MAR 19980004: NORTHERN/WESTERN Received date: Apr 01, 1998 Public release date: Apr 02, 1999 DISCLAIMER By accessing and using the Alberta Energy website to download or otherwise obtain a scanned mineral assessment report, you (“User”) agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions: a) Each scanned mineral assessment report that is downloaded or otherwise obtained from Alberta

Energy is provided “AS IS”, with no warranties or representations of any kind whatsoever from Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta, as represented by the Minister of Energy (“Minister”), expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, no warranties or other representations from the Minister, regarding the content, accuracy, reliability, use or results from the use of or the integrity, completeness, quality or legibility of each such scanned mineral assessment report;

b) To the fullest extent permitted by applicable laws, the Minister hereby expressly disclaims, and is released from, liability and responsibility for all warranties and conditions, expressed or implied, in relation to each scanned mineral assessment report shown or displayed on the Alberta Energy website including but not limited to warranties as to the satisfactory quality of or the fitness of the scanned mineral assessment report for a particular purpose and warranties as to the non-infringement or other non-violation of the proprietary rights held by any third party in respect of the scanned mineral assessment report;

c) To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the Minister, and the Minister’s employees and agents, exclude and disclaim liability to the User for losses and damages of whatsoever nature and howsoever arising including, without limitation, any direct, indirect, special, consequential, punitive or incidental damages, loss of use, loss of data, loss caused by a virus, loss of income or profit, claims of third parties, even if Alberta Energy have been advised of the possibility of such damages or losses, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Alberta Energy website, including the accessing or downloading of the scanned mineral assessment report and the use for any purpose of the scanned mineral assessment report so downloaded or retrieved.

d) User agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Minister, and the Minister’s employees and agents against and from any and all third party claims, losses, liabilities, demands, actions or proceedings related to the downloading, distribution, transmissions, storage, redistribution, reproduction or exploitation of each scanned mineral assessment report obtained by the User from Alberta Energy.

Alberta Mineral Assessment Reporting System

~APEX ··· Geoscience Ltd.-· -~~---------

... ,, Suite200, 9797-45Ave Suite218,9'l0Yonge Street

Mr. Maurjce KeyJor . Ells River Resources Inc. 17 424.,. 106A Avenue Edmonton,·Albe$T5S 1 E6 Fax: (403) 486-0039; 3 Pages

DearMaurice,.

. Edmonton; AB• T6E 5V8 'lbronto, ON· M4W JCT Bus.403·439-5380 • Fax4CIHD·1336 Bus.416·923·8254 • Fax416·9'23·8.'.D4 apexgeo@compusmart.ab.ca apexto@lstar.ca

April 11 , 1998

As promised, enclosed is a draft of a summary document that I am preparing for you that details the work.we have done to date including the review of the geophysical airborne data;.·At present, I.still need to review my prioritization of the anomalies based upon the new maps and profiles ~>"rovided to me by GEDCO last Wednesday. Upon my return from South Africa I will finalize this document.

•

Summary Review Of Magnetic Data For Ells River Resources Ltd.'s Northeast Alberta Metallic Mineral Permits

Work Conducted

2

Between about March 6 and April 6, 1998, personnel on behalf of APEX Geoscience Ltd. (APEX) and Geophysicon Exploration and Development Company (GEDCO) received digital airborne geophysical data from Ells River Resources Ltd. (Ells) that was subsequently downloaded into specialized software at GEDCO's office. The data was then used to produce several filtered maps in order to evaluate the data for the presence of possible near-surface kimberlite or lamproite diatremes.

After the initial set of maps were received from GEDCO, Mr. M. Dufresne visited GEDCO's office where he reviewed the entire set of total field magnetic data in profile form in conjunction with a geophysicist from GEDCO. A total of about 35 magnetic anomalies were identified of interest. Profiles of each of these 35 magnetic anomalies are provided. In addition, GEDCO had to relevel the original World Geoscience Ltd. magnetic data in order to insert the tieline data into the dataset prior to gridding the data for contouring. Three maps incuding a first vertical derivative and two shallow target enhancement maps are provided. The first order enhancement map is essentially the 151 vertical derivative of shallow band pass filtered data. The second order enhancement map is a 2nd vertical derivative of shallow band pass filtered data.

Summary Results

The initial inspection of the shallow target enhancement maps and the first vertical derivative map indicate that there are no apparent targets of the quality of the magnetic targets that have yielded kimberlites in the Buffalo Head Hills. However, there are several important points to make about the Buffalo Head Hills pipes. First, there are a few spectacular anomalies that have yielded kimberlites, but there are many that are less than spectacular that have yielded kimberlites as well. In general, very few (perhaps one or two pipes) of the Buffalo Head Hills pipes are visible on the total field magnetics, however, most or all are visible as discreet anomalies on the bulk of the filtered magnetic maps. The Buffalo Head Hills magnetic data seems to indicate that the basement signature is quite a bit quieter than for the Birch Mountains. The Ells dataset for the Birch Mountains seems to yield few evident map anomalies that could be indicative of kimberlites. However, the background magnetic data from the basement beneath the Birch Mountains could be providing a significant amount of interference as it is significantly higher in magnetic signature than in the Buffalo Head Hills area.

Upon reviewing the total field magnetic data in profile form several unexpected magnetic anomalies that could be due to shallow sourced intrusions or volcanics were discovered. Anomalies that could be of interest are tabulated in the accompanying table. The more prospective anomalies include 4, 7, 8, 13 with lower quality anomalies such as 9, 10, 14a, 14 b, 17, 18, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31and34. In addition, anomalies 2 and 3 may warrant further investigation as they represent sharp, shallow-sourced magnetic features that are

April11,1998

3

actually indicative of a reversely magnetized geological unit such as a possible near-surface dyke or fault. Several of the above mentioned anomalies could be of interest for possible

\. __ J kimber1ite or lamproite related intrusions or volcanic horizons and, therefore, warrant conducting further exploration. I recommend a field test of the targets that could include the following: (a) ground checking and prospecting all the potential anomalies of interest in order to eliminate those anomalies that are likely related to culture and/or natural features such as drainage, (b) collecting a number of till, soil or rock samples at each of the higher priority targets, and (c) conducting ground geophysical surveys over selected higher priority airborne magnetic anomalies in order to evaluate whether any of the anomalies are real and unexplained, and therefore possibly warrant a drill test, or whether the anomalies are related to drainage and/or culture. As well, the possibility of obtaining existing seismic data should be investigated.

At this stage, conducting further airborne geophysical surveys, including infilling the prior survey, is likely not going to result in the discovery of high quality magnetic anomalies that were not identified in the initial survey and that could be indicative of kimber1ites of lamproites. Any further airborne geophysical surveys will likely only enhance the targets that have been identified to date. The existing data is regarded of sufficient quality to conduct the recommended ground follow-up fieldwork.

APEX Geoscience Ltd.

April 11, 1998

ASSESSMENT REPORT

FOR

METALLIC AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS PERMITS

# 9393110069 # 9393110070 # 9393110071

HELD BY

ELLS RIVER RESOURCES INC.

Submitted April 1, 1998

on behalf of

Ells River Resources Inc.

by

Mr. Henry Cieszynski, C.E.O. Mr. Maurice Keylor, President Mr. Raymond Caron, Director

2 -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I . s u MMA Ry . . . . . . . II • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3

I I. INTRODUCTION. . . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . 4

I I I. PERMIT TABULATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

IV. PROPERTIES

A. WESTERN BLOCK ..................................... . J_. Loc,3tj_on .••• ,, .. •........ ~" •.•. ~ ............. 11 ••• , ~

2. Physiography ................................... . :i . Access ... Cl •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• .II •••••

4. Work Cc.Jmpleted ................................. . 5. Conclusion .................. " .................. .

6 7 7 -, I

8 8

V. BIBLIOGRAPHY. . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . • • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . 10

VI. APPENDICES A. LOCATION MAP OF PERMITS ............................ 11

B. AUTHOR QUALIFICATIONS .............................. 13

C. STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES and DECLARATION OF EXPENDITURES ..... , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

D. ASSAYS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 11••••• 22 1. Ledoux & Company. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 2. Murox Industries Ltd ......................... 25 J. Saskatchewan Research Council ................ 30

E. WORLD GEOSCIENCE - QUESTOR SURVEYS LIMITED ......... 34

F. IMAGE INTERPRETATION TECHNOLOGIES ................. 35

G. APEX GEOSCIENCE ANALYSIS REPORT .................... 57

··~

3 -

l. SUMMARY

This report is being submitted by Ells River Resourres Inc. for assessment work performed on the three (3) Metallic and Industrial Minerals permits as described in Section III. These permits involve a property we have defined as the "Western Block'' located in the Fort McMurray/Fort MacKay region of northeastern Alberta.

Originally, the property was secured as a potential base metal and precious metals play. As a result, our initial exploration program was developed to prove up this potential and consisted of:

a) information gathering - researching published reports, examination of maps, et cetera,

b) area reconnaissance - mapping, examination of terrain, et cetera,

c) accessing permits area - cutting access routes onto permitted lands,

d) sample collection - outcrops, stream sediments, etc., e) sample analysis - panning, detailed microscopic work,

assaying, consultant input, f) documentation.

While in the field, rock samples and panned concentrates were collected. Rock samples from both areas have been assayed by certified Canadian laboratories for gold and other minerals. In addition, multi-element analysis was done on several of the samples. The panned concentrates were visually examined with the aid of a microscope to detect sulphides, gold, other heavy minerals and diamond indicator minerals. From this detaiJed examination selected concentrates were sent to assay laboratories for further analysis.

In 1997, our focus for the property changed as the result of work being done in the Buffalo Hills area by Ashton in terms of diamond exploration work.

Ells River Resources will continue to explore the Western Block in order to carry out further analytical work for base metals, precious metals and diamonds. However, certain portions, as detailed in Appendix C, will be surrendered back to the Crown.

4 -

II. INTRODUCTION

There have been reports of gold and other precious metals being found in Alberta for over one hundred (100) years. These finds tended to small in comparison to the more promising discoverjes in British Columbia and the Yukon. Consequently activity was centered in those areas drawing attention away from Alberta's potential. In addition, oil and gas finds, and the vast tar sands in northeastern Alberta overshadowed and exceeded any known metallic mineral potential.

In the 1990s Alberta's potential for producing gold and other precious metals was re-discovered. Individuals and companies began submitting applications to the Government of Alberta for permits to explore for metallic and industrial minerals throughout the province.

Mr. Henry Cieszynskj, a financial analyst and prospector from Toronto, Ontario, began to investigate certain regions of northeastern Alberta with the intent of securing metaJJic and mineral permits. Eventually he secured several permits 1.n thjs region thus allowing him to explore the Cretaceous and Devonian stratigraphy, on the properties, for economic mineral deposits. Cretaceous rocks present in the Western Block include the Clearwater, Grand Rapids, Shaftesbury, Dunvegan, and LaBiche Formations as well as the Smoky Group. The Middle Devonian rocks are found on the Northern Block (Green, 1970).

Shortly after receiving the permits, Mr. Cieszynski formed a partnership with Mr. Maurice Keylor, an Edmonton businessman. The mandate of the partnership was to explore the newly acquired properties and identify regions with anomalous metal concentrations for more detailed follow-up work. This work has included prospecting, examining heavy mineral concentrates, geochemical analysis on both rock and stream silt samples and basic research.

On December 9, 1994, Ells River Resources Inc. (formerly 635216 Alberta Ltd.) was incorporated pursuant to the Business Corporations Act (Alberta). The company named Mr. Cieszynski as Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Keylor as President. On July 7, 1995 the permits held by Mr. Cieszynski were transferred to Ells River Resources Inc. with Memorandums of Registration completed August 9, 1995.

This report is being submitted by Ells River Resources Inc. for assessment work related to three (3) mineral permits described jn Section III. For assessment purposes, the work completed is for the following periods:

A. Western Block : November 29, 1995 to November 29, 1997.

5 -

III. PERMIT TABULATION

The properties held by Ells River Resources Inc. are covered by three (3) Metallic and Industrial Minerals permits. The properties are located in an area which we have defined as the "Western Block" (Appendix A, Figure 1). A tabul~tion of the permits follows:

Location Permit # Date Is sup Legal Area (Ha)

Western 9393110069 Nov 29/93 Sec 1-36, 95-13-W4 9,216

Western 9393110070 Nov 29/93 Sec 1-36, 96-13-W4 9,216

Western 9393110071 Nov 29/93 Sec 1-36, 97-13-W4 9,216

6 -

IV. PROPERTIES

This section will describe the location, physiography, access, general work completed, and an overall conclusion for the Western Block.

A.WESTERN BLOCK

1. Location The Western Block is situated in northeastern Alberta centered near 57 degrees 20'N latitude and 112 degrees OO'W longitude. It is located eighty (80) kilometers northwest from the city of Fort McMurray, consisting of approximately twenty-seven thousand six hundred forty-eight (27,648) hectares within Townships 95, 96 and 97 in Range 13.

