Mystery and speculations: An introduction to E.M. Jellinek...

Substance Abuse Library and Information Studies: Proceedings of the 36th

Annual SALIS Conference

Mystery and speculations: An introduction to E.M. Jellinek’s redemption 33

Mystery and speculations: An introduction to E.M. Jellinek’s redemption WilliamBejarano,MA,MLIS‘15

Center of Alcohol Studies

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

This is the first in a series of papers depicting the mostly undocumented life of E.M. Jellinek. This paper

serves as an introduction to several more topics related to Jellinek’s pre-alcohol studies life and

scholarship, including his family background, his years in Hungary, his time abroad, his tenure at the

Worcester State Hospital, and his relationship with Mark Keller. This first part focuses on some major

controversial issues about Jellinek’s life, which challenged those who attempted to write a biography.

The information in these papers was first presented at the 36th Annual Substance Abuse Librarians and

Information Specialists (SALIS) Conference on May 1st, 2014, by seven presenters in a panel entitled

“Mystery and speculations: Piecing together E.M. Jellinek’s redemption.”

Introductions, intentions,

and scope Thereareessentiallyfourgoalswe1want

to accomplish with this panel, which are asfollows:

1 The“we”inthisarticlereferstothejointeffortsof

theRutgersCenterofAlcoholStudiesstaffandDr.RonRoizen

(1)Tohonorandacknowledgethefounderofour library, one of the figureheads of theCenter of Alcohol Studies, and the primarydrivingforcebehindtheemergenceofalcoholscience.

(2)Toshowtheresearchprocesses involvedin collecting, digitizing, and analyzing all ofthe information we have uncovered. Ofparticular importance with this goal is anemphasisonmakingasmuch informationas

DI

SC

OV

ER

IN

G

HI

ST

OR

Y



34 Mystery and speculations: An introduction to E.M. Jellinek’s redemption

possible accessible, as we never know whatwillbecomerelevantinthefuture.Inkeepingwith the theme of the Conference (entitled“Looking forward, looking back”), we havebeen building on our past to better prepareusforourfuture.

(3)Togiveafullerpictureofthefoundationsofalcoholscience,asrootedinthemakingofthe man who was a large part of itsbeginnings.Webelieveitbenefitsthoseofuswho work in substance abuse libraries tohave a working knowledge of one of thefoundersof ourdiscipline, ashispersonalityhadaverylargeinfluenceonitsstructure.

(4) To document this history in our voice(because who else will do it?). We areessentiallytwogenerationsremovedfromthefoundationofthisfield,anditisimportanttomake information accessible in hope that itdoes not get distorted or filtered throughthosewithbiasesonewayoranotheronthetopic. Essentially, our job is to uncover asmuch of the material as we can, utilize thematerial we have uncovered, and perhapsmost importantly, provide context whenavailable.

Jellinek is of coursemost famous for hisnumerous contributions to the alcoholscience field, someofwhich Imakementionof below, but it should be noted that hestartedthisphaseofhiscareerwhenhewasapproximately 50 years old, which leavesquitealotoflifetoconsiderbeforehetookupthiscause(Jellinek,1947a).Soasmentioned,thefocusofthispanel,whilecertainlymakingreference to his years in alcohol studies(especiallyduringMollyStewart’sportiononhis relationshipwithMark Keller), is on theforging of his personal, educational, andprofessionalinterestspre-alcohol.

The panel’s intention is to give a well-rounded picture of this complex andinteresting man, and show how his uniquetakeonlifeandscholarlypursuitsisreflectedintheworkwearedoingassubstanceabuselibrarians,decadesafterhispassing.Includedinthisworkistheresearchinvolvedintryingtofillinthegapsofhislife,andwehavecometofindthatthemorewelearnaboutJellinek,

the more we learn about the foundation ofalcohol studies as a discipline. In keepingwith his (either second or third) ex-wifeThelmaPierceAnderson’swishes, in a letterto colleague Mark Keller about a potentialJellinekbiography,weplantorevealthemanin several aspects of his life (Anderson toKeller, 1984). Of course, an honestassessment of an individual will alwaysexposeflawsincharacter,butourintentionisnot todefame.Weplanon showing the truehuman being, flaws and all, and on chartinghis failures and subsequent successes inequal measure. (Hence, the word“redemption” prominently displayed in thetitleofthepanel.)Aboveall,wewanttoshowthat this is amanwho containedmultitudesanddefiesarchetype.

