MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM...

29
Title: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION Author: n/a Pages: 28 Agency: CIA RIF#: 104-10428-10104 Subjects: MCDONALD Source: AARC

Transcript of MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM...

Page 1: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

Title: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM HOUSE SELECTCOMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATIONAuthor: n/aPages: 28Agency: CIARIF#: 104-10428-10104Subjects: MCDONALDSource: AARC

Page 2: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

Date 09/18/98Page 1

JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEMIDENTIFICATION FORM

------------------------------------------------------------------------AGENCY INFORMATION

AGENCY CIARECORD NUMBER 104-10428-10104RECORD SERIES JFK

AGENCYFILE NUMBER Russ Holmes Work File-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

DOCUMENTINFORMATION

ORIGINATOR CIAFROM MCDONALDCHIEF CIA HISTORY STAFF

TO DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCETITLE MEMOFOR SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON

ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATIONDATE 02/10/92

PAGES 26SUBJECTS MCDONALD

DOCUMENTTYPE PAPER TEXTUAL DOCUMENTCLASSIFICATION SECRET

RESTRICTIONS OPEN IN FULLCURRENT STATUS OPEN

DATE OF LAST REVIEW 08/26/98OPENING CRITERIA

COMMENTS JFK-RH16:F24 1998.08.26.10:27:11:450128

--------------------------------------------------------------------------[R] ITEM IS RESTRICTED

Page 3: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

!"1fJ RICA[ REVIEW PRjj

OGRA,r5-1

RET

OTE 92-140310 February 1992

MEMORANDUM FOR Director of Central Intelligence

VIA Director of Training and EducationDirector Center for the Study of Intelligence

FROM J Kenneth McDonaldChief CIA History Staff

SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records from House SelectCommittee on Assassinations Investigation

As you requested on 16 January the History Staff hasnow surveyed CIA's records from the House Select Committee onAssassinations (HSCA) investigation into the assassination ofPresident John F Kennedy As promised in my 30 Januaryinterim report I can now give you a full account of ourfindings and of my recommendation for transferring this HSCAcollection at its existing classification to the NationalArchives through CIA's Historical Review Program

After the Office of Congressional Affairs arrangedpermission from Congress for History Staff access to thesequestered 64 boxes of this collection we examined these andother related holdings at Headquarters and the WarrentonRecords Center As a result of careful persistent anddetermined inquiries we are fairly confident--although by nomeans certain--that we have seen all the documents that CIAcollected for the HSCA investigation of 1977-1979 The summaryof our findings which follows is documented in more detail inattachments A and B

General Descri ion The HSCA collection (defined asall records that the CIA provided to that Committee for its1977-1979 investigation) is a large and chaotic collectionBeyond the 64 boxes sequestered by Congress that have beeninvolved in FOIA litigation there are 16 boxes of Oswald's 201file and numerous loose folders (mainly from Mexico CityStation records) that were collected for the Warren Commissioninvestigation Most of this material can be found on microfilmin the sequestered collection Of the 64 boxes 34 havematerial collected by the Directorate of Operations while

CL BY 0986542

ECRE DECL QADR

Page 4: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

I

29 contain records from the Office of Legislative Counsel (nowOCA) Inspector General Office of the General CounselDirectorate of Science and Technology Office of Security aswell as several boxes of HSCA staff notes and records Box No64 contains 72 microfilm reels (each equivalent to a box of

records) which include the Oswald 201 file and Mexico CityStation records as well as other 201 files and informationabout Cuban exile groups

Qrganization The collection is arranged haphazardlyhaving been gathered in response to a series of HSCA and (inthe case of the Oswald 201 file) Warren Commission requestsAlthough portions of the collection are organized by a varietyof systems there is no overall intellectual control of theentire body of records We found fifteen indexes to thecollection none of which is adequate for control or retrieval

Sensitivity Although the collection is almostentirely at SECRET or lower classification there is ascattering of TOP SECRET and codeword documentation Materialswe consider especially sensitive--more for privacy thannational security reasons--include 201 files phone taps mailintercepts security files photo surveillance names ofsources watch lists and MHCHAOS documentation Such materialoccurs throughout the collection usually in response to HSCArequests for name traces There are 22 microfilm reels of 201files in addition to the Oswald file while eight boxes containsecurity records including for example files on David AtleePhillips Martin Luther King and Clay Shaw

Non-CIA Mater. The collection includes a lot ofthird-agency material mostly from the FBI FBI reportsdominate the 16 boxes of Oswald's 201 file and nearly half ofthe 34 boxes of DO-collected material consists of third-agencymaterial The collection's remaining 29 boxes contain mostlyCIA records as does the box of microfilm except for Oswald's201 file There is also some documentation of foreign liaisonmainly with the Mexican government

CIA Complicity Our survey found nothing in theserecords that indicates any CIA role in the Kennedyassassination or assassination conspiracy (if there was one)or any CIA involvement with Oswald These records do revealhowever that Clay Shaw was a highly paid CIA contract sourceuntil 1956 While nothing surfaced on Carlos Marcello in thecollection we found substantial documentation on other membersof the mob including Santos Trafficante

Although the results of our survey fully support myearlier recommendation against inviting a panel of historians

2

Page 5: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

I

into CIA to examine and report on this collection the problemthat this proposal addressed remains--the widespreadallegations given new impetus by Oliver Stone's "JFK, thatCIA was part of a conspiracy to assassinate President KennedyThat CIA has a closed collection of records concerning theKennedy assassination is well known both because it is part ofover 800 cubic feet of HSCA investigation records that Congresshas closed until 2029 and because our 64 boxes of theserecords have been the subject of FOIA requests litigation andcourt orders Since opening all US Government records on theKennedy assassination has been proposed by former PresidentFord Congressman Louis Stokes and others many observers willconsider your decision on this question a test of your newopenness policy

9 Options CIA's three principal options are to keep theAgency's HSCA records closed and in our hands to open thementirely or to transfer them to the National Archives Beforemaking my case for the third option I should note thefollowing considerations with respect to the first two

