Land Cover Height & Topographic Contours

/

!(

!(

735730

725

720

715

720

715720

730

740

745

740

735

720

725

Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community

0 200 400 600 800100 Feet·

Date: 2/15/2017Legend/ Project Site

!( Viewer Location

5 Foot Elevation

Land Cover Height & Topographic Contours

Sources: USGS, ESRI, EBILand Cover (feet)

10

30

35

40

45

60

Land Cover ExhibitHV1094 WS TAPP ROADS WEIMER RD.MONROE COUNTYBLOOMINGTON, IN 47403PN: 6116004086

Line of Sight & Profile

Profiles include ground elevation plus assumed land cover values. Viewer height 5' 10". Tower height 195 feetDistance (feet)

1,5001,4001,3001,2001,1001,0009008007006005004003002001000

Eleva

tion (

Feet)

930920910900890880870860850840830820810800790780770760750740730720


Source: Selected data from ESRI USGS and EBI.

0 500 1,000250Feet

·Date: 2/15/2017

SOUTH PROFILE 1ELEVATION WITH LAND COVER

PN: 6116004086

Tower

Tower is visible

Line of Sight

Land Cover (Tree Stands at 60 feet)

Viewer

Tower Visible Viewer Location

Viewer

Tower is visible

Line of Sight & Profile

Profile includes ground elevationplus assumed land cover. Viewer height 5' 8". Tower height 195 feet. Distance (feet)

2,2002,0001,8001,6001,4001,2001,0008006004002000

Eleva

tion (

feet)

920

900

880

860

840

820

800

780

760

740

720

Viewer

Tower is visible


Source: Selected data from ESRI, USGS and EBI.

0 500 1,000250Feet

·Date: 2/15/2017

SOUTH PROFILE 2ELEVATION WITH LAND COVER

PN: 6116004086

Tower

Tower is visible

Line of Sight

Land Cover (Tree Stands at 60 feet)

Viewer

Land Cover (Building at 40 feet)

Tower Visible Viewer Location

UPS CampusShip: View/Print Label

1. Ensure there are no other shipping or tracking labels attached to your package. Select the

Print button on the print dialog box that appears. Note: If your browser does not support this function

select Print from the File menu to print the label.

2. Fold the printed label at the solid line below. Place the label in a UPS Shipping Pouch. If you do

not have a pouch, affix the folded label using clear plastic shipping tape over the entire label.

3. GETTING YOUR SHIPMENT TO UPS

Customers with a Daily Pickup

Your driver will pickup your shipment(s) as usual.

Customers without a Daily Pickup

Take your package to any location of The UPS Store®, UPS Access Point(TM) location, UPS Drop

Box, UPS Customer Center, UPS Alliances (Office Depot® or Staples®) or Authorized Shipping Outlet

near you. Items sent via UPS Return Services(SM) (including via Ground) are also accepted at Drop

Boxes. To find the location nearest you, please visit the Resources area of CampusShip and select

UPS Locations.

Schedule a same day or future day Pickup to have a UPS driver pickup all your CampusShip

packages.

Hand the package to any UPS driver in your area.

UPS Access PointTM UPS Access PointTM UPS Access PointTM

THE UPS STORE THE UPS STORE THE UPS STORE

101 MIDDLESEX TPKE 101 GREAT RD 405 WALTHAM ST

BURLINGTON ,MA 01803 BEDFORD ,MA 01730 LEXINGTON ,MA 02421

FOLD HERE

Page 1 of 1UPS CampusShip: Shipment Label

3/3/2017https://www.campusship.ups.com/cship/create?ActionOriginPair=default___PrintWindowPage&key=labelWind...

FCC Form FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Approved by OMB 3060 – 1039

Notification Date: See instructions for File Number: public burden estimates

General Information 1) (Select only one) ( )

NE – New UA – Update of Application WD – Withdrawal of Application

2) If this application is for an Update or Withdrawal, enter the file number of the pending application currently on file. File Number:

Applicant Information

3) FCC Registration Number (FRN):

4) Name:

Contact Name

5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix:

9) Title:

Contact Information

10) P.O. Box: And /Or 11) Street Address:

12) City: 13) State: 14) Zip Code:

15) Telephone Number: 16) Fax Number:

17) E-mail Address:

Consultant Information


19) Name:

Principal Investigator


24) Title:

Principal Investigator Contact Information




32) E-mail Address:

Horvath Towers, LLC

0013457312

Shauna Adair

Compliance Manager

312 W. Colfax Ave.

South Bend IN 46601

(574)237-0464 (574)217-4357

0016385759

EnviroBusiness Inc. d/b/a EBI Consulting (EBI 6116004086)

[email protected]

Tara Cubie

Senior Architectural Historian

6876 Susquehanna Trail South

York PA 17403

(339)234-2597

[email protected]

1 of 23

NE

620

FCC Form 620

New Tower (�NT� ) Submission Packet0007532961

7AM EST 11/03/2016

May 2014

Professional Qualification

33) Does the Principal Investigator satisfy the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards? ( ) Yes ( ) No

34) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( ) Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) __________________________________________________________________________________________

Additional Staff

35) Are there other staff involved who meet the Professional Qualification Standards of the Secretary of the Interior? ( ) Yes ( ) No

If “YES,” complete the following:

X

X

X


40) Title:

41) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( ) Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) ____________________________________________________________________________________________

Kiristen D Webb

X

Archaeologist


40) Title:

41) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( ) Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) ____________________________________________________________________________________________

James C Prichard

X Principle Investigator

Principle Investigator

2 of 23 FCC Form 620May 2014

Site Information Tower Construction Notification System

1) TCNS Notification Number: Site Information

2) Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: ( ) Yes ( ) No

3) Site Name:

4) Site Address: 5) Detailed Description of Project: 6) City: 7) State: 8) Zip Code:

9) County/Borough/Parish:

10) Nearest Crossroads:

11) NAD 83 Latitude (DD-MM-SS.S): ( ) N or ( ) S

12) NAD 83 Longitude (DD-MM-SS.S): ( ) E or ( ) W Tower Information

13) Tower height above ground level (include top-mounted attachments such as lightning rods): ___________________ ( ) Feet ( ) Meters

14) Tower Type (Select One): ( ) Guyed lattice tower ( ) Self-supporting lattice ( ) Monopole ( ) Other (Describe):

Project Status

15) Current Project Status (Select One): ( ) Construction has not yet commenced ( ) Construction has commenced, but is not completed Construction commenced on: _______________ ( ) Construction has been completed Construction commenced on: _______________ Construction completed on: _______________

143449

WS Tapp Road / HV1094

S Weimer Rd.

Bloomington IN

MONROE

47403

39-08-38.9

086-33-37.4

X

X

60.7 X

�

3 of 23

X

X

FCC Form 620May 2014

Sudburg Lane and Weiner Road

6116004086; Proposed construction of a new telecommunications monopole and compound resulting in ground disturbance. Please see Attachment 4 of this filing for project design details.

X

Determination of Effect

14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE

15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE

4 of 23

X

X


Tribal/NHO Involvement

1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects?

( ) Yes ( ) No

2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________

143449 25

X

0

Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS

3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response

10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other

Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma

09/29/2016

X

Ashley Brokeshoulder

THPO Specialist


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Cherokee Nation

09/28/2016

X

Sheila BirdM

THPO




( ) Yes ( ) No


143449 25

X

0


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation

09/28/2016 10/03/2016

X

Alvin Windy Boy Sr

THPO


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma

09/29/2016 09/29/2016

X

Travis Patton

TCNS Coordinator




( ) Yes ( ) No


143449 25

X

0


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe

09/28/2016 09/28/2016

X

Garrie Kills a Hundred

THPO-Director


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Forest County Potawatomi Community

09/29/2016

X

Michael LaRonge

THPO




( ) Yes ( ) No


143449 25

X

0


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Ho-Chunk Nation

09/28/2016

X

William Quackenbush

Tribal Historic Preservation Officer


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Kaw Nation

09/29/2016

X

kenny wheeler

TCNS Administrator




( ) Yes ( ) No


143449 25

X

0


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Keweenaw Bay Indian Community

09/29/2016 10/05/2016

X

Gary Loonsfoot Jr

THPO


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians

09/29/2016 10/03/2016

X

Melinda YoungJ

THPO




( ) Yes ( ) No


143449 25

X

0


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians

09/28/2016 09/28/2016

X

Giiwegiizhigookway Martin Ms

THPO and NAGPRA Representative


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Miami Tribe of Oklahoma

09/28/2016 09/28/2016

X

Diane Hunter

THPO




( ) Yes ( ) No


143449 25

X

0


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Omaha Tribe of Nebraska

09/29/2016 09/30/2016

X

Thomas Parker

THPO


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians

09/29/2016 10/03/2016

X

Elsie Whitehorn

Tribal Historic Preservation Officer




( ) Yes ( ) No


143449 25

X

0


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma

09/29/2016

X

Cheryl Stafford

EPA


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma

09/28/2016

X

Logan PappenfortR

Special Projects Manager/NAGPRA




( ) Yes ( ) No


143449 25

X

0


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians

09/29/2016

X

Jason WesawS

THPO


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma

09/28/2016 10/12/2016

X

Earl Howe III

Chairman




( ) Yes ( ) No


143449 25

X

0


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation

09/29/2016

X

Thomas Wabnum

Tribal Historical Cultural Preservation


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin

09/28/2016

X

Larry Balber

THPO




( ) Yes ( ) No


143449 25

X

0


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians of Minnesota

09/28/2016 10/17/2016

X

Kade Ferris MSM

Tribal Archaeologist/THPO


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Shawnee Tribe

09/29/2016 10/05/2016

X

Kim Jumper

THPO




( ) Yes ( ) No


143449 25

X

0


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation

09/29/2016 09/28/2016

X

Dianne Desrosiers

THPO & Tribal Anthropologist


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Spirit Lake Nation

09/29/2016 09/28/2016

X

Erich Longie Dr

THPO




( ) Yes ( ) No


143449 25

X

0


3) Tribe/NHO FRN:

4) Tribe/NHO Name:

Contact Name


9) Title:

Dates & Response


Wyandotte Nation

09/29/2016

X

Sherri Clemons

THPO


Other Tribes/NHOs Contacted

Tribe/NHO Information


2) Name:

Contact Name


7) Title:

Contact Information




15) E-mail Address:

16) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both

Dates & Response

17) Date Contacted _______________ 18) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other

18 of 23 FCC Form 620 May 2014

Historic Properties Properties Identified

1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APEs for direct and visual effect? ( ) Yes ( ) No

2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? ( ) Yes ( ) No

3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APEs for direct and visual effect? If “Yes”, you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. ( ) Yes ( ) No

Historic Property

4) Property Name:

5) SHPO Site Number:

Property Address

6) Street Address:


10) County/Borough/Parish:

Status & Eligibility

11) Is this property listed on the National Register?

Source: _______________________________________________________________________________________ ( ) Yes ( ) No

12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register?

Source: _______________________________________________________________________________________ ( ) Yes ( ) No

13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( ) No

14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE

15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE

Woolery Stone Company

X

X

105-005-55001

2295 W. Tapp Road

Bloomington IN

MONROE

47403

IN SHPO

IN SHPO

X

X

X

X

X

X


Local Government Involvement

Local Government Agency


2) Name:

Contact Name


7) Title:

Contact Information




15) E-mail Address:


Dates & Response


Additional Information

19) Information on local government’s role or interest (optional):

City of Bloomington, Housing and Neighborhood Development

Nancy Hiestand

Program Manager Historic Preservation

100

Bloomington IN 47402

(812)349-3420

[email protected]

X

10/19/2016

X


Other Consulting Parties Other Consulting Parties Contacted

1) Has any other agency been contacted and invited to become a consulting party? ( ) Yes ( ) No

Consulting Party


3) Name:

Contact Name


8) Title:

Contact Information




16) E-mail Address:


Dates & Response


Additional Information

20) Information on other consulting parties’ role or interest (optional):

X

Monroe County History Center

To Whom It May Concern

202 E. 6th Street

Bloomington IN 47408

(812)332-2517

X

10/19/2016

X


Designation of SHPO/THPO

1) Designate the Lead State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) based on the location of the tower.

SHPO/THPO

Name: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2) You may also designate up to three additional SHPOs/THPOs if the APEs include multiple states. If the APEs include other countries, enter the name of the National Historic Preservation Agency and any state and provincial Historic Preservation Agency.

SHPO/THPO Name: ________________________________________________________________________________________________

SHPO/THPO Name: ________________________________________________________________________________________________

SHPO/THPO Name: ________________________________________________________________________________________________

Certification

I certify that all representations on this FCC Form 620 Submission Packet and the accompanying attachments are true, correct, and complete.

Party Authorized to Sign

First Name: MI: Last Name: Suffix:

Signature: Date: _______________

FAILURE TO SIGN THIS APPLICATION MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE APPLICATION AND FORFEITURE OF ANY FEES PAID.

WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM OR ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 312(a)(1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 503).

22 of 23 FCC Form 620

Indiana Natural Resources Department (Deputy SHPO)

Tara Cubie

11/02/2016Tara Cubie

May 2014

Attachments :

Type Description Date Entered

Photographs Attachment 02 11/01/2016 Map Documents Attachment 03 11/01/2016 Additional Site Information Attachment 04 11/01/2016 Area of Potential Effects Attachment 05 11/01/2016 Tribal/NHO Involvement Attachment 06 11/01/2016 Historic Properties for Direct Effects Attachment 07 11/01/2016 Historic Properties for Visual Effects Attachment 08 11/01/2016 Local Government Involvement Attachment 09 11/01/2016 Public Involvement Attachment 10 11/01/2016 State-Specific Forms Attachment 11 11/01/2016 Resumes/Vitae Attachment 01 11/01/2016


23 of 23

NT SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB

3060-1039 See instructions for

public burden estimates

Applicant’s Name: Horvath Towers, LLC Project Name: WS Tapp Road Project Number: HV1094

FCC Form 620

Attachment 1. Consultant Information Provide a current copy of the résumé or curriculum vitae for the Principal Investigator and any researcher or other person who contributed to, reviewed, or provided significant input into the research, analysis, writing or conclusions presented in this filing. The résumé for the Principal Investigator and any researcher or other person who contributed to, reviewed, or provided significant input into the research, analysis, writing or conclusions are presented in this submission.

Tara Cubie Architectural Historian

6876 Susquehanna Trail York, PA 17403

Phone: 339.234.2597

SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Tara Cubie has over 10 years of experience in historic preservation as an Architectural Historian and Preservation Specialist. In her career she has prepared numerous technical reports, including Historic Structure Reports and National Register Nominations, for highly visible and diverse projects. She has successfully worked with a number of stakeholders including National Park Cultural Resource and Maintenance Staff, National Park Service Partners, Non-Profit Organizations and the Public for positive project outcomes. Her extensive knowledge of Architectural history coupled with her research and writing skills have facilitated the successful completion of many restoration projects and publications. Recently, Tara served as the Historic Preservation Specialist for the National Capital Region of the NPS under a task agreement with the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers (NCSHPO). In this role she was tasked with writing Historic Structure Reports, managing the List of Classified Structure (LCS) architectural survey program, reviewing Section 106 projects under the National Park Service Programmatic Agreement, reviewing projects completed by A/E Contractors and serving as a consultant on restoration projects for compliance to the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation She trained under the Historic Preservations Training Center’s PAST program, and learned hands on methods for historic preservation in Smoky Mountain National Park. She supervised two full time staff in addition to National Council for Historic Preservation Interns in the completion of the LCS survey. The LCS program exceeded the goal set by the NPS every year under her supervision. Her work has been presented at the Vernacular Architecture Forum Conference. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE

Expert command of American history, architectural history, and urban development. Expert command of archival research methods, including the National Archives and Records

Administration (NARA) and the Library of Congress. Expert at writing architectural descriptions and evaluating integrity of historic resources. Training as Architectural Photographer. Skilled at evaluating primary and secondary sources of documentation and physical evidence

obtained through field surveys. Experienced at conducting field surveys. Experienced with NRHP nomination processes and guidelines. Expert in interpreting the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards. Cultural Resource Management consultation. A/E Design project review and management. Section 106 Review, according to National Park Service Programmatic Agreement. Approx.

65/projects a year. Trained in Section 106 and Section 4(F) New Regulations. Historic Structures Stabilization (HSS) National Park Service Project review and approval. Certified as a Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative for the National Park Service. Database and Program management. Experienced with Photoshop, InDesign, and Quark. Spanish, French and Russian language skills.

Tara Cubie Architectural Historian

6876 Susquehanna Trail York, PA 17403

Phone: 339.234.2597

EDUCATION 2005 M.S. Historic Preservation, Columbia University, New York, NY 2005 M.S. Urban Planning, Columbia University, New York, NY 2001 B.A. College of Wooster, Wooster, OH PUBLICATIONS Historic Structures Reports:

The Old Stone House, Rock Creek Park (NPS, 2011) The Poffenberger Barn, Antietam National Battlefield (NPS, 2010)

National Register and Local Nominations

Lewis House National Register Nomination, Lower Merion, PA (Determined Eligible, 2006)

Haverford Station Historic District (State Register, Approved by local Historic Review Board, 2008)

Bala Cynwyd Commercial Historic District (State Register, Approved by PHMC but not local board, 2006)

Surveys: List of Classified Structure (LCS) National Park Service Survey for C&O Canal 2007-2008 List of Classified Structure (LCS) National Park Service Survey for National Capital Parks East

and Prince William Forest Park 2010 List of Classified Structure (LCS) National Park Service Survey for National Mall and Rock

Creek Park 2011 List of Classified Structure (LCS) National Park Service Survey for Antietam National Battlefield

2009 Building survey inventory for Far West Side Historic District, New York, NY Building survey inventory of Upper West Side Historic Churches, New York, NY

Publications:

The Old Stone House Historic Structure Report (NPS Final Draft, to be published 2012) The Poffenberger Barn Historic Structure Report (NPS, 2011) The Mills of Mill Creek, Architectural Tour, Lower Merion, PA (2006) Architecture’s Historical Turn: Phenomenology and the Rise of the Post Modern (Book

Review) (CRM: The Journal of Heritage Stewardship Winter/Summer 2011) Vernacular Architecture Forum Presentation: Free Black Communities at the Terminus

of the Underground Railroad. Paper forthcoming. Newsletter Editor, Lower Merion Conservancy (2005-2006)

46

JAMES C. PRITCHARD, RPA Sr. Archaeologist EDUCATION AND TRAINING 2001 Masters of Applied Science. University of Canberra, Australia, (Cultural Heritage Management/Archaeological Heritage Management). 1991 Bachelor of Arts. Millsaps College (Sociology) PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS Register of Professional Archaeologists Society for American Archaeology American Foreign Academic Research (Research Associate) American Institute of Archaeology (Education Committee) Tennessee Council of Professional Archaeologists (Awards Committee) Kentucky Organization of Professional Archaeologists (Board) Society of American Military Engineers SELECTED REPORTS 2015 Site Examinations Conducted for Four Sites at the Birch Hill Dam Reservoir Area in the Towns of Templeton and Winchendon, Worcester County, Massachusetts. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of the Former Chrisman Lands (Tax Map 57, Parcels 28.0 and 28.07) along Rocky Fork Road in Nolensville, Williamson County, Tennessee. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey in Support of a Proposed Drees Premier Homes Development at Beckwith Road in Mt. Juliet, Wilson County, Tennessee. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations in Support of the Tap Root Hill PUD Subdivision in Williamson County, Tennessee. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation at King’s Chapel Communities, Williamson County, Tennessee.

