (use of pesticide/insecticides and chemical fertilizers.

4. Use of Chemical Fertlizer

It is observed that most of the farmers apply different doses of chemical fertilizers mainly on

their experience (some farmers learn from surrounding farmers) and crop responses, although

a few of them receive some training from DAE. In doing so, farmers fail to maintain balance of

fertilizers in most occasions.

According to field survey various chemical fertilizers used for different crops grown in the area

are given in the following table:

Annex-C


6

Table- 4: Average Use of Chemical Fertilizers (ha) used

Crops Fertilizers (kg/hectare)

Urea TSP MP Zinc

B. Aus 66 35 22 -

B. Aman 31 16 9 -

Lt. Aman 124 66 35 -

HYV T. Aman 204 110 49 7

Boro(HYV/Hybrid) 459 330 139 9

Jute 112 122 78 -

Lentil 6 24 6 -

Source: Data on field survey

5. Use of pesticides/Insecticides

It is found that farmers usually use pesticides/ insecticides for Boro crops mainly. Main types

and quantity used are given below (based on field data):

Table-5: Use of pesticides/insecticides

Village Crops Type of

pesticide/insecticide

Average

Quantity/ha

(kg)

Remarks

Satgoria Boro, T.

Aman

(HYV/Hybrid)

Thiovit/Sumithion/Cup 5.0 The farmers use any of

the mentioned types

mainly for Boro and T.

Aman crops.

Sometimes they also

use Raichon or Ripit to

control the pest/ insect

attack. They also use

both solid and Liquid

insecticides

Dopakhola Boro, T.

Aman

(HYV/Hybrid)

Thiovit/Sumithione/Cup 5.0

Barendar Boro, T.

Aman

(HYV/Hybrid)

Thiovit/Sumithione/Cup 5.0

Source: Field Survey

For other crops (than Boro) the farmers usually do not use any pesticide/insecticide.

Moreover, application of insecticides/pesticides is carried out by DAE-trained local people on

payment. The total quantities used by the people (spray) will be collected on use per hectare in

various crops.

6. Wetlands/Beels

There is no perennial wetland/beel in the SIP area. Few of the existing beel remains inundated

for 6-7 months from June to December. Data/ information on the beel are furnished in the

following table:

Annex-C


7

Table-6: Beel situation

Village Beel

name

Depth of

beel during

monsoon

No. of HHs of

affected

livelihood

No. of HHs

of partly

affected

livelihood

Remarks

Bansvita Banstoler

beel and

their

adjoining

areas.

1.5-2.0 m

but dries out

seasonally

- 10 Banstoler beel

is seasonally

inundated.

Bahirdanga 20 20

Durbazuri 3 12

Source: Field survey

The potentially affected HHs, who are mainly fishermen of the locality have to be provided with

alternative suitable means of livelihood.

7. Irrigation Facility

It is found that Ground water is the major source (80%) of irrigation water. Surface water is

also used in some are where beel water is available. The detail data/information on irrigation of

the 3 sampled villages is furnished below:

Table-7: Status of Irrigation Water

Village Per cent

irrigated by

surface water

Per cent

irrigated by

Ground water

Problem/s of irrigation

Bansvita 15 85 Salinity of river water;

Siltation of khal;

Non-functional regulator (gates

broken).

Bahirdanga 20 80 Salinity of river water;

Siltation and early drying of

khal;

Non-functional regulator (gates

broken).

Durbazuri 25 75 Lowering of GWT creates

problem in lifting of irrigation

water;

Salinity of river water.

Total 20% 80%


Annex-C


8

8. Bovine animals and cow-dung

Data on number of bovine animals and different uses of cow-dung on the sampled villages of

the SIP areas are given in the following table:

Currently most HHs use cow-dung as the main source of fuel (79.95%). Potential increase in

agricultural crop lands following improvements to flooding a changed situation is expected. This

may reduce the grazing land and livestock population that reduce the amount of cowdung

available for energy needs. This may lead to increase demand of fuel wood.

Table-8: No. of Bovine animals and cow-dung

Village Total

nos.

Tota

l

cow

-

dun

g

(kg/

day)

Quantity (in kg/day) of cow-dung for

different uses

Remarks

For fuel For

manure

Others

Bansvita 70 (20*) 280 224 42 14 Other uses of

cow-dung

include

smearing of

court yard and

earthen house

floor mainly.

Bahirdanga 65 (20*) 260 208 39 13

Durbazuri 72(20*) 288 230 43 15

Total 207 (60*) 828 662 (79.95%) 124

(14.97%)

42 (5.00%)

Source: Field Survey; * Figures in the parenthesis indicate number of HHs.

Annex-C


9

9. Fuel wood situation

Fuel wood is available round the year in the area, although its price goes up during monsoon,

when dry fuel wood is scarce. Information on fuel wood has been furnished in the following

table:

Table-9: Availability and use of fuel wood

Village Availability Average

consumption

(kg/day)

Remarks

Bansvita Available round the

year

11-12 The availability of

fuel wood becomes

difficult during the

rainy season

(between mid-June

and end- October)

Bahirdanga Available round the

year

12

Durbazuri Available round the

year

11


10. Renewable Energy

Cow dung, crop residues, leaves and twigs and fuel wood are main energy sources used for

cooking (more important) and crop processing in the area. The extents of different sources are

shown as follows:

Table-10: Extent of use of bio-mass sources

Bio-mas sources Extent of uses

(per cent)

Cow dung 39.58

Leaves and twigs 21.88

Crop residues 20.83

Fuel wood 17.71

Total 100.00

Source: Data on field survey

Annex-C


10

Availability of bio-mass sources is quite smooth in the area, as stated by the local people;

however, there a few complain of its non-availability. According to them there were some

natural jungles previously from where the poor people could collect plant and tree residues for

fuel purposes, which have become non-existent at present.

It is to be noted that there is no brick field and no saw mill in the surveyed area.

11. Grazing/Fodder Situation

The study area SIP-8 no significant grazing area is present. The situation is worsening day by

day. That’s why number of bovines is decreasing in the area, which ultimately enhanced use of

power tiller for cultivation. Due to lack of fodder the bovine animals’ production capacity is also

hampered. Moreover, reduction of grazing areas farmer’s cost of protecting cattle is increased

(shed, guarding). As a consequence the availability of manure is dwindling resulting in

increased use of fertilizers and less fuel for cooking.

12. Biodiversity

According to the local people biodiversity of the study area was rich once upon a time. Due to

the different types of anthropogenic factors the trend of aquatic flora and fauna are decreasing.

Some endangered and threatened species name of SIP-8 areas are given in the following

table.

Table 11: Biodiversity of SIP-8, some threatened and endangered species uses local name

Biodiversity Threatened species Endangered species

Aquatic flora Shapla

Aquatic fauna Panipoka

Terrestrial fauna Ghorial

Wood species Tentul, gamari, chatka,

eucalyptus, royna and kocha

gab, somrail and uri aam

Fruit trees bel, kamranga, jalpai, amra

and dalim

chalta and koromcha

Aesthetic plants kamini, palash

Herbal plants kumari lata and madhabi lata

Reptiles species kanan and ghormoni

Amphibians sona beng and kuno beng gecho beng, mecho beng

and kola beng

Birds kutum, kokka, bhuban chil,

shonko chil, baz and shokun

Annex – D

Gender & Livelihood enhancement plan SWN – 8 Annex - D

SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

1

Asian Development Bank Government of the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Kingdom of The Netherlands

__________________________________________________________________________

Gender and Livelihood Enhanced Perspective (GLEP)

SIP # SWN – 8 (Tularampur Scheme)






SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

2

Table of Contents

Sl No. Table Subject Page

no Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Objectives……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Methodology…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 1 Location……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 2 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 2.1 List of villages in SIP……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 2.2 Population……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 2.3 Adult population……………………………………………………………………………………………………... 6 2.4 House Holds…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 2.5 Population of HHs Size Ratio……………………………………………………………………………………… 7 2.6 Age Structure………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 7 2.7 HHs category of Land………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8 2.8 Male & Female headed HHs category of Land………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.9 Occupation Status…………………………………………………………………………………………………... 10 2.10 Poor / Non poor population………………………………………………………………………………………... 11 2.11 Educational Status………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.12 Housing Characteristics……………………………………………………………………………………………. 12 2.13 Sanitation Status……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 2.14 Drinking Water Status……………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 2.15 Present Health Status……………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 2.16 Electricity Coverage Status………………………………………………………………………………………... 14

3 Findings of the Study………………………………………………………………………………………………. 15

4 Focus Group Discussion for the Need Assessment of Gender and Livelihood Enhancement…………….. 16 5 Location of FGD…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 16 6 Poverty………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 16 7 Causes of Poverty………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 17 8 Poverty Reduction; Government Organizations and its Impact……………………………………………….. 18 9 Gender Participation of situation Demand for Family / HHs…………………………………………………… 19 10 Present Livelihood Situation in the area…………………………………………………………………………. 19 10.1 Impact of Micro Credit……………………………………………………………………………………………… 19 10.2 Use of Micro Credit…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 20 11 Options for Livelihood Enhancement Activity……………………………………………………………………. 21 12 Expectation of the Project………………………………………………………………………………………….. 21 13 Services of GOB & NGO Structure……………………………………………………………………………….. 22 14 Present Marketing Situation……………………………………………………………………………………….. 22 15 Gender and Women’s Empowerment……………………………………………………………………………. 23 16 Present Migration Situation………………………………………………………………………………………... 23 17 Future Scenario of the Project…………………………………………………………………………………….. 24 18 Objective of the Gender & Livelihood Enhancement Perspectives (GLEP)………………………………….. 24 19 Feasible Livelihood enhancement Activities…………………………………………………………………….. 25 20 Strategies for Implementation of Livelihood Enhancement Program…………………………………………. 26 20.1 Targeting the number of Poor Beneficiaries for Project Assistance…………………………………………... 26 20.2 Transparency to be maintained in selection process to have right kind of beneficiaries…………………… 26 20.3 Ensuring Appropriate Institutional Arrangement for Implementation of GLEP………………………………. 26 21 Gender Dimension of the Livelihood Enhancement…………………………………………………………….. 27 21.1 Recommendation…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 27 21.2 In brief GLEP will have the following special features………………………………………………………….. 28 22 Guideline for Selection of IGA…………………………………………………………………………………….. 28 22.1 Following are the possible steps for facilitating the organization of IGA for the target groups’ members… 28 23 G&L enhancement Training Plan [Annex- 1]…………………………………………………………………….. 28 24 Monitoring…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 25 Goals / G&L Enhanced Policy of SAIWRPMP…………………………………………………………………... 29 26 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 30 2.1.1 List of Villages in SIP………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 2.2.1 Population and Sex Ratio………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6

2.3.1 Adult Population and Sex Ratio (18 years & above)……………………………………………………………. 6

2.4.1 Male and Female headed HHs……………………………………………………………………………………. 6

2.5.1 Population of HHs Size Ratio……………………………………………………………………………………… 7

2.6.1 Age Structure of HHs Member…………………………………………………………………………………….. 8 2.7.1 HHs category of Land owner basis under the village…………………………………………………………... 8 2.8.1 HHs Category of Land owner basis in Male & Female headed HHs in the area……………………………. 9 2.9.1 Occupation…………...……………………………………………………………………………………………… 10 2.10.1 Poor / Non poor population identification Per Capita Income in the area……………………………………. 11 2.11.1 Educational Attainment…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.12.1 Main Housing Characteristics of HHs…………………………………………………………………………….. 12 2.13.1 Access to Sanitation of the HHs in the SIP area………………………………………………………………... 13 2.14.1 Sources of drinking water of the HHs within the SIP area……………………………………………………... 13 2.15.1 Most common Diseases mentioned by Respondents…………………………………………………………... 14 2.16.1 Electricity coverage according to per HHs……………………………………………………………………….. 14

5.1 Place of Focus Group Discussion (FGD) SWN – 8……………………………………………………………... 16

6.1 Present Poverty Situation………………………………………………………………………………………….. 17 7.1 Causes of Poverty………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 17

8.1 Poverty Reduction Program undertaken by the GOB and non-GOB Organizations and its impacts……... 18

9.1 Major Gender Dimension and Participation……………………………………………………………………… 19 10.1.1 Impact of Micro Credit on Livelihood Enhancement and Poverty Reduction………………………………… 20 10.2.1 Use of Micro Credit…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 20 11.1 Income Generating Activities Situation…………………………………………………………………………… 21 12.1 Expectation / Support / Demand of the Local Area……………………………………………………………... 22 13.1 Services of GOB & NGO…………………………………………………………………………………………... 22 14.1 Marketing Status……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 23 15.1 Decision Making of your Family & any situation…………………………………………………………………. 23 16.1 Out Migration status………………………………………………………………………………………………... 23 17.1 Livelihood Enhancement to be created by Proposed Project………………………………………………….. 24


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

3

Summary Gender and Livelihood are two complementary aspects of the SAIWRPMP project. The gender aspect relates to involvement of women in water management organizations. As women are socially suppressed by men, in order to protect their rights, at least 30% of the seats of the managing committee of the WMG and WMA shall be allocated for women as per the guideline for participatory water management (GPWM). In these seats only women candidates are allowed to compete in the election. The project should make it their regular activity to empower women in water management sector. The Project will support WMGs / project beneficiaries through PMO / SMO / Line Agencies / NGOs / LGIs with institutional strengthening gender concerns to ensure sustainability as gender is a cross-cutting issue. In these aspects, the situation of poverty, gender & livelihood enhancement and other related social issues were studied through primary data enumeration & FGD for the Tularampur Scheme (SIP # SWN – 8) with the newly recruitment facilitator & fine tuned through Research Assistant, during the project between the periods 2008 and April-May, 2011. The objectives of the study is to asses the current poverty & livelihood status, gender & livelihood and Socio-economic situation of the targeted beneficiaries, specially those families and vulnerable women who will be directly or indirectly involved or influenced by the water resource management program of the project. The study was carried out using Participatory Rapid Rural Appraisal (PRRA) method and house to house Households survey under the overall supervision of the concerned persons of the projects Gender & Livelihood Component. The study techniques applied were HHs Survey and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with marginal farmers, Landless, Share croppers and farm workers group, women’s group and occupational group like fishermen; Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) specially interviewing the formal / informal leaders of community and Local Governments Institutes (LGI), large farmers, businessmen and concerned officials of the governments and non-governments organizations (NGOs). A household survey was also carried out to identity poor and non-poor population per house holds by collecting data on income and expenditure and other basic socio-economic condition. The appraisal on gender & social issues and livelihood look after the demand of the poor and vulnerable women. To get a picture of real socio-economic situation an inventory of households was made in the subunit area on their land ownership, occupational activities, approximate income and expenditure, other family assets (cattle, households farming, non framing equipment etc.), and gender concerns. HHs survey shows that there are 2767 (97%) male headed and 88 (3%) female headed house holds in the area. Out of total HHs also shows the following Landless (1163) 41%, Marginal (653) 23%, Small (494) 17%, Medium (413) 14% and Large (132) 5% HHs in the area. Basically Farmers dimension of land indicate in the area. It was found that about (4197) 29 % of the HHs population lives below poverty line (National average as per BBS 2005 40%). They belong to landless and some of them marginal & small farmers including sharecroppers who cannot meet the required expenditure on food, clothing, healthcare, child education etc. Their main constraints appeared to be very small size of land holding, less job opportunity and low wages (for women less job opportunity and 30% less earnings than men in the same job), and absence of private and public investments (SME or any industry) in the SIP area. The present government safety net programs (VGD, VGF, Old Age, and Widow Allowances) are perceived as inadequate. In the SIP there were 54 poor Female headed HHs who are vulnerable and destitute. All vulnerable women and approximately 30% poor HHs are covered by VGF, VGD, Old age and Widow allowances (Tk. 300.00 - 350.00 per month) under safety net support. The amounts they get are not sufficient to maintain expense of livelihood. Household survey shows that 14677 household’s members including 7458 (51%) male and 7219 (49%) female population live in 24 villages within the subunit area. However, final selection to involve the poor in livelihood enhancement activities (Gender awareness training, technical skill and business training and follow-up training) will be finalized by the selection committees (Representative of WMG, LGI, NGO, PMO / SMO) after formation of the WMG. The final decision will be as per the Managing Committee and project authority’s decision. It is expected that finally selected beneficiaries by the project could be minimum 30% if this total number of poor or approx. Minimum 649 poor women beneficiaries including poor women as target group for their livelihood enhancement (allocation based on DPP budget and other probable reason is that the committee may not find beneficiaries among the poor who will be able to fulfill the criteria such as interest for training, give time for training, limit of working age 18-50 years, pregnant and lactating mother, ability to invest in business by taking loan etc). It is expected that the proposed


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

4

livelihood enhancement activities will be undertaken by the remaining beneficiaries through social induced method (adopting some new idea / activity / technology by following the others). Poor Households including vulnerable women living under the poverty line will be able to participate in a variety of income generating activities. A number of such activities are homestead vegetables gardening, seed production, quick growing fruit tree plantation at homestead and timber tree plantation by the roadside and embankment, mini nursery, agri-business, food processing specially rice based food processing (puffed rice, rice ball, toffee, pressed rice), fish cum duck farming including mini hatchery, home based bamboo work, home based jute work and pottery etc. A selection of them will be offered to the beneficiaries, after selection, skill training will be provided to them on relevant activities along with post training support including market linkages. This part of the program will ensure sufficient income for the poor and vulnerable women to reduce their poverty. It was identified that on the two sides of the embankment there are some khash land. This khas land is proposed to be distributed / leasing out to the vulnerable poor women and hard core poor families through establishing linkages with Department of land, local UNO / Upazila parishad, DC and LGIs. Another scope to benefit the hardcore poor and vulnerable women is to involve them in project construction works like canal digging, earth works in connection with embankment through Labour Contracting Society (LCS). The project should take advantage of utilizing local resources and institutions to assist poor for poverty reduction, Facilitating links with other organizations and institutions, such as DAE, DWA, DOF, DOLA, DOC, DSS, DOFT, LGED, DOYD and concerned NGO for specialized skill training and micro credit / SME loan from local banks (10% quota for women entrepreneur, policy imposed by Bangladesh Bank for all Banks), is a part of this effort. One tool has been development to facilitate this process: The Venn diagram analyzes the role of different micro finance institutes. Especially the poor and the vulnerable members of the committees will be monitored in order to see if they benefit from new opportunities under the project, or become marginalized further and would need especial supporting measures by targeting individuals. Objectives The objectives of the study are: To asses the livelihood status of the targeted beneficiaries specially water resources management

families and vulnerable women; To support project targeted beneficiaries specially the poor to enhance their livelihood and poverty

reduction; Methodology As mentioned earlier the methodology followed to conduct the study is House holds Survey and participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA). The most important techniques of PRA are Focus Group Discussion (FGD); Key Informant Interviews (KIIs), survey and case study have been chosen and applied to conduct this study.


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

5

1. Location

SIP # SWN - 8 of Narail sub-project is located in 3 Unions and 1 Pourashova (Mulia, Tolarampur, Sahabad and Narail Pourashava) of Narail Upazila under Narail District. 24 villages from these 3 Unions and 1 Pourashova are associated (fully or partly) within this SIP # SWN - 8. SIP # SWN - 8 is popularly known as Mulia khal (canal) area and bounded by the river Chitra to the east and the Afra to the west. 2. Introduction Bangladesh Water Development Board has given highest priority to poverty reduction in its development efforts. SAIWRPM project is fully aware of the presence of all pervasive and endemic gender based discriminations and depravations in all social and economic levels, among all castes, religions, and ethnic groups in both poor and non poor beneficiaries of the project area. Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB) under the Ministry of Water Resource (MoWR) started the implementation the project “Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project (SAIWRPMP)” from 2007 with financial and technical assistance from Asian Development Bank and Royal Netherlands Government. The overall objective of the project is to reduce poverty by increasing agricultural and fish production and employment creation through integrated water management (Flood Control, Drainage and Irrigation) with active participation of the local people.

The project focuses need based issues of engineering and technical matters of water management, environment, water management institution/group and association, agriculture and fishery, gender, poverty and livelihood enhancement to achieve its objectives.

One of the objectives of the project is to enhance the livelihood of the poor living within the project area. Provision has therefore been kept within the project frame work to utilize project resources for implementing activities needed to achieve this objective. For this purpose the project felt the need to carry out a study on poverty and livelihood in the selected project area as a preparatory activity for gathering information on key issues of poverty and livelihood. This is extremely needed to make plan and formulate strategies for the implementation of livelihood enhancement activities for the poor. This study is the outcome of project’s primary step to start implementation process on livelihood enhancement for the poor. While in all implementation stage the project decided to ensure people’s participation as a key implementation strategy, this study followed the method of participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA). At the first stage the study has been undertaken at Narail Sadar Upazila of Narail District.

The projected present population is 14677 part of which male 7458 (51%) and female 7219 (49%) based line based on enumeration of 2008 and April-May, 2011. According to survey data the total population of the surveyed households is 2855 part of which male headed HHs 2767 and female headed HHs 88. The average household size of the SIP area is 5.14, which is much smaller than the national average of 4.8. So, field survey showed a positive link of family size with income; landless, marginal, small, medium and large farmer category identification on quantity of land.

The section deals primarily with the clientele or the stakeholders of different classes in the project area and its main socio-economic characteristics. 2.1 List of villages in SIP

SIP # SWN – 8 of Narail Sub-project comprises 24 Villages are fully or partly at 3 Unions and 1 Pouroshova of 1 Upazila under Narail districts. Total area is 3811 ha; figure as showing is table 2.1.1.

Table – 2.1.1 : List of Villages in SIP

Sl. No.

Name of Village Union Upazilla District Remarks

1 Gopikantopur Sahabad Narail Narail

2 SadanandaKathi Sahabad Narail Narail

3 Nayanpur Sahabad Narail Narail

4 Chandpur Sahabad Narail Narail

5 Bishnupur Sahabad Narail Narail

6 Sahidpur Sahabad Narail Narail

7 Mohazon Sahabad Narail Narail

8 Durgapur Narail Pourashova Narail Narail

9 Bahirdanga Narail Pourashova Narail Narail

10 Nanikhir Narail Pourashova Narail Narail

11 Dhakkin Narail Narail Pourashova Narail Narail


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

6

12 Bonogram Mulia Narail Narail

13 Goalbari Mulia Narail Narail

14 Hizoldanga Mulia Narail Narail

15 Sitarampur Mulia Narail Narail

16 Durbajuri Mulia Narail Narail

17 Ichorbaha Mulia Narail Narail

18 Saliarvita Mulia Narail Narail

19 Baliadanga Mulia Narail Narail

20 Mulia Mulia Narail Narail

21 Banshvita Mulia Narail Narail

22 Tolarampur Tolarampur Narail Narail

23 Chamrul Tolarampur Narail Narail

24 Betenga Tolarampur Narail Narail Total 24 4 1 1

Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

2.2 Population

The projected total population according to HHs survey is 14677 of which male 7458 (51%) and 7219 (49%) female. Showing is table 2.2.1 and pie.

Table – 2.2.1 : Population and Sex Ratio

HHs Categories

Population No of HHs Male Female Total

Landless 2691 2477 5168 1163

Marginal 1738 1579 3317 653

Small 1349 1407 2756 494

Medium 1283 1303 2586 413

Large 397 453 850 132

Total 7458 7219 14677 2855 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

Sex Ratio of Population

Male

51%

Fema

le

49%

Male Female

2.3 Adult population

The projected total adult population according to HHs survey depicts that among the eligible (18 years & above) is 8816 of which male 4447 (51%) and 4369 (49%) female. Showing is table 2.3.1 and pie.

Table – 2.3.1 : Adult Population and Sex Ratio (18 years & above)

HHs Categories

Population No of HHs Male Female Total

Landless 1553 1444 2997 1163

Marginal 1053 975 2028 653

Small 825 850 1675 494

Medium 772 815 1587 413

Large 244 285 529 132

Total 4447 4369 8816 2855 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

Sex Ratio of Adult Population

Femal

e

49%

Male

51%

Male Female

2.4 House holds The Present situation of projected that total HHs / Family according to HHs survey is 2855 of which male headed HHs 2767 (97%) and 88 (3%) female headed HHs. Maximum HHs are male headed showing is table 2.4.1 and pie.

Table – 2.4.1 : Male and Female headed HHs and Population

Name of Village

Population HHs

Male Female Total Male Headed

HHs Female Headed

HHs Total HHs


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

7

Gopikantopur 419 407 826 155 17 172

SadanandaKathi 257 271 528 102 4 106

Nayanpur 231 223 454 92 3 95

Chandpur 433 442 875 172 1 173

Bishnupur 342 354 696 131 0 131

Sahidpur 43 38 81 15 0 15

Mohazon 177 184 361 60 1 61

Durgapur 688 595 1283 237 3 240

Bahirdanga 349 338 687 124 3 127

Nanikhir 107 105 212 34 2 36

Dhakkin Narail 349 322 671 148 3 151

Bonogram 244 233 477 68 1 69

Goalbari 147 139 286 47 2 49

Hizoldanga 339 312 651 129 2 131

Sitarampur 372 397 769 146 6 152

Durbajuri 274 265 539 113 3 116

Ichorbaha 318 310 628 121 6 127

Saliarvita 69 74 143 19 0 19

Baliadanga 82 83 165 31 0 31

Mulia 299 291 590 102 6 108

Banshvita 486 433 919 148 4 152

Tolarampur 1045 996 2041 453 18 471

Chamrul 212 228 440 70 2 72

Betenga 176 179 355 50 1 51 Total 7458 7219 14677 2767 88 2855


Male & Female Headed HHs Status

Female

Headed

HHs

3%

Male

Headed

HHs

97%Male Headed HHs Female Headed HHs

2.5 Population of HHs Size Ratio

The Present situation confirmed is observation that the average size of large farmer HHs is also bigger than that of the landless and marginal farmer’s families. Showing is table 2.5.1 and figure of column.

Table – 2.5.1 : Population of HHs Size Ratio

Land owner

Categories

Population No of HHs

HHs Size

Male Female Total

Landless 2691 2477 5168 1163 4.44

Marginal 1738 1579 3317 653 5.08

Small 1349 1407 2756 494 5.58

Medium 1283 1303 2586 413 6.26

Large 397 453 850 132 6.44

Total / Avg.

7458 7219 14677 2855 5.14


Status of HHs Size

4.44 5.08 5.58 6.26 6.44 5.14

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

Landless Marginal Small Medium Large Total /

Avg.

2.6 Age Structure


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

8

Presents the age structure of the population in the house holds survey and this data is perhaps more intriguing. Available age status information showing is table 2.6.1 and pie.

Table – 2.6.1 : Age Structure of HHs Member

Age Group

Population

Male Female Total 1 - 17 2492 2382 4874

18 - 45 3361 3207 6568 46 - 60 1185 1059 2244

61 + 420 571 991

Total 7458 7219 14677 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

Age Structure of Population

0 - 17

33%

18 - 45

45%

46 - 60

15%

61 +

7%

0 - 17 18 - 45 46 - 60 61 +

2.7 HHs category of Land

Land man relationships are immensely important in agriculture. The tenure arrangement influences the whole production system significantly. Main socio-economic condition dimension category of per farmer land identity. 5 kinds of farmer / Family / HHs are very clearly showing at table 2.7.1 and pie. Maximum HHs is landless (41%) and marginal (23%). Basically this overview is very strong and respectively.

Table – 2.7.1 : HHs category of Land owner basis under the village

Name of Village HHs Category of Land

Total Landless Marginal Small Medium Large

Gopikantopur 108 29 14 12 9 172

SadanandaKathi 55 21 14 10 6 106

Nayanpur 27 28 25 13 2 95

Chandpur 60 41 31 30 11 173

Bishnupur 36 35 19 34 7 131

Sahidpur 8 5 1 1 0 15

Mohazon 25 12 7 13 4 61

Durgapur 88 65 49 33 5 240

Bahirdanga 37 31 24 31 4 127

Nanikhir 18 6 7 4 1 36

Dhakkin Narail 55 42 24 25 5 151

Bonogram 21 22 13 12 1 69

Goalbari 18 13 12 4 2 49

Hizoldanga 35 33 43 13 7 131

Sitarampur 84 35 18 11 4 152

Durbajuri 49 19 23 14 11 116

Ichorbaha 62 21 16 17 11 127

Saliarvita 7 5 3 4 0 19

Baliadanga 13 11 4 2 1 31

Mulia 51 24 16 11 6 108

Banshvita 53 40 27 26 6 152

Tolarampur 212 89 79 70 21 471

Chamrul 37 15 8 9 3 72

Betenga 4 11 17 14 5 51

Total 1163 653 494 413 132 2855 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

9

HHs Category of Land

Large

5%Medium

14%

Small

17%

Marginal

23%

Landless

41%

Landless Marginal Small Medium Large

2.8 Male & Female headed HHs category of Land The survey data shows that some landless and marginal female headed HHs is stated in the area. Basically in attendance are poor female families. Obtainable figure is show at table - 2.8.1 and pie.

Table – 2.8.1 : HHs Category of Land owner basis in Male & Female headed HHs in the area

Name of Village

Category of Land Owner Total

Total HHs

Landless Farmer (0-49

Dec)

Marginal Farmer (50-

120 Dec)

Small Farmer (121-247 Dec)

Medium Farmer

(248-500 Dec)

Large Farmer ( >

501) No. of HHs

Male Female

Male Female

Male Female

Male

Female

Male

Female

Male Female

Gopikantopur 95 13 27 2 13 1 12 0 8 1 155 17 172 SadanandaKathi 53 2 20 1 13 1 10 0 6 0 102 4 106

Nayanpur 25 2 27 1 25 0 13 0 2 0 92 3 95

Chandpur 60 0 41 0 30 1 30 0 11 0 172 1 173

Bishnupur 36 0 35 0 19 0 34 0 7 0 131 0 131

Sahidpur 8 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 15 0 15

Mohazon 25 0 11 1 7 0 13 0 4 0 60 1 61

Durgapur 86 2 65 0 49 0 32 1 5 0 237 3 240

Bahirdanga 35 2 30 1 24 0 31 0 4 0 124 3 127

Nanikhir 16 2 6 0 7 0 4 0 1 0 34 2 36 Dhakkin Narail 53 2 41 1 24 0 25 0 5 0 148 3 151

Bonogram 21 0 22 0 13 0 11 1 1 0 68 1 69

Goalbari 16 2 13 0 12 0 4 0 2 0 47 2 49

Hizoldanga 35 0 32 1 42 1 13 0 7 0 129 2 131

Sitarampur 81 3 34 1 17 1 10 1 4 0 146 6 152

Durbajuri 47 2 18 1 23 0 14 0 11 0 113 3 116

Ichorbaha 59 3 19 2 15 1 17 0 11 0 121 6 127

Saliarvita 7 0 5 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 19 0 19

Baliadanga 13 0 11 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 31 0 31

Mulia 47 4 22 2 16 0 11 0 6 0 102 6 108

Banshvita 51 2 39 1 27 0 25 1 6 0 148 4 152

Tolarampur 201 11 87 2 77 2 68 2 20 1 453 18 471

Chamrul 35 2 15 0 8 0 9 0 3 0 70 2 72

Betenga 4 0 10 1 17 0 14 0 5 0 50 1 51 Total 1109 54 635 18 486 8 407 6 130 2 2767 88 2855



SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

10

Category of Land Owner

39%

2%22%

1%

17%

0%

14%

0% 5% 0%

Landless Farmer (0-49 Dec) Male Landless Farmer (0-49 Dec) FemaleMarginal Farmer (50-120 Dec) Male Marginal Farmer (50-120 Dec) FemaleSmall Farmer (121-247 Dec) Male Small Farmer (121-247 Dec) FemaleMedium Farmer (248-500 Dec) Male Medium Farmer (248-500 Dec) FemaleLarge Farmer ( > 501) Male Large Farmer ( > 501) Female

2.9 Occupation Status

Occupation indicates sources of income from work, time spent in work as well as social status. Table shows the main households occupation. Agriculture farming is the main occupation of all categories of farmers. Wage / Daily labourers are mostly found in landless, marginal and small farm families. Trade and business as family occupation is found in all level farmer. IGA is very importance of livelihood development. But IGA is very atypical of found in all level farmer. Also actual fisherman is very exceptional. Maximum populations are being used HHs work and students. The table - 2.9.1 and pie shows in all occupational figures.

