LAP COURSE: JUNIOR DOCTOR FEEDBACK

EVALUATION

Jonathan Ruffler MEM - CWP

Lynda Hurst MEM – GMMH

CWP:

• The teaching sessions are ordered as below:

– Trainee 1: Case Presentation

– Trainee 2: Journal Club

– Trainee 1: 555

– Consultant: ELS and MCQs

– Trainee 3: Chair for the afternoon

Education Support:

Local Education Provider Programme Feedback

(To be completed by all attendees)

Topic SMS: CAMHS - ADHD Date: 14 December 2016

About you (please circle)

FY CT1 CT2 CT3 GP Trainee SASG ST4-6 Cons

Please evaluate the following sessions against the learning objectives. Please circle your answer 1 = very poor – 5 = excellent

Case Presentation 1 2 3 4 5

Comments:

Journal Club 1 2 3 4 5

Comments:

555 1 2 3 4 5

Comments:

Expert Led Session 1 2 3 4 5

Who led the Expert session? (Name & Title)

Comments:

Chair 1 2 3 4 5

Comments:

Local Programme Y/N Comments Was the teaching session well organised?

Did you have MCQs at the end?

Did this session help prepare you for the MRCPsych exams?

Did this session prepare you for your everyday clinical role?

What went well today?

What could we improve upon?

At each teaching session we hand out the feedback form which was provided by Latha. This has been slightly modified by CWP as we do not ask for feedback on the module handbook, but instead request feedback on the chair of the session. The feedback sheets request a score out of 5 for each individual presentation, as well as free text comments.

Feedback Form:

• Feedback forms are collected at the end of the teaching session.

Scores are averaged for each individual presentation (total score

from all feedback forms/number of feedback forms received).

Free text comments are also recorded for each individual

presentation. These are all collected on a single spreadsheet to

provide an overview of the entire year.

Collated Feedback:

Certificate: Trainees:

Dear Dr X, Thank you for presenting at the MAPMED teaching session on 21st December 2016. All sessions are scored out of 5, and the average score awarded by the attendees for your session is shown below, along with any feedback relating to your session.

21/12/2016 Psychiatry across the Ages

Expert Led Session: Average Score 4.6

Expert Led Session: 1. Very interesting 2. An interesting and unique presentation. Very informative. It is the field that we have the least knowledge in. 3. Fantastic session. Very worthwhile. 4. Really interesting 5. Very interesting 6. Very good presentation. Good explanation of a difficult subject 7. Fascinating! 8. Relevant for MRCPsych. 9. Very good. 10. Really interesting and caused a lot of reflection, encouraging us to think outsidew the box 11. Very interesting topic. Good presentation 12. Presented at a good pace Many Thanks

Jonathan Ruffler Medical Education Manager

Scores for each presentation and the feedback comments are added to a certificate and sent to all presenters in a PDF format (Trainees and Consultants who present ELS)

Certificate: Consultants:

Dear Dr X, Thank you for chairing the MAPMED teaching session on 21st December 2016. Chairing the sessions is a vital part of the teaching programme, which ensures the smooth running of the day. The role is designed to provide an opportunity for you to demonstrate your management skills, by ensuring that all sessions run to time, and that the all attendees at the event are able to participate. All sessions are scored out of 5, and the average score awarded by the attendees for your session is shown below, along with any feedback relating to your session.

21/12/2016 Psychiatry Across the Ages

Chair: Average Score 4.7 Chair: 1. Managed everything in a very timely manner 2. Great 3. Good time keeping 4. Very good. Well led 5. Made it interactive Many Thanks

Jonathan Ruffler Medical Education Manager

GMW now GMMH:

• LEP Teaching programme:

– Case Presentation

– Journal Club

– 555 Statistics

– 555

– Presentations

– ELS & MCQs presented by a Consultant

• Chair for the session

• Co-ordinating Tutor

Programme:

Weekly Session:

• The LEP Teaching programme for the next semester will commence on Wednesday 1st March in rooms 1 & 2 the Curve.

•

• A light sandwich lunch will be available from 12.30pm. The session will commence at 13.00pm prompt.

•

• Topic: MS: Diagnosis and Treatment for people with problems with substances other than alcohol:

• I have attached the journal for this session for your convenience.

•

• 13.00 - 13.45pm - CP: Dr …………

• 14.00 – 14.45pm - JC: Dr …………

• 14.45pm – Refreshment break

• 15.00 – 15.15pm - 555: Dr ………..

• 15.15 – 16.30pm - ELS: Dr ……….

•

• Chair: Dr …………..

• Co-ordinating Tutor: Dr …………...

• Please find an updated copy of the programme attached for your information.

