"Looking through the GLAAS"
-
Upload
ursula-melton -
Category
Documents
-
view
23 -
download
0
description
Transcript of "Looking through the GLAAS"
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water1 |
Ministerial Dialogueon Sanitation and Water
Washington, DC
22 April 2010
Federico Properzi Peregrine SwannProject Manager Senior [email protected] [email protected]
WHO GLAAS Team
"Looking through the GLAAS"
"Looking through the GLAAS"
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water2 |
Context and content of presentationContext and content of presentation Data from first UN-Water GLAAS report – launched yesterday 21 April
Report includes data from nearly all donors and 42 developing countries
WHO GLAAS team worked closely with World Bank WSP team that is preparing the Country Status Overviews for 32 African countries
Strong collaboration between UN-Water GLAAS and WSP-CSO
Presentation looks at:– Impact of poor sanitation and unsafe water– Targeting of resources
• Who's providing the external resources?• Who's receiving ODA?• Who's not receiving ODA?• Are resources focused on the poor and the un-served?
– What is happening at the country level– Some highlights
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water3 |
OutlineOutline
1. Impact
2. Priorities
3. Targeting
4. Capacities
5. Partnerships
6. Highlights
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water4 |
1. Impact of poor sanitationand unsafe water
1. Impact of poor sanitationand unsafe water
HEALTH
2.2 million preventable deaths of children
Diarrhoea the second leading contributor to global disease burden
For children under 15, impact of diarrhoea greater than that of HIV/AIDS, malaria and TB combined
Overall around 9% of the global burden of disease attributable to poor sanitation and unsafe water
EDUCATION
11% increase in girls attendance in Bangladesh – UNICEF study
Evidence of increased learning performance when worm infections reduced
ECONOMY
$ economic benefits of many times the $ invested
World Bank estimate between 2% and 7% of GDP lost through poor sanitation and unsafe water in developing countries
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water5 |
1. Impact of poor sanitationand unsafe water
1. Impact of poor sanitationand unsafe water
% of deaths attibutable to WASH
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Afghanistan
Burkina Faso
Chad
Ethiopia
Liberia
Madagascar
Mali
Mauritania
Mozambique
Niger
Uganda
YemenSource:Safer Water, Better HealthWHO, 2008
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water6 |
2. PrioritiesDonor priority sectors
2. PrioritiesDonor priority sectors
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water7 |
2. PrioritiesAid for health and education has outpaced aid
for sanitation and drinking-water
2. PrioritiesAid for health and education has outpaced aid
for sanitation and drinking-water
0%
5%
10%
15%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Aid c
omm
itmen
ts as
a pe
rcent
of to
tal O
DA co
mm
itmen
ts
Water and sanitationEducationHealth, population, HIV/AIDs
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water8 |
2. PrioritiesDeveloping countries report insufficient funds to meet the sanitation and water MDG target
2. PrioritiesDeveloping countries report insufficient funds to meet the sanitation and water MDG target
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water9 |
UN-Water GLAAS 2010 ReportRecommendation No. 1
UN-Water GLAAS 2010 ReportRecommendation No. 1
Greater political commitment to sanitation and drinking-
water by donors and developing countries
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water10 |
3. Targeting42% of WASH aid to low-income countries
3. Targeting42% of WASH aid to low-income countries
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water11 |
3. TargetingGlobal trends of WASH aid
3. TargetingGlobal trends of WASH aid
Aid flows for basic water and sanitation remained relatively
constant at US$ 1.1 billion, and aid flows for large
systems increased from US$ 2.6 billion to US$ 4.3 billion
from 2000 to 2008
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water12 |
3. TargetingPoor targeting to unserved and poor
populations
3. TargetingPoor targeting to unserved and poor
populations
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water13 |
UN-Water GLAAS 2010 ReportRecommendation No. 2
UN-Water GLAAS 2010 ReportRecommendation No. 2
Target resources better to reach the sanitation and
drinking-water MDG Target
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water14 |
4. CapacitiesInstitutional roles and responsibilities need to
be better defined and operationalized
4. CapacitiesInstitutional roles and responsibilities need to
be better defined and operationalized
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water15 |
4. CapacitiesInvestment programmes in sanitation are
lagging behind
4. CapacitiesInvestment programmes in sanitation are
lagging behind
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water16 |
4. CapacitiesStaff shortages primarily due to
inadequate budgets
4. CapacitiesStaff shortages primarily due to
inadequate budgets
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water17 |
UN-Water GLAAS 2010 ReportRecommendation No. 3
UN-Water GLAAS 2010 ReportRecommendation No. 3
Strengthen national systems to plan, implement and
monitor delivery of services
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water18 |
5. PartnershipsProcedures to promote local stakeholder
participation are weak
5. PartnershipsProcedures to promote local stakeholder
participation are weak
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water19 |
5. PartnershipsMost aid recipients have a multitude of donors
disbursing funds
5. PartnershipsMost aid recipients have a multitude of donors
disbursing funds
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water20 |
5. PartnershipsAid disbursements generally follow
commitment levels
5. PartnershipsAid disbursements generally follow
commitment levels
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water21 |
UN-Water GLAAS 2010 ReportRecommendation No. 4
UN-Water GLAAS 2010 ReportRecommendation No. 4
Stronger partnerships to develop and implement national sanitation and
drinking-water plans
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water22 |
6. Highlights Donors
6. Highlights Donors
WASH aid increased between 2000 and 2008: by over 150% to Africa and over 50% globally
Over the same period, WASH aid reduced as a % of overall aid (from approx 6.3% to 4.7%)
42% of aid targeted to LICs (plus some regional aid)
Top 12 priority recipients receive 50% of WSS aid
ODA for basic services declined from 27% to 16% over the last five years
Donors targeted 37% of WASH aid to sanitation against 63% to water
Predictability of donor funding as perceived by GLAAS countries increasing
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water23 |
6. Highlights Developing countries
6. Highlights Developing countries
Most countries developed national MDG targets but financial flows to WASH insufficient to meet these national MDG targets in many countries
Governments spend 20% of WASH funds on sanitation (median figure)
Only one third of countries implement criteria for targeting resources to the poor for water and hardly any for sanitation
Most countries have developed WASH policies but only one half have clearly defined and operationalized roles for WASH institutions
Most countries are developing some kind of HRD plan, but many HR obstacles are cited
Most countries have an annual review process but few update undertakings made in previous reviews
Around one third of sub-sectors utilize over 75% of donor commitments, but 20% utilize less than 50%
Local participation in planning and implementation of programmes not consistently applied in any of the four sub-sectors (urban/rural water/sanitation)
UN-Water Global Annual Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water24 |
THANK YOUTHANK YOU
www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/glaas
Federico Properzi Peregrine SwannProject Manager Senior [email protected] [email protected]
WHO GLAAS Team