Murrindindi Bushfire Memorials · In the case of Flowerdale and Hazeldene where only 3 people came...
Transcript of Murrindindi Bushfire Memorials · In the case of Flowerdale and Hazeldene where only 3 people came...
Murrindindi Bushfire MemorialsDesign Brief Report 2014
prepared by
Phase 2 of the Community Consultation process for Murrindindi Shire is complete. Based on feedback received from the Murrindindi Bushfire Memorials Working Group, as part of its extensive consultation process, a design brief has been prepared that will see two regional memorials to be sited in Marysville and Kinglake to represent the broader impact of the fires on either side of the shire, as well as several ‘Local Memorials’ to be sited in communities where lives were lost.
The local memorials will be more intimate markers for community remembrance and as such will be smaller in scale. The function of the regional memorials is to acknowledge the broader impact of the fires on communities and to provide a space for larger memorial events.
The Working Group has also recommended that all names of the deceased be included in the two regional memorials unless families wish otherwise.
Preferred sites have been identified for the regional Memorials at Marysville and Kinglake. The sites for local memorials have also been identified in Narbethong, Toolangi/Castella, Kinglake Central, Kinglake West and Flowerdale / Hazeldene. These will be announced once approvals have been received.
The siting of the Flowerdale/Hazeldene and Toolangi / Castella memorials has been voted on by community members at community meetings that took place in April. The agenda of these meetings was to discuss all recommended sites and to agree on the most appropriate one for these areas. In the case of Flowerdale and Hazeldene where only 3 people came to the meeting, we ran a further survey on the web-site for a period of 2 months. Community members were notified via press releases and a locally distributed flyer. The response was robust and a preferred site was identified.
In terms of the memorials themselves, survey respondents were asked whether names of the deceased should be included in the design.
Most agreed that the names of people who have died should be included. However around 20 per cent did not agree and on this basis the working group has recommended that an opt-out option be offered for those who do not wish their loved ones names to be incorporated into the memorials.
Executive Summary
Respondents also felt strongly that the loss of pets, wildlife, the environment and property should be acknowledged in the memorials, as well as ongoing impacts on communities.
Another request was that the many people who contributed to the fire response effort and recovery should also be recognised by the memorials. This has been incorporated into the design brief. It is the recommendation of the Working Group that the two regional memorials be the appropriate sites for the telling of these stories.
The survey responses were unanimous in requesting that the memorials should reflect the beauty of the natural environment, and the resilience of the local community – and that the design should be simple, enduring and evocative, to allow quiet contemplation.
On this basis, the Working Group has determined that the bushfire memorials will be “respectful places that commemorate the loss of life, of livelihood, of home, of friends and community and of treasured landscapes wrought by the devastation of the 2009 bushfires”.
Expressions of interests for memorial deigns will be called for as soon as the sites has been finalised and approvals received. Short-listed designers will be asked to make a model to go on display for the communities to comment on.
Information about all aspects of the memorials and their designs, including contact details for members of the Working Group, is available on the Murrindindi Bushfire Memorial website at http://murrindindibushfirememorials.wordpress.com. Families of the bereaved were encouraged to contact us via phone, letter or email to share with us their thoughts on the memorial and the inclusion of names of the deceased. The process of contacting the bereaved will be continued through to phase 3 when the designer has been selected to design the memorials. This may be done through the Projects Working Group and via notifications through the relevant bereaved publications. It is acknowledged however that contacting the bereaved is a sensitive process and the correct protocols must be followed.
Jan NowellConsultantArterial Design Pty Ltd
Table of Contents
1. Introduction 1
2. History of the shire 3
3. The Events of February 7, 2009 3
4. The recovery process 7
5. The significance of Remembrance and Memorials 18
6. Murrindindi memorials process 19
7. Key Design Criteria 10
8. The Sites 11
9. Attachments 13
10. References 13
1
1. Introduction
On 7th February 2009 vast areas of country Victoria were devastated by catastrophic bushfires resulting in Australia’s highest ever loss of life from bushfire. This became known as Black Saturday.
Bushfire affected communities in the Shire of Murrindindi have expressed their desire to establish memorials to recognise the impact of these catastrophic bushfires.
Memorials offer places where people can remember losses, reflect on their own experiences and recognise community spirit. The story for each person will be different, and no less or more important than another story. Memorials needs to represent all the losses and impacts of the bushfires.
