Mango Bio Control Project-final Report

8/9/2019 Mango Bio Control Project-final Report

1/39

1

AFRICAN UNION

UNION AFRICAINE

SemiArid Africa Agricultural Research and DevelopmentRecherche et Dveloppement Agricoles dans les Zones Semi-Arides de lAfrique

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL PROGRAM FOR THE MANGO MEALYBUG RASTROCOCCUS INVADENS Williams (HOMOPTERA:PSEUDOCOCCIDEA) IN WEST AFRICA.

FINAL REPORTDecember 2009

Prepared by:

Lenli Claude Otoidobiga, Agronomist, Entomologist, Ph.D.Lapodini Marc ATOUGA, Agricultural Economist, Ph.D.


2/39


3/39

3

List of abbreviations:

APROMA B Association Interprofessionnelle de la mangue du Burkina Faso(Burkina Faso)

CIRAD Centre de coopration internationale en recherche agronomique pour ledveloppement (France)

CMA/AOC Confrence des Ministres de l'Agriculture de l'Afrique de l'Ouest et duCentre

CNRA Centre National de Recherche Agronomique (Cte d'Ivoire)DPV Directorate for Plant Protection - Direction de la Protection des

VgtauxDPVC Direction des Protections des Vgtaux et du Conditionnement(Burkina Faso)

DPVCQ Direction de la Protection des Vgtaux et du Contrle de la Qualit(Cte d'Ivoire)

ECOWAS Economic Community Of West African StatesFAO Food and Agriculture OrganizationFAOSTAT Food and Agriculture Organization StatisticsIITA - Bnin Institut International d'AgricultureTropicale (Bnin)

(Internal Institut for Tropical Agriculture-Benin)COLEACP Comit de Liaison Europe Afrique Carabes-Pacifique pour la

promotion des exportations horticoles ACPINERA Institut de l'Environnement et des Recherches agricoles (Burkina Faso)IPPC International Plant Protection ConventionIRAG Institut de Recherche Agronomique de Guine (Guine)

MOFA Ministry of Food and Agriculture's (Ghana)OCAB Organisation Centrale des Producteurs-Exportateurs de Bananes,Ananas, Mangues (Cte d'Ivoire)

OMOA Organic Mango Out growers association (Ghana)UEMOA Union Economique et Montaire Ouest AfricaineCFC Common Fun for CommoditiesNARS National Agricultural Research ServicesNBCP National Biological Control PannelsWAFFI West African Fruit Fly Initiative


4/39

4

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors of this report express their gratitude to the many peoples whose contributions have made it possible to achieve the objective of designing andproposing thisprogram for the biological control of the mango mealy bug in western Africa, specially:

His excellence, the Minister Delegate to Agriculture, Hydraulic and Water Resources of Burkina Faso, Dr Abdoulaye Combary for his supportto this initiative. His speech at the opening ceremony of the workshop has underlined the importance the government of Burkina Faso accredits to fruitproduction in general and to the mango sector in particular in the economies of mango producing West African countries. Through his excellence, weextend our gratitude to all the government of Burkina Faso for this mark of consideration.

The coordinator of the office of AU/SAFGRAD in Ouagadougou, Dr Ahamed Elmekass for the interst he has had for the draft report he foundwhen he recently took charge of the office. His endeavour and diligence have made it possible to convene in a short frame time the regional workshopon December 29-30, 2009. During this workshop his insight and guidance have greatly contributed to the endorsement of this program by thedelegates of the interested countries. We are also thankful to him for his enlightened recommendations and contributions to the improvement of this

final report.The former Director of AU/SAFGRAD in OuagadougouWe express our deep appreciation and sincere gratitude to Dr Mahama Oudraogo, former interim Director of the office of AU/SAFGRADin

Ouagadougou for investing his confidence in our abilities to successfully carry out the mission and provide the institution he was leading with adocument that meets its standards. We are also thankful to him for reviewing and contributing to the improvement of the draft report.

Staff membersWe are grateful to Evenunye Adanlete and Eleonore Sayah, administrative staff at the office of AU/SAFGRAD in Ouagadougou, whose timely

support has been very important in completing our different missions on the field. Our special thanks to Dr Mamadou I. Ouattara, director of AU/FOUTA-DJALLON who masterfully made all the arrangements for a successful mission in Guinea by providing us with good logistics during ourstopover.


