LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
-
Upload
osagie-alfred -
Category
Documents
-
view
241 -
download
2
Transcript of LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 1/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
1
The Appraisal Process and Concepts of Value
Introduction to the Concept of Market Value
Market value is the common denominator in the world of assessment. Governmental jurisdictions have statutes using other language but the concept of willing buyer and willingseller trading real estate is fundamental. In order to arrive at an accurate estimate of marketvalue there are three approaches traditionally used by the practitioner: Cost, Market Data andIncome.
The Cost Approach to value lends itself to the appraisal of real estate on a mass basis. Thisapproach involves the systematic, bulk assemblage of market and cost data and the conversion of such information into usable standardized form that can be applied easily and readily to a large
number of real properties. This approach provides for the systematic modification of thestandardized data to fit the peculiar physical characteristics of each property. Since the people inthe real estate market, buyers and sellers, frequently base their decisions largely on cost, thisapproach has validity for many types of real properties.
The Market Data Approach to value, or comparable sales approach, utilizes sales of similarproperties to learn what buyers and sellers are doing and what they are exchanging property forin terms of money. In its application to a particular property, this approach requires thereconciliation of differences among the various properties that have sold and the properties beingappraised. Applied on a mass basis it provides reasonable, objective estimates of market valueand is adaptable for the mass appraisal assignment.
The Income Approach to value, readily adaptable to the assessment function, is most useful inthose jurisdictions having a number of income producing properties, such as apartment buildings,stores, or offices. It is beneficial to appraise such properties by capitalizing income. The marketfor such properties is based almost exclusively on the income produced in which case capitalizedincome is normally the best value indicator. The assessor must be on most familiar terms withthe Income Approach to Value in order to understand all facets that contribute to the decisionmaking process when income producing property is bought and sold.
The acceptance of the assessor’s efforts rests with the taxpaying public, administrative reviewbodies and the courts. Judgments on the quality of his work will be made on these levels. The
highest courts of the land have recognized the accomplishments of assessors and review theirwork products in relation to reason, logic, and sound real estate appraisal practice.
Regardless of the use of national standards or manuals on the general subject of real estateappraisal, chief emphasis must be placed on local experience. Whatever criteria used, it must beverified in the local real estate market. Building costs, land values, rents, expenses, mortgagerate and capitalization rates vary, sometimes widely, from community to community.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 2/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
2
The Market Data Approach in general deals with comparing a parcel as a whole while the CostApproach uses the components of value. These two approaches are the most normally acceptedmeans of valuing property. Use of the Income Approach is limited in land and timber appraisals
for ad valorem tax purposes due to the uncertainty of income and profits and managerial skillsand management practices involved in land ownership. For example, one individual owner’stimber management program may be custodial. That is, he may allow nature to take its coursethereby realizing a return of $10.00 per year on his purchase while another owner may managehis timber intensively, thereby realizing a $20.00 per acre year return ($15 net return) on asimilar purchase.
Current market value by the Income Approach would be different for each owner or purchaser.Consider the following:
Jim has 500 acres and spends nothing for management of his forest. Over a period of 20
years he expects to receive an average of $10.00 per acre per year return. He expects tosell the bare land for $350.00 per acre at the end of 20 years and for the $10.00 / acre / year / annual return and future sale he expects to receive a 9% return on his investment.Market value by the income approach for Jim is:
$350.00 capitalized at 9% for 20 years = $ 62.45 / acre
$10 / acre / year for 20 years @9% = $ 91.29
$153.74 or $154 per acre
George has 500 acres. He also expects to sell the bare land at the end of 20 years for$350 per acre, but he intends to net an income of $15 / acre / year ($20 / acre / year less$5 for management cost) over the 20 year period. He, too, expects a 9% return on theinvestment. How much can he pay and still realize a 9% return? Said another way, whatis George’s market value by the income approach?
Market value by the income approach for George is:
$350 capitalized at 9% for 20 years = $ 62.45
$ 15 / acre / year for 20 years @ 9% = $136.93
$199.38 or $200 / acre
As you can readily see, the income approach is a necessary approach for the potential investor.But for a taxing authority a more uniform common denominator must be used, hence the marketdata or cost approach.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 3/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
3
§48-5-1. Legislative Intent
The intent and purpose of the tax laws of this state are to have all property and subjects of taxation returned at the value that would be realized from the cash sale, but not the forced sale, of the property and subjects as such property and subjects are usually sold.
§48-5-2. Definitions
As used in this chapter, the term:
“Arm’s length, bona fide sale” means a transaction which has occurred in good faith withoutfraud or deceit carried out by unrelated or unaffiliated parties, as by a willing buyer or willing
seller, each acting in his or her own self-interest, including but not limited to a distress sale, shortsale, bank sale, or sale at public auction.
“Fair market value of property” means the amount a knowledgeable buyer would pay for theproperty and a willing seller would accept for the property at an arm’s length, bona fide sale.The income approach, if data is available, shall be considered in determining the fair marketvalue of income-producing property. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter to thecontrary, the transaction amount of the most recent arm’s length, bona fide sales in any year shallbe the maximum allowable fair market value for the next taxable year. With respect to thevaluation of equipment,machinery, and fixtures when no ready market exists for the sale of theequipment, machinery, and fixtures, fair market value may be determined by resorting to any
reasonable, relevant, and useful information available including, but not limited to, the originalcost of the property, any depreciation or obsolescence, and any increase in value by reason of inflation. Each tax assessor shall have access to any public records of the taxpayer for thepurpose of discovering such information.
In determining the fair market value of a going business where its continued operationis reasonable anticipated, the tax assessor may value the equipment, machinery, andfixtures which are the property of the business as a whole where appropriated to reflectthe accurate fair market value.
The tax assessor shall apply the following criteria in determining the fair market value
of real property:
(i) Existing zoning of property;(ii) Existing use of property, including any restrictions or limitations on the use of
the property resulting from state or federal law or rules or regulations adoptedpursuant to the authority of state or federal law;
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 4/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
4
(iii) Existing covenants or restrictions in deed dedicating the property to aparticular use;
(iv) Bank sales, other financial institution owned sales, or distressed sales, or any
combination thereof, of comparable real property;(v) Decreased value of the property based on limitations and restrictions resulting
from the property being in a conservation easement; and(vi) Any other existing factors provided by law or by rule and regulation of the
commissioner deemed pertinent in arriving at fair market value.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 5/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
5
Rules and Regulations
Chapter 560-11-10 Appraisal Procedures Manual 560-11-10-.01 – 560-11-10-.10560-11-10-.01 Purpose and Scope
(1) Purpose
This appraisal procedures manual has been developed in accordance with Code section 48-5-269.1 which directs the Revenue Commissioner to adopt by rule, subject to Chapter 13 of Title50, the "Georgia Administrative Procedure Act," and maintain an appropriate procedural manualfor use by the county property appraisal staff in appraising tangible real and personal propertyfor ad valorem tax purposes.
(2) Specific procedures
In order to facilitate the mass appraisal process, specific procedures are provided within thisChapter that is designed to arrive at a basic appraisal value of real and personal property. Thesespecific procedures are designed to provide fair market value under normal circumstances. Whenunusual circumstances are affecting value, they should be considered. In all instances, theappraisal staff will apply Georgia law and generally accepted appraisal practices to the basicappraisal values required by this manual and make any further valuation adjustments necessaryto arrive at the fair market values.
(3) Board of tax assessors
The county board of tax assessors shall require the appraisal staff to observe the procedures inthis manual when performing their appraisals. The county board of tax assessors may not adoptlocal procedures that are in conflict with Georgia law or the procedures required by this manual.The county board of tax assessors must consider the appraisal staff information in theperformance of their duties. In each instance, however, the assessment placed on each parcel of property shall be the assessment established by the county board of tax assessors as provided inCode section 48-5-306.
(4) Other appraisal procedures
The appraisal staff may use those generally accepted appraisal practices set forth in the UniformStandards of Professional Appraisal Practice, published by the Appraisal Foundation, and thestandards published by the International Association of Assessing Officers, as they may beamended from time to time, to the extent such practices do not conflict with this manual andGeorgia law.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 6/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
6
560-11-10-.02 Definitions
(1) Definitions. When used in this Chapter, the definitions found in this Rule shall apply.
(a) Absorption rate
"Absorption rate" means the rate at which the real estate market can absorb real property of a given type.
(b) Appraiser
"Appraiser" means a member of the county appraisal staff, who serves the board of taxassessors and whose position was created pursuant to Part 1 of Article 5 of Chapter 5 of
Title 48 of the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. This term does not limit its meaning toa single appraiser and may mean one or more members of the county appraisal staff.
(c) Basic cost approach
"Basic cost approach" means a cost approach procedure, used in the mass appraisal of personal property, which uses standard estimates of the most common factors affecting thevalue of such property. The basic cost approach is intended to provide a uniform estimateof personal property value.
(d) Depreciation
"Depreciation" means the loss of value due to any cause. It is the difference between themarket value of a structural improvement or piece of equipment and its reproduction orreplacement cost as of the date of valuation. Depreciation is divided into three categories,physical deterioration, functional obsolescence, and economic obsolescence. Depreciationmay be further characterized as curable or incurable depending upon the difficulty orpracticality of restoring the lost value through repair or maintenance.
(e) Economic life
"Economic life" means the period during which property may reasonably be expected toperform the function for which it was designed or intended.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 7/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
7
(f) Economic obsolescence
"Economic obsolescence" means a form of depreciation that measures a loss of value fromnegative influence external to the real or personal property. It results when the desirabilityor useful life of real or personal property is impaired due to forces such as changes inoptimum use, legislative enactment that restricts or impairs productivity, and changes insupply and demand relationships. Economic obsolescence is normally incurable.
(g) Effective age
"Effective age" means the age of an improvement to property as compared with otherproperty performing like functions. It is the actual age less the age that has been taken off by face-lifting, structural reconstruction, removal of functional inadequacies,
modernization of equipment, and similar repairs and overhauls. It is an age that reflects atrue remaining life for the property, taking into account the typical life expectancy of buildings or equipment of its class and usage.
(h) Fair market value
"Fair market value" means fair market value as defined in Code section 48-5-2 (3).
(i) Final assessment
"Final assessment" means the final assessed value that is determined for the property forthe applicable tax year after the following events have occurred: the time period for filingappeals has expired and any appeals that have been filed have been resolved; the authoritiesauthorized to levy taxes on property in the county have approved the final tax levy; theRevenue Commissioner has authorized that the digest may be used as the basis forcollecting taxes; the tax commissioner has mailed the final tax bills based on the authorizeddigest; and in the case of personal property, the appraisal staff has completed its audit of the personal property pursuant to Rule 560-11-10-.08(4)(d) within the seven year statute of limitations.
(j) Functional obsolescence
"Functional obsolescence" means a form of depreciation that measures a loss of value froma design deficiency or appearance in the market of a more innovative design. Somefunctional obsolescence may be curable and some functional obsolescence may beincurable.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 8/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
8
(k) Inventory
"Inventory" means goods held for sale or lease or furnished under contracts for service;also, raw materials, work in process or materials used or consumed in a business.
(l) Large acreage tract
"Large acreage tract" means a rural land tract that is greater in acreage than the smallacreage break point.
(m) Mass appraisal
"Mass appraisal" means the process of valuing a universe of properties as of a given dateusing standard methodology, employing common data and allowing for statistical testing.
(n) Original cost
"Original cost" means, in the case of machinery, equipment, furniture, personal fixtures,and trade fixtures in the hands of the final user, all the direct costs associated withacquiring, transporting and installing such property at the site where it is to be used. Thisincludes the cost of the property to the property owner, the cost of transporting the property
to its present site, the cost of any on-site assembly or customized modification of theproperty, the cost of installing the property, the cost of installing personal fixtures and tradefixtures necessary for the proper operation of the property, and any sales or use tax paid onthe property. Original cost is equivalent to original cost new if the property owner was thefirst to put the personal property into service.
(o) Original cost new
"Original cost new" means, in the case of machinery, equipment, furniture, personalfixtures, and trade fixtures in the hands of the final user, all the direct costs associated with
acquiring, transporting and installing such property at the site where it is to be used. Thisincludes the historical cost of the property at the time it was first put into service new, thecost of transporting the property to its present site, the cost of any on-site assembly orcustomized modification of the property, the cost of installing the property, the cost of installing personal fixtures and trade fixtures necessary for the proper operation of theproperty, and any sales or use tax paid on the property. Original cost new is equivalent tooriginal cost if the property owner was the first to put the personal property into service.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 9/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
9
(p) Paired sales analysis
"Paired sales analysis,” means the comparing of the sale prices of similar properties, some
with and some without a particular characteristic, in order to determine what portion of thedifference in sales price might be attributable to such characteristic.
(q) Personal fixtures
"Personal fixtures" means personal property that has been set-up or installed on land or in abuilding or in a group of buildings and is not permanently attached to such land orbuildings. A consideration for whether personal property is a personal fixture is whether itsremoval would cause significant damage to such property or to the real property on whichit has been set-up or installed. The term personal fixtures shall not include trade fixtures.Personal fixtures are classified as personal property. Examples of personal fixtures are
desks, shelving, display cases and gondolas.
(r) Personal property
"Personal property" means tangible personal property that may be seen, weighed,measured, felt, or touched or which is in any other manner perceptible to the senses.Personal property shall include trade fixtures. For the purposes of this Rule, personalproperty shall not include the capital stock of all corporations; money, notes, bonds,accounts, or other credits, secured or unsecured; patent rights, copyrights, franchises, andany other classes and kinds of property defined by law as intangible personal property.
(s) Physical deterioration
"Physical deterioration" means a form of depreciation that measures the loss of utility of real or personal property over time from wear and tear, age, and exposure to the elements.Some physical deterioration may be curable and some physical deterioration may beincurable.
(t) Ready market
"Ready market,” means a market, possibly global, where exchanges of machinery,equipment, personal fixtures and trade fixtures occur with such regularity and under suchconditions as to provide a reliable measure of fair market value. Five conditions that mayindicate a ready market are: the items of personal property being sold within the market arereasonable substitutes for each other; there are an adequate number of buyers and sellers of the personal property in the market, no one of whom can measurably affect price; there isan absence of artificial restraints and unusual incentives in the market; the item of personal
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 10/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
10
property is reasonably free to be moved where it will receive the greatest return and buyersare reasonably free to buy where the price is lowest; and buyers and sellers areknowledgeable and informed about market conditions.
(u) Real estate
"Real estate" means the physical parcel of land, improvements to the land, improvementsattached to the land, real fixtures and appurtenances such as easements.
(v) Real fixtures
"Real fixtures" means personal property that has been installed or attached to land or a
building or group of buildings and is intended to remain permanently in its place. Aconsideration for whether personal property is a real fixture is whether its removal wouldcause significant damage to such property or to the real property to which it is attached.The term real fixtures shall not include trade fixtures. Real fixtures are classified as realproperty. Examples of real fixtures are plumbing, heating and cooling, and lightingfixtures.
(w) Real property
"Real property" means the bundle of rights, interests, and benefits connected with theownership of real estate. Real property does not include the intangible benefits associated
with the ownership of real estate, such as the goodwill of a going business concern.
(x) Replacement cost
"Replacement cost" for real property means the cost required to construct a similarstructure with like utility as the subject property using modern design, materials, andworkmanship. Replacement cost for personal property means the current cost of a similarnew item having the nearest equivalent utility as the subject property.
(y) Reproduction cost
"Reproduction cost" for real property means the cost required to construct an identical orexact replica structure of the subject property. Reproduction cost for personal propertymeans the current cost of duplicating an identical new item.
(z) Residual value
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 11/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
11
"Residual value" means the value of personal property that is at the end of its normallyexpected economic life but still in use.
(aa) Rural land
"Rural land" means any land that that normally lies outside corporate limits, plannedsubdivisions, commercial sites, and industrial sites.
(bb) Salvage value
"Salvage value" means the value of personal property that is at the end of its normally
expected economic life and has been taken out of use.
(cc) Small acreage break point
"Small acreage break point" means the point, expressed as a number of acres, at which theslope of a trend line, drawn through the plotted qualified sales of rural land on a graph,reflects a distinct and pronounced change. Such graph uses the dollars per acre on thevertical axis and numbers of acres on the horizontal axis. The small acreage break pointshould show the point below which the market factors of accessibility and desirability of the land primarily influence value, and above which the productivity of the soil andsuitability for timber growth primarily influence value.
(dd) Small acreage tract
"Small acreage tract" means a rural land tract that is equal to or smaller in acres than thesmall acreage break point.
(ee) Tax situs
"Tax situs" means the location of personal property for ad valorem tax purposes.
(ff) Trade fixtures
"Trade fixtures" means fixtures that are owned and temporarily installed or attached to arented space or building by a tenant and used in conducting a business. For personalproperty to be classified as trade fixtures the lease or rental agreement has to show intentfor the fixtures to be removed by the owner at the termination of the lease. Fixtures that
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 12/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
12
revert to the landlord when the lease is terminated are not trade fixtures. Property shall notbe classified as a trade fixture when the cost of removal, or damage that removal wouldcause to the realty, or to the fixture itself, clearly indicates that a tenant is unlikely to
remove such fixture at the termination of the lease. Trade fixtures shall be classified aspersonal property.
(gg) Transitional real property
"Transitional real property" means any real property that is undergoing a change in use,such as residential, agricultural, commercial, or industrial, and has not been firmlyestablished in its new use. Change in use may be evidenced by recent zoning changes,purchase by a known developer, affidavits of intent, or close proximity to property exposedto these market factors.
(hh) Trend
"Trend" means an observable tendency of behavior such as stable economic direction overextended periods despite temporary fluctuations.
560-11-10-.09 Real Property Appraisal
(1) Real property - Introduction
The appraisal staff shall follow the provisions of this Rule when performing their appraisals of real property. Irrespective of the valuation approach used, the result of any appraisal of realproperty by the appraisal staff shall conform to the definition of fair market value.
(a) General valuation procedures.
The appraisal staff shall consider the sales comparison, cost, and income approaches in theappraisal of real property. The degree of dependence on any one approach will change withthe availability of reliable data and type of property being appraised. The appraisal staff may express the final fair market value estimate to the board of tax assessors in numbers
that are rounded to the nearest hundred dollars.
(b) Real property identification.
The appraisal staff shall identify real property, determine its taxability, and classify it foraddition to the county ad valorem tax digest in accordance with this subparagraph.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 13/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
13
1. Distinguishing real property.
The appraiser shall be required to correctly identify real property and distinguish itfrom personal property where the proper valuation procedures, as set forth in thisRule, may be followed.
(i) Real property examples.
As used in this Rule, real property shall be that property defined in Rule560-11-10-.02(1)(w). This Rule shall provide illustrations to assist theappraiser in the proper interpretation of the definition. However, theseillustrations should not be construed in a manner that conflicts with the
definition. Examples of real property are tangible items such as land, allimprovements attached to land, real fixtures, and leasehold interests in realproperty.
(ii) Identification of real fixtures.
When property the appraiser believes to be a real fixture has not beenreturned by the landlord, the appraiser shall require the landlord to producetheir lease agreement and shall carefully review the agreement beforemaking their recommendation to the board of tax assessors regarding the
classification and taxability of the property in question. The appraiser shallinform the landlord that they may redact, at their option, any informationrelating to the payments that are required by the lease agreement.
2. Assessment date.
Code section 48-5-10 provides that each return by a property owner shall be forproperty held and subject to taxation on January 1 of the tax year. The appraisalstaff shall base their decisions regarding the taxability, uniform assessment, andvaluation of real property on the circumstances of such property on January 1 of the
tax year for which the assessment is being prepared. When real property istransferred to a new owner or converted to a new use, the circumstances of suchproperty on January 1 shall nevertheless be considered as controlling.
3. Classification.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 14/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
14
The appraisal staff shall classify real property as provided in Rule 560-11-2-.21 forinclusion in the county tax digest. Real property may be further stratified and
categorized as appropriate for aggregating comparable properties for an appraisal.
(2) Return of real property.
In accordance with Code section 48-5-299 (a), the appraisal staff, on behalf of the board of taxassessors, shall investigate diligently and inquire into the property owned in the county, for thepurpose of ascertaining what real and tangible personal property is subject to taxation in thecounty and to require the proper return of the property for taxation. The appraisal staff shallmake such investigation as may be necessary to determine the value of any property upon whichfor any reason all taxes due the state or the county have not been paid in full as required by law.
In all cases where taxes are assessed against the owner of property, the appraisal staff shallprepare a proposed assessment on the property according to the best information obtainable.
(a) Information sources.
The appraisal staff should develop and maintain information sources for the discovery of unreturned real property.
(b) Returns.
The county appraisal staff shall review the returns in accordance with policies andprocedures set by the county board of tax assessors consistent with Georgia law and thisRule. Each year, after the deadline for filing returns, the appraisal staff shall secure thereturns from the official responsible for receiving returns on or before the tenth dayfollowing such deadline.
1. New returns.
Department of Revenue form PT-50R is authorized for use by property ownerswhen returning real property. No other form shall be provided for this purpose to
property owners by the county official responsible for receiving returns unlesspreviously approved in writing by the Revenue Commissioner.
2. Automatic returns.
In accordance with Code section 48-5-20, the appraisal staff shall deem any
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 15/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
15
property owner that does not file a return by the deadline as returning for taxationthe same property as was returned or deemed to have been returned in the precedingtax year at the same valuation as the property was finally determined to be subject
to taxation in the preceding year.
3. Real estate transfer declaration forms.
The Department of Revenue has established Form PT-61 for owners to declare thereal estate transfer tax due when property is transferred from one owner to another.The appraisal staff shall review all PT-61 forms filed with the clerk of superiorcourt to discover new owners of property and to ascertain if their property has beenreturned for taxation. When a property owner acquires real property by transfer inthe preceding tax year and does not file a return on such property for the current tax
year, the appraisal staff shall follow the procedures of this subparagraph todetermine if the newly acquired property has been properly returned for taxation.
(i) When real estate transfer tax declaration form properly completed.
For the purposes of subparagraph (2)(b)(3) of this Rule, the PT-61 formshall be deemed properly completed when all applicable informationrequired by the instructions on the form has been entered on the form, it hasbeen signed by the new owner and filed in quadruplicate with the clerk of superior court. A PT-61 form shall not be deemed properly completed whenthe appraisal staff determines any of the required information on the form isomitted, false, or misleading.
(ii) When transferred property deemed returned.
When a property owner acquires by transfer real property that has not beensubdivided from the preceding tax year, and such owner properly completesa real estate transfer tax PT-61 form and pays any real estate transfer tax thatmay be due as provided in Article 1 of Chapter 6 of Title 48 of the Code, theappraisal staff shall deem the owner as having returned the propertyacquired by transfer at the same value finally determined to be applicable to
such property for the preceding year.
(iii) When transferred property deemed unreturned.
The appraisal staff shall not deem as returned any property:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 16/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
16
(I) That is an improvement made since January 1 of the precedingtax year to property that has been transferred;
(II) That has been transferred and for which the real estate transfertax PT-61 form has not been properly completed;
(III) That has been transferred and for which the real estate transfertax PT-61 form has not been filed with the clerk of superior court onor before the deadline for returning property in the year followingthe year the property is transferred; and
(IV) That has been transferred and for which the real estate transfertax has not been paid.
(c) Reassessments.
The appraisal staff may not recommend to the board of tax assessors a reassessment of thesame real property for which a final assessment has already been made by the board. For thepurposes of this subsection, the appraisal staff shall presume that a final assessment on realproperty includes both the land and any improvements to the land.
1. Recently appealed real property.
The appraisal staff shall observe the provisions of Code section 48-5-299 (c) andthis subparagraph before recommending a change to the assessment of real property
that was the subject of an appeal on either the immediately preceding tax digest orthe next immediately preceding tax digest. Such property shall be designated in theappraisal staff's records as recently appealed property for the two tax yearsfollowing the year of the appeal. This subparagraph shall not apply when suchproperty has been returned by the taxpayer at a value different from the appeal-established value.
(i) Changing assessment of recently appealed real property.
In the two tax years following an appeal, the appraisal staff may not
recommend a change of assessment for the sole purpose of changing thevaluation established or decision rendered in an appeal to the board of equalization or superior court. Rather a new appraisal must be accompaniedby an on-site inspection to determine the occurrence of any changes to theproperty, errors in the appraisal staff's records or changes in the marketforces affecting the value of the property since the appeal was heard thatestablished the value of the property. The appraisal staff may recommend,consistent with the provisions of this subparagraph, to the board of tax
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 17/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
17
assessors a change of assessment on the property that was the subject of theappeal when an appraisal based on current market conditions indicates thevalue has changed substantially from the value established by the recent
appeal. Such appraisal shall be accompanied by a written statement attestingto the fact that an appraiser has conducted the
required on-site inspection of the subject property and setting forth thereasons why the appraiser believes that a change of assessment is authorizedunder Code section 48-5-299 (c) and this subparagraph. The writtenstatement shall attest to at least one of the following: construction orrenovation of the subject property has occurred since January 1 of the appealyear; an error has been discovered in the property records regarding thedescription or characteristics of the subject property; or extrinsic physicalfactors relative to the subject property have changed since January 1 of theappeal year that have substantially affected the appeal-established value of such real property. Such extrinsic physical factors may include, but are notlimited to, construction of highways or other public improvements in closeproximity to the subject property; development, subdivision or improvementof adjacent property, or natural or man-made changes to surroundingproperties by disaster or otherwise.
(d) Collecting and maintaining property information.
The appraisal staff shall keep a record of information relevant to the ownership and
valuation of all real property in the county and shall follow the procedures in thissubparagraph when collecting and maintaining such real property data.
1. Description of property information.
The type of information the appraisal staff shall maintain includes, but is not limitedto, property ownership, location, size, use, physical characteristics, sales prices,construction costs, rents, and operating expenses to the extent such information isavailable. The appraisal staff shall, consistent with this subparagraph, recommendto the board of tax assessors a uniform policy regarding the information to be
included in their records.
(i) Geographic information.
Cadastral maps or computerized geographic information systems are to bemaintained by the appraisal staff for all real property located in the county.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 18/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
18
In the event the county governing authority has established a separatemapping office and the maps maintained by such office conform to therequirements of this subparagraph, the appraisal staff may provide relevant
information to such mapping office and still be in compliance with thissubparagraph. Minimum mapping specifications shall include the following:all streets and roads plotted and identified; property lines delineated for eachreal property parcel; unique parcel identifier for each parcel; and physicaldimensions or acreage estimate for each parcel. The appraisal staff shall usethe parcel identifiers to link the real property records to the maps. Theappraisal staff shall notify the Revenue Commissioner of all proposedchanges to existing parcel-numbering systems before implementing suchchanges.
(ii) Sales information.
The appraisal staff shall maintain a record of all sales of real property thatare available and occur within the county. The appraisal staff should alsofamiliarize themselves with overall market trends within their immediategeographical area of the state. They should collect and analyze sales datafrom other jurisdictions having market and usage conditions similar to theircounty for consideration when insufficient sales exist in the county toevaluate a property type, especially large acreage tracts. The Real EstateTransfer Tax document, Department of Revenue Form PT-61, shall be aprimary record source. However, the appraisal staff may also review deeds
of transfer and security deeds recorded in the Office of the Superior CourtClerk, and probated wills recorded in the Office of the Probate Judge tomaintain a record of relevant information relating to the sale or transfer of real property. Records required to be maintained shall include at a minimumthe following information: map and parcel identifier; sale date; sale price;buyer's name; seller's name; deed book and page number; vacant orimproved; number of acres or other measure of the land; representativenessof sale using the confirming criteria provided in Rule 560-11-2-.56 (1)(d);any income and expense information reasonably available from publicrecords; property classification as provided in Rule 560-11-2-.21, and; whenavailable, the appraised value for the tax year immediately following the
year in which the sale occurred.
(iii) Property characteristics.
The appraisal staff shall maintain a record of real property characteristics.This record shall include, but not be limited to, sufficient propertycharacteristics to classify and value the property. In addition, the following
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 19/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
19
criteria may be considered when determining which characteristics shouldbe gathered and maintained: factors that influence the market in the locationbeing considered; requirements of the valuation approach being employed;
digest classification and stratification; requirements of other governmentaland private users; and marginal benefits and costs of collecting andmaintaining each property characteristic.
(iv) Land and location characteristics.
The appraisal staff shall maintain a record of the land and locationcharacteristics. The record should include, but not be limited to, zoning, use,legal or deed restrictions on use, covenants, parcel shape and size,neighborhood and other locational characteristics such as view, topography,
and corner influence, proximity to recreational bodies of water, nuisancesand similar external influences.
(v) Improvement characteristics.
The appraisal staff shall maintain a record of the characteristics of theimprovements to land. The record shall include, but not be limited to, thesize, actual use, design, construction quality, construction materials, age andobserved condition.
2. Collecting property information.
The appraisal staff shall, consistent with the policies of the board of tax assessorsand this subparagraph, physically inspect properties when necessary to gather theinformation required by Rule 560-11-10-.09(2)(d).
(i) Field inspections.
The appraisal staff shall develop and present to the board of tax assessors for approvalprocedures that provide for periodic field inspections to identify properties and ensure that
property characteristics information is complete and accurate. The procedures shall includeguidelines for the physical inspection of the property by either appraisers or speciallytrained data collectors. The format should be designed for standardization, consistency,objectivity, completeness, easy use in the field, and should facilitate later entry into acomputer assisted mass appraisal system, when one is used. When interior information isrequired, the procedures shall include guidelines on how and when to seek access to theproperty along with alternative procedures when such access is not permitted or feasible.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 20/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
20
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 21/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
21
3. Maintaining property characteristics information.
The appraisal staff shall systematically update the property characteristics information inresponse to changes brought about by new construction, new parcels, remodeling, demolition,and destruction. The appraisal staff shall physically measure and update their records to reflectall such changes to real properties in the county.
4. Records retention schedules.
The appraisal staff shall develop, in accordance with the provisions of Code section 50-18-99,records retention schedules for each series of documents maintained in their office and have suchschedules approved by the board of tax assessors before submitting the schedules to the StateRecords Committee for official approval pursuant to Code section 50-18-92.
(i) Building permits.
In counties that issue building permits, no appraisal shall be based solely on declarations of proposed construction cost made by the person obtaining such building permits.
(ii) Aerial photographs.
New aerial photographs should be compared to previous aerial photographs, if suchphotographs exist, to discover new or previously unrecorded construction.
(iii) Field review frequency.
All real property parcels should be physically reviewed at least once every three years toascertain that property information records are current.
(3) Land valuation.
The appraisal staff shall estimate land values by use of the sales comparison or income approach
to value as provided in this subparagraph giving preference to the sales comparison approachwhen adequate land sales are available. The appraisal staff shall identify and describe theproperty, collect site-specific information, make a study of trends and factors influencing valueand obtain a physical measurement of the site. Once the subject is analyzed, the appraisal staff shall classify the land for valuation. Once land values have been estimated, such appraisalsshould be regularly reviewed and updated.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 22/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
22
(a) Land analysis and stratification.
The appraisal staff shall appraise land separately from the improvements both to consider
the trends and factors affecting each and to arrive at a separate assessment for the digest. Inno event, however, may the separate appraisals of the land and improvements exceed thefair market value of the land and improvements when considered as a whole. For appraisalpurposes, land shall be separated into different categories based on its use and sales withinthe market.
1. Site analysis.
The appraisal staff shall utilize the trends and factors affecting the value of the subject property,such as its accessibility and desirability. The existing zoning, existing use, existing covenants
and use restrictions in the deed and in law shall be considered. The other factors the appraisermay consider include, but are not limited to, environmental, economic, governmental, and socialfactors. Site-specific information that may be considered includes, but is not limited to, location,frontage, width, depth, shape, size, topography, landscaping, slope, drainage, hydrology, off-siteimprovements, soil condition, oil productivity, and the quality of access.
2. Market research and verification.
The appraisal staff shall build and maintain an up-to-date file system of qualified sales asprovided in Rule 560-11-10-.09(2)(d)(1)(ii). Other preferred information to be considered is the
motivations of the buyer and seller, as obtained from actual interviews of the parties to the sales.Adjustments to the sales to be considered by the appraiser include, but are not limited to, time of sale; location; physical characteristics; partial interest not conveyed; trades or exchangesincluded; personal property included; leases assumed; incomplete or unbuilt communityproperty; atypical financing; existing covenants; deed restrictions; environmental, economic,governmental and social factors affecting the sale property and the subject parcel. These adjustedqualified sales may then be used to appraise the subject property.
(b) Acreage tract valuation.
The appraisal staff shall determine the small acreage break point to differentiate betweensmall acreage tracts and large acreage tracts and develop or acquire schedules for thevaluation of each. When this small acreage break point cannot easily be determined, theappraisal staff shall recommend to the board of tax assessors a reasonable break point of notless than five acres nor more than twenty-five acres. The base land schedules should beapplicable to all land types in a county. The documentation prepared by the appraisal staff should clearly demonstrate how the land schedule is applied and explain its limitations.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 23/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
23
1. Small acreage tract valuation schedule.
After the appraisal staff has performed the site analysis, as provided in Rule 560-11-10-.09(3)(a)(1), they shall analyze the market to identify groups of comparable properties that maybe combined in the valuation process, as provided in Rule 560-11-10-.09(4)(b)(3). The appraisalstaff shall then analyze the sales to establish a representative base price per acre, and adjustmentfactors for reflecting value added by the characteristics discovered in the site analysis. Usingsuch base value and the adjustment factors, the appraisal staff shall develop the small acreageschedule for all acreage levels through the small acreage break point.
2. Large acreage tract valuation schedule.
After the appraisal staff has performed the site analysis, as provided in Rule 560-11-10-
.09(3)(a)(1), they shall analyze the market to identify groups of comparable properties that maybe combined in the valuation process, as provided in Rule 560-11-10-.09(4)(b)(3). The appraisalstaff shall then analyze the sales to establish a representative benchmark price per acre, andadjustment values for reflecting incremental value associated with different productivity levels,sizes, and locations, as discovered in the site analysis. Using such benchmark values andadjustment values, the appraisal staff shall develop the large acreage schedule for all acreagelevels above the small acreage break point.
(i) Land productivity values.
The appraisal staff should analyze sales of large acreage tracts to extract the value of allimprovements, crop allotments, standing timber, and any other factors that influence thevalue above the base land value. The appraisal staff should then stratify the sales into twocategories of open land and woodland. The base land values should be further stratified intoup to nine productivity grades for each category of land, with grade one being the best,using the productivity classifications of the United States Department of Agriculture NaturalResources Conservation Service, where available. Where soil productivity information isnot available, the appraisal staff may consult with the local United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Supervisor. Alternately, the appraisalstaff may use any acceptable means by which to determine soil productivity gradesincluding, but not limited to, aerial and infrared photography, historical soil productivity
information, and present use. The appraisal staff should analyze sales within the strata anddetermine benchmark values for as many productivity grades as possible. The missing stratavalues are then determined by extrapolating between grades. In the absence of sufficientbenchmark values, a system of productivity factors may be developed from crop or timberproduction based on ratings provided by the United States Department of AgricultureNatural Resources Conservation Service.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 24/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
24
(ii) Pond values.
The appraisal staff should analyze sales of large acreage tracts containing ponds to extract
the value of ponds. The appraisal staff should develop up to three grades of ponds basedupon the quality of construction with regard to the dam, the amount of tree clearing withinthe pond body, and the nature of the waterline around the pond.
(iii) Location and size adjustments.
The appraisal staff should plot sales on an index map of the county where trends in salesprices based on size and location may be analyzed. From this analysis, the appraisal staff should develop adjustments for each homogeneous market area, which are based on a tract'slocation within the county. Within each identified homogeneous market area, sales should
also be analyzed to develop adjustment factors for ranges of tract sizes where the marketreflects a relationship between the value per acre and the number of acres in a tract. Suchfactors should be calculated to the fourth decimal place and should extend from the smallacreage break point to the tract acreage point where size no longer appears to have asignificant impact on the price paid per acre. The appraiser should select an acreage pointbetween these two points that represents a typical agricultural use tract size and assign it anindex factor value of 1.0000. Such adjustments should be supported by clearly identifiablechanges in selling prices per acre. Finally, large acreage tracts that have sold within the mostrecent 24 months, unless no such sale has occurred in which case the look back periodshould be 48 months, should be appraised using the schedule of adjustment factors and asales ratio study performed to test for uniformity and conformity of the schedule to Rule
560-11-2-.56, and if the schedule thus conforms, the adjustments shall then be applied to allother large acreage tracts that are within the scope of the schedule being tested.
(iv) Adjustments for absorption
When insufficient large tract sales are available to create a reliable schedule of factors, theappraisal staff may use comparable sales to develop values for the size tracts for whichcomparables exist, and then adjust these values for larger tracts by (1) estimating a rate of absorption for the smaller tracts for which data exists, (2) dividing the large tract intosmaller, marketable sections, (3) developing a sales schedule with estimated income by year
reflecting the absorption rate and the value characteristics of each of the smaller tracts, (4)discounting the income schedule to the present using an appropriate discount rate, and (5)summing the resulting values to arrive at an estimated value for the property.
(v) Standing Timber Value Extraction
When determining the market value of land underlying standing timber, where such
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 25/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
25
standing timber is taxed in accordance with Code section 48-5-7.5, the appraiser shall notrely exclusively on the sales prices of such land that has recently had the timber harvested.Rather he or she shall also consider sales of land with standing timber after the value of such
standing timber has been determined in accordance with this subparagraph and deductedfrom the selling price.
(I) Determine timber value from buyer and seller.
For all types of timber, the value of the standing timber on recently sold land should bedetermined from reliable information from the buyer and seller clearly segregating the valueof the standing timber from the underlying land. In the absence of such information, theappraiser may use one of the following methods to determine the value of the standingtimber if in his or her judgment the results are reasonably consistent with other sales where
buyer and seller information is known:
I. Calculate value of merchantable timber.
For all types of merchantable timber, the value of the standing timber may bedetermined by multiplying estimated volumes by product class, such as softwoodand hardwood pulpwood, chip and saw logs, saw timber, poles, posts, and fuelwood, of timber on the property by prices for each product class as obtained fromthe table of weighted average prices paid for harvested timber applicable to theyear during which the sale occurred and prepared by the Commissioner pursuant
to paragraph (g) of Code section 48-5-7.5. For the purposes of this subparagraph,merchantable timber shall include stands that have been in production for morethan fifteen years. Estimated volumes by product class may be obtained by one of the following methods: reliable information from the buyer or seller or fromspecially trained data collectors who have estimated volumes from a visual on-siteinspection or from an aerial survey.
II. Calculate value of pre-merchantable planted pine timber.
For pre-merchantable planted pine timber, the value of the standing timber may
be determined by estimating the value of the timber at the age of merchantabilityand then prorating this value to the actual age of the pre-merchantable stand. Theappraiser may arrive at this estimate using the following steps:
A. For each applicable timber product class, multiply the estimated tons of timbervolume yield per acre for each product class at the age of merchantability timesthe locally prevailing timber price per ton of such product classes. Sum the
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 26/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
26
individual results of the timber product class calculations into a single result.
(A) In the absence of reliable locally prevailing timber price per ton information,
the appraiser may use timber price per ton from the table of weighted averageprices paid for harvested timber prepared by the Commissioner pursuant toparagraph (g) of Code section 48-5-7.5.
(B) In the absence of specific yield information to the contrary, the appraiser mayestimate timber volume yields at an average yield of 52.2 tons per acre orpreferably by using the land productivity classifications established by Rule 560-11-10-.09(3)(b)(2)(i) and the following tables of estimated yields of fully stockedplanted timber stands at age fifteen, and then adjusting the yields according to theactual stocking density of the timber stand.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 27/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
27
Loblolly Pine – Lower Coastal Plain
Georgia TaxProductivity
Rating
Georgia TaxAdjusted SiteIndex Range
Site Index UsedFor GrowthProjections
Tons/Acre@ Age
15Pulpwood Chip-n-Saw
1 90 – 101 96 139 125 14
2 85 – 89 87 110 99 11
3 81 – 84 83 98 88 10
4 80 80 90 81 9
5 75 – 79 77 81 73 8
6 70 – 74 72 69 66 3
7 60 – 69 65 53 51 2
8 10 – 59 45 19 19 0
9 0 - 9 0 0 - -
Loblolly Pine – Upper Coastal Plain
Georgia TaxProductivityRating
Georgia TaxAdjusted SiteIndex Range
Site Index UsedFor GrowthProjections
Tons/Acre@ Age15
Pulpwood Chip-n-Saw
1 90 – 101 96 129 116 13
2 85 – 89 87 103 93 10
3 81 – 84 83 93 84 9
4 80 80 85 77 8
5 75 – 79 77 78 70 8
6 70 – 74 72 67 63 4
7 60 – 69 65 52 49 3
8 10 – 59 45 18 18 0
9 0 - 9 0 0 - -
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 28/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
28
Loblolly Pine – Piedmont
Georgia TaxProductivity
Rating
Georgia TaxAdjusted SiteIndex Range
Site Index UsedFor GrowthProjections
Tons/Acre@ Age
15Pulpwood Chip-n-Saw
1 90 – 101 96 123 111 12
2 85 – 89 87 98 88 10
3 81 – 84 83 88 79 9
4 80 80 81 73 8
5 75 – 79 77 74 66 8
6 70 – 74 72 62 59 3
7 60 – 69 65 48 46 2
8 10 – 59 45 17 17 0
9 0 - 9 0 0 - -
Slash Pine – Lower Coastal Plain
Georgia TaxProductivity
Rating
Georgia TaxAdjusted SiteIndex Range
Site Index UsedFor GrowthProjections
Tons/Acre@ Age
15Pulpwood Chip-n-Saw
1 90 – 101 96 155 139 16
2 85 – 89 87 114 103 11
3 81 – 84 83 98 88 10
4 80 80 87 78 9
5 75 – 79 77 77 69 8
6 70 – 74 72 61 58 3
7 60 – 69 65 42 40 2
8 10 – 59 45 11 11 0
9 0 - 9 0 0 - -
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 29/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
29
Slash Pine – Upper Coastal Plain
Georgia TaxProductivity
Rating
Georgia TaxAdjusted SiteIndex Range
Site Index UsedFor GrowthProjections
Tons/Acre@ Age
15Pulpwood Chip-n-Saw
1 90 – 101 96 150 135 15
2 85 – 89 87 113 102 11
3 81 – 84 83 99 89 10
4 80 80 87 78 9
5 75 – 79 77 77 69 8
6 70 – 74 72 62 59 3
7 60 – 69 65 43 41 2
8 10 – 59 45 12 12 0
9 0 - 9 0 0 - -
(C) In the absence of reliable local information on typical timber product class volume yields atthe age of merchantability, the appraiser may assume that 90% of the timber will be pulpwoodand 10% will be chip-n-saw.
B. Multiply the result in subparagraph A. by the number of acres of pre-merchantabletimberland.
C. Deduct from the result in subparagraph B. the normal cost to establish a timber stand on cutover woodland, which shall be known as the base value. Normal cost may be determined fromplanters, local site preparation and planning contractors and other reliable sources.
D. Divide the result in subparagraph C. by the age of merchantability to determine the averageannual timber growth value. In the absence of reliable local information to the contrary, the ageof merchantability shall be fifteen years.
E. Multiply the result in subparagraph D. by the actual age of the standing timber to arrive at thevalue of the accumulated timber growth.
F. Add back the base value deducted in subparagraph C. to the result in subparagraph E. to yieldthe total value of the pre-merchantable standing timber.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 30/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
30
III. Determine value of other pre-merchantable timber.
For types of pre-merchantable timber other than planted pine, the value of the standing timbermay be determined from the best information available. In the absence of local reliableinformation to the contrary, the value of other pre-merchantable timber may be estimated asfollows:
A. Natural stands less than five years of age should be assigned no value.
B. Natural pre-merchantable stands five years of age and older should be valued in the samemanner as planted pine timber is valued, except the appraiser should make no adjustments for thebase cost of establishing the timber stand; yields for natural pine stands should be estimated atfifty percent of the volume determined for a planted pine stand; and yields for hardwood stands
should be estimated at forty percent of the value determined for a planted pine stand.
Table of Owner Harvest Timber Values (2005)
The tables of Owner Harvest Timber Values as defined in Code section 48-5-7.5 are created bythe Revenue Commissioner after consulation with the Georgia Forestry Commission. The tablescontaining weighted average price paid for the various timber categories are to be preparedwithin 60 days of the end of each calendar year.
The tables of Owner Harvest Timber Values can be printed and/or downloaded from thefollowing site:
http://www.etax.dor.ga.gov/ptd/cas/timber/year.shtml
The tables are available from 1997 until the current year and contain timber values for allcounties. When working with the APM Regulations presented above, the appraiser should takecaution and use the timber values from the proper year.
For the purpose of this class, we will use the timber prices for Burke County contained in theexcerpt from the Table of Owner Harvest Timber Value below.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 31/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
31
County SoftwoodPulpwood
Softwoodchip-n-saw
SoftwoodSawtimber
SoftwoodPoles
SoftwoodPosts
SoftwoodFuelchips
HardwoodPulpwood
HardwoodSawtimber
HardwoodFirewood
Burke 6.13 21.70 34.91 50.75 4.69 .75 11.70 27.31 7.10
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 32/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
32
Appraisal Procedures Manual – Rural Land
The regulations above are referred to generally as the Appraisal Procedures Manual (APM). These
regulations govern the appraisal process for real and personal property and should be considered asbinding as any State statutue. The discussion in Course IV-B with regard to the APM willconcentrate on the aspects of the regulation that are dedicated to the appraisal of rural land.
Following are some of the important Rural Land appraisal/property definitions contained with theregulation:
560-11-10-.02 Definitions.
(a) Absorption rate"Absorption rate" means the rate at which the real estate market can absorb real property
of a given type.
(aa) Rural land."Rural land" means any land that normally lies outside corporate limits, plannedsubdivisions, commercial sites, and industrial sites.
(l) Large acreage tract."Large acreage tract" means a rural land tract that is greater in acreage than the smallacreage break point.
(dd) Small acreage tract."Small acreage tract" means a rural land tract that is equal to or smaller in acres than thesmall acreage break point.
The APM directly addresses issues surrounding the analysis, stratification and valuationprocedures for various categories of rural land. Following are the code sections addressing theseareas:
560-11-10-.09(2)(d)1 Description of property information
(ii) - Sales information
• Appraisal staff shall maintain a record of all real property sales that occur within the
county
• Staff should become familiar with market trends within the immediate geographicalarea
• Sales should be gathered from other jurisdictions when insufficient sales exist in thecounty for a particular property type, especially large tract sales
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 33/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
33
• PT61, deeds of transfer, security deeds and probated wills shall all be a relevantsource of information regarding sales
• The following minimum information should be maintained for each sale:
Map id
Sale date
Sale price
Buyer’s and seller’s name
Deed book/page number
Notes as to whether parcel was vacant or improved at the time of the sale
Acres or other land measure
Representativeness of sale (qualified or not)
Income and expense data reasonably available from public records
Appraised value of property from tax year immediately following year of sale
(iii) - Property characteristics
• A record of real property characteristics shall be maintained
• Characteristics shall include, but not be limited to, adequate data to classify andappraise the property
• Additional property characteristics may be gathered and maintained if available andnecessary
(iv) – Land and location characteristics
• Land and location characteristics shall be recorded and maintained
• Records shall include but not be limited to
Zoning
Use
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 34/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
34
Legal or deed restrictions on use
Covenants
Parcel shape and size
Neighborhood
Other location influences, such as
o View
o Topography
o Corner influence
o Proximity to recreational bodies of water
o Nuisances and similar external influences
560-11-10-.09(3) Land Valuation
(a) – Land analysis & stratification
• Land and improvements shall be appraised separately
• Sum of the land value and improvement value shall not exceed the fair market
value of the property
• Land shall be categorized according to use and sales within the market
1 – Site analysis
• Trends and factors affecting the value of the property shall be utilized in theappraisal of such. Such trends and factors may include but not be limited to
Existing zoning
Existing use
Existing covenants and use restrictions in the deed and in law
Environmental, economic, governmental and social factors
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 35/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
35
Location, frontage, width, depth, shape, size, topography, landscaping,slope, drainage, hydrology, off-site improvements, soil condition, soilproductivity and quality of access
2 – Market research and verification
• An up-to-date file system of qualified sales shall be maintained by the appraisalstaff
• Qualified sales shall be used to appraise subject properties
2(b) – Acreage Tract Valuation
• A small acre break point shall be determined to differentiate between small andlarge tracts
• When small acre break point cannot be determined, the appraisal staff shallrecommend a reasonable breaking point between 5 and 25 acres, inclusive
• Separate base land schedules shall be developed for small and large tracts
• Documentation explaining the procedures employed shall be maintained
(b)1 – Small Acre Tract Valuation Schedule
• Base price per acre shall be established
• Adjustment factors for adding value based on property characteristics shall beestablished
• Small acre tract schedule shall be established for acre levels up to the small acrebreak point
(b)2 – Large Acre Tract Valuation Schedule
• Benchmark value shall be established
•
Factors and incremental values shall be established for different productivity levels,sizes and locations
• Benchmark values and adjustments shall be used to develop large acreage schedulewhich shall be applied to all comparable parcels with acreage above small acrebreak
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 36/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
36
(b)2(i) – Land Productivity Values
• Large acreage tract sales should be analyzed for the purpose of extracting the value
of items that affect value above the base land value
• Following are typical items the appraiser should look for
Improvements
Crop allotments
Standing timber
Any other factors
• Sales should be stratified into two categories of land, open and wooded
• Base land values for open land and woodland should be stratified into up to 9different productivity grades
Grade one represents the most productive land type
Grades should be based on US Department of Agriculture NaturalResources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil productivity in counties wereclassifications are available
In counties were classifications are not available, the county may
o Consult with NRCS supervisor for the purpose of obtaininginformation concerning soil classifications within the county.Information may be related to the existence of preliminary work thatis available or any other data concerning soil classifications thatwould assist the county in the grading process of the land
o Other means of determing soil classifications in the absences of NRCS data are
Aerial and infrared photography
Historical soil productivity information
Present use of land
• Sales should be analyzed for each strata (land category) and benchmark valuesdetermined for each productivity grade, as possible
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 37/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
37
• In the absence of a benchmark value for a grade, the value should be extrapolatedfrom known values determined for other productivity grades
• If insufficient benchmark values exist, a system of productivity factors may bedeveloped from crops or timber productivity ratings provided by NRCS
(b)2(ii) – Pond Values
• Pond values should be extracted from sales
• Appraiser should establish up to 3 grades of ponds within the schedule
• Pond grades shall be based on
Quality of construction with regard to the dam
Amount of tree clearing within the body of the pond
Nature of the waterline around the pond
(b)2(iii) – Location & Size Adjustments
• Sales should be plotted on a county index map for the purpose of detecting markettrends based on size and location
• Homegeneous market areas within the county should be defined based on the
market trends
• Value adjustments for each homogeneous area should be developed
• Size adjustments within each homogeneous area should be developed where themarket indicates a relationship between the number of acres and value per acre of the property
Size factors should be calculated to the 4th decimal place
Size factors should extend from the small acre break point to the acreagelevel where sales indicate that size is no longer a consideration
A base tract size shall be established and assigned a factor of 1.0000
All size adjustments shall be clearly identifiable changes in selling pricesper acre
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 38/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
38
• Valuation schedules shall be applied to parcels that have sold within the last 24months, unless adequate sales are not available. In cases where adequate sales arenot available, the look-back period shall be 48 months.
• Sales ratio study shall be performed on the sales to test for uniformity andconformity as spelled out in Rule 560-11-2-.56
• Should the schedule conform, the schedules shall be applied to all parcelscategorized as large tracts
(b)2(iv) – Adjustments for absorption
• Used when insufficient large tract sales are available to create a reliable schedule of size factors
• Size factors shall be developed for tracts where adequate sales exist
• For tracts that are of a size where there is insufficient sales data, the appraiser mayadjust the values of the larger tracts using the following procedure
Estimate a rate of absorption for the smaller tracts for which data exists
Divide the larger tract into smaller marketable sections
Develop a sales schedule with estimated income by year reflecting theabsorption rate and the value characteristics of the smaller tracts
Discount the income schedule to the present using an appropriate discountrate
Sum the resulting values for each year to arrive at an estimated value for theproperty
(b)2(v) – Standing Timber Value Extraction
• Appraiser shall not rely solely on the sales of “cut-over” tracts of land
• Sales of tracts with standing timber should also be considered when the value of thestanding timber can be determined
(b)2(v)(I) – Determine timber value from buyer and seller
• When available and reliable, the appraiser should use the timber value obtainedfrom the buyer and/or seller of the tract of land
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 39/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
39
• When buyer/seller information is not available the appraiser may use one of thefollowing methods to determine the value of the standing timber if in his/her judgement the results are consistent with other sales where buyer/seller information
is known
(b)2(v)(I)I – Calculate value of merchantable timber
o Timber stands older than 15 years shall be considered asmerchantable timber
o Merchantable timber shall be categorized into the following productclasses
Softwood and hardwood pulpwood
Chip and saw logs
Saw timber
Poles
Posts
Fuel wood
o Volume estimates by product class maybe obtained by one of the
following methods
Reliable information from buyer and/or seller
Information obtained from specially trained data collectorswho have estimated volumes from a visual on-site inspectionor from an aerial survey
o Value of merchantable timber is determined by multiplying theestimated volumes by product class by prices obtained from thetable of weighted average prices paid for harvested timberapplicable to the year of the sale and prepared by the Commissioner
pursant to code section 48-5-7.5
(b)2(v)(I)II – Calculate value of pre-merchantable planted pine timber
o For pre-merchantable planted pine timber, the value of the timbermay be determined by estimating the value of the timber at the age
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 40/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
40
of merchantability and then prorating the value to the actual age of the pre-merchantable stand
o To calculate the value of the pre-merchantable pine timber, theappraiser should follow the steps below:
(1) Multiply the estimated tons of timber volume yield peracre for each product class (pulpwood and chip-n-saw) atage 15 times the product’s local timber price per ton.
If no local timber prices can be obtained, theappraiser may use the timber price per ton for theappropriate product class from the Table of OwnerHarvest Timber Values that is prepared by the
Commissioner.
In the absence of yield information, the appraisermay determine yields by
⇒ estimating timber volume yields at anaverage of 52.2 tons per acre, adjust forstocking density and assume that 90% of thevolume is pulpwood and 10% is chip-n-sawor
⇒ using Conservation Use land productivity
classifications and the tables of estimatedyields contained within this section andadjust for stocking density
(2) Sum the results of the timber product class calculationsinto a single result
(3) Multiply the result in Step 2 by the number of acres of pre-merchantable pine timberland
(4) Deduct from the result in Step 3 the normal cost to
establish a timber stand on cut-over woodland. Thecalculated value shall be known as the base value.
