Mapping Online Publics: New Methods for Twitter Research
-
Upload
axel-bruns -
Category
Social Media
-
view
1.045 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Mapping Online Publics: New Methods for Twitter Research
Mapping Online Publics: New Methods for Twitter Research
Axel Bruns, Jean Burgess, and Darryl WoodfordARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and InnovationQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbane, Australiaa.bruns / je.burgess / dp.woodford @ qut.edu.auhttp://mappingonlinepublics.net/
SOCIAL MEDIA RESEARCH AND ‘BIG DATA’
• Social media as the ‘big data’ moment in HASS research
• But ‘big data’ + ‘social media’ almost always = ‘Twitter data’
• Computational social science – e.g. MSR NYC; epidemiology; election & stock market prediction
Scott A. Golder*, Michael W. Macy (2011) Diurnal and Seasonal Mood Vary with Work, Sleep, and Day length Across Diverse Cultures, Science 333 (6051): 1878-1881
SOCIAL MEDIA RESEARCH AND ‘BIG DATA’
• ‘Computational turn’ in new humanities research: shift from computational tools to a new computational paradigm (Berry, 2012).
• Eg shift from ‘close’ to ‘distant’ reading (Moretti); ‘software studies’ (eg Fuller, 2008) and ANT approaches to new media platforms; ‘natively’ digital methods to diagnose patterns of social change (Rogers, 2009).
• Intersections between data-driven social media research & critical platform studies (Gillespie)
THE MAPPING ONLINE PUBLICS PROJECT
• Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project (2010-13) – $410,000 + ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation (CCI)
– First comprehensive study of Australian social media use– Computer-assisted cultural analysis: tracking, mapping, analysing networked publics– media, communication & cultural studies’ concerns; combining quantitative analytics with
qualitative analysis• Mapping public engagement around politics, crisis, culture on Twitter as part of the
broader media ecology• Various spin-offs: ARC Linkage, LIEF, Future Fellowship, ATN-DAAD, etc.
TWITTER AND ITS PUBLICS
HASHTAG PUBLICS: #QLDFLOODS (2011)
10 Jan 201111 Jan 2011 12 Jan 201113 Jan 201114 Jan 201115 Jan 2011
HASHTAG PUBLICS: #EGYPT @MENTIONS
1-28 Feb. 2011 15 June to 15 Sep. 2011
@mentions between users tweeting predominantly in Latin (blue) vs. Arabic (green) characters
PERSONAL PUBLICS
• How do personal publics (cf. Jan Schmidt) around social media accounts form and dissolve?– No clear data available through Twitter API– But: API delivers lists of followers/followees– And: account creation date for such accounts is known Method for approximating follower accession(cf. Bruns, Woodford, Sadkowsky, First Monday 19.4)
– Benefits:• Shows impact of key events on follower growth• Shows following strategies of central account• Can indicate influx of ‘fake’ followers (followback bots, etc.)• Offers comparative tracking across selected population of accounts
– Limitations:• Unable to determine un/refollowing
FOLLOWER ACCESSION
@TONYABBOTTMHR’S FAKE FOLLOWERS
(11/12 Aug. 2013)
TWITTER AND THE MEDIA ECOLOGY
TWITTER AND TV: TELEMETRICS
• The Importance of Hype
• Social Media Audiences
• From Sabermetric to Telemetrics
• The HypometerTM
• Work with Katie Prowd and partially funded by QUTBluebox
THE IMPORTANCE OF HYPE
• Traditional ratings measure what people have watched, but have limited impact on what people *will* watch.
• That is, they are divorced from the “decision moment”.
• Yet, companies spend millions promoting shows and attempting to influence viewer behaviour, both through TV ads and through social media.
• How do we measure that?
SOCIAL MEDIA RATINGS
• Contemporary commercial social media ratings have the same limitation, even if you trust their numbers
Cable Channel vs Major Network?
Why is having more followers the important statistic?
2.5 hour special
1 hour show
BUT YOU NEED TO GET IT RIGHT
Beamly Screenshot: 31 May 2014
BUT YOU NEED TO GET IT RIGHT
Beamly Screenshot: 31 May 2014
BIG BROTHER USA VS AU (AUDIENCE)• In US, for Big Brother (&
shows generally), there is little correlation between viewers and tweets.
• In Australia, for Big Brother and other shows in our pilots, high correlation between viewer count and tweets.
• Applying US models to Australia is not possible.
• Algorithms need to adjust for their local environment and industry context
SEASONAL MODELS • Blue Line represents the ratio of total viewers, Orange Line represents ratio of tweets (to season average per show).
