LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of...
Transcript of LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG€¦ · This report focuses on the final six months of...
REP/003/2017
LLWR Managing Director’s Report to WCSSG October 2016 to March 2017
WCSSG Scrutiny Report
REP/003/2017 Page 1 of 16
Contents
Highlights 2
Issues 5
Health, Safety, Security & Environment 6
Waste Management Services 8
National Waste Programme 10
Site Operations 12
Science & Engineering 13
Looking Forward 14
National Waste Programme Dashboard – March 2017 15
REP/003/2017 Page 2 of 16
This report focuses on the final six months of financial year 2016/17 at the Low Level
Waste Repository and provides a brief look ahead.
Highlights
It has been another year of achievement for LLWR, with a record amount of scope
delivered safely across the business and more waste diverted from the Repository Site
than ever before.
The majority of LLWR’s PBIs were achieved and the organisation successfully
managed a record Annual Site Funding Limit within tight tolerances. This was a result
of the excellent forecasting discipline that has been developed into business planning
activities.
Paul Pointon, former Head of Site, has
transitioned into a new role of Deputy Managing
Director. This new role gives oversight to
leadership and governance roles at the same
time as providing continuity, stability and
increased capacity to enable the creation and
management of a programme office to administer
the Repository Development Programme (RDP)
whilst freeing up the Managing Director (MD)
from day-to-day business activities.
Paul is one of the nine original PBO Nominated Staff representatives from 2008 and
was instrumental in developing the PBO’s tender for the Management and Operation
of LLW Repository Ltd. He has worked alongside the MD and Lead Team colleagues
in developing appropriate fit-for-purpose management and operational processes and
the underpinning organisational structure. He has been integral to the creation of a
solid foundation for the delivery of a successful enterprise, and has successfully
performed the function of Acting MD in the MD’s absence.
Replacing Paul as Head of LLWR Site is PBO Nominated Staff representative Iain
Irving. Iain held the role of Group Vice President, Nuclear and Environment
International Group with AECOM, and has extensive experience within the nuclear
industry and a wide ranging track record for cost effective delivery in business
development, stakeholder relations, project management, nuclear plant operations,
waste management, decommissioning and programme controls.
Iain Irving with Paul Pointon
REP/003/2017 Page 3 of 16
Iain will not be a stranger to members of the WCSSG as he represented Sellafield Ltd
in this forum during his time as Stakeholder Relations Director as a PBO Secondee.
The RDP Tranche 1 Business Case was approved by the NDA and associated funding
package allocated.
Installation of the new Security Fence around the Site perimeter was completed on
time and under budget, despite delays due to the discovery of uncharted cables.
Completion of the first pair of Type B transport packages and the receipt of the
transport licence from Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) has been a major
accomplishment. This first pair of packages will be used by Harwell to transport some
if it’s ILW to Sellafield starting in May. The second pair of packages are nearly
complete and in May, they will be delivered to LLWR Site to start the process of
shipping the ILW generated as a part of the PCM programme back to Sellafield.
The Sellafield Tritium Block was successfully consigned to the Cyclife Metal Recycling
Facility (MRF) at Lillyhall, supporting a waste management milestone for Sellafield to
complete before the end of the financial year.
Photographs of the new Security Fence
First pair of Type B packages (Novapaks)
REP/003/2017 Page 4 of 16
The LLWR/GRAHAM Construction ED&C Framework received industry recognition at
the Considerate Constructors Scheme (CCS) awards in Manchester by winning a
Bronze Award. In receiving this award from CCS – a scheme established by the
construction sector to improve its image by raising standards - the Framework was
rated ‘beyond compliant’ in all five categories under scrutiny. It is the first time LLWR
has entered the national award scheme and it is delighted with the success.
LLWR has again been active in the community, making donations to worthy causes
and encouraging volunteers from the workforce to participate in community initiatives.
Employees have raised £5,000 for the chosen charity of the year, West Cumbria
Carers, which includes match funding of £2,000 from the company.
LLWR have also approved a five-year sponsorship of the First Lego League and
members of the workforce gave up their time to support West Cumbrian schools in the
endeavour. A donation of hi-vis vests was made to Thornhill Primary School’s nursery,
and youngsters on a charity visit from deprived areas in Belarus were presented with
hi-vis bags filled with practical gifts and mementoes.