2. Physiography The permits are situated on the eastern flank of the Birch Mountains. The southern two thirds of the property is fairly flat and dominated by areas of muskeg. In the northern part of the permits, the Birch Mountains rise to the northwest, providing more relief where mixed deciduous and coniferous forest is prevalent. Elevation ranges from three hundred forty (340) metres in the southeast, along the Ells River, up to seven hundred sixty (760) metres in the northwest corner of the property.

Three (3) streams and several of their tributaries flow across the permits. The largest of these is the Ells River which cuts the south east corner of the permits and flows to the east. The other two (2) streams are the Joslyn Creek and Tar River which generally run southeast through the property. The streams are sourced in the Birch Mountains and drain into the Athabasca River which is located approximately eighteen (18) kilometers to the east of the permits. The Tar and Ells Rivers have distinct valleys where Cretaceous rocks outcrop.

3. Access The property can be accessed by either helicopter or all-terrain vehicles (eg. quads, snowmobiles, etc.). In the winter ot 1997, there was clear-cutting and logging activity on the extreme northern boundary of permit number 9393110071. This opened up a portion of this area for winter access by 4x4 vehicles.

A helicopter can be used to access several landing Lakes approximately twenty-five (25) minutes to fly McMurray.

sites. It from Fort

Access chiving

to the southeast corner of the property ls gained by fifty-two (52) kilometers from Fort McMnrray to Por-t

- 7 -

".__/ MacKay on paved highway No. 63. Off road vehicles are then used on cutlines, seismic lines, quad trails, trapper trails, et cetera that lead from Fort MacKay to the permits, approximately twenty-three (23) kilometers to the west.

\'-',,

4. Work Completed

The work performed during the assessment period included the following:

a. Research and Evaluation, b. Sample Analysis, c. High Resolution AeroMagnetic Survey - World Geoscience, d. HRAM Data Analysis - Image Interpretation Technologies, e. HRAM Data Analysis - APEX Geoscience Ltd.

a.) Research and Evaluation Considerable work was done in the following areas:

1. evaluating drilling proposals, 2. reviewing access, 3. evaluating process methods and procedures, 4. monitoring activities of other company's

working in the area.

b.) Sample Analysis No samples were collected during this past assessment period. The few samples that were submitted for analysis were obtained prior to November, 1995 and had been held in inventory.

1. Ledoux & Company A sample identified as # 28-02-96LB-PTB obtained from Point B (see February, 1996 Assessment Report), along the Ells River. This buff coloured sandstone from the Clearwater formation was obtained from the colluvium on a cut-bank on the river. A fire assay was done using lead collection.

2. Murox Industries Ltd. Six (6) samples were forwarded processed using a fire assay with identified as follows:

5MDP003 - Point B on Ells River 5MDP009 - on Ells River 5MDP013 - further west on Ells

to Murox Industries to be lead flux. The samples are

5MDP017 - from the Tar River 5DB0319 - on Ells River 5NF0002 - far west on Ells

Please refer to February, 1996 Assessment Report, Appendix G, Apex Geoscience Report for more details regarding these samples.

3. Saskatchewan Research Council Two samples, identified as Tar95-05/08 and Tar 95-09, were submitted to the SRC and analyzed for diamond indicator minerals. These samples were obtained from Site 2 (see February, 1996 Assessment Report) along the Tar River. Tar95-05/08 is a

B -

composite of two samples (05 & 08) which were taken from a sandstone outcrop which consisted mostly of fine to coarse grained sand. Tar95-09 consisted of panned sands and gravels with abundant quartz.

c.) HRAM Survey - World Geoscience A copy of the Exabyte tape containing the Located and Gridded data is included in Appendix E. The information not included but available upon request are laminated copies of the following:

1. - Total MagnetJ_c Intensity (TMI) with N & E illuminations 2. - TMI reduced to Pole (RTP) First Vertical Derivative J • - TMI RTP second Vertical Derivative 4. - TMI RTP Pseudo Depth Slice 1 with N & E illuminations 5 • - TMI RTP Pseudo Depth Slice 2 with N & E illuminations b. - TMI RTP Pseudo Depth Slice 3 with N & E illuminations

These are at a scale of l : 50,000

In addition, we have available upon request, mylar plots of:

1. - Flight Path 2. - TMI with Flight Path 3. - TMI RTP Second Vertical Derivative with Flight Path

These are at a scale of 1 : 50,000

d.) HRAM Interpretation - Image Interpretation Technologies A copy of the report provided by IIT is included in Appendix F. The poster prepared by IIT is available on CD-ROM and is also included as part of Appendix F.

e.) HRAM Interpretation - APEX Geoscience At the time of writing this report, APEX Geoscience had not completed their report on the analysis of the HRAM data. This report will be provided when completed to be inserted into Appendix G.

5. Conclusion

The 1997 exploration program developed and deployed by Ells River Resources Inc. identified at least six (6) magnetic anomalies potentially related to kimberlites. Many of the anomalies are closely grouped in a cluster, which is a common characteristic of kimberlite intrusions.

It is proposed that the 1998 exploration program will involve ground surveys of the most prospective anomalies.

From previous work, the stratigraphy areas under permit (9393110070 and

of the two (2) northerly 9393110071) indicate th<'

9 -

\ .. _,,., presence of the Whi tespecks Zone which can potentially host sulphide - base metal style mineralization. These areas require further detailed examination and analysis to exploit thP Whitespeck potential.

It is the intention of Ells River Resources Inc. to maintain portions of the three (3) permits held for the Western Block (9393110069, 9393110070, and 9393110071). The portions being surrendered back to the crown are as described in Appendix C, Note 4.

- 10 -

V. BIBLIOGRAPHY

Green, R., et a]. (1970): Bedrock Geology of Northern Alberta; Research Council of Alberta; east half, 1:500 000 scale map.

Rhine, J.L., and Smith, D.G. (1988): The late Pleistocene Athabasca braid delta of northeastern Alberta, Canada: a Paraglacial drainage system affected by aeolian sand supply.

in: Fan deltas: Sedimentary and tectonic settings, eds. W. Nemec and R.J. Steele, Blackie and Son. p 158-169.

·~·

- 11 -

APPENDIX A

LOCATION MAP OF PERMITS

~/·

J, .... ~ ... ~- .. , ... : ;;-:;·

-~I w .~,,. '' .-:

,._. - ·;:-._-.- ~ I·'

. .

~··

....... ,, '

~- .. , .... _,.,....

-i :. : ~--=-~ -_· _-_-_-_ ~ T_. ;- - ~ i;, __ _:._:_; . ._-_-,;_c_;, __ ~;.;,_·_-_-=;.,;·;_'_,_ ______ _

--- . i .",_ . 25 27.. .1 . - - , .

. -l,' - --;r .. ~9BIRC~~~U~TAIN• ·r-"!., Jt::... t.j -~- •

.I

0

""":,

26TH BASE Lii'

--·

O 20K~ j·--====--c:=:::::sl . scale:· 1:500-000 ..

........... ~. - ,"' ·.;; ·i

Fig. 1,- Location ,.-..... ~-..

map·_ ;o~ _:t::he permits

- 13 -

APPENDIX B

AUTHORS' QUALIFICATIONS

- 14 -

I, HENRY CIESZYNSKI, of the City of Toronto, in the Province of

Ontario; state the following to be true:

I have received a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Alberta, Edmonton, in 1965.

I have been engaged in mineral exploration for over thirty (30) years.

I hold a Prospector's License, Number A 51688, Province of Ontario.

1n the

I am the Chief Executive Officer of Ells River Resources Inc.

I am a co-author of this Assessment Report.

Dated this the 26 th day of March, 1998; in the City of Toronto,

in the Province of Ontario.

Witnesse ~oy' Henry Cieszynski

- 15 -

I, MAURICE KEYLOR, of the City of Edmonton, in the Province of

Alberta; state the following to be true:

I have received a Telecommunications Electrician diploma from the Northern Alberta Institute of Technology in 1969.

I have been interested in mineral exploration for over thirty (30) years.

I am the President of Ells River Resources Inc.

I am a co-author of this Assessment Report.

Dated this the 18th day of March, 1998; in the City of Edmonton,

in the Province of Alberta.

Maurice Keylor

\.___,.·

- 16 -

I, RAYMOND CARON, of the City of Edmonton, in the Province of

Alberta; state the following to be true:

I have received a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Alberta, Edmonton, in 1978.

I have held the position of Vice-President, Finance for Caron Services Ltd., for over fifteen (15) years.

I am a Director of Ells River Resources Inc.

I am a co-author of this Assessment Report.

Dated this the 20th day of February, 1998; 1n the City of

Edmonton, in the Province of Alberta.

- 17 -

The co-authors of this Assessment Report, Mr. Henry Mr. Maurice Keylor, and Mr. Raymond Caron would like following for their contributions:

Mr. Tony Cowan Mr. Neil Firt

Much of the material contained within this report from field notes, observations, and/or research these individuals.

Cieszynski, to thank the

was obtained conducted by

Their kind assistance has been of great benefit to Ells River Resources Inc., for which we are grateful.

- 18 -

APPENDIX C

STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES and

DECLARATION OF EXPENDITURES

- 19 -

STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES

A. PERMIT # 9393110071

Required to Maintain Permit: (9,216 hectares @ $10/hectare)

Carry Forward from November, 1995 Report:

Carry Forward from October, 1996 Report:

TOTAL CLAIM FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES

Balance

B. PERMITS # 9393110069 and 9393110070

Required to Maintain Permits (18,432 hectares @ $10/hectare)

Equipment (includes F/A & Rentals)

Exploration Costs (includes Assays, Maps, Supplies, License & Permits)

Travel and Accommodation (includes, Hotel, Fuel & Food)

Off ice (includes Professional Fees)

Salaries & Wages

Directors' Soft Costs (Note 1)

Review of Airborne Magnetic Data (Note 2)

Ground Geophysics Work ( Note 3)

TOTAL CLAIM FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES

Balance

11,082.95

64,573.96

1,434.85

14,712.91

11,353.36

37,196.00

6,100.00

20,000.00

$ 92,160.00

54,097.26

38,062.74

_92 I 16 () • 0 0

$ 0.00

$ 184,320.00

5 1,~ ) I! //:_; (;) ~

$ 32,578.88

As we are in a deficit position we are required to surrender Three Thousand Two Hundred Fifty-eight (3,258) hectares of land back to the crown. For details please see Note 4 on page 20a which follows.

- 20 -

"----'' NOTES

a.) Note 1

Directors' Soft Costs A considerable amount of time has been expended by the founders and other directors in this project. They have received a total of "zero" remuneration from the corporation. However to accurately reflect the time they have expended in assessment work the following charges have been levied as "soft costs":

a. H. Cieszynski: 91.000 days @

b. M. Keylor 84.000 days @

c. R. Caron 67.460 days @

TOTAL DIRECTORS' SOFT COSTS $ 37,196.00 ==========::::::...::

b.) Note 2

Review of Airborne Magnetic Data We have contracted the services of APEX Geosciences to review our airborne magnetic data for magnetic anomalies potentially related to kimberlites. At the time of finalizing this report, the review was not complete and will be provided at a later date as discussed and agreed to with the Department. The expenditure related to the work to be performed by APEX Geosrjence is included as a part of this assessment report.

c.) Note 3

Ground Geophysics Work We have retained the services of APEX Geoscience to initiate ground surveys over the most prospective anomalies identified from the analysis in Note 2 above. Due to several factors (weather, access, equipment shortages, failure in data logging equipment, etc.) this ground work was not completed at the time of submitting this assessment report. However, the monies were budgeted and committed for the assessment period and are included in this report. This is as per our discussion with the Department.

- 20a -

d.) Note 4

Lands to Be Surrendered Ells River Resources Inc. will surrender the following properties back to the Crown:

Permit # Legal Descri12tion - Section 9393110069 Twn 95 Ran 13 W4 13

" " 14 " 23

" " 24 " " 25 II t! 35

II 36 9393110070 Twn 96 Ran 13 W4 l

2 " " ll

" 12 " " 13 II " 14

These thirteen sections represent an area of Three Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-eight (3,328) hectares more or less, given that there are Two Hundred Fifty-six (256) hectares per section. As previously stated we are required to return to the crown Three Thousand Two Hundred Fifty-eight (3,258) hectares.

- 21 -

DECLARATION OF EXPENDITURES

I, RAYMOND CARON, of the City of Edmonton, in the Province of

Alberta; hereby certify and declare that the financial information

contained in the "STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES" found in Appendix D of

this Assessment Report pertaining to the Metalljr and Industrial

Minerals Permits (9393110069, 9393110070, and 9933110071) held by

Ells River Resources Inc., are true and correct to the best of my

knowledge. The receipts substantiating these expenses have duly

logged and are available for inspection upon request.

Dated this the 20th day of February, 1998 in the City of Edmonton,

/?

, ,· ··-n Caron ,/' · D:kfector

./Ells River Resources ,.?

/ \,_./"''

Inc.

