LEGAL ISSUES IN HRM LEGAL ISSUES IN HRM 1. Announcements ELM update Assignment ◦ Compare any 2...
-
Upload
sherman-french -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
1
Transcript of LEGAL ISSUES IN HRM LEGAL ISSUES IN HRM 1. Announcements ELM update Assignment ◦ Compare any 2...
LEGAL ISSUES IN HRM LEGAL ISSUES IN HRM
1
AnnouncementsAnnouncementsELM updateAssignment
◦Compare any 2 organizations◦Functions such as recruitment,
selection, compensation,, training and development, labour relations, etc.
◦What are the differences and why? What problems are the companies experiencing in HR/LR practices and how are these being resolved?
Guest speaker Anthony Celani next week
2
Lecture AgendaLecture AgendaOverview of Canadian legal
context
Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Human Rights Legislation
Employment Standards Legislation
Equity Legislation◦Employment Equity◦Pay Equity
3
Legal Issues in HRMLegal Issues in HRMMust consider the law when
deciding:◦Which employee(s) to hire◦How to compensate employees◦What benefits to offer◦How to accommodate employees
with dependents◦How to accommodate employees
with disabilities◦How and when to fire employees◦How to manage health and safety
4
5
Why obey the law (related to Why obey the law (related to employment)?employment)?
Organizations are embedded in society◦Must also serve social interests
It’s all about fairness◦Employment laws are intended to
ensure fair treatment of employees◦Clarifies rights and responsibilities
for all parties
Other benefits◦Fair treatment of employees may
have positive organizational impact
Canada’s Legal Environment Canada’s Legal Environment re: Employmentre: Employment
Constitutional Law◦ Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Statutes or Legislation◦ Acts of federal and provincial parliaments
Common Law◦ Not derived from specific legislation◦ Based on judge’s decisions
Contract Law◦ Individual employment contracts, collective
agreements6
Charter of Rights and Charter of Rights and FreedomsFreedomsPart of the Constitution Act, 1982Provides a range of fundamental
rights to Canadians◦Freedom of conscience and religion◦Freedom of thought, belief, opinion,
and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication
◦Freedom of association◦The right to live and seek employment
anywhere in Canada◦Etc.
7
Charter of Rights and Charter of Rights and FreedomsFreedomsSection 15: Principle of equality
◦Freedom from discrimination
•“Every individual is equal before and under the law… without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age, or mental or physical disability.”
8
Charter of Rights and Charter of Rights and FreedomsFreedomsSubsection (1) of Constitution Act
◦“does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups…”
◦Implies that programs which favour individuals from certain groups (to overcome previous disadvantage) are OK E.g., employment equity programs
9
Charter of Rights and Charter of Rights and FreedomsFreedomsHRM Applications
◦Freedom of association (section 2) has implications for labour relations
◦1987 Supreme court decision:◦ Includes right to organize and belong to a
union◦Does not include the right to bargain
collectively and strike—are not fundamental freedoms, but are regulated by legislation
Affects HRM, but more indirectly◦ Generally speaking, other legislation needs to meet
the standards of the Charter◦ Cases decided in Supreme Court
June, 2007 Supreme court decision reversed this
Suggested that right to bargain collectively is a fundamental human right
10
Human Rights LegislationHuman Rights LegislationPurpose
◦Prohibits discrimination in employment and in the provision of goods and services
◦To provide equal employment opportunities (i.e., prevent discrimination) to members of protected groups
2 levels of legislation◦Federal◦Provincial
11
Human Rights LegislationHuman Rights Legislation
Federal◦Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA,1978)◦Employers under federal jurisdiction◦About 10% of labour force
E.g., federal gov’t, crown corps, banks, airlines, etc.