Speakingtothefourthgoalofours(“Whoelsewilldoit?”),andwithrespecttoThelma’sconcerns, we want Jellinek’s biographicalinformation to be placed in the propercontext, and not sensationalized or used topushanagenda.Whilethedubiousclaimsandalleged indiscretions we will discuss cancertainlypainthiminanunflattering light, itistoosimplistictothinkinsuchbinarytermsas to discredit his great contributions to thefield.Thethemeofthispanelistorecognizeaman who failed often, and surely felt thereverberations of those failures, butcontinuedtoworkathiscraft.

For an example of how cherry-pickedinformation can be used for defamatorypurposes, take the response to Dr. RonRoizen’s 1997 column “Jellinek’s PhantomDoctorate”, which explored his attempts toverify Jellinek’s academic credentials anddetailedhisdiscovery that Jellinekmayhavebeen less than forthright about his claims.Roizen concludes that this shows just howmarginalafigureJellinekwasinthescientificworld,andpostulatesthatthefieldofalcoholscience itself wasmarginal by extension. Heeven makes sure to state: “a doctor-lessJellinekshouldbynomeansvitiateeitherhiscareerorhisaccomplishments in thealcoholscience movement. Indeed, some of us mayevenbeinclinedtograntJellinekafewextra-creditpoints--i.e., foraccomplishingasmuch




as he did with a c.v. as problematic as hisappearstohavebeen!”(Roizen,1997).

Shortly afterRoizen’s articlewasposted,Dr.StantonPeelechosenottofocusonthesebalanced and nuanced conclusions, andinstead used Roizen’s research to write anarticleentitled“JellinekWasaCheat!”forhispersonalblog(Peele,1997).ItisprobablynotcoincidentalthatdiscreditingJellinekoutrightwouldfitinwithhisviewsagainstthediseaseconcept of addiction, as Jellinek’s perhapsmost publicizedwork is entitledThe Disease

Concept of Alcoholism.Thirteenyearslater,in2010, Peele reposted the same article to hiswebsite dedicated to his addiction recoveryprogram(Peele,2010).

WewillbegettingintoJellinek’sacademiccredentials shortly, but first, as to ourintentions, a reminder of his innumerablecontributions to the field of alcohol andsubstanceabusestudies.Thefollowing list isby no means exhaustive, but provides anoverview of just how many initiatives inwhich he was involved. Perhaps his mostenduring contribution to the field is his ideaof “phases” of alcohol addiction (Jellinek,1946,1952), latermodifiedbyDr.MaxGlattto include a recovery element (Glatt, 1958),butstillpopularlyreferredtoasthe“JellinekCurve.” This curve has been modified andapplied to all sorts of addiction disordersover the years and remains highly cited tothis day (Fisher 1990, Hoffman 1994, Baird2008).

Bunky’s Doodle

(Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies Archives)

Also in need of mention is his wide-

ranging appeal to audiences of all types. Forthe scholars, he was one of the founders ofthepioneeringQuarterly Journal of Studies on

Alcohol (QJSA), currentlyJournal of Studies on

Alcohol and Drugs (JSAD),thelongestrunningalcohol/substance-related research journalpublished in theUnitedStates, inaddition tohis numerous publications in other journals(Keller, 1984). He also catered to thelayperson,highlightedby theshortanimatedfeature “To Your Health” (featuring hiscartoon likeness), and the publication“Alcohol, Cats and People” describingexperiments with alcohol on cats, pepperedwith amusing illustrations (Jellinek, 1948,1953).