- 22 -

APPENDIX D

ASSAYS

- 23 -

1. Ledoux & Company

\ "-.,.,/

Ledoux & Company Tel: 201837-7160

I~ n Fax: 201 837-1235

m. ""@ ~ 359 Alfred Avenue, Teaneck, New Jersey 07666-5755 A ri14 1996 [ INDEPENDENT CONTROL AND RESEARCH CHEMISTRY. INSTRUMENTAL AND CHEMICAL

p ' ANALYSIS • SAMPLING, WEIGHING, INTERNATIONAL SHIPPERS' REPRESENTATION

REPORT OF ANALYSIS

Ledoux & Company Analysis# 1137258

Material identified by Client as: CRUSHED LIGHT BUFF

Marked: Sample# 28-02-96LB-PTB Sample Location: Point B

SUBMITTED TO US FOR ANALYSIS BY: Ells River Resources Inc.

AFTER DRYING THE ANALYTICAL SAMPLE

Gold 0.020o7Jton ***

o7Jton: Ozs Per Short Ton

ADJUSTED I CORRECTED BASIS: GOLD RESULTS ARE EQUIVALENT TO RESULTS ADJUSTED FOR

SLAG & CUPEL ABSORPTION

INVOICE & 2 TO:

Ells River Resources Inc. 17424 - 106A Avenue Edmonton, Alberta Canada T5S 1E6 Attn: M.P. (Maurice) Keylor

LEDOUX & CO~IPANY

(NO WARRANTY IS EXTENDED IN RESPECT TO SERVICES PROVIDED BY LEDOUX & COMPANY - PLEASE SEE REVERSE SIDE)

--·----·---·--· ·--------

- 25 -

2. Murox Industries Ltd.

MUROX INDUSTRIES LTD. ·' '· ·' '" ... \Ill~~~.., .. ~ ...

P.O. 801 32.58, Station D Edmonton, Alberta, Canada TSL 4Jt (403) 454-3879 Fu (403) 939-2457

SA."1PLE NAME

SA:1PLE TYPE :

( ) CARBON

SAMPLE SIZE

or I . D. : ELL S.

) QUARTZ ORE

) PRECIPITATES

SENT I

ASSAYED

R~ll5R: DATE: ~c. ·'f/qS-@Br '. SAND ( ) DORE ( ) ASHES

C ) CONCENTRATES ®_l~_Cc_K ___ _

( ) LBS. ( ) KGS. ( ) OZ. C ) GRAMS

( ) LBS. ( ) GRAMS * 'cJ) .. l\.SSA Y TON E-IJ::l-4 *Assay Ton (29.166 GRAMS)'~ ~

METHODS USED ON BULK SA.".1PLE: V {'f ~~ _ ;)/ Od 0 ,{

FURNACE: ~ FIRE ASSAY HIGH TEMP SMELT Y'< REDUCTION S:·SLT

~ LEAD COLLECTOR ( ) SILVER COLLECTOR ( l COPPER COLLECTOR

C ) GOLD COLLECTOR .Vv ClJPELED C ) COLLECTOR ANODIZED

COLLECTOR ACID DIGESTED ( )

c. '30RATORY: ) WET CHEMICAL (ACID)

( ACID FUSION ( ) ALKALI FUSION

) SELECTIVE DROP ( ) BULK DROP

) GRAVITY CONCENTRATION

NOTES: /It-/_ ~/(.TlL~

(

( ) WET CHEMICAL .CBASIC)

SELECTIVE LEACH

( ) SPOT TEST ( ) DRY FUSION

MIXED BEAD ---> D OUNCES PER TON ------ >

( ) BEAD COULD NOT BEAD RE11J?SED BECAUSE IT WAS SMALLER TH.n.N 1 :1g. ( ) OTHER

~ Ag Pt Pd Rh Ir Ru Os

~ve ged ~~L ar~ed E2 on ~samp~bmi~by the customer. using accepted analytical procedures. No warranty is made as to the reproducibility. or extractability of any of the values

, ~~~t may be found to exist in the sample(s) submitted. and no -.... 1\_..1bi 1 ity is assumed whatsoever as to the accuracy or usefulness of any

of the- information contained within this report. This report is for control purposes only and is not a Certificate of Analysis or a Certificate of Assay. All samples are discarded after 5 days, unless prior arrangements have been made with the customer.

; .

c : .. ~ .... \.J

.1

CLIENT _ ELLS RIVER RESOURCES

FIRE ASSAYS ON THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES USING 1/2 ASSAY TON OF ORE SAMPLE (14.58 GRAMS). PRILLS WERE LEFT IN THE CUPELS AND NOT WEIGHED.

SAMPLE ~ APPROX. PRILL SIZE (THOUSANDS OF AN INCH)

· CUPEL #1 - NF0-2 . 010"

.-}·

CUP EL #2 - MDP-3 .005"

CUP EL #3 - MDP-17 .008"

CUP EL #4 - MDP-13 . 007''

CUP EL #5 - MDP-9 . 007''

CUP EL #6 - DB0-319 .006"

VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE ABOVE PRILLS INDICATES A GOLD, PLATINUM, PALLADIUM COMPOSITION. THESE PRILLS SHOULD BE SENT OUT FOR ATOMIC ABSORPTION OR ICP ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE THERE EXACT COMPOSITION.

. vJ E 5 Tt--nf-) OLC(.A\ _s,4kt'LE"S ouT -,o Gfl~TH' ~J1~A/'-'

~ __ y 5A,f'Aft....€ LC'- A 110 .J-J v.;Gl~J17 vJ€1 <:.Hr-~,,..._,,/\;-/\ 1

7

5 JV'\D 0 00 3 Po1,vr e 71 ih 3 lb !:,. f/F ooo -z_ Fo.r (,.IJl ~ I- I lb z.s ll:i

GU..'> .(IV~

'

S.M of'oc ~ El..1..S 'lit- lb <: 3 lb

5oeo31:) eu.s {. n z /b

5fl\Df013 e;li.,) '% 1 lb -z. { b

5 /V\D Po1·1 ·-rM ~ Ji } # s Ii

-------·-

.J

711 \

"

t<E. ~ : G~ Q:c~ i ~ <::,*S f:Si ! ' . . - . -· • ···--··- ..... ! .

: ! I i

lbl~·- W\~ b~i.CT~ 'Q.~100 ttJ:) ~))f:l-Y ON S~l4Pl~~, - ... - . ·-- . - ...- . .. . . . .. -~· . ·-- - . .. •·· . -~·-· .... . -- --- .. -·-· .... ·•· ----- ~

' ' i

~· , ! t ". . .. ·-

t.,N\:"o-,z_ .. : -.·.3 -oz__/1Cft.J-~o.+ PMC:s . ' .. !,,_, ...................... ____ .,,_._,. .. _., ____ ,,_~,, ... _ .... -····-- .. --...... -- ....... ..

l :i . i l

'·. :

-z~, ~ o~-4 . ··~ _::_~•,.lt~ .. <E;~IICN~_:_~j. ~t71G's -. ' ,.; ! ! '<ii :.··1 ; .·.·

.. :. . .. : ............ - .. : __ ,,, . ... : . ' . .

~,;MD~~\~ ! .. :.\.~k ...... ~~/J~ ___ Q(J~--l ,P_f'i65 . . \ I

'br .. L\. hOP- ll- : - \5 01,,/t(f}..) _{:;i.o/Jo~ QMG'~ - - ·- ·-·· , .... -···· ·-·· ... ---··· ...... -··· ., . .. -

i

Llc 3~uJc~ ~\'1-ffi ~ M~ UJJ)~-~~ ·.CuT ·1BE:.-. CuPP~t(e l'JYO .lE_~\ ~~ \\ (,cu,LO lJ-/J\.E ~f/)l(het:) 4Sofvtc ~ t1J~

--~ . . - - .. ---··· .. -~·------ - ···--- - ... ---· ---- .... ,_, .

~.~L~ ~ET/JlS-

'I'-../ ... '\,... ' !

' ··-·· ·-· ..... ·-· ··- ···--· -----· --- -

- 30 -

3. Saskatchewan Research Council

\ .. _/

' . •.• ,,_~~:,!'. ·.~.~,

"-._./

March 7, 1997

Al Holsten Saskatchewan Research Council Geochem Lab 15 Innovation Blvd. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 2X8

Dear Sir.

We have sent to you, two (2) samples on which we would like you to perform a Diamond Indicator Minerals Recovery for Sediment Samples. A Micro Prob~ Analysis of Indicator Mineral Grains may also be run pending the results of the initial analyses.

The first sample (TAR95-05/08) is from the Pelican Formation (Viking Equivalent) and weighs approximately 48 pounds. A small portion of the sample is lightly cemented but is too hard to break up by hand. Also note that it contains some shaley bits, if.that might affect the operation of the shaker table. ·

The second sample (T AR95-09) weighs approximately 15 pounds and consists of panned sands and gravels.

Could we get from you initially, an estimate of when the analysis will be completed. Upon completion, a fax of the results would.be appreciated.

\

Yours sincerely,

Anthony Cowen Ells River Resources Inc.

:;r.:c: GEDCHEMISTR'y'

• Saskatchewan Research Council Geoanalytical Services 125-15 Innovation Blvd., Saskatoon, SK., S7N 2X8

Phone:306-933-5426 Fax:306-933-5656 \ ... ___ ./

Ml36 COWEN ELLIS RIVER l. SAMPLE WEIGHT IN XG

APRIL 7 1997 (2) [INDICATOR MINERALS] OT97.39

2 +l.7mm WEIGHT IN KG 3 MAGSTREAM MID FRACTION IN GRAMS 4 MAGSTREAM HEAVY FRACTION IN GRAMS 5 VISIBLE PYROPIC GARNET GRAIN cot.TNT 6 VISIBLE Cr-DIOPSIDE GRAIN COUNT 7 a 9

TAR.95 05 08 TAR.95 05 09

sm

2l..3 6.3

+1. 7 MIDS HEAVY

l.75 0.31 0.37 0.54 12.87 47.09

'7~ \-._J

( \..J

PG

0 0

CD

0 0

PAGE 02

04/07/1397 08:12 SF'C GEDCHEMISTR"/ PAGE 03

INDICATOR MINERAL GRAIN DESCRIPTION

(__, GEOLOGIST/COMPANY: _______________ GROUP #: c.:J(Cj? ·' 39

DATE. _____ _

SAMPLE # PYROPE CR. EC LOG BLACK OTHER DEF. GEN. DIOP. (POSS) OPAQUE COUNT COUNT

1 *fA R q~ -or -us 0 0 0 0 ID D 0 COMMENTS: ID bt..c.l. ~ ,,-"-f..1 ( L~ ,.J "' Lo:.. 4rA..~) cJ3. 2 -nu .. 'j). o(-0~ 0 0 1 2 I:;_ 0 :z

COMMENTS: ;;. Po)., c ~t"()M.(. /) I c!S 11/t. 10 ~fo..ok 4!r,..,N', ( lo..J.c.J,,., 1Aese. G"'"•..is.) cg

3

COMMENTS:

4

COMMENTS:

... ~

~MMENTS:

6

COMMENTS:

7 #

COMMENTS:

8

COMMENTS:

9

COMMENTS:

10

COMMENTS: .. ,

11

COMMENTS: r

~'::,,.....- ··-

COMMENTS:

\ . "--".

- ]4 -

APPENDIX E

WORLD GEOSCIENCE AIRBORNE MAGNETIC DATA

071000

070000

83800U O

$350000

0340000

8338000

• 0 0

" .. • .. "

0 D 0

., ...

l

- t12 • 00·00 11

0 0 0 0 ... ...

" 0 0

"' ... ...

~ ... . ~

0

D D

'

nT/m

I

400 380 360 340 320 300 260 1---• 260 240 220 200 180 160 HO 120 100 60 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -60 -80 -100 -120 -140 -160 - 180

PROCESSING I REDUCTION TO POLE

AND WIENER FILTERED

!ST VERTICAL DERIVATIVE

GEDCO

-200 - 220 -240

I s7.3'N 112 . 00' : $2$ . 0m: 1997-06-15 j

I

I .

I

-260 Kacnelic Fi eld : U8S0 . 79 nT 79 . 02 20.40

-280 -300

Ma.cnellc lncltna l ion: Macnelic Deel in•\ lon:

-320 -340 -360 - 360

Seale 1:50000

l o- 0.5 -1 J . 5 2 Ki l om•t•r• A 8 A A A E"""'3 E3

l 0 0.$ I !Il l es RRHHHI

I SURVEY PARAMETERS

FLOWN BY: WORLD GEO SCIENCE

TRAVERSE LI NE SPACING: 400 METERS N/S CONTROL LINE SPACING : 1200 MF:TERS E/W

fLYING HEIGHT : 120 MBTERS DRAP.8 SPHERO Ill : CLARKE 1666

I PROJECTION PARAMETERS

PROJECTION: UTM ELLIPSOID: CLARKE 1866 UNITS: METERS CENTRAL MERIDIAN: - l I l DEGREES ll'EST LATITUDE ORIGIN: 0 . 0 DEGREES SCALE FACTOR: 0.9996 FALSE EASTING: 500000.0 METERS FALSE NORTHING: o.o METERS

APEX GEOSCIENCE LTD

ELLS RIVER PROSPECT

lST VERTICAL DERIVATIVE MAP

.