Provincial◦Ontario Human Rights Code (1990)◦Employers under provincial jurisdiction◦About 90% of labour force
E.g., manufacturing (GM), retail (Canadian Tire), service, etc
12
Prohibited Grounds of Prohibited Grounds of DiscriminationDiscrimination
Canadian HumanCanadian HumanRights ActRights Act
PardonedPardonedconvictsconvicts
National orNational orethnic originethnic origin
DisabilityDisability
Marital andMarital andfamily statusfamily status
ReligionReligion
AgeAge
Sex, sexualSex, sexualorientationorientation
Race andRace andcolourcolour
•Slight variations between federal and provincial legislation
DiscriminationDiscriminationNot specifically defined in federal
legislation◦Involves practices that fail to provide
equal opportunity to members of protected groups
Direct (Intentional) Discrimination◦Employment practice that intentionally
discriminates on a prohibited ground◦The deliberate use of prohibited grounds
in employment decisions
14
DiscriminationDiscriminationIndirect (Systemic) Discrimination
◦Employment practice that results in discrimination against protected group, but is not intentional
◦Focus on the impact, not intent◦Referred to as: Adverse Impact, Disparate
Impact, Adverse Effect Discrimination, Constructive Discrimination
◦E.g., height requirement for police officers discriminates against women, visible minorities
◦E.g., employee referrals
15
Bona Fide Occupational Bona Fide Occupational RequirementsRequirementsText refers to them as BFO
QualificationsWhat is a BFOR / BFOQ?
◦A job requirement that legally overrides human rights protection
◦Allowed when characteristics needed to carry out the essential job requirements are related to a prohibited ground
◦E.g., religious schools may hire only teachers of a particular faith
16
Bona Fide Occupational Bona Fide Occupational RequirementsRequirements
Examples of court cases involving BFORs
Etobicoke, ON ◦Policy of mandatory retirement for
firefighters after age 60◦1982 Supreme court decision stated
that being under 60 was not a BFOR Inadequate evidence suggesting that
reaching age 60 resulted in inability to perform the job
17
Bona Fide Occupational Bona Fide Occupational RequirementsRequirements
Examples of court cases involving BFORs
Canadian Coast Guard◦Applicant with complete hearing loss in
one ear was excluded from officer cadet training
◦Coast guard cited the condition was a safety risk
◦BFOR claim was denied because employer’s evidence of the safety risk was inadequate
18
Supreme Court Case re: Supreme Court Case re: BC Fire FighterBC Fire Fighter
Woman employed in elite firefighting unit by province of BC for more than 2 years
New fitness tests were introduced for unitShe failed one of new tests (run 2.5 km in
11 minutes) and was firedUnion grieved – got appealed to Supreme
CourtCourt sided with complainant
◦ BC gov’t had failed to establish the fitness requirement as a BFOR – lack of evidence showing inability to meet it was a safety risk
19
Bona Fide Occupational Bona Fide Occupational RequirementsRequirementsWhen BFORs are upheld:
Theatrical productions◦That require actors with particular
characteristics
Use of gender as selection criterion◦E.g., Male nursing attendants to
provide bathing, etc. for male hospital patients
◦E.g., RCMP guards must be of same sex as prisoners being guarded
20
Criteria used to assess Criteria used to assess BFORBFOR In this decision, the court established 3
criteria to assess appropriateness of BFORs
1. Is the standard rationally connected to the performance of the job?
2. Was the standard established in an honest and good faith belief that it was necessary to accomplish the purpose identified in stage 1?
3. Is the standard reasonably necessary to accomplish its purpose? (i.e., must show it is impossible to accommodate employees without imposing undue hardship on employer)
21
Duty to AccommodateDuty to AccommodateRequirement that employer must
accommodate the employee to the point of “undue hardship”◦Aka: Reasonable Accommodation◦Employer is required to make certain
adjustments to job content or working conditions if an individual cannot meet job requirements (due to BFOR)
◦E.g., redesigning work stations, lighting, adjusting work schedules
Undue hardship not specifically defined◦Factors to consider include financial cost,
disruption of collective agreement, morale of other employees, etc.
