Measurements of the model parameter in the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity
-
Upload
karina-holden -
Category
Documents
-
view
17 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Measurements of the model parameter in the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity
Measurements of the model parameterin the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity
1
Masaki Asano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo)
Collaborator: E. Asakawa (Meiji-gakuin Univ.), K. Fujii (KEK), T. Kusano (Tohoku
Univ.), S. Matsumoto(Univ. of Toyama), R. Sasaki (Tohoku Univ.), Y. Takubo (Tohoku Univ.), H. Yamamoto (Tohoku Univ.)
arXiv:0901.1081
2
In LHT,SM
NEW
H
ΦHWH ZH AHqH lH
q lg W Z A
• Particles & these partners are same spin.• New particles get mass by VEV f ~ 1 TeV.• New gauge boson masses depend only on VEV f.
In this study, we estimate…• measurement accuracy of new heavy gauge boson masses• determination of VEV f & other model parameters• the dark matter relic abundance @ ILC.
Gauge boson Fermion Higgs
Littlest Higgs model with T-parity (LHT) is one of attractive models for TeV new physics. LHT could solve the little hierarchy problem, & contains a dark matter candidate.
Same Spin
• Introduction• What is the LHT?• How to measure the LHT at ILC?• Simulation results• Summary
3
Plan
What is the LHT?
4
mh2 = m0
2 + Λ2
Fine-tuning!
The SM is the successful model describing physics below ~ 100 GeV.
If we assume that
Hierarchy problem (related to quadratic divergence to the Higgs mass term)
1002 ⇔ 10000000000000002
But ...
SM is valid all the way up to the GUTs scale, Λ~1015 GeV,
EW scale higgs mass requires
mh2 = m0
2 + Λ2
No fine-tuning
The SM is the successful model describing physics below ~ 100 GeV.
If we require that
Hierarchy problem (related to quadratic divergence to the Higgs mass term)
1002 ⇔ 10002
But ...
there are no fine-tuning for Higgs mass term,
No fine-tuning Λ ~ 1 TeV
Cut off scale
mh2 = m0
2 + Λ2
No fine-tuning
The SM is the successful model describing physics below ~ 100 GeV.
However…
Hierarchy problem (related to quadratic divergence to the Higgs mass term)
1002 ⇔ 50002
But ...
LEP experiments require that the cut off scale is larger than 5 TeV!
Λ ~ 1 TeV
R.Barbieri and A.Strumia (’00)
LEP experiments
Cut off scaleLittle Hierarchy problem!
Still fine-tuning appear!
LHT solves little hierarchy problem! Even if Λ ~ 10TeV, there are still no fine-tuning!
Because of …
• Collective symmetry breaking (VEV f )
• T-parity
SM ⇔ SM, New ⇔ - New
(Heavy photon AH)
Wh h
g2 +WH
h h– g2
N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen, H. Georgi (’01)
H. C. Cheng, I. Low (’03)
In order to avoid constraints from EWPM, Z2 symmetry (T-parity) are introduced.
• Higgs boson: A Pseudo NG boson of a global symmetry at some higher scale.• Explicit breaking of the global symmetry is specially arranged to cancel
quadratic divergent corrections to mh at 1-loop level.
Λ can be ~10 TeV without fine-tuning!(Little Higgs mechanism)
Lightest T-odd particle becomes dark matter candidate!
A, W±, Z, h
AH, WH±, ZH, Φ
t T
cancel
Particle contents
Gauge-Higgs sector
Top sector
Due to the cancelation of quadratic divergences, partners are introduced.In the fermion sector, only top partner is required to cancel the quadraticdivergences because other fermion Yukawa couplings are small.
In order to Implement the Little Higgs mechanism…
• The non-linear sigma model breaking SU(5)/SO(5).• The subgroup [SU(2)×U(1)]2 in SU(5) is gauged, which is broken down
to the SM gauge group by vev f.
Fermion sector
b…cancel
[Arkani-Hamed, Cohen, Katz and Nelson (2002)]
[SU(2)×U(1)]2 [SU(2)×U(1)]SM
[SU(5)] [SO(5)]VEV f ~ O(1) TeV
Global sym.Gauge sym.
