Management of Malignant Polyps
-
Upload
flavian-myles -
Category
Documents
-
view
96 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Management of Malignant Polyps
Management of Malignant Polyps
Santhat Nivatvongs, MD
Colon and Rectal Surgery
Mayo Clinic
Rochester Minnesota
U.S.A.
Literature ReviewHigh Risk of LNM in Malignant Polyps
• Lymphovascular invasion
• Poor differentiation
• Gender, positive margins
• Extensive budding, microacinar structures
• Depressed lesions
• Deep submucosal invasion (Sm3)
Pathologic Assessment of Malignant PolypsInter-observer Variability
Kappa Statistics--a measure of observer agreement
Characteristics Kappa Result
Lymphovascular invasion 0.017 poor
Histologic grade 0.163 poor
Haggitt’s classification 0.682 very good
T stage 0.725 very good Komuta K, Batts K, et al . Br J Surg 2004; 91:1479
Malignant Polyps Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis
LNM (%)
Pedunculated -- Level 1,2,3 < 1
Sessile & Pedunculated Level 4 12 Haggitt R, et al. Gastroent 1985; 89:328
Nivatvongs S, et al. DCR 1991; 34:323
Kyzer S, et al. Cancer 1992; 70:2044
Sessile Malignant PolypIndependent Risk Factors
Factor Odds ratio 95% CI p
LVI 3.5 1.4-8.9 0.009
Sm3 5.0 2.3-10.6 <0.001
Lower 1/3 R 6.0 2.2-14.2 <0.001 Nascimbeni R et al DCR 2002;45:200
High Risk of LN Metastasis In T1 Low Rectum
Author No. Treatment LNM (%)
Nascimbeni 2002 29 LAR / APR 34
Goldstein 1999 53 APR 17
Blumberg 1998 48 LAR / APR 10
Adequate Local Excision
Colon Clear margins
Clear depth > 2 mm
Low rectum Clear margins
Full thickness
LOCAL EXCISION FOR T1 CA. RECTUM
Standard Criteria
Size < 3 cm
Full thickness excision, 1 cm margin
Not undifferenciated Ca.
No lymphovascular invasion
LITERATURE REVIEWLocal Excision Ca. Rectum ( T1)
Author Yr No. Loc Recur(%) FU/ M0
Madbouly 2005 52 17 55
Nascimbeni 2004 70 7 60
Paty 2002 67 14 60
Mellgren 2000 69 18 52
OUTCOME OF MID OR LOW RECTAL CA
Local Excision Resection p
N=70 N=74
5 yr (%) 10 yr (%) 5 yr (%) 10 yr (%)
Local recurrence 6.6 12.2 2.8 6.2 0.26
Distant metastasis 14.2 20.5 6.9 10.2 0.13
Overall survival 72.4 44.3 90.4 72.0 0.008
Ca-free survival 66.6 39.6 83.6 69.8 0.003
Nascimbeni R et al. DCR 2004; 47: 1773
T1 Carcinoma of RectumLocal Excision vs Radical Resection
You YN, Baxter NN, Stewart A, Nelson H (ACOSOG)
National Data Base 1994-1996 ---Follow-up 6.3 yr
Local Excision Radical Resection p
Number of patient 601 493
Overall Survival (5 yr) 77 % 82% 0.09
Disease Free Survival (5 yr) 93% 97% 0.004
Local Recurrence (5 yr) 13% 7% 0.003
T1 Carcinoma of Rectum
The data favor radical surgery as the more definitive
cancer treatment but do not eliminate local excision as a
reasonable choice for many patients
Bentrem DJ, et al. Ann Surg 2005; 242:472
Local Excision Plus Chemoradiation
Author No. Recur. (%) FU (mo)
Lamont 2000 10 0 33
Bouvet 1999 37 5 51
( 68% treated )
Bailey 1992 35 T1 10 60
18 T2
Paty 2002 67 ( untreated ) 17 120
7 ( treated ) 17 120
PO Radiation After Local ExcisionR Benson, BJ Cummings, et al. Int J Rad Onc Biol Phy 2001; 50:1309 Princess Margaret Hosp. Toronto
24 T1-- Low Rectum ( median 4cm from anal verge )
Reasons for radiation ( no chemo) Fragmentaions 29 %
LVI 41 %
Positive margins 42 %
Recurrence at 5 yr 39 %
Disease-free survival at 5 yr 59 %
Immediate vs Salvage Resection
No Ca -free survival ( % )
Immediate radical resection 37 79 % at 5 yr Mayo Clinic DCR 2005; 48:429
Delayed radical resection 21 56 at 5 yr Cleveland Clinic DCR 2005; 48:711
Delayed radical resection 49 53 at 5 yr Memorial DCR 2005; 48:1169
Delayed radical resection 24 50 at 3 yr Univ Minn DCR 2000; 43:1064
Management of Malignant PolypsSummary
Patients’ risk Local excision
Radical resection
Cancer risk Lymphovascular invasion Sm3 or high grade
Lower 1/3 rectum
Adequate excision Size < 3 cm
Management of Malignant PolypsHigh Risk Group
• Colon, high rectum Radical Resection
• Low rectum LAR / APR
Loc. Exc. +/- Ch R?
OUTCOME OF MID OR LOW RECTAL CA
Local Excision Resection p
N=70 N=74
5 yr (%) 10 yr (%) 5 yr (%) 10 yr (%)
Local recurrence 6.6 12.2 2.8 6.2 0.26
Distant metastasis 14.2 20.5 6.9 10.2 0.13
Overall survival 72.4 44.3 90.4 72.0 0.008
Ca-free survival 66.6 39.6 83.6 69.8 0.003
Nascimbeni R et al. DCR 2004; 47: 1773
Local Excision Followed by Radical Resection
T1 Ca Rectum No. FU (mo) Loc Recur (%) Met (%)
Study group 37 101 3 11
Match control 78 122 5 12
Hahnloser D, et al. DCR 2005; 48: 429