Well-developed memorials will provide for the needs of all people impacted by the bushfire event. This will include those directly impacted as well as their supporters and those involved in the emergency response and recovery. Memorials will also meet the needs of future generations who seek to understand the impact of bushfire event on their families and community.
Through extensive community engagement, it has been agreed that two central memorials will be represented either side of the shire: Kinglake and Marysville. These memorials will be larger in scale and will express the broader impacts of the fire upon the Shire.
Central Memorials will:
• Provide quite reflective spaces and privacy for visitors
• Remember the loss of life and provide space for thenames of those who died
• Recognise the range of impacts and losses for the fires
• Tell the story of the fires
2
• Provide a space for memorial events
• Provide access for all abilities
• Be larger in scale
Five local memorials will be developed for towns who suffered the loss of life. These memorials will be smaller in scale and their purpose will be for the quiet, intimate reflection of the local communities.
Local Memorials will:
• Provide recognition of the impact of the fires on the local community• Provide a place of remembrance• May be in a more public space• Be smaller in scale
For further information:go to website:
http://murrindindibushfirememorials.wordpress.comcontact: Jenny Branton 0417 532 344
Purpose statement
The bushfire memorials will be respectful places that commemorate the loss of life, of livelihood, of home, of friends and community and of treasured landscapes wrought by the devastation of the 2009 bushfires. These memorials will also be places to acknowledge and appreciate the enduring community spirit that is nurturing regrowth and renewal in a landscape and world that has changed forever.
3
2. History of the Shire
Murrindindi Shire is located north east of Melbourne’s urban fringe and encompasses large areas of agricultural land, beautiful national parks and state forests, the majestic Goulburn River and the expansive Lake Eildon.
Extending over an area of just under 4,000sq kilometres, 48 percent of the shire is crown land. Murrindindi is characterised by many small towns including Acheron, Alexandra, Buxton, Cathkin, Castella, Eildon, Flowerdale, Glenburn, Gobur, Highlands, Homewood, Kanumbra, Kinglake, Kinglake West, Koriella, Limestone, Marysville, Molesworth, Murrindindi, Narbethong, Rubicon, Strath Creek, Taggerty, Terip Terip, Thornton, Toolangi, Woodbourne, Yarck and Yea.
3. The Events of February 7, 2009
In February 2009 vast areas of country Victoria were devastated by catastrophic bushfires resulting in Australia’s highest ever loss of life from a bushfire. This became known as Black Saturday.
During Black Saturday, 1,539km2, or forty percent, of Murrindindi Shire was burned, resulting in catastrophic loss of life and property. There was substantial impact on agricultural, tourism, accommodation and retail businesses, community infrastructure and the natural environment. Many people were displaced and significant social disruption occurred Kinglake Ranges, including Kinglake, Kinglake West, Kinglake East and Pheasant Creek, Flowerdale and Marysville suffered significant loss of life and property.
Toolangi, Castella, Narbethong and Strath Creek suffered some loss of life and property.
Buxton, Taggerty, Granton, Murrindindi and Woodbourne suffered some loss of property.
Yea and Alexandra, while not directly suffering loss of life or property, operated as evacuation and relief centres and offered extraordinary support in the aftermath of the fires.
Overall, the Shire was devastated with a total of 95 people losing their lives, and the destruction of 1,397 homes, 75 businesses, 16 community
4
or government buildings and 234 sheds. Significant losses were also experienced in other parts of Victoria.
Although some communities were physically destroyed, the resilience, courage and determination shown by the communities of the Shire of Murrindindi has been inspirational.
The Murrindindi Fire
Record-breaking weather conditions resulted in bushfires of a scale and ferocity that tested human endurance. Within Murrindindi Shire, the first sign of fire was at 2.55 pm on 7 February 2009 with a report about smoke to the north of a sawmill in Wilhelmina Falls Road, Murrindindi. Fanned by a strong north-north-westerly wind, the fire quickly moved south along the side of the road, through grass paddocks, a privately owned blue-gum plantation, and into the Toolangi State Forest.
The combination of rolling ground in the State Forest and fire crowning almost immediately, the fire moved rapidly to the south-east, and up the western slopes of the Black Range. Spot fires burned to the south and east of the main front.
