N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

27
Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24

Transcript of N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Page 1: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200

RELAx - MI

Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24

Page 2: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

RELAx - MI

Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24

Results - Pre-PCI

Page 3: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

RELAx - MI

Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24

Results - Post-PCI

Early Late P

TIMI 3 final 92% 92% NS

TFCc final 27±19 32±23 0.09

MBG 2-3 79% 58% 0.001

Réduction ST > 70% 50% 35% 0.03

Pic troponine 115±122 172±267 0.05

∑ 48-h troponine 3329±3481 4165±4076 0.09

Page 4: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

RELAx - MI

Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24

Results - 1 month

In patients with AMI treated with PPCI, early abciximab improves pre-PCI angiographic findings, post-PCI tissue perfusion, and 1-month left ventricular function recovery, possibly by starting early recanalization of the IRA.

Page 5: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

« Early vs. Late »

Godicke & al. Am Heart J 2005;150:1015.e11-1015.e17

6 studies / Abciximab , n=602

Page 6: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

« Early vs. Late »

185

2215

2718

33

15

43

31

47

33

0

25

50

75

Early Late /NO

Early Late /NO

Early Late /NO

% T

IMI 2

- 3

Abciximab Tirofiban Eptifibatide

Gibson & al. Am Heart J 2006;152:668275

Page 7: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Les questions

Chez les patients bénéficiant d’une ACT première pour IDM ST +, une administration précoce d’antiGP2b3 apporte-t-elle un bénéfice par rapport à une utilisation péri-PCI en terme de : paramètres angiographiques : OUI critères pronostiques intermédiaires : OUI MACEs (décès, ré-IDM) ?

Page 8: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Aucun essai clinique n’a permis de démontrer individuellement une réduction de mortalité par

l’utilisation d’anti-GP2B3A associé à l’angioplastie première…

13 essais « faible puissance » : Ace, Admiral, Bridging, Erami, Intami, In time, Isar, On time, Rapport, Relax, Reomobile, Tiger , Titan

1 essai « faible risque » :

Cadillac

Page 9: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Méta-analyses

Montalescot & al. JAMA. 2004;292:362-366Keeley & al. Lancet 2006; 367: 579–88

Flux TIMI 3 pré-angioplastie 26 vs. 15% P < 0.001Flux TIMI 3 post-angioplastie 90 vs. 85% P = 0.057Mais….

Décès = NS

Page 10: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Méta-analyses

Flux TIMI 3 pré-angioplastie 26 vs. 15% P < 0.001Flux TIMI 3 post-angioplastie 90 vs. 85% P = 0.057Mais….

Montalescot & al. JAMA. 2004;292:362-366Keeley & al. Lancet 2006; 367: 579–88

Re-IDM = NS

Page 11: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Méta-analyses

Flux TIMI 3 pré-angioplastie 26 vs. 15% P < 0.001Flux TIMI 3 post-angioplastie 90 vs. 85% P = 0.057Mais….

Montalescot & al. JAMA. 2004;292:362-366Keeley & al. Lancet 2006; 367: 579–88

Urgent revascularization = NS

Page 12: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Méta-analyses

Flux TIMI 3 pré-angioplastie 26 vs. 15% P < 0.001Flux TIMI 3 post-angioplastie 90 vs. 85% P = 0.057Mais….

Montalescot & al. JAMA. 2004;292:362-366Keeley & al. Lancet 2006; 367: 579–88

Saignements = NS

Page 13: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

En résumé

In a meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials, early administration of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI appeared to improve coronary patency with favorable trends for clinical outcomes. These findings are supportive of a strategy of facilitated PCI.Further evaluations in adequately powered large trials are awaited to confirm the clinical benefit of this strategy.

Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention offers no benefit over primary percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI treatment and should not be used outside the context of randomised controlled trials.

Keeley & al. Lancet 2006; 367: 579–88

Montalescot & al. JAMA. 2004;292:362-366

Page 14: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Cadillac

8,3

4,85,7

4,4

0

5

10

PTCA PTCA+ABCIX STENT STENT+ABCIX

% C

ompo

site

EP

30 joursN=2082P=0.02

Stone & al. N Engl J Med 2002;346:957

Page 15: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Cadillac

20.0

16.5

11.5 10.2

0

10

20

PTCA PTCA+ABCIX STENT STENT+ABCIX

% C

ompo

site

EP

6 moisN=2082P=0.02

Stone & al. N Engl J Med 2002;346:957

Page 16: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Cadillac

Stone & al. N Engl J Med 2002;346:957

Page 17: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Cadillac

Stone & al. N Engl J Med 2002;346:957

2.5% 2.7%

Page 18: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Cadillac

Stone & al. N Engl J Med 2002;346:957

4.5% 4.2%

Page 19: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Cadillac

Stone & al. N Engl J Med 2002;346:957

0.8% 0.8%

Page 20: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Cadillac

Stone & al. N Engl J Med 2002;346:957

1.8% 2.2%

Page 21: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

ADMIRAL

† + IDM +RevN=300

Montalescot & al. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1895

Page 22: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Montalescot & al. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1895-903

ADMIRAL

Page 23: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Montalescot & al. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1895-903

ADMIRAL

3.4 vs. 6.6%

Page 24: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Montalescot & al. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1895-903

ADMIRAL

3.4 vs. 7.3%

Page 25: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Montalescot & al. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1895-903

ADMIRAL

Major bleeding + stroke = NS

Page 26: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Méta-analyse « européenne »

Montalescot & al. Eur Heart J 2007;28:443–449

ACE, ADMIRAL, ISAR - n=1101 - Abciximab

Death +MI

Page 27: N Abciximab ER vs. Cath Lab, n=200 RELAx - MI Maioli & al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1517–24.

Méta-analyse « européenne »

Monlescot & al. Eur Heart J 2007;28:443–449

ACE, ADMIRAL, ISAR - n=1101 - Abciximab

Total mortality