A, W±, Z, h
AH, WH±, ZH, Φ
t T
cancel
Particle contents
Gauge-Higgs sector
Top sector
In order to Implement the Little Higgs Mechanism…
• The non-linear sigma model breaking SU(5)/SO(5).• The subgroup [SU(2)×U(1)]2 in SU(5) is gauged, which is broken down
to the SM gauge group by vev f.
Fermion sector
b…cancel
[Arkani-Hamed, Cohen, Katz and Nelson (2002)]
[SU(2)×U(1)]2 [SU(2)×U(1)]SM
[SU(5)] [SO(5)]VEV f ~ O(1) TeV
Global sym.Gauge sym.
T-parity T-parity
tH TH bH…T-parity
T-odd partners are introduced for each fermions.
In order to implement the T-parity…
T-even
T-odd
A, W±, Z, h
AH, WH±, ZH, Φ
t T
cancel
Gauge-Higgs sector
Top sector
Fermion sector
b…cancel
T-parity T-parity
tH TH bH…T-parity
Model parameters
O (f)
O (v)
Dark Matter
• New particle masses are ~ f
• f: VEV of SU(5) -> SO(5)• λ, κ: Yukawa coupling of new fermions• + SM parameters (mh, … )
How to measure the LHT at ILC?
12
A, W±, Z, h
AH, WH±, ZH, Φ
t T
cancel
cancelGauge-Higgs sector
Top sector
Fermion sector
b…
tH TH bH…
O (f)
O (v)500 GeV
Dark Matter
• can be measured at LHC. • too heavy to produced at ILC.
• can be produced at ILC!• cannot measure masses at LHC• masses depend only on vev f!
Top sector
Gauge sector
We should measure the gauge sector in the LHT at ILC.
Q. H. Cao, C. R. Chen (07)
S. Matsumoto, T. Moroi, K. Tobe (08)and …….
In order to verify the LHT,we should measure the Little Higgs mechanism!
• can produce @ 500 GeV:
mAH + mZH < 500 GeV• cross section is small• It is difficult to produce
@ 500 GeV• cross section is large
In the gauge sector,
14
O (f)
O (v)500 GeV
Dark Matter
1. Using e+e- AHZH @ 500 GeV ILC, Using e+e- WHWH @ 1 TeV ILC, we determine gauge boson masses.2. gauge boson mass vev f3. Cross section heavy lepton mass (eH, νH)4. Production angle of WH WH spin
e+e- AHZH
e+e- WHWH
Representative point of our simulation
15
16
Relic abundance
Mode &Representative point
WMAP allowed region
Dark matter (AH)
M. A, S. Matsumoto, N. Okada,Y. Okada PhysRevD.75.063506
• Main DM annihilation mode: AHAH h WW(or ZZ)
• The relic density depends only on f & mh!
Shaded area is WMAP allowed region .
DM abundance is determined by the Higgs mass & vev f.
At this WMAP allowed region, the model also satisfys other experimental constraints!
17
Relic abundance
Mode &Representative point
WMAP allowed region
Which particle can produced at the ILC ? → It depends on VEV f .Which particle can produced at the ILC ? → It depends on VEV f .
Because heavy gauge boson massed depend only on vev f.
M. A, S. Matsumoto, N. Okada,Y. Okada PhysRevD.75.063506
Shaded area is WMAP allowed region .
DM abundance is determined by the Higgs mass & vev f.
At this WMAP allowed region, the model also satisfys other experimental constraints!
e+e- AHZH e+e- WHWH
Dark matter (AH)
Fine-tuning Λ ~ 4π f > 10TeV
If f is larger than ~800GeV, the hierarchy problem appears again.
18
Relic abundance
Mode &Representative point
WMAP allowed region
e+e- AHZH
e+e- WHWH
Which particle can produced at the ILC ? → It depends on VEV f .Which particle can produced at the ILC ? → It depends on VEV f .
Because heavy gauge boson massed depend only on vev f.
New gauge bosons are too heavy mWH+mWH > 1TeV
mAH + mZH > 500GeV
M. A, S. Matsumoto, N. Okada,Y. Okada PhysRevD.75.063506
Fine-tuning Λ ~ 4π f > 10TeV
Shaded area is WMAP allowed region .