22
O’Malley v. Simpson-Sears O’Malley v. Simpson-Sears Ltd.Ltd.O’Malley was a full-time sales clerk at S-S for
several years; worked 2/3 SaturdaysBecame member of 7th Day Adventist Church
which observes sabbath from Fri – Sat PMNo longer available to work on SaturdaysEmployer suggested she resign; she didn’tEmployer cut her hoursLower courts sided with employer, saying
this was not intentional discriminationSupreme Court ruled it was adverse effect
discrimination (not intentional) Inadequate reason for not accommodating
employee
23
Adverse Effect Discrimination as defined Adverse Effect Discrimination as defined in O’Malley v. Simpson-Sears Ltd.in O’Malley v. Simpson-Sears Ltd.“…an employer for genuine business
reasons adopts a rule or standard which is on its face neutral, and which will apply equally to all employees, but which has a discriminatory effect upon a prohibited ground on one employee or group of employees in that it imposes, because of some special characteristic of the employee or group, obligations, penalties, or restrictive conditions not imposed on other members of the work group”
24
25
Enforcement of Human Rights Enforcement of Human Rights LegislationLegislation
Complaint to Human Rights Commission↓
Complaint notification↓
Reasonable cause?↓
Investigation↓
Attempted resolution / Mediation↓
Decision / remedy specified↓
Acceptance or appeal
26
Remedies for Human Rights Remedies for Human Rights ViolationsViolationsMay occur at various stages
◦ Early settlement, conciliation agreement, or tribunal decision
Could include:◦ Stoppage of discriminatory practice◦ Restore rights, opportunities that were denied
victim◦ Reinstatement and/or compensation for lost
wages◦ Letters of apology◦ Issuance of an anti-harassment policy by an
employer (in cases of harassment complaints)
Video: Workplace Video: Workplace Discrimination-Discrimination-
12 Danger Zones 12 Danger Zoneshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=alEH4NyTvWc&feature=related
What are your thoughts?What were some of the prohibited
grounds of discrimination covered in this video?
What would you do as a HR manager?
27
28
Employment Standards Employment Standards LegislationLegislationProvincial legislation (e.g., Employment
Standards Act) addressing:◦ Minimum wage rates◦ Maximum hours of work◦ Paid holidays and vacations◦ Leave for maternity, adoption, bereavement◦ Payment upon termination of employment
Purpose◦ Promote fair and productive workplaces◦ Balance fair treatment of employees and
employer concerns with productivity and flexibility
29
Examples from Ontario’s Examples from Ontario’s ESAESAMinimum wage rates
- $9.50 as of April 1, 2009 (up to $10.25 in 2010)
Maximum hours of work◦ No more than 5 consecutive hours without .5
hr meal break◦ Typically, 8 hrs/day or 48 hrs / week◦ Max of 60 hrs / week (if agreed in writing)◦ See:
www.labour.gov.on.ca/english/es/guide/index.html
Pregnancy / Parental leave◦ Birth mothers: 17 weeks pregnancy leave &
35 weeks parental leave◦ Other parents: 37 weeks parental leave
Equity LegislationEquity Legislation Proactive rather than reactive Purpose is to advance the
employment circumstances of certain groups that have been historically disadvantaged
2 main categories of legislation:1. Employment Equity2. Pay Equity
30
Employment Equity ActEmployment Equity ActLegislation aimed at improving the
employment status of women, visible minorities, aboriginals, and people with disabilities
Purpose is to address historical discrimination
Called Affirmative Action in the US – although there are some differences in the two
Applies to federally-regulated employers with 100+ employees
BC has EE legislation; some have policies31
Employment EquityEmployment EquityRequirements of EE legislation
◦Prepare a plan to achieve equity◦Timetable for implementation◦Submit on-going statistics◦Provide for reasonable
accommodation E.g., sign language for job interview with
deaf applicant E.g., adjust work schedules for employees
to accommodate religious obligations
EE has resulted in concerns with reverse discrimination
32
Employment Equity and Employment Equity and HRHRExamples:
◦HR planning should incorporate equity goals
◦ Job descriptions should not include requirements which exclude certain individuals
◦Selection system must use non-discriminatory practices
◦Training & Development opportunities must be available for all groups
◦Promotion decisions must be free from bias
◦Compensation must be based on skills, performance etc.