Normal cost for establishing timber stands may beobtained from planters, local site preparation andplanning contractors and other reliable sources
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 41/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
41
(5) Divide the result in Step 4 by the age of merchantability,15 years in the absence of reliable local information, todetermine the average annual timber growth value
(6) Multiple the result in Step 5 by the actual age of thestanding timber to arrive at the value of the accumulatedtimber growth
(7) Add the base value from step 4 to the result in Step 6 toproduce the total value of the pre-merchantable pine timber
(b)2(v)(I)II – Calculate value of other pre-merchantable timber
o Value may be determined by the best information available
o In the absence of reliable local information, the appraiser mayestimate the value by
Assigning no value to stands less than 5 years of age
Natural pre-merchantable timber stands 5 years and oldershould have their value estimated in the same manner as pre-merchantable planted pine timber with the exception of noadjustment for the cost of establishing a timber stand
Natural pine stands should be estimated at 50% of
the volume determined for planted pine stands
Hardwood stands should be estimated at 40% of thevalue determined for a planted pine stand
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 42/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
42
§48-5-7.1. Tangible real property devoted to agricultural purposes
Definition; persons entitled to preferential tax assessment; covenant to maintain agricultural
purposes; penalty for breach of covenant.
(a) For purposes of this article, "tangible real property which is devoted to 'bona fideagricultural purposes' ":
(1) Is tangible real property, the primary use of which is good faith commercialproduction from or on the land of agricultural products, including horticultural,floricultural, forestry, dairy, livestock, poultry, and apiarian products and all otherforms of farm products; but
(2) Includes only the value which is $100,000.00 or less of the fair market value of tangible real property which is devoted to the storage or processing of agricultural
products from or on the property; and
(3) Excludes the entire value of any residence located on the property.
(b) No property shall qualify for the preferential ad valorem property tax assessmentprovided for in subsection (b) of Code Section 48-5-7 unless:
(1) It is owned by one or more natural or naturalized citizens; or
(2) It is owned by a family-farm corporation, the controlling interest of which is ownedby individuals related to each other within the fourth degree by civil reckoning, andsuch corporation derived 80 percent or more of its gross income for the yearimmediately preceding the year in which application for preferential assessment ismade from bona fide agricultural pursuits carried out on tangible real property locatedin this state, which property is devoted to bona fide agricultural purposes.
(c) No property shall qualify for said preferential assessment if such assessment would resultin any person who has a beneficial interest in such property, including any interest in thenature of stock ownership, receiving in any tax year any benefit of preferential assessment asto more than 2,000 acres. If any taxpayer has any beneficial interest in more than 2,000 acresof tangible real property, which is devoted to bona fide agricultural purposes, such taxpayershall apply for preferential assessment only as to 2,000 acres of such land.
(d) No property shall qualify for preferential assessment unless and until the owner of such
property agrees by covenant with the appropriate taxing authority to maintain the eligibleproperty in bona fide agricultural purposes for a period of at least ten years beginning on thefirst day of January of the year in which such property qualifies for preferential assessmentand ending on the last day of December of the tenth year of the covenant period. After theexpiration of any ten-year covenant period, the property shall not qualify for furtherpreferential assessment until and unless the owner of the property enters into a renewalcovenant for an additional period of ten years.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 43/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
43
(e) No property shall maintain its eligibility for preferential assessment unless a validcovenant remains in effect and unless the property is continuously devoted to bona fideagricultural purposes during the entire period of the covenant.
(f) If any change in ownership of such qualified property occurs during the covenant period,all qualification requirements must be met again before the property shall be eligible to becontinued for preferential assessment. If ownership of the property is acquired during acovenant period by a person qualified to enter into an original covenant, by a newly formedcorporation the stock in which is owned by the original covenanter or others related to theoriginal covenanter within the fourth degree by civil reckoning, or by the personalrepresentative of an owner who was a party to the covenant, then the original covenant maybe continued by such acquiring party for the remainder of the term, in which event no breachof the covenant shall be deemed to have occurred.
(g) A penalty shall be imposed under this subsection if during the period of the covenant
entered into by a taxpayer the covenant is breached. The penalty shall be computed bymultiplying the amount by which the preferential assessment has reduced taxes otherwise duefor the year in which the breach occurs times:
(1) A factor of five if the breach occurs in the first or second year of the covenantperiod;
(2) A factor of four if the breach occurs during the third or fourth year of the covenantperiod;
(3) A factor of three if the breach occurs during the fifth or sixth year of the covenantperiod; or
(4) A factor of two if the breach occurs in the seventh, eighth, ninth, or tenth year of thecovenant period.
(h) A penalty imposed under subsection (g) of this Code section shall bear interest at the ratespecified in Code Section 48-2-40 from the date the covenant is breached.
(i) Penalties and interest imposed under this Code section shall constitute a lien against theproperty and shall be collected as other unpaid ad valorem taxes are collected. Such penaltiesand interest shall be distributed pro rata to each taxing jurisdiction wherein the preferentialassessment has been granted based upon the total amount by which such preferentialassessment has reduced taxes for each such taxing jurisdiction on the property in question as
provided in this Code section.
(j) The penalty imposed by subsection (g) of this Code section shall not apply in any casewhere a covenant is breached solely as a result of:
(1) The acquisition of part or all of the property under the power of eminent domain;
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 44/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
44
(2) The sale of part or all of the property to a public or private entity which would havehad the authority to acquire the property under the power of eminent domain; or
(3) The death of an owner who was a party to the covenant.(k) All applications for preferential assessment, including the covenant agreement requiredunder this Code section, shall be filed on or before the last day for filing ad valorem taxreturns in the county for the tax year for which such preferential assessment shall be firstapplicable. An application for continuation of preferential assessment upon a change inownership of the qualified property shall be filed on or before the last date for filing taxreturns in the year following the year in which the change in ownership occurred.Applications for preferential assessment shall be filed with the county board of tax assessorswho shall approve or deny the application. If the application is approved on or after July 1,1998, the county board of tax assessors shall file a copy of the approved application in theoffice of the clerk of the superior court in the county in which the eligible property is located.
The clerk of the superior court shall file and index such application in the real propertyrecords maintained in the clerk's office. Applications approved prior to July 1, 1998, shall befiled and indexed in like manner without payment of any fee. If the application is not sorecorded in the real property records, a transferee of the property affected shall not be boundby the covenant or subject to any penalty for its breach. The fee of the clerk of the superiorcourt for recording such applications approved on or after July 1, 1998, shall be paid by theowner of the eligible property with the application for preferential treatment and shall be paidto the clerk by the board of tax assessors when the application is filed with the clerk. If theapplication is denied, the board of tax assessors shall notify the applicant in the same mannerthat notices of assessment are given pursuant to Code Section 48-5-306 and shall return anyfiling fees advanced by the owner. Appeals from the denial of an application by the board of
tax assessors shall be made in the same manner that other property tax appeals are madepursuant to Code Section 48-5-311. As to property approved for preferential assessment priorto July 1, 1998, the county board of tax assessors shall file copies of all approvedapplications in the office of the clerk of the superior court not later than August 14, 1998, andthe clerk shall file, index, and record such approved applications, as provided for in thissubsection, with the fee of the clerk of the superior court for filing, indexing, and recordingto be paid out of the general funds of the county.
(l) The commissioner shall by regulation provide uniform application and covenant forms tobe used in making application for preferential assessment. Such application shall include anoath or affirmation by the taxpayer that he has not at any time received, or made a pending
application for, preferential assessment in the same or another county with respect to anyproperty which taken together with property for which application is then being madeexceeds 2,000 acres.
(m) The commissioner shall annually submit a report to the Governor and members of theGeneral Assembly, which shall show the fiscal impact of the preferential assessmentprovided for in this Code section. The report shall include the amount of assessed valueeliminated from each county's digest as a result of the preferential assessment; approximate
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 45/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
45
tax dollar losses, by county, to all local governments affected by such preferentialassessment; and any recommendations regarding state and local administration of this Codesection, with emphasis upon enforcement problems, if any, attendant with this Code section.
The report shall also include any other data or facts, which the commissioner deemsrelevant.
(n)(1) The transfer prior to July 1, 1988, of a part of the property subject to a covenant shallnot constitute a breach of a covenant entered into before or after July 1, 1984, if:
(A) The part of the property so transferred is used for single-family residential purposesand the residence is occupied by a person who is related within the fourth degree of civilreckoning to an owner of the property subject to the covenant; and
(B) The part of the property so transferred, taken together with any other part of theproperty so transferred during the covenant period, does not exceed a total of three
acres.
(2) The transfer on or after July 1, 1988, of a part of the property subject to a covenant shallnot constitute a breach of a covenant entered into before or after July 1, 1988, if:
(A) The part of the property so transferred is transferred to a person who is related withinthe fourth degree of civil reckoning to an owner of the property subject to the covenant;and
(B) The part of the property so transferred, taken together with any other part of theproperty transferred to the same relative during the covenant period, does not exceed atotal of five acres.
(o) The following shall not constitute a breach of a covenant entered into before or after July1, 1984:
(1) Mineral exploration of the property subject to the covenant or the leasing of theproperty subject to the covenant for purposes of mineral exploration if the primary use of the property continues to be the good faith commercial production from or on the land of agricultural products; or
(2) Allowing all or part of the property subject to the covenant to lie fallow or idle forpurposes of any land conservation program, for purposes of any federal agriculturalassistance program, or for other agricultural management purposes.
(p) Property which is subject to preferential assessment shall be separately classified from allother property on the tax digest; and such separate classification shall be such as will enableany person examining the tax digest to readily ascertain that the property is subject topreferential assessment. Covenants shall be public records and shall be indexed andmaintained in such manner as will allow members of the public to readily locate the covenantaffecting any particular property subject to preferential assessment.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 46/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
46
(q)(1) In any case in which a covenant is breached solely as a result of the foreclosure of adeed to secure debt, or the property is conveyed to the lien holder without compensation andin lieu of foreclosure, the penalty specified by paragraph (2) of this subsection shall apply
and the penalty specified by subsection (g) of this Code section shall not apply if:
(A) The deed to secure debt was executed as a part of a bona fide commercial loantransaction in which the grantor of the deed to secure debt received consideration equal invalue to the principal amount of the debt secured by the deed to secure debt;
(B) The loan was made by a person or financial institution who or which is regularlyengaged in the business of making loans; and
(C) The deed to secure debt was intended by the parties as security for the loan and wasnot intended for the purpose of carrying out a transfer, which would otherwise be subjectto the penalty specified by subsection (g) of this Code section.
(2) When a breach occurs solely as a result of a foreclosure which meets the qualifications of paragraph (1) of this subsection, the penalty imposed shall be the amount by whichpreferential assessment has reduced taxes otherwise due for the year in which the covenant isbreached.
(3) A penalty imposed under this subsection shall bear interest at the rate specified in CodeSection 48-2-40 from the date the covenant is breached.
(r)(1) In any case in which a covenant is breached solely as a result of a medicallydemonstrable illness or disability which renders the owner of the real property physicallyunable to continue the property in agricultural use, the penalty specified by paragraph (2)
of this subsection shall apply and the penalty specified by subsection (g) of this CodeSection shall not apply. The penalty specified by paragraph (2) of this subsection shalllikewise be substituted for the penalty specified by subsection (g) of this Code section inany case in which a covenant is breached solely as a result of a medically demonstrableillness or disability which renders the operator of the real property physically unable tocontinue the property in agricultural use, provided that the alternative penalty shall applyin this case only if the operator of the real property is a member of the family owning afamily-farm corporation which owns the real property.
(2) When a breach occurs which meets the qualifications of paragraph (1) of thissubsection, the penalty imposed shall be the amount by which preferential assessment hasreduced taxes otherwise due for the year during which the covenant is breached.
(3) A penalty imposed under this subsection shall bear interest at the rate specified inCode Section 48-2-40 from the date the covenant is breached.
(4) Prior to the imposition of the alternative penalty authorized by this subsection in lieuof the penalty specified by subsection (g) of this Code section, the board of tax assessorsshall require satisfactory evidence which clearly demonstrates that the breach is the result
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 47/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
47
of a medically demonstrable illness or disability which meets the qualifications of paragraph (1) of this subsection.
(r.1) In any case in which a covenant is breached solely as a result of an owner electing todiscontinue the property in its qualifying use, provided such owner has renewed without anintervening lapse at least once the covenant under this Code section, has reached the age of 65 or older, and has kept the property in a qualifying use under the renewal covenant for atleast three years the penalty specified by subsection (g) of this Code section shall not applyand the penalty imposed shall be the amount by which preferential assessment has reducedtaxes otherwise due for the year in which the covenant is breached. Such penalty shall bearinterest at the rate specified in Code Section 48-2-40 from the date of the breach. Suchelection shall be in writing and shall not become effective until filed with the county board of tax assessors.
(s) Property which is subject to preferential assessment and which is subject to a covenant
under this Code section may be changed from such covenant and placed in a covenant forbona fide conservation use under Code Section 48-5-7.4 if such property meets all of therequirements and conditions specified in Code Section 48-5-7.4. Any such change shallterminate the covenant under this Code section, shall not constitute a breach of the covenantunder this Code section, and shall require the establishment of a new covenant period underCode Section 48-5-7.4. No property may be changed under this subsection more than once.
(t) At such time as the property ceases to be eligible for preferential assessment or when anyten-year covenant period expires and the property does not qualify for further preferentialassessment, the owner of the property shall file an application for release of preferentialtreatment with the county board of tax assessors who shall approve the release upon
verification that all taxes and penalties with respect to the property have been satisfied. Afterthe application for release has been approved by the board of tax assessors, the board shallfile the release in the office of the clerk of the superior court in the county in which theoriginal covenant was filed. The clerk of the superior court shall file and index such releasein the real property records maintained in the clerk's office. No fee shall be paid to the clerk of the superior court for recording such release. The commissioner shall by regulationprovide uniform release forms. (Code 1981, § 48-5-7.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1983, p. 1850, §3; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 48; Ga. L. 1984, p. 686, § 1; Ga. L. 1985, p. 149, § 48; Ga. L. 1986,p. 820, § 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 286, §§ 1-3; Ga. L. 1988, p. 895, § 1; Ga. L. 1990, p. 292, § 1;Ga. L. 1991, p. 668, § 1; Ga. L. 1991, p. 1903, § 5; Ga. L. 1998, p. 553, §§ 1, 2; Ga. L. 1999,p. 589, § 1; Ga. L. 2002, p. 1031, § 1.)The 1998 amendment, effective July 1, 1998, in
subsection (k), added the fourth through eighth sentences, added "and shall return any filingfees advanced by the owner" at the end of the ninth sentence, and added the last sentence;and added subsection (t).
The 1999 amendment, effective April 28, 1999, in the next to the last sentence of subsection (t),substituted "No fee shall be paid to" for "The fee of" and deleted "shall be paid by the owner of the property with the application for release from preferential treatment, and such fee shall be
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 48/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
48
paid to the clerk by the board of tax assessors when the release is filed with the clerk" from theend.
The 2002 amendment, effective May 14, 2002, added subsection (r.1). See Editor's note forapplicability.
Code Commission notes. - Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1985, "convenant" was changedto "covenant" in the introductory language of subsection (n) and in paragraph (2) of subsection(o).
Editor's notes. - Section 1 of Ga. L. 1983, p. 1850, effective April 8, 1983, not codified by theGeneral Assembly, provided that "It is the intent of this Act to implement certain changesimposed by Article VII, Section I, Paragraph III, subparagraph (c) of the Constitution of the Stateof Georgia."
Section 4 of Ga. L. 1983, p. 1850, effective April 8, 1983, not codified by the General Assembly,provided that that Act (§ 3 of which enacted this Code section) "shall apply to all tax yearsbeginning on or after January 1, 1984."
Section 4 of Ga. L. 1987, p. 286, not codified by the General Assembly, provided that theamendments to subsections (g), (q) and (r) by that Act shall apply to breaches occurring on orafter the effective date of the Act [March 26, 1987] and the amendment to subsection (k) shallapply with respect to changes of ownership occurring during calendar year 1986 or at any timethereafter.
Ga. L. 1991, p. 1903, § 15, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendmentto this Code section by that act shall be applicable beginning January 1, 1992, with respect to ad
valorem taxation of timber and shall be applicable beginning January 1, 1992, for all otherpurposes. Taxation for prior periods shall continue to be governed by prior law.
Ga. L. 2002, p. 1031, § 9, not codified by the General Assembly, provided that the Act shall beapplicable to all taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2002.
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Construction with other law. - Assessments lacked uniformity in failing to follow the mandatesof § 48-5-2 regarding consideration of "existing use of the property" and "other factors deemedpertinent in arriving at fair market value" and in failing to exempt standing timber under themandate of paragraph (a)(1) of this section and § 48-5-7.5 as set forth in Ga. Const. Art. VII,
Sec. 1, Par. (3)(e)(2). Leverett v. Jasper County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 233 Ga. App. 470, 504S.E.2d 559 (1998).
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 49/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
49
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Transfer of portion of property. - Subsection (f) of this section does not require that allproperty subject to a covenant be transferred before the covenant can be continued pursuant tothat provision. 1987 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U87-14.
Subsections (f) and (n) may be implemented concurrently, which would allow the transfer of up to three acres of land to a relative for the purpose of building a residence, while also allowingthe covenant to be continued by the same relative with respect to the remaining acreagetransferred which is to be continued in agricultural usage as required by the statute. 1987 Op.Att'y Gen. No. U87-10.
Chapter 560-11-3 Forms
560-11-3-.19 Farm Property Preferential Assessment/ Application/ Covenant Form.
(1) In order for tangible real property to qualify for the preferential assessment provided for inO.C.G.A. Sections 48-5-7 and 48-5-7.1, its primary use must be the good faith commercialproduction of agricultural products. Such land must be devoted to bona fide agriculturalpurposes, which as a general rule, contemplates both the usage of multiple acre tracts and anoverall pursuit of profit. The mere ownership of multiple acres whose primary use is not thegood faith commercial production of agricultural products but is only used in the limited,occasional or sporadic production of agricultural products would not qualify for the preferentialassessment.
(2) For purposes of this regulation, the following terms are defined to mean:
(a) "bona fide agricultural purposes" means the production, as a part of an overallbusiness pursuit engaged in for profit of one or more types of agricultural productsincluding horticultural products, floricultural products, forestry products, dairy products,livestock products, poultry products, apiarian products, and any other form of farmproduct.
(b) "Good faith commercial production" means an overall business pursuit factually andgenuinely engaged in for the primary purpose of producing agricultural products for aprofit.
(c) "Primary use" means that use which is the principal, chief and leading use or activityto which the property is devoted.
(d) "Storage or processing of agricultural products" means to put or set aside agriculturalproducts for safekeeping or for use when needed or the act or series of acts performedupon agricultural products to transform such products into a different state of condition.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 50/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
50
(3) O.C.G.A. Section 48-5-7.1 requires the State Revenue Commissioner to annually submit areport to the Governor and General Assembly, which, among other things, shows the fiscalimpact of preferential assessment and the assessed value eliminated from each county’s digest as
a result of such assessment. To aid in the collection of such date for statistical accountingpurposes, tangible real property that receives the preferential assessment shall utilize anidentification code of A-3 and improvements that are devoted to the storage or processing of agricultural products from or on such property shall utilize an identification code of A-1.
(4) All applications for the preferential assessment of tangible real property devoted to bona fideagricultural purposes as set forth in O.C.G.A. Section 48-5-7 and O.C.G.A. Section 48-5-7.1 aswell as the covenant described therein shall be made upon the form adopted by the StateRevenue Commissioner for that purpose. Form PT-230 set forth below has been adopted by theCommissioner for said purpose.
Authority O.C.G.A. Sections 48-5-7, 48-5-7.1. Administrative History. Original Rule entitled
"Farm Property Preferential Assessment/ Application/ Covenant Form" was filed on October 28,1983; effective November 17, 1983.
§48-5-7.4.
Bona fide conservation use property; residential transitional property; application procedures;penalties for breach of covenant; classification on tax digest; annual report. (Effective January 1,2004. See note.)
(a) For purposes of this article, the term "bona fide conservation use property" meansproperty described in and meeting the requirements of paragraph (1) or (2) of thissubsection, as follows:
(1) Not more than 2,000 acres of tangible real property of a single owner, the primarypurpose of which is any good faith production, including, but not limited to, subsistencefarming or commercial production from or on the land of agricultural products or timber,subject to the following qualifications:
(A) Such property includes the value of tangible property permanently affixed tothe real property which is directly connected to such owner's production of agricultural products or timber and which is devoted to the storage and processingof such agricultural products or timber from or on such real property;
(B) Such property excludes the entire value of any residence located on theproperty;
(C) Except as otherwise provided in division (vii) of this subparagraph, suchproperty must be owned by:
(i) One or more natural or naturalized citizens;
(ii) An estate of which the devisees or heirs are one or more natural ornaturalized citizens;
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 51/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
51
(iii) A trust of which the beneficiaries are one or more natural or naturalizedcitizens;
(iv) A family owned farm entity, such as a family corporation, a familypartnership, a family general partnership, a family limited partnership, a familylimited corporation, or a family limited liability company, all of the interest of which is owned by one or more natural or naturalized citizens related to eachother by blood or marriage within the fourth degree of civil reckoning, exceptthat, solely with respect to a family limited partnership, a corporation, limitedpartnership, limited corporation, or limited liability company may serve as ageneral partner of the family limited partnership and hold no more than a 5percent interest in such family limited partnership, an estate of which thedevisees or heirs are one or more natural or naturalized citizens, or a trust of which the beneficiaries are one or more natural or naturalized citizens and
which family owned farm entity derived 80 percent or more of its gross incomefrom bona fide conservation uses, including earnings on investments directlyrelated to past or future bona fide conservation uses, within this state within theyear immediately preceding the year in which eligibility is sought; provided,however, that in the case of a newly formed family farm entity, an estimate of the income of such entity may be used to determine its eligibility;
(v) A bona fide nonprofit conservation organization designated under Section501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code;
(vi) A bona fide club organized for pleasure, recreation, and other non-profitable purposes pursuant to Section 501(c)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code;
or
(vii) In the case of constructed storm-water wetlands, any person may own suchproperty.
(D) Factors which may be considered in determining if such property is qualifiedmay include, but not be limited to:
(i) The nature of the terrain;
(ii) The density of the marketable product on the land;
(iii) The past usage of the land;
(iv) The economic merchantability of the agricultural product; and
(v) The utilization or non-utilization of recognized care, cultivation,harvesting, and like practices applicable to the product involved and anyimplemented plans thereof; and
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 52/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
52
(E) Such property shall, if otherwise qualified, include, but not be limited to,property used for:
(i) Raising, harvesting, or storing crops;(ii) Feeding, breeding, or managing livestock or poultry;
(iii) Producing plants, trees, fowl, or animals; or
(iv) Production of aquaculture, horticulture, floriculture, forestry, dairy,livestock, poultry, and apiarian products; or
(2) Not more than 2,000 acres of tangible real property, excluding the value of anyimprovements thereon, of a single owner of the types of environmentally sensitiveproperty specified in this paragraph and certified as such by the Department of NaturalResources, if the primary use of such property is its maintenance in its natural condition
or controlling or abating pollution of surface or ground waters of this state by storm-water runoff or otherwise enhancing the water quality of surface or ground waters of thisstate and if such owner meets the qualifications of subparagraph (C) of paragraph (1) of this subsection:
(A) Environmentally sensitive areas, including any otherwise qualified land area1,000 feet or more above the lowest elevation of the county in which such area islocated that has a percentage slope, which is the difference in elevation between twopoints 500 feet apart on the earth divided by the horizontal distance between thosetwo points, of 25 percent or greater and shall include the crests, summits, and ridgetops which lie at elevations higher than any such area;
(B) Wetland areas that are determined by the United States Army Corps of Engineersto be wetlands under their jurisdiction pursuant to Section 404 of the federal CleanWater Act, as amended, or wetland areas that are depicted or delineated on mapscompiled by the Department of Natural Resources or the United States Fish andWildlife Service pursuant to its National Wetlands Inventory Program;
(C) Significant ground-water recharge areas as identified on maps or data compiledby the Department of Natural Resources;
(D) Undeveloped barrier islands or portions thereof as provided for in the federalCoastal Barrier Resources Act, as amended;
(E) Habitats as certified by the Department of Natural Resources as containingspecies that have been listed as either endangered or threatened under the federalEndangered Species Act of 1973, as amended;
(F) River corridors which shall be defined as those undeveloped lands adjacent torivers and perennial streams that are within the 100 year flood plain as depicted onofficial maps prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency; or
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 53/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
53
(G)(i) Constructed storm-water wetlands of the free-water surface type certified bythe Department of Natural Resources under subsection (k) of Code Section 12-2-4 and approved for such use by the local governing authority.
(ii) No property shall maintain its eligibility for current use assessment as abona fide conservation use property as defined in this subparagraph unless theowner of such property files an annual inspection report from a licensedprofessional engineer certifying that as of the date of such report the propertyis being maintained in a proper state of repair so as to accomplish theobjectives for which it was designed. Such inspection report and certificationshall be filed with the county board of tax assessors on or before the last dayfor filing ad valorem tax returns in the county for each tax year for which suchassessment is sought.
(b) Except in the case of the underlying portion of a tract of real property on which is
actually located a constructed storm-water wetlands, the following additional rules shallapply to the qualification of conservation use property for current use assessment:
(1) When one-half or more of the area of a single tract of real property is used fora qualifying purpose, then such tract shall be considered as used for suchqualifying purpose unless some other type of business is being operated on theunused portion; provided, however, that such unused portion must be minimallymanaged so that it does not contribute significantly to erosion or otherenvironmental or conservation problems. The lease of hunting rights or the use of the property for hunting purposes shall not constitute another type of business;
(2) The owner of a tract, lot, or parcel of land totaling less than ten acres shall berequired by the tax assessor to submit additional relevant records regarding proof of bona fide conservation use;
(3) No property shall qualify as bona fide conservation use property if suchcurrent use assessment would result in any person who has a beneficial interest insuch property, including any interest in the nature of stock ownership, receiving inany tax year any benefit of current use assessment as to more than 2,000 acres. If any taxpayer has any beneficial interest in more than 2,000 acres of tangible realproperty, which is devoted to bona fide conservation uses, such taxpayer shallapply for current use assessment only as to 2,000 acres of such land;
(4) No property shall qualify as bona fide conservation use property if it is leasedto a person or entity which would not be entitled to conservation use assessment;
(5) No property shall qualify as bona fide conservation use property if suchproperty is at the time of application for current use assessment subject to arestrictive covenant which prohibits the use of the property for any purposedescribed in subparagraph (a)(1)(E) of this Code section; and
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 54/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
54
(6) No otherwise qualified property shall be denied current use assessment on thegrounds that no soil map is available for the county in which such property islocated; provided, however, that if no soil map is available for the county in
which such property is located, the owner making an application for current useassessment shall provide the board of tax assessors with a certified soil survey of the subject property unless another method for determining the soil type of thesubject property is authorized in writing by such board.
(c) For purposes of this article, the term "bona fide residential transitional property" meansnot more than five acres of tangible real property of a single owner which is privatesingle-family residential owner occupied property located in a transitional developingarea. Such classification shall apply to all otherwise qualified real property which islocated in an area which is undergoing a change in use from single-family residential useto agricultural, commercial, industrial, office-institutional, multifamily, or utility use or a
combination of such uses. Change in use may be evidenced by recent zoning changes,purchase by a developer, affidavits of intent, or close proximity to property, which hasundergone a change from single-family residential use. To qualify as residentialtransitional property, the valuation must reflect a change in value attributable to suchproperty's proximity to or location in a transitional area.
(d) No property shall qualify for current use assessment under this Code section unless anduntil the owner of such property agrees by covenant with the appropriate taxing authorityto maintain the eligible property in bona fide qualifying use for a period of ten yearsbeginning on the first day of January of the year in which such property qualifies for suchcurrent use assessment and ending on the last day of December of the final year of thecovenant period. After the owner has applied for and has been allowed current use
assessment provided for in this Code section, it shall not be necessary to makeapplication thereafter for any year in which the covenant period is in effect and currentuse assessment shall continue to be allowed such owner as specified in this Code section.Upon the expiration of any covenant period, the property shall not qualify for furthercurrent use assessment under this Code section unless and until the owner of the propertyhas entered into a renewal covenant for an additional period of ten years; provided,however, that the owner may enter into a renewal contract in the ninth year of a covenantperiod so that the contract is continued without a lapse for an additional ten years.
(e) A single owner shall be authorized to enter into more than one covenant under this Codesection for bona fide conservation use property, provided that the aggregate number of
acres of qualified property of such owner to be entered into such covenants does notexceed 2,000 acres. Any such qualified property may include a tract or tracts of land,which are located in more than one county. A single owner shall be authorized to enterqualified property in a covenant for bona fide conservation use purposes and to entersimultaneously the residence located on such property in a covenant for bona fideresidential transitional use if the qualifications for each such covenant are met. A singleowner shall be authorized to enter qualified property in a covenant for bona fide
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 55/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
55
conservation use purposes and to enter other qualified property of such owner in acovenant for bona fide residential transitional use.
(f) An owner shall not be authorized to make application for and receive current useassessment under this Code section for any property which at the time of such applicationis receiving preferential assessment under Code Section 48-5-7.1 except that such ownershall be authorized to change such preferential assessment covenant in the mannerprovided for in subsection (s) of Code Section 48-5-7.1.
(g) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, no property shall maintain its eligibilityfor current use assessment under this Code section unless a valid covenant remains ineffect and unless the property is continuously devoted to an applicable bona fidequalifying use during the entire period of the covenant. An owner shall be authorized tochange the type of bona fide qualifying conservation use of the property to another bonafide qualifying conservation use and the penalty imposed by subsection (l) of this Code
section shall not apply, but such owner shall give notice of any such change in use to theboard of tax assessors.
(h) If any breach of a covenant occurs, the existing covenant shall be terminated and allqualification requirements must be met again before the property shall be eligible forcurrent use assessment under this Code section.
(i) If ownership of all or a part of the property is acquired during a covenant period by aperson or entity qualified to enter into an original covenant, then the original covenantmay be continued by such acquiring party for the remainder of the term, in which eventno breach of the covenant shall be deemed to have occurred.
(j)(1) All applications for current use assessment under this Code section, including thecovenant agreement required under this Code section, shall be filed on or before the lastday for filing ad valorem tax returns in the county for the tax year for which such currentuse assessment is sought, except that in the case of property which is the subject of areassessment by the board of tax assessors an application for current use assessment maybe filed in conjunction with or in lieu of an appeal of the reassessment. An application forcontinuation of such current use assessment upon a change in ownership of all or a part of the qualified property shall be filed on or before the last date for filing tax returns in theyear following the year in which the change in ownership occurred. Applications forcurrent use assessment under this Code section shall be filed with the county board of taxassessors who shall approve or deny the application. If the application is approved on or
after July 1, 1998, the county board of tax assessors shall file a copy of the approvedapplication in the office of the clerk of the superior court in the county in which theeligible property is located. The clerk of the superior court shall file and index suchapplication in the real property records maintained in the clerk's office. Applicationsapproved prior to July 1, 1998, shall be filed and indexed in like manner without paymentof any fee. If the application is not so recorded in the real property records, a transferee of the property affected shall not be bound by the covenant or subject to any penalty for its
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 56/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
56
breach. The fee of the clerk of the superior court for recording such applicationsapproved on or after July 1, 1998, shall be paid by the owner of the eligible property withthe application for preferential treatment and shall be paid to the clerk by the board of tax
assessors when the application is filed with the clerk. If the application is denied, theboard of tax assessors shall notify the applicant in the same manner that notices of assessment are given pursuant to Code Section 48-5-306 and shall return any filing feesadvanced by the owner. Appeals from the denial of an application by the board of taxassessors shall be made in the same manner that other property tax appeals are madepursuant to Code Section 48-5-311.
(2) In the event such application is approved, the taxpayer shall continue to receive annualnotification of any change in the fair market value of such property and any appeals withrespect to such valuation shall be made in the same manner as other property tax appealsare made pursuant to Code Section 48-5-311.
(k)(1) The commissioner shall by regulation provide uniform application and covenant formsto be used in making application for current use assessment under this Code section. Suchapplication shall include an oath or affirmation by the taxpayer that he or she is incompliance with the provisions of paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (b) of this Codesection, if applicable.
(2) The applicable local governing authority shall accept applications for approval of property for purposes of subparagraph (a)(2)(G) of this Code section and shall certifyproperty to the local board of tax assessors as meeting or not meeting the criteria of suchparagraph. The local governing authority shall not certify any property as meeting thecriteria of subparagraph (a)(2)(G) of this Code section unless:
(A) The owner has submitted to the local governing authority:
(i) A plat of the tract in question prepared by a licensed land surveyor,showing the location and measured area of such tract;
(ii) A certification by a licensed professional engineer that the specificdesign used for the constructed storm-water wetland was recommended bythe engineer as suitable for such site after inspection and investigation; and
(iii) Information on the actual cost of constructing and estimated cost of operating the storm-water wetland, including without limitation adescription of all incorporated materials, machinery, and equipment; and
(B) An authorized employee or agent of the local governing authority has inspectedthe site before, during, and after construction of the storm-water wetland todetermine compliance with the requirements of subparagraph (a)(2)(G) of this Codesection.
(l) A penalty shall be imposed under this subsection if during the period of the covenantentered into by a taxpayer the covenant is breached. The penalty shall be applicable to the
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 57/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
57
entire tract which is the subject of the covenant and shall be twice the difference betweenthe total amount of tax paid pursuant to current use assessment under this Code sectionand the total amount of taxes which would otherwise have been due under this chapter for
each completed or partially completed year of the covenant period. Any such penaltyshall bear interest at the rate specified in Code Section 48-2-40 from the date thecovenant is breached.
(m) Penalties and interest imposed under this Code section shall constitute a lien against theproperty and shall be collected in the same manner as unpaid ad valorem taxes arecollected. Such penalties and interest shall be distributed pro rata to each taxing jurisdiction wherein current use assessment under this Code section has been grantedbased upon the total amount by which such current use assessment has reduced taxes foreach such taxing jurisdiction on the property in question as provided in this Codesection.
(n) The penalty imposed by subsection (l) of this Code section shall not apply in any casewhere a covenant is breached solely as a result of:
(1) The acquisition of part or all of the property under the power of eminentdomain;
(2) The sale of part or all of the property to a public or private entity which wouldhave had the authority to acquire the property under the power of eminentdomain; or
(3) The death of an owner who was a party to the covenant.
(o) The transfer of a part of the property subject to a covenant for a bona fide conservationuse shall not constitute a breach of a covenant if:
(1) The part of the property so transferred is used for single-family residentialpurposes, starting within one year of the date of transfer and continuing for theremainder of the covenant period, and the residence is occupied by a person whois related within the fourth degree of civil reckoning to an owner of the propertysubject to the covenant; and
(2) The part of the property so transferred, taken together with any other part of the property so transferred to the same relative during the covenant period, doesnot exceed a total of five acres;
and in any such case the property so transferred shall not be eligible for acovenant for bona fide conservation use, but shall, if otherwise qualified, beeligible for current use assessment as residential transitional property and theremainder of the property from which such transfer was made shall continueunder the existing covenant until a terminating breach occurs or until the end of the specified covenant period.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 58/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
58
(p) The following shall not constitute a breach of a covenant:
(1) Mineral exploration of the property subject to the covenant or the leasing of
the property subject to the covenant for purposes of mineral exploration if theprimary use of the property continues to be the good faith production from or onthe land of agricultural products;
(2) Allowing all or part of the property subject to the covenant to lie fallow or idlefor purposes of any land conservation program, for purposes of any federalagricultural assistance program, or for other agricultural management purposes;
(3) Allowing all or part of the property subject to the covenant to lie fallow or idledue to economic or financial hardship if the owner notifies the board of taxassessors on or before the last day for filing a tax return in the county where theland lying fallow or idle is located and if such owner does not allow the land to lie
fallow or idle for more than two years of any five-year period; or
(4)(A) Any property which is subject to a covenant for bona fide conservation usebeing transferred to a place of religious worship or burial or an institution of purely public charity if such place or institution is qualified to receive theexemption from ad valorem taxation provided for under subsection (a) of CodeSection 48-5-41. No person shall be entitled to transfer more than 25 acres of such person's property in the aggregate under this paragraph.
(B) Any property transferred under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph shall notbe used by the transferee for any purpose other than for a purpose which wouldentitle such property to the applicable exemption from ad valorem taxation
provided for under subsection (a) of Code Section 48-5-41 or subsequentlytransferred until the expiration of the term of the covenant period. Any such useor transfer shall constitute a breach of the covenant.
(q) In the following cases, the penalty specified by subsection (l) of this Code section shallnot apply and the penalty imposed shall be the amount by which current use assessmenthas reduced taxes otherwise due for the year in which the covenant is breached, suchpenalty to bear interest at the rate specified in Code Section 48-2-40 from the date of thebreach:
(1) Any case in which a covenant is breached solely as a result of the foreclosureof a deed to secure debt or the property is conveyed to the lien holder withoutcompensation and in lieu of foreclosure, if:
(A) The deed to secure debt was executed as a part of a bona fidecommercial loan transaction in which the grantor of the deed to securedebt received consideration equal in value to the principal amount of thedebt secured by the deed to secure debt;
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 59/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
59
(B) The loan was made by a person or financial institution who or which isregularly engaged in the business of making loans; and
(C) The deed to secure debt was intended by the parties as security for theloan and was not intended for the purpose of carrying out a transfer, whichwould otherwise be subject to the penalty specified by subsection (l) of this Code section;
(2) Any case in which a covenant is breached solely as a result of a medicallydemonstrable illness or disability which renders the owner of the real propertyphysically unable to continue the property in the qualifying use, provided that theboard of tax assessors shall require satisfactory evidence which clearlydemonstrates that the breach is the result of a medically demonstrable illness ordisability; or
(3) Any case in which a covenant is breached solely as a result of an ownerelecting to discontinue the property in its qualifying use, provided such owner hasrenewed without an intervening lapse at least once the covenant for bona fideconservation use, has reached the age of 65 or older, and has kept the property ina qualifying use under the renewal covenant for at least three years. Such electionshall be in writing and shall not become effective until filed with the county boardof tax assessors.
(r) Property which is subject to current use assessment under this Code section shall beseparately classified from all other property on the tax digest; and such separateclassification shall be such as will enable any person examining the tax digest to ascertainreadily that the property is subject to current use assessment under this Code section.Covenants shall be public records and shall be indexed and maintained in such manner aswill allow members of the public to locate readily the covenant affecting any particularproperty subject to current use assessment under this Code section. Based on informationsubmitted by the county boards of tax assessors, the commissioner shall maintain acentral registry of conservation use property, indexed by owners, so as to ensure that the2,000 acre limitations of this Code section are complied with on a state-wide basis.
(s) The commissioner shall annually submit a report to the Governor, the Department of Agriculture, the Georgia Agricultural Statistical Service, the Georgia ForestryCommission, the Department of Natural Resources, and the University of GeorgiaCooperative Extension Service and the House Ways and Means, Natural Resources and
Environment, and Agriculture and Consumer Affairs committees and the Senate Finance,Natural Resources and Environment, and Agriculture and Consumer Affairs committeesand shall make such report available to other members of the General Assembly, whichreport shall show the fiscal impact of the assessments provided for in this Code sectionand Code Section 48-5-7.5. The report shall include the amount of assessed valueeliminated from each county's digest as a result of such assessments; approximate taxdollar losses, by county, to all local governments affected by such assessments; and any
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 60/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
60
recommendations regarding state and local administration of this Code section and CodeSection 48-5-7.5, with emphasis upon enforcement problems, if any, attendant with thisCode section and Code Section 48-5-7.5. The report shall also include any other data or
facts that the commissioner deems relevant.
(t) A public notice containing a brief, factual summary of the provisions of this Code sectionshall be posted in a prominent location readily viewable by the public in the office of theboard of tax assessors and in the office of the tax commissioner of each county in thisstate.
(u) Reserved.
(v) Reserved.
(w) At such time as the property ceases to be eligible for current use assessment or when any
ten-year covenant period expires and the property does not qualify for further current useassessment, the owner of the property shall file an application for release of current usetreatment with the county board of tax assessors who shall approve the release uponverification that all taxes and penalties with respect to the property have been satisfied.After the application for release has been approved by the board of tax assessors, theboard shall file the release in the office of the clerk of the superior court in the county inwhich the original covenant was filed. The clerk of the superior court shall file and indexsuch release in the real property records maintained in the clerk's office. No fee shall bepaid to the clerk of the superior court for recording such release. The commissioner shallby regulation provide uniform release forms.
(x) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code section to the contrary, in any case
where a renewal covenant is breached by the original covenanter or a transferee who isrelated to that original covenanter within the fourth degree by civil reckoning, the penaltyotherwise imposed by subsection (l) of this Code section shall not apply if the breachoccurs during the sixth through tenth years of such renewal covenant, and the onlypenalty imposed shall be the amount by which current use assessment has reduced taxesotherwise due for each year in which such renewal covenant was in effect, plus interest atthe rate specified in Code Section 48-2-40 from the date the covenant is breached.
(Code 1981, § 48-5-7.4, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 1903, § 6; Ga. L. 1992, p. 6, § 48; Ga. L.1993, p. 947, §§ 1-6; Ga. L. 1994, p. 428, §§ 1, 2; Ga. L. 1996, p. 1021, § 1; Ga. L. 1998, p. 553,
§§ 3, 4; Ga. L. 1998, p. 574, § 1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 589, § 2; Ga. L. 1999, p. 590, § 1; Ga. L. 1999,p. 656, § 1; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1338, § 1; Ga. L. 2002, p. 1031, §§ 2, 3; Ga. L. 2003, p. 271, § 2; Ga.L. 2003, p. 565, § 1.)
The 2000 amendment, effective May 1, 2000, in division (a)(1)(C)(iv), inserted a commafollowing "entity" near the beginning, inserted a comma following "company", inserted "byblood or marriage" and the language beginning with ", except that," and ending with "such
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 61/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
61
family limited partnership" near the middle, inserted the language beginning with ", including"and ending with "uses," near the end, and added the proviso at the end.
The 2002 amendment, effective May 14, 2002, inserted "or the use of the property for huntingpurposes" in paragraph (b)(1), and in subsection (q), substituted "The" for "the" at the beginningof subparagraphs (q)(1)(A) through (q)(1)(C), deleted "or" at the end of subparagraph (q)(1)(C),substituted "; or" for a period at the end of paragraph (q)(2), and added paragraph (q)(3). SeeEditor's note for applicability.
The 2003 amendments. The first 2003 amendment, effective January 1, 2004, rewrote this Codesection. The second 2003 amendment, effective July 1, 2003, added the proviso at the end of thelast sentence in subsection (d).
Code Commission notes. - Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1992, "and Environment" wasdeleted following the second occurrence of "Natural Resources" in subsection (s).
Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1998, subsection (w), as added by Ga. L. 1998, p. 574, §1, was re-designated as subsection (x).
Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2003, divisions (a)(2)(G)(1) and (a)(2)(G)(2) as addedby Ga. L. 2003, p. 271, § 2, was re-designated as divisions (a)(2)(G)(i) and (a)(2)(G)(ii).
Editor's notes. - Ga. L. 1991, p. 1903, § 15, not codified by the General Assembly, provides thatthis Code section shall be applicable beginning January 1, 1992, with respect to ad valoremtaxation of timber and shall be applicable beginning January 1, 1992, for all other purposes.Taxation for prior periods shall continue to be governed by prior law.
Ga. L. 1993, p. 947, § 10, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "Sections 1, 2, 3, 4,and 9 of this Act shall be applicable to all bona fide conservation use covenants entered into forall taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1993, and to any table of values of bona fideconservation use property established by the state revenue commissioner for all taxable yearsbeginning on or after January 1, 1993. Any bona fide conservation use covenant entered into forthe taxable year beginning January 1, 1992, shall continue to be governed by the law in effect forthat taxable year."
Ga. L. 2002, p. 1031, § 9, not codified by the General Assembly, provided that the Act shall beapplicable to all taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2002.
Ga. L. 2003, p. 271, § 3, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendment by
this Act shall be applicable to all taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2004.Law reviews. - For note on 2000 amendment of O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7.4, see 17 Ga. St. U.L. Rev.277 (2000).
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 62/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
62
JUDICIAL DECISIONS
Valuation of comparable properties as evidence. - Evidence of the valuations of conservation use properties was relevant in an action involving the assessment of comparablecorporate properties. Georgia-Pac. Corp. v. Talbot County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 241 Ga. App.444, 526 S.E.2d 914 (1999).
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 63/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
63
Chapter 560-11-6 Conservation Use Property
560-11-6-.01 Application of Chapter.
(1) Regulations in this Chapter apply to conservation use valuations of property included incovenants entered into for the tax year beginning January 1, 1993.
Authority O.C.G.A. Sections 48-2-12, 48-5-7, 48-5-7.4, 48-5-269. History. Original Ruleentitled “Application of Chapter” adopted. F. May 28, 1993; eff. June 17, 1993. Repealed: NewRule of same title adopted. F. Mar. 1, 1995; eff. Mar. 21, 1995. Repealed: New Rule of sametitle adopted. F. Mar. 4, 2004; eff. Mar. 24, 2004.
560-11-6-.02 Definitions.
For the purposes of implementing O.C.G.A. Section 48-5-7.4, O.C.G.A. Section 48-5-269 andthese Regulations, the following terms are defined to mean:
(a) "Beneficial interest," in addition to legal ownership or control, means the right to derive anyprofit, benefit, or advantage by way of a contract, stock ownership or interest in an estate;
(b) "Good Faith Production" means:
1. A viable utilization of the property for the primary purpose of any good faithproduction, including, but not limited to, subsistence farming or commercial production,from or on the land of agricultural products or timber;
2. The primary use of the property shall include, but not be limited to:
(i) Raising, harvesting, or storing crops;
(ii) Feeding, breeding, or managing livestock or poultry;
(iii) Producing plants, trees, fowl, or animals; or
(iv) Production of aquaculture, horticulture, floriculture, forestry, dairy, livestock,poultry, and apiarian products;
3. Factors which may be considered in determining if such property is primarily used forgood faith production of agricultural products or timber may include, but are not limited
to:(i) The nature of the terrain;
(ii) the density of the marketable product on the land;
(iii) the past usage of the land;
(iv) the economic merchantability of the agricultural product; and
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 64/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
64
(v) the utilization or non-utilization of recognized care, cultivation, harvesting,and like practices applicable to the product involved and any implemented plansthereof;
(c) "Maintenance in its natural condition" means to manage the land in such a manner that wouldnot ruin, erode, harm, damage, or spoil the nature, distinctiveness, identity, appearance, utility orfunction that originally characterized the property as environmentally sensitive under O.C.G.A.Section 48-5-7.4(a)(2);
(d) "Mineral exploration" means the examination and investigation of land by drilling, boring,sinking shafts, driving tunnels, or other means, for the purpose of discovering the presence andextent of valuable minerals. Such term does not include the excavation of any such minerals afterdiscovery;
(e) "Primary purpose or primary use" means the principal use to which the property is devoted,
as distinct from an incidental, occasional, intermediate or temporary use for some other purposenot detrimental to or in conflict with its primary purpose, i.e., the devotion to and utilization of the property for the full time necessary and customary to accommodate the predominant use, e.g.the growing season, the crop cycle or planting to harvest cycle;
(f) "Qualifying use" means the primary use to which the property is devoted that qualifies theproperty for current use valuation under O.C.G.A. Section 48-5-7.4;
(g) "Tract" means a parcel of property that is delineated by legal boundaries, levying authoritiestax district boundaries, or other boundaries designated by the tax assessors to facilitate the properidentification of property on their maps and records.
Authority O.C.G.A. Sections 48-2-12, 48-5-7.4, 48-5-269. History. Original Rule entitled
“Definitions” adopted. F. May 28, 1993; eff. June 17, 1993.
560-11-6-.03 Qualification Requirements.
In addition to those requirements of O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7.4, the following qualificationrequirements shall apply:
(a) No property shall qualify for current use valuation as residential transitional property unless itis devoted to use by a single family and occupied more or less continually by the owner as theprimary place of abode and for which the owner is eligible to claim a homestead exemption. Theproperty that otherwise qualifies for current use valuation as residential transitional property
shall be limited to the real property consisting of the residential improvement and no more thanthe contiguous five acres of land;
(b) In determining whether or not an applicant or the property in question qualifies for currentuse valuation provided for environmentally sensitive properties, the board of tax assessors shallrequire the applicant to submit a certification by the Department of Natural Resources asrequired by O.C.G.A. § 12-2-4(k) that the specific property is environmentally sensitive property
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 65/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
65
as defined by O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7.4. Additionally, the board of tax assessors may requireaccompanying documentation or information including but not limited to:
1. Evidence of the legal ownership of the property;2. Evidence that the past usage of the property demonstrates it has not been developed orsignificantly altered or otherwise rendered unfit for its natural environmental purpose;and
3. Evidence that the property has been and will continue to be maintained in its naturalcondition;
(c) In determining whether or not an applicant or the property in question qualifies for currentuse valuation provided for constructed storm water wetland conservation use properties, theboard of tax assessors shall require the applicant to submit a certification by the Department of Natural Resources as required by O.C.G.A. § 12-2-4 that the specific property is constructed
storm-water wetlands of the free-water surface type property as defined by O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7.4.Additionally, the board of tax assessors may require accompanying documentation orinformation including but not limited to:
1. Evidence of the legal ownership of the property;
2. A plat of the tract in question prepared by a licensed land surveyor, showing thelocation and measured area of the tract;
3. A certification by a licensed professional engineer that the specific design used for theconstructed storm-water wetland was recommended by the engineer as suitable for suchsite after inspection and investigation; and
4. Information on the actual cost of constructing and an estimated cost of operating thestorm-water wetland, including without limitation a description of all incorporatedmaterials, machinery, and equipment.
(d) No property shall maintain current use valuation as constructed storm water wetlandconservation use property unless the owner of such property files with the board of tax assessorson or before the last day for filing ad valorem tax returns for each tax year for whichconservation use valuation is sought an annual inspection report from a licensed professionalengineer certifying that as of the date of such report the property is being maintained in a properstate of repair so as to accomplish the objectives for which it was designed.
(e) No property shall qualify for current use valuation as conservation use property if such
valuation would result in any person who has a beneficial interest in such property receiving anybenefit from current use valuation on more than 2,000 acres in this state in any tax year. Anyperson so affected shall be entitled to the benefits of current use valuation on no more than 2,000acres of such land in this state;
(f) Except as necessary to effect the provisions of the 2,000 acre limitation, a taxing jurisdictionboundary, or to exclude any property that is under a separate covenant as residential transitional
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 66/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
66
property, each covenant must encompass the entire tract of property for which the conservationuse valuation is sought. In those instances where inclusion of the total acreage of a tract wouldcause the owner to exceed the 2,000 acre limitation, the owner shall be permitted to designate so
much of a contiguous area of the tract that will equal but not exceed the 2,000 acre limitation.
Authority O.C.G.A. Sections 48-2-12, 48-5-7, 48-5-7.4, 48-5-269. History. Original Ruleentitled “Qualification Requirements” adopted. F. May 28, 1993; eff. June 17, 1993. Repealed:New Rule of same title adopted. F. Mar. 4, 2004; eff. Mar. 24, 2004.
560-11-6-.04 Applications.
(1) All applications for current use assessment shall be made using the form adopted by theCommissioner for that purpose. Forms PT-283A, PT-283E, and PT-283R (Rev. 7/98) are herebyadopted and prescribed. The application shall be filed with the board of tax assessors of the
county in which the property is located.
(2) In those counties where Soil Conservation Service soil survey maps are available, it shall bethe responsibility of the board of tax assessors to delineate the soil types on the tax records of theapplicant’s property.
(3) In those counties where the board of tax assessors has not been able to obtain SoilConservation Service soil survey maps, the owner making application for current use assessmentshall provide the board of tax assessors with a certified soil survey of the subject property unlessanother method for determining the soil type of the subject property is authorized in writing bythe board of tax assessors.
(4) Applications for current use valuation provided for environmentally sensitive properties maybe filed without certification by the Department of Natural Resources that the specific property isenvironmentally sensitive property. However, failure to file such certification with the board of tax assessors within 30 days of the last day for filing the application for current use assessmentmay result in the application being denied by the board of tax assessors.
(5) Applications for current use valuation provided for constructed storm water wetlandconservation use properties shall not be certified as meeting the criteria of bona fide constructedstorm-water wetlands of the free-water surface type unless an authorized employee or agent of the local governing authority has inspected the site before, during, and after construction of thestorm-water wetland to determine that the property is being used for controlling or abatingpollution of surface or ground waters of this state by storm-water runoff or otherwise enhancing
the water qualify of surface or ground waters of this state.
(6) An application for current use valuation may be withdrawn prior to or within the applicabletime period for filing property tax assessment appeals after the date of mailing the notice by theboard of tax assessors of the current use valuation placed on the property for the first year of thecovenant period.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 67/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
67
(7) When property receiving current use assessment and subject to a conservation use covenant istransferred to a new owner and the new owner fails to apply for a continuation of the current useassessment on or before the deadline for filing tax returns in the year following the year in which
the transfer occurred, such failure may be taken by the board of tax assessors as evidence that abreach of the covenant has occurred in which case the board of tax assessors shall send to boththe transferor and the transferee a notice of the board’s intent to assess a penalty for the breach of the covenant. The notice shall be entitled "Notice of Intent to Assess Penalty for Breach of aConservation Use Covenant" and shall set forth the following information:
(a) the requirement of the new owner of the property currently receiving current useassessment to apply for a continuation of the current use assessment within 15 days of thedate of postmark of the notice;
(b) the requirement of the new owner of the property currently receiving current useassessment to continuously devote the property to an applicable bona fide qualifying use
of the duration of the covenant;
(c) the change to the assessment if the covenant is breached; and
(d) the amount of the penalty if the covenant is breached.
(8) In the event the new owner fails to apply during the period provided for in paragraph 6 of thisregulation, such failure may be taken by the board of tax assessors as further evidence thecovenant has been breached due to the new owner’s lack of qualification or intent not tocontinuously devote the property to an applicable bona fide qualifying use and the board of taxassessors shall be authorized to declare the covenant in breach and assess a penalty.