“To Your Health”

Supervised by E.M. Jellinek

Andofcourse,spanningbothpopularand

scholarly audiences is perhaps his mostcomprehensive work, the book The DiseaseConceptofAlcoholism(Jellinek,1960),whichcombined with his other work has left animpactexemplifiedbythefactthatalcoholismis occasionally referred to as “Jellinek’sDisease”(Keller1984).

Further still, he developed the idea andcurriculumfortheSummerSchoolofAlcoholStudies,stillholdingitsannualsessionsalongwith several specialized courses, under itscurrent moniker the Summer School ofAddictionStudies(Jellinek,1943).Hisappealto librariansand informationspecialistsmaybe best represented by his work on theCAAAL collection, an organizational systemforallofthealcoholliteratureavailableatthetime (Jellinek, Efron & Keller, 1948). Andfinally,hislegendlivesonviatheperiodicallygranted “JellinekMemorialAward”, inwhich




the Canadian-based Jellinek Memorial Fundrecognizes scholarly contributions to thealcoholfield,representedbythe“Bunky”bust(JellinekMemorialAwards).

An un-examinable life? I’d like to begin showing our research

processbyhighlightingjusthowdifficultthisman’s life is to piece together, taking youthroughattempts to sort everythingout in abiography.ThefirsttrueattemptataJellinekbiography got underway in 1965, less thantwoyearsafterhisdeath.Hisdaughter,RuthSurry, tookup theeffort, fundedbya$2,000grantfromtheBrinkleySmithersFoundation.We have a series of memos written shortlyafter Jellinek’s death between Surry, R.BrinkleySmithers,andsomeonewehaveonlybeen able to identify as “CPF” (possibly aneditor or otherwise in Smithers’ employ)detailing an outline of her discoveries, hersources, the costs involved, and reports onher progress (Surry, 1965). In thesememos,the initial emotion is pleasure that thingsweremovingalongsorapidly.

Ruth Surry, Jellinek’s daughter at

Mark Keller’s Recognition Dinner, October 7, 1977 (Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies Archives)

Shebeganbyspeakingtofamilymembersand tracking leads. However, approximatelyone year later, in a message from CPF toSmithers from 1966, the sentiment becamesignificantly less optimistic. By this point,Ruth was under significant pressure, andseeminglyoverwhelmedby the “tremendousamount of research involved” (CPF, 1966).She began to express trepidations aboutrevealing Jellinek’srelationship tohis family,andCPFworriesinthememoabouthowlongabookfromhermighttaketocomplete.Inahandwrittennoteat thebottomof the letter,he mentions that she promises a progressreportsoon.ByDecemberof1966,shenotesthat the “biographical work is proceedingvery slowly indeed” and that much of theinformationiscontradictory(Surry,1966).(Ifyou are curious about what she must havegonethrough,abriefpreviewofsomeofthisconfusinginformationwillfollowshortly.Wehave only these memos as sources for thisattempt, which include a helpful outline ofJellinek’s life, but have no actual pagesproducedinhereffort.Weremainoptimistic,however, as we contacted the SmithersFoundation to see if they may possessanything beyond these memos, and theyrecently replied, offering to send overanythingthatmayberelatedtotheproject,sowehopetogainmoreinformationaboutthisattemptsoon.)

Several other Jellinek biographies wereattempted outside of Ruth’s ill-fated effort.Mark Keller actually makes mention of apotential biographical piece in 1963, only afewmonthsremovedfromJellinek’sdeath,inalettertoThelmaAnderson.Though,hedoesstipulate that he doesn’t “have in mind abiography in the true sense, but oneessentiallylimitedtoworkandachievements.(Someone with literary ambitions could try a

real biography)” (Keller, 1963). Theaforementioned CPF letter notes that MaxGlatt,oneof thepioneers inthetreatmentofalcohol problems (and as noted earlier, theman who added the “curve” to the “JellinekCurve”), had the idea to work on a Jellinekbiographywithmoreofanoralhistorybent,collecting statements from prominent