Date: APRIL J998 11

Map: 1

I

I

I

I

I

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~

837 1000

0370000

038 0000

SS50000

8340000

03 8 0000

' c c

c .. . .. ~

0 0 0 -., ..

- 1La • oo ·oo " c 0 0 c • •

0 0 0 .. .. ..

nT/m

I PROCESSING I

REDUCTION TO POLE

AND WIENER FILTERED

SEPARATION ABOVE 300m

lST VERTICAL DERIVATIVE

uo HO 130 HO I I 0 JOO 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 I 0 0 -10 -20 GEDCO - so -40

-50 -80 - 70 - 80 -90 I n . stN 112.0U: 52$.0m: 1097-00-15 1

-100 - 110 ••cnetic Pi~ld:

••gn e tic Jncllnatlon: 59880 . 79 uf

79.02 20.10 - I i o Waga etic Daclination:

- I 30 - 140 - 150

I

Scale 1:50000 I o 0 . 5 l 1 . 5 2 lilom•ter• H8HHHf==3 E3 I

l 0 0 . $ !Mil .. HHHHH I

SURVEY PARAMETERS

FI.OWN BY: WORLD GEOSCIENCE

TRAVERSE LINE SPACING : 400 METERS N/S

CONfROL LINE SPACING : 1200 METERS E/W

FLYING HEIGHT 120 METERS DRAPE

SPHEROID CLARKE 1888

PROJEC TION PARAMETERS

PROJEC TION: UTM

ELLIPSOID: CLARKE 1866

UNITS: METERS CENTRAL MERIDIAN: -111 DEGREES WEST LATITUDE ORIGIN: 0.0 DEGREES SCALE FACTOR: 0 . 9996

FALSE EASTING: 500000.0 METERS FALSE NORTHING: o.o METERS

APEX GEOSCIENCE LTD

ELLS RIVER PROSPECT

FIRST ORDER SHALLOW TARGET

Dale : APRIL 1998 11

Map: 2

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=========~~

6371000

070000

ueoooo

03 00000

8340000

8SStOOG

' .. 0

0 .. . ,._ "'

0 0 0 -., ...

- 112'00'00 " 0 0 0 0 .. ..

nT/m

I

500 475 450 425 400 375 350

1---- 325 I--- 300

275 250 225 200 175 150 125 JOO 75 50 25 0 -25 -50 - 75 - 100 -125 - 150 -175 - 200 -225 -250 -275 -300 -325 - 350 - 375 -400 -425 -450 -475 -500

PROCESS I NG I

REDUCTION TO POLE

AND WI ENER FILTERED

SEPARATION ABOVE 300m

2VD VERTICAL DERIVATIVE

GEDCO

I 57 . 3'N 112.0411: ~25 . 0m; 1997-08-15 I M•gueti.::i PJeld : M•cnetic l oclinal l on: M•1neli c De c lin•lion:

Sc& le 1 : 110000 I 0 0 , 6 1- t , -$ -t-fC-i 1--ome-t eT S

HHHHHE-3 E3 I I 0 0 . 5 J lllles HHHHHI

59800.79 nT 79.92 20.40

SURVEY PARAMETERS

FLOWN BY: WORLD GEOSCIENCE

TRAVERSE LINE SPACING: 400 METERS N/S

CONTROL LINE SPACING : 1200 METERS E/W

FLYING HEIGHT

SPHERO I D

120 METERS DRAPE

CLARKE 1866

I PROJECTION PARAMETERS

PROJECTION: UTM ELLIPSOID: CLARKE 1666 UNITS: METERS CENTRA L MERIDIAN : - I I I DEGREES WEST LATITUDE ORIGIN: 0.0 DEGREES SCALE FACTOR: l>. 9996 FALSE EASTING: 500000.0 METERS FALSE NORTHING: O.O METERS

APEX GEOSCIENCE LTD

ELLS RIVER PROSPECT

SECOND ORDER SHALLOW TARGET

I

Date: APRIL 1996 I .__I _Map:_3 _

__J

- 35 -

APPENDIX F

IMAGE INTERPRE'fATION TECHNOLOGIES REPORT

\ ' '-..._./

\'-...__.,/

ELLS RIVER RESOURCES WEST BLOCK

KIMBERL/TE DETECTION USING HRAM

February 1998

Submitted by: Image Interpretation Technologies

Calgary, Alberta

IMAGE INTERPRETATION TE C H N 0 L 0 G I E S LT 0.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction 1

2. Data Processing 1

3. Results and Discussion 1

3.1 Euler Filtering 1 3.2 Modelling 1

3.2.1 Line 10060 1 3.2.2 Line 10110 2 3.2.3 Line 10170 2 3.2.4 Line 10180 2 3.2.5 Line 10211 2 3.2.6 Line 10220 2 3.2.7 Line 10240 3 3.2.8 Line 10250 3 3.2.9 Line 10260 3

3.3 Geochemistry 3 3.4 Topography 4

~· 3.5 Structural Interpretation 4

4. Conclusions 4

5. Recommendations 4

Appendix I 8 Appendix II 10 Appendix Ill 11

\. _____ ./ 1. Introduction Using high resolution aeromagnetic (HRAM) data surveyed by World Geoscience, Ells River Resources commissioned Image Interpretation Technologies (IIT) to examine, model and report on the possibility of kimberlite and any other geophysical anomalies located in their property in northeastern Alberta. Whilst examining the data for potential kimberlite targets, the potential for other anomalies in the area was not to be overlooked. This report contains the results of that study.

2. Data Processing HRAM survey data was collected in June 1997. Detailed information regarding survey specifications and data acquisition can be found in Appendix I. Using proprietary World Geoscience software, the original gridded HRAM data was filtered into groups of frequencies contained in the data. This process is known as MagSlicing or pseudo depth slicing. The first MagSlice (MSI) was used for interpretation as it best revealed structural and high frequency anomalies.

Landsat TM provided structural information at both regional and local scales. The map titled 'Landsat TM RGB=357' is an RGB display with band 3 as the red band, band 5 as the green and band 7 as the blue. An equalization stretch was applied to bands 3 and 5 and a 99% clip with linear stretch was applied to band 7. The band combination is useful for geological features detection via topography, lithographic expression and correlation with vegetation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Euler Filtering Initially an euler filter was used to find vertical pipes. Euler algorithms work by passing a window of variable size across a grid. Different types of anomalies are detected by using a structural index which represents various types of structures. Since kimberlite pipes are similar to a cylinder, a corresponding structural index of 2 can be used. The results should show tight clusters of results over each anomaly. However, the results were not encouraging as they were scattered with little or no coherency. Consequently, the euler results were not utilized in this study.

3.2 Modelling The objective of the study was to examine the gridded data expressed in MS I and locate possible kimberlite anomalies. In total, eight anomalies were located and modelled. Included in these was a dyke­like structure in the southwest comer of the property. Although not likely a kimberlite pipe, it was chosen due to it structural setting and because it was completely anomalous with regard to this setting.

The remaining anomalies were located in the northeast and central part of the property and represent the most likely kimberlites. These anomalies were small ( < 500m diameter) and round with low amplitude. Most importantly these anomalies were isolated. Although kimberlite pipes are often located in clusters of odd numbered pipes their magnetic signatures are always isolated of each other.

The following sub-sections describe the modelled geometry of each anomaly. Anomaly numbers refer to the flight line number as indicated in the original data. Models can be found in Appendix II. On the models, susceptibilities shown are only relative and may not bear any resemblance to susceptibilities that were mapped in the field. Locations of selected anomalies can be found on the 1 :50 000 scale maps titled 'Stream Sample Geochem Results' and 'MagSlice 1 and Anomaly Profiles'.

3.2.1 Line 10060 This was the first line modelled as part of the proposed southwest dyke. It was made up of a single large negatively magnetized body, shown in blue. Further to the north (to the right on the model) the depth of the overlying material increased to 400 metres. There was no physical data available regarding the

properties of the rock and, therefore. we were unable to accurately ascertain any remanent character to the dyke. Normally such a feature would be modelled with a negative susceptibility but in this case the body showed a positive susceptibility. The problem lies in that the dyke is very thin and the signal itself cannot be sampled with enough accuracy. Thus the true nature of its lithological properties cannot be determined from this line.

3.2.2 Line 10110 Located at the eastern end of the dyke, this line again showed the possibility of remanence in the proposed dyke. The dyke thinned out considerably in comparison to what was modelled in Line 10060. Of note was a slight change in the depth of the overburden as distance increased away from the anomaly. This elevation change may indicate a late stage dyke that (1) was implaced at a different time (hence its remanent magnetism) and (2) is a much later development as indicated by a slower rate of weathering and different subsurface elevation. The surrounding sediments were comprised of very low susceptibility materials.

The anomalous feature, shown in blue, was modelled with a negative susceptibility to mimic a remanence that may exist in the body. This is not always accurate because it does not reflect any actual remanent property that may exist in the lithology. This body may in fact be a local magnetic low. However it was represented as a negative body because it exhibited the intense low similar to a remnant body further to the east. Lack of an intense low was probably due to the small size of the body which meant it was under­sampled by the aircraft's magnetometer. It is recommended that detailed ground follow up be done in this area to accurately ascertain the nature of this feature.

3.2.3 Line 10170 This anomaly was localized and small and located in the central part of the property. One of the most significant properties revealed through modelling was its near surface depth. Examination of the Landsat TM image revealed no cultural features present and, as such, we propose that this feature is a pipe-like anomaly. The width of the anomaly was slightly over 100 metres making it a good candidate for follow up work.

3.2.4 Line 10180 Located in the central part of the property, this anomaly consisted of three units (Figure 3.1). The first was the large body in the middle of the model coloured blue and the others were the pink coloured anomalies on either side of the blue. The blue anomaly was small, semi-localized and approximately 1500 metres wide. Of more interest were the two anomalies to the south (to the left on the model). Kimberlite intrusions often occur at times of remanence in the earth's magnetic field. Consequently, it is worthwhile to investigate negative anomalies as well as positive anomalies. These small anomalies were representative of a remnant anomaly and were represented by pink coloured bodies. The bodies were between 100 and 200 metres wide which is a more feasible size range than the 1500 metres of the main anomaly.

3.2.5 Line 10211 This anomaly represents the first of three Jines containing anomalies in what may be described as a cluster formation. The main anomaly, approximately 200 metres wide with Jobes (in red) approximately 110 metres wide, was very close to the surface at a depth of about 50 metres. It was on a magnetic 'plateau' bounded on the western side by a subtle fault and possibly another fault on the eastern side. It was difficult to be certain about the eastern fault as it was very close to the edge of the survey area.

Two minor anomalies were also modelled. The first was to the south (left) of the anomaly described above and the second was to the right and appeared to be a sharp, positive anomaly. Both are not considered to be significant.

3.2.6 Line 10220 East of Line 10211, this anomaly was also part of the 'plateau' and is the southern most anomaly of the cluster. Two anomalies were noted along this line and were marked on the map. The main anomaly was approximately 200 metres wide. While not more than 40 metres to the top of the body, it appeared to outcrop in some locations. The other anomaly to the north was identified but not considered a priority assessment.

2

~··

Figure 3.1

3.2.7 Line 10240 This was the third and final anomaly in this area. It was characterized by a large anomaly dipping to the south and was approximately 200 metres wide. Modelling revealed that this anomaly also outcrops.

3.2.8 Line 10250 The anomaly located in the northern section of this line was the best single anomaly with respect to kimberlite geology. Small and isolated with a low but significant amplitude, this anomaly was quite complex in its modelled geometry. Five sections were identified as components of the model with a central stem in an ideal inverted carrot shape. The shape of the anomaly and its location suggest ground follow up work would be advisable.

3.2.9 Line 10260 Similar to the anomaly modelled on Line I 0260, this anomaly was an isolated disturbance composed of a small amplitude signal. The main anomaly was made up of two slightly different bodies and is also worthy of follow up work.

3.3 Geochemistry Stream samples as well as rock and channel samples were provided and the locations of the samples were plotted on 'Stream Sample Geochem Results with MagSlice I'. Locations of all the samples and their identification tags can be found on the map title 'Geochem Locations and Rivers'.

The main thrust of placing the geochem results on the HRAM images was to find a correlation between geochem anomalies and magnetic anomalies. The dyke in the southwest comer of the survey area has a geochemical sample at its eastern end (Stream Sample No. 5DBC022). The sample indicates Zn, Cu and

3

Ni anomalies above detection limits. Further southeast there are a number of stream and channel samples that also have a Zn anomaly. This is assumed to be the background for the area as results are fairly similar.

