Louisiana coastal master plan

45
Imagine the result High Performance Computing for the 2017 Louisiana Coastal Master Plan Z. Cobell

Transcript of Louisiana coastal master plan

Imagine the result

High Performance Computing for the 2017 Louisiana Coastal Master Plan

Z. Cobell

9 September 20152

Acknowledgements

*This project was funded by The Water Institute of the Gulf under project award number

CPRA-2012-TO3-EM. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author

and do not necessarily represent the views of The Water Institute of the Gulf

9 September 20153

Acknowledgements

9 September 20154

Motivation • Coastal Louisiana is in a land loss crisis.

• 4800 sq km lost since 1930*

• 4500 sq km potential loss by 2060*

• More loss, more damage

• $23 billion additional damage from storm surge due to

loss by 2060*

*Peyronnin et al, 2013, Louisiana’s 2012 Coastal Master Plan: Overview of a Science-

Based and Publicly Informed Decision-Making Process

9 September 20155

Agenda • Numerical Models Employed

• 2007 LACPR

• 2012 Master Plan

• 2017 Master Plan

• Conclusions

6 9 September 2015

Numerical Models

9 September 20157

Numerical Models

• ADCIRC

• Circulation model

• Solves shallow water equations

• Unstructured finite element mesh

• Serial or MPI

• SWAN

• Spectral wave model

• Solves action density equation for non-stationary waves

• Unstructured, curvilinear, or structured mesh

• Serial, OpenMP, or MPI

9 September 20158

METIS Decomposition

9 September 20159

Model Communication

9 September 201510

Coupled Simulation Schematic

Fx Fyζ u v

wx wy

ADCIRC

UnSWAN

0 600 1200

TIME

Note: This is a single model run

9 September 201511

Model Efficiency

9 September 201512

Model Efficiency

9 September 201513

Model Efficiency

9 September 201514

Model Efficiency

9 September 201515

Model Domain

9 September 201516

Model Domain

9 September 201517

Model Domain

9 September 201518

Model Validation

9 September 201519

Model Validation

20 9 September 2015

LACPR 2007

9 September 201521

2007 LACPR • 2007 FEMA study in Louisiana created suite of 446 synthetic

hurricanes

• These 446 storms used to define the statistical returns for

water surface elevation

9 September 201522

2007 LACPR • One of the first studies of its kind

• Developed methods still used today

• Computers simply unable to analyze large numbers of

projects

• Large storm set

• Computational time required per simulation

• Conducted at USACE supercomputing facilities

23 9 September 2015

2012 Master Plan Framework

9 September 201524

2012 Master Plan Framework

• Framework to analyze proposed restoration projects

• How do these projects effect the landscape?

• How do these projects effect each other?

• How do these projects reduce damage during storms?

9 September 201525

2012 Master Plan Framework

• Modeling system developed to aid in project selection

process

• Includes models for:

• Vegetation

• Water Quality

• Ecology/Hydrology

• Wetland Morphology

• Barrier Island Morphology

• Fish/Wildlife

• Storm Surge/Waves

• Damage/Risk Analysis

9 September 201526

Model Interaction

9 September 201527

Model Interaction

9 September 201528

2012 Master Plan

• Premise of analyzing large number of projects and large

number of environmental scenarios

• Storm suite reduced while maintaining acceptable levels of

accuracy

9 September 201529

2012 Master Plan

• 2012

• Project level screening analysis – 40 storm suite

• 34 hurricane protection projects analyzed

• Projects grouped into 7 non-interacting groups to

isolate impacts

9 September 201530

Project Groups

9 September 201531

Simulation Results

9 September 201532

2012 Master Plan

• 2012

• Project level screening analysis – 40 storm suite

• 34 hurricane protection projects analyzed

• Projects grouped into non-interacting groups to isolate

impacts

• 7 groupings and base condition

• Portfolio analysis – 40 storm suite

• Future conditions with different suites of projects

implemented

9 September 201533

Model Interaction

9 September 201534

2012 Master Plan

• 2012

• Project level screening analysis – 40 storm suite

• 34 hurricane protection projects analyzed

• Projects grouped into non-interacting groups to isolate

impacts

• 7 groupings and base condition

• Portfolio analysis – 40 storm suite

• Future conditions with different suites of projects

implemented

9 September 201535

Simulation Results

9 September 201536

2012 Master Plan

• 2012

• Total simulations conducted:

• Project Level

40 storms

8 groupings (7+1 base condition)

3 scenarios

840 simulations

• Alternative Level

40 storms

3 groupings

3 scenarios

2* time levels (0*, 25, 50 years)

800 simulations

1640 simulations

~6MM CPU Hours

37 9 September 2015

2017 Master Plan

9 September 201538

2017 Simulation Suite

• 2017 – In progress

• Number of storms increased

• 60 storm project screening level suite

– 3 time levels

– 3 scenarios

• 154 storm alternatives analysis suite

– 3 time levels

– 3 scenarios

• Total planned simulations: 7712

• Total planned CPU hours: ~10MM

39 9 September 2015

Computational Resources

9 September 201540

Computational Resources

• 2007 LACPR Resource – USACE “Sapphire”

• Cray XT3

• Dual AMD Opteron Processors @ 2.6GHz

• 8192 total cores

• Shared government resource

• 2012 Master Plan Resource – “Athos”

• Online 2010

• Dual 6 core Nehalem Processors @ 2.67GHz

• Qlogic QDR Infiniband, 2:1 Oversubscription

• 996 total cores

• Dedicated resource

• 2017 Master Plan Resource – “Aegaeon”

• Online 2015

• Dual 12 core Sandy Bridge Processors @ 2.5GHz

• Mellanox FDR Infiniband, 2:1 Oversubscription

• 1488 total cores

• Dedicated resource

9 September 201541

Computational Resources • Aegaeon (2015) provides nearly a 2X speedup versus the

machine developed in 2010

5000

50000

500000

10 100 1000 10000

Scaling Analaysis

Aegaeon (sec) Athos (sec)

9 September 201542

Conclusions

9 September 201543

Conclusions • 2007 – 446 simulations

• 2012 – 1640 simulations (x3.6) – 4MM CPU

• 2017 – 7712 simulations (x4.7) – 8MM CPU

• The number of simulations that can be reasonably completed

has grown drastically

• CPUs, Interconnects, Storage, Availability

• The “value” of a CPU hour has increased

• These simulations heavily influence policy decisions

• The computational power we can harness, the more detail we

can provide to policy makers

9 September 201544

Conclusions • Computer speed has increased to allow high performance

models to derive forecasts

Imagine the result