Louise McArdle Richard Saundry PeteThomas 1. Research on mediation typically empirical Reflects the...
-
Upload
madison-rogers -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Louise McArdle Richard Saundry PeteThomas 1. Research on mediation typically empirical Reflects the...
Louise McArdleRichard Saundry
PeteThomas
1
Research on mediation typically empirical◦ Reflects the tendency in industrial, relations research
whereby theoretical aspects are not made explicit (Edwards, 2011)
Critical Discourse Analysis◦ (Chouliaraki & Fairclough, 1999)◦ Used to explore the discursive processes involved in
the development of a mediation scheme◦ Focus on the meaning of mediation in the context of
antagonistic articulations by individuals and groups involved
Change◦ Changing workplace relations depends upon changing
the interpretation of the meaning of mediation
2
Discourse as an important aspect of social practice Role in constituting social practices
Allows understanding of the ways in which meaning is generated and how meanings become fixed (albeit temporarily)
Social practices involve a struggle to fix meanings through political processes and articulation
Politicized view of social organization reflects antagonism of workplace relations (Edwards 1990) Goes beyond usual class or relations of production
explanations of conflict Process of antagonism is played out in struggles over the
articulation within organizations
3
Introduction of mediation in a Primary Care Trust ◦ PCT = conjuncture
3 main groups involved in political processes to try and fix discursive meaning of mediation◦ Senior HR managers◦ Operational managers◦ Union reps (staff side)
Grievance Culture Discourse – Partnership Discourse
4
Dominant discourse within the conjuncture◦ Discourse of conflict permeated relations between
management and union representatives◦ Lack of opportunity to articulate members’ interests
Formal procedures used to articulate interests Discourse influences the meaning of mediation
◦ HR Management – mediation interpreted as a solution to problem of conflict
◦ Union Reps - Deliberate attempt at incorporation and threat to their role
◦ Operational managers – threat to authority
5
New HR Director brought partnership working to the organization
‘investment’ in partnership – more active role for union reps
More opportunity for dialogue between operational managers and ‘staff-side’◦ High trust social relations◦ Better shared understanding of the corrosive grievance
culture New interpretation for the meaning of mediation
◦ Partnership as a ‘label’ to ‘real’ partnership between management and unions reps
◦ Hostile antagonism to ‘co-operative’ struggle
6
Changing workplace relations dependent upon changing meaning (of mediation) in relationship to the partnership discourse
Roles of managers and trade union officials needs to be contextualised within the conjuncture of social and power relations
Meaning plays a central part in the development of the mediation scheme ◦ Grievance culture to partnership
Change represents a shift in abilities to articulate interests and thereby build trust and confidence
7
CDA allows appreciation of the political processes at play in social organizations through struggles between discourses and beyond the structures and processes of workplace relations
Specific actors are significant in shaping the meaning of mediation and in fixing that meaning with other social actors
Implications◦ Mediation cannot be simply ‘dropped in’ as a solution
to problematic workplace relations◦ Meaning of mediation is fluid and therefore transitory
8
Edwards P (2011) Message from the Editor-in Chief Human Relations 65(1):3-4
Edwards P (1990) ‘Understanding conflict in the Labour Process: The logic and autonomy of struggle’ in Knights D & Willmott H (eds) Labour Process Theory London: Macmillan
Chouliaraki L & Fairclough N (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity, Edinburgh:Edinburgh University press
9