Closed To maintain the status quo would keep thecollection classified closed and in CIA's handssequestered by Congress until 2029 CIA would howeverremain subject to the 1988 court order to review portionsof it in response to FOIA litigation While putting thecollection into Historical Review Program processing wouldspeed and broaden its declassification review (which wouldnevertheless take several years) such an internal shiftwould probably not change the public perception of ourclosed position Although keeping these records closedremains a viable option it tends both to encouragesuspicion that CIA is part of a cover-up and to underminethe credibility of CIA's openness policy If Congressshould decide to open all HSCA records however CIA wouldbe hard put to keep its HSCA collection closed

Qpene$ To open the HSCA collection would require thepermission of Congress Indeed CIA would presumably notconsider this option except in response to congressionalaction or pressure or in order not to be the last hold-outin a Government-wide opening of Kennedy assassinationrecords While opening the collection would disclose agood deal of information that deserves continued protectionfor privacy or national security reasons a total releasewould dramatically demonstrate CIA's new openness andrapidly reveal that these records contain nothing pointingto a CIA role in the Kennedy assassination

Page 6: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

ET

10 Recommendation I recommend that CIA transfer itsentire HSCA collection (as defined and identified in this

report) at its existing classification to the National Archivesand Records Administration (NARA) for continuingdeclassification review by Archives staff in accordance withthe relevant laws regulations and CIA guidelines Thistransfer should be carried out under the auspices of CIA'sHistorical Review Program To retire this HSCA collection tothe National Archives offers some significant advantages

It would get the collection off our hands Retiringthe records to the National Archives which is by law theeventual repository for all permanent uS Governmentrecords should reduce public suspicion of a CIA cover-upSuch a transfer would not set a new precedent since CIAhas previously retired over 4000 cubic feet of Office ofStrategic Services operational records to NARA as well asall CIA records so far declassified under the Agency'sHistorical Review Program Although CIA has not previouslytransferred classified records to NARA the transfer ofthis HSCA collection resulting from a congressionalinvestigation follows the special precedent of theclassified CIA documents retired to NARA's vaults as partof the records of the Watergate and Iran-Contrainvestigations

Transferring these HSCA records to the NationalArchives will protect their existing classification TheDepartments of State and Defense have routinely retiredclassified records to NARA for years In accordance withstatutory guidelines NARA must ensure the confidentialityof investigatory sources and the proper protection ofpersonal privacy and national security informationincluding intelligence sources and methods NARA wouldcontinue the court-ordered declassification reviewaccording to CIA guidelines CIA can accelerate thedeclassification of this collection by funding reviewpositions at NARA as the Department of State and otheragencies have done in the past (Attachment C outlinesdeclassification procedures for classified records retiredto the National Archives.)

NARA's professional archivists will bring thiscollection under control (as they have done with the 4000cubic feet of disorganized OSS records that CIA has retiredsince 1984) so that it can be usefully researched as it isdeclassified Moreover many of the records in thiscollection (especially photographs carbon flimsies andThermofax) need expert preservation which NARA isorganized to provide

4SE

Page 7: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

Attachments

d If Congress should eventually undertake to open thisentire collection without regard to classification theNational Archives will be in a stronger position to protectits national security and privacy information than the CIAwhose motives would appear self-serving if not sinister

11 Action If you wish to retire the Agency's HouseSelect Committee on Assassinations collection to the NationalArchives the following actions (from the offices noted) willbe needed

Request permission from Congress (Office ofCongressional Affairs)

Transfer responsibility for court-ordered FOIAdeclassification review from CIA to the National Archives(Office of the General Counsel with Information ManagementStaff DO)

Prepare CIA guidelines for NARA's declassificationreview (Office of Information Technology DA)

Prepare the appropriate Historical Review Programdocumentation and NARA forms and deliver the records(Office of Information Technology DA)

Announce the transfer jointly with Dr Don WilsonArchivist of the United States and Congressman LouisStokes (Public Affairs Office)

/s/ J Kc.neth McDonald

J Kenneth McDonald

Page 8: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records from House Select Committeeon Assassinations Investigation

DA/OTE/CSI/HS JKMcD:nkl (10 Feb 92) 30147

DistributionOrig Addressee Watts

1 Paul Ericson D/OTE Watts1 James A Barry D/CSI Watts1 Page Moffett DD/aCA Watts1 Joe Detrani D/PAO Watts1 John Hedley DD/PAO Watts1 David Gries VC/NIC Watts1 Don Cryer DD/IMS/D0 Watts1 Jack Wright D/ISD/OIT1 HS Chrono w/o atts1 HS Subject (Kennedy Assassination) Watts1 DCI Correspondence Watts

Page 9: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

SUMMARYCIA HISTORY STAFF SURVEY

House Select Committee on Assassinations Collection

10 February 1992

The House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA)Collection consists of the following parts which the attachedbox list describes in further detail

1 Sequestered HSCA Records The first and major part ofthe collection 64 boxes of records under Job No 80-TO1357Ais wide-ranging material collected in response to House SelectCommittee on Assassinations requests for documents relating tothe assassinations of President John F Kennedy and to a farlesser extent Dr Martin Luther King Coordinated by theOffice of Legislative Counsel (now the Office of CongressionalAffairs) and now under OCA control these are the "sequesteredboxes that have been the subject of FOIA litigation and courtorder

a Boxes 1-34 DO Boxes 1-34 (34 cu ft of records) areabout one-half DO-collected materials with the remainderlargely of third agency documents primarily FBI reportsgathered for the Warren Commission There is also somematerial from the Department of State and the Immigrationand Naturalization Service as well as the original HSCArequests Also included are staff handwritten notesphotographs and copies of newspaper clippings Theserecords cover a wide variety of topics but focus on CIAoperations against Cuba and Castro Lee Harvey Oswald'ssojourn in the USSR Oswald's activities in Mexico City andNew Orleans and a large number of name traces requested bythe HSCA staff There is also material on the BlackPanthers the civil rights movement and the peacemovement Among the subjects that appear in these boxesare Jack Ruby Clay Shaw Frank Sturgis E Howard HuntNosenko Guy Bannister David Ferrie Silvia Duran MartinLuther King Coretta Scott King James Earl Ray WilliamKunstler Jim Garrison G P Hemming Marina Oswald JohnRoselli Sam Giancana Santos Trafficante and RolandoCubela's AMLASH operations against Castro These recordsalso include the 1967 Inspector General's report on CIAplots against Castro and the testimony of Richard Helms inexecutive session before HSCA

