Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

download Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

of 13

Transcript of Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    1/29

    Page 1 –  COMPLAINT 

    Darian A. Stanford, OSB No. 994491

    [email protected]

    Scott T. Rennie, OSB No. 144154

    [email protected]

    J. Curtis Edmondson WSB 43795 (pro hac vice pending)

    [email protected] NELSON STANFORD111 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1940

    Portland, OR 97204

    Tel: 503.417.7777Fax: 503.417.4250

    Of Attorneys for Plaintiff

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    DISTRICT OF OREGON

    PORTLAND DIVISION

     NAMU, INC., an Oregon Corporation, dba

     NAMU KOREAN AND HAWAIIAN, and NAMU KILLER KOREAN BBQ,

    Plaintiff,

    v.

     NAMU HAIGHT, LLC., a California LimitedLiability Company; DAVID LEE, an

    Individual

    Defendants. 

    Case No.:

    COMPLAINT

    1.  DECLARATORY RELIEF ACTION

    PURSUANT TO A CLAIM OFTRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT;

    2. CANCELLATION OF TRADEMARKS

    AT THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND

    TRADEMARK OFFICE; AND,

    3.  OREGON UNLAWFUL TRADE

    PRACTICES ACT

    (28 U.S.C. §2201)

    INTRODUCTION

    1.  This dispute arises from the use of the word “NAMU” in connection with selling

    Hawaiian-Korean barbeque in Portland. Plaintiff, Namu, Inc., Clint Colbert built the business

    from scratch starting in 2010. A video of his first location was posted to the Internet on August

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    2/29

    Page 2 –  COMPLAINT 

    23, 2010. (see https://vimeo.com/14355734). Since opening in 2010, he has expanded from this

    humble start to three locations inPortland.

    2.  The two NAMUs, one in Portland, NAMU PDX, and one in San Francisco,

     NAMU SFO, have coexisted peacefully for years. This is largely due to the fact that the Bay

    Area and the Northwest are distinct geographic regions for the purpose of gastronomic tourism.

    Where San Francisco is home to many ultra-gourmet restaurants, Portland prides itself on its

    accessibility to international style street food.

    3.  Without provocation, or any evidence that consumers in the Northwest and

    consumers in the Bay Area are confused by the two businesses, NAMU SFO’s lawyers 

    demanded  that NAMU PDX stop using the word “NAMU”.

    4.   NAMU PDX cannot “stop” using the name NAMU any more than NAMU SFO

    can stop using their name without suffering irreparable harm.

    5.  This declaratory relief action requests an order from this Court that NAMU PDX

    may use the word “NAMU” in connection with serving food in the Pacific Northwest  and to

    enjoin NAMU SFO from advertising and marketing their restaurant services under the name

     Namu in the same region.

    PARTIES 

    3. Namu, Inc., (“Plaintiff” or “ NAMU PDX”) is an Oregon Corporation which operates

    three food carts throughout the Greater Metropolitan Area. Plaintiff has continuously operated its

    food carts in interstate commerce under the names Namu Korean & Hawaiian, and Namu Killer

    Korean BBQ. Plaintiff has never had a physical operation outside of the Greater Metropolitan

    Area.

    4. Based on information and belief, Namu Haight, LLC, (“Defendant “or “ NAMU SFO”)

    is a California Limited Liability Company which has operated the Namu Gaji Restaurant in San

    Francisco. Based on information and belief, Defendant has operated under the name “Namu

    Gaji” . NAMU SFO has filed for two USPTO trademarks: App. Serial No. 85/461,412

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    3/29

    Page 3 –  COMPLAINT 

    (“NAMU” word), and App. Serial No. 85/738,256 (“NAMU” design plus word).

    5. Further, based on information and belief, Defendant has never operated a restaurant

    outside the San Francisco Bay Area and its name has never been used in interstate commerce.

    JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    6. This action arises under the Declaratory Relief Act, 28 U.S.C. §2201 et seq., and 28

    U.S.C. §1331. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant for the following reasons:

    Defendant made unprovoked and unwarranted demands to Plaintiff based on Plaintiff’s use of its

    name in the usual course of its business located within this judicial district; on information and

     belief Defendant ordered that Plaintiff cease using its commercial name pursuant to its rights at

    Common Law; and, on information and belief, Defendant ordered that Plaintiff cease using its

    commercial name pursuant to its rights under the Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.

    7. Venue for this action is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391(b)(2) because substantially all

    of the events giving rise to this action have occurred within this judicial district.

    FACTUAL BACKGROUND 

    Geographic Regions and Relevant Markets

    6. 

    The Pacific Northwest Region (“PNW”) is generally divided into two geographic

    sub areas: the Northwest Coast and the Northwest Plateau. (https://en.wikipedia.org/  wiki/

    Pacific_ Northwest). Within the Northwest Coast region, there are three metropolitan markets:

    Portland, Seattle, and Vancouver. Collectively these three markets have approximately 7.5M

     people.

