Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

21
1 APCOP- MfDR Managing for Development Results (MfDR) May 2011 1

description

Managing for Development Results ( MfDR ). May 2011. 1. Presentation Topics. Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR. 2. Public Sector Management Cycle. National Development Plan. Plan. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

Page 1: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

1APCOP-MfDR

Managing for Development

Results (MfDR) May 2011

1

Page 2: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

2APCOP-MfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR

Presentation Topics

2

Page 3: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

3APCOP-MfDR

Plan

Public Sector Management Cycle

Allocate Resources

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

National Development

Plan

National Budget

ImplementationNational Monitoring

National Evaluation

Sub- National Budget

Sub-NationalDevelopment

Plan

Sub-National Program

Implementation

Sub-NationalPerformance Monitoring

Sub-NationalPerformance

Evaluation

Sector Development

Plan

Sector Budget

Sector Program Implementation

Sector Performance Monitoring

Sector Performance

Evaluation

3

Page 4: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

4APCOP-MfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR

Topics

4

Page 5: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

5APCOP-MfDR

Making PSM Results-Based

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

PLAN FOR RESULTS• Results /activities

defined• Indicators, targets

BUDGET FOR RESULTS• Budget aligned with

activities

IMPLEMENT FOR RESULTS• People• Policies• Processes

MONITOR RESULTS• Linked to planning• How & who• Data, reporting

EVALUATE RESULTS• How & who• Dissemination,

feedbackResults

5

Page 6: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

6APCOP-MfDR

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Core Results Attributes

6

Page 7: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

7APCOP-MfDR

Horizontal and Vertical Integration

Focus on Common Results

Inter-dependent PSM components

Informed Decisions Continuous Learning

Core Results Attributes

Key FeaturesPlan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

Results

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

7

Page 8: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

8APCOP-MfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR

Topics

8

Page 9: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

9APCOP-MfDR

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Core Results Attributes

9

Page 10: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

10APCOP-MfDR

Capacity Development

Goals

Plan

Budget

ImplementMonitor

Evaluate

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

1. Assess gaps

2. Identify constraints

3. Develop actions

Country Planning System

10

Page 11: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

11APCOP-MfDR

Senior Government Officials as change agents

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

1. Assess gaps

2. Identify constraints

3. Develop plans

Country system

Drive Process

11

Page 12: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

12APCOP-MfDR

Public Sector Management Results-Based Approaches Capacity Development Asia Pacific Community of Practice on MfDR

Topics

12

Page 13: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

13APCOP-MfDR

Asia-Pacific CoP on MfDR

ADB(Secretariat)

Onlookers

Active Members

CoordinatingCommittee Development

Partners

13

Page 14: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

14APCOP-MfDR

Modes of Activities

• Virtual Learning

• Face to Face

14

Page 15: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

15APCOP-MfDR

15

Page 16: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

16APCOP-MfDR

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

Define core attributes

Share good practices

South –South dialogueDialogue with Donors

Regional Level- APCoP members;

16

Page 17: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

17APCOP-MfDR

Country Level:APCoP members as change agents

Core attributes• - - - - - -• - - - - - -• - - - - - -

1. Assess gaps

2. Identify constraints

3. Develop plans

Country system

Drive Process

17

Page 18: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

18APCOP-MfDR

18

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study – Bangladesh

Page 19: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

19APCOP-MfDR

19

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study : Cambodia Rural Development Sector

Page 20: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

20APCOP-MfDR

20

PLANNING BUDGETING IMPLEMENTATION (Institutional)

MONITORING EVALUATION

Linkages between Levels of Results defined

Results Based Budgeting system established

Institutional priorities aligned to planning outcomes

Indicators from Planning

Evaluation Methodology formulated

Indicators with targets specified for each level of results

Budget based on results from planning

Policies,People, Processes orientatied to deliver intended activities

Institutional responsibilities defined

Institutional Responsibilities defined

Indicators satisfy S.M.A.R.T principles (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant , Time Bound)

Budgets have medium term horizon linked to planning

Service delivery standards established

Data Processing Methodology specified

Dissemination Methodology formulated

Planning targets aligned to available budgets

Tracking and reporting methodology for budget execution established

Analysis and Reporting Methodology Specified

Stakeholder engagement defined

Pilot Study : Bhutan – Transport Sector

Page 21: Managing for Development Results ( MfDR )

21APCOP-MfDR

Thank You!