Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

30
Land Subsidence Monitoring Report Number 1 July 2013 By Brian D. Conway

Transcript of Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Page 1: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report

Number 1

July 2013

By Brian D. Conway

Page 2: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 1

Table of Contents

List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 2

List of Pictures ................................................................................................................................ 2

List of Graphs ................................................................................................................................. 2

Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 3

Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 4

ADWR’s Land Subsidence Monitoring Program ........................................................................................ 5

ADWR’s InSAR Program ............................................................................................................................ 5

ADWR’s InSAR Results ............................................................................................................................... 6

Surveying Results ...................................................................................................................................... 6

Green Valley/Sahuarita Results ....................................................................................................... 6

Cochise County/Willcox Basin Results ............................................................................................. 7

McMullen Valley Basin Results ........................................................................................................ 8

Holbrook Basin Results .................................................................................................................... 9

Hawk Rock Results ......................................................................................................................... 10

Future Land Subsidence Data Collection ................................................................................................ 10

Page 3: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 2

List of Figures

Figure 1. Arizona land subsidence features .......................................................................................... 12

Figure 2. West Valley land subsidence feature ..................................................................................... 13

Figure 3. Northeast Phoenix/Scottsdale land subsidence feature ........................................................ 14

Figure 4. Hawk Rock land subsidence feature ...................................................................................... 15

Figure 5. Tucson land subsidence feature ............................................................................................. 16

Figure 6. Green Valley land subsidence feature ................................................................................... 17

Figure 7. Maricopa-Stanfield land subsidence feature ......................................................................... 18

Figure 8. Picacho-Eloy land subsidence feature .................................................................................... 19

Figure 9. McMullen Valley land subsidence feature ............................................................................. 20

Figure 10. Harquahala Valley land subsidence feature .......................................................................... 21

Figure 11. Ranegras Valley land subsidence feature .............................................................................. 22

Figure 12. Fort Grant Rd land subsidence feature .................................................................................. 23

Figure 13. Kansas Settlement land subsidence feature .......................................................................... 24

Figure 14. Elfrida land subsidence feature.............................................................................................. 25

Figure 15. Bowie/San Simon land subsidence feature ........................................................................... 26

Figure 16. Holbrook Basin land subsidence feature ............................................................................... 27

Figure 17. Location Map of Usery Mountain Park and San Tan Mountain Park CORS ........................... 28

Figure 18. Current satellites frames used by ADWR to collect InSAR data in Arizona............................ 29

List of Pictures

Picture 1. GPS Surveying along Sahuarita Rd in Green Valley ................................................................ 6

Picture 2. Collecting gravity and groundwater level data in Green Valley............................................. 6

Picture 3. Earth fissure warning sign in Cochise County ........................................................................ 7

Picture 4. Exposed well casing in Cochise County .................................................................................. 8

Picture 5. Sulfur Hills earth fissure in Cochise County ........................................................................... 8

Picture 6. Centennial Wash flooding the town of Wenden in 2010, McMullen Valley ........................ 9

Picture 7. GPS Surveying in the McMullen Valley ................................................................................. 9

Picture 8. Expansion cracks located in the Chimney Canyon Area, Holbrook Basin ............................. 9

Picture 9. GPS Surveying in the Chimney Canyon Area of the Holbrook Basin ..................................... 9

Picture 10. Earth fissure located at Baseline Rd and Meridian Rd in the Hawk Rock Feature .............. 10

Picture 11. Usery Mountain Park bedrock CORS ................................................................................... 10

List of Graphs

Graph 1. GPS Survey and groundwater data for the Green Valley Land Subsidence Feature ................. 7

Graph 2. GPS Survey data for land subsidence along Dragoon Rd in Cochise County ............................ 8

Page 4: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 3

Acknowledgements

This Land Subsidence Monitoring Report was completed with the help of many individuals who collected and/or contributed data, helped with data analysis, or provided editorial help and suggestions. Contributors include, but are not limited to Frank Corkhill, Teri Davis, Paul Ivanich, and Tracey Carpenter of ADWR who offered editorial suggestions. Paul Ivanich, Brian Mihlfeith, and Michael Winn (retired) of ADWR and Rob Carruth of the USGS assisted with survey-grade GPS data, transducer groundwater level data, and gravity data collection.

The help provided by these individuals and all those not listed is deeply appreciated.

Page 5: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 4

Executive Summary

In 1997, the Arizona Department of Water Resources created a land subsidence monitoring program. The program initially focused on monitoring land subsidence in the east valley of the Phoenix Metropolitan area using survey-grade GPS equipment. In 2002, ADWR was awarded a 3-year $1.3 million NASA grant to expand the land subsidence monitoring program to include Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar data (InSAR). Upon completion of the NASA grant in 2005, ADWR quickly migrated to a land subsidence program that primarily utilized InSAR data using GPS surveying to support the program. With the InSAR data, ADWR has identified more than 25 land subsidence features in Arizona, collectively covering more than 2,800 square miles of the state (Figure 1). In addition, the program now cooperates with 12 entities whose financial assistance allows the Department to fund the InSAR data collection. ADWR provides land subsidence maps for download from ADWR’s website. As of May 2013, 163 land subsidence maps are available for download and are used on a daily basis by geologists, hydrologists, engineers, planners, surveyors, floodplain managers, GIS analysts, and water resources managers.