5/39

5

The delegates of Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Guinea, Mali, Code DIvoire Togo , ECOWAS and IITA

We are indebted to all the experts, members of the delegations of Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Guinea, Mali, Cote DIvoire, Togo, ECOWASand IITA who have accepted to leave their homes and families to come to Ouagadougou by these very last days (December 29 &30) of 2009 tocontribute with their great and diverse experiences to the writing of this program in a collaborative manner.

The scientists and representatives of mango producers we met.Our thanks are extended to all the eminent scientists in the countries we visited who took their time to assist us in our mission. We thank the

representatives of the organizations of producers and traders of mangoes met during our tour of the countries for their assistance and pertinentcontributions to the discussions we had.

All other contributors to this endeavourLast but not the least, we are grateful and indebted to all the people who have by one way or another contributed to the accomplishment of this

assignment. It would be difficult to list all of them here, but we want them to know that we did not purposely forgot them and that we are very thankfulfor their valuable contributions.


6/39


7/39


8/39


9/39


10/39


11/39


12/39


13/39

13

4.2. Burkina Faso

In Burkina Faso, the main mango producing areas are located in the south-western and center-western regions of the country. The south-western region provides 75% of the national production. Mango orchards occupy 15,000 ha and produce annually 120,000 tones. About 6,000 toneshave been exported in 2006 of which 2,000 tones were sold on the international market. The varieties exported as fresh fruit are Amlie, Kent, Keittand Valencia. Brooks, Lippens, and part of Amlie are dried or transformed into juice for exportation and local consumption.

Late maturing varieties (Kent, Keitt and Brooks) are most infested than early maturing ones. Up to 40% of fruits are attacked by fruit flies.Respectively five, one and zero shipments have been intercepted and destroyed at European ports respectively in 2004, 2005, and 2006. The numbersof intercepted shipments at Eurpean ports have decreased because exporters were forced to shorten their campaign. As a consequence of fruit fliesinfestation an important quantity of the production is abandoned in the field. A project, PAFASP is contributing to solving fruit flies problems and afacility has been built in Bobo-Dioulasso to boost mango exports on the international market. Also FAO and CFC have planned on helping elaborateand implement a regional project.

An agricultural research station created in 1924 at Banfora and transferred to INERA in 1994 is specializing in research on the development of mango production. The facility produces mango nurseries, trains producers and technicians involved in the development of mango production.Research on integrated management of mango pests is conducted in collaboration with colleagues at Farakoba agricultural station. Five species of fruitflies, of which four are ceratitis spp. (Diptera: Tephritidae) and one is B. Invadens have been identified to date (Oudraogo, 2007). The methods

currently suggested to control fruit flies are chemical (Terpinyl or Methyl-Eugenol food bait) R. Invadens has been introduced in the Cte dIvoire. Initially limited to Niangoloko neighbourhood, the insect has spread to invade all thesouth-western region of the country (cf. fig1 & 2). A project is initiated to use Biological control it. An insectarium has been built to mass produceGyranusodea tebigy and Anagyrus mangicola, two natural enemies parasitoids of R. invadens for release against the pest.


14/39

14


15/39

15

Fig. 1& 2: areas infested by R. invadens in Burkina Faso.


16/39


17/39


18/39


19/39


20/39


21/39

22


22/39

COMPONENTS ACTIVITIES REGIONALLEVEL

NATIONALLEVEL

RESPONSIBILITIES.

1. Coordination of the Program Mobilization of resources x

SAFGRAD

o Monitoring & Evaluation of national programs xo Development of partnership xo Finances and administration xo Communication x

Harmonization of Programs xo Planning of activities x

2. Production & Diffusion o Parasitoid Mass production x x IITA/NARSo Parasitoid shipment to countries x x IITA/ NARSo Training of staff (researchers and technicians) x NARS

3. Capacity building o Training of producers x x NARS /DPPo Infrastructures and Equipments x x state/Donors

4. Research & Development o Inventories of natural enemies x IITA/ NARS

o Monitoring of population dynamics x NARSo Mass release and monitoring of populations x NARS /DPPo Technology generation and diffusion x x NRAS/IITAo Extension x DPV/NRAS

5. Monitoring & Evaluationo

Monitoring and Evaluation of activities x x Coordination at regionaland national levelso Monitoring of the impact of the Program

(indicators of impact)x x Coordination at regional

and national levels6. Communication o Design and plan a strategy of information,

Communication and sensibilization (massmedia, round table, etc.)

x x Coordination at regionaland national levels


23/39

24


24/39

which will need to decide priorities. Within (or beyond) the suggested activities, in light of the research plans of other significant projects (to avoidduplication), the available resources (human and financial) and the most appropriate mechanism for deciding what research should be undertaken inwhich country or countries are yet to be decided.

