Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

32
Metrics for Measuring Team Performance Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch, Ph.D. University of Central Florida

Transcript of Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Page 1: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch, Ph.D.

University of Central Florida

Page 2: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Overview

• Why measure team performance?

• Why is it not done well?

• What should be measured?

Page 3: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

WHY MEASURE TEAM PERFORMANCE?

Page 4: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Why Measure Team Performance?

1. Quality control

Page 5: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Why Measure Team Performance?

1. Quality control

2. To test the impact of training or changes in job design

Page 6: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Why Measure Team Performance? 1. Quality control

2. To test the impact of training or changes in job design

3. To provide meaningful feedback

Page 7: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Why Measure Team Performance? 1. Quality control

2. To test the impact of training or changes in job design

3. To provide meaningful feedback

4. To assess training needs

Page 8: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

• Raters can reliably use it

• Scores are meaningful - predicts performance

• Scores are diagnostic – Developmental feedback is meaningful – Isolates training needs

• Measure is practical to use – Instructors can cognitively manage it – Trainees can understand it

Properties of a Good Measure

Page 9: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

WHY ISN’T TEAM PERFORMANCE MEASURED WELL

Page 10: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

So.. Why Isn’t Team Performance Measurement Done Well?

1. Measuring performance (especially team performance) costs money

Page 11: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

So.. Why Isn’t Team Performance Measurement Done Well?

1. Measuring performance (especially team performance) costs money

2. Defining performance standards is controversial/political

Page 12: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

So.. Why Isn’t Team Performance Measurement Done Well?

1. Measuring performance (especially team performance) costs money

2. Defining performance standards is controversial/political

3. Developing valid performance measures is difficult and time consuming

Page 13: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

• Mixing process and outcome

• Inferring cognitive states from behaviors

• Category definitions that are overlapping

• An unmanageable number of categories

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Page 14: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Teams Need Help

“Seeing the forest for the trees”

Information Search

Information Pushing

Providing Big Picture Summaries

Page 15: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Teamwork Mental Models

Communication Leadership

Correcting Mistakes

Task Overload

Helping Out Without Being Asked

Confusing Phraseology Providing Backup for

a Teammate

Page 16: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

• Generate initial list of behaviors based on observation and input from subject matter experts

• Group into conceptually-distinct categories

• Test for inter-rater reliability – Categorization – Evaluation

Developing a Good Measure

Page 17: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Information Exchange

Initiative/ Leadership

Supporting Behavior

A controller failed to account for the slight communication

delays on the ISS and repeatedly talked over communications

from the flight crew.

Page 18: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

… teach a [team] to fish and they’ll eat for a lifetime.”

“Give a [team] a fish and they’ll eat for a day...

Team Self Correction

Page 19: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Frame-of-Reference Training

Page 20: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

WHAT TO MEASURE

Page 21: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Low Fidelity Simulation Ad

Hoc

Tea

ms

Inta

ct T

eam

s

High Fidelity Simulation

Page 22: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Low Fidelity Simulation Ad

Hoc

Tea

ms

Inta

ct T

eam

s

High Fidelity Simulation

Page 23: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Low Fidelity Simulation Ad

Hoc

Tea

ms

Inta

ct T

eam

s

High Fidelity Simulation

Individual-level

Teamwork skills

Page 24: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Low Fidelity Simulation Ad

Hoc

Tea

ms

Inta

ct T

eam

s

High Fidelity Simulation

Individual-level

Task-work Teamwork

Page 25: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Low Fidelity Simulation Ad

Hoc

Tea

ms

Inta

ct T

eam

s

High Fidelity Simulation

Page 26: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Low Fidelity Simulation Ad

Hoc

Tea

ms

Inta

ct T

eam

s

High Fidelity Simulation

Team-level

Teamwork

Page 27: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Low Fidelity Simulation Ad

Hoc

Tea

ms

Inta

ct T

eam

s

High Fidelity Simulation

Team-level

Task-work Teamwork

Page 28: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Low Fidelity Simulation Ad

Hoc

Tea

ms

Inta

ct T

eam

s

High Fidelity Simulation

Improved Learning 28% Teamwork 30% Task-work

38% Improved Teamwork Learning Improved Learning 21% Teamwork 28% Task-work

110% Improvement in Decision Making

285% Reduction in Tactical Errors

Page 29: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

TAKE AWAYS

Page 30: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

• Separate process and outcome measures

• Raters should evaluate observable/audible behaviors

• Definitions of rating categories definitions must be distinct

• Raters should not be asked to rate more than 4-5 categories during the same performance episode

Take Aways

Page 31: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

• Check inter-rater agreement with respect to categories (revise as needed)

• Provide frame-of-reference training

• Ad hoc team setting – individual-level behavior

• Intact team setting - team-level processes

Take Aways

Page 32: Metrics for Measuring Team Performance

Thank You!