Page 6: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 5

ADWR’s Land Subsidence Monitoring Program In 1997 numerous non-exempt wells were proposed in the Apache Junction and Luke Air Force Base areas, both areas noted for significant historic land subsidence and earth fissuring. Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) management had concerns over the potential for the new wells to cause unreasonable increasing harm which led to a Directorate level decision to begin a land subsidence monitoring program. As a result, Geophysics/Surveying Unit (GSU) of the Hydrology Division was created and started monitoring land subsidence by collecting survey-grade GPS data on survey monuments in the Hawk Rock land subsidence area located in east Mesa and Apache Junction. In 2002, ADWR was awarded a $1.3 million NASA grant to develop a land subsidence monitoring program over three years that processes satellite-based synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data using interferometry (InSAR). Upon completion of the NASA grant in 2005, ADWR quickly migrated to a land subsidence program that primarily utilized InSAR data using GPS surveying to support the program.

ADWR’s InSAR Program Synthetic Aperture Radar is a side-looking, active (produces its own illumination) radar-imaging system that transmits a pulsed microwave signal towards the earth and records both the amplitude and phase of the back-scattered signal that returns to the antenna. InSAR is a technique that utilizes interferometric processing that compares the amplitude and phase signals received during successive passes of the SAR platform over a specific geographic area at different times. InSAR techniques, using satellite-based SAR platform data, can be used to produce land-surface deformation products with cm-scale vertical resolution. Changes in land elevation are detected through the change in phase of the radar signal. InSAR is used to detect surface motion along active faults, on volcanoes, landslides, sinkholes, and other geologic hazards.

ADWR has developed an extensive library of over 1,200 SAR scenes used to process InSAR data, covering an area greater than 150,000 square miles at a cost of more than $750,000, mostly paid for by grants and cooperators. ADWR has compiled a state-wide dataset for the active land subsidence areas identified with InSAR data in Arizona. Most datasets cover time periods between 1992 to 2000, 2004 to 2010, 2006 to 2011, and 2010 to present. Using these data, ADWR has identified more than 25 land subsidence features in Arizona, collectively covering more than 2,800 square miles (Figure 1). ADWR provides land subsidence maps for download from ADWR’s website. As of May 2013, 163 land subsidence maps are available for download and are used on a daily basis by geologists, hydrologists, engineers, planners, surveyors, floodplain managers, GIS analysts, and water resources managers and can be accessed at this link:

http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/Hydrology/Geophysics/LandSubsidenceInArizona.htm

ADWR also provides an interactive land subsidence map that utilizes a Google Maps interface and can be accessed at this link:

http://maps.google.com/maps?q=http%3A//www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/Hydrology/Geophysics/ArizonaLandSubsidenceArea04-2013.kmz

ADWR uses InSAR data not only for monitoring land subsidence, but also seasonal deformation (uplift and subsidence), natural and artificial recharge events, as a tool for geological mapping and investigations, locating earth fissures, identifying areas where conditions may exist for future earth fissure formation, and for dam mitigation and land subsidence modeling.

ADWR cooperates with the following groups: Flood Control District of Maricopa County, Pinal County Flood Control District, Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District, Central Arizona Project, Arizona Department of Transportation, Arizona State Land Department, Arizona Geological Survey, Community Water Company of Green Valley, City of Scottsdale, Cochise County, Salt River Project, and Petrified Forest National Park.

Page 7: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 6

ADWR InSAR Results ADWR initially started focusing the InSAR data collection efforts on the Phoenix and Tucson Active Management Areas (AMA), where there were already identified and well-documented land subsidence features. Three land subsidence features in the Phoenix AMA known as the West Valley (Figure 2), Northeast Phoenix/Scottsdale (Figure 3), and the Hawk Rock (Figure 4) land subsidence features, and also three land subsidence features in the Tucson AMA known as the Central Well-field and the Valencia features (Figure 5), and the Green Valley feature (Figure 6) were readily identified by ADWR using archived InSAR data from the 1990’s.

By cooperating with other federal, state, county, and local agencies and water companies, ADWR was able to greatly expand its data collection efforts to cover the entire State. The additional InSAR data provided ADWR the necessary resources to confirm two well-documented land subsidence areas in the Pinal AMA known as the Maricopa-Stanfield (Figure 7) and the Picacho-Eloy (Figure 8) land subsidence features. InSAR data for west-central Arizona helped ADWR identify three new land subsidence features in far western Maricopa and eastern La Paz Counties known as the McMullen Valley (Figure 9), Harquahala Valley (Figure 10), and the Ranegras Valley (Figure 11) land subsidence features. ADWR also identified two more land subsidence features in southwestern Maricopa County known as the Buckeye and Gila Bend features. The most recent land subsidence features identified with ADWR InSAR data are located in Cochise and Apache Counties. The Cochise County features currently have the highest magnitude of land subsidence in the entire State, greater than 8 centimeters/year (3.1 inches/year) and are known as the Fort Grant Rd (Figure 12), Kansas Settlement (Figure 13), Elfrida (Figure 14), and the Bowie/San Simon (Figure 15) land subsidence features. The Apache County features were identified while investigating possible land subsidence related to the existing Holbrook sinks and to also establish a baseline for any existing land subsidence around the Petrified Forest National Park before planned potash mining activity begins in the area. These features are known as the Holbrook Basin (Figure 16) land subsidence features.

