LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

15
LHC Hardware Commissioning Review 11-13 May 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 LHC Hardware Commissioning Review Contribution ID: 20 – Quality assurance and documentation of results Database Management for the ELQA Activities A case study Wednesday, 11 May 2005 Davide Bozzini, AT-MEL-EM Contribution: A. Dafinei, L. Furman, R. Saban, F.R. Mateos, E. Barbero

description

LHC Hardware Commissioning Review Contribution ID: 20 – Quality assurance and documentation of results Database Management for the ELQA Activities A case study Wednesday, 11 May 2005 Davide Bozzini, AT-MEL-EM Contribution: A. Dafinei, L. Furman, R. Saban, F.R. Mateos, E. Barbero. Outline - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

Page 1: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

1

LHC Hardware Commissioning ReviewContribution ID: 20 – Quality assurance and documentation of results

Database Management for the ELQA Activities A case study

Wednesday, 11 May 2005

Davide Bozzini, AT-MEL-EM

Contribution: A. Dafinei, L. Furman, R. Saban, F.R. Mateos, E. Barbero

Page 2: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

2

Outline

– Why do we have an ELQA database and what does it contain

– Structure of ELQA database activities

– Who are ELQA data's suppliers – clients – neighbours

– What data are available

– How data will be accessible

– MTF for Hardware Commissioning and ELQA database

– Selection of data to be stored in HC MTF

– Communication between ELQA and HC coordination team

– Conclusion

Page 3: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

3

Why do we have a ELQA database and what it contains

Why– To store and manage the overall reference and qualification data for the

correct execution of the ELQA activities

– To gather online the data produced by the data acquisition systems driven by LabView software

– To flexibly and rapidly modify the structure based on ELQA needs

– To be able to rapidly develop applications for data analysis

– To be independent from other existing data bases

What does it contain– Assembly and electrical schematic parameters generated from the LHC

reference database (details on the next slide)

– Manufacturing and qualification data of some electrical components

– Data acquired during the machine assembly and hardware commissioning

– Data generated by non conformities

– The on line status of ELQA crews activities

Page 4: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

4

Electrical schematic parameters generated form the LHC reference database

Tables for the automatic verification of the ARC corrector circuitsHALFCELL

PLANE_NAME

PLANE_POSITION ASSEMBLY WIRE PORT_A MAGNET

_TYPE POSITION BEAM VOLTAGE_TAP

LAYOUT_VERSION

16R7 IC1516R7 20648243,1 15 6.402

16R7 IC1516R7 20648243,1 16 6.402

16R7 IC1516R7 20648243,1 18 6.402

16R7 IC16R7_2 20663903,1 LBARA.16R7 9 US MCS A INTERNAL MBA_EE931 6.402

16R7 IC16R7_2 20663903,1 LBARA.16R7 19 US MCS A INTERNAL MBA_EE931 6.402

More than 100.000 entries

Page 5: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

5

Structure of ELQA database activities

ELQA_DB is an Oracle application on cern.devdb

Page 6: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

6

Who are ELQA data's suppliers – clients – neighbours

Suppliers– The ELQA systems and activities coordinators

– The LHC Reference DB

Clients (who need data for a technical reason)– Quench protection experts (inductance)

– Power converter experts (transfer function, insulation, polarities)

– Hardware Commissioning coordination team

Neighbours (who want to receive data for information only)– EDMS, MTF

Page 7: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

7

What data are available

Test applied to Method Assembly

HC warm

HC cool-down

HC cold

Electrical insulation

segment - ground DCV supply        

segment - segment I leakage

segment – groundDCV supply        

segment – segment

Capacity Circuit - groundDCV

       Measurement of C

Continuitysegments DCA supply

       Circuit Closed loop

Polaritysegments DCA supply

       Circuit Voltage drop via V_taps

Instrumentation Current lead V_taps

DCA supply       

Voltage drop via V_taps

Diode polarity MB,MQ diodesPolarity

       Turn on voltage

Transfer function

Circuit Z(f)       