CL BY 0986542

4 _ DECL OADR

Page 10: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

Boxes 35-63 Boxes 35 through 63 in this job (29 cuFt of records) are equally eclectic divided as they arebetween records from the Office of Legislative Counsel (nowOCA) Inspector General Office of the General CounselDirectorate of Science and Technology Office of Security(security files) and the HSCA itself These recordswhich are mostly CIA material (heavily DO) consist ofreports memoranda transcripts cables letters newspaperclippings photographs and charts They include materialsrelating to the Garrison investigation Watergate Cubanexile activities and CIA attempts to assassinate FidelCastro There is also some material relating to MartinLuther King black power and racial violence as well as aDS&T report on photos of the "unknown man at the MexicoCity Soviet embassy and an NPIC analysis of the Zapruderfilm

Box 64 Microfilm Box 64 of Job No 80-TO1357Acontains 72 reels of microfilm (although the box is labeled"CIA/DDO HSCA Records box 1 of 2, box 2 has not beenfound) The History Staff was assured however that thiswas indeed box 64 of Job No 80-TO1357A In addition to acopy of Oswald's 201 file (as actually shown to the HSCAstaff in 1978) the microfilm contains material on Oswald'sactivities in Mexico City (primarily photographic and phonetap surveillance of the Soviet and Cuban embassies andconsulates) Mexico City Station files (including cabletraffic and the station's "P Personality files) CIAsecurity files Nosenko interrogation transcripts and agreat deal of information relating to Cuban exile groupsThere are also 22 reels of 201 files which contain 151individual files Some of the material on these microfilmreels reproduces DO material in the boxes although it isdifficult to judge exactly how much

2 Q2wald's 201 File The second part of the HSCAcollection is Lee Harvey Oswald's 201 file 16 boxes (16 cuft of records) held in the DO's Information Management Staff(IMS) This file consists primarily of copies of FBI reportsrelating to Oswald FBI investigations on Oswald and hisactivities (including items that FBI sent CIA prior to theassassination) interviews with Marina Oswald Department ofState cable traffic concerning Oswald's passport and visaapplications information tracing Oswald's weapons material onJack Ruby and Silvia Duran and a tape of Oswald's August 1963radio debate There are also detailed FBI reports concerningOswald's assassination of the President and his contacts withSoviet officials as well as records relating to GilbertoAlvarado who maintained that he witnessed Cubans passingOswald cash at a party on the night before the assassination

Page 11: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

Loose Files The HSCA collection's third part comprisesa number of loose folders that evidently belong within thecollection including eight bulky Mexico City Station files(including cable traffic and "P files) that are also in themicrofilm These files are considered to be part of the Oswald201 file and are held in IMS A group of 16 file folders thatappear to be unaccessioned contain a miscellany of HSCArequests and Agency responses on subjects such as Oswald in theUSSR Marina Oswald Roselli and Giancana These appear tobelong with Job No 80-T01357A

Organization Partly because of the collection'sorigins in the disorderly process of the Agency's response tomassive investigatory committee requests the collection badlyorganized Moreover years of working through these files inresponse to numerous Freedom of Information Act requests havedisrupted the collection further More importantly howeverthe Agency has not taken intellectual control of the collectionin the fifteen years since it was created Partial systems oforganization have been imposed upon various parts of thecollection without reference to or use of sound archivalprinciples and procedures Although 15 separate (andunsatisfactory) indexes to the collection eventually surfacedthe lack of any central index or finding aid makes retrieval ofindividual documents extremely difficult Although CIA reviewofficers attempted to impose some order to the collection bynumbering each document and adding a folder numbering system toeach box there is no central control or finding aid for any ofthese these systems Provenance cannot be traced and entirefiles are missing that cannot be satisfactorily accounted for

Non-record Copies This collection consists for themost part of xeroxed copies rather than original documents Wesuspect that the originals of many if not most of thesexeroxed documents would be difficult if not impossible tolocate

Preservation Much of the material throughout thecollection especially thermofax copies and photos is fragileand in poor physical condition requiring immediate attentionto prevent further deterioration

Page 12: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

BOX LIST OF FILES REVIEWEDCIA HISTORY STAFF SURVEY

House Select Committee on Assassinations Collection

10 February 1992

Job No 80-T01357A

Box 1 CIA Security files on numerous individuals includingG P Hemming Martin Luther King Marina Oswald and others1967 CIA IG report on plotting against Castro Garrison

investigation (File folders 6 7 17 and 20 are missing)

Box 2 CIA Security files on William D Pawley Frank SturgisJack Ruby Clay Shaw and others numerous FBI documents andassorted CIA material

Box 3 Helms hearing testimony Mexico City Station cable

traffic CIA FBI Warren Commission and HSCA correspondence

Box 4 Chronology of Lee Harvey Oswald's sojourn in the USSRCIA operations against Cuba Castro and the Cuban IntelligenceService including information relating to ZRRIFLE AMLASHAMMUG description of CIA 201 system information on Nosenko

interrogation regarding Oswald and his Soviet connections (Filefolder 8 is missing)

Box 5 Notes on Oswald various HSCA notes and affidavits

transcripts of Helms's testimony FOIA information

Box 6 Information relating to Lee Harvey Oswald's activities inMexico City including surveillance from CIA projects LIEMPTYLILYRIC and LIMITED Garrison investigation CIA support toWarren Commission AMMUG debriefing copies of Mexico CityStation despatches (HMMA) sensitive material on photocoverage of

Soviet Cuban Czech and Polish embassies in Mexico City an

index to HSCA papers held by CIA an index of Warren Commission

exhibits information relating to Silvia Duran a copy of an

agreement between the Director and Chairman Louis Stokes requiringthe CIA to retain for 30 years all materials gathered in responseto Committee requests Richard Helms executive session testimonyin 1978 before the committee an index to requests to the CIA

from J Lee Rankin of the Warren Commission

CL BY 0986542DECL OADR

Page 13: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

2

Box 7 Mexico City Station surveillance of Cuban Sovietembassies AMMUG Silvia Duran Oswald's activities in NewOrleans (FBI report) monthly operations reports from Mexico CityStation summaries of HMMA cables Cuban exile mug booksGilberto Alvarado the Nicaraguan who claimed he saw Lee HarveyOswald receive cash in meeting inside Mexico City Cuban embassytranscripts of phone calls to and from Soviet embassy a machinelisting of documents officially recorded as being in Oswald's 201file (list missing from folder) Warren Commission trip to MexicoCity and interview with U.S Ambassador Thomas Mann Jack RubyFair Play for Cuba Committee FBI reports on Oswald HTLINGUALdocuments Nosenko interviews and interview of Mexico CityStation personnel by committee staff (File folder 37 is missing)