Representatives from LLWR and GRAHAM’s receiving the CCS Award
REP/003/2017 Page 5 of 16
Issues
Discussions with the NDA will continue over the next few months to understand the
scope for the third contract term.
Preparatory work is underway for RDP, a Programme which will necessitate disruption
to Drigg Village on a larger scale than in the past. LLWR will do all in its power to
mitigate disruption and as many deliveries as possible will arrive on Site by rail.
LLWR are currently investigating two potential misconsignment events. The
Environment Agency has been informed.
The Perfect Day initiative, which was introduced by LLWR’s decommissioning partner,
NSG, has been rolled out into the organisation. LLWR has modified the criteria set by
NSG to better suit to the organisations activities.
LLWR’s Perfect Day Criteria
Everyone goes home safe
We don’t damage property through carelessness or inattention
We work to our procedures or make timely challenge if they’re wrong
No complaints from stakeholders and local residents
Our environments isn’t harmed by our activities
No Security events
We deliver our work to the agreed timescales
Our behaviours and actions are in line with our Standards and Expectations
193 ‘Perfect Days’ were achieved in the financial year, equivalent to 53% of total days.
Whilst this is an encouraging figure for a concept relatively new to the organisation,
LLWR will strive to improve on this during 2017/18. The majority of lost days in
2016/17 occurred due to work planning and schedule adherence events.
REP/003/2017 Page 6 of 16
Health, Safety, Security and Environment
LLWR ended the financial year with 5.5 years without a RIDDOR reportable injury and
achieved 193 Perfect Days.
The total number of minor injuries, such as minor cuts, trips and falls, suffered by
LLWR staff and contractors was higher than LLWR views acceptable. Moving into
2017/18 financial year focus will be applied to improving basic safety behaviours with
the aim of minimising the number of injuries occurring as a result of insufficient care
and attention being paid when carrying out mundane, everyday activities.
Good progress was made against the EHS&Q Improvement Plan, with 76% of the
Plan being achieved by the year end, and some real safety improvements being
achieved, such as the declassification of magazines from C5 to C3 status (meaning
air-fed suit entries are no longer required and will be replaced with the use of air
hoods), the removal of the majority of redundant radioactive sources from LLWR site
and the safe demolition of a former PCM Drum Store.
The new perimeter Security Fence was completed in January 2017 and work has
moved to the new entrance set up including car parks, search bay and road layout.
One of the benefits of the new entrance layout is that it enables visitors and deliveries
to be processed before entering the secure area of the site. It also allows some
meetings to be held outside the secure area in the existing conference facility.
REP/003/2017 Page 7 of 16
The focus on cyber security continued with strengthening the understanding of staff on
the risks of cyber-attack at home and at work.
The new Radioactive Substances Regulation (RSR) Permit allowing ongoing disposal
of waste, issued by the EA in late 2015, was fully implemented during the year with
work undertaken across the organisation to achieve this. In line with the new Permit
LLWR successfully implemented the required transition to Radioactive Waste Advisors
(RWA) responsible for advising on all Permit aspects.
Significant work was undertaken to ensure the new Security Fence and Repository
Infrastructure Projects have had minimal impact on the ecology and environment at
and adjacent to the LLWR Site, despite working in environmentally sensitive areas
near the Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and other protected habitats on Site.
While Environmental compliance has in general remained high throughout the year
two significant learning reports were raised early in 2017, relating to potential
misconsignment of LLW. This was already raised as a significant risk for LLWR and
has led to further focus in this area.
The radiological safety performance at LLWR has continued to be good. In 2016, for
the 5th year in a row the maximum radiation dose to any person working on the site
was less than 1 millisievert. For the 7th consecutive year, the maximum dose has also
decreased compared to the previous year.
The average dose to people working on the site in 2016 was approximately 0.1
millisieverts, a quarter of the average recorded 5 years earlier. The maximum
Artist Impression of the new Site entrance
REP/003/2017 Page 8 of 16
radiation dose to a member of the public in 2016 as a result of direct radiation from the
site is estimated to be about 0.032 millisieverts. To put these figures into context, the
average radiation dose to people in the UK from natural radiation sources in the
environment equates to about 2.2 millisieverts per year.
