LeBreton - Public Board Presentation
-
Upload
national-capital-commission-commission-de-la-capitale-nationale -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
15.131 -
download
0
Transcript of LeBreton - Public Board Presentation
![Page 1: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Evaluation ResultsBoard of Directors
April 28, 2016
![Page 2: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2 | 49
GOAL
LeBreton Flats will be a signature
destination for visitors to Canada’s
Capital and a point of civic pride for its
residents.
![Page 3: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3 | 49
PRESENTATION
1. Context2. Competitive solicitation process3. Public and stakeholder consultations4. Evaluation process5. Evaluation highlights (DCDLS)6. Evaluation highlights (RendezVous LeBreton)7. Evaluation results8. Recommendation9. Next Steps
![Page 4: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4 | 49
1 – CONTEXT – 2001
![Page 5: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5 | 49
1 – CONTEXT – 2009
![Page 6: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6 | 49
1 – CONTEXT – LIGHT RAIL
Image LRT route
6 | 49
![Page 7: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7 | 49
1 – CONTEXT – DEVELOPMENT• Canadian War
Museum• Bayview
Innovation Centre• Harmony Park• National
Holocaust Monument
• Richmond landing
• Zibi• LeBreton Flats• Claridge
Development
![Page 8: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8 | 49
2 – SOLICITATION PROCESS
• STAGE 1 – Request for Qualifications• STAGE 2 – Request for Proposals• Fairness Monitor• Subject Matter Experts• Public and Stakeholder Consultations• Evaluation
![Page 9: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9 | 49
3 – CONSULTATIONS
![Page 10: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10 | 49
3 – CONSULTATIONS• Elected officials• First Nations’ communities• Public Open House
• 2000+ in attendance• 1000+ on webcast
• Online survey• 7939 responses• 82% from NCR • 18% from rest of Canada
• #LeBretonFlats trended on social media
• NCC/Environics summary of consultations available on the NCC Website.
![Page 11: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11 | 49
3 – CONSULTATIONS
•National significance
•Connectivity with community
•Green and public spaces
•Events centre
•Neighbourhood amenities
•Regular updates on project
11 | 49
![Page 12: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12 | 49
4 – EVALUATION PROCESS
![Page 13: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13 | 49
5 – EVALUATION HIGHLIGHTS – DCDLS
• Public Anchor Uses• Development Plan• Non-Public Anchor Uses• Delivery Model
![Page 14: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14 | 49
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – PUBLIC ANCHOR USES
![Page 15: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15 | 49
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – PUBLIC ANCHOR USES
• The proposed public anchor uses are extensive, bold and imaginative.
• The Canadensis Walk is a uniting feature of the whole development scheme.
• The proposal responds well to the intent of the RFP to enrich the social and cultural fabric of Canada’s Capital and to create a compelling draw for visitors.
![Page 16: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16 | 49
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – PUBLIC ANCHOR USES
• The intention to create a diverse series of experiences through evocative design and land-use is laudable.
• More supportive information on the financial viability of the public anchor uses would have enhanced the proposal.
![Page 17: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17 | 49
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – DEVELOPMENT PLAN
![Page 18: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18 | 49
BandshellCanada SquareCanada Circle
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – DEVELOPMENT PLAN
![Page 19: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19 | 49
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – DEVELOPMENT PLAN
![Page 20: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20 | 49
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – DEVELOPMENT PLAN
![Page 21: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21 | 49
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – DEVELOPMENT PLAN
![Page 22: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22 | 49
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – DEVELOPMENT PLAN
• Building the Canadensis Walk in phase 1 is a good strategy to create interactions with the public and contributes to the retail and residential deployment strategy.
• The Bandshell location at Booth is an appropriate and logical location for a public space.
• The LRT track acts as a divisive element to the site and derogates from the north-south pedestrian experience.
![Page 23: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23 | 49
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – DEVELOPMENT PLAN
• Clustering of anchor uses divided from the mixed use community is a missed opportunity
• The proposed approach includes very few roadways in the interior of the site, and so would enhance environmental sustainability by reducing the presence of cars.
• The single proposed public parking entrance could create problems at events.
![Page 24: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24 | 49
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – NON-PUBLIC ANCHOR USES
![Page 25: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25 | 49
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – NON-PUBLIC ANCHOR USES
• The proponent has put significant effort into attracting core owners and tenant operators, from a retirement living complex, to a spa, and a grocery store.
• The YMCA, the elementary school and the local retailers are excellent community-building elements.
• The proposal includes a good local retail strategy, and a projected residential absorption rate that is considered reasonable.
• The proposal would have benefited from a firmer commitment to sustainability standards.
![Page 26: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26 | 49
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – DELIVERY MODEL
![Page 27: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27 | 49
5 – HIGHLIGHTS – DELIVERY MODEL
• For the mixed-use components, the proponent offers a clear delivery model including ownership, management and financial capability.
• For the public anchor use components, the proposal would have benefitted from a more defined delivery model and financial commitments.
• At this time, the level of conditionality and the financial terms proposed by the proponent would need to be addressed in negotiations.
![Page 28: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28 | 49
6 – EVALUATION HIGHLIGHTS - RVL
• Public Anchor Uses• Development Plan• Non-Public Anchor Uses• Delivery Model
![Page 29: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29 | 49
6 – PROJECT PRESENTATION – RVL
![Page 30: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30 | 49
Major Event CenterAbilities Center Ottawa
Sensplex
6 – HIGHLIGHTS – PUBLIC ANCHOR USES
![Page 31: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31 | 49
6 – HIGHLIGHTS – PUBLIC ANCHOR USES
• The proposed features, ancillary uses and activities of the Major Event Centre are sufficiently distinctive to create a new capital landmark.