VII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The mango mealy bug Rastrococcus invadens is a pest which originates from Southern Asia and invaded western Africa in the eighties. Thepest threatens to bankrupt the mango industry in the region. Introduced without its natural enemies it has found a favorable ground to expand itspopulation wild in the field. Few control methods are able to keep the pest under economic injury level. At the inception of the problem a biologicalcontrol program has been implemented which has allowed the introduction, release and successful establishment of two natural parasitoid enemies inTogo, Ghana and Benin. This biological control project was working well, but has been abandoned because of resources shortage.

A consultation conducted in seven countries to evaluate the magnitude at which R. Invadens is affecting the mango industry in the region foundthat the pest has now invaded all the mango production areas of western Africa, seriously threatening the viability of the entire mango industry. On theirown alone, National Agricultural Research and Plant Protection Services can hardly tackle individually the threat.

Given the situation, one reliable alternative is that the interested countries unite their efforts to confront the pests. In this prospect, they were convenedat workshop help in Ouagadougou on December 29 and 30, 2009. They unanimously agreed that the insectariums of Burkina Faso and Benin be usedto reinitiate the biological control program prematurely stopped in the eighties to serve as the foundation of the regional biological control effortsagainst the pest.

A strategy to implement the regional biological control of the mango mealy bug in West Africa is proposed. The strategy aims at expandingand coordinating actions among all the countries to release the natural enemies. It has six components: 1) Coordination of the Program; 2) Production& Diffusion; 3) Capacity building, 4) Research and Development; 5) Monitoring and evaluation and 6) Communication

25


25/39

REFERENCES

1. Agounk, D., and Agricola, U., and Bokonon-Ganta, A. H., 1988. Rastrococcus invadens Williams (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), a serious pest of

fruit trees and other plants in West Africa. Bull. Entomol. Res. 78: 695-702.2. Agricola, U., Agounke, D., Fischer, H.U., Moore, D., 1989. The control of Rastrococccus invadens Williams Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) by

Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes (Hemiptera: Encyrtidae). Bull. Ent. Res. 79, 671-678.

4. Arodokoum, D. Y., 1986. Importance des plantes htes alternatives et des ennemis naturels indignes dans le contle biologique de Marucatestulalis Geyer (Lepidoptera : Pyralidae), ravageur deVigna unguiculuta Walp. Universit Laval, Qubec, Canada, 167 pp.

5. Boavida, C., Ahounou, M., Vos, M., Neuenschwander, P., and van Alphen, J. J. M., 1995. Host stage selection and sex allocation byGyranusodaetebygi (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), a parasitoid of the mango mealy bug, Rastrococcus invadens (Homoptera: Pseudococcidea). Biologicalcontrol 5: 487-496.

6. Boavida, C., and Neuenschwander, P., 1995 Population dynamic and life tables of the mango mealy bug, Rastrococcus invadens Williams and itsintroduced natural enemy,Gyranusodae tebygi Noyes, in Benin. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 5, 489-508.

7. Boavida, C., M. Ahounou, M. Vost, Neuenschwander, P. And Alphen J.J. 1995. Host stage selection and sex allocation byGyranusoidea tebygi Noyes (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) a parasitoid of the mango mealy bug, Rastrococcus invadens Williams (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Biol.Control 5, 487-496.

8. Boavida, C., Neuenschwander, P., and Herren, H. R., 1995. Experimental assessment of the impact of the introduced parasitoid,Gyranusodaetebygi Noyes, on the mango mealy bug, Rastrococcus invadens Williams by physical exclusion method. Biol. Control 5: 99-103.

9. Boeye, J., S. Burde, H. Keil, G.-A Laborius & F.A. Schulz. 1988. The possibilities for biological integrated control of the larger grain borer(Prostephanus truncatus [Horn] in Africa 110-139. In G.G.M Schulten & A.J. Toet (eds. ). Proceedings on the Workshop on the containmentand control of the larger grain borer, Arusha, Tanzania, [16-21 May 1988]. Ministry of Agriculture and livestock Development [Tanzania] withthe assistance from Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, [Rome, Italy], Report II. Technical paper presented at theworkshop, ii + 195pp.


26/39


27/39


28/39

29


29/39

White I.E., Elson-Harris M.M., 1992: Fruit flies of economic significance: their identification and bionomics, CAB International, Wallingford, UK,

601 p.