(9) When property receiving current use assessment and subject to a conservation use covenant is
transferred to an estate or heirs by virtue of the death of a covenant owner, and the estate or heirsfail to apply for a continuation of the current use assessment on or before the deadline for filingtax returns in the year following the year in which the death occurred, such failure may be takenby the board of tax assessors as evidence that a breach of the covenant has occurred in whichcase the board of tax assessors shall send to any remaining parties to the covenant, the estate orthe heirs a notice entitled "Notice of Intent to Terminate a Conservation Use Covenant." Thenotice shall set forth the following:
(a) the requirement of the estate or heirs to the property currently receiving current useassessment to apply for a continuation of the current use assessment within 15 days of thedate of postmark of the notice;
(b) the requirement of the estate or heirs to the property currently receiving current useassessment to continuously devote the property to an applicable bona fide qualifying usefor the duration of the covenant; and
(c) the change to the assessment if the covenant is breached.
(10) In the event the estate or heirs fail to apply during the period provided for in paragraph 8 of this regulation, such failure may be taken by the board of tax assessors as further evidence the
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 68/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
68
covenant has been breached due to the estate or heirs' lack of qualification or intent not tocontinuously devote the property to an applicable bona fide qualifying use and the board of taxassessors shall be authorized to declare the covenant in breach without penalty.
(11) All approved applications for current use assessment shall be filed with the clerk of thesuperior court in the county where the property is located.
(a) the fee of the clerk of the superior court for recording approved applications shall bepaid by the owner of the property with the application for current use assessment.
(b) the board of tax assessors shall collect the recording fee from the applicant seekingcurrent use assessment and such recording fee to be in the amount provided for in Article2 of Chapter 6 of Title 15 and shall be paid to the clerk of the superior court when theapplication is filed with the clerk.
(c) if the application for current use assessment is denied, the board of tax assessors shall
notify the applicant in the same manner that notices of assessment are given pursuant toO.C.G.A. § 48-5-306 and shall return any filing fee paid by the applicant.
(12) At such time as property ceases to be eligible for current use assessment, the owner of theproperty shall file an application for release of current use assessment with the county board of tax assessors.
(a) the board of tax assessors shall approve the release upon verification that all taxes andpenalties have been satisfied.
(b) the board of tax assessors shall file the approved release in the office of the clerk of the superior court in the county in which the original covenant for current use assessment
was filed. No fee shall be paid to the clerk of the superior court for recording suchrelease.
Authority O.C.G.A. Sections 48-2-12, 48-5-7, 48-5-7.4, 48-5-269. History. Original Ruleentitled “Applications” adopted. F. May 28, 1993; eff. June 17, 1993. Repealed: New Rule of same title adopted. F. Mar. 1, 1995; eff. Mar. 21, 1995. Repealed: New Rule of same titleadopted. F. Feb. 24, 1997; eff. Mar. 16, 1997. Repealed: New Rule of same title adopted. F.Mar. 10, 1999; eff. Mar. 30, 1999. Amended: F. Feb. 2, 2000; eff. Feb. 22, 2000. Repealed:New Rule of same title adopted. F. Mar. 4, 2004; eff. Mar. 24, 2004.
560-11-6-.05 Change of Qualifying Use.
(1) During the covenant period the owner may change, without penalty, the use of the propertyfrom one qualifying use to another qualifying use, but such owner shall be required to givenotice of any such change to the board of tax assessors on or before the last day for the filing of atax return in the county for the tax year for which the change is sought. Failure to so notify theboard of tax assessors of the change in use shall constitute a breach of the covenant effectiveupon the date of discovery of the breach.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 69/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
69
(2) In those instances where the property owner has duly notified the tax assessors that the use of the property has been changed from one qualifying use to another qualifying use, the board of tax assessors shall re-calculate the current use valuation of the property for said tax year in
accordance with the valuation standards and tables prescribed by these Regulations for the newqualifying use, however, the limitation on valuation increases or decreases provided for byO.C.G.A. Section 48-5-269 shall be applied to the recomputed valuation as if the owner hadoriginally covenanted the property in the new qualifying use.
(3) In addition to the provisions for property subject to the covenant to lie fallow or idle inO.C.G.A. 48-5-7.4(p)(2), allowing conservation use property to lie fallow due to economic orfinancial hardship shall not be considered a change of qualifying use nor a breach of thecovenant provided the owner notifies the board of tax assessors on or before the last day forfiling a tax return in the county of the land lying fallow and does not allow the land to lie fallowfor more than two years of any five year period.
Authority O.C.G.A. Sections 48-2-12, 48-5-7.4, 48-5-269. History. Original Rule entitled“Change of Qualifying Use” adopted. F. May 28, 1993; eff. June 17, 1993.
560-11-6-.06 Breach of Covenant.
(1) If a breach of the covenant occurs during a tax year but before the tax rate is established forthat year, the penalty for that partially completed year shall be calculated based upon the tax ratein effect for the immediately preceding tax year, however, the tax due for the partially completedyear shall be the same as would have been due absent the breach.
(2) If a breach occurs on all or part of the property that was the subject of an original covenant
and was transferred in accordance with O.C.G.A. Section 48-5-7.4(i), then the breach shall bedeemed to have occurred on all the property that was the subject of the original covenant and thepenalty shall be pro rata assessed against each of the parties to the covenant in proportion to thetax benefit enjoyed by each during the life of the original covenant.
(3) The breach shall be deemed to occur upon the occasion of any event which would otherwisedisqualify the property from receiving the benefit of current use valuation and the lien against theproperty for penalties and interest shall attach as of the date of that disqualifying event.
(4) If a covenant is breached by the original covenanter or a transferee who is related to theoriginal covenanter within the fourth degree of civil reckoning, and where such breach occursduring the sixth through tenth years of a renewal covenant, the penalty imposed shall be only the
amount by which current use assessment has reduced taxes otherwise due for each year in whichsuch renewal covenant was in effect, plus interest at the rate specified in O.C.G.A. Section 48-2-40 from the date the covenant was breached.
Authority O.C.G.A. Sections 48-2-12, 48-5-7.4, 48-5-269. History. Original Rule entitled“Breach of Covenant” adopted. F. May 28, 1993; eff. June 17, 1993. Repealed: New Rule of same title adopted. F. Mar. 10, 1999; eff. Mar. 30, 1999.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 70/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
70
560-11-6-.07 Valuation of Qualified Property.
Annually, and in accordance with the provisions and requirements of O.C.G.A. § 48-5-269, theCommissioner shall propose and promulgate by regulation as specified by the GeorgiaAdministrative Procedure Act, tables and standards of value for current use valuation of properties whose qualifying use is as bona fide conservation use properties. Once adopted by theCommissioner, these tables and standards of value shall be published and otherwise furnished tothe boards of tax assessors and shall serve as the basis upon which current use valuation of suchqualified properties shall be calculated for the applicable tax year.
(a) Conservation use land shall be divided into two use groups consisting of nine soilproductivity classes each. These two use groups shall be agricultural land (crop land and pastureland) and timberland. The Commissioner shall determine the appropriate soil characteristics or
site index factors for each of these eighteen soil productivity classes for use as a guide for theassessors. In those counties where the Soil Conservation Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture has classified the soil according to its productivity, the Commissioner shall insteadprepare and publish a table converting the Soil Conservation Service’s codes into the eighteensoil productivity classes.
(b) The state shall be divided into the following areas for the purpose of accumulating theincome and market information necessary to determine conservation use values:
1. For the purpose of determining the income of crop land and pasture land, the state shallbe divided into an appropriate grouping of the nine crop-reporting districts as delineatedby the Georgia Agricultural Statistical Service and which shall be referred to as
agricultural districts;2. For the purpose of determining the income of timber land, the agricultural districtsshall be combined into timber zones as follows: agricultural districts #1, #2 and #3 shallcompose timber zone #1, agricultural districts #4, #5 and #6 shall compose timber zone#2, and agricultural districts #7, #8 and #9 shall compose timber zone #3;
3. For the purpose of determining the market value of agricultural land and timberland,the state shall be divided into an appropriate grouping of the nine crop-reporting districtsas delineated by the Georgia Agricultural Statistical Service. Such areas shall be referredto as market regions.
(c) Sixty-five percent of the conservation use value shall be attributable to the capitalization of
net income from the property and this component of total value shall be determined as follows:
1. For crop land, the income valuation increment of the conservation use valuation shallbe based on the five-year weighted average of per-acre net income from those majorpredominant acreage crops harvested in at least 125 counties of Georgia ("base crops").In making this calculation, the Commissioner, utilizing the latest information eitherpublished or about to be published in the Georgia Department of Agriculture’s edition of
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 71/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
71
Georgia Agricultural Facts and the United States Department of Agriculture EconomicResearch Service’s Costs of Production-Major Field Crops, shall:
(i) For each year, determine for each of the nine agricultural districts the yield peracre for each of the base crops;
(ii) For each year, determine for each of the nine agricultural districts the acresharvested of each of the separate base crops and the total acres harvested of all thebase crops;
(iii) For each year, determine a statewide price received per unit of yield for eachof the base crops;
(iv) For each year, determine a state-wide cost of production consisting of thetypical costs incurred in the production of the base crops, including, but notlimited to, the reasonable cost of planting, harvesting, overhead, interest on
operating loans, insurance and management;
(v) For each year, using the determinations herein, compute for each of the nineagricultural districts, the weighted net income per acre by summing the results of the computation of each base crop’s net income obtained by multiplying the yieldper acre times the percentage of total acreage times the price received and thenmaking a reduction to account for the cost of production;
(vi) Compute for each of the nine agricultural districts, the per acre incomevaluation by capitalizing the average per acre weighted net income beforeproperty taxes, utilizing the rate of capitalization provided for in O.C.G.A. § 48-5-269 plus the effective ad valorem tax rate;
2.(i) For pastureland, the income valuation increment of the conservation use valuation shall bebased on the five-year weighted average of per-acre rental rates of pasture property. In makingthis calculation, the Commissioner, utilizing the latest information available, shall:
(ii) Compute for each of the nine agricultural districts, the per acre income valuation bycapitalizing the average per acre rental rates weighted by the acreage of hay harvested each yearutilizing the rate of capitalization provided for in O.C.G.A. § 48-5-269;
3.(i) The income valuation derived for crop land and pasture land shall be combined into theincome valuation for agricultural land by calculating and applying a weighted average of all cropand pasture acreage in each agricultural district.
(ii) Using soil productivity data from the Soil Conservation Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, determine productivity influence factors by calculating the relationships between thevolumes of corn that will grow on the soils contained within each of the nine productivityclasses. Apply these factors to the per acre income valuation of agricultural land to determine theincome valuations for each of the nine soil productivity classes.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 72/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
72
4. For timberland, the income valuation increment of the conservation use valuation shall bebased on the five-year weighted average of per-acre net income from hardwood and softwoodharvested in Georgia. In making this calculation the Commissioner shall:
(i) For each timber category and zone, determine for the immediately preceding fiveyears for which information is available, the unit prices received by the sellers of standing timber in Georgia from reports received by the Commissioner of actual sales,from information furnished by the Georgia Forestry Commission, from commerciallyprepared publications of average sales prices, or from a combination of these sources;
(ii) For each timber category and zone, determine the average volumes of the varioustypes of timber harvested annually in Georgia;
(iii) For each timber category and zone, compute the gross income each year from theharvests of timber by multiplying the unit price for each year times the annual average
harvest volumes of each type of timber harvested;(iv) For each timber zone, determine the acres of softwood timberland and hardwoodtimberland;
(v) For each timber zone, compute the weighted gross income per acre for each year bydividing the gross income from the harvest of softwoods each year by the acreage of softwood timberland; dividing the gross income from the harvest of hardwoods each yearby the acreage of hardwood timberland and weighting the two resulting per acre grossincomes by the percentage of acres of softwood and hardwood timberland to total acresof timberland;
(vi) For each timber zone, determine the costs of production of timber for each year
including, but not limited to, the cost of site preparation, planting, seedlings, prescribedburnings, management, marketing costs and ad valorem taxes due on the harvest or saleof timber;
(vii) For each timber zone, determine the acreages of timberland annually receivingproduction treatments, i.e. site preparation, planting and burning;
(viii) For each timber zone, compute the production expenses per acre incurred each yearby multiplying the expense by the appropriate factor, i.e. multiply the cost of sitepreparation per acre by the percentage of acres annually receiving this treatment, multiplythe harvest tax millage by the weighted gross income per acre;
(ix) For each timber zone, compute the net income per acre for each year by subtractingthe production expenses incurred during the year from the weighted gross income peracre for that year;
(x) For each timber zone, calculate the per acre income valuation by capitalizing theaverage per acre net income before property taxes, utilizing the rate of capitalizationprovided for in O.C.G.A. § 48-5-269 plus the effective ad valorem tax rate;
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 73/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
73
(xi) Determine productivity influence factors by calculating the relationships between thevolumes of Loblolly Pine grown on each of the nine productivity classes of soil and applythese factors to the per acre income valuation for the benchmark land, to determine the
income valuations for each of the nine soil productivity classes.
(d) Thirty-five percent of the conservation use value shall be attributable to values produced by amarket study consisting of sales data from arms length bona fide sales of comparable realproperty with and for the same existing use. In determining this increment of total value, theCommissioner shall:
1. Gather a statistically valid sample of qualified sales of agricultural and timberproperties;
2. Calculate a residual land value for each sale in the sample by adjusting the sales priceto remove any portion representing value attributable to any component of the sale other
than the land;3. Utilizing the residual land value sale prices, determine, as far as is practical, therelationships between the average sales price per acre for each of the nine soilproductivity classes in each of the market regions.
(e) Environmentally sensitive properties and constructed storm water wetland conservation useproperties shall be classified by the board of tax assessors as being within the timber land usegroup and shall be valued according to the current use value determined for timber land of thesame or similar soil productivity class.
(f) The current use value for land lying under water, such as ponds, lakes or streams, shall be thevalue determined for the lowest productivity level of the predominate adjacent land use.
(g) Land utilized for an orchard or vineyard shall be classified as cropland. The trees, shrubs orvines shall be considered an improvement to the land and separately valued.
(h) Current use valuation for qualified bona fide residential transitional property shall bedetermined annually by the board of tax assessors by the consideration, as applicable, of thecurrent use of such property, its annual productivity, if any, and sales data of comparable realproperty with and for the same existing use.
(i) Except as otherwise provided, the total current use valuation for any property, includingqualified improvements, whose qualifying use is as bona fide conservation use property for anyyear during the covenant period shall not be increased or decreased by more than three percent
from the current use valuation for the immediately preceding tax year or be increased ordecreased during the entire covenant period by more than 34.39 percent from its current usevaluation for the first year of the covenant period. The limitations imposed herein shall apply tothe total value of all the conservation use property that is the subject of an individual covenantincluding any improvements that meet the qualifications set forth in O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7.4(a)(1);provided, however, that in the event the owner changes the use of any portion of the land or addsor removes there from any such qualified improvements, the limitations imposed by this
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 74/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
74
subsection shall be recomputed as if the new uses and improvements were in place at the timethe covenant was originally entered. This limitation on increases or decreases shall not apply tothe current use valuation of residential transitional property.
Authority O.C.G.A. Sections 48-2-12, 48-5-7, 48-5-7.4, 48-5-269. History. Original Ruleentitled “Valuation of Qualified Property” adopted. F. May 28, 1993; eff. June 17, 1993.Repealed: New Rule of same title adopted. F. Mar. 4, 2004; eff. Mar. 24, 2004.
560-11-6-.08 Appeals.
(1) Applications for current use valuation as conservation use property or residential transitionalproperty provided by O.C.G.A. Section 48-5-7.4 shall be approved or denied by the county boardof tax assessors. If the application is denied, the board of tax assessors shall notify the applicantin the same manner that notices of assessment are given pursuant to O.C.G.A. Section 48-5-306.
Appeals from the denial of an application shall be made in the same manner, according to thesame time requirements, and decided in the same manner that other ad valorem tax assessmentappeals are made pursuant to O.C.G.A. Section 48-5-311.
(2) For the first year of the covenant period the taxpayer shall be notified by the board of assessors of the current use valuation placed on the property for that year. Appeals shall be madeand decided in the same manner as other ad valorem tax assessment appeals are made anddecided pursuant to O.C.G.A. 48-5-311.
(3) During the covenant period the taxpayer shall be given notification of any change in thecurrent use valuation made by the board of tax assessors for the then current tax year. Appealsshall be made and decided in the same manner as other ad valorem tax assessment appeals are
made and decided pursuant to O.C.G.A. Section 48-5-311.
(4) Appeals regarding the current use valuation of conservation use property under paragraphs(2) and (3) of this regulation may be made contesting the board of tax assessor’s initialdetermination or subsequent change of the qualifying use of the property, the soil classificationof any part or all of the qualified property, the valuation of any qualified improvements, theassessment ratio utilized with regard to the qualified property; as well as with regard to anyalleged errors that may have been made by the assessors in the application of the tables andstandards of value prescribed by the Commissioner. An appeal, however, may not be made to thelocal board of tax assessors concerning the tables or standards of value prescribed by theCommissioner pursuant to Regulation 560-11-6-.09.
(5) The tax assessors shall continue to notify the taxpayer of any changes to the fair market valueof the covenanted property, and such notice shall conform to the provisions of O.C.G.A. Section48-5-306. A taxpayer desiring to appeal such changes shall do so in the same manner as otherassessment appeals are made pursuant to O.C.G.A. Section 48-5-311.
Authority O.C.G.A. Sections 48-2-12, 48-5-7.4, 48-5-269. History. Original Rule entitled“Appeals” adopted. F. May 28, 1993; eff. June 17, 1993.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 75/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
75
560-11-6-.09 Table of Conservation Use Land Values.
For the purpose of prescribing the current use values for conservation use land, the state shall bedivided into the following 9 Conservation Use Valuation Areas (CUVA 1 through CUVA 9) andthe following accompanying table of per acre land values shall be applied to each acre of qualified land within the CUVA for each soil productivity classification for timber land (W1through W9) and agricultural land (A1 through A9):
(a) CUVA #1 counties: Bartow, Catoosa, Chattooga, Dade, Floyd, Gordon, Murray, Paulding,Polk, Walker, and Whitfield. Table of per acre values: W1-568, W2-511, W3-464, W4-426, W5-391, W6-364, W7-341, W8-314, W9-286, A1-1,030, A2-974, A3-900, A4-826, A5-747, A6-668,A7-595, A8-522, A9-449;
(b) CUVA #2 counties: Barrow, Cherokee, Clarke, Cobb, Dawson, Dekalb, Fannin, Forsyth,
Fulton, Gilmer, Gwinnett, Hall, Jackson, Lumpkin, Oconee, Pickens, Towns, Union, Walton, andWhite. Table of per acre values: W1-769, W2-696, W3-629, W4-569, W5-525, W6-493, W7-465, W8-428, W9-389, A1-1,128, A2-1,005, A3-895, A4-792, A5-709, A6-634, A7-568, A8-518, A9-465;
(c) CUVA #3 counties: Banks, Elbert, Franklin, Habersham, Hart, Lincoln, Madison,Oglethorpe, Rabun, Stephens, and Wilkes. Table of per acre values: W1-769, W2-696, W3-629,W4-569, W5-525, W6-481, W7-405, W8-331, W9-277, A1-859, A2-780, A3-700, A4-621, A5-542, A6-490, A7-402, A8-337, A9-286;
(d) CUVA #4 counties: Carroll, Chattahoochee, Clayton, Coweta, Douglas, Fayette, Haralson,Harris, Heard, Henry, Lamar, Macon, Marion, Meriwether, Muscogee, Pike, Schley, Spalding,
Talbot, Taylor, Troup, and Upson. Table of per acre values: W1-556, W2-499, W3-452, W4-415, W5-362, W6-337, W7-294, W8-255, W9-209, A1-705, A2-632, A3-580, A4-519, A5-456,A6-379, A7-329, A8-257, A9-187;
(e) CUVA #5 counties: Baldwin, Bibb, Bleckley, Butts, Crawford, Dodge, Greene, Hancock,Houston, Jasper, Johnson, Jones, Laurens, Monroe, Montgomery, Morgan, Newton, Peach,Pulaski, Putnam, Rockdale, Taliaferro, Treutlen, Twiggs, Washington, Wheeler, and Wilkinson.Table of per acre values: W1-475, W2-439, W3-404, W4-370, W5-336, W6-301, W7-266, W8-231, W9-193, A1-524, A2-457, A3-425, A4-389, A5-347, A6-297, A7-245, A8-194, A9-143;
(f) CUVA #6 counties: Bulloch, Burke, Candler, Columbia, Effingham, Emanuel, Glascock,Jefferson, Jenkins, McDuffie, Richmond, Screven, and Warren. Table of per acre values: W1-
469, W2-432, W3-394, W4-359, W5-322, W6-285, W7-248, W8-210, W9-173, A1-594, A2-528, A3-483, A4-442, A5-389, A6-325, A7-266, A8-204, A9-146;
(g) CUVA #7 counties: Baker, Calhoun, Clay, Decatur, Dougherty, Early, Grady, Lee, Miller,Mitchell, Quitman, Randolph, Seminole, Stewart, Sumter, Terrell, Thomas, and Webster. Tableof per acre values: W1-503, W2-458, W3-417, W4-376, W5-332, W6-291, W7-248, W8-204,W9-163, A1-689, A2-625, A3-556, A4-485, A5-416, A6-349, A7-271, A8-208, A9-142;
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 76/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
76
(h) CUVA #8 counties: Atkinson, Ben Hill, Berrien, Brooks, Clinch, Coffee, Colquitt, Cook,Crisp, Dooly, Echols, Irwin, Jeff Davis, Lanier, Lowndes, Telfair, Tift, Turner, Wilcox, andWorth. Table of per acre values: W1-546, W2-495, W3-444, W4-394, W5-344, W6-294, W7-
244, W8-194, W9-159, A1-696, A2-659, A3-595, A4-532, A5-467, A6-404, A7-314, A8-255,A9-190;
(i) CUVA #9 counties: Appling, Bacon, Brantley, Bryan, Camden, Charlton, Chatham, Evans,Glynn, Liberty, Long, McIntosh, Pierce, Tattnall, Toombs, Ware, and Wayne. Table of per acrevalues: W1-551, W2-499, W3-452, W4-402, W5-351, W6-303, W7-253, W8-203, W9-159, A1-645, A2-623, A3-559, A4-499, A5-437, A6-376, A7-314, A8-252, A9-190.
Authority O.C.G.A. Sections 48-2-12, 48-5-7, 48-5-7.4, 48-5-269. History. Original Ruleentitled "Table of Conservation Use Land Values" adopted. F. May 28, 1993; eff. Jun. 17, 1993.Repealed: New Rule same title adopted. F. May 13, 1994; eff. Jun. 2, 1994. Repealed: NewRule, same title, adopted. F. Mar. 1, 1995; Mar. 21, 1995. Repealed: New Rule, same title,
adopted. F Jan. 28, 1996; eff. Feb. 18, 1996. Repealed: New Rule, same title, adopted. F. Feb.24, 1997; eff. Mar. 16, 1997. Repealed: New Rule same title, adopted. F. Dec. 9, 1997; Dec. 29,1997; Dec. 29, 1997. Repealed: New Rule, same title, adopted. F. Mar. 10, 1999; eff. Mar. 30,1999. Amended: F. Feb. 2, 2000; eff. Feb. 22, 2000. Amended: F. Apr. 20, 2001; eff. May 10,2001. Repealed: New Rule of same title adopted. F. Apr. 17, 2002; eff. May 7, 2002. Repealed:New Rule, same title adopted. F. May 19, 2003; eff. June 8, 2003. Repealed: New Rule of sametitle adopted. F. Mar. 4, 2004; eff. Mar. 24, 2004.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 77/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
iw INLAND WATER 9 9 11E4 PACOLET
pond LAKES, STREAMS,AND PONDS
9 9 120B3 TALBOTT
quar ROCK QUARRY 9 9 120C3 TALBOTT
WATER 9 9 122A1 DOWELLTON
102B TALBOTT SILT LOAM, 2 TO 6 6 4 123A WOLFTEVER
102B2 TALBOTT SILT LOAM, 2 TO 6 6 4 123A1 008 ROME
102C TALBOTT SILT LOAM, 6 TO 15 5 4 123A1 041 ROME
102C2 TALBOTT SILT LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 4 123A1 110 ROME
102C2 039 PACOLET SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 5 123A1 146 ROME
102C2 133 PACOLET SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 5 123B WOLFTEVER
102D2 TALBOTT SILT LOAM, 10 TO 15 8 4 123B1 008 ROME
103C3 TALBOTT SILTY CLAY LOAM, 6TO 10, ERODED
6 4 123B1 041 ROME
103D3 TALBOTT SILTY CLAY LOAM, 10TO 25, ERODED
8 8 123B1 110 ROME
106A GAYLESVILLE SILT LOAM, FREQ
FLOODED
2 8 123B1 146 ROME
106A1 008 TUPELO CLAY LOAM, FREQFLOODED
6 7 123C WOLFTEVER
106A1 041 TUPELO SILT LOAM, FREQFLOODED
6 7 123C2 ROME
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 78/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
78
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
106A1 110 TUPELO CLAY LOAM, FREQFLOODED
6 7 124A1 CARTECAY
106A1 146 TUPELO SILT LOAM, FREQFLOODED
6 7 129A1 STASER
108B WAYNESBORO FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
3 4 129B SIPSEY
108B2 WAYNESBORO FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
3 4 129D SIPSEY
108C WAYNESBORO FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 10
4 4 13 DUMPS
108C2 WAYNESBORO FINE SANDY LOAM, 6
TO 10
4 4 130A WHITWELL
108D WAYNESBORO FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 15
4 4 13E3 NANKIN
108D2 WAYNESBORO FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 15
4 8 152B HANCEVILLE
109C3 WAYNESBORO CLAY LOAM, 6 TO10,ERODED
4 4 152C HANCEVILLE
109D3 WAYNESBORO CLAY LOAM, 10 TO 25,ERODED
5 8 152E HANCEVILLE
10A1 NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 3 153B3 CUNNINGHAM
10B1 NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 3 3 153C3 CUNNINGHAM
10B2 PACOLET SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 5 5 153D3 CUNNINGHAM
10C2 PACOLET SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 5 155B1 DEWEY
10C2 008 PACOLET SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 10 5 5 155C2 DEWEY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 79/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
10C2 043 NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 4 3 155D2 DEWEY
10C2 065 NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 4 3 15B1 BUNCOMBE
10C2 110 PACOLET SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 10 5 5 16
10D2 PACOLET SANDY LOAM, 10 TO15
6 5 164 UDORTHENTS
10E1 PACOLET SANDY LOAM, 15 TO25
8 5 164A1 CARTECAY
10E2 PACOLET SANDY LOAM, 15 TO25
8 5 165
112B TOWNLEY-TIDIN
2 TO 6 6 8 165 008
112C2 TOWNLEY SILT LOAM, 2 TO 10 9 7 165 012 UDORTHENTS 112D TOWNLEY-TIDIN
6 TO 15 8 8 165 045 UDORTHENTS
112D2 TOWNLEY SILT LOAM, 10 TO 15 8 8 165 053 UDORTHENTS
112E TOWNLEY-TIDIN
15 TO 30 9 8 165 110
112F1 TOWNLEY SILT LOAM, 25 TO 45 9 8 165 134 UDORTHENTS
11B3 PACOLET SANDY CLAY LOAM, 2TO 6, ERODED
5 8 166
11C3 PACOLET SANDY CLAY LOAM, 2
TO 10, ERODED
7 8 166 105 ULTIC
11C3 072 PACOLET SANDY CLAY LOAM, 6TO 10, ERODED
7 8 166 155 ULTIC
11C3 079 PACOLET SANDY CLAY LOAM, 6TO 10, ERODED
7 8 167 WAYNESBORO
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 80/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
80
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
11C3 130 PACOLET SANDY CLAY LOAM, 6TO 10, ERODED
7 8 16A1 KOLOMOKI
11D3 PACOLET SANDY CLAY LOAM,10 TO 15, ERODED
8 8 16A1 043 FACEVILLE
11E3 PACOLET SANDY CLAY LOAM,15 TO 25, ERODED
9 8 16A1 065 FACEVILLE
16B1 FACEVILLE LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 2 3 29C1 ALBERTVILLE
16C2 FACEVILLE SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8,ERODED
4 3 29C2 ALBERTVILLE
170A CAPSHAW 5 4 29D ALBERTVILLE
170A1 WOLFTEVER 5 5 29D1 ALBERTVILLE
170B CAPSHAW 5 4 29D2 ALBERTVILLE 170B1 WOLFTEVER 6 5 29E ALBERTVILLE
170C2 WOLFTEVER 6 5 29E1 ALBERTVILLE
171B1 TIDINGS 6 4 29E2 ALBERTVILLE
171C1 TIDINGS 7 4 29F1 TIDINGS
171D1 TIDINGS 8 4 30C1 TIDINGS
171F1 TIDINGS 9 8 30D TIDINGS
17B1 HORNSVILLE 4 5 30D1 TIDINGS
17B2 HOLSTON 4 4 30E TIDINGS
17C2 HOLSTON 4 4 30F TIDINGS
17D1 HOLSTON 5 4 30F1 TIDINGS
17D2 HOLSTON 5 4 31B TOWNLEY 185 ULTIC 9 9 31C2 TOWNLEY
189A1 SULLIVAN 3 2 31D TOWNLEY
18A1 RIGDON 4 5 31E TOWNLEY
18E ASHE ASSOC MODERATELY STEEP 8 8 31E1 TOWNLEY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 81/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
18F ASHE ASSOC 9 8 31F1 TOWNLEY
19A1 REMBERT SANDY LOAM, FREQFLOODED
8 9 32C3 TOWNLEY
19A1 013 MANDARIN SAND 8 8 32C3 008 TOWNLEY
19A1 024 MANDARIN SAND 8 8 32C3 110 TOWNLEY
200 URBAN LAND 9 9 32E3 TOWNLEY
207C ALLEN 5 4 32E3 008 TOWNLEY
207E ALLEN 8 6 32E3 110 TOWNLEY
208C WAYNESBORO 4 4 33A CHENNEBY
21B1 WICKSBURG 7 6 33A1 WEHADKEE
21C1 WICKSBURG 7 6 33B1 FOXWORTH
229C ALBERTVILLE 5 4 33B1 043 BIGBEE
22D TUSQUITEE 4 3 33B1 053 LAKELAND
22E TUSQUITEE 8 6 33B1 065 BIGBEE
230A WHITWELL 4 1 34A1 COOSAW
244C LYERLY 9 8 35A WAX
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 82/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
82
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
245C BARFIELD 8 9 35A1 CHIPLEY
248C CONASAUGA 8 7 35A1 008 WAX
252C HANCEVILLE 4 6 35A1 041 WAX
266C FULLERTON URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 2 TO 10
5 5 35A1 110 WAX
266C 105 MINVALE URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 2 TO 15
5 4 35A1 146 WAX
266C 155 MINVALE URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 2 TO 15
5 4 35B WAX
278C CUNNINGHAM 6 4 35B1 WAX
284E MONTEVALLO 9 8 35C1 WAX
289A HAMBLEN 3 2 36B1 CHISOLM 28E1 NELLA 8 7 36B2 ARAGON
297C TOWNLEY 7 7 36C2 ARAGON
298F HECTOR 9 8 36D2 ARAGON
29B ALBERTVILLE 5 4 36E1 ARAGON
29B1 ALBERTVILLE 5 4 37B1 EDDINGS
29B2 ALBERTVILLE 5 4 37B1 148 BLANTON
38A1 REMBERT 8 9 40B MINVALE
39B1 EUHARLEE 5 4 40B1 MINVALE
39C2 EUHARLEE 5 4 40B1 008 SHACK
401 CHEWACLA 5 2 40B1 110 SHACK
401A1 TAWCAW CHASTAIN 8 8 40B2 MINVALE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 83/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
401A1 008 CHEWACLA FINE SANDY LOAM,FREQ FLOODED
5 2 40C1 MINVALE
401A1 043 RIVERVIEW SILT LOAM 2 1 40C1 008 SHACK
401A1 065 RIVERVIEW SILT LOAM 2 1 40C1 110 SHACK
401A1 066 CHEWACLA SILT LOAM 4 2 40C2 MINVALE
401A1 070 CHEWACLA SILT LOAM 4 2 40D MINVALE
401A1 072 CHEWACLA SANDY LOAM 5 2 40D1 MINVALE
401A1 079 CHEWACLA FINE SANDY LOAM 3 2 40D1 008 SHACK
401A1 090 CHEWACLA SILT LOAM 4 2 40D1 110 SHACK
401A1 110 CHEWACLA FINE SANDY LOAM,FREQ FLOODED
5 2 40D2 MINVALE
401A1 130 CHEWACLA SANDY LOAM 5 2 40E MINVALE
401A1 131 CHEWACLA SILT LOAM 4 2 40E1 MINVALE
401A1 157 CHEWACLA SILT LOAM 4 2 40E1 008 SHACK
402 CONGAREE 1 1 40E1 110 SHACK
402A1 CONGAREE SILT LOAM 1 1 40E2 MINVALE
402A1 043 RIVERVIEW SILT LOAM 2 1 410B2 CECIL 402A1 065 RIVERVIEW SILT LOAM 2 1 410C2 CECIL
402A1 079 CONGAREE FINE SANDY LOAM 1 1 410D2 CECIL
402A1 090 RIVERVIEW SILT LOAM 2 1 410D2 039 CECIL
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 84/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
84
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
402A1 157 RIVERVIEW SILT LOAM 2 1 410D2 133 CECIL
403C3 GEORGEVILLE 6 8 410E1 CECIL
403D3 GEORGEVILLE 9 8 410E2 CECIL
405A1 CHASTAIN 8 8 410E2 090 PACOLET
405A1 066 WEHADKEE SILT LOAM 8 7 410E2 157 PACOLET
405A1 070 WEHADKEE SILT LOAM 8 7 411B3 CECIL
405A1 072 WEHADKEE FINE SANDY LOAM 5 7 411B3 072 CECIL
405A1 130 WEHADKEE FINE SANDY LOAM 5 7 411B3 130 CECIL
405A1 131 WEHADKEE SILT LOAM 8 7 411C3 CECIL
406A1 008 ALTAVISTA FINE SANDY LOAM, 0TO 2
1 1 411C3 072 CECIL
406A1 090 ALTAVISTA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 2 1 411C3 130 CECIL
406A1 110 ALTAVISTA FINE SANDY LOAM, 0TO 2
1 1 411D3 CECIL
406A1 157 ALTAVISTA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 2 1 411D3 090 PACOLET
406B1 ALTAVISTA 2 1 411D3 157 PACOLET
406B1 018 ALTAVISTA SANDY LOAM, 1 TO 4 3 1 411E3 CECIL
406B1 079 ALTAVISTA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 3 2 1 415B2 HIWASSEE
406B1 102 ALTAVISTA SANDY LOAM, 1 TO 4 3 1 415B2 039 DAVIDSON
406B2 ALTAVISTA 3 1 415B2 066 DAVIDSON
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 85/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
407B1 APPLING 4 3 415B2 070 DAVIDSON
407B2 APPLING 4 3 415B2 072 HIWASSEE
407C2 APPLING 5 3 415B2 130 HIWASSEE
407D2 APPLING 5 3 415B2 131 DAVIDSON
407E2 WEDOWEE 6 4 415B2 133 DAVIDSON
408C3 APPLING 6 7 415C2 HIWASSEE
409B1 BUNCOMBE LOAMY SAND 7 5 415C2 072 HIWASSEE
409B1 018 BUNCOMBE LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 6 5 415C2 130 HIWASSEE
409B1 102 BUNCOMBE LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 6 5 415D2 HIWASSEE
415E2 HIWASSEE 8 5 422E2 133 GWINNETT 416B3 HIWASSEE 4 7 423B3 GWINNETT
416B3 066 DAVIDSON CLAY LOAM, 2 TO 6,ERODED
4 6 423C3 GWINNETT
416B3 070 DAVIDSON CLAY LOAM, 2 TO 6,ERODED
4 6 423C3 090 HIWASSEE
416B3 131 DAVIDSON CLAY LOAM, 2 TO 6,ERODED
4 6 423C3 157 HIWASSEE
416C2 DAVIDSON 5 6 423D3 GWINNETT
416C3 HIWASSEE 4 7 423E3 GWINNETT
416C3 066 DAVIDSON CLAY LOAM, 6 TO 10,
ERODED
5 6 423E3 090 HIWASSEE
416C3 070 DAVIDSON CLAY LOAM, 6 TO 10,ERODED
5 6 423E3 157 HIWASSEE
416C3 072 HIWASSEE SANDY CLAY LOAM, 6TO 10, ERODED
4 7 426D RION
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 86/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
86
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
416C3 130 HIWASSEE SANDY CLAY LOAM, 6TO 10, ERODED
4 7 426D1 LOUISA
416C3 131 DAVIDSON CLAY LOAM, 6 TO 10,ERODED
5 6 426E RION
416D2 DAVIDSON 8 6 426E1 LOUISA
416D3 HIWASSEE 7 7 428C1 RION
416D3 066 DAVIDSON CLAY LOAM, 10 TO 15,ERODED
8 6 428C2 LOUISBURG
416D3 070 DAVIDSON CLAY LOAM, 10 TO 15,ERODED
8 6 428C2 018 ASHLAR
416D3 072 HIWASSEE SANDY CLAY LOAM,
10 TO 15, ERODED
7 7 428C2 079 LOUISBURG
416D3 130 HIWASSEE SANDY CLAY LOAM,10 TO 15, ERODED
7 7 428C2 102 ASHLAR
416D3 131 DAVIDSON CLAY LOAM, 10 TO 15,ERODED
8 6 428D2 LOUISBURG
416E3 HIWASSEE 9 7 428E1 RION
417C2 HIWASSEE 4 2 428E1 066 LOUISBURG
417E1 WEDOWEE 8 6 428E1 070 LOUISBURG
417E2 HIWASSEE 8 5 428E1 131 LOUISBURG
418A1 AUGUSTA 3 3 428E2 ASHLAR
418B2 AUGUSTA 4 3 428E2 079 LOUISBURG
41C3 PACOLET 7 8 429B2 LOUISBURG
420B1 HELENA 5 3 429C1 LOUISBURG
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 87/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
420B2 HELENA 5 3 429D1 LOUISBURG
420C1 HELENA 5 3 429E1 LOUISBURG
420C2 HELENA 5 3 429E2 LOUISBURG
420D2 HELENA 6 3 42D BODINE
421B1 IREDELL 6 8 42D1 BODINE
421C2 IREDELL 6 8 42E1 BODINE
422B2 GWINNETT 4 3 42F BODINE
422B2 090 HIWASSEE LOAM, 2 TO 6 2 2 42F1 BODINE
422B2 157 HIWASSEE LOAM, 2 TO 6 2 2 430B2 MADISON
422C2 GWINNETT 5 3 430C2 MADISON
422C2 039 GWINNETT CLAY LOAM, 6 TO 10,
ERODED
5 3 430D1 MADISON
422C2 090 HIWASSEE LOAM, 6 TO 10 4 2 430E1 MADISON
422C2 133 GWINNETT CLAY LOAM, 6 TO 10,ERODED
5 3 431B2 MADISON
422C2 157 HIWASSEE LOAM, 6 TO 10 4 2 431C2 MADISON
422D1 GWINNETT 7 3 431D2 MADISON
422D2 GWINNETT 7 3 431E2 MADISON
422D2 039 GWINNETT CLAY LOAM, 10 TO 15,ERODED
7 3 432B1 ASHLAR
422D2 090 HIWASSEE LOAM, 10 TO 25 8 5 432C1 ASHLAR
422D2 133 GWINNETT CLAY LOAM, 10 TO 15,
ERODED
7 3 432C3 MADISON
422D2 157 HIWASSEE LOAM, 10 TO 25 8 5 432D3 MADISON
422E1 GWINNETT 8 6 432D3 072 PACOLET
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 88/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
88
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
422E2 GWINNETT 8 6 432D3 130 PACOLET
422E2 039 GWINNETT LOAM, 15 TO 25 8 6 432E3 MADISON
433B2 MASADA 2 4 447E1 WILKES
433C ASHLAR 4 2 447E1 018 WILKES
434C3 MECKLENBURG 6 8 447E1 079 WILKES
434D3 MECKLENBURG 8 8 447E1 102 WILKES
435C3 MUSELLA 6 4 447F1 WILKES
435D2 MUSELLA 9 4 448A1 TOCCOA 436C1 MUSELLA 8 7 448A1 018 TOCCOA
436C3 MUSELLA 8 7 448A1 102 TOCCOA
436D3 MUSELLA 9 7 449A1 CARTECAY
436E1 MUSELLA 9 7 449A1 090 CARTECAY
436E1 079 MUSELLA STONY CLAY LOAM,15 TO 30
9 7 449A1 157 CARTECAY
437A1 ROANOKE 2 8 44A1 LYERLY
438A1 TOCCOA 4 1 44A1 030 VARINA
438B1 TOCCOA 4 1 44A1 118 VARINA
43A TUPELO 6 7 44A1 120 VARINA
43A1 TUPELO 6 7 44B LYERLY 43B1 TUPELO 6 7 44B1 LYERLY
442B2 VANCE 5 6 44B1 030 VARINA
442C2 VANCE 5 6 44B1 118 VARINA
443B2 VANCE 5 6 44B1 120 VARINA
443C2 VANCE 5 6 44B2 LYERLY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 89/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
443C3 VANCE 6 8 44C LYERLY
443D2 VANCE 8 8 44C1 LYERLY
443D3 VANCE 8 8 44C2 LYERLY
444A1 WICKHAM 1 1 44D2 LYERLY
444B1 WICKHAM 2 1 450A1 WEHADKEE
444B2 WICKHAM 2 1 451 ROCK
444B2 018 WICKHAM SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 2 1 454B2 MADISON
444B2 079 WICKHAM SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 2 1 454C2 MADISON
444B2 102 WICKHAM SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 2 1 454D2 MADISON
444C2 WICKHAM 3 1 454E2 MADISON
444C2 079 WICKHAM SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 3 1 454E2 018 MADISON
444D2 WICKHAM 4 1 454E2 102 MADISON
446B2 WILKES 6 5 455C3 MADISON
446C2 WILKES 8 5 455D3 MADISON
446C2 072 WILKES SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 10 6 5 457A1 WEHADKEE
446C2 090 ZION SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 10 6 6 457A1 090 FLUVAQUENTS
446C2 130 WILKES SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 10 6 5 457A1 157 FLUVAQUENTS
446C2 157 ZION SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 10 6 6 458B1 WORSHAM
446D1 WILKES 8 5 45C2 LYERLY
446D2 WILKES SANDY LOAM, 10 TO25
8 5 45D1 LYERLY
446D2 018 WILKES SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 15 8 5 45E BARFIELD
446D2 090 ZION SANDY LOAM, 10 TO15
7 6 463B1 WEDOWEE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 90/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
90
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
446D2 102 WILKES SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 15 8 5 463B2 WEDOWEE
446D2 157 ZION SANDY LOAM, 10 TO15
7 6 463C1 WEDOWEE
446E1 WILKES 9 7 463C2 WEDOWEE
446E2 WILKES 9 7 463C2 007 WEDOWEE
447D1 WILKES 8 7 463C2 110 WEDOWEE
447D1 008 WILKES STONY SANDY LOAM,10 TO 25
9 7 463D2 WEDOWEE
447D1 110 WILKES STONY SANDY LOAM,
10 TO 25
9 7 463D2 079 WEDOWEE
463E1 WEDOWEE 8 6 492E3 MADISON
463E2 WEDOWEE 8 6 493C1 MOLENA
463E2 018 WEDOWEE SANDY LOAM, 15 TO30
8 6 494B1 TOCCOA
463E2 102 WEDOWEE SANDY LOAM, 15 TO30
8 6 496B2 PACOLET
465B2 ENON 4 6 496C2 PACOLET
465C2 ENON 5 6 498B2 HERNDON
467C3 MADISON 6 7 498C2 HERNDON
467D3 MADISON 7 7 49E2 ORANGEBURG
467E3 MADISON 9 7 500B2 MECKLENBURG 468B1 MOLENA 6 7 500C2 MECKLENBURG
469B2 VANCE 5 6 500E2 MECKLENBURG
469C2 VANCE 5 6 502A1 ROANOKE
469D2 VANCE 5 6 506B1 PACOLET
47 DECATUR 8 6 506C1 PACOLET
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 91/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
470A1 TOCCOA 5 1 506D1 PACOLET
472B2 WEDOWEE 5 4 508B1 HELENA
472C1 WEDOWEE 5 4 52A1 PELHAM
472C2 WEDOWEE 5 4 52A1 012 PELHAM
472D2 WEDOWEE 6 4 52A1 045 PELHAM
475C2 ENON 4 6 52A1 116 RAINS
477B2 GEORGEVILLE 4 3 52A1 134 PELHAM
478C3 GEORGEVILLE 6 8 52A1 148 PELHAM
479 PACOLET 8 6 52A1 156 RAINS 479 066 UDORTHENTS CLAYEY 9 9 52B2 DECATUR
479 070 UDORTHENTS CLAYEY 9 9 52C2 DECATUR
479 072 PACOLET UDORTHENTSCOMPLEX, 6 TO 15
8 8 52D2 DECATUR
479 128 GULLIED LAND 9 9 52E2 DECATUR
479 130 PACOLET UDORTHENTSCOMPLEX, 6 TO 15
8 8 533C GWINNETT
479 131 UDORTHENTS CLAYEY 9 9 53B3 DECATUR
479 152 GULLIED LAND 9 9 53C3 DECATUR
479E3 UDORTHENTS 9 9 53D3 DECATUR
480C2 GOLDSTON 5 6 53E3 DECATUR 480E2 GOLDSTON 9 7 54B1 CHIPOLA
482B1 IREDELL 6 8 54B2 DEWEY
483B2 MECKLENBURG 4 5 54C2 DEWEY
483C2 MECKLENBURG 5 5 54D2 DEWEY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 92/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
92
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
484C2 NASON 4 4 55A1 SURRENCY
485C3 NASON 6 4 55A1 032 SURRENCY
487C2 TATUM 4 5 55A1 050 SURRENCY
48A1 CONASAUGA 6 7 55A1 148 RUTLEGE
48A1 013 RIDGELAND SAND 6 7 55B DEWEY
48A1 024 RIDGELAND SAND 6 7 55D DEWEY
48B CONASAUGA 6 7 55E DEWEY
48B1 CONASAUGA 6 7 56A EMORY
48B2 CONASAUGA 6 7 56A1 EMORY
48C CONASAUGA 8 7 56C2 COWARTS 48C1 CONASAUGA 8 7 56D2 COWARTS
48C2 CONASAUGA 8 7 57B1 ARUNDEL
492C3 MADISON 6 7 57C2 ARUNDEL
492D3 MADISON 7 7 58A ETOWAH
58A1 ETOWAH 3 1 68A1 ENNIS
58A1 043 TIFTON LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 2 68A1 041 ENNIS
58A1 065 TIFTON LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 2 68A1 146 ENNIS
58B ETOWAH 4 1 69A KETONA
58B1 ETOWAH 4 1 69A1 GUTHRIE
58B1 043 TIFTON LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 2 2 6D TALLADEGA
58B1 065 TIFTON LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 2 2 6E2 TALLAPOOSA 58B2 ETOWAH 4 1 6F TALLADEGA
58C ETOWAH 4 1 6F1 TALLAPOOSA
58C2 ETOWAH 4 1 700A1 ECHAW
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 93/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
58C2 043 TIFTON SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8,ERODED
5 2 700B1 AMERICUS
58C2 065 TIFTON SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8,ERODED
5 2 700C1 AMERICUS
58D ETOWAH 5 1 702A1 CENTENARY
59B2 FARRAGUT 5 4 702A1 030 OCILLA
59C2 FARRAGUT 6 4 702A1 043 OCILLA
59D2 FARRAGUT 6 4 702A1 065 OCILLA
60B3 FARRAGUT 5 4 702A1 118 OCILLA
60C3 FARRAGUT 6 4 702A1 120 OCILLA
60D3 FARRAGUT 6 4 703B1 CHISOLM