members of the alcohol science field withtheirviewsoftheman.Heisquotedassayingthatthe lackofa Jellinekbiographyis like“abuilding without the cornerstone” (CPF,1966).Nearlytwentyyearslater,KelleraskedThelmaherselftotakeupthetask.Inaletterfrom Thelma in 1984, she appearsapprehensive, but then delves into somehypotheticals about the potential scope andfocusofthebook(AndersontoKeller,1984).By 1990, Keller had apparently taken thereins himself, and even crafted a title—“Bunky: A Remembrance of E.M. Jellinek”.Thelma mentions the title while wishingKeller luck in its undertaking (Anderson toKeller, 1990).Wedohave a copyof about8pages taken from an early draft of thatattempt. Perhaps the most comprehensivebiography comes courtesy of J. GeorgeStrachan,whowroteanunpublished63-pagedraftentitledE.M. Jellinek: His stay in Canada(Strachan, 1989). The title is a bit of amisnomer, as nearly two-thirds of the draftcovers Jellinek’s personality and his careerbeforearrivinginCanada.Despitealloftheseambitions, none of these biographies havebeen completed and published, so thatproverbialcornerstone inDr.Glatt’squote isstillmissing.

Let us now see some examples thatmay

haveconfusedRuthandperhapssomeothersduring their research, such as his ever-changingacademiccredentials.In1918,a28-yearoldJellinekwaslistedas“Doctor”intheproceedings of the 5th annual International

Psychoanalytics Congress held in Budapest(Psyalpha,1919).(Note:Jellinekpresentedatthis conference along with Sigmund Freudand his close colleague Géza Róheim, thedetails of which will follow in a subsequentpaper).In1933,whileworkingforWorcesterState Hospital, he published with the titleMaster of Education, with no sign of adoctorate (Hoskins et al, 1933). By 1935, hehadearnedaDoctorateofScience(WorcesterState Hospital, 1935), but in 1940, hequalifiedthatDoctorateashonorary(Jellinek& McFarland, 1940). In 1942, the honoraryqualifierwas dropped, aswas theMaster ofEducation (Jellinek, 1942). In 1947, he didaway with titles altogether (Jellinek, 1947).And in the aforementioned unpublishedStrachanbiography,heislistedasaDoctorofScience, Master of Education, and anhonorary Doctor of Medicine (Strachan,1989).

Toavoidconfusion,perhapswecouldjustrefer to him by his preferred nickname,“Bunky”.Oneoftheongoingmythsisthathisfather called him “Bunky” because it means“little radish” in Hungarian (Keller, 1984).Interestingly enough, we have a nativeHungarian speaker on our panel and twoattending the conference, all of whom agreethat the Hungarian word for “radish” is“retek”, not “bunky”. We will explore thisfurtherinDr.JuditWard’spaperonJellinek’sHungarianpast.

Poring through the

documentation Jellinek’s CV and biography, provided by

theStrachanFilesfromAlberta,shedsalittlelightonhiscredentials,butalsoleadstomorequestions.Aswehavefoundwithmuchofthematerialonhim,we tend tomove two stepsforward,andthenoneback.

We can see that he attended theUniversity of Grenoble in 1911, though nodegree is listed.Next, it lists that in1914hereceived his Master of Education at theUniversity of Berlin, though it appears hereceived it three years after he had left theschool. Twenty-one years later, in 1935, he




received his Doctorate of Science, but noinstitution is listed. This also raises thequestion of what exactly he was doing inthose21years,anothertopicwewillgetintolater. Twenty years after that, in 1955, hereceives an Honorary Doctorate of Medicinefrom the University of Chile (“AdditionalBiographicalInformation,”1963).