Waste Management Services
LLWR continues to work closely with UK waste producers to ensure that only LLW that
cannot be dealt with elsewhere is disposed of at our Site.
Key Statistics
952 containers transported by road nationally to waste treatment and disposal
facilities through the Transport Framework during the year. This compared to
856 in 2015/16;
Metallic waste treatment – target of 3320te exceeded with a total of 3855te
being treated this year, 3562te of which was from NDA Sites and 293te from
Non-NDA waste producers;
Combustible waste treatment –target of 2482m3 exceeded with a total of
3098m3 being treated this year, 2896m3 from NDA Sites and 202m3 from Non-
NDA waste producers;
VLLW disposal –target of 2915m3 exceeded with a total of 6509m3 being
treated this year, 3829m3 from NDA Sites and 2680m3 from Non-NDA waste
producers;
LLW disposal – 174 ISO containers were disposed of in the year, up from 171
in 2015/16.
LLWR continues to develop its range of Waste Management Services in the line with
UK policy for the management of radioactive waste from the nuclear industry.
**** Metallic Waste (te) to (m3) Conversion: 1.00 te/m3 (assuming 10te per HHISO)
Note: Non-NDA Sites include all other organisations that produce radioactive waste.
REP/003/2017 Page 9 of 16
LLWR’s services enable waste producers to implement the waste hierarchy in a safe,
compliant and cost-effective manner. We continue to act as the industry’s ‘integrator’ -
holding contracts with every organisation in the UK that produces radioactive waste as
well as contracts with multiple suppliers to deliver waste characterisation, packaging,
transport, treatment and disposal services.
LLWR’s diversion statistics were the most impressive to date, with collaboration,
between departments within the company and with organisations across the estate, a
factor in this success. Some 3,855te of metals were diverted in 2016/17, which was
more than double the 2015/16 total of 1,505te. In addition, 3,098m³ of waste went
down the Combustible route compared to 2,216m³ in 2015/16, and the volume of Very
Low Level Waste diverted also increased from 5,311m³ in 2015/16 to 6,509m³ in
2016/17.
Service Delivery managed a record 52 transports and approved 82 waste
consignments in the final week of the financial year, to meet unprecedented customer
demand.
The 2016/17 financial year was brought to a successful end by facilitating the
movement of a 100-tonne concrete block on 31st March 2017 from Sellafield. The
Tritium block was successfully consigned to the Cyclife MRF at Lillyhall, supporting a
waste management milestone for Sellafield to complete before the end of the financial
year. It was a project with extremely tight timescales, and involved a great deal of
collaborative working between LLWR, Sellafield, Cyclife and lifting contractor
Mammoet.
Sellafield Tritium Block
REP/003/2017 Page 10 of 16
Significant co-operation between LLWR, Capenhurst Nuclear Services (CNS) and the
Magnox Ltd central team ensured CNS was able to deliver a consignment of ion
exchange resins toTradebe Inutec before the end of the fiscal year. Close
collaboration ensured safety case amendments were completed at the Winfrith site in
a timely manner, enabling Tradebe Inutec to accept the waste before the year end.
In another example of collaborative working, LLWR opened new diversion routes for
low level waste from Rolls Royce in Derby. For many years this waste was super-
compacted and disposed of in the vaults at LLWR. It now utilises a Combustible route,
preserving disposal capacity at the LLWR.
In 2016/17 LLWR disposed of 174 containers, an increase of 3 on the previous year.