NGuetta K. 1994: First inventory of fruit flies in the northern region of Cte dIvoire, Cirad-Flore, Doc. interne, Run. annu., Montpellier, France.

Vayssires J.F., Kalabane S. 2000, Inventory and fluctuations of the catches of Diptera Tephritidae associated with mangos in Coastal Guinea, Fruits

55, 259270.

Vayssires J.F., Sanogo F., Noussourou M.2004 : , Inventaire des espces de mouches des fruits (Diptera Tephritidae) infodes au manguier au Maliet essais de lutte raisonne, Fruits59, 316.

30


30/39

ANNEX 1: Mango and Guava Production in Western Africa (FAOSTAT June 2008).

Countries 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Benin 12000 12000 12000 12000 12200 12500 12000 12500Burkina Faso 5000 5000 7500 9000 9000 9300 9000 9600Cape Verde 4500 4500 4500 4500 4500 4500 4500 6000

Cte d'Ivoire 23655 27490 25758 25054 30865 30428 118000 120000

Gambia 629 554 560 560 600 650 560 700

Ghana 4000 4000 4000 4000 4000 6600 6996 6800

Guinea 83000 120000 155812 160000 164000 162000 164000 165000Guinea-Bissau 4500 4700 4700 5000 5000 5000 5000 5300Mali 25905 33097 29145 60434 55000 61424 65386 70000

Nigeria 730000 730000 730000 730000 730000 731000 731500 734000Senegal 73000 83715 78523 85365 65840 61646 82194 84000

Sierra Leone 6500 7000 7000 7500 7500 7800 6500 7000Western Africa 972689 1032056 1059498 1103413 1088505 1092848 1205636 1220900

31


31/39

ANNEX 2: Income generated by mango and guava export (FAOSTAT 2005)

Pays 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Burkina Faso 373,000 373,000 560,000 673,000 673,000 673,000Cte d'Ivoire 2,622,000 2,622,000 2,622,000 2,622,000 2,622,000 2,622,000Ghana 2,227,000 2,227,000 2,227,000 2,227,000 2,227,000 2,227,000Mali 2,881,000 3,681,000 3,241,000 6,722,000 3,448,000 6,832,000Nigeria 49,137,000 49,137,000 49,137,000 49,137,000 49,137,000 49,137,000Toal Income 57,240,000 58,040,000 57,787,000 61,381,000 58,107,000 61,491,000

32


32/39

Annexe 3: Rapport de latelier sur le projet de stratgie sous rgionale de lutte

biologique contre la cochenille farineuse du manguierOuagadougou, 29-30 dcembre 2009

PROJET DE RAPPORT FINAL

Les 29 et 30 dcembre 2009, sest tenu dans la salle de runion n2 de lhtel Palm Beach de Ouagadoug ou un atelier sur le

projet de stratgie sous-rgionale de lutte biologique contre la cochenille farineuse du manguier.

Ont pris part cet atelier, les producteurs, des directeurs gnraux ou leurs reprsentants des structures de recherche et de

dveloppement du Burkina Faso, du Bnin, de la cte divoire, du Ghana, de la Guine, du Togo et du Mali, ainsi que ceux des

organisations telles que lUA/SAFGRAD, la CEDEAO et lIITA.

La liste des participants est jointe en annexe.

Le prsent atelier qui sest fix pour objectifs de prsenter les rsultats de ltude ainsi que la validation du projet de stratgie

dlaboration et de mise en uvre dun programme sous rgional sest droul en deux phases savoir une crmonie douverture et

les travaux proprement dits.

33


33/39

I- Crmonie douverture

La crmonie douverture a t prside par Monsieur le Ministre dlgu charg de lAgriculture du Burkina Faso. Elle sest

droule en prsence du Directeur Gnral de lINERA et du coordonnateur de lUA/SAFGRAD.

Trois allocutions ont marqu cette crmonie douverture. Celle du coordonnateur de lUA/SAFGRAD, du Directeur de lINERA et

le discours douverture du Ministre de dlgu charg de lAgriculture du Burkina Faso.

Les diffrents intervenants ont soulign limportance de cette rencontre en ce sens quelle concerne lagriculture de plusieursEtats. La filire mangue joue un rle important dans lconomie, elle reprsente plus de 60% de la production fruitire mais connait

plusieurs contraintes parmi lesquelles figurent les problmes phytosanitaires.

