Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results
description
Transcript of Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results
![Page 1: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results
Presentation forMedia & Learning 2013
12 Dec 2013
Dr Daniel Tan
![Page 2: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
No Brainer eLearning ProjectseServices Issues and Challenges
Plagiarism Management System
• Handling violations must be done wisely
• Institution reputation management
Clickers Response System
• Faculty development – easy deployment
Learning Space Class-room re-design
• Faculty development in “noisy classroom” environment
Lecture recording • Buy-in from faculty before tipping point
• Changing role of faculty in content-rich world
• Operational scalability• Content re-use and re-purpose
![Page 3: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Why?
Rationale
![Page 4: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Quality of Content
Quality of Teaching
Quality of Learning
![Page 5: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Source: web.mit.edu/rsi/www/2005/misc/minipaper/papers/Hake.pdfCited 2171 times
Research Evidence
5
![Page 6: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Participative Learning to enhance Learning Quality
Hake, R. R., (1998). Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64- 74
![Page 7: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Learner Understanding During Lecture Presentation
0
20
40
60
80
100
time
30%Lecture
65%With clicker
activities
Professor’s belief
Re-learn/ review via lecture recording
![Page 8: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
In-Class Latency Gap between Teaching and Learning (assuming perfect language literacies)
• Professor teaches at the pace of expression– Prep time of between 5
to 20 hrs per 1 hr lecture
– Teach as re-runs for established courses
• Students are processing and constructing new knowledge– Time taken for students
to listen, join the dots, and understand
– Then, take notes
![Page 9: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Post-class Forgetting Curve(assuming good level of knowledge understanding)
After 2 days, the effect of the (re-)learning is minimised
![Page 10: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Learning Analytics:
Histogram of Viewings for a Lecture Recording
Num
ber
of
vie
win
gs
Time
(for illustrative purposes only)
![Page 11: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Current andNear Future
Learning Environments
![Page 12: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
TeacherDidactic
CommunicatorKnowledge transfer
ContentTextbook
Training MaterialCourseware
LearnerReceptor
Current ModeBook-based
![Page 13: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
TeacherFacilitatorCurator
ContentTextbook
Courseware
Learner
eContentInternet
WebOER
Video Lectures
Emerging Model• Internet-based • Education 3.0:
– Participative– Collaborative– Teacher to student,
student to student, student to teacher, people-technology-people (co-constructivism)
Learner
![Page 14: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What we are doing
Response
![Page 15: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Operational Elements of University 2.0@NTU (Today)
edveNTUre Ecosystem Framework
Blackboard Learn Course content delivery and communicationSocial and community of Learning through Web 2.0 social media
Blackboard Mobile Learn and Central
Mobile learning and services
Blackboard Connect Campus Emergency Alerts, Outreach and Course Notifications
Turnitin Plagiarism Management
Uni-wood Lecture Recording
eUreka Project Work Management System
Clickers Audience Response System
Participating and active learning in Lectures
LAMS – Learning Activities Management System
Re-usable learning pathways
Learning Analytics Analytics for eLearning
edUtorium Faculty and professional programhttp://edutotrium.ntu.edu.sg
Teaching Assistant (TA) ProgramFaculty of the Future
HWG702: University Teaching for Teaching Assistance
TR+ Classroom Learning Space for participative and collaborative learning
![Page 16: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Teach Less, Learn More
16
Night scene of Nanyang Auditorium
![Page 17: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Sample End Productof Recorded Lecture
![Page 18: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Mobile Learning: Lecture Recording
![Page 19: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Impact and Usefulness of Lecture Recording
• Not learning more content– More content– More workload
• Learning (quality) better the content– Mastering the core
content– Learn, re-learn,
unlearn– Learning quality
Holes in understanding
Disconnection
Lost
Gaps
Lecture
![Page 20: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Best Seat Location + Teleprompter
![Page 21: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Centralized Command Centre for Lecture Recording (CCCLR)
• Campus-wide Lecture Recording is a key strategic eLearning initiative endorsed by the University’s management
• CCCLR: to ensure quality of content recording
![Page 22: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Future Considerations • From doing lecture capture
to doing lecture capture well
• Lecture capture moving from IT project to AV and video production project
• Increased usage by students– Scalability and
bandwidth issues– Reliability of service
• Learning design with lecture segments as a sub-activity
• Changing role of faculty– Flipped classroom– More interactions during
class– Less post-class disruption– Knowledge Curator
• Changing role of students– Mind-mapping/big picture– Students becoming self-
directed learners
![Page 23: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Outcomes
Results
![Page 24: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Statistics for UniWood Lecture RecordingNo. of new
recordings in AY2012/13
14,000>
18.9%
Record Hits in AY2012/13
1.63 million
Record viewership in AY2012/13
80.2 Years
![Page 25: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
UniWoodFrom AY2005/06 Sem Ito AY2012/13 Sem II
55,562 video recordings
6,946,304 viewing hits
324.2 years of viewing time
![Page 26: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Content Creation & Distribution Process
IDM
AcuStream
AcuManager
Uploadcontent1Professors
4
hyperlink posted
2replication
3
Email Notificationwith hyperlink(within 10 min)
AcuStream
AcuStream
AcuStream
![Page 27: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Content Access Process
1
IDM 2000
AcuManager 2
3
student clickson hyperlink
– optimum performance redirection
AcuStream
AcuStream
AcuStream
AcuStream
4
![Page 28: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Students’ Feedback
55.09
39.82
3.68 1.40
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
1 2 3 4
TOTAL Q13
Legend:
1: Strongly agree2: Agree3: Disagree4: Strongly disagree
94%of students agreed that video recorded lectures were useful in relation to their studies (n=1140)
![Page 29: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Students’ FeedbackTOTAL Q14
15.24
67.78
13.75
3.24
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
1 2 3 4
83.02%of students were satisfied with the video recorded lectures (n=1142)
Legend:
1: Strongly agree2: Agree3: Disagree4: Strongly disagree
![Page 30: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Students’ FeedbackTOTAL Q15
62.30
33.48
3.051.17
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
1 2 3 4
95.78% of students agreed that video recorded lectures should be continued in the following semesters (n=1114)
Legend:
1: Strongly agree2: Agree3: Disagree4: Strongly disagree
![Page 31: Lecture Capture: Rationale • Response • Results](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051401/56815580550346895dc34bef/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Dr Daniel Tane: [email protected]