At about 4.15 pm the fire entered the Black Range, 12 kilometres from where it started. Strong winds launched the fire from the top of the Black Range, propelling burning bark, leaves and branches south-east up to 15 kilometres ahead of the main fire. The burning debris ignited spot fires in and around Granton, Narbethong, St Fillans, Mt Gordon and the Maroondah Highway. Over 10 kilometres away spot fires burned independently of the main front for long periods. Some of these became so large they created a second wave of spot fires further to the south-east.
The fire reached Narbethong between 4.30 and 5.00 pm. At around 6.15pm a south-westerly wind change in Narbethong caused the 40 kilometre north-east flank of the fire to become its main front. By this time the fire had travelled 40 kilometres with an average speed of nearly 11 kilometres an hour. This wind also carried embers that caused spot fires on the southern outskirts of Marysville. The spot fires that had grown around Narbethong joined and burned towards Marysville.
The firefront arrived in Marysville with devastating force at about 7.15 pm.
5
Buxton and the adjoining Steavenson River valley were on fire by about 7.30pm. Further north, the fires arrived just south of Taggerty at about 10.00 pm. The weather conditions eased but the Kilmore East and Murrindindi fires merged, and the fire burning in heavily forested public land continued for weeks and was not formally declared contained until 5 March.
The Kilmore East fire
The Kilmore East fire began at about 11.47 am on 7 February 2009, near Saunders Road, Kilmore East. It started after a power pole conductor failed, and caused arcing, which ignited vegetation near the base of the pole. Early reports from crews on the scene described a blaze 80–100 metres wide. The fire ran south towards a hill where it split into two tongues: one running south to Saunders Road and the other east towards Wandong. Attempts to stop the fire at Saunders Road were unsuccessful, and the fire crossed the road about 15 minutes after fire crews arrived.
The fire then burnt through about 200 hectares of plantation logging slash, moving towards the Hume Highway. It is very likely that the fire was spotting over the highway by about 1.20 pm. It crossed the highway at Heathcote Junction just before 2.00 pm. At this stage the fire had multiple tongues, with a collective width of about 5 kilometres between Clonbinane Road and the north-eastern railway line.
Between Wandong and Clonbinane the fingers merged, and headed south-east towards Yabamac and the Wandong Regional Park. The fire entered a forested area near Shiels Road in Clonbinane where it intensified. It then moved south-east up the slopes of the Great Dividing Range towards Mt Disappointment. The western flank of the fire was also moving laterally towards Lords and Mahadys Roads in Upper Plenty, reaching the area at about 4.20 pm.
The head of the fire reached Mt Disappointment at about 3.00 pm, and progressed up its slopes between 3.15 and 3.45 pm.
As the head of the fire climbed Mt Disappointment, spot fires were reported 20–40 kilometres ahead of the main firefront at Wallaby Creek, Humevale, Strathewen, St Andrews, Steels Creek, Dixons Creek, Yarra Glen and in the Healesville area. The topography of the area caused spot fires in Humevale to run in multiple directions. As a result, between 3.30 and 5.00 pm, fires
6
from Mt Disappointment and from within Humevale struck Kinglake West and Humevale.
At the same time spot fires developed in Strathewen and St Andrews North, up to 22 kilometres ahead of the main firefront. Once again the spot fires moved in several directions. Generally the fires headed south-east, but they also spread north due to local topography and the fire’s convection column.
A south-westerly wind change arrived at about 5.45 pm, progressively turning the eastern flank of the fire into its head. At this point the blaze spread from Clonbinane to the Chum Creek area. The wind change caused the front to move north, and north-east.
The impact of the wind change was enormous. It brought the full front of the fire upon the Kinglake West township. By 6.00 pm new spot fires had formed in Humevale, Strathewen, Arthurs Creek, Yarra Glen, Gruyere and Healesville. From Strathewen and Humevale the main fire headed north, through Kinglake, Castella, and along the Melba Highway towards Glenburn.
After the wind change the Kilmore East–Wandong section of the fire turned and headed north along the Hume Highway. It also burnt through the remainder of Wallaby Creek catchment, Kinglake National Park, and Mt Disappointment Forest. During the evening the fire travelled north-east, reaching Hazeldene and Flowerdale. Although fire was reported in Flowerdale at 7.40 pm, the main front did not reach the Flowerdale Hotel until about 11.20 pm.
The wind change fanned very intense fires in the Castella, Toolangi and Glenburn regions, and caused another extreme branch of the fire to travel north and north-east towards Strath Creek, and Reedy Creek where it impacted at 8.00 pm.