En situant la rencontre dans son contexte, M. le Ministre Abdoulaye COMBARI a exprim tout son espoir que le projet permettra

dharmoniser davantage les efforts des pays en matire de lutte biologique contre le pseudococcus du manguier Rastrococcus invadens

en Afrique de lOuest.

Aprs une brve suspension, les travaux se sont poursuivis sous la conduite du bureau de sance ci-aprs : Prsident : Monsieur Famoi BEAVOGUI (Guine) Rapporteurs : Monsieur Haruna BRAIMAH (Ghana)

Madame Raki KIEMA KOUELA (Burkina Faso)

Lordre du jour adopt aprs amendements se rsume comme suit : Prsentation du sujet, contexte et justification Prsentation des rsultats de ltude suivie de discussion

Prsentation de la stratgie suivie de discussion

34


34/39

Prsentation de la CEDEAO

II- Travaux proprement dits de latelier

2-1 Prsentation du sujet, contexte et justificationCette prsentation a t faite par M. OUEDRAOGO Mahama de lUnion Africaine. Elle a port essentiellement sur : La gense, les

objectifs assigns, le partenariat, lapproche dvelopp et les rsultats attendus pour le nouveau projet.

2-2 Prsentation des rsultats de ltude suivie de discussion

Les rsultats de ltude ont t prsents par Dr Lapodini Marc ATOUGA.. Ltude ralise a permis de ressortir six rsultats qui

sarticulent autour des points suivants : La confirmation de lImportance socio conomique du manguier ;

Les dfis relever tels que limpact des dgts et les mthodes de contrle des insectes, la collaboration entrez Etats et lesopportunits saisir comme la production de mangue biologique afin daccrotre lexportation internationale;

Les capacits scientifiques et techniques existantes telles que les paquets technologiques, les infrastructures (insectarium de

Bobo), les centres de recherche et les comptences techniques (chercheurs); Les documents de contrle qui portent sur les initiatives pour chaque pays pour le projet afin dharmoniser la lutte ;

La lutte rgionale avec des initiatives des organisations sous rgionales comme la CEDEAO et la CMA La stratgie Rgionale de contrle qui acquiert le soutient des tats.

A lissue de ces prsentations, plusieurs questions ont t abordes. Il sagit notamment de:

La faible reprsentation des producteurs et transformateurs cet atelier ;

35


35/39

Leffectif rduit du genre fminin chercheur la rencontre ainsi que le rle de la femme dans le projet ;

Le retard mis pour la rdaction du projet de stratgie de lutte (2002 2008);

La manifestation de lengagement des pays dans la lutte biologique dans une stratgie rgionale ;

Le lien et le rle de linsectarium de bobo qui veut avoir un caractre rgional et celui de lIITA ;

La modification du titre du projet de stratgie pour viter une contradiction avec les autres initiatives rgionales comme celle

concernant les Tephritidae par la CEDEAO ;

Lexistence de paquets technologiques prouvs rellement pour mener une lutte biologique efficace afin datteindre les objectifs

de production et dexportation des marchs biologiques et quitables ;

Le lien existant entre le projet rgional de lutte intgre et ce nouveau projet ;

La lutte contre les ravageurs au niveau des concessions familiales vu limportance du manguier pour les mnages ;

Lutilisation unique de la lutte biologique au lieu de la lutte intgre pour venir bout de Rastrococcus invadens.

A toutes ces questions, des rponses satisfaisantes ont t trouves.

Des observations et amendements ont t faits: Faire apparaitre dans le rapport, les capacits de chaque pays ; Dcrire brivement les projets et les initiatives de recherche dans chaque pays ; Indiquer les acquis transfrables lissue des dits projets ; Organiser des rencontres avec les producteurs pour diffuser les acquis ; Utiliser la stratgie de lutte biologique qui servira de relais en intgrant la gestion

A la demande de certains participants, chaque pays et institution a t invit partag son exprience en matire de lutte contre la

cochenille farineuse. Il ressort de ces changes que la cochenille farineuse est un redoutable ravageur pour le manguier. Les luttes

chimique et biologique sont utilises pour contrler les populations de ces cochenilles.

36


36/39

Pour la lutte chimique, les pesticides tels que le Thiamethoxame et le chlorpyriphos Ethyl ont t appliqus respectivement au Burkina

Faso et en Cote dIvoire. En ce qui concerne la lutte biologique, elle a consist lutilisation des ennemis naturels de la cochenille dans

tous les pays. Cette activit sest ralise grce lappui de lIITA. Le taux de parasitisme varie de 15 70 % selon les pays.