Box 8 HSCA requests primarily for name traces involvingindividuals including James Earl Ray Clay Shaw John RoselliSam Giancana Santos Trafficante 1977 CIA study on Churchcommittee findings relating to the CIA HSCA requests tointerview CIA personnel ZRRIFLE information relating to theCuban airline flight from Mexico City to Havana Nosenkointerviews photos of anti-Castro individuals

Box 9 Primarily HSCA requests for name traces on individuals andorganizations CIA surveillance operations in Mexico Citycopies of cable traffic from Mexico City Station (File folder 76missing)

Box 10 Name traces from 201 files HTLINGUAL mail interceptsand MHCHAOS files including individuals associated with BlackPanthers Students for a Democratic Society the civil rightsmovement Ramparts and the peace movement Material on HenryWinston Maurice Halperin George Edward Wright Julian BondWilliam Kunstler James Earl Ray Also Lee Harvey Oswald and JimGarrison

Box 11 Misc items on JFK assassination HSCA materialincluding personal history of Nosenko and Oswald chronology

Box 12 HSCA chronologies 1976-78 draft reviews and CIAcomments Oswald dossier forwarded to Warren CommissionGarrison investigation of JFK assassination CIA chronology ofmemos received from Warren Commission HSCA chronologyJanuary-March 1978

Box 13 Alphabetical files of individuals marked "completed or"pending based on 201 files

Box 14 Primarily HSCA requests for name traces on individualsand organizations some 201 files interviews with POWs from Bayof Pigs FBI and Immigration and Naturalization Service reportson Oswald

Page 14: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

Box 15 Alphabetical files based on CIA State and FBI on

numerous individuals including Claire Booth Luce Clay Shaw

Martin Luther King and Coretta Scott King

Box 16 Copies of 201 files interview and transcripts relating

to Mexico City activities of Oswald and the Mafia

Box 17 JMWAVE cable DCI cable traffic

Box 18 HSCA chronology Oswald 201 file report on CIA

performance

Box 19 HSCA staff notes taken at CIA (File folders 2-5 14

18 25 28 and 34-35 missing With HSCA records?)

Box 20 Follow-up requests from HSCA on name traces handwritten

notes of committee staff members on CIA 201 files CIA

surveillance of Soviet embassy in Mexico City Oswald's

activities in Mexico City copies of staff interviews with CIA

personnel (file folders 58-62 65 69-70 73-74 80 83 85-86

88-92 96 101 103 and 112 are missing while folder 57 is

empty With HSCA records?)

Box 21 HSCA requests by JFK file number

Box 22 HSCA staff notes misc

Box 23 HSCA staff notes misc. including Helms's testimony in

executive session

Box 24 HSCA staff notes misc. including Mexico Cityinterviews and speculation about a dual CIA filing system re

Oswald and Oswald's relationship to Agency

Box 25 Committee staff notes on materials reviewed at CIA

relating to Oswald and his possible connections with the CIA and

his activities in Mexico City a sanitized copy of the 1977 CIA

report on the Church Committee findings information relating to

Cuban embassy officials in Mexico City including Silvia DuranEusebio Lopez and Alfredo Diaz

Box 26 Documents re Oswald's Mexico City visit DCI's

appearance before Warren Commission allegations of Oswald's

connection with CIA

Box 27 Agency file on Oswald as sent to Warren Commission

Nosenko interrogation notes

Page 15: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

Box 28 HSCA files mixed in with FBI and CIA documents

investigation of Silvia Duran 28 November 1963 numerous HSCA

handwritten notes

Box 29 Alphabetical file on individuals from various sources

including Guy Bannister Clay Shaw and David Ferrie

Box 30 HSCA report on Cuba trip 1978 handwritten notes on

Oswald Domestic Contact Division notes on Garrison

investigation and information on Nosenko

Box 31 Administrative materials correspondence between HSCA and

CIA index and file of HSCA material returned to DO

BOx 32 Mexico City Station cables and dispatches

Box 33 Cuban Mugbook and Mexico City Station traffic October

1963-January 1964

Box 34 HSCA files on George de Mohrenschildt Cuban MugbookHSCA reading file CIA relations with FBI and Warren Commission

Nosenko on Oswald and Ruby's alleged travel to Cuba

Box 35 Review of HSCA trip to Cuba and Mexico HSCA report on

Silvia Odio report "CIA Operations against Cuba prior to the

Assassination of President John F Kennedy on 23 November 1963and Senate Select Committee reports and comments

Box 36 Review what could Castro have known? review of HSCA

draft report IG report on Cuban operations for 1960-64 for any

bearing upon JFK assassination Book V of Church Committee final

report with review by Agency of provocation theory (charges of

Agency cover-up of Cuban operations) E Howard Hunt fileMexico City/Havana flights Win Scott AMTRUNK Oswald contacts

with Soviet and Cuban embassies Mexico City CIA relations with

FBI and Warren Commission Alpha 66 photo of unidentified manMexico City cable traffic AMLASH AMWHIP Mafia plottingJack Ruby/Cuba QJWIN ZRRIFLE

Box 37 Information relating to Cuban exile activities againstCastro such as the Torriente Group and Alpha 66 name trace on

E Howard Hunt and information relating to the Garrison

investigation

Box 38 Alphabetical files including Hemming Luce SturgisRoselli James McCord and Nosenko file on U-2 overflights from

Japan DDS&T report on photos of unknown man

Box 39 Photo comparisons of E Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgiswith tramps arrested in Dallas on day of JFK assassination chart

of frames from the Zapruder film showing the actual assassination

Page 16: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

Box 28 HSCA files mixed in with FBI and CIA documentsinvestigation of Silvia Duran 28 November 1963 numerous HSCAhandwritten notes

Box 29 Alphabetical file on individuals from various sources

including Guy Bannister Clay Shaw and David Ferrie

Box 30 HSCA report on Cuba trip 1978 handwritten notes onOswald Domestic Contact Division notes on Garrison

investigation and information on Nosenko

Box 31 Administrative materials correspondence between HSCA and

CIA index and file of HSCA material returned to DO

BOx 32 Mexico City Station cables and dispatches

Box 33 Cuban Mugbook and Mexico City Station traffic October

1963-January 1964

Box 34 HSCA files on George de Mohrenschildt Cuban MugbookHSCA reading file CIA relations with FBI and Warren CommissionNosenko on Oswald and Ruby's alleged travel to Cuba

Box 35 Review of HSCA trip to Cuba and Mexico HSCA report onSilvia Odio report "CIA Operations against Cuba prior to theAssassination of President John F Kennedy on 23 November 1963and Senate Select Committee reports and comments

Box 36 Review what could Castro have known? review of HSCAdraft report IG report on Cuban operations for 1960-64 for anybearing upon JFK assassination Book V of Church Committee final

report with review by Agency of provocation theory (charges of

Agency cover-up of Cuban operations) E Howard Hunt fileMexico City/Havana flights Win Scott AMTRUNK Oswald contactswith Soviet and Cuban embassies Mexico City CIA relations withFBI and Warren Commission Alpha 66 photo of unidentified manMexico City cable traffic AMLASH AMWHIP Mafia plottingJack Ruby/Cuba QJWIN ZRRIFLE

Box 37 Information relating to Cuban exile activities againstCastro such as the Torriente Group and Alpha 66 name trace onE Howard Hunt and information relating to the Garrisoninvestigation

Box 38 Alphabetical files including Hemming Luce SturgisRoselli James McCord and Nosenko file on U-2 overflights fromJapan DDS&T report on photos of unknown man

Box 39 Photo comparisons of E Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgiswith tramps arrested in Dallas on day of JFK assassination chartof frames from the Zapruder film showing the actual assassination

Page 17: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

SE

Box 40 Security files (including record of those files

inadvertantly destroyed)

Box 41 Security files (alphabetical) including Lucien Coneinalso material on Fair Play for Cuba Committee

Box 42 Name traces from Office of Security files Garrison

investigation information a copy of a manuscript "The KennedyConspiracy An Uncommissioned Report on the Jim Garrison

Investigation copies of material relating to Oswald shown tocommittee staff at CIA

Box 43 Security files (some missing inadvertantly destroyed)Files present include that of Martin Luther King

Box 44 Security files

Box 45 Security files including those of David Atlee Phillipsand Clay Shaw

Box 46 HSCA requests for information relating to Frank SturgisClay Shaw and Watergate information relating to JMWAVE and theMiami Station FBI reports on left-wing and racial unrest in U.S

Box 47 Security files mostly newspaper clippings list ofnotes by HSCA staff member Oswald security materal newspaperarticles on Oswald unsanitized material released in sanitizedform via FOIA from Oswald material

Box 48 Security files including Tokyo Position Control Register(1960-64) HSCA staff notes reviewed by OS HSCA staff review atheadquarters of selected OS files (including Roselli and

Giancana) plus other name traces through OS including Gerald PHemming

Box 49 Name trace requests transcripts of interviews of CIApersonnel executive session transcript of a Senate ArmedServices Committee meeting 21 November 1973 regarding CIAassassination plots CIA plans to assassinate Castro and theMafia/CIA connection in attempts to assassinate Castro

Box 50 HSCA requests by date Oswald chronology draft copy ofHornbeck Report

Box 51 Numerous HSCA requests and individual files Jack Rubyfile as well as Hemming Hall Pawley M L King and others

Box 52 HSCA reviews by date Cuban Counter-revolutionaryHandbook 1962 & 1964 photos of unkown man NPIC analysis of

Zapruder film and Hoch memorandum

Page 18: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

SE

Box 53 HSCA request log and priority response list copy of

manuscript "Castro's Red Hot Hell" information relating to HSCA

leaks guidelines procedures clearances and secrecy agreements

Box 54 HSCA staff notes

Box 55 HSCA staff notes HSCA chronologies 1953-77

Box 56 FBI reports on racial violence in the U.S in 1967 andthe Black Power movement and Martin Luther King depositionmaterial but not the actual depositions of Ray Rocca John

McCone Richard Helms and David Phillips

Box 57 Mexico City Station file 1959-68 correspondenceconcerning HSCA visit to Mexico HSCA receipts testimony etc.1975 report on unidentified man at Cuban embassy HSCA requestfor JMWAVE traffic

Box 58 IG report on Church Committee final report book Vannex to task force report (AMLASH) DDCI testimony beforecommittee (Dec 1978) HSCA final report (summary) and

correspondence internal DO memos re Warren Commission (what totell it re Cuban operations?) correspondence/memos re HSCAinterviews and depositions from Win Scott Golitzyn ShevchenkoMcCone Nosenko (for most part interviews and depositionsthemselves not here)

Box 59 HSCA press releases and correspondence

Box 60 Nosenko material including polygraph transcripts miscHSCA memos James J Angleton material 1977-78

Box 61 Copies of House Select Committee draft reports and CIAcomments relating to Cuban exiles and their activities againstCastro Silvia Duran AMLASH and Oswald's activities in Mexico

City

Box 62 HSCA requests photo surveillance around Cuban embassyin Mexico City CIA/HSCA defector study various interviewsabout JFK's death

Box 63 Warren Commission reports on Oswald a House report onOswald's activities in New Orleans CIA plots to assassinate

Castro and a folder on Ray Rocca's testimony before theRockefeller Commission (his testimony is not present in the

folder) and information relating to the disposition of CIAmaterials relating to the House investigation

Page 19: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

Box 64 Microfilm

History Staff reviewed Reels for which there were no descriptionThese were Reels 46 53-56 59 60-62 and 65-71 History Staffalso sampled Reels 1 14 18 22 24 26 30 31 and 44 Reels

reviewed as follows

Reel 1 CIA Security files in alphabetical order containingbackground investigation results memos passport applications

Reel 14 CIA Security files in alphabetical order

Reel 18 True name dossier from Office of Security files listof U.S defectors to Soviet Bloc material on WIROGUE and the

Congo Cuban exile operations to infiltrate men into Cuba

Reel 22 AMMUG LIEMPTY LILYRIC LINCHPIN LIENVOY (MexicoCity surveillance activities of the Cuban and Soviet embassies inMexico City

Reel 24 Photo surveillance of Cuban embassy in Mexico CityAugust & November 1963 photo surveillance of USSR embassy inMexico City July-December 1963 Garrison investigation articlesand CIA correspondence

Reel 26 Extensive file on Cuban exile groups in U.S receivingCIA help DRE Liberation Army of Cuba

Reel 30 Mexico City Station files CIA personnel recordsMexico City message traffic relating to Silvia Duran photos ofindividuals entering or leaving the Soviet embassy and the Cubanconsulate in Mexico City press accounts of Garrison trial of

Clay Shaw

Reel 31 Oswald diary Warren Commission file numbers and

inventory index of Mexico City traffic Mexico Citychronology 1975 CIA report on unidentified man 1975 CIA reporton Cuba-JFK connection list of "soft files at beginning ofmicrofilm

Reel 44 Warren Commission documents relating to OswaldAmbassador Thomas Mann's meeting with the Commission staff inMexico City in 1964 Helms affidavit 1964 Jack Ruby MarinaOswald Clay Shaw and Jim Garrison

Reel 46 Nosenko files Mexico City Station chronological fileand a list of all station despatches from 10/15/63 to 11/27/63 (20despatches missing)

Reel 53 CIA Security/201 files in alphabetical order

Page 20: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

SEC

Reel 54 CIA Security/201 files maps of Cuba reports onMexican/Cuban activities

Reel 55 CIA Security files

Reel 56 CIA Security files

Reel 59 CIA Personnel files (including fitness reports)

Reel 60 CIA Personnel files

Reel 61 Nosenko interrogation information relating toGolitsyn Cuban exile groups and their anti-Castro activitiesWilliam Pawley's anti-Castro activities

Reel 62 CIA Nosenko interrogation transcripts CubanRevolutionary Council progress reports March-April 1963 list ofCuban consulate employees worldwide FBI report on Cubangovernment in exile in NYC monthly expenditures of CubanRevolutionary Council (CRC)

Reel 65 Cuban exile organizations such as the CubanRevolutionary Council (CRC) Cuban Democratic Revolutionary Front(CDRF) Judicatura Cuban Democratica and the 30 November Movement

Reel 66 AMBUD file on CRC monthly reports statement ofexpenses proposed programs and projects budget projections andaccounting statements of the Council

Reel 67 AMBUD (Col Johnson) file CRC budget and programsdocuments relating to the coordination problems within and betweenCuban exile groups

Reel 68 Col Johnson Working File weekly summary reports theunderground in Cuba CRC activities and position paperstranslations of Council documents biographic information on CRCleaders Dr Miro Cardona and Tony Varona

Reel 69 CRC and the Cuban exile community meeting in San Joseand around Latin America--selection of delegates expenses andrecruitment efforts

Reel 70 CRC finances Brigade 2506 Juan Bosch interview inDominican Republic with Cuban exiles and information relating toCRC delegates to various Latin American governments

Reel 71 Cuban organizations photos of Mexican embassy entrance

Reel 72 Photos of Mexican embassy entrance

Page 21: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

SECR

Oswald 201 File

Box 1 mostly FBI interviews/investigation notes items sent byFBI to CIA prior to JFK assassination regarding Oswald'sactivities in New Orleans State Department correspondenceregarding Oswald defection and return Silvia Duran materialnewspaper articles Mexico City Station files and othermaterial

Box 2 FBI background investigation of Oswald and his wifeMarina's activities while in the Soviet Union

Box 3 FBI background investigation of Oswald activities in NewOrleans FBI interviews of Marina Oswald information relatingto the Fair Play for Cuba Committee State Department actions

regarding Oswald's passport and visa applications FBI tracing of

weapons connected with Oswald information on Jack Ruby and a

tape of the radio debate in which Oswald participated in August1963

Box 4 FBI reports on Oswald FBI interviews with Oswald andMarina after the assassination copy of Cuban government'sprotest to Mexican authorities over the arrest and treatment ofSilvia Duran and an index to the FBI reports is included in thebox

Box 5 FBI investigation of the assassination (3 vols.) a copyof Oswald's diary while he was in Moscow biographic material onMarina Oswald a copy of Oswald's chronology while in the SovietUnion and a copy of the questions for the Soviet governmentcomposed by CIA officials

Box 6 Oswald chronology biography of Marina Oswald WarrenCommission correspondence name traces of those who appear inOswald diary Warren Commission correspondence Oswald Mexicotrip Oswald address book Silvia Duran Mexican interrogationnewspaper clippings

Box 7 FBI reports on Oswald Nosenko interviews photos ofOswald in Minsk list of Oswald's apartment articles and a namelist of CIA traces for the Warren Commission

Box 8 Photos shown to Marina Oswald for ID purposes SR/CIStudies for the Warren Commission continuing FBI investigationDallas area interview with Marina Oswald/Ruby allegedassociation attachments to Oswald chronology in USSR

Box 9 Copy of Marina Oswald's notebook with addresses list ofitems prepared by CI on Oswald care for the Warren Commission

9.4-GFCRFT

Page 22: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

Oswald's contacts in the Soviet Union and an FBI report onOswald's activities in Mexico a CIA brief for presentation tothe Warren Commission on Oswald Soviet Government documentsrelating to Oswald and a translation of a Portuguese book AConspiracao

Box 10 FBI investigations Nosenko material anti-Castroactivities in U.S. CIA report of Oswald in Mexico City CIAreport on Oswald defection CIA report of Oswald as Kennedymurderer assorted FBI items

Box 11 Bulky material mostly SR/CI Studies for WarrenCommission FBI reports Marina Oswald material Oswald Cubanapplication USSR radio and newspaper traffic Silvia Duraninterview foreign press reaction to JFK assassination and WarrenCommission report photos of unidentified man in Mexico CityBernard Fensterwald FOIA case assorted CIA and FBI material

Box 12 Warren Commission Log Book from National Archivesmaster list of Warren Commission correspondence and exhibits fromNational Archives and copies of FBI reports on the assassination

Box 13 HTLINGUAL intercepts (Russian language with sometranslations) SE soft file on Oswald Nosenko information onother Soviet defectors

Box 14 Copies of CIA documents still classified in the WarrenCommission records held at the National Archives Oswald'sactivities in the Soviet Union information relating to GilbertoAlvarado "Source D Silvia Duran and Oswald in Mexicotranscripts of telephone intercepts from the Mexico City Station

Box 15 CIA-Warren Commission released materials 1964background on Jack Ruby Oswald Oswald's Soviet medical recordNational Archives list of status of CIA documents in WarrenCommission records 1967 Soviet press reaction toassassination internal memoranda and other records of the WarrenCommission transcript of executive session of the WarrenCommission Oswald's Mexico trip Soviet defection Oswald'salleged CIA connections Warren Commission material "kookcases follow-up on numerous."leads" Helms's file on Oswald andWarren Commission documents (as of January 1964)

Box 16 Garrison investigation newspaper clippings and otherreports Warren Commission memos

Mexico City Station files (8 bulky files)

(Considered part of the Oswald 201 file to be placed in box

within Oswald's 201 file)

Page 23: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

11

RET

Mexico Station files on Oswald (P-files) Oswald chronologynewspaper clippings FBI report on Oswald in Mexico city miscmaterial on Oswald in Mexico Garrison investigation material(mostly newspaper clippings) Warren Commission testimony

HSCA Miscellaneous Folders (16 folders)

(These file folders which are unaccessioned at present will beplaced within HSCA collection Job No 80-T01357A)

HSCA requests information on Oswald in USSR Marina Oswalddocuments on Roselli and Giancana

Page 24: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

NOTES ON TRANSFER TO THE NATIONAL ARCHIVESAND DECLASSIFICATION OF CIA RECORDS

10 February 1992

Transfer CIA would transfer documents under their

existing classification to the National Archives and RecordsAdministration (NARA) in much the same way that it alreadytransfers declassified documents Using a NARA Form 258 theusual transfer document CIA would note that the documents to betransferred are classfied These records would then go intosecure NARA vaults where they would be accessible only toarchivists with appropriate security clearances Codeworddocuments would go into a compartmented vault under the directcontrol of the Records Declassification Division to be processedonly by reviewers with the necessary SCI access approvals

Classification Any transfer of CIA records to NARA under

existing classification would provide continuing securityprotection for these documents consistent with Agency standardsIn accordance with statutory guidelines NARA must ensure the

confidentiality of investigatory sources and the proper protectionof personal privacy as well as national security informationincluding intelligence sources and methods

Declassification Declassification guidelines would be amatter for negotiation between the CIA and NARA Some agencies(e.g the Department of Defense) give general guidance whileothers (e.g the Department of State) offer more specificguidelines Although specific guidelines require more effort to

develop NARA prefers them to more general guidelines since underspecific instructions NARA's reviewers find less need for referralback to the donor agency

Funding and Resource Funding and resources would also bematter for negotiation between the Agency and NARA TheDepartment of State and the Agency for International Development(AID) for example have funded a certain number of reviewerpositions while NARA funds all overseer positions (both reviewersand overseers are NARA employees) For consistency and qualitycontrol NARA does two reviews for State and AID State's ownstaff members then do a final quality check--in effect a thirdreview--of the product at NARA State and AID consider theirreview guidelines to be draft guidance until they review the

SECL BY 05'86542DECL OADR

Page 25: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

RET

Historical Review Program Policy and ResourcesReport to the DCI

10 February 1992

The Historical Review Program (HRP) has its origins in a1983 agreement between DCI William Casey and Senator DavidDurenberger then SSCI Chairman which played an importantrole in bringing about the passage of the CIA Information Actof 1984 At the request of Congress and with CIA's earlierdeclassification of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS)records as precedent the Agency in May 1985 formallyestablished this voluntary systematic review program todeclassify and transfer selected historically significant CIArecords to the National Archives The Classification ReviewBranch in IPCRD/OIT/DA with the advice and support of theHistory Staff in CSI/OTE/DA coordinates with Agencycomponents to declassify records while assuring the securityof documents that still require protection Although theHistory Staff provides the HRP with guidance and liaison withthe outside historical community and closely monitors theprogram's progress OIT's Classification Review Branch isalone responsible for the actual records review process

As Congress directed in the CIA Information Act of 1984 apanel of consultants including the Archivist of the UnitedStates the Librarian of Congress and three distinguishedhistorians helped CIA establish the HRP in 1985 This panelwhich has returned in 1987 and 1990 to monitor the program'sprogress and report to the DCI and Congress on it is due tomeet again in 1992

HRP Declassification Resources and Results 1991 In 1991OIT's Information Privacy and Classification Review Divisiondevoted three staff employees and five part-time annuitants tothe Historical Review Program (HRP) The figures for totalAgency manpower allocated to the HRP (including componentreview officers) are not available but in 1991 IP&CRD devotedapproximately six man-years to historical review while theCIA History Staff allocated the equivalent of one man-yearThis effort resulted in the declassification and transfer tothe National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) ofabout 10,000 pages of CIA History Staff Source Collectionrecords These were mostly source documents cited in the onlyother CIA documents transferred to NARA since the HRP'sinception in 1985 two sanitized CIA History Staff studies avolume of about 1000 pages transferred in 1989 and a volume

Page 26: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

SEC

of about 750 pages transferred in 1990 (In 1990 HRP alsosent NARA a collection of about 134,000 pages on"international communism, gathered over several decades by aState official and passed on to CIA by State around 1960.)

As Senator Durenberger had promised DCI Casey Congressprovided CIA with ten additional positions in FY86 to supportthe new Historical Review Program Eight of these positionswere allocated to the Classification Review Branch and two tothe History Staff The History Staff has since lost one ofthese two positions while as indicated above IP&CRD nowdevotes approximately six man-years to the Historical ReviewProgram

HRP Problems Although the HRP is understaffed lack ofresources is not the principal reason for its meager record ofdeclassification To an important degree the problem isstructural in the nature of the US Government's system forclassifying declassifying and safeguarding national securityinformation and in the rigidity of CIA's present policies andprocedures for applying this system It is this regimen thatmakes it virtually impossible for the Historical ReviewProgram--in spite of commitment hard work and good will--todeclassify significant numbers of records

In the first place CIA has developed complex andmulti-tiered declassification procedures which typicallyrequire a document to be reviewed by several components in alengthy labor-intensive and almost always unproductiveprocess This system encourages extreme caution by requiringthe close review of each individual document by a successionof reviewers representing a variety of interests

Secondly as a secret intelligence organization CIA hasalways maintained a pervasive secrecy about almost all of itswork and organization CIA works hard to infuse its employeeswith the high level of security consciousness that isnecessary for their work The information in CIA's records(especially with respect to sources and methods) typicallyrequires much more classification protection and for farlonger than the records of most other agencies Thesetraditional imperatives have formed an organizational culturethat recoils at the prospect of opening CIA's classifiedrecords to the public There is no CIA constituency forgreater declassification

Thirdly the Freedom of Information Act dominates CIA's(and all Federal agencies') declassification proceduresIntended originally to declassify current information forjournalists the FOIA is perhaps the most inefficient and

Page 27: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

3

expensive method that could be devised for declassifyingrecords for historians The FOIA's categories of exemptedmaterial have produced a vast body of case law that constantlygrows in size and complexity This produces an adversarysystem in which agencies--and individual reviewers--tend towithhold as much as the law in its most generousinterpretation allows This adversary system sets the tonefor all of CIA's declassification programs even including theHistorical Review Program

Roadblocks The Historical Review Program has run intothe following specific roadblocks which have presentedvirtually insurmountable barriers to the HRP's efforts todeclassify historically significant groups of older CIArecords

Mosaic Effect Although the HRP from the beginningespecially sought to declassify finished intelligence inCIA's oldest records in August 1985 the Directorate ofIntelligence and the National Intelligence Councilreported that while individual copies of serialpublications or finished intelligence could besatisfactorily sanitized for release a complete set forany given block of time would or could reveal too muchabout CIA's intelligence interests concerns andcapabilities This was held to be true for any of theserialized publications produced by the DI This viewthat individually declassified documents collectivelybecome classified is usually referred to as the "mosaiceffect. This position has up to the present precludedthe review of any runs of such publications as NationalIntelligence Estimates

Official Disclosure The contrast between the narrowlimits of "official disclosure and former CIA officerswide latitude (under the Publication Review Board's firstamendment regime) to talk and write about Agency programsand activities makes it impossible to declassifyinformation about activities and events that have beenwidely if unofficially disclosed by former DCIs andother retired CIA officers In spite of Kim Roosevelt'sbook describing CIA's role in the 1953 Iran Coup CIA'sunwillingness to acknowledge its part in this event led tothe flap over the gaps in the Department of State'sForeign Relations volume on Iran 1952-54 which in turnled to new legislation HR 1415 whose consequences forCIA we discuss elsewhere

Specific Presence Abroad The Agency's policy againstofficially acknowledging any specific presence abroad (as

Page 28: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

for example the London Station) puts virtually allrecords concerning foreign intelligence collection andcovert action operations off limits for HRPdeclassification

Bold steps are needed to put life into the HRP to permitCIA to declassify substantial amounts of its historicalrecords especially finished intelligence reports and to openthem to the public at the National Archives In my view thefollowing steps would begin the march

Thirty-Year Rule The Historical Review Program needs aspecific point at which it can expect to take responsibilityfor the systematic declassification review of Agency recordsCongress new HR 1415 legislation gives the Department ofState a 30-year deadline by providing that (except for fourcategories of exempted records) "each classified record ofpermanent historical value...shall be declassified not laterthan 30 years after the record was prepared, transferred toNARA and made available for public inspection and copyingFor the HRP a rolling 30-year line would govern severalfeatures in its organization and responsibilities

Thirty years after a document was created theauthority for its declassification should revert from itsoriginating office to the Director of Central Intelligence

At this 30-year point all documents would become theresponsibility of the Historical Review Program whichwould be administered by a Review Group operating underthe DCI's declassification authority and supervised bythe Chief History Staff

This Review Group would be staffed with sufficientexperienced senior reviewers to make finaldeclassification decisions on all documents 30 years oldand older without referral to the originating office Forthis reason the Review Group should work independently ofthe deputy directorates and independent offices reviewofficers who would continue to handle all non-HRP--i.eFOIA Privacy Act and EO 12356--declassification reviewMembers of the existing Historical Review SectionCRB/IP&CRD/OIT/DA could form the core of the new ReviewGroup which should have at least five staff employees andsix part-time annuitants

This Review Group would be attached to and near theCIA History Staff Its Chief Reviewer would report to theChief History Staff who would be responsible to the DCIfor the Historical Review Program

Page 29: MEMO FOR: SURVEY OF CIA'S RECORDS FROM …jfkfacts.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Shaw-as-informant.pdf · COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS INVESTIGATION ... SUBJECT Survey of CIA's Records

5

The Historical Review Program should use Agency-wideconsultations to develop guidelines for the DCI's approvalto acknowledge officially (as of 30 years earlier) casesof specific CIA presence abroad programs and activitiesthat are widely known from unofficial disclosure

The Historical Review Program should also developspecial guidelines for the declassification review ofNational Intelligence Council estimates the best-knownfinished intelligence that are 15 years old or olderStandard guidelines should be developed to sanitizeestimates by routine deletions to avoid identifyingtechnical systems and codeword controls There should bea strong presumption for disclosure so that estimateswould be declassified at 15 years unless a compellingcase e.g for damage to foreign relations could be made

The steps outlined above only sketch the kind of newReview Group working under the History Staff that will benecessary to make the Historical Review Program the channelfor the systematic declassification of CIA's older recordsthat DCI Casey promised in his October 1983 agreement withSenator Durenberger To succeed it will need enterprisingleadership substantial new resources and a willingness tobreak out of established patterns But above all it will needstrong and direct support from the DCI

/s/ J Kenneth

J Kenneth McDonaldChief CIA History Staff