Rock and channel sample No. 5MDOOO 1, located in the middle of a magnetic high in the southern part of the property, produced an arsenic anomaly of29 ppm and a gold anomaly of 4 ppb. Sample No. 5DBC027, directly beneath the anomaly modelled at Line 10211 produced readings of 47 ppm Zn, 7 ppm Pb and 10 ppm Cu. Platinum group elements failed to detect. Further southeast, Sample No. 5DBC028 produced anomalies in Cr and Mn only. Sample No. 5DBC026 was located over a HRAM high in the northern part of the survey area and produced the following significant results: Pb 20 ppm, Ni 20 ppm, Sr 104 ppm, Zn 24 ppm, Cu 24 ppm.

Overall, there were no spectacular geochemistry results that could be correlated with magnetic anomalies.

A detailed discussion of the geochemistry of the region can be found in 'Precious-Base Metal Exploration 1995: Ells River Area, Northeast Alberta' by APEX Geoscience.

3.4 Topography MagSlice 1 was overlaid with a digital elevation grid to find correlations between topography and magnetic anomalies. In this area the topography is sloping to the east off the Birch Mountains. There was no topographic impression in the area of the proposed dyke in the southwest part of the property. The most obvious observation was the broad magnetic low in the middle of the image which was bounded by a river to the northeast for some distance. It was interpreted as a fault. The southwestern edge of the magnetic low was not defined by either a magnetic or topographic boundary, but rather blended into the higher magnetic material to the southwest. Overall, there were not clear correlations between topography and magnetic anomalies in the northern section of the property.

3.5 Structural Interpretation Figure 3.2 illustrates a structural interpretation using HRAM pseudo depth slice 1 (PDSI) with northeast illumination. A subset of the TM scene over the HRAM survey area is shown in Figure 3.3 and includes interpretation overlay.

4. Conclusions Based on geophysical and structural investigation of MagSlice 1 there are several targets with 'good' potential as kimberlite pipes. These anomalies were located on profile Lines 10250, 10260 and possibly I 0170. The best way to define the kimberlite potential of any area has always been mineral sampling of streams and land. Following leads provided by diamond indicator minerals sourced from the kimberlite family of rock types has been the most successful method employed world wide for finding diamond pipes. Kimberlites have an extremely variable chemistry where magnetite occurs only as an accessory, making detection of them difficult. As such, it is usually coincident that kimberlite pipes can be found on images after they have been found by other means. For example, aeromagnetic detection of kimberlites in the Northwest Territories was in part due to a very quiet background against which the kimberlites were more visible though in most instances they could not be distinguished at all.

Structurally the area is well defined by faults that may provide better control for gold occurrences of massive sulphides. Although there are no geochemical anomalies co-located with magnetic anomalies this does not mean that the area is not prospective for base metals or gold. Give the structural settling and mineral prospects of the regions, the potential for success should not be discounted.

5. Recommendations Two recommendations can be made based up on the results of this study.

4

z • 0 0

IQ ;.... It')

z • 0 0 0 t'I

&:;

ii 2·os•oo~w

Cj Dyke

~ Strike-slip fault

z ,. 0 0

~ ,... It')

z ,. 0 0

0 t'I ;.... It')

z

~ Basement boundary

Q HRAM anomaly

Figure 3.2 HRAM PDS1 with northeast illumination and structural interpretation overlay.

( Circular feature corresponding to HRAM anomaly

( Circular feature along fault or dyke

_,,,,,. Linear feature

Figure 3.3 Landsat TM with structural interpretation.

\ ___ ) (1)

(2)

Infill of HRAM to 200 m line spacing. Several of the anomalies found in the northeastern section of the survey area were approximately 100 metres in width. It is believed that with 400 x 1200 metre line spacing several of these anomalies were 'undersampled' by the aircraft's magnetometer. Lack of an intense magnetic signature inhibits accurate modelling and interpretation of these anomalies. Geochemical sampling of all possible kimberlite anomalies. Several anomalies were identified as plausible kimberlite targets but lacked adequate sampling to confirm or refute these results.

7

Appendix I \. . .__,/ Data acquisition and processing parameters.

\.__./

ELLS RIVER RESOURCES INC. WEST BLOCK AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY

Surveyed and Compiled by WORLD GEOSCIENCE

SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS Job number: Q7705 Aircraft: Cessna C206G Stationair Survey date: June 1997 Flight lines: Spacing: 400 metres

Direction: 000 -180 degrees Tie lines: Spacing: 1200 metres

Direction: 090 - 270 degrees Survey elevation: 120 metres Cycle rate: 0.1 second Nominal sample interval: 7 metres

DAT A ACQUISITION Computer: Magnetometer: Instrument resolution: Navigation:

PI CODAS PDAS-1000 digital acquisition system Split beam cesium vapour 0.00 I nanotesla NovAtel GPSCard

Total survey distance: I, 118 kilometres

DAT A PROCESSING Coordinate information: Clarke 1866 Spheroid

North American 1927 Datum Universal Transverse Mercator Projection - zone 12

Final magnetic intensity corrections: IGRF model 1995 removed - base value 59875 nT Diurnal correction applied - base value 59695 nT System parallax removed

Data collected by each of the sources are checked for spikes and noise by complex procedures. A stringent series of quality checks were carried out daily on all aspects of the data and all quality controls products were made available to the client. Whenever these checks proved that the data was unacceptable, the affected lines or part lines were retlown. The process is summarized below:

• Apply any spike corrections to the raw magnetic variables. • Interpolate undefined magnetic values. • Apply tluxgate corrections and compensate the data with post-processed compensation files. • Diurnal values were appropriately filtered and subtracted from individual magnetic readings. • Regional effects of the earth's magnetic field were removed by subtracting the calculated IGRF value

from each reading. • Apply parallax corrections.

The magnetic data was leveled using tie-line cross-over values to compute miss-tie errors which were distributed by least-square procedures until errors were minimized. The IGRF corrections were computed for each value. Final gridding of the data used enhanced bi-cubic spline interpolation methods.

8

Quality control inspections of the imaged data were carried out to detect erroneous data between tie-line cross-over points. Some of these errors were removed using diurnal data. Then data then required further application of proprietary microlevelling techniques to remove residual errors. Note that this procedure is always corrected back to the line located data and not just applied to gridded data. These procedures ensure the magnetic data are free from blemishes when subjected to inspection.

9

Appendix II Profile models of Lines 10060, 10110, 10170, 10180, 10211, 10220, 10240, 10250 and 10260. Susceptibilities shown are relative numbers only and may not bear any resemblance to susceptibilities mapped in the field.

10

Appendix Ill

Selected References Besserer, D.J. and Dufresne, M.B. (1995) Ells River Resources Inc. Precious-Base Metal Exploration 1995: Ells River Area, Northeast Alberta.

Dufresne, M.B. et al (1995) The Diamond Potential of Alberta. Alberta Geological Survey.

11

IMAGE INTERPRETATION TECHNOLOGIES CD-ROM

Along with their final report Image Technologies included a CD­ROM. We have attempted to have this duplicated but at the time of submission of our Assessment Report the copies were not available. When they are available we will provide them as part of Appendix F.

59914.5

~ ~9913.5 ., ., c:

l 59912.5

60011.5

0

1000 -c-$ ., E ~

R a

2000

3000

Line 10060 Ells River Resources

... .,, ....

-73.66

V.E.; 0.« S<;ale=12112.68

\ \

\ \

~·- ls-o-

H J ...

• 926.34

Wed Jan 14 14:42:14 19118

------

I

\ l I I \ I I

S=OW>\24

\ I I I --..,...,.,

·--r 1926.34 2926.34

g:;iij,ctttfj§ r 3926.34

Distance (meter)

J

59914.67

u;­~913.67 E ,9

ii912.67 c:

f 59911.67

Line 101 10 Ells River Resources

59910.67

;::=Observed, - =Calculated, - =Error

-500 ~-----------------------

500 I ·-·1

<='

ll .s 1500 .c 0. '3

I

I l I

~L ~00000· I

I I I I

2500

I I

I I I I I I I I

I •

I I

I I I

I .,... :lOOOSO

I I I

·~j~" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I

Wed Jan 14 14:42;32 1998

I I I

I I I

I I

I I I

I I I

I I I

I I I

I I

I I I

5=0.DOOli& I I .... ..,.. I I I

I I I

I I I I I

s=o.000101 S=0.00!»13 I I I

I I I I

4

3500 -1-------~----,--------.----·.----~---~-----------~---~-------~------~~ 1900 2900 -100

V.E.=0.33 Scale=10428.57

900 Distance (meter)

Line 101 70 Ells River Resources

59912 -.------------------------------~------------------------- Wecl Jan 14 14:41:50 1998

5991 1.7 - i'

~ I ~9911.4 +----~----~===~~---------~-~~---=~=~-~----~~-- -~=--=""""~------~~::::,...-~=-/--·----t

! .// 59911.1

o=Observed, - =Calculated, =Error 59910.8 -'------'-------'----

-1000 -r---------------------------------------------------------~ - - --------------

'<'.:' ., -., §. .<: a "' 0

0

5'10.000Cl3!!

1000

2000

5=0.000038

3000

J----------..------------1--

' I I I

I S •0.00004'4

I

' ' ' ' I I

' I '

4000 -1----------~----~---~----~---~-----------

-100

V.E.=0.14 Scale=5492.96

500 Distance (meter)

I I ...,0000, I I S=O"""""'

I I I

I I I I

~0.0Xl032

I I I I I I I ~0.000000 ""'"""""'

I I I I I I I I I

1100 1700

_J

Line 10180 Ells River Resources

59912 2

~=Observed, - =calculated, =Error 59911 -'------'------'-----------------------------~ -1000 --- -

oJ_.__. .......... ~~--..---------~~._. .. ,.. ...

1000 C' Q)

a; E ~

.t: Q. ., Cl

2000 S.0.""'22

3000

Wed Jan 1415:12:591998

2000

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I _J

Line 10220 Ells River Resources

59914.56 _,..-------------------- ----- -

~913.86

.s fl i <= Cl) .. ~913.16

,o_=_O_bse.:..:__N~ed~,_-_=_ca~l~~lm~ed~,'--=-E_no~r-------------~ 59912.46 -

-900

••lm"•Q WMllQX!:i:o.uwo1-.io!Cllo 1 • -0 fNPINJ,'

r 100 I I I I I

I I I ' I I

I I \.lo""""" I 'c:' I I CD I ., I I §. I s.o.qo...i.,,

.<= 1100 I I a I I "' I

.... .,.,,.., I I 0 I I

I f I

&OOXI071

I I I I I I

_j I

I I I I - 5'00000! I I

2100 I I I I I

I I

I

I I 'S:OOOoci9e I I

I I I I

I • 3100

-10-0 900

V.E.=0.28 Scale=9014.08

W'1'.W.WRJ.W»»l!.W.~A\VP#.;R.

' +-I I I I --I I I I I

f

I I I '

I I I

I I I I I I

-s=QCIOJIJ4il I I I

I 1900

Distance (meter)

•

l

Wed Jao 14 20:57:00 1998

I I I

S°"O<pXm

I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I

2900

Line 10240 Ells River Resources Wed Jan 14 21:20:171998

59915.12

59914.12

g ii913.12 J-~----:,.-~-~~~~~~-~~-~~==-~==~-,....,~~--:;_,,c.:..._~~~~==--_..=====-....... ==,,-~~..:::.:..;:,.._-====---"'=====........,====-~====~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ c:

"" "' ::::.

59912.12

-250

350

950 -

1550 -100

9()

-.~ I

I

I I I

I

I

I (

/ i

V.E.=4.64 Scale=6760.56

I f I

I

!

&0.000102

' ' ' '

' ' ' ' '

S=00001!:5

700

I I

I I I I

I I I I I I I

I I

I I I

I I

I I

I I

I

I I

I

S.OOJO>n I

I I I I I I I

I I I I

I s=o.0001ss I

I I I I I I I

I I I

S=l>OC014

I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I

T I I I I I I

I I I

...,,

-=-~--l- ~~~~~~~~ ....... ~~~~~~~~--~~--!

1500 2 300

Distance (meter)

_J

59912.67

~12.37 s

~ c a "' ~2.07

59911 .77

0

-c- 1000 c

~ ~

.c 11. ~

2000

Line 10250 Ells River Resources

]---

'

=Observed, - =Calculated, =Error

•

' I I I

3000 -1--·100

V.E.=0.17 Scale=4788.73

400

I I r

I

--

S-0 "'''"" I {

I

I I

Distance {meter')

I I I

I I

I I I I --

900

I I I I I I

S>OOOOM I

~"'"'""

I

I

Wed Jan 14 21:29:34 1998

/ ~---1 _,,.

i----~----1

1400

_J

Line 10260 Ells River Resources

59912.46

~ 8'1912.26 -1----~-----"""~-~~---=---::!lo-,---~-~~--~=--=~=---J!.­Q) c ~ :;:

59912.06

o=Observed, - =Calculated, - =Error 59911.86 _,_ _ _ ...:...:._.::___:..:..:.____:_:.:.c:.:. _ __________ _

-250

I I I S=O

I _j, I I

I S=OC00033 I

350 ' I I I

I C> !'3 S=O 0000'.!0 "' I I .§. .t:. I a. ~

I I

J 950 I j I

r I

S=O I I

I J I I I '

I I SoQOJ0034

I I I I

I I

L 155-0

-100

V.E.=0.35 Scale=5070.42

I I

S-0.000028 I I

5=0.0000~

I s.o.0<>0"1•

I I

5=0.0:.J003S

I :;=(). O'.ICl002

500

Distance (meter)

Thu Jan 1510:12:361998

I r--I I I

I I I I I I I I i'"'c·""""f I

I I I

I I I '500000034 I S00.00003 I I

i 5"00000,J I S•Q

I I I I

I I I I I I I I

I

I I

I I I I I I

.S:O OOC01t

I I I I

-.., 1100 1700

c c ELLS RIVER RESOURCES (Magnetic Anomalies of Interest)

--~-----------!