    7.  The San Francisco Bay Area (SFBA) is a region located near San Francisco, CA

    that includes Nine California Counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San

    Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma. Likewise, these nine counties also have a population of

    approximately 7.5M people. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Bay_Area.

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    4/29

    Page 4 –  COMPLAINT 

    8.  Due to the large distance between San Francisco and Portland, and great climatic

    differences (PNW has rain, SFBA does not), restaurant consumers are drawn primarily from local

     populations. While, visitors and food critics may be out of town guests when they visit NAMU

    PDX or NAMU SFO they never confuse what city they are eating in while consuming the food

     provided.

    9.  The mark which is used by NAMU SFO appears below:

    The Beginning of NAMU PDX and Clint Colbert

    9. Beginning in 2010, Plaintiff’s owner, Clint Colbert (“Colbert”) set out with the sole

    commercial purpose of providing high quality Hawaiian and Korean Barbeque. Mr. Colbert’s

    goal was to start a food cart in Portland with the goal expanding in the PNW and Northwest Coast

    region.

    10. Upon opening in April 2010, Namu PDX was located at 33rd and Hawthorne in

    Southeast Portland under the name “Namu Killer Korean BBQ” using the Namu Design. (shown

     below). Subsequently, in June 2010, NAMU PDX move to Southeast 43rd and Belmont, with

    new signage as “Namu Korean & Hawaiian.” At the time of opening his restaurant, Colbert was

    not aware of any other restaurant and/or food service provider in the Greater Metropolitan Area,

    or the United States operating under the name “Namu.” NAMU PDX has grown substantially,

    and has added two additional locations in the PNW at Southeast 28th and Division, and in the

    South Waterfront known as the Gantry, located on Southwest Moody Avenue. Each of the three

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    5/29

    Page 5 –  COMPLAINT 

    locations uses the “Namu Korean & Hawaiian” name and symbol, as shown below:

    11. Throughout the six year period Plaintiff has always remained in Portland as part of

    PNW. NAMU PDX has continuously used the Namu name and has been recognized by customers

    in Portland, and the PNW region. NAMU PDX has seen their establishments praised in food

    guides for their respective localities. (Exhibit A).

     NAMU SFO’s Demand Letters 

    12. On January 26, 2016, without any provocation, Defendant sent a cease and desist letter

    (“January Demand Letter”) to Colbert’s former business partner, Gary Evans (“Evans”),

    demanding that Namu, Inc. cease and desist its use of the Namu Korean and Hawaiian and Namu

    Killer Korean BBQ names. The January Demand Letter states that Namu Gaji name enjoys

     protection at common law and under the Lanham Act. (Exhibit B).

    David Lee’s Fraudulent Trademark Applications 

    13. David Lee applied for, and was granted a word mark, “Namu Gaji,” U.S. Trademark

    Regustration No. 4,777,130 (“‘130 Mark”). The ‘130 mark was registered on July 21, 2015.

    (Exhibit C).

    14. David Lee also applied for, and was granted a design plus word mark, U.S. Trademark

    Registration No. 4,334,874, (“‘874 Mark”). The ‘874 Mark was registered on May 14, 2013.

    (Exhibit D).

    15. The basis for the ‘130 and ‘874 registration was David Lee’s representation to the

    USPTO that David Lee is the individual who owns the mark. A search of the San Francisco

    County Fictitious Business Name Registry contradicts this; rather, “Namu Gaji” is owned by

    “Namu Haight, LLC.” (Exhi bit E). Currently, the California Secretary of State has suspended

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    6/29

    Page 6 –  COMPLAINT 

     Namu Haight, LLC from conducting business activity. (Exhibit F).

    16. The United States Trademark Manual of Examination Procedure (“TMEP”) clearly

    states that the owner of the mark must been the applicant. TMEP §1201; Chien Ming Huang v.

    Tzu Wei Chen Food Co. Ltd , 849 F.2d 1458, 7 U.S.P.Q.2d 1335 (C.A. Fed., 1988).

    Counsel Could not Resolve this Dispute

    17. On February 19, 2016 (“February Letter”), Plaintiff replied to then January Demand

    Letter acknowledging Defendant’s letter and arguing that Defendant’s held no common law rights

    to the Namu name in the Metropolitan Area. (Exhibit G). Counsel for NAMU PDX and NAMU

    SFO have exchanged subsequent letters with no resolution. 

    COUNT 1

    DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

    18. NAMU PDX repeats and realleges each of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1

    through 17, and the same incorporated herein by reference.

    19. NAMU SFO asserts that it holds superior rights to the word mark “Namu Gaji” and

    similar names to Plaintiff.

    20. NAMU SFO has never operated an establishment under the “Namu Gaji” nor any

    other similar name in the PNW.

    21. NAMU SFO’s federally protected rights under the ‘130 and ‘874 registrations do not

    exist based on its fraud on the USPTO.

    22. NAMU PDX has been using the names “Namu Korean & Hawaiian” and “Namu

    Killer Korean BBQ” continually in commerce since 2010.

