Launch slides part 2

Tom Bell, Consarc &

Steve Blackshaw, Winvic Construction

iCon: The making of a new beacon for the low carbon economy

30 June 2011 3

iCon Conference

iCon:

The Making of a new beacon for the low carbon economy

30 June 2011 4

iCon Conference

One Team:• A Client with high ambitions and an appetite for

pushing the boundaries• Joined up design team thinking. The team was

selected as a result of an anonymous and international design competition chaired and judged by the RIBA (Royal Institute of British Architects) and the BRE (Building Research Establishment); of which there were 72 submissions.

• A dedicated Contractor - Winvic were selected from a shortlist of 8 national and international contractors

30 June 2011 5

iCon Conference

30 June 2011 6

iCon Conference

30 June 2011 7

iCon Conference

The Environmental Building Brief:• It must minimise carbon use to no more than 15kg/CO2/m2

per annum• It must achieve the highly respected EU accreditation for

buildings environmental performance of Breeam Excellent.• It must continue to champion and enact these goals ‘in-use’

through the operation of the building, long after the architect, engineers and construction teams have gone.

• All of which had to be delivered on time and within budget (£150sqft to Cat A).

30 June 2011 8

iCon Conference

Principles of Design:

1. Achieving A Carbon Footprint ofno more than 15kgCO2/m2 per annum

Conventional Air Conditioned Office: 89.0kgCo2/m2

CIBSE TM 46:2008 Energy Benchmarks:52.3kgCo2/m2

30 June 2011 9

iCon Conference

BRE Environmental Building: 34.0kgCo2/m2

30 June 2011 10

iCon Conference

Lincoln Innovation Centre: 29.0kgCo2/m2

ECON 19 “Best Practice” 28.1kgCo2/m2

30 June 2011 11

iCon Conference

Rivergreen Offices 24.5kgCo2/m2

30 June 2011 12

iCon Conference

iCon Daventry 12.2kgCo2/m2

30 June 2011 13

iCon Conference

Passive Ventilation

30 June 2011 14

iCon Conference

Super Insulation / Timber Structure

30 June 2011 15

iCon Conference

• Good Air TightnessiCon Achieves 5.5m3/hour/m2Building reg requires 10m3/hour/m2

30 June 2011 16

iCon Conference

Heat Recovery:iCon utilises an Exhaust Air Heat Pump

Key Benefits:- Uses extract air only, provides greater efficiencies- Creates negaitive air pressure, no loss of heat- COP (coefficient to performance) increased

30 June 2011 17

iCon Conference

• Daylight & Daylight linked Dimming:High ceilings and high windows help daylight to penetrate further into the offices. In additional a photocell in each light fitting is installed such that the light output of the lamp is automatically reduced when daylight is available. This can reduce lighting energy by as much as 60%

30 June 2011 18

iCon Conference


2. BREEAM Excellent (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method).

Why BREEAM Excellent and not BREEAM Outstanding?

30 June 2011 19

iCon Conference

30 June 2011 20

iCon Conference


3. Ongoing building monitoring

-We intend to learn from this building data -University of Northampton PhD monitoring-Carbon Buzz

30 June 2011 21

iCon Conference

Impact: Thermal Mass becomes equivalent of concrete: making timber viable

30 June 2011 22

iCon Conference

Dispelling Myths:

• “Eco-Bling” or “Green Wash” - do we really need it and at what cost?All technologies are valid, but they must be utilised intelligently.

To reduce carbon emissions at the iCon from 52kgCO2/m2 to 12.2kgCO2/m2

As built (EAHP + Passive Measures) = Net saving of £80sqm on Mechanical Installations

Photovoltaic + Balanced ventilation system = Cost of £450sqm on Mechanical Installations

30 June 2011 23

iCon Conference

Dispelling Myths:

• Exemplar environmental buildings V Energy Performance Certificates?

EPC ratings are based upon a notional models

• Starting with an efficient design and low energy requirements is therefore inhibitive

• Adversely poor design with environmental bolt-on can achieve higher grades

• Are there too many caveats for existing / listed buildings?

30 June 2011 24

iCon Conference

Forward Thinking:

• Are you up to date with policy? • Zero Carbon V Low Carbon –quality V quantity?• It’s time to get tough on unregulated carbon loads? • Lets share what we know – Carbon Buzz.

Peter Jones OBEEcolateral

Sustainability in the waste industry

Sustainability in the UK Waste and Resources Sector

Daventry iCon Event

30th June 2011

Peter Jones, OBE

[email protected]

KEY SECTORAL DRIVERSEnd of PFI support Private Balance Sheets to take the strainCarbon taxationResource Efficiency Agenda Global Warming ImpactsElectricity Market ReformEconomics of JobsEU Producer Responsibility Energy SecurityTransfer of Value and profit from gatefees to outputs.