47

Phase I Archaeological Investigation of 96 Acres at the Ovation Development Site, Williamson County, Tennessee. Phase I Archaeological Investigation of 109 Acres at the Mill Creek/York Road Site, Williamson County, Tennessee. 2014 Phase I Archaeological Site Detection Survey of 5 Acres for the Proposed UK Trunk A Sewer Project in Lexington, Fayette County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Swamp Road Mitigation Bank #2, Rutherford County, Tennessee. Phase I Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Expansion at the T.J. Patterson Industrial Park, Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase IA Archaeological Investigations of 561 Acres at Camp Atterbury Joint Maneuver Training Center, Union and Harrison Townships, Bartholomew County, Indiana. Phase IA Archaeological Investigation of 410 Acres at the Former Camp Atterbury Cantonment Area, Camp Atterbury Joint Maneuver Training Center, Nineveh and Blue River Townships, Johnson County, Indiana. 2013 Phase Ia Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proposed Hughes Barge Fleeting Project in Charlestown, Clark County, Indiana. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Robinson Developments Project, Wilson County, Tennessee. Phase I Archaeological Survey of Five Trailhead Parking Facilities in Support of the Dawkins Line Rails to Trails Project in Johnson and Magoffin Counties, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey in Support of Rehabilitation and Extension of Martin Luther King Avenue in Hattiesburg, Forrest County, Mississippi. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 2,467 Acres at Fort Campbell in Montgomery County, Tennessee and Trigg County, Kentucky. 2012 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Tennessee Stampings Mitigation, Sumner County, Tennessee. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of an Interchange on SR 2 (US 72/Corridor V) at Moore’s Mill Road, Madison County, Alabama.

48

Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Emergency Management Center in Winchester, Clark County, Kentucky. Archaeological Reconnaissance in Support of a Half-Mile Reconstruction of CR-1127 (Straight Fork Road) from KY 59, Lewis County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey in Support of the Proposed Cumberland Townhomes at 291 Old Scottsville Road in Bowling Green, Warren County, Kentucky. An Archaeological Assessment of the Proposed Elizabethtown Nature Park, Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase II Archaeological Evaluation of Four Sites at the Sabre Heliport, Ft. Campbell, Montgomery County, Tennessee. Intensive Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Lincoln Heritage House Site (Site 15HD848) at Freeman Lake Park in Elizabethtown, Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Radcliff Bypass Corridor, Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey in Support of Development and Revitalization of Infantry Facilities in Hunting Areas 16, 21, 29, 77, and 83 at Fort Knox, Hardin and Bullitt Counties, Kentucky. Phase II Testing of Two Sites and Phase I Intensive Investigations at Eight Sites at Fort Knox, Bullitt, Hardin, and Meade Counties, Kentucky. Archaeological Survey of 453 Acres in Support of Endangered Species Work in Hunting Areas 79 and 95 at Fort Knox. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 974 Acres and Phase I Intensive Archaeological Survey of Four Known Sites at Fort Knox, Bullitt, Hardin, and Meade Counties, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 99 Acres in Hunting Areas 14 and 74, Cantonment Area 11, and Phase I Intensive Evaluation of Sites 15HD158, 15HD160, 15HD163, 15HD164, 15HD165, 15HD166 and 15HD500 at Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 193 Acres in Support of the Battle Area (BAX) Project at Baum Range, Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. A Phase I Archaeological Survey of 146 Acres in Hunting Areas 80 and 81 at Fort Knox,

49

Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase I and Phase I Intensive Archaeological Investigations at the Proposed Live Fire Breach Facility in Hunting Areas 87 and 88 at Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. 2011 Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Walker Boat Yard Marine Railway in McCracken County, Kentucky. Archaeological Assessment of 1 Acre Adjacent to the Buchanan Cemetery, 2905 Elm Hill Pike in Nashville, Davidson County, Tennessee. Phase I Archaeological Survey of Approximately 11 Acres for a Proposed Multi-Family Residential Development on Tunnel Hill Road in Elizabethtown, Hardin County, Kentucky. Big Four Approach Ramp (INDOT Des. No. 0710993): Site 12CL937 Phase Ic (Deep Testing) in Jeffersonville, Clark County, Indiana. A Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Parks at Vine Residential Development in Radcliff, Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 390 Acres for Endangered Species Habitat Management Actions (Year 3) at Fort Knox, Hardin and Meade Counties, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 1641 Acres in Support of BRAC 2005: Newport Chemical Depot. Vermillion County, Indiana. Section 110 Survey of 38 Acres at the West Tennessee Mitigation Area, Weakley County, Tennessee. Section 110 Survey of 662 Acres at the St. Francis Basin Mitigation Area, Dunklin County, Missouri. Section 110 Survey of 2,038 Acres at the Cache River and Wapanocca Bayou Mitigation Areas, Monroe and Crittendon Counties, Arkansas. Archaeological Inventory for Endangered Species Management Habitat Actions – Year 2 at Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase I Intensive and Phase II Investigations along the Ohio River Floodplain Terraces in Hunting Areas 1 and 6 at Fort Knox, Meade County, Kentucky.

50

2010 Phase I Archaeological Survey of Four Acres for the Proposed McCracken Joint Entry at the Paducah Sports Plex in McCracken County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed Zion Wireless Communications Tower in Zion, Henderson County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Puncheoncamp Surface Mine in McDowell County, West Virginia. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed Carrollton DT Wireless Communications Tower in Carrollton, Carroll County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed Broad Run Interceptor Sewer Line Project in Louisville, Jefferson County, Kentucky. Cultural Resource Investigations of the Proposed Dry Branch Surface Mine in McDowell County, West Virginia. Phase II Archaeological and Historical Evaluation of Three Sites Located within the Footprint of a Proposed Quarry near Grand Rivers, Livingston County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed Fort Boone Sewer Line and Pump Station Improvement Project in Frankfort, Franklin County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for a Proposed Borrow Area Near the City of Cynthiana, Harrison County, Kentucky. An Archaeological Reconnaissance for the Proposed Rorer Property Site in Harrison County, Kentucky. Archaeological Testing of Site 15McN142 at the Proposed McCracken County Consolidated High School Site in McCracken County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of 421 Acres in Hunting Areas 11, 72, 73, 77, 89, and 90; and a Proposed Paintball Facility in Hardin and Meade Counties, Kentucky. A Phase I Archaeological Survey of 490 Acres in Hunting Areas 95 and 96 at Fort Knox, Bullitt County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Coal Mine Operation for Southbound Coal, LLC. Near the Community of Burke in Elliott County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey for a Proposed Expansion of State Route 52 in Overton

51

County, Tennessee. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 1.44 Acre in Support of the Liberty Crossing Bridges Project in the City of Liberty, Casey County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey in Support of WMU Proposed Sanitary Upgrades in Clark County, Kentucky. A Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Winchester Municipal Utilities Sewage Trunkline Extension at Lower Howards Creek in Winchester, Clark County, Kentucky. Phase I Intensive Archaeological and Historic Evaluation of 55 Sites Located at Fort Knox, Hardin, Meade, and Bullitt Counties, Kentucky. Section 106 and 110 Survey Results: Archaeological Investigations for Proposed Improvements to the Godman Airfield and at Dietz and Van Voorhis Housing at Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase I Survey of 504 Acres at Camp Carlson, HA71, TA10, Rodger’s Hollow and a Proposed Convention Center at Fort Knox, Hardin, Meade and Bullitt Counties, Kentucky. Phase II Test Excavations of Site 15BU563 and Site 15BU624 at Fort Knox, Bullitt County, Kentucky. 2009 Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed Chestnut Street Emergency Response Tower in Berea, Madison County, Kentucky. Sections 106 and 110 Survey Results: A Phase I Archaeological Survey of 200 Acres at the West Point Air Strip at Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for a Proposed Emergency Response Tower in Berea, Madison County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed NB Emergency Response Tower in Richmond, Madison County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of the Proposed Central Hardin 138-69 kV Substation and Taps in Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for a Proposed Power Transmission Line Between Goose Rock and Big Creek in Clay County, Kentucky.

52

Phase I Archaeological Survey of 1200 Acres in Support of BRAC 2005: Newport Chemical Depot. Vermillion County, Indiana. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Replacement of the James D. Hoskins Bridge Over the French Broad River and The Proposed Rerouting of State Route 92 in Jefferson County, Tennessee. 2008 Phase I Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Coal Mine Operation Near the Community of Fannin in Elliott County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Coal Mine Operation Near the Community of Mazie in Lawrence County, Kentucky. Still-Williams-Jenkins Cemetery Documentation in Williamson County, Tennessee. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of 218 Acres in Hunting Areas 17, 21 and 29 at Fort Knox, Bullitt and Hardin Counties, Kentucky. Myakkahatchee Creek Grant Project: Cultural Resource Overview and Reconnaissance in the City of North Port, Sarasota County, Florida. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of the 277-Acre Retreat Tract in Liberty County, Georgia. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations of the Walnut Meadow Branch Stream Mitigation in the City of Berea, Madison County, Kentucky. Cultural Resources Assessment of the Blessing Addendum to the Victoria, Texas Transmission Line in Jackson and Matagorda Counties, Texas. Cultural Resources Assessment of the Victoria, Texas Transmission Line in Goliad, Jackson, and Victoria Counties, Texas. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 471 Acres in Hunting Areas 80 and 112 at Fort Knox in Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of 48 Acres in Hunting Area 79 at Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase II NRHP Evaluation of Site 15MA250 at the Blue Grass Army Depot in Madison County, Kentucky. Cultural Resources Survey of the Macedonia Primary Extension Tract in Baker County,

53

Florida. Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan for Blue Grass Army Depot in Madison County, Kentucky. Phase I Survey of 622 Acres and Phase I Intensive Archaeological Investigations at 29 Sites for Improvement in Various Training Areas at Fort Knox, Hardin, Meade, and Bullitt Counties, Kentucky. Phase I Intensive Archaeological Investigations at 36 Sites for ITAM Land Rehabilitation at Fort Knox, Hardin and Meade Counties, Kentucky. Phase I Intensive and Phase II Test Excavations in Support of the Range and FOB Improvements at Fort Knox in Bullitt, Meade, and Hardin Counties, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Green County Mitigation Bank in Green County, Georgia. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed 880-Acre Southern Company Power Plant in Wayne County, Georgia. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 399 Acres at the Blue Grass Army Depot in Madison County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase II NRHP Evaluation of Site 15MA264 at the Blue Grass Army Depot in Madison County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Survey and Phase II NRHP Evaluation of the Armuchee Sewer Project in Rome, Floyd County, Georgia. Phase III Data Recovery of the Town Creek Site (9BL129) in Baldwin County, Georgia. Phase III Data Recovery at the Savannah Lots Site (9CH1094) in Chatham County, Georgia. 2007 Phase II Archaeological and Historical Evaluation of Four Sites and Phase I Intensive Investigations at Two Sites, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Bullitt and Hardin Counties, Kentucky. Final Report of Findings: Phase I Archaeological Investigations of the Proposed 360-Acre Forward Operating Base in Training Area 2, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky.

54

Phase I Intensive Archaeological Survey Addendum Report: Phase I Archaeological Investigations of the Proposed 360-Acre Forward Operating Base in Training Area 2, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Live-Fire Access Road and Firing Points/Observation Points Addendum Report: Phase I Archaeological Investigations of the Proposed 360-Acre Forward Operating Base in Training Area 2, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Final Report of Findings: Phase I Archaeological Investigations of a Proposed 86-Acre Land Transfer in Training Area 3, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of 15 Acres in Training Areas 5 and 8, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. 2006 Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of Approximately 85 Acres in Support of the Proposed Madison Lake and Park, Madison County, Mississippi. Intensive Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Creighton Road Tract Development, Cherokee County, Georgia. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey in Support of 2005 BRAC Activities at the Bluegrass Army Depot. Intensive Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Bannister Creek Mitigation Bank along Bannister and Brewton creeks, Forsyth County, Georgia. Intensive Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Bannister Creek Mitigation Bank along Bannister and Brewton Creeks, Forsyth County, Georgia. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of an Interchange on SR 2 (US 72/Corridor V) at Moore’s Mill Road, Madison County, Alabama. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey In Support of a Proposed Stream Relocation Within the Clear Lake Meadows Development, Sumner County, Tennessee. Phase I Intensive Cultural Resources Investigations of Approximately 150 Acres near the City of Newnan, Coweta County, Georgia: Newnan Crossing. 2005 Phase I Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Electric Utility Easement within the U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Hardin, Meade, and Bullitt Counties, Kentucky.

55

Final Report of Findings: Phase I Archaeological Survey of 670 Acres in Support of a Proposed Lands Exchange Between Bi-County Solid Waste Management Systems and the U.S. Army Garrison Fort Campbell, Trigg County, Kentucky, and Stewart County, Tennessee. Phase I Archaeological Survey In Support of a Proposed Stream Relocation within the Mt. Juliet Commons Development, Wilson County, Tennessee. Intensive Archaeological Survey in Support of Proposed Residential Communities Initiative Developments (Areas O thru S) at Fort Leavenworth, Leavenworth County, Kansas. Intensive Archaeological Survey of Proposed Improvements at the Porterdale Waste Water Treatment Facility, Newton County, Georgia. 2004 Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations for the Proposed Buckeye Gulf Coast Pipelines, L.P. Toledo, Ohio, Hydrogen and Product Lines Project, Oregon Township, Lucas County, Ohio. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations in Support of But/War-75-3.76/1.90 (Pid No. 24664). Phase I Archaeological Survey at 15 Riverside Drive, St. Clair Township, Butler County, Ohio. Phase I Cultural Resources Reconnaissance Survey of a Proposed Waterfowl Marsh at Salamonie Lake in Huntington County, Indiana. Cultural Resources Literature Review and Preliminary Photodocumentation for the STA/MAH/COL-62F/14F-39.18/0.00/0.00 (PID 4089) Transportation Planning Study, Stark, Mahoning, and Columbiana Counties, Ohio. Phase II National Register Evaluation of Archaeological Site 15Sh66, for Shelbyville Bypass, Item 5.326.00, Shelby County, Kentucky. 2003 Phase I Archaeological Investigations of the Proposed Whole Neighborhood Renewal at the Anderson Golf Course, U.S. Army Armor Center and Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Final Report, Phase I Investigations in Training Area 18 and the Wilcox Range at the US Army Armor Center and Fort Knox in Bullitt County, Kentucky. Final Report, Phase II Investigations of Four Sites (15Bu311, 15Bu544, 15Bu551 and

56

15Bu560) Within the U.S. Army Armor Center and Fort Knox, Bullitt County, Kentucky. Predictive Model, Phase I Archaeological Investigation of the Anderson Golf Course at the U.S. Army Armor Center and Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Addendum Report, Cultural Resources Investigations for the ANR Pipeline Coffee Creek Line Change Project. Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Washington Boulevard Extension (Millikin Woods Section) in the City of Hamilton, Hanover Township, Butler County, Ohio. Final Letter Report, Cultural Resources Background Research and Literature Review and Walkover Survey, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Airport South Airfield, Boone County, Kentucky. Final Report, Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations for the ANR Pipeline Coffee Creek Line Change Project. Final Addendum Report No. 4, Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations for an Eight-Acre Wetland Mitigation for the Proposed Texas Eastern Hanging Rock Lateral Pipeline Project, Lawrence and Scioto Counties, Ohio. 2002 Final Report, Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations for the ANR NIPSCO-Chesterton Interconnect, Jackson Township, Porter County, Indiana. Literature Search of High Priority Areas for the MAH-76-0.00 (PID 23676) I-76/80 Corridor Improvements Project, Medina, Summit, Portage, Mahoning, Trumbull Counties, Ohio. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of the Proposed Tuscarawas Bridge, City of Barberton, Norton and Coventry Townships, Summit County, Ohio. Cultural Resources Literature Review in Support of the Environmental Assessment for the Washington Boulevard Extension (Millikin Woods Section), City of Hamilton, Hanover Township, Butler County, Ohio. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations For Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation's Proposed Line A-5 Natural Gas Pipeline Replacement, Town of Tuxedo, Orange County, New York Phase I And II Cultural Resources Investigations At A Proposed Commercial Development Near Columbus, Bartholomew County, Indiana.

57

Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations for the Proposed NYSEG Elmira Natural Gas Pipeline, Big Flats and Horseheads, Chemung County, New York. Historic American Engineering Record, Sault Ste. Marie International Railroad Bridge, Sault Ste. Marie, Chippewa County, Michigan. Final Supplemental Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations and Phase II Archaeological Testing at Sites 33SC92, 33SC417, 33SC431, 33SC432, 33SC434, and 33SC457 for the Proposed Texas Eastern Hanging Rock Lateral Pipeline Project, Lawrence and Scioto Counties, Ohio. Predictive Model and Ground-Truthing Survey of the NASA Plum Brook Station, Perkins, Huron, Milan, and Oxford Townships, Erie County, Ohio. Addendum Report No. 3 Phase I Archaeological Investigations of Tract 6 for the Proposed South Point Industrial Park, Lawrence County, Ohio. Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Owensboro South Site Wireless Communication Tower, Utica, Daviess County, Kentucky. Addendum Report No. 1: Supplemental Data for the Completion of the Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations Report for the Proposed Texas Eastern Hanging Rock Lateral Pipeline Project, Lawrence and Scioto Counties, Ohio. Cultural Resources Investigations along Selected Alignments (Alignments A-I, A-II, and B-Ib) of the Proposed Ohio River Greenway Corridor, Floyd and Clark Counties, Indiana. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of Proposed Road Upgrades to US Route 131, a 15-Acre Roadside Park and Additional Road Upgrades in Grand Traverse and Wexford Counties, Michigan. 2001 Phase IA Archaeological Investigation of the Proposed I-71 Corridor Light Rail Transit, Hamilton County, Ohio. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations of the East Sandusky Bay Hydrology Restoration Project In Erie County, Ohio. Port Arthur Public Archaeology Program (Australia) Report 2001. Port Arthur Public Archaeology Program (Australia): Evaluation of Archaeology Tours Report 2001.