In1947thepublicationCurrent Biography

compiledhisearlyeducationintoanarrative(Jellinek, 1947a). It makes mention ofUniversity of Berlin (1908-1911), whichcorresponds with the Alberta bio; Grenoblefortheyear1911(stillholdingtrue),andthena previously unmentioned school, referredhere only as “Leipzig”, from 1911-1914, aswhere he earned hisMaster of Education. Italso mentions that his Doctorate of Sciencedegree comes from Leipzig, issued 21 yearslater. It should be noted that Current

Biography gets its information from varioussources, and there is a good chance Jellinekwrote thisbiohimself.By1988, inanarticlewritten by CAS librarian (and former SALISmember)PennyBoothPage,hiseducation isspoken of in general terms, though shementions that his Doctorate of Science fromUniversity of Leipzig is honorary (Page,1988). And in 1997, Dr. Ron Roizen trackedthis down a little further, noticing that The

Historical Register of Yale University, 1937-

1951 has the same Leipzig informationregardinghisM.Ed.,butthathis1935Sc.D.isfromtheUniversityofTegucigalpa,locatedinthe capital of Honduras (Yale University,1952).

InthememofromRuthSurrytoSmithers(1965) in reference to her attemptedbiography, she mentions that Jellinek firstwent to Berlin Technical Institute, then leftfor University of Leipzig, and went toGrenoble for graduate study after that. Shedoes not specifically mention that hegraduated from Leipzig. Finally, incorrespondence from Thelma to Keller in1988, she remarks on his various titles anddegrees, quoting his answer that “Europeandegrees are not comparable to Americandegreesbuttheywerelikedoctorates”,before

positing that “the truth may be moreinteresting”(AndersontoKeller,1988).

Jellinek’scareer,according to theAlbertafile,beginsinthe1920s.Butaccordingtothatfile and the Current Biography piece, heearned his Master’s in 1914, either fromBerlin or Leipzig. So what was he doingbetween thenand the“1920s”?Thepossiblyself-written piece from Current Biography

expands on that a bit. Itmentions that from1914-1919, hewas employed as a biometricconsultant, and as a library and fieldresearcher. Again, no institutions are listed.Also, he was apparently workingsimultaneously (1915-1920) as biometricianat the Government School for NervousChildren in Budapest (perhaps that is thebiometric consultant job thathementions inthe previous sentence).We should also notethatwehavenotbeenabletoverifywhetheror not this school ever existed. These yearsareshroudedinmystery,butluckilyDr.WardwillexpandupontheminherpaperdetailinghisHungarianyears.

The following decade also lackssubstantialsources.Wehavenotbeenabletofind any corroborating evidence of his yearsin Sierra Leone, though both his CV and(auto?)biographical piece mention his stintending after five years. After lookingeverywhere for information on the ElderDempstercompany,ourfindingsonthisclaimare again inconclusive. One other scrap ofevidence we have about his time in WestAfrica comes from his posthumouslypublished article in the Journal of Studies on

Alcohol in 1977 entitled “The Symbolism ofDrinking”, in which it is mentioned that hehad observed some tribal symbolism duringhistimethere(Jellinek,1977).

Another piece of corroboratinginformation comes from theWorcester StateHospital Annual Reports, in which he isintroduced as a statistician who worked inWest Africa for Elder Dempster and R.Pariser,thelatterafirmnotmentionedinanyprevious or subsequent document(Worcester,1931).

After his African years, Strachan’sbiographical narrative lists his title as




assistant director of research with UnitedFruitCompanyinTela,Honduras,andhisbioadds thatheworked for them for five years,starting in 1925 (Strachan, 1989; Jellinek,1947a). His daughter also mentions a bookaboutbananaswrittenbyhimduringhistimethere (Surry, 1965). Again, this somewhatcorrelates with his educational background,ashe claims to have earned his Sc.D. fromaschoolinHonduras,butifyouhavebeenabletofollowalongthistangledweb,heclaimstohave earned that degree in 1934,approximately four years after leaving thecountry.

Finally,furthercomplicatingourresearchprocess is the fact that Jellinek allegedlychanged his name when he left for SierraLeone, and kept that pseudonym until hebegan working forWorcester State Hospitalin1931.Wefoundthisintheaforementionedmemo from his daughter regarding hisbiography, in which she mentions that hetook the name Nikita Hartmann (Surry,1965).