UK Landfill Inputs Collapse

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

200

Tax by 2010

Landfill Tax

Landfill Gate Fee

Transport to Landfill

Recycling Logistics(glass/paper/metals/card/news/compost)

PlasticsRecovery

CompostCard Paper

Metals

Plastics

COST

INCOME

zero

1 tonne bale of waste floc

The Resources Hierarchy

Compost/fertiliser soil fuelsRecycling into new MaterialsPyrolysis to CarbonAnaerobic DigestionGasification/steam turbineGasification/internal combustionGasification/hydrogen/fuel cells

Value by Financial and Fossil Carbon Tradeoffs

SPATIALS for PLANNERS

200 landfills @ 20 hectares=4000 ha1500 Resource Parks @ 10 hectares = 15,000 ha.60 million tonnes consumed, 60 million tonnes disposedWhat is built now is not necessarily that which is viable 2015 plus.

Market Led Decisions in Scrap Resources

2010 UK Energy Market £108 Billion as electricity,gas,heat & transport fuels2010 Recycling market £1 billion for 15 -20 million tonnesComposting soils market £0.1 billion for 4 million tes

34

Anaerobic digestion (AD)Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a method of waste treatment that produces a gas with high methane content from organic materials.The methane can be used to produce heat, electricity, or a combination of the two.

Land Requirements Estimated at 1 sq ft per tonne processed.

Capital Costs £10m - £29m for 60,000 tpa plant

Operating Costs £28 per tonne processed

Staff Levels Dependent on unit size

New Thinking in WasteDefine the fossil energy sinksThat defines the energy needThat defines the technologyThat defines the ‘fuel’ mixThat defines the logisticsThat defines the collection discipline

The Lights Go Out???

Source: DTI

GAPS in the WASTE REVIEW

Material Flow TrackingMaterial resources StandardsProducer ResponsibilityScotland & Carbon EvaluationEnergy LinkageWater Linkage

What are “Good” Fossil Substitution Sinks?

Food –freezing,preparation+retailDiversified industrial estatesHospitalsPrisonsBus and truck complexesDocks and Airports and DistributionData centresEnergy distribution pipes and wiresConfectionery factoriesSewage plantsRoad fuel distribution depotsIndustrial gases operations

Source: Labour Market Trends & UK National Accounts (The Blue Book)

Costs for Producer Responsibility

Co

st

as v

alu

e %

re

tail

su

pp

ort

Thousand tonnes output

50

20

10

5

250 500 1,000 2,000 8,000

Glass containers

Paper & board

CarsPlastics

Tyres

Fridges

Brown goods

Why is there an Investment Hiatus in Waste?

Innovation Risk comprises those on-………Feedstock supply………Site and Land………Technology……..Exit markets for output……..Funding THERE IS NO PLc with a singular approach to these risks!

New Alliances in Carbon Efficiency

Solutions&

ESCOs

• Technology Skills• Grid Backup• Grid Inputs• Regulatory Risk• Infrastructure

Energy Suppliers

• Contracts• Locations• Economic Role

in Communities

• Carbon CSRAgenda

• Forward Price Uncertainty

Electrical &Heat Users

• Rising Gate Fees• Process Technology• Conditioning

Technology• Supply Chain• Strong Balance Sheets

Waste & ResourceLogistics

TechnologySuppliers

Forward Issues

Linking Waste , energy, property and technology single wire or grid injection entitiesA coherent Planning approachStrong NGO Support & transparencyStandards of feedstockCarbon protocolsContext of other markets-hydrogenThe “spark gap”

Peter T. Jones OBE

[email protected]

Guy BattleDcarbon8, Deloitte

Next generation business thinking

© 2011 Deloitte LLP. Private and

confidential.

Re-Imagining BusinessSustainability Transformation


confidential.

Sustainability Services A unique blend of industry leaders

Responsible Business

Forward looking businesses are considering how to integrate sustainability into their organisation and the opportunities this offers to create economic value. Our Responsible Business Services team can help support your organisation by providing you with the following services: corporate strategy; operational integration and implementation; and reporting, assurance, communication and branding.

Climate Change & Carbon Management

Businesses have now realised that the low carbon economy is not something to be shied away from, but rather an opportunity to embrace. We offer a full range of climate change and carbon management services that include: climate risk and adaptation planning; carbon strategy; carbon accounting, assurance and CRC compliance; carbon footprinting and reduction; Carbon Trust services; and carbon markets and offsets.

Sustainable Property & Real Estate

We can offer a one-stop shop for all sustainability issues relating to the built environment. Our work covers building carbon management services; sustainable property investment, design advisory and certification, occupational estate strategy; and planning advisory for the development of major eco-developments.