Table – 2.9.1 : Occupation

Occupation Categories HHs Category


Agri. Farmer 1455 829 362 172 132 2950

Fisherman 95 34 22 5 4 160

Partial Fisherman 106 42 53 14 21 236

Day Labour 1035 139 82 51 3 1310

Transport Worker 132 85 84 76 6 383

Service Holder 83 115 98 97 101 494

Traders / Businessmen 58 87 73 52 38 308

Student 737 823 1005 1129 238 3932

HHs Works 750 779 726 675 227 3157

IGA 14 4 11 4 5 38

Destitute / Vulnerable Women 38 11 2 0 0 51

Others 665 369 238 311 75 1658

Total 5168 3317 2756 2586 850 14677 NB : IGA = (Handicrafts, Embroidery, Poultry, B. fattening, V. Gardening, Cow rearing, Duck farming, Livestock, Nursery, Hatchery etc.)

NB : Day Labour =(Daily Wage labour, Rajmistri, Daily Agri. Farmer, Carpenters, Blacksmith, Barber, Tailor, Potterman, Hawker, Electrician etc.)

NB : Transport Worker = ( Ricksaw, Van, Bus, Track, Boat, Launch, Tempu, Grambangla & others Driver etc.)

NB : Others = ( Infant, Unemployed, Beggar & Old etc.)

NB.: Service Holder = (GOB, NGO & Private etc.)


About 312 nos traditional fishermen households exists in this sub–unit area since about 7th generation, all are of Hindu religion and social order is in the name of Rajbongshi. Now most of the fisher men have changed their profession in course of time due to lack of open water fish in the river, beel and khals having less availability of fish due to over fishing. Most of the fishermen are now engaged in agriculture, catching fish in the beel during monsoon, some time caching fish in Gher (Close water fishing inland) on hire and fish trading. Most of the fishermen families are becoming affluent day by day; they are taking education and trying to living a better life. 11 nos traditional fishermen households Hindu by religion, having social order of Rajbongshi, Village: Tularampur & Mulia, now they are doing private & Govt. service. As per field data about 60% of traditional fisher men are connected with agriculture, they catch fish in the beel during monsoon and also catch fish in Gher (Close water fishing) on hire; about 28 % of


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

11

traditional fishermen are engaged in culture fish production and fish trading; and about 12% of professional fishermen are fishing in khal and river, fishing in beel during monsoon and fishing in Gher (Close water fishing) on hire. In this area 50 Muslim poor people and 186 Hindu’s fishermen are also catching fish in beel area during monsoon period, actually they are daily labourers, Rikshwa puller etc. They have been shown as part time fishermen. So they have no adverse impact in the traditional Hindu fishermen community.

Main Occupational Status

Agri Farmer

20%

Fisherman

1%

Partial Fisherman

2%

Day Labour

9%

Transport

Worker

3%Service Holder

3%Traders /

Businessmen

2%

Student

27%

HHs Works

22%

IGA

0.26%

Destitute /

Vulnerable

Women

0.34%

Others

11%

Agri Farmer Fisherman Partial Fisherman

Day Labour Transport Worker Service Holder

Traders / Businessmen Student HHs Works

IGA Destitute / Vulnerable Women Others

2.10 Poor / Non Poor population

Figure at table – 2.10.1 and pie summarize the monthly per capita income for the various groups of farmers families in the project area. Maximum Small, Large, medium and marginal farming HHs population income is normally indication of Non poor but landless HHs population 47% is poor.

Table – 2.10.1 : Poor / Non poor population identification Per Capita Income/ monthly in the area

Type HHs Category

Total Landless % Marginal % Small % Medium % Large %

Poor 2462 47.64 829 24.99 453 16.44 364 14.08 89 10.47 4197

Non Poor

2706 52.36 2488 75.01 2303 83.56 2222 85.92 761 89.53 10480

Total 5168 100 3317 100 2756 100 2586 100 850 100 14677

NB : Poor = ( Per capita monthly Tk. 742 < ) and Non Poor = ( Per capita monthly Tk. 742 > ) . Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

Poor and Non Poor Status

Poor

29%

Non

Poor

71%

Poor

NonPoor

2.11 Educational Status

In the project area the literacy rate is 73% which part of the male literacy rate is 39% and the female literacy rate is 34% against the national average of 65%. Figure showing the table 2.11.1 and pie of


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

12

primary level, junior secondary, Secondary, Higher Secondary, Graduate, Self taught and Illiterates data & % figure are presented.

Table – 2.11.1 : Educational Attainment

Education Status

Literacy Rate (%)

Total Male Female

No % No %

Primary (Class I - V) 1762 23.6 1841 25.5 3603

Junior Secondary (Class VI - VIII) 1139 15.3 1250 17.3 2389

Secondary and Equivalent 983 13.2 931 12.9 1914

Higher Secondary and Equivalent 541 7.3 513 7.1 1054

Graduate / Post Graduate and Equivalent 197 2.6 78 1.1 275

Literacy Course / Self taught 1249 16.7 894 12.4 2143

Illiterate 1587 21.3 1712 23.7 3299

Total 7458 100% 7219 100% 14677 Source: HHs Survey, 2008 & 2011, SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

Literacy Rate

Male

40%

Femal

e

38%

Illiterat

e

22%

Male Female Illiterate

Educational Status

25%

16%

13%7%

2%

15%

22%

Primary (Class I - V) Junior Secondary (Class VI - VIII)Secondary and Equivalent Higher Secondary and Equivalent Graduate / Post Graduate and Equivalent Literacy Course / Self taught Illiterate

2.12 Housing Characteristics

In earlier days the roof of a house most prominently depicted the socio-economic status of household in society. But with the paucity of availability of straw / bamboo / katcha and difficulty in maintenance, the poor and non poor also have gone for tin / CI sheet / semi brick wall roofing of the main house. The data shows that figure in the table – 2.12.1 and pie are offered in the present situation at the SIP area.

Table – 2.12.1 : Main Housing Characteristics of HHs

Type of Roof HHs Category


Pucca 87 75 91 104 48 405

Semi Pucca 231 158 109 113 50 661

Tin + Bamboo 601 299 267 188 24 1379

Jute Stick + Straw 124 38 8 - - 170

Kacha 68 54 7 2 - 131

Others 52 29 12 6 10 109



SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

13

Housing Characteristics status

Pucca

14%

Semi Pucca

23%Tin + Bamboo

48%

Jute Stick +

Straw

6%

Kacha

5%

Others

4%

Pucca Semi Pucca Tin + Bamboo Jute Stick + Straw Kacha Others

2.13 Sanitation Status

The toilet facilities for discharging of human waste are important element for healthy and hygienic environment of households. The use of sanitary latrine has improved tremendously over the last decades. The present important Figure showing the table – 2.13.1 and pie.

Table – 2.13.1 : Access to Sanitation of the HHs in the SIP area

Type of Latrine HHs Category


Sanitary / Pucca 87 93 124 139 83 526

Ring Slub 823 479 301 258 32 1893

Katcha / Hanging 169 43 38 11 15 276

Open 84 38 31 5 2 160


Sanitation Status

Sanitary /

Pucca

18%

Ring Slub

66%

Katcha /

Hanging

10%

Open

6%

Sanitary / Pucca Ring Slub Katcha / Hanging Open

2.14 Drinking Water Status

Due to acute scarcity of drinking Water the local people use more than one source for drinking purpose. Table – 2.14.1 and figure of pie shows that in the project area. 93% people are drinking of tube well water, but it is not tested. Table – 2.14.1 : Sources of drinking water of the HHs within the SIP area

Type HHs Category


Tube well 1118 609 465 387 89 2668

Pond / khals / rivers 12 3 0 0 0 15

Others 33 41 29 26 43 172



SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

14

Sources of Drinking Water

Tube

well

93%

Pond /

khals /

rivers

1%

Others

6%

Tube w ell Pond / khals / rivers Others

2.15 Present Health Status

Table – 2.15.1 shows the common disease of the SIP area. Modern medical facilities are not available to large population. For many people the medical facilities are far away and difficult to reach. The health condition of the people in the project area is generally poor. It is found from the sample households that the landless and marginal farmer mostly suffer from water borne disease. The common disease are Gastric, Diarrhea / Dysentery, Influenza / Cough, Jaundice, Pain in Hip / Back etc. figure and % showing the pie.

Table – 2.15.1 : Most common Diseases mentioned by Respondents

Type of Disease HHs Category Total

Landless Marginal Small Medium Large No

Gastric 275 84 125 153 23 660

Diarrhea / Dysentery 212 158 42 29 7 448

Influenza / Cough 369 226 184 113 51 943

Pain in Hip / Back 154 83 64 63 22 386

Jaundice 36 28 13 7 3 87

Others 74 35 39 25 15 188

Diseases Free 43 39 27 23 11 143


Main Disease of Respondent

Disease Free

5%

Others

7%Jaundice

3%

Pain in Hip /

Back

14%Influenza /

Cough

32%

Diarrhea /

Dysentery

16%

Gastric

23%

Gastric Diarrhea / Dysentery Influenza / Cough Pain in Hip / Back

Jaundice Others Disease Free

2.16 Electricity Coverage Status

Out of total house holds maximum respondents answered to the question. Among them 69% HHs mentioned they have electricity connection in their houses. And 31% they have no electricity connection in their houses. Show the table – 2.16.1 and pie.

Table – 2.16.1 : Electricity coverage according to per HHs


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

15

Electricity Status

HHs Category Total

Landless Marginal Small Medium Large No

Yes 728 511 350 276 112 1977

No 435 142 144 137 20 878


Electricity Coverage

No

31%

Yes

69%

Yes

No

3. Findings of the Study Some of the Key findings followed House Holds survey study analyzed below:

The area is connected by a semi paved and unpaved road through which only light transport vehicle (rickshaw/ van/ bicycle) and occasionally light motor van move. Due to constraints in resources and time only the household heads / members were interview on their quantity of land, education, occupation, income and assets etc. owned by them. In the synthesized socio economic data of 24 villages of the SIP has been presented. This gives some insight on general socio economic conditions of the people living under the Hydrological Unit or SIP # SWN – 8. Analysis of these data was supported by Households Survey, field observation report and FGDs. Both data and its analysis were made gender disaggregated. The table shows that 45% populations are within the age 18-45. This demographic situation indicates the existence of a very good number of working age population within the SIP area. Their labour and skills may be utilized for the socio economic development of people living within the SIP area. The average literacy rate although 78% its distribution is more within self taught to post graduate, primary (25%) followed by 16% within VI-VIII, 13% Secondary, 15% Self taught and illiterate is 22%. This indicates also a large percentage of school dropouts especially among poor community. Probably it is the personal initiative that they themselves took this skill training from Government and Non Government Organizations. But this is not a sufficient number to build human capital for socio economic and livelihood development. The project cans intervene in this area at least with a program of skill and business training. Such intervention will contribute to develop socio economic condition and livelihoods of people. The project should also undertake advocacy and awareness creation program to give most basic education under adult no formal education program in collaboration with local elected bodies or through WMA to its beneficiaries. The same is with other social indicators. For example occupation of highest number of people is Agri farming (20%) followed by small trade/ business (2%), actual + partial fishermen (3%), day labour (13%), Transport worker (4%) Service holder in GOB, NGO and private organization (3%), Student (27%), IGA (0.26%), HHs / family works (22%) and Destitute / Vulnerable (0.34%) are also included. The encouraging fact is that the others (infant, old and unemployment) rate is 7% and maximum women are involved in HHs or family work. So, it is big fact of development in the area. Various IGA training is very essential in the area. The project should address this issue by creating alternative employment. The income show that more than 29% of families population monthly income less than Tk. 742, to meet their basic requirement (food, cloth etc) which indicate that they are living below poverty line And 69% families population monthly income more then Tk. 742 which indicate that they are living upper poverty line. As per study the House Hold Survey mentioned by gender and livelihood disaggregated. This


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

16

means medium poverty exists in the SIP area. Poverty reduction measure is therefore a justified intervention by the project. This figure is secure to national average (44.3% as per BBS 2005 sample survey) which justifies the validity of data and also justifies the fact that one of the causes of poverty is landlessness. The project should therefore undertake alternative livelihood enhancement activities to reduce the poverty of landless poor. Indicators on household structure show a little bit better living condition both for poor and non poor including female headed households. 48% of households have houses with Tin Bamboo roofing. Maximum poor / non poor are included in this figure. 23% of HHs has houses with semi pucca (Brick wall + Tin) roofing. Maximum large and medium non poor HHs is included in this figure. On drinking water it is encouraging. Almost 93% including poor and non poor have access to safe drinking water / tube well. In case of sanitation it is worst. 66% HHs have water sealed Ring slub latrine, 18% sanitary latrine, 10% Katcha / hanging and 6% open latrine. The project through WMG should address this issue with technical support from district public health engineering department. Temporary Migration for Employment and Income: This is both a social and an economic problem a large number of families / HHs, approximately 50% FGD members thinkable 0.2% people of out migrate to Bombay, India, UAE, Saudi Arab, Qatar, Quet, Malaysia, Singapore, Korea illegally for hard work (men find work in construction and women in rich men’s house as maid) for a year or two and return with Tk. 30000-35000. They invest this money to construct a house or to buy other asset or to repay loan. 30% of them are harassed by broker, police etc and return with penniless. Some time they remain in jail for several months. Cases of trafficking are reported but not significantly (even less than 1%). The men of these poor families work as illegal worker in construction site and the women work as house maid. Some women also work as construction worker. Such illegal migration is not acceptable. This could only be reduced if the project creates alternative employment opportunities for them. In spite of low illiteracy rate and poor base of physical and human capital / assets, existing natural resources / Beel / canal / river / water may be utilized through better management to improve livelihood of poor community. Intervention by this project through construction / rehabilitation of water structure for an efficient water resource management along with other alternative opportunities will definitely contribute to create more employment and improve livelihood through increased cropping intensity and its yield and an increased fish production which ultimately improve the social and economic condition of people in the SIP area. 4. Focus Group Discussion for the Need Assessment of Gender and Livelihood Enhancement

The objectives of the study is to asses the current poverty & livelihood status, gender & livelihood and Socio-economic situation of the targeted beneficiaries, specially those families and vulnerable women who will be directly or indirectly involved or influenced by the water resource management program of the project. The study was carried out using Participatory Rapid Rural Appraisal (PRRA) method under the overall supervision of the concerned persons of the projects Gender & Livelihood Component. The study techniques applied were Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with marginal farmers, Landless, Share croppers and farm workers group, women’s group and occupational group like fishermen; Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) specially interviewing the formal / informal leaders of community and Local Governments Institutes (LGI), large farmers, businessmen and concerned officials of the governments and non-governments organizations (NGOs). 5. Location of FGD Eight Focus Group Discussion (FGD) were held in the project area and a number of Key Informants Interviews (KIIs) were carried under the study. These provided perception of the communities about the existing water resources with regard to irrigation, drainage condition and flood hazards, and their ideas and priorities about the improvements needs.

At village level, discussion were held with different categories of people, ranging from farmers, fishermen, boatman, small traders, landless, destitute & vulnerable women, union level LGI, UP Chairman & Members, Religious leader, school teacher and others people.

Table – 5.1 : Place of Focus Group Discussion (FGD) SWN – 8


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

17

District Upazila Union Village Date Place Participants

Narail Narail Sodor Tularampur Tularampur 14.05.2008 Exist. Regulator 53

Narail Narail Sodor Tularampur Tularampur 04.05.2011 Betenga village 41

Narail Narail Sodor Mulia Ichorbaha 16.06.2008 Ichorbaha village 54

Narail Narail Sodor Mulia Banshvita 12.06.2008 Banshvita village 47

Narail Narail Sodor Narail Pourashova

Durgapur 17.06.2008 Village Mandir 55

Narail Narail Sodor Sahabad SadanandaKathi 18.05.2008

SadnandaKhati village

69

Narail Narail Sodor Mulia Sitarampur 24.07.2008 Village Mandir 56

Narail Narail Sodor Mulia Mulia 01.05.2011 Exist. Regulator 52

1 1 4 8 Total 427

6. Poverty Poverty has been assessed in this study by making a monthly expenditure for basic need (food, clothing, children education and health care) survey for each individual HHs of villages within the SIP area. The number of poor or incidence of poverty is further validated by comparing with poverty information from Key Informants (Kls), FGDs and literature. 129 Kls or 298 FGD members are comments on poverty situation in this area. According to maximum KIs the incidence of poverty therefore is Acceptable ranges in this area. But according to maximum FGD member’s comments on the incidence of poverty therefore is very highly a range of acceptable in the area. The number of poor or incidence of poverty is further validated by comparing with poverty information from Key Informants (Kls), FGDs and literature. The information of poverty given by Kls and FGDs is given in following table. Table 6.1 : Present Poverty Situation

Ranking : More than 80% = 5 highly acceptable, 50-80% = 4 or acceptable, below 50% = 3 not acceptable)

Discussion matters

Comments of Kls or FGD members

No of Kls or FGD

members commented

Total No of Kls or FGD members

Percentage

(%) Ranking

KIs : How is the poverty situation in the area?

Very high or above 75% 46 129 36% 3 or not

acceptable

High or within the range of 51% - 75% 75 129 58% 4 or

acceptable

Moderate or within the range of 35-49% 8 129 6% 3 or not

acceptable

FGDs : How is the poverty situation in the area?

Very high or above 75% 224 298 75% 5 or highly acceptable

High or within the range of 51% - 75% 45 298 15% 3 or not

acceptable

Moderate or within the range 35-49% 30 298 10% 3 or not

acceptable

7. Causes of Poverty These causes of high poverty as expressed by the majority participants of FGD and Kls 85% of Kls and 90% of FGD participants are very common, logical and justified. They are lack of employment, Decrease of cultivable land, low literacy rate and no facilities for skill development, lack of communication network, Marketing problem, Lack of Credit facilitates, Low wage rate of women and lack of seed & fertilizers problem. These causes are logical and justified. However, the project has limitation to address all the causes. Project’s gender and poverty component may address the employment issues by undertaking tailored made skills training to promote income generating activities for the poor. The projects do not have approved resources allocation or provision to address the other causes directly. However increased


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

18

fishery and crop production due to project intervention will create employment opportunities as a whole which will contribute to reduce poverty. The causes of poverty are relevant to local situation. Most interesting is that the people are aware of it. Their opinion is summarized in the following table: Table- 7.1 : Causes of Poverty


Discussion matters


No of Kls or FGD

members commented

Total No of Kls or

FGD members

Percentage (%)

Ranking

KIs : What do you think what could be the possible causes of so high or high poverty?

Decrease the cultivable land, Lack of employment, low wage, irrigation problem, agriculture seed & fertilizers problem, low literacy rate, Training & skill problem, inadequate credit facilities, lack of communication network.

110 129 85%

5 or highly

acceptable

FGDs : What do you think what could be the possible causes of so high or high poverty?

Decrease the cultivable land, Lack of employment, low wage, irrigation problem, agriculture seed & fertilizers problem, low literacy rate, Training & skill problem, inadequate credit facilities, no industry. Marketing problem.

268 298 90%

5 or highly

acceptable

8. Poverty Reduction According to most FGD participants and key informant skill training, VGD, Old age and Pregnant women allowances, awareness raising and road construction (road, bridge, canal etc.). Under took by the government, although in limited scale, contributed to increase employment opportunity for the people. Maximum number of KIs and FGD participants told that immunization and safe drinking water program implemented by the government agencies made an impact on poverty reduction. The team enquire these facts further by observation and discussing it informally with local people in market place and union parishad / local Govt. body and a few district level and Upazila level government officers like District Women affairs, Rural Development officer, Block Supervisor of DAE etc. who informed the team that government budget is extremely poor compare to need, size of area and number of people and therefore whatever development activities they implement, its impact are forgotten by the people quickly and its visibility disappear although it creates some impact at least on a few poor families

Government Organizations and its Impact

Different agencies / department of government and NGOs implement development program aimed at reducing poverty directly or indirectly. The issue was discussed with the Key informants as they are most aware of it and even involved with it. The following table summarizes their comment / opinion and also result. Table – 8.1 : Poverty Reduction Program undertaken by the Government and non-Government Organizations and its impacts


Discussion matters


Comment on Impact

No of Kls / FGD

Participants

Total No of Kls or

FGD members

Percentage (%)

Ranking

KIs : Development Program undertaken by

Skill Training, VGD, Old age and pregnant women allowance, awareness raising and road construction (road, bridge, canal etc.)

Employment Increased

84 129 65% 4 or

acceptable


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

19

the government and NGOs in this SIP aimed at reducing poverty directly or indirectly.

VGD, Old age and maternity allowances

Impact insignificant on poverty

65 129 55% 4 or

acceptable

Immunization and supply of safe drinking water Contribute

poverty reduction

110 129 85%

5 or highly

acceptable

FGDs : Development Program undertaken by the government and NGOs in this SIP aimed at reducing poverty directly or indirectly.

Skill Training, VGD, Old age and pregnant women allowance, awareness raising and road construction (road, bridge, canal etc.)

Employment Increased

179 298 60% 4 or

acceptable

VGD, Old age and maternity allowances

Impact insignificant on poverty

164 298 55% 4 or

acceptable

Immunization and supply of safe drinking water

Contribute poverty

reduction 268 298 90%

5 or highly

acceptable

Government development program especially Skill training, VGD, Old age and pregnant women allowances, awareness raising and road construction (road, bridge, canal etc.). Although compare to the need it is inadequate it contribute to increase employment and reduce poverty. Immunization, supply of safe drinking water by tube well and family planning service did not contribute to reduce poverty directly, a one third of KIs and FGD participants made opinion that immunization and safe drinking water contribute to poverty reduction process by saving cost of health care and keeping the family size smaller. Transfer or adaptation of new improved agriculture technology and construction of new road linking to city town market place etc. can create tremendous impact on poverty reduction. 9. Gender Participation of situation Demand for Family / HHs Regarding the community level local people to present overall scenario about the participation of male and female members of different issues influencing the livelihood and position of different decision making on the area. The table on present scenario, indicates that the major components to dependent of men are very highly influencing, Participation at the HHs decision making to men and women are medium influencing, Participation at the community level decision to dependent of men are very highly influencing and Knowledge & awareness to men and women are low influencing of the area.

Table - 9.1 : Major Gender Dimension and Participation

Sl. No

Components / Factors Women Men

No L M H No L M H

1 Control over HHs resources (Land, Crop, Cow etc.) √ √

2 Mobility inside the community (relative, shop, group meeting etc.)

√ √

3 Mobility outside the community (market, labour, crop field, hospital, bank, fair, movie etc.)

√ √

4 Participation at the HHs Decision :

a. Decision to have new children √ √

b. Decision to undertake new economic activity √ √

c. Decision to purchase / sell of property √ √

d. Decision to children schooling √ √

e. Decision to children marriage √ √

f. Decision to buy inputs and daily essentials √ √

5 Participation at the Community Decision :

a. Participation in the Mosque / mondir committee √ √

b. Participation in village development activity √ √

c. Participation in school management committee √ √

d. Participation in village salish √ √

e. participation in union parishad √ √

6 Knowledge and Awareness :

a. Law related to marriage and divorce √ √

b. Law related to inheritance rights √ √

c. Legal process to torture and inhuman treatment √ √


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

20

NB : L = Low ; M = Medium ; H = High

10. Present Livelihood Situation in the area Livelihood is maintaining life with its basic means or food, shelter, clothing, health care, safe drinking water etc for which assets are required as described earlier in methodology. The issues on present livelihood situation were discussed with randomly by field facilitators especially with families appeared to be poor, landless and marginal and farmers. Poverty and livelihood relates closely in the way that if poverty reduce livelihood improves proportionately. Some assets like cattle, chicken etc. can be acquired by taking loan from NGOs which are now available. Land is expensive and acquiring it is difficult. Skills can be acquired by training and physical ability to work can be better utilized by creating employment opportunities against wage. It was also examined through Kls (FGD participants declined to comment on this issue) that for what purpose micro credit are being used. These are summarized as follows: 10.1 Impact of Micro Credit It was also examined through FGD and Kls whether micro credit creates an impact on livelihood enhancement and poverty reduction. Majorities of Kls (55%) and FGD participants (70%) who are users of micro credit gave opinion that micro credit help to increase income and improve livelihood. It is summarized as follows: Table – 10.1.1 : Impact of Micro Credit on Livelihood Enhancement and Poverty Reduction


Discussion matters


No of Kls or FGD

commented

Total No of Kls or

FGD members

Percentage

Ranking

Kls : How is micro credit helping in poverty alleviation?

Increasing income, improving livelihood, developing housing, increasing facilities of education and health care. Fish Farm, Beef fattening, Agri farming, Investment of small cottage & handicrafts.

71 129 55% 4 or

acceptable

FGDs : How is micro credit helping in poverty alleviation?

Increasing income, improving livelihood, developing housing, increasing facilities of education and health care. Agriculture Investment.

209 298 70% 4 or

acceptable

10.2 Use of Micro Credit Majorities of Kls told that micro credit are being used for small business, crop cultivation, beef fattening and van purchase. 100% Kls and FGD participants told that NGOs are the biggest providers of micro credit. It is in fact true. BRAC, Grameen Bank, Jagoroni Chakra, Ad-din, Prottasha, RRC, Shabok, Shonirvhor Bangladesh,Akota Samity, Bangladesh Protibandhi Kallyan Samity, Bondhu Kallyan and ASHA are major providers of micro credit. A number of Kls told that Banks especially Gopikantopur Bohumukhi Somobai Samity, Narail Upazila Somobai Samity, BRDB, Krishi Bank, Sonali Bank and also provide credit. The team however could not find its evidence in the area. Thus the role of micro credit can not be ignored for livelihood enhancement. According to most Kls its demand is high and continues to increase. The project should take this advantage. Through WMG they should take collective loan from the bank with low interest and distribute to marginal farmers, landless share croppers and other poor members of WMGs. Such provision now exists in all nationalized banks. Table – 10.2.1 : Use of Micro Credit


Discussion matters

Comments of Kls No of Kls or FGD

Total No of Kls or

FGD

Percentage

Ranking


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

21

commented

members

Kls : what purpose are used of micro credit?

Small business, crop production, cow rearing, beef fattening, Poultry farming, livelihood expenditure, payment of loan, marriage of daughter, house preparation or repair.

116 129 90%

5 or highly

acceptable

FGDs : what purpose are used of micro credit?

Small business, crop production, cow rearing, beef fattening, Poultry farming, livelihood expenditure, payment of loan, marriage of daughter, house preparation or repair.

283 298 95%

5 or highly

acceptable

Key Findings of the Micro credit study Present livelihood is inadequate for most people of SIP area due to the possession of little amount of assets / land, cattle, chicken, skills, low wage etc and under utilization of health asset or physical ability to work. Land being an expensive asset is difficult to acquire by them or though external assistance. However, its productivity can be increased for more income by applying improved technology. Other assets like cattle, chicken, skills etc. can be acquired through generation of additional income, saving and external assistance (micro credit, grant etc.) for a better livelihood.

The role of micro credit can not be ignored for livelihood enhancement. According to most Kls, demand of micro credit is high and continues to increase. The project should take this advantage. Through WMG they should take collective loan from the bank with low interest and distribute to marginal farmers, landless share croppers and other poor members of WMGs. Such provision now exists in all nationalized banks.

The occupational group or fishermen and potters are facing difficulties to maintain livelihood due to reduction of fish population and increased price of potter’s raw materials. They need assistance through alternative employment creation.

Inadequate livelihood created social problem like trafficking of women and children. Especially the poor women need alternative employment to improve their livelihood. Underutilized physical ability of most women may be utilized for income by creasing alternative employment opportunities (non farm). 11. Options for Livelihood Enhancement Activity

Identifying options to support the Livelihood enhancement of poor beneficiaries is one of the major objectives of this study. Related issues on different options of livelihood enhancement were discussed with FGD participants and KIs and the result is summarized in the following tables:

Income Generating Activity

Present livelihood is Agricultural Income Generating Activities is small relevant but non farm income generating activities is not relevant of the area.

Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants on possible IGAs, they verify these recommendations with local realities (resource owned by communities, capital supply, available land, market and credit facilities and institutional support). The team found that the following IGA are technically and economically feasible for the poor families. The team therefore recommended the following livelihoods enhancement for the identified poor families of the area.

Table – 11.1 : Income Generating Activities Situation


Discussion matters

Comments of Kls or FGD

No of Kls/FGD comment

ed

Total No of Kls or

FGD members

Percentage

Ranking


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

22

KIs : what are the agricultural Income Generating Activities of the Area?

Early HYV / Hybrid rice, pulse crop, Vegetables, Integrated Rice and Fish culture, Duck farming, Poultry, Cow & Goat rearing, Beef fattening, Seed processing, Food processing, Oil seeds,

52 129 40% 3 or not accepta

ble

FGD : what are the agricultural Income Generating Activities of the Area?

Early HYV / Hybrid rice, pulse crop, Vegetables, Integrated Rice and Fish culture, Duck farming, Poultry, Cow & Goat rearing, Beef fattening, Seed processing, Food processing Oil seeds,


ble

KIs : what is the probable non farm Income Generating Activities in the area?

Home based jute industry, small business, case culture, organic fertilizer, food processing, masonry, Handicraft,


ble

FGDs : what is the probable non farm Income Generating Activities in the area?

Home based jute industry, small business, case culture, organic fertilizer, food processing, masonry, Handicraft; Home based bamboo work, Pottery.


ble

12. Expectation of the Project The team also carried out FGDs and KIs survey whether the proposed project may create options for their expectation of the project for livelihood enhancement. These are summarized below:

Table – 12.1 : Expectation / Support / Demand of the Local Area


Discussion matters

Comments of Kls

No of Kls/ FGD commen

ted

Total No of Kls or

FGD members

Percentage

Ranking

Kls : What is your Expectation / support / demand?