The fire was gradually secured as it hit grassland during the night of 7 February, and over the following days. Containment proved to be difficult in forested areas, particularly the Maroondah catchment, Toolangi State Forest and Yarra Ranges National Park. The fire also continued to burn in the Healesville area. It was finally contained on 16 February.
7
4. The Recovery Process
Since 2009 a process of community consultation about the need, meaning and purpose of memorials has occurred within the fire affected communities of Murrindindi, supported by funding from the Victorian and Commonwealth Governments. The consultation process has reached out to affected people, in particular, those who have lost loved ones but also for many others whose homes, friends, pets, possessions and communities were lost.
Experience suggests that the marking of anniversaries and the development of more lasting community memorials can be an important part of the recovery journey. Experience from other communities following similar disasters has taught us that people recover from disasters at different rates and that consideration of commemoration and memorials should not be rushed.
Murrindindi Shire Council is determined to ensure commemoration services and memorials not only involve those most affected but also reflect the community’s shared understanding of their purpose.
A number of communities have already developed formal and informal bushfire memorials. This Shire-wide memorials process should recognise and complement (not compete with) these established memorials.
All affected communities have expressed similar impacts and needs for memorials. At the same time local communities are passionate about their own identities. It is important to engage with local communities rather than treating them homogeneously.
8
5. The Significance of Remembranceand Memorials
Making sense of disaster requires coming to terms with what loss means in the new ‘normal’. Much of this ‘sense making’ will be about how people place their memories of what has been lost into a context where the memories are no longer as painful, and may ultimately be of some comfort. This is remembrance.
Remembrance occurs at many levels; personal, family and community and can be experienced in many ways - symbolic rituals, anniversaries, visits to places of importance, pieces of music that were favourites and establishment of physical memorials.
Traditionally, physical memorials have been a function of government with the focus typically on honouring those who are lost through the building of monuments. However, over recent decades a change in the process of achieving remembrance for a community’s loss has occurred. Staid monuments have lost their relevance and responsive and interactive community-focussed memorials are now preferred.
Remembrance, and how it is expressed, contributes to the rebuilding of a sense of place by helping identify what is important, in a community sense, to people both prior to the disaster and in the “new normal”. When well facilitated, the process of achieving remembrance seeks to collectively express the meaning of the disaster for all the community, by engaging people in a conversation about the past, what is important to them, and the future.
Memorials offer places where people can remember losses, reflect on the their own experiences and recognise community spirit. The story for each person will be different, and no less or more important than another story. The memorial needs to represent all the losses and impacts of the bushfires.A memorial will need to be not just for now, but “in perpetuity”, recognising that role of the memorial may change over time, capturing what has happen so it is not forgotten. Some strong themes:
• Respectfully remembering, never to forget• Be educative, telling the story• Recognise that everyone has been impacted through a broad
range of losses• A place to come to reflect
9
6. Murrindindi Memorials Process
Murrindindi Shire Council, through its Memorials Working Group, commenced planning for an appropriate memorial, or memorials, in late 2009. During Stage 1 the community was consulted extensively, and it became apparent that each community within Murrindindi Shire has a strong local identity. This has particular importance when considering, designing and creating memorials that adequately reflect the needs, values and experiences of each community.
During Stage 2 of the memorials process (Design Brief Development), community members were engaged through information releases in local papers, memorials website, surveys, and community meetings. There has been some difficulties in engaging the broader, fire affected community.It is likely that the translation of community needs and desired memorial elements into design concepts will result in an increase community interest and engagement.
In Stage 3 of the memorials development process, design and construction, community members will expect to be informed and be able to have input into the final design of the central and local memorials. In particular local communities in which local memorials are to be placed should be engaged in design and placement.
There will be many personal opinions and the final design and placement of memorials should aim to meet the needs of affected communities as expressed though the design brief, rather than responding to individual preferences.
10
7. Key Design Criteria
During the Stage 1 community consultation process and the subsequent Stage 2 brief preparation and site selection process the following underlying themes, message requirements, location options and features were identified. People submitting expressions of interest are encouraged to read the full consultation reports to gain a broader understanding of the communities response.
Siting
a. It has to allow for access for all people, but not in a main thoroughfare.
b. The community have a desire for the memorial/s to be in a quietlocation.
c. Adding to existing memorials was not widely supported.
d. Maintenance of the site needs to be a consideration.
