MIP- Master s Thesis - Uni Stuttgart · 2018-11-05 · Noise pollution •Cost Effectiveness...

1
Master᾿s Thesis by Arq. Yael Gutiérrez Zúñiga Supervised by M.Sc. David Camacho Alcocer Period 02 - 08 2017 MIP- Master᾿s Thesis Approach for large public transport projects in Mexico based on the adaptation of the German Cost-Benefit standardized evaluation for public transport investment and follow-up costs Arch. Yael Gutiérrez Zúñiga The objective of this study is to develop a standardized Mexican evaluation for large public transport projects. To do so, the German scheme, better known as Standi, was used as the basis framework in order to develop this new methodology. Overall, this study lead to three main findings: Through the comparison were found great similarities and some differences between both structures related to how they address transport project evaluations (fig. 1). Due to this similarities, makes it easier to identify those parts of the Mexican methodology that are required to enhance, based on the German evaluation framework. During the comparison between both evaluation frameworks, were identified for their adaption to the new Mexican methodology the next elements: “Without case” principle enhancement, Adaptation of evaluation indicators, Implementation of the Benefit Cost Ratio, Follow-up costs considerations, and Qualitative risk analysis remarks. A new standardized Mexican framework that takes into account all previous elements and remarks is established (fig. 2). This new methodology serve as a first step for the development of a complete standardized evaluation method. E-2017/08 Without case + “optimizations” or improvements Evaluation indicators mentioned but not quantified: CO 2 emissions Accidents damage Follow-up costs are used to demonstrate the convenience of carrying out the investment project Qualitative risk analysis With / Without case principle Determination of the evaluation indicators in monetary form (CBA) Follow-up Costs (Cash flow values, NPVs, IRR) Sensitivity analysis Cost due to: CO 2 emissions /other polluting emissions Accident damage Noise pollution Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Project Evaluation (PE)(Mexico) Standardized Evaluation (SE or Standi) (Germany) Fig.2 Flowchart for the new standardized Mexican framework for large public transportation projects Fig.1 Comparison of the two evaluation methods

Transcript of MIP- Master s Thesis - Uni Stuttgart · 2018-11-05 · Noise pollution •Cost Effectiveness...

Page 1: MIP- Master s Thesis - Uni Stuttgart · 2018-11-05 · Noise pollution •Cost Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Project Evaluation (PE)(Mexico) Standardized Evaluation (SE or Standi)

Master᾿s Thesis by Arq. Yael Gutiérrez Zúñiga

Supervised by M.Sc. David Camacho Alcocer

Period 02 - 08 2017

MIP- Master᾿s Thesis

Approach for large public transport projects in Mexico based on the adaptation

of the German Cost-Benefit standardized evaluation for public transport

investment and follow-up costs

Arch. Yael Gutiérrez Zúñiga

The objective of this study is to develop a standardized Mexican evaluation for large publictransport projects. To do so, the German scheme, better known as Standi, was used as thebasis framework in order to develop this new methodology. Overall, this study lead tothree main findings:

① Through the comparison were foundgreat similarities and some differencesbetween both structures related to howthey address transport project evaluations(fig. 1). Due to this similarities, makes iteasier to identify those parts of theMexican methodology that are required toenhance, based on the German evaluationframework.

② During the comparisonbetween both evaluationframeworks, were identifiedfor their adaption to the newMexican methodology thenext elements:

• “Without case” principle enhancement,

• Adaptation of evaluation indicators,

• Implementation of the Benefit Cost Ratio,

• Follow-up costs considerations, and

• Qualitative risk analysis remarks.

③ A new standardized Mexican frameworkthat takes into account all previouselements and remarks is established (fig. 2).This new methodology serve as a first stepfor the development of a completestandardized evaluation method.

E-2017/08

•Without case +

“optimizations” or

improvements

•Evaluation indicators

mentioned but not

quantified:

CO2 emissions

Accidents damage

•Follow-up costs are used

to demonstrate the

convenience of carrying

out the investment project

•Qualitative risk analysis

•With / Without case

principle

•Determination of

the evaluation

indicators in

monetary form

(CBA)

•Follow-up Costs

(Cash flow values,

NPVs, IRR)

•Sensitivity analysis

•Cost due to:

CO2 emissions /other

polluting emissions

Accident damage

Noise pollution

•Cost Effectiveness

Analysis (CEA)

Project Evaluation

(PE)(Mexico)

Standardized

Evaluation (SE or

Standi) (Germany)

Fig.2 Flowchart for the new standardized Mexican frameworkfor large public transportation projects

Fig.1 Comparison of the two evaluation methods