Increase Income per capita & development

90 129 70% 4 or

acceptable

Increase Agriculture production

Increase small cottage & business Poverty reduction & social development

Education & Health sector development Infrastructure & Communication development Agriculture & Others Marketing

FGDs : What is your Expectation / support / demand?

Increase Income per capita & development

224 298 75% 4 or

acceptable

Increase Agriculture production

Increase small cottage & business Poverty reduction & social development

Education & Health sector development Infrastructure & financial development Agriculture & Others Marketing

Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants on possible for local beneficiary members demand of highly acceptable on Increase Income per capita, Agriculture production, small cottage & business, Poverty reduction & social mobilization, Education & Health sector development, Infrastructure & communication, and marketing of the area. 13. Services of GOB & NGO Structure Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants on present situation on services of GOB is very low (12%) and lack of demand of the area. But NGO supported is comparably is good because 45% people are involved any other NGO and others private credit organization.


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

23

Table – 13.1 : Present Services of GOB & NGO


Discussion matters

Comments of Kls

No of Kls/ FGD

commented

Total No of Kls or

FGD members

Percentage

Ranking

Kls : what are the Service of GOB?

Bank, DAE, DOF, DWA, DOL, PWDB, BWDB, BRDB, BBS, LGI, UP, Upazila & District level all officials, Institutional, Educational & Health , IT services etc.


ble

FGDs : what are the Service of GOB?

Bank, DAE, DOF, DWA, DOL, PWDB, BWDB, BRDB, BBS, LGI, UP, Upazila & District level all officials, Institutional, Educational & Health, IT services etc.


ble

Kls : what are the Service of NGO?

Credit, Institutional service, Educational Service, Information Technology, Health & sanitation etc. services


ble

FGDs : what are the Service of NGO?

Credit, Institutional service, Educational Service, Information Technology, Health & sanitation etc. services

149 298 50% 4 or

acceptable

14. Present Marketing Situation

Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants on present situation on marketing of various product of demand for production status problem is acceptable and highly acceptable. Agriculture product Value of Price is very differential of all market of the area.

Table – 14.1 : Marketing Status


Discussion matters

Comments of Kls

No of Kls/ FGD

commented


Percentage

Ranking

Kls : Do you have any problem to sale your Product & where ?

Value of Price level difference between another market, Agricultural goods, Fishery production, Vegetable marketing, Paddy marketing, Handicrafts marketing, Jute product, Bamboo product, other Crop product marketing.

97 129 75% 4 or

acceptable

FGDs : Do you have any problem to sale your Product & where ?

Value of Price level difference between another market, Agricultural goods, Fishery production, Vegetable marketing, Paddy marketing, Handicrafts marketing, Jute product, Bamboo product, Crop product marketing & Others crop.

238 298 80%

5 or highly acceptable

15. Gender and Women’s Empowerment

Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants for regarding usually the major family / HHs decision are taken from Men and Women both, but maximum people opinion that, major family decision taken from Men.

Table – 15.1 : Decision Making of your Family & any situation


Discussion matters

Comments of Kls Impact

No of Kls/FGD commen

ted

Total No of Kls or

FGD members

Percentage

Ranking

Kls : Who and usually the major family

Regarding HHs income Decision taken

from Male &

65 129 50% 4 or

acceptable

Regarding HHs Expenditure

Regarding buying HHs assets Regarding selling HHs assets


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

24

decision are taken?

Regarding children assets Female Regarding children marriage

Regarding birth control Regarding Election / voting / other

FGDs : Who and usually the major family decision are taken?

Regarding HHs income

Decision taken

from Male & Female

134 298 45%

3 or not

acceptable

Regarding HHs Expenditure

Regarding buying HHs assets Regarding selling HHs assets Regarding children assets Regarding children marriage Regarding birth control Regarding Election / voting / other

16. Present Migration Situation

Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants of Out Migration status is very low (0.2%), Out of migration people at outside of country level various type of jobs. Because out of migration are Available job, Higher wages, big family, Debt ness, Social conflict and NGO loan of the major criteria in the area.

Table – 16.1 : Out Migration Status


Discussion matters

Comments of Kls

No of Kls/FGD comme

nted

Total No of Kls or

FGD members

Percentage

Ranking

Kls : What is your Out Migration Situation in area?

Out of migration People 5% in the area

77 129 60% 4 or

acceptable

Available job, Higher wages, big family

Debt ness, Social conflict

FGDs : What is your Out Migration Situation in area?

Out of migration People 5% in the area

149 298 50% 4 or

acceptable

Available job, Higher wages, big family

Debt ness, Social conflict

17. Future Scenario of the Project

Although the study team took opinion from KIs and FGD participants Everymen are well-disposed that the proposed project will be helpful for improvement of livelihood of poor and poverty alleviation.

Table – 17.1 : Livelihood Enhancement to be created by Proposed Project


Discussion matters Comments of Kls or FGD

members

No of Kls or FGD

members commented


Percentage

Ranking

Kls: Do you agree that the proposed project will be helpful for improvement of livelihood of poor and poverty alleviation? (If yes then what?)

Yield of crop and fish will be increased and new employment will be generated.

103 129 80%

5 or highly acceptable

Income will be increased

Food supply will be increased

Food price will be increased

others

FGDs: Do you agree that the proposed project will be helpful for improvement of livelihood of poor and poverty alleviation? (If yes then what?)

Yield of crop and fish will be increased and new employment will be generated. 238 298 80%

5 or highly acceptable Income will be increased

Food supply will be increased

Key Findings


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

25

All FGD participants including the participants from potters and fishermen community and Kls suggested the implementation of proposed project to promote livelihood enhancement activities through increased income, more food supply at reduced price and more employment.

All however shows similar conditions which are: People live in cluster (village) around the elevated side of beel using the beel for crop cultivation and fishing as major livelihood activities. A paved road on eastern side of beel and other connecting road leading to beel area provide facilities to bring the beel products to home and market. Which also support the crop and fish farming? Schools, religious centers / Mosque / Temple, local government offices, market provide ample social evidence that people are involved in managing the existing resource / land, water, river, canal etc for their livelihood. It justifies that crop and fish farming is two major and potential livelihood enhancement activities.

The FGD report shows that the NGOs are directly providing most micro finance service to the people of SIP. The NGOs are Grameen Bank, BRAC, TMSS, Islami Bank, Palli Daridra, Proshikha, Daridro Bimochon, Susebok, Sawnirvar Bangladesh, Banchte Shekha, Burea Bangladesh, RRF, Shakti Foundation, Jagoroni Chakro, Add-din, Bondhu Kallyan, Durbar Foundation and ASHA. Only a few participants are provided by Government institution (BRDB, Krishi Bank, Sonali Bank etc). For livelihood enhancement credit is needed. The FGD report provides important information that NGOs are the major sources of credit and their cooperation and assistance are required for livelihood enhancement of the poor. Finally project is exceptionally necessitated of the area. 18. Objective of the Gender & Livelihood Enhancement Perspectives (GLEP) Asses the existing gender and livelihood demand identify the local resources and recommended the possible interventions to be incorporated in the SIP # SWN – 8 of the Southwest Area integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Plan (SAIWRPMP).

For attaining the project objectives earmarked as the enhanced livelihood and livelihood opportunities impacted by integrated water resources management as result of increased user participation and improved decentralized service delivery.

In order to asses the present socio-economic condition, a Participatory Rapid Rural Appraisal (PRRA) was conducted. Based on the PRRA findings, following information was analyzed and possible means for livelihood enhancement strategy were identified.

From the analysis of options for livelihood enhancement and the study team’s observations and discussion with business and other relevant people a list of feasible livelihood activities is prepared which is as follows: 19. Feasible Livelihood enhancement Activities

Sl. No

Name of the livelihood enhancement activities

Justification / Feasibility

1. Homestead vegetable gardening, fruit tree at homestead and timber tree plantation by the roadside and embankment

Suitable for poor and marginal farmers and landless share croppers because they do not sufficient land accept homestead by at the same time interested to increase their income. The products have a guaranteed market in the area and the profit margins are high (estimated 60-70%).

2. Food processing specially rice based food processing (puffed rice, rice ball, till toffee, pressed rice etc.)

A profitable activity where women from landless poor households will be employed, their income will increase and their livelihood will be enhanced. The product has demand in local market.

3. Duck farming including mini hatchery

There is no problem of marketing duck and eggs. Profit margin is high / almost 70%. The area has good natural condition / river, canal, water body etc. for duck rearing

4. Poultry farming including mini hatchery

There is no problem of marketing Meat and eggs. Profit margin is high / almost 60%. The area has good natural condition / river, canal and green level ground area for poultry farm.


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

26

5. Cow Rearing farm There is no problem of marketing Meat and eggs. Profit margin is high / almost 50%. The area has good natural condition / river, canal and green level ground area for Cow Rearing farm.

6. Beef fattening farm There is no problem of marketing Meat and eggs. Profit margin is high / almost 50%. The area has good natural condition / river, canal and green level ground area for Beef fattening farm.

7. Home based bamboo work This activity is getting popular in the area. Already some poor and marginal farmer families undertook this activity. Others are interested but capital and skill limits the promotion of this activity. There is already adequate market for bamboo products / basket / sieve / winnower etc. The profit margin is estimated to be 60-80% which is very reasonable.

8. Home based Jute work The area is Jute growing area. It is available at low cost during season. Many useful items like rope, mat, bag etc. can be making with it at home using appropriate technology. The product has good market in local area and also at Narail & Jessore town.

9. Pottery There is some professional potters group. They need to support by the project. Potters product is used in rice storage and processing. The product has good market and the profit margin is 70-80%.

10. Tailoring & Handicrafts This activity is getting popular in the area. Already some poor and marginal farmer families undertook this activity. Others are interested but capital and skill limits the promotion of this activity. There is already adequate market for Handicrafts goods. The profit margin is estimated to be 50-60% which is very reasonable.

11. Packet / Box / Shopping Bag This activity is getting popular in the area. Already some poor and marginal farmer families undertook this activity. Others are interested but capital and skill limits the promotion of this activity. There is already adequate market for paper box / packet. The profit margin is estimated to be 60-80% which is very reasonable.

20. Strategies for Implementation of Livelihood Enhancement Program

The findings on important issues studied through PRRA / Focus Group Discussion under this project provide the basis and justification to formulate strategies for implementation of program for livelihood enhancement, these are follows:

20.1 Targeting the number of Poor Beneficiaries for Project Assistance

Under the section incidence of poverty the number of poor households has been estimated 29%. All of them may not be able to participate in livelihood enhancement program due to engagement in housework, field work, pregnancy, lactation of children etc. On the other hand resource is also a constraint to address all the poor. Therefore, one fifth of the poor which is approx. Gender are targeted for project intervention. Once their capacity building is completed they undertake income generating activities and the others will adopt these through social induced method. Budget allocation per WMO in DPP was also considered to make the target for livelihood enhancement activities.

Gender Dimension of Targeting: On the basis of the findings in section incidence of poverty and causes of poverty that, “women faces difficulties of poverty more than men, they have little opportunities to work outside against wage, they are the victims of trafficking and a few women who work outside their wages are less than men”, the target number need to be split out equally for both women and men.

20.2 Transparency to be maintained in selection process to have right kind of beneficiaries

Livelihood program implementation needs beneficiary selection ahead. An unplanned selection will lead to chaotic situation. Transparency is too maintained to have right kind and deserving beneficiaries. This can achieved if selection is made by a well established selection board following a set of well chosen criteria.


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

27

A selection board consisting of a representative of WMG, relevant UP member, and a representative sub project is being proposed here. This should be reviewed and finalized. Based on findings that skills, credit, orientation on improved technology and undertaken IGA are required for livelihood enhancement, the following criteria are being proposed here for discussion, review and finalization:

The beneficiary must be a member of a poor family whose monthly expenditure per family member is below Tk. 742 (upper poverty line).

He or she must be within working age preferably below 50 and above 18. He or she must be permanent resident of project area. He or she must below interest to join skill, business and marketing training for livelihood

enhancement. He or she should guarantee that after the training business / IGA will be undertaken by herself or

himself He or she must join as member in the local WMG.

20.3 Ensuring Appropriate Institutional Arrangement for Implementation of GLEP

Livelihood enhancement program targeting the poor involve activities at the grass root level. Identifying the poor families, selecting the poor beneficiaries, aware and motivate them to acquire skills and undertaken IGA, organizing training and orientation for them, linking them with the market, arranging for them required financial capital etc. need local expertise and organizational and financial capacity. Government agency including BWDB may have technical expertise for implementing technical activities like design, construction, technology, demonstration etc. But they do not have capacity and expertise to handle the poor directly at the grassroots level as required for livelihood enhancement of poor people.

Some XO of SMO, PMO Facilitators and NGOs are implementing similar livelihood activities at Narail & Jessore area. They have required capacities to handle the poor at the grass root level for livelihood enhancement.

Livelihood enhancement program, specially identifying and selecting poor beneficiaries, creating awareness, financing, organizing and involve the poor in livelihood enhancement activities, locally are therefore proposed to be implemented by outsourcing through appropriate NGOs working in the relevant project area under the supervision of this project. 21. Gender Dimension of the Livelihood Enhancement

Some of the gender issues are related to livelihood. These are the cases of divorce, violence against women, women headed households, marriage registration, birth registration and child marriage. The issues were discussed with women participants openly and some times privately on individual basis to maintain privacy. The marriage and birth registration have improved. More than 80% marriage and 70% birth were registered through Union Council. As reported by the women participants of FGD and women key informants, this contributed the decline of divorce and child marriage. Of course awareness raising by NGOs and Government program / radio / television etc. also contributed to the decline of it. Due to government incentive (food or cash incentive to poor children) primary school enrollment of girls is almost more than 70%.

VGD and VGF program are currently implemented by the government. The program has contributed to enhance livelihood of poor households to very limited extent.

Employing women in operation and maintenance of water structure; there is another gender dimension to enhance the livelihood of vulnerable women (FHH). Generally men are employed in operation and maintenance of the water structure and they get financial benefit. It is here suggested that along with men equal number of women must also be given opportunity for this activity.

In the construction of embankment and canal digging vulnerable women must be involved, minimum 50%, through LCS. 21.1 Recommendation

After analyzing the HHs Survey data analysis, PRA study reports and other related documents comprehensive mitigation measures are suggested:

Gender and Livelihood Enhancement Awareness raising campaign among WMGs members/ community leaders / UP members / Line Agencies (DWA / DAE / DOF / DOF / concerned NGOs.


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

28

Legal Aid support for ensuring good governance, gender balanced family, women trafficking, polygamy and working environment.

Organize skills development training of the target group beneficiaries.

Facilitate linkage development activities with the resources organizations for the livelihood enhancement programs promotion/credit support/technologies of the target group beneficiaries.

Promote gender awareness programs to ensuring women’s rights and their entailment.

Ensure women involvement, especially vulnerable women in water management organization as executive committee member (as per GPWM-minimum one third) and general committee 50%.

Poor fishing community / landless member of the community will be involved in WMGs.

Vulnerable women will be form groups as LCs for canal digging, construction of embankment.

Disadvantage poor community / vulnerable women will get access in khash land / canal side tree plantation / nursery rising.

Fishing community/poor families will access for fish culture in borrow pit.

Training on organizational management / leadership development / participatory planning/ resource mobilization and linkages / business development & marketing / banking transaction / poverty alleviation & management / women’s empowerment / LCS formation and poverty alleviation & management.

Gender awareness training for both male and female in target level;

Motivational and communicational skill development training for WMGs representatives

Monitoring, supervision and follow up training for WMGs representatives,

Mobilization of youth group to protect violence;

Ensure extension services to the WMGs / target beneficiaries for getting information / technology at regular basis (when require).

Legal Aid support for ensuring good governance and gender balanced family and working environment.

The GLEP will be in line with and complementary to the Gender Action Plan (GAP).

21.2 In brief GLEP will have the following special features

Increase involvement of the line agencies.

Capacity building of the beneficiaries on identified potential IGAs including business promotion and marketing linkages.

Awareness rising on gender issue legal rights, women violence etc.

Utilization of local resources & poverty & management.

Facilitation for linkage & communication skill.

Assistance for empowering women and poor people / fishing community.

22. Guideline for Selection of IGA

a. WMG member with the support of NGO facilitators first identify the local level potential IGA activities which are profitable and easily marketable in the local market.

b. Market assessment involving the selected member needed for finalization of the IGA. c. The candidate member / group of members must apply to Managing Committee (MC) for having

support from the project / or other sources: other GO (DAE / DOFi / DOF (Social Forestry) / DOL / DOL (Land) / DOYD / BRDB /DWA / DSS etc) NGOs / Private sectors etc. and fill up a prescribed from prepared by WMG with the support of PMO / NGO facilitator.

22.1 Following are the possible steps for facilitating the organization of IGA for the target groups’ members:

a. After assessment by the committee (Representative from the Managing Committee / NGO facilitators / GFP, PMO / SMO) minimum 15 of thus selected poor members of the WMG (per village 50% members) will be selected where 50 percent at least will be vulnerable women for support by the project.

b. The identified participants will get skill training through local level organizations / NGOs / private sector first.

c. In some cases resource person in the training could be engaged from outside as per skill need for the identified IGA.

d. Participants could be sent to other concerned organizations / for be required skills


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

29

e. Trained targeted poor WMG members who will be involved in the IGA, if needed, they will be supported to link to the concerned financial institutes (Govt. banks / commercial banks / NGOs) for micro credit / SME loans [10% quota kept for women (Ref. Bangladesh Bank)]

f. Marketing linkages will be supported by the G&L PMO & NGO facilitators g. LCS will be organized by the poor beneficiaries (minimum 50 percent vulnerable women), supported

by WMG / PMO / SMO / ASG to carry out earthwork as “D” class contractor h. Targeted poor WMG members will be linked to the concerned authority of the Department of Land

(DOLA) /Deputy Commissioner to have Khash Land / Borrow pit (for the tree plantation beside the embankment and LGED paved & unpaved road/ nursery raising / fish culture etc) for involving poor / vulnerable women members of WMG.

23. Gender & Livelihood enhancement Training Plan

Annex - 1

Detailed Costing

Sl. N

o.

Topic of Training

Participants

Number of

Participants

(Female)

Tra

inin

g

Allo

wa

nc

e/ D

ay

No

. o

f T

rain

ee

No

. o

f D

ay

Tra

inin

g

Allo

wa

nc

e (

To

tal)

(axb

xc)

= d

No

. o

f S

es

sio

n

Ho

no

rari

um

Ra

te/

Sessio

n

N

o.

of

Gro

up

s

To

tal

Ho

no

rari

um

(exfx

g)

= h

Sn

ac

ks

& L

au

nch

To

tal

Fo

od

(bxi)

= j

Mis

cell

an

eo

us

(k)

Gra

nd

To

tal

L =

(d+

h+

j+k)

a b c d e f g h i j k l

(Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.

) (Tk.)

(Tk.)

(Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.)

1.

Homestead vegetable gardening, fruit tree at homestead and timber tree plantation by the roadside and embankment

WMG Membe

rs 60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3

14400

200 1200

0 10000

78400

2.

Rice based food processing / puffed rice, rice ball, rice cake etc

WMG Membe

rs 60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3

14400

200 1200

0 10000

78400

3.

Duck / Koile bird farming along with mini hatchery

WMG Membe

rs 60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3

14400

200 1200

0 10000

78400

4.

Home based bamboo work / storage and processing basket, and marketing

WMG Membe

rs 60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3

14400

200 1200

0 10000

78400

5.

Home based jute works

WMG Membe

rs 60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3

14400

200 1200

0 10000

78400

6.

Pottery / improved design for rice storage and processing pot etc

WMG Membe

rs 60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3

14400

200 1200

0 10000

78400

7.

Gender Awareness

WMG Membe

rs 60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3

14400

200 1200

0 10000

78400

8.

Tailoring / Handicrafts / Embroidery

WMG Membe

rs 60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3

14400

200 1200

0 10000

78400

9.

Packet / Box / Shopping Bag

WMG Membe

rs 60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3

14400

200 1200

0 10000

78400

10.

Cow Rearing / Beef fattening

WMG Membe

rs 60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3

14400

200 1200

0 10000

78400

11.

Mashrum Cultivation & Marketing

WMG Membe

rs 60 (30) 350 60 2 42000 8 600 3

14400

200 1200

0 10000

78400

12.

Motivational Tour

WMG Membe

rs

200 (100)

350 200 2 14000

0 8 600 3

14400

200 4000

0 30000

254400

Training costing for 2 WMG 1116800

Tentative 11 WMG for SWN – 8, (5.5 x 1116800) 6142400

Total cost for Gender & Livelihood Enhancement Plan; SWN – 8 ; 6142400

Program implementation cost (Follow-up on post training activities, linkage with resources, marketing promotional activities, demonstration / piloting in sample basis (initial capital for destitute women only) etc.

24. Monitoring


SAIWRPMP, BWDB.

30

Monitoring and evaluation will be carried out side by side: GFP / PMO / SMO / ASG / project personnel / MC of WMG & WMA will form a monitoring committee and will provide a quarterly report to the PMO / Project authority, copy to Gender and Poverty Component (GPC).

25. Goals / G&L Enhanced Policy of SAIWRPMP

The major goals of are as follows:

To establish participation of water resources operation and maintenance for women capacity building.

To minimum 70% poor / non poor women are always contribution of any water related program.

To minimum 50% poor / non poor women are targeted of any other IGA participation.

To minimum 50% poor / non poor women are targeted of various IGA / Skill / WMG / leader ship empowering / capacity building / Agri based / Fish farm / O&M of water structures training.

To minimum 50% poor / non poor women are always contribution of WMG program.

To establish equality between men and women in all spheres of livelihood.

To ensure women’s security in all sphere of state, society and family.

To ensure empowerment of women in the fields of politics, administration and the economy.

To financial / credit facility as per WMG activity for IGA.

To the 100% poverty / impoverished reduced for women participation require is always of any water resource program.

To establish Women’s human rights.

To develop women as educated and efficient human resources.

To free women from the curse of poverty.

To eliminate existing discrimination against men and women.

To acknowledge women’s contribution in social and economic sphere.

To eradicate all forms of oppression on women and girls.

To establish equality between men and women in administration, politics, education, culture, sports and all other economic activities.

To devise and import technology congenial to the interest of women and ban use of technology harmful to women.

To take adequate measures to ensure women’s health and nutrition.

To ensure priority of women in the arrangement of hoisting and providing suitable shelter for women.

To meet the needs of women especially in difficult circumstances.

To ensure security for widows, divorced, unmarried and childless women.

To reflect gender perspective in mass-media by projection positive image of women.

To provide assistance on flourishing creativity of meritorious and talented women.

To provide support services in the advancement of women.

26. Conclusion Many thanks for the cooperation of the PMO & SMO official’s staff of the BWDB, ISPM Consultants of BWDB such as Research Assistant, Senior Facilitator, Community Facilitator, XO of SMO, NGO Facilitator, and Project Beneficiaries local members in collecting data, checking the filled-in questionnaires, data entry, data cleaning, and editing the entered data in the computer database. Without their help it would have not been possible to complete the Baseline House holds survey Report.

We also convey our thanks to all our colleagues of Socio-economy Division and Research Cell of Gender & Livelihood, BWDB for their tireless efforts at all stages of conducting the survey and to all who contributed in producing and improving the report. Whatever is found useful in this report is all due to these inputs from various colleagues. However, the production of this report itself has been a valuable experience for the Report Writing Team. This report is a one-hundred percent BWDB product and that is very much in line with the objectives of Gender & Livelihood enhancement plan of SAIWRPMP: women empowering, capacity building and poverty reduced integrated institutional strengthening competence upsurge.

One of the important issues of the project objective is to enhanced livelihood through created IGA opportunities in collaboration with Government and Non-Government organizations. The feature of the gender & livelihood of SIP # SWN – 8 (Tularampur Scheme) already mentioned in this report which are come across by the study. May wish the project will take initiative for better livelihood situation to alleviate of poverty reduction.

Finally, we are thankful to the All.

Annex – E

Annex-E

BWDB-SAIWRPMP WMO formation in SWN-8 Tularampur

0

Developing Water Management Organizations

(WMO) in SWN-8

Table of Contents

Sl. No Heading

Page No

1. Summary 3 2. Introduction 3 3. Phases Involve in WMO Development 4 4. Location 4 5. Levels of Water Management Organization 7 6. a) Water Management Group, Principles followed to from

WMG and to identify potential WMG members within DBA. b) Water Management Association

7

8

7. Key Activities involved in development WMO a) List of Beneficiaries b) Organizing WMO c) Formation of WMG d) Registration of WMO e) WMO proceeds within O & M activities

8

8 8 8 8 8

8. Training Program 9 9. Monitoring Indicators 9

10. Table – 1 : Villages of SIP 5 11. Table – 2 : Planned Formulation for Organizing WMO 6 12. Annex – 1 : Representation of WMO Structures 11 13. Annex – 2 : WMO Formation at- a- glance 12 14. Annex – 3 : Barchart WMO activities 13

Annex-E


1

Summary FCD/ 1 Projects may either enhance the community integration or it may make the people quarrel. This became ironically true for most of FCD/ 1 projects of the erstwhile WAPDA installed in the early sixties. Planners during the time nursed the theory that as soon as water is made available to farmers, farmers will utilize irrigation water and food production will be doubled. But in reality, farmers felt reluctant to use irrigation water in different parts of the country. Although irrigation canals were completed in record period with an excellent level of engineering skills, an integrated approach with farmers participation was totally missing. So in many areas farmers strongly oppose the FCD/ 1 systems. Participatory management has received a lot of attention in recent years as a result of commercialization and privatization of Government agencies in many parts of the world. It is recognized that participation of the farmers plays an important role in increasing agriculture production and performance improvement of FCD/ 1 systems. One of the ways of institutionalizing participatory Water Management in public sector FCD/ 1 system is to establish a formal mechanism for interaction between beneficiaries and agency personnel. From the survey it reveals that 13 local NGOs are working in the SIP area. About 90% of them are involved in credit & the rests are working with health, education etc. But none is involved is water management sectors. For SIP # 8 proposed 11 WMG and one WMA will enable beneficiaries to discuss, negotiate and participate in decision making with the agency on various issues of water managements. Introduction The Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning & Management Project (SAIWRPMP), with the assistance of Asho Samaj Gori (ASG) an NGO contracted by the project, will utilize a clear, step-by- step and participatory process in the formation, strengthening and mobilization of WMOs. ASG through its cadre of facilitators will be primarily responsible for developing the capacity of WMOs to manage their water-related resources on their own. This process of WMO Development is guided by the provisions of the Guidelines for Participatory Water Management (GPWM) and will be adopted in the formation of WMOs in the Narail and Chenchuri Beel sub-projects then reviewed, adjusted and fine tuned based on the actual field experiences from these 2 sub-projects to make it more responsive to the needs and requirements of the other sub-projects under SAIWRPMP. As proposed in the inception report, the process of WMO development has 6 phases as illustrated below:

Phases Involved in WMO Development

Phase Description of Each Phase Time frame

1 Rapport and knowledge building phase Months 1 & 2

2 Problem analysis and service identification phase Months 3 – 9

3 Organization building phase Months 3 – 9

4 Capacity building phase Months 10 -12

5 SIP Implementation 1 Year

6 Management transfer phase After completion of rehabilitation works

Location

Annex-E


2

SIP # 8 of Narail sub-project is located in 4 Unions (Mulia, Tolarampur, Sahabad and Narail Pourashava) of Narail Upazila under Narail District. 24 villages from these Four Unions are associated (fully or partly) within this SIP # 8 (Table-1 & 2). SIP # 8 is popularly known as Mulia khal (canal) area and bounded by the river Chitra to the east and the Afra to the west.

Table – 1: Villages of SIP # 8 on GPS Study Sl. No. Name of villages GPS Remarks

1 Gopikantapur N-230 12.096` E-890 29.313`

Medium Village

2 Sadanandakathi N-230 12.064` E-890 28.913`

Medium Village

3 Chanpur N-230 11.733` E-890 28.781`

Medium Village

4 Nayanpur N-230 11.487` E-890 28.421`

Medium Village

5 Banshvita N-230 09.891` E-890 28.995`

Medium Village

6 Sitarampur N-230 09.701` E-890 28.249`

Medium Village

7 Hizaldanga N-230 09.345` E-890 28.067`

Medium Village

8 Durbazuri N-230 09.662` E-890 27.586`

Medium Village

9 Icharbaha N-230 09.281` E-890 28.375`

Big Village

10 Shaliarvita N-230 08.905` E-890 27.427`

Small Village

11 Baliadanga N-230 08.840` E-890 27.561`

Very Small Village

12 Chamrul N-230 10.427` E-890 26.373`

Medium Village

13 Mulia N-230 08.754` E-890 27.573`

Medium Village

14 Beatanga N-230 10.510` E-890 27.263`

Medium Village

15 Tularampur N-230 10.618` E-890 26.445`

Very Big Village

16 Goalbari (part) N-230 09.469` E-890 29.413`

Small Village

17 Durgapur

N-230 18892` E-890 47253`

Medium Village

18 Bahirdanga

N-230 18744` E-890 48786`

Medium Village

19 Bishnupur N-230 18680` E-890 47386`

Medium Village

20 Sahidpur N-230 17844` E-890 467194`

Small Village

21 Mohazon N-230 186.80` E-890 46925`

Medium Village

22 Bongram N-230 08.952` E-890 28.488`

Medium Village

23 Nanikhir N-230 08.843` E-890 28.972`

Big Village

24 Dakhin Narail N-230 09.15.2` E-890 29.39.9`

Big Village

Annex-E


3

Table- 2: Planned Formulation for Organizing WMOs in SIP # SWN - 8

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project

WMO Activities during January 1-15, 2010

SIP # SWN – 8 Members enrolled

Sl.

No

Name of WMG

(with cl. Villages)

Date of

WMG

Formation

Area

(Ha)

Planned

Members

(1 from

each HHs)

Potential #

of

Members

(70%)

Last

Month

Current

M. Total

(Female)

General

Election

Held on

Target Date

of

Submission

to DoC for

Registration

Date of

Monthly

Meeting

Members

enrolment

meeting

Executive

Committee

meeting

General

meeting

Capital *

formation

(Tk.)

Bank A/C

No.

Responsibi

lity

1. Boishakhi WMG (S- 8/ 1), Tulrampur

11.4.09

344

471

330

95

105

(29)

8.12.09

24.1.10

1st Saturday

of each month

1.1.10

1.1.10

8.12.09

9550

5472

S.Bank,Tularampur

Bidhan

2. Balaka WMG

(S- 8/ 1 A),

Chamrul & Betenga

11.4.09

170

123

86

108

108

(28)

7.11.09

24.1.10

2nd

Saturday of each month

11.1.10

11.1.10

14.12.09

10500

5483 &

5482

S.Bank,Tularampur

Kumaresh

3. Borsha WMG (S- 8/ 2), Gopikantopur & Sadanandakhati

29.9.09

377

278

194

103

105 (65)

14.11.09

24.1.10

Last Tuesday of

each month

9.1.10

7.12.09

14.12.09

11300

7774 S. Bank,

Rupgonj.