GPS Surveying ADWR also collects survey-grade GPS data for ground-truthing of the InSAR data and for land subsidence monitoring in Hawk Rock Area in East Mesa and Apache Junction (Figure 4), Sahuarita/Green Valley Area (Figure 6), the McMullen Valley/Wenden Area (Figure 9), the Dragoon Rd Area in Cochise County (Figure 13) and the Chimney Canyon land subsidence feature in the Holbrook Basin (Figure 16).

Green Valley/Sahuarita Results Comparison of recent GPS surveying (Picture 1) and ADWR groundwater data (Picture 2) from the Sahuarita/Green Valley Area has shown a striking correlation.

Picture 1 - GPS Surveying along Sahuarita Rd in Green

Valley

Picture 2 - Collecting gravity and groundwater level data at the Rosemont East transducer, Green Valley

Page 8: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 7

Seasonal groundwater pumping demands have resulted in both seasonal groundwater declines and recovery of 110 feet, causing both seasonal uplift and land subsidence that reflect the groundwater changes (Graph 1).

Cochise County/Willcox Basin Results ADWR started collecting InSAR data over Cochise County in 2010 and the InSAR data has documented land subsidence of as much as 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) in a twelve month period.

ADWR also collects survey-grade GPS data in the center of one of the subsidence-bowls which is located between the towns of Dragoon and Willcox along Dragoon Rd within the Kansas Settlement land subsidence feature. ADWR was able to recover an old survey monument, V 261, which was established in 1945 by the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) along Dragoon Rd a mile west of US HWY 191. Comparing recent (2013) ADWR GPS data with the historical 1945 data, ADWR was able to determine that a total of 1.2 meters (3.9 feet) of land subsidence has occurred at this location since 1945, and 26 centimeters (10.2 inches) of land subsidence has occurred between 2011 and 2013 (Graph 2).

2340

2390

2440

2490

2540

2590

795.360

795.370

795.380

795.390

795.400

795.410

795.420

795.430

795.440

795.450De

c-11

Feb-

12

Apr-

12

May

-12

Jul-1

2

Aug-

12

Oct

-12

Dec-

12

Jan-

13

Mar

-13

May

-13

Jun-

13

Wat

er L

evel

Ele

vatio

n (ft

)

Ellip

soid

Hei

ght (

m)

Data Collection Date

Sahuarita GPS Survey for Land Subsidence Monitoring and InSAR Support Ellipsoid Height Water Level Elevation

Graph 1 – GPS Survey and transducer groundwater data for the Green Valley Land Subsidence Feature

Picture 3 - Earth Fissure warning sign along Dragoon Rd in Cochise County

Page 9: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 8

There is also an exposed well casing (Picture 4) about a mile northwest of the V 261 survey monument, and numerous earth fissures located in the Willcox Basin (Picture 5). These features further document the amount of historical land subsidence that has occurred in the immediate area as well as the need for ADWR to continue to surveying V 261 for land subsidence in this area.

Picture 4 - Exposed well casing in Cochise County Picture 5 - Sulfur Hills earth fissure in Cochise County

McMulley Valley Basin Results ADWR first detected land subsidence in the McMullen Valley in 2008 with InSAR data. In 2010, the Town of Wenden, located in the McMullen Valley, was flooded for a second time in ten years (2000) by Centennial Wash. The Town of Wenden is located within a land subsidence bowl which has contributed

1258.175 m

1257.912 m

1257.85

1257.90

1257.95

1258.00

1258.05

1258.10

1258.15

1258.20

3/30

/201

1

11/1

5/20

11

4/9/

2012

6/7/

2012

10/2

3/20

12

2/13

/201

3

4/7/

2013

Ellip

soid

Hei

ght (

m)

GPS Survey Date

Cochise County V261 GPS Survey for Land Subsidence Monitoring and InSAR Support

Graph 2 – GPS Survey data for land subsidence along Dragoon Rd in Cochise County

Page 10: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 9

to the recent flooding. ADWR recently recovered three historical NGS monuments (A 480, Y 479, X 479) in the Wenden Area (Picture 7) that will be used for on-going ground-truthing of the InSAR data and for land subsidence monitoring in the McMullen Valley.

Picture 6 - Centennial Wash flooding the Town of

Wenden in 2010 (Photo credit La Paz County)

Picture 7 - GPS Surveying in the McMullen Valley

Comparing recent ADWR GPS data with the historical 1991 data for the three survey monuments, a total of 0.28 meters (0.92 feet), 0.43 meters (1.4 feet), and 0.81 meters (2.7 feet) of land subsidence has occurred at these three locations since 1991. ADWR will continue to survey (Figure 3) all three survey monuments for monitoring land subsidence in the McMullen Valley.

Holbrook Basin Results ADWR recently discovered three new land subsidence features in the Holbrook Basin (Figure 16) while investigating potential land subsidence related to the well-documented geologic sink features that exist in the basin.

While the two southern-most land subsidence features seem to be directly related to the more than 400 existing sinks located throughout the basin, these two sinks are much larger in size but not as deep. Staff from the AZGS and ADWR visited the Chimney Canyon sink (Picture 9) and collected baseline GPS survey data in October 2012 (Picture 9). Repeat survey data will be collected in the near future to monitor

Picture 8 - One of the many expansion cracks located in

the Chimney Canyon Area of the Holbrook Basin

Picture 9 - GPS Surveying in the Chimney Canyon Area

of the Holbrook Basin

any changes in these features, as part of the ongoing cooperative land subsidence monitoring efforts between the AZGS and ADWR.