What is one tool which would help an organization ensure these requirements are met???
33
Pay EquityPay EquityPay Equity
◦Women earn on average 82 cents for every $1 earned by men
◦Many potential reasons for this gap: differences in work experience, education, occupation etc. Although gap still remains when these are
controlled
◦Pay equity focuses on reducing the difference in pay earned by men and women
34
Pay EquityPay Equity“Equal Pay for Equal Work”
◦ Job for job - same or similar pay
“Equal Pay for Work of Equal Value”◦ If two jobs have similar 1) skills, 2) effort, 3)
responsibilities and 4) working conditions, then they are valued as the same
•Ontario & Quebec (& Federal) have legislation covering the public and private sector (orgs with >10 employees), while other provinces only apply to the public sector
35
HarassmentHarassment Harassment based on any of the
prohibited grounds◦ No clear definition◦ Occurs when a member of an org
treats an employee in an offensive manner because of employee’s sex, race, religion, etc.
◦ Unwanted behaviour that creates a hostile work environment
36
HarassmentHarassment
CHRC’s standard◦Is harassment if “a reasonable
person ought to have known that such behaviour was unwelcome”
◦May include verbal abuse, threats, display of offensive material, practical jokes that cause embarrassment, unwelcome remarks, innuendo, etc.
37
Sexual HarassmentSexual Harassment Unsolicited or unwelcome sex- or
gender-based conduct that has adverse employment consequences for target
Includes range of behaviours◦ Verbal – comments, etc.◦ Non-verbal – display of pornographic
material◦ Physical – unwelcome touching◦ Other – sexual activity exchanged for
positive employment consequences; threats of negative consequences if advances are rejected
38
Sexual HarassmentSexual Harassment 3 characteristics of SH identified by
CHR Tribunal
1.Encounters must be unsolicited, unwelcome, and expressly or implicitly known by the respondent to be unwelcome;
2.The conduct must either continue despite complainant’s protests or, if the conduct stops, the complainant’s protests must have led to negative employment consequences; and
3.The complainant’s cooperation must be due to employment-related threats or promises 39
40
Model sexual harassment policies can be found at CHRC’s website
◦ http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/publications/anti_harassment_toc-en.asp
Should include the following: policy statement, descriptions of harassing behaviour, procedures for making and investigating complaints, corrective action, and protection from retaliation
Sexual HarassmentSexual Harassment
41
Does intra-office romance put employers at risk?
Should/can intra-office romantic relationships be banned?
What are the legal concerns with intra-office dating?
Are “love contracts” a practical solution?
Alternative solutions?
Article DiscussionArticle Discussion
Other Issues of HR and Other Issues of HR and the Lawthe LawThe following will be discussed when
these topics are covered later in the semester
Employee rights and discipline◦Discipline, termination, etc.
Organizing unions and collective bargaining◦Canada Labour Code
Health and Safety◦Health and safety laws, worker’s compensation
42
Quiz- True or False???Quiz- True or False???
Levitt, H. (Feb. 8, 2006), Employment law myths: The true story. National Post.
1. Excellent, loyal performers cannot be fired◦ An employer can terminate anyone, even
arbitrarily, as long as it pays appropriate severance
2. Good performers are entitled to more severance◦ Severance is a function of length of service,
position, age, etc.◦ Though no severance is due if termination is for
cause
43
Quiz- True or False???Quiz- True or False???
3. In a downsizing, employees must be laid off in order of seniority◦ Seniority has no legal relevance in non-union
environment◦ In union environment, seniority only has an effect if
it’s part of the CBA – not always the case
4. If an employee provides a doctor’s note, he is entitled to sick leave◦ Judges do not always accept doctors’ notes, as many
doctors will provide one w/o examination
5. An employee has a right to select his vacation dates◦ unless policy dictates this, vacation times are up to
the employer44
Questions / Comments ?Questions / Comments ?
45