Akbar

4. Sraboni WMG (S- 8/ 3), Bishnupur, Sahidpur & Mohazon

30.9.09

315

207

145

74

76 (24)

14.11.09

24.1.10

21st of each month

7.1.10

10.12.09

14.12.09

6640

5617-0

Pubali Bank,

Narail

Afroza

5. Sapla WMG (S- 8/ 4), Chanpur & Nayanpur

5.9.09

398

268

187

100

105

(25)

13.11.09

21.1.10

5th of each

month

6.1.10

2.12.09

13.12.09

13410

7755

S. Bank,

Rupgonj.

Afroza

6. Mollika WMG (S- 8/ 5), Sitarampur & Hizoldanga

27.3.09

417

283

198

92

112

(36)

11.11.09

18.1.10

24th of each

month

5.1.10

5.1.10

11.12.09

25000

7606

S. Bank, Rupgonj.

Razia

7. Jaba WMG (S -8/ 6), Banshvita

30.3.09

313

152

106

85

101

(35)

6.11.09

31.1.10

23rd of each

month

2.12.09

14.12.09

6.12.09

34000

7610

S. Bnak,

Rupgonj.

Suvankar

8. Haimonty WMG (S- 8/ 7), Durgapur & Bahirdanga

18.9.09

324

367

257

171

196

(87)

2.11.09

19.1.10

20th of each

month

9.1.10

9.12.09

2.12.09

19200

7769

S. Bank, Rupgonj.

Akbar

9. Agrani WMG (S- 8/ 8), Durbajuri & Ichorbaha

29.3.09

396

243

170

107

121

(52)

5.11.09

24.1.10

Last Sunday

of each

month

13.1.10

13.12.09

5.12.09

13770

5512

S. Bank,

Rupgonj.

Tokarem

10. Falguni WMG (S- 8/ 9), Saliarvita, Baliadanga & Mulia

25.3.09

318

158

107

62

69 (32)

3.11.09

24.1.10

22nd of each month

10.1.10

10.12.09

3.12.09

7100

7605 S. Bank,

Rupgonj.

Razia

11. Chaity WMG (S- 8/ 10), Bonogram,

27.3.09

442

305

213

138

138 (70)

7.11.09

24.1.10

27th of each month

5.1.10

13.12.09

7.12.09

9100

7660 S. Bank,

Kumaresh

Annex-E


4

Levels of Water Management Organization in the SIP # 8 1. Water Management Group (WMG) The Southwest project intends to establish Water Management Organizations (WMOs) that will in future be able to take care of O&M of the water infrastructure in their area. The areas are defined on hydrological basis, called subunits of the subproject area. Further subdivision is based on “sub-schemes” basis within the sub-units, that are defined as the command area (CA) of the main regulator discharging to the river. The GPWM distinguishes three tiers of WMO for projects of 5000 hectares or more:

Water Management Group (WMG) at the lowest level for each smallest hydrological unit or Social Unit (Para or Village).

Water Management Association (WMA) at the mid level for each project or system.

Water Management Federation (WMF) at the apex level of the project/scheme.

Principles followed to form WMG and to identify potential WMG members within DBA: In SWAIWRPMP, following this 3- tires model the principle followed is that a hydrologically delineated DBA based WMG shall be formed within each SIP area. SIP # 8 covers 2 regulators (1 is proposed), 7 WM structures, 24 Villages in 4 Unions. 24 Villages are clustered into 11 groups for organizing 11 WMGs. In clustering the villages following factors are considered: a) Future O & M of water infrastructure in their area b) Social complexcity c) Maintaining minimum distance to facilitate WMG members to attend meeting place. d) Maintaining (as per as possible) administrative boundaries (Village or Union boundaries) for each WMG. e) Common and acceptable nomenclatures of each WMG. f) Overall, technically feasible & socially acceptable Section of the water infrastructure are the basis of WMG formation. Nomenclatures of each WMG is proposed on popular artistic names of Bangla Months / Seasons in consultation with stakeholders (Table- 2).To identify potential WMG members mouza maps are used. Mouza maps of the Directorate of Lands are overlaid in DBA map developed by the SW project to identify the related villages (fully or partly). The villages are then screened to identify plot numbers. Superimposed DBA thus obtained are then further verified through ‘Google Earth’. Next task is to identify the names of plot owners. Normally Upazila Sub- Register’s office (Land Registry office) is the source where names of actual land owners are available. This ownership record are in huge quantity which contains both minor and adults. But for WMG formation only adult land owners (above 18 years) of small area is needed. To prepare a reliable & actual land ownership list for each WMG, one or two senior resource persons were picked- up as volunteers from the local Community to supply the names of plot owners in one sitting organized in any meeting place near the DBA. This list is more accurate & accepted by the stakeholders. The WMG is the grass root and core WM organization for O & M of which all (>70%) of the people of the DBA in the community (farmers, fishermen, aqua-culturists, small traders, boatmen, craftsmen, landless people, destitute women, PAPs etc) shall become member The process of organizing the local stakeholders into WMOs is implemented by an NGO (ASG) under guidance of the ISPM-consultants and supervised by the Project Director (PMO).

Annex-E


5

General members of the WMG will elect representatives for WMG and WMA. They will hold two elections; 1st Election for the Executive Committee of the WMG consisting 12, (at least 30% women) that will decide on how to spend the budget for O&M which needs approval from the general members. The second election is to elect 5 representatives (male1, female-1, landless-1, fisherman-1, destitute woman-1) of the WMG to the WMA as in Annex-1.

A member of WMG Executive Committee can not be a general member of the WMA, meaning they will not be allowed to compete for two posts simultaneously in two tiers (one in the WMG Executive Committee and the other in the WMA neither member or EC). This is different from the public administration and the Co-operative Societies where dual posts can be held. 2. Water Management Association (WMA): One (1) WMA will be formed to manage the water management activities in SIP # 8. Representatives of General Members of each WMG will become General Members of WMA who in turn will form WMA Executive Committee consisting 12 members through election. 7. Key Activities involved in developing WMO in SIP # 8 The following summarizes the key steps those are being undertaken by the ASG NGO facilitators in the process of organizing the Water Management Association in SIP # 8 1. Prepare list of beneficiaries: The NGO Asho Samaj Gori (ASG) has been contracted for social mobilization works during September, 2008. They have fielded 14 Facilitators and 1 NGO Supervisor. Facilitators are now in the stage of WMO formation with their entry in the local community. The aim is to establish rapport with the Community by conducting house to house visits to meet potential beneficiaries’ families and participating in the Community activities. Before fielding, the Facilitators were imparted 2-days training (1 day class room and 1 day field test) on the preparation of beneficiaries list. Their performances were tested before they are actually fielded on the 10th of September’ 2008. The ASG completed their initial report for WMO formation during November 2008. After fine tuning of the DBA, number of villages have been increased. Further beneficiaries survey was made during 1-5 March 2009 through the NGO Facilitators, 2. Organizing the WMO: At the initial stage of WMO formation, series of discussion meetings were held and is continuing with local stakeholders, UP Chairman, LGI members before and after Union Level Orientation workshop (29.04.08) at Mulia Union Parishad. After synthessing the stakeholders recommendations SIP was cleared in the DLIAPEC meeting on 7.1.09. SMO Narail confirms the implementability of works. Process for formation of WMO is in progress. 3. Formation of Water Management Group (WMG) and Water Management Association (WMA): 11 water management groups (WMG) and 1 Water Management Association will be formed in SIP # 8. (Table-2 and Annex-1). 4. Registration of the WMO with the Department of Cooperatives. The WMG, through its elected executive committee, registers with the DoC after completing all the required documentations and complying with all the requirements for registration. WMA the mid tier will supervise & monitor WMG and will participate O & M activities under management agreements. Afterwards attempts will be made for registering WMA.

Annex-E


6

5. WMO Proceeds with its O & M Activities.

The WMO makes plan/program of activities so that it is able to actively participate in the discussion, finalization and implementation of the SIP and in undertaking its O & M activities. (The process of WMO formation is illustrated in the flowchart (Annex-2) 8. Training program for WMO members in SIP # 8 Training of WMG/WMA Executive Committee members on organizational management. This training intervention is designed to enhance the existing basic leadership skills of WMA leaders. It is geared towards the provision of adequate knowledge and leadership skills to enable the WMA leaders to improve their performance as they carry out their O & M tasks (Annex-4). This training provides learning opportunities to WMA leaders for more effective and efficient job performance. The curriculum includes a discussion of the WMA’s operations and its composition, the roles and functions of the WMA leaders, sessions which explore the WMA leaders’ skills in communication and problem solving as well as management of WMA records. This training also introduces the WMG/WMA leaders to the concept of saving and the operation and maintenance of water management infrastructures. This organizational management training ( Training Plan) will be given to each WMG and WMA executive committee members. Each training will last for 3 days and will be facilitated by the NGO facilitator assigned in SIP # 8. Bar chart of WMO development activities in SIP # 8 (Annex-3) 9. Monitoring Indicators for WMO development in SIP # 8 The progress of the WMO development activities in SIP # 8 needs to be regularly monitored and evaluated to assess the viability status of the WMO during the various phases of WMO development. This will determine the key areas where the WMO needs to be strengthened and to guide the NGO facilitators in redirecting organizing efforts geared towards developing the capability of the WMO to manage its water resources efficiently and effectively. The monitoring indicators listed below focus on the capacity of the various committees to carry out committee work effectively; the organizational and leadership skills of the WMO officers and leaders; and, the functionality of the WMO as a whole. Evaluation of the WMO in SIP # 8 based on the monitoring indicators below will be conducted jointly by the Executive Engineer/Narail SMO, JMC subcommittee and representatives from the SIP #8 WMOs. Organizational Phase 1) Leaders/officers demonstrate organizational leadership skills in:

a) preparing and organizing meetings properly b) presiding meetings in an orderly manner c) keeping records of minutes of meetings d) maintaining financial books and other financial reports

2) Leaders/officers demonstrate good problem solving capability in:

a) identifying and analyzing the problems affecting them; b) setting priorities, general objectives and plan action strategies, c) implementing action/strategies and monitoring and evaluating outcome of

implementation.

3) Committee level. The ad hoc committees carry out committee work effectively when:

a) members participate actively in committee activities and meetings;

b) the committee regularly conducts meetings to assess accomplishments vs. targets;

c) the committee regularly reports to the officers and members;

d) planned activities are implemented at a given time;

Annex-E


7

4) WMO level. The WMO is able to assess existing organizational structure to suit the

changing needs. The members also actively participate in the affairs of the WMO. a) The WMO is legally registered; b) 70% of the potential beneficiaries( 30% women) are registered members of the

WMO; c) The necessary positions to be created determined by the leaders and members.

Functions of the positions to be created are well defined by the officers and members;

d) Qualifications criteria for the positions to be created are set by the officers and members;

e) Mechanics for filling up the position set up by the officers and members; f) The proposed organizational set up discussed with the members before finalization; g) Members regularly attend WMO meetings; h) Members actively participate by voicing out their ideas, opinions, suggestions and

concerns regarding conflicts, problems, issues, activities , accomplishments and plans of the WMO;

i) The members carry out their duties and responsibilities expected of them by the WMO e.g. involvement in committee work, payment of dues, etc.

Operation and Maintenance Phase 5) Leaders/officers demonstrate organizational leadership skills in:

a) preparing and organizing meetings properly b) presiding meetings in an orderly manner c) keeping records of minutes of meetings d) maintaining financial books and other financial reports

6) Leaders/officers demonstrate good problem solving capability in: a) identifying and analyzing the problems affecting them; b) setting priorities, general objectives and plan action strategies, c) implementing action/strategies and monitoring and evaluating outcome of

implementation. 7) Committee level. The committees carry out committee work effectively when:

a) members participate actively in committee activities and meetings; b) the committee regularly conducts meetings to assess accomplishments vs. targets; c) the committee regularly reports to the officers and members; d) planned activities are implemented at a given time;

8) WMO level. a) regular executive committee meetings held to assess status of operation and

maintenance b) in the WMO and issues and problems encountered in the implementation of O & M policies; c) executive committee members attend committee meetings d) regular general assembly meetings are held to assess status of WMO operation and maintenance and issues/problems encountered in the implementation of O & M policies e) members attend general assembly meetings; f) regular maintenance work is undertaken; g) members actively participate in regular maintenance work; h) fees and dues required are collected; i) A financial report is regularly presented to the general assembly; j) Issues/ conflicts are resolved by the WMO in a timely fashion;

Annex-E


8

k) WMO is up-to-date in keeping its records and documents e.g. financial records, membership books, minutes of meetings, etc.; l) standing committee members actively participate in the committee activities; m) executive committee members of the WMO actively perform their duties and responsibilities; n) O & M personnel actively perform their duties and responsibilities.

Annex-1

Annex-E


9

Annex-2

WMO FORMATION AT A GLANCE

SMO confirms Implementability of SIP

Approval of Internal Rules & Regulations by the General

Members of WMG

Elected representatives of WMG form WMA E.C

Registration of WMO with DoC

SIP clearance by Union

SIP Approved in DLIAPEC

Prepare list of Beneficiary from DB Areas

Stakeholders form WMO Foundation Committee

Drafting Internal Rules & Regulations of the WMG

Hold 2 Elections: WMG E.C. & WMA Representatives

WMA

General Members of the WMG

WMO proceeds with its O&M activities

Annex-E


10

WMO Development Main Activities in SIP # SWN - 8 Annex-3

Sl.

No Activities 2009 - 2010 2010 - 2011 2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013

1. SIP clearance by Union 2. SIP approved in DLIAPEC 3. SMO Confirms implement ability of SIP 4. Prepare list of beneficiaries 5. Formation of WMO Foundation Committee 6. WMO Foundation Committee submit project request to SMO 7. Formation of WMG Creation of Committee to develop draft internal Rules Drafting bye – laws Election of Executive Committee 8. Formation of WMA Creation of Committee to develop draft internal Rules Drafting bye – laws Election of Executive Committee 9. Registration by DoC 10. Training on Organizational Management WMG Executive Committee / Members WMA Executive Committee Capacity Development 11. SIP IA Signing by WMA & BWDB 12. Regular Organizational Strengthening 13. Awareness building and Motivational Campaign 14. WMG members registration 15. Collection of Savings, Shares, Admission fees etc. 16. Monitoring 17. WMA Proceeds O & M

Annex-E


11

Annex-4: SIP wise WMO Training Plan

Detailed Costing of Training 1st Phase

Sl

.

N

o.

Topic of Training

Participants

Number of

Participants

(Female)

Tra

inin

g

All

ow

an

ce/

Da

y

(A)

No

. o

f T

rain

ee

(B)

No

. o

f D

ay

(C)

Tra

inin

g

All

ow

an

ce

(To

tal)

(AX

BX

C)

= D

No

. o

f S

essi

on

(E)

Ho

no

rari

um

Ra

te/

Ses

sio

n

(F)

No

. o

f G

rou

ps

(G)

To

tal

Ho

no

rari

um

(EX

FX

G)

= H

Tra

nsp

ort

Su

pp

ort

(I)

To

tal

Tra

nsp

ort

(BX

I) =

J

Ven

ue

Ch

arg

e

(K)

Gra

nd

To

tal

= (

D+

H+

J+

K)

(Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk

.)

(Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.)

1. Concepts of IWM

& objects of WMO

WMG

Members

60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100

2. GPWM & Formation

of WMG / Tasks &

Responsibility

WMG

Members

60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100

3. Preparation List of

Beneficiaries WMG

Members

60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100

4. Procedures of WMG

By-law drafting WMG

Members

30 (10) 200 30 2 12000 8 400 1 3200 100 3000 1500 19700

5. Election Procedures

of WMO WMG

Members

60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100

6. Registration

Procedures of WMO WMG

Members

60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100

7. Book Keeping

WMG

Members

30 (10) 200 30 2 12000 8 400 1 3200 100 3000 1500 19700

8. Meetings &

Maintaining meeting

proceedings

WMG

Members

30 (10) 200 30 2 12000 8 400 1 3200 100 3000 1500 19700

9. Motivational Tour

WMG

Members

50 (15) 5 Members from each WMG X 10 WMG = 50 LS 50000

FY 2009- 10 Total

314600

SIP wise WMO Training Plan

Annex-E


12

Detailed Costing of Training 2nd Phase

Sl.

No.

Topic of Training

Participants

Number of

Participants

(Female) Tra

inin

g

All

ow

an

ce/

Day

(A)

No

. o

f T

rain

ee

(B)

No

. o

f D

ay

(C)

Tra

inin

g

All

ow

an

ce (

To

tal)

(AX

BX

C)

= D

N

o.

of

Ses

sio

n

(E)

Ho

no

rari

um

Ra

te/

Ses

sio

n

(F)

No

. o

f G

rou

ps

(G)

To

tal

Ho

no

rari

um

(EX

FX

G)

= H

Tra

nsp

ort

Su

pp

ort

(I)

To

tal

Tra

nsp

ort

(BX

I) =

J

V

enu

e C

ha

rge

(K)

Gra

nd

To

tal

= (

D+

H+

J+

K)

(Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.)

1. Formation of

WMA & Task &

Responsibilities

WMG Members 60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100

2. WMA By-law

drafting WMG Members 30 (10) 200 30 2 12000 8 400 1 3200 100 3000 1500 19700

3. Management transfer

WMG Members 60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100

4. Conflict

Management

WMG Members 60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100

5. Formation JMC its

composition tasks &

responsibilities

WMG Members 60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100

6. Operation &

Maintenance

WMG Members 60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100


WMG Members


FY 2010- 11 Total

275200

Annex-E


13

SIP wise WMO Training Plan

Detailed Costing of Training 3rd Phase

Sl.

No.

Topic of Training

Participants

Number of

Participants

(Female) Tra

inin

g

All

ow

an

ce/

Day

(A)

No

. o

f T

rain

ee

(B)

No

. o

f D

ay

(C)

Tra

inin

g

All

ow

an

ce (

To

tal)

(AX

BX

C)

= D

N

o.

of

Ses

sio

n

(E)

Ho

no

rari

um

Ra

te/

Ses

sio

n

(F)

No

. o

f G

rou

ps

(G)

To

tal

Ho

no

rari

um

(EX

FX

G)

= H

Tra

nsp

ort

Su

pp

ort

(I)

To

tal

Tra

nsp

ort

(BX

I) =

J

V

enu

e C

ha

rge

(K)

Gra

nd

To

tal

= (

D+

H+

J+

K)

(Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.) (Tk.)

1. O & M

WMG Members 60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100

2. Capacity Building

WMG Members 60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100

3. Monitoring &

Evaluation

WMG Members 60 (20) 200 60 2 24000 8 400 3 9600 100 6000 1500 41100

4. Audit & Inspection

WMG Members 30 (10) 200 30 2 12000 8 400 1 3200 100 3000 1500 19700


WMG Members


FY 2011- 12 Total

193000

Annex – F

Annex-F

1

O & M Plan for SIP SWN 08

1. Introduction

The Narail Sub-Project is a project under the South West Area Integrated Water

Resources Planning & Management Project ( SWAIWRMP). During the project

preparation (PPTA), the Narail sub- project was divided into 25 sub-units namely

SWNs on the basis of the hydrological boundary. After detail hydrological study, the

hydrological boundary of Sub-unit SWN-09 has been finalized. The SWN 08 with a

gross area of 3811 ha of which 2858 ha is the net area. The SIP is bounded by the

Pantita-Narail road on the north, the Chitra river in the east and part of south, Birgram

( Kalora)-Pantita road on the south and the Afra river on the west. The sub-unit area is

located partly or wholly within Mulia,Tularampur,Sahabad unions and Narail

Porashabha and spreading over 24 (twenty four) villages.

2. Methodology :

The SIP area has been delineated and the WMG formation has been

completed.There are 11 (eleven) WMGs within the SIP. At the very outset, discussion

meetings were held for awareness development about the concept & activities of the

project with the Chairman, Ward Members & the beneficiaries of the area. In view of

the suggestions made in the awareness building meetings walkthrough were held for

physical verification of the need placed by the participants in all the tentative WMG

areas. After taking into account of the beneficiaries demand the total no of

infrastructure within the SIP SWN 08 are as follows :

i) Construction of new regulator Tularampur.

ii) Repair of Mulia regulator and Nayanpur Check structure.

iii) Re excavation of khals : Tularampur (4.0 km), Zia (4.0 km), Mulia (8.5 km),

Hizolanga/Sitarampur (3.45 km), Nayanpur Alokdia (1.00 km) & Nayanpur-Trimohoni

(0.5 km).

iv) Foot bridge /culverts (new ) 4 nos,WMG office building (new) 3 nos,Tube wells (new)

11 nos.

3. Data Collection:

A draft O & M Plan for this SIP SWN 08 has been prepared on the basis of data

received from the research assistants. There were senior facilitators, community

facilitators in the field to collect data for this SIP and these data were sent to the

research assistants working under the PMO. After analyzing by the research

assistants the data were submitted to the O & M specialist for this Project. The O & M

specialist after getting the infrastructure data of the SIP have examined and

incorporated in the O & M Plan for the SIP. During discussion with the beneficiaries it

was found that the beneficiaries have suggested for all types of earthwork within the

SIP are to be executed through the WMG members. The beneficiaries also opined

that they are ready to share the O & M cost for the SIP.

Annex-F

2

4. Annual Maintenance Cost:

Summary of Annual Maintenance Cost of Infrastructure under SWN-08 (Sub-Unit Action Plan) is given

in Table:1.

Table: 1

(Tk. in Lac)

Item of Works Type of Maintenance Cost Total Cost

Reference

Preventive Periodic

Drainage

Channel/Khal

0’107 4.212 4.319 Table: 4

Structures 0.478 6.207 6.685 Table: 5

Total 0.585 10.419 11.004

5. Cost Sharing between WMG & BWDB

The total O & M cost for this SIP,SWN 08 comes to Tk 11,00,400.00 per year For sustainable

operation & maintenance of the scheme, all peripheral infrastructure & the khals connecting to the

peripheral structures and infrastructure within the SIP having command area more than 1000 ha are

considered as public goods. The periodic maintenance of these public goods will be borne by BWDB

under the JMC. The preventive maintenance of these public goods plus the preventive & periodic

maintenance of other infrastructure within the SIP are to be borne by WMGs. In this SIP Mulia &

Tularampur regulators, Nayanpur Ck Structure ,4 nos Bidge /culverts and Mulia & Tularampur khals

are taken as public goods.. The operation & maintenance cost sharing for SWN 08 is given below in

Table2

Table : 2.

O & M Cost

Borne By

Of Works (Lac Tk)

Embankment Structures . Khals/Canals

Total

WMA 0 0.952 1.428 2.380

BWDB 0 5.733 2.891. 8.624

Total 0 6.685 4.319 11.004

The WMA/WMG share comes to Tk 34 /acre/year and on the other hand the share for

BWDB under JMC comes to Tk 122 /acre/year The O & M Cost sharing is given in Table:3.

Maintenance responsibilities and cost sharing between the parties will be finalized during the

negotiations between the WMO and the BWDB.

6. Maintenance Schedule

Annex-F

3

A yearly maintenance schedule is to be prepared at the beginning of the each financial year which

should be strictly followed to achieve regular and effective maintenance. Maintenance schedule is to

be prepared by BWDB in consultation with the WMOs. Draft maintenance program is to be prepared

by BWDB before 30th June for the works of the next year. Necessary steps like budget allocation,

design drawings for the maintenance work, work authorization, tendering processes are to be initiated

at proper time by the BWDB.

7. Training on Maintenance Issue

Water Management Group (WMG) members shall have to be trained on operation of structure for

proper water management of the project. BWDB officials should be given training on the same issue.

For proper implementation of the maintenance plan, training on maintenance is also to be imparted to

water management groups as well as to the BWDB officials. The training should cover maintenance

needs assessment, types of maintenance work, roles and responsibilities of each party, maintenance

schedule, budgeting and monitoring. Training is also required to be imparted to the gate operators of

all the infrastructure (regulators, sluices and water control structures) the project. Such type of training

should be imparted to the individual gate operator at his concerned gate site showing the practical

operation of the gate by BWDB experts.

8. Rates For Maintenance (Canals/Khals) :

i) Preventive maintenance work on khals and canals includes:

(a) removal of floating debris and water hyacinth and water hyacinth and

(b) cutting grass/weeds prior to the starting of the monsoon.

Preventive maintenance of canals has been taken as Tk.500.00 per Km.

ii) Periodic maintenance work on khals and canals includes mainly desalting and re-excavation of

khals

Average siltation per year has been taken as 10 cm.

Side slope of khals has been taken as 1:!.5 both sides

Silt clearance at the rate of Tk 60.40/cum (BWDB Jessore Circle rate)

There are eight no khals within SIP SWN 08.The khals are Mulia (8.5 km), Tularampuri (2.0 km),Zia

(4.0km),Trimohoni(0.6 km),,Nayanpur-Trimohon(0.5 km),i,Nayanpur-Alokdia(1.0 km),,Sitarmpur(2.5

km), & Gearuchera(1.0 km),

The annual maintenance cost of these khals are given Table:4

9. Rates For Maintenance (Structures) :

a) Preventive Cost: i) Painting area has been taken as vent size area plus 10% more for the angles & others.

ii) Painting @ Tk.225. 44 per sq.m. ( as per schedule of rates of Jessore O&M Circle).

iii) Greasing cost for greasing gearbox Tk 644.02 (as per schedule of rates of Jessore O & M

Circle).

iv) Devris clearance : L.S. Tk.300.00 per structure per year.

v) Gauge painting : L.S Tk.150.00 per meter.

Average 7 meter per structure i.e. Tk. 1,050.00 per structure.

b) Periodic Cost.

Annex-F

4

Periodic maintenance cost per structure per year has been taken as the 1.5% of total

Investment cost. Investment cost of the existing old structures have been taken as the

present cost for the type design of similar structure in PPTA. The bill of quantities of the

type design of same size & vent (1.5 m X 1.8 m) has been updated with the present

schedule of rates of Jessore O & M Circle. For example the PPTA cost for 1 vent (1.5

m X 1.8 m) structure was Tk.53.76 lac which has been updated to Tk 88.49 lac at

present schedule of rates.

Periodic cost will include the following :

Replacing of rubber seals ( 1 in 3 years )

Repairing of structures ( 1 in 10 years )

Replacement of gates ( 1 in 15 years)

Replacing wire ropes for pinion gear gate ( 1 in 5 years )

Annual maintenance cost of structure are given in Table:5

Annex-F

5

Cost Sharing in SIP SWN 08 Table :3

Command

Area ( ha) 3811

Benefitted

Area ( ha) 2858

O & M Cost O & M Cost

Payable by

WMA

(

Tk/Acre/Year

)

O & M Cost payable

by BWDB

(Tk/Acre/Year)

Total Cost

payable

(Tk/Acre/Year) Borne By

Of Works (Lac Tk)

Embankment Khals/Canals Structures Total

WMA 0 1.428 0.952 2.38 34

BWDB 0 2.891 5.733 8.624 122

0 4.319 6.685 11.004 156

SIP : SWN 08 Table: 4

Annex-F

6

Preventive & Periodic Maintenance Costs of Khals/Canals

Sl.No

Name of Khal Length (Km)

Avg. Bed

Width (m)

Avg.Side Slopes (1:1.5)

Annual Siltation (m)

Volume of Siltation( m3/year)

Unit Rate of Maintenance

Costs ( Tk)

Total (Tk)

Cost Sharing Preventiv

e (Tk/Km) Periodic(Tk

/ m3 ) Preventiv

e Periodic

1 Zia 4 3 1:1.5 0.1 1260 500 60.4 2000 76104 78104

Pre & Per WMA

2 Mulia 8.5 4 1:1.5 0.1 3527.5 500 60.4 4250 213061 217311

Pre:WMA Per:BWD

B

3 Tularampur 4 3 1:1.5 0.1 1260 500 60.4 2000 76104 78104

Pre:WMA Per:BWD

B

4

Sitarampur/Hizoldanga

3.45 2 1:1.5 0.1 741.75 500 60.4 1725 44801.7 46526.7

Pre & Per WMA

5 Nayanpur -Alokdia 1 1 1:1.5 0.1 115 500 60.4 500 6946 7446

Pre & Per WMA

6 Nayanpur-Trimohoni 0.5 1.25 1:1.5 0.1 70 500 60.4 250 4228 4478

Pre & Per WMA

Total 21.45 6974.25 10725 421244.

7 431969.

7

Canal Maintenance Sharing Preventive (Tk)

Periodic (Tk) Total (Tk)

WMA 10725 132079.7 142804.7

BWDB under JMC 0.0 289165 289165.0

Total 10725 421244.7 431969.7

Preventive & Periodic Maintenance cost of Structures in SWN 08

A. A

Structures Table 5

Annex-F

7

Sl. No

Name of Structures

Vent Size

No. Vents

Approx Cost of

Structures(lac Tk)

Preventive Cost Periodic Costs=1.5%

of Investment Costs (Lac

Tk) Cost Sharing

Painting of Gates Painting Gauge

(Tk)

Greasing of Gates

Others (Tk)

Total (Tk) Area

(Sq.m) Cost

(Tk/Sq.m) Costs (Tk)

Cost/Gate Costs (Tk)

1 Tolarampur

Reg.