National Waste Programme
LLWR leads the ongoing implementation of the UK’s LLW Strategy on behalf of the
NDA through the National Waste Programme. The focus of the Programme is to work
with the waste producing sites and the wider stakeholder group to share good practice
and to support its embedding across the nuclear industry. LLWR have made good
progress on a diverse range of collaborative projects with stakeholders to support the
sharing and embedding of good practice across the industry:
A project to assess the advantages, disadvantages and potential implications
of different international models of radioactive waste classification was
completed;
A technology assessment was completed for a group of wastes (wastes failing
the discrete item limit) which are not suitable for disposal in the LLWR. This
identified a number of potential options which need further work to make them
available;
The Strategic Review 2016 – a report produced every three years to provide a
description of how the UK nuclear industry is managing its LLW at a given point
in time – was completed;
The first phase of a collaborative study with waste producers and Radioactive
Waste Management (RWM) focussed on improving the quality of the
information on the inventory of LLW/ILW boundary waste was completed. The
second part of this study will be completed by June 2017;
The Programme has continued to provide support to NDA, RWM and other
stakeholders on the Problematic Waste Integrated Project Team, which is
REP/003/2017 Page 11 of 16
seeking to improve how wastes without established management routes are
managed. This has included the delivery of a study to identify preferred options
for improving the management of problematic wastes and the development of a
work programme to be delivered April 2017-March 2018 and beyond;
A review of a national strategic options study for the management of metallic
waste was completed. This concluded that the options study continues to be
valid and does not require fundamental redevelopment at this time;
Work has continued on developing and rolling out e-learning and self-directed
learning training modules, to support organisations and individuals gain
knowledge and up-skilling in LLW management.
LLWR have continued to hold regular meetings with stakeholders to ensure that there
is oversight and challenge of the Programme, and to support the sharing of learning
and good practice around the industry. Meetings include:
The six-monthly Delivery Overview Group, which involves the widest
stakeholder group including waste producers, the supply chain, regulators and
government sharing information on LLW management.
The six-monthly Regulatory Meeting, which enables detailed conversations
with the regulators on the progress within the Programme.
The six-monthly Practitioners Forum, which enables waste engineers to share
successes, challenges, problems and solutions with each other.
The monthly meetings with waste producers in the NDA estate (involving the
non-NDA estate quarterly).
The Programme Board, which involves senior representatives from waste
producing organisations to provide oversight and challenge to the Programme.
A range of reports have continued to be produced for the different stakeholders to
share information on progress made within the Programme. The National Waste
Programme Quarterly Report is available to all stakeholders and can be accessed on
the LLWR website www.llwrsite.com.
Support also continues to the wider LLWR organisation through running workshops,
delivering technical work, consolidating responses on behalf of the organisation to
external consultations and participating in visits to site by external stakeholders.
REP/003/2017 Page 12 of 16
Site Operations
The PCM Programme is making good progress and decommissioning of Magazines 3
and 9 is ahead of schedule. The uncertainty in the condition and extent of
decontamination required in the void areas of Magazines had been a key risk to the
decommissioning programme.
Magazine 9’s void area has been successfully decontaminated and void recovery
operations are progressing well.
Decommissioning continues with Magazine 3, which has now been re-classified from a
C5 working area, requiring air-fed suit entry, to a C3 working area, only requiring air-
fed hoods. The hoods allow greater freedom of movement and therefore accelerated
productivity. Sampling of legacy drums continues to progress and a revised legacy
drum sampling strategy is being proposed to reduce the sampling requirements for this
population. This is a result of our confidence in characterisation and will enable us to
work more efficiently.
The LLWR Site Incineration Route went live during the period. This will result in almost
all of the soft waste generated on the Site, predominantly from the PCM Project, being
diverted from Supercompaction to Incineration, preserving Vault capacity.
The first shipment of drummed soft waste arising from operations at the LLWR Site
was consigned for incineration at the Tradebe facility in February.
Magazine 9 Void Ceiling Removal
REP/003/2017 Page 13 of 16
Demolition of the long-standing former PCM drum store on Site has also been
completed. The drum store was considered for reuse two years ago, after lying empty
for several years. However the PCM team’s efficient waste management practices
ensured the number of drums generated fell, meaning it was not required. Base slab
from the building has been removed and exported to Vault 9 for interim storage, ready
for eventual use as infill material in the RDP profile cap.
Improvements to the perimeter track around Vaults 8 & 9 have been completed ahead
of schedule.
Fabrication of pipework for the refurbishment of the vault discharge system has
commenced. Planning for the next phase of Manhole 11 Refurbishment is well
underway with the design element of the project complete and execution phase about
to commence.