DM abundance is determined by the Higgs mass & vev f.
At this WMAP allowed region, the model also satisfys other experimental constraints!
Dark matter (AH)
Mode &Representative point
e+e- AHZH
e+e- WHWH
Which particle can produced at the ILC ? → It depends on VEV f .Which particle can produced at the ILC ? → It depends on VEV f .
Because heavy gauge boson massed depend only on vev f.
19
Relic abundance
WMAP allowed region
M. A, S. Matsumoto, N. Okada,Y. Okada PhysRevD.75.063506
Fine-tuning Λ ~ 4π f > 10TeV
Mass spectrum
f 580 eH 410 ZH 369 WH 368 AH 82 Higgs 134
Point I (GeV)
Sample points satisfy all experimental & cosmological constraints.
New gauge bosons are too heavy mWH+mWH > 1TeV
mAH + mZH > 500GeV
Simulation results
20
1.Event generation
MadGraph : for LHT processPhyssim : for SM process - helicity amplitude calculation, gauge boson polarization effect - phase space integration and generation of parton 4-momenta2.Hadronization
3.Detector simulation
PYTHIA - parton showering and hadronization
JSFQuickSimulator - create vertex-detector hits - smear charged-track parameters in central tracker - simulate calorimeter signals as from individual segments
@ 500 GeV ILC @ 1 TeV ILCe+e- AHZH AHAH h e+e- WHWH AHAHWW
• Integrated luminosity 500 fb-1
• Cross section 1.9 fb• Integrated luminosity 500 fb-1
• Cross section 121 fb
22
Event
Masses of AH and ZH can be determined from edges of Higgs energy distribution.
@ 500 GeV ILC
• Large missing energy
• 2 jet in final state
e+e- AHZH AHAH h
mAH = 83.2 ± 13.3 GeV,
mZH = 366. ± 16. GeV f = 576. ± 25. GeV
Results
Energy distribution of reconstructed Higgs bosons after subtracting BG
23
• Large missing energy• 4 jet in final state
Event
@ 1 TeV ILC
e+e- WHWH AHAHWW
Masses of AH and WH can be determined from edges of W energy distribution.
mAH = 81.58 ± 0.67 GeV,
mWH = 368.3 ± 0.63 GeV f = 580 ± 0.69 GeV
ResultsHigh accuracy !
Energy distribution of reconstructed W bosons after subtracting BG
24
Production angle of WH±
Angular distribution of jets from W±
Other parametersCross section
Heavy lepton mass!
WH is spin 1 particle!
The dominance of the longitudinal mode!
The coupling arises from EWSB!
Beam polarization
WH has SU(2)L charge, but no U(1)Y charge!
For details, next Sasaki san’s talk
Cosmological impact
25
26
Cosmological Impact
Simulation results : f + mh
DM annihilation cross section σv (f, mh)
• DM abundance will be determined with O(10%) accuracy @ 500 GeV.• DM abundance will be determined with O(1%) accuracy @ 1 TeV.• It is possible to consistency check of the model using PLANCK.
Probability densityDM relic abundance can be determined at ILC
Probability density of DM relics
Summary
27
• Littest Higgs model with T-parity (LHT) is one of attractive models for physics beyond the SM.
• Important model parameter are determined by measurements of heavy gauge boson sector with good accuracy• @ 500 GeV ILC, using e+e- → AHZH .• @ 1 TeV ILC, using e+e- → WHWH.
• Heavy gauge boson masses can be determined by model-independent way.
• The property of dark matter also can be investigated at ILC.