63C1 WEDOWEE 5 4 703B1 053 BLANTON 63D1 WEDOWEE 6 4 704B1 CAINHOY
65 UDORTHENTS 9 9 707B1 KOLOMOKI
66B FULLERTON 5 5 708A1 FREEMANVILLE
66B1 FULLERTON 5 5 708A1 030 FREEMANVILLE
66B1 041 FULLERTON CHERTY SILT LOAM, 2TO 6
5 5 708A1 118 FREEMANVILLE
66B1 146 FULLERTON CHERTY SILT LOAM, 2TO 6
5 5 708A1 120 FREEMANVILLE
66C1 FULLERTON 5 5 708B1 FREEMANVILLE
66C1 041 FULLERTON CHERTY SILT LOAM, 6
TO 10
5 5 708B1 030 FREEMANVILLE
66C1 146 FULLERTON CHERTY SILT LOAM, 6TO 10
5 5 708B1 118 FREEMANVILLE
66C2 FULLERTON 5 5 708B1 120 FREEMANVILLE
66D FULLERTON 5 5 708B2 FREEMANVILLE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 94/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
94
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
66D1 FULLERTON 6 5 708C2 FREEMANVILLE
66D1 041 FULLERTON CHERTY SILT LOAM,10 TO 15
6 5 708C2 043 CARNEGIE
66D1 146 FULLERTON CHERTY SILT LOAM,10 TO 15
6 5 708C2 065 CARNEGIE
66D2 FULLERTON 6 5 708C3 CARNEGIE
66E FULLERTON 8 7 708D2 CARNEGIE
66E1 FULLERTON 8 7 709B2 CARNEGIE
66E1 041 FULLERTON CHERTY SILT LOAM,15 TO 40
8 7 709B2 043 CARNEGIE
66E1 146 FULLERTON CHERTY SILT LOAM,
15 TO 40
8 7 709B2 065 CARNEGIE
66E2 FULLERTON 8 7 709C2 CARNEGIE
66F FULLERTON 9 8 709D2 CARNEGIE
66F1 FULLERTON 9 7 709D3 CARNEGIE
67C3 FULLERTON 5 6 70A1 KINSTON
67C3 041 FULLERTON CHERTY SILTY CLAYLOAM, 6 TO 10,
ERODED
5 6 70A1 043 MEGGETT
67C3 146 FULLERTON CHERTY SILTY CLAYLOAM, 6 TO 10,
ERODED
5 6 70A1 065 MEGGETT
67D3 FULLERTON 6 7 70B1 HARTSELLS 67D3 041 FULLERTON CHERTY SILTY CLAY
LOAM, 10 TO 25,ERODED
6 7 70C1 HARTSELLS
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 95/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
67D3 146 FULLERTON CHERTY SILTY CLAYLOAM, 10 TO 25,
ERODED
6 7 70D1 DEKALB
67E3 FULLERTON 6 7 70D1 041 HARTSELLS
68A ENNIS 5 1 70D1 146 HARTSELLS
70E1 DEKALB 7 8 716C1 FACEVILLE
70E1 041 HARTSELLS FINE SANDY LOAM,15TO 25
8 8 716C2 FACEVILLE
70E1 146 HARTSELLS FINE SANDY LOAM,15
TO 25
8 8 716C2 030 FACEVILLE
70F1 DEKALB 9 8 716C2 051 VARINA
712B1 NANKIN 5 4 716C2 118 FACEVILLE
712B2 NANKIN 5 4 716C2 120 FACEVILLE
712C2 NANKIN 7 4 716C2 124 VARINA
712C2 030 NANKIN ESTO COMPLEX, 5 TO15
7 4 716D2 FACEVILLE
712C2 118 NANKIN ESTO COMPLEX, 5 TO15
7 4 717A1 EULONIA
712C2 120 NANKIN ESTO COMPLEX, 5 TO15
7 4 717A1 043 HORNSVILLE
712C2 128 NANKIN ESTO COMPLEX, 5 TO15, ERODED
8 5 717A1 065 HORNSVILLE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 96/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
96
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
712C2 152 NANKIN ESTO COMPLEX, 5 TO15, ERODED
8 5 717B1 EULONIA
712E2 NANKIN 9 6 717B1 043 HORNSVILLE
712E2 128 NANKIN ESTO COMPLEX, 15 TO35, ERODED
9 6 717B1 065 HORNSVILLE
712E2 152 NANKIN ESTO COMPLEX, 15 TO35, ERODED
9 6 718A1 GOLDSBORO
713C3 NANKIN 7 4 719A1 GRADY
714A1 LUCY 5 7 719A1 030 GRADY
714B1 LUCY 5 7 719A1 032 GRADY
714C1 LUCY 5 7 719A1 043 GRADY
715B1 030 LAKELAND SAND, 0 TO 8 6 7 719A1 050 GRADY
715B1 043 TROUP LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 6 7 719A1 051 GRADY
715B1 051 LAKELAND SAND, 1 TO 5 6 7 719A1 065 GRADY
715B1 065 TROUP LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 6 7 719A1 118 GRADY
715B1 072 EUSTIS SAND, 2 TO 10 6 7 719A1 120 GRADY
715B1 118 LAKELAND SAND, 0 TO 8 6 7 719A1 124 GRADY
715B1 120 LAKELAND SAND, 0 TO 8 6 7 719A1 128 GRADY 715B1 124 LAKELAND SAND, 1 TO 5 6 7 719A1 152 GRADY
715B1 128 TROUP SAND, 0 TO 8 6 7 71B1 HARTSELLS
715B1 130 EUSTIS SAND, 2 TO 10 6 7 71C1 HECTOR
715B1 152 TROUP SAND, 0 TO 8 6 7 71D1 HECTOR
715C1 LAKELAND 8 7 71E1 HECTOR
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 97/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
715C1 043 TROUP LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 6 7 71F1 HECTOR
715C1 065 TROUP LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 6 7 720 GRADY
715D1 LAKELAND 9 7 720A1 GRADY
715D1 043 TROUP LOAMY SAND, 8 TO 12 8 7 721A1 GREENVILLE
715D1 065 TROUP LOAMY SAND, 8 TO 12 8 7 721A1 030 GREENVILLE
715D1 128 TROUP SAND, 8 TO 12 8 7 721A1 118 GREENVILLE
715D1 152 TROUP SAND, 8 TO 12 8 7 721A1 120 GREENVILLE
715E1 TROUP 8 7 721B1 GREENVILLE
716A1 FACEVILLE 2 3 721B1 039 GREENVILLE
716A1 043 FREEMANVILLE LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 4 4 721B1 133 GREENVILLE
716A1 051 VARINA LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 3 2 721B2 GREENVILLE
716A1 065 FREEMANVILLE LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 4 4 721B2 030 GREENVILLE
716A1 124 VARINA LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 3 2 721B2 118 GREENVILLE
716B1 FACEVILLE SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 2 3 721B2 120 GREENVILLE
716B1 043 FREEMANVILLE LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 4 4 721C2 GREENVILLE 716B1 051 VARINA LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 3 2 721C2 012 GREENVILLE
716B1 065 FREEMANVILLE LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 4 4 721C2 045 GREENVILLE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 98/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
98
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
716B1 124 VARINA LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 3 2 721C2 128 GREENVILLE
716B2 FACEVILLE 2 3 721C2 134 GREENVILLE
721C2 152 GREENVILLE SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8 4 3 736B1 128 WAGRAM
721D2 GREENVILLE 8 5 736B1 130 AILEY
721D2 012 GREENVILLE SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12,ERODED
7 3 736B1 134 FUQUAY
721D2 045 GREENVILLE SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12,ERODED
7 3 736B1 152 WAGRAM
721D2 134 GREENVILLE SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12,
ERODED
7 3 736C1 FUQUAY
721E2 GREENVILLE 8 3 736C1 043 BONNEAU
722C3 GREENVILLE 8 5 736C1 065 BONNEAU
722C3 030 GREENVILLE CLAY LOAM, 5 TO 12,ERODED
8 5 736C1 066 BLANEY
722C3 118 GREENVILLE CLAY LOAM, 5 TO 12,ERODED
8 5 736C1 070 BLANEY
722C3 120 GREENVILLE CLAY LOAM, 5 TO 12,ERODED
8 5 736C1 072 AILEY
722D3 GREENVILLE 8 4 736C1 128 WAGRAM 725A1 OUSLEY 7 7 736C1 130 AILEY
728A1 DASHER 9 9 736C1 131 BLANEY
728A1 051 DASHER MUCKY PEAT 9 9 736C1 152 WAGRAM
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 99/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
728A1 124 DASHER MUCKY PEAT 9 9 737B1 LAKELAND
729A1 EUNOLA 4 3 737B1 039 LAKELAND
72D1 PACOLET 6 5 737B1 043 BLANTON
72F1 PACOLET 9 6 737B1 051 BONIFAY
731A1 DOTHAN 2 2 737B1 053 BONIFAY
731A1 072 EUNOLA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 3 3 3 737B1 065 BLANTON
731A1 130 EUNOLA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 3 3 3 737B1 072 LAKELAND
733B1 KERSHAW 9 8 737B1 124 BONIFAY
733B1 043 LAKELAND SAND, 0 TO 5 6 7 737B1 130 LAKELAND
733B1 065 LAKELAND SAND, 0 TO 5 6 7 737B1 133 LAKELAND
733C1 KERSHAW 9 8 737B1 148 LAKELAND
733C1 043 LAKELAND SAND, 5 TO 12 8 7 737C1 LAKELAND 733C1 065 LAKELAND SAND, 5 TO 12 8 7 737C1 043 BLANTON
733D1 LAKELAND 8 7 737C1 051 BONIFAY
734A1 OCILLA LOAMY SAND 5 6 737C1 053 BONIFAY
734A1 012 LEEFIELD LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 3 4 6 737C1 065 BLANTON
734A1 032 LEEFIELD LOAMY SAND 4 6 737C1 066 LAKELAND
734A1 045 LEEFIELD LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 3 4 6 737C1 070 LAKELAND
734A1 050 LEEFIELD LOAMY SAND 4 6 737C1 124 BONIFAY
734A1 053 OCILLA LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 5 6 737C1 131 LAKELAND
734A1 116 STILSON LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 5 2 737D1 LAKELAND
734A1 134 LEEFIELD LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 3 4 6 737D1 043 BLANTON
734A1 156 STILSON LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 5 2 737D1 051 BONIFAY 735A1 ALBANY 6 3 737D1 053 BONIFAY
735A1 053 ALBANY CHIPLEY SOILS, 0 TO 3 7 3 737D1 065 BLANTON
735B1 BLANTON 6 6 737D1 066 LAKELAND
736A1 BONNEAU 4 6 737D1 070 LAKELAND
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 100/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
100
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
736B1 FUQUAY 4 6 737D1 124 BONIFAY
736B1 012 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 737D1 131 LAKELAND
736B1 030 BONNEAU LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 5 4 6 737E1 LAKELAND
736B1 043 BONNEAU LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 5 4 6 738A1 BLADEN
736B1 045 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 738A1 030 MEGGETT
736B1 065 BONNEAU LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 5 4 6 738A1 032 BIBB
736B1 072 AILEY LOAMY COARSESAND, 2 TO 5
7 8 738A1 043 GRADY
736B1 118 BONNEAU LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 5 4 6 738A1 050 BIBB
736B1 120 BONNEAU LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 5 4 6 738A1 065 GRADY
738A1 118 MEGGETT FINE SANDY LOAM 8 8 746B1 030 NORFOLK
738A1 120 MEGGETT FINE SANDY LOAM 8 8 746B1 039 NORFOLK
739A1 LEON 7 8 746B1 043 NORFOLK
739A1 051 LEON SAND 7 8 746B1 065 NORFOLK
739A1 124 LEON SAND 7 8 746B1 066 NORFOLK
73A1 ETOWAH 3 1 746B1 070 NORFOLK
73B1 ETOWAH 4 1 746B1 118 NORFOLK
73C2 ETOWAH 4 1 746B1 120 NORFOLK
740A1 MASCOTTE 7 7 746B1 128 NORFOLK
740A1 013 MASCOTTE FINE SAND 7 7 746B1 131 NORFOLK 740A1 024 MASCOTTE FINE SAND 7 7 746B1 133 NORFOLK
740A1 148 MASCOTTE FINE SAND, 0 TO 2 7 7 746B1 152 NORFOLK
741A1 CLARENDON 1 2 746B2 NORFOLK
741A1 012 CLARENDON LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 3 1 2 746C1 NORFOLK
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 101/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
741A1 030 DUPLIN LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 5 746C2 DOTHAN
741A1 039 ARDILLA LOAMY SAND 4 3 746C2 039 NORFOLK
741A1 043 LYNCHBURG LOAMY SAND 2 5 746C2 043 NORFOLK
741A1 045 CLARENDON LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 3 1 2 746C2 065 NORFOLK
741A1 065 LYNCHBURG LOAMY SAND 2 5 746C2 066 NORFOLK
741A1 118 DUPLIN LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 5 746C2 070 NORFOLK
741A1 120 DUPLIN LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 5 746C2 072 DOTHAN
741A1 133 ARDILLA LOAMY SAND 4 3 746C2 130 DOTHAN
741A1 134 CLARENDON LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 3 1 2 746C2 131 NORFOLK
742A1 LEEFIELD 4 6 746C2 133 NORFOLK
742A1 051 LEEFIELD LOAMY SAND 4 6 747A1 FUQUAY
742A1 124 LEEFIELD LOAMY SAND 4 6 747B1 FUQUAY
743B1 FACEVILLE 2 3 747B1 032 FUQUAY
743C2 FACEVILLE 4 3 747B1 050 FUQUAY
744A1 VARINA 3 2 747B1 072 FUQUAY
744A1 030 MARLBORO SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 3 3 747B1 130 FUQUAY
744A1 118 MARLBORO SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 3 3 747C1 FUQUAY
744A1 120 MARLBORO SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 3 3 748A1 OLUSTEE
744B1 MARLBORO 3 3 748A1 012 RIGDON 744B1 043 VARINA SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 3 2 748A1 045 RIGDON
744B1 065 VARINA SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 3 2 748A1 051 RIGDON
745A1 RAINS 3 4 748A1 124 RIGDON
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 102/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
102
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
745A1 051 RAINS SANDY LOAM,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
7 4 748A1 134 RIGDON
745A1 053 REMBERT SANDYLOAM,PONDED
8 9 748A1 148 OLUSTEE
745A1 124 RAINS SANDY LOAM,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
7 4 749A1 ORANGEBURG
746A1 DOTHAN 2 2 749B1 ORANGEBURG
746A1 030 NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 3 749B1 066 ORANGEBURG
746A1 039 NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 3 749B1 070 ORANGEBURG
746A1 043 NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 3 749B1 131 ORANGEBURG 746A1 065 NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 3 749B2 ORANGEBURG
746A1 118 NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 3 749B2 051 ORANGEBURG
746A1 120 NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 3 749B2 124 ORANGEBURG
746A1 128 NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 3 749C1 ORANGEBURG
746A1 133 NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 3 749C2 ORANGEBURG
746A1 152 NORFOLK LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 3 749C2 039 ORANGEBURG
746B1 DOTHAN 2 2 749C2 043 ORANGEBURG
749C2 065 ORANGEBURG LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 4 4 753B1 ORANGEBURG 749C2 066 ORANGEBURG LOAMY SAND, 6 TO 10 4 4 753C2 ORANGEBURG
749C2 070 ORANGEBURG LOAMY SAND, 6 TO 10 4 4 753D2 ORNAGEBURG
749C2 072 ORANGEBURG SANDY LOAM 4 4 754A1 LUCY
749C2 130 ORANGEBURG SANDY LOAM 4 4 754B1 LUCY
749C2 131 ORANGEBURG LOAMY SAND, 6 TO 10 4 4 754B1 012 LUCY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 103/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
749C2 133 ORANGEBURG SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8 4 4 754B1 045 LUCY
749D2 ORANGEBURG SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12,ERODED
5 4 754B1 134 LUCY
749D2 030 ORNAGEBURG SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 15,ERODED
5 4 754C1 LUCY
749D2 039 ORANGEBURG SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12 4 4 754C1 116 LUCY
749D2 043 ORANGEBURG LOAMY SAND, 8 TO 12 4 4 754C1 156 LUCY
749D2 065 ORANGEBURG LOAMY SAND, 8 TO 12 4 4 754D1 LUCY
749D2 118 ORNAGEBURG SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 15,
ERODED
5 4 755A1 013 RUTLEGE
749D2 120 ORNAGEBURG SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 15,ERODED
5 4 755A1 024 RUTLEGE
749D2 133 ORANGEBURG SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12 4 4 755A1 051 RUTLEGE
749E2 ORANGEBURG SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 15,ERODED
5 4 755A1 053 PICKNEY
74A HOLSTON 4 4 755A1 124 RUTLEGE
74B HOLSTON 4 4 755A1 148 SURRENCY
74B1 HOLSTON 4 4 756B1 043 NANKIN
74C HOLSTON 4 4 756B1 051 NANKIN
74C1 HOLSTON 4 4 756B1 053 NANKIN
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 104/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
104
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
74D HOLSTON 5 4 756B1 065 NANKIN
74D2 HOLSTON 5 4 756B1 124 NANKIN
74E HOLSTON 5 7 756B2 NANKIN
751A1 012 PELHAM LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 1 8 8 756C1 NANKIN
751A1 013 PLUMMER SAND 7 8 756C2 NANKIN
751A1 024 PLUMMER SAND 7 8 756C2 043 NANKIN
751A1 032 PLUMMER LOAMY SAND 8 8 756C2 065 NANKIN
751A1 043 PELHAM LOAMY SAND,PONDED 8 8 756D2 NANKIN
751A1 045 PELHAM LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 1 8 8 757B1 SUSQUEHANNA
751A1 050 PLUMMER LOAMY SAND 8 8 757B2 ESTO
751A1 051 PLUMMER SAND,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
7 8 757C2 SUSQUEHANNA
751A1 065 PELHAM LOAMY SAND,PONDED
8 8 757C2 051 SUSQUEHANNA
751A1 124 PLUMMER SAND,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
7 8 757C2 053 SUSQUEHANNA
751A1 134 PELHAM LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 1 8 8 757C2 066 SUSQUEHANNA
751A1 148 PLUMMER SAND, 0 TO 2 7 8 757C2 070 SUSQUEHANNA
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 105/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
752A1 PELHAM 8 8 757C2 072 ESTO
752A1 043 PELHAM LOAMY SAND, FREQFLOODED
8 8 757C2 124 SUSQUEHANNA
752A1 051 PELHAM LOAMY SAND,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
8 8 757C2 130 ESTO
752A1 053 PELHAM LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
8 8 757C2 131 SUSQUEHANNA
752A1 065 PELHAM LOAMY SAND, FREQ
FLOODED
8 8 757D2 ESTO
752A1 072 PELHAM SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 3 8 8 757D3 SUSQUEHANNA
752A1 124 PELHAM LOAMY SAND,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
8 8 758A1 TIFTON
752A1 130 PELHAM SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 3 8 8 758A1 032 FUQUAY
752A1 148 PELHAM LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 8 8 758A1 043 VARINA
752B1 PELHAM LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 5 6 758A1 050 FUQUAY
752B1 012 PELHAM LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 3 8 8 758A1 065 VARINA
752B1 045 PELHAM LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 3 8 8 758B1 TIFTON
752B1 134 PELHAM LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 3 8 8 758B1 032 FUQUAY
753A1 ORANGEBURG 2 4 758B1 043 VARINA 758B1 050 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 4 4 6 763A1 130 DOGUE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 106/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
106
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
758B1 065 VARINA SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 3 2 763A1 134 WAHEE
758B2 VARINA 3 2 763A1 152 WAHEE
758C2 TIFTON SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8,ERODED
5 2 765A1 SAPELO
758C2 030 VARINA SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8 4 2 765A1 013 SAPELO
758C2 118 VARINA SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8 4 2 765A1 024 SAPELO
758C2 120 VARINA SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8 4 2 765A1 148 SAPELO
759A1 TIFTON 2 2 767 OSIER
759B1 TIFTON 2 2 767A1 KINSTON 760B2 CARNEGIE LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5,ERODED
5 2 767A1 012 KINSTON
760B2 012 CARNEGIE SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5,ERODED
6 2 767A1 045 KINSTON
760B2 043 CARNEGIE SANDY LOAM, 3 TO 5 5 2 767A1 051 OSIER
760B2 045 CARNEGIE SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5,ERODED
6 2 767A1 072 BIBB
760B2 051 CARNEGIE SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5,ERODED
6 2 767A1 116 BIBB
760B2 053 CARNEGIE SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 5 2 767A1 124 OSIER
760B2 065 CARNEGIE SANDY LOAM, 3 TO 5 5 2 767A1 130 BIBB
760B2 116 CARNEGIE SANDY LOAM, 3 TO 5 5 2 767A1 134 KINSTON
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 107/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
760B2 124 CARNEGIE SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5,ERODED
6 2 767A1 156 BIBB
760B2 134 CARNEGIE SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5,ERODED
6 2 768A1 OCHLOCKONEE
760B2 156 CARNEGIE SANDY LOAM, 3 TO 5 5 2 76B NELLA
760C2 CARNEGIE SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8,ERODED
6 2 76B1 NELLA
760C2 013 CARNEGIE LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8,ERODED
6 2 76D NELLA
760C2 024 CARNEGIE LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8,ERODED
6 2 76E NELLA
760C2 053 CARNEGIE SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8 6 2 76F NELLA 760C2 148 CARNEGIE LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8,ERODED
6 2 76F1 NELLA
760D2 CARNEGIE 8 2 770 HYDRAQUENTS
761B1 VAUCLUSE 6 6 770A1 HEROD
761B1 012 WICKSBURG LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 6 7 770A1 043 OSIER
761B1 045 WICKSBURG LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 6 7 770A1 053 MEGGETT
761B1 134 WICKSBURG LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 6 7 770A1 065 OSIER
761C1 WICKSBURG 7 7 770A1 128 KINSTON 761C2 VAUCLUSE 6 5 770A1 152 KINSTON
761D2 COWARTS 8 5 771B1 LUCY
761D2 039 VAUCLUSE SANDY LOAM, 12 TO25
8 7 771C1 LUCY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 108/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
108
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
761D2 133 VAUCLUSE SANDY LOAM, 12 TO25
8 7 772A1 ORANGEBURG
762C2 VAUCLUSE 6 5 772A1 030 RED BAY
762E3 VAUCLUSE 8 7 772A1 118 RED BAY
763A1 WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM, 0TO 2, OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
3 6 772A1 120 RED BAY
763A1 012 WAHEE BETHERA ASSOC, 0 TO2, OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
7 7 772A1 128 RED BAY
763A1 030 WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM, 0
TO 2
3 6 772A1 152 RED BAY
763A1 032 WAHEE OUSLEY COMPLEX 7 6 772B1 RED BAY
763A1 043 WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM 2 6 772B1 043 ORANGEBURG
763A1 045 WAHEE BETHERA ASSOC, 0 TO2, OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
7 7 772B1 065 ORANGEBURG
763A1 050 WAHEE OUSLEY COMPLEX 7 6 772B2 RED BAY
763A1 053 WAHEE SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 1 2 6 772B2 043 ORANGEBURG
763A1 065 WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM 2 6 772B2 065 ORANGEBURG
763A1 072 DOGUE FINE SANDY LOAM, 1TO 3
2 3 772C2 RED BAY
763A1 118 WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM, 0TO 2
3 6 772C2 072 RED BAY
763A1 120 WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM, 0TO 2
3 6 772C2 130 RED BAY
763A1 128 WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM 2 6 772D2 RED BAY
772E2 RED BAY 8 1 784A1 156 CLARENDON
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 109/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
773A1 ORANGEBURG 2 4 784B1 CLARENDON
773B1 ORANGEBURG 2 4 785A1 ELLABELLE
776B1 COWARTS NANKIN LOAMYSANDS, 2 TO 5
5 2 785A1 032 BAYBORO
776B1 012 NANKIN LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 5 4 785A1 050 BAYBORO
776B1 045 NANKIN LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 5 4 785A1 051 SURRENCY
776B1 134 NANKIN LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 5 4 785A1 124 SURRENCY
776C2 COWARTS NANKIN LOAMYSANDS, 5 TO 8
5 2 786A1 IZAGORA
776C2 NANKIN SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8,ERODED 7 4 786A1 043 IZAGORA
776C2 148 COWARTS NANKIN LOAMYSANDS, 5 TO 8,
ERODED
5 2 786A1 065 IZAGORA
777C2 HENDERSON 5 4 787C2 VAUCLUSE
777E2 HENDERSON 9 4 787D2 VAUCLUSE
778C2 SUNSWEET SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 12,ERODED
8 6 788D2 VAUCLUSE
778C2 148 SUNSWEET SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12 8 6 789A1 GRADY
778D2 SUNSWEET 8 6 78B CUNNINGHAM
779A1 TIFTON 2 2 78D TOWNLEY 779B1 TIFTON 2 2 78E TALLANT
779C2 TIFTON 5 2 78F TALLANT
77A TANYARD 4 3 793A1 DUNBAR
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 110/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
110
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
77A1 LEADVALE 5 4 793A1 013 WAHEE
77A1 041 WAX LOAM, 0 TO 2 6 4 793A1 024 WAHEE
77A1 146 WAX LOAM, 0 TO 2 6 4 79A1 CARTECAY
77B DOCENA 5 5 7B ALLEN
77B1 WAX 6 4 7B2 ALLEN
780B1 TROUP 6 7 7C2 ALLEN 780D1 013 TROUP AILEY COMPLEX, 8 TO12
8 7 7D ALLEN
780D1 024 TROUP AILEY COMPLEX, 8 TO12
8 7 7D1 ALLEN
780D1 148 TROUP AILEY COARSE SAND,8 TO 12
8 7 7D2 ALLEN
781A1 BLANTON SAND, 0 TO 2 7 3 7E ALLEN
781A1 013 BLANTON SAND, 0 TO 4 6 7 7E1 ALLEN
781A1 024 BLANTON SAND, 0 TO 4 6 7 800B1 TROUP
781A1 043 OCILLA LOAMY SAND 5 6 800B1 012 BONIFAY
781A1 065 OCILLA LOAMY SAND 5 6 800B1 045 BONIFAY 782B1 AILEY 7 8 800B1 116 BLANTON
782C1 AILEY LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 7 8 800B1 134 BONIFAY
782C1 039 AILEY LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 12 8 8 800B1 156 BLANTON
782C1 133 AILEY LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 12 8 8 800C1 TROUP
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 111/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
782D1 AILEY LOAMY SAND, 8 TO 17 8 8 800C1 072 TROUP
782D1 039 AILEY LOAMY SAND, 12 TO25
9 8 800C1 116 BLANTON
782D1 133 AILEY LOAMY SAND, 12 TO25
9 8 800C1 130 TROUP
783A STILSON 5 2 800C1 156 BLANTON
783A1 STILSON LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 5 2 800D1 TROUP
783A1 032 STILSON LOAMY SAND 5 2 800D1 116 BLANTON
783A1 050 STILSON LOAMY SAND 5 2 800D1 156 BLANTON
783A1 051 STILSON LOAMY SAND 5 2 80B NAUVOO 783A1 124 STILSON LOAMY SAND 5 2 80C2 LINKER
784A1 CALRENDON SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 1 1 80D NAUVOO
784A1 032 CLARENDON LOAMY SAND 1 2 80D2 LINKER
784A1 050 CLARENDON LOAMY SAND 1 2 80E NAUVOO
784A1 116 CLARENDON LOAMY SAND 1 2 810A1 DOTHAN
810B1 DOTHAN 2 2 861C1 039 COWARTS
813A1 LYNCHBURG 2 5 861C1 051 COWARTS
81A1 WEHADKEE SILT LOAM 8 7 861C1 053 COWARTS
81A1 013 CENTENARY SAND, 0 TO 5 6 8 861C1 124 COWARTS
81A1 024 CENTENARY SAND, 0 TO 5 6 8 861C1 133 COWARTS
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 112/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
112
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
820C2 VAUCLUSE LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 15 6 6 861C2 COWARTS
820C2 128 VAUCLUSE LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 15 6 6 861D2 COWARTS
820C2 152 VAUCLUSE LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 15 6 6 861D2 039 COWARTS
820E2 VAUCLUSE 8 7 861D2 051 COWARTS
821B1 ESTO 7 3 861D2 124 COWARTS
821C1 AILEY 7 8 861D2 133 COWARTS
821C2 ESTO 7 3 865A1 TAWCAW
821D2 ESTO 8 3 868A1 OCHLOCKONEE
821E1 AILEY 9 8 870A1 LEEFIELD
822C1 COWARTS 5 2 876B1 NANKIN
822C1 032 LOWNDES LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 12 7 7 876C2 NANKIN
822C1 050 LOWNDES LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 12 7 7 876D2 NANKIN
822E1 COWARTS 6 2 87A1 HAMBLEN
824A1 IUKA 3 2 89A HAMBLEN
827B1 VALDOSTA 6 5 89A1 CARTECAY82A SWAFFORD 2 2 8C3 ALLEN
82B SWAFFORD 3 2 8C3 041 ALLEN
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 113/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
82B1 AILEY 7 8 8C3 146 ALLEN
836C1 CHISOLM 4 5 8D1 LINKER
837A1 BONIFAY 7 7 8E3 ALLEN
837B1 BONIFAY 7 7 8E3 105 ALLEN
839A1 KINSTON 9 4 8E3 155 ALLEN
844A1 BAYBORO 8 9 8F1 LINKER
845A1 MEGGETT 5 8 90A1 SUBLIGNA
849A1 BLADEN 8 8 91A SULLIVAN 84C1 008 MONTEVALLO CNANNERY SILTLOAM, 6 TO 15
8 7 91A1 TOCCOA
84C1 041 MONTEVALLO SHALY SILT LOAM, 6TO 15
8 7 93A1 CEDARBLUFF
84C1 110 MONTEVALLO CNANNERY SILTLOAM, 6 TO 15
8 7 94A1 ROANOKE
84C1 146 MONTEVALLO SHALY SILT LOAM, 6TO 15
8 7 95A1 CONGAREE
84C2 MONTEVALLO 8 7 96A SEQUATCHIE
84D MONTEVALLO 8 7 96A1 008 SEQUATCHIE 84D2 MONTEVALLO 8 7 96A1 110 SEQUATCHIE
84E MONTEVALLO 9 8 96B SEQUATCHIE
84E1 MONTEVALLO 9 8 96B1 SEQUATCHIE
84F MONTEVALLO 9 8 96B2 SEQUATCHIE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 114/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
114
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
84F1 008 MONTEVALLO CHANNERY SILTLOAM, 15 TO 45
9 8 97 UDORTHENTS
84F1 041 MONTEVALLO SHALY SILT LOAM, 15TO 45
9 8 97B CUNNINGHAM
84F1 110 MONTEVALLO CHANNERY SILTLOAM, 15 TO 45
9 8 97B2 CUNNINGHAM
84F1 146 MONTEVALLO SHALY SILT LOAM, 15TO 45
9 8 97C CUNNINGHAM
857C1 KUREB 9 8 97C2 CUNNINGHAM
85F1 HECTOR 9 6 97D1 CUNNINGHAM
860A1 JOHNSTON 9 8 97E CUNNINGHAM
860A1 053 KINSTON BIBB SOILS, FREQFLOODED 8 8 97E1 CUNNINGHAM
861B1 COWARTS 5 2 98 UDORTHENTS
861B2 COWARTS 5 2 98D HECTOR
98D1 HECTOR 8 5 AdE3 APPLING
98D2 HECTOR 8 5 ADG ASHE
98F HECTOR 9 8 Ae APPLING
98F1 HECTOR 9 8 AeB APPLING
99 URBAN LAND 9 9 AeB 062 AILEY
99A TAFT 5 6 AeB 081 AILEY
99A1 CEDARBLUFF 7 5 AeB 083 AILEY
9C2 ALLEN 5 4 AeB 087 AILEY 9D2 ALLEN 5 4 AeC APPLING
Aa ARKAQUA LOAM, FREQFLOODED
3 6 AeC 002 AILEY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 115/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Aa 058 ALLUVIAL LAND, POORLYDRAINED
8 2 AeC 003 AILEY
Aa 060 ALTAVISTA FINE SANDY LOAM,LEVEL PHASE
1 1 AeC 034 AILEY
AaB AILEY 7 8 AeC 062 AILEY
AaB 027 ALLEN FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6, ERODED
4 4 AeC 081 AILEY
AaB 057 ALLEN FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6, ERODED
4 4 AeC 083 AILEY
AaB 115 ALLEN FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6, ERODED
4 4 AeC 087 AILEY
AaB2 ALLEN 4 4 AeC 150 AILEY AAC AILEY 7 7 AeC 158 AILEY
AaC AILEY 7 8 AeD AILEY
AaC ALLEN FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 10
5 4 AeD 058 APPLING
AaC2 ALLEN 5 4 AEE ASHE
AaD ALLEN 5 4 AeE AILEY
AaD2 ALLEN 5 4 AeE 058 APPLING
AaE ALLEN 8 6 AEF ASHE
AB ANGELINA 8 8 Af APPLING Ab 058 ALLUVIAL
LANDMODERATELY WELL
DRAINED4 1 AfC AILEY
Ab 060 ALTAVISTA FINE SANDY LOAM,UNDULATING PHASE
2 1 Afs AUGUSTA
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 116/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
116
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
AbC3 ALLEN 6 4 Afs 099 AUGUSTA
AbE3 ALLEN 8 6 Ag APPLING
Ac ALTAVISTA 3 1 AgB AILEY
AcA ALTAVISTA 1 1 AgB 121 AILEY
AcB 058 ALTAVISTA FINE SANDY LOAM,VERY GENTLY
SLOPING PHASE
2 1 AgC AILEY
AcB 107 ALCOVY LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 6 4 2 AgC 005 AILEY
AcB 122 ALCOVY LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 6 4 2 AgC 084 AILEY
AcB2 ALTAVISTA 2 1 AgC 117 AILEY
ACE ASHE 8 8 AgD AILEY
AcG ASHE 9 8 Ah ALAPAHA
Acn ALLUVIALLAND
8 8 Ah 040 ALAPAHA
Ad ALBANY 6 3 Ah 060 APPLING
Ad 060 APPLING SANDY CLAY LOAM,SEVERELY ERODED
ROLLING PHASE
6 7 Ah 142 ALAPAHA
AdA ALBANY 6 3 AhD AILEY
AdA 009 ALBANY SAND 6 3 Ai ALAPAHA
AdA 020 ALBANY FINE SAND, 0 TO 2 6 3 Ajc ALLUVIALLAND
AdA 063 ALBANY FINE SAND, 0 TO 2 6 3 Ak APPLING
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 117/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
AdA 077 ALBANY SAND 6 3 AkA ALTAVISTA
AdB2 APPLING 5 4 AkA 031 ALTAVISTA
AdC2 APPLING 6 7 AkA 036 ALTAVISTA
AdC3 APPLING 6 7 AkA 056 ALTAVISTA
AdD2 APPLING 8 7 AkA 075 ALTAVISTA
AdD3 APPLING 8 7 AkA 097 ALTAVISTA
AkA 107 ALTAVISTA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 3,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
2 1 AmD APPLING
AkA 109 ALTAVISTA LOAM, 0 TO 2,
OCCASIONALLYFLOODED
2 1 AmD 019 AMERICUS
AkA 122 ALTAVISTA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 3,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
2 1 AmD 049 AMERICUS
AkA 149 ALTAVISTA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 2 1 AmD2 APPLING
AkB ALTAVISTA 2 1 AmE2 APPLING
AkB2 ALTAVISTA 2 1 An ALAPAHA
AL ALTAVISTA 2 1 An 060 APPLING
Al APPLING 5 3 An 137 ALAPAHA
AlA ALTAVISTA 1 1 AnB ALLEN
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 118/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
118
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
AlB ALTAVISTA SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 2 1 AnB3 APPLING
AlB 033 ALTAVISTA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 4 2 1 AnC APPLING
AlB2 ALTAVISTA 2 1 AnC 023 ALLEN
AlM ALLUVIALLAND
4 1 AnC2 APPLING
Alm ALLUVIALLAND
4 1 AnC2 006 APPLING
AlM 048 ALLUVIAL
LAND
MODERATELY WELL
DRAINED
5 1 AnC2 127 APPLING
Alm 104 ALLUVIALLAND
CONGAREE 2 1 AnC3 APPLING
AlP ALLUVIALLAND
8 2 AnC3 029 APPLING
Alp ALLUVIALLAND
MODERATELY WET 8 2 AnC3 108 APPLING
Am APPLING 5 3 AnC4 APPLING
AmB APPLING SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 4 3 AnD ALLEN
AmB 019 AMERICUS LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 5 6 6 AnD2 APPLING
AmB 046 AMERICUS LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 5 6 6 AnD3 APPLING
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 119/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
AmB 049 AMERICUS LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 5 6 6 AnE ALLEN
AmB 083 AMERICUS LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 6 6 Ao AUGUSTA
AmB 087 AMERICUS LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 6 6 AoA ALBANY
AmB 094 AMERICUS LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 5 6 6 AoA 137 ALBANY
AmB 109 APPLING COARSE SANDYLOAM, 2 TO 6
4 3 AoB APPLING
AmB2 APPLING 4 4 AoC APPLING
AmC AMERICUS LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 6 6 AoC2 ALLEN
AmC 031 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 Ap ALAPAHA
AmC 033 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 ApB APPLING
AmC 036 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 ApB 023 APISON
AmC 038 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 ApB 099 APPLING AmC 044 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 ApB2 APPLING
AmC 052 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 APC ASHLAR
AmC 056 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 ApC APPLING
AmC 059 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 ApC 023 APISON
AmC 074 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 ApC2 APPLING
AmC 075 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 ApD APPLING
AmC 085 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 APE ASHLAR
AmC 095 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 Aq ARDILLA
AmC 097 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 AqA ARDILLA
AmC 107 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 AqA 010 ARDILLA AmC 109 APPLING COARSE SANDY
LOAM, 6 TO 105 3 AqA 086 ARDILLA
AmC 114 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 Ar ARDILLA
AmC 122 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 ArA ARDILLA
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 120/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
120
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
AmC 141 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 ArA 137 ARDILLA
AmC 145 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 ArB AMERICUS
AmC 149 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 ArB 027 ARAGON
AmC2 APPLING SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10,ERODED
6 3 ArB 057 ARAGON
ArB 062 ARUNDEL LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 9 7 AwC ASHLAR
ArB 081 ARUNDEL LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 9 7 AwC 042 AUGUSTA
ArB 088 AMERICUS SAND, 0 TO 5 6 6 AwC 093 AUGUSTA
ArB 115 ARAGON FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
5 4 AwC 154 AUGUSTA
ArB 135 AMERICUS SAND, 0 TO 5 6 6 AWE ASHLAR
ArB 143 AMERICUS LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 6 6 AwE ASHLAR
ArC AMERICUS LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 6 6 AxA APPLING
ArC 023 ARMUCHEE CHANNERY SILTLOAM, 6 TO 10
7 6 AxB APPLING
ArC 027 ARAGON FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 10
6 4 AxB2 APPLING
ArC 057 ARAGON FINE SANDY LOAM, 6
TO 10
6 4 AxC2 APPLING
ArC 115 ARAGON FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 10
6 4 AxC2 029 APPLING
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 121/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
ArD ARAGON FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 15
7 4 AxC2 108 APPLING
ArD 123 AMERICUS LOAMY SAND, 8 TO 15 8 6 AxD2 APPLING
ArD 129 AMERICUS LOAMY SAND, 8 TO 15 8 6 AyF ALLEN
ArE ARAGON FINE SANDY LOAM, 15TO 25
8 6 AzB APPLING
ArF ASHLAR SANDY LOAM, 20 TO35, VERY BOULDERY
9 7 AzB2 APPLING
As ALBANY LOAMY FINE SAND, 0TO 2
6 3 AzC2 APPLING
As 015 ALBANY FINE SAND 6 3 B.P. PITS As 025 ALBANY FINE SAND 6 3 Ba BUNCOMBE
AsA ALBANY LOAMY FINE SAND, 0TO 2
6 3 Ba 002 BAYBORO
AsC ASHLAR ROCK OUTCROPCOMPLEX, 2 TO 10
4 2 Ba 003 BAYBORO
AsC 031 ASHLAR SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 10 4 2 Ba 010 BARTH
AsC 056 ASHLAR SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 10 4 2 Ba 034 BAYBORO
AsC 075 ASHLAR SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 10 4 2 Ba 086 BARTH
AsF ASHLAR COMPLEX, 10 TO 30 8 7 Ba 089 BAYBORO
Asl AUGUSTA LOAM 4 3 Ba 091 BAYBORO
Asl 048 AUGUSTA SILT LOAM 3 3 BB BIBB
Asl 067 AUGUSTA SOILS 4 3 Bb BARTH
At ALAPAHA 8 5 BbB BLANTON
AtA ALAPAHA 8 5 Bc BEACHES
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 122/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
122
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
AtE ASHLAR 8 7 BcB2 BRADDOCK
Atk ATKINS 8 7 BcC2 BRADDOCK
Au AUGUSTA LOAM 4 3 BcD2 BRADDOCK
Au 010 ANGIE FINE SANDY LOAM,FREQ FLOODED
7 6 BcE2 BRADDOCK
Au 086 ANGIE FINE SANDY LOAM,FREQ FLOODED
7 6 Bd BLADEN
AuC APPLING URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 2 TO 10
5 3 BdC3 BRADDOCK
Av ANGIE FINE SANDY LOAM 3 6 BdD3 BRADDOCK
Av 121 ALTAVISTA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 2 1 Be BEACHES
AvD ASHLAR 5 2 Bf BAYBORO AvF ASHLAR 9 5 Bfs BUNCOMBE
AvP ALLUVIALLAND
WET 8 7 Bfs 048 BUNCOMBE
Avp ALLUVIALLAND
WET 4 7 Bfs 067 BUNCOMBE
AwA AUGUSTA 3 3 Bfs 068 BUNCOMBE
AwB 022 AUGUSTA SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 2 1 BgA BIGBEE
AwB 042 AUGUSTA FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
3 3 BgA 082 BARTH
AwB 068 AUGUSTA SILT LOAM, 2 TO 6 2 1 BgC BLANTON
AwB 071 AUGUSTA SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 2 1 Bh BIBB AwB 093 AUGUSTA FINE SANDY LOAM, 2
TO 63 3 Bh 026 BIBB
AwB 154 AUGUSTA FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
3 3 Bh 096 BIBB
AWC ASHLAR 5 2 Bh 106 BIBB
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 123/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
BhA BAYBORO SOILS 8 9 BrD3 BOSWELL
BhA 098 BAYBORO CLAY LOAM 8 9 BrE BRADSON
BiA BLADEN LOAM 8 8 BrE 119 BRADSON
BjA BLADEN LOAM AND CLAYLOAM
8 8 BrE 139 BRADSON
BK BIBB KINSTON SOILS 8 8 Brs BLADEN
Bk BIBB KINSTON SANDYLOAMS
8 8 BsE BODINE
Bk 020 BLADEN LOAM 8 8 BsF BODINE
Bk 021 BLADEN FINE SANDY LOAM 8 8 BuB2 BINNSVILLE Bk 054 BLADEN FINE SANDY LOAM 8 8 BvF BURTON
Bk 063 BLADEN LOAM 8 8 BwB BUNCOMBE
Bk 132 BLADEN FINE SANDY LOAM 8 8 Bwc BIBB
BkA BLADEN COXVILLE FINESANDY LOAMS
8 8 BzE BODINE
BkA 151 BLADEN COXVILLE-WESTONCOMPLEX
8 8 BzF BODINE
BlA BLADEN 8 8 CA CARTECAY
Bls BLADEN 8 8 Ca 044 CARTECAY
Bm BAYBORO LOAM 8 8 Ca 052 CARTECAY Bm 035 BAYBORO MUCKY LOAM 8 8 Ca 055 CHATUGE
Bm 037 BAYBORO MUCKY LOAM 8 8 Ca 059 CARTECAY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 124/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
124
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
BmA BUNCOMBE 6 5 Ca 060 CECIL
Bn BLANTON 6 7 Ca 089 CAPE FEAR
BnA BLANTON 6 3 Ca 091 CAPE FEAR
BnB BLANTON 6 6 Ca 095 CARTECAY
BO BOHICKET CAPERS ASSOC 9 9 Ca 109 CARTECAY
BO 121 BIBB OSIER SOILS 8 8 Ca 121 CHASTAIN
BoA BONNEAU LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 4 6 Ca 144 CHATUGE
BoA 017 BONIFAY FINE SAND, 1 TO 5 7 7 CaA CAHABA
BoB BONIFAY 7 7 CaB CAPSHAW
BoC BIGBEE OCHLOCKONEECOMPLEX, 0 TO 10,
OCCASIONALLYFLOODED
7 3 Cab CARTECAY
BoC 002 BONIFAY SAND, 2 TO 8 7 7 CaB 020 CAINHOY
BoC 003 BONIFAY SAND, 2 TO 8 7 7 CaB 063 CAINHOY
BoC 017 BONIFAY FINE SAND, 5 TO 8 7 7 CaB2 CARNEGIE
BoC 021 BONIFAY FINE SAND, 1 TO 8 7 7 CaB2 014 CARNEGIE
BoC 034 BONIFAY SAND, 2 TO 8 7 7 CaB2 083 CARNEGIE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 125/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
BoC 054 BONIFAY FINE SAND, 1 TO 8 7 7 CaB2 087 CARNEGIE
BoC 062 BONIFAY FINE SAND, 5 TO 8 7 7 CaB2 136 CARNEGIE
BoC 081 BONIFAY FINE SAND, 5 TO 8 7 7 CaB3 CECIL
BoC 132 BONIFAY FINE SAND, 1 TO 8 7 7 CAC CECIL
BoD BONIFAY FINE SAND, 8 TO 12 8 7 CaC CARNEGIE
BoE BODINE 8 7 Cac CARTECAY
BoF BODINE 9 8 CaC2 CARNEGIE
Bp BORROW PITS 9 9 CaC3 CECIL
BqB BOSWELL 7 3 CaD CARNEGIE
BqB2 BOSWELL 7 3 CaD2 CARNEGIE BqC2 BOSWELL 8 3 CaD3 CECIL
Br BROOKMAN 8 8 CaE CECIL
BrB2 BOSWELL 7 6 CaE3 CECIL
BrC BRADSON LOAM, 6 TO 10 3 3 CaF3 CECIL
BrC 119 BRADSON FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 10
3 3 Cah CARTECAY
BrC 139 BRADSON FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 10
3 3 Cb CEDARBLUFF
BrD2 BOSWELL 8 6 Cb 023 CEDARBLUFF
Cb 060 CECIL CLAY LOAM,SEVERELY ERODED
HILLY PHASE
8 7 CdE2 CECIL
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 126/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
126
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
CBA CAPTINA 6 4 Ce 023 CHENNEBY
CbA CECIL 4 3 Ce 058 CONGAREE
CbB CARNEGIE GRAVELLY SANDYLOAM, 3 TO 5
5 2 Ce 060 CECIL
CbB 002 CAINHOY SAND, 0 TO 5 6 8 Ce 089 CAPERS
CbB 003 CAINHOY SAND, 0 TO 5 6 8 Ce 091 CAPERS
CbB 034 CAINHOY SAND, 0 TO 5 6 8 CeB CECIL
CbB2 CECIL 5 3 CeB2 CARNEGIE
CbC CECIL 5 3 CEB3 CHRISTIAN CbC2 CECIL 5 3 CeC CECIL
CbD CECIL 8 6 CeC 067 CECIL
CbD2 CECIL 8 6 CEC3 CHRISTIAN
CbE CECIL 9 6 CeD CECIL
CbE2 CECIL 9 6 CeD 011 CECIL
CbF CECIL 9 6 CED3 CHRISTIAN
CC CHEWACLA CHASTAIN-
RIVERVIEW ASSOC
5 2 CeE CHESTNUT
Cc CAPE FEAR 8 8 CEE3 CHRISTIAN
Cc 007 CARTECAY CHEWACLA SOILS 8 2 CeuC CECIL
CC 017 CHASTAIN TAWCAW ASSOC 8 7 Cf 058 CONGAREE
Cc 052 CARTECAY SOILS, PONDED 8 2 Cf 060 CECIL
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 127/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Cc 059 CARTECAY SOILS, PONDED 8 2 CfB2 CECIL
Cc 060 CECIL CLAY LOAM,SEVERELY ERODED
STEEP PHASE
8 7 CfC2 CECIL
Cc 069 CARTECAY CHEWACLA SOILS 8 2 CfC2 044 CECIL
Cc 078 CARTECAY CHEWACLA SOILS 8 2 CfC2 067 CECIL
Cc 095 CARTECAY SOILS, PONDED 8 2 CfD2 CECIL
CC 121 CHEWACLA CHASTAIN ASSOC 5 2 CfE2 CECIL
Cc 150 CHEWACLA CHASTAIN ASSOC 5 2 Cfl CHEWACLA
Cc 158 CHEWACLA CHASTAIN ASSOC 5 2 Cfs CHEWACLA
CCA CARTECAY 8 2 Cfs 048 CHEWACLA
CcB CECIL 4 3 Cfs 073 CHEWACLA
CcB2 CECIL 4 3 Cg 060 CECIL
CcC CECIL 4 3 Cg 150 CHEWACLA
CcC2 CECIL 4 3 Cg 158 CHEWACLA
CcD CECIL 6 5 Cga CONGAREE
CcD2 CECIL 6 5 CgC COBBLY
CCE CHANDLER 9 7 CgC2 CARNEGIE CCF CHANDLER 9 7 CgD COBBLY
CCG CHANDLER 9 8 CgE COBBLY
Cco CHEWACLA 4 2 Ch 002 CHASTAIN
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 128/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
128
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Cd CHEWACLA SILT LOAM 4 2 Ch 003 CHASTAIN
Cd 060 CECIL SANDY LOAM,UNDULATING PHASE
4 3 Ch 014 CHIPLEY
CdA CLARENDON LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 1 1 Ch 015 CAPERS
CDB CHRISTIAN 5 4 Ch 025 CAPERS
CdB CECIL 5 5 Ch 026 CHASTAIN
CdB2 CECIL 5 5 Ch 034 CHASTAIN
CDC CHRISTIAN 6 4 Ch 060 CECIL
CdC2 CECIL 5 5 Ch 062 CHASTAIN
CDD CHRISTIAN 5 4 Ch 081 CHASTAIN
CdD2 CECIL 6 5 Ch 089 CHIPLEY
CDE CHRISTIAN 8 6 Ch 091 CHIPLEY
Ch 096 CHASTAIN LOAM, FREQFLOODED
8 8 CME COLBERT
Ch 106 CHASTAIN LOAM 7 8 Cn CLARENDON
Ch 109 CHEWACLA SILT LOAM,
OCCASIONALLYFLOODED
4 2 Cn 060 CHEWACLA
Ch 119 CHATUGE LOAM 5 8 Cn 106 CONGAREE
Ch 136 CHIPLEY SAND 7 3 CnA CLARENDON
Ch 139 CHATUGE LOAM 5 8 CnA 046 CLARENDON
ChA CHIPLEY 7 3 CnA 094 CLARENDON
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 129/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
CHB CLARKSVILLE 5 4 CnB CARNEGIE
Chc CHEWACLA 5 2 CnB 002 CLARENDON
CHC2 CLARKSVILLE 5 4 CnB 003 CLARENDON
CHD CLARKSVILLE 6 4 CnB 027 CONASAUGA
CHE CLARKSVILLE 8 6 CnB 034 CLARENDON
ChE CHESTATEE 9 8 CnB 057 CONASAUGA
CHE2 CLARKSVILLE 8 6 CnB 115 CONASAUGA
ChF CHESTNUT 9 8 CnB 150 COWARTS
ChG CHESTNUT 9 8 CnB 158 COWARTS
CIB COLFAX 5 6 CnB2 CARNEGIE CiB COLFAX 3 3 CnC CARNEGIE
CIC COLFAX 5 6 CnC 027 CONASAUGA
CIC2 COLFAX 5 6 CnC 057 CONASAUGA
CiC2 COLFAX 5 4 CnC 115 CONASAUGA
CID3 CLARKSVILLE 8 4 CnC2 COWARTS
CK CHEWACLA CONGAREE SOILS 4 2 CnC2 082 CARNEGIE
Ck 007 CHEWACLA LOAM, FREQFLOODED
5 2 Cng 022 CONGAREE
CK 011 CHEWACLA ASSOC 5 2 Cng 048 CONGAREE Ck 027 CHEWACLA SILT LOAM 4 2 Cng 067 CONGAREE
Ck 057 CHEWACLA SILT LOAM 4 2 Cng 068 CONGAREE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 130/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
130
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Ck 060 CECIL SANDY LOAM,ERODED HILLY PHASE
5 3 Cng 071 CONGAREE
Ck 062 CHEWACLA SANDY LOAM,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
4 2 CO COHUTTA
Ck 069 CHEWACLA LOAM, FREQFLOODED
5 2 Co COXVILLE
Ck 078 CHEWACLA LOAM, FREQFLOODED
5 2 Co 011 CONGAREE
Ck 081 CHEWACLA SANDY LOAM,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
4 2 Co 060 CHEWACLA
Ck 106 CHEWACLA LOAM 4 2 Coa CONGAREE
Ck 115 CHEWACLA SILT LOAM 4 2 CoB COWARTS
CkC3 CARNEGIE 6 2 Cob CHEWACLA
CKE CLIFTON 8 6 CoB 010 CARNEGIE
CKF CLIFTON 9 6 CoB 023 CONASAUGA
Cl CECIL 7 5 CoB 086 CARNEGIE
ClC CLIFTON 4 3 CoB2 CARNEGIE
CLE CLIFTON 9 6 CoB2 040 COWARTS
ClE CLIFTON 8 6 CoB2 142 COWARTS
CLF CLIFTON 9 6 COC COWARTS
CLG CLIFTON 9 6 CoC COWARTS
Cls CHASTAIN 8 8 CoC 009 CARNEGIE
Cm 010 CHIPLEY FINE SAND, FREQFLOODED
8 8 CoC 023 CONASAUGA
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 131/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Cm 015 CHIPLEY FINE SAND 7 3 CoC 077 CARNEGIE
Cm 025 CHIPLEY FINE SAND 7 3 COC2 CUTHBERT
Cm 060 CECIL SANDY LOAM,ERODED STEEP PHASE
7 5 CoC2 CARNEGIE
Cm 086 CHIPLEY FINE SAND, FREQFLOODED
8 8 COD COWARTS
CmA CHIPLEY SAND, 0 TO 2 7 3 CoD COWARTS
Cod COXVILLE 8 8 CuC 115 CUNNINGHAM
CoD2 CARNEGIE 8 2 CUC2 CUMBERLAND
COE COWARTS 8 5 CuD CUNNINGHAM
CoE CUTHBERT 8 3 CuD 023 CUNNINGHAM
Con CONGAREE 1 1 CuE CECIL
Con 068 CONGAREE SILT LOAM 1 1 CuE 027 CUNNINGHAM
Con 104 CONGAREE SILT LOAM 2 1 CuE 057 CUNNINGHAM
Cos 067 CONGAREE SOILS, FREQ FLOODED 5 1 CuE 115 CUNNINGHAM
Cos 073 CONGAREE SOILS 4 1 CuF CECIL
Cot CONGAREE 4 1 Cus CONGAREE
Cp CONGAREE 2 1 Cv COXVILLE
CpB COLFAX 5 6 CvB2 CUNNINGHAM
CqB COWARTS 5 2 CVB3 CUMBERLAND
CqB2 COWARTS 5 2 CVC3 CUMBERLAND CqC COWARTS 5 2 CvD2 CUNNINGHAM
CqC2 COWARTS 6 2 CvF CHESTATEE
CR CHEWACLA 5 2 Cw CHEWACLA
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 132/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
132
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Cr 055 COLVARD FINE SANDY LOAM,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
2 3 Cw 033 CARTECAY
Cr 060 CONGAREE SILT LOAM 2 1 CwB COWARTS
Cr 144 COLVARD FINE SANDY LOAM,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
2 3 CwC COWARTS
CRA CONASAUGA 6 7 CwC2 COWARTS
CrA CRAVEN 2 5 CwE COWARTS
CRB CONASAUGA 6 7 Cwf CHEWACLA
CRB2 CONASAUGA 6 7 CwG COWEE
CrC CONASAUGA 8 7 CX CAHABA CrC2 COWARTS 5 2 Cx CRAVEN
CrG CHANDLER 9 8 Cx 159 COXVILLE
CSB CONASAUGA 6 7 CxC CRAVEN
CSB2 CONASAUGA 6 7 CxD2 CUNNINGHAM
CSC2 CONASAUGA 8 7 CxE COWEE
CSC3 CONASAUGA 9 7 CxF COWEE
CSD CONASAUGA 8 7 CxG COWEE
CsD2 COWARTS 8 2 Cy CHIPLEY
CsF CHANDLER 9 8 CYB CECIL
Csl CHEWACLA 4 2 CYB2 CECIL
Cst CHEWACLA 4 2 CyB2 CECIL Csw CHEWACLA 5 2 CYC CECIL
CtC2 COWARTS 6 2 CYC2 CECIL
CtD2 COWARTS 8 2 CyC2 CECIL
CUB CUMBERLAND 5 4 CYD CECIL
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 133/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Cub COASTALBEACH