46

Sustainability Services Centre of

Excellence

At Deloitte, we bring together the vast breadth of the firm to provide a range of integrated and holistic services and solutions for all businesses. Whether your challenge is sustainable consumption, climate risk planning or even the design of a sustainable eco-city we have the in-depth knowledge and passion to help you make the right choices for long-term success.

Deloitte has significantly enhanced its dedicated Sustainability Service team during 2010 with the acquisition of the leading carbon management consultant dcarbon8 and through its groundbreaking merger with the leading international real estate advisors Drivers Jonas Deloitte. Our core advisory services and solutions are divided into three principle divisions.

© 2010 Deloitte Global Services Limited

Sustainability ?

Sustainability: from the verb to sustain meaning: to hold up; to bear; to support; to

provide for; to maintain; to sanction; to keep going; to keep up; to prolong; to support the life of. (Chambers Concise

Dictionary


confidential.48

Growth/New

Markets

Reducing costs/Improving efficiency

Increased Margins and Profits

Shareholder and Customer Value

Sustainability is not just about the Planet


confidential.

Trends Business opportunitiesResources

Climate Change

Regulation

Global Change

Consumer Behaviour

• Energy costs are increasing• Carbon is being taxed• Resources are becoming more

scarce

• Climate risk impacting asset values• Potential design on-costs• Supply chain risks

• Consumer increasingly choosing green• Rise of ethical brands• Increasing demand for transparency

• Increasing regulations around carbon and energy

• Zero carbon development by 2016 and 2019

Growth • New and better market penetration• Brand enhancement• Innovation and new product

development• Value-chain partnerships• Consumer loyalty• Asset value• Staff productivity and wellbeing

• Reduced material costs• Reduced operational costs• Improved construction efficiency• Reduced staff non-productivity• Reduced planning costs and timer• Reduced risk

Costs • Need to rebuild Trust post GFC• Talent attraction in a global

marketplace• Role of business in building a better

global society

49

Sustainability trends and business opportunitiesTraditional business approaches are becoming rapidly out-dated ;The Old Paradigm– abundant raw materials, cheap energy and limitless sink for waste; New Paradigm– climate change, consumer awareness, environmental and social performance matters Sustainability is no longer an add on- but rather a way of doing business


confidential.


Med(A1B)

High(A1F1)

Low(B1)

01

76

53

42

2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100

Predicted Global Changes IPCC - Predicted global mean temperature change ºC under 3 scenarios

WorldStabilisation

Scenario

(-4%/ yr from 2016)

Tem

pera

ture

ºC

Year


confidential.

52

Climate Modelling

Outputs: Heat Waves

.

The following is a graph of the initial outputs from the modelling of possible heat waves (using the standard UK definition of at least consecutive 5 days over 25C).

.


confidential.

53

Climate Modelling

Outputs: Heat Waves

.

The following graphs show the predictions of the likelihood of heat waves in 2020, 2050 and 2080 under the low, medium and high scenarios (using the standard UK definition of at least 5 consecutive days over 25C).

.


confidential.


confidential.

• ~60% of consumers rated environmental impact as more important than a product’s brand name. European Commission (2009)

• 63% of people are more likely to buy a product if they know action is being taken to reduce its carbon footprint. Carbon Trust Research (2009)

• 22% of consumers will actively spend more to buy green

• Green consumers are more 29% loyal and spend more than other consumers

95% of consumers “willing to buy green” Deloitte (2009)

ConsumersCustomer Expectations

There is a large latent market for green products and services, which companies will be keen to exploit.


What should you be thinking about?

Increased legislation, regulation and regulatory divers. Mirrored in a patchwork way across the world leading to significant complexities when operating across multiple jurisdictions

Increasing pressure for companies to have a sustainability strategy and share it transparently with their stakeholders

There is an increasing awareness amongst consumer facing of the growing constraints on resources

There is increasing market evidence that a sustainability programme can lead to material cost savings in some areas

Increase in voluntary reporting and participation in sustainability indices. Reporting requirements will continue to expand from carbon to all sustainability areas including supply chain management

Increased regulation

Stakeholder & media pressure

Resource constraints

Customer Expectations

Cost savings

Customers are increasingly aware of sustainability and demand more sustainable products

There are a number of factors driving sustainability across business

What is driving sustainability?

Disclosure

56


confidential.

Where is the Market?

© 2010 Deloitte Global Services Limited 58

Mark Parker, CEONike USA

Paul Polman, CEO Unilever, United Kingdom

Maurice Levy, CEO Publicis Group France

“We are living in a resource-constrained world in which

we need to look at fundamentally new business models. This platform is not

about rhetoric. It’s about action.”

“We need to walk the talk on sustainable

consumption before we regain the trust of

consumers”

“As a CEO, if you want to plan for success you need to decouple your growth

strategy from environmental impact”

What is driving sustainability - CEO’s are setting the pace


confidential.