Page 11: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 10

Hawk Rock Results ADWR has conducted several GPS surveys in the Hawk Rock Area since 1997. The monument, SGC 17, was first measured in 1973. Comparing the SGC 17 elevation from 1973 and a re-surveyed elevation from 2013, SGC 17 has subsided just over 1.55 meters (5.1 feet) in 40 years. Recently ADWR recovered three historical monuments, Y 477, SS-C, and SS-D (Figure 4). The SS-C and SS-D monuments were first established in 1978 during the first land subsidence studies in preparation and design of the CAP canal and the Y 477 monument was established later in 1991. Recent ADWR survey results (2013) showed that Y 477 has subsided 0.46 meters (1.52 feet) since 1991, and SS-C has subsided 0.37 meters (1.21 feet) and SS-D has subsidence 0.35 meters (1.13 feet) since 1978. The SS-C and SS-D monuments are located 50 feet across from each other, situated on different sides of an active earth fissure (Picture 10), further documenting the vertical offset on either side of the earth fissure.

Continuous Operating Reference Station Over the past three years, ADWR has played an important role in site-selection and installation of several GPS Continuous Operating Reference Station (CORS) sites in Arizona. Many of the CORS sites are operated by the State Cartographer’s Office (SCO) with the Arizona State Land Department and all the data is managed by the National Geodetic Survey. There are more than twenty CORS sites located throughout Arizona that provide precise GPS data that are then used for both real-time and post-processed surveying projects. For those projects that require accurate and precise elevations, it is crucial that the survey control is stable and not subsiding. As a result, ADWR has provided guidance for where stable sites may be located away from land subsidence areas to not only the SCO, but to other entities.

ADWR has worked with the SCO, Central Arizona Project, Maricopa County Department of Transportation, and Maricopa County Parks to install two new stable CORS sites that are located on bedrock in Eastern Maricopa County at Usery Mountain and San Tan Mountain Parks (Figure 17). These sites will provide stable vertical control around the Hawk Rock land subsidence feature to the surveying community.

Future Land Subsidence Data Collection ADWR’s GPS-surveying program plays a vital role in supporting the State-wide InSAR land subsidence monitoring program. Routine survey data will continue to be collected in existing areas and other subsidence areas will be examined to determine if additional surveying locations should be added for enhanced monitoring using GPS surveying techniques.

ADWR continues to provide land subsidence products for its own hydrologic studies and for cooperators, consultants, other government and private entities, and the public. At the same time, ADWR is continually searching for additional InSAR cooperators, educating groups about the InSAR data and how the data can be used to meet their monitoring needs, and further enhancing the InSAR program through investments in software and hardware upgrades.

ADWR will continue to collect InSAR data around the State at the existing data collection frequency and spatial distribution (Figure 18). ADWR will also continue to update land subsidence maps on an annual basis, making the maps available on the Department’s website.

Picture 10 - Earth Fissure located at Baseline Rd and Meridian Rd in the Hawk Rock feature

Picture 11 –Usery Mountain Bedrock CORS

Page 12: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 11

Figures

Page 13: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

0 25 50 75 10012.5Miles

Active Land Subsidence Area

Highways and InterstatesInterstate

US

State µ1:2,832,259

Figure 1 - Active Land Subsidence Areas in Arizona Based on ADWR InSAR Data InSAR Data is Collected, Processed, and Analyzed

By the Geophysics/Surveying Unit of the Hydrology Division

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 12

Page 14: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

!

!

!

!

!!!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!!

!

!!!

!

!

!!!!

!!

!!!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!!!!!

!

!

Bell Rd

59th

Ave

Olive Ave

43rd

Ave

McDowell Rd

83rd

Ave

Van Buren St

Northern Ave

67th

Ave

91st

Ave

Dysa

rt Rd

Citru

s Rd Camelback Rd

Cotto

n Ln

Indian School Rd

51st

Ave

Litch

field

Rd

75th

Ave

Yuma Rd 99th

Ave

Glendale Ave

Cactus Rd

Thomas Rd

Reem

s Rd Peoria Ave

Sariv

al Av

eUnion Hills Dr

107th

Ave

Greenway Rd

Waddell Rd

Perry

ville

Rd

El Mi

rage

Rd

163rd

Ave

Jack

rabbit

Tr

111th

Ave

Thunderbird RdBu

llard

Ave

Lake

Plea

sant

Rd

Deer Valley Rd

Patton Rd

195th

Ave

Alsu

p Ave

103rd

Ave

Beardsley Rd

Deer Valley Dr

Boswell Blvd

219th

Ave

Happy Valley Rd

Verra

do W

y

Bethany Home Rd

Avon

dale

Blvd

R H Johnson Blvd

Del W

ebb B

lvd

Vistancia Blvd

Jomax Rd

Stardust Blvd

115th

Ave

Sunrise

BlvdEs

trella

Pkwy

Wigwam Blvd

Pinnacle Peak Rd

Glen

Harbo

r Blvd

Tuthi

ll Rd

Old Dean Rd

Parkv

iew Pl

94th

Dr

Western Ave

Terra

mar B

lvd

rx303

rx101

§̈¦10

0 2 4 6 81Miles

05/08/2010 To 04/22/2013Subsidence

Decorrelation/No Data6 To 8 cm4 To 6 cm3 To 4 cm2 To 3 cm1 To 2 cm0 To 1 cm

Subsidence FeatureHardrock

!

! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates

InterstateUSStateRoads

Figure 2 - Land Subsidence in Western Metropolitan PhoenixBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data

© MDA 2010 - 2013

µ1:183,029

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Time Period of Analysis: 3.0 Years 05/08/2010 To 04/22/2013

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 13

Page 15: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!!

!!

!

!

!

!

Shea Blvd

Tatu

m Bl

vd

7th St

56th

St

Scott

sdale

Rd

Bell Rd

Cactus Rd

32nd

St

Cave

Cree

k Rd

Pima R

d

40th

St

Via Linda

Hayden Rd

Lincoln Dr

64th

St

Dynamite Blvd

Pinnacle Peak Rd

McDonald Dr16th

St

128th

St

Jomax Rd

Union Hills Dr

Thunderbird Rd

Greenway Rd

Rio Verde Dr

Mayo Blvd

136th

St

Frank Lloyd Wright Blvd

Indian Bend Rd

Happy Valley Rd24

th St

Deer Valley Dr

124th

St

94th

St

Greenway Pkwy

92nd

St

Deer Valley Rd

Raintree Dr

90th

StDoubletree Ranch Rd

Glendale Ave

Northern AveVia De Ventura

Camelback Rd

108th

St10

4th St

Peoria Ave

McCormick Pkwy

Princess Dr

Exten

sion R

d

rx51

rx101

0 1 2 3 40.5Miles

05/08/2010 To 04/22/2013Subsidence

Decorrelation/No Data2.0 To 2.5 cm1.5 To 2.0 cm1.0 To 1.5 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm

Subsidence FeatureHardrock

!

! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates

InterstateUSStateRoads

Figure 3 - Land Subsidence in Northeast Phoenix and Scottsdale AreasBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data

© MDA 2010 - 2013

µ1:138,037

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Time Period of Analysis: 3.0 Years 05/08/2010 To 04/22/2013

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 14

Page 16: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

!

!

!!!

!!!

!

!!

!

!!!!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!.!.

!.

!. SS-DSS-C

Y 473

SGC 17

Ellsw

orth

Rd

Apache Tr

Viney

ard R

d

Southern Ave

Elliot Rd

Crism

on R

d

Baseline Rd

University Dr

Germann Rd

Broadway Rd

Superstition Blvd

Moun

tain R

dBaseline Ave

Merid

ian R

d

Toma

hawk

Rd

Pecos Rd

Signa

l Butt

e Rd

Broadway Ave

Guadalupe Rd

Goldf

ield R

d

Ironw

ood D

r

Moun

tain V

iew R

d

Warner Rd

Hawe

s Rd

Idaho

Rd

Williams Field Rd

rx202

rx88

£¤60

0 1 2 3 40.5Miles

05/15/2010 To 04/29/2013Subsidence

Decorelation/No Data4 To 5 cm3 To 4 cm2 To 3 cm1 To 2 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm

Subsidence Feature!. Survey Monument

Hardrock!

! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates

InterstateUSStateRoads

Figure 4 - Land Subsidence in the Hawk Rock Area of East Mesa and Apache JunctionBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data

© MDA 2010 - 2013

µ1:91,309

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Time Period of Analysis: 3.0 Years 05/15/2010 To 04/29/2013

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 15

Page 17: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

E 22ND ST

S KOL

B RD

S MISS

ION

RD

E VALENCIA RD

E SPEEDWAY BL

E BROADWAY BL

E GRANT RD

S PAR

K AV

S ALV

ERNO

N WY

S 12T

H AV

S 6TH

AV

E 5TH ST

E RIVER RD

S NOGALES HYN

SWAN

RD

E GOLF LINKS RD

S WILM

OT R

D

E AJO WY

N ST

ONE A

V

W VALENCIA RD

E 36TH STS K

INO

PW

E DREXEL RD

E 29TH ST

W IRVINGTON RD

E 6TH ST

W SPEEDWAY BL

N SILVERBELL RD

N 1S

T AV

N CA

MPBE

LL AV

S RITA

RD

W AJO HY W AJO WY

S PAL

O VE

RDE

RD

N CR

AYCR

OFT R

D

E AVIATION PW

W ANKLAM RD

E FORT LOWELL RD

N 6T

H AV

N OR

ACLE

RD

E PIMA ST

W STARR PASS BL

E PRINCE RD

S PAN

TANO

RD

S 10T

H AV

W GRANT RD

S CAR

DINA

L AV

N KO

LB R

D

W PRINCE RD

S SWA

N RD

E IRVINGTON RD

N EU

CLID

AV

N PA

NTAN

O RD

E CLOUD RD

W DREXEL RD

S CAM

INO

SECO

N CA

MINO

SECO

W SAN XAVIER RD

N BE

AR C

ANYO

N RD

W SAINT MARYS RD

W CONGRESS ST

W 22ND ST

E OLD VAIL CONNECTION RD

S GOL

F LIN

KS R

D

N WI

LMOT

RD

W DREXEL RD

S WILM

OT R

D

S SWA

N RD

§̈¦10

§̈¦19

0 1 2 3 40.5Miles

05/15/2010 To 04/29/2013Subsidence

Decorrelation/No Data2.0 To 3.0 cm1.5 To 2.0 cm1.0 To 1.5 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm

Subsidence FeatureHardrock

Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSStateRoadsRailway

Figure 5 - Land Subsidence in the Tucson Metropolitan AreaBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data

© MDA 2010 - 2013

µ1:121,136

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Time Period of Analysis: 3.0 Years 05/15/2010 To 04/29/2013

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 16

Page 18: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!.