9 9 CYD2 CECIL
CuB 023 CUNNINGHAM SILT LOAM, 2 TO 6 6 4 CYE CECIL
CuB 027 CUNNINGHAM LOAM, 2 TO 6 6 4 CYE2 CECIL
CuB 057 CUNNINGHAM LOAM, 2 TO 6 6 4 CyE2 CECIL
CuB 115 CUNNINGHAM LOAM, 2 TO 6 6 4 CZB2 CECIL
CuC CECIL 4 3 CZB3 CECIL
Cuc CHIPLEY 7 3 CZB4 CECIL
CuC 023 CUNNINGHAM SILT LOAM, 6 TO 10 6 4 CZC2 CECIL
CuC 027 CUNNINGHAM LOAM, 6 TO 10 6 4 CZC3 CECIL
CuC 057 CUNNINGHAM LOAM, 6 TO 10 6 4 CZC4 CECIL
CZD3 CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM, 6TO 15, SEVERELY
ERODED
8 7 DgD2 DAVIDSON
CZD4 CECIL 8 7 DgE2 DAVIDSON
CZE2 CECIL 8 7 DhA DOGUE
CZE3 CECIL 9 8 DhB DEWEY
CzF CECIL 9 6 DhB2 DAVIDSON
Da DASHER MUCK 9 9 DhB3 DAVIDSON
Da 002 DASHER MUCK, PONDED 9 9 DhC DEWEY
Da 003 DASHER MUCK, PONDED 9 9 DhC 119 DILLARD
Da 015 DOTHAN LOAMY SAND 2 2 DhC 139 DILLARD
Da 025 DOTHAN LOAMY SAND 2 2 DhC2 DAVIDSON Da 034 DASHER MUCK, PONDED 9 9 DhC3 DAVIDSON
Da 060 DAVIDSON CLAY LOAM, ERODEDUNDULATING PHASE
4 6 DhD DEWEY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 134/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
134
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Da 089 DOTHAN LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 2 DhD2 DAVIDSON
Da 091 DOTHAN LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 2 2 DhD2 011 DAVIDSON
DaA DOTHAN 2 2 DhD3 DAVIDSON
DaB DOTHAN LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 2 2 DhD4 DAVIDSON
DaB 010 DOTHAN LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 4 2 2 DhE2 DAVIDSON
DaB 023 DECATUR SILT LOAM, 2 TO 6 5 4 DhE3 029 DAVIDSON
DaB 055 DILLARD FINE SANDY LOAM, 2
TO 6
3 3 DhE3 085 DAVIDSON
DaB 086 DOTHAN LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 4 2 2 DhE3 108 DAVIDSON
DaB 103 DOTHAN LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 2 2 DhE3 114 DAVIDSON
DaB 138 DOTHAN LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 2 2 DhE3 145 DAVIDSON
DaB 144 DILLARD FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
3 3 Dib DUNBAR
DaB 153 DOTHAN LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 2 2 DiB 033 DURHAM
DaB2 DOTHAN 2 2 DiB 067 DURHAM
DaC DOTHAN LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 3 2 Dic DUNBAR
DaC 023 DECATUR SILT LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 4 DjA DURHAM
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 135/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
DaC2 DOTHAN 3 2 DjB DURHAM
Db DAVIDSON 5 6 DmA DUNBAR
Dc DAVIDSON 8 6 DmA 082 DUNBAR
DcB DECATUR 5 4 DmB DUNBAR
DcC DECATUR 5 4 DnD2 DAVIDSON
DcC2 DECATUR 7 4 DnE DAVIDSON
DcD2 DECATUR 8 4 DnF DAVIDSON
DdB2 DEWEY 4 5 Do DOWELLTON
DdC2 DEWEY 5 5 DoA DOTHAN
DeB DEWEY 4 5 DoA 073 DURHAM
DeC DEWEY 5 5 DoB DOTHAN
DeC3 DEWEY 6 8 Dob DUNBAR
DeD2 DECATUR 8 8 DoB 073 DURHAM
DeD3 DEWEY 8 8 DoB 092 DOTHAN
DeE2 DECATUR 8 8 DoC DOTHAN
DeE3 DEWEY 8 8 DpA DUPLIN
DgA DOGUE SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 1 3 DpB3 DAVIDSON
DgA 106 DOGUE LOAM, 1 TO 2 1 3 DpC3 DAVIDSON DgA 121 DOGUE FINE SANDY LOAM, 0
TO 31 3 DpD3 DAVIDSON
DgB DAVIDSON 2 2 DqB2 DAVIDSON
DgB2 DAVIDSON 2 2 DqC2 DAVIDSON
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 136/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
136
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
DgC DAVIDSON 4 2 DqE2 DAVIDSON
DgC2 DAVIDSON 4 2 DrB2 DAVIDSON
DrC2 DAVIDSON 5 3 EnB 009 ESTO
DrD2 DAVIDSON 6 3 EnB 077 ESTO
DsB3 DAVIDSON 5 3 EnB 101 ESTO
DsC3 DAVIDSON 6 7 EnB 109 ENON
DsD3 DAVIDSON 8 7 EnB2 ESTO
Dsl DUNE LAND 9 8 EnC 004 ESTO
DtC2 DOTHAN 4 2 EnC 101 ESTO
DtD DEKALB 8 7 EnC 109 ENON
DuA DUPLIN 2 5 ENC2 ESTO
DuB DOTHAN URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 2 TO 5
2 2 EnC2 ESTO
DuB 121 DOTHAN URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 0 TO 5
2 2 EnD ENON
DuE DEKALB 9 8 EnD2 ESTO DuF DEKALB 9 8 EnE ESTO
DvB DUNBAR 3 8 Ens ENNIS
DvD DUNBAR 8 3 EoA EULONIA
DwB DUPLIN 3 5 EoB ESTO
DwC DUPLIN 7 3 EoC ESTO
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 137/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Dx DUNBAR 3 6 EOD ESTO
DyC DAVIDSON 4 2 EoD ESTO
DyC 119 DYKE LOAM, 2 TO 10 1 7 EoD 002 ESTO
DyC 139 DYKE LOAM, 2 TO 10 1 7 EoD 003 ESTO
DyE DYKE LOAM, 10 TO 25 4 7 EoD 034 ESTO
Ea ECHAW 5 5 EoD 159 ESTO
EaB2 EDGEMONT 8 8 EpA EULONIA EaC EDGEMONT 8 8 EpB EULONIA
EaD2 EDGEMONT 8 8 EPD EDNEYVILLE
EaE EDGEMONT 8 8 EPE EDNEYVILLE
EaE2 EDGEMONT 8 8 EPE 106 ESTO
EaF EDGEMONT 9 8 EPF EDNEYVILLE
EC ECHAW 5 5 EPF 119 EDNEYVILLE
EdA ETOWAH 3 1 EPF 139 EDNEYVILLE
EdB ETOWAH 4 1 EPG EDNEYVILLE EdC ETOWAH 4 3 EqB EUSTIS
EdE EDNEYVILLE 8 7 EqC EUSTIS
Ee ELLABELLE 8 8 ErB EUSTIS
EfC ESTO 7 3 ErC EUSTIS
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 138/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
138
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
EgE ESTO 9 6 ErD EUSTIS
EjB2 ENON 4 6 ErD 002 ESTO
EjC2 ENON 5 6 ErD 003 ESTO
El ELLABELLE 8 8 ErD 034 ESTO
Em EMORY 2 1 Es ENNIS
Em 012 ELLABELLE LOAMY SAND 8 8 EsB ESTO
Em 054 ELLABELLE LOAMY SAND 8 8 EsB 143 EUSTIS
Em 132 ELLABELLE LOAMY SAND 8 8 EsC ESTO
EmB ESTO 7 3 EsC 143 EUSTIS
EmC ESTO 7 3 EsD ESTO
EmD ESTO 8 3 EsD 019 ESTO
En ENNIS 5 1 EsD 049 ESTO
ENB ESTO 7 3 EtA 026 EUNOLA
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 139/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
EnB 004 ESTO NORFOLK COMPLEX, 2TO 5
7 3 EtA 027 ETOWAH
EtA 057 ETOWAH LOAM, 0 TO 2 3 1 FaB 150 FACEVILLE
EtA 096 EUNOLA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 3,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
4 3 FaB 154 FANNIN
EtA 106 EUNOLA SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 3 3 3 FaB 158 FACEVILLE
EtA 115 ETOWAH LOAM, 0 TO 2 3 1 FaC FANNIN
EtA 151 EULONIA LOAMY FINE SAND, 0TO 2
3 5 FaC 119 FANNIN
EtB ETOWAH LOAM, 2 TO 6 4 1 FaC 139 FANNIN
EtB 151 EULONIA LOAMY FINE SAND, 2TO 5
4 5 FaC2 FACEVILLE
EtC ETOWAH 4 3 FaD FACEVILLE
Eu EULONIA 3 5 FaE FANNIN
EuA EUSTIS LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 6 7 FbB FACEVILLE
EuA 106 EUNOLA URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 0 TO 3
3 3 FbC2 FANNIN
EuB ESTO SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 7 3 FbE2 FANNIN
EuB 046 EUSTIS LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 6 7 FcC2 FACEVILLE
EuB 062 EUSTIS SAND, 0 TO 5 6 7 FcD2 FACEVILLE EuB 081 EUSTIS SAND, 0 TO 5 6 7 FcF FANNIN
EuB 094 EUSTIS LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 6 7 FdA FACEVILLE
EuB 100 ESTO LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 7 3 FdB FACEVILLE
EuB 125 ESTO LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 7 3 FdB 011 FACEVILLE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 140/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
140
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
EuB 150 EUSTIS LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 6 6 7 FdC FACEVILLE
EuB 158 EUSTIS LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 6 6 7 FdC2 FACEVILLE
EuB2 ESTO 6 4 FdD FRIPP
EuC ESTO SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8 7 3 FeA FACEVILLE
EuC 027 ETOWAH URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 2 TO 10
4 3 FeB FACEVILLE
EuC 057 ETOWAH URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 2 TO 10
4 3 FeB 023 FULLERTON
EuC 062 EUSTIS SAND, 5 TO 8 6 7 FeB2 FACEVILLE
EuC 081 EUSTIS SAND, 5 TO 8 6 7 FeC 023 FULLERTON
EuC 115 ETOWAH URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 2 TO 10 4 3 FeC 121 FACEVILLE
EuC2 ESTO 7 4 FeC2 FACEVILLE
EuD EUSTIS LOAMY SAND, 6 TO 12 8 7 FeD FULLERTON
EuD 014 ESTO SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 12 8 3 FeD 019 FACEVILLE
EuD 040 ESTO SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12 8 3 FeD 049 FACEVILLE
EuD 136 ESTO SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 12 8 3 FeD2 FACEVILLE
EuD 142 ESTO SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12 8 3 FeE FULLERTON
EuE ESTO 8 3 FfB2 FARRAGUT EuE2 ESTO 8 4 FgB3 FARRAGUT
Eus EUSTIS 6 5 FgC3 FARRAGUT
EvB EUHARLEE 5 4 FgD3 FARRAGUT
EvC EUHARLEE 5 4 FhA FUQUAY
EvC2 ESTO 8 3 FhB FUQUAY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 141/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
EvE ESTO 8 3 FmA FACEVILLE
EVF EVARD 9 8 FmB FULLERTON
EwD ENON 5 6 FmC FULLERTON
EwE ENON 8 7 FmC 036 FLOMATON
FaA FACEVILLE 2 3 FmC 097 FLOMATON
FaB FACEVILLE SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 2 3 FmC 149 FLOMATON
FaB 014 FACEVILLE LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 2 3 FmD FULLERTON
FaB 017 FACEVILLE LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 2 3 FmE FULLERTON
FaB 042 FANNIN FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
5 6 FmF FULLERTON
FaB 093 FANNIN FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
5 6 FnC3 FULLERTON
FaB 136 FACEVILLE LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 2 3 FnD3 FULLERTON
FnE3 FULLERTON 9 7 FuA FACEVILLE
Fo FOXWORTH 7 7 FuB FUQUAY
FoA FACEVILLE 2 3 FuB 027 FULLERTON
FoB FACEVILLE 2 3 FuB 057 FULLERTON
FoB2 FACEVILLE 4 3 FuB 062 FUQUAY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 142/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
142
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
FoC2 FACEVILLE 4 3 FuB 081 FUQUAY
FoD FACEVILLE 5 3 FuB 115 FULLERTON
Fp FLUVAQUENTS 9 9 FuB2 FACEVILLE
FpB FAIRHOPE 4 5 FuC FUQUAY
FqB FUQUAY 4 6 FuC 023 FULLERTON
FqC FUQUAY 4 6 FuC 027 FULLERTON
Fr FRENCH 2 3 FuC 057 FULLERTON
FrA FLINT 3 5 FuC 115 FULLERTON
FrB FREEMANVILLE SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 4 4 FuC 121 FUQUAY
FrB 047 FLINT FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 5
4 5 FuC2 FACEVILLE
FrD FRIPP 9 8 FuD FULLERTON
FrE2 FULLERTON 6 7 FuE FULLERTON
Fs FUQUAY 4 6 FuF FULLERTON
FsA FUQUAY 4 6 FvE2 FULLERTON
FsB FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 5 4 6 Fws FRESH WATER
FsB 002 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 Ga 058 GULLIED LAND FsB 003 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 Ga 060 GROVER
FsB 009 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 4 6 GAB GILEAD
FsB 010 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 4 4 6 GAB2 GILEAD
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 143/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
FsB 011 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 GAC GILEAD
FsB 014 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 GAC2 GILEAD
FsB 016 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 4 6 GaD GRADY
FsB 017 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 GAD2 GILEAD
FsB 021 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 Gb 058 GULLIED LAND
FsB 034 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 Gb 060 GROVER
FsB 035 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 4 4 6 GBB GILEAD
FsB 037 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 4 4 6 GBC GILEAD
FsB 054 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 Gc GULLIED LAND
FsB 077 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 4 6 GCB GILEAD FsB 082 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 4 6 GcB GEORGEVILLE
FsB 086 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 4 4 6 GCB2 GILEAD
FsB 088 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 GCC GILEAD
FsB 103 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 GCC2 GILEAD
FsB 121 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 GCD GILEAD
FsB 132 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 GCD2 GILEAD
FsB 135 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 GCE2 GILEAD
FsB 136 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 GCF2 GILEAD
FsB 138 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 Gcl GRADY
FsB 153 FUQUAY LOAMY SAND, 1 TO 5 4 6 GdB2 GWINNETT
FsC FUQUAY 5 6 GdC2 GEORGEVILLE FsC2 FACEVILLE 5 3 GdD3 GWINNETT
FsD2 FACEVILLE 8 3 GdE2 GEORGEVILLE
FtB3 FACEVILLE 4 3 GdE3 GWINNETT
FtC3 FACEVILLE 5 3 GDF GILPIN
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 144/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
144
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
FtD3 FACEVILLE 8 3 GeB GWINNETT
GeB 036 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 4 4 GiF GROVER
GeB 052 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 4 4 GlB2 GROVER
GeB 059 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 4 4 GlC2 GROVER
GeB 095 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 4 4 GlD GROVER
GeB 097 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 4 4 GmA GOLDSBORO
GeB 109 GEORGEVILLE VERY FINE SANDYLOAM, 2 TO 6
4 3 GmA 121 GOLDSBORO
GeB 149 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 4 4 GnA GOLDSBORO
GeB2 GWINNETT 5 3 GnA 151 GOLDSBORO
GeB3 GWINNETT 5 3 GnB GOLDSBORO
GeC GWINNETT SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 3 GoA GOLDSBORO
GeC 036 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 4 GoA 047 GREENVILLE
GeC 052 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 4 GoA 123 GREENVILLE
GeC 059 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 4 GoA 129 GREENVILLE
GeC 095 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 4 GoA 143 GREENVILLE
GeC 097 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 4 GoB GREENVILLE
GeC 149 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 5 4 GoB2 GREENVILLE
GeC2
0
WINNETT 6 7 GoC2 GREENVILLE
GeC3 GWINNETT 5 7 GoC2 109 GEORGEVILLE
GeD GWINNETT SANDY LOAM, 10 TO15
7 3 GoD2 GREENVILLE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 145/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
GeD 036 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 10 TO15
5 4 GoE GOLDSTON
GeD 097 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 10 TO15
5 4 GpB3 GREENVILLE
GeD 149 GROVER SANDY LOAM, 10 TO15
5 4 GpC3 GREENVILLE
GeD3 GWINNETT 7 7 GpD3 GREENVILLE
GeE GWINNETT SANDY LOAM, 15 TO25
8 6 GpE3 GREENVILLE
GeE 044 GWINNETT SANDY LOAM, 15 TO30
8 6 GpF3 GREENVILLE
GeE2 GWINNETT 8 8 GqA GREENVILLE GeE20
WINNETT 8 8 GqB3 GREENVILLE
GfB2 GWINNETT 4 3 GqC3 GREENVILLE
GfD2 GWINNETT 7 3 GqD3 GREENVILLE
GfF GWINNETT 9 6 GR GRADY
GgB GWINNETT SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 4 3 Gr GRADY
GgB 027 GROVER GRAVELLY FINESANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6
4 4 Gr 004 GRADY
GgB 057 GROVER GRAVELLY FINE
SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6
4 4 GR 017 GRADY
GgB 115 GROVER GRAVELLY FINESANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6
4 4 Gr 019 GRADY
GgB 121 GEORGEVILLE LOAM, 2 TO 6 4 3 Gr 049 GRADY
GgB2 GWINNETT 5 3 Gr 083 GRADY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 146/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
146
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
GgC GROVER GRAVELLY FINESANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10
5 4 Gr 087 GRADY
GgC 121 GEORGEVILLE LOAM, 6 TO 10 4 3 Gr 088 GRADY
GgC2 GWINNETT 6 7 Gr 101 GRADY
GgD2 GWINNETT 8 7 Gr 121 GRADY
GgE GROVER 8 6 Gr 135 GRADY
GgE2 GWINNETT 8 8 Gr 150 GRADY
GgF2 GWINNETT 9 8 Gr 158 GRADY
GhB2 GROVER 5 8 GrA GREENVILLE
GhC GEORGEVILLE 4 3 Gra GRADY
GhC2 GROVER 6 8 GrA 016 GRADY
GiB GROVER 4 4 GrA 098 GALESTOWN GiC2 GROVER 6 8 GrB GREENVILLE
GiD GROVER 5 4 GrD GRADY
GiD2 GROVER 5 4 Grd GRADY
GsA GREENVILLE SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 3 3 HaB 057 HARTSELLS
GsA 076 GREENVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 0TO 2
3 3 HaB 115 HARTSELLS
GsA 111 GREENVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 0TO 2
3 3 HAB2 HABERSHAM
GsB GREENVILLE SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 4 3 HaB2 HABERSHAM
GsB 076 GREENVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 5
4 3 HAC HABERSHAM
GsB 111 GREENVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 5
4 3 HaC HAYESVILLE
GsB 150 GREENVILLE SANDY LOAM, 1 TO 5 4 3 HaC 027 HARTSELLS
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 147/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
GsB 158 GREENVILLE SANDY LOAM, 1 TO 5 4 3 HaC 057 HARTSELLS
GsB2 GREENVILLE 4 3 HaC 115 HARTSELLS
GsC GREENVILLE SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8 4 3 HaC 119 HAYESVILLE
GsC 083 GREENVILLE SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 10 4 3 HaC 139 HAYESVILLE
GsC 087 GREENVILLE SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 10 4 3 HAC2 HABERSHAM
GsC2 GREENVILLE SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 10,ERODED
4 3 HaD HARTSELLS
GsC2 076 GREENVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 5TO 8, ERODED 4 3 HaD 058 HABERSHAM
GsC2 111 GREENVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 5TO 8, ERODED
4 3 HAD2 HABERSHAM
GsD GREENVILLE 7 3 HaD3 HABERSHAM
GsD2 GREENVILLE 7 3 HaE HAYESVILLE
Gt GOLDSBORO 1 1 HaE 027 HARTSELLS
GtA GREENVILLE 3 5 HaE 057 HARTSELLS
GtC2 GREENVILLE 6 5 HaE 058 HABERSHAM
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 148/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
148
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
GtD2 GREENVILLE SANDY CLAY LOAM, 8TO 12, ERODED
8 5 HaE 115 HARTSELLS
GtD2 088 GREENVILLE SANDY CLAY LOAM, 5TO 12, ERODED
(FACEVILLE)
8 3 HaE3 HABERSHAM
GtD2 109 GEORGEVILLE SILTY CLAY LOAM, 10TO 25, ERODED
9 8 HaF HAYESVILLE
GtD2 135 GREENVILLE SANDY CLAY LOAM, 5TO 12, ERODED
(FACEVILLE)
8 3 Hb HIWASSEE
GU GUTHRIE 7 7 HbC2 HIWASSEE
Gul GULLIED LAND 9 9 Hc HIWASSEE Gut GUTHRIE 7 7 HCC3 HABERSHAM
GvB GROVER 4 4 HcD2 HIWASSEE
GvC GROVER 5 4 Hd HIWASSEE
GvC2 GREENVILLE 6 5 HDB HABERSHAM
GvD2 GREENVILLE 8 5 HdB2 HENDERSON
GwB2 GWINNETT 5 3 HDC HABERSHAM
GwC2 GWINNETT SANDY CLAY LOAM, 6TO 10, ERODED
6 7 HdC HENDERSON
GwC2 007 GWINNETT CLAY LOAM, 6 TO 10,ERODED
6 7 HdC2 HENDERSON
GwC2 044 GWINNETT SANDY CLAY LOAM, 2TO 10, ERODED
5 3 HDD HABERSHAM
GwC2 069 GWINNETT CLAY LOAM, 6 TO 10,ERODED
6 7 HdD2 HENDERSON
GwC2 078 GWINNETT CLAY LOAM, 6 TO 10,ERODED
6 7 HdE HENDERSON
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 149/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
GwC3 GWINNETT 5 7 He 040 HEROD
GwD2 GWINNETT 7 7 He 046 HEROD
GwE2 GWINNETT SANDY CLAY LOAM,15 TO 25, ERODED
8 8 He 094 HEROD
GwE2 007 GWINNETT CLAY LOAM, 10 TO 25,ERODED
8 8 He 142 HEROD
GwE2 031 GWINNETT SANDY CLAY LOAM,10 TO 25, ERODED
8 8 He 159 HEROD
GwE2 056 GWINNETT SANDY CLAY LOAM,10 TO 25, ERODED
8 8 HeB HIWASSEE
GwE2 069 GWINNETT CLAY LOAM, 10 TO 25,
ERODED
8 8 HeB 036 HELENA
GwE2 075 GWINNETT SANDY CLAY LOAM,10 TO 25, ERODED
8 8 HeB 097 HELENA
GwE2 078 GWINNETT CLAY LOAM, 10 TO 25,ERODED
8 8 HeB 109 HIWASSEE
GwE3 GWINNETT 8 8 HeB 149 HELENA
Ha HELENA 5 3 HEB2 HALEWOOD
HaB HELENA SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 5 3 HEC HALEWOOD
HaB 027 HARTSELLS FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
4 6 HeC HIWASSEE
HeC 036 HELENA LOAMY COARSESAND, 6 TO 10
5 3 HoC HOLSTON
HeC 097 HELENA LOAMY COARSESAND, 6 TO 10
5 3 HOC2 HELENA
HeC 109 HIWASSEE LOAM, 6 TO 10 4 2 HoD HOLSTON
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 150/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
150
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
HeC 149 HELENA LOAMY COARSESAND, 6 TO 10
5 3 HQB2 HIWASSEE
HEC2 HALEWOOD 5 3 HQC2 HIWASSEE
HED HALEWOOD 6 3 HQD2 HIWASSEE
HeD HECTOR 8 7 HrA HORNSVILLE
HEE HALEWOOD 8 6 HRC3 HIWASSEE
HEF HALEWOOD 9 8 HRD3 HIWASSEE
HeF HECTOR 9 8 HSB HIWASSEE
HfF2 HOFFMAN 8 7 HsB HIWASSEE
HGB HARTSELLS 4 6 HsB 044 HIWASSEE
HGC HARTSELLS 5 6 HSC HIWASSEE
HgD3 HULETT 8 8 HsC HIWASSEE HhB HULETT 5 4 HSC 042 HIWASSEE
HhB2 HULETT 5 4 HsC 044 HIWASSEE
HhC2 HULETT 5 4 HSC 093 HIWASSEE
HhD2 HULETT 6 4 HSC 154 HIWASSEE
Hi HAZLEHURST 4 3 HSC2 HIWASSEE
HJC3 HAYESVILLE SANDY CLAY LOAM, 6TO 10, SEVERELY
ERODED
5 5 HSD HIWASSEE
HJC3 028 HAYESVILLE SANDY CLAY LOAM, 2TO 10, SEVERELY
ERODED
5 5 HsD HIWASSEE
HJC3 061 HAYESVILLE SANDY CLAY LOAM, 2TO 10, SEVERELY
ERODED
5 5 HSF HIWASSEE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 151/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
HJC3 112 HAYESVILLE SANDY CLAY LOAM, 2TO 10, SEVERELY
ERODED
5 5 HTB2 HIWASSEE
HJE3 HAYESVILLE 9 7 HTC2 HIWASSEE
HKC3 HAYESVILLE 3 3 HtC2 HIWASSEE
HlB HAYESVILLE SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 3 3 HtC2 044 HIWASSEE
HlB 028 HAYESVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
3 3 HTD2 HIWASSEE
HlB 061 HAYESVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 2
TO 6
3 3 HTD3 HIWASSEE
HlB 112 HAYESVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
3 3 HTE2 HIWASSEE
HLC HAYESVILLE 4 3 HU HUMAQUEPTS
HlC HAYESVILLE SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 4 3 HvA HORNSVILLE
HlC 028 HAYESVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 10
4 3 HVB HELENA
HlC 061 HAYESVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 10
4 3 HVD HOLSTON
HlC 112 HAYESVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 10
4 3 HwB2 HIWASSEE
HLD HAYESVILLE 5 3 HwC2 HIWASSEE
HlE HAYESVILLE SANDY LOAM, 10 TO25
8 6 HwC2 109 HIWASSEE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 152/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
152
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
HlE 028 HAYESVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 25
8 6 HwD2 HIWASSEE
HlE 061 HAYESVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 25
8 6 HXA HUNINGTON
HlE 112 HAYESVILLE FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 25
8 6 Hy HYDRAQUENTS
HLF HAYESVILLE 9 8 HYB HOLSTON
Hm HEROD 8 8 HyB HELENA
HM 017 HEROD MUCKALEE LOAMS 8 8 HYB 067 HELENA
HM 019 HEROD MUCKALEE ASSOC 8 8 HYB2 HELENA
HM 049 HEROD MUCKALEE ASSOC 8 8 HYC HELENA
HM 062 HEROD MUCKALEE LOAMS,FREQ FLOODED 8 8 HyC HELENA
HM 081 HEROD MUCKALEE LOAMS,FREQ FLOODED
8 8 HYC2 HELENA
HM 083 HEROD MUCKALEE SANDYLOAMS, FREQ
FLOODED
8 8 HYC3 HELENA
HM 087 HEROD MUCKALEE SANDYLOAMS, FREQ
FLOODED
8 8 Hz HYDRAQUENTS
HO HYDRAQUENTS 9 9 HZ 011 HYDRAQUENTS
HoB HOLSTON 4 4 HZ 121 HYDRAQUENTS HZB3 HELENA 5 3 KeC 089 KERSHAW
HZC3 HELENA 5 3 KeC 091 KERSHAW
IA IREDELL 8 7 KeC 101 KERSHAW
IaB2 IREDELL 6 8 KeC 132 KERSHAW
IbB IREDELL 6 8 KfA KLEJ
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 153/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
IbB2 IREDELL 6 8 KgA KLEJ
IcB IREDELL 6 8 KhA KLEJ
Ig IRVINGTON 4 1 KiA KLEJ
IgA IRVINGTON LOAMY SAND, 0 TO2 4 1 Kib KINSTON
IgA 047 IRVINGTON SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 1 1 Kic KERSHAW
IhA IRVINGTON 4 1 KJ KINSTON
IhB IRVINGTON 4 1 KjD KLINESVILLE
Ij IRVINGTON 1 1 KjE KLINESVILLE
IjA IRVINGTON LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 3 1 1 KjF KLINESVILLE
IjA 016 IRVINGTON LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 1 1 Kk KINGSLAND
IjA 113 IRVINGTON LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 4 1 KkB KERSHAW IrB IREDELL 6 8 KkC KERSHAW
IrC IREDELL SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 6 8 Ko KINSTON
IrC 044 IREDELL FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 10
6 8 KO 040 KINSTON
Ist ISTOKPOGA 9 9 KO 137 KINSTON
Iu IUKA 3 2 KO 142 KINSTON
Iza 047 IZAGORA DUNBAR LOAMY FINESANDS
3 3 KoA KOLOMOKI
Iza 143 IZAGORA SANDY LOAM 3 3 KuB KUREB
Izg IZAGORA 3 3 KuD KUREB Izs IZAGORA 4 3 La LLOYD
JaC JEFFERSON 4 4 LAA LAKELAND
JaD JEFFERSON 5 4 LAB LAKELAND
JaE JEFFERSON 8 7 LaB LAKELAND
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 154/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
154
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
JB JOHNSTON 9 8 LaB 017 LAKELAND
Jc JOHNS 2 2 LaB 046 LAKELAND
JcE JUNALUSKA 8 7 LaB 062 LAKELAND
JcF JUNALUSKA 9 8 LaB 081 LAKELAND
JcG JUNALUSKA 9 8 LaB 083 LAKELAND
Jd JOHNSTON 9 8 LaB 087 LAKELAND
Je JOHNSTON 9 8 LaB 094 LAKELAND
Jo JOHNSTON SOILS 9 8 LaB 150 LAKELAND
Jo 092 JOHNSTON LOAM 9 8 LaB 158 LAKELAND
Job JOHNSTON 9 8 LaB3 LLOYD
JtC JUNALUSKA 8 7 LaC 011 LAKELAND
JtE JUNALUSKA 8 7 LaC 026 LAKELAND JtF JUNALUSKA 9 8 LaC 092 LAKELAND
JtG JUNALUSKA 9 8 LaC 096 LAKELAND
Kb KINSTON 8 8 LaC 137 LAKELAND
KdB KERSHAW 9 8 LaC3 LLOYD
KdC KERSHAW 9 8 LaD LAKELAND
Ke KETONA 6 8 LaD 011 LAKELAND
KeC KERSHAW COARSE SAND, 2 TO 8 9 8 LaD 017 LAKELAND
KeC 004 KERSHAW SAND, 2 TO 12 9 8 LaD 026 LAKELAND
KeC 021 KERSHAW SAND, 2 TO 8 9 8 LaD 062 LAKELAND
KeC 054 KERSHAW SAND, 2 TO 8 9 8 LaD 081 LAKELAND
LaD 096 LAKELAND SAND, 12 TO 18 9 7 LDE 108 LOUISBURG
LaD 150 LAKELAND SAND, 8 TO 12 8 7 LDE 147 LOUISBURG
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 155/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
LaD 158 LAKELAND SAND, 8 TO 12 8 7 LdE2 LLOYD
LaD3 LLOYD 7 3 LdE3 LOUISA
LaE LEHEW RAMSEY GRAVELLYFINE SANDY LOAMS,
15 TO 25
8 4 LDF 033 LOUISBURG
LaE 026 LAKELAND SAND, 12 TO 25 9 7 LDF 067 LOUISBURG
LaE 062 LAKELAND SAND, 12 TO 30 9 7 LDF 147 LOUISBURG
LaE 081 LAKELAND SAND, 12 TO 30 9 7 Le LEEFIELD
LaE 096 LAKELAND SAND, 12 TO 25 9 7 Le 060 LLOYD
LaE 106 LAKELAND SAND, 10 TO 25 9 7 LeA LEEFIELD
LaE3 LLOYD 8 6 Lea LEAF
LaF LEHEW 9 7 LeB LYERLY
Lak LAKELAND 6 5 LeB3 LLOYD
Lb LLOYD 8 8 LEC LOUISA
LbB LEHEW DEKALB GRAVELLYFINE SANDY LOAMS, 2
TO 6
5 2 LeC LYERLY
LbB 058 LLOYD LOAM, VERY GENTLYSLOPING PHASE
2 2 LeC2 LOUISBURG
LbB2 LLOYD 2 2 LeC3 LLOYD
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 156/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
156
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
LBC LAKEWOOD 9 8 LeC4 LLOYD
LbC LEHEW 6 2 LeC4 048 LLOYD
LbC2 LLOYD 4 2 LED LOUISA
LbD LEHEW 7 2 Led LOCALALLUVIA
LbD2 LLOYD 4 2 LeD3 LLOYD
LbE LLOYD 8 6 LeD3 LLOYD
LbE2 LLOYD 8 6 LeD4 LLOYD
Lc LLOYD 9 8 LeD4 048 LLOYD
LCB LOUISBURG 5 3 LeD4 099 LLOYD
LcB LUCY 5 7 LEE LOUISA
LCC LOUISBURG 6 3 LeE LOUISBURG
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 157/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
LcC LUCY 5 7 LeE3 LLOYD
LcC2 LOUISA 7 6 LeE3 073 LLOYD
LCD LOUISBURG 5 2 LeE4 LLOYD
LcD LUCY 7 7 LeF LOUISBURG
LcD2 LOUISA 8 6 LeF3 LLOYD
LcE LOUISA 9 7 Lf 040 LEEFIELD
LCE2 LOUISBURG 8 8 Lf 060 LLOYD
LcF LOUISA 9 7 Lf 142 LEEFIELD
LcM LOCALALLUVIA
3 1 LfB2 LLOYD
Lcm LOCALALLUVIA
3 1 LFB3 LLOYD
Lcn LOCALALLUVIA
LAND, WET 5 7 LfC LLOYD
Ld LLOYD 8 6 LfC2 LLOYD
LdB2 LLOYD 2 2 LFC3 LLOYD LDC LOUISBURG 5 3 LfD2 LLOYD
LdC2 LLOYD 5 2 Lg LLOYD
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 158/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
158
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
LDD LOUISBURG STONY LOAMY SAND,6 TO 15
8 8 LGB2 LLOYD
LDD 099 LOUISBURG STONY LOAMYCOARSE SAND, 10 TO
15
5 3 LgE LLOYD
LdD2 LLOYD 7 2 Lh LLOYD
LDE 022 LOUISBURG STONY LOAMY SAND,15 TO 25
8 8 LHD LOUISBURG
LDE 029 LOUISBURG STONY LOAMY SAND,10 TO 25
8 8 LHD3 LOUISBURG
LDE 071 LOUISBURG STONY LOAMY SAND,
15 TO 25
8 8 LHE LOUISBURG
LDE 099 LOUISBURG STONY LOAMYCOARSE SAND, 15 TO
25
8 8 LhE LILY
LhE3 LEHEW 9 8 LMA LUCY
LHF LOUISBURG 8 8 LMB LUCY
LIA LANDISBURG 6 4 LmB LUCY
LiA LEEFIELD 4 6 LMB 047 LUCY
LIB LANDISBURG 6 4 LmB 062 LUCY
LIC 064 LANDISBURG CHERTY SILT LOAM, 6TO 10
7 4 LmB 081 LUCY
Lid LEAF 8 7 LmB 121 LUCY LJA LEADVALE 6 4 LMC LUCY
LJB LEADVALE 6 4 LmC LUCY
LjD 048 LOUISA FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 15
8 6 LMD LUCY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 159/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
LjD 073 LOUISA FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 15
8 6 LMD 015 LUCY
LjD2 LOUISA 8 6 LmD 017 LUCY
LjE LOUISA 9 7 LMD 025 LUCY
LjE2 LOUISA 9 7 LmD 062 LUCY
LjF 048 LOUISA FINE SANDY LOAM, 25TO 40
9 7 LmD 081 LUCY
LjF 068 LOUISA FINE SANDY LOAM, 25
TO 60
9 7 LmD 085 LOUISBURG
LjF 147 LOUISA FINE SANDY LOAM, 15TO 45
9 7 LmD 114 LOUISBURG
LjG LOUISA 9 8 LmD 121 LUCY
Lk LLOYD 6 5 LmD 145 LOUISBURG
LKB LOCUST 5 4 LmE LUCY
LkB LAKELAND 6 7 LmE 048 LOUISBURG
LkC LOUISA GRAVELLY FINESANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10
7 6 LmE 104 LOUISBURG
LkC 027 LINKER FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 10
5 7 Ln LOCKHART
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 160/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
160
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
LkC 057 LINKER FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 10
5 7 LnB LOUISBURG
LkC 115 LINKER FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 10
5 7 LnC 029 LOUISBURG
LkC 121 LAKELAND SAND, 5 TO 10 8 7 LnC 067 LOUISBURG
LkD 022 LOUISA GRAVELLY FINESANDY LOAM, 10 TO
15
8 6 LnC 108 LOUISBURG
LkD 067 LOUISA GRAVELLY SANDYLOAM, 6 TO 15
8 6 LnC 126 LOUISBURG
LkD 071 LOUISA GRAVELLY FINESANDY LOAM, 10 TO15
8 6 LnD LOUISBURG
LkD 121 LAKELAND SAND, 10 TO 17 9 7 LnD2 068 LOUISBURG
LkE 022 LOUISA GRAVELLY FINESANDY LOAM, 15 TO
40
9 7 LnD2 073 LOUISBURG
LkE 026 LAKELAND SAND, 18 TO 25 9 7 LnE LOUISBURG
LkE 027 LINKER FINE SANDY LOAM, 10
TO 25
8 8 LnE 033 LOUISBURG
LkE 033 LOUISA GRAVELLY SANDYLOAM, 10 TO 25
9 7 LnE 068 LOUISBURG
LkE 057 LINKER FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 25
8 8 LnE2 LOUISBURG
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 161/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
LkE 071 LOUISA GRAVELLY FINESANDY LOAM, 15 TO
40
9 7 LNF LOUISA
LkE 096 LAKELAND SAND, 18 TO 25 9 7 LnF LOUISBURG
LkE 115 LINKER FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 25
8 8 Lo LOCKHART
LkE3 LOUISA 9 7 LoB LAKELAND
LkF LOUISA 9 7 LoC LAKELAND
LL LEEFIELD 4 6 LoD LOUISA
LlB2 LOUISBURG 4 2 LOE LOUISA
LlC 104 LOUISBURG COMPLEX, 6 TO 10 7 5 LoE LOUISA
LlC2 048 LOUISBURG COMPLEX, 6 TO 10,ERODED 5 2 LoF LOUISA
LlC2 126 LOUISBURG SOILS, 6 TO 10,ERODED
5 2 Lp 015 LAKELAND
LlD LOUISBURG 8 5 Lp 025 LAKELAND
LlD2 048 LOUISBURG COMPLEX, 10 TO 15,ERODED
5 2 Lp 060 LOCKHART
LlD2 126 LOUISBURG SOILS, 10 TO 15,ERODED
8 7 LpA LAKELAND
LLD3 LEHEW 7 2 LpB LAKELAND
Lm LLOYD 8 6 LpC LAKELAND LpC 005 LAKELAND SAND, 2 TO 10 8 7 Lx LOUISA
LpC 084 LAKELAND SAND, 2 TO 10 8 7 Lxa LOUISA
LpC 117 LAKELAND SAND, 2 TO 10 8 7 Lxb LOUISA
LpC 123 LAKELAND SAND, 0 TO 8 6 7 LxC LAKEWOOD
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 162/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
162
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
LpC 129 LAKELAND SAND, 0 TO 8 6 7 Lxc LOUISA
LpD LAKELAND SAND, 8 TO 12 8 5 Ly LOUISBURG
LpD 005 LAKELAND SAND, 10 TO 15 9 7 LyA LYERLY
LpD 016 LAKELAND SAND, 5 TO 12 8 7 Lya LOUISBURG
LpD 084 LAKELAND SAND, 10 TO 15 9 7 LyB LYERLY
LpD 117 LAKELAND SAND, 10 TO 15 9 7 Lyb LOUISBURG
LpE LAKELAND 9 7 LyB2 LLOYD
LQ LYNN 7 8 LyC LYERLY
LqB LAKELAND 6 7 LyC2 LLOYD
LqD LAKELAND 8 7 LzA LYNCHBURG
Lr 015 LEON FINE SAND 7 8 LzB LYNCHBURG Lr 025 LEON FINE SAND 7 8 Ma MANDARIN
Lr 060 LOCKHART CECIL SANDY LOAMS,ERODED
UNDULATING PHASES
4 3 Ma 060 MADE
LrA LEON SAND 7 8 MaA MAXTON
LrA 098 LEON FINE SAND 7 7 MaA 019 MARLBORO
LrC LYERLY 7 8 MaA 049 MARLBORO
LRF LOUISBURG 8 8 MaA 106 MASADA
Ls LEEFIELD LOAMY SAND 4 6 MaB MADISON
Ls 060 LOCKHART CECIL SANDY LOAMS,ERODED ROLLING
PHASES
4 3 MaB 019 MARLBORO
LsA LEEFIELD LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 3 4 6 MaB 049 MARLBORO
LsA 016 LEEFIELD LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 4 6 MaB 064 MONONGAHELA
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 163/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Lt LOCKHART 5 3 MaB 083 MARLBORO
LtA LYNCHBURG 2 5 MaB 087 MARLBORO
LTC LAKELAND 6 7 MaB 150 MARLBORO
Lu LEEFIELD URBAN LANDCOMPLEX
4 6 MaB 158 MARLBORO
Lu 060 LOCKHART CECIL SANDY LOAMS,ERODED HILLY
PHASES
5 3 MaB3 MADISON
LuA LYNCHBURG 5 6 MaC MADISON
LuB LUCY 5 7 MaC 064 MONONGAHELA
LuC LUCY LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 5 7 MaC3 MADISON
LuC 023 LYERLY URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 2 TO 10
7 8 MaD MADISON
LuC 046 LUCY LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 12 7 7 MaD MADISON
LuC 094 LUCY LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 12 7 7 MaD3 MADISON
LuE LOUISBURG 9 7 MaE MADISON
Lum LUMBEE 8 4 Mae MADE
Lv LOCKHART 7 5 MaE3 MADISON
LvA LYNCHBURG 4 3 MAF MADISON
LvB LYNCHBURG 4 5 Mb MANDARIN
Lw LOCKHART 7 5 Mb 060 MADISON
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 164/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
164
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
LwB LAKELAND 9 8 Mba MEGGETT
LWC LUCY 5 7 MBA 098 MEGGETT
LwC 010 LAKELAND SAND, 2 TO 8 8 7 MBA 151 MEGGETT
LwC 086 LAKELAND SAND, 2 TO 8 8 7 MbB MONONGAHELA
LwC 092 LOWNDES LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 12 9 7 MbB2 MADISON
LwC 098 LAKELAND COARSE SAND, DEEP,5 TO 12
9 8 MbC2 MADISON
LwC 151 LAKELAND COARSE SAND, DEEP,5 TO 8
9 8 MbD2 MADISON
LwD LAKELAND 9 8 MbE MADISON
MbE2 MADISON 8 6 MDE2 MADISON
Mc MADISON 7 7 MdE2 MADISON McB MASADA 2 1 MDE3 MADISON
McC2 MASADA 3 1 Me MEGGETT
McC3 MONTEVALLO 9 7 Me 020 MEGGETT
MCD MUSELLA 8 7 Me 060 MADISON
McD MONTEVALLO 8 7 Me 062 MEGGETT
McD3 MONTEVALLO 8 7 Me 063 MEGGETT
MCE MUSELLA COBBLY LOAM, 6 TO25
9 7 Me 081 MEGGETT
McE MONTEVALLO 9 8 Me 089 MASCOTTE MCE 028 MUSELLA COBBLY LOAM, 10 TO
259 7 Me 091 MASCOTTE
MCE 061 MUSELLA COBBLY LOAM, 10 TO25
9 7 MeB 064 MUSE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 165/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
MCE 112 MUSELLA COBBLY LOAM, 10 TO25
9 7 MeB 109 MEKLENBURG
McE3 MONTEVALLO 9 8 MeB2 MUSE
MCF MUSELLA 9 7 MeC MECKLENBURG
McF MONTEVALLO 9 8 MeC2 MUSE
MCG MUSELLA 9 7 MeD MECKLENBURG
Md MANDARIN URBAN LANDCOMPLEX
8 8 MEF2 MUSELLA
Md 060 MADISON FINE SANDY LOAM,ERODED
UNDULATING PHASE
4 4 Mel MELVIN
MdB MADISON SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 4 4 Mf MEGGETT
MdB 038 MADISON GRAVELLY SANDYLOAM, 2 TO 6
4 4 Mf 060 MADISON
MdB 064 MONTEVALLO SHALY SILT LOAM, 2TO 6
9 7 MfC2 MADISON
MdB 074 MADISON GRAVELLY SANDYLOAM, 2 TO 6
4 4 MfC2 038 MADISON
MdB 141 MADISON GRAVELLY SANDY
LOAM, 2 TO 6
4 4 MfC2 044 MADISON
MDB2
MADISON 4 4 MfC2 074 MADISON
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 166/395
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 167/395
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 168/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
168
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
MdE 097 MADISON SANDY LOAM, 10 TO25
8 6 MgC2 115 MADISON
MdE 141 MADISON GRAVELLY SANDYLOAM, 15 TO 25
8 6 MgD MADISON
MdE 149 MADISON SANDY LOAM, 10 TO25
8 6 MgD2 MADISON
MgD2 027 MADISON GRAVELLY CLAYLOAM, 10 TO 15,
ERODED
7 7 MjE2 MADISON
MgD2 057 MADISON GRAVELLY CLAY
LOAM, 10 TO 15,ERODED
7 7 MJF MUSELLA
MgD2 115 MADISON GRAVELLY CLAYLOAM, 10 TO 15,
ERODED
7 7 MjF MADISON
MgE MADISON 8 6 MK MAXTON
MgE2 MADISON SANDY LOAM, 15 TO25, ERODED
8 6 Mk MADISON
MgE2 027 MADISON GRAVELLY CLAYLOAM, 15 TO 35,
ERODED
9 7 MkB 052 MECKLENBURG
MgE2 057 MADISON GRAVELLY CLAYLOAM, 15 TO 35,ERODED
9 7 MkB 059 MECKLENBURG
MgE2 115 MADISON GRAVELLY CLAYLOAM, 15 TO 35,
ERODED
9 7 MkB 095 MECKLENBURG
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 169/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
MGF MUSELLA 9 7 MkB 121 MECKLENBURG
Mh MADISON 5 4 MkB3 MADISON
MhB2 MADISON GRAVELLY FINESANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6,
ERODED
4 4 MkC3 MADISON
MhB2 067 MADISON GRAVELLY SANDYLOAM, 2 TO 6,
ERODED
4 4 MkC4 MADISON
MhC MADISON 5 4 MkD3 MADISON
MhC2 MADISON GRAVELLY FINESANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10,
ERODED
5 4 MkD4 MADISON
MhD MADISON 5 4 MkE3 MADISON
MhD2 MADISON GRAVELLY FINESANDY LOAM, 10 TO
15, ERODED
5 4 MkE4 MADISON
MhE MADISON 8 6 Ml MADISON
MhE2 MADISON 8 6 MlB3 MADISON
MHF MOUNTAINBURG
9 8 MlC2 MADISON
MiB2 MADISON 5 7 MlC3 MADISON
MIB3 MADISON 5 7 MlD2 MUSELLA
MiB3 MADISON SANDY CLAY LOAM, 2TO 6, SEVERELY
ERODED
4 4 MlD2 007 MADISON
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 170/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
170
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
MiB3 048 MADISON GRAVELLY SANDYCLAY LOAM, 2 TO 6,SEVERELY ERODED
4 4 MlD2 069 MADISON
MiC2 028 MADISON GRAVELLY SANDYCLAY LOAM, 2 TO 10,
ERODED
5 4 MlD2 078 MADISON
MiC2 061 MADISON GRAVELLY SANDYCLAY LOAM, 2 TO 10,
ERODED
5 4 MlD3 MADISON
MiC2 067 MADISON SANDY CLAY LOAM, 6TO 10, ERODED
6 7 MlE3 MADISON
MiC2 112 MADISON GRAVELLY SANDYCLAY LOAM, 2 TO 10,
ERODED
5 4 MlE3 033 MUSELLA
MIC3 MADISON 6 7 MM MEGGETT
MiC3 MADISON SANDY CLAY LOAM, 6TO 10, SEVERELY
ERODED
6 7 Mm MEGGETT
MiC3 048 MADISON GRAVELLY SANDYCLAY LOAM, 6 TO 10,
SEVERELY ERODED
5 4 Mm 060 MADISON
MIC4 MADISON 5 4 MmC2 MADISON MiC4 MADISON 5 4 MmD2 MADISON
MiD2 MADISON 7 7 MmE2 MADISON
MID3 MADISON 7 7 Mn MASCOTTE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 171/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
MiD3 MADISON SANDY CLAY LOAM, 6TO 15, SEVERELY
ERODED
7 7 Mn 060 MADISON
MiD3 048 MADISON GRAVELLY SANDYCLAY LOAM, 10 TO 15,
SEVERELY ERODED
5 4 MnA MASCOTTE
MID4 MADISON 5 4 MnC2 MECKLENBURG
MiD4 MADISON 5 4 MnD2 MECKLENBURG
MIE3 MADISON 9 7 MO MYATT
MiE3 MADISON SANDY CLAY LOAM,
10 TO 25, SEVERELYERODED
7 7 Mo MINE PITS
MiE3 048 MADISON GRAVELLY SANDYCLAY LOAM, 15 TO 25,
SEVERELY ERODE
8 6 Mo 060 MADISON
MiE4 MADISON 8 6 MoA MASADA
MiF2 MADISON 9 6 MoB MASADA
MjB MADISON 4 4 MoB2 MASADA
MjB2 MADISON 4 4 MoC MOLENA
MjC MADISON 5 4 MoC2 MASADA
MjC2 MADISON 5 4 MoC3 MASADA MjD MADISON 5 4 MoD2 MASADA
MjD2 MADISON 5 4 Mp MADISON
MjE MADISON 8 6 MpB MASADA
MpC MASADA 3 3 Mx MOLENA
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 172/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
172
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
MpC2 MASADA 5 3 MxA MAGNOLIA
Mpd MINE PITS DUMPS 9 9 MxB2 MAGNOLIA
MqC2 MECKLENBURG 5 5 MxC2 MAGNOLIA
Mr MADISON 8 6 My MOLENA
MrE MECKLENBURG 8 6 Mya MYATT
Ms 060 MECKLENBURG GRAVELLY CLAYLOAM, ERODED HILLY
PHASE
5 5 MyD2 MASADA
Ms 083 MASCOTTE SAND 7 7 Myt MEGGETT
Ms 087 MASCOTTE SAND 7 7 MzB MARLBORO
Ms 089 MASCOTTE URBAN LAND
COMPLEX
7 7 NaB NANKIN
Ms 091 MASCOTTE URBAN LANDCOMPLEX
7 7 NaC 023 NAUVOO
MsC MINVALE 6 4 NaC 026 NANKIN
MsD 023 MINVALE SHACK GRAVELLYSILT LOAMS, 10 TO 15
6 4 NaC 096 NANKIN
MsD 027 MONTEVALLO VERY SHALY SILTLOAM, 6 TO 15
8 7 NaD NAUVOO
MsD 057 MONTEVALLO VERY SHALY SILTLOAM, 6 TO 15
8 7 NaE NAUVOO
MsD 115 MONTEVALLO VERY SHALY SILTLOAM, 6 TO 15
8 7 NbB NOLICHUCKY
MsD3 MADISON 7 7 NbC NOLICHUCKY
MsE MINVALE 8 6 NbD2 NOLICHUCKY
MsE2 MADISON 8 6 NeB NANKIN
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 173/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
MsF MONTEVALLO 9 8 NeC2 NANKIN
Mt 060 MECKLENBURG GRAVELLY SANDYLOAM, ERODED
ROLLING PHASE
5 5 NeC2 046 NANKIN
Mt 089 MEGGETT FINE SANDY LOAM 5 8 NeC2 094 NANKIN
Mt 091 MEGGETT FINE SANDY LOAM 5 8 NeF NELLA
MtB MOLENA 6 7 NfA NORFOLK
MtC MOLENA LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 10 6 7 NfB NORFOLK
MtC 048 MOLENA LOAMY SAND, 6 TO 10 6 7 NfB 151 NORFOLK
Mu 017 MUCKALEE LOAM 8 8 NfC NORFOLK
Mu 060 MIXEDALLUVIU
WELL DRAINED 5 1 NgA NORFOLK
MuA MASADA 2 4 NgB NORFOLK
MuC MADISON 5 4 NgB2 NORFOLK
MuD MUSELLA 8 7 NgC2 NORFOLK
MuD2 MUSELLA 8 7 NhA NORFOLK
MuE MADISON 8 6 NhA 011 NORFOLK
MuE2 MUSELLA 9 7 NhB NORFOLK MuF MUSELLA 9 7 NhB 005 NORFOLK
Mv MIXEDALLUVIU
SOMEWHAT POORLYDRAINED
8 2 NhB 011 NORFOLK
MvC2 MUSELLA 6 4 NhB 036 NORFOLK
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 174/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
174
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
MvC3 MUSELLA 6 4 NhB 084 NORFOLK
MvD2 MUSELLA CLAY LOAM, 10 TO 15,ERODED
8 4 NhB 097 NORFOLK
MvD2 044 MUSELLA CLAY LOAM, 6 TO 15,ERODED
8 4 NhB 117 NORFOLK
MvD3 MUSELLA 8 4 NhB 149 NORFOLK
MvE2 MUSELLA 9 6 NhB 151 NORFOLK
Mw MIXEDALLUVIU
POORLY DRAINED 8 7 NhB2 NORFOLK
MwC2 MUSELLA 8 7 NhC NORFOLK
MwD MUSELLA 8 7 NhC2 NORFOLK
MwD2
MUSELLA 8 7 NiB2 NORFOLK
MwD3
MUSELLA 8 7 NiC2 NORFOLK
MwE MUSELLA 9 7 NiD2 NORFOLK
MwE2 MUSELLA 9 7 NkB NANKIN
MwF MUSELLA 9 7 NkB2 NANKIN
NkC 014 NANKIN SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8 6 4 Od 083 OCILLA
NkC 092 NANKIN SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 8 6 4 Od 087 OCILLA NkC 136 NANKIN SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8 6 4 OdB ORANGEBURG
NkC2 NANKIN 7 4 OdC ORANGEBURG
NkC3 NANKIN 8 4 Oe OLUSTEE
NkD3 NANKIN 8 7 OeA ORANGEBURG
NkE3 NANKIN 8 7 OeB ORANGEBURG
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 175/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
NnE3 NANKIN 8 7 OeB 005 ORANGEBURG
NnF3 NANKIN 9 7 OeB 035 ORANGEBURG
NoA NORFOLK 2 3 OeB 037 ORANGEBURG
NoB NORFOLK 3 3 OeB 084 ORANGEBURG
NoC NORFOLK 4 3 OeB 117 ORANGEBURG
NTF NELLA 9 7 OeB2 ORANGEBURG
Oa OLUSTEE 5 7 OeC ORANGEBURG
OB OSIER 8 8 OeC 005 ORANGEBURG
ObA ONA SAND 5 7 OeC 084 ORANGEBURG
ObA 098 ONA FINE SAND 5 7 OeC 117 ORANGEBURG
Obs OSIER BIBB COMPLEX 8 8 OeC2 ORANGEBURG
Obs 103 OSIER BIBB SOILS 8 8 OeC2 088 ORANGEBURG
Obs 138 OSIER BIBB SOILS 8 8 OeC2 135 ORANGEBURG
Obs 153 OSIER BIBB SOILS 8 8 OeD ORANGEBURG
Oc OCHLOCKONEE SANDY LOAM 3 1 OeD 121 ORANGEBURG
Oc 014 OCHLOCKONEE LOAMY SAND 2 1 OeD2 ORANGEBURG
Oc 019 OCILLA LOAMY SAND 5 6 OeE ORANGEBURG
Oc 026 OCHLOCKONEE SANDY LOAM,RARELY FLOODED
2 1 OeE2 ORANGEBURG
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 176/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
176
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Oc 040 OCILLA LOAMY SAND 5 6 Of OCILLA
Oc 049 OCILLA LOAMY SAND 5 6 OfB2 OKTIBBEHA
Oc 083 OCHLOCKONEE SANDY LOAM,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
3 1 OfD2 OKTIBBEHA
Oc 087 OCHLOCKONEE SANDY LOAM,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
3 1 OgA ORANGEBURG
Oc 088 OCILLA LOAMY SAND 5 6 OgB ORANGEBURG
Oc 089 OCILLA LOAMY FINE SAND 5 6 OgB2 ORANGEBURG
Oc 091 OCILLA LOAMY FINE SAND 5 6 OgC ORANGEBURG
Oc 096 OCHLOCKONEE SANDY LOAM,RARELY FLOODED 2 1 OgC2 017 ORANGEBURG
Oc 135 OCILLA LOAMY SAND 5 6 OgC2 076 ORANGEBURG
Oc 136 OCHLOCKONEE LOAMY SAND 2 1 OgC2 111 ORANGEBURG
Oc 137 OCILLA LOAMY SAND 5 6 OgD2 017 ORANGEBURG
Oc 142 OCILLA LOAMY SAND 5 6 OgD2 076 ORANGEBURG
OcA OCILLA LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 5 6 OgD2 111 ORANGEBURG
OcA 011 ORANGEBURG SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 2 4 Oh OCILLA
OcB ORANGEBURG 2 4 OhA OCILLA
OcB3 ORANGEBURG 2 4 OhA 009 OCILLA
OcC ORANGEBURG SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 4 4 OhA 077 OCILLA
OcC 011 ORANGEBURG SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8 4 4 Oi OCHLOCKONEE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 177/395
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 178/395
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 179/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
OsC2 ORANGEBURG SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8,ERODED
4 4 PeB PLUMMER
OsC2 062 ORANGEBURG SANDY CLAY LOAM, 5TO 8, ERODED
4 4 PfB2 PACOLET
OsC2 081 ORANGEBURG SANDY CLAY LOAM, 5TO 8, ERODED
4 4 PfC PACOLET
OsD2 ORANGEBURG SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12,ERODED
5 4 PfC2 067 PACOLET
OsD2 062 ORANGEBURG SANDY CLAY LOAM, 8TO 15, ERODED
5 4 PfC2 107 PACOLET
OsD2 081 ORANGEBURG SANDY CLAY LOAM, 8
TO 15, ERODED
5 4 PfC2 109 PACOLET
OTE ORANGEBURG 9 5 PfC2 122 PACOLET
Ou 002 OUSLEY LOAMY FINE SAND,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
7 7 PfD PACOLET
Ou 003 OUSLEY LOAMY FINE SAND,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
7 7 PfD2 PACOLET
Ou 014 OUSLEY FINE SAND 7 7 PfD2 029 PACOLET
Ou 034 OUSLEY LOAMY FINE SAND,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
7 7 PfD2 108 PACOLET
Ou 092 OUSLEY LOAMY FINE SAND 7 7 PfE PACOLET
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 180/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
180
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Ou 136 OUSLEY FINE SAND 7 7 PfE 005 PACOLET
OuB ORANGEBURG 2 4 PfE 044 PACOLET
OuC ORANGEBURG 4 4 PfE 084 PACOLET
Pa PITS QUARRIES 9 9 PfE 117 PACOLET
Pa 100 PELHAM SAND 8 8 PfE2 PACOLET
Pa 125 PELHAM SAND 8 8 Pg PITS
PaA PELHAM 8 8 PgB2 PACOLET
PgC2 PACOLET SANDY CLAY LOAM, 6TO 10, ERODED 7 8 Pop POPE
PgC2 044 PACOLET SANDY CLAY LOAM, 2TO 10, ERODED
5 5 Por PORTSMOUTH
PgC3 PACOLET 7 8 Pos POPE
PgD PACOLET URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 10 TO 25
8 6 Pr POOLER
PgD 109 PACOLET GULLIED LANDCOMPLEX, 10 TO 25
9 8 Ps 026 PSAMMENTS
PgD2 PACOLET SANDY CLAY LOAM,10 TO 15, ERODED
8 8 Ps 096 PSAMMENTS
PgD3 PACOLET 8 8 Ps 150 PERSANTI PgE2 PACOLET 9 8 Ps 158 PERSANTI
PgE3 PACOLET ORTHENTS COMPLEX,10 TO 25, SEVERELY
ERODED
9 8 PsF PORTERS
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 181/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
PgE3 006 PACOLET SANDY CLAY LOAM,15 TO 25, SEVERELY
ERODED
9 8 PsG PORTERS
PgE3 127 PACOLET SANDY CLAY LOAM,15 TO 25, SEVERELY
ERODED
9 8 Pt PITS
PhC 029 PACOLET GULLIED LANDCOMPLEX, 6 TO 10
7 8 Pt 011 PITS
PhC 052 PACOLET COMPLEX, 2 TO 10 5 5 PTF PACOLET
PhC 059 PACOLET COMPLEX, 2 TO 10 5 5 PuB PITS
PhC 095 PACOLET COMPLEX, 2 TO 10 5 5 PuD2 PACOLET
PhC 106 PACOLET URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 2 TO 10 5 5 PuE PACOLET
PhC 108 PACOLET GULLIED LANDCOMPLEX, 6 TO 10
7 8 PuF PACOLET
PhE PACOLET 9 8 Pur PURDY
PhE3 PACOLET 9 8 Pw PITS
PiD2 PACOLET 9 8 PxH PORTERS
PiE2 PACOLET 9 8 QU QUARRIES
PiF PACOLET 9 8 Qu 072 PITS
PjF PACOLET 9 6 Qu 109 QUARRIES
Pk PITS 9 9 Qu 130 PITS
Pk 036 PITS KAOLIN 9 9 Ra RAINS Pk 097 PITS KAOLIN 9 9 Ra 014 RAINS
Pk 149 PITS KAOLIN 9 9 Ra 019 RAINS
PkB PACOLET 5 5 Ra 020 RAINS
PkC PACOLET 5 5 Ra 040 RAINS
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 182/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