No Position Early Warning Expectation Endorsement Mandatory

• No policy or aspiration. • Very few in this category

• Aspiration for sustainable supply chain. • Timetable used

• Recommendation to adopt sustainable practices

• Specific sustainability policies suppliers should implement

• Requirements stated and enforced

Toxic waste in Africa 2006

Held sustainability forum with suppliers in Jan 2009

Clear ethical stance but no sustainable supply chain policy yet

All future suppliers to sign a sustainability agreement

Suppliers expected to comply with supplier standards of conduct

Ethical Trading Code of Conduct

Key policy: helping clothing suppliers to pay a fair living wage by 2015

Support provided to suppliers to achieve set targets. Moving towards ‘mandatory standards’ level

Stringent requirements for suppliers introduced

“If a supplier cannot be compliant with requirements on the environment and sustainability, we’ll stop doing business with them.” John Paterson, IBM Chief Procurement Officer, 2010

Many companies are now demanding disclosure from their supply chain

Disclosure


confidential.

Proof that it pays

Marks and Spencer

Mission: Become the world's most sustainable retailer by 2015

• Plan A strategy 2007: 100 commitments to achieve within 5 yrs• Working with customers and supply chains to:

» Combat climate change» Reduce waste» Use sustainable raw materials» Trade ethically» Help customers lead healthier lifestyle

• In 2011 M&S reported the following:

» Cut CO2 emissions by 40,000t

» Reduced 10,000t of packaging» Diverted 20,000t of waste from landfill » Saved 100 million litres of water

June 2011 Marc Bolland Report a Net annual cost savings of around £70m (£50m in 2010)


Life Cycle AssessmentResource Constraints

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

• Unilever have pledged to increases sales by 50% but in doing so will not allow their environmental footprint to change

• This implies a de-coupling of growth from environmental impact

• Unilever have carried out detailed LCAs of many products, including detergents, hygiene and food products and using this measure as a strategic methodology to measure and reduce

• Benefits will include reduce costs, increased efficiencies

61

ww.sustainablel-iving.unilver.com

• www.sustainable-living.unilever.com/the-opportunity/

http://www.sustainablel-iving.unilver.com/

http://www.sustainable-living.unilever.com/the-opportunity/

http://www.sustainable-living.unilever.com/the-opportunity/


confidential.62

6 Ideas(For The construction industry)


confidential.

6 Ideas

• Reduce the business costs associated with incremental and extreme weather events

• Plan for risks within the supply chain related to global climate change• Increase value of building assets for longevity, cut insurance premiums

• Assess supply chain performance- identify risk, good practice and cost savings

• Ensure compliance with responsible sourcing and future resilience• Reduce supply chain cost base

• Integrate message and activities across business – As One• Leadership and Employee engagement• Transformation and behaviour change management

• Automate carbon, water and waste reporting• Scope 3 reporting• Develop and produce end of year integrated CSR/Financial report

Integrated ReportingImplement an integrated system for reporting for your

financial and environmental performance

• Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of key products• Map environmental impact and costs through value chain• Develop reduction/good practice strategies including marketing stories• Identify closed loop product development opportunities

Climate Change Adaptation

Future proof your business and supply chain against climate change risk

Sustainable Supply ChainSupply chain assurance AND improvement planning

Implementation and Change Management

Develop internal behaviour change programme and implement strategy

Sustainable Product Design

Reduce costs of production and develop closed loop manufacture and supply solutions

Sustainability Transformation

Develop a Transformational Sustainability Business Strategy

• Integrate sustainability into the DNA of the organisation• Set business strategy to meet changing shale of the market• Good practice and targets• Implementation road map


confidential.

Zero Embodied Carbon Store Roadmap

Marks & Spencer and

The Carbon Trust

February 2011


confidential.

Key Questions for the study

65What is the definition of a zero embodied carbon building?

What strategies may be adopted to deliver a zero carbon outcome?

Is zero carbon feasible without offsetting?

What role does the supply chain (materials manufacturers and contractors) have in delivering the solution?

How can designers help deliver real time and future visions for such a solution and what would such a store look like?

Do low carbon buildings cost more?


confidential.

What do we mean by embodied carbon

66

Direct and Indirect economic data

collectionRaw

Materials & Manufacture

Delivery

Onsite activities

Operations

Maintenance

End of Life

60-Year Building Lifetime

Embodied Carbon

Operational Carbon

quantified

considered

quantified

considered

quantified

considered


confidential.

What do we mean by embodied carbon

67

Direct and Indirect economic data

collectionRaw

Materials & Manufacture

Delivery

Onsite activities

Operations

Maintenance

End of Life

60-Year Building Lifetime

Embodied Carbon

Operational Carbon

quantified

considered

quantified

considered

quantified

considered

As operational efficiencies increase, the importance of embodied carbon also increases.


confidential.