Science & Engineering
The planning consent for the closure engineering over trenches 1 to 7, Vault 8 & 9 and
the construction of an extension to Vault 9 and 2 new vaults, Vaults 10 & 11 included a
number of pre-commencement planning conditions that result in the preparation and
submission of several documents to address these conditions. They will be issued to
CCC shortly for approval.
Demolition of the PCM Drum Store
REP/003/2017 Page 14 of 16
The Programme Level Business Case for the RDP, which aligns with the planning
application, was approved by the NDA Executive and Board of Directors in August
2016. The detailed project business cases and supporting documentation that
comprise Tranche 1 of the works were approved by the NDA in January 2017. We are
now in detailed design phase and about to enter he execute phase of tranche 1 and
the first visible sign that preparatory work for RDP is underway will be seen later this
year when noise reduction barriers are installed.
LLWR continue to have discussions with all the relevant parties with respect to
capacity on the Cumbrian Rail line and attend the Nuclear Transport Group, sponsored
by Cumbria County Council, and the Cumbria Rail Programme Board sponsored by
the Cumbrian LEP.
Looking Forward
The focus for 2017/18 will be on the following:
Preparatory work for the RDP;
Achieving the Joint Waste Management Plan targets for waste diversion.
Forecasts predict that LLWR will manage increased volumes of waste;
Continue to manufacture Type B packaging:
Develop Lifetime Plan 2018;
Deliver a number of IT change projects;
Commence design and construction of the new Security Force Control Centre;
Look at opportunities to innovate and continue to provide value for money in
our third contract term.
REP/003/2017
te
m3
m3
m3
Sellaf ie ld Ltd
M agno x Ltd
LLWR Ltd
T o tal:
te via framework
Sellaf ie ld Ltd
M agno x Ltd
LLWR Ltd
T o tal:
m3 via framework
Sellaf ie ld Ltd 1
M agno x Ltd
LLWR Ltd
T o tal:
m3 via framework
te M etallic m3 Combusitble m3 VLLW
Onsite
Via framework Rosyth Res in Catch Tanks
Out of Scope
T o tal:
Onsite
Via framework
Out of Scope
T o tal:
Onsite
Via framework
Out of Scope
T o tal:
Ke y: Cumulative Actual Waste diverted Target / Forecast
Page 1 of 2 Last Updated: 2
March 2017 Waste Metric Dashboard
Yearly
Target
Actual
YTD
0
This table shows the cumulative actual waste diverted*** by non- NDA sites in the YTD
142 157
Yearly
Target
Combustible Treatment:
VLLW Disposal:
N / A 201
(te) (m3)N o n-N D A Site(s)
T o tal 1 : N / A 2680
2575
0
from Non- NDA Sites
1478
275
18
Period 12 : 26th February to 31st March FY 16/17
The National Waste Programme aims to communicate progress in the implementation of the Waste Hierarchy and the Nuclear Industry Strategy for Low Level Waste
Management across the UK. This dashboard shows key metrics that demonstrate the successful diversion of waste away from direct disposal and the optimal use of key
national assets, such as LLWR and waste treatment facilities on sites around the UK, typically based on delivery of Joint Waste Management Plans (JWMPs). The objective
is to encourage transparency and communicate progress to all stakeholders.