1.52 m X 1.82 m

1 88.49 12.17 225.44 2743.60 1050 644.02 644.02 300 4737.62 1.33 Pre:WMA Per:BWDB

2 Nayanpur Check Str.

1.5 m X 1.8

m 2 87.97 12.17 225.44 2743.60 1050 644.02 1288.04 300 5381.64 1.32

Pre:WMA Per:BWDB

3 Mulia Reg.

1.52 m X 1.82 m

3 144.86 36.51 225.44 8230.81 1050 644.02 1932.06 300 11512.87 2.17 Pre:WMA Per:BWDB

4 WMG office 3 Nos 21 Lump Sum

1500.00 0.32 Pre & Per

WMA

5 Bridge/ Culverts

4 Nos 58.2 Lump Sum

2000.00 0.87 Pre:WMA Per:BWDB

6 Tube Well 11

Nos 7.7

Lump Sum

1250.00 0.12 Pre & Per

WMA

26382.14 6.12

WMA 26382.14 0.44

WDB 0.00 5.68

B. Brick Masonry Reference Sections on Khals

Preventive & Periodic Maintenance cost of 2m Wide Brick Masonry on Khals in SWN 08

Annex-F

8

Sl No

Name of Canal

Length of

Canal (Km)

Bed Width (m)

No of 2m Brick Masonry

Unit Cost of one Khal Brick Masonry (Lac Tk)

App.Cost Masonry (Lac Tk)

Preventive Cost Tk 500 per brick

Masonry (Lac Tk)

Periodic Costs=1.5% of

Investment Costs (Lac Tk)

Cost sharing

1 Zia 4 3 8 0.134 1.072 0.04 0.016

Pre & Per WMA

2 Mulia 8.5 4

17 0.147 2.499 0.085 0.037 Pre:WMA

Per:BWDB

3 Tularampur 4 3

8

0.134 1.072 0.04 0.016 Pre:WMA Per:BWDB

4

Sitarampur/Hizoldanga

3.45 2

7 0.12 0.84 0.035 0.013

Pre & Per WMA

5 Nayanpur -Alokdia 1 1

2 0.107 0.214 0.01 0.003

Pre & Per WMA

6 Nayanpur-Trimohoni 0.5 1.25

1 0.11 0.11 0.005 0.002

Pre & Per WMA

Total 0.215 0.087

Total A + B Preventive (Lac

Tk) Periodic(Lac Tk) Total

WMA 0.478 0.474 0.952 WMA 0.215 0.034

BWDB 0 5.733 5.733 WDB 0 0.053

Total 0.478 6.207 6.685

Annex-F

9

Map of SWN - 08

Annex – G

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-G

SWN-8; Tularampur Scheme 1

HYDROLOGY

SWN-8, Tularampur Scheme 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background This report briefly describes the hydrological analysis for the proposed SIP areas SWN-8. The study area is located in the Narail Sub-Project under Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project (SWAIWRPMP).SWN-8 is bounded by the Chitra river on the east and Afra-Bhairab river on the west, on the South by Zia khal and village roads. The study area are shown in Figures 1.1 and 1.2. The Chitra river is tidal and thus the drainage of the study area is governed by the tidal fluctuation of this peripheral river. Monsoon and post-monsoon drainage is the major problem of the study area. In variably the entire southwest region has been suffering from tidal intrusion and monsoon drainage congestion over the years. In order to prevent the salinity intrusion and tidal flooding, the study area is enclosed by constructing coastal embankment (commonly known as polder) with water control structures for drainage of the polder areas. But at present most of the controlling structures are not functioning fully and some of the internal drainage khals have been severely silted up as well, which prevents the people to get full benefit out of the existing project. In view of the above fact, the hydrological analysis has been carried out to provide a rational justification for quick decision making in planning, design and improved O&M of the controlling structures to ensure sustainable drainage improvement in the proposed study area. 1.2 Objective of the Study The main objective of this hydrological study is to review and improve the existing drainage plan and to generate data for assessing the inundation patterns after rehabilitation of the existing project. . 1.3 Study Area SWN-8 covers twenty four (24) and four Union, villages namely Gopikantopur, Nayanpur, Chandpur, Bishnupur, Durgapur, Hizoldanga, Sitarampur and Tolarampur. The whole area of Narail Sub-project has been divided into a number of sub-catchments considering formation of Water Management Organisations (WMO) and existing drainage patterns. The total area of SWN-8 are about 3811 ha. The average land elevation of SWN-8 area is about 3.00 m, PWD. Maximum land of SWN-8 area is within the elevation of 2.00 m PWD and 4.00 m PWD covering about 92% of this SIP area. The variations of land elevation of these proposed SIPs are shown in Figures 1.2. Agriculture is the main source of income of the people of the project area, which is most frequently affected by tidal intrusion through the existing damaged structures and monsoon drainage congestion.



Figure 1.1: Map of Narail Sub-Project showing Study Area



Figure 1.2: Map of Proposed SIP, SWN-8, Tularampur Scheme



2. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The study has been carried out mainly based on the secondary data collected from BWDB and previous study reports. 2.1 Rainfall Data The nearest rainfall station to the study area is located at Narail (R-461) maintained by BWDB. The rainfall data is available from 1965 to 2007.Monthly Maximum, Mean & Minimum rainfall table, Annual & Monthly rainfall and 5-Day rainfall analysis (Maximum Rainfall Depth-Duration Data) table are shown below. That table is computed from 1987 to 2007 (20 years) data.

Table 2.1.1: Monthly Maximum, Mean & Minimum rainfall ( mm )

Rainfall station : R- 461 ( Narail )

Year Parameter January February March April May June July August September October November December

1987

Max= 0.00 0.00 10.20 81.30 33.00 99.10 105.40 259.10 39.40 14.00 84.30 7.60

Mean= 0.00 0.00 0.98 5.72 2.37 12.99 18.66 21.08 5.88 1.07 3.33 0.33

Min= 0 0 2.5 5.1 2.5 5.1 2 1.3 1.3 9.1 1.5 2.5

1988 Max= 0.00 0.00 39.90 122.40 55.90 78.70 76.20 62.00 25.90 27.20 50.80 0.00

Mean= 0.00 0.00 3.17 5.21 9.23 14.51 12.10 14.53 3.65 3.43 3.62 0.00

Min= 0 7.6 5.1 7.6 2.5 1 1.5 0.8 0.5 5.1 27.2 0

1989 Max= 0.00 28.40 2.00 50.80 106.70 40.10 41.10 31.80 48.80 90.70 0.00 1.30

Mean= 0.00 1.12 0.08 1.70 10.50 8.98 8.95 4.27 5.70 7.44 0.00 0.04

Min= 0 3 0.5 0.3 0.3 7.9 2.3 2.3 1.5 5.1 0 1.3

1990 Max= 0.00 31.80 56.60 31.80 63.50 38.10 60.20 46.20 101.60 44.50 22.10 5.10

Mean= 0.00 2.94 4.50 1.86 8.97 6.38 10.48 4.47 9.54 5.96 1.33 0.16

Min= 0 2.5 2.5 7.6 2.5 2.5 1.3 2.3 5.1 5.1 2.5 5.1

1991 Max= 31.50 15.20 31.80 40.60 69.90 66.00 33.50 137.20 147.80 63.50 0.00 59.70

Mean= 1.22 0.54 1.35 3.26 4.96 13.32 7.35 10.38 15.78 6.12 0.00 2.50

Min= 6.4 15.2 10.2 20.3 5.1 1.3 5.1 4.6 7.1 2.5 0 17.8

1992 Max= 20.30 20.30 0.00 12.70 96.50 238.30 120.70 71.10 37.00 3.00 0.00 0.00

Mean= 0.65 2.28 0.00 0.42 8.77 16.07 22.09 8.03 5.58 0.19 0.00 0.00

Min= 20.3 5.1 0 12.7 7.6 2.5 15.2 5.1 9 1.4 0 0

1993 Max= 0.00 54.00 45.00 45.00 74.00 90.00 69.00 60.00 71.00 67.00 10.00 0.00

Mean= 0.00 1.93 2.97 3.70 9.55 16.97 9.87 11.26 10.47 4.10 0.33 0.00

Min= 0 54 15 7 5 4 4 4 4 6 10 0

1994 Max= 0.00 45.00 25.00 50.00 69.00 120.00 100.00 75.00 30.00 9.00 0.00 0.00

Mean= 0.00 2.29 0.81 3.27 6.97 11.20 11.87 10.03 2.57 0.29 0.00 0.00

Min= 0 19 25 15 10 4 5 5 10 9 0 0

1995 Max= 0.00 23.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 110.00 0.00

Mean= 0.00 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.57 0.00

Min= 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0

1996 Max= 35.00 9.00 20.00 45.00 67.00 150.00 33.00 71.00 52.00 210.00 75.00 0.00

Mean= 1.13 0.55 0.65 1.73 4.74 17.53 4.45 10.19 3.67 9.90 2.50 0.00

Min= 35 7 20 2 25 10 4 9 4 22 75 0

1997 Max= 0.00 30.00 23.00 23.00 35.00 55.00 40.00 60.00 76.00 40.00 20.00 15.00

Mean= 0.00 2.50 0.74 2.77 3.71 8.33 11.77 7.06 16.67 1.29 0.67 0.87

Min= 0 10 23 10 15 5 5 5 10 40 20 12

1998 Max= 20.00 17.00 95.00 36.00 75.00 15.00 60.00 38.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 0.00

Mean= 1.00 0.93 4.52 2.97 5.16 2.33 10.71 6.03 7.50 4.81 4.00 0.00

Min= 11 9 12 8 10 5 6 5 6 10 25 0

1999 Max= 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.00 70.00 43.00 60.00 86.00 70.00 52.00 0.00 0.00

Mean= 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.07 4.35 4.40 10.06 12.32 10.87 8.03 0.00 0.00

Min= 0 0 0 10 5 3 3 8 6 5 0 0

2000 Max= 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 48.00 100.80 98.00 120.00 180.00 105.00 0.00 0.00

Mean= 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.40 6.61 11.83 12.58 10.87 15.90 5.19 0.00 0.00

Min= 0 0 0 15 5 10 10 5 4 8 0 0

2001 Max= 0.00 20.00 14.00 20.00 14.00 15.00 60.00 65.00 45.00 35.00 30.00 0.00

Mean= 0.00 1.25 0.45 2.17 2.00 5.97 6.71 4.10 3.13 4.58 66.32 0.00

Min= 0 15 14 5 8 4 4 10 7 10 10 0

2002 Max= 15.00 0.00 30.00 60.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 80.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Mean= 0.81 0.00 1.19 3.33 8.90 18.20 8.42 16.19 8.70 0.00 0.00 0.00

Min= 10 0 7 15 5 5 7 5 5 0 0 0

2003 Max= 0.00 0.00 42.00 40.00 28.00 80.00 58.00 32.00 0.00 73.00 0.00 7.00

Mean= 0.00 0.00 3.68 3.37 2.29 12.63 10.74 4.42 0.00 8.45 0.00 0.52

Min= 0 0 15 15 10 10 10 5 0 5 0 4

2004 Max= 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 54.00 36.00 30.00 67.00 122.00 44.00 10.00 0.00

Mean= 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 5.26 9.47 4.06 6.52 19.73 4.77 64.97 0.00

Min= 0 0 0 25 6 10 8 10 12 10 10 0



Table 2.1.2 : Monthly & Annual rainfall Rainfall station : R-461 ( Narail )

Year Annual

rainfall (mm) January

(mm) February

(mm) March (mm)

April (mm)

May (mm)

June (mm)

July (mm)

August (mm)

September (mm)

October (mm)

November (mm)

December (mm)

1987 2217 0 0 31 172 74 390 579 653 177 33 100 10

1988 2176 0 50 98 156 286 435 375 451 110 106 109 0

1989 1493 0 31 3 51 326 269 278 132 171 231 0 1

1990 1727 0 82 140 56 278 191 325 139 286 185 40 5

1991 1999 38 15 42 98 154 400 228 322 474 190 0 78

1992 1940 20 66 0 13 272 482 685 249 168 6 0 0

1993 2168 0 54 92 111 296 509 306 349 314 127 10 0

1994 1504 0 64 25 98 216 336 368 311 77 9 0 0

1995 230 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 0

1996 1707 35 16 20 52 147 526 138 316 110 307 75 0

1997 1712 0 70 23 83 115 250 365 219 500 40 20 27

1998 1498 31 26 140 89 160 70 332 187 225 149 120 0

1999 1568 0 0 0 32 135 132 312 382 326 249 0 0

2000 2057 0 0 0 132 205 355 390 337 477 161 0 0

2001 981 0 35 14 65 62 179 208 127 94 142 55 0

2002 1983 25 0 37 100 276 546 261 502 261 0 0 0

2003 1413 0 0 114 101 71 379 333 137 0 262 0 16

2004 1550 0 0 0 25 163 284 126 202 592 148 10 0

2005 1493 12 0 144 66 72 120 449 110 86 446 0 0

2006 1151 0 0 0 26 221 255 0 148 447 54 0 0

2007 1969 0 0 0 0 228 0 562 252 325 359 243 0



Table 2.1.3 : 5-Day rainfall analysis ( Maximum Rainfall Depth-Duration Data) Rainfall station : 461 ( Narail )

Year Premonsoon Monsoon

1-DAY 2-Day 3-DAY 4-Day 5-DAY 1-DAY 2-Day 3-DAY 4-Day 5-DAY

1987 99.1 160.1 231.5 245.5 245.5 259.1 309.9 386.1 395.5 395.5

1988 78.7 108.2 159 179.3 197.1 62 62.8 62.8 62.8 63.6

1989 40.1 40.1 40.1 40.1 40.1 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8

1990 38.1 38.1 38.1 38.1 38.1 46.2 77.4 77.4 77.4 77.4

1991 66 66 66 101.6 111.8 137.2 149.9 149.9 149.9 149.9

1992 238.3 238.3 238.3 268.8 269 71.1 86.3 86.3 86.3 86.3

1993 90 90 90 165 186 60 60 105 130 130

1994 120 165 169 169 169 75 75 105 135 167

1995 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1996 150 175 175 175 258 71 80 80 80 80

1997 55 55 55 78 78 60 72 72 72 72

1998 15 25 40 55 60 38 47 57 69 74

1999 43 43 43 43 43 86 108 164 164 164

2000 100.8 100.8 122.8 132.8 165.8 120 157 197 197 197

2001 15 29 29 39 39 65 94 117 127 127

2002 75 75 110 180 215 80 130 130 130 130

2003 80 112 144 154 154 32 37 37 37 37

2004 36 36 36 36 36 67 97 97 97 97

2005 45 53 61 76 81 30 30 30 30 30

2006 180 194 194 194 194 31 61 61 61 61

2007 0 0 0 0 0 45 50 50 50 58

No. of Data 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0

Mean(mm) 74.5 85.9 97.2 112.9 122.9 69.9 86.5 99.8 103.9 106.1 Std Dev 59.9 66.7 74.1 80.0 88.2 53.2 64.3 81.2 83.2 83.7

Max(mm) 238.3 238.3 238.3 268.8 269.0 259.1 309.9 386.1 395.5 395.5

Min(mm) 15 25 29 36 36 31 30 30 31.8 30

Frequency Analysis of Individual Month using Extreme Value Distribution

1 in 2 17 76 87 103 113 60 77 90 94 96

1 in 5 126 137 148 164 174 121 138 151 155 157

1 in 10 178 189 200 216 226 173 189 203 207 209

1 in 20 233 244 255 271 281 228 245 258 262 264

1 in 25 268 279 290 306 316 263 280 293 297 299

1 in 30 188 199 211 226 236 183 200 213 217 220

1 in 50 243 255 266 282 292 239 255 269 273 275

80% dep.

1.25 17 29 40 56 66 13 29 43 47 49



2.2 Water Level Data Daily water level data (Stations: Afraghat-SW30, Bhairab(lower) river & Narail-SW56.1, Chitra river) of the peripheral rivers of the project area has been analysed to determine the monthly maximum water level, monthly mean water level and frequency analysis of water level and also are presented hydrograph. Table 2.2.1 : Monthly Maximum water level (m PWD) River : Bhairab(lower), Station : Afraghat-SW30, Flow Type : Tidal, Period : 1988 to 2008


1988 Max (H.Tide)= 1.67 1.93 1.93 1.98 2.27 2.72 3.01 3.27 3.26 2.73 2.04 2.04

Max (L.tide)= 0.37 0.38 0.38 0.78 1.10 1.97 2.39 2.71 2.78 2.00 1.31 1.19

1989 Max (H.Tide)= 1.65 2.06 1.84 1.94 2.28 2.37 2.91 3.00 2.79 2.73 2.33 1.71

Max (L.tide)= 0.34 0.31 0.27 0.43 1.49 1.34 1.76 1.86 1.79 1.72 1.51 0.59

1990 Max (H.Tide)= 1.70 1.52 1.82 2.16 2.12 2.50 3.17 3.20 2.90 3.03 2.29 1.88

Max (L.tide)= 0.29 0.17 0.42 0.52 0.62 1.34 2.11 2.38 2.03 1.91 1.18 0.59

1991 Max (H.Tide)= 1.93 1.88 1.90 2.10 2.10 2.66 2.83 3.04 3.36 2.71 1.94 2.00

Max (L.tide)= 0.55 0.32 0.30 0.45 0.83 1.45 2.49 1.94 2.18 2.05 1.03 0.61

1992 Max (H.Tide)= 1.94 1.98 2.10 2.10 2.11 2.25 2.76 2.95 2.89 2.57 2.15 1.78

Max (L.tide)= 0.42 0.36 0.38 0.38 0.74 1.08 1.76 1.93 1.86 1.53 1.17 0.65

1993 Max (H.Tide)= 1.83 1.90 1.89 2.02 2.38 2.65 2.82 3.08 3.08 2.90 2.21 2.05

Max (L.tide)= 0.45 0.34 0.50 0.48 0.81 1.65 2.02 2.22 2.26 1.95 1.19 0.77

1994 Max (H.Tide)= 1.97 1.96 2.13 2.27 2.35 2.49 2.74 3.07 2.89 2.84 2.28 1.95

Max (L.tide)= 0.48 0.41 0.55 0.61 0.73 1.26 1.56 2.00 1.77 1.11 0.75 0.47

1995 Max (H.Tide)= 1.79 1.81 1.90 1.91 2.19 2.31 2.71 2.86 2.86 2.91 2.51 1.84

Max (L.tide)= 0.29 0.32 0.30 0.36 0.81 1.26 1.71 1.91 2.11 2.31 1.71 0.76

1996 Max (H.Tide)= 2.35 2.41 2.44 2.51 2.66 2.88 3.80 3.26 3.31 3.07 2.77 1.97

Max (L.tide)= 0.80 0.84 0.81 0.88 1.21 1.38 1.88 2.08 2.23 1.85 1.83 0.94

1997 Max (H.Tide)= 2.15 2.17 2.17 2.17 2.43 2.40 3.23 3.50 3.52 3.20 2.43 2.07

Max (L.tide)= 0.57 0.43 0.44 0.64 1.26 1.16 1.91 2.37 3.22 2.09 1.43 0.99

1998 Max (H.Tide)= 2.13 2.25 2.29 2.65 2.75 2.94 3.50 3.66 3.78 3.27 2.85 2.50

Max (L.tide)= 0.63 0.68 0.77 0.93 1.26 1.49 2.45 2.71 3.03 2.17 1.61 1.28

1999 Max (H.Tide)= 2.38 2.38 2.88 2.81 2.74 2.98 3.35 3.45 3.42 3.32 2.85 2.32

Max (L.tide)= 0.91 0.71 0.76 1.00 1.07 1.21 2.22 2.54 2.40 2.38 1.97 1.01

2000 Max (H.Tide)= 2.16 2.86 2.29 2.53 2.51 2.77 3.23 3.20 3.41 3.28 2.68 2.12

Max (L.tide)= 0.71 0.62 0.67 0.77 1.13 1.51 1.95 2.02 2.49 2.35 1.72 0.81

2001 Max (H.Tide)= 2.16 2.18 2.21 2.42 2.61 2.92 2.85 2.93 2.98 2.77 2.48 2.06

Max (L.tide)= 0.71 0.54 0.53 0.61 0.87 1.51 1.65 1.59 1.68 1.35 1.27 0.66

2002 Max (H.Tide)= 1.81 1.88 2.11 2.24 2.52 2.65 2.46 2.68 3.01 2.68 2.19 1.71

Max (L.tide)= 0.37 0.22 0.32 0.54 0.83 1.45 2.08 2.52 2.74 2.46 1.85 1.07

2003 Max (H.Tide)= 1.55 1.57 1.72 2.27 2.55 2.65 2.83 2.89 2.96 3.00 2.61 2.12

Max (L.tide)= 0.61 0.49 0.70 0.59 0.87 1.45 1.65 1.91 1.92 1.91 1.61 0.76

2004 Max (H.Tide)= 1.87 1.91 2.11 2.31 2.54 2.58 2.99 3.02 3.33 3.08 2.48 1.95

Max (L.tide)= 0.85 0.20 0.49 0.64 0.89 1.16 1.96 1.74 2.45 2.21 1.27 0.47




2005 Max (H.Tide)= 1.84 1.81 2.17 2.11 2.19 2.21 2.93 2.84 2.93 2.94 2.96 2.24

Max (L.tide)= 0.20 0.27 0.23 0.27 0.53 0.83 1.77 1.54 1.86 1.97 2.18 0.94

2006 Max (H.Tide)= 2.30 2.32 2.18 2.35 2.31 2.51 2.88 2.96 2.93 2.89 2.18 1.80

Max (L.tide)= 0.71 0.45 0.28 0.43 0.62 0.92 1.62 1.66 1.86 1.78 0.74 0.47

2007 Max (H.Tide)= 1.88 1.97 2.18 2.35 2.41 2.59 3.35 3.39 3.20 3.04 2.45 2.19

Max (L.tide)= 0.57 0.54 0.67 1.40 1.01 1.50 2.23 2.61 2.40 2.10 1.44 1.03

2008 Max (H.Tide)= 2.25 2.43 2.43 2.58 2.73 2.55 3.20 3.30 3.20 3.04 2.89 2.32

Max (L.tide)= 0.58 0.94 0.50 0.53 0.74 1.13 1.89 2.30 2.40 2.10 1.80 0.86

Table 2.2.2 : Monthly Mean water level (m PWD) River : Bhairab(lower), Station : Afraghat-SW30, Flow Type : Tidal, Period : 1988 to 2008


1988 Max (H.Tide)= 1.29 1.32 1.37 1.60 1.97 2.41 2.79 3.01 3.05 2.31 1.79 1.61

Max (L.tide)= 0.23 0.16 0.18 0.35 0.65 1.59 2.12 2.41 2.56 1.43 0.78 0.62

1989 Max (H.Tide)= 1.24 1.38 1.37 1.45 1.91 2.18 2.51 2.75 2.65 2.52 1.93 1.41

Max (L.tide)= 0.19 0.21 0.18 0.22 0.66 1.21 1.46 1.71 1.67 1.61 0.93 0.38

1990 Max (H.Tide)= 1.24 1.21 1.17 1.55 1.77 2.22 2.89 2.98 2.70 2.53 1.99 1.56

Max (L.tide)= 0.13 0.02 -0.10 0.25 0.46 0.98 1.80 2.11 1.70 1.59 0.95 0.46

1991 Max (H.Tide)= 1.28 1.32 1.42 1.62 1.90 2.26 2.59 2.73 2.99 2.22 1.70 1.57

Max (L.tide)= 0.30 0.20 0.21 0.28 0.63 1.03 1.61 1.77 2.04 1.54 0.66 0.42

1992 Max (H.Tide)= 1.43 1.44 1.55 1.64 1.82 2.00 2.40 2.77 2.61 2.33 1.92 1.56

Max (L.tide)= 0.28 0.19 0.23 0.29 0.51 0.76 1.28 1.78 1.63 1.33 0.85 0.44

1993 Max (H.Tide)= 1.31 1.45 1.49 1.65 1.95 2.30 2.56 2.85 2.90 2.48 1.95 1.71

Max (L.tide)= 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.32 0.66 1.08 1.58 1.95 2.09 1.55 0.85 0.55

1994 Max (H.Tide)= 1.58 1.44 1.67 1.82 1.92 2.10 2.55 2.82 2.61 2.26 1.72 1.46

Max (L.tide)= 0.36 0.24 0.33 0.43 0.57 0.77 1.27 1.69 1.40 0.92 0.50 0.27

1995 Max (H.Tide)= 1.23 1.36 1.47 1.55 1.79 2.09 2.40 2.68 2.71 2.57 2.08 1.54

Max (L.tide)= 0.10 0.14 0.13 0.23 0.48 0.95 1.38 1.81 1.94 1.79 1.16 0.50

1996 Max (H.Tide)= 1.86 1.90 1.98 2.14 2.45 2.66 2.86 2.98 3.14 2.54 2.30 1.75

Max (L.tide)= 0.69 0.65 0.69 0.77 1.06 1.23 1.56 1.79 1.88 1.40 1.28 0.60




1997 Max (H.Tide)= 1.58 1.59 1.69 1.66 1.89 2.18 2.69 3.08 3.40 2.53 2.10 1.75

Max (L.tide)= 0.40 0.32 0.36 0.36 0.58 0.83 1.49 1.95 3.10 1.43 0.93 0.61

1998 Max (H.Tide)= 1.70 1.73 2.11 2.08 2.27 2.66 3.16 3.49 3.52 2.92 2.57 2.17

Max (L.tide)= 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.68 0.89 1.30 1.90 2.45 2.68 1.88 1.45 0.98

1999 Max (H.Tide)= 1.96 1.95 2.12 2.30 2.37 2.49 3.06 3.27 3.20 3.03 2.45 2.02

Max (L.tide)= 0.74 0.66 0.67 0.84 0.89 1.02 1.85 2.22 2.23 2.07 1.38 0.79

2000 Max (H.Tide)= 1.81 1.76 1.93 2.15 1.04 2.51 2.94 2.98 3.06 2.84 2.27 1.85

Max (L.tide)= 0.55 0.48 0.55 0.66 0.89 1.21 1.75 1.91 2.09 1.89 1.17 0.66

2001 Max (H.Tide)= 1.81 1.74 1.81 1.92 2.26 2.58 2.68 2.72 2.70 2.51 2.08 1.68

Max (L.tide)= 0.55 0.44 0.39 0.47 0.75 1.24 1.43 1.48 1.48 1.28 0.91 0.43

2002 Max (H.Tide)= 1.43 1.35 1.57 1.70 2.02 2.27 2.23 2.53 2.75 2.43 1.87 1.46

Max (L.tide)= 0.18 0.10 0.13 0.24 0.55 0.99 1.64 2.26 2.55 2.17 1.30 0.76

2003 Max (H.Tide)= 1.30 1.21 1.22 1.72 2.03 2.27 2.52 2.71 2.77 2.76 2.36 1.87

Max (L.tide)= 0.47 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.58 0.99 1.51 1.67 1.71 1.53 1.10 0.56

2004 Max (H.Tide)= 1.50 1.40 1.62 1.86 2.09 2.36 2.78 2.79 2.94 2.76 1.88 1.54

Max (L.tide)= 0.32 0.10 0.24 0.42 0.59 0.88 1.47 1.56 1.92 1.85 0.73 0.29

2005 Max (H.Tide)= 1.37 1.27 1.47 1.65 1.78 1.90 2.56 2.59 2.64 2.69 2.38 1.97

Max (L.tide)= 0.09 0.07 0.10 0.15 0.30 0.49 1.38 1.35 1.37 1.58 1.31 0.68

2006 Max (H.Tide)= 1.80 1.70 1.59 1.85 1.96 2.20 2.63 2.68 2.64 2.44 1.82 1.47

Max (L.tide)= 0.46 0.28 0.11 0.28 0.42 0.78 1.27 1.30 1.37 1.18 0.50 0.21

2007 Max (H.Tide)= 1.26 1.40 1.34 1.80 1.97 2.13 2.64 3.15 2.93 2.65 2.23 1.76

Max (L.tide)= 0.24 0.25 0.22 0.47 0.62 0.87 1.59 2.25 2.03 1.63 1.16 0.65

2008 Max (H.Tide)= 1.45 1.76 2.01 2.09 2.26 2.36 2.98 3.06 2.93 2.65 2.48 2.07

Max (L.tide)= 0.48 0.54 0.42 0.47 0.63 0.78 1.55 1.93 2.03 1.63 1.28 0.76

Average monthly H.Tide 1.50 1.51 1.62 1.80 1.97 2.29 2.69 2.89 2.90 2.57 2.09 1.70

Average monthly L.Tide 0.36 0.29 0.29 0.40 0.64 1.00 1.57 1.87 1.98 1.58 1.01 0.55



Table 2.2.3 : Frequency Analysis of River Water Level

River : Bhairab(lower), Station : Afraghat-SW30, Flow Type : Tidal, Period : 1988 to 2008

Year

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL

1988 1.7 0.37 1.93 0.38 1.93 0.38 1.98 0.78 2.27 1.10 2.72 1.97 3.01 2.39 3.27 2.71 3.3 2.78 2.73 2.00 2.04 1.31 2.04 1.19

1989 1.7 0.34 2.06 0.31 1.84 0.27 1.94 0.43 2.28 1.49 2.37 1.34 2.91 1.76 3.00 1.86 2.8 1.79 2.73 1.72 2.33 1.51 1.71 0.59

1990 1.7 0.29 1.52 0.17 1.82 0.42 2.16 0.52 2.12 0.62 2.50 1.34 3.17 2.11 3.20 2.38 2.9 2.03 3.03 1.91 2.29 1.18 1.88 0.59

1991 1.9 0.55 1.88 0.32 1.90 0.30 2.10 0.45 2.10 0.83 2.66 1.45 2.83 2.49 3.04 1.94 3.4 2.18 2.71 2.05 1.94 1.03 2.00 0.61

1992 1.9 0.42 1.98 0.36 2.10 0.38 2.10 0.38 2.11 0.74 2.25 1.08 2.76 1.76 2.95 1.93 2.9 1.86 2.57 1.53 2.15 1.17 1.78 0.65

1993 1.8 0.45 1.90 0.34 1.89 0.50 2.02 0.48 2.38 0.81 2.65 1.65 2.82 2.02 3.08 2.22 3.1 2.26 2.90 1.95 2.21 1.19 2.05 0.77

1994 2.0 0.48 1.96 0.41 2.13 0.55 2.27 0.61 2.35 0.73 2.49 1.26 2.74 1.56 3.07 2.00 2.9 1.77 2.84 1.11 2.28 0.75 1.95 0.47

1995 1.8 0.29 1.81 0.32 1.90 0.30 1.91 0.36 2.19 0.81 2.31 1.26 2.71 1.71 2.86 1.91 2.9 2.11 2.91 2.31 2.51 1.71 1.84 0.76

1996 2.4 0.80 2.41 0.84 2.44 0.81 2.51 0.88 2.66 1.21 2.88 1.38 3.80 1.88 3.26 2.08 3.3 2.23 3.07 1.85 2.77 1.83 1.97 0.94

1997 2.2 0.57 2.17 0.43 2.17 0.44 2.17 0.64 2.43 1.26 2.40 1.16 3.23 1.91 3.50 2.37 3.5 3.22 3.20 2.09 2.43 1.43 2.07 0.99

1998 2.1 0.63 2.25 0.68 2.29 0.77 2.65 0.93 2.75 1.26 2.94 1.49 3.50 2.45 3.66 2.71 3.8 3.03 3.27 2.17 2.85 1.61 2.50 1.28

1999 2.4 0.91 2.38 0.71 2.88 0.76 2.81 1.00 2.74 1.07 2.98 1.21 3.35 2.22 3.45 2.54 3.4 2.40 3.32 2.38 2.85 1.97 2.32 1.01

2000 2.2 0.71 2.86 0.62 2.29 0.67 2.53 0.77 2.51 1.13 2.77 1.51 3.23 1.95 3.20 2.02 3.4 2.49 3.28 2.35 2.68 1.72 2.12 0.81

2001 2.2 0.71 2.18 0.54 2.21 0.53 2.42 0.61 2.61 0.87 2.92 1.51 2.85 1.65 2.93 1.59 3.0 1.68 2.77 1.35 2.48 1.27 2.06 0.66

2002 1.8 0.37 1.88 0.22 2.11 0.32 2.24 0.54 2.52 0.83 2.65 1.45 2.46 2.08 2.68 2.52 3.0 2.74 2.68 2.46 2.19 1.85 1.71 1.07