58

Conservation Report: Museum of the Riverina, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia. 2000 The Heritage of the Ainslie Church of Christ (Australia). 1997 Preliminary Report of 1997 Field Season: Excavations of Structure 8, a Post Classic Mayan single-phase construction. 1996 Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations of Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation Proposed Market Expansion Project: Line 10240 Eagle Suction Loop, East Hempfield, Penn, Warwick, Manheim, West Earl, Earl, East Earl Townships, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations of Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation Market Expansion Coco "C" Storage Facility Project, Kanawha County, West Virginia. PAPERS AND POSTERS 2012 Geoarchaeological and Palynological Evidence of Late Mississippian Landscape Alternation along the Wapanocca Bayou, Arkansas, USA. Poster presented at the 2012 SAA Conference, April 18-22, Memphis, TN. 2011 Fort Knox Cultural Resources Management: Supporting Endangered Species Management and Ensuring Mission Readiness. Poster presented at the Sustaining Military Readiness Conference, July 25-28, Nashville, TN. 2011 Prehistory and Geoarchaeological Investigations along the Central Mississippi Valley: Recent Advances. 2011 A Change of View? Archaeological Investigations at the Lincoln Heritage House. Paper presented at the 2011 SHA Conference, January 9-11, Austin, TX. 2004 Of Privies and Hog Pits: Archaeobotany of Site 15Sh66. Paper Presented at the joint SEAC/MAC meetings, October 21-24, St. Louis, Missouri. 2003 Balancing registers thematically and the resultant conflicts between levels of significance: Some insights derived from a gaps analysis of the heritage of the Tasman Peninsula, Tasmania. Paper presented at the Fifth World Archaeology Congress, June 21-26, 2003, Catholic University, Washington, DC. 2002 Public Archaeology at the Port Arthur Historic Site, Tasmania, Australia. Paper presented at the Society for Historical Archaeology 2002 Conference: Celebrating the 300th Anniversary of Mobile’s Colonial Origins, January 10, 2002

59

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE June 2015-Present-Sr. Archaeologist, Environmental Research Group, Baltimore, Maryland. June 2007-Present-Research Associate, American Foreign Academic Research, Davidson, North Carolina. February 2007-June 2015-Vice President, Brockington and Associates, Inc., Elizabethtown, Kentucky. February 2005-February 2007-Senior Archaeologist/Principal Investigator, Brockington and Associates, Inc., Various Locations January 2002- February 2005- Principal Investigator, Gray & Pape, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio May 1995-January 2002- Archaeologist/Field Director, Gray & Pape, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio May 1993-May 1995-Archaeologist, Earth Search, Inc., New Orleans, Louisiana May 1992-May1993-Archaeologist, Archaeology Mississippi, Inc., Jackson, Mississippi SELECTED PROJECTS AND PROJECT INVOLVEMENT 2015 Principal Investigator. Site Examinations Conducted for Four Sites at the Birch Hill Dam Reservoir Area in the Towns of Templeton and Winchendon, Worcester County, Massachusetts. Research Associate/Instructor. Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance Archaeological Field School at the Site of Cahal Pech, Cayo District, Belize. Principal Investigator. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of the Former Chrisman Lands (Tax Map 57, Parcels 28.0 and 28.07) along Rocky Fork Road in Nolensville, Williamson County, Tennessee. Principal Investigator. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey in Support of a Proposed Drees Premier Homes Development at Beckwith Road in Mt. Juliet, Wilson County, Tennessee. Principal Investigator. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations in Support of the Tap Root Hill PUD Subdivision in Williamson County, Tennessee. Principal Investigator. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation at King’s Chapel Communities, Williamson County, Tennessee. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigation of 96 Acres at the Ovation Development Site, Williamson County, Tennessee.

60

Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigation of 109 Acres at the Mill Creek/York Road Site, Williamson County, Tennessee. 2014 Research Associate/Instructor. Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance Archaeological Field School at the Site of Cahal Pech, Cayo District, Belize. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Site Detection Survey of 5 Acres for the Proposed UK Trunk A Sewer Project in Lexington, Fayette County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Swamp Road Mitigation Bank #2, Rutherford County, Tennessee. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Expansion at the T.J. Patterson Industrial Park, Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase IA Archaeological Investigations of 561 Acres at Camp Atterbury Joint Maneuver Training Center, Union and Harrison Townships, Bartholomew County, Indiana. Principal Investigator. Phase IA Archaeological Investigation of 410 Acres at the Former Camp Atterbury Cantonment Area, Camp Atterbury Joint Maneuver Training Center, Nineveh and Blue River Townships, Johnson County, Indiana. 2013 Research Associate/Instructor. Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance Archaeological Field School at the Site of Cahal Pech, Cayo District, Belize. Principal Investigator. Phase Ia Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proposed Hughes Barge Fleeting Project in Charlestown, Clark County, Indiana. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Robinson Developments Project, Wilson County, Tennessee. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of Five Trailhead Parking Facilities in Support of the Dawkins Line Rails to Trails Project in Johnson and Magoffin Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey in Support of Rehabilitation and Extension of Martin Luther King Avenue in Hattiesburg, Forrest County, Mississippi. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 2,467 Acres at Fort Campbell in Montgomery County, Tennessee and Trigg County, Kentucky. 2012 Research Associate/Instructor. Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance

61

Archaeological Field School at the Site of Cahal Pech, Cayo District, Belize. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Tennessee Stampings Mitigation, Sumner County, Tennessee. Principal Investigator. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of an Interchange on SR 2 (US 72/Corridor V) at Moore’s Mill Road, Madison County, Alabama. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Emergency Management Center in Winchester, Clark County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Archaeological Reconnaissance in Support of a Half-Mile Reconstruction of CR-1127 (Straight Fork Road) from KY 59, Lewis County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey in Support of the Proposed Cumberland Townhomes at 291 Old Scottsville Road in Bowling Green, Warren County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. An Archaeological Assessment of the Proposed Elizabethtown Nature Park, Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase II Archaeological Evaluation of Four Sites at the Sabre Heliport, Ft. Campbell, Montgomery County, Tennessee. Principal Investigator. Intensive Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Lincoln Heritage House Site (Site 15HD848) at Freeman Lake Park in Elizabethtown, Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Radcliff Bypass Corridor, Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey in Support of Development and Revitalization of Infantry Facilities in Hunting Areas 16, 21, 29, 77, and 83 at Fort Knox, Hardin and Bullitt Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase II Testing of Two Sites and Phase I Intensive Investigations at Eight Sites at Fort Knox, Bullitt, Hardin, and Meade Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Archaeological Survey of 453 Acres in Support of Endangered Species Work in Hunting Areas 79 and 95 at Fort Knox. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 974 Acres and Phase I Intensive Archaeological Survey of Four Known Sites at Fort Knox, Bullitt, Hardin, and Meade

62

Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 99 Acres in Hunting Areas 14 and 74, Cantonment Area 11, and Phase I Intensive Evaluation of Sites 15HD158, 15HD160, 15HD163, 15HD164, 15HD165, 15HD166 and 15HD500 at Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 193 Acres in Support of the Battle Area (BAX) Project at Baum Range, Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. A Phase I Archaeological Survey of 146 Acres in Hunting Areas 80 and 81 at Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I and Phase I Intensive Archaeological Investigations at the Proposed Live Fire Breach Facility in Hunting Areas 87 and 88 at Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. 2011 Research Associate/Instructor. Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance Archaeological Field School at the Site of Cahal Pech, Cayo District, Belize. Principal Investigator. Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Walker Boat Yard Marine Railway in McCracken County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Archaeological Assessment of 1 Acre Adjacent to the Buchanan Cemetery, 2905 Elm Hill Pike in Nashville, Davidson County, Tennessee. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of Approximately 11 Acres for a Proposed Multi-Family Residential Development on Tunnel Hill Road in Elizabethtown, Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Big Four Approach Ramp (INDOT Des. No. 0710993): Site 12CL937 Phase Ic (Deep Testing) in Jeffersonville, Clark County, Indiana. Principal Investigator. A Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Parks at Vine Residential Development in Radcliff, Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 390 Acres for Endangered Species Habitat Management Actions (Year 3) at Fort Knox, Hardin and Meade Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 1641 Acres in Support of BRAC 2005: Newport Chemical Depot. Vermillion County, Indiana.

63

Project Manager. Section 110 Survey of 38 Acres at the West Tennessee Mitigation Area, Weakley County, Tennessee. Project Manager. Section 110 Survey of 662 Acres at the St. Francis Basin Mitigation Area, Dunklin County, Missouri. Project Manager. Section 110 Survey of 2,038 Acres at the Cache River and Wapanocca Bayou Mitigation Areas, Monroe and Crittendon Counties, Arkansas. Principal Investigator. Archaeological Inventory for Endangered Species Management Habitat Actions – Year 2 at Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Intensive and Phase II Investigations along the Ohio River Floodplain Terraces in Hunting Areas 1 and 6 at Fort Knox, Meade County, Kentucky. 2010 Research Associate/Instructor. Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance Archaeological Field School at the Site of Cahal Pech, Cayo District, Belize. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of Four Acres for the Proposed McCracken Joint Entry at the Paducah Sports Plex in McCracken County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed Zion Wireless Communications Tower in Zion, Henderson County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Puncheoncamp Surface Mine in McDowell County, West Virginia. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed Carrollton DT Wireless Communications Tower in Carrollton, Carroll County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed Broad Run Interceptor Sewer Line Project in Louisville, Jefferson County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Cultural Resource Investigations of the Proposed Dry Branch Surface Mine in McDowell County, West Virginia. Principal Investigator. Phase II Archaeological and Historical Evaluation of Three Sites Located within the Footprint of a Proposed Quarry near Grand Rivers, Livingston County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed Fort Boone Sewer Line and Pump Station Improvement Project in Frankfort, Franklin County, Kentucky.

64

Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for a Proposed Borrow Area Near the City of Cynthiana, Harrison County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. An Archaeological Reconnaissance for the Proposed Rorer Property Site in Harrison County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Archaeological Testing of Site 15McN142 at the Proposed McCracken County Consolidated High School Site in McCracken County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of 421 Acres in Hunting Areas 11, 72, 73, 77, 89, and 90; and a Proposed Paintball Facility in Hardin and Meade Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. A Phase I Archaeological Survey of 490 Acres in Hunting Areas 95 and 96 at Fort Knox, Bullitt County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Coal Mine Operation for Southbound Coal, LLC. Near the Community of Burke in Elliott County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey for a Proposed Expansion of State Route 52 in Overton County, Tennessee. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 1.44 Acre in Support of the Liberty Crossing Bridges Project in the City of Liberty, Casey County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey in Support of WMU Propsosed Sanitary Upgrades in Clark County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. A Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Winchester Municipal Utilities Sewage Trunkline Extension at Lower Howards Creek in Winchester, Clark County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Intensive Archaeological and Historic Evaluation of 55 Sites Located at Fort Knox, Hardin, Meade, and Bullitt Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Section 106 and 110 Survey Results: Archaeological Investigations for Proposed Improvements to the Godman Airfield and at Dietz and Van Voorhis Housing at Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Survey of 504 Acres at Camp Carlso, HA71, TA10, Rodger’s Hollow and a Proposed Convention Center at Fort Knox, Hardin, Meade and

65

Bullitt Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase II Test Excavations of Site 15BU563 and Site 15BU624 at Fort Knox, Bullitt County, Kentucky. 2009 Research Associate/Instructor. Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance Archaeological Field School at the Site of Cahal Pech, Cayo District, Belize. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed Chestnut Street Emergency Response Tower in Berea, Madison County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Sections 106 and 110 Survey Results: A Phase I Archaeological Survey of 200 Acres at the West Point Air Strip at Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for a Proposed Emergency Response Tower in Berea, Madison County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed NB Emergency Response Tower in Richmond, Madison County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of the Proposed Central Hardin 138-69 kV Substation and Taps in Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations for a Proposed Power Transmission Line Between Goose Rock and Big Creek in Clay County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 1200 Acres in Support of BRAC 2005: Newport Chemical Depot. Vermillion County, Indiana. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Replacement of the James D. Hoskins Bridge Over the French Broad River and The Proposed Rerouting of State Route 92 in Jefferson County, Tennessee. 2008 Research Associate/Instructor. Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance Archaeological Field School at the Site of Cahal Pech, Cayo District, Belize. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Coal Mine Operation Near the Community of Fannin in Elliott County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Coal Mine Operation Near the Community of Mazie in Lawrence County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Still-Williams-Jenkins Cemetery Documentation in Williamson

66

County, Tennessee. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of 218 Acres in Hunting Areas 17, 21 and 29 at Fort Knox, Bullitt and Hardin Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Myakkahatchee Creek Grant Project: Cultural Resource Overview and Reconnaissance in the City of North Port, Sarasota County, Florida. Principal Investigator. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of the 277-Acre Retreat Tract in Liberty County, Georgia. Principal Investigator. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations of the Walnut Meadow Branch Stream Mitigation in the City of Berea, Madison County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Cultural Resources Assessment of the Blessing Addendum to the Victoria, Texas Transmission Line in Jackson and Matagorda Counties, Texas. Principal Investigator. Cultural Resources Assessment of the Victoria, Texas Transmission Line in Goliad, Jackson, and Victoria Counties, Texas. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 471 Acres in Hunting Areas 80 and 112 at Fort Knox in Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of 48 Acres in Hunting Area 79 at Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase II NRHP Evaluation of Site 15MA250 at the Blue Grass Army Depot in Madison County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Cultural Resources Survey of the Macedonia Primary Extension Tract in Baker County, Florida. Principal Investigator. Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan for Blue Grass Army Depot in Madison County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Survey of 622 Acres and Phase I Intensive Archaeological Investigations at 29 Sites for Improvement in Various Training Areas at Fort Knox, Hardin, Meade, and Bullitt Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Intensive Archaeological Investigations at 36 Sites for ITAM Land Rehabilitation at Fort Knox, Hardin and Meade Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Intensive and Phase II Test Excavations in Support of the

67

Range and FOB Improvements at Fort Knox in Bullitt, Meade, and Hardin Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Green County Mitigation Bank in Green County, Georgia. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed 880-Acre Southern Company Power Plant in Wayne County, Georgia. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 399 Acres at the Blue Grass Army Depot in Madison County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase II NRHP Evaluation of Site 15MA264 at the Blue Grass Army Depot in Madison County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey and Phase II NRHP Evaluation of the Armuchee Sewer Project in Rome, Floyd County, Georgia. Principal Investigator. Phase III Data Recovery of the Town Creek Site (9BL129) in Baldwin County, Georgia. Project Archaeologist. Phase III Data Recovery at the Savannah Lots Site (9CH1094) in Chatham County, Georgia. 2007 Research Associate/Instructor. Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance Archaeological Field School at the Site of Cahal Pech, Cayo District, Belize. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 764 Acres in Hunting Areas 80 and 112 at the U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox in Meade and Hardin Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase II Archaeological Evaluation of Site 15MA250 at the Blue Grass Army Depot, Madison County, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase II Archaeological and Historical Evaluation of Six Sites and Phase I Intensive re-visit/site update at Three Sites Located at the U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Bullitt, Hardin, and Meade Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. ITAM: Phase I Intensive Archaeological Investigations of 36 sites located at the U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox in Meade and Hardin Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase I Intensive Archaeological Investigations of 30 sites and Phase I Archaeological Survey of Approximately 1000 Acres located at the U.S. Army

68

Garrison Fort Knox in Meade and Hardin Counties, Kentucky. Principal Investigator. Phase II Archaeological Evaluation of Site 15MA264 at the Blue Grass Army Depot, Madison County, Kentucky. Contract No. W22G1F-06-V-0218. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Survey of 399 Acres at the Blue Grass Army Depot, Madison County, Kentucky. Contract No. W22G1F-06-V-0218. Principal Investigator. A Phase I Archaeological Resources Survey of 880 Acres for the Southern Company Wayne County Power Plant Tract, Wayne County, Georgia. Principal Investigator. Intensive Archaeological Survey of 75 Acres in Support of a Proposed Mitigation Bank along Town Creek in Greene County, Georgia. Surveyor. Belize Valley Archaeological Reconnaissance, Institute of Archaeology, Belize under the direction of Dr. Jaime Awe. GIS land survey and mapping of Maya components at Cahal Pech and Baking Pot Sites, Cayo District, Belize. July to August 2007. Principal Investigator. Intensive Archaeological Survey of 2.5 Acres in Support of a Proposed School Bus Maintenance Facility Construction at Fort Leavenworth, Leavenworth County, Kansas. June to September 2007. Principal Investigator. Phase II Archaeological and Historical Evaluation of Four Sites and Phase I Intensive Investigations at Two Sites, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Bullitt and Hardin Counties, Kentucky. December 2005 to June 2007. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of 15 Acres in Training Areas 5 and 8, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. February to May 2007. 2006 Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of the Proposed 360-Acre Forward Operating Base in Training Area 2, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. October 2006 to June 2007. Principal Investigator. Phase I Intensive Archaeological Survey of Three Sites for the Proposed 360-Acre Forward Operating Base in Training Area 2, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. October 2006 to June 2007. Principal Investigator. Live-Fire Access Road and Firing Points/Observation Points Survey for the Proposed 360-Acre Forward Operating Base in Training Area 2, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. October 2006 to June 2007. Principal Investigator. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of a Proposed 86-Acre Land

69

Transfer in Training Area 3, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. October 2006 to January 2007. Principal Investigator, Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of Approximately 85 Acres in Support of the Proposed Madison Lake and Park, Madison County, Mississippi. January 2006. 2005 Principal Investigator, Phase I Cultural Resources Survey in Support of 2005 BRAC Activities at the Bluegrass Army Depot. April 2006. Project included metal detection survey of portions of the delineated Battle of Richmond. Principal Investigator, Intensive Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Bannister Creek Mitigation Bank along Bannister and Brewton creeks, Forsyth County, Georgia. April 2006. Principal Investigator, Phase I Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Electric Utility Easement within the U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Hardin, Meade, and Bullitt Counties, Kentucky. May through August 2005. Principal Investigator, Intensive Archaeological Survey in Support of Proposed Residential Communities Initiative Developments (Areas O thru S) at Fort Leavenworth, Leavenworth County, Kansas. April to August 2005. Principal Investigator, Phase I Archaeological Survey of Two Proposed Rail Lines, Gypsum Dewatering Facility, and Limestone Ball Mill at Georgia Power's Plant Bowen, Bartow County, Georgia. March and April 2005. Principal Investigator, Phase I Archaeological Survey of 8 Acres at the Harmony Club, Putnam County, Georgia. March 2005. Principal Investigator, New Hope Road/Mooneyham Cemetery Delineation, Gwinnet County, Georgia. February 2005. Archaeological Delineation of nineteenth century rural cemetery. 2004 Principal Investigator, Phase I Archaeological Survey in Support of the HAM-Reading Road Railroad Grade Separation (HAM-CR456-0.15, PID 23062), City of Sharonville, Hamilton County, Ohio. October and November 2004. Principal Investigator, Phase I Archaeological Survey of 38 Acres within Training Area 7 at U.S. Army Garrison Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. September to December 2004. Project included identification and recordation of numerous historic military sites. Principal Investigator, Phase I cultural resources investigations for the proposed Buckeye

70

Gulf Coast Pipelines, L.P. Toledo, Ohio, Hydrogen and Product Lines Project located in Oregon Township, Lucas County, Ohio. August to November, 2004. Crew Chief, Class III Archaeological Inventory in Support of the Entrega Pipeline Project, Sweetwater, Carbon, Laramie, and Albany Counties, Wyoming. May through September, 2004. Principal Investigator, Phase I Archaeological Survey of Training Areas 2-17, U.S. Army Armor Center and Fort Knox, Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. March through December, 2004. Principal Investigator, BUT-WAR/I-75/3.76-1.90 (PID No. 24664), Butler and Warren Counties, Ohio. March through May 2004. Principal Investigator, Phase I Cultural Resources Reconnaissance Survey of a Proposed Waterfowl Marsh at Salamonie Lake in Huntington County, Indiana. March and April 2004. Principal Investigator, Phase I Archaeological Investigations for the Proposed Improvements to Home Road (DEL-CR 124-4.38; PID 75917) in Liberty Township, Delaware County, Ohio. January through March 2004. Principal Investigator, Supplemental Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations, WAR-132 Bridge Replacement and Road Improvements, Warren County, Ohio. December 2003 and January 2004. 2003 Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc., Plase II National Register Evaluation of Archaeological Site 15Sh666, for Shelbyville Bypass, Item 5.326.00, Shelby County, Kentucky. October 2003 through January 2004. Project included detailed assessment of a 1790s thru 1970s farm. Principal Investigator, Gray & Pape, Inc., Phase I Archaeological Investigations of the Proposed Whole Neighborhood Renewal at the Anderson Golf Course, U.S. Army Armor Center and Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. September and October 2003. Project included documentation of the archaeological remains of the historic communities of Bloomington and New Stithton, Kentucky. Principal Investigator, Gray & Pape, Inc., Archaeological Survey for the Woodsdale Regional Park, Madison Township, Butler County, Ohio. June through August 2003. Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey Within Training Area 18 and the Wilcox Range at Fort Knox, Bullitt County, Kentucky. April 2003.