Non-NDA Sites (YTD)*****
UK Waste Diversion
Yearly
Target
Actual
YTD
2365 2511
Via framework N/A
Onsite disposal N/A
Out of Scope
T o tal:
7
N / A
Yearly
Forecast
Non- NDA estate
Ac tua l Volume Re -
Cla ssifie d YTD (m3
)SLC
Tota l 297
3855
3098
6509
1740
from NDA Sites
(excluding DSRL)
297
(Metric added for FY 16/17)
Onsite treatment
Via framework ***
Out of Scope
T o tal:
246
836
VLLW Disposal:
0
21
0
Issue04-May-17
800
0 0
926
Yearly
Target
Yearly
Target
Actual
YTD
669 744
119
Magnox Ltd ❷❸❹❺❻❼❽❾❿⓫⓬⓭
Onsite treatment
693
177
1000 T o tal: 948
Onsite treatment
Via framework
113
0
1199
Actual
YTD
665
0 0
0 0
54
0
30
0
Sellafield Ltd
126
0
Yearly
Target
1100 1226
VLLW Disposal:
Onsite treatment
34
Actual
YTD
1686
Metallic Treatment:
Actual
YTD
1740
Combustible Treatment:
2511
0
Onsite treatment
Via framework
Out of Scope
T o tal: 2365
0
LLWR Ltd
817
Yearly
Target
926800
30
Actual
YTD
Via framework
Out of Scope
Onsite disposal
Via framework
0 8136
92
74
Yearly
Target
2993
VLLW Disposal:
1318 1596
Yearly
TargetYearly
Target
1100
Actual
YTD
1226
2758
51
20
T o tal:
2085 2778
679 771
0
❶
(m3)
0
Actual
YTD
0
Actual
YTD
0
AWE Aldermaston0
926
Onsite disposal
VLLW Disposal:
Cyclife
EDF Energy
253
800 Via framework 1416 2033 0
12
These graphs show the cumulative actual waste diverted by Low Level Waste Repository Ltd against
their JWMP targets in the YTD.
0
⓯
Metallic Treatment:
7
Yearly
Target
0
LLWR Ltd
0
Actual
YTD
126
Non-NDA Site Summary YTD ⓰⓱ ⓲⓳⓴ Diversion and Disposal Totals YTD based on Raw Waste (****)
Out of Scope N/A 105
77%
23%These graphs are a summary of the cumulative progress to date against the combined JWMP targets **.
These number do not capture VLLW disposed of on site.
NDA Site Summary YTD
These graphs show the cumulative actual waste diverted by Magnox Ltd against their JWMP targets in the
Year to Date (YTD).
Metallic Treatment:
Combustible Treatment:
Yearly
Forecast
Metallic Treatment:
0
2085 2778
948 1000
0
These graphs are a summary of the cumulative diversions to date from Non NDA sites.
Metallic Treatment:
Onsite treatment
Via framework
Actual
YTD
N/A
N/A
N/A
Yearly
Forecast
Actual
YTD
0
Combustible Treatment:
N/A 0
N/A 199
N/A 3
293
Actual
YTD
T o tal 1 :
0
These graphs show the cumulative actual waste diverted by Sellafield Ltd against their JWMP targets in the
YTD.
Out of Scope
T o tal :
119
Via framework
Out of Scope
Out of Scope
T o tal:
Out of Scope
1 Actuals/Target YTD only applies to VLLW via the framework
2482
3320 3562
2896
51
64 74
64
7
64
39
Combustible Treatment:
1318 1596
Actual
YTD
38292915
961
Yearly
Target
1100 1226
30
0
04
0Urenco UK
0
Magnox Ltd
Sellafield Ltd
123
584
Tradebe Inutec Ltd
Capenhurst Nuclear Services
Unitech
Others
Stack being loaded at AWE (VLLW)
Dounreay
0 75
0
7623
18 100
ILW → LLW Re-Classification
This table shows the actual volume of waste re- classified
from ILW to LLW in the YTD.
The values above are inclusive of material diverted through direct contracts:
0 82
m3
0
10
20
30
40
50
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
0
50
100
150
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
Period
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
te
0
500
1000
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
m3
0
200
400
600
800
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
m3
Period
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
0
500
1000
1500
2000
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
m3
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
m3
Period
Dounreay
Hunterston A
Chapelcross
Sellafield LLWR
Wylfa
Trawsfynydd
Berkeley
Oldbury
Hinkley Point A
Sizewell A
Bradwell
Dungeness A
Harwell
Winfrith
Capenhurst / Urenco UK
⓱Tradebe Inutec Fawley
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
Period
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
0
50
100
150
200
250
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12Period
12%
25%
20%
43%
m3
tem
3m
3te
m3
m3
te
te
UniTech Services Group
HMNB Clyde
RRMPOL Derby
AWE Aldermaston
Cyclife MRF Lillyhall
21
22
21 22
(1)
GE Healthcare23
23
*
REP/003/2017 Page 16 of 16