Conclusions So, what to conclude from such a

convolutedmess of dates, facts, and claims?Theconfusingnatureofthisintroductionisatleastpartlyintentional,asthepurposewastoshowjusthowmaddeninganddifficultithasbeentotrackJellinek’slifeovertheyears.Thegoodnewsisthatthesubsequentsegmentsofthis series will provide some clarity andanswer some questions posed here, thoughthere is still much work to be done. InJellinek’s 73 years of life, he traveled fromNew York City to Budapest, West Africa,CentralAmerica,Massachusetts, Connecticut,Texas, Canada, Switzerland, California, andpossibly beyond. He worked in many fields,possibly under different names, and wasallegedlyinvolvedinactivitiesthatonewouldlikely be inclined to keep under wraps. Forthesereasonsandmore,attemptingtofollowhischronologyisfrustratinganddifficult,butwe hope as you follow along the differentpartsofthisseries,thattheadventureofitallholdsasmuch interest foryouas itdoes forus.




ReferencesAdditionalbiographicalinformation.Dr.Elvin

MortonJellinek.(1963).StrachanFiles.CenterofAlcoholStudiesArchives(inprocess),Rutgers,TheStateUniversityofNewJersey,Piscataway.

Anderson,T.P.(1984,August22).[LettertoMarkKeller].KellerFiles.CenterofAlcoholStudiesArchives(inprocess),Rutgers,TheStateUniversityofNewJersey,Piscataway.

Anderson,T.P.(1990,July20).[LettertoMarkKeller].KellerFiles.CenterofAlcoholStudiesArchives(inprocess),Rutgers,TheStateUniversityofNewJersey,Piscataway.

Baird,C.(2008).Treatingwomenwithchildren:Whatdoestheevidencesay?Journal of

Addictions Nursing,19(2),83-85.CPF.(1966).[MemotoR.BrinkleySmithers].

JellinekFiles.CenterofAlcoholStudiesArchives(inprocess),Rutgers,TheStateUniversityofNewJersey,Piscataway.

Fisher,L.B.,Goldstein,L.S.,&Buongiorno,P.A.(1990).Phasesofchronicpain:amodelforassessmentandtreatment.The Clinical

Journal of Pain,6(3),191-198.Glatt,M.(1958).Grouptherapyinalcoholism.

British Journal of Addiction,54,133–143.Hoffman,F.(1994).Culturaladaptationsof

AlcoholicsAnonymoustoserveHispanicpopulations.Substance Use & Misuse,29(4),445-460.

Hoskins,R.G.,Sleeper,F.H.,Shakow,D.,Jellinek,E.M.,Looney,J.M.,&Erickson,M.H.(1933).Acooperativeresearchinschizophrenia.Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry,30(2),388-401.

Psyalpha.(1919).1919 Budapest - V.

Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Kongress.AttendeeslistofInternationalePsychoanalytischeKongresseSeit1908,Budapest,Hungary.Retrievedfromhttp://www.psyalpha.net/chronik/ipv-internationale-psychoanalytische-vereinigung/internationale-psychoanalytische-kongresse-seit-1908/1919-budapest-v-internationaler-psychoanalytischer-kongress

Jellinek,E.M.,&McFarland,R.A.(1940).Analysisofpsychologicalexperimentsontheeffectsofalcohol.Quarterly Journal of Studies on

Alcohol,1,272-371.Jellinek,E.M.(1942).Theinterpretationofalcohol

consumptionrates,withspecialreferenceto

statisticsofwartimeconsumption.Quarterly

Journal of Studies on Alcohol,3,267-280.Jellinek,E.M.(1943).Thefirst(1943)summer

sessionoftheSchoolofAlcoholStudies,YaleUniversity.Quarterly Journal of Studies on

Alcohol,4,187-194.Jellinek,E.M.(1946).Phasesinthedrinking

historyofalcoholics:analysisofasurveyconductedbytheGrapevine,officialorganofAlcoholicsAnonymous.Quarterly Journal

of Studies on Alcohol,7,1-88.Jellinek,E.M.(1947a).Current Biography: Who’s

News and Why 1947. (pp.334-335).NewYork:H.W.Wilson.