    23. Therefore, NAMU SFO holds no rights to “Namu Gaji” or similar names at common

    law within the PNW.

    / / /

    / / /

    / / /

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    7/29

    Page 7 –  COMPLAINT 

    COUNT 2

    TRADEMARK CANCELLATION OF THE ‘130 and ‘874 Marks 

    24. NAMU PDX repeats and realleges each of the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1

    through 23, and the same are incorporated herein by reference.

    25. David Lee applied for two trademarks at the USPTO stating he was the owner of the

    ‘130 and ‘874 marks. 

    26. David Lee’s representation was false and fraudulent in view of the FBN filing in San

    Franscisco County that Namu Haight, LLC owns the “Namu Gaji” mark. Further, the actual

    owner of the mark, Namu Haig, LLC, has been suspended by the California Secretary of State.

    COUNT 3

    VIOLATION OF OREGON’S UNLAWFUL TRADE PRACTICES ACT 

    27. NAMU PDX repeats and realleges each of the allegations set forth in paragraph 1

    through 26, and the same are incorporated herein by reference.

    28. NAMU SFO made demands that it has valid USPTO marks, namely the ‘130 Mark

    and the ‘874 Mark, and asserted other enforceable rights in the name NAMU. Further, NAMU

    SFO demanded that NAMU PDX should cease using the NAMU name.

    29. NAMU SFO’s demands were, in fact, false. These false demands have damaged

     NAMU PDX to the extent that it has been forced to seek legal advice on responding to these

    demands. Further, NAMU PDX is damages insofar as it cannot expand in the PNW without the

    damoclean sword of litigation hangin over its business. Finally, the value of NAMU PDX has

     been significantly dimished while NAMU SFO’s unwarranted and meritless demands are pending

    as any potential buyer would be forced to discount the goodwill associated with the NAMU PDX

    name.

    / / /

    / / /

    / / /

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    8/29

    Page 8 –  COMPLAINT 

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    ON ALL COUNTS

    A. NAMU PDX seeks declaratory judgment that it is the priority holder to the mark

    “Namu” and variations thereof in the class of goods for restaurant services within the PNW;

    B. NAMU PDX seeks declaratory judgment that NAMU SFO, David Lee, their agents,

    servants, assigns, and all other related parties, do not hold any rights to the “Namu” mark or any

    variations thereof in the PNW;

    C. A temporary restraining order, preliminary and permanent injunction against NAMU

    SFO, David Lee, their agents, servants, assigns, or related parties from interfering with NAMU

    PDX customers in the PNW, by claiming they are the owner of “Namu” or similar sounding

    names in the class of goods for restaurant services within the PNW;

    D. Cancellation of the ‘130 Mark and the ‘874 Mark for f raudulent registrations by David

    Lee in front of the USPTO;

    E. Actual damages pursuant to Oregon’s Unlawful Trade Practices Act; 

    G. Reasonable Attorney Fees;

    H. Costs of Suit; and,

    I. Any and all other appropriate nondiscriminatory measures to overcome the above

    described actions of Defendant.

    DATED: March 15, 2016

    SLINDE NELSON STANFORD

    By: /s/ Darian A. Stanford.

    Darian A. Stanford, OSB No. 994491Email: [email protected]

    Scott T. Rennie, OSB No. 144154

    Email: [email protected]

     Attorney for Plaintiff  

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    9/29

    Page 9 –  COMPLAINT 

    EXHIBIT A

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    10/291/

    owned and operated

    by

    Gary Evans and Clint Colbert,.

    Namu offers up only a few items, but those items sate

    your BBQ appetite. The pulled pork, a hunk of love that

    had been marinating

    all

    day is served w

    i

    th cabbage and

    a

    superb

    h

    omemade honey horseradish sauce on

    a

    toasted bun. The pork, sourced locally

    fro

    m Sweet Briar

    Farms was decadent and the entire sandwich melted In

    my mouth. was supposed to brtng It home to share,

    but it never made it off the lot. O her items on the menu

    include Korean

    short

    ribs

    -

    rice served with peanu

    t

    sauce, some ribs, cucumber salad, klmchee and sesame

    spinach. For 7, that is quite a meal. They offer a veggie

    bowl which, from

    a

    review by Bar Pilot over at the

    Portland Monthly, is a spicy, satisfying safari of flavors,"

    Gotta try that sometime.

    21 Comments

    Namu

    Hawth

    o

    rne, always

    a

    destination spot for

    many Portlanders, Is now

    a

    destination for

    food

    cart

    lovers. With Cartopia at SE 12th

    and Hawthorne redefining late

    ni

    ght nosh,

    and the venerable Whole Bowl up around

    40th, Hawthorne knows food. Now, a new

    pod has spring up in front of House of

    Vintage at SE 33rd. Namu, a cool hand-bullt

    ca rt with a

    rustic steel

    roof is

    one o

    f

    those

    new carts serving up

    a

    tasty menu of

    Korean

    BBQ.