• Results obtained from the collider experiments will be compared to those from astrophysical experiments(PLANCK) 28
Summary
Back up
29
30
e-
e+ AH
AH
eH1. No signal
2. Vertex is suppressed
e+
e- γ, Z
WH
WH
1. Depend only on f
2. Large Cross section
II. LHT at the ILC
31
32
Phase space integration and the generation of parton 4-momenta
helicity amplitudes (effect of gauge boson polarizations properly)
BASES/SPRING
HELAS library
TAUOLA final-state tau leptons (their polarizations correctly)
Detector Parameters
hits by charged particles at the vertex detector and track parameters at the central tracker are smeared according to their position resolutions
realistic simulation of cluster overlapping (calorimeter signals are simulated in individual segments)
Track-cluster matching is performed for the hit clusters at the calorimeter (in order to achieve the best energy flow measurements)
33
Event selection
<Cut statistics and breakdown of efficiency>
WW++WW-- and ee++ee--WW++WW-- are effectively reduced by PTmiss cut.
ZZHHZZHH is negligible after W2 cut.
W+W- and W+W-Z remain after 2 cuts.
#event (efficiency)
All events are forced to 4 jets in final stateW
2 < 10 : 2 for W± reconstruction from jets
PTmiss > 50 GeV/c : Missing transverse momentum
22
2 21
WW m
WW
m
WWw
mmmm
<Selection cut>
34
1) Energy edges of W±
]2[1
]1[1]0[
4
1[], maxmin
par
EEErf
par
EEErfparparEF WW
Werror
432 ]6[]5[]4[]3[1[], WWWWWpoly EparEparEparEparparEF
1) Cheat Emin,Emax
Ffit1 = Ferror(par[1,2]) Get resolution(par[1,2])
2) Cheat Emin,Emax & Fix par[1,2]Ffit2 = Ferror x Fpoly(par[3~9])
Get shape(par[3~9])
3) Fix par[1~9]Ffit3 = Ferror(Emin,max) x Fpoly(Emin,max)
Get edge(Emin,Emax) Calculate mass(mAH,mWH)
<Fit function>
<Fit step>
xdttxErf
0
2)exp(2
)(
edgeEE :, maxmin
35
SignalBackground
• Large missing energy• 2 jet in final state
All events are forced to 2 jets in final state|cosθ|< 0.6 : 2 for angular dist. of Higgs100 < mh <140 GeV : reconstracted Higgs mass
Selection Cut
Event
e+e- AHZH AHAH hAHAH jj
we can calculate mass of AH and ZH by usingthe edge of the Higgs energy distribution.
@ 500 GeV ILC
36
• Mass determination mAH = 82.5 ± 7.7 GeV, mZH = 370. ± 12. GeV true(81.85) true(368.2)
• f determination f = 581 ± 17. GeV true(580)
An energy distribution of Higgs from ZHAH after subtraction of the backgrounds, whose number of events was estimated by independent background samples. The distribution is fitted by a polynomial function convoluted with an error function.
@ 500 GeV ILC
37
SignalBackground
• Large missing energy• 4 jet in final state
All events are forced to 4 jets in final stateW
2 < 10 : 2 for W± reconstruction from jets
PTmiss > 50 GeV/c : Missing transverse momentum
22
2 21
WW m
WW
m
WWw
mmmm
Selection Cut
WW++WW-- and ee++ee--WW++WW-- are effectively reduced by PTmiss cut.
ZZHHZZHH is negligible after W2 cut.
W+W- and W+W-Z remain after 2 cuts.
Event
@ 1 TeV ILCe+e- WHWH AHAHWW
38
• Mass determination mAH = 81.85 ± 0.65 GeV, mWH = 368.1 ± 0.62 GeV true(81.85) true(368.2)
• f determination f = 580 ± 0.68 GeV true(580)
An energy distribution of W’s from WHWH after subtraction of the backgrounds, whose number of events was estimated by independent background samples. The distribution is fitted by a polynomial function convoluted with an error function.
High accuracy !
@ 1 TeV ILC
39
e-
e+WH
+W+
AH
WH-
AH
W-
WH± candidates are reconstructed
as corn around W±. If WH+ and WH
- are assumed as back-to-back, there are 2 solutions for WH
± candidates. In this mode, however , 2 solutions should be close to true WH
±.W+
W-
WH+WH
-
WH+ of generator
information
Production angle of WH±
This shape shows WH± spin as spin-1spin-1.
Angular distribution of jetsAngular distribution of jets
W+
j1
j2
<Rest frame of W+>
j1j2
W± helicity as longitudinallongitudinal mode.
40
41