• In both one run seasons (top) and those with mid-season break (bottom), tweets are highly exaggerated version of traditional ratings model.
• In other words: Users tweet much more around premieres & finales than regular shows. Metrics must account for this.
THE HYPOMETERTM
• iOS app developed as functional prototype to act as a ‘modern TV Guide’ for Australian television
• Calculates ‘hype’ via a proprietary algorithm which accounts for national and industry context
• Ongoing evaluation of both hype figures and predictions vs. post-show TV ratings and social media engagement.
• Clear trend towards ‘dynamic’ audiences; a proportion of the population on whom broadcasters should focus.
SOME EARLY DATA
UnderpromotedOverperforming
High performingUnderperforming
TWITTER AND THE NEWS: ATNIX
• Australian Twitter News Index (ATNIX):– Long-term project to track all tweets sharing links to Australian news sites– Tracking, link extraction, processing, analysis
• Outcomes include:– Day-to-day (second-by-second) volume of links being shared– Course-of-day / course-of-week activity patterns– Trending stories, long-term issues– Distribution of attention across sites, and change over time– Impact of paywalls and other changes to site structure and functionality– Mindshare? Marketshare?
• Further extensions:– Translation to other mediaspheres: DETNIX, NOTNIX, SWETNIX– Comparison with other platforms/practices: Facebook, Hitwise, internal data
TWITTER: THE BIG PICTURE
TWITTER IN AUSTRALIA (AND BEYOND)
• Putting Twitter into context:– Do specific activities reach beyond pre-existing networks?– Can we benchmark the phenomena we observe?– How do individual events compare to each other?
• Research needs:– Background information on underlying follower/followee network
structures in Australia How (and how far) does information travel, whom does it reach?
– Baseline data on everyday average Twitter activity patterns in Australia How extraordinary are extraordinary events, compared to “normal”?
– Standardised metrics for a wide range of events and occurrences Do similar events unfold similarly? Can we use this to identify them?
CRISIS EVENT COMPARISON
● #qldfloods 2011● #qldfloods 2013● #eqnz 2011● #eqnz 2013
TWITTER GROWTH IN AUSTRALIA
FOLLOWER NETWORKS
PerthMarketing / PR
DesignWeb
Creative
FarmingAgriculture
HardlineConservatives
ConservativesJournalists
ALPProgressives
Greens
News
OpinionNews
NGOsSocial Policy
ITTech
Social MediaTechPR
Advertising
Real EstateProperty
JobsHR
Business
BusinessProperty
Parenting
Mums CraftArts
FoodWine
Beer
Adelaide
SocialICTs
CreativeDesign
FashionBeauty
UtilitiesServices
Net Culture
BooksLiteraturePublishing
FilmTheatre
Arts
RadioTV Music
DanceHip Hop
Triple JTalkback
Breakfast TVCelebritiesCycling
Union
NRL
FootballCricket
AFL
SwimmingV8s
Evangelicals
Teachinge-Learning
Schools
ChristiansHillsong
Teens
Jonas Bros.Beliebers
Australian Bands
@KRuddMP@JuliaGillard
Follower/followee network:~120,000 Australian Twitter users(of ~950,000 known accounts by early 2012) colour = outdegree, size = indegree
INFORMATION DISSEMINATION
Dissemination of Julia Gillard’s “misogyny” speech, 9 Oct. 2012(from Bruns & Sauter, “Anatomie eines Trending Topics”, DGPuk Vienna, 8 Nov. 2013)
INFORMATION DISSEMINATION
Dissemination of Julia Gillard’s “misogyny” speech, 9 Oct. 2012(from Bruns & Sauter, “Anatomie eines Trending Topics”, DGPuk Vienna, 8 Nov. 2013)
OUTLOOK
PRACTICAL CHALLENGES
• Data access, platform volatility• Research ethics
– textual research using public texts, or ‘human subjects’ research using personal data?
– Consequences of public/personal convergence, data markets/open data movement, and ‘context collapse’ (boyd)
– Cross-national and cross-disciplinary differences, need for public discussion
PRACTICAL CHALLENGES
• Better integration with existing social and cultural theory & empirical work– Mixed methods, especially integration of qualitative and
ethnographic approaches• Propagation and regularisation of methods (and
consequences for research training)– ‘Code literacy’ sufficient to engage with the material
consequences of software platforms
The map is not the territory (Korzybski)
http://mappingonlinepublics.net/
@snurb_dot_info@jeanburgess@dpwoodford@timhighfield@tsadkowsky
@socialmediaQUT – http://socialmedia.qut.edu.au/