71

Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for Proposed Expansions A and B at the Godman Airfield, Fort Knox, Hardin County, Kentucky. March 2003. Principal Investigator, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for A Proposed 1575-Foot Pipeline Replacement, 3.5-Acre Storage Yard, and 0.4-Acre Temporary Parking Area in Liberty Township, Porter County, Indiana. February 2003. Principal Investigator, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Archaeological Survey for the Proposed Washington Boulevard Extension (Millikin Woods Section) in the City of Hamilton, Hanover Township, Butler County, Ohio. February 2003. Principal Investigator, Gray & Pape, Inc. Walkover Survey, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Airport South Airfield, Boone County, Kentucky. January 2003. Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations of the ANR Pipeline Coffee Creek Line Change Project, Porter County, Indiana. January 2003. 2002 Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Cultural Resources Investigations of Lake White Dam, Pike County, Ohio. December 2002. Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase III Data Recovery of Site 33HA733, Hamilton County, Ohio. November 2002 through January 2003. Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations for the ANR NIPSCO-Chesterton Interconnect, Jackson Township, Porter County, Indiana. October and November 2002. Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations for an Eight-Acre Wetland Mitigation for the Proposed Texas Eastern Hanging Rock Lateral Pipeline Project, Lawrence and Scioto Counties, Ohio. October 2002. Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase Ia investigations for the environmental assessment of the Washington Boulevard Extension (Millikin Woods Section), Butler County, Ohio. September 2002. Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase II testing of Sites 15BU544, 15BU551 and 15BU560 at the Fort Knox Military Reservation, Bullitt County, Kentucky. August 2002. Project included documentation and excavation of two historic charcoal kilns in Bullitt County, Kentucky. Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of 582 Acres (Training Areas 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9) at the Fort Knox Military Reservation, Hardin and Meade

72

Counties, Kentucky. July 2002. Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of Tract 6 for the Proposed South Point Industrial Park, Lawrence County, Ohio. March 2002. Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Additional Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations for the Proposed Texas Eastern Hanging Rock Lateral Pipeline Project, Lawrence and Scioto Counties, Ohio. February 2002. Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase II testing of Site 12B1325, Bartholomew County, Indiana. February 2002. 2001 Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations for the Proposed Texas Eastern Hanging Rock Lateral Pipeline Project, Lawrence and Scioto Counties, Ohio. October and November 2001. Archaeologist, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Archaeological Investigations of Proposed Upgrades to US Route 131, a 15-Acre Roadside Park and Additional Road Upgrades in Grand Traverse and Wexford Counties, Michigan (MDOT Job# 52691). September and October 2001. Cultural Heritage Consultant, Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority, Tasmania, Australia. Development of Initial Phase of a Public Archaeology Program for the Port Arthur Historic Site. January and February 2001. Project included excavation and interpretation of convict period (1830-1877) remains. Field Director, Tetra Tech, Inc. Phase II NRHP testing of Sites 18CH160 and 18CH161. Blossom Point Proving Grounds Research Facility, Charles County, Maryland. January 2001. 2000 Field Director, Hardlines Design Company. Data Recovery of Site 36AL480. Allegany County, Pennsylvania. November and December 2000. Project included excavation and recordation of the Harmony Brick Factory. Field Director, Tetra Tech, Inc. Phase II NRHP testing of Sites 18CH155 and 18CH156. Blossom Point Proving Grounds Research Facility, Charles County, Maryland. June 2000. Senior Field Technician, Gray & Pape, Inc. Data Recovery of Site 33FR1189. Franklin County, Ohio. January 2000. 1999 Senior Field Technician, Midwestern Environmental Consultants, Inc. Data Recovery of Sites 33WY674 and 33WY783. Wyandot County, Ohio. November and December 1999.

73

Senior Field Technician, Midwestern Environmental Consultants, Inc. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of 16 acres at Ravenna Munitions Depot, Ohio. October 1999. Senior Field Technician, Midwestern Environmental Consultants, Inc. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of proposed "Fort to Port" Highway 24 widening. Defiance County, Ohio. October 1999. Senior Field Technician, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase II testing of Site 33OT263. Middle Bass Island, Ottawa County, Ohio. October 1999. Senior Field Technician, Pan American Consultants, Inc. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of Proposed MDOT25. Marion County, Mississippi. September 1999. Senior Field Director, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase II testing of Site BRO-117. Broome County, New York. July and August 1999. Recorder/Student, Arizona Archaeological Society. Rock Art Recording Field School. Coconino National Forest, Anderson Pass, Arizona. June 1999. Senior Field Director, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I and II testing. Millennium Pipeline Project. Broome, Delaware, Sullivan, Orange and Rockland Counties, New York. April through June 1999. Project included detailed assessment of rural historic farmsteads. Senior Field Technician, Tetra Tech, Inc. Phase II NRHP testing of Site 18CH227. Blossom Point Proving Grounds Research Facility, Charles County, Maryland. March and April 1999. Senior Field Technician, Pan American Consultants, Inc. Phase III data recovery of Site 1EE491, Elmore County, Alabama. Excavation of a multi-component prehistoric site. February and March 1999. 1998 Senior Field Director, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase II NRHP testing of Sites 11WI1636, 12PR1943, and 12PR1948. Vector Pipeline project. Will County, Illinois, and Porter County, Indiana. October through December 1998. Senior Field Director, Gray & Pape, Inc. GIS access road survey and Penmapping of Historical Resources for Millennium Pipeline project. Erie, Chautauqua, Cattaraugus, Allegany, Chemung, Tioga, Broome, Steuben, Delaware, Sullivan, Rockland, and Westchester Counties, New York, August through October 1998. Senior Field Technician, Tetra Tech, Inc. Phase II Testing of 2 sites on Iowa Army Ammunitions Plant, Middletown, Iowa, July 1998.

74

Senior Field Technician, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Mississinewa Lake archaeological survey. Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, Indiana, May to July 1998. Senior Field Director, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Vector Pipeline survey, Lake County, Indiana, May 1998. 1997 Crew Chief, Commonwealth Cultural Resources Group. Phase I pipeline survey, Kalamazoo County, Michigan, November and December 1997. Senior Field Director, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I 408-mile pipeline survey. Erie, Chautauqua, Cattaraugus, Allegany, Chemung, Tioga, Broome, Steuben, Delaware, Sullivan, Rockland, and Westchester Counties, New York, July through November 1997. Excavation Supervisor, Mayflower Project, College of Lake County Archaeological Field School. Supervision of block excavation of Post-Classic Maya structure. Mayflower Camp, Stann Creek District, Belize, Central America, May to July 1997. Senior Field Technician, Gray & Pape, Inc. Green River Lake Shoreline Survey. Adair, Casey, and Taylor Counties, Kentucky. April 1997. Senior Crew Chief, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase II investigations of Corn Wet Milling Plant, Davies County, Indiana, April 1997. Field Technician, Commonwealth Cultural Resources Group. Phase I Cultural Resources Survey. Washington, Indiana. March 1997. Senior Crew Chief, Gray & Pape, Inc. Corn Wet Milling Plant Phase Ib Survey, Davies County, Indiana, February 1997. 1996 Senior Field Technician, Earth Search, Inc. Phase III Data Recovery of Wilton Plantation (16SJ20). Donaldsonville, Louisiana, November 1996 through February 1997. Senior Field Technician, Earth Search, Inc. Phase III Data Recovery of Orange Grove Plantation. Waggaman, Louisiana, October 1996. Field Technician, Archaeological Services-Western Wyoming College and Brigham Young University Office of Public Archaeology. Mitigation of Site 48SW10888 ("Hearth in Road" site) in support of the Seedskadee Land Exchange project. Project was conducted for the Bureau of Reclamation. Sweetwater County, Wyoming, July to October 1996. Field Technician, GAI Consultants. Phase III Data Recovery of Site 46WA128. Washington County, West Virginia, July 1996.

75

Senior Field Director, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Pipeline Replacement and Retirement Survey, Kanawha County, West Virginia, June 1996. Senior Field Director, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Survey, Gilmer County, West Virginia, May 1996. Senior Field Technician, Gray & Pape, Inc. 46KA294 Data Recovery, Kanawha County, West Virginia, April to May 1996. Senior Field Director, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Survey, Gettysburg and New Holland, Pennsylvania, February to April 1996. Senior Field Technician, Earth Search, Inc. Phase III Birds Creek Data Recovery, Harrisonburg, Catahoula Parish, Louisiana, January 1996. 1995 Senior Field Director, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Twenty-mile Survey of Line 10240 Eagle Suction and Discharge, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, October to December 1995. Senior Crew Chief, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I Seven-mile Survey of Line 10240 Gettysburg Suction, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, September to October 1995. Senior Field Director, Gray & Pape, Inc. Line A-5 Construction Monitoring, Orange County, New York, September 1995. Senior Field Technician, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase II testing of two sites at Blue Sky Park Road Bridge, Clermont, Ohio, August 1995. Senior Field Technician, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase III Stuart Station Data Recovery, Adams County, Ohio, August 1995. Field Technician, Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. Phase II Higbie Tavern Project, Lexington, Kentucky, August 1995. Senior Field Technician, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase I survey of Jefferson National Forest Access Roads, Allegheny and Rock Bridge Counties, Virginia, July 1995. Senior Field Technician, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase II testing of Line A Replacement, Madison County, Ohio, July 1995. Senior Field Technician, Gray & Pape, Inc. Phase II testing of the North Fork of the Hughes River Dam, Cairo, West Virginia, June 1995.

76

Surveyor, NSF granted Ek Balam project under the direction of Dr. William Ringle and Dr. George Bey. GIS land survey and mapping of Spanish Colonial and Formative Maya components of Ek Balam site, Ek Balam, Yucatan, Mexico, March to May 1995. Field Technician, Archaeological Consultants, Inc. Phase I wetlands replacement survey, Plant City, Florida, February 1995. Senior Technician, Earth Search, Inc. Phase III Data Recovery of a Spanish Colonial Period (Isleño) House Site, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, January 1995. 1994 Field Technician, Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. Falls Harbor Phase II investigations, Louisville, Kentucky, October to December 1994. Field Technician, Archaeological Consultants, Inc. Phase I wetlands replacement survey, Tampa, Florida, September 1994. Field Technician, Earth Search, Inc. Phase III Data Recovery at 16JE218, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, June to August 1994. Lab Technician, Earth Search, Inc. Washing and sorting of artifacts recovered from Phase II testing of Troyville, Frogmore, DePrato, and Turtle Lake mound complexes, May 1994. Field Technician, Earth Search, Inc. Phase I survey of 45 miles of Highway 84 widening. Phase II testing of Troyville, Frogmore, DePrato, and Turtle Lake mound complexes, Jonesville, Catahoula Parish, Louisiana, March to May 1994. Lab Technician, Earth Search, Inc. Artifact analysis, washing and sorting of Historic New Orleans Collection Project, February to March 1994. Crew Chief, Earth Search, Inc. Phase I survey of Highway 8 widening project, Harrisonburg, Catahoula Parish, Louisiana, January 1994. 1993 Lab Technician, Earth Search, Inc. Flat glass and metal analysis, SURFER, LOTUS, data entry, December 1993. Field Technician, Earth Search, Inc. Cultural Resources Survey of EAPL Off-Site Borrow Areas, Levee Items E-64, E-76, and E84a, Iberville, Iberia, and Assumption Parishes, Louisiana, October to November 1993. Field Technician, Earth Search, Inc. Phase III Data Recovery of Orange Grove Plantation, Waggaman, Louisiana, October 1993. 1992 Excavations Supervisor, Millsaps College Archaeological Field School, Flowood

77

Mounds, Mississippi, June to July 1992. Crew Chief, Archaeology Mississippi, Inc. Phase II testing, Hinds and Rankin Counties, Mississippi, April to July 1992. 1991 Field Technician, Ek Balam Project. Reconnaissance, mapping, and ceramic analysis, Ek Balam, Yucatan, Mexico, May to August 1991.

78

Kiristen Webb Appalachian Archaeology, LLC

PO Box 984 Wooton, KY 41776

(606) 275-‐1425 [email protected] Education University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida M.A., Anthropology with an emphasis in Archaeology Graduated May 8, 2010 Sambaqui: Changes in Monumental Architecture along the Brazilian Coast in Response to Disruptions in Climate Patterns University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky B.A., Anthropology with an emphasis in Archaeology Graduated May 5, 2006 Field Experience Phase I Surveys • June 30 – July 11, 2003 - UK-PAR, KY 90 Road Widening, Pulaski and Wayne

Counties, Kentucky Field Technician • June 14 – June 18, 2004 - UK-PAR, I-69 Henderson County, Kentucky Field Technician • November 29 – December 3, 2010 - UK-PAR, Christian County, Kentucky (15CH670

and 15CH671) Field Technician • February 16 – February 18, 2011 - UK-PAR, KYTC Barren County, Kentucky Field Technician • July 26 , 2011 – KAS, Jim Scutter Nature Preserve

Field Technician • October 21, 2011 – UK-PAR, KYTC Lincoln County, Kentucky

Field Technician

• October 24-28, 2011 – UK-PAR, Whitley County, Kentucky Coal Survey Field Technician

• December 2011 – February 2012 – Gray and Pape, Fort Campbell Military base Field Technician

79

• April 10, 2013 – Appalachian Archaeology, LLC., Proposed Veterans Cemetery, Leslie Co., KY Field Director

• June 5, 2013 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC., Proposed water plant facility, Lee Co.,

VA Field Director

• September 22, 2015 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC., Proposed cell tower location in Harlan Co., KY Field Director

• October 6, 2015 – Appalachian Archaeology, LLC., Proposed cell tower location in Morgan Co., KY Field Director

• October 13, 2015 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC., Proposed cell tower location in Morgan Co., KY Field Director

• November 2, 2015 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC., Proposed cell tower location near Trace Fork in Magoffin Co., KY Field Director

• November 2, 2015 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC., Proposed cell tower location near Authurmabel in Magoffin Co., KY Field Director

• November 9, 2015 – Appalachian Archaeology, LLC., Proposed cell tower location near Hendricks in Magoffin Co., KY Field Director

• November 10, 2015 – Appalachian Archaeology, LLC., Proposed cell tower location near Wolf Coal in Breathitt Co., KY Field Director

• November 10, 2015 – Appalachian Archaeology, LLC., Proposed cell tower location near Copland in Breathitt Co., KY Field Director

• November 13, 2015 – Appalachian Archaeology, LLC., Proposed cell tower location near

Haddix in Breathitt Co., KY Field Director

• November 23, 2015 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC., Proposed cell tower location near Gunlock in Magoffin Co., KY Field Director

80

• December 7, 2015 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC., proposed cell tower location near Smith Creek in Morgan Co., KY Field Director

• December 30, 2015 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location near Moon in Morgan Co., KY Field Director

• January 18, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location near Galdia in Magoffin Co., KY Field Director

• April 22, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location near Waddy in Shelby Co., KY Field Director

• April 23, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location near Clearfield in Rowan Co., KY Field Director

• May 18, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location near Barbourville in Knox Co., KY Field Director

• May 19, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location near Indian Creek in Jackson Co., KY Field Director

• July 6, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location near Burning Fork in Magoffin Co., KY Field Director

• July 6, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location near Ezel in Morgan Co., KY Field Director

• July 29, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location near Rogers in Wolfe Co., KY Field Director

• September 9, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location in Humboldt, Gibson Co., TN Field Director

• September 27, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location in Elizabethtown, Hardin Co., KY Field Director

• October 4, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location in Loogootee, Martin Co., IN Field Director

81

• October 5, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location in

Bloomington, Monroe Co., IN Field Director

• October 6, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location in Oldenburg, Franklin Co., IN Field Director

• October 11, 2016 - Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, proposed cell tower location in Beefhide, Letcher and Pike Co., KY Field Director

Phase II • July 7 – July 11, 2003 - UK-PAR, Mammoth Cave National Park, Lincoln, Kentucky Field Technician • June 2 – July 31, 2009 Santa Catarina, Brazil Master’s Field Research • July 14 – July 28, 2010 - McBride Preservation The Hall at Camp Nelson, Jessamine County, Kentucky (15JS256) Field Technician • January 31 – February 7, 2011 - UK-PAR The Battle of Richmond Site, Madison County, Kentucky (15MA306) Field Technician • March 5-6, 2011 – KAS, Hunt-Morgan House Fayette County, Kentucky • May 23- 27, 2011 – UK-PAR, McConnell House Greenup County, Kentucky Field Technician • June 6-10, 2011 – UK-PAR, Trigg County, Kentucky (15TR1)

Field Technician

• July 5-11, 2014 – Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, Data collection for multiple prehistoric sites in Sumner Co., SC

Phase III • June 1 – July 15, 2005 - UK-PAR, Clark County, Kentucky Field Technician

82

• July 18 – August 19, 2005 - CCRG, Inc., Boone County, Kentucky (15BE200) Field Technician • May 10 – July 13, 2010 - UK-PAR, Estill County, Kentucky (15ES111) Field Technician • February 21 – April 29, 2011 – KAS, Eastern State Hospital Cemetery, Lexington,

Kentucky Field Technician

Laboratory Experience • August 23, 2003 – December 19, 2005 - UK-PAR, KAS, OSA

Lab Technician • August 16 – September 30, 2010 - UK-PAR, Estill County, Kentucky (15ES111)

Macro-‐botanical Analyst • October 1 – November 26, 2010 - UK-PAR, Leslie County, Kentucky (15LS205)

Macro-‐botanical Analyst • December 6, 2010 – December 11, 2011 - UK-PAR, Estill County, Kentucky (15ES111)

Lithic Analyst • January 17 – February 8, 2011 - UK-PAR, Monroe County, Kentucky (15MR65)

Lithic Analyst Publications 2004 Andrew Madsen, with contributions by Ann Wilkinson, Kiristen Bright, Rebecca Madsen, Myrisa Byrd, and Allison Hadley. Phase 1 Archaeological Survey for the New

Connector for KY17 at Highland Park, Kenton County, Kentucky (Item No. 6-‐350.00) (UK PAR Project No. 04-‐07).

