Managing citations

• Capture at moment of storage• Capture bibliography-ready (complete)– Author(s): Last and first• Journals: Title, journal, volume, number, pg. range• Books: Book title, publisher, city, date• Website: Page/doc title, pub date, access date, URL

Debate citations

• Unique additions– Qualifications, ISSN, ISBN, DOI, etc.– Structure

Tagline (argument synopsis)

Debate citation

Quoted text (evidence)

Debate evidence

Debate citation

TAGLINE

Jacobsen et al 2015, DOF @ U Oregon[Trond, Punzalan R, Hedstrom M, “Invoking ‘collective memory’: mapping the emergence of

a concept in archival science, Archival Science, v.13(2-3), pp. 217-251]

Jacobsen, DOF @ U Oregon 2015, et al [Trond, Punzalan R, Hedstrom M, “Invoking ‘collective memory’: mapping the emergence of

a concept in archival science, Archival Science, v.13(2-3), pp. 217-251]

EVIDENCE TEXT

Chomsky 1985 [Noam, Institute Professor in Linguistics, MIT, Turning the Tide, pp. 8-9] We live entangled in webs of endless deceit, often self-deceit, but with a little honest effort, it is possible to extricate ourselves from them. If we do, we will see a world that is rather different from the one presented to us by a remarkably effective ideological system, a world that is much uglier, often horrifying. We will also learn that our own actions, or passive acquiescence, contribute quite substantially to misery and oppression, and perhaps eventual global destruction. But there is a brighter side. We are fortunate to live in a society that is not only rich and powerful—and hence, as any student of history would expect, dangerous and destructive—but also relatively free and open, perhaps more so than any other, though this may change if the reactionary jingoists who have misappropriated the term “conservative” succeed in their current project of diminishing civil liberties, strengthening the power of the state, and protecting it from public scrutiny. For those who are relatively wealthy and privileged, a very large sector of a society as rich as ours, there are ample opportunities to discover the truth about who we are and what we do in the world. Furthermore, by international standards the state is limited at home in its capacity to coerce. Hence those who enjoy a measure of wealth and privilege are free to act in many ways, without undue fear of state terror, to bring about crucial changes in policy and even more fundamental institutional changes. We are fortunate, perhaps uniquely so, in the range of opportunities we enjoy for free inquiry and effective action. The significance of these facts can hardly be exaggerated. I want to consider here some aspects of the reality that is often concealed or deformed by the reigning doctrinal system, which pervades the media, journals of opinion, and much of scholarship. An honest inquiry will reveal that striking and systematic features of our international behavior are suppressed, ignored or denied. It will reveal further that our role in perpetuating misery and oppression, even barbaric torture and mass slaughter, is not only significant in scale, but is also a predictable and systematic consequence of longstanding geopolitical conceptions and institutional structures. There is no way to give a precise measure of the scale of our responsibility in each particular case, but whether we conclude that our share is 90%, or 40%, or 2%, it is that factor that should primarily concern us, since it is that factor that we can directly influence. It is cheap and easy to deplore the other fellow’s crimes in the manner of the official peace movements of the so-called “Communist” states, or their counterparts in the West who, with comparable sincerity, denounce the crimes of official enemies while dismissing or justifying our own. An honest person will choose a different course.

SURVIVAL REQUIRES PERSONAL REJECTION OF DOMINANT PROPAGANDA Debaters are privileged intellectuals. We are uniquely positioned to expose lies and to act.Failure to reject propaganda masks our role in global oppression and destruction.

Chomsky 1985 [Noam, Institute Professor in Linguistics, MIT, Turning the Tide, pp. 8-9] We live entangled in webs of endless deceit, often self-deceit, but with a little honest effort, it is possible to extricate ourselves from them. If we do, we will see a world that is rather different from the one presented to us by a remarkably effective ideological system, a world that is much uglier, often horrifying. We will also learn that our own actions, or passive acquiescence, contribute quite substantially to misery and oppression, and perhaps eventual global destruction. But there is a brighter side. We are fortunate to live in a society that is not only rich and powerful—and hence, as any student of history would expect, dangerous and destructive—but also relatively free and open, perhaps more so than any other, though this may change if the reactionary jingoists who have misappropriated the term “conservative” succeed in their current project of diminishing civil liberties, strengthening the power of the state, and protecting it from public scrutiny. For those who are relatively wealthy and privileged, a very large sector of a society as rich as ours, there are ample opportunities to discover the truth about who we are and what we do in the world. Furthermore, by international standards the state is limited at home in its capacity to coerce. Hence those who enjoy a measure of wealth and privilege are free to act in many ways, without undue fear of state terror, to bring about crucial changes in policy and even more fundamental institutional changes. We are fortunate, perhaps uniquely so, in the range of opportunities we enjoy for free inquiry and effective action. The significance of these facts can hardly be exaggerated. I want to consider here some aspects of the reality that is often concealed or deformed by the reigning doctrinal system, which pervades the media, journals of opinion, and much of scholarship. An honest inquiry will reveal that striking and systematic features of our international behavior are suppressed, ignored or denied. It will reveal further that our role in perpetuating misery and oppression, even barbaric torture and mass slaughter, is not only significant in scale, but is also a predictable and systematic consequence of longstanding geopolitical conceptions and institutional structures. There is no way to give a precise measure of the scale of our responsibility in each particular case, but whether we conclude that our share is 90%, or 40%, or 2%, it is that factor that should primarily concern us, since it is that factor that we can directly influence. It is cheap and easy to deplore the other fellow’s crimes in the manner of the official peace movements of the so-called “Communist” states, or their counterparts in the West who, with comparable sincerity, denounce the crimes of official enemies while dismissing or justifying our own. An honest person will choose a different course.