182
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Pl PELHAM 8 8 Ra 049 RAINS
PlA 016 PELHAM LOAMY SAND 8 8 Ra 060 RIVERWASH
PlA 047 PELHAM LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 2 8 8 Ra 062 RAINS
Pls PELHAM 8 8 Ra 063 RAINS
Pm 036 PITS QUARRIES 9 9 Ra 081 RAINS
Pm 097 PITS QUARRIES 9 9 Ra 121 RAINS
Pm 106 PELHAM LOAMY SAND 9 8 Ra 136 RAINS
Pm 121 PITS MINES 9 9 Ra 137 RAINS Pm 149 PITS QUARRIES 9 9 Ra 142 RAINS
PmB PACOLET 5 5 RaE RABUN
PmD PACOLET 6 5 RaE 119 RABUN
Pn 015 POOLER FINE SANDY LOAM 8 8 RaE 139 RABUN
Pn 025 POOLER FINE SANDY LOAM 8 8 Rb RICEBORO
Pn 089 PONZER MUCK 9 8 RbA RED BAY
Pn 091 PONZER MUCK 9 8 RbD3 RABUN
Po 020 POTTSBURG SAND 7 8 RbE3 RABUN
Po 063 POTTSBURG SAND 7 8 RbF RABUN
Po 089 POOLER FINE SANDY LOAM 8 8 ReA RED BAY
Po 091 POOLER FINE SANDY LOAM 8 8 ReA 004 RED BAY Po 159 PELHAM LOAMY SAND,
OCCASIONALLYFLOODED
8 8 ReA 101 RED BAY
PoD PAOLA 9 8 ReB RED BAY
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 183/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
ReB 140 RAINS SANDY LOAM, THICKSURFACE, 2 TO 5
8 8 RmC2 RARDEN
ReC RED BAY SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8 4 1 RmD2 RARDEN
ReC 026 RED BAY LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 4 1 Rn ROANOKE
ReC 096 RED BAY LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 4 1 RnC3 RARDEN
ReC2 RED BAY 4 1 RnD3 RARDEN
ReD 019 RED BAY SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12 6 1 RnE3 RARDEN
ReD 049 RED BAY SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12 6 1 Ro 010 RUTLEGE
ReD 107 RION SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 15 6 4 Ro 019 RIVERVIEW
ReD 122 RION SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 15 6 4 Ro 036 ROANOKE
ReE RION 9 6 Ro 038 ROANOKE
RfA 009 RAINS LOAMY FINE SAND 2 8 Ro 049 RIVERVIEW
RfA 077 RAINS LOAMY FINE SAND 2 8 Ro 055 ROCK
RfA 151 RAINS LOAMY SAND, THICKSURFACE (PELHAM)
8 8 Ro 074 ROANOKE
Rg RIGDON 4 5 Ro 086 RUTLEGE
RgA RED BAY 4 1 Ro 088 RIVERVIEW
RgB RED BAY LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 6 4 1 Ro 097 ROANOKE
RgB 143 RED BAY LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 4 1 Ro 121 RIVERVIEW
RgB2 RED BAY 4 1 Ro 135 RIVERVIEW
RgC2 RED BAY 6 1 Ro 141 ROANOKE
RgD2 RED BAY 8 1 Ro 144 ROCK
Rh RIVERVIEW LOAM 5 2 Ro 149 ROANOKE
Rh 121 RAINS URBAN LANDCOMPLEX
2 8 Roa ROANOKE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 184/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
184
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
RhA 076 RED BAY FINE SANDY LOAM, 0TO 2
4 1 RoA 023 ROME
RhA 111 RED BAY FINE SANDY LOAM, 0TO 2
4 1 RoA 027 ROME
RhA 123 RED BAY SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 4 1 RoA 057 ROME
RhA 129 RED BAY SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 2 4 1 RoA 115 ROME
RhB 067 RED BAY SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 4 1 Rob ROBERTSVILLE
RhB 076 RED BAY FINE SANDY LOAM, 2
TO 5
4 1 RoB 027 ROME
RhB 111 RED BAY FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 5
4 1 RoB 057 ROME
RhB 123 RED BAY SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 4 1 RoB 115 ROME
RhB 129 RED BAY SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 4 1 RoB 123 ROME
RhC2 RED BAY SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10,ERODED
8 1 Roc ROCK LAND
RhC2 123 RED BAY SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8,ERODED
6 1 Rok ROCK
RhC2 129 RED BAY SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8,
ERODED
6 1 Rol ROANOKE
RhD2 RED BAY 8 1 Ron ROANOKE
RiB RUSTON 2 4 Ros RAINS
RiB2 RUSTON 2 4 Ros 010 RAINS
RiC2 RUSTON 4 4 Ros 035 RAINS
Riv RIVERVIEW 5 2 Ros 037 RAINS
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 185/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
RjB RUSTON 5 7 Ros 086 RAINS
RjC RUSTON 5 7 Rp RIVERVIEW
RK RIVERVIEW 5 2 Rpa RUTLEGE
Rk ROANOKE 8 8 Rr ROCK
RkA RUTLEGE SAND 8 8 Rr 121 ROANOKE
RkA 098 RUTLEGE FINE SAND 8 8 Ru RUTLEGE
Rl ROBERTSDALE 5 5 Ru 021 RUTLEGE
RlA ROBERTSDALE 4 3 Ru 054 RUTLEGE
RLF RAMSEY 9 8 Ru 132 RUTLEGE
RmB RARDEN 6 7 Rv RIVERVIEW
RmB2 RARDEN 6 7 Rx ROCK
Sa SAPELO FINE SAND 7 7 SiD SUSQUEHANNA Sa 058 SENECA FINE SANDY LOAM 4 1 SiE2 SUSQUEHANNA
Sa 060 SENECA FINE SANDY LOAM,LEVEL PHASE
4 1 SjC3 SUSQUEHANNA
SaA SEQUATCHIE 4 2 SjD3 SUSQUEHANNA
SaB SEQUATCHIE 2 2 SkC2 SANDY/CLAYEY
SaB2 SEQUATCHIE 2 2 SkD2 SANDY/CLAYEY
SAE SALUDA 8 8 SkE SANDY/CLAYEY
SaE SAUNOOK 8 7 SkE3 SANDY/CLAYEY
SAF SALUDA 9 8 SlB SAWYER
Sb 020 SATILLA SILT LOAM 1 8 SlB2 SAWYER
Sb 058 SEV GULLIED LAND 9 9 SlC SAWYER Sb 060 SENECA FINE SANDY LOAM,
UNDULATING PHASE4 1 SlC2 SAWYER
Sb 063 SATILLA SILT LOAM 1 8 SmB SUMTER
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 186/395
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 187/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
SgF SWEETAPPLE 9 7 Sta 048 STATE
ShB SHACK 5 4 StD2 040 SUNSWEET
ShC SHACK 5 4 StD2 137 SUNSWEET
SHC2 SUMTER 7 8 StD2 142 SUNSWEET
ShC2 SUNSWEET 7 6 Stj 098 ST JOHNS
ShD SHACK 6 4 Stj 151 ST JOHNS
ShD2 SUNSWEET SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 12,ERODED 8 6 Stl STENDAL
ShD2 009 SUNSWEET SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12,ERODED
8 6 Sto STARR
ShD2 077 SUNSWEET SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 12,ERODED
8 6 Su 002 SURRENCY
ShE SHACK 8 6 Su 003 SURRENCY
SiB SUSQUEHANNA 7 6 Su 034 SURRENCY
SiB2 SUSQUEHANNA 7 6 Su 055 SUCHES
SiC SUSQUEHANNA 8 6 Su 144 SUCHES
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 188/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
188
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
SiC2 SUSQUEHANNA 8 6 SuA SUFFOLK
SuB SUSQUEHANNA SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 5 7 6 TfB TIFTON
SuB 027 SUBLIGNA GRAVELLY LOAM, 1TO 6
6 2 TfC TIFTON
SuB 057 SUBLIGNA GRAVELLY LOAM, 1TO 6
6 2 TfE TATE
SuB 115 SUBLIGNA GRAVELLY LOAM, 1TO 6
6 2 TgC2 TIFTON
SUB2 SAWYER 7 3 TgG TIDINGS
SuC SUSQUEHANNA SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 12 8 6 ThB THURMONT
Suc STILSON 5 2 ThC THURMONT
SuC 106 SUSQUEHANNA SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8 8 6 ThC2 TIFTON SuC2 088 SUNSWEET SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 8,
ERODED7 6 ThD TROUP
SuC2 092 SUNSWEET SANDY LOAM, 5 TO 8,ERODED
7 6 ThD3 TALLAPOOSA
SuC2 135 SUNSWEET SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 8,ERODED
7 6 ThE THURMONT
SuD SUSQUEHANNA 8 6 ThE2 TALLAPOOSA
SuD2 SUNSWEET 8 6 ThE3 TALLAPOOSA
Sv SURRENCY 8 8 TiC2 TALLAPOOSA
Swa SWAMP 8 9 TID TUSQUITEE
Swa 140 SWAMP (OSIER) 8 8 TID2 TUSQUITEE TA TAWCAW 8 6 TiD2 TALLAPOOSA
Ta TOCCOA 4 1 TiE2 TALLAPOOSA
TaB 023 TALBOTT SILT LOAM, 2 TO 6 6 4 TjF TALLAPOOSA
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 189/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
TaB 058 THURMONT BRADDOCK FINESANDY LOAMS, VERY
GENTLY SLOPING
2 3 Tk TOCCOA
TaB2 THURMONT 2 3 TkB THURMONT
TaC TALBOTT 7 4 TkC THURMONT
TaD3 THURMONT 4 3 TkD THURMONT
TaE2 TALLAPOOSA 9 7 TLB TROUP
TaF TALLAPOOSA 9 8 TlB TUSQUITEE
TbC2 TALBOTT 7 4 TLC TROUP
TbD2 TALBOTT 8 4 TlC TUSQUITEE
TbE 028 TALLAPOOSA COBBLY SANDY
LOAM, 10 TO 25
9 7 TlC2 TUSQUITEE
TbE 042 TALLAPOOSA COBBLY FINE SANDYLOAM, 6 TO 25
9 7 TlD TUSQUITEE
TbE 061 TALLAPOOSA COBBLY SANDYLOAM, 10 TO 25
9 7 TlE TUSQUITEE
TbE 093 TALLAPOOSA COBBLY FINE SANDYLOAM, 6 TO 25
9 7 TlF TUSQUITEE
TbE 112 TALLAPOOSA COBBLY SANDYLOAM, 10 TO 25
9 7 TmC TUSQUITEE
TbE 154 TALLAPOOSA COBBLY FINE SANDYLOAM, 6 TO 25
9 7 TmD 023 TIDINGS
TbF TALLAPOOSA 9 8 TmD 068 TUSQUITEE
TC TAWCAW CHASTAIN-CONGAREE ASSOC,
FREQ FLOODED
8 6 TmE 028 TUSQUITEE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 190/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
190
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
TC 089 TAWCAW CHASTAIN ASSOC 8 6 TmE 042 TUSQUITEE
TC 091 TAWCAW CHASTAIN ASSOC 8 6 TmE 061 TUSQUITEE
TCA TOCCOA 5 1 TmE 093 TUSQUITEE
TcD TALLAPOOSA 8 7 TmE 112 TUSQUITEE
TcE TALLAPOOSA FINE SANDY LOAM, 15TO 25
9 7 TmE 154 TUSQUITEE
TcE 042 TALLAPOOSA FINE SANDY LOAM, 10
TO 25
9 7 TmF TUSQUITEE
TcE 093 TALLAPOOSA FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 25
9 7 TmF 023 TIDINGS
TcE 154 TALLAPOOSA FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 25
9 7 Tmh 015 TIDAL MARSH
TdC TIDINGS 7 4 Tmh 025 TIDAL MARSH
TdD TIDINGS 8 4 Tmh 098 TIDAL MARSH
TdF TIDINGS 9 8 Tml 098 TIDAL MARSH
TdG TALLAPOOSA 9 7 TnC TOWNLEY
TeG TALLADEGA 9 8 TnC 035 TIFTON
Tf TOCCOA 5 1 TnC 037 TIFTON
TfA TIFTON 2 2 TnC2 TIFTON
TnE TOWNLEY 8 8 TrE TROUP
TnF TOWNLEY 9 8 TrE 062 TROUP
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 191/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
To TOCCOA FINE SANDY LOAM 4 1 TrE 081 TROUP
To 007 TOCCOA SOILS 4 1 TRF TALLADEGA
To 031 TOCCOA SANDY LOAM 4 1 TS TOCCOA
To 044 TOCCOA SANDY LOAM, HIGH 4 1 TsB2 088 TIFTON
To 056 TOCCOA SANDY LOAM 4 1 TsB2 135 TIFTON
To 069 TOCCOA SOILS 4 1 TsB2 140 TIFTON
To 075 TOCCOA SANDY LOAM 4 1 TsC TIFTON
To 078 TOCCOA SOILS 4 1 TsC2 TIFTON
To 106 TOCCOA SANDY LOAM 4 1 TsC2 140 TIFTON
To 109 TOCCOA FINE SANDY LOAM,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
4 1 TsD TROUP
Toc TOCCOA SOILS 4 1 Tt TRANSYLVANIA
ToC2 TOWNLEY 9 8 TtB TIFTON
Tod TOCCOA 1 1 TtB2 TIFTON
ToE TOWNLEY 9 8 TtC2 TIFTON Toe TOCCOA 5 1 Tu TUPELO
ToE2 TOWNLEY 8 8 TuA TIFTON
Tp TOXAWAY 3 8 TuA 023 TUPELO
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 192/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
192
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
TpA TUPELO 6 7 TuB TIFTON
TpB TROUP 6 5 TuB 002 TIFTON
TpC TROUP 6 5 TuB 003 TIFTON
TqA TIFTON 2 2 TuB 034 TIFTON
TqB TIFTON 2 2 TuB 040 TIFTON
TqB2 TIFTON 3 2 TuB 047 TIFTON
TqC TIFTON 4 2 TuB 100 TIFTON TqC2 TIFTON 5 2 TuB 125 TIFTON
Tr TRANSYLVANIA 2 3 TuB 142 TIFTON
TrA TIFTON 4 6 TuB2 TIFTON
TrB TIFTON LOAMY SAND, THICKSURFACE, 2 TO 5
4 6 TuC TUSQUITEE
TrB 017 TROUP FINE SAND, 1 TO 5 6 5 TuC 040 TIFTON
TrB 026 TROUP LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 6 7 TuC 142 TIFTON
TrB 062 TROUP FINE SAND, 1 T0 5 6 5 TuC2 TIFTON TrB 081 TROUP FINE SAND, 1 T0 5 6 5 TuE TUSQUITEE
TrB 083 TROUP SAND, 0 TO 6 6 5 TuE 026 TROUP
TrB 087 TROUP SAND, 0 TO 6 6 5 TuE 096 TROUP
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 193/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
TrB 096 TROUP LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 6 7 TUF TROUP
TrB 106 TROUP LOAMY FINE SAND, 2TO 5
6 5 Tv TUPELO
TrC TROUP FINE SAND, 5 TO 8 6 5 Tv 036 TOCCOA
TrC 026 TROUP LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 12 8 7 Tv 097 TOCCOA
TrC 046 TROUP LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 6 5 Tv 149 TOCCOA
TrC 094 TROUP LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 6 5 TvB TIFTON
TrC 096 TROUP LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 12 8 7 TvB2 TIFTON
TrC 106 TROUP LOAMY FINE SAND, 5TO 8
6 5 TvC TIFTON
TrD TROUP LOAMY SAND, 12 TO
18
9 7 TvC2 TIFTON
TrD 017 TROUP FINE SAND, 8 TO 17 8 5 TVD TROUP
TrD 062 TROUP FINE SAND, 8 TO 12 8 5 TVF TUSQUITEE
TrD 081 TROUP FINE SAND, 8 TO 12 8 5 TwA TAFT
TrD 106 TROUP LOAMY FINE SAND, 8TO 12
8 5 TwB TROUP
TRE TALLADEGA 9 8 TwB 121 TROUP
TwC 004 TROUP SAND, 5 TO 8 6 5 UoC URBAN LAND
TwC 036 TROUP SAND, 2 TO 10 6 5 Up UDORTHENTS
TwC 088 TROUP SOILS, 0 TO 8 6 5 UpF UDORTHENTS
TwC 097 TROUP SAND, 2 TO 10 6 5 Ur URBAN LAND
TwC 101 TROUP SAND, 5 TO 8 6 5 UtC URBAN LAND TwC 121 TROUP FINE SAND, 5 TO 10 6 5 UtE URBAN LAND
TwC 135 TROUP SOILS, 0 TO 8 6 5 VaB VANCE
TwC 149 TROUP SAND, 2 TO 10 6 5 VaB 046 VAUCLUSE
TWD TROUP 8 5 VaB 092 VALDOSTA
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 194/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
194
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
TwD 088 TROUP SOILS, 8 TO 12 8 5 VaB 094 VAUCLUSE
TwD 121 TROUP FINE SAND, 10 TO 17 8 5 VaB2 VANCE
TwD 135 TROUP SOILS, 8 TO 12 8 5 VAC VAUCLUSE
TwE TROUP 9 7 VaC VANCE
TxA TUPELO 6 7 VaC 046 VAUCLUSE
TxB2 TUPELO 6 7 VaC 094 VAUCLUSE
TxC TROUP 6 5 VaC 121 VAUCLUSE
TyA TYLER 6 4 VaC 150 VAUCLUSE
TyB TYLER 6 4 VaC 158 VAUCLUSE
TyD TROUP 8 5 VaC2 VANCE
TzB TROUP 7 7 VaD 046 VAUCLUSE
TzC TROUP 6 5 VaD 094 VAUCLUSE
TzD TROUP 8 7 VaD 121 VAUCLUSE
Ua UDORTHENTS LOAMY 9 9 VaD 150 VAUCLUSE
Ua 060 UNCLASSIFIED CITY LAND 9 9 VaD 158 VAUCLUSE
UaA UDORTHENTS 9 9 VAE VAUCLUSE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 195/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Ub 026 UDORTHENTS URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 0 TO 10
9 9 VaE2 VANCE
Ub 044 UDORTHENTS 2 TO 10 9 9 VbC2 005 VANCE
Ub 096 UDORTHENTS URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 0 TO 10
9 9 VbC2 084 VANCE
Ub 106 UDORTHENTS CLAYEY 9 9 VbC2 106 VANCE
Ubp URBAN LAND BARROW PITS 9 9 VbC2 117 VANCE
Uc UDORTHENTS 9 9 VbC3 VANCE
UD URBAN LAND 9 9 VbD2 011 VANCE
Ud URBAN LAND 9 9 VbD2 106 VANCE
Ud 027 UDORTHENTS 9 9 VdB2 VANCE
Ud 057 UDORTHENTS 9 9 VdC2 VANCE
Ud 083 UDORTHENTS LOAMY 9 9 VdD2 VANCE
Ud 087 UDORTHENTS LOAMY 9 9 VeB VAUCLUSE
Ud 089 UDORTHENTS SANDY AND CLAYEY 9 9 VeB2 VAUCLUSE
Ud 091 UDORTHENTS SANDY AND CLAYEY 9 9 VeC 005 VAUCLUSE
Ud 115 UDORTHENTS 9 9 VeC 011 VAUCLUSE UdC URBAN LAND 9 9 VeC 084 VAUCLUSE
UdD UDORTHENTS 9 9 VeC 106 VAUCLUSE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 196/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
196
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
UeC URBAN LAND 6 9 VeC 117 VAUCLUSE
UeE URBAN LAND 8 9 VeC2 VAUCLUSE
UfC URBAN LAND 6 9 VeD 011 VAUCLUSE
UgC URBAN LAND 6 9 VeD 036 VAUCLUSE
UhC URBAN LAND 6 9 VeD 097 VAUCLUSE
UiE URBAN LAND 9 9 VeD 106 VAUCLUSE
UkB URBAN LAND 2 9 VeD 149 VAUCLUSE
Uo UDORTHENTS 9 9 VeE2 VAUCLUSE
VOC2 VAUCLUSE 6 6 WbB2 064 WAYNESBORO
VOD2 VAUCLUSE 6 6 WbC2 WAYNESBORO
VuC 011 VAUCLUSE URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 2 TO 8
6 6 WbD2 058 WICKHAM
VuC 121 VAUCLUSE URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 5 TO 8
6 5 WbD2 064 WAYNESBORO
VuD 011 VAUCLUSE URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 8 TO 15
6 6 WbE2 WAYNESBORO
VuD 121 VAUCLUSE URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 8 TO 17
6 5 Wc WICKHAM
W WATER 9 9 WcA WORSHAM
WA WAHEE SOILS 3 6 WcB 002 WICKSBURG
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 197/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Wa WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM,FREQ FLOODED
3 6 WcB 003 WICKSBURG
WA 021 WAHEE ASSOC 7 6 WcB 034 WICKSBURG
Wa 040 WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM 3 6 WcB 058 WORSHAM
Wa 046 WAHEE LOAM 3 6 WcB2 WORSHAM
WA 054 WAHEE ASSOC 7 6 WcC WICKSBURG
Wa 058 WEHADKEE SILT LOAM 8 7 WcC3 WAYNESBORO
Wa 060 WEHADKEE FINE SANDY LOAM 8 7 WcD3 058 WORSHAM
Wa 089 WAHEE SANDY LOAM 7 6 WcD3 064 WAYNESBORO
Wa 091 WAHEE SANDY LOAM 7 6 WcE3 WAYNESBORO
Wa 094 WAHEE LOAM 3 6 Wd WICKHAM
WA 132 WAHEE ASSOC 7 6 WdA WHITWELL
Wa 142 WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM 3 6 WdB WHITWELL
WaA WAX LOAM, 0 TO 2 6 4 We WORSHAM
WaA 023 WAX LOAM, 0 TO 2,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
6 4 Wea WEHADKEE
WaB WAGRAM LOAMY SAND, 0 TO 5 5 7 WeA 004 WAHEE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 198/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
198
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
WaB 023 WAX LOAM, 2 TO 6, RARELYFLOODED
6 4 WeA 047 WAGRAM
WaB 027 WAX LOAM, 2 TO 6 6 4 WeA 101 WAHEE
WaB 036 WAGRAM LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 6 5 7 WeA 159 WAHEE
WaB 057 WAX LOAM, 2 TO 6 6 4 WeB WEDOWEE
WaB 097 WAGRAM LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 6 5 7 WeB 036 WEDOWEE
WaB 106 WAGRAM LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 5 5 7 WeB 047 WAGRAM
WaB 115 WAX LOAM, 2 TO 6 6 4 WeB 097 WEDOWEE
WaB 149 WAGRAM LOAMY SAND, 2 TO 6 5 7 WeB 100 WAGRAM WaC WAGRAM LOAMY SAND, 5 TO 8 5 7 WeB 125 WAGRAM
Wac WAHEE 2 6 WeB 149 WEDOWEE
WaC 036 WAGRAM LOAMY SAND, 6 TO 10 5 7 WEC WILKES
WaC 097 WAGRAM LOAMY SAND, 6 TO 10 5 7 WeC WEDOWEE
WaC 149 WAGRAM LOAMY SAND, 6 TO 10 5 7 WeC 036 WEDOWEE
WaD WAGRAM 6 7 WeC 097 WEDOWEE
WaE WATAUGA LOAM, 15 TO 25 8 7 WeC 121 WEDOWEE
WaF WATAUGA 9 7 WeC 149 WEDOWEE
Waf WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM 3 6 WeD WEDOWEE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 199/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Waf 015 WAHEE SANDY LOAM 2 6 Wed WEHADKEE
Waf 025 WAHEE SANDY LOAM 2 6 WeD WEDOWEE
Wah WAHEE 3 6 WeD 036 WEDOWEE
Wat WAHEE 3 6 Wed 042 WEHADKEE
Wb WEHADKEE 8 7 Wed 073 WEHADKEE
WbA 027 WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM, 0TO 2, RARELY
FLOODED
2 6 Wed 093 WEHADKEE
WbA 096 WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM, 0TO 2, RARELYFLOODED
2 6 WeD 097 WEDOWEE
WbA 106 WAHEE FINE SANDY LOAM, 0TO 2
3 6 WeD 121 WEDOWEE
WbB WICKHAM 2 1 WeD 149 WEDOWEE
WbB2 058 WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM,ERODED, VERY
GENTLY SLOPINGPHASE
2 1 Wed 154 WEHADKEE
WEE WILKES ENON SOILS, 10 TO 25 9 7 WhB 052 WICKHAM WeE WEDOWEE SANDY LOAM 8 6 WhB 059 WICKHAM
WeE 036 WEDOWEE LOAMY SAND, 15 TO25
8 6 WhB 069 WICKHAM
WEE 038 WEDOWEE SOILS, 10 TO 25 8 6 WhB 078 WICKHAM
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 200/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
200
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
WeE 044 WEDOWEE SANDY LOAM, 15 TO25
8 6 WhB 095 WICKHAM
WEE 074 WEDOWEE SOILS, 10 TO 25 8 6 WhB3 WICKHAM
WeE 097 WEDOWEE LOAMY SAND, 15 TO25
8 6 WhC WICKHAM
WeE 106 WEDOWEE SANDY LOAM, 10 TO35
8 6 WhC3 WICKHAM
WEE 141 WEDOWEE SOILS, 10 TO 25 8 6 WHD WILKES
WeE 149 WEDOWEE LOAMY SAND, 15 TO25
8 6 Whs WEHADKEE
Weh WEHADKEE SILTY CLAY LOAM 8 7 Wht WEHADKEE
Weh 085 WEHADKEE SILTY CLAY LOAM,FREQ FLOODED 8 7 WiB2 WILKES
Weh 114 WEHADKEE SILTY CLAY LOAM,FREQ FLOODED
8 7 WiC2 005 WILKES
Weh 145 WEHADKEE SILTY CLAY LOAM,FREQ FLOODED
8 7 WiC2 048 WILKES
Wer WEHADKEE 8 7 WiC2 084 WILKES
Wes WESTON 2 8 WiC2 117 WILKES
Wet WESTON 7 7 WiD2 WILKES
Wf 036 WEHADKEE SILT LOAM 8 7 WiE WILKES Wf 044 WEHADKEE SILT LOAM, FREQ
FLOODED8 7 WjD WILKES
Wf 060 WORSHAM SANDY LOAM,ERODED
UNDULATING PHASE
5 8 WjD2 WILKES
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 201/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
Wf 097 WEHADKEE SILT LOAM 8 7 WjE WILKES
Wf 149 WEHADKEE SILT LOAM 8 7 WjF 006 WILKES
WfA WOLFTEVER 5 5 WjF 033 WILKES
WfB WOLFTEVER 6 5 WjF 127 WILKES
Wg WORSHAM 5 8 WkA WORSHAM
WgB 006 WICKHAM SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 2 1 WkB WORSHAM
WgB 028 WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
2 1 WkB 109 WICKHAM
WgB 061 WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6 2 1 WkC WILKES
WgB 112 WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
2 1 WkE WILKES
WgB 127 WICKHAM SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 2 1 Wks WORSHAM
WgB2 WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6, ERODED
2 1 WlA WESTON
WgB2 067 WICKHAM SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6,ERODED
2 1 WmB WORSHAM
WgC WICKHAM SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10 3 1 WmD WILKES
WgC 042 WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 6
TO 10
3 1 WmF WILKES
WgC 093 WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 10
3 1 WnC3 028 WICKHAM
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 202/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
202
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
WgC 154 WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 10
3 1 WnC3 061 WICKHAM
WgC2 WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 6TO 10, ERODED
3 1 WnC3 099 WICKHAM
WgC2 067 WICKHAM SANDY LOAM, 6 TO 10,ERODED
3 1 WnC3 112 WICKHAM
WgD WICKHAM SANDY LOAM, 10 TO15
4 1 WnD3 WICKHAM
WgD 042 WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 25 8 5 WnE3 WICKHAM
WgD 093 WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 25
8 5 Wo WORSHAM
WgD 154 WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 10TO 25
8 5 WoA WOLFTEVER
WgE2 WICKHAM 4 7 WoB 027 WOLFTEVER
WgF WICKHAM 9 5 WoB 044 WORSHAM
WH WEHADKEE 8 7 WoB 057 WOLFTEVER
Wh WHITWELL 4 2 WoB 099 WORSHAM
WhA 023 WHITWELL LOAM, 1 TO 3,OCCASIONALLY
FLOODED
4 2 WoB 115 WOLFTEVER
WhA 106 WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 0TO 2
1 1 Wos WEHADKEE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 203/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
WhB WICKHAM FINE SANDY LOAM, 2TO 6
2 1 WpB2 WILKES
WhB 007 WICKHAM SANDY LOAM, 2 TO 6 2 1 WpC2 WILKES
WpD WILKES 8 5 WvC 074 WILKES
WpD2 WILKES 8 5 WvC 080 WICKSBURG
WpE 006 WILKES COMPLEX, 10 TO 25 9 7 WvC 141 WILKES
WpE 104 WILKES COMPLEX, 15 TO 25 9 7 WvD 011 WILKES
WpE 127 WILKES COMPLEX, 10 TO 25 9 7 WvD 033 WILKES
WqA WHITWELL 4 2 WvF WILKES
WqB WHITWELL 4 2 WW WAHEE
WrE2 WEDOWEE 8 6 WwB WICKHAM
WsB WICKHAM 2 1 WwC WICKHAM
WsC WICKHAM 3 1 WwE WAGRAM
Wsl WORSHAM 8 8 WxC WAGRAM
Wst WESTON 8 8 Wy WAHEE
WtE2 WEDOWEE 8 6 ZnC ZION
WtF WEDOWEE 9 8 ZnD ZION Wtl WET ALLUVIAL 8 8 ZnE ZION
WuC 107 WEDOWEE URBAN LAND-ASHLAR COMPLEX, 6
TO 15
6 4 Cls 1 Class 1
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 204/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
204
Soil Cnty Soil Soil Agric Wood Soil Cnty Soil
Type No Composition Description Prod Prod Type No Composition
WuC 121 WEDOWEE URBAN LANDCOMPLEX, 6 TO 10
5 4 Cls 2 Class 2
WuC 122 WEDOWEE URBAN LAND-ASHLAR COMPLEX, 6
TO 15
6 4 Cls 3 Class 3
WuD WEDOWEE 6 4 Cls 4 Class 4
WuE3 WEDOWEE 9 8 Cls 5 Class 5
WvB WICKHAM 2 1 Cls 6 Class 6
WvC 001 WICKSBURG GRAVELLY COARSESAND, 2 TO 8
6 7 Cls 7 Class 7
WvC 011 WILKES GRAVELLY SANDY
LOAM, 5 TO 10
6 5 Cls 8 Class 8
WvC 038 WILKES GRAVELLY SANDYLOAM, 4 TO 10
6 5 Cls 9 Class 9
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 205/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
205
Soil Ratings for Conservation Use
The following pages contain procedures, data and productivity tables that where used in therating of soils for conservation use. Many of the ideas used in the soil ratings were a result of discussions and work with Soil Conservation Service (SCS) personnel. Steve Lawrence,assistant state soil scientist, provided many hours of work and numerous suggestions for theestablishment of the soil productivity ratings. The SCS was most generous with their time andcomputer facilities to produce many soil listings from which data was obtained.
It is also acknowledged that Dennis Martin, Georgia Forestry Commission, brought forth ideasused in establishing the site index ranges for woodland. His suggestions were directlyincorporated into the rating procedures for woodland.
The various modifiers used throughout the rating process were results of discussions withindividuals knowledgeable in their respective fields or based upon information derived from ahistory of sales study.
Cultivated Land
A corn yield or a projected corn yield was used to rate soils for cultivated land. A projected cornyield was used in the absence of a corn yield. Factoring the soil’s soybean yield by 2.6 arrived atthe projected corn yield. If no soybean yield was available, 1.94 to give a projected corn yieldfactored the soil’s wheat yield.
The multiplier of 2.6 was derived from the relationship of corn yield to soybean yield in the 1562occurrences where it could be established. The multiplier of 1.94 for wheat yield wasestablished based upon 535-corn yield to wheat yield relationships.
Three criteria were used to set up the Productivity Ratings for cultivated land, corn yield orprojected corn yield, soil capability class, and flood rating. The table below lists the criteria andthe associated rating.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 206/395
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 207/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
207
Woodland
A loblolly pine site index or slash pine site index was used in the establishment of soil ratings forwoodland. The site index was adjusted for various factors, such as seedling mortality andequipment limitation. Below are the adjustments made for the listed criteria.
Seedling Mortality Equipment LimitationSlight (S) = 1.00 Slight (S) = 1.00
Moderate (M) = .95 Moderate (M) = .90
Severe (V) = .80 Severe (V) = .70
No adjustment was made for flooding. “Equipment Limitations” and “Seedling Mortality”factors accounted for flooding problems. The following table was used to rate soils for
woodland.
Adj Site Index (SI) Productivity Rating
90 < = SI < = 101 1
85 < = SI < = 89 2
81 < = SI < = 84 3
80 = = SI = = 80 4
75 < = SI < = 79 5
70 < = SI < = 74 6
60 < = SI < = 69 7
10 < = SI < = 59 80 < = SI < = 9 9
Digest Classification and Coding
In addition to regulations governing the issues discussed thus far, there are additional regulationsthat define the classification and coding of properties on the Property Tax Digest. Theclassification and coding system is applied to property as well as to the various exemptions that
maybe assigned to the parcel.
The table on the following page contains the State digest classification and stratification codesfor property and the standard State exemption codes for the various Current Use and Agcovenants.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 208/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
208
Real Property - Digest Classification & Stratification Codes
Code Description Code DescriptionR1 Residential Improvement V3 Conservation Use Lot
R3 Residential Lot V4 Conservation Use Small Tract
R4 Residential Small Parcel V5 Conservation Use Large Tract
R5 Residential Large Tract V6 Conservation Use Production/Stg/Aux
R6 Residential Production/Stg/Aux
R9 Residential Other T1 Residential Trans Improvement
T3 Residential Trans Lot
A1 Agricultural Improvement T4 Residential Trans Small Tract
A3 Agricultural Lot
A4 Agricultural Small Tract U1 Utility Improvement
A5 Agricultural Large Tract U2 Utility Operating
A6 Agricultural Production/Stg/Aux U3 Utility Lot
A9 Agricultural Other U4 Utility Small Tract
U5 Utility Large Tract
C1 Commercial Improvement U6 Utility Production/Stg/Aux
C3 Commercial Lot
C4 Commercial Small Tract W1 Environmentally Sensitive Imp
C5 Commercial Large Tract W3 Environmentally Sensitive Lot
C9 Commercial Other W4 Environmentally Sensitive Small TractW5 Environmentally Sensitive Large Tract
I1 Industrial Improvement W6 Environmentally Sensitive Prod/Stg/Aux
I3 Industrial Lot
I4 Industrial Small Tract SA Agricultural Exemption (Preferential)
I5 Industrial Large Tract SV Conservation Use Exemption
I6 Industrial Other SW Environmentally Sensitive Exemption
SH Historical Exemption
H1 Historical Improvement ST Residential Transitional Exemption
H3 Historical Lot
P3 Preferential Lot
P4 Preferential Small Tract
P5 Preferential Large Tract
P6 Preferential Production/Stg/Aux
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 209/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
209
Mapping and Aerial PhotographySources of Photography
1. U.S. Governmenta. ASCS Offices
Aerial Photography DivisionASCS – USDA2505 Perley’s WaySalt Lake City, Utah 84109
b. U.S. Forest ServiceChief, Forest ServiceU.S. Dept. Of Agriculture
Washington, D. C. 20250
c. Soil Conservation ServiceSoil Conservation ServiceCartographic DivisionU. S. Dept. of AgricultureHyattsville, Maryland 20251
The Necessity of New Photography
A. Do not use 3 to 5 year-old photography.
Technical Specification for Aerial Photography
Obtaining quality photography is a part of the appraisal program often overlooked, yet isextremely important in obtaining reliable rural forestland appraisals. While ground inspection isnecessary,
it can only be performed to a limited extent on each parcel. This places a great deal of responsibility on the ability of the photography to accurately render the variations in timber standconditions and specie composition necessary to allow reliable interpretation. Do not dependentirely upon government agencies or commercial firms to supply with quality photography.The assessor should be in a position to request certain basic standards of quality. Whencontracting with a commercial firm, specifications for the flight should take the form of a
contract. Items to be included may include the following.
1. Business Arrangements. These include such items as the cost of the aerial survey, re-flights, cancellation privileges, schedules for delivery and payments, and ownershipand storage of negatives.
2. Area to be photographed. Includes location, size and boundaries. These are ordinarilyindicated on flight maps supplied by purchaser.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 210/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
210
3. Type of photographic film. Panchromatic or infrared film depending upon the seasonof the year.
4. Negative scale. Maximum scale deviation normally allowed is
5. Position of flight line. Lines are to be parallel, oriented in correct compass direction,and within a stated distance from positions drawn on flight maps.
6. Overlap. Usually set at 55 to 65 percent (averaging 60%) along the line of flight and15 to 45 percent (averaging 30%) between adjacent lines. At the ends of each flightline, two photo centers should fall outside tract boundary line.
7. Print alignment. Crab or drift is not to affect more than 10% of the print width for anythree consecutive photographs.
8. Tilt. Should not exceed 2 or 3 degrees for a single exposure, not average more than 1degree for the entire project.
9. Time of photography. During the middle of the day when shadows will be lessprominent. Panchromatic film should be used in winter months when deciduous trees
are bare (Nov. 15 to March 15), depending upon leaf fall or leaf development in thespring. Infrared should be used in early spring after new leaves have formed butbefore they have fully developed – range from March 15 to May 30 depending uponlatitude within the state.
10. Film processing. Type of photographic paper, single weight, double weight, finish(glass or matte) and degree of contrast.
11. Quality of prints or negatives. Should be free of stains, scratches. Also no cloudcover, hot spots or sunspots.
12. Materials to be delivered. How many sets of prints, size of photos, and number of indexes.
13. Ownership of negatives. Commercial firms usually retain negatives unless otherwise
specified.14. Assessing print quality. Should usually be performed by the appraiser using the
photographs unless a staff member is sufficiently skilled in evaluating photo quality.
Mylars vs. Photo Prints.
1. Mylars: Advantages.a. Easily reproduced in office.b. More durable, therefore can be erased and updated more easily.c. Sale of blue-line prints is a source of income to the tax office.
2. Mylars: Disadvantages.
a. Poor Quality. Not usable for forestland appraisals.b. Physical features such as roads, etc. less apparent.c. Higher initial cost.
3. Photo Prints (Photographic prints from negatives): Advantages.a. Quality usually sufficient to allow reliable forestland appraisals.b. Physical features: Use lines such as hedgerows, fence lines are more readily
apparent.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 211/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
211
4. Photo Prints. Disadvantages.a. Less durable.b. Appraisers field notes often interfere with property line maintenance.
c. Maintenance of “splits”, etc. is more difficult.5. Cost: A range from $3,500 to $8,500 depending upon the size of the county and the
amount of low altitude photography required.6. Samples available for review.
Photo print produced from Mylar.
Land Identification
Maps as Assessment Tools.1. Need to discover real property.
2. Land often must be valued separately from improvements.3. Need for flexibility and versatility.4. Maintenance problems.
Legal Descriptions.1. Metes and Bounds.
a. Earliest form of land identification with physical landmarks as reference pointsand boundaries.
b. Later, incorporated with surveying.
2. Rectangular Survey.
a. Principal meridians and base lines established.b. Division into squares of equal areas called townships and further divided into
sections.c. Discrepancies put into western sections.
3. Lot and Block a. Subdivisions of metes and bounds.b. Numerical delineation in the sub-categories.
Parcel Identifiers.Reduces legal descriptions to numerical expressions.
1. Map – page identifiers.
2. Geocodes.a. Coordinate system with reference point.b. Easily maintained.
B. Other Methods of Description.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 212/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
212
C. Surveying Methods.1. Field surveys.2. Photo-assisted surveys (Photogrammetry).
Major Points of Land Identification
1. Assessment maps have a multiplicity of uses and users. They provide the assessor with thelocation and delineation of land and can also be legal descriptions.
2. The three generally used systems of land identification are: a. Metes and Bounds describes land based on semi-permanent physical features or
monuments.b. The rectangular survey system is based upon range or township divisions located with
respect to a point of origin through which principal meridians and base lines pass.1. A township or range is approximately six miles square and is further broken down
into sections one mile square.2. Discrepancies due to the curvature of the earth are put into the western and
northern sides of the township.c. The lot and block system references land units to an official map in the jurisdiction.
3. There are two basic survey methods:4. Geocode parcel identifiers are referenced by a grid system to a point on a coordinate plane.5. Maps and identification systems should be flexible in design.Important Terms
SiteLot and Block ParcelLongitudeMetes and BoundsLatitudeRectangular SurveyCoordinatesSectionGeocodesTownshipPhotogrammetryRange
Land Identification and Assessment Mapping
The assessor must deal with a wide variety of appraisal related data. It is therefore advantageousto utilize tools that provide methods for modern and efficient presentation of these data. Anassessment map is such a tool. It can be used to give tangible meaning in visual form to land-related data such as the location and limits of each individual appraisal unit. It may also be used
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 213/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
213
to depict land use, socioeconomic patterns, sales data, school districts, legal ownership, or anyother desired data conglomerations. These data are of primary importance to assessors for theyhave been given the responsibility of making equitable appraisals on all property within their
jurisdiction; however, without maps, they cannot be sure all property has been discovered andappraised. It is therefore necessary for the assessor to foster the development of assessmentmapping in order to fulfill this responsibility.
Legal Descriptions
Assessment maps provide the assessor the location and delineation of legal land descriptions forthe purpose of appraisal. All legal descriptions of land are based on surveys that may be purelyvisual or highly mathematical recitations of the limits of the land. Assessment maps aretherefore the net result of delineating the variety of methods used to describe the land. Thefollowing are land identification systems commonly in use.
Metes and Bounds.
The earliest form of land description was the “bounded” description. This type of descriptiontotally disregarded the regularity or permanence of the land unit. It was often thought sufficientif land was described by naming adjacent property owners and / or features of the terrain. Forexample, “bounded on the north by French Creek, bounded on the east by the land of Ezra Jones,bounded on the south by a wooden fence, and bounded on the west by a line of trees”. Littlethough was given to the fact that a wooden fence or a line of trees would someday cease to exist.
As the land became more valuable and disputes over unclear “bounds” became more numerous,
it was apparent that better methods were needed to describe the land. A general surveyingpractice began to evolve which took into consideration the compass direction and distances alongand between these bounds. Boundaries of property being described in this manner were said tobe described by “metes and bounds”. Metes meaning measurements and bounds meaningboundaries that included features of the terrain in conjunction with compass bearings anddistances. See Figure 5.1.
Rectangular Survey (Section, Township, and Range). The rectangular survey system is basedupon existing law and was devised with the object of marking upon the ground and fixing for alltime legal subdivisions for purposes of description and disposal of the public domain under thegeneral land laws of the United States.
An ordinance passed in May 1785 was the first of many to be passed by Congress that wouldregulate the surveying, marking, and disposing of public lands in the United States in accordancewith the rectangular survey system. The original ordinance called for the establishment of townships six miles square, each containing 36 sections, and each section being one mile square.The first divisions of land in accordance with the foregoing ordinance were those north of theOhio River.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 214/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
214
As shown in Figure 5.2, surveys of the rectangular system are located with respect to an initialpoint or origin (usually a prominent geographic feature) through which pass true meridians and
parallels of latitude respectively called principal meridians and baselines. The principal meridianis a true north-south line that passes through the geographic poles of the earth while the baselineis a line that runs east and west parallel to the equator.
Once a principal meridian and baseline have been established, additional divisions are created.This is accomplished by establishing townships that are approximately six miles square, asshown in figure 5.3. Each six-mile division, either north or south of the baseline, is called atownship north or a township south. Each six-mile division either east or west of the principalmeridian is called a range east or range west. Each township and range is further divided into 36sections each approximately one mile square. In the United States, the sections are numberedconsecutively, beginning with the section at the northeast corner of each township and
continuing west to the northwest corner. Then the sequence of numbers drops down one row andruns back east, and so on until the entire township is numbered, with Section 36 in the southeastcorner. In Canada, the numbering system begins at the southeast corner of the township andends at the northeast corner. The divisions of areas of the rectangular survey system areapproximate because of the convergence of meridians toward the poles. This often results inirregular sized townships and sections. This discrepancy, as well as others due to errors inmeasurement or alignment, is thrown into the most westerly half of the township. Shortages inacreage are thus found on the west and north sides of townships. They become evident infractional sections and in subdivisions of fractional sections. A full explanation of this mattermay be found in the “Manual of Instructions for the Survey of the Public Lands of the UnitedStates” issued by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C.
As can be seen in the following description, further divisions can be made by reference to thehalves and quarters of a section – “The NE¼ of the NE¼ of the NW½ of the NW¼ of Section14, Township 2, South, Range 3, West…” In analyzing this description, it is necessary to notethat the first ¼ section (the NE¼) mentioned is the property of primary interest and allsubsequent mention of ¼ sections relates only to the divisions necessary to locate the property.The key to the foregoing description is found in reading it backwards. By progressivelydelineating it in this manner, we have now solved the location of the descriptions within thegiven section.
RECTANGULAR SURVEY OF A SECTION OF LAND
160 Rods or 2640 Feet 80 Rods or 1320 Feet
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 215/395
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 216/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
216
Beginning at a point on the center line of Palomares Canyon Road, formerly Stony Brook Roador County Road No. 7784, 50 feet wide, distance thereon, northerly 427.10 feet from the
southern line of Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 1 East, monumented base and meridian,and running thence along said center line of Palomares Road, North 0º 53’45” East 199.88 feet;thence South 81º 26’ West 266.64 feet; thence South 5º 03’15” East 162.22 feet to a line drawnSouth 89º 39’45” West from the point of beginning; and thence North 89º 39’45” East 246.26feet to the point of beginning.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 217/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
217
NORTH
EASTWEST
5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5
SOUTH
3
2
1
1
2
3
P R I N C I P A L
M E R I D A N
BASE LINE
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 218/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
218
FIGURE 5.2 – Township Grid (Rectangular Survey System) Township 2 South, Range 3 West Section 14
Figure 5.3 Subdivision of a Township (Rectangular Survey System)
6 5 4 3 2 1
7 8 9 10 11 12
18 17 16 15Section
1413
19 20 21 22 23 24
30 29 28 27 26 25
31 32 33 34 35 36
NW ¼NW ¼
NE ¼NW ¼ Northeast
Quarter(NE 1/4)
SW ¼NW ¼
SE ¼NW ¼
N ½ SW ¼ WestHalf of South-
EastQuarter
E ½SE ¼
Lot 1Lot 2
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 219/395
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 220/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
220
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 221/395
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 222/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
222
Map Symbol & Improved
Soil Name Corn Soybeans Wheat Cotton Lint PeanutsBermuda
Grass
N I N I N I N I N I N I
BU BU BU BU BU BU Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs.AUM
*AUM
*
DoC Dothan 100 160 30 35 35 45 800 950 3,600 4,850 10.0 13.0
DuBDothan-UranLand - - - - - - - - - - - -
ENBEsto andNankin 60 60 30 35 30 35 500 2,600 1,900 2,550 7.0 9.0
ENC2Esto andNankin 40 40 20 25 20 25 400 500 1,500 2,000 6.0 7.5
FaA Faceville 115 115 45 50 40 50 875 1,050 4,000 4,750 10.0 13.0
FaB Faceville 115 115 45 50 40 50 875 1,050 4,000 4,750 10.0 13.0
FeC2 Faceville 85 135 25 40 40 40 550 950 2,800 3,800 8.5 11.0
FeD2 Faceville - - - - - - - - - - 6.0 8.0
FmA Faceville 115 185 45 50 50 50 875 1,050 4,000 5,860 10.0 13.0
FsB Fuquay 80 180 30 50 50 50 650 800 2,900 4,350 7.5 10.0
FsC Fuquay 75 170 25 45 45 45 600 750 2,600 3,500 7.0 9.5
GR Grady-Rembert - - - - - - - - - - - -
HMHerod &Muckalee - - - - - - - - - - - -
KuB Kureb - - - - - - - - - - - -
LaB Lakeland 55 160 20 40 40 40 450 550 2,000 3,500 7.0 9.5
LaD Lakeland - - - - - (35) - - - - 6.0 -
LmB Lucy 80 180 35 50 50 30 650 800 3,000 4,500 8.0 10.5
LmC Lucy 70 160 25 45 45 - 600 750 2,500 3,750 7.5 10.0
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 223/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
223
Map Symbol & Improved
Soil Name Corn Soybeans Wheat Cotton Lint PeanutsBermuda
Grass
N I N I N I N I N I N I
BU BU BU BU BU BU Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. Lbs.AUM
*AUM
*
LmD Lucy - - - - - - - - - - 7.0 -
Me Meggett - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mu Muckalee - - - - - 40 - - - - - -
OcA Ocilla 75 120 3 40 40 5 - - - - 8.5 10.5
OeA Orangeburg 120 190 45 5 5 55 900 1,100 4,000 5,400 10.5 14.0
OeB Orangeburg 120 190 45 55 55 45 900 1,100 4,000 5,400 10.5 14.0
OgC2 Orangeburg 85 135 35 40 40 - 700 850 2,800 3,800 10.0 12.5
OgD2 Orangeburg - - - - - - - - - - 8.0 -
OI Osier & Bibb - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ra Rains - - - - - - - - - - - -
TA Tawcaw - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shellbluff 120 190 40 45 45 55 900 1,000 4,000 5,400 10.5 14.0
TfA Tifton 115 185 45 55 45 50 950 1,150 3,800 5,100 10.5 14.0
TfB Tifton 115 185 45 55 45 50 950 1,150 3,800 5,100 10.5 14.0
ThC2 Tifton 80 130 35 40 35 45 650 800 3,000 4,050 9.0 11.5
TrB Troup 60 160 25 45 25 45 500 600 2,200 3,850 7.5 10.0
TrC Troup 55 130 20 35 20 35 450 550 1,800 3,000 7.5 10.0
TrD Troup - - - - - - - - - - 6.0 -
TUF Troup & Lucy - - - - - - - - - - - -
* Animal-Unit-Month: The amount of forage or feed required to feed one animal unit (one cow,
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 224/395
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 225/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
225
TABLE 8: WOODLAND MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTIVITY Burke County Soil Survey
Only the soils suitable for production of commercial timber are listed.
The absence of an entry indicates that information was not available.* See description of the map unit for composition and behavior characteristics of the map unit.