Memorial Elements
a. Messages including honour, remembrance and reflection should beconveyed through the memorial, along with survival, recovery andcommunity spirit.
b. The names of those who were lost in the fires should feature in thecentral memorials, with space left for future listing of names for thosewho opt out in the initial development.
c. The loss of pets and wildlife should be acknowledged in some way, butin a manner secondary to the loss of human life.
d. The loss of property should be acknowledged through a generalstatement.
e. The story of the fires should be told through some interpretive elements,including the response from the emergency services and broadercommunity (particularly people in Alexandra, Yea and Whittlesea), toprovide context into the future.
f. Structures should be simple, not overstated.
11
Materials
a. Elements including rocks, gardens, trees and water could beincorporated into design options.
b. Linking the memorials through some common theme should beconsidered but is not essential.
c. Maintenance and durability is a key consideration. The materialsshould be durable, long lasting and have a relatively low maintenancerequirement over the long term.
8. The Sites
During Stage 2 further consultation and site analysis helped refine the site options. A site selection matrix was developed with the criteria such as land ownership, site qualities, parking, accessibility, and maintenance.The following locations have been selected refer appendix for the details regarding each proposed site:
Central Regional Memorials
Marysville – Lions Park
Kinglake – Frank Thomson Reserve
Local Memorials
Narbethong – (Narbethong Reserve)
Toolangi / Castella – Central Park Castella
Kinglake West –Whittlesea Road / Yea Rd
Flowerdale / Hazeldene – Byrneside Reserve
22
13
9. Attachments to the Brief
Overall Shire Map including affected towns and proposed site options
Site information
10. References
http://www.murrindindi.vic.gov.au/Your_Council/About_Murrindindi_Shire, accessed 06.02.2013
http://woodbourne.vic.au/, accessed 07.02.2013
http://www.pria.com.au/resources/community-relations-6/murrindindi-shire-bushfire-memorials-consultation, accessed 31.01.2013
Murrindindi Shire Bushfire Memorials Consultation Stage One Consultation Report, December 2011, Professional Public Relations
FINAL REPORT SUMMARY, July 2010, 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission
The Fires and the Fire-related Deaths, FINAL REPORT VOLUME I, July 2010, 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission, http://www.royalcommission.vic.gov.au/commission-reports/final-report/volume-1/chapters/the-murrindindi-fire, accessed 06.02.2013
The Statements of Lay Witnesses, FINAL REPORT VOLUME IV, undated, 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission, http://vol4.royalcommission.vic.gov.au/index.php?pid=31, accessed 06.02.2013
Background Information on Memorials
28
15
Background Informationon MemorialsPresentation to Murrindindi Working Group
Rob Gordon, December 2009
16
The urge for memorials is in every civilization. They preserve important events and remember those who died. Memorials are physical objects which stand for events, people and human experiences. They hold onto what has happened and make sure it is not forgotten and that those who did not know about it can find out, and they tell those who come after what is in their own past. They are touchable, see-able and can be gone to on special occasions so that reminders of the people and events are there for all to experience.
They are symbols for events and people, for communities and actions. Symbols belong to the deepest level of the human mind. Young children respond to symbols long before they can think in a logical way. The symbolic level of mind is always present in the background, and is responsible for connecting things up so one thing stands for anther and carries not only the memory, but also the emotion of the past and can bring it back to life in the present. Symbols bring together all the aspects of the experience of what they symbolise, because they have the power that comes from emotions and from the intensity of the original event.
An important expression of symbols is in our dream life. Dreams consist of symbols and do not make sense unless we take the events and characters of the dream as symbols for parts of our own life. Symbols often emerge from dreams, but at the same time, communities form a shared collection of symbols related to common experiences. The formation of common symbols in a community is like the community being able to dream together and they unite them by bringing back the event, the people and the feeling of the original experience.
A community memorial, then is formed by shared symbols which must work for each person in their own way. This
Notes on Disaster MemorialsPresentation to Murrindindi Working Group
Rob Gordon, December 2009
17
means the community has to find symbols to bring the community to common ground and they have to integrate the dimensions of the experience in a way that enables those who come to the memorial to know instinctively what happened and how the dead are valued.
Creating a memorial is a unique opportunity to awaken the symbolic dimension and allow symbols to come to life out of the community by a sort of shared dreaming process. To dream we have to let go of rational thinking, common sense, opinions, presumptions, expectations and pre-set, personal views. Dreaming means to allow a free play of ideas and images so that gradually, some ideas and images come to the fore and are recognised as carrying the feelings for the community. It is the product of a certain sort of communication in which the end result is not known before, and the valuing of each contribution allows all who wish to have an influence and the selection happens by a feeling of recognition.