2-3 Prsentation du projet de stratgie

Le projet de stratgie a t prsent par Dr Otoidobiga Lenli Claude. Les points suivants ont t dvelopps : Limportance socio conomique de la mangue dans les pays ouest africains ; Les dgts et pertes causs par les nuisibles telles que les maladies et les insectes ; Le contrle de ces nuisibles par la lutte intgre (produit chimique, bio-insecticides, ennemis naturels, parasitodes) ; La lutte biologique classique qui savre moins coteuse contre la cochenille farineuse par lutilisation des ennemis naturels tels

que Anagyrus mangicola et Gyranusodea Tebigy noyes ;

Les options de lutte possible par linterdpendance entre les pays pour juguler les contraintes financires et transfrontalires; Les diffrentes composantes que sont :

Linsectarium ;

Lunit de coordination rgionale ;

Les services de recherche nationaux ;

LUA/SAFGRAD, CEDEAO et autres institutions. Lorganigramme du projet.

Avant de passer aux discussions sur le projet de stratgie, Mr TRAORE SY Alain de la Commission CEDEAO a fait une

prsentation du Plan dAction Rgional de Lutte contre la mouche des fruits

37


37/39

Il faut signaler que ce plan a t valid et attend sa mise en uvre. Il sert de guideline pour llaboration du projet de stratgie et

na pas t objet de discussions

Des changes fructueux sur le projet de stratgie, il en est ressorti six composantes pour le projet (Voir tableau ci-dessus).

La journe du 30 dcembre 2009 a t consacr la poursuite des discussions sur la stratgie de mise en uvre du projet de lutte

biologique . Elles ont essentiellement portes sur : la dfinition des composantes du programme ; les activits raliser ; les niveaux de mise en uvre des activits ; la dsignation des principaux responsables.

Les rsultats de ces discussions ont permis didentifier 06 six composantes et leur contenues qui sont prsentes dans le tableau ci-

dessous.

The mango mealy bug biological control project 38


38/39

Tableau : composantes et activits du programme de lutte biologique

NB : les diffrentes activits sont affiner et les principaux responsables prciser.

COMPOSANTES ACTIVITES NIVEAU REGIONAL NIVEAUNATIONAL

PrincipauxResponsables

7. Coordination du Programme o Mobilisation des ressources x

SAFGRAD

o Suivi & Evaluation xo Dveloppement de partenariat xo Administration et Finances xo Communication xo Harmonisation des Programmes xo Planification des activits x

8. Production & Diffusion o Elevage de masse et distribution x x IITA/SNRAso Formation des formateurs (chercheurs, techniciens) x x IITA/SNRAso Lcher x SNRAs

9. Renforcement des capacits o Formation des acteurs (producteurs, etc.) x x SNRAs/DPVo Infrastructures et Equipements x x Etat/Donateur

10. Recherche & Dveloppement o Inventaire des ennemis naturels x IITA/SNRAs

o Suivi de la dynamique des populations x SNRAso Lchers et Suivi des populations x SNRAs/DPVo Dveloppement dautres mthodes de lutte

compatiblesx x SNRAs/IITA

o Stratgies de Vulgarisation x DPV/SNRAs11. Suivi & Evaluation o Suivi et Evaluation de lexcution des activits x x Coordinations rgionale

et nationale

o

Suivi de limpact du Programme (indicateursdimpact) x x Coordinations rgionaleet nationale12. Communication o Concevoir, Excuter un Plan de stratgies

dinformation de Communication et desensibilisation (mass media, table-ronde, etc.)

x x Coordinations rgionaleet nationale

The mango mealy bug biological control project 39


39/39

Les organes de pilotage retenus lissu des dbats sont :

- AU NIVEAU REGIONALUne Coordination rgionale assure par lUA/SAFGRAD ;Un Comit Directeur (Steering Commitee) qui se runit une fois par an et ou exceptionnellement.

- AU NIVEAU NATIONALo Un Comit National de lutte biologique contre la cochenille farineuse du manguier composs des

organisations de Producteurs, de systmes nationaux de Recherche et Vulgarisation, des Directions de laProtection des Vgtaux qui pourraient se runir deux fois par an ;

o Un Coordonnateur National de programme charg de coordonner la mise en uvre des activits dans sonpays

Fait Ouagadougou, le 30 dcembre 2009

LAtelier

Mango Bio Control Project-final Report

Documents

Transcript of Mango Bio Control Project-final Report