Pro"ect 98225

~-~o-m-aly 1~_i_n_e_# __ _,__F-id_u_c_ia_1__,_P_r_io_r_it-y--+-D-e_s_c_r_ip_t_i_o=n==================================================U==T=M======U=T=M===== ... Easting Northing __ ._J 10030 i 5425 Broad, 5 nT peak that could be part of broad basement feature

1 2 3

4 5

14a

\ 2 nT peak on topof large basement anomaly; note 2 shoulders on edge, roughly 520 m in diameter and { ':

·. • y~ikely_ n~ar surLac_e_ --------~---~---­.Fault ag_ain, 5-6 nT r~v_erselx_ m~n~tize_dpE!~-

·. magnetized peak ·.··: ExceOent 1.5-2.0 nT sharp Wel1-definedpeak,·8bout 340 m diameter and at surface; note-slight surface ;::::=·-·· . expression

weak shoulder possibly of interest 0.5 nT and likely near surface

•:•weak shoulder, near surface 1 nT anomaly, 150-200 m wide

} Interesting 0.5-1.0 nT anomaly that is 280 m wide and near surface

j}} Interesting 1.0-1.5 nT peak, 270m wide and at surface; both this and prior anomalies are on edge of }( basement anomaly

>J Continuation of 10080-8283, roughly 1.0 nT anomaly at surface, prominent shoulder peak

14b ··-· ~~Q __ ~ ____ J 1 oogoi 8354] [I;-;Ji~;;n~~~ly ______ _

15 ·· · · · ·_._ -'!&:JOO ·• ••·-. / 8$58 loWi~·ffii;d •.•• Poor map anomaly-0-.5---1 _-0_n_T_s_h-ou-ld_e_r_, s-h-a-llo_w_a_n_d_n_o_t -ve_ry_w_id-e-----------~.·yr ~~~I ! ~~WW~ --- --- i . . . . . · 1 . . . . . . . ] .... ·.· .. .. . . .. Anomaly that we were on edge of at 10100-109 7-8 nT, roughly 800 m wide with half width depth 130 m

-------- +---- 1 ()9?~]~~?_8~ ~~:: ~~~;:i~e or related to anomaly on next line 5 nT,750 m wide, 110-120 m depth but could be