If this can be done, all members of the community can embrace the memorial and it becomes a focus for remembering the events and people and allows them to become part of history. When a tragedy becomes part of history, it can be remembered with rituals and ceremonies and as the years go by, remains part of the community life. Then what happened in the past becomes an element of the community’s identity. It tells them who they are and shows who they are to anyone who encounters the symbols.
A process is required to enable the community to dream together to find the symbols and rituals to express for each person something essential about the event that is there for whoever comes to join. While the formation of the actual memorial with its features and symbols is the goal, the
18
elements emerge when people allow the symbolic dimension of their minds to bring out what is needed. The process has to be shaped so that time allows a gradual coming together of ideas, images and suggestions until something genuinely common to all emerges.
If the focus is on the outcome, the tendency is for each person to give their own ideas and have strong feelings about them. These will not coincide and will inevitably lead to conflict, competition and disappointment and some feeling excluded. Such a memorial will then only be for a section of the community and will always evoke pain to those who cannot relate to it.
However, since symbols come from a deep and universal level of the mind the same basic symbols are there for everyone - symbols of life, death, good, bad, fire, earth, water, hope, love, sacrifice, survival. Symbols are part of a universal language which anyone can recognise and understand. But each person may feel connected with their own bit and want to express it in their own way. What brings a common feeling, is working towards the actual symbols by allowing them to emerge so that what comes, is something that no one would have started with but everyone can embrace because they see how it can express what is important to them.
The process of arriving at a symbolic form for the memorial need to value the process over the outcome. Instead of everyone coming with their ideas already formed and arguing over whose is best or whose can be accepted, it is a process in which a group of people (perhaps representing various groups) feel their way towards something none will be clear about at first. But by starting with what is absolutely common, then adding elements and qualities that are important, they can gradually come to something that is a product of the group rather than the idea of individuals. If the focus is on protecting this process, it will produce a memorial of the community.
19
Such a community process becomes an important part of the recovery of the community. In working on the memorial, memories, emotions and the relationship to what has happened will be reviewed, discussed and placed into a new perspective. This is what recovery from trauma and grief involve - finding a way to put the experience into the story of life so that those who are gone can be remembered with love, what they gave can be held onto and they are made part of the future, even though they are not present. In this way, creating, building and inaugurating the memorial represent opportunities for healing which will not be repeated. The more people can be involved in it the more it will become a true community memorial.
If this perspective is kept in mind, it will mean carefully considering such matters as time lines, deadlines and how people are drawn into the process. It is important to set the terms of the discussion and how it will proceed so that all participants understand the importance of finding common symbols and everyone needs to allow themselves to be influenced by each other’s views and experiences so that something common can arise.
What is common arises when people who have strong, definite ideas are encouraged to move from the specific forms of the ideas to the essence of what they are trying to express. At first our ideas come up in a specific way - a sculpture, a locality, a figure, particular plants or shapes or colours. But if they are to become symbols, such questions need to be asked as:
• What do you want to express in the symbols of thememorial?
• What is it about those shapes, forms, locality, plants,colours etc that is important?
• What is it about that particular idea that symbolisessomething for the event?
• Are there any other symbols that can also carry the samefeeling?
20
If the essence of the experience can be found and expressed, a commonality will emerge because the fundamental human experiences are common to all who went through the tragedy in whatever form, and this is the common ground to the one reality which has taken everyone into it.
Such a process will require a group of people to find a way of bringing people together so they can talk, listen, discuss and be influenced by each other in the confidence that what they create together will be a unique contribution to the community’s healing.
There will need to be careful consideration as to how the various views and opinions can be expressed and then an agreed way of moving to defining what is to be designed. If the procedure is planned to support the process of arriving at common symbols, and this is understood by all who participate, then it should be possible to respect differences, resolve conflicts and shift towards something that everyone can feel a relationship to.
Perhaps one of the most important principles is that coming together with others in a shared remembering may be more healing than having exactly what was imagined. Then the memorial will be able to slowly grow in importance and meaning to those it represents as years pass, keep history alive and tell us who we are.