3.

Embodied Emissions are more important than operational

68

-

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

-

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

2031

2032

2033

2034

2035

2036

2037

2038

2039

2040

2041

2042

2043

2044

2045

2046

2047

2048

2049

2050

2051

2052

2053

2054

2055

2056

2057

2058

2059

2060

2061

2062

2063

2064

2065

2066

2067

2068

2069

2070

End of Life

Maintenance

Operations

Onsite activitiesDelivery

Raw materials


confidential.

The Baseline


confidential.

Baseline Assessment Embodied carbon over a 60-year lifecycle (not including operation)

70

0.501

0.0300.107

0.139

0.030

0.000

0.200

0.400

0.600

0.800

1.000

1.200

Baseline Shell & Core

tCO2e / m2 GIA

End of Life

Maintenance

Onsite Activities

Delivery

Raw Materials

0.808

0.0870.023

0.177

0.000

0.200

0.400

0.600

0.800

1.000

1.200

Baseline Fit-out

tCO2e / m2 GIA

End of Life

Maintenance

Onsite Activities

Delivery

Raw Materials

0.289

The graphs above show the embodied carbon of a store over a 60year lifecycle. This shows the relative importance of raw materials (shell & Core) and maintenance (fit-out).


confidential.

Baseline Assessment Breakdown of embodied carbon by material type

71

43%

24%

7%

4%

2%2% 1%1%

1%1%<1%

14%<1%

Steel

Concrete

Aluminium

Cement

Clay

Paint

Asphalt

Aggregate

Insulation

Glass

Plastics

Waste (various)

Other

0.501 tCO2e/m2

62% of the

embodied carbon

72%

9%

5%

4%3%

2% 1%

1%1%

1%

1%

Steel

Vinyl Flooring

Miscellaneous

Aluminium

Timber

Plaster

Ceramics

Iron

Carpet

Copper

Other

0.087 tCO2e/m2

30% of embodied

carbon

The breakdown of materials shows the prominence of steel, concrete, aluminium and waste in the Shell & Core, and the steel, vinyl flooring and aluminium in the Fit-out.

Fit-OutBase Build


29%

12%

11%11%

6%

4%

3%

2%2%1%1%

4%

14%

Main Building Frame (Columns & Beams)Roofing

Ground bearing Slab

Pads

Floor Slabs

Non-Glazed Cladding Units

Hardstanding / Yard areas

Drainage (foul, land and surface water)Roads and Vehicle Parks

Glazed Cladding Units

Perimeter Beam

Other

Construction Waste

0.501 tCO2e/m2

62% of the

embodied carbon

26%

18%

17%

8%

5%

5%

5%

5%

4%3% 4%

Circulation & Movement

Floors & floor finishes

Ceilings

Central plant

Security equipment & Fire protection

Fridge/Freezers

Walls

Shelving & Racks

Kitchen Equipment

Furniture

Other

0.177 tCO2e/m2

61% of embodied

carbon

Baseline Assessment Breakdown of embodied carbon by building component

Base Build Fit-Out


confidential.

Baseline Assessment Embodied carbon over a 60-year lifecycle (not including operation)

73

The graph shows the breakdown of carbon emissions associated with the notional M&S store within each year of the 60year lifecycle. The orange line illustrates the cumulative carbon emissions associated with the building.

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

-

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

End of Life

Maintenance

Operations

Onsite activities

Delivery

Raw materials

Cumulative Total


confidential.

Strategies for achieving Zero Carbon


confidential.

Five Approaches to Delivering Zero Embodied Carbon

75

Materials substitution• Use of low carbon materials

Embo

died

Car

bon

Impa

cts

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

-25%

-50%

-75%

Time2007 spec

Achievable today

Achievable today

2020

Sequestered carbon- 20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Carb

on

Em

iss

ion

s

Time

Carbonation reaction within lime cements

Timber sequestering carbon over growth

phase

Building carbon footprint

Supply Chain Reductions– Low carbon initiatives within the supply chain

Living Buildings– Buildings that continue to absorb more

over their lifetime and act as carbon sinks

Closed Loop Management– Zero waste, nothing thrown away, closed ecosystem

Carbon Offsetting– Local of far offsetting of unavoidable

emissions-100%

-50%

0%

50%

100%

Time

- 25%

- 50%

- 75%

- 100%

Offset

Reduce

- 25%- 50%- 75%- 100%

Ca

rbo

n E

mis

sio

ns

Cycle 1

Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Cycle 4

Initial “hit” for the first cycle

“Reused” building “Reused” building “Reused” building

Time

Em

bo

die

d C

arb

on

Im

pa

cts

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

Main Contractor

Sub-contractor

Manufacturer DistributorManufacturer

Future: Engaging manufacturers for reductions

Current relationship


Low Carbon Materials

Reclaimed/ Recycled Materials

Natural Materials

"Green Energy" Materials

Organic Materials

Plant Based Materials

Inorganic Materials

Animal Based Materials

Reclaimed Materials

High RC Materials

Living Materials

Steel

Bricks

GGBS

Plasterboard

Flooring Tiles

Timber

Hemp

Sheep Wool

Rammed Earth

Stone

Alcan Aluminium

Mosa Flooring Tiles

Lime

Concrete

Categories

Examples

Key

Low Carbon Materials Definitions


confidential.