• Please be reminded that it is each individuals responsibility to organise swaps of sessions with colleagues and when this has been agreed, please

advise Lynda Hurst Lynda.hurst@gmw.nhs.uk

Master Feedback Evaluation:

GMW – MRCPsych Teaching Session Conference Room 7, the Curve, Prestwich

Wednesday 4th January 2017

Topic: Across the Ages - Psychosis

Attendees - Evaluation Summary

Attendees: 32

Responses: 16 1) Respondent: FY - CT1 - CT2- CT3 - GP Trainee - SAS - Consultant – Other

Respondent FY CT1 CT2 CT3 GP

Trainee ST4-6 SAS Consultant

6

2

4 1 3

2) The Module handbook was effective in preparing me for this session

Effectiveness of the handbook 1= V Poor 5 = Excellent

1 2 3 4 5 N/a

2 2 1

Comments:

N/a x 4

1) Case Presentation: Dr Jonathan Keay

Case Presentation 1= V Poor 5 = Excellent

1 2 3 4 5

2 8 3

2

4

6

8

10

1 2 3 4 5

Case Presentation -

Master Evaluation Cont….

Comments:

Good presentation. Generated good discussion.

Not present.

An interesting case study and good presentation.

Good presentation – explained clearly and well.

Confident presentation. Slides were good; readable but not overloaded. For development try

to anticipate audience questions and be prepared e.g. more info on medical notes.

Concise presentation. Good engagement with audience.

Interesting case, a lot of discussion regarding care for patient with chronic delirium.

Casually presented, easy style and good presenting skills and clear slides. Interesting

discussions on delirium Vs psychosis.

Quite basic presentation, not a great deal of information provided.

Good confident presentation.

Good case for discussion. Maybe more effect in getting detailed info from medical team.

1) Journal Club: Dr Emily Melling

Journal Club - 1= V Poor 5 = Excellent

1 2 3 4 5

9 5

0

2

4

6

8

10

1 2 3 4 5

Journal Club - Dr

Comments:

Well prepared. Delivered at a good pace with clear and concise explanation, making

appropriate use of power-point slides (presentation). Critical appraisal done in a well

organised and methodical manner.

Excellent presentation. Well presented. Good understanding of statistics and outcome and

results well explained.

Thorough presentation.

A thoughtful and carefully prepared presentation. It was clear that Dr Melling understood the

paper well. Good interaction with audience, good pace of delivery. Use of consort guidelines

was useful.

Well presented. Elaborate. Thorough.

Thorough journal presentation, interesting subject. Some good quality discussions and

engagement in audience. Perhaps more images and context about journal to add some more

interest to slides.

Well researched and reviewed. Good grasp of paper.

Very well presented.

Well researched and presented.

Well presented. Worked hard to put across the paper well. May be made it more interactive by

posing the questions to the audience.

1) STAT 555: N/a

2) 555: Dr Stella Anakwe-Umeh/Dr Misty Bhandary

555 - 1= V Poor 5 = Excellent

1 2 3 4 5

2 11 1

0

5

10

15

1 2 3 4 5

555 - Dr

Comments:

Concise, to the point.

Good presentation. Thanks.

Good brief overview of schizophrenia in different ages.

Clearly a lot of work put into slides – but as a learning point I’d suggest reducing the info

on slides and talk through them.

A lot of text on the slides. Very informative.

Perhaps follow 555 criteria and closely 5 short points each slide was not followed in all

slides. High yield info as schizophrenia in slides was very useful. Pertinent info.

Very informative slides.

Stuck to rules of 555, stuck to points well.

Accurate and precise.

Stella prepared good slides. Misty delivered very well and she had good knowledge on the

subject which is on the study.

Master Evaluation Cont….

1) Who Led the Expert session? – Dr Dick Hackett

Expert Led Session:

ELS - 1= V Poor 5 = Excellent

1 2 3 4 5

2 1 8

Comments:

Informative, interesting and useful,

Late.

Interesting, especially as I do not know much about neuropsychiatry at this stage. Lots of

information, very detailed – was this exam level?

Excellent – very informative and clinically relevant. Fantastic learning for all levels of

doctors.

Completely agreed in views of organic cases not fully excluded. + + informative.

Very informative. Fascinating talk. Really useful, my favourite educational session.

Was very interesting and clear presentation.

Slightly mundane.

Good presentation, helped to refresh our neuropsychiatry knowledge.

2) Local Programme A) Was the teaching session well organised?

Yes No

11

Comments:

B) Did this session prepare you for your everyday clinical role? Y = 8 No = 1

Comments:

1) What went well today?

ELS and Case Conference

Good use of microphones.

All sessions ran to time. Good audience inclusion. High quality presentations overall. ELS

outstanding.