85
22
FIRE MAP
23
PEOPLE WHO DIED
ARTHURS CREEK
Josef Matheis
Glenys Matheis
BENDIGO
Mick Kane
CAMBARVILLE
David Balfour
CALLIGNEE
Fred Frendo
Scott Frendo
Annette Leatham
Martin Schultz
FLOWERDALE—HAZELDENE
Ronald Barling
Richard Hall
Gavin Dunn
Bob Harrop
Daniela Marulli
Jesse Inzitari
Aldo Junior Inzitari
Donald Walker
Helen Walker
John Walker
Cheri-Lee Walker
HAZELWOOD SOUTH
David Gibson
Colin Gibson
HUMEVALE
Barry Johnston
Lloyd Martin
Mary Martin
Allan O’Gorman
Carolyn O’Gorman
Stuart O’Gorman
JEERALANG JUNCTION
Gertrude Martin
KINGLAKE
Adrian Brown
Mirrabelle Brown
Matthew Brown
Eric Brown
Brielle Brown
Neeve Buchanan
Mackenzie Buchanan
Melanie Chambers
Penelope Chambers
Daniel Clark
Rob Davey
Natasha Davey
Jorja Davey
Alexis Davey
Mark Butler
Mike Flynn
David Holcombe
Carol Holcombe
Geoff Hyde
Suzanne Hyde
Gennaro Laudisio
Graham O’Shea
Debbie O’Shea
Trey O’Shea
Lyric O’Shea
Dimitrios Tsimiklis
Tanja Tsimiklis
Richard Zann
Eileen Zann
Eva Zann
Karma Hastwell
KINGLAKE WEST
Krystal Breeze
Nathan Breeze
Teagan Haymes
Tina Wilson
Rex Norris
Paul Rolands
Karen Rolands
Caitlin Rolands
Nicola Rolands
Lesley Leahy
Kiona Gibson
Jye Gibson
Ava Gibson
Eileen Gillespie
Brian Naylor
Moiree Naylor
KOORNALLA
Alan Jacobs
Miros Jacobs
Luke Jacobs
Nathan Charles
The Commission focused on improving Victoria’s bushfire safety, so that the lessons learnt from the tragedy of Black Saturday will make the state a safer place. It offers this report and its recommendations to the Government and people of Victoria in memory of those who lost their lives.
24
MARYSVILLE
Jamie Bowker
Nicole Jefferson
Kevin Bradwell
Melissa Bunning
Glenis Delmenico
Lesleigh Webb
Dalton Fiske
Elizabeth Fiske
James Gormley
Julie Wallace-Mitchell
Aileen Hoskin
Geoff Grady
Patrick Jennings
Dean Lesmana
Rudi The
Laurel Lewis
Elizabeth Liesfield
James Liesfield
Matthew Liesfield
Coralie Lynch
David Lynch
Alen Mawson
Errol Morgan
Harley Morgan
Isak Nilsson
Kirstie Nilsson
Colin Paul
Len Postlethwaite
Ken Rowe
David Sebald
Marlene Sebald
Suat Bian Tan
Marie Walsh
David Whittington
Kate Whittington
MUDGEGONGA
John Wilson
Sue Wilson
NARBETHONG
Grace Mundovna
Fay Walker
Bill Walker
Geoff Walker
REEDY CREEK
Christopher Towie
ST ANDREWS
Garry Bartlett
Jacinta Bartlett
Erryn Bartlett
Michael Real
Angela Brunton
Reg Evans
Jenni Bundy
Raye Carter
Arthur Enver
George Jackson
Sam Matthews
Robert Pierce
Graeme Savage
Marcel Smits
STEELS CREEK
Leigh Ahern
Charmian Ahern
John Barnett
Jenny Barnett
Lynne James
Greg Leonard
Gail Leonard
Greg Lloyd
Melanee Hermocilla
Jaeson Hermocilla
STRATH CREEK
Hubert Jelinek
STRATHEWEN
Peter Avola
Max Emmins
Terry Paulka
Donna Paulka
Bob O’Sullivan
Sue Evans
Jon Le Gassick
Haydn McMahon
Kaya Mehmedoff
Don Hatton
Leonie Hatton
Catherine McIver
Greg McIver
Judy McIver
Phillip Perry
Libby Perry
Joe Shepherd
Danny Shepherd
Marilyn Spooner
Damien Spooner
Irma Winton
Michael Winton
TOOLANGI
Kate Ansett
Steve Fisher
UPPER PLENTY
Stephen Lackas
David Stokes
YARRA GLEN
Gareth Jones-Roberts Jr
SITE ASSESSMENT MATRIX FOR CENTRAL MEMORIALS
Site from Stage 1 report or PWG suggestion.