2010 Bright, Kiristen. Changes in Monumental Architecture along the Brazilian

Coast in Response to Disruptions in Climate Patterns. Gainesville, FL; University of Florida.

2011 Phase I Archaeological Survey of Spot Improvements Along US 31E in Larue

County, Kentucky (Item No. 4-‐8504) (UKPAR Project No. 11-‐06). Phase I Archaeological Survey of Selected Segments Along US 41A in Christian

County, Kentucky (Item No. 2-‐311.10) (UKPAR Project No. 11-‐1). 2013 Phase I Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Water Treatment Facility in Lee

County, Virginia. Appalachian Archaeology, LLC.

83

Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Veterans Cemetery in Leslie County, Kentucky. Appalachian Archaeology, LLC.

2016 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Clearfield Telecommunications Tower, Rowan County, Kentucky. Appalachian Archaeology, LLC.

Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Humboldt Telecommunications Tower, Gibson County, Tennessee. Appalachian Archaeology, LLC.

Professional Affiliations Register of Professional Archaeologists Kentucky Organization of Professional Archaeologists





FCC Form 620

Attachment 2. Site Information - Photographs You are required to provide photographs and maps as part of this filing. Additional site information can be provided in an optional attachment. Photograph Requirements: Except in cases where no Historic Properties were identified within the Areas of Potential Effects, submit photographs as described below. Photographs should be in color, marked so as to identify the project, keyed to the relevant map or text, and dated; the focal length of the lens and the height of the camera should be noted. The source of any photograph included but not taken by the Applicant or its consultant (including copies of historic images) should be identified on the photograph.

a. Photographs taken from the tower site should show views from the proposed location in all directions. The direction (e.g., north, south, etc.) should be indicated on each photograph, and, as a group, the photographs should present a complete (360 degree) view of the area around the communications tower or non-tower structure. b. Photographs of all listed and eligible properties within the Areas of Potential Effects. c. If any listed or eligible properties are visible from the proposed tower site, photographs looking at the site from each historic property. The approximate distance in feet (meters) between the site and the historic property should be included. If any listed or eligible properties are within the APE, photos looking at each historic property should be included.

Include aerial photos of the APE for visual effects, if available. There are a variety of publicly available websites that provide aerial photographs.

Please see the attached Photographs, taken on October 10, 2016, unless otherwise noted. A photograph location map is included within this attachment.





FCC Form 620

Photo Location Map 1

Arrow indicates the approximate location and direction in which the photograph was taken

8 5 7 6

Project Site 1

9 2 4

3 10

Subject Property





FCC Form 620

Woolery Stone Company (SHARGIS # 105-005-55001) - 2295 W Tapp Road, Bloomington, IN

Photo Location Map 2

Arrow indicates the approximate location and direction in which the photograph was taken

0.5 Mile APE-VE

Project Site

11

12

14

13

15-16





FCC Form 620

1. Looking north at the Project Site.

2. Looking east at the Project Site.





FCC Form 620

3. Looking south at the Project Site.

4. Looking west at the Project Site.





FCC Form 620

5. View facing east, away from the Project Site.

6. View facing east, at the overall Project Site.





FCC Form 620

7. View facing south, away from the Project Site.

8. View facing west, away from the Project Site.





FCC Form 620

9. View of proposed access/utility easement facing east.

10. View of proposed access/utility easement facing north.





FCC Form 620

11. 0.5 mile APE-VE west of the Project Site facing east towards the proposed undertaking.

12. 0.5 mile APE-VE north of the Project Site facing south towards the proposed undertaking.





FCC Form 620

13. 0.5 mile APE-VE east of the Project Site facing west towards the proposed undertaking.

14. Woolery Stone Company (SHARGIS# (105-005-55001) located approximately 1,100 feet south from the Project Site.





FCC Form 620

15. View of Woolery Stone Company (SHARGIS# 105-005-55001) towards the Project Site.

16. Looking away from Woolery Stone Company (SHARGIS# (035-442-45095) towards the Project Site. The proposed undertaking at the Project Site may be minimally visible. (red arrow indicated location)





FCC Form 620

Attachment 3. Site Information - Map Requirements Include one or more 7.5-minute quad USGS topographical maps that: a. Identify the Areas of Potential Effects for both Direct and Visual Effects. If a map is copied from the original, include a key with name of quad and date. b. Show the location of the proposed collocation site and any new access roads or other easements including excavations. c. Show the locations of each property listed. d. Include keys for any symbols, colors, or other identifiers. e. Submit color maps whenever possible.

The following maps are attached to this report: Street Map (Figure 1) Topographic Map (Figure 2) Aerial Photograph (See Attachment 2, Photo Location Map)

Historic Resources Map

EBI GIS

Figure 1: Site Location Map

PN: 6116004086

Source: Selected data fromESRI, EBI & USGS

Date: 9/27/2016·

0 1,000 2,000 3,000500 Feet

Legend

Site Radius_̂ Project Site

at 250', 500', 1000' and ½ mile

HV1094 WS TAPP ROADS WEIMER RD.BLOOMINGTON, IN 47403

EBI GIS

Figure 2 - Topographic Map

PN: 6116004086

Source: Selected data fromESRI, EBI & USGS

Date: 9/27/2016·

0 1,000 2,000 3,000500 Feet

USGS 24K Quad: Bloomington, IN 1986

Legend

Site Radius_̂ Project Site

at 250', 500', 1000' and ½ mile

HV1094 WS TAPP ROADS WEIMER RD.BLOOMINGTON, IN 47403

Indiana Department of Natural Resources

es: Esri, DeLorme,

, USGS, Intermap,

Addresses

Cemeteries

Outstanding

Notable

Contributing

Non-Contributing

Demolished

UnknownI 1:8,988

Indiana Dept. of Natural ResourcesGeographic Information Systems

Map Coordinate System: WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere

HV1094

Author:

Relative Scale





FCC Form 620

Attachment 4. Site Information – Additional Site Information Additional Site Information Recommendations: Describe any additional structures, access roads, utility lines, fences, easements, or other construction planned for the site in conjunction with the proposed wireless telecommunication facility. Use this attachment to provide additional details needed to present a full and accurate description of any construction activities that will take place to complete the installation. The Subject Property, located at S. Weimer Road, approximately 500± feet of the intersection of Weimer Road and Sudburg Lane, in Bloomington, Indiana, is situated within a predominantly agricultural and wooded area, with some limited residential and commercial development. Development dates from the mid-20th century through the present. The Subject Property consists of an approximately 80-acre lot that includes two irregular-shaped parcels improved with a single-family residence that was reportedly constructed in 1986, a storage shed and three structures that were reportedly constructed sometime in the early 1900s, agricultural land (i.e. pasture land), undeveloped wooded land, and a landscaped (i.e. mowed) grass field. The area of the proposed facility currently consists of a landscaped grass field. Horvath Towers, LLC proposes to construct a tower facility on the south-central portion of the Subject Property. The tower facility will include a 195-foot (199-foot with appurtenance) monopole tower and associated support equipment located within an 80-foot by 100-foot square-foot lease area. The tower will accommodate future antenna carriers and equipment within the compound. The compound will be surrounded by an 8-foot wood fence. Horvath Towers, LLC proposes to improve an existing access road from South Weimer Road to the tower facility. Utilities will follow the proposed access route. Site Plans/Lease Exhibits provided by Horvath Towers, LLC are included in this attachment.

DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:DATE:

PODMEP9.22.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

POD NUMBER: 16-10025

DOP

REV. DATE DESCRIPTION

PRELIMINARYNOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION

SITE INFORMATION:

HORVATH SITE NUMBER:

VERIZON WIRELESS SITE NAME:

TAPP ROADS. WEIMER ROAD

BLOOMINGTON, IN 47403MONROE COUNTY

HV1094

WS TAPP ROAD

ZONINGDRAWINGS

A 9.30.16 ISSUED FOR REVIEW

B 10.4.16 OLC COMMENTS

312 WEST COLFAX AVESOUTH BEND, IN 46601

NEW 195' MONOPOLEw/4' LIGHTNING ARRESTORTOTAL TOWER HEIGHT 199'

FROM CITY OF BLOOMINGTON INDIANA BUILDING, PLANNING, AND ZONING DEPARTMENT: 401 N MORTON ST, SUITE 130, BLOOMINGTON, IN 47404: TAKE W 7TH ST TO N ROGERS ST (0.2 MI). HEAD SOUTHON N MORTON ST TOWARD W 8TH ST (341 FT). TURN RIGHT ONTO W 7TH ST (0.1 MI). TAKE W BLOOMFIELD RD TO S WEIMER RD IN PERRY TOWNSHIP (2.0 MI). TURN LEFT ONTO N ROGERS ST (0.5 MI). TURNRIGHT ONTO W 2ND ST (0.7 MI). CONTINUE ONTO W BLOOMFIELD RD (0.9 MI). CONTINUE ON S WEIMER RD. DRIVE TO SUDBURG LN IN BLOOMINGTON (1.0 MI). TURN LEFT ONTO S WEIMER RD (0.8 MI).TURN LEFT TOWARD SUDBURG LN (423 FT). CONTINUE ONTO SUDBURG LN (0.1 MI).

FROM WEST SIDE MTSO: 1645 MIDWEST BLVD. INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46214: HEAD WEST ON MIDWEST BLVD (0.5 MI). TURN RIGHT ONTO W 21ST ST (0.6 MI). TURN RIGHT ONTO N GIRLS SCHOOL RD (1.0 MI). USETHE LEFT 2 LANES TO TURN LEFT ONTO 10TH ST (0.9 MI). TURN RIGHT ONTO THE INTERSTATE 465 S/INTERSTATE 74 E RAMP (0.3 MI). MERGE ONTO I-465 S/I-74 (9.2 MI). USE THE RIGHT LANE TO TAKE EXIT 4FOR IN-37 S/HARDING ST. (0.1 MI). USE THE RIGHT 2 LANES TO TURN RIGHT ONTO IN-37 S/HARDING ST (SIGNS FOR W THOMPSON RD) (46.5 MI). TURN LEFT ONTO W TAPP RD (0.6 MI). TURN LEFT ONTO SWEIMER RD (0.4 MI). CONTINUE STRAIGHT (423 FT). CONTINUE ONTO SUDBURG LN (0.1 MI). SITE WILL BE LOCATED ON RIGHT (SOUTH) SIDE OF ROAD.

ELECTRICALDUKE ENERGYADDRESS: 1100 W 2ND ST

BLOOMINGTON, IN 47403CONTACT: TBDPHONE: (800) 521-2232EMAIL: TBD

SURVEYORPOWER OF DESIGN GROUP, LLC11490 BLUEGRASS PARKWAYLOUISVILLE, KY 40299PHONE: (502) 437-5252

NOTE:ALL ITEMS WITHIN THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE BY TOWER OWNER'S GENERALCONTRACTOR AND HIS SUB-CONTRACTORS UNLESS NOTED AS (VZW GC) WHICH SHALL INCLUDE VERIZONWIRELESS GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND HIS SUB-CONTRACTORS. GENERALLY DESCRIBED BELOW:HORVATH COMMUNICATIONS SCOPE: INSTALL A NEW 195' MONOPOLE w/ 4' LIGHTNING ARRESTOR (TOTAL 199') INSTALL A NEW TOWER FOUNDATION SYSTEM INSTALL A NEW 70'X70' FENCED GRAVEL COMPOUND INSTALL A NEW SITE H-FRAME INSTALL A NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE RUN TO SITE H-FRAME INSTALL A NEW GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE NO WATER OR SEWAGE SERVICES RUN TO SITE INSTALL NEW TOWER & SITE GROUNDING SYSTEM INSTALL NEW VZW SUBSURFACE GROUNDING SYSTEM INSTALL A NEW 11'-6"x19'-6" CONCRETE EQUIPMENT/GENERATOR PAD INSTALL ELECTRICAL SERVICE CONDUIT WITH PULL TAPES FROM ATS ENCLOSURE STUB-UP TO UTILITY

H-FRAME INSTALL NEW CONDUITS WITH PULL TAPES FROM VZW ATS ENCLOSURE STUB-UP TO EQUIPMENT

ELECTRICAL PANEL STUB-UP INSTALL NEW CONDUITS WITH PULL TAPES FROM VZW ATS & EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURES STUB-UP TO

GENERATOR LOCATION INSTALL NEW CONDUITS WITH PULL TAPES FROM MAIN EQUIPMENT CABINET STUB-UP TO GROWTH

CABINET STUB-UP INSTALL (1) NEW "VERIZON WIRELESS ONLY" FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT WITH PULL TAPE AND TRACER

WIRE FROM VZW EQUIPMENT TO NEW "VERIZON WIRELESS ONLY" HAND HOLE OUTSIDE COMPOUND INSTALL (1) NEW "VERIZON WIRELESS ONLY" FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT WITH PULL TAPE FROM NEW

"VERIZON WIRELESS ONLY" HAND HOLE AND STUB UP AT FUTURE FIBER PEDESTAL LOCATION PERMANENT ELECTRIC POWER MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR VERIZON WIRELESS AT THE METER BASE

PRIOR TO THE SITE BEING RELEASED AS TENANT READY.VERIZON WIRELESS SCOPE (VZW GC): INSTALL A NEW 11'-6"x14'-9" PREFABRICATED CANOPY ON EXISTING CONCRETE PAD FOUNDATION INSTALL NEW 20KW DIESEL GENERATOR ON EXISTING CONCRETE FOUNDATION INSTALL VZW ICE BRIDGE AND FOUNDATIONS INSTALL VZW ANTENNA MOUNTING SUPPORT STRUCTURE ON TOWER INSTALL VZW ANTENNAS, LINES, COAX, GPS ANTENNAS AND RADIO EQUIPMENT INSTALL EXISTING SUBSURFACE GROUND LEADS TO VZW EQUIPMENT & FACILITIES INSTALL VZW ELECTRIC SERVICE CONDUCTORS FROM UTILITY H-FRAME TO VZW ATS ENCLOSURE INSTALL VZW GENERATOR CIRCUITS FROM VZW ATS & EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURES TO VZW

GENERATOR INSTALL (2) 1-1/4" & (1) 1" INNERDUCTS WITH PULL TAPES AND TRACER WIRE WITHIN OWNER

INSTALLED "VERIZON WIRELESS ONLY" FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT

ELECTRICAL UTILITY COORDINATIONIS NOT FINALIZED. DO NOT PROCEEDWITH CONSTRUCTION.

TAPP ROADHV1094

S. WEIMER ROADBLOOMINGTON, IN 47403

MONROE COUNTYTENANT: GTE MOBILENET OF INDIANA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS

WS TAPP ROAD

SITE

SITESITE

SHEET NUMBER DESCRIPTION

T-1 PROJECT INFORMATION, SITE MAPS, SHEET INDEX

B-1 TO B-1.4 SITE SURVEY

R-1 REVISION LOG

TOWER ELEVATION

TE-1 TOWER ELEVATION

CIVIL

C-1A OVERALL SITE PLANC-3 DETAILED SITE PLANC-4 DIMENSIONED SITE PLAN

SITE DETAILS

D-3 EQUIPMENT PAD & CANOPY ELEVATIONS (REFERENCEONLY)

D-5 PRELIMINARY BRIDGE DESIGNARCHITECTURAL

POWER OF DESIGN GROUP, LLC11490 BLUEGRASS PARKWAYLOUISVILLE, KY 40299PHONE: (502) 437-5252

PROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT DESCRIPTION CONSULTANT TEAM

AERIALLOCATION MAPVICINITY MAP

APPLICABLE CODES

HORVATH COMMUNICATIONS SITETAPP ROADSITE #: HV1094

VERIZON WIRELESS SITEWS TAPP ROADPROJECT#: 20141126383MARKET ID: BLOOMINGTONLOCATION CODE: 312019

SITE ADDRESSS. WEIMER ROADBLOOMINGTON, IN 47403MONROE COUNTYE911 ADDRESS: TBD

TOWER OWNERHORVATH COMMUNICATIONS312 W COLFAX AVESOUTH BEND, IN 46601CONTACT: JENNIFER A. SIROVICAPHONE: (574) 237-0464MOBILE: (574) 215-0620E-MAIL: [email protected]

PROPERTY OWNERHARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY &MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY1901 S WEIMER RD.BLOOMINGTON, IN 47403CONTACT: HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURYPHONE: (812) 272-9572

POLICEBLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT220 E 3RD STBLOOMINGTON, IN 47408PHONE: (812) 339-4477

FIREBLOOMINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENTS YANCY LNBLOOMINGTON, IN 47404PHONE: (812) 332-9763

GENERAL INFORMATIONLATITUDE : 39° 08' 38.91" NLONGITUDE : 86° 33' 37.37" W1983 (NAD83)ELEVATION : 733.00' AMSL1988 (NAVD88)

HORVATH COMMUNICATIONSLEASE AREA

100'-0" x 100'-0"(10,000 SF)

PROJECTINFORMATION,

SITE MAPS,SHEET INDEX

T-1

ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCALGOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMITWORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES.

BUILDING CODE 2014 INDIANA BUILDING CODE (IBC 2012)STRUCTURAL CODE TIA/EIA-222 - REVISION GMECHANICAL CODE 2014 INDIANA MECHANICAL CODE (IMC 2012)PLUMBING CODE 2012 INDIANA PLUMBING CODE (IPC 2006)ELECTRICAL CODE 2008 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (NEC) - NFPA 70FIRE/LIFE SAFETY CODE 2014 INDIANA FIRE CODE (2012 IFC)ENERGY CODE 2010 INDIANA ENERGY CODE ASHRAE 90.1-200 (COMMERCIAL)GAS CODE 2014 INDIANA FUEL GAS CODE (IFGC 2012)

ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESSREQUIREMENTS ARE NOT REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2009 IBC BUILDING CODE.

312 WEST COLFAX AVENUE

SOUTH BEND, IN46601

PARCEL ID: 53-08-07-100-001.005-009HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY &MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY

INST. #2014005699(NORTH REMAINER PER PLAT

INST. #2014004467)

PARCEL ID:53-08-07-100-004.001-009HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY &MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY

INST. #2014005698

S. WEIM

ER ROAD

PUBLIC RIGHT O

F WAY - W

IDTH UN

KNO

WN

APPROXIMATE FLOOD LINE -GRAPHIC PLOTTING ONLY,

NOT FIELD VERIFIED

ZONE: XZONE: AE

ZONE: AE

ZONE: X

733'

731'

729'

728'

727'

725'

724'

723'

PARCEL ID: 53-08-07-300-006.000-009PUBLIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION

BOOK 327, PG. 440

P.O.C.FOUND 5/8" REBAR IN THECENTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP8 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA

PROPOSED LEASE AREA(8,000.000 S.F.)DETAIL SHEET B-1.1


INST. #2014005700(SOUTH REMAINER PER PLAT

INST. #2014004467)

PARCEL ID: 53-08-07-400-008.099-009JOE KEMP CONSTRUCTION, LLC

INST. #2016010797


INST. #2014005692(COMBINED TRACT PER PLAT

INST. #2014004467)

P.O.R.FOUND 5/8" REBARCAPPED "BRG"

FOUND 5/8" REBARCAPPED "BRG"

PROPOSED ACCESS &UTILITY EASEMENT "A"

(8,536.583 S.F.)DETAIL SHEET B-1.1

PROPOSED ACCESS &UTILITY EASEMENT "B"(21,412.464 S.F.)DETAIL SHEET B-1.1 & B-1.2

S. WEIM

ER ROAD

VARIABLE WIDTH PU

BLIC RIGHT OF W

AY

EX. INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE CO. & PSIENERGY, INC. EASEMENTBOOK 399, PG. 1

EX. INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE CO.EASEMENTBOOK 398, PG. 28

LEASE TIES88°58'33"E 470.47'

S88°58'32"E 487.50' S88°58'33"E 792.73'TOTAL LENGTH

132.