_:___ 10100L ~ edgeofanomaly

~~~)~--~~===~~~~~o_:_~-~~~-1e_~-~-~-:-~_a_~-----------------~----~----10110; 572[ L__ ______________________________________ ~ 435940 6367419

::. Basement peak with anomaly on either side or top; weak shallow anomaly-note topo change i!ijJJJil~~il

iili~r~~:~::~: .::::;::~:;:·:,:::'::::::::,;~:~.:,;;:~'° ro 50

m bet~'""'" ri!ililll::!iil 16a

16b

( '

19 20

1ot:fo .· 10130

i4$2 1542

( veryi-fow High risk !reline anomaly _ ____ _ _____ _

very law Indicates that this anomaly part of trend of 10140-2469 and 10150-2535; all likely basement

10130 · 1720 I [Interesting map anomaly, looks like baseme~t- ... .. ___ ·-·-- __ _

(

······· ·· .......... 43i!i3ss····'"': · ······•:i;ij~ti::t ••.•••.••.•.••. _ .•• _ .•. _ ••. _(_._._,._••_-,._·_.·_._·_..,._•_·_··_·•_••_•_.s·_ •• _._M __ .-_ •••. <.: ..................... · ........ . ...,.,, ~ ~@~fQ

21 10130 1800 med to low 1 nT well defined shoulder, 380 m wide, roughly 60-70 m depth ):). 4$i'J$®.: < •d~a$2i$e 22 ··<1ofoa> · • • ) ~~ M~fu1aW-!:~::ra:~~::~:~;~~~~;1Yp~~s;l~e~~;e~~::~:~e~t :~~~t~~~i~~1~n1::d:nd prior anomaly at •• i ii~i' ;:.;:;:::•1~~~~ 23 Ji ~ili~ti m~M .kM ? Interesting 1-2 nT shoulder, poorly defined; also close to river •. : tiiioo•·i •lml~•~ti

-----24 • .......... (_1._·. l._•.• .. •••.A_•_ .••• n_ •.•• _ ••.•.•.•. •i•.·•-•i ••i•i•i•i•i•• .. ••-··-··-···-···-·2···•·.L_•.•••.•.t.••••.• .. i.•.•-• .•.•.•. _._.•.i,",• .. ·.•.~--·-·-·~_• .. •_.••.•.•.·._ .• I•.•_ ... •.•.•.-... •.•.•.•._• .. _.•.•.• .• •.•.• .• ••.•.• .• ••-· rsealamt1_evealys sahnaormp·,a01yf 11_not1e5re0s-t2535, 3-5 nT peak and about 30 m below surface, roughly 600 m wide, •• .},: • :•: i? ·: • J . F :• : ..., , ,,.., """' .,..., ,,,., ' MM'146 •6368.iWo - - --~-~ .··.· > 1 ~j~b< I~~( <Mt )-.~-nn-dT_c_~n-u~-:-:-~-b--:-:-~~-1-~~-~--. -of-i-nt-e-re_s_t.-r-ou_g_h_ly-6_0_m_b_e-lo_w_s_u_rf_a_c_e_, _ro_u_g_h-ly_1_k_m_d-ia-m-et-e-r--di-ff-ic_u_lt-to_p_i-ck- i lli~I!! lll~~~

26 • 1~i~g ) > ·~~~ t~\g~ ~;r:;t~o::1;~ ~~:~db:~~ulder about 130 m below surface, 750 m wide but broad - difficult::~ i~~il• • :~i~~

1 10160 3038 Broad and deep

____ ~ ~ -=-r~=- 101 ~~---3_1 __ 6_2+---- ---t-=B_ro_a_,d_b..,.u_m~p...,i_n_tr_o_u~gh---., t_re_l..,.in_e_a_,_n_,_om-,,-al"=y?c--:=----:----,--:--0----,--..,.----,----,------,------,,-,...,--,,,-,-,.---+------+-------i

I Broad shoulder poorly developed 10-15 n T roughly 180 m below surface bur very broad 300-500 m

1 0170 3723 diameter

-----~ < ~~; < @§~ / •; .. ~~ ~:~h~~~y ~f ~n~~~e;~ m diameter and very shallow; of interest : J:::~I~ } ·iij®~fz -- -- -- --] _ 1~1~1--~ ~- ~~6() 1 · ...... ·. ··.·-· Edge of Ells River 3-4 nT anomaly, likely to topograghic effect [

10200 ! ... 5014; ~~~:sti~~~'2! __ ~or:!:laly, but correlates with edge of bank on Ells River; high risk --------',:•••• •••• ••••• •:•••••• :•·•:•:•:•:..-······•·••:=::::: :•:\{:} /

28 10200 . . $~3~ > tdw _s_a_~e _as _a~_omaly 10211_-~~~· sam_e_lo_o_k 1 OnT peak, shallow, very similar characters as prior anomaly •!•i!!::•_:••. Jill~: _• .. •_,.-.· . .-_ •. ·_.·,.•_,:._._:_ ... _,.·_ .•• _ .. •_,:•_,.•_,'~-·-.:_._: .. · ... •56_'~_:_.:_.:_._::_:E_::_·_ .•.•.•.• _.•.9_~_:_;,_:_· 29 102lf 6QB fM(j fo t\rgt( ~i~ ~:'I define_d_3n:r: p=~~·_r_o~!!hly 500 m roughly 100 m below surface J :~$$.1$• ~-.. ,.,. 30 <I02H . •·. 747 . med • / 2nT shoulder plus 2 other weak peaks at 752 ,751 of interest, shallow anomalies - ·-- --------; ( 2.,9$ \: :•63~1Qi

31 § ~i~~ i~I • ;! I : jj ~~rf~~~l~~:~;:l~fo~r:~p~~~ ~;;~le shows 15 nTanomaly, about 470 m wide, 60-100m below j!JlJ!:i :::::;:~i~~:·[[j ,:\:I~;~

~--j · ·.· 10220 5520 Denection, Ells River, looks like drainage (bank) effect

--- I 10230 Nothing of interest

--3

} \ )/ li: i tf f@{!Jll] :1:~1 ! ~~~:;,:-~~-;--1-~-~-=s-r e-7 ~-8e-~-~-.-ro_u_g_h-ly_8_0_0_m_w_i_d_e_, b-a-s-em-e-nt-. -1-10---1-35_m_b_e-lo_w_s_u_rf_a-ce_m_a_y-in-d-ic_a_te _ _,]J'~'I' ll'il(Jl!Mli ... < :· ·:: \\/:><< :: ::::::::: . .:::::::.::::::::::::::: :::::·. :::: :: /·.·: "<;:;:;:::.:: il~;:~t~i~~~ /i~\::: :f~:f}:::::::::;:. ;.;.:.;-:;:::::::: :::~:)::

Hid5d ( \ ~1~~ /~~fa~ •••• Poor defined shoulder 3-4 nT might be of interest, very very broad peak; poor ' • ' Mi#14 · • 1 :•~$.ji ··r------------·-·----·----------------------·---------------------___ ._l_ __ 10250 7139 Basement, strong Mag very broad,15-20nT could be 50 nT

33

j 10260 7515 Treeline anomaly

1 10270 7968 Very poor deflection, 2-3nT, better on large scale, 720 m diameter, too broad, basement? -- ----+-- 10270 7988 Basement, 30-40 nT, broad basement _______ _,__ ______ -----___ ---· +·- ----- ------ ---·---------------·--------------------+------+-----·-f

· 10270 8103 10-15 nT, broad shoulder, basement ' ----- ------------- - _____ , __ ..____ ___________________________________________ t-------t---------f

102701 8130 Broad besement feature 1.2 km -l-------------------t-------·---~-------~1-------------------------------------------------+------+-----f

10280 l 8469 Poor 0.5~-:!:"_~~-o_m_a_l~y,_e_d_g_e_o_f v_a_ll_y_b_an_k ______________________ -+-------'

}q~~p. > • ~® > hled <Well defined 0.5nT anomaly in Magnetic low- close to fault ::1 ? ·.· :rw '~: iii ::~~:~;:~=~:~,~~~~~~i~~;=~ ~~=:.~~::;;: ::ghly '"" '° m below

34 35 • t< 44®00 (: . ~l!~i

....... ·, ... ~~/f:) ~:f~{: ........... ·.<·.;.·.·. :-:::::;::::::::.:::

• ,::·;:· ~7~n .: Ill~

(

-E ->.

.i:. c. IC "-Cl 0 c. 0 I-

-I-c: -Cl IC E c: ~

N

700.0000

600 0000

500 0000

400.0000

5 000000

4.000000 --

3.000000 -

2 000000 -

1 000000 -·

0.

900.00 5626.

I I I

I 900.00 5626.

950.00 5631.

I

1 000.0 1 050.0 5636. 5641.

FINMAG-1 0030

1000.0 5636.

1

500m

1050.0 5641.

(

1100.0 5646.

1100.0 5646.

1150.0 5651.

1150.0 5651.

1200.0 5656.

1200.0 5656.

1250.0 5661.

1250.0 5661.

1300.0 5666.

1300.0 5666.

c

s 700.0000

600.0000

500.0000

400.0000

1350.0 5671.

5.000000

4.000000

3.000000

2.000000

1.000000

135(P.o 5671.

( '·

( (

N s 700.0000 700.0000

-E 600 0000 - 600.0000 -

>. ~ Q. !ti I.. Cl 0 Q. 500.0000 500.0000 0 I-

400.0000 400.0000

3700.0 3750.0 3800.0 3850.0 3900.0 3950.0 4000.0 4050.0 4100.0 4150.0 5906. 5911. 5916. 5921. 5926. 5931. 5936. 5941. 5946. 5951.

10.00000 FINMAG- 1 0030 10.00000

I

I I ·'

8.000000 I

- 8.000000 ,. (

I I I I-

{

c: 6.000000 . 6.000000 -Cl

I !ti E c: 4 000000 4.000000

LL. I z 000000 I 500m 2.000000

I 0.

3700.0 3800.0 3850.0 3900.0 3950.0 4050.0 4100.0 4150.0 0.

5906. 5916. 5921. 5926. 5931. 5941 5946. 5951.

( ( (

s N 700.0000 700.0000

600.0000 600.0000

E ->. .t:. Q. «I 500.0000 500.0000 .... C)

0 500m Q. 0 f-

400 0000 400.0000

550.00 600.00 650.00 700.00 750.00 aoo.oo a5o.oo 900.00 950.00 1 000.0 6063. 6066. 6073. 6076. 6063. 6066. 6093. 6096. 6103. 6106.

5.000000 5.000000

4 000000

\ ~/

·- 4.000000

f- 3.000000 -- 3.000000 c: -C) «I E c: 2.000000 . 2.000000

Li..

1.000000 . 1.000000

I 0 550.00 600.00 650.00 700.00 750.00 800.00 650.00 900.00

6063. 6066. 6073. 6076. 6063. 6066. 6093. 6098.

c

!. >. ~ Q. 11' ... C') 0 Q. 0

""'"

-""'" s C') 11' E c u.

N

700.0000

500.0000

500.0000

400.0000

3.000000

2.000000 -

1.000000

0.

100.00 6506.

I

I. 100.00 6506.

150.00 6511

I

I

l 150.00 6511.

l

200.00 6516.

250.00 6521

FINMAG- 10050

200.00 6516.

I

I

f I'

I l 250.00 6521.

(

500m

300.00 6526.

I

4

J I 300.00 6526.

350.00 6531.

I

I I 350.00 6531.

400.00 6536.

I 400.00 6536.

450.00 6541.

450.00 6541.

500.00 6546.

500.00 6546.

(

s 700.0000

600.0000

500.0000

400.0000

550.00 6551.

3.000000

2.000000

1 .000000

550.06' 6551.

( ( (

N s 700.DOOO 700.0000

E 600.0000 600.0000 -

>. ~ c.

"' ~ Cl 0

500 ODDO . 500.0000 c..

250m 0 f-

40D.OOOO 400.0000

1 ?OD.O 1800.0 1 900.0 2000.0 21 DO 0 6666. 6676. 6686. 6696. 67D6.

5.0DDODO 5.000000

4.0DDOOO - 4.000000

f- 3000000 .

\ 3.000000

c:

\ -Cl

"' 5 E 2.000000

\ 2.000000 c: lJ..

\ 1 .OOODOO 1 .000000

0. 1 700.0 1800.0 1900.0 2000.0 2100 0 (l

6666. 6676. 6686. 6696. 6706.

(

700.0000

E 600.0000 ->. ~ 0. Ill '-Cl 500 0000 0 0. 0 I-

400.0000

- 3.000000 I-C: -Cl

Ill 2.000000 E c:

LL

s

4250.0 7395.

1 000000 - I\

4300.0 7400.

I

4350.0 7405.

4400.0 7410.

(

500m

4450.0 7415.

6

4500.0 7420.

4550.0 7425.

46000 7430.

4650.0 7435.

N

4700.0 0.

(

700.0000

600.0000

500.0000

400.0000

4.000000

3.000000

2.000000

1.000000

0.'---""42-5~0-.0~..._4_3_0~0~.0~~4-3~5~0-.o""-~4-4~0~0.-0~~4~4~5~0.~0~~~-=-=-~~4=5~50~.~o~---,4~6~00~.0,,........~-4-65~0-.0~~~4=70~0~.o,,..... 0 · 7395. 7400. 7405. 741 0. 7415. 7425. 7430. 7435. 0.

(

E ->. .t:.

700.0000

601] 0000

~ 500.0000 I.. Cl 0 a. 0 I-

400.0000

N

50.000 7458.

100.00 7463.

150.00 7468.

200.00 7473.

(

500m

250.00 7478.

300.00 7483.

350.00 7488.

400.00 7493.

450.00 7498.

(

s

700.0000

600.0000

---~500.0000

400.0000

500.00 7503.

3. 000000 .--...------.'---..,......_...------'-FJ!.INr-M=A~G.._--rl_,,_0""'07'-"'0'------.----...---...---.---.--r-,--,-r-...---r---r---...-----"T--.~-----,-, 3.000000 I

I- 2 .000000 -c -Cl

"' E c

Li. 1 .000000

\

\ \__) ~ I

1-~ 2.000000

- 1.000000

I I 0'---'---5-0~.o-o_o _ __,_1~00~.o~o---,5~0~.o~o--'---2~0~0.-oo-=---~25=0~.o~o--3~0~0~.o~o__.._~3~50~.o~o,_.__..___.~40~0~.o~o_.___.._=-~---=5~00,._..08

7458. 7463. 7468. 74 73. 74 78. 7483. 7488. 7493. 7503.

( ( (

N s

700 0000 700.0000

E 600 0000 - 600.0000 -» ~ 0.. nl I.. Cl 500.0000 500.0000 0 250m 0.. 0 I-

400.0000 400.0000

1150.0 1200.0 1250.0 1300.0 1350.0 7566. 7573. 7576. 7563. 7566.

3 000000

\ 3.000000

2.000000 \ 10 - 2.000000 I-

c: I - I \

Cl

\ \ nl I

E \ c: IJ.

1.000000 .. 1.000000

9 \ 0

I 0. 1150.0 1200.0 1300.0 1350.0

7566 7573. 7583. 7566.

( ( (

N s

700.0000 700.0000

-E 600.0000 600.0000 ->. .t: Q. Cll ... Cl 500.0000 500.0000 0 Q. 0

fo-

400.0000 400.0000

1300.0 1350.0 1400.0 1450.0 1500.0 7563. 7566. 7593. 7596. 7603.

1 0 00000 FINMAG-1 0070 10 00000

8.000000 6.000000

- \ fo- 6.000000 6 000000 c \ - \ \

Cl \ Cll E 4.000000 4.000000 c

LL.

250m 2.000000 2.000000

\ 01300.0 1350.0 1400.0 1450.0 1500.0 0.

7563. 7566. 7593. 7596. 7603.

( (

s N

700.0000 700.0000

600.0000 600.0000 -E ->. ~ c. cu 500.0000 500.0000 ~

Cl 0 c. 0 I-

400.0000 400.0000

3450.0 3500.0 3550.0 3600.0 3650.0 6271' 8276. 6261. 6266. 8291.

3.000000 FIN 3.000000

/ - 2.000000 2.000000 I- 12 c: -Cl cu

I E c:

LL. 1 .000000 1 .000000 250m

I •' I

I

I 0 3450.0 3500.0 3550.0 3600.0 3650.0 0

8271' 8276. 6261' 6266. 6291

-E ->. .c c. I'll I.. Cl c c. c I-

-I-c: -Cl as E c:

u..

700.0000

600.0000

500.0000

400.0000

2.000000

1 .000000 .

s

4300.0 8356.

4350.0 8361.

4400.0 8366.

4450.0 8371.

(

500m

4500.0 8376.

4550.0 8381.

4600.0 8386.

4650.0 8871.

4700.0 1486.

N

4750.0 1492.

700.0000

600.0000

500.0000

400.0000

2.000000

1 000000

0 ·...._4~3~0~0.~o ...................... 4~3~50~.-o..._~4~4~00-.-o..__ __ 4~45~0-.0-----4-50~0-.o-----4-55~0-.o----~4-50~0-.o...._.._._45-5~0-o-----47-o~o-.o----4-7-5~0-o__. 0 · 8356. 8361. 8366. 8371. 8376. 8361. 8386. 6871. 1486. 1492.

(

( ( (

s N

700.0000 700.0000

600.0000 600.0000 -E ->. ..c: c. 500.0000 500 0000 «I 500m I.. Cl c c. c I-

400.0000 400.0000

3950.0 4000.0 4050.0 4100.0 4150.0 4200.0 4250.0 4300.0 4350.0 4400.0 6321. 6326. 6331. 6336. 6341. 6346. 6351. 8356. 8361. 8366.

5.000000 5 000000

r I

4.000000 4 000000

- 3.000000 3.000000 I-c: 14b -Cl I «I I E 2.000000 - 2.000000 c:

lJ.

1 .000000 - 1 000000

0.'---'--'-3~9~50~.o.___...__.__4~00~0~.o__..__-!-' __ _._ __ ,-,-'-,.._~-,-41~5~0~.o~~~--~~4~25~0~.o,......___._4_3~0~0~.o_.__.__4~3~50~.o_,_~~44~0~0_,_0° 8321. 8326. 8341. 8351. 8356. 8361 8366.