Key Findings


confidential.

81

AukettFitroyRobinson, Darnton ESG, FieldenCleggBradley, Sheppard Robson, TTG Architects


confidential.

Achieving Zero Embodied Carbon TodayEmbodied

Carbon (tCO2e/m2)

Estimated Incremental CAPEX

Baseline 1.097 -

-25% Specification 0.811 -1%

-50% Specification 0.693 +7%

-75% Specification 0.275 >20%

Zero Carbon Specification 0 >100%

82

Reductions only

Ad

dit

ion

al

Co

st

in %

CA

PE

X 100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

Incremental embodied carbon reductions

25% 50% 75% 100%

Additional CAPEX

Uncertainty range

Key findings are as follows:

• A 25% reduction in embodied carbon will reduce capital costs by 1%

• A 50% reduction in embodied carbon results in an increase of approximately 7%. In time this is expected to reduce as low carbon materials become more cost effective

• Although future and evolving technologies will make achieving 75% reduction possible, it is not presently viable to achieve further incremental reductions cost effectively


confidential.

Achieving Zero Embodied Carbon Today

• Based on the latest DEFRA projections on carbon value, offset options are expected to increase from £12/tCO2e to £25 /tCO2e in 2020, £70 /tCO2e in 2030 and £200 /tCO2e in 2050 increasing offset costs accordingly. At some point it will be cheaper to reduce than offset.

Now• Possible to achieve 25% reduction and offset

the remaining 75% using CERs/VERs (cost effective option) at no cost premium

Recommendations

• Combine reductions and offsetting until reductions become cost effective

• Incentivise supply chain by taxing carbon content of all products and services

• Developed community offset strategy that permits local investment to local projects e.g. The M&S Community Carbon Fund.

83

-100%

-50%

0%

50%

100%

Time

- 25%

- 50%

- 75%

- 100%

Offset

Reduce

- 25%- 50%- 75%- 100%

Ca

rbo

n E

mis

sio

ns

Reductions & offsetting

350

Ab

ate

me

nt

/ O

ffs

ett

ing

Co

st

(£/t

CO

2e

)

TimeOffsetting

Reductions

12

Today 2050

200

2030


confidential.

Key design elements:• Material substitution with natural materials

• Lightweight design to minimise foundation requirements

• Flexible floor layout

• Prefabrication of modular components Combined structural and functional components e.g. intelligent columns which provide structural support and collect rainwater.

84

Design submission: Darnton EGS submitted 2 designs for different time periods, based on current and future material availability. The first design used material substitution, the second addressed the store functionality and use of intelligent building systems.

Approaches to Zero CarbonIncremental reductions through design change

Key design elements: • Reclaimed steel building frame

• Reduction in floor to floor height from 5.1m to 4.4m

– Reducing wall area

– Foundation requirements

– Fit-out requirements

• Open plan back of house

• Omission of ceilings to back of house areas

Design Submission: TTG Architects concentrated on the current potential to increase the recycled content in construction materials. Many of the limitations and barriers of today’s market were highlighted.


confidential.

The FutureLiving Buildings and Closed Loop System Management

85


confidential.

Approaches to Zero Carbon

86

Sequestered carbon- 20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Ca

rbo

n E

mis

sio

ns

Time

Carbonation reaction within lime cements

Timber sequestering carbon over growth

phase

Building carbon footprint

Living buildings & Sequestration

How?

A living building is a building which absorbs more carbon over its lifetime than is emitted . The building is either constructed from organic materials that sequester carbon during their growth (e.g. timber, hemp, straw, bamboo), or man-made materials (for example, lime cements) which react with carbon dioxide through carbonation

However, in order to account for the carbon sequestration, it is essential that the carbon is not re-emitted back into the environment at the end of its life, i.e. through decomposition (land filling) etc

To ensure transparency and accountability, tracking/logging systems need to be implemented to adequately manage renewable materials throughout their lifecycle.

The use of products that either act as carbon sinks or sequester carbon over their lifecycle


confidential.