19'

S27°29'19"W

157.60'N82°59'05"W

350.

63'

S01°21'19"W

S12°26'10"W 549.78'

N88°58'14"W 433.82'

N01°42'58"W

1010.58'

S01°37'59"E 610.00'

S88°58'32"E 629.92'

S88°11'03"E 850.00'

178.71'

N01°37'59"W

S36°20'56"E

209.87'

S38°23'51"W 486.98'

S05°58'52"W 197.75'

S40°17'17"E33.72'

S40°17'17"E24.02'P.O.B.

ACCESS & UTIL. ESMT. "B"

N01°01'27"E45.00'

FOUND 5/8" REBARCAPPED "BRG"EX. SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT

CITY OF BLOOMINGTONBOOK 147, PG. 133(APPROX. LOCATION)

SE 1/4, SECTION

7

SW 1/4, SECTIO

N 7

NE 1/4, SECTIO

N 7

NW

1/4, SECTION

7

NE 1/4, SECTION 7

SE 1/4, SECTION 7

DOP


DAPMEP9.19.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


SITE NUMBER:

SURVEYREV. DATE DESCRIPTION

A 9.19.16 PRELIM ISSUE WITH TITLE

TAPP ROADSITE INFORMATION:


MONROE COUNTY

SOURCE OF TITLE:

TAX PARCEL NUMBER:53-08-07-100-001.005-009

PROPERTY OWNER:HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY &MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY

1901 WEIMER ROADBLOOMINGTON, IN 47403

INSTRUMENT #2014005699INSTRUMENT #2014005700

T.J. BOOFTERCIVIL ENGINEERS &LAND SURVEYORS

207 W Spring St, New Albany, IN 47150

HV1094


574.237.0464

VERIZON WIRELESS SITE NAME:WS TAPP ROAD

B 9.26.16 ROW DESIGNATION

B-1

0° 19' 47"

GRID

NO

RTH

N

TRUE NORTH

BASED ON INDIANA STATEPLANE WEST ZONE AND

DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATIONSCOMPLETED ON AUGUST 26, 2016

GENERAL NOTES

0'

1 INCH = 200 FEET

400'200'

SITE MAP - NOT TO SCALE

SITE

NO SEARCH OF PUBLIC RECORDS HAS BEEN COMPLETEDBY POD GROUP TO DETERMINE ANY DEFECTS AND/ORAMBIGUITIES IN THE TITLE OF THE PARENT PARCEL.

THIS SURVEY IS FOR THE LEASE AREA ONLY, THEPROPOSED ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENTS, AND ONLY APARTIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PARENT PARCEL HASBEEN PERFORMED.

THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED BY METHOD OF RANDOMTRAVERSE WITH SIDE SHOTS. UNADJUSTED CLOSURE FORTHIS TRACT EQUALS 0.09', FOR A PRECISION OF 1:37,766AND HAS NOT BEEN ADJUSTED.

THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY RECORDEDEASEMENTS AND/OR RIGHTS OF WAY SHOWN HEREON ORNOT.

THIS PLAT IS NOT INTENDED FOR LAND TRANSFER.

THE PROPOSED LEASE AREA AND PART OF THE PROPOSEDACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN HERON ARE NOTLOCATED IN A 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN PER FLOOD HAZARDBOUNDARY MAP, COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER18105C0143D AND 18105C0139D, DATED DECEMBER 17,2010. THE PROPOSED LEASE AREA IS LOCATED IN ZONE X.A PORTION OF THE PARENT PARCEL AND THE PROPOSEDACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT IS IN A FLOOD ZONE (ZONE:AE, BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED).

FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTEDSET 5/8" REBAR 24" LONG

EX. FENCE

P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNINGP.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT

PROPERTY LINEADJACENT PROPERTY LINE

1. RANDOM TRAVERSE CONTROL MONUMENTSWERE SET USING GPS METHODS. A PORTIONOF THE TOPOGRAPHY WAS COLLECTED USINGGPS METHODS.

2. THE TYPE OF GPS UTILIZED WAS NETWORKADJUSTED REAL TIME KINEMATIC (INDOT VRSNETWORK), NAD 83 INDIANA EAST ZONE WITHTHE ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHT COMPUTED USINGGEOID12A. RELATIVE POSITIONAL ACCURACYVARIED FROM 0.03' TO 0.07' HORIZONTALLY.

3. SPECTRA PRECISION EPOCH 50 DUALFREQUENCY RECEIVERS WERE USEDCONDUCTING THE SURVEY. SERIAL NUMBER:5325400009

GLOBAL POSITIONING NOTE

NOTICE TO CONTRACTORPER INDIANA STATE LAW IC-8-1-26-18, IT ISAGAINST THE LAW TO EXCAVATE WITHOUT

NOTIFYING THE UNDERGROUND LOCATION SERVICETWO (2) WORKING DAYS BEFORE COMMENCING WORK.

FAA COORDINATE POINTNORTHING: 1419371.306EASTING: 3100933.650ELEVATION: 734.28'LOCATION: A SET 60D NAILN71°05'W 90.6'± FROM THESOUTHWEST CORNER OF THEPROPOSED LEASE AREA.

TEMPORARY BENCHMARKNAD 83LATITUDE: 39°08'38.91"LONGITUDE: 86°33'37.37"NAVD 88ELEVATION: 733'± AMSLNORTHING: 1419381.025EASTING: 3101070.067

SITE SURVEY

W TAPP RD

S.R.

37

IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 865, CHAPTERS 1 THRU 12 OF THEINDIANA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONAND OPINIONS ARE SUBMITTED REGARDING THE VARIOUSUNCERTAINTIES IN THE LOCATIONS OF THE LINES AND CORNERSESTABLISHED ON THIS SURVEY AS A RESULT OF:A) VARIANCES IN THE REFERENCE MONUMENTSB) DISCREPANCIES IN RECORD DESCRIPTIONS AND PLATSC) INCONSISTENCIES IN LINES OF OCCUPATIOND) RANDOM ERRORS IN MEASUREMENT (THEORETICAL

UNCERTAINTY)

AS A RESULT OF THE ABOVE OBSERVATIONS, IT IS MY OPINIONTHAT THE UNCERTAINTIES IN THE LOCATIONS OF THE LINES ANDCORNERS ESTABLISHED ON THIS SURVEY ARE AS FOLLOWS:

1. VARIANCES IN THE REFERENCE MONUMENTS: THIS SURVEY ISTIED TO A FOUND 5/8" REBAR IN THE CENTER OF SECTION 7,TOWNSHIP 8 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, MONROE COUNTY,INDIANA

2. DISCREPANCIES IN RECORD DESCRIPTIONS AND PLATS: THEREARE NO KNOWN DISCREPANCIES.

3. INCONSISTENCIES IN LINES OF OCCUPATION: THERE ARE NOKNOWN INCONSISTENCIES.

4. RANDOM ERRORS IN MEASUREMENT (THEORETICALUNCERTAINTY): THE THEORETICAL UNCERTAINTY (DUE TORANDOM ERRORS OF MEASUREMENTS) OF THE CORNERS OFTHE SUBJECT TRACT ESTABLISHED THIS SURVEY IS WITHINTHE SPECIFICATIONS FOR A CLASS A SURVEY (0.10 FEET) ASDEFINED IN IAC 865.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY AND THE PLAT SHOWNHEREON WERE PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ANDACCORDING TO THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF 865 IAC 1-12.

LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE

THOMAS J. BOOFTER, LS #S-0133 DATE

S WEIM

ER RDS.R. 45

W SUDBURY DR

P.O.R. POINT OF REFERENCE

722

723

721

722

722

725

730

727

733

732

735

733

734

PARCEL ID:53-08-07-100-001.005-009

HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY &MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY

INST. #2014005699

PROPOSEDLEASE AREA

(8,000.000 S.F.)

PROPOSED ACCESS &UTILITY EASEMENT "A"

(8,536.583 S.F.)

PROPOSED ACCESS &UTILITY EASEMENT "B"(21,412.464 S.F.)

PARC

EL ID

: 53-

08-0

7-30

0-00

6.00

0-00

9PU

BLIC

INVE

STM

ENT

CORP

ORA

TIO

NBO

OK

327,

PG.

440

EX. INDIANA BELLTELEPHONE CO. & PSI

ENERGY, INC. EASEMENTBOOK 399, PG. 1

S88°58'33"E 100.00'

S01°01'27"W 80.00'

N88°58'33"W 100.00'

N01°01'27"E 80.00'

S01°01'27"W 80.00'

S88°58'33"E 33.36'

S88°58'33"E

30.00'

N01°01'27"E

15.0

0'

45.0

0'

N01°01'27"E

S81°54'11"E 63.76'

N81°54'11"W 61.91'

N88°58'33"W 98.36'C1

C2

C3

C4

C5

C6

C7

S88°58'32"E 487.50'S88°58'33"E 470.47'

LEASE TIE

N88°58'33"W 78.75'S88°58'33"E 78.75'

N01°42'58"W

431.32'

45.09'S88°58'33"E

EX. INDIANA BELL TELEPHONECO. EASEMENTBOOK 398, PG. 28


INST. #2014005700

EX. CREEK

EX. GRAVEL D

RIVE

EX. GRAVEL DRIVE

P.O.B.LEASE AREA ANDACCESS & UTIL. ESMT. "A"

P.O.B.ACCESS & UTIL. ESMT. "B"

EX. WELL

EX. DRIPLINE

EX. DRIPLINE

N88°58'33"W11.76'

DOP


DAPMEP9.19.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


SITE NUMBER:





MONROE COUNTY

SOURCE OF TITLE:







HV1094


574.237.0464



B-1.10'

1 INCH = 50 FEET

50' 100'

IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 865, CHAPTERS 1 THRU 12 OFTHEINDIANA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE FOLLOWINGOBSERVATIONAND OPINIONS ARE SUBMITTED REGARDING THE VARIOUSUNCERTAINTIES IN THE LOCATIONS OF THE LINES ANDCORNERS ESTABLISHED ON THIS SURVEY AS A RESULT OF:A) VARIANCES IN THE REFERENCE MONUMENTSB) DISCREPANCIES IN RECORD DESCRIPTIONS AND PLATSC) INCONSISTENCIES IN LINES OF OCCUPATIOND) RANDOM ERRORS IN MEASUREMENT (THEORETICAL

UNCERTAINTY)

AS A RESULT OF THE ABOVE OBSERVATIONS, IT IS MYOPINION THAT THE UNCERTAINTIES IN THE LOCATIONS OFTHE LINES AND CORNERS ESTABLISHED ON THIS SURVEYARE AS FOLLOWS:

1. VARIANCES IN THE REFERENCE MONUMENTS: THISSURVEY IS TIED TO A FOUND 5/8" REBAR IN THECENTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 8 NORTH, RANGE 1WEST, MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA

2. DISCREPANCIES IN RECORD DESCRIPTIONS AND PLATS:THERE ARE NO KNOWN DISCREPANCIES.

3. INCONSISTENCIES IN LINES OF OCCUPATION: THEREARE NO KNOWN INCONSISTENCIES.

4. RANDOM ERRORS IN MEASUREMENT (THEORETICALUNCERTAINTY): THE THEORETICAL UNCERTAINTY (DUETO RANDOM ERRORS OF MEASUREMENTS) OF THECORNERS OF THE SUBJECT TRACT ESTABLISHED THISSURVEY IS WITHIN THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR A CLASS ASURVEY (0.10 FEET) AS DEFINED IN IAC 865.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY AND THE PLAT SHOWNHEREON WERE PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ANDACCORDING TO THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF 865IAC 1-12.





SITE SURVEY

FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED

UTILITY POLE

SET 5/8" REBAR 24" LONG

EX. FENCE

P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING

TELE PEDESTALEOP EDGE OF PAVEMENTROW RIGHT OF WAY

P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENTEX. OVERHEAD ELECTRIC


SANITARY MANHOLE869.6 EX. SPOT ELEVATION

CURVE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH RADIUSC1 S70°37'42"W 24.40' 35.00'C2 S56°01'48"W 63.64' 315.00'C3 N63°00'34"E 126.06' 285.00'C4 N70°37'42"E 45.31' 65.00'C5 N46°01'27"E 49.50' 35.00'C6 N86°56'30"E 110.28' 285.00'C7 S79°57'45"W 196.09' 315.00'

0° 19' 47"

GRID

NO

RTH

N

TRUE NORTH



GENERAL NOTESNO SEARCH OF PUBLIC RECORDS HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY POD GROUP TODETERMINE ANY DEFECTS AND/OR AMBIGUITIES IN THE TITLE OF THE PARENTPARCEL.

THIS SURVEY IS FOR THE LEASE AREA ONLY, THE PROPOSED ACCESS & UTILITYEASEMENTS, AND ONLY A PARTIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PARENTPARCEL HAS BEEN PERFORMED.

THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED BY METHOD OF RANDOM TRAVERSE WITHSIDE SHOTS. UNADJUSTED CLOSURE FOR THIS TRACT EQUALS 0.09', FOR APRECISION OF 1:37,766 AND HAS NOT BEEN ADJUSTED.

THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY RECORDED EASEMENTS AND/OR RIGHTS OFWAY SHOWN HEREON OR NOT.


THE PROPOSED LEASE AREA AND PART OF THE PROPOSED ACCESS & UTILITYEASEMENT SHOWN HERON ARE NOT LOCATED IN A 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAINPER FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP, COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER18105C0143D AND 18105C0139D, DATED DECEMBER 17, 2010. THEPROPOSED LEASE AREA IS LOCATED IN ZONE X. A PORTION OF THE PARENTPARCEL AND THE PROPOSED ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT IS IN A FLOOD ZONE(ZONE: AE, BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED).




GLOBAL POSITIONING NOTE FAA COORDINATE POINTNORTHING: 1419371.306EASTING: 3100933.650ELEVATION: 734.28'LOCATION: A SET 60D NAILN71°05'W 90.6'± FROM THESOUTHWEST CORNER OF THEPROPOSED LEASE AREA.


MATCHLINE

B-1.2

735

725

722

721

722

PARC

EL ID

: 53-

08-0

7-30

0-00

6.00

0-00

9PU

BLIC

INVE

STM

ENT

CORP

ORA

TIO

NBO

OK

327,

PG.

440


INST. #2014005700

S. WEIM

ER ROAD

PUBLIC RIGHT O

F WAY - W

IDTH UN

KNO

WN


S88°17'02"W20.15'

S01°42'58"E 457.42'

N01°42'58"W

431.32'

N11°25'31"W

58.41'


PARCEL ID: 53-08-07-300-006.000-009PU

BLIC INVESTM

ENT CO

RPORATIO

NBO

OK 327, PG. 440

EOP

EOP

EOP

EOP

EOP

EOP

EX. DRIPLINE

DOP


DAPMEP9.19.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


SITE NUMBER:





MONROE COUNTY

SOURCE OF TITLE:







HV1094


574.237.0464



B-1.20'

1 INCH = 50 FEET

50' 100'

IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 865, CHAPTERS 1 THRU 12 OFTHEINDIANA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE FOLLOWINGOBSERVATIONAND OPINIONS ARE SUBMITTED REGARDING THE VARIOUSUNCERTAINTIES IN THE LOCATIONS OF THE LINES ANDCORNERS ESTABLISHED ON THIS SURVEY AS A RESULT OF:A) VARIANCES IN THE REFERENCE MONUMENTSB) DISCREPANCIES IN RECORD DESCRIPTIONS AND PLATSC) INCONSISTENCIES IN LINES OF OCCUPATIOND) RANDOM ERRORS IN MEASUREMENT (THEORETICAL

UNCERTAINTY)

AS A RESULT OF THE ABOVE OBSERVATIONS, IT IS MYOPINION THAT THE UNCERTAINTIES IN THE LOCATIONS OFTHE LINES AND CORNERS ESTABLISHED ON THIS SURVEYARE AS FOLLOWS:

1. VARIANCES IN THE REFERENCE MONUMENTS: THISSURVEY IS TIED TO A FOUND 5/8" REBAR IN THECENTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 8 NORTH, RANGE 1WEST, MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA

2. DISCREPANCIES IN RECORD DESCRIPTIONS AND PLATS:THERE ARE NO KNOWN DISCREPANCIES.

3. INCONSISTENCIES IN LINES OF OCCUPATION: THEREARE NO KNOWN INCONSISTENCIES.

4. RANDOM ERRORS IN MEASUREMENT (THEORETICALUNCERTAINTY): THE THEORETICAL UNCERTAINTY (DUETO RANDOM ERRORS OF MEASUREMENTS) OF THECORNERS OF THE SUBJECT TRACT ESTABLISHED THISSURVEY IS WITHIN THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR A CLASS ASURVEY (0.10 FEET) AS DEFINED IN IAC 865.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY AND THE PLAT SHOWNHEREON WERE PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ANDACCORDING TO THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF 865IAC 1-12.





SITE SURVEY

FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED

UTILITY POLE

SET 5/8" REBAR 24" LONG

EX. FENCE

P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING

TELE PEDESTALEOP EDGE OF PAVEMENTROW RIGHT OF WAY

P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENTEX. OVERHEAD ELECTRIC


SANITARY MANHOLE869.6 EX. SPOT ELEVATION

0° 19' 47"

GRID

NO

RTH

N

TRUE NORTH



GENERAL NOTESNO SEARCH OF PUBLIC RECORDS HAS BEEN COMPLETED BY POD GROUP TODETERMINE ANY DEFECTS AND/OR AMBIGUITIES IN THE TITLE OF THE PARENTPARCEL.

THIS SURVEY IS FOR THE LEASE AREA ONLY, THE PROPOSED ACCESS & UTILITYEASEMENTS, AND ONLY A PARTIAL BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PARENTPARCEL HAS BEEN PERFORMED.

THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED BY METHOD OF RANDOM TRAVERSE WITHSIDE SHOTS. UNADJUSTED CLOSURE FOR THIS TRACT EQUALS 0.09', FOR APRECISION OF 1:37,766 AND HAS NOT BEEN ADJUSTED.

THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY RECORDED EASEMENTS AND/OR RIGHTS OFWAY SHOWN HEREON OR NOT.