2003 1.6 0.61 1.57 0.49 1.72 0.70 2.27 0.59 2.55 0.87 2.65 1.45 2.83 1.65 2.89 1.91 3.0 1.92 3.00 1.91 2.61 1.61 2.12 0.76

2004 1.9 0.85 1.91 0.20 2.11 0.49 2.31 0.64 2.54 0.89 2.58 1.16 2.99 1.96 3.02 1.74 3.3 2.45 3.08 2.21 2.48 1.27 1.95 0.47

2005 1.8 0.20 1.81 0.27 2.17 0.23 2.11 0.27 2.19 0.53 2.21 0.83 2.93 1.77 2.84 1.54 2.9 1.86 2.94 1.97 2.96 2.18 2.24 0.94

2006 2.3 0.71 2.32 0.45 2.18 0.28 2.35 0.43 2.31 0.62 2.51 0.92 2.88 1.62 2.96 1.66 2.9 1.86 2.89 1.78 2.18 0.74 1.80 0.47

2007 1.9 0.57 1.97 0.54 2.18 0.67 2.35 1.40 2.41 1.01 2.59 1.50 3.35 2.23 3.39 2.61 3.2 2.40 3.04 2.10 2.45 1.44 2.19 1.03

2008 2.3 0.58 2.43 0.94 2.43 0.50 2.58 0.53 2.73 0.74 2.55 1.13 3.20 1.89 3.30 2.30 3.2 2.40 3.04 2.10 2.89 1.80 2.32 0.86

No. of Data = 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21

Mean, X = 1.97 0.54 2.06 0.45 2.13 0.49 2.28 0.63 2.42 0.92 2.60 1.34 3.03 1.96 3.12 2.12 3.14 2.26 2.95 1.97 2.46 1.46 2.03 0.81

Stdev = 0.24 0.20 0.31 0.21 0.26 0.18 0.24 0.26 0.21 0.25 0.22 0.25 0.31 0.28 0.25 0.37 0.26 0.43 0.21 0.34 0.30 0.38 0.21 0.24

Co-eff. Of Skewness = 0.17 0.11 0.65 0.8 1.0 0.35 0.46 1.4 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.5 0.44 0.2 0.7 0.68 0.10 -0.95 0.16 -0.16 0.39 0.27

Feequency: Frequency Analysis of Max. & Min. Water Level of Annual and Individual Month using Extreme Value Distribution

1 in 2.33 1.97 0.54 2.06 0.45 2.13 0.49 2.28 0.63 2.42 0.93 2.60 1.34 3.03 1.96 3.12 2.12 3.14 2.26 2.95 1.97 2.46 1.46 2.03 0.81

1 in 5 2.14 0.68 2.28 0.60 2.32 0.62 2.45 0.82 2.57 1.10 2.76 1.52 3.25 2.16 3.30 2.38 3.33 2.57 3.10 2.21 2.36 1.73 2.18 0.98

1 in 10 2.28 0.80 2.46 0.73 2.47 0.73 2.59 0.97 2.69 1.25 2.89 1.67 3.43 2.32 3.44 2.60 3.49 2.82 3.23 2.41 2.84 1.95 2.30 1.12

1 in 20 2.42 0.91 2.64 0.84 2.62 0.83 2.73 1.12 2.81 1.39 3.01 1.81 3.61 2.47 3.58 2.80 3.64 3.06 3.35 2.59 3.01 2.17 2.42 1.25

1 in 50 2.60 1.05 2.86 0.99 2.81 0.96 2.91 1.31 2.97 1.57 3.17 1.99 3.83 2.68 3.76 3.07 3.83 3.37 3.50 2.84 3.22 2.44 2.57 1.42



Table 2.2.4 : Frequency Analysis of River Water Level

River : Chitra, Station & Station name : SW 56.1 - Narail , Flow Type : Tidal, Period : 1995 to 2008

Year

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL HWL LWL

1995 1.8 0.52 1.85 0.57 1.95 0.65 2.16 0.34 2.44 0.74 2.44 1.14 2.45 1.04 3.73 2.17 2.9 2.10 2.74 1.82 2.05 0.85 1.55 0.36

1996 1.9 0.20 2.31 0.20 2.33 0.28 2.53 0.38 2.58 0.73 2.73 1.01 2.68 0.71 3.85 1.85 3.0 1.47 2.50 1.00 2.14 0.63 1.91 0.33

1997 2.4 0.40 2.52 0.26 2.62 0.41 2.63 0.55 2.82 0.76 2.88 1.16 2.60 0.83 3.32 1.35 2.7 1.50 1.92 0.43 1.81 0.33 1.60 0.18

1998 2.2 0.83 2.46 0.48 2.61 0.36 2.78 0.53 3.37 1.39 3.47 1.67 3.25 1.74 3.73 2.63 2.7 1.65 2.51 1.16 2.03 0.83 1.85 0.30

1999 2.4 0.56 2.45 0.46 2.58 0.38 2.82 0.68 2.93 0.83 3.06 1.08 3.01 1.12 3.30 1.93 3.2 2.28 2.83 1.38 2.21 0.64 2.03 0.46

2000 2.2 1.02 2.22 1.07 2.28 0.92 2.42 0.98 2.56 1.30 3.16 1.91 2.95 1.86 4.83 2.16 3.2 2.16 2.56 0.96 2.16 1.16 1.83 0.73

2001 2.6 1.23 2.20 0.69 2.30 0.70 2.45 0.65 2.55 0.83 2.88 1.58 2.64 1.48 3.57 1.81 2.5 1.76 2.31 1.58 1.93 0.88 1.48 0.48

2002 1.8 0.40 2.13 0.28 2.30 0.53 2.42 0.68 2.76 1.16 3.08 1.86 2.62 1.56 3.54 2.27 2.7 1.91 2.20 1.21 2.00 0.91 1.60 0.50

2003 1.8 0.60 1.80 0.38 2.30 0.55 2.50 0.72 2.72 1.02 2.77 1.12 2.68 1.12 3.45 1.88 3.4 2.28 2.16 1.75 2.10 1.01 1.88 0.52

2004 2.1 0.78 2.11 0.68 2.28 0.67 2.57 1.36 2.58 1.21 2.63 1.87 2.53 1.05 4.18 2.15 2.6 1.63 2.59 1.73 1.71 1.13 1.55 0.58

2005 2.1 0.82 2.06 0.86 2.15 0.68 2.08 0.92 2.97 2.07 2.62 1.29 2.32 1.01 3.56 1.79 2.8 1.93 2.47 1.10 1.81 0.47 1.34 0.06

2006 1.8 1.75 2.20 1.70 2.30 0.79 2.42 2.48 2.44 2.60 2.68 1.87 2.47 1.32 3.75 2.08 2.8 1.67 2.29 1.47 1.70 0.60 1.45 0.42

2007 2.0 0.85 2.10 0.90 2.19 0.89 2.43 1.02 2.53 1.43 2.67 1.77 2.48 1.32 4.15 2.38 2.8 2.34 2.44 1.66 2.16 1.26 1.44 0.50

2008 2.1 0.61 1.64 0.94 2.04 0.84 2.05 0.97 2.34 0.94 2.64 1.49 2.52 0.97 4.56 2.02 3.0 2.10 2.50 0.97 1.63 1.04 1.83 0.94

No. of Data = 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14

Mean, X = 2.06 0.76 2.15 0.68 2.30 0.62 2.45 0.88 2.69 1.22 2.84 1.49 2.66 1.22 3.82 2.03 2.87 1.91 2.43 1.30 1.96 0.84 1.67 0.45

Stdev = 0.27 0.39 0.25 0.40 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.54 0.27 0.54 0.27 0.34 0.25 0.34 0.46 0.31 0.26 0.30 0.24 0.40 0.19 0.27 0.21 0.22

Co-eff. Of Skewness = 0.50 1.22 -0.45 1.2 0.2 -0.15 -0.29 2.2 1.3 1.6 0.9 -0.1 1.2 0.5 1.07 -0.3 0.6 -0.04 -0.45 -0.57 -0.42 -0.29 0.17 0.43

Feequency: Frequency Analysis of Max. & Min. Water Level of Annual and Individual Month using Extreme Value Distribution

1 in 2.33 2.06 0.76 2.15 0.68 2.30 0.62 2.45 0.88 2.69 1.22 2.84 1.49 2.66 1.22 3.82 2.03 2.87 1.91 2.43 1.30 1.96 0.84 1.67 0.45

1 in 5 2.25 1.04 2.33 0.97 2.44 0.77 2.61 1.26 2.88 1.60 3.03 1.73 2.84 1.47 4.15 2.25 3.06 2.13 2.60 1.59 1.92 1.04 1.82 0.61

1 in 10 2.41 1.27 2.48 1.20 2.56 0.89 2.75 1.58 3.04 1.92 3.19 1.93 2.99 1.66 4.42 2.43 3.21 2.31 2.74 1.82 2.21 1.20 1.95 0.74

1 in 20 2.56 1.49 2.62 1.43 2.67 1.00 2.88 1.88 3.19 2.23 3.35 2.13 3.13 1.85 4.67 2.61 3.36 2.48 2.87 2.04 2.32 1.35 2.07 0.86

1 in 50 2.75 1.77 2.81 1.72 2.81 1.15 3.04 2.27 3.39 2.62 3.55 2.38 3.31 2.10 5.00 2.83 3.55 2.69 3.05 2.33 2.47 1.55 2.22 1.02

1 in 100 2.89 1.99 2.95 1.94 2.92 1.26 3.17 2.56 3.53 2.91 3.69 2.56 3.4 2.28 5.25 3.00 3.7 2.86 3.18 2.54 2.57 1.70 2.34 1.14



Determination of SIP’s River water level Stations (Afraghat-SW30, Bhairab(lower) river & Narail-SW56.1, Chitra river) are nearest to the SIP area boundary. 2.4 Surface Water

Figure 2.4: Hydrograph of ( Station: Narail –SW56.1, Chitra river ) Study Area

Figure 2.5: Hydrograph of ( Station: Afraghat-SW30, Bhairab (lower) river ) Study Area

The availability of surface and ground water was assessed from TR-15 of MPO and FAP 4 reports. Above Table-2.2.2 & Figure-2.4 & 2.5 shows the water level in the area. Moreover invert level of the regulators in peripheral embankment are quite low (-0.60 mPWD), allowing 0.89 m to 2.11m depth of water availability during dry season. Water can be made available in the khals through the regulators during each high tide, which can be stored in the khal for dry season irrigation by closing the C/S lift gate.



2.5 Drainage Rate Analysis (Pre-Monsoon)

Table 2.5.1 : Drainage Rate Analysis

CRITERIA: Design Storm : 20-Yr 5-Day storm recorded at the nearest Rainfall Station

Crop Damage : Sub-Project WL during design storm may not inundate more than 5% area

by depth more than 300mm for duration of more than 3 days.

ASSUMPTIONS: Infiltration, Evapo-Transpiration and Depression Storage are neglected.

INPUT DATA: Drainage Area (Ha.) : 3811.40

Gross Benefited Area (Ha.) : 2858.55

Lowest Ground Level/Drainage Level (mPWD) : 1.75

Allaowable Damaged Area (% of Benefited Area)

: : 5.00%

Area-Elevation-Storage Data :

Elevation (m) Cum. Area (Ha.) Cum. Stor. (Ha-

m)

LGL=> 1.75 7.23 6.33

2.00 204.79 32.83

2.25 717.95 148.17

2.50 1457.58 420.11

2.75 2134.58 869.13

3.00 2491.14 1447.35

3.25 2864.57 2116.81

3.50 3088.63 2860.96

3.75 3319.92 3662.03

4.00 3539.16 4519.42

4.25 3659.62 5419.26

4.50 3811.40 6353.14

Design Storm Rainfall (mm): Station, Narail - CL 461

Pre - Monsoon

Days 1 2 3 4 5

Cum Depth 233 244 255 271 281

Trial Drainage Rate (mm/day): 55.00



Table 2.5.2 : Calculations for Basin Water Level (Pre-Monsoon):

Day Cum RF (mm)

Cum DR (mm)

Cum RO (mm)

Cum. Stor. (Ha-m)

WLbasin (mPWD)

WLdam% (mPWD)

WLdam% +0.3

(mPWD)

Day with WLFull dam

100% Crop Damage (Ha.)

Design Drain. Rate

(mm/day)

1 232.75 55.00 177.75 677.48 2.64 2.05 2.35 Day-1

2 244.11 110.00 134.11 511.14 2.55 2.05 2.35 Day-2

3 255.45 165.00 90.45 344.74 2.43 2.05 2.35 Day-3 1.75 55.00

4 271.09 220.00 51.09 194.72 2.29 2.05 2.35 -ve

5 281.10 275.00 6.10 23.24 1.91 2.05 2.35 -ve

1. A day is counted as "day with WL corresponding to full damage of allowable % of Area" if WLbasin > WLdam% +0.3 for the day.

2. If 3 consecutive days are counted to be crop damage days, crops of land corresponding to allowable % area will be considered fully damaged.

3. If count of crop damage day < 3, rivise trial drainage rate downward.

4. If count of crop damage day > 3, rivise trial drainage rate upward.



2.6 Drainage Rate Analysis ( Monsoon ) Table 2.6.1 : Drainage Rate Analysis

CRITERIA: Design Storm : 20-Yr 5-Day storm recorded at the nearest Rainfall Station

Crop Damage : Sub-Project WL during design storm may not inundate more than 5% area

by depth more than 300mm for duration of more than 3 days.

ASSUMPTIONS: Infiltration, Evapo-Transpiration and Depression Storage are neglected.

INPUT DATA: Drainage Area (Ha.) : 3811.40

Gross Benefited Area (Ha.) : 2858.55

Lowest Ground Level/Drainage Level (mPWD) : 1.75

Allaowable Damaged Area (% of Benefited Area)

: : 5.00%

Area-Elevation-Storage Data :

Elevation (m) Cum. Area (Ha.) Cum. Stor. (Ha-

m)

LGL=> 1.75 7.23 6.33

2.00 204.79 32.83

2.25 717.95 148.17

2.50 1457.58 420.11

2.75 2134.58 869.13

3.00 2491.14 1447.35

3.25 2864.57 2116.81

3.50 3088.63 2860.96

3.75 3319.92 3662.03

4.00 3539.16 4519.42

4.25 3659.62 5419.26

4.50 3811.40 6353.14

Design Storm Rainfall (mm): Station, Narail - CL 461

Monsoon

Days 1 2 3 4 5

Cum Depth 228 245 258 262 264

Trial Drainage Rate (mm/day): 50.00



Table 2.6.2 : Calculations for Basin Water Level (Monsoon)

Day Cum RF (mm)

Cum DR (mm)

Cum RO (mm)

Cum. Stor. (Ha-m)

WLbasin (mPWD)

WLdam% (mPWD)

WLdam% +0.3

(mPWD)

Day with WLFull dam

100% Crop Damage

(Ha.)

Design Drain. Rate

(mm/day)

1 228.10 50.00 178.10 678.80 2.64 2.05 2.35 Day-1

2 244.70 100.00 144.70 551.52 2.57 2.05 2.35 Day-2

3 258.05 150.00 108.05 411.80 2.49 2.05 2.35 Day-3 1.75 50.00

4 262.16 200.00 62.16 236.91 2.33 2.05 2.35 -ve

5 264.34 250.00 14.34 54.66 2.05 2.05 2.35 -ve

1. A day is counted as "day with WL corresponding to full damage of allowable % of Area" if WLbasin > WLdam% +0.3 for the day.

2. If 3 consecutive days are counted to be crop damage days, crops of land corresponding to allowable % area will be considered fully damaged.

3. If count of crop damage day < 3, rivise trial drainage rate downward.

4. If count of crop damage day > 3, rivise trial drainage rate upward.



2.7 Structural vent size Analysis

The required numbers of vents and vent size has been estimated preliminarily using drainage

modulus method and subsequently it has been checked by carrying out monsoon flood. Table 2.7.1 : Sizing of Regulator/Sluice

Flow Considerations:

When Hw > Hv and Htw > Hv , Flow Type I QI = 0.80xNxBwxHvx(2x9.81xh')0.5

When Hw > 1.5Hv and Htw < Hv , Flow Type III

QIII = 0.60xNxBvxHvx{2x9.81x(Hw-

Hv/2)}0.5

When Hw < 1.5Hv and Htw >2Hv/3 , Flow Type IV

QIV = 0.83xNxBvx(Hw-

h')x(2x9.81xh')0.5

When Hw < 1.5Hv and Htw <2Hv/3 , Flow Type V QV = 1.56xNxBvxHw3/2

Where: Hw = Upstream Water Depth N = Vent Nos.

Htw = Tail Water

Depth

h' = Head

Difference

Hv = Vent Hieght Q = Flow through Regulator

Bv = Vent Width

Input Data:

N = 5 nos. RWL 2.30 mPWD

BV = 1.52 m

Basin

WL = 2.60 mPWD

HV = 1.82 m

Design

Q = 26.47 m3/Sec (20% addition)

Sill Level = -0.61 mPWD

RWL HW HTW h'

Flow

Type Q

(mPWD) (m) (m) (m) m3/Sec

2.30 3.21 2.91 0.30 I 26.85

26.85 OK

Drainage Rate = 50.00 mm/day (Monsoon)

Catchment Area = 3811 ha-m

Discharge = 22.05 cumec



3 BASIN OR SIP AREA WATER LEVEL 3.1 Findings

The nearest Water Level station are in Narail no. SW56.1 & Afraghat no. SW30; daily water level of Chitra & Bhairab (lower) river (Tidal) analysis has been done and are presented in Table:2.2.3 & Table: 2.2.4.and also found from different return periods 1 in 2.33 year, 1 in 5 year, 1 in 10 year and 1 in 20 year are 3.70 m PWD, 4.14 m PWD, 4.49m PWD, 4.82 m PWD respectively for Chitra river,. This Water Level will not control directly on SIP Water Level, the rainfall of this area also controls SIP area WL. The nearest rainfall station is in Naril no. R-461, 5-day maximum rainfall depth-duration data ( Pre-Monsoon & Monsoon ) has been done and also compute the basin water depth and drainage modulus during monsoon and found 2.64 m PWD, 50 mm/day respectively and are presented in Table-2.5.1, Table-2.5.2 & Table-3.6.1, Table-3.6.2 . Moreover checked vent size and nos and found satisfactory, shows in Table 2.7.1.Observed water level gauge had been putted in the individual SIP area, Cut-mark on the body of structure noted during field Survey and flood depth plus ground level ( GL+flood depth ) field survey for individual SIP have been checked and are presented in Table : 3.1.1

Table 3.1.1: Observed Water Level

SL. No.

Name of SIP

Existing Water Level

Based on Gauge reading

Flood depth plus groung level ( GL + flood depth )

Based on Cut-mark Survey

1 SWC-10+12 (Bagdanga) 3.00 2.85 2.68

2 SWC-13 (Islampur) 2.83 2.84

3 SWC-4~6,8,9+14 ( Diabari ) 2.93 2.89 2.80

4 SWC-15 (Madinar Khal) 2.97 2.93

5 SWC-16 & SWC-17+18 3.13 2.84

6 SWN- 8 (Tularumpur) - 2.81

7 SWN- 9 (Barenda) - 2.83

8 SWN- 16 (Singia) 2.48 2.41

9 SWN 17~19 (Ranagati) 2.41 2.38 2.30

10 SWN- 21 (Jamrildanga) 2.01 2.34

11 SWN- 22 (Peruli) 2.04 2.19 2.50

12 SWN 23~25 ( Ramgati ) 2.35 2.34 2.55

4 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS Water level before rehabilitation ( Pre-Project ) 2.98 m PWD and after rehabilitation ( Post Project ) 2.68 m PWD have suggested for SIP SWN-8 by PMO and consultants ISPMC on 16 January 2011. This Water Level is justified, because we found basin WL 2.64 m PWD, flood depth plus ground level ( GL+flood depth ) of this area is 2.81 m PWD , those all are nearest to 2.98 & 2.68 m PWD.



5. BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS The expected benefits of the proposed interventions have been estimated using the findings of the hydrological analysis in terms of anticipated change in cropping patterns coverage in the study area. The benefit that has been found from the analysis seems to be very significant and encouraging. The anticipated changing land use patterns of SIP SWN-8 is given in Table 5.1 and graphically shown in Figure 5.1. It has been seen that F0 (productive land) land would be increased after proposed rehabilitation condition from 1866.38 ha to 2708.84 ha, F1 (productive land) land would be decreased after rehabilitation from 1576.02 ha to 1071.62 ha. On the other hand, the F2 and F3 (deeply inundated land) lands will be decreased significantly. Table 5.1: Types of land under different inundation depth

Land Type Existing condition

Area (ha) After proposed rehabilitation

Area(ha) Remarks

F0 (d<0.3m) 1866.38 2708.84

F1 (0.3m<d<0.9m) 1576.02 1071.62

F2 (0.9m<d<1.8m) 369.00 30.94

F3 (d>1.8m) 0.00 0.00

0.00

500.00

1000.00

1500.00

2000.00

2500.00

3000.00

Are

a (

ha

)

Existing condition Area (ha) 1866.38 1576.02 369.00 0.00

After proposed rehabilitation

Area(ha)

2708.84 1071.62 30.94 0.00

F0 (d<0.3m)F1

(0.3m<d<0.9m)

F2

(0.9m<d<1.8m)F3 (d>1.8m)

Figure 5.1: Changing land classes expected due to proposed interventions

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project, BWDB Annex-H

For all SIP

Training

Introduction:

The concept of Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project

(SAIWRPMP) is a new idea totally based on participation of beneficiaries / stakeholders in all phases

of planning, design, implementation and operation & maintenance cycle of the project. Moreover the

concept includes transfer of management to the stakeholders after completion of the rehabilitation

works of the project.

Plan

Training components have been incorporated for capacity development of the a) Officers of PMO,

SMOs, Line Agencies and the NGO Supervisor & Facilitators (Staff training) and b) Members of the

WMOs (WMO training) of Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management

Project (SAIWRPMP). In this process a total of 389 Nos. of training programs have been planned to

implement during 2009-2010, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 to train up the officers of PMO / SMOs,

District / Upazilla level officers of line agencies, Facilitators of NGO (ASG), WMG members and other

beneficiaries of the project. Staff training – 42 & WMO training –347. Detailed Training plan

annexed in Tables.

Achievement

A total of 117 trainings have so far been imparted on (a) Drafting of Bylaw for WMG (b) Registration

procedures for WMG. ,(c) Procedure of Book Keeping for WMG, (d) Operation and Maintenance of

infrastructure through participatory water management , (e) Plantation Activities and Vegetable

Gardening in SAIWRPMP , (f) Cultivation Procedure of different crops and Vegetables gardening , (g)

Seed Production & Compost Preparation, (h) Poultry, Cow and Goat Rearing for Collective Action

Plan (CAP) in SAIWRPMP, (i) Meaning and Functions of WMG/ WMA/JMC in SAIWRPMP, (j) Basic

training on Carp poly-culture in SAIWRPMP area, (k) Basic training on GIFT (Tilapia) culture in

SAIWRPMP area, (l) Field Training and sharing experiences of High value crop production, (m)

Field Training and sharing experiences of CAP, (o) LCS Training For WMG members , (p) Gender

awareness for the WMG members,(q) Salinity of surface water and its safe use, (r) Multi disciplinary

delineation, planning and implementation of a sub-unit of SAIWRPM, (s) On-Job training on

delineation, planning and other related matters for implementation of a sub-unit of SAIWRPMP, (t)

Orientation Workshop of the newly recruited Facilitators and others, (u) Induction course on

preparation of SIP and formation of WMO , (u) Hydrography, Topography Survey & Data processing

by GIS, (v) Communication Tools and Techniques, (w) Workshop on “Participatory Action Plan for

Preparation of SIP and Formation of WMO, (x) Feedback training on “Participatory Action Plan for

Preparation of SIP and Formation of WMO, (y) Formation of WMO and Laws of Cooperative and (z)

Workshop on Micro Credit Management of SAIWRPMP etc. The rest 272 training courses will be

imparted during the next two and a half year.

Besides the above training there are some Foreign trainings and lots of Demonstrations on Fisheries

and Agriculture area.


For all SIP

Southwest Area Integrated water Resources planning and Management Project

Implemented Training Activities during 2009-2010 Staff Training (2009-10) Part-A

Course

No.

Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of

Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)

Remarks/Resource Person

01/2009

-10

Formation of WMO,

Rules of

cooperatives,

Formation procedure

and activities of LCS.

Zilla

Parishad

Auditorium

, Narail

2 days

(8-9

Sept,09)

NGO Supervisor,

Facilitators &

Extension

Overseers of

BWDB

17(Male-13,

Female-4)

34 18,840.00 TL of ISPMC ,

WMA Specialist of ISPMC

District Co-Operative Officer, Narail and

EE,DP-3, (IPSWAM) BWDB, Dhaka

02/2009

-10

Formation of WMO,

Rules of co-

operatives,

Formation procedure

and activities of LCS.

Zilla

Parishad

Auditorium

, Narail

2 days (14 -

15 Sept,09)

Officers of PMO

& SMOs and

ED,NGO(ASG)

12( Male-12,

Female-0)

24 18,940.00 TL of ISPMC ,

WMO Specialist of ISPMC


EE,DP-3, (IPSWAM) BWDB, Dhaka

05/2009

-10

Basic Fisheries

Extension and Semi

intensive carf

Polyculture.

Zilla

Parishad

Auditorium

, Narail

3 days (03 -

05 Nov.,09)

Officers of

Fisheries

Department,

Officers of PMO ,

Officers of SMO

and NGO

Facilitator(Fish)

13( Male-11,

Female-2)

39 27,250.00 DTL,WMO Specialist and Fisheries Specialist of

ISPMC ,

Deputy Chief(Fishery),Dte of Planning-

3(IPSWAM),BWDB,Dhaka

,District Fisheries Officer, Narail and

Senior Scientific Officer ,BFRI, Jessore.

06/2009

-10

Water Management

of Different Crops,

Green Manuring and

Compost

preparetion"

Zilla

Parishad

Auditorium

, Narail

3 days (09 -

11

Nov.,2009)

Officers of

Department of

Agriculture

Extension,

Officers of PMO,

Officers of SMO

and NGO

Facilitators (Ag.)

13( Male-13,

Female-0)

39 28,200.00 DTL and Agriculture Development Specialist of

ISPMC ,

Deputy Director, DAE, Narail ,

Crop Production Specialist , DAE , Narail and

Plant Protection Specialist,DAE ,Narail.


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


12/2009

-10

Guide Lines on

Gender and

Development

Zilla

Parishad

Auditorium

, Narail

3 days(19-21

January,201

0)

Officers of line

agencies,NGO

Supervisor and

NGO Facilitator.

13(Male-8

Female-5)

39 28,450.00 Dr. Rokeya Khatun (ADB),

Mr.A.Kashem (IPSWAM),

Dist. Women Affairs Officer and

Ms. Tajkera Khair (GL Specialist,)

20/2009

-10

Financial

Management for

SAIWRPMP

BWDB

Conferenc

e

room,Motij

heel,Dhak

a

2 days(14-15

March,2010)

Officers of

PMO,SMOs,RAC,

Dte of Finance,

Dte of Accounts

and Dte of Audit.

23(Male-22

Female-1)

46 100,000.00

(Expenditure

made from

consultant’s

budget fund)

Mr.Zahirul Islam(PD,SAIWRPMP)

Mr.R.Roostee(TL,ISPMC)

Mr.Alexandar Fox(Procurement

Specialist,ADB,BRM,Dhaka)

Mr.M.A. Ahad(Head of Disbursement,

ADB,BRM,Dhaka)

Mr.Zakirul Islam,(Director,

Finance,BWDB,Dhaka)

Mr.Rezaul Karim,(Director, Audit,BWDB,Dhaka)

Mr.Ataul Karim(Financial Adviser,ISPMC)


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


30/2009

-10

Participatory

Integrated Water

Resources

Management.

CEGIS

Conferenc

e

Room,Guls

han,Dhaka

4days(14-

17

June,2010)

Officers of PMO,

Officers of SMOs,

NGO Superviser,

NGO Facilitators,

37(Male-29 +

Female-8)

148 666,626.00

(Expenditure

made from

consultant’s

budget fund)

Mr.Giasuddin Ahmed Choudhury, Executive

Director,CEGIS,Dhaka

Prof. Abdul Matin,BUET,Dhaka

Dr.Musfiqus Salehin, Prof.,IWMF, BUET, Dhaka

Mr.Ahmadul Hassan, Director, Research

Development and Training

Division,CEGIS,Dhaka

Mr.Wazi Ullah,Deputy Executive Director

,CEGIS,

Mr.H.S.Mozaddad Faruque, WR Expart,

CEGIS,

Mr.Mujibul Huq, Environmental Advisor, CEGIS,

Mr.Md.A. Rashid, Agriculture Engineer, CEGIS,

Mr.Sultan Ahmed, , Director, Business

Development Division, CEGIS,Dhaka

Dr.Dilruba Ahmed, , Director, Socio-economic

Division, CEGIS,Dhaka

Mr.Ehsan Hafiz Chowdhury, Director, Database

and IT Division, CEGIS,Dhaka

Mr.Mahfuzur Rahman,Executive Engineer,

CDSP,BWDB,Dhaka

Mr.Nityananda Chakravorty, Socio-economic

Advisor, CEGIS,Dhaka

Mr.Maminul Haque Sarker, Deputy Executive

Director(Development), CEGIS,Dhaka

Dr.Sujit Bala, Prof.,IWMF, BUET, Dhaka

Mr.Malik Fida Abdulla Khan, Director, Climate

Change Division, CEGIS,Dhaka

Sub-Total (A)

2009-10

128(male-108,

female-20)

369 888,306.00


For all SIP

WMO Training (2009-10)

Part-B

Course No. Course Title Venue Duration Participants Total No. of

Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


03/2009-10 Drafting of Bylaw

for WMG

(Batch-1)

Proshika

Auditorium

, Narail

2 days

(13-14

Oct.,09)

WMG Members of

SIP - 8

21( Male-14,

Female-7)

42 23,395.00 TL of ISPMC,



Upazilla Co-Operative Officer, Narail.

04/2009-10 Drafting of Bylaw

for WMG

(Batch-2)

Proshika

Auditorium

, Narail

2 days

(19-20

Oct.,09)

WMG Members of

SIP - 8 &9

27(Male-18,

Female-9)

54 26,055.00 TL of ISPMC,




07/2009-10 Registration

Procedure for

WMG Member

(Batch-1)

Proshika

Auditorium

, Narail

2 days (9 -

10 Dec,09)

WMG Members (

Chairman,Vice-

Chairman and

Cashier of SIP - 8

and 9)

24( Male-24+

Female-0)

48 26,000.00 TL&WMO Specialist of ISPMC,



08/2009-10 Registration

Procedure for

WMG Member

(Batch-2)

Proshika

Auditorium

, Narail

2 days (13

- 14

Dec,09)

WMG Members (

Chairman,Vice-

Chairman and

Cashier of SIP - 8

and 9)

24(Male-22

+Female-2) =

48

48 26,000.00 TL&WMO Specialist of ISPMC,



09/2009-10 Plantation

Activities and

Vegetable

Gardening.