Closed loop approach

Closed loop systems are a conceptual sustainable approach to managing the entire life-cycle of a product, whereby all materials not safely consumed in the use of the product are designed to be a valuable input into the same or other processes at their end of life . In this way waste is eliminated, materials never leave the M&S ecosystem and are either:

a) recaptured and reused in the process of making the same or other products, or

b) bio-degraded/bio-composted to become useful inputs to the broader biosphere.

87

Cycle 1

Cycle 2 Cycle 3 Cycle 4

Initial “hit” for the first cycle

“Reused” building “Reused” building “Reused” building

Time

Em

bo

die

d C

arb

on

Im

pa

cts

100%

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

4. Approaches to Zero Carbon

Closed loop approaches draw on innovative sustainability concepts such as industrial ecology, cradle to cradle design and bio mimicry to minimise and eventually reduce to zero impacts harmful to the environment.


confidential.

Closed Loop Manufacture and Supply

Source: World Economic Forum in collaboration with Deloitte

Material sourcing

Sales and retail

Reverse logistics

Manufacturing

Materials Sourcing

Distribution Logistics

Sales and Retail

Consumption and UseProduct disposal

(e.g. landfill)

Manufacturing

Material sourcing

Distribution logistics

Sales and retail

Consumption / use

Reverse logistics

Raw materials

Manufacturing process reuse

Manufacturing

Materials Sourcing


Sales and Retail

Consumption and Use

Product Recycling and Materials Recovery

Logistics waste and auxiliary

products reuse

Product and by-product reuse

Waste from consumption

Open Loop Manufatcure and Supply


confidential.

89

Approaches to Zero Carbon DesignClosed Loop Value Chain

Manufacturing

Material sourcing

Distribution logistics

Sales and retail

Consumption / use

Reverse logistics

Raw materials

Manufacturing process reuse

Manufacturing

Materials Sourcing


Sales and

Retail

Consumption and Use

Product Recycling and Materials

Recovery

Logistics waste and auxiliary

products reuse

Product and by-product reuse

Waste from consumption

Source: World Economic Forum in collaboration with Deloitte• Closed loop systems have the potential to reduce capital costs through material availability and energy savings.

• The store will be entirely dismountable at its end of life and all components may be reused within the M&S ecosystem with no (or minimal) reprocessing. Zero Waste

• Combined with low energy design a store would typically absorb more carbon that it emitted in its construction and operation


confidential.

90Key elements of the design:

Closed loop building components Modular components Prefabricated unit s which are capable of using a

variety of materials purpose dependent. Flexible design & flooring systems which maximise

area footprint

CASE STUDY: Sheppard Robson - Closed Loop

Buildings

Approaches to Zero Carbon

Design Submission: Inspired by a beehive structure SR’s submission uses a single unit for external and internal cladding and structural components


confidential.

Portable building component (Northern Line)


confidential.

Portable building component (Victoria Line)


confidential.

Key Recommendations

93


confidential.

Key recommendations for developers/designers/procurement teams

94

1. Encourage supply chain engagement and innovation

2. Incentivise use of low carbon materials (allowable solutions)

3. Facilitate low carbon design

4. Develop closed loop systems and materials management

5. Develop corporate strategies around offsetting, sequestration and zero carbon


confidential.

Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.co.uk/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of DTTL and its member firms.

Deloitte LLP is the United Kingdom member firm of DTTL.

This publication has been written in general terms and therefore cannot be relied on to cover specific situations; application of the principles set out will depend upon the particular circumstances involved and we recommend that you obtain professional advice before acting or refraining from acting on any of the contents of this publication. Deloitte LLP would be pleased to advise readers on how to apply the principles set out in this publication to their specific circumstances. Deloitte LLP accepts no duty of care or liability for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication.

© 2011 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.

Deloitte LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC303675 and its registered office at 2 New Street Square, London EC4A 3BZ, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 (0) 20 7936 3000 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7583 1198.

Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited

Tea/coffee break&

Exhibition

Simon CoxPrologis

Embracing the green agenda

Copyright © 2011 Prologis, Inc.

Embracing the Green Agenda

Simon Cox – First Vice President Project Management and UK Sustainability Officer

Copyright © 2011 Prologis, Inc. 99

Prologis

Prologis is the leading global provider of industrial real estate, offering customers more than 600 million square feet of distribution space in markets across the Americas, Europe and Asia.

The company leases its 3,500 industrial facilities in 22 countries to manufacturers, retailers, transportation companies, third-party logistics providers and other enterprises with large-scale distribution needs.

Since merging with AMB Property Corporation on June 3, 2011, Prologis now manages combined assets valued at more than $44 billion.


Corporate Responsibility – Three Dimensions

Prologis takes pride in being a responsible global citizen.

Our approach to corporate responsibility comprises three dimensions of care: for the planet, for people and for the pursuit of excellence in business.


Corporate Responsibility

Carbon Disclosure Leadership Index


UK Approach – Sainsbury’s RDC - Pineham Northampton


Award Winning Sustainable Development

Estates Gazette Green Award (2008)

Property Week Green Award (2007)

IAS Sustainable Achievement (2007)


BREEAM Excellent


Embodied Carbon LCA – Planet Positive


ProLogis Key Metrics – BREEAM Excellent

Dunstable DC1 530,000

Dunstable DC2 240,000

Barnsley DC1 530,000

Pineham DC1 620,000

Pineham DC2 135,000

Pineham DC3 370,000

ProLogis Park Stoke DC3 380,000

Crewe DC1 360,000

Midpoint DC3 235,500

Midpoint DC4 312,500

Royal Mail Swan Valley 201,934

ProLogis M8 Glasgow 503,385

ProLogis Park Stoke DC2 250,000

ProLogis Park Bradford DC1

1,043,225

Project Lion – DIRFT 2 815,063

Total Area (sq.ft) 6,526,607


BREEAM – Research and Development

• SusCon College - The Bridge, Dartford• BREEAM ‘Outstanding’ (Interim) - 88.85%• Highest BREEAM ‘Education’ rating


EPC ‘A’ Rated – Standard Product


Glasgow M8 – Operational Emissions

• Predicted Emissions: • 7.6 kgCO2e/m2/annum

• Building Regulations: • 18.0 kgCO2e/m2/annum

• Existing Buildings • 39.0 kgCO2e/m2/annum

• Carbon Savings (30 years):• 14,376t compared to Building

Regulations• 43,405t compared to Existing Buildings


Glasgow M8 – Energy Costs

• Predicted Emissions:• 23.0 kWh/m2/annum

• Building Regulations • 55.7 kWh/m2/annum

• Existing Buildings• 118.0 kWh/m2/annum

• Potential annual cost savings:• £ 99,144 compared to Building

Regulations• £ 508,764 compared to Existing Buildings

(Based on Electricity at 9.5p / kWh and Gas at 6.6p kWh)


Life Cycle Assessment – Standard Product


Embodied Carbon Profiling - RICS


Emission Reduction


Materials Specification: Solar, Cyclic, Safe

• Low embodied energy• Recycled and recyclable • Reused and reusable• Non toxic


Planet Positive Certification Process

1.Planet Positive validate Deloitte carbon report

2.110% of unavoidable emissions are mitigated

3.Donation to Cool Earth

4.Budget set aside for UK community or school projects


Embodied Carbon – DIRFT 2


Our Contribution to Cool Earth

Amazon Rainforest622 acres protected161,629 t/CO2 storedEach acre protects:6 endangered mammals322 types of plants11,000 species of insects44 mature trees

DIRFT 2 Warehouse 817,594 sq/ft18.77 acres29,387 t/CO2

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7e/London_from_the_air.jpg


DIRFT 2 – Zone 1 – Tesco Intermodal Facility


840,000 square Feet – Dedicated Rail Served Site


DIRFT II – Rail Connectivity


DIRFT II – A5 Bridge Slide


DIRFT II –A5 Rail Tunnel Complete


DIRFT 2 - Rail Freight Strategy


DIRFT 2 – Tesco goods in yard


DIRFT 2 – Tesco


The end of the Line?


DIRFT 3


Thank you

Paul FryerIBM

Bringing a smarter planet to life

132


A Smarter Planet …..?

133


April 2010

134


The Transistor

135


Chips in Everything

136


Connecting Everything

137


Growth of Computing Power

138


Perfect Storm

Computing Power

Transistors in Everything

Telecommunications

139


Something Else ?

140


+ + =

So what is a Smarter Planet ?

A smarter planet: Is about thinking and acting in new ways to make our systems more efficient,

productive and responsive.BUT

What does that mean ?

141


+ + =

What a smarter planet is NOT?

A smarter planet: Is not an IBM product.

143


2016

144


Renewable Energy

145


+ + =

What else do we need to create a smarter planet ?

A smarter planet: Also requires imagination and foresight.

A smarter planet will be conceived and built by brilliant minds, creative thinking using world class technology and systems,

partners and clients.

The world has all of these…..

146


Watson

147


Watson

148


Watson

This poet laureate's “Enoch Arden” sold 17,000 copies on its publication day in 1864

149


What could be smarter ?

Smarter Traffic

Smarter Water

Smarter Cities

Smarter Money

Smarter Food

Smarter Retail

Smarter Communications

Smarter Power

Smarter Oil

Safer Citizens

Smarter Health

150


Bringing a Smarter Planet to Life

Workshops

1.15pm & 2.15pm

Lunch&

Exhibition

Panel Discussion

Hosted by

Northamptonshire Institute for Urban Affairs

Thanks

Tours of the iCon Building

Launch slides part 2

Education

Transcript of Launch slides part 2