MapSymbol
Soil Name OrdinationSymbol
ErosionHazard
EquipmentLimitation
SeedlingMortality
CommonTrees
SiteIndex
Trees toPlant
BoA,BoC,BoD
Bonifay 3a Slight Moderate Moderate Slash Pine 80 Slash Pine
Longleaf Pine
65
Loblolly
Pine
80
CaB2,CaC2
Carnegie 20 Slight Slight Slight LoblollyPine
86 Loblolly PiSlash Pine
Slash Pine 86Longleaf Pine
72
CC* Chastain 2W Slight Slight Slight Sweet Gum 94 Loblolly PiAmerican
Water Oak 89 Sycamore,
Sweet GumEasternCottonwood
90 CherrybarkOak
Green Ash 88LoblollyPine
90
WaterTupelo
-
White Oak -SouthernRed Oak
-
BaldCypress
-
Tawcaw 1w Slight Moderate Moderate LoblollyPine
100 Loblolly PiEastern
Sweet Gum 100 CottonwoodAmerican
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 226/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
226
MapSymbol
Soil Name OrdinationSymbol
ErosionHazard
EquipmentLimitation
SeedlingMortality
CommonTrees
SiteIndex
Trees toPlant
Water Oak 90 Sycamore,
Sweet GumWaterTupelo
- Water Oak,CherrybarkOak
ChA Chipley 2s Slight Moderate Slight Slash Pine 90 Slash Pine,Loblolly Pi
LoblollyPine
90
Longleaf Pine
80
Post Oak -Turkey Oak -Blackjack Oak
-
CnA Clarendon 2w Slight Moderate Slight LoblollyPine
90 Loblolly PiSlash Pine,
Slash Pine 90 AmericanSycamore,
Sweet Gum 85 YellowPoplar, SweGum
CoB,CoD,CwC2
Cowarts 2o Slight Slight Slight LoblollyPine
86 Loblolly PiLongleaf
Slash Pine 86 Pine, SlashPine
Longleaf Pine
67
DgA Dogue 2w Slight Moderate Slight LoblollyPine
90 Loblolly Pi
SouthernRed Oak
80
Sweet Gum 90YellowPoplar
93
White Oak 80
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 227/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
227
MapSymbol
Soil Name OrdinationSymbol
ErosionHazard
EquipmentLimitation
SeedlingMortality
CommonTrees
SiteIndex
Trees toPlant
DoA,
DoB,DoC
Dothan 2o Slight Slight Slight Slash Pine 89 Slash Pine,
Loblolly Pin
Longleaf Pine
70 Longleaf Pi
LoblollyPine
-
ENB*,ENC 2*
Esto 3o Slight Slight Slight LoblollyPine
80 Loblolly PinSlash Pine,
Longleaf Pine
65 Longleaf Pi
Slash Pine 80
ENB*,ENC2*
Hankin 3o Slight Slight Slight LoblollyPine
80 Loblolly PinSlash Pine,
Slash Pine 80Longleaf Pine
70
FaA,FaB,FeC2
Faceville 3o Slight Slight Slight LoblollyPine
82 Loblolly PinSlash Pine
FeD2,FmA
Slash Pine 80
Longleaf Pine
65
FaB, FsC Fuquay 3s Slight Moderate Moderate LoblollyPine
83 Slash Pine,Longleaf Pi
Slash Pine 83Longleaf Pine
67
GR* Grady 4w Slight Severe Severe BaldCypress
- AmericanSycamore,
Blackgum 65 Water TupeWater Oak 65
Rembert 5w Slight Severe Severe BaldCypress
- Bald CypresWater
WaterTupelo
- Tupelo
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 228/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
228
MapSymbol
Soil Name OrdinationSymbol
ErosionHazard
EquipmentLimitation
SeedlingMortality
CommonTrees
SiteIndex
Trees toPlant
HM* Herod 1w Slight Severe Severe Loblolly
Pine
100 Loblolly Pin
Slash Pine,Sweet Gum 95 Sweet Gum
EasternWater Oak 90 CottonwoodEasternCottonwood
100
Muckalee 2w Slight Severe Severe Sweet Gum 90 Sweet GumLoblolly Pin
LoblollyPine
90 AmericanSycamore,
Slash Pine 90 EasternCottonwoodWater Oak 90Green Ash 85EasternCottonwood
100
KuB Kureb 5a Slight Severe Severe Longleaf Pine
52 Longleaf PiSlash Pine
Slash Pine -Sand Pine -
LaB,LaD
Lakeland 4s Slight Moderate Moderate Slash Pine 75 Slash Pine,Loblolly Pin
LoblollyPine
75
Longleaf Pine
60
LmB,LmC,LmD
Lucy 3s Slight Moderate Moderate Slash Pine 85 Slash Pine,Longleaf Pi
Longleaf Pine
74 Loblolly Pin
LoblollyPine
85
Me Meggett 1w Slight Severe Severe Slash Pine 100 Slash Pine,Loblolly Pin
LoblollyPine
100
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 229/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
229
MapSymbol
Soil Name OrdinationSymbol
ErosionHazard
EquipmentLimitation
SeedlingMortality
CommonTrees
SiteIndex
Trees toPlant
Pond Pine 75
Mu Muckalee 2w Slight Severe Severe Sweet Gum 90 Sweet GumLoblolly Pin
LoblollyPine
90 AmericanSycamore,
Slash Pine 90 EasternCottonwood
Water Oak 90Green Ash 85EasternCottonwood
100
OcA Ocilla 3w Slight Moderate Moderate LoblollyPine
85 Loblolly PinSlash Pine
Slash Pine 85Longleaf Pine
75
OeA,OeB,OgC2,
Orangeburg 2o Slight Slight Slight LoblollyPine
80 Slash Pine,Loblolly Pin
OgD2 Slash Pine 86Longleaf
Pine
77
0I* Osier 3w Slight Severe Severe Slash Pine 85 Slash Pine,Loblolly Pin
LoblollyPine
87
Longleaf Pine
69
Bibb 2w Slight Severe Severe LoblollyPine
95 EasternCottonwood
Sweet Gum 90 Loblolly PinSweet Gum
Water Oak 90 Yellow PopBlackgum -
Ra Rains 2w Slight Severe Severe LoblollyPine
94 Loblolly PinSlash Pine,
Slash Pine 91 Sweet GumAmerican
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 230/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
230
MapSymbol
Soil Name OrdinationSymbol
ErosionHazard
EquipmentLimitation
SeedlingMortality
CommonTrees
SiteIndex
Trees toPlant
Sweet Gum 90 Sycamore
TA* Tawcaw 1w Slight Moderate Moderate LoblollyPine
100 Loblolly PinEastern
Sweet Gum 100 CottonwoodAmerican
Water Oak 90 Sycamore,Sweet Gum
WaterTupelo
- Water Oak,Cherrybark Oak
Shellbluff 1o Slight Slight Slight Sweet Gum 100 Loblolly Pin
YellowPoplar 105
Cherrybark Oak
105
EasternCottonwood
105
Scarlet Oak 100Black Walnut
100
TfA,TfB,
ThC2
Tifton 2o Slight Slight Slight LoblollyPine
86 Loblolly PinSlash Pine
Slash Pine 86Longleaf Pine
72
TrB,TrC, TrD
Troup 3a Slight Moderate Moderate LoblollyPine
77 Loblolly PinLongleaf
Longleaf Pine
76 Pine, SlashPine
Slash Pine 85
TUF* Troup 3a Slight Moderate Moderate LoblollyPine
77 Loblolly PinLongleaf
Longleaf Pine
76 Pine, SlashPine
Slash Pine 85
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 231/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
231
MapSymbol
Soil Name OrdinationSymbol
ErosionHazard
EquipmentLimitation
SeedlingMortality
CommonTrees
SiteIndex
Trees toPlant
Lucy 3a Moderat
e
Moderate Severe Longleaf
Pine
71 Longleaf
Pinie,Loblolly
LoblollyPine
84 Pine
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 232/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
232
TABLE 9: RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENTBurke County Soil Survey
Some terms that describe restrictive soil features are defined in the Glossary. See text for definitions of
"slight", "moderate" and"severe." Absence of an entry indicates the soil was not rated. *See footnote at end of table.
MapSymbol
SoilName
Camp Areas Picnic Areas Playgrounds Paths andTrails
Golf Fairways
BoA Bonifay Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:
Too Sandy Too Sandy Too Sandy Too Sandy Droughty
BoC,BoD
Bonifay Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:
Too Sandy Too Sandy Slope, Too Sandy Too Sandy Droughty
CaB2 Carnegie Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Slight Slight
Percs Slowly Percs Slowly Slope, Percs Slowly
CaC2 Carnegie Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Slight Slight
Percs Slowly Percs Slowly Slope
CC* Chastain Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:
FloodingWetness,
Wetness, Too Clayey, Wetness, Wetness,
Too Clayey Too Clayey Wetness, Flooding Too Clayey Too Clayey
Tawcaw Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:
Flooding, Too Clayey Too Clayey, Too Clayey Flooding
Too Clayey Flooding
ChA Chipley Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe:Too Sandy Too Sandy Too Sandy Too Sandy Droughty
CnA Clarendon
Moderate: Moderate: Moderate Moderate: Moderate:
Wetness, Wetness, Wetness, Wetness, Wetness,
Percs Slowly Percs Slowly Percs Slowly
CoB Cowarts Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Slight Slight
Percs Slowly Percs Slowly Slope,
Percs Slowly
CoD Cowarts Moderate: Moderate: Severe: Slight Moderate:
Slope, Slope, Slope Slope
Percs Slowly Percs SlowlyCwC2 Cowarts Moderate: Moderate: Severe: Slight Slight
Percs Slowly Percs Slowly Slope
DgA Dogue Moderate: Moderate: Moderate: Slight Slight
Wetness, Wetness, Wetness,
Percs Slowly Percs Slowly
DoA Dothan Slight Slight Slight Slight Slight
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 233/395
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 234/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
234
PROCEDURE FOR CONSTRUCTION AND APPLICATION OFA MASS APPRAISAL SCHEDULE - LARGE TRACTS
1. Locate Sales – Office of Clerk of Superior Court.
2. Sales Research – Gather on an appropriate form the following data (See sales data formenclosed).
Name of buyer and seller
Date of sale
Acreage
Verification of sale price if possible
Location
Neighborhood
Occupation and motives of buyer and seller
Other considerations
Improvements
Timber valuation
Characteristics of land – Open, woodland, topography, quality, etc.
About 20 to 40 sales over 30 acres in size occurring over a 2-year period should be obtained,if possible. Approximately 50 to 100 small tract sales below 30 acres are needed to developa small tract schedule.
3. Preliminary Validation of Sales.
4. Locate Valid Sales on Photographs.
5. Construct an Index Map Showing Location of all Sales. (See Example).
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 235/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
235
6. Field Review and Classification (See Example).
Use Basic Schedule.
7. Determine Acreage in Each Classification for Every Sale and Tabulate Information on anAppraisal Worksheet (See Example) .
8. Review, Study, and Analyze.
a. Validate Sales in View of Field Review.
b. Study Price Trend Based on Size, Location, Etc.
c. Determine “Bare Land” Value by Extracting Improvements, Timber Value, Etc.Tabulate the Information on Form entitled “Sales Analysis Worksheet”.
d. Isolate “Benchmark Sales.”
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 236/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
236
e. Construct Graphs, Locational Charts, and Use Other Forms of Analysis to Determine
the Bare Land Value by Grades or Quality Classes.
f. Apply Values to Initial Appraisal Schedule.
9. Make a “Trial Run” at Appraising Sales Based on Values on Appraisal Schedule.
10. Analyze Results of Appraisals.
11. Adjust Values on Schedule and Reappraise Sales until a Satisfactory Degree of Accuracyis obtained.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 237/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
237
AERIAL MAP
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 238/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
238
APPRAISAL SCHEDULE
County A
OPEN LAND (Cultivated and Pasture)
Code Value/Acre Definition of Code
I 700 Best Normally used for cultivations, well drained, level to gentlyslopping.
II 575 Good Used for cultivation or pasture, gently sloping, well drainedproductive soils. May include area such as hedgerow or wetareas, such areas shall not exceed 15% of total area.
III 450 Fair to Poor Cultivated land, best suited for pasture, shallow topsoil orvery sandy soil, or steep.
IV 350 Very Poor Rough land heavily interspersed with wet drains, extremelydeep sand, stumps, mostly unsuitable for tending withmechanized equipment.
WOODLAND
Code Value/Acre Definition of Code
W1 400 Excellent, level to very gently sloping topography, suitable for clearing andcultivation as Class I or II. 95% of area suitable for site preparation or treeplanting.
W2 300 Average woodland with 80% of area suitable for site preparation and treeplanting, or possibly yielding 50-70% of area suitable for clearing as cultivatedland.
W3 175 Small hardwood branches, extremely sandy soils, generally unsuitable forfarming activity, limited to possibly 25-35% of area suitable for sitepreparation and tree planting.
W4 100 Large creek swamps, bottomland hardwood areas, suitable for hardwoodtimber production only.
W5 50 Unproductive – land recognized locally as extremely low value, includingtupelo ponds, thick black gum ponds in swamp land, etc.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 239/395
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 240/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
240
TIMBER APPRAISAL SCHEDULE“A” COUNTY, GEORGIA
Pre-merchantable Stands
Code Value/Acre DescriptionA 0 Cutover, no value.
B $25 Poor natural pine reproduction.
C $40 Good natural pine reproduction.
D $50 Planted pine (slash) below 10 ft. in height.
E $75 Planted pine (slash) 10 to 20 ft. in height.
F $125 Planted pine (slash over 20 ft. but still pre-merchantable orwith a non-thinned volume below 12 cords per acre.
MERCHANTABLE STAND - PINEPulpwood Stand $18/Cord Chip-n-saw $35/Cord
G1 3-6 cds./ac. = $ 80/ac G2 3-6 cds./ac. = $ 160/ac
H1 7-12 cds./ac. = $170/ac H2 7-12 cds./ac. = $ 335/ac
I1 13-18 cds./ac. = $280/ac I2 13-18 cds./ac. = $ 545/ac
J1 19-26 cds./ac. = $450/ac J2 19-26 cds./ac. = $ 790/ac
K1 27-35 cds./ac. = $560/ac K2 27-35 cds./ac. = $ 1,085/ac
L1 35 + cds./ac. = $700/ac L2 35 + cds./ac. = $ 1,365/ac
Saw Timber Stand - $55/Cord Hardwood Value - $60/MBF
G3 3-6 cds./ac. = $ 250/ac HD1 Less than 1,000 BF/ac. = $ 45/ac
H3 7-12 cds./ac. = $ 525/ac HD2 1,000 – 2,000 BF/ac. = $ 90/ac
I3 13-18 cds./ac. = $ 855/ac HD3 2,000 – 4,000 BF/ac. = $180/ac
J3 19-26 cds./ac. = $,1240/ac HD4 4,000 – 7,000 BF/ac. = $330/ac
K3 27-35 cds./ac. = $1,705/ac
L3 35 + cds./ac. = $2,145/ac
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 241/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
241
SALE NO. 1
REF: MAP 2 PARCEL: 1_____
GRANTOR: Joseph P. Simmons_____________ SALE DATE: Oct. 23, 1977______
GRANTEE: Grady Jones Simmons, Jr.________ ACRES: 232_________________
RECORDED: 121-432________ PLAT: 5-97 R/E TRANSFER TAX: 110.00__
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $110,000_________ (VERIFIED): $110,040 (420/ac.)_
VERIFIED BY: Deed and closing attorney________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): Land lot 21, 22, 57, In bad land district of Oxbow_County._______________________________________________________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: Good farming community.____________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Farmer, now retired and lives in Macon, GA
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Local farmer, lives about 10 miles south of _property but rents another farm adjoining this one._
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: 20 Ac. Peanut allotment._____________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: Old barn (NV); 1 pole barn 24 x 48. TOTAL VALUE: $1500______
TIMBER VALUES: Cut one year prior to sale – To a 10” stump diameter – Remaining_____
reproduction had very little to no influence on sale.___ TOTAL VALUE: _______________
LAND DESCRIPTION: Cultivated Acres - __________ PASTURE: ___________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: ________________ NET LAND VALUE: __________
REMARKS: Grantee no relation to the grantor._____________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 242/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
242
SALE NO. 2
REF: MAP 12 PARCEL: 21__
GRANTOR: I. Dunn Dunit_______ SALE DATE: Jan. 10, 1977______
GRANTEE: H. E. Soldit_________ ACRES: 516_________________
RECORDED: 132-651 ______ PLAT: 8-21 R/E TRANSFER TAX: $246.00___
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $246,000_________ (VERIFIED): $246,000_________
VERIFIED BY: Seller_________________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): L. L. 121, 132, 133, 4th land dist in northeastcorner of county.______
NEIGHBORHOOD: Good rural active farming.____________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Investor – Owns builders supply business intown.
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Farmer – Owns adjoining land. Also ownsabout 1,500 ac. of timber-land.____________________________________________________
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Seller financed sale at 25% down, balance due in 10equal___ payments at 8 1/2 %interest._____________________________________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: None _____________________ TOTAL VALUE: _______________
TIMBER VALUES: Mr. Dunit had cruise made just before selling property. He said timbervalue was $100,000.__________________________ TOTAL VALUE: $100,00____
LAND DESCRIPTION: Cultivated Acres -__________ PASTURE: ___________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: _______________ NET LAND VALUE: _______
REMARKS: _________________________________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 243/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
243
SALE NO. 3
REF: MAP: 12 PARCEL: 5___
GRANTOR: Arthur Johnson____________ SALE DATE: March 21, 1977___
GRANTEE: John and Mary Simmons___ ACRES: 116_______________
RECORDED: 130-12___________ PLAT: _______ R/E TRANSFER TAX: $37.70_
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $37,700 (VERIFIED): $37,700 (325/ac.)__
VERIFIED BY: Purchaser_____________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): Land lot 102, 2nd
land district 3 miles N. E. of_Clinchville on county paved road._______
NEIGHBORHOOD: _________________________________________________OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Owns garage – Reason for selling?_______
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Car salesman for Boxer Chevrolet Company(now building a home on the property).____________________________________________
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: __________________________________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: None at purchase.___________ TOTAL VALUE: ______________
TIMBER VALUES: __________________________ TOTAL VALUE: _______________
LAND DESCRIPTION: Cultivated Acres - _________ PASTURE: ___________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: _______________ NET LAND VALUE: _________
REMARKS: _________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 244/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
244
SALE NO. 4
REF: MAP: 16 PARCEL: 12___
GRANTOR: Billy Robman________________ SALE DATE: May 16, 1977______
GRANTEE: James R. Boland____________ ACRES: 101__________________RECORDED: 121-16___ PLAT: 3-19 R/E TRANSFER TAX: $80.00____
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $80,800 (VERIFIED): $80,800 ($800/ac.)_
VERIFIED BY: Deed__________________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): L. L. 21, 2nd
land district in southwest section of county on county graded road.
NEIGHBORHOOD: Fair Rural Area_____________________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Farms some, buys and sells land, sellscars.___
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Originally from this county retired from AirForce._Moving back home. Land located near father’s place._
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Owner financed at 9%, 10 yrs., $10,000 down payment -_Balance due in 10 payment at $11,032.06/yr.__________________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: ________________________ TOTAL VALUE: - 0 -__________
TIMBER VALUES: _________________________ TOTAL VALUE: ______________
LAND DESCRIPTION: Cultivated Acres - _____ PASTURE: ___________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: ____________ NET LAND VALUE: ________
REMARKS: _________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 245/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
245
SALE NO. 5
REF: MAP: 97 PARCEL: 12___
GRANTOR: Samuel R. Roddenburg, et.al. SALE DATE: Dec. 30, 1976______
GRANTEE: Buck Creek Timber Co.________ ACRES: 377_________________
RECORDED: 120-16 PLAT: ________ R/E TRANSFER TAX: $110.00___
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $110,000 ____ (VERIFIED): $110,000__________
VERIFIED BY: Closing attorney_________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): Buck Creek Community, L. L.’s 121, 122, 116,118_5
thland district._________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: Sparsely populated area adjoined by mostly timber tracts.___________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Administrator of estate. Sold to convertasset to cash and divide among heirs.________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Bought for timber production.___________
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Isolated - Access through adjoining owneronly._____________
IMPROVEMENTS: ________________________ TOTAL VALUE: - 0 -__________
TIMBER VALUES: _________________________ TOTAL VALUE: ______________
LAND DESCRIPTION: Cultivated Acres - _____ PASTURE: ___________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: ____________ NET LAND VALUE: ____________
REMARKS: _________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 246/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
246
SALE NO. 6
REF: MAP: 102 PARCEL: 3_
GRANTOR: Morgan Gilreath______ SALE DATE: Feb. 3, 1977______
GRANTEE: Jimmy Johnson______ ACRES: 320_________________
RECORDED: 127-37____________ PLAT: 10-10_ R/E TRANSFER TAX: $140.00__
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $140,000 exchange and assumption of loan and 50 acres of land in Bartow.______________________________ (VERIFIED): ____________
VERIFIED BY: ______________________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL ANDGENERAL):___________________________________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: Good farming neighborhood__________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Sold family farm. Went to work for StateGovernment. In bad health and doctor told him to get job with less worry._________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Young local farmer - Expanding farmoperation (adjoining owner)
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: 15 acre peanut allotment, 40 head cattle, all farm equipment_included, 2 tractors, harrows, cultivators, etc.________________________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: 2 grain bins @ $2500 each, 1 brick veneer house 1600 sq. ft. _____
_________________________________________ TOTAL VALUE: - 0 -__________
TIMBER VALUES: _____________________ TOTAL VALUE: ______________
LAND DESCRIPTION: Cultivated Acres - _____ PASTURE: ___________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: ____________ NET LAND VALUE: ____________
REMARKS: _________________________________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 247/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
247
SALE NO. 7
REF: MAP: 36 PARCEL: 5____
GRANTOR: Edward Neely SALE DATE: Jan. 30, 1977______GRANTEE: Rainbow Sims ACRES: 100 acres___________
RECORDED: 130-12_____ PLAT: _________ R/E TRANSFER TAX: $57.00__
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $57,000 _ (VERIFIED): _________________
VERIFIED BY: ______________________________________________________________
LOCATION ( LEGAL AND GENERAL):
NEIGHBORHOOD: Good rural farming neighborhood.____________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Absentee Owner – Has been renting land toMr. Sims for several years.______________________________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Mr. Sims, farmer, owns local cotton farmer’swarehouse & fertilizer distributorship._____________________________________________
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS:__________________________________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: Old barn – Occasionally used to store hay, but of no value.__________
____________________________________________ TOTAL VALUE: ______________
TIMBER VALUES: __________________________ TOTAL VALUE: _______________
LAND DESCRIPTION: CULTIVATED ACRES: _____ PASTURE: _________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: ______________ NET LAND VALUE: _________
REMARKS: Mr. Neely financed $50,000 of sale at 9% for 10 years with payments due______
Jan. 5, 1978 and each Jan. 5th thereafter until paid in full. Payments are $7,147.71 per year.__
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 248/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
248
SALE NO. 8
REF: MAP: 73 PARCEL: 12_
GRANTOR: Mary Alice Martin SALE DATE: May 20, 1977____
GRANTEE: John D. & Susan F. Moore ACRES: 160 acres___________RECORDED: ______________ PLAT: _______ R/E TRANSFER TAX: $132.00_
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $132,000____________ (VERIFIED): $132,000________
VERIFIED BY: Mr. Moore_____________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): __________________________________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: On. U. S. Hwy 12 north of town about 8 miles._____________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Local resident, husband died. Mrs. Martin_____
retained life estate in old house on property.________________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Owns tractor dealership here in town – Also farms
and owns a farm about one mile from Martin place.___________________________________
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: ___________________________________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: House value about $6,000 but probably had no real influence on sale price.
_____________________________________________ TOTAL VALUE: _______________
TIMBER VALUES: ____________________________ TOTAL VALUE: _______________
LAND DESCRIPTION: CULTIVATED ACRES: ______ PASTURE: __________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: ________________ NET LAND VALUE: ___________
REMARKS: On May 25, 1977 timber sold to J & B Timber Co. for $62,000. Contract includesall timber regardless of size or species. Apparently had a commitment on timber at time he____bought the land. (Note that land was bought on May 20, then on May 25, he sold timber______indicating that he was well informed at time of purchase._______________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 249/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
249
SALE NO. 9
REF: MAP: 36 PARCEL: 14___
GRANTOR: Lucille B. Balcom________________ SALE DATE: Aug. 12, 1977______
GRANTEE: Valley Lumber Co. _ ACRES: 840_________________
RECORDED: __130-12__ PLAT: ___________ R/E TRANSFER TAX: $151.20___
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): (VERIFIED): $151,200.00_______
VERIFIED BY: Mr. Richards (Valley Lumber Co.)___________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): ___________________________________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: Located on Tiger River________________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Absentee owner__________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Local timber company______________________
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None______________________________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: ____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________ TOTAL VALUE: _______________
TIMBER VALUES: ____________________________ TOTAL VALUE: _______________
LAND DESCRIPTION: CULTIVATED ACRES: ______ PASTURE: __________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: ________________ NET LAND VALUE: ____________
REMARKS: Valley lumber Co. bought timber in Nov. 1976 for $147,000 (all merchantable____
timber) then bought land this year. Said owner contacted him in May of 1977. There was no__
agreement at time timber was sold that land would be bought later. Mr. Richards said they____
probably would not cut the timber now that they owned the land._________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 250/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
250
SALE NO. 10
REF: MAP: 53 PARCEL: 16___
GRANTOR: Albone Baxley _ SALE DATE: May 23, 1977______
GRANTEE: J. B. Jones & A. P. Darley____ ACRES: 193_________________
RECORDED: 118-32 PLAT: 5-62 R/E TRANSFER TAX: $83.50____
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): _____________ (VERIFIED): $83,500.00________
VERIFIED BY: Mr. Darley______________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): ___________________________________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: Northwest part of county – Some farming but mostly a timberland area.__
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: “Freckles” Baxley is local “wheeler-deeler” –Land
speculator. Never been known to work for living._____________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Buyers are brothers-in-law – Mr. Jones is an____
attorney in Atlanta; Darley, a local realtor, owns about 2000 more acres of land incounty______
and adjoining county.___________________________________________________________
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: ____________________________________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: ___________________________ TOTAL VALUE: ______________
TIMBER VALUES: According to Mr. Darley’s inventory by Forest Management Service Co. –_
Timber value is $43,500 ____ TOTAL VALUE: ______________
LAND DESCRIPTION: CULTIVATED ACRES: ______ PASTURE: ___________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: _______________ NET LAND VALUE: ____________
REMARKS: Mr. Darley said he figured he had around $200 in the land without timber._______
____________________________________________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 251/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
251
SALE NO. 11
REF: MAP: 83 PARCEL: 15___
GRANTOR: J. B. Jones & A. P. Darley ___ SALE DATE: Oct. 10, 1977_____
GRANTEE: Robert Addled ___ ACRES: 85_________________
RECORDED: 121-12 PLAT: _______ R/E TRANSFER TAX: $34,000__
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): ______________ (VERIFIED): $34,000 (400/ac.)___
VERIFIED BY: Deed_________________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): ___________________________________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: Well populated rural area – On graded county road__________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Jones an attorney, Darley a realtor___________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Works in quality control lab as supervisor in ____
garment plant in adjoining county._________________________________________________
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Father recently died. Mr. Addled was only heir to his estate.___
IMPROVEMENTS: _______________________ TOTAL VALUE: ______________
TIMBER VALUES: _______________________ TOTAL VALUE: ______________
LAND DESCRIPTION: CULTIVATED ACRES: ______ PASTURE: ___________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: ________________ NET LAND VALUE: ____________
REMARKS: Deed book 121, Pg. 37, R. B. Haddit, in April 1975 sold this land to Jones and___
Darley for $51,000 ($600/ac.). They later sold timber (amount unknown). This tract has been__
known locally as a good timber tract._______________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 252/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
252
SALE NO. 12
REF: MAP: 50 PARCEL: 30_________
GRANTOR: Johnny Onthespot SALE DATE: Feb. 20, 1977___________
GRANTEE: I. B. Slingnasty ACRES: 250______________________
RECORDED: 125-121 PLAT: _____ R/E TRANSFER TAX: $76.70_________
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $76,700 VERIFIED: $76,680__________________Assumption of Loan $88,260 $164.940 ($660/Ac)
VERIFIED BY: Deed___________________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): ____________________________________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: Excellent farming area_________________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Farmer – Owns other farmland. This tract was__about 10 miles from his main operation._____________________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Neighboring farmer_______________________
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Peanut allotment – 30 acres.____________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: 1 Grain bin - $2500 – nice brick home ($22,000) __________________
_____________________________________________ TOTAL VALUE: _______________
TIMBER VALUES: _____________________________ TOTALVALUE: ________________
LAND DESCRIPTION: CULTIVATED ACRES: ______ PASTURE: ___________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: ________________ NET LAND VALUE:
____________
REMARKS: House sold in Feb 21, 1977 to R. B. Whatchamacallit for $22,000. Mr. Slingnasty_
assumed Federal Land Bank loan for $88,260.________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 253/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
253
SALE NO. 13
REF: MAP: 50 PARCEL: 15_____
GRANTOR: Ben Spent SALE DATE: June 5, 1977_________
GRANTEE: J. B. Bramlet ACRES: _____280_______________
RECORDED: PLAT: ____________ R/E TRANSFER TAX: $118.00_____
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $118,000 ($421/ac.)__ (VERIFIED): ____________________
VERIFIED BY: __________________________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): ___________________________________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: Fair, not too well populated._______________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Retired farmer, renting farm to neighbor.______
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Former county agent, moved back home to farm__
with father who is getting old._________
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: Seller financed $75,000 for 10 years at 6%, 10 equal annual___payments._______________________________________________________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: ________________________ TOTAL VALUE: - 0 -_____________
TIMBER VALUES: _________________________ TOTAL VALUE: _________________
LAND DESCRIPTION: Cultivated Acres - _____ PASTURE: ______________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: ____________ NET LAND VALUE: _______________
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 254/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
254
SALE NO. 14
REF: MAP: 53_ PARCEL: 12_____
GRANTOR: James R. Mackey SALE DATE: Sept. 12, 1977________
GRANTEE: T. B Tomlinson ACRES: 1365___________________
RECORDED: 123-413 PLAT: None R/E TRANSFER TAX: $169.00____
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $169,000 + Loan____ (VERIFIED): $545,000(399/ac.)_____
VERIFIED BY: Purchaser________________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): ____________________________________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: Active farm neighborhood________________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Farmer, building contractor, said to have lostmoney in Florida during recent recession.
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Local farmer also owns 1,500 acre farm tract abouttwo miles from this place.___________________________________________________________
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: 40 acre peanut allotment.
IMPROVEMENTS: 2 grain bins, 2 tenant houses, 2 pole barns, 1 house____________________
_______________________ (Estimated Total Value TOTAL VALUE: $38,000)__________
TIMBER VALUES: ______________________ TOTAL VALUE: ___________________
LAND DESCRIPTION: CULTIVATED ACRES: _____ PASTURE: _________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: _______________ NET LAND VALUE: _____________
REMARKS: Assumed a loan outstanding at Federal Land Bank for $376,000.00_______________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 255/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
255
SALE NO. 15
REF: MAP: 102 PARCEL: 1_____
GRANTOR: I. M. Broke SALE DATE: Oct. 10, 1977________
GRANTEE: I. B. Richer ACRES: 107
RECORDED: __118-12________ PLAT: None _ R/E TRANSFER TAX: $45.00______
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): ____________________ (VERIFIED): $45,000.00(420/ac.)___
VERIFIED BY: __________________________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): ___________________________________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: Good – Heavily populated rural area
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Investor, land buyer (land speculator), known tobe active in buying and selling land.
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Owns rental property in town and operates aninsurance agency. Reason for purchase?
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: _____________________________________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: _____________________________ TOTAL VALUE: ______________
TIMBER VALUES: _____________________________ TOTAL VALUE: ________________
LAND DESCRIPTION: CULTIVATED ACRES: ______ PASTURE: ______
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: _______________ NET LAND VALUE: ____________
REMARKS: Mr. Broke bought this tract in July 1975 for $189.00 per acre. See deed book 98, ___
Pg. 432._________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 256/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
256
SALE NO. 16
REF: MAP: 82 PARCEL: 12_____
GRANTOR: Robert & Julia Cannon SALE DATE: Aug. 3, 1977________
GRANTEE: Sam and Margie Galdre ACRES: 216
RECORDED: ___________ PLAT: ________ R/E TRANSFER TAX: $135.00____
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $135,000 _________ (VERIFIED): __________________
VERIFIED BY: _______________________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): ____________________________________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: Good farm area, fairly heavy population____________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Sold farm and retired – Moved to mountains in__
North Georgia._________________________________________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Bought to farm – Young farmer just gettingstarted.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: $25,000 down payment – Balance due 5 years @ 8%interest___
IMPROVEMENTS: Old house $13,500, 2 pole barns, 1 barn, feed lot, grain bin, other________
equipment including tractors (2). Has pecan orchard (good producer) and big lake (16 acres).__
TIMBER VALUES: ______________________ TOTAL VALUE: ________________
LAND DESCRIPTION: CULTIVATED ACRES: ______ PASTURE: ___________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: ________________ NET LAND VALUE: ___________
REMARKS: Deed calls for 216 acres. Photo reveals 197 acres and property lines appear to be_
correct??______________________________________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 257/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
257
SALE NO. 17
REF: MAP: 12 PARCEL: 13______
GRANTOR: Thomas B. Kilroy SALE DATE: Nov. 14, 1977_________
GRANTEE: John and Saler K. Montgomery ACRES: 127
RECORDED: 124-19___ PLAT: None R/E TRANSFER TAX: $30.00_______
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $30,000 (236/ac.)__ (VERIFIED): ____________________
VERIFIED BY: __________________________________________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL): ____________________________________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: Excellent farm area – Close to town, 2 miles._________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Mr. Kilroy farms along with his two sons-in-law.____
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Mrs. Montgomery is Mr. Kilroy’s daughter_____
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: _____________________________________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: ________________________ TOTAL VALUE: - 0 -_____________
TIMBER VALUES: _________________________ TOTAL VALUE: _________________
LAND DESCRIPTION: Cultivated Acres - _____ PASTURE: ______________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: ____________ NET LAND VALUE: _______________
REMARKS: ____________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 258/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
258
SALE NO. 18
REF: MAP: 50 PARCEL: 12_____
GRANTOR: A. P. Barrentine, Et. Al. ____ SALE DATE: April 12, 1977_________
GRANTEE: New River Wood Producers Co.___ ACRES: 670____________________
RECORDED: 119-253___ PLAT: None___ R/E TRANSFER TAX: $150.00______
SALE PRICE (INDICATED): $150,000 (VERIFIED): $150,000 (224/ac.)_____
VERIFIED BY: Forester for New River Wood Products.__________________________________
LOCATION (LEGAL AND GENERAL):____________________________________
NEIGHBORHOOD: Remote area of county.___________________________________________
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF SELLER: Administrator of O. B. Barrentine Estate. Sold to
divide cash among heirs._____
OCCUPATION AND MOTIVE OF BUYER: Bought for timber production._______________
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: None_____________________________________________
IMPROVEMENTS: None ______________________TOTAL VALUE: _____________
TIMBER VALUES: Timber sold in Feb 1976 with 12 month contract – Cut to 8” stump.________
diameter. _____________________________________ TOTAL VALUE: __________________
LAND DESCRIPTION: CULTIVATED ACRES: ______ PASTURE: __________________
WOODLAND BY TIMBER TYPES: NET LAND VALUE: _______________
REMARKS: Sold on sealed bid basis. 4 bids were submitted ranging from $120,000 to $150,000._
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 259/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
259
Building Large Tract Base Schedules – Extraction of Timber Values
After all sales of rural land have been gathered and qualified, the appraiser must extract the value of all non-land items from the sales price. Non-land items will include but not be limited to,improvements, crop quotas or allotments, timber, personal property, etc.
In some situations, the appraiser may determine that the harvest value of timber had no bearing onthe sales price. These situations will normally occur when the tract is not of a size where timberproduction would be a viable option. Usually, where timber production is not a viable option, thepresence of trees does impact the value from an aesthetic standpoint and should be considered whenassigning desirability codes.
In all cases where the market value of the standing timber contributed to the sales price, the appraisermust obtain the value of the timber and deduct it from the sales price. As discussed earlier in thecourse with regard to Rule 560-11-10-.09(3)(b)(2)(v) Standing Timber Value Extraction, there aretwo options available for obtaining the value of the timber:
Reliable information from the buyer/seller Calculation of timber value based on volume and pricing information
The appraiser may consult with the buyer and or seller of the property concerning the considerationof value given to the standing timber in the property transaction. The consultation may take place bymail, phone or direct discussion with the party. A recording of the date and method of consultation
should be made by the appraiser.
If possible, the appraiser should ask for a copy of a cruise if made by a registered forester and informthe buyer/seller that the information will be held in strict confidentiality. If a cruise is not availableand a timber value is provided, the appraiser must use his/her judgement as to the reliability of theinformation.
If the timber consideration is not available from the buyer/seller or the appraiser desires to confirmthe information that was provided in the consultation, the timber value may be calculated using thevaluation methods defined in Rule 560-11-10-.09(3)(b)2(v)(I)I. As prescribed in the aforementionedRule, the appraiser should calculate the value of all product classes of merchantable timber (trees 15
years and older) and the value of all pre-merchantable timber and sum both values to obtain the totaltimber value.
The calculate the value of merchantable and pre-merchantable timber, the appraiser will be requiredto gather data with regard to the volume of the timber product classes and the pricing thatcorresponds to the time of the sale. Volume information may come from the buyer/seller or a partytrained in the gathering of such information. Pricing information can come from the local market or
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 260/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
260
from the Table of Owner Harvest Timber Value as prepared by the Revenue Commissioner on anannual basis. The appraiser should ensure that the pricing information is as close as possible to thedate of the sale due to the fluctuation in timber prices.
After the volume and pricing information is obtained, the appraiser may use forms similar to the oneson the following pages to calculate the timber value for the sale.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 261/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
261
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Merchantabile Timber
Map ID: Date:
Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Volume (Tons) Unit Price Value
Softwood Pulpwood
Softwood Chip-n-Saw
Softwood Sawtimber
Softwood Poles
Softwood Posts
Softwood Fuelchips
Hardwood Pulpwood
Hardwood Sawtimber
Hardwood Firewood
Total Merchantible Timber Value
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 262/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
262
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted)
Map ID: Date:Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Vol(Tons)/Acre Unit Price Stocking Density Value
Pulpwood
Chip-n-Saw
Total Value/Acre (Pulpwood + Chip-n-Saw)
Acres of Pre-Merch
Total Value (Total Value/Acre x Acres)
Cost (Cost of Establishing Stand / Acre * Acres)
Base Value (Total Value – Cost)
Age of Merch (15 is default; local conditions take precedance)
Average Annual Timber Growth (Base Value ÷ Age of Merchantability)
Age of Stand (in years)
Accumulated Timber Growth (Average Annual Timber Growth * Age of Stand)
Total Accumulated Value (Accumulated Timber Growth + Cost)
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 263/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
263
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Pine Pre-Merchantable (Natural)
Map ID: Date:Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Vol(Tons)/Acre Unit Price Stocking Density Value
Pulpwood .50
Chip-n-Saw .50
Total Value/Acre (Pulpwood + Chip-n-Saw)
Acres of Pre-Merch
Base Value (Total Value/Acre x Acres)
Age of Merch (15 is default; local conditions take precedance)
Average Annual Timber Growth (Base Value ÷ Age of Merchantability)
Age of Stand (in years)
Value of Accumulated Growth (Avg Annual Timber Growth * Age of Stand)
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 264/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
264
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Hardwood Pre-Merchantable (Natural)
Map ID: Date:Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Vol(Tons)/Acre Unit Price Stocking Density Value
Pulpwood .40
Chip-n-Saw .40
Total Value/Acre (Pulpwood + Chip-n-Saw)
Acres of Pre-Merch
Base Value (Total Value/Acre x Acres)
Age of Merch (15 is default; local conditions take precedance)
Average Annual Timber Growth (Base Value ÷ Age of Merchantability)
Age of Stand (in years)
Value of Accumulated Growth (Avg Annual Growth * Age of Stand *.40)
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 265/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
265
Timber Value Summary
Map ID: Date:
Timber Type Value
Merchantable
Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted)
Pine Pre-Merchantable (Natural)
Hardwood Pre-Merchantable
Total Value of all Timber Types
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 266/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
266
The following worksheet can be used as a guide to generate the volume of pre-merchantible timberstands that are being valued with productivity ratings and the Productivity – Timber Yield chartsfound in Rule 560-11-10-.09(3)(b)2(v)(I)II. A separate worksheet should be compiled for the various
timber types and age of stand categories that are present on a parcel. The volume entries forpulpwood and chip-n-saw are found in the Productivity-Timber Yield charts.
The % of Stand Ac column is calculated based on the acres within the productivity rating divided bythe total acres with the timber type-age stand. For example, if a planted pine stand contained 20acres of 6 year old Slash pine with 5 acres in a Productivity Class of 2, the % of Stand Acreagecalculation would be 5 ÷ 20 = .25 or 25%.
The Wt PW Vol (weighted pulpwood volume) and the Wt CS Vol (weighted chip-n-saw volume)columns will contain the weighted volumes for pulpwood and chip-n-saw within the productivityrating. Using the 25% of Stand Acreage within Productivity Class 2 for the Slash pine, if the
pulpwood tons/acre is 90 tons and the chip-n-saw tons/acre is 10, the weighted volume values wouldbe calculated as follows:
Wt PW Vol = 90 * .25 = 22.50 Wt CS Vol = 10 * .25 = 2.50
The summation of the weighted volume columns would be placed in Total Volume. The TotalVolume is then used in the pre-merchantable timber calculation.
Productivity-Volume Worksheet
Map ID: Acres: Date:
Volume – Tons/Acre
Productivity Pulpwood Chip-n-Saw % of Stand Ac Wt PW Vol Wt CS Vol
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Total Volume
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 267/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
267
Timber Valuation – Example 1
Map ID 022-009 is a 600 acre tract of rural land which sells for $850,000. All indications are that the
sell is qualified. However, upon inspection of the parcel, the appraiser notes that there is aconsiderable amount of timber present on the property. Efforts to contact the buyer and seller haveproduced no information with regard to timber values or volumes.
The county contracts with a registered forester who upon a visit to the property and the use of aerialphotography concludes that the following timber volumes and acres are present. The forester, also,states that the stocking density of the pre-merchantible stands is average and the cost of establishingplanted timber stands is about $130 per acre.
Merchantable Timber
Timber Type TonsPine Pulpwood 200
Pine Chip-n-Saw 1500
Pine Sawtimber 6300
Hardwood Sawtimber 550
Pre-Merchantable Timber
Timber Type Age Acres
Pine 7 60.00
Pine 12 25.00
The appraiser must now determine the value of the timber that is to be deducted from the sales price.Use the Table of Owner Harvest Timber Values provided in the manual for Burke County.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 268/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
268
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Merchantabile Timber
Map ID: 022-009 Date: 06/30/05Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Volume (Tons) Unit Price Value
Softwood Pulpwood 200 6.13 1,226
Softwood Chip-n-Saw 1500 21.70 32,550
Softwood Sawtimber 6300 34.91 219,933
Softwood Poles
Softwood Posts
Softwood Fuelchips
Hardwood Pulpwood
Hardwood Sawtimber 550 27.31 15,021
Hardwood Firewood
Total Merchantible Timber Value 268,730
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 269/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
269
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted)
Map ID: 022-009 Date: 06/30/05Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Vol(Tons)/Acre Unit Price Stocking Density Value
Pulpwood (52.2 * .90) 47 6.13 1.00 288
Chip-n-Saw (52.2 * .10) 5.0 21.70 1.00 109
Total Value/Acre (Pulpwood + Chip-n-Saw) 397
Acres of Pre-Merch 60.00
Total Value (Total Value/Acre x Acres) 23,820
Cost (Cost of Establishing Stand / Acre * Acres) 7,800
Base Value (Total Value – Cost) 16,020
Age of Merch (15 is default; local conditions take precedance) 15
Average Annual Timber Growth (Base Value ÷ Age of Merchantability) 1,068
Age of Stand (in years) 7
Accumulated Timber Growth (Average Annual Timber Growth * Age of Stand) 7,476
Total Accumulated Value (Accumulated Timber Growth + Cost) 15,276
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 270/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
270
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted)
Map ID: 022-009 Date: 06/30/05Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Vol(Tons)/Acre Unit Price Stocking Density Value
Pulpwood (52.2 * .90) 47 6.13 1.00 288
Chip-n-Saw (52.2 * .10) 5.0 21.70 1.00 109
Total Value/Acre (Pulpwood + Chip-n-Saw) 397
Acres of Pre-Merch 25
Total Value (Total Value/Acre x Acres) 9,925
Cost (Cost of Establishing Stand / Acre * Acres) 3,250
Base Value (Total Value – Cost) 6,675
Age of Merch (15 is default; local conditions take precedance) 15
Average Annual Timber Growth (Base Value ÷ Age of Merchantability) 445
Age of Stand (in years) 12
Accumulated Timber Growth (Average Annual Timber Growth * Age of Stand) 5,340
Total Accumulated Value (Accumulated Timber Growth + Cost) 8,590
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 271/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
271
Timber Value Summary
Map ID: 022-009 Date: 06/30/05Timber Type Value
Merchantable 268,730
Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted) 23,866
Pine Pre-Merchantable (Natural)
Hardwood Pre-Merchantable
Total Value of all Timber Types 292,596
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 272/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
272
Timber Valuation – Example 2
Map ID 022-010 is a 200 acre tract of rural land which sells for $300,000. All indications are that the
sell is qualified. Upon inspection of the parcel, the appraiser notes that the entire 200 acres is plantedpine. Efforts to contact the buyer and seller have produced no information with regard to timbervalues or volumes but the seller did state that the age of the Loblolly planted pine stand is 5 years.
The county has soil maps and has determined the following with regard to productivity ratings andacreage. Information from a forester states that Burke County is in the Upper Coastal Plain region,the stocking density of the pre-merchantible Loblolly stand is average and the cost of establishingplanted timber stands is about $130 per acre.
Productivity Rating Acres
2 805 100
8 20
The appraiser must now determine the value of the timber that is to be deducted from the sales price.Use the Table of Owner Harvest Timber Values provided in the manual for Burke County and theland productivity rating-timber yield table provided in Rule 560-11-10-.09(3)(b)2(v)(I)II.
Productivity-Volume Worksheet
Map ID: 022-010 Acres: 200.00 Date: 06/30/05
Volume – Tons/Acre
Productivity Pulpwood Chip-n-Saw % of Stand Ac Wt PW Vol Wt CS Vol
2 93 10 80 acs – 40% 37.20 4.00
5 70 8 100 acs – 50% 35.00 4.00
8 18 0 20 acs – 10% 1.80 0.00
Total Volume 74.00 8.00
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 273/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
273
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted)
Map ID: 022-010 Date: 06/30/05
Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Vol(Tons)/Acre Unit Price Stocking Density Value
Pulpwood 74.00 6.13 1.00 454
Chip-n-Saw 8.00 21.70 1.00 174
Total Value/Acre (Pulpwood + Chip-n-Saw) 628
Acres of Pre-Merch 200.00
Total Value (Total Value/Acre x Acres) 125,600
Cost (Cost of Establishing Stand / Acre * Acres) 26,000
Base Value (Total Value – Cost) 99,600
Age of Merch (15 is default; local conditions take precedance) 15
Average Annual Timber Growth (Base Value ÷ Age of Merchantability) 6,640
Age of Stand (in years) 5
Accumulated Timber Growth (Average Annual Timber Growth * Age of Stand) 33,200
Total Accumulated Value (Accumulated Timber Growth + Cost) 59,200
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 274/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
274
Timber Value Summary
Map ID: 022-010 Date: 06/30/05Timber Type Value
Merchantable
Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted) 59,200
Pine Pre-Merchantable (Natural)
Hardwood Pre-Merchantable
Total Value of all Timber Types 59,200
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 275/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
275
Timber Valuation – Exercise 1
Map ID 030-012 is a 400 acre tract of rural land which sells for $765,000 in Burke County. All
indications are that the sell is qualified. However, upon inspection of the parcel, the appraiser notesthat there is a considerable amount of timber present on the property. Efforts to contact the buyer andseller have produced no information with regard to timber values or volumes.
The county contracts with a registered forester who upon a visit to the property and the use of aerialphotography concludes that the following timber volumes and acres are present. The forester, also,states that the stocking density of the Loblolly pre-merchantible stands is 80% and the cost of establishing planted timber stands is about $110 per acre. Burke Co is located in the Upper CoastalPlain region of the State.
Merchantable Timber
Timber Type Tons
Pine Pulpwood 400
Pine Chip-n-Saw 2200
Pine Sawtimber 7600
Hardwood Sawtimber 1100
Pre-Merchantable Pine – 8 years old
Productivity Rating Acres
2 5
4 8
5 12
Pre-Merchantable Pine – 14 years old
Productivity Rating Acres
3 10
6 14
Calculate the value of timber to be extracted from the sales price.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 276/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
276
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Merchantabile Timber
Map ID: Date:Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Volume (Tons) Unit Price Value
Softwood Pulpwood
Softwood Chip-n-Saw
Softwood Sawtimber
Softwood Poles
Softwood Posts
Softwood Fuelchips
Hardwood Pulpwood
Hardwood Sawtimber
Hardwood Firewood
Total Merchantible Timber Value
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 277/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
277
Productivity-Volume Worksheet
Map ID: Acres: Date:
Volume – Tons/Acre
Productivity Pulpwood Chip-n-Saw % of Stand Ac Wt PW Vol Wt CS Vol
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Total Volume
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 278/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
278
Productivity-Volume Worksheet
Map ID: Acres: Date:
Volume – Tons/Acre
Productivity Pulpwood Chip-n-Saw % of Stand Ac Wt PW Vol Wt CS Vol
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Total Volume
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 279/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
279
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted)
Map ID: Date:Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Vol(Tons)/Acre Unit Price Stocking Density Value
Pulpwood
Chip-n-Saw
Total Value/Acre (Pulpwood + Chip-n-Saw)
Acres of Pre-Merch
Total Value (Total Value/Acre x Acres)
Cost (Cost of Establishing Stand / Acre * Acres)
Base Value (Total Value – Cost)
Age of Merch (15 is default; local conditions take precedance)
Average Annual Timber Growth (Base Value ÷ Age of Merchantability)
Age of Stand (in years)
Accumulated Timber Growth (Average Annual Timber Growth * Age of Stand)
Total Accumulated Value (Accumulated Timber Growth + Cost)
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 280/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
280
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted)
Map ID: Date:Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Vol(Tons)/Acre Unit Price Stocking Density Value
Pulpwood
Chip-n-Saw
Total Value/Acre (Pulpwood + Chip-n-Saw)
Acres of Pre-Merch
Total Value (Total Value/Acre x Acres)
Cost (Cost of Establishing Stand / Acre * Acres)
Base Value (Total Value – Cost)
Age of Merch (15 is default; local conditions take precedance)
Average Annual Timber Growth (Base Value ÷ Age of Merchantability)
Age of Stand (in years)
Accumulated Timber Growth (Average Annual Timber Growth * Age of Stand)
Total Accumulated Value (Accumulated Timber Growth + Cost)
Information Supplied by:
Timber Value Summary
Map ID: Date:
Timber Type Value
Merchantable
Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted)
Pine Pre-Merchantable (Natural)
Hardwood Pre-Merchantable
Total Value of all Timber Types
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 281/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
281
DEVELOPMENT OF A RURAL APPRAISAL SCHEDULE FOR COUNTY “B”
Background Information on County “B”
County “B” is a typical county with some developmental and urban growth influence. Therecontinues to be an reasonably active ag/timber economy with sales that are considered to be primarilyof ag/timber use. However, these sales prices of the rural parcels are impacted somewhat by thedevelopmental and urban growth and the increasing demand for land.
Developing a rural land appraisal schedule will be a complicated and resource intensive process. Theappraiser will be required to spend time verifying sales to be used in the schedule development. Thequalified sales from the verification process must be analyzed to generate a small acre break point, alarge tract “use” schedule, a size and location adjustment table of factors for large tracts (tracts withacreage above the small acre break point) and a small tract valuation schedule. The entire process
could cover a time span of several weeks before it is concluded and sales-assessment ratio studieshave been generated to substantiate the schedules.
The steps below represent a general overview of the process of construction a rural land appraisalschedule.
1. Separate the rural land sales (small and large acreage) from sales within subdivisions andurban areas.
2. Select from the list of rural land sales available those sales that appear upon first review to besuitable for constructing a rural appraisal schedule. List them by sale numbers.
3. List by sale number those sales upon first review that you consider unsuitable for constructingan appraisal schedule. Beside each number briefly state why you consider the sale unsuitable.
4. Develop a small acre break point using the sales that have been deemed as suitable.
5. Using sales of parcels with acreage above the small acre break point, isolate sales thatrepresent ag/timberland transactions with little or no influence for size and location.
6. Analysis these sales to produce the base land schedule for large tracts of rural land.
7. Complete columns 1-11 and 13 on the “Sales Analysis Worksheet” to provide assistance inthe sales analysis.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 282/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
282
8. By reviewing the sales data record and the “sales analysis worksheet”, list the sales that youconsider as valid sales for constructing a schedule of values for:
1) Open land
2) Woodland
5. Some of the sales listed in Question 4 are for one reason or another more reliable than others.We will call them benchmark sales.
a. List the sales that you consider “benchmark sales” for establishing the value of open landand give brief reason for you selection.
b. List the sales that you conside as “benchmark sales” for establishing the value of timberland and give brief reasons for your selection
6. Using paired-sales analysis and the information from the benchmark sales, establish the base“use” value for the various land schedule classifications.
7. Appraise the sales based on their land classifications and the newly developed land schedule.
8. Test the validity of the rural land schedule with sales-asssement ratio studies
9. Develop a size/location adjustment table for tracts of rural land above the small acre break point.
10. Throught ratio studies, test the validity of the base land schedule with the addition of thesize/location adjustments.
11. With rural land sales that are below the small acre break, develop a small parcel schedule thatcontains adjustments for accessibility (location), desirability and size.
12. Confirm the accuracy of the small parcel schedule with ratio studies.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 283/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Sales Analysis Worksheet1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
SaleNo. MapParcel Acres Sales Price Imp.Value OtherValue TimberValue ResidLand %Open %Wooded
Residual
Land perAcre
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 284/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
284
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 285/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
285
Developing the Small Acre Break Point
The small acre break point is the acre level at which buyers begin looking more to productivity of thesoil and timber value than the other factors such as, accessibility (location), desirability, as it relates toa use other than agricultural, and size. In other words, it is where small parcel valuation ends.
All rural land parcels with total acreage greather than the small acre break point will be valued with thelarge tract schedule. All rural land parcels with total acreage less than or equal to the small acre break point must be valued with the small parcel schedule.