Jellinek,E.M.(1947b).Recenttrendsinalcoholismandinalcoholconsumption.Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol,8(1),1-42.

Jellinek,E.M.(1948).Dr.Masserman’scats.AlliedYouth,17(6),3,7.(Reprintedas:Alcohol,catsandpeople[booklet].(1948).NewHaven:YaleCenterofAlcoholStudies.)

Jellinek,E.M.,Efron,V.,&Keller,M.(1948).Abstractarchiveofthealcoholliterature.Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol,8,580-608.

Jellinek,E.M.(1952)Phasesofalcoholaddiction,Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol,13(4),673-684.

Jellinek,E.M.(1977).Thesymbolismofdrinking;aculture-historicalapproach. Journal of

Studies on Alcohol,38(5),852-866.JellinekMemorialAwards.(n.d.).About us.

Retrievedfromhttp://www.jellinekaward.org/about-us.html

Keller,M.(1963,November18).[LettertoThelmaAnderson].KellerFiles.CenterofAlcoholStudiesArchives(inprocess),Rutgers,TheStateUniversityofNewJerssey,Piscataway.

Keller,M.(1984).IrememberBunky.Alcoholism,4,50-51.

Page,P.B.(1988).Theoriginsofalcoholstudies:EMJellinekandthedocumentationofthealcoholresearchliterature.British Journal of

Addiction,83(9),1095-1103.Peele,S.(1997,October).Jellinek was a cheat!

Retrievedfromhttp://www.peele.net/lib/jellinek.html

Peele,S.(2010,February3).Jellinek was a cheat!Retrievedfromhttp://lifeprocessprogram.com/lp-blog/library/jellinek-was-a-cheat/




Roizen,R.(1997).Jellinek’sPhantomDoctorate.Ranes Report.Retrievedfromhttp://www.roizen.com/ron/rr11.htm

Strachan,J.G.(1989)E.M.Jellinek,Sc.D.,M.Ed.,M.D.(Hon.):HisstayinCanada(unpublishedmonograph).(Edmonton,Alberta)

StrachanFiles.CenterofAlcoholStudiesArchives(inprocess),Rutgers,TheStateUniversityofNewJersey,Piscataway.

Surry,R.(1965,July21).[MemotoR.BrinkleySmithers].JellinekFiles.CenterofAlcoholStudiesArchives(inprocess),Rutgers,TheStateUniversityofNewJersey,Piscataway.

Surry,R.(1966,December3).[MemotoR.BrinkleySmithers].JellinekFiles.CenterofAlcoholStudiesArchives(inprocess),Rutgers,TheStateUniversityofNewJersey,Piscataway.

WorcesterStateHospital.(1931).Annual report of

the trustees of the Worcester State Hospital

for the year ending November 30, 1931.Retrievedfromhttps://archive.org/details/annualreportoftr134worc

WorcesterStateHospital.(1935).Annual report of

the trustees of the Worcester State Hospital

for the year ending November 30, 1935.Retrievedfromhttps://archive.org/details/annualreportoftr138worc

WorldHealthOrganization(Producer),&Jellinek,E.M.(ScriptSupervisor).(1953).To Your

Health[AnimatedShort].UK:HalasandBachelorCartoonFilms.

YaleUniversity.(1952).Historical register of Yale

University 1937- 1951.NewHaven,CT:YaleUniv.

Contact the author WilliamBejaranoInformationSpecialistCenterofAlcoholStudies,Rutgers,TheStateUniversityofNewJersey607AllisonRoadPiscataway,NJ08854USAPhone:[email protected]

E.M. Jellinek’s bookplate and signature in a book donated by him to our library

(Rutgers, Center of Alcohol Studies)

Mystery and speculations: An introduction to E.M. Jellinek...

Documents

Transcript of Mystery and speculations: An introduction to E.M. Jellinek...