!.

!.Rosemont Copper East

Rosemont Copper West

S NOG

ALES

HY

E SAHUARITA RD

S LA

CANA

DA D

R

W DUVAL MINE RD

W TWIN BUTTES RDS O

LD N

OGAL

ES H

Y

W HELMET PEAK RDN A

BREG

O DR

N LA

CAN

ADA

DR

S MISSION RD

W PIMA MINE RD

W SAHUARITA RD

E PIMA MINE RD

W TWIN BUTTES RD

ADWR GV 01

0 0.65 1.3 1.95 2.60.325Miles

02/22/2012 To 04/29/2013Subsidence

Decorrelation/No Data2.0 To 4.0 cm1.0 To 2.0 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm

Subsidence Feature!. Survey Monument!. ADWR Transducer

Hardrock

!! CAP Canal

Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSStateRoadsRailway

Figure 6 - Land Subsidence in the Sahuarita and Green Valley Areas, Pima CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data

© MDA 2012 - 2013

µ1:86,569

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Time Period of Analysis: 1.1 Years 02/22/2012 To 04/29/2013

!"d$

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 17

Page 19: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

PETERS RD

RUSS

ELL R

D

CHUI

CHU

RD

WARR

EN R

D

RALS

TON

RD

MURP

HY R

D

SMITH

RD

CLAYTON RD

FARRELL RD

THOR

NTON

RD

MONT

GOME

RY R

D

PORT

ER R

D

BARNES RD

SHEDD RD

FUQU

A RD

WHITE

AND

PARK

ER R

D

HONEYCUTT RD

SMITH ENKE RD

MIDW

AY R

D

AMAR

ILLO

VALL

EY R

D

HIDD

EN VA

LLEY

RD

STEEN RD

HANNA RD

SELMA HWY

TEEL RD

MESQUITE RD

CAMINO GRANDE WH

ITE R

D

ANDE

RSON

RD

WOODRUFF RD INDI

AN VA

LLEY

RD

ETHI

NGTO

N RD

PAPAGO RD

PORT

ER R

D

ARICA RD

KORTSEN RD

CLAYTON RD

TEEL RD

RUSS

ELL R

D

STANFIELD RD

PETERS RD

KORTSEN RD

MILLER RD

HOUSER RD

BIAN

CO R

D

SMITH

RD

MILLER RD

GREE

N RD

FUQU

E RD

MURP

HY R

D

BARNES RD

STAN

FIELD

RD

BURR

IS RD

VAL VISTA BLVD

MURP

HY R

D

rx347

rx84

rx238

§̈¦8

§̈¦10

0 3 6 9 121.5Miles

05/08/2010 To 04/22/2013Subsidence

Decorrelation/No Data3.0 To 4.0 cm2.0 To 3.0 cm1.5 To 2.0 cm1.0 To 1.5 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm

Subsidence FeatureHardrock

!

! ! CAP CanalArizona Highways and Interstates

InterstateUSStateRoadsRailway

Figure 7 - Land Subsidence in the Maricopa-Stanfield Sub-Basin, Pinal CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data

© MDA 2010 - 2013

µ1:257,110

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Time Period of Analysis: 3.0 Years 05/08/2010 To 04/22/2013

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 18

Page 20: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!!

!!

!!

!

!!!

!

!!

!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

KLECK RD

BATTAGLIA DR

SUNL

AND

GIN

RD

SELMA HWY

OVER

FIELD

RD

PETERS RD

TWEE

DY R

D

LA PA

LMA

RD

STOREY RD

HARMON RD

TOLT

EC H

WY

RUSS

ELL R

D

MCCARTNEY RD

CHUI

CHU

RD

PRETZER RD

LAMB

RD

HANNA RD

RANDOLPH RD

SUNS

HINE

BLV

D

CORNMAN RD

BIAN

CO R

D

MARTIN RD

CURTIS RD

EARLEY RD

TREK

ELL R

D

BURR

IS RD

VAH KI INN RD

HOTTS RD

ARIES DR

SHEDD RD

CLAYTON RD

HUNT HWY

THOR

NTON

RD

SKOU

SEN

RD

MONT

GOME

RY R

D

ATTA

WAY R

D

BARTLETT RDSIGNA

L PEA

K RD

PEAR

T RD

TOLT

EC B

UTTE

S RD

WOODRUFF RD

PICAC

HO H

WY

NUTT RD

ARICA RD

STEELE RD

BARNES RDHE

NNES

S RD

HOUSER RD

CURR

Y RD

CAMINO GRANDE

KENILWORTH RD

MILLER RD

GREENES RESERVOIR RD

VAL VISTA BLVD

SHAY RD

ETHI

NGTO

N RD

MILLIGAN RD

STOREY RD

ARICA RD ARICA RD

MIDW

AY R

D

TWEE

DY R

D

BIAN

CO R

D

TREK

ELL R

DTR

EKEL

L RD

TOLT

EC B

UTTE

S RD

ALSDORF RD

BAUMGARTNER RD

CURR

Y RD

TREK

ELL R

D

SHEDD RD

EARLEY RD

BURR

IS RD

HOUSER RD

OVER

FIELD

RD

KORTSEN RD

MIDW

AY R

D

PEAR

T RD

PHILLIPS RD

HANNA RD

rx84

rx387rx187

rx287rx87

rx287

rx79

§̈¦8

§̈¦10

§̈¦10

0 3 6 9 121.5Miles

05/15/2010 To 04/29/2013Subsidence

Decorelation/No Data4 To 5 cm3 To 4 cm2 To 3 cm1 To 2 cm0 To 1 cm

Subsidence FeatureHardrock

!

! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates

InterstateUSStateRoadsRailway

Figure 8 - Land Subsidence in the Picacho Sub-Basin, Pinal CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data

© MDA 2010 - 2013

µ1:341,495

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Time Period of Analysis: 3.0 Years 05/15/2010 To 04/29/2013

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 19

Page 21: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!.

!.

!.Y 479X 479

A 480

Alam

o Rd

Eagle

Eye R

d

Salome Rd

Aguila Rd

Hova

tter R

d

Harcuvar Rd

Sorefinger Rd Micro

wave

Stati

on R

d

491s

t Ave

County 69th St

Cente

nnial

Park

Rd

Pete Rd

County 86th St

Little Horn Peak Rd

County 67th St

Aguila Valley Rd

6th St

Aven

ue 66

1/2e

Balliet Rd

£¤60

£¤60

0 3 6 9 121.5Miles

05/01/2010 To 03/22/2013Subsidence

Decorrelation/No Data6.0 To 8.0 cm4.5 To 6.0 cm3.0 To 4.5 cm1.5 To 3.0 cm0 To 1.5 cm

Subsidence Feature!. Survey Monument

Hardrock

!

! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates

InterstateUSStateRoadsRailway

Figure 9 - Land Subsidence in the McMullen Valley, Maricopa and La Paz CountiesBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 Single Pair InSAR Data

© MDA 2010 - 2013

µ1:287,039

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years: 05/01/2010 To 03/22/2013

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 20

Page 22: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

!

!

!

!!

!!!

!!!!!

!

!!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!!!!!

Salome Hwy

Dobbins Rd

539th

Ave

Baseline Rd

491s

t Ave50

7th Av

e

Buckeye Rd

Courthouse RdHarq

uaha

la Va

lley R

d

Centennial Rd

Eagle

Eye R

d

483rd

Ave

Eagletail Rd

Elwood St

Van Buren St

Camelback Rd

477th Ave

547th

Ave

499th

Ave

§̈¦10

0 2 4 6 81Miles

05/01/2010 To 03/22/2013Subsidence

Decorrelation/No Data1.5 To 2.0 cm1.0 To 1.5 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm

Subsidence FeatureHardrock

!

! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates

InterstateUSStateRoads

Figure 10 - Land Subsidence in the Harquahala Valley, Maricopa CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data

© MDA 2010 - 2013

µ1:207,806

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years 05/01/2010 To 03/22/2013

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 21

Page 23: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!!

!!!!!

!!!

!

!!

!!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!

Vicks

burg

Rd

Aven

ue 49

e

Fewe

ll Ran

ch R

d

County 60th St

Balliet Rd

County 63rd St

0 1 2 3 40.5Miles

Figure 11 - Land Subsidence in the Ranegras Valley, La Paz CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data

©MDA 2010 - 2013

µ1:121,130

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

05/01/2010 To 03/22/2013Subsidence

Decorrelation/No Data2.0 To 3.0 cm1.5 To 2.0 cm1.0 To 1.5 cm0.5 To 1.0 cm0 To 0.5 cm

Subsidence FeatureHardrock

!

! ! CAP CanalHighways and Interstates

InterstateUSStateRoadsRailway

Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years 05/01/2010 To 03/22/2013

!"a$

Iv

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 22

Page 24: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

Fort

Gran

t

Briggs

Orchard

Ash Creek Hooker

Broo

kerso

nAsh Creek

Fort GrantFo

rt Gr

ant

Ash CreekHooker

AIRPORT

HASK

ELLFO

RT G

RANT

SAGUARO

CIRC

LE I

HAMI

LTON

INGR

AM

COX

TAYL

ORROCKHOUSE

OLD STEWART

HARDY

MULESHOE

MALEY

RANCH HOUSE

MARGUERITE

ATWO

OD

PAGE RANCHKO

RTSE

NS R

ANCH

JOE H

INES

NICK

ELS

WILLIAMS

VISTA BI

SBEE

REX ALLEN

BLACK

OLD

FORT

GRA

NT

MALEY

JOE H

INES

OLD FORT GRANT

FORT GRANT

OLD STEWART PAGE RANCH

0 2 4 6 81Miles

05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013Subsidence

Decorrelation/No Data12 To 15 cm9 To 12 cm6 To 9 cm4 To 6 cm2 To 4 cm0 To 2 cm

Subsidence FeatureHardrock

Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSStateRoadsRailway

Figure 12 - Land Subsidence in the Fort Grant Road and Willcox Areas, Cochise CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 Time-Series InSAR Data

© MDA 2010 - 2013

µ1:191,637

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years 05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013