(Batch-1)

Proshika

Auditorium

, Narail

2 days (23

- 24

Dec,09)

WMG Agriculture

Committee

Members ( SIP -

8 and 9)

24( Male-15+

Female-9)

48 26,550.00 Agriculture Extention Specialist of ISPMC ,

Upazila Agriculture Officer,Narail

, Upazilla Agriculture Officer, Lohagora,

Agriculture Extension officer ,DAE, Narail

and

Sub- Asstt. Agriculture Officer.


For all SIP


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


10/2009-10 Operation and

Maintenance of

Infrastructure

through

participatory water

management(Batc

h-1)

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

2 days (11-

12 January,

2010)

WMG Members (

O&M sub-committee

SIP - 8 )

21( Male-14+

Female-7)

42 22,900.00 Team Leader, ISPM consultant

Deputy Team Leader, ISPM consultant

Water management specialist , ISPM consultant

,O&M specialist, ISPM consultant and

Quality control specialist of ISPM consultant

11/2009-10 Operation and

Maintenance of

Infrastructure

through

participatory water

management(Batc

h-2)

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

2 days (13-

14 January,

2010)

WMG Members (

O&M sub-committee

SIP - 8 and 9)

24(Male-16

+Female-8

48 24,100.00 Team Leader, ISPM consultant

Deputy Team Leader, ISPM consultant

Water management specialist , ISPM consultant

,O&M specialist, ISPM consultant and

Quality control specialist of ISPM consultant

13/2009-10 Plantation

Activities and

Vegetable

Gardening. (Batch-

2)

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

2 days (26 -

27 January,

2010)

WMG Agriculture

Committee

Members ( SIP - 8

and 9)

21( Male-12+

Female-9)

42 27,350.00

Agriculture Extension Specialist of ISPMC ,

Upazila Agriculture Officer,Narail

,Upazilla Agriculture Officer, Lohagora,,

Agriculture Extention officer,DAE,Narail and

Sub- Asstt. Agriculture Officer.

14/2009-10 Semi Intensive

carp Polyculture.

(Batch-1)

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

2 days (8-9

February,

2010)

WMG Members (

Fisheries sub-

committee SIP - 8 )

24( Male-16+

Female-8)

48 26,650.00 Mr.Md.Abbdul Wadud, District Fisheries

Officer,Narail,

Mr.Enamul Hoque, Upazila Fisheries

Officer,Narail Sador,Narail and

Ms.Hosneara Happy, Upazila Fisheries

Officer,Lohagora,,Narail,

15/2009-10 Semi Intensive

carp Polyculture.

(Batch-2)

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

2 days (10-

11

February,

2010)

WMG Members

(Fisheries sub-

committee SIP - 8

and 9)

24(Male-19

+Female-5)

48 26,650.00 Mr.Md.Abbdul Wadud, District Fisheries

Officer,Narail,

Mr.Enamul Hoque, Upazila Fisheries

Officer,Narail Sador,Narail and

Ms.Hosneara Happy, Upazila Fisheries

Officer,Lohagora,,Narail,


For all SIP


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


16/2009-10 Seed production

and Compost

preparation.

(Batch-1)

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

2 days(22-

23

February,

2010)

WMG Members (

Poor and

Vulnerable women

of the project

beneficiaries SIP -

8 )

24(Male-0

Female-24)

48 26,700.00 Mr.Md.Ruhul Amin, , Upazila Agriculture

Officer,Narail Sador,Narail

,Mr.Mohadev Chandra Sana,Agricuture Extension

Officer,Kalia,Narail and

Mr.Badal Chandra Biswas, SAAO, Tularampur

UP.

17/2009-10 Seed production

and Compost

preparation.

(Batch-2)

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

2 days (24 -

25

February,

2010)

WMG Members

(Poor and

Vulnerable women

of the project

beneficiaries SIP –

8 & 9 )

24( Male-0+

Female-24)

48 27,450.00 Mr.Md.Ruhul Amin, , Upazila Agriculture

Officer,Narail Sador,Narail,

Mr. Kingkor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture

officer,Kalia,Narail

, Mr.Mohadev Chandra Sana, Agricuture

Extension Officer, Kalia, Narail. And

Mr.Zakir Hossain, SAAO, Korola UP.

18/2009-10 Poultry,Goat and

Cow

rearing(Batch-1)

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

2 days (8-9

March,

2010)

WMG Members (

Poor and

Vulnerable women

of the project

beneficiaries SIP -

8 )

24( Male-0+

Female-24)

48 27,650.00

Dr.Ali Akbar Mia(DLO,Narail)

Dr.Pizush Kanti Ghosh(TLO,Narail)

Dr.Sushen Haldar(Veterinary Surgeon, Narail)

19/2009-10 Poultry,Goat and

Cow

rearing(Batch-2)

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

2 days (10-

11

March y,

2010)

WMG Members (

Poor and

Vulnerable women

of the project

beneficiaries SIP –

8 & 9 )

24(Male-

0+Female-24)

48 27,650.00 Dr.Ali Akbar Mia(DLO,Narail)

Dr.Pizush Kanti Ghosh(TLO,Narail)

Dr.Sushen Haldar(Veterinary Surgeon, Narail)


For all SIP


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


21/2009-10 Book keeping for

WMG

(SIP-8)

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail and

Field visit

3 days (22 -

24

March,2010

)

Secretary, Cashier

and one signatory

member of the

WMG Executive

Committee.

24( Male- 22 +

Female- 2)

72 38,750.00 District Cooperative Officer, Narail.

Mr.Md.Hassan Mahmood, DAR, Office of the

District Cooperative Officer, Narail

Mr.Biraj Mohon Kundu, Upazila Cooperative

Officer, Narail Sador, Narail.

Mr.Tarikul Islam, Inspector, Office of the District

Cooperative Officer,

Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan,WMA Specialist, ISPMC

22/2009-10 Book keeping for

WMG

(SIP-8&9)

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail and

Field visit

3 days (29 -

31

March,2010

)

Secretary, Cashier

and one signatory

member of the

WMG Executive

Committee.

24( Male-19 +

Female- 5 )

72 38,750.00 District Cooperative Officer, Narail.

Mr.Md.Hassan Mahmood, DAR, Office of the

District Cooperative Officer, Narail

Mr.Biraj Mohon Kundu, Upazila Cooperative

Officer, Narail Sador, Narail.

Mr.Tarikul Islam, Inspector, Office of the District

Cooperative Officer,

Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan,WMA Specialist, ISPMC

23/2009-10 Gender Awareness

for WMG Members

of NSP SIP -8

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

2 days (11-

12

April,2010)

WMG Members of

NSP SIP -8

24( Male-6+

Female-18)

48 25,450.00 Mr.Md.Ataul Hoque,DTL,ISPMC

Mr.Md.Lutfar Rahman, EE/SMO, Narail Sub-

Project,BWDB,Narail.

Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan,WMA Specialist,ISPMC

Mrs. Mousumi Biswas, District Women Affairs

Officer,Narail.

Mr.Uttam Kumar Goldar ,Supervisor,NGO(ASG)

Mr.Bidhan Goldar ,Facilitator,NGO(ASG)

24/2009-10

Gender Awareness

for WMG Members

of NSP SIP -8 & 9

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

2 days (20-

21

April,2010)

WMG Members of

NSP SIP -8 & 9

24( Male-6+

Female-18)

48 25,450.00 Mr.Md.Ataul Hoque,DTL,ISPMC

Mr.Md.Lutfar Rahman, EE/SMO, Narail Sub-

Project, BWDB, Narail.

Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan,WMA Specialist,ISPMC

Mrs. Mousumi Biswas, District Women Affairs

Officer, Narail.

Mr.Uttam Kumar Goldar ,Supervisor,NGO(ASG)

Mr.Bidhan Goldar ,Facilitator,NGO(ASG)


For all SIP


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


25/2009-10 Salinity of

surface water

and its safe use

Proshika

Auditorium

, Narail

2 days(3 -

4

May,2010)

WMG Members of

NSP SIP -8

(comparatively big

size farmer)

24( Male-24+

Female-0)

48 25,450.00 Mr.Md.Lutfar Rahman, EE/SMO, Narail Sub-

Project, BWDB, Narail.

Mr.Abu Bakar Siddique, Environmental

Specialist,ISPMC

Mr.King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila

Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail.

Mr.Raghu Nath Kar,Mr. Upazila Agriculture

Officer,Lohagora,Narail

Mr.Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture Officer,

DAE, Narail Sador,Narail

26/2009-10 Salinity of

surface water

and its safe use

Proshika

Auditorium

, Narail

2 days(5 -

6

May,2010)

WMG Members of

NSP SIP -8 & 9

(comparatively big

size farmer)

24( Male-23+

Female-1)

48 25,450.00 Mr.Dipak Kumar Sarkar, EE/SMO, Chenchuri

Beel Sub-Project, BWDB, Narail.

Mr.Abu Bakar Siddique, Environmental

Specialist,ISPMC

Mr.King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila

Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail.

Mr.Raghu Nath Kar,Mr. Upazila Agriculture

Officer,Lohagora,Narail

Mr.Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture Officer,

DAE, Narail Sador,Narail

27/2009-10 Refresher course

on O&M of

infrastructure

through

participatory

water

management

Proshika

Auditorium

, Narail

2 days(19

- 20

May,2010)

WMG members

(Chairman,

Secretary and 3

other members of

each WMG) of

NSP SIP-

9(5WMG).

25( Male-20+

Female-5)

50 24,700.00 Mr.Zahirul Islam,Project Director

,SAIWRPMP,BWDB,Jessore

Mr.M.H.Siddique,Water Resources Planner,

ISPMC.

Mr. Md. Lutfar Rahman, SMO /EE, Narail

Sub-project, BWDB, Narail.

Mr.Manzurul Karim, O&M Specialist , ISPMC

Mr.Abdur Razzaque,EE, Office of the PMO,

SAIWRPMP

Mr.Ataul Huq,,DTL,ISPMC

Mr. Shah A.A.Khan,WMA Specialist,ISPMC


For all SIP


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)

Remarks/Resource person


on O&M of

infrastructure

through

participatory

water

management

Proshika

Auditorium

, Narail

2 days(23

- 24

May,2010)

WMG members

(Chairman,

Secretary and 3

other members of

each WMG) of

NSP SIP-

8(5WMG).

25(Male-21+

Female-4)

50 24,700.00 Mr.Zahirul Islam, Project Director,

SAIWRPMP, BWDB, Jessore.

Mr.M.H.Siddique, Water Resources Planner,

ISPMC.

Mr. Dipak Kumar Sarkar, SMO /EE,

Chenchuri Beel Sub-project, BWDB, Narail.


Mr.Abdur Razzaque,EE, Office of the PMO,

SAIWRPMP




on O&M of

infrastructure

through

participatory

water

management

Proshika

Auditorium

, Narail

2 days(25

- 26

May,2010)

WMG members

(Chairman,

Secretary and 3

other members of

each WMG) of

NSP SIP-

8(6WMG).

30( Male-24+

Female-6)

60 27,100.00 Mr.Zahirul Islam,Project Director

,SAIWRPMP,BWDB,Jessore

Mr.M.H.Siddique, Water Resources Planner,

ISPMC.

Mr. Md. Lutfar Rahman, SMO /EE, Narail

Sub-project, BWDB, Narail.


Mr.Fakrul Abedin,EE, Office of the PMO,

SAIWRPMP



Sub-total(B) 554(Male-335,

Female-219)

1156 620,900.00

Grant

Total(A+B)

For 2009-10

682(Male-

443+ Female-

239)

1525 1509,206.00


For all SIP

Southwest Area Integrated water Resources planning and Management Project Implemented Training Activities during 2010-2011

Part-A (Staff Training) 2010-11

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


01/

2010-11

Multi disciplinary

delineation, planning

and implementation of

a sub-unit of

SAIWRPMP

CEGIS conference

room,Gulshan,

Dhaka.

4 days (2-5

August,2010)

Officers of PMO,

SMOs and NGO

(ASG).

29( Male-27

Female-02)

116 666,000.00

(Expenditure

incurred from

consultant’s

training fund)

Mr.Giasuddin Ahmed Choudhury, Executive Director,CEGIS,Dhaka

Prof. Abdul Matin,BUET,Dhaka

Mr.Wazi Ullah,Deputy Executive Director(Operation),CEGIS , Dhaka

Mr.H.S.Mozaddad Faruque, WR Expart, CEGIS,Dhaka

Mr.Mujibul Huq, Environmental Advisor, CEGIS,Dhaka

Mr.Nityananda Chakravorty, Socio-economic Advisor, CEGIS, Dhaka

Mr.Ataul Huq and Mr.M.H.Siddiquee,ISPMC

02/

2010-11

On-Job training on

delineation, planning

and other related

matters for

implementation of a

sub-unit of

SAIWRPMP

BACHTE

SHEKHA

Conference room,

Arabpur, Jessore.

3 days ( 1-3

September,2010)

Officers of PMO,

SMOs and NGO

(ASG).

30( Male-30

Female-00)

90 60,000.00

(Expenditure

incurred from

consultant’s

training fund)

Mr.Zahirul Islam, Project Director,SAIWRPMP

Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, SAIWRPMP

Mr.Md.Masud Karim,DCEO, PMO

Mr.Mahbubar Rahman,EE, PMO

Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), SAIWRPMP

Mr.R.F.Roostee,TL,ISPMC

Mr.Ataul Huq , ISPMC

Mr.M.H.Siddiquee,ISPMC

Mr.Shah Ahammed Ali Khan, ISPMC

Mr.Monzurul Karim,ISPMC

Dr.Rezaul Karim,ISPMC

Dr.Shamsul Huda,ISPMC


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


03/

2010-11

Hydrography,

Topography Survey &

Data processing by

GIS.

BWDB Rest

House,

Narail

4 days ( 21-24

October,2010)

SDEs, AE and SAE

of PMO/SMO .

07( Male-07

Female-00)

28 27,500.00

Mr.Md.Fakrul Abedin, Executive Engineer, Office of the PMO, SAIWRPMP

Mr.Md.Amirul Islam, Executive Engineer, Office of the Chief Monitoring, BWDB, Dhaka.

04/

2010-11

Communication Tools

and Techniques.

BACHTE

SHEKHA

Auditorium,

Arabpur, Jessore

3 days(30.10.10

to 01.11.10)

Officers of PMO,

Extension Overseers

and Facilitators

35(Male-28

Female-07)

105 5,88,000.00

(Expenditure

incurred from

consultant’s

training fund)

Mr.Zahirul Islam, Project Director, SAIWRPMP

Mr.Md.Masud Karim,,DCEO, PMO

Mr.Giasuddin Ahmed Choudhury, Executive Director, CEGIS,Dhaka.

Mr.Md. Wazi Ullah,,Deputy Executive Director (Operation), CEGIS , Dhaka.

Dr. Hamidul Hoque,…., Institute of Livelihood Studies,Dhaka.

Dr.M.A.Matin, Professor, BUET, Dhaka.

Dr.Md. Rezaul Karim,AE Specialist,ISPMC,SAIWRPMP

05/

2010-11

Orientation Workshop

of the newly recruited

Facilitators and others

BACHTE

SHEKHA

Auditorium,

Arabpur, Jessore

1day(03.11.10) Newly recruited

Facilitators and

others

51(Male-44

Female-7)

51 16,000.00

(Expenditure

incurred from

consultant’s

training fund)

Mr.Zahirul Islam, Project Director, SAIWRPMP

Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, SAIWRPMP

Mr.Mahbubar Rahman,EE, PMO .

Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), SAIWRPMP


Mr.Ataul Huq , DTL,ISPMC




Dr.Md. Rezaul Karim,ISPMC


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


06/

2010-11

Induction course on

preparation of SIP and

formation of WMO

BACHTE

SHEKHA

Auditorium,

Arabpur, Jessore

3days

(10-12Nov.10)

Newly recruited

Facilitators and

others

35(Male-30

Female-5)

105 98,480.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzque,EE, PMO

Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO

Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO

Mr.Mahbubar Rahman,EE, PMO

Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), PMO

Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, PMO

Mr.Md.Lutfor

Rahman,EE/SMO,Narail

Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAR,Office of

the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail

Upazila Cooperative officer, Kalia,

Narail

Mr.Shah Ahammed Ali Khan,

ISPMC




Mr.Md.Aminul Karim,PMO

07/

2010-11

Orientation Workshop

of the newly recruited

Facilitators of

NGO(ASG) and others

Proshika

Auditorium, Narail

1day(22.11.10) Newly recruited

Facilitators of

NGO(ASG) and

others

15(Male-12

Female-3)

15 - Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO

Mr.Md.Abdur Razzaque,EE, PMO

Mr.Masud Karim,

DCEO,SAIWRPMP


Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F),

SAIWRPMP


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


08/

2010-11

Induction course on

preparation of SIP and

formation of WMO

Proshika

Auditorium, Narail

2days (25 and

27 Nov.10)

Newly recruited

Facilitators of NGO

and others

15(Male-12

Female-3)

30 41,050.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzque,, EE, PMO



Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, PMO



Mr.Biddut Kumar Shaha, EE/

SMO,Chenchury Beell Sub-project,

Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of

the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail


Mr.Ataul Haq,DTL,ISPMC

Mr.Shah Ahammed Ali Khan,

ISPMC




Mr.Md.Aminul Karim,ISPMC

09/

2010-11

Workshop on

Participatory Action

Plan

BANCHTE

SHEKHA

Auditorium,

Arabpur, Jessore

3days

(28 + 29 Nov. +

01 Dec..,10)

Officers of PMO and

Newly recruited

Facilitators and

others of PMO and

NGO

85(Male-68

Female-17)

255 200,000.00

(Expenditure

incurred from

consultant’s

training fund)

Mr.Md.Abdur Razzque,EE, PMO












Dr.C.M.Wijayaratna, Int.WMA Specialist

Mr.Abu Bakor Siddique


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


16/

2010-11

Feedback training on

“Participatory Action

Plan for Preparation of

SIP and Formation of

WMO”

Bachte Shekha

Auditorium,

Arabpur, Jessore

2days (23&25

December,

2010.)

Facilitators and

others of PMO and

NGO

84(Male-66

Female-18)

168 1,34,850.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzque,EE, PMO









23/

2010-11

2nd Feedback training

on “Preparation of SIP

and Formation of

WMO”

Zila Parisad

Auditorium, Narail.

1day

(15.01.2011)

Officers of

PMO,Facilitators of

PMO and NGO

94(Male-77

Female-17)

94 74,650.00 Mr.Zahirul Islam,PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr.Md.Fakhrul Abedin, EE, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr.Md.Didarul Islam, IWM.


58/

2010-11

Formation of WMO

and Laws of

Cooperative

Banchte Shekha

Auditorium,

Arabpur, Jessore

2 days

(04-05 May,

2011)

Officers of

PMO,Facilitators of

PMO and NGO

51( Male-42

Female-9)

102 91,750.00 Mr. Shah Ahmed Ali Khan, WMA. Specialist, ISPMC

Mr. Samir Kumar Biswas, Joint Registrar of Cooperatives, Khulna

Mr.Md.Jahangir Alam,Dist. Cooperative Officer,Narail

Ms. Pronati Bisnu, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Jessore

Mr. Mobarak Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC

59/

2010-11

Formation of WMO

and Laws of

Cooperative

Banchte Shekha

Auditorium,

Arabpur, Jessore

2 days

(08-09 May,

2011)

Officers of

PMO,Facilitators of

PMO and NGO

51( Male-42

Female-9)

102 91,750.00 Mr. Shah Ahmed Ali Khan, WMA. Specialist, ISPMC

Mr. Samir Kumar Biswas, Joint Registrar of Cooperatives, Khulna


Ms. Pronati Bisnu, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Jessore

Mr. Mobarak Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


86/2010-

11

Workshop on Micro

Credit Management of

SAIWRPMP

Banchte Shekha

Auditorium,

Arabpur, Jessore

1 day

(30 June,2011)

Officers of PMO,

RA,SF,CF and

WMCA president

72( Male-70

Female-2)

72 58,750.00 Mr.Mobarak Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC

Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCO,Narail

Ms. Pronoti Bisnu, DCO,Jessore

Total(Staff

Training) Part –

A(2010-11)

Total Course = 14 654( Male

555+

Female-99)

1333 2148,780.00


For all SIP

Part-B (WMO Training) (2010-11)

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


10/

2010-11 Drafting of Bylaw

for WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P.

3days(07-09

Dec.,2010)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# 16/1, 16/2, 16/3, 16/4

and 16/5

31(Male-21

Female-10)

93 97,150.00 Mr.Jahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist. Cooperative Officer, Narail.

Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail

Mr.Md.Mudasser Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.



11/

2010-11 Cultivation

Procedure of

different crops and

Vegetables

gardening

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3days(07-09

Dec.,2010)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# 16/1, 16/2, 16/3, 16/4

and 16/5

31(Male-20

Female-11)

93 98,200.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP



Deputy Director, DAE, Narail.

Mr.King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail.

Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail.

SAAO (BS), Purulia Block, Kalia, Narail.


Dr.Rezaul Karim, ISPMC


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


13/

2010-11 Cultivation

Procedure of

different crops and

Vegetables

gardening.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3days(14+15+17

Dec.,2010)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# 16/6, 18/2, 18/3, 18/4

and 18/5

30(Male-19

Female-11)

90 98,200.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO SAIWRPMP







14//


for WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P.

3days(20-22

Dec.,2010)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# 18/5A, 18/6, 18/6A,

18/7 and 18/8

30(Male-20

Female-10)





Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.


Mr.Md.Mudasser Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.

15/

2010-11 Cultivation

Procedure of

different crops and

Vegetables

gardening.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3days(20-22

Dec.,2010)

WMG Members of

CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# 18/5A, 18/6, 18/6A,

18/7 and 18/8

30(Male-20

Female-10)

90 98,200.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO








For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


17/

2010-11

Registration

procedures for

WMG.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

3 days (28-30

December,

2010.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP: 16-18

WMG#16/1, 16/2, 16/3,

16/4 and16/5.

30(Male-19

Female-11)

90 96,100.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzque,EE, ,PMO






Mr.Md.Musaddek Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.

Mr.Parimal Kumar Das,Assitant Inspector,Upazila Cooperative office ,Narail

18/

2010-11

Basic training on

Carp poly-culture in

SAIWRPMP area.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3 days (28-30

December,

2010.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP:16-18

(Fishery Sub-

committee) of WMG #

18/5A, 18/6,

18/6A,18/7 and18/8

30(Male-20

Female-10)

90 96,850.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,PMO



, Dist.Fisheries Officer, Narail.

Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque,Sr.Fisheries Officer,Narail

Ms. Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila Fisheries Officer,Lohagora, Narail.

Mr.Md.Azizul Hoque,Assitant Fisheries Officer,KaliaNarail


19/

2010-11

Registration

procedures for

WMG.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

3 days (04-06

January, 2011.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP: 16-18

WMG#16/6, 18/2, 18/3,

18/4 and18/5.

30(Male-20

Female-10)




Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO


Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAR,Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail




For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


20/

2010-11

Basic training on


SAIWRPMP area.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3 days (04-06

January, 2011.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP: 16-18

(Fishery Sub-

committee) of WMG #

16/1, 16/2, 16/3, 16/4

and16/5.

30(Male-18

Female-12)

90 96,850.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,PMO





Ms..Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila Fisheries Officer,Lohagora, Narail.


21/

2010-11

Registration

procedures for

WMG.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

3 days (11-13

January, 2011.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP: 16-18

WMG#18/5A, 18/6,

18/6A,18/7 and18/8

30(Male-20

Female-10)


Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.




22/

2010-11

Basic training on


SAIWRPMP area.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3 days (11-13

January, 2011.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP:16-18

(Fishery Sub-

committee) of WMG #

16/6, 18/2, 18/3, 18/4

and18/5.

30(Male-20

Female-10)

90 96,850.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, , PMO




Ms.Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila Fisheries Officer, Lohagora, Narail.




For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


24/

2010-11

Procedure of Book

Keeping for WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

3 days (19-21

January, 2011.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP: 16-18 WMG

# 16/1, 16/2, 16/3, 16/4

and16/5.

30(Male-23

Female-7)

90 95,600.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO,

Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, , PMO







25/

2010-11

Seed Production &

Compost

Preparation.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3 days (19-21

January, 2011.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# 16/2, 16/3, 16/4,

18/2, and 18/3

30(Male-10

Female-20)

90 97,750.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO


Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman, EE, PMO,





SAAO (BS), Kalia, Narail.

26/

2010-11

Procedure of Book

Keeping for WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

3 days (23-25

January, 2011.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP: 16-18 WMG

# 16/6, 18/2, 18/3, 18/4

and18/5.

32(Male-29

Female-3)

96 97,700.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO,









For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


27/

2010-11

Seed Production &

Compost

Preparation.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3 days (23-25

January, 2011.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# 18/4,18/5,18/8,18/6

and 18/7

30(Male-17

Female-13)

90 97,750.00 Mr.Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO.

Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO.

Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman, EE, PMO.






28/

2010-11

Procedure of Book

Keeping for WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

3 days (29-31

January, 2011.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP: 16-18 WMG

# 18/5A, 18/6, 18/7 and

18/8.

28(Male-20

Female-8)

84 93,500.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO.

Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, , PMO


Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(S), PMO .





29/

2010-11

Seed Production &

Compost

Preparation.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3 days (29-31

January, 2011.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# 16/1, 16/5,16/6 and

18/5A

30(Male-2

Female-28)

90 97,750.00 Mr.Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO

Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO.

Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman, EE, PMO.







For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


30/

2010-11

LCS Training For

WMG members.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

1 day (14.02

2011.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# 18/5,16/4, 16/3, 16/6

and 16/5

45(Male-34

Female-11)

45 37,150.00 Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan, ISPMC.

Mr. .Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,

Mr.Md. Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO.

Mr. Biddut Kumar Shaha, EE/SMO, CSP, SAIWRPMP

Mr. Hasan Mahmud, SDE, Chnchuri Beel Sub-project, SAIWRPMP.

31/

2010-11

LCS Training For

WMG members.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

1 day (14.02

2011.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# 18/7, 18/2, 18/3, 16/2

and 18/4

40(Male-33

Female-7)

40 34,400.00

Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan, ISPMC,

Mr.Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,

Mr.Md. Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO,

Mr. Zulfikar Ali Hawlader, EE, Narail Sub-project, SAIWRPMP

Mr. Amrito Kumar Das, SDE, Narail Sub-project, SAIWRPMP.

32/

2010-11

LCS Training For

WMG members.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

1 day (15.02

2011.)

WMG members of

CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# 18/4, 18/8, 18/6, 16/1

and 18/5A

42(Male-33

Female-9)

42 36,100.00 Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan, ISPMC,

Mr. .Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,


Mr. Biddut Kumar Shaha, EE/SMO, CSP,SAIWRPMP

Mr. Hasan Mahmud, SDE, Chnchuri Beel Sub-project, SAIWRPMP.

33/

2010-11

LCS Training For

WMG members.

Zila parisad

auditorium,

Narail

1 day (15.02

2011.)

WMG members of

NSP/SIP:8 & 9) WMG

#

8/1, 8/1A, 8/2, 8/3, 8/4,

8/5, 8/6, 8/7, 8//, 8/9,

8/10, 9/1, 9/2, 9/3, 9/4

and 9/5

42(Male-27

Female-15)

42 36,100.00 Mr.Shah Ahmed Ali Khan, ISPMC

Mr.Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO


Mr. Zulfikar Ali Hawlader, EE, Narail Sub-project, SAIWRPMP

Mr. Amrito Kumar Das, SDE, Narail Sub-project, SAIWRPMP.


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


34/

2010-11

Drafting of Bylaw

for WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Singa-Soalpur

U.P., Narail.

3days(22-24

February, 2011)

WMG Members of (SW

NSP/SIP:16 and 21)

6WMG

36(Male-23

Female-13)

108 100,400.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzaque, EE, PMO.

Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, PMO.





Mr.Hashan Mahmood, DAD, Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.

Upazila Cooperative Officer, Narail Sador, Narail.

Inspector of Cooperative, Narail Sador, Narail


35/

2010-11

Cultivation

Procedure of

different crops and

Vegetables

gardening.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Singa-Soalpur

U.P., Narail.

3days(22-24

February, 2011)

WMG Members of (SW

NSP/SIP:16 and 21)

6WMG

36(Male-23

Female-13)

108 100,100.00 Deputy Director,DAE,Narail

Upazila Agriculture officer, Narail Sador, Narail.

Mr.Jahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP


Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(Sociology), PMO

Dr.Rezaul Karim, ISPMC

Mr. Provat Kumar Tarafdar,SAAO (BS), Narail Sador , Narail.

Mr.Badal Kumar Das,SAAO (BS), Narail Sador , Narail


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


36/

2010-11

Registration

Procedures for

WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Singa-Soalpur

U.P., Narail.

3days(26-28

February, 2011)

WMG Members of (SW

NSP/SIP:16 and 21)

6WMG

36(Male-26

Female-10)

108 100,400.00 Mr.Md.Abdur Razzaque,EE,Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP



Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(Sociology), Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP



Mr.Hashan Mahmood, DAR, Office of the Dist.Cooperative Officer, Narail.

Upazila Cooperative Officer, Narail Sador, Narail.

Inspector of Cooperative, Narail Sador, Narail


37/

2010-11

Basic training on


SAIWRPMP area.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Singa-Soalpur

U.P., Narail.

3days(26-28

February, 2011)

WMG Members of (SW

NSP/SIP:16 and 21)

6WMG

36(Male-27

Female-9)

108 100,350.00 Mr. Md. Lutfor Rahman, EE, PMO, SAIWRPMP.

District Fisheries Officer,Narail

Mr. S.M. Enamul Hoque, Senior Fisheries Officer, Narail.

Ms. Hosneara Happy, Upazila Fisheries Officer, Lohagora, Narail.

Asstt. Fisheries Officer, Narail Sador, Narail.




Dr. Shamsul Huda, ISPMC


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


38/

2010-11

Procedure of Book

Keeping for WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Singa-Soalpur

U.P

3 days (7-9

March, 2011.)

WMG members of

NSP/SIP: 16 and 21

(6 WMG).

36(Male-22

Female-14)

108 100,500.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,PMO PD,SAIWRPMP





Mr.Md.Golam Rasul, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Narail.

Inspector of Cooperative, Cooperative office ,Narail

39/

2010-11

Seed Production &

Compost

Preparation.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Singa-Soalpur

U.P.

3 days (7-9

March, 2011.)

WMG members of

NSP/SIP: 16 and 21

(6 WMG).

36(Male-23

Female-13)



Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman, EE, PMO, SAIWRPMP.




SAAO (BS), Narail.

40/


for WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P.,

Kalia, Narail.

3days(15-17

March,2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)

WMG # 15/3,

15/4,15/5,15/6 and

15/7

30(Male-20

Female-10)

90 95,600.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA,

PMO,SAIWRPMP

Mr. Md. Lutfor Rahman, EE, PMO




Mr.Jahangir Alam, Dist.Cooperative

Officer, Narail.

Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAR,Office of the

Dist.Cooperative Officer,Narail

Mr.Md.Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila

Cooperative Officer, Narail.

Mr.M.A. Talukdar,ISPMC


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


41/

2010-11

Basic training on


SAIWRPMP area.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P., Kalia,

Narail.

3days(15-17

March,2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)

WMG # 15/3,

15/4,15/5,15/6 and

15/7

31(Male-22

Female-9

93 98,250.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,Office of the

PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, Office of

the PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr.Amimul Ehsan,Asstt.Chief(Fish),

Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr.Abdur Razzak,AC(F), Office of the

PD,SAIWRPMP


Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque,Sr.Fisheries

Officer,Narail

Ms..Hosne Ara Happy, Upazila

Fisheries Officer,Lohagora, Narail.

Mr.Md.Azizul Hoque,Assitant Fisheries

Officer,KaliaNarail


42/


for WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P.,

Kalia, Narail.

3days(21-23

March,2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)

WMG # 15/1,

15/2,15/3,13/5 and

13/6

30(Male-18

Female-12)

90 95,600.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the

PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr. Md. Lutfor Rahman, EE, Office of

the PD,SAIWRPMP


the PD,SAIWRPMP


PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, Office of

the PD,SAIWRPMP


Officer, Narail.

Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the



Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.



For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


43/

2010-11

Basic training on


SAIWRPMP area.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P., Kalia,

Narail.

3days(21-23

March,2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)

WMG # 15/1,

15/2,15/3,13/5 and

13/6

30(Male-19

Female-11)


PD,SAIWRPMP


the PD,SAIWRPMP




PD,SAIWRPMP



Officer,Narail




Officer,KaliaNarail


44/


for WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P.,

Kalia, Narail.

3days(29-31

March,2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)

WMG # 13/2,

13/3,13/4, and 13/5

24(Male-14

Female-10)

72 86,300.00 Mr.Zahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the

PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr. Md. Lutfor Rahman, EE, Office of

the PD,SAIWRPMP


the PD,SAIWRPMP


PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr.Md.Hafizur Rahman,EO, Office of

the PD,SAIWRPMP


Officer, Narail.

Mr.Hasan Mahmood,DAD,Office of the



Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.



For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


45/

2010-11

Basic training on


SAIWRPMP area.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P., Kalia,

Narail.

3days(29-31

March,2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)

WMG # 13/2, 13/3,13/4

and 13/5

24(Male-16

Female-8)


PD,SAIWRPMP


the PD,SAIWRPMP




PD,SAIWRPMP



Officer,Narail




Officer,KaliaNarail


46/

2010-11 Cultivation

Procedure of

different crops and

Vegetables

gardening.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3days(04-06

April, 2011)

WMG Members of

CSP/SIP:13-15) WMG

# 15/4, 15/5, 15/6 and

15/7

32(Male-25

Female-7)




Mr. Md Alamgir, Research Officer (Economics),Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP

Deputy Director,DAE,Narail

Mr. King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture officer, Kalia, Narail.

Mr.Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail Sador , Narail

SAAO (BS), Babra-Hasla UP, Kalia, Narail.


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


47/

2010-11

Registration

procedures for

WMG.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

3days(04-06

April, 2011)

WMG Members of

CSP/SIP:13-15) WMG

# 13/3, 13/4, 13/5 and

13/6

32(Male-18

Female-14)

96 98,800.00 Mr.Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP




Mr.Md. Alamgir, Research Offecer (Economics), Office of the PD, SAIWRPMP.



Mr. Mosaddeque Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.

Mr. Parimal Kumar Das, Assit Inspector Upazila Cooperative Office, Kalia, Narail

Mr. Mobarok Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC

48/

2010-11 Cultivation

Procedure of

different crops and

Vegetables

gardening.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3days(10-12

April, 2011)

WMG Members of

CSP/SIP:13-15) WMG

# 15/1, 15/2, 15/3 and

13/6

32(Male-23

Female-9)










For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


49/

2010-11

Registration

procedures for

WMG.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

3days(10-12

April, 2011)

WMG Members of

CSP/SIP:13-15) WMG

# 13/2, 15/7, 15/6 and

15/5

32(Male-22

Female-10)











50/

2010-11 Cultivation

Procedure of

different crops and

Vegetables

gardening.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3days(16-18

April, 2011)

WMG Members of

CSP/SIP:13-15) WMG

# 13/5, 13/4, 13/3 and

13/2

32(Male-21

Female-11)








SAAO (BS), Babra-Hasla UP, Kalia, Narai


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


51/

2010-11

Registration

procedures for

WMG.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

3days(16-18

April, 2011)

WMG Members of

CSP/SIP:13-15) WMG

# 15/4, 15/3, 15/2 and

15/1

32(Male-18

Female-14)











52/2010-

11

Basic training on

Gift Telapia culture

in SAIWRPMP

area.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P., Kalia,

Narail.

3days(19-21

April,2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)

WMG # 13/2, 13/3,13/5

and 13/6

32(Male-24

Female-8)


PD,SAIWRPMP


the PD,SAIWRPMP




PD,SAIWRPMP



Officer,Narail



Mr.Md.Alamgir, RO, SAIWRPMP

Dr.Shamsul Huda, Fisheries Specialist,

ISPMC


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


53/

2010-11

Procedure of Book

Keeping for WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P.,

Kalia, Narail.

3days(19-21

April,2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)

WMG # 13/3, 13/4,13/5

and 13/6

32(Male-15

Female-17)

96 98,800.00 Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO



Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO, Office of the PD,SAIWRPMP



Mr.Md.Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.

Mr. Parimal mKumar Das, Inspector of Cooperative, Kalia , Narail

Mr. Mobarak Ali Talukdar, Cooperative Specialist, ISPMC.


54/2010-

11

Basic training on


in SAIWRPMP

area.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P., Kalia,

Narail.

3days(23-25

April,2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)

WMG # 13/4, 15/1,15/5

and 15/6

32(Male-21

Female-11)

96 100,550.00 Mr. Ferdous Ahmmed, Asstt. Director,

Dte of Fisheries, Dhaka.

Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,Office of the

PD,SAIWRPMP


the PD,SAIWRPMP




PD,SAIWRPMP



Officer,Narail





ISPMC


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


55/2010-

11

Procedure of Book

Keeping for WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P.,

Kalia, Narail.

3days(23-25

April,2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)

WMG # 13/2, 15/5,15/6

and 15/7

32(Male-23

Female-9)





Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO, PMO



Mr.Md.Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail.

Mr. Parimal mKumar Das, Inspector of Cooperative, Kalia , Narail



56/2010-

11

Basic training on


in SAIWRPMP

area.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P., Kalia,

Narail.

3days(26-28

April,2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)

WMG # 15/7, 15/3,15/2

and 15/4

32(Male-24

Female-8)

96 100,550.00 Mr. Ferdous Ahmmed, Asstt. Director,

Dte of Fisheries, Dhaka.

Mr.Md.Lutfor Rahman,EE, ,Office of the

PD,SAIWRPMP


the PD,SAIWRPMP

Mr.Amimul Ehsan, Asstt. Chief (Fish),

PMO




Officer,Narail





ISPMC


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


57/2010-

11

Procedure of Book

Keeping for WMG

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P.,

Kalia, Narail.

3days(26-28

April,2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:13 and 15)

WMG # 15/1, 15/2,

15/3 and 15/4

32(Male-26

Female-6)





Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO, PMO



Mr.Md.Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila Cooperative Officer, Kalia,

Mr. Parimal mKumar Das, Inspector of Cooperative, Kalia ,



60/2010-

11

Field Training and

sharing

experiences of

High value crop

production.

BARRI Regional

office, Tala,

Satkhira

1 day

(10.05.2011)

WMG members

(Conveners of

Agriculture sub-

committee of

SW/NSP/SIP# 8, 9, 16,

21 and

SW/CSP/SIP#13, 15,

16-18).

52( Male-50

Female-2)

52 72,330.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO, Dr. AKM Habibur Rahman, PSO, BARRI, Tala, Satkhira.

Mr. Md. Abdus Samad, Scientific Asstt., BARRI, Satkhira.

Mr. Mainuddin Fakir, PSO, BARRI, Satkhira.

Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman , EO, PMO,SAIWRPMP

61/2010-

11

Field Training and

sharing

experiences of

CAP

Giala-Ghosh

para Dugdha

Utpadon Kari

Samity, Tala,

Satkhira.

1 day

(10.05.2011)

WMG members

(Conveners of

Livelihood sub-

committee of

SW/NSP/SIP# 8, 9, 16,

21 and

SW/CSP/SIP#13, 15,

16-18).

52( Male-4

Female-48)

52 71,000.00 Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,

Mr. Proshanto Kumar Ghos, Secretary, Giala-Ghosh para Dugdha Utpadon Kari Samity, Tala, Satkhira.

Mr. Chironjit Ghos, Giala-Ghosh para Dugdha Utpadon Kari Samity, Tala, Satkhira.

Mr. Subir Kumar Ghos, Giala-Ghosh para Dugdha Utpadon Kari Samity, Tala, Satkhira.

Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS,PMO,


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


62/2010-

11 Operation and

Maintenance of

infrastructure

through

participatory water

management.

UP auditorium,

Purulia UP,

Kalia, Narail.

3 days

(11-13 May,

2011)

WMG members (O&M

sub-committee) of

SW/CSP/SIP#13-

15(WMG#S-13/6, 13/5,

13/4 and 13/3)

33( Male-19

Female-14)

99 97,450.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO.

Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,SAIWRPMP

Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,SAIWRPMP

Mr. Md. Manzurul Karim, O&M specialist, ISPMC

63/2010-

11

Seed Production

and Compost

Preparation.

UP auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

UP, Kalia,

Narail.

3 days

(11-13 May,

2011)

WMG members (GL

sub-committee) of

SW/CSP/SIP#13-

15(WMG#S-13/6, 13/5,

13/4 and 13/3)

32( Male-6

Female-26)

96 100,700.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,SAIWRPMP



Deputy Director, DAE, Narail

Mr. King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila Agriculture officer, Kalia,

Mr.Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture Officer, Narail Sador ,


64/2010-

11 Operation and

Maintenance of

infrastructure

through

participatory water

management.

UP auditorium,

Purulia UP,

Kalia, Narail.

3 days

(14-16 May,

2011)

WMG members (O&M

sub-committee) of

SW/CSP/SIP#13-

15(WMG# S-13/2,

15/5, 15/6 and 15/7)

32( Male-23

Female-9)





65/2010-

11

Seed Production

and Compost

Preparation.

UP auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

UP, Kalia,

Narail.

3 days

(14-16 May,

2011)

WMG members (GL

sub-committee) of

SW/CSP/SIP#13-

15(WMG#S-13/2, 15/5,

15/6 and 15/7)

32( Male-10

Female-22)

96 100,700.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,

Mr. Md. Jahangir Islam, DCA, PMO,

Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO,




SAAO (BS), Babra-Hasla UP, Kalia,


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


66/2010-

11 Operation and

Maintenance of

infrastructure

through

participatory water

management.

UP auditorium,

Purulia UP,

Kalia, Narail.

3 days

(17-19 May,

2011)

WMG members (O&M

sub-committee) of

SW/CSP/SIP#13-

15(WMG# S-15/1,

15/2, 15/3 and 15/4)

32( Male-24

Female-8)

96 96,400.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO.




67/2010-

11

Seed Production

and Compost

Preparation.

UP auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

UP, Kalia,

Narail.

3 days

(17-19 May,

2011)

WMG members (GL

sub-committee) of

SW/CSP/SIP#13-

15(WMG#S-15/1, 15/2,

15/3 and 15/4)

32( Male-8

Female-24)







SAAO (BS), Babra-Hasla UP, Kalia,

68/

2010-11

Operation and

Maintenance of

infrastructure

through

participatory water

management.

UP auditorium,

Purulia UP,

Kalia, Narail.

3days

(22-24 May,

2011)

WMG members(O&M

sub-committee) of

SW/CSP/SIP#16-

18(WMG# Doel,

Koel,Babui,Moyna and

Satodal )

33( Male-26

Female-7)



Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS, PMO

Mr. Md. Manzurul Karim, O&M

specialist, ISPMC

Mr. Aminul Karim, P E, PMO

69

/2010-11

Basic training on


in SAIWRPMP

area.

UP auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

UP, Kalia,

Narail.

3days

(22-24 May,

2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# Koel, Babui,Moyna

,Surjamukhi and

Satodal )

33( Male-21

Female-12)

99 100,900.00 Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO


PMO



Officer,Narail





For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


70/

2010-11

Operation and

Maintenance of

infrastructure

through

participatory water

management.

UP auditorium,

Purulia UP,

Kalia, Narail.

3days

(25-27 May,

2011)

WMG members(O&M

sub-committee) of

SW/CSP/SIP#16-

18(WMG# Beli, Keya,

Surjamukhi,

Noboganga and Ekota

33( Male-26

Female-7)

99 97,450.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO




specialist, ISPMC

Mr. Aminul Karim, P E, PMO

71

/2010-11

Basic training on


in SAIWRPMP

area.

UP auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

UP, Kalia,

Narail.

3days

(25-27 May,

2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# Koel, Doyel,Ekota,

Surovi, Hasnahena and

Keya )

33( Male-21

Female-12)

99 100,900.00 Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO

Mr.Amimul Ehsan, A C (Fish), PMO


Mr.S.M.Enamul Hoque, Sr.Fisheries

Officer,Narail




72/2010-

11 Operation and

Maintenance of

infrastructure

through

participatory water

management.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

3days

(01-03 June,

2011)

WMG members(O&M

sub-committee) of

SW/CSP/SIP#16-

18(WMG# Ekota,

Surovi, Hasnahena,

Kanokchapa and

Gondhoraj)

32 96 97,450.00 Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,



SAIWRPMP


specialist, ISPMC

73

/2010-11

Basic training on


in SAIWRPMP

area.

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3days

(01-03 June,

2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# Keya, Beli,

Gondhoraj,

Kanokchapa and

Novoganga))

32 96 100,900.00 Mr.Md.Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO

Mr. Ferdous Ahmed, Assist. Director,

Directorate of Fisheries,


PMO



Dr. Shamsul Huda, Fisheries

Specialist,ISPMC


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


74/2010-

11

Meaning and

Functions of WMG/

WMA/JMC in

SAIWRPMP

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

3days

(07-09 June,

2011)

WMG membersof

SW/CSP/SIP#16-

18(WMG# Babui,

Moyna, Doel,Satodol

and Surjamukhi)

33( Male-

25,Female- 8)

99 99,850.00 Mr. Md. Zahirul Islam, PD, SAIWRPMP

Mr. Masud Karim, DCEO, PMO,

SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP

Mr. Md. Hafizur Rahman, EO,PMO,

SAIWRPMP

Mr. Md. Jahangir Alam, DCO, Narail

Mr. Md. Hassan Mahmud, DAR, Office

of the DCO, Narail

Mr. Md. Mossaddek Hossain, Upazila

Cooperative Officer, Kalia, Narail

Mr. Parimal Kumar Das, Asstt.

Inspector, Office of the Upazila


75

/2010-11

Plantation Activities

and Vegetable

Gardening in

SAIWRPMP

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3days

(07-09 June,

2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# Keya, Beli,

Hasnahena, Surovi and

Ekota)

33( Male-

24,Female- 9)


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP


Mr. King Kor Chandra Das, Upazila

Agriculture Officer, Kalia, Narail

Mr. Ruhul Amin, Upazila Agriculture

Officer, Narail Sador, Narail

SAAO(BS), Babra Hasla UP


For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


76/2010-

11

Meaning and

Functions of WMG/

WMA/JMC in

SAIWRPMP

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

3days

(18-20 June,

2011)

WMG membersof

SW/CSP/SIP#16-

18(WMG# Surjamukhi,

Koyel, Bely, Keya,

Hasnahena and

Surovi)

33( Male-

20,Female-

13)


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP



of the DCO, Narail






77

/2010-11


and Vegetable

Gardening in

SAIWRPMP

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3days

(18-20 June,

2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# Gondoraj, Koyel,

Doyel, Satodal and

Ekota)

33( Male-

18,Female-

15)


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP








For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


78/2010-

11

Meaning and

Functions of WMG/

WMA/JMC in

SAIWRPMP

Union parisad

auditorium,

Purulia U.P

3days

(14-16 June,

2011)

WMG membersof

SW/CSP/SIP#16-

18(WMG# Ekota,

Gondoraj,

Kanokchapa,

Noboganga and

Surovi)

32( Male-

21,Female-

11)


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP



of the DCO, Narail






79/2010-

11


and Vegetable

Gardening in

SAIWRPMP

Union parisad

auditorium,

Babra-Hasla

U.P.

3days

(14-16 June,

2011)

WMG Members of

(CSP/SIP:16-18) WMG

# Babui, Moyna,

Surjamukhi,

Kanokchapa and

Novoganga)

32( Male-

22,Female-

10)


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP








For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


80/2010-

11 Cow and Goat

Rearing for

Collective Action

Plan (CAP) in

SAIWRPMP

UP Auditorium,

Tularampur UP,

Narail

3 days(21-23

June,2011)

WMG membersof SW

/NSP/SIP#8 & 9

(WMG# Madhobilata,

Kalmilata, Sapla,

Balaka, Sraboni,

Falguni, Mollika and

Agroni )

33(Male- 26,

Female-7)


SAIWRPMP


Mr. M.M. Doalatana, District Livestock

Officer, Narail.

Veterinary Surgeon, Narail.

Mr. Pijush Kumar Saha, Upazila

Livestock Officer, Narail Sador,



SAIWRPMP

81/2010-

11

GIFT (Tilapia)

Culture in

SAIWRPMP

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

3 days(21-23

June,2011)

WMG members of NSP

SIP: 08-09 WMG #

Swarnalata, Torulata

and Madhobilata

33(Male- 23,

Female-10)

99 100,900.00 Mr. Amimul Ehsan, AC(F), PMO,



SAIWRPMP

District Fisheries Officer, Narail

Mr. S.M. Enamul Hoque, , Sr. Fisheries

Officer, Narail

Ms. Hosneara Happy, Upazila Fisheries

Officer, Lohagara, Narail

Asstt. Fisheries Officer,Narail Sador,N

arail

82/2010-

11 Cow and Goat

Rearing for

Collective Action

Plan (CAP) in

SAIWRPMP

UP Auditorium,

Tularampur UP,

Narail

3 days(24-26

June,2011)

WMG members of NSP

SIP: 08-09 WMG#

Baishakhi, Bonolata

and Agroni

33(Male- 20,

Female-13)


SAIWRPMP


SAIWRPMP


Officer, Narail.



Livestock Officer, Narail Sador, Narail


SAIWRPMP



For all SIP

Course

No.


Participants

Total

Trainee

days

Cost

incurred

(Taka)


83/2010-

11

GIFT (Tilapia)

Culture in

SAIWRPMP

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

3 days(24-26

June,2011)

WMG members of NSP

SIP: 08-09 WMG #

Kalmilata, Jaba, Mollika

and Falguni

33(Male- 22,

Female-11)


Mr. Amimul Ehsan, AC(F), PMO,

Mr. Md. Abdur Razzak, ACS,PMO,

District Fisheries Officer, Narail

Mr. S.M. Enamul Hoque, , Sr. Fisheries

Officer, Narail

Ms. Hosneara Happy, Upazila Fisheries

Officer, Lohagara, Narail

Asstt. Fisheries Officer,Narail

84/2010-

11 Cow and Goat

Rearing for

Collective Action

Plan (CAP) in

SAIWRPMP

UP Auditorium,

Tularampur UP,

Narail

3 days(27-29

June,2011)

WMG members of NSP

SIP: 08-09 WMG#

Borsha, Bonolata ,

Hoimonty and Chaity

33(Male- 9,

Female-24)




Officer, Narail.



Livestock Officer, Narail Sador,



85/2010-

11

GIFT (Tilapia)

Culture in

SAIWRPMP

Proshika

Auditorium,

Narail

3 days(27-29

June,2011)

WMG members of NSP

SIP: 08-09 WMG #

Falguni, Sapla,Balaka

and Sraboni

33(Male- 23,

Female-10)

99 102,000.00 Mr. Amimul Ehsan, AC(F), PMO,



Dr. Khalilur Rahman, SSO, BFRI,

Jessore

Mr. Ferdous Ahmed, Asstt. Director,

DoF, Dhaka

Total

Part-B = 72

2367(Male-

1513 ,

Female- 854)

6553 6789,180.00

For 2010 - 11 G.Total:

(Part - A + Part - B)

3021(Male-

2068 ,

Female-953)

7886 8937,960.00


For all SIP

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project Bangladesh Water Development Board

Training Plan for 2011 – 12

Capacity development for officers of PMO,SMOs,Line Agencies & NGO (Staff Training) 2011-12 Part-A

Sl. No. Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total

event

Duration Trainee Total

Trainees

Trainee

Days

Estimated cost

1 Delineation of Sub-unit

Implementation Plan(SIP)

and Sub-project

Implementation Procedure.

Officers of PMO, SMOs and

Staff of NGO (ASG)

ISPMC & BWDB

Officials.

Jessore/

Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

2 Communication tools and

techniques


Staff of NGO (ASG)

ISPMC & BWDB

Officials.

Jessore/

Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

3 Participatory Integrated

Water Resources

Management


Staff of NGO (ASG)

ISPMC & BWDB

Officials.

Jessore/

Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

4 Formation of WMO &Rules

of Co-operatives,


Staff of NGO (ASG)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Cooperatives &

BWDB Officials.

Jessore/

Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

5 Agriculture Extension :

Basic training on

Agriculture Extension

Concerned Upazila Officers

of DAE & NGO Facilitator

(Agriculture)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Agriculture

Extension.

Jessore/

Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

6 Fisheries Extension:

Basic Training on Fisheries

Development.


of Deptt. of Fisheries & NGO

Facilitator (Fisheries)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Fisheries.

Jessore/

Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

7 Financial Management for

SAIWRPMP

Officers of PMO,

SMOs,RAC & concerned

officers of

Accounts,Audit,Finance Dte.

and Staff of NGO (ASG)

ISPMC, Senior

officers of BWDB &

Resource persons

from ADB, BRM.

Jessore/

Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00


For all SIP

Sl. No. Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total

event


Trainees

Trainee

Days

Estimated cost

8 Guidelines of Gender and

Livelihood.


of Department of Women

Affairs, Livestock, Youth

Development, Social

Welfare & NGO Facilitator

(Gender and Livelihood).

ISPMC, Officers of

DWA & BWDB

Jessore/

Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

9 O&M of Project

Infrastructure & Upfront

contribution


Staff of NGO (ASG)

ISPMC & BWDB

Officials.

Jessore/

Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

10 On-job training for use of

Leveling instrument ,Total

Station,DGPS &

Echosounder


Staff of NGO (ASG)

ISPMC & BWDB

Officials.

Jessore/

Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

Sub-Total Capacity development for officers of PMO,SMOs,Line

Agencies & NGO (Staff Training) (Part-A)

2011 - 12 10 300 900 1500,000.00


For all SIP

WMO Training 2011-12 Part B

Sl.

No.

Name of Course Participants Trainers Venue Total

event


Trainees

Trainee

Days

Estimated

cost

1

Formation of WMO

&Rules of Co-

operatives,

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Cooperatives & BWDB

Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

2 Drafting of Bylaws of

Water Management

Groups (WMG)

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Cooperatives & BWDB

Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

3 Procedure for

Registration of WMG

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Cooperatives & BWDB

Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

4 Procedure for Book

Keeping of WMG

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Cooperatives & BWDB

Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

5 Operation and

Maintenance (O&M)

of infrastructure

through participatory

water management

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of BWDB

Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

6 Plantation activities

and

Vegetable Gardening

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Agriculture Extension &

BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

7 Seed Production &

Compost Preparation

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of


BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

8 Poultry, Goat, Cow

rearing

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of Livestock

& BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00


For all SIP

Sl.

No.


event


Trainees

Trainee

Days

Estimated

cost

9 Meanings and

Functions of

WMG,WMCA/WMCS

,JMC in SAIWRPMP

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Cooperatives & BWDB

Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

10 Fisheries Extension

Basic Training on

Carp-poly culture,

Nursery

Management, Rice-

Fish Farming, Fish

Culture in Borrow-pit,

Monosex GIFT

Telapia & Sanctuary

Development.

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of Fisheries

& BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

11 Integrated Water

Management,

Objective of WMO,

GPWM and its

application, Co-

operatives, Rules.

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Cooperatives & BWDB

Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

12 Gender Awareness

for WMA Members

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of Women

Affairs & BWDB

Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

13 Salinity of

River/Surface Water

and its Safe use

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of


BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

14 Cultivation of HYV

crop & Crop

diversification (Water

Management,

Fertilizer

Management & Pest

Control)

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of


BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00


For all SIP

Sl.

No.


event


Trainees

Trainee

Days

Estimated

cost

15 Income Generating

Activities for WMG

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of Women

Affairs & BSIC Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

16 Leadership

Development

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of Women


Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

17 IPM Techniques for

Crop production

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of Women


Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

18 Soil Management

and its safe use in

the project area

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of Women


Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

19 Refreshers course

on Procedure for

Book Keeping of

WMG

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of Women


Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

20 Refreshers course

on Operation and

Maintenance (O&M)

of infrastructure

through participatory

water management

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of Women


Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

21 Understanding of the

Concept of

Environment and its

protection from

degradation

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-3(14,15,24,25) and

CSP Batch-2(13,15,)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of Women


Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

Sub-total for WMO Training, 2011-12 126 3780 11340 9450,000.00

Grant Total for 2011-12 136 4080 12240 10950000.00


For all SIP

Southwest Area Integrated Water Resources Planning and Management Project Bangladesh Water Development Board

Training Plan for 2012 – 13

Capacity development for officers of PMO, SMOs,Line Agencies & NGO (Staff Training) Part-A

Sl.

No


event


Trainees

Trainee

Days

Estimated

cost

1 Delineation of Sub-unit

Implementation Plan(SIP)

and Sub-project

Implementation

Procedure.

Officers of PMO, SMOs


ISPMC & BWDB

Officials.

Jessore

/Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

2 Communication tools and

techniques



ISPMC & BWDB

Officials.

Jessore

/Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

3 Participatory Integrated

Water Resources

Management



ISPMC & BWDB

Officials.

Jessore

/Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

4 Formation of WMO

&Rules of Co-operatives,


Staff of NGO (ASG)

ISPMC, Officers

of Department of

Cooperatives &

BWDB Officials.

Jessore

/Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

5 Agriculture Extension :

Basic training on



of DAE & NGO Facilitator

(Agriculture)

ISPMC, Officers

of Department of

Agriculture

Extension.

Jessore

/Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

6 Fisheries Extension:

Basic Training on

Fisheries Development.


of Deptt. of Fisheries &

NGO Facilitator (Fisheries)

ISPMC, Officers

of Department of

Fisheries.

Jessore

/Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

7 Financial Management for

SAIWRPMP

Officers of PMO,

SMOs,RAC & concerned

officers of

Accounts,Audit,Finance Dte.


ISPMC, Senior

officers of BWDB

& Resource

persons from

ADB, BRM.

Jessore

/Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00


For all SIP

Sl.

No.


event


Trainees

Trainee

Days

Estimated

cost

8 Guidelines of Gender and

Livelihood.


of Department of Women

Affairs, Livestock, Youth

Development, Social

Welfare & NGO Facilitator

(Gender and Livelihood).

ISPMC, Officers

of DWA & BWDB

Jessore

/Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

9 O&M of Project

Infrastructure & Upfront

contribution



ISPMC & BWDB

Officials.

Jessore

/Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

10 On-job training for use of

Leveling instrument ,Total

Station,DGPS &

Echosounder



ISPMC & BWDB

Officials.

Jessore

/Narail

1 3 days 30 30 90 150,000.00

Sub-Total Capacity development for officers of

PMO,SMOs,Line Agencies & NGO (Staff Training) (Part-A)

2012 - 13 10 300 900 1500,000.00


For all SIP

WMO Training(2012-13)

Part-B

Sl.

No.


event


Trainees

Trainee

Days

Estimated

cost

1

Formation of WMO

&Rules of Co-operatives,

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Cooperatives &

BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6

3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

2 Drafting of Bylaws of

Water Management

Groups (WMG)

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Cooperatives &

BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

3 Procedure for

Registration of WMG

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Cooperatives &

BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

4 Procedure for Book

Keeping of WMG

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Cooperatives &

BWDB

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

5 Operation and

Maintenance (O&M) of

infrastructure through

participatory water

management

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of BWDB

Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

6 Plantation activities and

Vegetable Gardening

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of


& BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

7 Seed Production &

Compost Preparation

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of


& BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00


For all SIP

Sl.

No.


event


Trainees

Trainee

Days

Estimated

cost

8 Poultry, Goat, Cow

rearing

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Livestock & BWDB

Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

9 Meanings and Functions

of

WMG,WMCA/WMCS,JM

C in SAIWRPMP

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Cooperatives &

BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

10 Fisheries Extension Basic

Training on Carp-poly

culture, Nursery

Management, Rice-Fish

Farming, Fish Culture in

Borrow-pit, Monosex

GIFT Telapia &

Sanctuary Development.

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Fisheries & BWDB

Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

11 Integrated Water

Management, Objective

of WMO, GPWM and its

application, Co-

operatives, Rules.

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Cooperatives &

BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

12 Gender Awareness for

WMA Members

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Women Affairs &

BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

13 Salinity of River/Surface

Water and its Safe use

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of


& BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00


For all SIP

Sl.

No.


event


Trainees

Trainee

Days

Estimated

cost

14 Cultivation of HYV crop &

Crop diversification

(Water Management,

Fertilizer Management &

Pest Control)

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of


& BWDB Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

15 Income Generating

Activities for WMG

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Women Affairs &

BSIC Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

16 Leadership Development WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Women Affairs &

BSIC Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

17 IPM Techniques for Crop

production

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Women Affairs &

BSIC Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

18 Soil Management and its

safe use in the project

area

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Women Affairs &

BSIC Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

19 Refreshers course on

Procedure for Book

Keeping of WMG

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Women Affairs &

BSIC Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00


For all SIP

Sl.

No.


event


Trainees

Trainee

Days

Estimated

cost

20 Refreshers course on

Operation and

Maintenance (O&M) of

infrastructure through

participatory water

management

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Women Affairs &

BSIC Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

21 Understanding of the

Concept of Environment

and its protection from

degradation

WMG Members of NSP

Batch-4(17,18,19) and

CSP Batch-3&4(10-12,4-

9,14)

ISPMC, Officers of

Department of

Women Affairs &

BSIC Officials.

Suitable Venue

at Narail or

Project area.

6 3 days 30 180 540 450,000.00

Sub-total for WMO Training 126 3780 11340 9450,000.00

Grant Total for 2012-13 136 4080 12240 10950000.00

NARAIL SUB-PROJECT AREAsouthwest.bwdb.gov.bd/files/report/aafbfd579fe... · define the sub-unit as...

Documents

Transcript of NARAIL SUB-PROJECT AREAsouthwest.bwdb.gov.bd/files/report/aafbfd579fe... · define the sub-unit as...