No. lives lost
Parking Accessibility Low Maintenance
Stable Land
Public Land or
community use
Shade Prominent location
Toilets water
Views / vistas
Quiet reflective space Land ownership Management Structure Feedback/comment
KINGLAKE RANGES 47Kinglake Central Stadium Council Council Committee of
Management (Section 86 delegation)
As the site of the former Kinglake Kindergarten, this site has a very strong community association. Site also earmarked as preferred location for Kinglake aquatic centre (subject to funding approval). Road noise and impacts detract from quiet reflective qualities.
Frank Thomson Reserve Crown Land Parks Vic (Kinglake National Park)
Although not a Shire owned site this site is highly valued by locals. Parks Vic has indicated that a memorial on this site would most likely be approved (subject to maintenance agreements).
MARYSVILLE 35
Gallipoli Park, adjacent to Steavensons River
Crown Land Council Committee of Management (Section 86 delegation)
Areas close to river may be subject to flooding or land stability issues.
Lions Park site
Crown Land Council Committee of Management (Section 86 delegation)
If sited carefully a memorial on this site would not detract from the existing use. Excellent aspect and views to river. Tranquil qualities despite nearby playground.
Monument on the island in Gallipoli Park
Crown Land Council Committee of Management (Section 86 delegation)
Island not large enough to accommodate a memorial that people could view or experience close up.
OTHER
Memorial for The Triangle in neutral location. Mt Gordon suggested.
Crown Land
DSE
Very remote location. This does not seem to be a site that would attract many visitors or locals.
KEYyesNoUncertain or TBC
25
MURRINDINDI BUSHFIRE MEMORIAL
SITE ASSESSMENT MATRIX FOR LOCAL MEMORIALS Draft 11/04/13
Site from Stage 1 report or PWG suggestion.
No. lives lost
Parking Accessibility Low Maintenance
Stable Land or flooding issues
Public Land or
community use
Quiet or reflective
spaceShade Land
Ownership Management Structure Feedback/comment
FLOWERDALE 11Moores Rd Reserve Crown Land Council Quiet park space developed after the fire. Site of past
memorial services. Can get busy on weekends.
Byrnside Reserve (Triangle Site near Hazeldene Store)
Crown Land
CMA? Further review to be undertaken.Limited maintenance regime. Parking and access very difficult.
Near the Flowerdale CFA CFA CFA Queries over ownership of old CFA site, some options in general vicitiny.
Flowerdale Community House Crown Land CouncilExisting memorial located in front garden, possible sites around the back adjacent to the creek.
TOOLANGI/CASTELLA 2Central Park (Melba Hwy intersection). Crown Land Council Committee of Management
(Section 86 delegation)
Former Castella School SiteCrown Land Council Committee of Management
(Section 86 delegation)Further assessment to be undertaken.
CJ Denis Memorial Hall / Community Garden site
Crown Land Council Committee of Management (Section 86 delegation)
NARBETHONG 4
Narthethong ReserveCrown Land Council is taking over - still with DSE Ideal public site. Few other locations in Town.
STRATH CREEK 1Viewing platform at top of Murchison Gap Crown Land VicRoads and Mitchell Shire Council. No memorial currently proposed for Strath Creek (based
on Stage 1 feedback). Structure is located in Mitchell's boundaries but maintained by Murrindindi.
Memorial on Falls Rd
KINGLAKE RANGES 47Kinglake West Oval Reserve Crown Crown Land Act Committee of
ManagementExisting memorial within space.
Cemetery Land (know as Chinaman's Grave) Crown Not confirmedCemetery land not considered suitable.
Bollygum Park (near CFA memorial bell in Kinglake West)
Council
Council Committee of Management (Section 86 delegation)
Bollygum COM has indicated they are developing their own memorial.
Yea Road / Kinglake West Intersection VicRoads VicRoads Prominent location
Reserve in front of Kinglake Library Council Council Further assessment to be undertaken.
Kinglake Central, within garden area near playground & picnic area.
Council Council Committee of Management (Section 86 delegation)
Mt SugarloafCrown Land DSE / ParksVic Very remote location. Not considered suitable.
KEYyesNoUncertain or TBC
26
Marysville Site
Kinglake
Narbthong
Castella/Toolangi
Flowerdale/Hazeldene
Kinglake West
118