!"a$

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 23

Page 25: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

AIRPORT

BAKER

SHELTON

BELL

RAN

CH

DESE

RT

HASK

ELL

BIRCH

PEARCE

IRONWOOD

KIMZEY

DRAGOON

ROBBS

SWANSON

MANZ

ORA

COX

PINTO

TAYL

OR

COCH

ISE ST

RONG

HOLD

TREASURE

CHAMBERS

SULPHUR SPRINGS

ARZBERGER

HAMI

LTON

HIGHLAND

JOHN

SON

CIRC

LE I

MALEY

KANS

AS SE

TTLE

MENT

PARKER RANCH

FORT

GRA

NT

GHOST TOWN

SEVEN DASH

JOE H

INES

FERN

EASTLAND

LANS

ING

RATHBI

SBEE

RICHLAND

BUSENBARK

I 010336A

KANS

AS SE

TTLE

MENT

DRAGOON DRAGOON

0 2 4 6 81Miles

05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013Subsidence

Decorrelation/No Data19 To 23 cm15 To 19 cm12 To 15 cm9 To 12 cm6 To 9 cm2 To 6 cm0 To 2 cm

Subsidence Feature!. Survey Monument

HardrockHighways and Interstates

InterstateUSStateRoadsRailway

Figure 13 - Land Subsidence in the Willcox and Kansas Settlement Areas, Cochise CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data

© MDA 2010 - 2013

µ1:250,000

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years 05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013

!"a$

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

!.V 261

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 24

Page 26: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

DAVIS

BELL

GLEESON

WEBB

GHOS

T TOW

N

CENT

RAL

MORM

ON

JEFFERSON

COURTLAND

MOORE

RUCKER CANYON

MART

INEA

U

SLOV

ER

SHEEP

LATIMER

THOMPSON

NOBLE

HOPKINS

HEDGES

WHITE

FAWN

GLEESON

JEFFERSON

0 2 4 6 81Miles

05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013Subsidence

Decorrelation/No Data9 To 12 cm6 To 9 cm4 To 6 cm2 To 4 cm1 To 2 cm0 To 1 cm

Subsidence FeatureHardrock

Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSStateRoadsRailway

Figure 14 - Land Subsidence in the Elfrida Area, Cochise CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data

© MDA 2010 - 2013

µ1:164,624

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years 05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 25

Page 27: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

NOLA

ND

APACHE PASS

LUZENA

WOOD

CAN

YON

CENT

RAL

CARR

HILLTOP

INDI

AN SP

RING

S

SAND STORM

RATLIFF

PARK

ER

COMM

UNITY

ONEAL

FOOTHILLS

BALL

RILE

Y

PINERY CANYON

BUSINESS

CAVOT

COYOTE SONG

RIVERS

3RD

FAN

WHETTEN

MAHA

N

TURK

EY CR

EEK

HAPPY CAMP

MULKINS RANCH

QUAIL

BARNES

ROSEWOOD

NOLA

ND

0 2 4 6 81Miles

05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013Subsidence

Decorrelation/No Data6 To 9 cm4 To 6 cm2 To 4 cm1 To 2 cm0 To 1 cm

Subsidence FeatureHardrock

Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSStateRoadsRailway

Figure 15 - Land Subsidence in the Bowie and San Simon Areas, Cochise CountyBased on ADWR Radarsat-2 InSAR Data

© MDA 2010 - 2013

µ1:288,798

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Time Period of Analysis: 2.9 Years 05/05/2010 To 03/26/2013

!"a$

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 26

Page 28: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

§̈¦40

rx99

rx377

0 1.5 3 4.5 60.75Miles

12/06/2006 To 02/01/2011Subsidence

Decorrelation/No Data18 To 26 cm12 To 18 cm6 To 12 cm4 To 6 cm2 To 4 cm0 To 2 cm

Subsidence Feature!. Survey Monument

HardrockHighways and Interstates

InterstateUSStateRoads

µ1:177,022

Decorrelation (white areas) are areas where the phase of the received satellite signal changed between satellite passes, causing the data to be unusable. This occurs in areas where the land surface has been disturbed (i.e. bodies of water, snow, agriculture areas, areas of development, etc).

Note! Colors assigned representing differing amounts of subsidence apply to this map only. Color codes may varyfor other maps

McCauley Sinks

Richard Lake

Figure 16 - Land Subsidence in the Holbrook Sinks Area, Navaho CountyBased on ADWR ALOS InSAR Data

© JAXA 2006 - 2011© ASF 2006 - 2011

Time Period of Analysis: 4.1 Years 12/06/2006 To 02/01/2011

Territorial Rd

McLaws Rd

Obed Rd

!. Chimney Canyon

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 27

Page 29: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

!.

!.

0 2 4 6 81Miles

1:182,411

!. Bedrock CORSHawk Rock Subsidence Feature

Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSState µ

Figure 17 - Bedrock CORS Sites

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 28

Añ?Ñ

Iv

Iv

Usery Mountain CORS

San Tan Mountain CORS

Page 30: Land Subsidence Monitoring Report - ADWR - Home Page

0 25 50 75 10012.5Miles

Active Land Subsidence AreaInSAR Frames

Highways and InterstatesInterstateUSState

µ1:2,832,259

Figure 18 - Current Satellite Frames Used by ADWR to Collect InSAR Data in ArizonaInSAR Data is Collected, Processed, and Analyzed

By the Geophysics/Surveying Unit of the Hydrology Division

Land Subsidence Monitoring Report 29Note: Not all InSAR Frames (Big Chino/Prescott Area) are showing active land subsidence at this time