• Interior and exterior views from the Major Event Centre, including the green roof create new views towards Parliament and the Ottawa River, and enhance the design excellence of the proposal.
• The Major Event Centre (including LeBreton Square) has the potential to bring civic life back to this historic capital district and offer non-residential, year round public access.
![Page 32: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32 | 49
6 – HIGHLIGHTS – PUBLIC ANCHOR USES
• The Ottawa Senators Hockey team, an existing viable entity, is proposed to be the tenant of the Major Event Centre.
• Both the Sensplex and the Abilities Centre are additions to social sustainability objectives of the site, year-round.
• More supportive information on the market viability of the Abilities Centre and the Sensplex would have enhanced the proposal.
![Page 33: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33 | 49
6 – HIGHLIGHTS – DEVELOPMENT PLAN
![Page 34: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34 | 49
• The development in five distinct districts is attractive and well laid out. The supporting documents provide a clear analysis of the site’s opportunities and constraints.
• The Albert St. north façade is varied to allow light to reach the street, inviting visitors to venture into the public realm.
• The mid-site location of the Major Event Centre and LeBreton Square is a sound planning decision as it enhances and animates the retail and food & beverage locations for users of the LRT.
6 – HIGHLIGHTS – DEVELOPMENT PLAN
![Page 35: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35 | 49
6 – HIGHLIGHTS – DEVELOPMENT PLAN
35 | 49
![Page 36: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36 | 49
6 – HIGHLIGHTS – DEVELOPMENT PLAN
• f
36 | 49
![Page 37: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37 | 49
6 – HIGHLIGHTS – DEVELOPMENT PLAN
• The LRT cover creates multiple north-south connections and helps mitigate negative impacts such as noise and visual separation.
• The Preston Street extension ensures a proper flow of traffic for the site and mitigates the impact of traffic on the surrounding area.
• Phase 3 was not as well conceived as Phases 1 and 2
![Page 38: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38 | 49
6 – HIGHLIGHTS – NON-PUBLIC ANCHOR USES
38 | 49
![Page 39: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39 | 49
6 – HIGHLIGHTS – NON-PUBLIC ANCHOR USES
• The proposal includes a commitment to LEED Gold for buildings over 250m2 to become the second One Planet Living Community in Canada.
• The inclusion of affordable housing in the proposal was a positive addition to ensure greater social sustainability.
• Each of the proposed office, commercial, retail and residential components of the proposal were aligned with the proposed development plan and phasing plan.
![Page 40: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40 | 49
6 – HIGHLIGHTS – NON-PUBLIC ANCHOR USES
• Optimistic residential absorption rate.
• The total allocation of retail seems high in relation to the overall site development.
• The proposal would have benefited from greater detail regarding the deliverables included in each phase.
![Page 41: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41 | 49
6 – HIGHLIGHTS – DELIVERY MODEL
![Page 42: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42 | 49
6 – HIGHLIGHTS – DELIVERY MODEL
• The Major Event Centre, Abilities Centre and the Sensplex are based on existing examples of successful projects.
• However, the submission lacks contingency plans for delivery models (e.g., the Abilities Centre).
• The level of conditionality and the financial terms proposed by the proponent would need to be addressed in negotiations.
![Page 43: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43 | 49
7 – EVALUATION RESULTS
Both proponents:
•Prepared bold and ambitious proposals•Passed the mandatory and points-rated requirements•Have experienced teams capable of delivering the proposed projects•Would be ready to enter into negotiations with the NCC•Would need to address preliminary issues entering into the negotiation phase
![Page 44: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44 | 49
7 – EVALUATION RESULTS
RendezVous LeBreton ranked highest
![Page 45: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45 | 49
8 – RECOMMENDATION
Having considered the recommendation of the Evaluation Committee, the Board of Directors hereby:
•Authorizes the Negotiation Team, in accordance with Section 13.2 of the RFP document, to engage in negotiations with the highest ranked proponent.
•Requests that the Negotiation Team reports back to the Board by November 2016 or earlier with a status update and further recommendations.
![Page 46: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46 | 49
Negotiations • Fair Market Value of Lands• Remediation• Further stakeholder engagement• Public realm phasing and ownership • Timing of land transfers and approvals• Connectivity of pathway networks• Universal Accessibility
9 – NEXT STEPS
![Page 47: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47 | 49
• First Nations Consultations
• Federal Approvals
• Municipal Processes
9 – NEXT STEPS
![Page 48: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48 | 49
9 – NEXT STEPS – TIMELINE
Solicitation Process Timeline
Decision of NCC Board of Directors on evaluation results and recommendation
April 2016
Negotiations 2016-2017
First Nations consultations 2016-2017
Federal approvals and announcement of successful proponent
2017-2018
Municipal processes (NCC and City of Ottawa) 2017-2019
![Page 49: LeBreton - Public Board Presentation](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061306/58a034431a28ab5d2e8b5201/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49 | 49
8 – RECOMMENDATION
Having considered the recommendation of the Evaluation Committee, the Board of Directors hereby:
•Authorizes the Negotiation Team, in accordance with Section 13.2 of the RFP document, to engage in negotiations with the highest ranked proponent.
•Requests that the Negotiation Team reports back to the Board by November 2016 or earlier with a status update and further recommendations.