    The Story:

    Location: SE 43rd and Belmont

    dleselbor

    June 17, 2010 Written by dieselboi

    Namu

    Killer

    Korean

    Q

    Aovrnns~

    .'.f.H-

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    11/29ttp://www.foodcartsporUand.com/2010I06/17/namu-killer-korean-bblj

    Chrlsttne

    says:

    June

    25,

    2010 at 9:37 am

    Awesome cart Super delicious and wonderful. Had the vegan bowl and it was completely

    worth it. Peanut sauce on the rice was drool-worthy

    /lili Amber

    Case

    says:

    11.j j June 22, 2010 at

    12:40

    pm

    Hey there's a Mexican cart/truck right next door to this one in front of the Vintage place. I had

    their veggie burrito and Itwas quite tasty. Check It out

    ~ J says:

    ~,:,· June 21, 2010 at

    11:42

    am

    I love the vegan bowl herel I only wish they offered tofu in the bowl. But it

    is

    the perfect mix of

    rice, spinach, cucumber, and kim chi MMMM. And the portion is appropriate, not too much

    and not too little.

    df Kr1sttna

    says:

    llfi ' June

    17,

    2010 at4:30 pm

    I love this cart so much. The pulled pork is the perfect blend of sweet and salty, and every bite

    is juicier than the last. The $1 kimchi is also pretty delicious. I haven't gotten around to trying

    out the other meats (along with the short ribs, they also have

    a

    chicken sandwich), but

    hopefully I will soon.

    ~'£

    Natalle

    says:

    ·

    ~: June

    17, 2010 at B:13 am

    Comments

    Filed Under: Debit/Credit Cara

    Accepted

      Dinner  Korean, Lunch,

    Salads

    , Sandwiches. SE 43rd and Belmont;

    Southeast-Portlan

    d,

    Vegetarian Options Weekends

    f Facebook 'o

    j

    - Twitter

    l

    Cr Google ~ Reddit

    j ii/Iii

    Ema .

    II

    .

    [

    6 Print. :

    INSERT_MAP

    Hours: Daily,

    11

    am-7pm

    Phone: 503 828 4260

    • Pulled Pork Sandwich: sweet horseradish sauce, pulled pork, cabbage and BBQ sauce on

    toasted bun - 5

    • Korean Short Ribs: rice w/peanut sauce, ribs, kimchee, cucumber salad and sesame spinach -

    7

    Veggie Bowl: rice, cucumber salad, sesame spinach, kimchee, drizzled with peanut sauce - 4

    sample Menu:

    Namu

    is

    just the start of the great carts opening at 33rd and Hawthorne. They are open daily to

    serve you up both lunch and dinner. Since they only have

    a

    few items, you know they focus their

    energy to make them the best they can. Drop on by Namu, say hi to Gary and Clint. check out

    their

    cool cart and let them know Food Carts Portland sent ya.

    Namu

    1912016

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    12/291/

    .sfgate.com/restaurantslbarbites/articlelNamu-Gaji-i n-S-F-Heppy-hour-for-whole-fam

    ily-4180656.php

    If you have miniature soba slurpers, it's a great opportunity to

    try the

    California-inspired

    Korean restaurant's

    bar

    menu and deals on drinks without having to worry about the crowd

    Bar bite and kid-friendly aren't usually said in

    the

    same breath, and certainly not in

    crowded Mission District restaurants. Yet Namu Gaji bridges

    that

    gap by offering a kk

    menu during its happy hour, when the restaurant isn't as packed.

    Sous chef Daniel Lim cooks a piece of beef on the grill at Namu Gaji in San Francisco.

    IMAGE

    1

    OF 4

    By

    Tara Duggan Updated

    3:11

    pm, Wednesday, January

    9, 2013

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Namu Gaji in S F : Happy

    hour for whole f mily

    SF

    G TE

    http://www.sfgate.com/restaurants/barbites/article/Namu-Gaji-in-S-F-Happy-hour-for-whole-family-4180656.php

    Namu Gajl inS.F.: Haw,

    hour

    for wholefamlly-SFGate

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    13/29http://www.sfgate.com/restaurants/barbites/article/Nam u-Gaji-in-S-F-Happy-hcu-for-whole-family-4180656.php

    Also

    on tap:

    During happy hour, the Seitokujunmai ginjo sake goes for 6, and

    there

    are

    always soju shots for 2.

    Signature

    drink:

    During happy hour, beers on tap are 3, including the proprietary Tillie'

    Union Ale

    ,

    a rice ale made by Magnolia Brewery. Wine is also available at a discount, like

    th

    Jo

    Landron Atmospheres

    brut

    sparkler ( 6).

    Killer app: Korean tacos { 3 each) are a must-order, with their nori wrapper. Kids can

    chose from options like a rice plate with mung bean sprouts, kimchi, toasted seaweed

    and

    a

    hot dog { 9) or a mini version

    of

    the okonomiyaki, a savory pancake with shredded

    vegetables

    and

    meat { 6).

    Best seat:

    While

    bar

    seats rim

    the

    restaurant, the handful facing the traditional charcoal

    grill make for good meal-side entertainment.

    The crowd:

    During happy hour, some families come in; otherwise it's younger couples and

    groups of friends.

    The vibe: Warm and casual, with thick wood-slab tables, wood rafters and trim, lots of

    bar

    seating and

    a

    long communal table.

    Namu Gaji is

    run

    by chef Dennis Lee and his brothers David

    and

    Daniel. After opening

    a

    restaurant

    in

    the

    Richmond District

    and

    gaining a broader audience with a Ferry Plaza stam

    the

    brothers

    relocated

    to

    Dolores Park

    last

    year.

    Namu Gaji

    in

    S.F.:

    HSWY

    hour f whole family- SFGate

    19/2016

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    14/29

    Page 10 –  COMPLAINT 

    EXHIBIT B

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    15/29

    ~1

     :ko:ow.

    ...

    U.C

    .EnsJjsJi: traQslat~on.

    _

    ·~{·~u'r:

    ~S

    1 ~d

    am

    f'  tbe ·tr., ad;e>rm;Qf.

    .

    is

    "woocl branch~

    :• As :S\lGb;; ~Jenns

    · are

     arbitmey : 

    ·

    .n

     

    ~.

    oi't

    n

    ~n

    wiffi rat&u

    rMt,.

     

    .

    ·food:

    takeou~

    and

    .

    bar.

    services,

    and

    an, thQ tn;jbty

    86dn

    ·

    ·marb:are ·· 'ptote.cted:afcomrribtfl

     

    aw 1:Wlierc,.in Nam.11:Haijht

    ·

    has

    nliv.e tjpts · ~ .upo.n its: unihtem;ted U1cr.Qf

    the

    :two marka.. In

    :additi()n~

    N.amu

    ,2006

    .

    ~;Lee-brothers,

    .

    Oe~ni~, David,andDani~J~hav.e ·:m.rtt~

    ·

    ~murmu.:.in .

    $.an _,

    r

    •~ ,~

    i~ f&iiia ;

    unde

    rffi~: WAMU ·

    •nd

    · NAMtI,:GAJt :;

    . .

    fte.uraJt{have

    1

    1,

     

    :

    ••@., .ffpm a~s

    ~

    ~illin.-t:Y

    pr~f~

    ·u19nars ·.~  iiitiw,w:~u~~

    ;:

    pa1blicauijn

    ·

     ,Jtbir

    ~~

    ~4~~d f.o.o.d

    :

    ~-~,

    irtthn~te :

    d~si

    .

    8"~

    '

      '~

     w.~mrh~pj~·i Y

    ·

    :n~· 6{9ti.&f

    opened

    in

    ,San ·

    Frandsco

    hi fiecem~r~

    ~...-

     -~:NA}4U

    .

    :ud

    -w.~

    mub

    :i ·and

    since:.Jul°)"

    :2009.~thJtbro.then: )laa~e

    :-~

    .

    a

    very

    · ~sfuJ-

    ~

    ~

    it

    ~r~~·a ;~n'd·•l•Q._

    .

    un~et th~ :~~

    m ~

    .

    · :Th~ '

    r

    -sec"nd.-s .

    taurarat

    :opened

    .

    April

    ~li

    :

    Ulildcr

    -t

    h

    ,

    :

    NA:MU

    .

    qA)fµwt~

    -

    N,mµ

    Qaji

    ba$.:l~~n

    -

    ~g~ized

    ··

    ;n~tiffll&llY

    ·

    ·

    tb.11011 mtaurants

    in

    .:Sfm

    -.

    F~cisco .

    ,

    bavlng ~nfeatuted

    t

    fu-'die : Ne~

    Y.o.rlt

    ime1

    nfilld

    fhti-Guardiu  ,

    .HOMO

    . . .

    . '

    .

    .. - .

    :

    . _.( . ·

    ;

    < ~

    { :

    .. . . ;.-

    .

    .. ·.

     Xt\f;

    tc

    .  ·

    . .: , '

    ·

      . ' •

    -· . · .. .

    . ' ·-

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    - ..

    .

    - ....

    --

    . .

    ·

    · ·

    -

    .

    · · ·

    ?

    ·it/ ·// ~

    ::

    . . . :.~>

    ·. ·

    ;:::. -.< . .

    : · .. .

    '

    ,

    ·~2916

    ·

    :

    .. .

    .

    . :

    ~

    ;,):;t

    ,

    j

    ,)

    ;

    .

    /

    ;. ·· :

    '? · ·

    ·

    ·· · ..

    ·

    - ·

    ,- . -. · ..... · ·

    ~

     

    ~~

    :. ::.1- {. t

    f

     ~: :r< :

    ·

    .  '. .· . ·

    ~

    ~ .~A.Ave <

    -> · ·

    .

    ·

    . · -

    . ~~

     ~  

    ~~ ...

    ..

    - .. •'

    . -

    ~

    >··<

    ~ >;'..

    '

    .

    E:

    ·

    .

    _

    .-

    ;

    ·f-:

     

    -

    \

    U•

     

    .»f:N•u

    &

    ·

    Nunu Oajl

    P~etaty

    ·

    Mar-ks

    ;>·   :.-. .

    ·

    ' · i: ~mu J l t 'L~ · /Dl pu~ ·

    ~tit

    Namu Int. : . __ :·:: .. < - _

    J

    /:~

    i' t ._:~ :;\ ,,, ·  ::~ ~~

    -t

    ::- •

    ,~~,

    ~

    .,

    :

    ·

    ,

    ..

    .

    :,I

    1

    --.

    ,

    .', • .'. '

    ·

    ·

    .

    :.' ' ' I

    • S , ·,r.: , , , •

    ·

    '

    - . . ·· 

    :•

    ;  .:·: :._:~~ ~  .: ' .-= ·:·~  ·. :~

    \

    ~

    \-

    >

    :~

    .:

    ,-.:.>· -:.:_·· .

    .Mr .;·

    Bvin$:

    .

    :

    .

    n

    ,

    -·:_ , .. - . T

    ,

    .

    .

    . }.·,-.

    , '.· 

    ·

    -

    · ·

    :/ ..

    .

    .

    J •

     ,.

    ,. · ; .· .

    ·

    ~ . ·. .  . •. · ..= :\ ~ :, . · ... ~

    .

    .seilt.

    'Nam~

    'Baigbt'LLC11 ;hie~:i

    ·

    s

    he-0wn~r,J.~~ trade~. ~t.MlJ{~d

    ·

    and ~~"'UGAJl med in co.njunctioii'with

    ~

    its wat-4,nowiln --•nd

    ~-~

    s

    .

    .. nt,-A 1ated

    .....

    vices.

    We

    ,wrif

    in-:i:-:. .

    .. . ... ·

    . ~(.&.-·

    '.

    -- . -

    ;

    ,

    ;

    ~ ~· ·

    -'

    -

    .

    -

    ;

    - '·~~V·

    ' .

    ~ .

    -  

    ~ -

    -

     

    ~

      ~~- .

    ,-

    ~

    .

    ,. .

    .

    . .

    .

    __ . ~ ,

    .

    _

    .• .

    •.~•t~~ ~

    :l,~

    ,

    yeur

    .

    -0.1;,~, Q&met ,~amu

    :Citt~H-~~~ ~i(orean

      Haw~·i~n

    ~ an.9. ' 'N J ~Ut,r]{g~ :·aarr ·1 .. :~~~Jl

    t

    7011ffbo

    ~

     

    -:

      ~

    -

    .i

     ·

    :

    •arious

    oeatf()ttS

    in.Pottland

    ~

    --

    ~gon

    ,

    ·

    wll,i~

    -

    sar.e-

    ~

    con

    ..

    ,ty

     :iq 1

    :o.,,aJentt$

    tt1a~;

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    16/29

    . . . . .

    H~~ght

    trusts

    you

    meant no. hatm

    to it ill

    taking

    the .term "aamu" for

    .

    your

    ,own

    use

    matter.may· ~tiU be resplved,ainicably withy.our·cooperation. In

    regard. and to protect its rights and avoid confusion, .N .amu ,~ui.?9, tliatyou ~

    ·

    oftluftenn

    "name" in

    connection

    with your food carts

    and

    .

    transr,r to

    It

    y(lµf

    URL namufoodoart.com.

    · · ·

    Nam11 .

    Haight~s

    ·willingness to ami~iy ettle: this

    m

    ~t

    it

    ij~~

    0:f::~

    :'

    i;JJ~$

    '

    seriou$ly.

    Yo.~

    a~ent

    Witlihithe

    .next

    1

    :

    0:

    l

    iiiys''.·af·eeasc:

    ,

    Use

    term

    5

    ~natnu'•

    ~~ to

    ·

    adop~ • -replacement nan,~. t.h,ti~. 1'Qt l;~,tf~~y

    umilat. will

    fier action ori Namu

    Haight'.s

    part unn~s.aa:y •. ?{~ fi~ y.~ur

    ~g~

     

    t-

    and retuming this

    letter

    no ·1tter ,thmi:Febtuary S/20lti

    .,

    ··we ~p~ :)fOUJ'

    ;®o~().n,JII thismatter·and-lookfotwata to.y&tt~~speedf~ly.

    .. ..

    . .

    .

    .. :. -·

    :

    r¢~tttl,:come

    o

    :

    our.attention

    that you are usin.gthe

    tenn·'~namun

    in ·eonnect:ion

    •rts

    as

    ~tained

    ln tht

    '

    name '~Na.mu .

    Food

    Cart,

    ••.Namu Korean.-~

    j&Ni:mp KillerKo

    r

    ean

    BBQt and as :contained iA

    ·the

    internet .demaJtt · -

    ''na,nufoodcart.eomt which

    are

    confusingly

    si

    milar

    ti)

    Namu.

    Hajgitr•s

    tr,tde._,._.

    : ·

    use of the

    infringini names is likely to

    cause c~t~ers-of

    .Namu

    Flajg~t's.

    :

    i,.- . _ .

    ->,

    as well as the general national audience

    . familiar.with

    its restaurant,, to

    : .-.:

    \ ·\

    a

    connection

    between

    you and its

    restautants,.whi'ch there

    is

    not. ' .

    eurr~ntly owns U.S .~Tr.a~em~k Registra~·onsfortbe ~ord ~rk N.A~L:_OAJ .

    ;

    4777130).and·for

    .

    the

    NAlvlU d~gn.mark(No._433.4874),

    both

    ~n oonn1:°tton.w1tb

    and bar

    services,

    in~ludjng

    carryout .~ces;

    restaunmt

    and

    cat~ng

    .

    .

    '' The

    NAMU

    and

    NAMU

    OAJJ

    trademark, are recognized

    nationaUy

    ~

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    17/29

    Date

    Print

    Name ed

    Title

    Signature

    Accepted

    and

    Agreed,

    as an

    Authorized Signatory:

    Very truly yours,

    Nothing

    in this letter

    shall be construed

    as a

    waiver

    of

    any

    ngbt or

    remedy

    available

    to

    Namu

    Haight internationally

    and/or

    in the

    United

    Statea. an 0f which ·

    ar~ expressly

    reserved.

    Gary Bvans

    January

    26)2016

    Page

    3 .

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    18/29

    Page 11 –  COMPLAINT 

    EXHIBIT C

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    19/29

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    20/29

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    21/29

    Page 12 –  COMPLAINT 

    EXHIBIT D

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    22/29

    May 14, 2013

    (REGISTRANT) Lee, David INDIVIDUAL UNITED STATES 778 11th Avenue San Francisco

    CALIFORNIA94118

    4334874

    February 26, 2013

    85738256

    September 25, 2012

    1A

    1A

    25.03.06 - Backgrounds covered with wood graining; Wood graining (background)

    NAMU

    The English translation

    of namu

    in

    the mark is tree or ''wood .

    IC 043. US 100 101. G S: Restaurant and bar services, including restaurant carryout services;

    Restaurant and catering services. FIRST USE: 20061201. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20061201

    (3) DESIGN PLUS WORDS, LETTERS, AND/OR NUMBERS

    Use the Back button

    of

    the Internet Browser

    t

    TT11R

    St :i1u

      JSSIGtl St atu s

    Word Mark

    Translations

    Goods and

    Services

    Mark Drawing

    Code

    Design Search

    Code

    Serial Number

    Filing Date

    Current Basis

    Original Filing

    Basis

    Published for

    Opposition

    Reg stration

    Number

    Registration Date

    owner

    return t TESSJ

    Zi

    fSOR

    .

    I

    Start

    ~·---

    Jump

    i ----

    -

    ···..

    Llat

    At: OR ·- ·· -·

    to

    record: Record

    8

    out of 14

    iiiiiiHii 14¥ili •%1GtMH ;;; ;; IPA M WbiMiMW 4 4 4

    IJIMiiM •iiiH•f·i

    IIMMII

    IAiiMN

    ~~~ o ~t

     

    Please logout when you are done to release system resources allocated for you

    TESS was last updated on Thu Feb 18 3:21: 3 EST 2 16

    Trademarks Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)

    ~ United States Patent and Trademark Office

    ~

    Home

    Site Index

    Search FAQ

    Glossary

    Guides Contacts

    eausiness

    eBlz

    alerts

    News

    Help

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    23/29

      .HOME I SITE INDEX SEARCH I eBUSINESS

    I

    HELP PRIVACY POLICY

    illi

    LIVE

    Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. The mark consists of a crosscut of a wooden tree with

    the word namu in the lower right hand corner.

    SERVICE MARK

    PRINCIPAL

    Vijay K. Toke

    ttorney of

    Record

    Description of

    Mark

    Type of Mark

    Register

    Live/Dead

    Indicator

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    24/29

    Page 13 –  COMPLAINT 

    Exhibit E

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    25/29

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    26/29

    Page 14 –  COMPLAINT 

    EXHIBIT F

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    27/291/

    Privac:t statement Free Document.Readers

    Copyright

    ©

    2016 Ca lifomia Secretary of

    State

    Back

    to Search Results

    odify Search New. Search Printer Frlendly

    Definitions.

    • For information o checking or reserving a name, refer to Name Availabili~.

    • For information on ordering certificates, copies of documents and/or status reports or to request a

    more extensive search, refer

    to Information_

    Requests.

    • For help with searching an entity name, refer to Search Tips.

    • For descrtptlons of the various fields and status types, refer to Field Descriptions and Status

    Indicates the information is not contained in the Cali fornia Secretary of State's database.

    Note: If the agent for serviceof process s a corporation, the addressof the agent may be requested

    by ordering a status report.

    101 LUCAS VALLEY RD STE 300

    SAN RAFAEL CA 94903

    ~ ' t

    t

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    28/29

    Page 15 –  COMPLAINT 

    EXHIBIT G

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&

  • 8/19/2019 Namu v. Namu Haight Declaratory Relief Complaint

    29/29

    Regards

     

    Nothin

    g in this le

    tter s

    ha

    ll

    be construed as a

    w

    ai

    v

    er o

    f

    any

    rig

    ht

    or re

    medy

    av

    ailable to Na

    mu 

    Inc

    .

    interna

    tion

    all

    y

    a

    n

    d/or

    in the Unit

    e

    d

    St

    a

    t

    es, all

    of w

    hich

    ar

    e express

    l

    y r

    eserv

    ed.

    Therefor

    e, Nam

    u

     

    In

    c.

    w

    i

    ll

    c

    o

    ntinue

    t

    o

    u

    se

    it

    s

    trad

    e

    n

    ames

    Na

    mu Korean & Hawa

    ii

    a

    n

      and

    Narnu Killer Korean BBQ  within

    th

    e

    Port

    l

    and   OR Metropolitan r a until

    s

    uch time that Namu

    Haight  LLC can provid

    e

    credible legal

    a

    uthority s

    upportin

    g its right to use the name Namu

     

    Namu Gaji 

    and/

    or the Namu

    Woo

    d d

    esi

    g

    in the

    Portl

    and Me

    tro

    p

    olit

    an

    Ar

    ea.

    Thu

    s,

    w

    hile

    N

    arnu

      Inc

    .

    under

    s

    tand

    s

    your

    p

    ositi

    on

      w

    e

    respectfull

    y dis

    a

    gree

    t

    hat you

    current

    ly

    ho

    ld a

    n

    y

    c

    ommon law ri

    g

    hts

    or otherwi

    se,

    t

    o use the

    na

    me

    N

    amu or

    Na

    mu Ga

    ji w

    ithin the

    P

    o

    rtland 

    OR

    Metropolitan Area  Moreov

    er 

    any rights you may have in Namu

     

    Namu Gaji

     

    and

     

    o

    r

    the

    N

    amu Wood

    de

    s

    i

    gn

     

    did not vest until after

    N

    amu

      In

    c. 's date o

    f

    first use

    i

    n this region  rendering them une

    nfor

    ceab

    l

    e

    .

    Thank you fo

    r

    y

    our

    l

    etter

    on beh

    a

    l

    f of

    the Lee bro

    th

    ers  and Namu Ha

    i

    ght  LLC . Namu  Inc .

    wishes to resolve this ma

    tter

    in a timel

    y

    and cost effective manner   As you are aware

     

    Namu

    K

    orean

    Hawaiian

     

    and Narnu Kil

    l

    er Korean BB

    Q

      have been in cons

    i

    stent use in commerce

    thr

    oughout the

    Portla

    nd

     

    O

    R

    Met

    ropo

    lit

    an

    rea

    since 20 I 0 .

    A

    s

    yo

    u are also

    aware 

    the Portland Me

    t

    ro

    p

    o

    li

    tan re

    a

    is

    expansive

      w

    ith a radius o

    f

    nea

    rl

    y 50 m

    il

    es in a

    ll d

    i

    rect

    ions (e.g.

    ro

    ughly

    Long

    view, WA

    -

    No

    rt

    h;

    Sherid

    an,

    O

    R

    - West

    ; Gov

    ernme

    nt Cam

    p

      OR

    -

    East;

    a

    nd 

    Sa

    lem,

    O

    R

    -

    Sou

    t

    h).

    It

    is clea

    r fr

    om yo

    ur

    trademark filings that

    Na

    mu

    H

    aight

     

    LLC did not use its mark in interstate commerce prior to November

    1

     

    2011; more th

    a

    n a year after Namu

     

    Inc. 's first use in the Portland M

    e

    tropolitan

    Are

    a .

    D

    ear

    M

    r.

    Tok

    e

     

    R

    E: Use

    of

    Namu Namu

    Ga

    ji

    Propri

    etary

    Mar

    ks

    Namu Haight, LLC Dispute with Namu   Inc.

    Mr.

    Vij

    ay T

    ok

    e

    Coba

    lt 

    LLP

    918 Parke

    r

    Street

     

    B

    uildin

    g A21

    Be

    rk

    eley, CA

    9

    4710

    T:

    510

    .841 .98

    00

    F:

    510.

    295

    .2401

    E: v

    ij

    [email protected]

    ia

    r

     gular mail and email

    F

    ebruar

    y

    1

    9,

    201

    6

    SCOTT T

    . R

     

    NNIE

    scott@s 

    in

     

    e

    ne

    l

    son

    .com

    !"#$ &'()*+,*--./&*01 23+45$67 ( 89:$; -&