To ground Z(f)

List of ELQA tests for the electrical qualification of superconducting circuits during assembly and hardware commissioning

Page 8: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

8

How data will be accessible

Suppliers– Read and write access to all data. For people not members of the ELQA

team a password will be provided

Clients (who need data for a technical reason)– All data and if requested direct access to the ELQA _DB

• Quench protection experts

• Power converters experts

• HC coordination team

Neighbours (who want to receive data for information only)– Activities follow-up and general parameters will be available via dedicated

web interfaces (read only)

– Upon request a test report on electronic format can be automatically generated and dispatched to a recipient list

Page 9: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

9

Formats of data (1)

Direct query to ELQA_DB – Ex: Benthic Software, Golden32 + login

Specific software interface tools for data analysis – Ex 1: follow-up of arc assembly polarity checks (see next slide)

Page 10: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

10

Formats of data (2)

Direct query to ELQA_DB – Ex: Benthic Software, Golden32 + login

Specific software interface tools for data analysis – Ex 1: follow-up of arc assembly polarity checks

– Ex 2: Line N segment manufacturing http://pcat0129.cern.ch\status.htm

Automatically generated test reports and non-conformity reports – html, excel, jpg, pdf formats

Page 11: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

11

MTF for Hardware Commissioning and ELQA database (1)

SECTOR 7-8Sector

D1Q3Q2Q1.L8

Region Equipment group

Superconducti

ng Circuits

Equipment / Activity

RCBXH1.L8.UA83

ELQA

Quench Protection SystemPower Converter

……………………….

MTF structure for the HC of the superconducting circuits

The question: What data of ELQA_DB need to stored in the MTF?

Page 12: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

12

MTF for Hardware Commissioning and ELQA database (2)

Aims of the HC MTF– HC MTF is not a copy of the ELQA_DB

– To make available only the significant information to carry out the HC

– To track the ELQA activities

– To allow the traceability of non conformities documentation

The ELQA team will provide to the HC coordination the followings:– Summary and status reports of the ELQA activities

• Summary reports containing the test results

• Status reports to track what goes on with a given circuit or element

– Measured electrical parameters• Inductance, resistance, insulation to ground,….

– Non conformity reports generated during the ELQA activities• Activation of a red flag

• Documentation of the non conformity

Page 13: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

13

MTF for Hardware Commissioning and ELQA database (3)

From the practical point of view– The ELQA team will provide the data in electronic format

– Upload of the files in HC MTF will be done by HC coordination team

Some additional remarks– The ELQA team will not use MTF as reference tool for their activities.

The ELQA team will rely on the ELQA_DB that contains more information and that are updated regularly every 3-5 hours

– The ELQA team will need to know the status of other activities. MTF contains the status of all individual system test and activities

– The updating frequency of HC MTF is a key point for a profitable and optimized chaining and follow up of activities

Page 14: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

14

Communication between ELQA and HC coordination team (1)

ELQA team will organize:– Daily meetings for the ELQA activities follow up

– “Troubleshooting” meetings to solve technical non conformities

Share of information with HC coordination team– ELQA team will report on a daily basis to the HC team

• The status of the ELQA activities (delays, conflicts, unforeseen problems,..)

• The status of the non conformities and the actions taken to come to a decision on how to proceed

Page 15: LHC Hardware Commissioning Review

LHC

Har

dwar

e C

omm

issi

onin

g R

evie

w 1

1-13

May

200

5, C

ER

N, 1

211

Gen

eva

23

15

Conclusion

Databases– ELQA_DB is a tool designed to cover the ELQA activities from assembly of

components to the machine operation

– The HC is a short term client of the ELQA_DB database

– All the information required for the HC MTF will be provided Hardware commissioning MTF

– MTF cannot be the tool for managing the sequencing of activities

– Work will slow down mainly due to non conformities. MTF has shown evident limits to handle non conformities.

General– Communication via MTF and mailing is not enough. Meetings are required

on a regular basis

– The decision makers structure for the non conformities has to be established according to quality assurance rules