Very interesting expert led session.

Presentations were well delivered. Mostly organised well. Suitable environment for teaching

sessions.

2) What could we improve on?

Trainee Feedback:

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1 2 3 4 5

Case Presentation - Dr

Comments:

Good presentation. Generated good discussion.

Not present.

An interesting case study and good presentation.

Good presentation – explained clearly and well.

Confident presentation. Slides were good; readable but not overloaded. For development try

to anticipate audience questions and be prepared e.g. more info on medical notes.

Concise presentation. Good engagement with audience.

Interesting case, a lot of discussion regarding care for patient with chronic delirium.

Casually presented, easy style and good presenting skills and clear slides. Interesting

discussions on delirium Vs psychosis.

Quite basic presentation, not a great deal of information provided.

Good confident presentation.

Good case for discussion. Maybe more effect in getting detailed info from medical team.

1) Local Programme A) Was the teaching session well organised?

Yes No

11

Comments:

B) Did you have MCQ’s at the end? Yes = 10

Trainee Feedback Cont….

Comments:

B) Did this session help prepare you for the MRCPsych exams? Y = 5 No = 1 N/a = 3

Comments:

C) Did this session prepare you for your everyday clinical role? Y = 8 No = 1

Comments:

1) What went well today?

ELS and Case Conference

Good use of microphones.

All sessions ran to time. Good audience inclusion. High quality presentations overall. ELS

outstanding.

Very interesting expert led session.

Presentations were well delivered. Mostly organised well. Suitable environment for teaching

sessions.

2) What could we improve on?

Room was too cold.

Better time keeping, there were a number of gaps between sessions whilst waiting for

speakers.

Record of Attendance:

Extr

a Se

ssio

n -

Dea

fnes

s an

d A

war

enes

s,

Fore

nsi

c P

sych

iatr

y

Extr

a Se

ssio

n -

Intr

od

uct

ion

to

LEP

,

Gu

idel

ines

fo

r Jn

r D

rs o

n L

EP

Extr

a Se

ssio

n -

Tal

k an

d w

ork

sho

p o

n

bio

psy

cho

soci

al f

orm

ula

tio

n

RC

Psy

ch p

ort

folio

dev

elo

pm

ent

GA

: Psy

cho

sis

1

GA

: Dep

ress

ion

1

OA

: Co

gnit

ion

GA

: MH

A

GA

: Bip

ola

r D

iso

rder

1

CA

HM

S: A

sses

smen

t in

Ch

ild P

sych

iatr

y

SMS:

Dia

gno

sis

and

Tre

atm

ent

for

peo

ple

Extr

a Se

ssio

n

Fore

nsi

cs

QA

: Alz

hei

mer

’s D

isea

se

ID: H

isto

ry T

akin

g an

d C

om

mu

nic

atio

n in

pat

ien

ts w

ith

LD

GA

: An

xiet

y D

iso

rder

CA

HM

S: A

DH

D

PSY

CH

THX

: Psy

cho

ther

apy

GA

: Sel

f-h

arm

an

d S

uic

ide

1

Ch

rist

mas

Bre

ak

Ch

rist

mas

Bre

ak

Acr

oss

th

e ag

es

Mo

ck C

ASC

Au

dit

Pri

ze P

rese

nta

tio

ns

Sep-16 10

/08

/20

16

17

/08

/20

16

24

/08

/20

16

31

/08

/20

16

07

/09

/20

16

14

/09

/20

16

21

/09

/20

16

28

/09

/20

16

05

/10

/20

16

12

/10

/20

16

19

/10

/20

16

26

/10

/20

16

02

/11

/20

16

09

/11

/20

16

16

/11

/20

16

23

/11

/20

16

30

/11

/20

16

07

/12

/20

16

14

/12

/20

16

21

/12

/20

16

28

/12

/20

16

04

/01

/20

17

11

/01

/20

16

18

/01

/20

17

Abdullah Akbari Dec FY2 LTFT - Bolton

Ahmed Sher ST6 – CBU Prestwich Night

s

Akhtar Armaan CT3 – Forensics Prestwich S/L S/L A/L

Alexande

r

Anais

KristinaCT3 - Bolton A/L

Anand Amit ST6 - Salford

Anakwe-

UmehStella CT3 - Salford Nights O/C NightsNights A/L

Anwar Medeeha Dec FY1 - Bolton

Aseri Aesha CT2 - Salford A/L S/L Apols A/L

Ashafi

Hajrah-

Katoon

Mahbob

FY1 - Salford

MRCPsych Master Attendance

Register

Certificate of Attendance:

THANK YOU FOR LISTENING…

ANY QUESTIONS..???