Thesis evaluation

ByMagdy M. Aly

Faculty of EducationAin Shams UniversityFacebook : Magdy Aly

Originality and significance:

•Title / new and not repeated

•Problem of research is a real one / it serves study

•The problem is clearly stated

•The research is a contribution to the field

•The research has applications and implications

Clarity of theoretical background:

Clarity of theoretical background:

The t.b is written according to a clear line of thought/ personality and the style of the researchNo cut and pasteThe T.b. is related and connected with the problem of the researchQuestions or hypotheses are formulated in light of the problem and the t.b and related to the research objectivesPrevious studies are relevant to the topic of the research.The research has his own views concerning these previous studies (analysis, appreciation, evaluation, comment) and the gaps (handicaps) in these studies which need to be bridged (met)

Method of the research:

•Objectives are related to the problem of the research

•Questions are research questions that need procedures and tools in order to be answered

•Sample is representative•Experimental design is adequate

•Tools are reliable and valid•Administration of tools, instructions and

scoring are intact

Statistical techniques

• Appropriate

•Deductions are accurate without fallacies and exaggerations

Consistency in analyzing results:

•Tables are readable, their results are related to questions or hypotheses of the study

•Analysis of data answered all the research questions

Accuracy in discussing and

Accuracy in discussing and interpreting results :

•Discussion of the research results in comparison with results of other studies

•Objectivity in deductions

•Recommendations are related to results and conclusions

Clarity of language:

•Clarity of language:

•Readable

•Well constructed

•Not redundancy

•No misleading sentences or phrases

Style of presentation:

•Logical sequence of research items (Introduction- Theoretical background- the problem- objectives- questions- sample- tools –results – discussion – conclusion – recommendations – references – appendices )

•Balance in presenting these parts•Line of thought

•References are enough and documentation:

•Accurate

•Scientific

•Up to date

Ethical Considerations

•-Getting permissions

• -Citations

• -Honesty

• -Confidentiality

• -TRIPS