Determination of the small acre break point is accomplished by plotting sales of rural properties – bothsmall and large tracts – on a graph with $/Acre on the vertical axis and # of Acres on the horizontalaxis. A “trend” line is then drawn through the plotted sales on the graph, and the point (acreage level)
at which the line’s slope is changed becomes the break point.
In the absence of adequate sales to create a small acre break point, the appraiser may select an acreagebetween 5.00 and 25.00 and offer the acreage to the Board of Assessors as the small acre break point.
After the small acre break point is established, the appraiser can separate the sales into their respectiverural land category, small tracts and large tracts. The analysis for each category will be performed in adifferent manner making it necessary to segregate the rural land sales.
On the following page is a graph of the $/Acre to Acreage relationship in a county which was used todetermine a small acre break point of 20.00 acres.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 286/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
286
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
1 . 0
0
1 . 4
0
1 . 5
1
2 . 3
2
2 . 5
6
3 . 7
0
5 . 0
0
7 . 5
0
8 . 8
3
1 4 . 0
9
1 5 . 3
1
1 7 . 0
0
2 0 . 7
0
2 4 . 9
0
2 8 . 7
0
3 5 . 0
0
4 7 . 1
3
5 3 . 6
0
6 2 . 0
0
6 8 . 0
0
8 2 2 9
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 287/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
Sales Price per Acre Compared to Acreage
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 1
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 288/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
288
Development of a Large Tract Base Land Schedule
Following are 15 sales that have been selected for the establishment of the Rural Land Base Schedulefor County B.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 289/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
289
Sale # 1Sales Price: 180,000
Timber Value: 0
W2
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 290/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
290
Sale # 2
Sales Price: 275,000Timber Value: 186,150
W2
W2
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 291/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
291
Sale # 3Sales Price: 300,000
Timber Value: 85,150
W2
W2
W1
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 292/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
292
Sale # 4
Sales Price: 110,000Timber Value: 0
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 293/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
293
Sale # 5Sales Price: 60,000
Timber Value: 0
W2
W3
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 294/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
294
Sale # 6Sales Price: 260,000Timber Value: 160,020
W4
W2
W2
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 295/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
295
Sale # 7
Sales Price: 140,000Timber Value: 5,500
W2
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 296/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
296
Sale # 8Sales Price: 143,000
Timber Value: 56,400
W4
W3
W5
W2
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 297/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
297
Sale # 9Sales Price: 148,000
Timber Value: 0
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 298/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
298
Sale # 10
Sales Price: 300,000Timber Value: 75,970
W1
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 299/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
299
Sale # 11Sales Price: 115,200
Timber Value: 33,865
W2
W5
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 300/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
300
Sale # 12
Sales Price: 195,800Timber Value: 0
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 301/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
301
Sale # 13Sales Price: 69,600
Timber Value: 0
W3
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 302/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
302
Sale # 14Sales Price: 113,800
Timber Value: 61,400
W2W3
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 303/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
303
Sale # 15
Sales Price: 93,700Timber Value: 0
W1
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 304/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
304
APPRAISAL SCHEDULE
COUNTY “B”
OPEN LAND (CULTIVATED AND PASTURE)
CODEVALUE / ACRE
DEFINITION OF CODE
I Best Normally used for cultivations, well drained, level togently slopping.
II Good Used for cultivation or pasture, gently sloping, welldrained productive soils. May include area such ashedgerow or wet areas, such areas shall not exceed 15%of total area.
III Fair to poor Cultivated land, best suited for pasture, shallow topsoilor very sandy soil, or steep.
IV Very poor Rough land heavily interspersed with wet drains,extremely deep sand, stumps, mostly unsuitable fortending with mechanized equipment.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 305/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
305
WOODLAND
Code Value / Acre Definition of Code
W1 Excellent, level to very gently sloping topography, suitable forclearing and cultivation as Class I or II. 95% of area suitable for sitepreparation or tree planting.
W2 Average woodland with 80% of area suitable for site preparation andtree planting, or possibly yielding 50-70% of area suitable for clearingas cultivated land.
W3 Small hardwood branches, extremely steep, or extremely sandy soils,generally unsuitable for farming activity, limited to possibly 25-35%
of area suitable for site preparation and tree planting.
W4 Large creek swamps, bottomland hardwood areas, suitable forhardwood timber production only.
W5 Unproductive – zland recognized locally as extremely low value,including tupelo ponds, thick black gum ponds in swamp land, etc.
(Appraisal Schedule – County “B”) ORCHARDS
Code Value / Acre Definition of Code
OR1 Highly productive, well maintained on Class I or II land.
OR2 Moderately productive, moderately well maintained Class I or IIland.
OR3 Low productive characteristics, possibly over mature orchard orneglected.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 306/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
306
Large Tract Case Study “Hand-In” Schedule
Appraisers:
Appraisers
Open Land Value Sales Used Benchmark (X)
I
II
III
IV
Woodland
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
Orchards
OR1
OR2
OR3
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 307/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
307
Large Tract Case Study “Hand-In” Schedule
Appraisers:
Appraisers
Open Land Value Sales Used Benchmark (X)
I
II
III
IV
Woodland
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
Orchards
OR1
OR2
OR3
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 308/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
308
STATISTICALLY TESTING AND PROVING THE RELIABILITY OF ARURAL APPRAISAL SYSTEM
In many respects, the application of mass appraisal techniques and procedures is an art as well as ascience. No mass appraisal system can hope to achieve 100% “accuracy.” That is, very few appraisalswill “hit right on” the actual selling price, but an adequate or effective appraisal schedule should, if properly applied in the field, result in an evaluation that closely approaches the selling price on acertain percentage of the sales.
There are statistical procedures to measure the acceptability of appraisals as compared to the actualselling price. It may be relatively easy to maintain a digest at 40% which is the assessment levelspecified in Georgia law. It is another matter to maintain equity in a valuation system.
Various procedures may be employed to “check” the accuracy of appraisals to determine if they fall
within certain tolerable limits of variation. However, in the State of Georgia the Coefficient of Dispersion must be used as the measure of uniformity for a ratio study.
In addition to measuring assessment level and uniformity, a statistical analysis of sales must check forbias. Bias in a statistical analysis indicates that either the higher priced properties or the lower pricedproperties are receiving preferential treatment (lower ratios) from the applied schedule. The PriceRelated Differential is the statistical measure that determines if bias is present.
Shown below is an example of the use of the statistical information in analyzing the reliability andequity of an appraisal system within the State of Georgia.
1. ASSESSMENT: Appraised Value * .40
2. RATIO (R): Assessment ÷ Sales Price (rounded to 4 decimals)
3. MEAN ( M ): Sum of ratios (∑ R) ÷ Number of Ratios (N)
4. MEDIAN (X): Physical midpoint of an array of ratios
5. AGGREGATE RATIO: Sum of assessment ÷ sum of sales prices
6. DEVIATION: Absolute value of median ratio - ratio
7. MEAN DEVIATION: Sum of deviations ÷ number of ratios
8. COEFFICIENT OF DISPERSION: Mean deviation ÷ median ratio
9. PRICE RELATED DIFFENRENTIAL: Mean ratio ÷ aggregate ratio
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 309/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
309
SaleNo.
Sale PriceLess Timber
Assessment(Appraised Value * .40)
Ratio(R)
AbsoluteDeviation from
Median Ratio (X-
Y)1 150,000 66,000 .4400 .0360
2 225,000 87,300 .3880 .0160
3 75,000 30,000 .4000 .0040
4 315,000 163,800 .5200 .1160
5 110,000 44,880 .4080 .0040
6 183,000 70,272 .3840 .0200
7 260,000 81,120 .3120 .0920
8 311,000 130,620 .4200 .0160
9 462,000 147,840 .3200 .0840
10 288,000 172,800 .6000 .1960
Totals 2,379,000 994,632 4.1920 0.5840
MEAN RATIO = ∑ R ÷ N = 4.1920 ÷ 10 = .4192
MEDIAN RATIO (X ) = Mid Pt of Ratio Array = .4080 + .4000 = .8080 ÷ 2 = .4040
SaleNo.
Ratio(R)
Midpt
10 .6000
4 .52001 .4400
8 .4200
5 .4080
3 .4000
2 .3880
6 .3840
9 .3200
7 .3120
With an even number of sales, the median ratio will be determined by summing the two midpoints, in
this case Sales 5 and 3 and dividing the result by 2.
The acceptable range for the median is .3600 to .4400. However, if public utility properties are to beassessed at 40%, the median must fall within a range of .3800 to .4200.
AGGREGATE RATIO = Sum of assessment ÷ sum of sales prices = 994,362 ÷ 2,379,000 = .4180
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 310/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
310
MEAN DEVIATION = Sum of Deviations____ = .5840 _ = .0584
# of ratios 10
COEFFICIENT OF DISPERSION (COD) = Mean of Deviation = _.0548__ = .1356Median Ratio .4040
Since the coefficient of dispersion in this study does not exceed .200 it may be concluded that theappraisal system employed is acceptable within the limits accepted as being adequate for taxappraisals. The COD. of .1356 tells us that “on the average” the deviation from the average ratio ormedian ratio (.4040) is 13.56% or .0584 points (mean deviation).
Expressed in another manner, the assessments in the example are “on the average” 40.40% of the sale
price. “On the average” the appraisals vary (plus or minus) 5.84 points. The COD. is a way of expressing this 5.84 point “spread” as a percentage.
The coefficient of dispersion must be below 20% or .2000 for agricultural and commercial/industrialsales. The level of acceptance for residential properties is 15% or .1500.
PRICE RELATED DIFFERENTIAL (PRD) = Mean Ratio = _.4192__ = 1.0029Aggregate Ratio .4180
The PRD must fall within a range of .95 to 1.10 before it is considered acceptable. A PRD valuebelow 1.00 indicates bias towards the lower priced properties. In other words, the lower priced
properties have ratios that are generally lower than their higher priced counterparts. The term for asituation of this nature is progressivity.
If the PRD is above 1.00, the bias is towards the higher priced properties. The term for bias toward thehigher priced properties is regressivity.
The median, coefficient of dispersion and price related differential must all fall within the specifiedranges before any valuation schedule is acceptable.
Statistic Range of Acceptance
Median (Level of Assessment) .3600 - .4400 for digest (.3800-.4200 for Utilities)
Coefficient of Dispersion (COD) 0.00 - .2000 for Ag/Comm/Ind (.1500 for Res)
Price Related Differential (PRD) .95 – 1.10
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 311/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
311
Statistical Analysis
SALENO. SALE PRICE(SP)
ASSESSED
VALUE(AV)
RATIO (X)(AV ÷ SP) DEVIATION FROMMEDIAN RATIO
MEDIAN RATIO =MEAN RATIO =AGG RATIO =MEAN DEVIATION =COEFFICIENT OF DISPERSION =PRICE RELATED DIFFERENTIAL =
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 312/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
312
Statistical Analysis
SALENO.
SALE PRICE(SP)
ASSESSED
VALUE(AV)
RATIO (X)(AV ÷ SP)
DEVIATION FROMMEDIAN RATIO
MEDIAN RATIO =
MEAN RATIO =AGG RATIO =MEAN DEVIATION =COEFFICIENT OF DISPERSION =PRICE RELATED DIFFERENTIAL =
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 313/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
313
Small Parcels
Definition - Small parcels are those tracts of land that are generally located outside of corporate limits
and subdivisions. In most cases, factors other than soil productivity and standing timber affect thevalue of these tracts.
Factors that Affect Value of Small Parcels
Accessibility (location)Desirability (those characteristics contained within the property boundaries)TopographyShapeDevelopmentLandscaping
Shade TreesOtherSize
Schedule Format
A small parcel schedule is usually set up in a table form with the accessibility and desirability codesforming the columns of the table and the acreage intervals setting up the lines .
Accessibility Codes – Numeric codes denoting different locations.
Desirability Codes – Alpha codes differentiating between various levels of desirability.
Use of Schedule
Valuation of small parcels by existing schedule.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 314/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
314
Classification by Accessibility (Location)
Plot sales on county map.
Using the sales prices and appraiser’s judgment designate different areas for accessibility.
Classification by Desirability
Usually a physical inspection of the property is required.
From the appraiser’s observation, a desirability code is assigned to the property.
Building a Small Parcel Schedule
Verify vacant rural land sales (all acreage levels).
Plot sales on graph to determine “breaking point.”
Classify sales according to accessibility and desirability.
Establish base from which to begin schedule.
This is done by preferably analyzing sales at the one-acre level in the middle of the schedule and
setting up a base per acre value.
Set up factors between accessibilities, desirability’s and acre intervals.
Accessibility Factor.
Compare sales at the same acre level, having the same desirability code and consecutive accessibilitycodes.
Divide the per acre value for the sale with the lower value by the per acre value of the sale with thehigher value.
Using as many sales as possible, determine the factor that should be used to adjust values betweenaccessibility levels.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 315/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
315
Desirability Factor.
Compare sales at the same acre level, having the same accessibility code and consecutive desirability
codes.
Divide the per acre value for the sale with the lower value by the per acre value of the sale with thehigher value.
Using as many sales as possible, determine the factor that should be used to adjust values betweendesirability codes.
Acre Factor.
Compare sale with the same accessibility and desirability codes but at different acre levels.
Divide the per acre value for the sale with the lower value by the per acre value of the sale with thehigher value.
Using as many sales as possible, determine the factor that should be used to adjust values betweenacres.
Completion of Schedule
Using the base value and the above established factors complete the small parcel schedule through thebreaking point.
Test Schedule with Ratio Study
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 316/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
316
SMALL PARCEL SCHEDULE
Definition of Accessibility/Desirability Codes
Accessibility
1. Best location in county; the areas where sales have indicated the highest values, or due to theappraiser’s judgment because of similarities between areas the location has been designated asone of the best. Generally, those location on mountains with good view, around lakes or riverswith good view and/or water depth, close proximity to towns or major highway intersections, orany other highly regarded area would fall into this classification.
2. Those areas where sales have indicated that values are less than those in the best locations buthigher than the values in other areas. Also, those areas where there are no sales but due to the
appraiser’s judgment and knowledge of the county they have been designated as the secondhighest. Generally, those areas, which are somewhat further, removed from the best locationsor the view and/or water depth is not as good.
3. The average location within the county as indicated by sales or the appraiser’s judgment.Generally, those areas away from city, lake, mountain, river, or any other influence that wouldcause the value to be in a higher range.
4. Locations or areas within the county where values are somewhat lower than in the averagelocation. Generally, those areas located in the rural part of the county and off the mainhighways and county paved roads.
5. The poorest locations within the county as indicated by sales or the appraiser’s judgment andknowledge of the county. Generally, those areas located in the rural and remote parts of thecounty with no or very little accessibility.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 317/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
317
Desirability
A. The tracts will have the best shape and topography. These tracts may be well developed withexcellent landscaping, well and septic tank or city/county water and sewage. The parcel willhave excellent road frontage. In the larger small parcels with very heavy stands of timber, thisclassification could be used to compensate for the timber value.
B. The tracts will have good shape and topography. These tracts may be developed with good toaverage landscaping, well and septic tank or city/county water and sewage. The parcel willhave better than average road frontage. This classification could also be used to helpcompensate for the heavier stands of timber on those small parcels where such value may affectthe selling price.
C. The tracts will have average shape and topography. These tracts in most cases will not have ahome site except in the larger small parcels where the influence of the home site value hasdiminished. The larger small parcels with fair timber stockings or exceptionally good farmlandcould be placed in this category.
D. The tracts in this category will have poor shape. The topography of these tracts will make themless desirable than the average or above tract. No development will have taken place on theseparcels. Very little timber will be present to affect the value of the larger tracts.
E. These tracts will be the least desirable of all the parcels in the small acreage category. Theywill be characterized by poor shape and road frontage, no development and very poor
topography. There will be no timber to influence the value of the larger small parcels.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 318/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
318
Small Parcel Zones – County A
1 2
Acres A B C D E A B C D E A
1 3375 3150 2925 2700 2475 2625 2438 2250 2100 1988 2025
2 3292 3073 2853 2633 2414 2564 2379 2195 2049 1938 1080
3 2996 2796 2596 2395 2195 2335 2166 1998 1865 1762 1806
4 2919 2724 2528 2333 2138 2278 2111 1947 1817 1716 1764
5 2842 2652 2461 2271 2080 2220 2088 1896 1770 1670 1722
6 2765 2579 2394 2209 2023 2163 2002 1845 1722 1624 16807 2688 2507 2327 2146 1966 2105 1947 1793 1674 1578 1638
8 2611 2436 2260 2084 1908 2048 1896 1742 1627 1532 1596
9 2534 2363 2192 2022 1850 1990 1838 1691 1579 1485 1554
10 2457 2291 2125 1959 1793 1933 1784 1640 1532 1439 1512
11 2380 2219 2058 1897 1736 1876 1729 1589 1484 1393 1470
12 2303 2147 1990 1835 1679 1819 1674 1538 1436 1347 1428
13 2226 2075 1924 1772 1621 1761 1620 1487 1389 1300 138614 2149 2003 1856 1710 1564 1703 1565 1436 1341 1254 1344
15 2072 1930 1789 1648 1506 1646 1510 1385 1294 1208 1302
16 1995 1859 1722 1586 1449 1589 1456 1333 1246 1162 1260
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 319/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
1 2
Acres A B C D E A B C D E A
17 1939 1805 1671 1537 1403 1551 1420 1299 1215 1133 1228
18 1883 1751 1620 1488 1357 1513 1384 1265 1184 1104 1196
19 1827 1697 1569 1439 1311 1475 1348 1231 1153 1075 1164
20 1771 1643 1518 1390 1265 1437 1312 1197 1122 1046 1132
21 1715 1589 1467 1341 1219 1399 1276 1163 1091 1017 1100
22 1659 1535 1416 1292 1173 1361 1240 1129 1060 988 1068
23 1603 1481 1365 1243 1120 1323 1204 1095 1029 959 1036
24 1547 1427 1314 1194 1081 1285 1168 1061 998 930 1004
25 1491 1373 1263 1145 1035 1247 1132 1027 967 901 972
26 1435 1319 1212 1096 989 1209 1096 993 936 872 940
27 1379 1265 1161 1047 943 1171 1060 959 905 843 908
28 1323 1211 1110 998 897 1133 1024 925 874 814 876
29 1267 1157 1059 949 851 1095 988 891 843 785 844
30 1211 1103 1008 900 805 1057 952 857 812 756 812
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 320/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
320
4
Acres A B C D E A B
1 1518 1650 1500 1350 1200 1250 1150
2 1643 1614 1468 1322 1175 1229 1131
3 1605 1473 1339 1207 1073 1208 1112
4 1569 1439 1309 1180 1051 1187 1093
5 1532 1406 1280 1154 1028 1166 1074
6 1495 1372 1250 1127 1005 1145 1055
7 1457 1338 1219 1100 1023 1124 1036
8 1420 1305 1189 1074 1000 1103 1017
9 1383 1271 1159 1047 977 1082 998
10 1346 1238 1129 1021 954 1061 979
11 1309 1204 1099 994 931 1040 960
12 1272 1170 1069 967 908 1019 941
13 1235 1137 1039 941 885 998 922
14 1198 1103 1009 914 862 977 903
15 1161 1070 979 888 839 956 884
16 1124 1036 949 861 816 935 865
17 1094 1009 925 839 794 917 848
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 321/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
4
Acres A B C D E A B
18 1064 982 901 817 772 899 831
19 1034 955 877 795 750 881 814
20 1004 928 853 773 728 863 797
21 974 901 829 751 706 845 780
22 944 874 805 729 684 827 763
23 914 847 781 707 662 809 746
24 884 820 757 685 640 791 729
25 854 793 733 663 618 773 712
26 824 766 709 641 596 755 695
27 794 739 685 619 574 737 678
28 764 712 661 597 552 719 661
29 734 685 637 575 530 701 644
30 704 658 613 553 509 683 627
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 322/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
322
USE OF SCHEDULE PROBLEMS
Acc / Des Acres $ / Acre Value
1. 3B 10.50
2. 1D 2.60
3. 4A 15.00
4. 5E 1.56
5. 2C 6.33
6. 4D 18.61
7. 1A 12.05
8. 3C 4.41 `
9. 5B 16.00
10. 2E 7.85
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 323/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
323
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 324/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
324
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 325/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
325
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 326/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
326
ACCESSIBILITY FACTOR EXERCISE
Acres Acc/Des Sales Price1.01 1C $2,020
1.35 2C $2,565
3.46 4D $5,190
3.00 5D $4,350
7.70 3A $9,240
7.91 5A $7,830
10.25 3B $13,940
10.50 4B $13,125
12.35 1D $17,290
12.60 2E $15,750
15.10 2A $14,800
15.45 3A $14,675
Accessibility Factors
Sale #’sAcreLevel
HigherAcc
LowerAcc
Higher $ / Ac
Lower $ / Ac
Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 327/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
327
DESIRABILITY FACTOR EXERCISE
Acres Acc/Des Sales Price
1.00 1D $2,800
1.25 2E $3,250
2.15 2B $4,945
2.50 2C $5,185
5.60 5A $9,940
5.45 5B $8,720
9.18 3D $10,375
9.00 3E $8,910
11.20 4A $10,08012.20 4B $9,455
14.10 1C $17,275
14.50 1D $16,820
Desirability Factors
Sale #’sAcreLevel
HigherDes
Lower DesHigher $ /
AcLower $ /
AcFactor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 328/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
328
ACREAGE FACTOR EXERCISE
Acres Acc/Des Sales Price
1.01 1A $8,000
2.20 1A $16,895
4.60 2D $18,470
5.75 2D $22,165
7.00 3C $14,100
8.15 5C $13,040
10.25 5B $11,275
11.50 5B $12,420
14.05 4C $13,700
14.70 4C $14,330
18.00 3D $14,400
19.50 3D $15,130
Acreage Factors
Sale #’sLower Acre
LevelHigher Acre
Level$ / Ac for
Lower Level$ / Ac forHigher Level
Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 329/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
329
SALES LISTSale # Acc/Des Acres
Sale Price
1 1B 2.68 11,6872 4C 18.78 19,982
3 3B 1.00 2,910
4 4C 9.80 14,974
5 4B 5.21 10,264
6 4C 1.07 2,263
7 4B 17.97 21,654
8 5D 14.88 13,466
9 4D 1.09 2,109
10 4B 6.75 12,859
11 3C 1.00 2,63012 2D 12.75 24,633
13 2D 19.22 27,870
14 5D 6.92 8,442
15 1D 19.10 34,570
16 4C 2.30 4,667
17 4E 15.50 12,400
18 2C 4.70 15,980
19 1A 3.60 16,595
20 3D 13.45 19,165
21 1A 1.15 6,500
22 3D 12.63 18,94523 5D 9.50 11,715
24 4A 5.05 12,474
25 5C 20.50 17,325
26 5C 14.11 13,955
27 5E 22.78 13,575
28 3C 1.07 2,857
29 4E 23.00 16,355
30 3C 14.00 24,920
31 3C 2.01 5,126
32 5C 9.00 11,11533 1C 24.33 42,580
34 5D 18.35 17,800
35 5E 3.60 3,960
36 3C 25.36 27,390
37 2C 1.20 3,978
38 3D 10.00 15,000
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 330/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
330
39 3B 6.00 14,214
40 5D 22.51 14,745
41 2E 13.61 22,797
42 5E 1.04 1,75043 2E 12.40 21,576
44 5E 23.00 13,110
45 2C 6.33 13,485
46 1C 7.25 20,000
47 1B 3.54 14,833
48 2B 21.00 52,500
49 3B 17.50 26,250
50 4B 18.01 20,980
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 331/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
331
LISTING SALES BY ACRES
Sale # Acc / Des Acres Sales Price $ / Acre
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 332/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
332
LISTING SALES BY ACRES
Sale # Acc / Des Acres Sales Price $ / Acre
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 333/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
333
LISTING SALES BY ACRES
Sale # Acc / Des Acres Sales Price $ / Acre
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 334/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
334
LISTING SALES BY ACRES
Sale # Acc / Des Acres Sales Price $ / Acre
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 335/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
335
Accessibility Factors
Sale #’s
Acre
Level
Higher
Acc
Lower
Acc
Higher $ /
Ac
Lower $ /
Ac Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 336/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
336
Accessibility Factors
Sale #’s
Acre
Level
Higher
Acc
Lower
Acc
Higher $ /
Ac
Lower $ /
Ac Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 337/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
337
Accessibility Factors
Sale #’s
Acre
Level
Higher
Acc
Lower
Acc
Higher $ /
Ac
Lower $ /
Ac Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 338/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
338
Accessibility Factors
Sale #’s
Acre
Level
Higher
Acc
Lower
Acc
Higher $ /
Ac
Lower $ /
Ac Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 339/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
339
Accessibility Factors
Sale #’s
Acre
Level
Higher
Acc
Lower
Acc
Higher $ /
Ac
Lower $ /
Ac Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 340/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
340
Desirability Factors
Sale #’s
Acre
Level
Higher
Acc
Lower
Acc
Higher $ /
Ac
Lower $ /
Ac Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 341/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
341
Desirability Factors
Sale #’s
Acre
Level
Higher
Des Lower Des
Higher $ /
Ac
Lower $ /
Ac Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 342/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
342
Desirability Factors
Sale #’s
Acre
Level
Higher
Des Lower Des
Higher $ /
Ac
Lower $ /
Ac Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 343/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
343
Desirability Factors
Sale #’s
Acre
Level
Higher
Des Lower Des
Higher $ /
Ac
Lower $ /
Ac Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 344/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
344
Desirability Factors
Sale #’s
Acre
Level
Higher
Des Lower Des
Higher $ /
Ac
Lower $ /
Ac Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 345/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
345
Acreage Factors
Sale #’s
Lower Acre
Level
Higher Acre
Level
$ / Ac for
Lower Level
$ / Ac for
Higher Level Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 346/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
346
Acreage Factors
Sale #’s Lower AcreLevel Higher AcreLevel $ /Ac forLower Level $ /Ac forHigher Level Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 347/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
347
Acreage Factors
Sale #’s Lower Acre
Level
Higher Acre
Level
$ /Ac for
Lower Level
$ /Ac for
Higher Level
Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 348/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
348
Acreage Factors
Sale #’s Lower Acre
Level
Higher Acre
Level
$ /Ac for
Lower Level
$ /Ac for
Higher Level
Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 349/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
349
Acreage Factors
Sale #’s Lower Acre
Level
Higher Acre
Level
$ /Ac for
Lower Level
$ /Ac for
Higher Level
Factor
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 350/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
350
1 2 3 4
Acres A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E A B C D
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
16.00
17.00
18.00
19.00
20.00
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 351/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
1 2 3 4
Acres A B C D E A B C D E A B C D E A B C D
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
16.00
17.00
18.00
19.00
20.00
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 352/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
352
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 353/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
353
Factors for Acreage < 1.00
.01 - .09 = .20
.10 - .19 = .32
.20 - .29 = .44
.30 - .39 = .53
.40 - .49 = .61
.50 - .59 = .70
.60 - .69 = .78
.70 - .79 = .85
.80 - .89 = .92
.90 - .99 = .97
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 354/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
354
Rural Land – Determination of Location/Size Factors for Large Parcels
The base land values that were calculated for large tracts were a result of analyzing the market
for the typical ag tract and determining the use values for such properties. The values that werecalculated should contain little or no adjustment for location and size. However, within anycounty there will be parcels with acreage above the small acre break point but less than thestandard ag parcel acreage. Typically, these parcels require adjustments for location and size togenerate the property’s Fair Market Value.
The lack of size/location adjustments in a rural land schedule can result in the following situationwhere the small acre break point exists and the large tract land schedule is applied. The value of a 25.00 acre small parcel with an accessibility/desirability code of 3C is 25,000 (25 *1,000/acre). The value of a 26 acre parcel that has 10 acres of Class II open land and 16 acres of Class W3 woodland is 11,800. The value difference of 13,200 dollars is difficult to explain to a
taxpayer since the lower valued parcel is the larger of the two.
A more definitive means of determining the need for such adjustments would be through a sales-assessment ratio study. A ratio study performed on the 15 sales that were used to derive thelarge tract base land values would produce the following statistics:
Median = .3951
COD = .0205
PRD = 1.0015
If the sales of the 10 smaller ag tracts on the following pages are introduced into the study, thestatistics are as follows:
Median = .3818
COD = .1107
PRD = .9397
The statistics above indicate that the rural land large tract schedule is producing the correctassessment level with acceptable uniformity but the schedule contains bias toward the smaller
tracts which is known as progressivity. In other words, the larger parcels would have the higherratios. If the sales were arrayed by size, it would be obvious as to this fact.
The progessivity of the rural land schedule, in this case, is due to the lack of a component of fairmarket value which is an adjustment/factor for size and location. The size/location adjustmentwould fall under the category of “any other factors deemed pertinent in arriving at fair marketvalue” as defined in Georgia Code Section 48-5-2.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 355/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
355
The sales price of Sale #16 below is 27,000 with an accessibility assignment of 3. The appraisedvalue of the land using the rural land base schedule is 22,900 as calculated on the followingpage.
Classification Acres $/Acre Value
II 25.00 700 17,500
W2 18.00 300 5,400
Land “Use” Value 22,900
The value difference of 4,100 between the sales price and the Use Value can be attributed to sizeand location influences. In the business of mass appraisal, the value difference is best defined asa factor that can be easily applied to hundreds, perhaps thousands of parcels.
The size/location adjustment factor would be 1.1790 and would be calculated by dividing theresidual land sales price by the land use value. The steps for the factor calculation are asfollows:
Residual Land Price = Sales Price – Non-Land Value Loc/Size Adj = Res Land Price / App Use Value (round to 4 decimal positions)
Accessibility assignments should be based on the location of the parcel within the county and theaccessibility areas defined in the small parcel market analysis. Factors for all sales should be
calculated and placed in an accessibility/desirability table at the proper acre level andaccessibility code point such as in the example below using Sale #16.
Acre/Acc 1 2 3 4 5
26.00
27.00
28.00
(29 – 42)
43.00 1.1790
After all size/location adjustments are calculated, the appraiser should establish a benchmark point in the table and then using interpolation routines to calculate accessibility and acreage
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 356/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
356
factors, extend the factors throught the accessibility/desirability table for tracts above the smallacre break point.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 357/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
357
Sale # 16Sales Price: 27,000Timber Value: 0
Use Value: 22,900
Sale # 17Sales Price: 39,000Timber Value: 0
Use Value: 22,400
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 358/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
358
Sale # 18Sales Price: 22,525Timber Value: 0
Use Value: 15,600
Sale # 19Sales Price: 26,300Timber Value: 8,660
Use Value: 19,600
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 359/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
359
Sale # 20Sales Price: 16,100Timber Value: 4,725
Use Value: 7,000
Sale # 21Sales Price: 34,400Timber Value: 6,630
Use Value: 21,400
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 360/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
360
Sale # 22Sales Price: 7,175Timber Value: 1,210
Use Value: 4,400
LOCATION
5
Sale # 23Sales Price: 26,800Timber Value: 4,000
Use Value: 18,000
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 361/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
361
Sale # 24Sales Price: 38,750Timber Value: 0
Use Value: 25,600
Sale # 25Sales Price: 30,100Timber Value: 2,035
Use Value: 22,900
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 362/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
362
Large Tract Transitional Table
Acres 1 2 3 4 526
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
4849
50
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 363/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
363
Large Tract Transitional Table
Acres 1 2 3 4 526
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
4849
50
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 364/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
364
Using Absorption Methodology in Rural Land Schedules
In most counties, parcels of rural land exist that are larger than the typical size agricultural tract
that sales. These “super sized” parcels may range from 400 to 500 acres and up to thousands of acres depending upon the county. Typically, there are few sales to no sales of these type tracts.Consequently, the appraiser is left without any real guidelines as to how to make sizeadjustments to these parcels.
In the absence of adequate sales to develop size adjustments for the “super sized” parcels, theAPM provides the appraiser with a means of arriving at size adjustments through absorptionmethodology. The appraiser should remember that this methodology is used only when adequatesales of rural large tracts are not available to provide market indications of size factors.
In Rule 560-11-10-.02(1)(a), an absorption rate is defined as the rate at which the real estate
market can absorb real property of a given type. In this situation, the appraiser is concerned withthe rate at which a large tract of land can be absorped by the market if it is divided into smallermarketable units and then determining the present worth of the property by discounting thefuture worth of the parcel to present day dollars.
Rule 560-11-10-.09(3)(b)(2)(iv) provides the methodology by which the appraise shall determinethe rate of absorption and apply the rate to the valuation process. The Rule states
“When insufficient large tract sales are available to create a reliable schedule of factors, theappraisal staff may use comparable sales to develop values for the size tracts for whichcomparables exist, and then adjust these values for larger tracts by (1) estimating a rate of
absorption for the smaller tracts for which data exists, (2) dividing the large tract intosmaller, marketable sections, (3) developing a sales schedule with estimated income by yearreflecting the absorption rate and the value characteristics of each of the smaller tracts, (4)discounting the income schedule to the present using an appropriate discount rate, and (5)summing the resulting values to arrive at an estimated value for the property. “
Each step of developing an absorption rate as outlined in the Rule above will be discussed on thefollowing pages.
The initial step in the process is to estimate a rate of absorption for the smaller tracts for whichdata exits and to define a standard size for ag tracts. This can be translated as determing the
number of smaller marketable units that are generally sold each year and the average size of thetracts.. The number of smaller marketable units may be obtained in the following manner:
1. The “true” ag tracts should be arrayed by acreage.
2. From the array of ag tracts the appraiser should select an acreage level where the largestnumber of sales have occurred. Due to the limited number of sales, the acreage level mayactually be an acreage range, not a specific number of acres. For example, the appraiser
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 365/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
365
may select a range of 150 to 250 acres with an average acreage level of 200 acres. Theaverage acreage level will be termed the standard ag marketable tract. In some situations,a period of time extending beyond 1 year may need to be used to provide the appraiserwith a clear indication of the standard size for ag tracts.
3. The rate of absorption will be the number of sales that occur at the acre level or acreagerange. If more than one year is used to draw the conclusion, the appraiser should averagethe number of sales over the number of years to produce a yearly rate.
The second step of the process is dividing the large tract into smaller, marketable units. In thefee appraisal process, each parcel to be appraise that is larger than the standard marketable unitwould need to be analyzed. However, considering the volume of parcels that much be appraisedeach year in mass appraisal, the appraiser must take a different approach. Consequently, thelarge tract will be identified as the largest non-exempt, non-utility parcel in the county. The
large tract should then be divided into smaller marketable units by dividing the acreage in thelarge tract by the total acres of the standard ag marketable tracts which produces the number of marketable sections.
For example, if the largest parcel in the county is 5,000 acres and the standard ag marketabletract is 200 acres with 5 such standard ag parcels sold each year, the appraiser would determinethe total acres of the standard ag marketable tract by multiplying the standard ag marketableacreage by the number for standard ag parcels sold. (200 * 5 = 1000).
The total standard ag acres would then be divided into the acreage of the large tract to generatethe number of years expected to sell off the large tract (5000 ÷ 1000 = 5). This will be known as
the sell-off period.
The third step in the absorption process is to develop a sales schedule with estimated income byyear reflecting the absorption rate and the value characteristics of each of the smaller tracts. Inother words, the appraiser should determine the value of the smaller marketable ag units. Sincethe result of the absorption process will be applied to all large tracts across the county, theappraise may determine the composition of the standard ag tract in the county and apply that tothe county’s rural base land schedule to generate the value of the smaller marketable ag units.
For example, if the standard ag tract compostion is 60 % woodland and 40 % open land and thevalue of the woodland is $1100 per acre and open land is $1500 per acre, the value of the
standard ag marketable acreage (1000 acres) can be calculated as follows:
Open Land value = std mkt acs * %Open * avg open value = 1000 * .40 * 1500 = 600,000
Woodland value = std mkt acs * %Wood * avg wood value = 1000 * .60 * 1100 = 660,000
Total value = Open Land value + Woodland value = 600,000 + 660,000 = 1,260,000
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 366/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
366
Step four of the absorption process involves discounting the income schedule to the presentusing an appropriate discount rate. This can be translated as determining the present worth of thestandard ag marketable units for each year with a discount rate. The discount rate can be definedas the rate of return that most buyers would expect from an investment in rural land. In the
absence of that information, the appraiser may inquire of local lending institutions as to thetypical rate for borrowing funds to purchase rural land properties.
In our example, the sell-off period is 5 years as calculated in Step 2 and the value of the standardmarketable acreage as determined in Step 3 is 1,260,000. The discount rate is 7%. The value of the standard marketable acreage must be discounted for each year of the sell-off period.
The present value of a future income stream can be calculated with the following formula:
PV = FV ÷ (1 + i)n
Where PV = present value, FV = future value, i = discount rate, and n = the year of the incomestream for which the present value is sought. For example, if we were looking for the presentvalue of the standard marketable acreage in the fourth year of the sell-off period, the presentvalue formula would be applied in the manner below:
PV = 1,260,000 ÷ (1 + .07)4 PV = 1,260,000 ÷ 1.074 PV = 1,260,000 ÷ 1.3108PV = 961,248
Following is a table containing the present worth value for each year of a standard 5,000 acre
tract.
Year Value Rate Present Value
0 1,260,000 7.00 1,260,000
1 1,260,000 7.00 1,177,570
2 1,260,000 7.00 1,100,533
3 1,260,000 7.00 1,028,535
4 1,260,000 7.00 961,248
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 367/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
367
The fifth step in the absorption process is summing the resulting values to arrive at an estimatedvalue for the property. This can be stated as totaling the present value for each year to producethe total discounted value of the large tract.
The table below contains the sum of the present values for the 5,000 acre tract.
Year Value Rate Present Value
0 1,260,000 7.00 1,260,000
1 1,260,000 7.00 1,177,570
2 1,260,000 7.00 1,100,533
3 1,260,000 7.00 1,028,535
4 1,260,000 7.00 961,248
Total Value 5,527,886
The process above could be applied to all large tracts of rural land. However, that would requirethe appraiser to be more specific as to the composition of the subject properties and thecalculations would have to be done hundreds of times. With the use of composition and value
standards for the county, a sixth step can be added to the process whereby the informationderived from this process can be used to create a size factor for the large tract which throughinterpolation can be applied to all parcels that are categorized as rural land and have acreageabove the standard ag tract size. The size factor should be integrated into the county’saccessibility/desirability table.
The size adjustment is calculated by dividing the per acre value of the large tract by the per acrevalue of the standard ag marketable tract. The steps to perform this calculation are as follows:
Value of std mkt tract of 200 acres = (200 * .60 * 1100) + (200 * .40 * 1500) = 252,000 Value of 5,000 acre tract = 5,527,886
Size Adj = $ per ac of large tract / $ per ac of std tract Size Adj = 1,106 / 1,260 Size Adj = .8778
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 368/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
368
The size factor would be added to the accessibility/desirability table as in the example below:
Acres Factor
50.00 1.4335
100.00 1.0554
200.00 1.0000
5000.00 .8778
Using an interpolation routine such as the one below, size factors could be determined for allacreage levels. The formula for the interpolation of size factors is
(((A – L) / (U – L)) * (UV – LV)) + LV
A = acre level where size factor is needed L = lower acre level in schedule within acre range of A U = upper acre level in schedule within acre range of A LV = Factor at L acre level
UV = Factor at U acre level
If the size factor for a 1500 acre tract is needed, the calculations would take place as follows:
(((A – L) / (U – L)) * (UV – LV)) + LV (((1500 – 200) / (5000 – 200)) * (.8778 – 1.0000)) + 1.0000 ((1300 / 4800) * -.1222) + 1.0000 (.2708 * -.1222) + 1.0000 -.0331 + 1.0000 = .9669
The size factors would be applied to the “use” values of the ag parcels to generate the Fair
Market Value of the land. The “use” values are calculated by applying the base land schedule tothe acreage associated with each use/productivity rating classification within the parcel.
In the example above, the size factor was calculated for the entire county without regard toaccessibility areas. Considering the size of the large tracts, the appraiser may find this to beacceptable. However, if sales indicate a need to calculate a different size factor for eachaccessibility area, the appraiser may do so keeping in mind that the value of the standardmarketable ag acreage must be adjusted for location.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 369/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
369
Absorption Exercise
Develop a size factor for large ag tracts within a county where the following determinations
were made:
5 parcels sold each year within an acre range of 100 to 200 acres (60% wooded / 40% open)
Wooded acres sell for 1500/ac ; Open 2000/ac 2500 acres is largest ag parcel 8 % is expected rate of return
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 370/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
370
Fair Market Value Exercise
Calculate the value of a 800 acre ag tract which is 80% open and 20% wooded. The value of theopen land is 2000 per acre; the woodland value is 1500 per acre. The accessibility/desirability
table that is to be used is as follows:
Acres Factor
50.00 1.4335
100.00 1.0554
150.00 1.0000
2500.00 .8347
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 371/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
371
Contracting a Rural Land Revaluation
Many times the Board of Tax Assessors will require the services of a contractor to provide theresources to perform a revalution of rural land. In such cases, the Board will draft a RFP to be
sent to contractors who are knowledgeable and experienced in the development of rural landschedules.
The Board should be careful when drafting the RFP to ensure that all aspects of the work to beperformed are covered. A sample RFP can be found on the following pages.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 372/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
372
The ______________________________ County Board of Tax Assessors is currentlysoliciting bids for the purpose of establishing classifications and values for rural land and timberwithin said county. The bids should be based on the following specifications:
1. All land in rural large tracts will be classified according to productivity, topography, etc.Woodland shall be separated from open land and so designated on maps. All orchardsand farm ponds shall be identified and classed. The different land types and associatedclasses will be delineated on blue line copies of film positives or on photographsdepending upon the discretion of the county. The county will furnish the photographs orblue-lines.
2. Location (accessibility) factors shall be established for rural large tracts. The factors willbe set up in a table that can easily be formatted for computer input.
3. Extraction of timber values from the qualified sales shall be the responsibility of the
vendor. All worksheets with timber calculations shall be submitted to the Board of Assessors
4. The company shall measure acreage in each classification delineated on maps.
5. Small parcels in rural areas shall be classified by accessibility and desirabilitycharacteristics. Accessibility codes will be numeric. Desirability will be indicated by theuse of alpha codes.
6. Accessibility areas shall be delineated in general on a county road map and morespecifically on the maps used to classify the large tracts. The desirability code for each
small parcel shall be indicated on the same maps.
7. The small parcel schedule shall resemble a grid with a value per acre for eachaccessibility/desirability combination at each acre level. The accessibility codes shallform the columns of the schedule with the desirability codes forming sub-columns. Theacreage intervals shall form the grid rows.
8. The acreage level at which the valuation of small parcels ends and large tracts begin shallbe determined by the company.
9. All schedules and values therein shall be the responsibility of the company. All values
for both large tracts and small parcels must be supported by ratio studies. There shall bea separate study for large and small tracts. The level of assessment indicated in eitherstudy shall not be less than______ or greater than ______. The coefficient of dispersionin either study shall not exceed twenty (17) percent. The price related differential shallfall within the range of .97 to 1.07, inclusive. Any study that does not meet the abovelisted criteria will be rejected by the assessors.
10. All work shall conform to Georgia Code and Rules & Regulations.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 373/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
373
11. A breakdown of land types, classes, and acreages shall be recorded on computer forms orproperty record cards that will be furnished by the county.
12. (Optional, if county is not automating records) All calculations will be extended to the
point of showing the final fair market value of the land and timber, both separately andtogether.
13. The company should include the cost of _____ days of hearings in the bid. Also, specifya per diem charge to include expenses for any additional days that might be required.
14. The cost for each phase of the job shall be listed within the bid.
15. Work should begin within one month of notification of acceptance of bid and becompleted no later than ____________________.
Bids will be opened _______________. Any bids received after _____________ on________________ will not be accepted or considered. Any questions concerning the abovespecifications should be directed to ___________________________ at the Assessor’sOffice or by phone at __________________.
The __________________ County Board of Commissioners and Assessors reserve the rightto waive irregularities in any bid, to reject any or all bids with or without cause and/or toaccept the bid that in their best judgment will be for the best interest of __________________ County.
The company shall furnish a list of references with phone number for jobs done within thelast five years. All work currently under contract shall be denoted with an asterisk (*).
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 374/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
374
RURAL LAND CASE PROBLEM
A number of sales were recorded in the Clerks of Superior Court’s office three years after theoriginal rural land schedule was established for County “B.” The assessors have instructed
their appraisers, ad they do each year, to study and analyze the sales to determine what, if any, changes need to be made to the rural land, timber, transitional, and small parcelschedules.
If any changes are indicated, new schedules for rural and timber should be prepared. Onlyclasses with accompanying values need be submitted. The definitions of the classes willremain the same. It is not necessary to prepare a new small parcel schedule or a “small-big”tract factor table. Only indicate what changes, if any, should be made. All recommendationsshould be supported with qualified evidence.
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 375/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
375
Sale # Acres Sales Price Access Class Ac / Cls Timber Val1 220 $129,500 I 100
II 50
III 70
2 5.50 $13,700 4A
3 1.00 $2,950 3C
4 40 $24,100 4 II 40
5 250 $118,000 II 175 4950
W4A 75
6 80 $8,200 IV 15
W5A 65
7 20 $43,500 1C
8 37 $16,200 5 III 25
IV 12
9 3.45 $6,200 5C
10 6 $11,900 4C
11 150 $67,200 III 150
12 12.25 $12,700 5E
13 45 $25,100 1 I 20
W2A 20
W5A 5
14 165 $116,900 I 150
W2A 15
15 29 $23,700 2 I 10 4693
W2A 19
16 2.10 $8,400 2B
17 17 $30,500 2D
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 376/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
376
Sale # Acres Sales Price Access Class Ac / Cls Timber Val
18 315 $642,000 W2A 315 591,440
19 120 $7,200 W5A 120
20 7.80 $15,200 3D
21 1 $3,050 3C
22 540 $386,100 II 200 192,825
III 75
W1A 160
W2A 105
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 377/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
377
Timber Valuation Worksheets
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Merchantabile Timber
Map ID: Date:Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Volume (Tons) Unit Price Value
Softwood Pulpwood
Softwood Chip-n-Saw
Softwood Sawtimber
Softwood Poles
Softwood Posts
Softwood Fuelchips
Hardwood Pulpwood
Hardwood Sawtimber
Hardwood Firewood
Total Merchantible Timber Value
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 378/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
378
Productivity-Volume Worksheet
Map ID: Acres: Date:
Volume – Tons/Acre
Productivity Pulpwood Chip-n-Saw % of Stand Ac Wt PW Wt CS Vol
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Total Volume
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 379/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
379
Productivity-Volume Worksheet
Map ID: Acres: Date:
Volume – Tons/Acre
Productivity Pulpwood Chip-n-Saw % of Stand Ac Wt PW Wt CS Vol
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Total Volume
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 380/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
380
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted)
Map ID: Date:
Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Vol(Tons)/Acre Unit Price Stocking Value
Pulpwood
Chip-n-Saw
Total Value/Acre (Pulpwood + Chip-n-Saw)
Acres of Pre-Merch
Total Value (Total Value/Acre x Acres)
Cost (Cost of Establishing Stand / Acre * Acres)
Base Value (Total Value – Cost)
Age of Merch (15 is default; local conditions take precedance)
Average Annual Timber Growth (Base Value ÷ Age of Merchantability)
Age of Stand (in years)
Accumulated Timber Growth (Average Annual Timber Growth * Age of
Total Accumulated Value (Accumulated Timber Growth + Cost)
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 381/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
381
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Pine Pre-Merchantable (Natural)
Map ID: Date:
Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Vol(Tons)/Acre Unit Price Stocking Value
Pulpwood .50
Chip-n-Saw .50
Total Value/Acre (Pulpwood + Chip-n-Saw)
Acres of Pre-Merch
Base Value (Total Value/Acre x Acres)
Age of Merch (15 is default; local conditions take precedance)
Average Annual Timber Growth (Base Value ÷ Age of Merchantability)
Age of Stand (in years)
Value of Accumulated Growth (Avg Annual Timber Growth * Age of Stand)
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 382/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
382
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Hardwood Pre-Merchantable (Natural)
Map ID: Date:
Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Vol(Tons)/Acre Unit Price Stocking Value
Pulpwood .50
Chip-n-Saw .50
Total Value/Acre (Pulpwood + Chip-n-Saw)
Acres of Pre-Merch
Base Value (Total Value/Acre x Acres)
Age of Merch (15 is default; local conditions take precedance)
Average Annual Timber Growth (Base Value ÷ Age of Merchantability)
Age of Stand (in years)
Value of Accumulated Growth (Avg Annual Growth * Age of Stand *.40)
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 383/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
383
Timber Value Summary
Map ID: Date:
Timber Type Value
Merchantable
Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted)
Pine Pre-Merchantable (Natural)
Hardwood Pre-Merchantable
Total Value of all Timber Types
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 384/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
384
Statistical AnalysisSale No. Sale Price
(SP)Assessed
Value (AV)Ratio (x)(AV/SP)
Deviationfrom Median
Ratio
Median Ratio = Mean Deviation (Xd) =
Mean Ratio (Xr) = Coefficient of Dispersion =
AGG Ratio =
Price Related Differential =
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 385/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
385
Statistical AnalysisSale No. Sale Price
(SP)Assessed
Value (AV)Ratio (x)(AV/SP)
Deviationfrom Median
Ratio
Median Ratio = Mean Deviation (Xd) =
Mean Ratio (Xr) = Coefficient of Dispersion =
AGG Ratio =
Price Related Differential =
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 386/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
386
Statistical AnalysisSale No. Sale Price
(SP)Assessed
Value (AV)Ratio (x)(AV/SP)
Deviationfrom Median
Ratio
Median Ratio = Mean Deviation (Xd) =
Mean Ratio (Xr) = Coefficient of Dispersion =
AGG Ratio =
Price Related Differential =
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 387/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
387
Statistical AnalysisSale No. Sale Price
(SP)Assessed
Value (AV)Ratio (x)(AV/SP)
Deviationfrom Median
Ratio
Median Ratio = Mean Deviation (Xd) =
Mean Ratio (Xr) = Coefficient of Dispersion =
AGG Ratio =
Price Related Differential =
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 388/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
388
Statistical AnalysisSale No. Sale Price
(SP)Assessed
Value (AV)Ratio (x)(AV/SP)
Deviationfrom Median
Ratio
Median Ratio = Mean Deviation (Xd) =
Mean Ratio (Xr) = Coefficient of Dispersion =
AGG Ratio =
Price Related Differential =
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 389/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
389
Statistical Analysis
Sale No. Sale Price(SP)
AssessedValue (AV)
Ratio (x)(AV/SP)
Deviationfrom Median
Ratio
Median Ratio = Mean Deviation (Xd) =
Mean Ratio (Xr) = Coefficient of Dispersion =
AGG Ratio =
Price Related Differential =
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 390/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
390
Statistical Analysis
Sale No. Sale Price(SP)
AssessedValue (AV)
Ratio (x)(AV/SP)
Deviationfrom Median
Ratio
Median Ratio = Mean Deviation (Xd) =
Mean Ratio (Xr) = Coefficient of Dispersion =
AGG Ratio =
Price Related Differential =
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 391/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
391
Timber Valuation- Exercise 1
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Merchantabile Timber
Map ID: 030-012 Date: 07/25/05
Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Volume (Tons) Unit Price Value
Softwood Pulpwood 400 6.13 2,452
Softwood Chip-n-Saw 2200 21.70 47,740
Softwood Sawtimber 7600 34.91 265,316
Softwood Poles
Softwood Posts
Softwood Fuelchips
Hardwood Pulpwood
Hardwood Sawtimber 1100 27.31 30,041
Hardwood Firewood
Total Merchantible Timber Value 345,549
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 392/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
392
Timber Valuation – Exercise 1
Productivity-Volume Worksheet
Map ID: 030-012 (8 yr old stand) Acres: 25.00 Date: 07/25/05
Volume – Tons/Acre
Productivity Pulpwood Chip-n-Saw % of Stand Ac Wt PW Wt CS Vol
1
2 93 10 20 18.60 2.00
3
4 77 8 32 24.64 2.56
5 70 8 48 33.60 3.84
6
7
8
9
Total Volume 76.84 8.40
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 393/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
393
Productivity-Volume Worksheet
Map ID: 030-012 (14 yr old stand) Acres: 24.00 Date: 07/25/05
Volume – Tons/Acre
Productivity Pulpwood Chip-n-Saw % of Stand Ac Wt PW Wt CS Vol
1
2
3 84 9 10.00 acs - 42 35.28 3.78
4
5
6 63 4 14.00 acs – 58 36.54 2.32
7
8
9
Total Volume 71.82 6.10
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 394/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
The Valuation of Rural Land
394
Timber Valuation – Exercise 1
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted)
Map ID: 030-012 (8 yr old stand) Date: 07/25/05Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Vol(Tons)/Acre Unit Price Stocking Value
Pulpwood 76.84 6.13 .80 377
Chip-n-Saw 8.40 21.70 .80 146
Total Value/Acre (Pulpwood + Chip-n-Saw) 523
Acres of Pre-Merch 25.00
Total Value (Total Value/Acre x Acres) 13,075
Cost (Cost of Establishing Stand / Acre * Acres) 2,750
Base Value (Total Value – Cost) 10,325
Age of Merch (15 is default; local conditions take precedance) 15
Average Annual Timber Growth (Base Value ÷ Age of Merchantability) 688
Age of Stand (in years) 8
Accumulated Timber Growth (Average Annual Timber Growth * Age of 5,504
Total Accumulated Value (Accumulated Timber Growth + Cost) 8,254
Information Supplied by:
7/29/2019 LGS GCP Course IVB Valuation of Rural Land Revised February 2011
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lgs-gcp-course-ivb-valuation-of-rural-land-revised-february-2011 395/395
Georgia Department of Revenue
Timber Valuation – Exercise 1
Timber Valuation Worksheet - Pine Pre-Merchantable (Planted)
Map ID: 030-012 (14 yr old stand) Date: 07/25/05Buyer/Seller Value:
Estimated Value Calculations
Product Class Vol(Tons)/Acre Unit Price Stocking Value
Pulpwood 71.82 6.13 .80 352
Chip-n-Saw 6.10 21.70 .80 106
Total Value/Acre (Pulpwood + Chip-n-Saw) 458
Acres of Pre-Merch 24.00
Total Value (Total Value/Acre x Acres) 10,992
Cost (Cost of Establishing Stand / Acre * Acres) 2,640
Base Value (Total Value – Cost) 8,352
Age of Merch (15 is default; local conditions take precedance) 15
Average Annual Timber Growth (Base Value ÷ Age of Merchantability) 557
Age of Stand (in years) 14
Accumulated Timber Growth (Average Annual Timber Growth * Age of 7,798
Total Accumulated Value (Accumulated Timber Growth + Cost) 10,438
Information Supplied by: