Meeting expectation of diverse Stakeholders: …€¦ · Significant number of incidents were...

23
Copyright of Shell International E & P 1 February 2012 Meeting expectation of diverse Stakeholders: DELIVERY OF INCIDENT FREE DP OPERATIONS BY LEVERAGING MTS DP COMMITTEE GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS PRESENTED AT 2 nd Americas Offshore Support Journal Conference, Houston 22 nd Sep 2015 PRESENTED BY : SUMAN MUDDUSETTI SERVING AS CHAIR MTS SUB COMMITTEE ON GUIDANCE AND STANDARDS

Transcript of Meeting expectation of diverse Stakeholders: …€¦ · Significant number of incidents were...

Copyright of Shell International E & P 1February 2012

Meeting expectation of diverse Stakeholders:

DELIVERY OF INCIDENT FREE DP OPERATIONS

BY LEVERAGING MTS DP COMMITTEE GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS

PRESENTED AT

2nd Americas Offshore Support Journal Conference, Houston

22nd Sep 2015

PRESENTED BY:

SUMAN MUDDUSETTI

SERVING AS CHAIR MTS SUB COMMITTEE ON GUIDANCE AND STANDARDS

Copyright of Shell International E & P 2February 2012

� A FOCUS ON DESIGN OPERATION, PEOPLE AND PROCESS

� THE NEED FOR A RELENTLESS FOCUS ON OPERATIONAL

RISK MANAGEMENT

� ACHIEVING DELIVERY PREDICTABILITY THROUGH

CONSISTENCY AND STANDARDISATION

� MEETING STAKEHOLDER EXPECTATIONS: DESIGNERS, SHIPYARDS, CHARTERER'S, VESSEL OPERATORS, ASSURANCE ORGANISATIONS AND REGULATORS

PRESENTATION OBJECTIVES

Copyright of Shell International E & P 3February 2012

� Marine Technology Society DP Committee

� Who are we and what do we do?

� Guidance Documents- Promulgation and uptake by Industry

� Objectives and Background to the development of the Guidance Documents

� What does it do for you?

�Operational Risk Management

� Design- The Seven Pillars

� Operations- Activity Specific Operating Guidelines

(ASOG)

� The What Why How and Who Questions answered

� People- Integrating the People element into the

DP System

� Can DPO Competency be demonstrated?

� Stewardship of the Documents ( By the Industry- For the Industry)

� Driving Standardization and Consistency

PRESENTATION OBJECTIVES

Copyright of Shell International E & P 4February 2012

BY THE INDUSTRY FOR THE INDUSTRY-MTS AN ALL VOLUNTEER BODY

DP COMMUNITY

VESSEL OWNERS

OPERATORS

SERVICE

PROVIDERS

VENDORS

INDIVIDUALS

Incident Free Operations

Copyright of Shell International E & P 5February 2012

MTS DP COMMITTEE

- DNV RPs - MSF

- ABS - IMCA NOTICE

- OP

REQUIREMENTs

- USCG

- FR NOTICES

- SAFETY ALERTS

- NPRM

D

P

CO

N

F

EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONs

COASTAL STATE

AUTHORITY

OPERATORs CHEVRON, CP,

HESS

PROJECT CONST.

VESSELs

LOGISTICs VESSELs

CLASS SOCIETYDNV/ABS…

DRILLING VESSELs

INDIVIDUALs

VENDOR COMMUNITY CONSULTANT COMMUNITY

MTS DP COMMITTEE SUPPORTING THE DP COMMUNITY

19962010 2011 2012 2013

Copyright of Shell International E & P 6February 2012

Critical Activity Mode

Task Appropriate

Mode

Post Failure

Capability

IM Modes and

Features

SUPPLEMENTING RULES AND EXISTING GUIDANCE WITH

INDUSTRIAL MISSION FOCUSED GUIDANCE

Industrial (IM) Mission

Focus

Inciden

t

Inciden

t

Industrial (IM) Mission

Focus

Critical Activity Mode

Task Appropriate Mode

IM Modes and

Features

Post Failure

Capability

Ops

People

Design

DP Requirements

Class

Flag State

Coastal

State

IMCA

Charterers/

Operators

Copyright of Shell International E & P 7February 2012

Incident free DP

Operations

Desig

n

Opera

tions

People

Pro

cess

DELIVERING INCIDENT FREE DP OPERATIONS:A RELENTLESS FOCUS ON OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT

Operational Risk Management

PredictabilityPredictability

Copyright of Shell International E & P 8February 2012

MTS DP COMMITTEE GUIDANCE PRODUCED

Copyright of Shell International E & P 9February 2012

TECHOPS

Copyright of Shell International E & P 10February 2012

GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS ADOPTED AND PUBLISHED AS RECOMMENDED PRACTICE

Copyright of Shell International E & P 11February 2012

DRIVING STANDARDIZATION AND CONSISTENCY-

ONE STANDARD

Risk and Consequenc

position

Risk and Consequenc

e

Of loss of position

IndustrialMission

Focus

Modes Modes And

Features

Industry Initiatives / RPs

Industry Standards

Lack Of

IM FOCUS

GUID

DSTS

GUID

DSTS

OPS

PEOPLE

DESIGN

DP

REQUIREMENTS

CLASS

FLAG

STATE

COASTAL

STATE

IMCA

FORUM”S

OPERATOR

S

Copyright of Shell International E & P 12February 2012

DP STATION KEEPING INTEGRITY- THE SEVEN PILLARS!

Ind

ep

en

de

nce

Se

gre

ga

tion

Diffe

ren

tiatio

n

Fa

ult to

lera

nce

Fa

ult re

sis

tan

ce

Fa

ult rid

e th

rou

gh

Au

ton

om

y

Predictability

Incident Free DP

Operations

Copyright of Shell International E & P 13February 2012

MTS DP COMMITTEE- INDUSTRIAL MISSION FOCUSCRITICAL ACTIVITY MODE(CAM)-TASK APPROPRIATE MODE(TAM)

GIVENS

Configurations to be analyzed, proven and documented in

FMEA’s and Proving Trials

Clear Guidance Contained on Processes to establish

choice and incorporated in DP Operations Manuals.

CRITICAL ACTIVITY MODE

(CAM)

•Highest level of Station

Keeping Integrity

•Configuration, People,

Process, Post Failure

Capability

•Usually Default Mode

TASK APPROPRIATE MODE

(TAM)

•HEMP Processes used to

support decision to step down

from CAM

•Defined Configuration and

understanding and

acceptance of consequence

of Loss of Position

Examples of CAM

•Diving Operations,Working within 500 m zone of surface

facilities and critical sub surface assets

•MODU’s- Non shearables through BOP, in Hydrocarbon

zone

Examples of TAM

•Working outside 500 m zone and in drift off confition

•ROV survey outside 500 m zone

CAM/TAM

Philosophy

Supplement DP Class Notation with Industrial Mission focus based on consequence of Loss Of Position while executing activity performed by vessel

CAM/TAM CONSIDERATONS

•Consequence of Loss of

Position

•Running hours and

Maintenance of equipment

•Emission requirements

Imposed.

Copyright of Shell International E & P 14February 2012

ASOG/WSOG

ACTIVITY SPECIFIC OPERATING GUIDELINES ( ASOG)-WHAT , HOW , WHO AND WHY?

FMEACausal

Factor

Environmen

t

(9%)

Causal

Factor

Power &

Prop (32%)

Causal

Factor

Sensors &

PRS (38%)

Casual

Factor

Operator

Error (21%)Inspect,

Repair, &

Maintain

Modes &

Features

IM Specific

Features

Project

Procedures

Simops

Consideratio

n

Process(WSOG / ASOG)

Condition GREEN ADVISORY YELLOW RED

Notify Master, Chief Engineer,

Client, Offshore Construction

Superintendent, Working

Deck and PERDIDO Control

Room

NO YES YES YES

ActionCONTINUE NORMAL

OPERATIONS

INFORMATIVE /

CONSULTATIVE STATUS

(RISK ASSESS), PROJECT

PERSONNEL AT STANDBY,

READINESS TO INITIATE

YELLOW/RED

IN READINESS TO BYPASS

TO VENT AND INITATE EDS,

EMERGENCY DISCONNECT -

MOVE TO SAFE AREA

Location of Pig

Pig at critical location (initated

by Deck)- MARINE

PERSONNEL TO POSITIONING

STANDBY

Current and predicted w eather

conditionsWithin Operating limits Approaching operating limits Exceeding operational limits

DRIVE OFF All systems operating correctlyDif ference in vessel position betw een

Visual, Navigation and DP Immediately w hen recognized by DPO Unable to bring vessel under control

DRIFT OFF All systems operating correctlyDif ference in vessel position betw een

Visual, Navigation and DP Immediately w hen recognized by DPO

Vessel Footprint/Weather re lated

excursionNo position alarms or w arning If w arning position limits reach (>3m ) If Alarm position reached (>5m )

Heading excursion No Heading Alarms or w arning If heading w arning limit reached (>3

degrees)

If heading Alarm limit reached (>5

degrees)

Bow Thruster Loads All < 30% Any approaching 33% Any > 33%

Stern Thruster Load All < 30% Any approaching 33% Any > 33%

Stern Thruster T5-T6 <45% >45% Approaching 50%

All thrusters Operational w ith no alarmsAny alarm, poor performance,

unexpected or unexplained eventLoss of any one thruster

Diesel Generator - EnginesAll diesel generators online or available

as required in both engine rooms.Any one generator unavailable. Loss of one 'Large' diesel generator.

Diesel Generator Loads All < 45% Any approaching 50% Any > 50%

DP UPS'sMain and back up supply available. No

UPS on bypass. No active alarmsAny UPS in bypass or in alarm

Main supply to UPS failure or loss of

output from one UPS

24 VDC SystemsMain and back up supply available. No

active alarmsAny DC system in alarm Main charger supply failure

DP Operator Control Station All operating normally, no alarms. Any alarm, poor performance,

unexpected or unexplained eventLoss of one operator station

DPCs All operating normally, no alarms. Any alarm, poor performance,

unexpected or unexplained eventLoss of one DPC

DP Netw orks Both operating normally, no alarmsAny alarm, poor performance,

unexpected or unexplained eventLoss of one netw ork Total loss of netw orks / DP control

Gyros 3 gyros selected and accepted by DP Any gyro alarm. One operational gyro remaining

MRUs 3 MRUs selected and accepted by DP Any MRU Alarm One operational MRU remaining

Wind sensors Operational w ith no alarms Loss of tw o w ind sensors

Activity Specific Operating Guidelines - Viking Poseidon

Copyright of Shell International E & P 15February 2012

ASOG’S AN EFFECTIVE DECISION SUPPORT TOOL-OWNED BY BY THE VESSEL

Maintenance

Industrial

Mission (IM)

(Vessel and

Project

Teams)

Marine

Incident Free Operations

Facilitates Interdisciplinary Integration Using Enhanced

Awareness. Addresses Dilution of Skills. Enables

Acceleration of Development. Decision Support Tool during

Execution

Facilitates Interdisciplinary Integration Using Enhanced

Awareness. Addresses Dilution of Skills. Enables

Acceleration of Development. Decision Support Tool during

Execution

Vessel Management Team

Copyright of Shell International E & P 16February 2012

DEMONSTRATING COMPETENCY!

ARTICULATING THE FOLLOWING IS A METHOD OF DEMONSTRATING COMPETENCE.

• The redundancy concept of the DP vessel they are serving on.

• The configuration(s) that the vessel needs to be set up in (CAM and TAM)

and the post failure capability of the vessel corresponding to those

configuration(s).

• The impact caused by non-availability of equipment due to inspection repair

maintenance activities on post failure capability.

• The processes in place to defend the redundancy concept.

• Their role in defending the redundancy concept and preventing the potential

for a loss of position.

Copyright of Shell International E & P 17February 2012

0

50

100

150

200

250

20

04

pre

AS

OG

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

No of ASOG’s

Loss Of position

� Incidents reported and tracked on vessels with ASOG’s

� Significant number of incidents were failure to follow ASOG/WSOG

ASOG’s/WSOG’s – Reducing DP Loss Of Position

Incidents

Copyright of Shell International E & P 18February 2012

*

*

1 1 1

4

2

1

1

1

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

POST ASOG IMPLEMENTATION: LOP & Incidents

Non LOP/Non DP Related IncidentsMODUNon LOP/Non DP Related IncidentsP&CLOP MODU

LOP P&C

LOP OSV

**

*

*

Actual LOP with ASOG/WSOG 4

Failure to follow ASOG/WSOG 8

ASOG not implemented** 4

Non LOP/Non DP Related 6

Fires 2

Failure to Follow ASOG/WSOG-Significant

Contributor

2015 up-tick in incidents

DP Loss of Position /Significant Incidents-Granularity

Copyright of Shell International E & P 19February 2012

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish minimum design,

operation, training, and manning standards for mobile offshore drilling

units (MODUs) and other vessels using dynamic positioning systems

to engage in Outer Continental Shelf activities. Establishing these

minimum standards is necessary to improve the safety of people and

property involved in such operations and the protection of the

environment in which they operate. This notice of proposed

rulemaking would decrease the risk of a loss of position by a

dynamically-positioned MODU or other vessel that could result in a

fire, explosion, or subsea spill, and supports the Coast Guard’s

strategic goals of maritime safety and protection of natural resources.

USCG NPRM SUMMATION

Copyright of Shell International E & P 20February 2012

� THE DYNAMIC POSITIONING COMMITTEE’S MISSION IS

TO

� encourage exchange of information,

� discussion of technology, training and education,

� foster improvement of DP reliability, develop guidelines,

and address any other issues pertinent to dynamic

positioning that facilitate incident free execution of DP

operations, and that are consistent with the objectives of

the Marine Technology Society.

� “develop guidelines, and address any other issues pertinent to dynamic positioning that facilitate incident free execution of DP operations”

MTS DP COMMITTEE- MISSION STATEMENT

Copyright of Shell International E & P 21February 2012

USCG NPRM - KEY THEMES

• DPO (Dynamic Positioning Operator) Certification Qualifications,

Competency and Manning Requirements.

• Addressed by MTS DP GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS

• DP Equipped Vessel Operations: Requirement for vessels to operate with

a vessel and industrial mission specific - Activity Specific Operating

Criteria / Well Specific Operating Criteria, including identification of

operations requiring CAM configuration and TAM configuration.

• Addressed by MTS DP GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS

• DPSAO ( DP Systems Assurance Organization).

• MTS DP GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS- Performance Standard

• MTS GAP ANALYSIS TOOLS- Verification and Measure against the

performance standard

Copyright of Shell International E & P 22February 2012

INDUSTRY-EARNING THE LICENSE TO OPERATE

Collaboration

• Incident Free DP Operations

• Shared Learnings

Enhanced Awareness

• Across the DP Community

• Consistent and Standardized Approach

Enabling Delivery

• Address Dilution of Skills With Decision

Support Tools

• Accelerate and Enable Professional

Development

Stewardship

•Ownership- By the Industry – For the

Industry

•Contribute to Initiatives-

Review/Participation,

DP

COMMUNITY

( License to

operate)

Copyright of Shell International E & P 23February 2012

�QUESTIONS