( ( (

N s 700.0000 700.0000

600.0000 600.0000 -E ->. .i= c. Cd 500.0000 500.0000 "-Cl c 250m c. c I-

400.0000 400.0000

1450.0 1500.0 1550.0 1600.0 1650.0 8551. 8556. 8561. 8566. 8571.

1 .000000 FINMAG-1 0090 1 000000

0.6000000 - 0.6000000

- 0.6000000 - - 0.6000000 I-c: -Cl Cd

- 0.4000000 E 0.4000000 c:

LI..

0.2000000 0.2000000

0.'--~-'--,-45~0-.o~_._~~_._~...,...,,_,....,-....___.~~~~~1s=5~0~.0~~~~~~~16~0~0~.o~~~~...._~1~6~5~o~o~...._~o

6551. 6561. 8566. 8571

(

-E ->. .t: c. ell I.. Cl 0 c. 0 I-

-I-c: -Cl ell E c:

l.J..

N 700.0000

600.0000

500.0000

400.0000

z 000000 ..

1.000000 ..

0.

400.00 565.

I I I I I

450.00 570.

(

250m

500.00 575.

500.00 575.

16b \

\

\

550.00 580.

\ \

\ I

550.00 560.

\ I I

I I

\

I I

'1

\

s 700.0000

. 600.0000

500.0000

400 0000

600.00 585.

. 2 000000

\ - 1 000000

\ \ .,

I

'• I I

Boo o(f'· 565.

(

( (

s N 700.0000 700.0000

600.0000 600.0000 -E ->. ~ Q. «S 500.0000 500.0000 ... Cl 0

500m Q. 0 I-

400.0000 400.0000

1550.0 1600.0 1650.0 1700.0 1750.0 1800.0 1850.0 1900.0 1950.0 2000.0 1171. 1176. 1181. 1186. 1191. 1196. 1201. 1206. 1211. 1216.

3.000000 FINMAG-1 0120 3.000000

•, I 1

\

\ I

\ \ I

- 2.000000 2.000000 I-c: -Cl 18 qi

E c:

LL. 1.000000

\ 1 .000000

\ \ 0. 1550.0 1650.0 1700.0 1750.0 1800.0 1850.0 1900.0 1950.0 2000.0 0.

1171. 1181. 1186. 1191. 1196. 1201. 1206. 1211. 1216.

(

-E ->. .c ~ cu '-Cl c ~ c I-

-I-c: -Cl cu E c:

LL.

700.0000

600.0000

500.0000

400.0000

s

4700.0 1486.

4750.0 1491.

4800.0 1496.

250m

4850.0 1501.

4900.0 0.

N 700.0000

600.0000

500.0000

400.0000

3.000000 .----...-.-------..-~---,--r-'-F"""IN_,_,_M=A-'-G=---'1'-"0-'-l =20"-----------,.--~--.---~----,-----~3 000000

/

2.000000 .. . .. 2.000000

1.000000 I - 1 000000

19

0. I 0. 4700.0 4750.0 4800.0 4850.0 4900.0 1486. 1491. 1496. 1501. 0.

(

(

-E ->. .c Q. «I ... Cl 0 c. 0 I-

-I-c: -Cl «I E c:

LI.

N 700.0000

600.0000

500.0000

400.0000

50.000 1532.

100.00 1537.

150.00 1542.

(

s 700.0000

- 600.0000

500.0000

400.0000

200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 400.00 450.00 500.00 1547. 1552. 1557. 1562. 1567. 1572. 1577.

1 5.00000 ~--_.,. ___ ..__,_ __ __,_"'-'l-''-"-"'"--'-"'-'-'3""o,,_I ----,----~----r.----.--..-...----..--r--~-..,.., 1 5.00000

10.00000 ..

r

I I

5.000000 500m

I O.L----5-o.io-00---1~00~0-o--~1~50~.o~o,__--20~0~.o~o:---~25~0~.o~o--~30~0~0=0-__,3~5~0~.o~o--'-4~0~0~.o~o---'4~5+0.~oo=----'--=:-'.""~

1532. :1537. 1542. 1547. 1552. 1557. 1562. 1567. 1572.

1 0 OOODO

5.000000

(

E ->. ~ c. Ill L.. en 0 c. 0 I-

-I-c: -en co E c:

LI..

N s 700.0000 =----r----._,.--_ __._,..,...,..._ ................... ---,------,------,---~----.----.-----= 700.0000

600.0000

500.0000 -

400.0000

2550.0 1782.

4.000000 -

3.000000

2.000000

1 .000000

£%so.a 1782.

2600.0 1787.

2600.0 1 787

2650.0 1792.

\

\

2650.0 1792.

2700.0 1797.

21

2750.0 1802

2800.0 1807.

22

500m

2800.0 1807

2850.0 1812.

2850.0 181 2

2900.0 1817.

2900.0 1817

2950.0 1822.

\~

2950.0 1822

//

3000.0 1827.

3000.0 1827

- 600.0000

500.0000

400.0000

4.000000

/ 3000000

- 2 000000

1 000000

0

(

-E ->.

.s::. c. qi ... Cl c c. c I-

-I-c: -Cl qi

E c:

I.I..

N 700.0000

600.0000

500.0000 -- ··-·

400.0000

4500.0 1977.

250m

4550.0 1982.

(

4600.0 1987.

4650.0 2469.

s 700.0000

1300.0000

500.0000

400 0000

4700.0 2474.

1 0.00000 ___ __,_ ___ ........_ __ __,__F.!!.IN.:..:.M=A-'-'G.,_--'lw.O"-l =30;----------.-------~--------1 0.00000

8.000000 8 000000

6.000000 6.000000

23 4.000000 ·- 4.000000

2.000000 2.000000

o.1----~---4-5~0~0-.0------4~5~5~0.-0--------,4=6~00~.~0-------,.4=65~0~.0,--------47-0LJOi

1977. 1962. 1967. 2469. 24 74.

(

( ( (

s N 700.0000 - - 700.0000

600.0000 - 600.0000 -E ->-

.&; c. 500.0000 500.0000 ell L. O'I 0 c. 0 I-

400.0000 500m 400.0000

300.0000 - - 300.0000 4400.0 4450.0 4500.0 4550.0 4600.0 4650.0 4700.0 4750.0 4800.0 4850.0 2444. 2449. 2454. 2459. 2464. 2469. 2474. 2479. 2484. 2489.

5.000000 F 5.000000

\ \ 4.000000 ·-

\ \I 4.000000

\ - 24 I-3.000000 - 3.000000 c: -

O'I Cll E c: 2.000000 2.000000

LL

1.000000 . \ 1 000000

0. 4400.0 4450.0 4500.0 4550.0 4600.0 4650.0 4700.0 4750.0 4800.0 4850.0 0.

2444. 2449. 2454. 2459. 2464. 2469. 2474. 2479. 2484. 2489

(

-E ->. .s::. c. cu r... C) 0 c. 0 t-

-t-c: -C) cu E c:

LI..

(

N s

600.0000 600.0000

500.0000 500 0000

-----400.0000 400.0000

300.0000 c:._ __ --L------'-----L----...l.----.L-------1---..........L------L---....L_--__J 300.0000 200.00 250.00 300.00 350.00 400.00 450.00 500.00 50.000

2520. 100.00 2525.

150.00 2530. 2535. 2540. 2545. 2550. 2555. 2560. 2565.

FINMAG-10150 50.00000 ~--~--_....-,-__ _,_,.._""'f.!!-'-""--""'--'-"""C,.----,------,~------r-----,----,-~-----.50.00000

40.00000 40.00000

30.00000 25 I I 30.00000

fl 20.00000 I 20 00000

500m ,/

10.00000 10.00000

O. i__ __ 5_0...J...0_00 ___ 1 -00_,_.0_0 __ 1_5...J0-.0-0--2--0..L.0.-00--~25""'0L.,.0,.-0----,3,....0~0.--o .... o ---=-3=50~.o=-=0,---4-,0=-='o'-. 0-0---'-4~5..L.O .-00 ___ 50......JO .So 2520. 2525. 2530. 2535. 2540. 2545. 2550. 2555. 2560. 2565.

(

-E ->. ~ Q. IU ... CD 0 Q. 0 ~

-~ c -CD IU E c

Li..

(

s N

600.0000 600.0000

500.0000 500.0000

400.0000 500m 400.0000

30 0 · 0 0 0 0 ~o .----=50=-_z.:00"""0----:1'""0:-:!:o-=. o.,,..o -----,,1-=-s~o .~oo=----::-2 o::--::o~. 0"""0,------..,2:,-;:5:-:!:o-=. o.,,..o ---=3~0 o~. 0::--::0:---.""'3 5=-=o'-=. 0::::-0---,4:--::-0~0 . .,,.,o o=-----:-4 =5 o~. o~o:------' 10 0 0 0 0 0 50. 2996. 3001. 3006. 3011. 3016. 3021. 3026 3031 3036

2.000000 I

1.500000 -

1.000000 - ~

0.5000000 -

0. 0. 50.

I

I

50.000 2996.

I I

1 I

't I 100.00 3001.

FINMAG-1 0160 I

26

I 150.00 3006.

I

I 200.00 3011.

I

I 250.00 3016.

I

I

I 300.00 3021

I

\

I 350.00 3026.

i,

l

\ I I

\ ~

\ I 400.00 3031

I 450.00 3036

\ 2 000000

I - 1 .500000

- 1 000000

- 0.5000000

(

( ( (

N s 600.0000 600.0000

500.0000 500 0000 -E ->.

.s:::. c. cu I.

400.0000 250m 400.0000 CJ) 0 c. 0 .....

300.0000 1 700.0 1800.0 1650.0 1900.0

.300 0000

4652. 4662 4668. 4672.

3.000000 3.000000

-\

..... 2.000000 I 2.000000 c: I -CJ) I cu I E c:

\ Li..

1.000000

\ - 1 000000

I I I I, \ \

I I 0.

1700.0 1750.0 1600.0 1850.0 1900.0 0.

4652. 4658. 4662. 4666. 4672.

( ( (

N s

600 OOIJO

600.0000

-E 500.0000 ->. 500.0000 &. Q. cd I.. Cl 0 Q. 0 so om 400.0000

I- 400.0000

300.0000 i=..--....1.------..J.---.---.L--,,--=-'------~-----=-.,..,,..,..~--=-=...J.-----..L------li------1._-=i- 300 0000 2400.0 2450.0 2500.0 2550.0 2600.0 2650.0 2700.0 2750 0 2800.0 2850.0 5209. 5214. 5219. 5224. 5229. 5234. 5239. 5244. 5249. 5254.

3.000000

;:::- 2.000000

..s. Cl IV E i:

LL. 1 000000

0.

I

I 2400.0 5209.

I

I I

I

2450.0 5214.

FINMAG-10200

!I

2500.0 5219.

2550.0 5224.

11

28

I I 2600.0 5229.

I

J

I 2650.0 5234.

I I

I

J I

I

2700 0 5239.

\

2750.0 5244.

I

I I I

I

2800.0 5249.

-11 ! I I I

I

3.000000

,_ 2.000000

- 1 000000

I

I 2850.0 O. 5254.

( ( (

s N

600.0000 600.0000

E ->. 500.0000 500.0000 ..c Q. IU I.. Cl 0 Q. 0

>- 400.0000 400 0000

300.0000 300.0000 -100.00 0. 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00 600.00

0. 100. 602. 612. 622. 632. 642. 652.

5.000000 FINMAG-1 0211 5.000001) I I \ \ I II

I \

I I

4.000000 - 4.000000

->- 3.000000 3.000000 c: -Cl IU E

2.000000 800m . 2.000000 c:

\ LL.

1.000000 \ - 1 .000000

0 -10000 100.00 400.00 500.00 600 o~ 0. 602. 632. 642. 652.

( ( (

s N

600.0000 600.0000

-E 500.0000 500.0000 ->. ~ c. Cll I-Cl 0 c. 400.0000 400.0000 0 I-

300.0000 ,_-___ ,__ ______ ____. _______ ....,.... ________ __,_ _______ __._ ___ __,300.0000 1500.0 1550.0 1600.0 1650 0 1700.0

742. 748. 752. 758. 762.

5.000000 ~---+--..---"'----~F.!!..IN..,_M""A-'-'G,,,_-_,l_,,0=21:...1'------ir---------.-------...,.--,.---,.---.. 5.000000

4.000000 ·-· 30 -·· 4.000000

-I- 3.000000 - - 3 000000 c -Cl

/ j Cll E 2.000000 - 2 000000 c I

Li.. I 250m 1.000000 -- ... 1.000000

0. I i I

0 1500.0 1550.0 1600.0 1650.0 1 700.0 742. 748. 752. 756. 762

(

-E ->. .i:. c. co "'-Cl 0 c. 0 ....

-.... c: -Cl cG E c: u.

(

s N

600.0000 600.0000

500.0000 500 .0000

400.0000 500m 400.0000

300.0000 L---___,,_L-_______ _..._ __ __,,___ _ ____,~~-----'-------,....L,-----...1------.L------l~--__J 300.0000 2750.0 2BOO.O 2850.0 2900.0 2950.0 3000.0 3050.0 31 00.0 3150.0 3200.0

666. 672. 876. 662. 666. 692. 696. 902. 906. 912.

5.000000

4.000000

3.000000

2.000000

1.000000

2750 o 66B.

I

2BOO.O B72.

I

I

2850.0 878

FINMAG-1 0211 I

I 2900.0

8B2.

I

2950.0 BBB.

I

1

\

31\

I 3000.0

892.

T

I 3050.0

B9B.

I

J

i ' 3100.0

902.

I 3150.0

90B.

J '

3200.0 912.

J 5.000000

4.000000

3 000000

2.000000

1.000000

(

(

N 600.0000

E ->. 500.0000 . .&:. c. I'll ~ Cl 0 c. 0 f-

400.0000

5.000000

4.000000

-f-c: - 3.000000 Cl I'll E c: u. 2.000000

1 .000000

0.

I

200.00 6981.

I

l 200.00 6981.

I

300.00 6991.

FINMAG-1 n?~n J

I

v

I

) 300.00 6991.

(

250m

32

400.00 7001

I

I I 400.00 7001.

500.00 7011.

500.00 7011.

600.00 7021.

600.00 7021.

(

s 600.0000

500.0000

- 400 0000

5.000000

4.000000

3.000000

2 000000

1 000000

0.

( ( (

N s 600.0000 600.0000

E 500.0000 500 0000 -

>. ~ c. «l ~ CJ c c. c 400.0000 - 400.0000 ~

1400.0 1500.0 1600.0 1700.0 1800.0 1900.0 2000.0 7101. 7111. 7121. 7131. 7141. 7151. 7161.

50.00000 FINMAG-1 0250 50.00000

40.00000 /~

I 40 00000 - I \ \ ~ I \ c - \ CJ 30.00000 30 00000 «l \ E \ c u.

20.00000 33 \

\ . zo 00000

BO Om 10.00000 .

\ I

- 1 0 00000 \

0. 1400.0 1500.0 1600.0 1 700.0 1800.0 1900.0 2000.0 0.

7101. 7111. 7121. 7131. 7141. 7151. 7161.

(

-E ->i

.s:. c.

500.0000

~ 400.0000 Cl 0 c. 0 I-

(

s N

500.0000

400.0000

500m

300.0000 =-...._ ___ ..__ __ __._ ___ __._ ___ _,_ ___ _._ ___ ..__ __ __,.__ __ __._. ___ _._ _ _...;;;;;J300.oooo 2550.0 2600.0 2650.0 2700.0 2750.0 2800.0 2850.0 2900.0 2950.0

-I-c: -Cl Ill E c:

LI..

8666. 8671. 8676. 8681. 8686. 8691. 8696. 8701. 8706.

3.000000 I

2.000000 ..

1.000000

I O. 2550.0

8666.

I

11 2600.0 8671.

I

I

I

2650.0 8676.

FINMAG-10280

\

I \

\

I \ 2700.0 8681.

I

34

I 2750.0 8686.

2800.0 8691.

I /

I 2850.0 8696.

}

I

J 2900.0 8701

I

2950.0 8706.

3000.0 8711.

3000.0 8711.

I

3.000000

2.000000

1.000000

0

(

s N

500.0000 500.0000

-E ->. ~ Q. ~ I.. Ol 400.0000 400.0000 0 Q. 0 500m t-

300.0000 ._-_,_ ___ .___ __ __,_ ___ ___,.,, ___ --=-----~---,_,......,,--~------,--,-L-----'------'300 DODO 4600.0 4650.0 4 700.0 4 750.0 4800.0 4850.0 4900.0 4950.0 5000.0 5050.0 8871 8876. 8881 8886 8891. 8896. 8901 8906 8911 8316.

5.000000 ~~---..------r--""-F"'-'-IN=M""A,._,G._· ----1 -=02=8~-.-----.-----,......-----.---r-.--...----,..-.-~-~ 5 000000

I

4.000000 - - 4.000000

-t-..s 3.000000 - 35 ·- 3.000000

Ol ~

E c: 2.000000 -

u...

1 000000

\ l z .000000

I 04~6o~o~.o,..__4+-6~5~0~0--4=7~00~.o-=---~=-=-=,---=-=-=-=------:4~s5~0~.o=---7.49~0~0~.o--4~9~50~.o=---~5~00~0~.o,--'----,5~0~5~0.~o--'--' 0 .

8871. 8876. 8881. 8896. 8901 8906 8911 8916

(

- 57 -

APPENDIX G

APEX GEOSCIENCE ANALYSIS REPORT

. '-.__../.

APEX GEOSCIENCE ANALYSIS REPORT

At the time of submission of our Assessment Report was not yet finalized. Mr. Mike Dufresene, of Apex advised us verbally on March 31st that the report completion and should be finalized by April 3rd. As letter we will supply this documentation when it is

this report Geoscience,

was nearing per our cover available .