THE PROPOSED LEASE AREA AND PART OF THE PROPOSED ACCESS & UTILITYEASEMENT SHOWN HERON ARE NOT LOCATED IN A 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAINPER FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP, COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER18105C0143D AND 18105C0139D, DATED DECEMBER 17, 2010. THEPROPOSED LEASE AREA IS LOCATED IN ZONE X. A PORTION OF THE PARENTPARCEL AND THE PROPOSED ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT IS IN A FLOOD ZONE(ZONE: AE, BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED).




GLOBAL POSITIONING NOTE

FAA COORDINATE POINTNORTHING: 1419371.306EASTING: 3100933.650ELEVATION: 734.28'LOCATION: A SET 60D NAILN71°05'W 90.6'± FROM THESOUTHWEST CORNER OF THEPROPOSED LEASE AREA.


B-1.1

MATCHLINE

DOP


DAPMEP9.19.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


SITE NUMBER:





MONROE COUNTY

SOURCE OF TITLE:







HV1094


574.237.0464



SITE SURVEY

B-1.3

DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ON B-1

SITE

STAT

E RO

UTE

37

SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 8 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST,MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA

S. W

EIM

ER R

OAD


UNCERTAINTY)





4. RANDOM ERRORS IN MEASUREMENT (THEORETICALUNCERTAINTY): THE THEORETICAL UNCERTAINTY (DUE TORANDOM ERRORS OF MEASUREMENTS) OF THE CORNERS OFTHE SUBJECT TRACT ESTABLISHED THIS SURVEY IS WITHIN THESPECIFICATIONS FOR A CLASS A SURVEY (0.10 FEET) ASDEFINED IN IAC 865.




7

W. TAPP ROAD

PROPOSED LEASE AREA

PROPOSED 30' ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT "A"

THE FOLLOWING IS A DESCRIPTION OF THE LEASE AREA TO BE LEASED FROM THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY ASRECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014005699, PARCEL ID: 53-08-07-100-001.005-009 WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEING PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 8 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ASFOLLOW:

BEARING DATUM USED HEREIN IS BASED UPON INDIANA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, WEST ZONE, NAD 83, FROM A REAL TIME KINEMATIC GLOBAL POSITIONINGSYSTEM OBSERVATION USING THE INDOT VRS REAL TIME GPS NETWORK (InCORS) COMPLETED ON AUGUST 26, 2016.

COMMENCING AT A FOUND AT A FOUND 5/8" REBAR IN THE CENTER TOWNSHIP OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 8 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA, SAIDCOMMENCEMENT BEING THE SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY CORNER OF THE PARCEL CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED ININSTRUMENT #2014005699, FOR REFERENCE, SAID COMMENCEMENT POINT IS S01°37'59"E 610.00' FROM A FOUND 5/8" REBAR IN THE SIDE OF S. WEIMER ROAD AND BEINGTHE NORTHWEST MOST BOUNDARY CORNER OF THE PARCEL CONVEYED TO CORNER HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT#2014005699; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, S88°58'32"E 487.50' TO A POINT COMMON TO THE NORTHWEST BOUNDARYCORNER OF THE PARCEL CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014005700; THENCE CONTINUING ALONGTHE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, S88°58'33"E 470.47'; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,TRAVERSING ACROSS THE LAND CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014005699, N01°01'27"E 45.00' TO ASET 5/8" REBAR IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED LEASE AREA AND BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N01°01'27"E 80.00' TO A SET 5/8" REBAR;THENCE S88°58'33"E 100.00' TO A SET 5/8" REBAR; THENCE S01°01'27"W 80.00' TO A SET 5/8" REBAR; THENCE N88°58'33"W 100.00' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING8,000.00 SQUARE FEET AS PER SURVEY BY THOMAS J. BOOFTER, LS #S-0133 WITH T.J. BOOFTER, CIVIL ENGINEER AND LAND SURVEYOR, DATED AUGUST 26, 2016.

THE FOLLOWING IS A DESCRIPTION OF THE 30' ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT "A" TO BE GRANTED FROM THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARYCAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014005699, PARCEL ID: 53-08-07-100-001.005-009 WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEING PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, IN THE CIRERO TOWNSHIP, TIPTON COUNTY,INDIANA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW:

BEARING DATUM USED HEREIN IS BASED UPON INDIANA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, EAST ZONE, NAD 83, FROM A REAL TIME KINEMATIC GLOBAL POSITIONINGSYSTEM OBSERVATION USING THE INDOT VRS REAL TIME GPS NETWORK (InCORS) COMPLETED ON AUGUST 20, 2016.

COMMENCING AT A FOUND AT A FOUND 5/8" REBAR IN THE CENTER TOWNSHIP OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 8 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA, SAIDCOMMENCEMENT BEING THE SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY CORNER OF THE PARCEL CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED ININSTRUMENT #2014005699, FOR REFERENCE, SAID COMMENCEMENT POINT IS S01°37'59"E 610.00' FROM A FOUND 5/8" REBAR IN THE SIDE OF S. WEIMER ROAD AND BEINGTHE NORTHWEST MOST BOUNDARY CORNER OF THE PARCEL CONVEYED TO CORNER HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT#2014005699; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, S88°58'32"E 487.50' TO A POINT COMMON TO THE NORTHWEST BOUNDARYCORNER OF THE PARCEL CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014005700; THENCE CONTINUING ALONGTHE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, S88°58'33"E 470.47'; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,TRAVERSING ACROSS THE LAND CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014005699, N01°01'27"E 45.00' TO ASET 5/8" REBAR IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED LEASE AREA AND BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PROPOSED 30' ACCESS AND UTILITYEASEMENT "A"; THENCE N88°58'33"W 98.36'; THENCE WITH THE CHORD OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00', S70°37'42"W 24.40'; THENCE WITH THE CHORDOF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 315.00', S56°01'48"W 126.06' TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7 AND BEING THECOMMON BOUNDARY LINE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED SUDBURY PARCELS; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, N88°58'33"W 78.75';THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TRAVERSING ACROSS THE LAND CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYNSUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014005699, WITH THE CHORD OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 285.00', N63°00'34"E 126.06'; THENCE WITH THECHORD OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 65.00', N70°37'42"E 45.31'; THENCE S88°58'33"E 33.36'; THENCE WITH THE CHORD OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING ARADIUS OF 35.00', N46°01'27"E 49.50'; THENCE N01°01'27"E 15.00'; THENCE S88°58'33"E 30.00' TO A SET 5/8" REBAR IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED LEASEAREA; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE PROPOSED LEASE AREA, S01°01'27"W 80.00' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 8,536.583 SQUARE FEET AS PER SURVEYBY THOMAS J. BOOFTER, LS #S-0133 WITH T.J. BOOFTER, CIVIL ENGINEER AND LAND SURVEYOR, DATED AUGUST 20, 2016.

PROPOSED 30' ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT "B" THE FOLLOWING IS A DESCRIPTION OF THE 30' ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT "B" TO BE GRANTED FROM THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARYCAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014005700, PARCEL ID: 53-08-07-100-001.008-009 WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEING PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, IN THE CIRERO TOWNSHIP, TIPTON COUNTY,INDIANA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW:

BEARING DATUM USED HEREIN IS BASED UPON INDIANA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, EAST ZONE, NAD 83, FROM A REAL TIME KINEMATIC GLOBAL POSITIONINGSYSTEM OBSERVATION USING THE INDOT VRS REAL TIME GPS NETWORK (InCORS) COMPLETED ON AUGUST 20, 2016.

COMMENCING AT A FOUND AT A FOUND 5/8" REBAR IN THE CENTER TOWNSHIP OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 8 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA, SAIDCOMMENCEMENT BEING THE SOUTHWEST BOUNDARY CORNER OF THE PARCEL CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED ININSTRUMENT #2014005699, FOR REFERENCE, SAID COMMENCEMENT POINT IS S01°37'59"E 610.00' FROM A FOUND 5/8" REBAR IN THE SIDE OF S. WEIMER ROAD AND BEINGTHE NORTHWEST MOST BOUNDARY CORNER OF THE PARCEL CONVEYED TO CORNER HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT#2014005699; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, S88°58'32"E 487.50' TO A POINT COMMON TO THE NORTHWEST BOUNDARYCORNER OF THE PARCEL CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014005700 AND IN THE SOUTH BOUNDARYLINE OF THE PARCEL CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014005699 AND BEING THE TRUE POINT OFBEGINNING OF THE PROPOSED 30' ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT "B"; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,S88°58'33"E 45.09'; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TRAVERSING ACROSS THE LAND CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURYAND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014005700, WITH THE CHORD OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 285.00', N86°56'30"E 110.28'TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7 AND BEING THE COMMON BOUNDARY LINE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED SUDBURY PARCELS;THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, S88°58'33"E 78.75'; THENCE LEAVING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OFSECTION 7, TRAVERSING ACROSS THE LAND CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014005700, WITH THECHORD OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 315.00', S79°57'45"W 196.09; THENCE N81°54'11"W 61.91'; THENCE N88°58'33"W 11.76'; THENCE S01°42'58"E457.42'; THENCE S88°17'02"W 20.15' TO THE CENTERLINE OF S. WEIMER ROAD; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF S. WEIMER ROAD, N11°25'31"W 58.41' TO A POINT IN THEWEST BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PARCEL CONVEYED TO HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014005700; THENCE LEAVINGTHE CENTERLINE OF S. WEIMER ROAD, ALONG THE THE WEST BOUNDARY LINE OF SUDBURY, N01°42'58"W 431.32' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 21,412.464SQUARE FEET AS PER SURVEY BY THOMAS J. BOOFTER, LS #S-0133 WITH T.J. BOOFTER, CIVIL ENGINEER AND LAND SURVEYOR, DATED AUGUST 20, 2016.

DOP


DAPMEP9.19.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


SITE NUMBER:





MONROE COUNTY

SOURCE OF TITLE:







HV1094


574.237.0464


WS TAPP ROAD


SITE SURVEY

B-1.4


UNCERTAINTY)





4. RANDOM ERRORS IN MEASUREMENT (THEORETICALUNCERTAINTY): THE THEORETICAL UNCERTAINTY (DUE TORANDOM ERRORS OF MEASUREMENTS) OF THE CORNERS OFTHE SUBJECT TRACT ESTABLISHED THIS SURVEY IS WITHIN THESPECIFICATIONS FOR A CLASS A SURVEY (0.10 FEET) ASDEFINED IN IAC 865.




SCHEDULE B

REPORT OF TITLETHIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY POD GROUP, LLC. AND AS SUCH WE ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INVESTIGATION OR INDEPENDENTSEARCH FOR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, ENCUMBRANCES, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, OWNERSHIP TITLE EVIDENCE, UNRECORDED EASEMENTS, AUGMENTINGEASEMENTS, IMPLIED OR PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENTS, OR ANY OTHER FACTS THAT AN ACCURATE AND CURRENT TITLE SEARCH MAY DISCLOSE. INFORMATIONREGARDING THESE MATTERS WERE GAINED FROM US TITLE SOLUTIONS, FILE NO. 54851-IN1608-5030, REFERENCE NO. HV1094CD, DATED AUGUST 10, 2016, FROM12-28-1968 TO 6-17-2016. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE IN REGARD TO SAID COMMITMENT AND THE NUMBERS IN THE COMMENTS CORRESPOND TO THENUMBERING SYSTEM IN SAID POLICY.

1. TAXES, TAX LIENS, TAX SALES, WATER RATES, SEWER AND ASSESSMENTS SET FORTH IN SCHEDULE HEREIN. (THIS IS NOT A SURVEY MATTER, THEREFORE, POWER OFDESIGN GROUP, LLC DID NOT EXAMINE OR ADDRESS THIS ITEM.)

2. MORTGAGES RETURNED HEREIN. (-1-). SEE SEPARATE MORTGAGE SCHEDULE. (NONE WITHIN PERIOD SEARCHED.)

3. ANY STATE OF FACTS WHICH AN ACCURATE SURVEY MIGHT SHOW OR SURVEY EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH HEREIN. (POWER OF DESIGN GROUP, LLC DID NOT PERFORMA BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PARENT PARCEL, THEREFORE POWER OF DESIGN GROUP, LLC DID NOT EXAMINE OR ADDRESS THIS ITEM.)

4. RIGHTS OF TENANTS OR PERSON IN POSSESSION. (POWER OF DESIGN GROUP, LLC DID NOT EXAMINE OR ADDRESS THIS ITEM.)

(JUDGMENTS, LIENS AND UCC)

5. NONE WITHIN PERIOD SEARCHED

(COVENANTS/RESTRICTIONS)

6. NONE WITHIN PERIOD SEARCHED

(EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY)

7. AGREEMENT BY ROBERT C. SUDBURY AND CORA SUDBURY, HUSBAND AND WIFE TO CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, DATED 11/30/1964 RECORDED 3/2/1984 IN BOOK 147PAGE 133 IN INSTRUMENT NO :156145. (EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 147, PAGE 133 AFFECTS THE PARENT PARCEL, BUT DOES NOT AFFECT THE PROPOSEDLEASE AREA OR THE PROPOSED ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENTS "A" AND "B" AND AS SHOWN HEREON.)

8. JOINT UTILITY EASEMENT BY HARVEY CRAIN SUDBURY AND MARY CAROLYN SUDBURY TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF INDIANA, DATED 2/7/1992 RECORDED3/13/1992 IN BOOK 398 PAGE 28 IN INSTRUMENT NO :203926. (JOINT UTILITY EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 398, PAGE 28 IS APPLICABLE TO AND AFFECTSTHE PARENT PARCEL, THE PROPOSED ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT "B", BUT DOES NOT AFFECT THE PROPOSED LEASE AREA AND THE PROPOSED ACCESS ANDUTILITY EASEMENT "A" AND IS SHOWN HEREON.)

9. SANITARY SEWER LINE EASEMENT BY CORA SUDBURY TO CITY OF BLOOMINGTON UTILITIES, DATED 6/16/1994 RECORDED 7/5/1994 IN BOOK 424 PAGE 322 ININSTRUMENT NO :410886. (SANITARY SEWER AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 424, PAGE 322 IS NOT APPLICABLE TO THE PARENT PARCEL AND DOES NOT AFFECT THEPROPOSED LEASE AREA AND THE PROPOSED ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS "A" AND "B".)

(OTHER FILED DOCUMENTS)

10. BOUNDARY SURVEY RECORDED 4/21/2014 IN INSTRUMENT NO. 2014004467. (BOUNDARY SURVEY AS RECORDED IN INSTRUMENT #2014004467 IS APPLICABLE TOTHE PARENT PARCEL. THE PROPOSED LEASE AREA AND THE PROPOSED ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT "A" LIE WITHIN THE "NORTH REMAINDER" AND THEPROPOSED ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT "B" LIES WITHIN THE "SOUTH REMAINDER" AS SHOWN ON SAID BOUNDARY SURVEY.)

LEGAL DESCRIPTION, INSTRUMENT #201400570 (NOT FIELD SURVEYED)A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 8 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT A 5/8 INCH REBAR AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINEOF SAID QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 487.50 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "BRG INC 6892", HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS A REBAR WITHBRG CAP, AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO PUBLIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION BY DEED BOOK 327, PAGE 440 IN THE OFFICE OF THERECORDER OF MONROE COUNTY, INDIANA AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 44 SECONDSEAST 792.74 FEET TO A REBAR WITH BRG CAP; THENCE SOUTH 40 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST 24.02 FEET TO A REBAR WITH BRG CAP; THENCE SOUTH27 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST 132.19 FEET TO A REBAR WITH BRG CAP ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO PHILIP AND BARBARA TAPP BYINSTRUMENT NUMBER 2011001304 IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF MONROE COUNTY. INDIANA; THENCE NORTH 82 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST 157.60FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH TAPP CAP AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TAPP PROPERTY: THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 22 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST ALONG THEWEST LINE OF SAID TAPP A DISTANCE OF 360.63 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH TAPP CAP; THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WESTLINE OF SAID TAPP, PASSING A 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH TAPP CAP AT 549.46 FEET, A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 549.78 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF WOOLERY PLANNEDCOMMUNITY, PHASE IX, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2012008140, PLAT CABINET D. PAGE 115 IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OFMONROE COUNTY, INDIANA; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 433.82 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAIDPUBLIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREE 42 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 1010.58 FEET TO THE POINT OFBEGINNING, CONTAINING 13.04 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.


PODMEP9.22.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


DOP


PRELIMINARYNOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION

SITE INFORMATION:





HV1094

WS TAPP ROAD

ZONINGDRAWINGS




REVISIONLOG

R-1

REVISION LOG

REV * MM/DD/YY SHEET NUMBER & NAME DESCRIPTION OF REVISION

A 9/30/2016 ALL SHEETS ISSUED FOR REVIEW

B 10/4/2016 C-1A REVISED DIMENSIONS PER OLC


PODMEP9.22.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


DOP


PRELIMINARYNOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION

SITE INFORMATION:





HV1094

WS TAPP ROAD

ZONINGDRAWINGS




TOWERELEVATION

TE-1

NOTE:

1. IT IS THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY ALLANTENNA INFORMATION AGAINST FINAL RADIO ENGINEERING PLANPROVIDED BY GTE MOBILNET OF INDIANA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/b/aVERIZON WIRELESS (VZW GC)

TOWER ELEVATIONSCALE: N.T.S.

VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS190'-0" ℄

T/FINISHED GRADE

TOP OF TOWER195'-0"

199'-0" TOP OF APPURTENANCETOTAL TOWER HEIGHT

FUTURE ANTENNAS175'-0" ℄

195' MONOPOLEw/4' LIGHTNING ARRESTOR

-TOTAL TOWER HEIGHT 199'

VERIZON WIRELESS PREFABRICATEDRADIO EQUIPMENT CANOPY (VZW GC)

8'-0" TALL WOODEN FENCE

4' LIGHTNING ARRESTOR

VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNASMOUNTED AT 190' AGL

1TE-1



NEW 12'-0" GRAVEL ACCESS DRIVE- NEW DRIVE @ ±870 LF

195' MONOPOLE w/4'LIGHTNING ARRESTOR-TOTAL TOWER HEIGHT 199'

VERIZON WIRELESS 11'-6"x14'-9" RADIOEQUIPMENT CANOPY (VZW GC)

100'-0"x100'-0" HORVATHCOMUNICATIONS LEASE AREA- SEE SURVEY FOR DESCRIPTION

ACCESS/UTILITY EASEMENT- SEE SURVEY FOR LOCATION


PODMEP9.22.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


DOP


PRELIMINARYNOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION

SITE INFORMATION:





HV1094

WS TAPP ROAD

ZONINGDRAWINGS




OVERALL SITE PLANw/AERIAL OVERLAY

C-1SCALE: N.T.S.OVERALL SITE PLAN w/AERIAL OVERLAY NNOTICE TO CONTRACTOR

PER INDIANA STATE LAW IC-8-1-26-18, IT ISAGAINST THE LAW TO EXCAVATE WITHOUT


VERIZON WIRELESS 11'-6"x19'-6"CONCRETE RADIO EQUIPMENT PAD

S. WEIMER ROAD(PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY - WIDTH UNKNOWN)

EX. CREEK

EX. BRIDGE(TO BE REPLACED)

EX. UTILITY EASEMENT- SEE SURVEY FOR LOCATION



INST. #2014005699

PARC

EL ID

: 53-

08-0

7-30

0-00

6.00

0-00

9PU

BLIC

INVE

STM

ENT

CORP

ORA

TIO

NBO

OK

327,

PG

. 440 PARCEL ID: 53-08-07-100-001.008-009


INST. #2014005700


INST. #2016010797

EX. SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT- SEE SURVEY FOR LOCATION

EX. TREE MASS

EX. WELL







PODMEP9.22.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


DOP


PRELIMINARYNOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION

SITE INFORMATION:





HV1094

WS TAPP ROAD

ZONINGDRAWINGS




OVERALL SITE PLANw/DISTANCE TOPROPERTY LINES

C-1ASCALE: 1" = 80'OVERALL SITE PLAN w/DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINES NNOTICE TO CONTRACTOR

PER INDIANA STATE LAW IC-8-1-26-18, IT ISAGAINST THE LAW TO EXCAVATE WITHOUT



LEGENDUTILITY POLE SANITARY MANHOLEGUY ANCHOR

PROPOSED LEASE LINEPROPOSED EASEMENTPROPOSED GRAVELPROPOSED FENCEEXISTING GRAVELEXISTING FENCEEXISTING LEASE AREAEXISTING EASEMENTEXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICEXISTING PAVEMENTPROPERTY LINE

0'

1"=

80'

80'

160'


EX. CREEK





INST. #2014005699

PARC

EL ID

: 53-

08-0

7-30

0-00

6.00

0-00

9PU

BLIC

INVE

STM

ENT

CORP

ORA

TIO

NBO

OK

327,

PG

. 440 PARCEL ID: 53-08-07-100-001.008-009


INST. #2014005700


INST. #2016010797


EX. TREE MASS

EX. WELL

±215'

±251' TO ⅊ BEYOND

±694' TO

⅊ BE

YON

D

±1,008' TO ⅊ BEYOND







PODMEP9.22.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


DOP


PRELIMINARYNOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION

SITE INFORMATION:





HV1094

WS TAPP ROAD

ZONINGDRAWINGS




DISTANCE TORESIDENTIALSTRUCTURES

C-1BSCALE: 1" = 80'

DISTANCE TO RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES NNOTICE TO CONTRACTORPER INDIANA STATE LAW IC-8-1-26-18, IT ISAGAINST THE LAW TO EXCAVATE WITHOUT



LEGENDUTILITY POLE SANITARY MANHOLEGUY ANCHOR

PROPOSED LEASE LINEPROPOSED EASEMENTPROPOSED GRAVELPROPOSED FENCEEXISTING GRAVELEXISTING FENCEEXISTING LEASE AREAEXISTING EASEMENTEXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICEXISTING PAVEMENTPROPERTY LINE

0'

1"=

80'

80'

160'


EX. CREEK





INST. #2014005699

PARC

EL ID

: 53-

08-0

7-30

0-00

6.00

0-00

9PU

BLIC

INVE

STM

ENT

CORP

ORA

TIO

NBO

OK

327,

PG

. 440 PARCEL ID: 53-08-07-100-001.008-009


INST. #2014005700


INST. #2016010797


EX. TREE MASS

EX. WELL

±879' TOWER ℄ TO RESIDENTIAL HOME

SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"

DETAILED SITE PLAN*NOTE:GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO ENSURETHERE IS NO DISTURBANCE OF PROPERTY,SOIL, ETC. OUTSIDE OF THE STAKED LEASEAREA WITHOUT APPROVAL FROMVERIZON WIRELESS CONSTRUCTIONMANAGER

TE-11


PODMEP9.22.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


DOP


PRELIMINARYNOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION

SITE INFORMATION:





HV1094

WS TAPP ROAD

ZONINGDRAWINGS




DETAILEDSITE

PLAN

C-3


GATE KEEPER(TYP OF 2)

14'-0" WIDEACCESS GATE

POWER & TELCO METERBOARD STRUCTURE- INSTALLED BY G.C.

VERIZON WIRELESS 11'-6"x14'-9"RADIO EQUIPMENT CANOPY

(CANOPY DWGS. SUPPLIEDBY MANUFACTURER) (VZW GC)

GRAVELCOMPOUND

ICE BRIDGE &FOUNDATIONS

8'-0" TALL WOODEN FENCE- @ 280 L.F.

FUTURE

FUTURE

FUTURE

NNOTICE TO CONTRACTORPER INDIANA STATE LAW IC-8-1-26-18, IT ISAGAINST THE LAW TO EXCAVATE WITHOUT


VERIZON WIRELESS STANDBY GENERATORON CONCRETE PAD (VZW GC)

195' MONOPOLE w/4'LIGHTNING ARRESTOR

-TOTAL TOWER HEIGHT 199'

LEGENDPROPOSED LEASE LINEPROPOSED EASEMENTPROPOSED GRAVELPROPOSED FENCE

0'

1"=

10'

10'

10'


TE-11

EX. TREE MASS

SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"

DIMENSIONED SITE PLAN*NOTE:GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO ENSURETHERE IS NO DISTURBANCE OF PROPERTY,SOIL, ETC. OUTSIDE OF THE STAKED LEASEAREA WITHOUT APPROVAL FROMVERIZON WIRELESS CONSTRUCTIONMANAGER


PODMEP9.22.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


DOP


PRELIMINARYNOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION

SITE INFORMATION:





HV1094

WS TAPP ROAD

ZONINGDRAWINGS




DIMENSIONEDSITE PLAN

C-4

FUTURE

FUTURE

FUTURE

NNOTICE TO CONTRACTORPER INDIANA STATE LAW IC-8-1-26-18, IT ISAGAINST THE LAW TO EXCAVATE WITHOUT


LEGENDPROPOSED LEASE LINEPROPOSED EASEMENTPROPOSED GRAVELPROPOSED FENCE

0'

1"=

10'

10'

10'

100'-0" HORVATH COMMUNICATIONS LEASE AREA

70'-0" LIMITS OF FENCE15'-0"

15'-0"

80'-0

" HO

RVAT

H CO

MM

UN

ICAT

ION

S LE

ASE

AREA

70'-0

" LIM

ITS

OF

FEN

CE5'

-0"

5'-0

"

28'-0

"14

'-0"

28'-0

"

35'-0

" TO

WER

CEN

TER/

LEAS

E 35'-0" TOWER CENTER/LEASE

15'-6

"

5'-0

"

5'-0

"

25'-0"

19'-0"6'-0"

6'-0

"

25'-6"

25'-6"

19'-6" LIMITS OF CONCRETE PAD

11'-6

" LIM

ITS

OF

CON

CRET

E PA

D

20' RADIUS

20'-0" TURNAROUND 4'-0"


PODMEP9.22.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


DOP


PRELIMINARYNOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION

SITE INFORMATION:





HV1094

WS TAPP ROAD

ZONINGDRAWINGS




PLATFORMELEVATIONS

(REFERENCE ONLY)

D-3

REAR ELEVATIONSCALE: 1" = 5'-0"

END ELEVATIONSCALE: 1" = 5'-0"

0'

1"=

5'

5'

10'

COMPOUND GRADE

VZWFUTURE

GROWTHCABINET

VZWFUTURECABINET

VZW 20kW DIESELGENERATOR (VZW GC)

ROOF PANEL CLOSURE STRIP (VZW GC)-INSTALL BETWEEN ROOF PANELS ANDHORIZONTAL FRAMING MEMBERS (TYP.)

VZW AUTOMATIC TRANSFERSWITCH -BEYOND (VZW GC)CONCRETE

EQUIPMENT PAD

CANOPY ROOFSTRUCTURE

(VZW GC)

METAL ROOF(VZW GC)

VZW EQUIPMENTCABINET (VZW GC)

ICE BRIDGE &FOUNDATIONS

(TYP.) (VZW GC) ELECTRIC POWER CONDUITOVERHEAD (VZW GC)

METAL ROOF(VZW GC)

CANOPY ROOFSTRUCTURE(VZW GC)VZW

AUTOMATICTRANSFER

SWITCH-BEYOND(VZW GC)

VZW EQUIPMENTCABINET (VZW GC)

CONCRETEEQUIPMENT PAD

6"8'

-1"

CON

CRET

E TO

CAN

OPY

FRA

MIN

G

14'-9" LIMITS OF CANOPY

11'-6" LIMITS OF CANOPY

±9'-5" COMPOUND GRADE TO

HIGH

PO

INT

OF

CAN

OPY

6"8'

-1"

CON

CRET

E TO

CAN

OPY

FRA

MIN

G

±9'-2" COMPOUND GRADE TO

LOW

PO

INT

OF

CAN

OPY

NOTE:

CANOPY ROOF PANELS PROFILE R/PBR. PROVIDE 1.7lbDENSITY POLYETHYLENE FOAM PANEL CLOSURE STRIPS TOMATCH PROFILE. AS MANUFACTURED BY: SEALTITE BUILDINGFASTENERS "ST CLOSURE" STRIPS OR EQUAL (VERIFY PROFILEWITH ROOF PANELS SUPPLIED WITH CANOPY)

NOTE:ICE BRIDGE & FOUNDATIONS NOT

SHOWN FOR CLARITY

NOTE:GENERATOR NOT

SHOWN FOR CLARITY


PODMEP9.22.16

SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:


DOP


PRELIMINARYNOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION

SITE INFORMATION:





HV1094

WS TAPP ROAD

ZONINGDRAWINGS




PRELIMINARYBRIDGE DESIGN

D-5

PRELIMINARY BRIDGE DESIGNSCALE: 1" = 5'-0"

0'

1"=

5'

5'

10'





FCC Form 620

Attachment 5. Area of Potential Effects You are required to provide two attachments regarding the Determination of Effect: Areas of Potential Effect and Mitigation of Effect (if applicable). Areas of Potential Effect Guidelines: a. Describe the APE for direct effects and explain how this APE was determined.

The APE for direct effects is limited to the area of potential ground disturbance and any property, or any portion thereof, that will be physically altered or destroyed by the Undertaking. On November 24, 2008, the FCC further clarified that the APE-Direct Effects is limited to the proposed lease area including the access route and utility corridor. EBI Consulting completed a field survey on October 10, 2016 and determined that the APE for direct effects is limited to the 80-foot by 100-foot telecommunication tower lease area and access/utility easement.

b. Describe the APE for visual effects and explain how this APE was determined.

The APE for visual effects is the geographic area in which the Undertaking has the potential to introduce visual elements that diminish or alter the setting, including the landscape, where the setting is a character-defining feature of a historic property that makes it eligible for listing on the National Register. The presumed APE for visual effects for construction of new facilities is the area from which the tower will be visible: a. Within a half mile from the tower site if the proposed Tower is 200 feet or less in overall height; b. Within ¾ of a mile from the tower site if the proposed Tower is more than 200 but no more than 400 feet in overall height; or c. Within 1 ½ miles from the proposed tower site if the proposed Tower is more than 400 feet in overall height. Due to the height of the proposed tower, the presumed APE for visual effects for this project is a half-mile radius from the tower site.

Mitigation of Effect Guidelines: In the case where an Adverse Visual Effect or Adverse Direct Effect has been determined you must provide the following: a. Copies of any correspondence and summaries of any oral communications with the

SHPO/THPO and any consulting parties. As of the date of this report, there has been no correspondence with the SHPO/THPO. b. Describe any alternatives that have been considered that might avoid, minimize, or

mitigate any adverse effects. Explain the Applicant’s conclusion regarding the feasibility of each alternative.

No adverse effects are expected as a result of the proposed facility; therefore, alternatives that might avoid, minimize, or mitigate any adverse effects need not be considered.

For each property identified as a Historic Property in the online e-106 form: Indicate whether the Applicant believes the proposed undertaking would have a) no

effect; b) no adverse effect; or, c) an adverse effect. Explain how each such assessment was made. Provide supporting documentation where necessary.





FCC Form 620

Please see the table below for an evaluation of the proposed project’s effects on identified historic properties.

NRHP/ Inventory Number

Historic Property Name

Effect Determination Explanation of Effect Determination

EBI Photo No.

105-005-55001

Woolery Stone Company

No Adverse Effect

This resource is located within the APE-VE, approximately 1,200 feet south of the Project Site. The Project Site may be minimally visible from this resource; however, the view towards the tower is mitigated by distance and intervening vegetation. In addition, property has modern development to the east and south. Therefore the proposed project will not impact any of the characteristics that make this structure eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and will have No Adverse Effect.

14-16





FCC Form 620

Attachment 6. Tribal and NHO Involvement At an early stage in the planning process, the Nationwide Agreement requires the Applicant to gather information from appropriate Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (“NHOs”) to assist in the identification of Historic Properties of religious and cultural significance to them. Describe measures taken to identify Indian tribes and NHOs that may attach religious and cultural significance to Historic Properties that may be affected by the collocation within the Areas of Potential Effects (“APE”) for direct and visual effects. If such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, list them and provide a summary of contacts by either the FCC, the Applicant, or the Applicant’s representative. Provide copies of relevant documents, including correspondence. If no such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, please explain. EBI Consulting filed the proposed undertaking on the FCC’s Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The attached FCC Notification email lists the Tribes identified through the TCNS process. Follow up correspondence, when necessary, will be completed via the methods listed on the attached email considered acceptable to each Tribe.

1

Janet Roeser

From: [email protected]: Friday, September 30, 2016 12:02 AMTo: Janet RoeserCc: [email protected]; [email protected]: NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER

CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #4730237

Dear Sir or Madam:

Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS).

The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the

information you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was

forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter).

Persons who have received the information that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally-recognized

American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribal Nations"), Native Hawaiian Organizations

(NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribal

Nations and NHOs and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal Nation

and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribal Nations may

have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current

Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for

Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission

(NPA), all Tribal Nations and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this

notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion

designated by the Tribal Nation or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4).

The information you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal Nations and NHOs. If a Tribal Nation or NHO does

not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribal

Nation or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.F.5). In the event a Tribal Nation or NHO does not

respond to a follow-up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal Nation or

NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the

FCC's Declaratory Ruling released on October 6, 2005 (FCC 05-176).

1. THPO Erich Longie Dr - Spirit Lake Nation - (PO Box: 198) Fort Totten, ND - [email protected];

[email protected] - 701-766-4032

Details: Spirit Lake Nation

Contact Us: Compliance Officer Susie Fox, 701-766-4031, email [email protected]

Submit Proposed Projects to: cms.spiritlakeconsulting.com

Summary of Information Required: We require the complete results of the file search ofthe area of potential effect.

Nearly every single Native cultural resource that is identified by archaeologists is recorded as unevaluated and needing

2

further evaluation. We require you to send ALL KNOWN sites identified in the complete file search - even the

unevaluated, undetermined, and recommended ineligible sites.

Complete Class I Cultural Inventory if fieldwork was not done. Complete Class III Cultural Resource Inventory Report if it

was done. This should include a list of all identified sites, their resource type, distance away from the project, National

Register eligibility determination if one has been made, SHPO file number, and site name. We require the same

information of all newly recorded cultural resources identified for the current undertaking as well.

We require the location of the proposed project, the area of direct effect and area of potential effect, topographical

maps, and photographs.

Current Fee Schedule: $400 per tower and PTC batches are $400 for the first tower and $250 per additional towers in

the batch

Checks: payable to the Spirit Lake THPO Office and mailed to PO Box 198, Fort Totten, North Dakota 58335

2. THPO & Tribal Anthropologist Dianne Desrosiers - Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation

- (PO Box: 907) Sisseton, SD - [email protected]; [email protected] - 605-698-3584

Details: The Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate required method of consultation is digitally through our website.

http://sisseton.heritageconsultation.com

All projects must be processed through our website. We do not accept paper or emailed submissions.

Our tribe requires the Cultural Resource or Archaeological Survey Reports completed for the project, such as the Class III

Cultural Resource Inventory Report if done, or at least a Class I Cultural Inventory if fieldwork was not required. This

report should include ALL identified sites within the designated area of potential effect. This includes NOT ONLY the

listed and eligible sites; we want the unevaluated, undetermined, and recommended not eligible sites as well.

This report should include the previously located cultural resource designation, distance from the project, and National

Register eligibility determination, if a determination has been made. No determination is fine if the site has not been

evaluated, but we still want to see the information on these sites. Please include the resource type, such as historic

irrigation, homestead, lithic scatter, burial mound, etc.

The Tribe charges a review fee in the amount of $400 for processingeach request, including colocations, since we were

not at the table to begin with on these colocation projects, we want to make sure we have the opportunity to look at

these now and get that history known.

This paragraph only applies to Positive TrainControl Projects submitting multiple PTC towers using the FCC batching

method. The Tribe charges $400 for the first nonexcluded PTC tower in the batch, plus $250 for each additional

nonexcluded tower listed under one TCNS number.

3

Payments can be made by check or money order, made payable to the Sisseton Wahpeton OyateTHPO Office and mailed

to PO Box 907, Sisseton, South Dakota 57262. Please include the TCNS in the memo line of your check so that your

payment is applied to the correct project.

If you have any questions or need more information, our current compliance officer is Alicia Cloud. She can answer

project specific questions and track project payments.Her office phone number is 605 698 8306 and her email is

[email protected]

3. THPO-Director Garrie Kills a Hundred - Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe - 603 W. Broad Avenue (PO Box: 283)

Flandreau, SD - [email protected]; [email protected] - 605-997-3891 (ext: 1240)

4. THPO Thomas Parker - Omaha Tribe of Nebraska - 100 Main Street (PO Box: 368) Macy, NE -


Details: If the Applicant receives no response from the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska within 30 days after notification

through TCNS, the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska has no objection to project, however, the Omaha Tribe will show no

interest in participating in pre-construction review for the site. The Applicant, however, must notify the Omaha Tribe of

Nebraska in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with

Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement andapplicable law.

5. Tribal Historical Cultural Preservation Officer Thomas Wabnum - Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation -

Government Center 16281 Q Road Mayetta, KS - [email protected] - 785-966-4016

If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation within 30 days

after notification through TCNS, the Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation has no interest in participating in pre-construction

review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder,

however, must immediately notify the Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation in the event archaeological properties

or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic

Agreement and applicable law.

6. TCNS Administrator kenny wheeler - Kaw Nation - 3547 springwood Apartment 308 Ponca City, OK -

[email protected]; [email protected] - 405-443-7531

Details: The Kaw Nation wishes to continue exercising its sovereignty concerning identification and protection of Tribal

Cultural Sites, Sacred Sites, and Traditional Cultural Properties by fully participating in the FCC's Tower Control

Notification System and Section 106/pre-construction review for new and existing towers. The Kaw Nation requests that

consultants forward the complete FCC Form 620 along with a $500.00 fee made payable to the Kaw Nation for research

4

and review of each project identified through the Tower Control Notification System. After research and review, the Kaw

Nation will submit a letter of concurrence/non-concurrence and acknowledgment of receipt of fees. Point of contact for

all TCNS correspondence is Kenny Wheeler, TCNS Administrator, 3547 Springwood Suite 308, Ponca City, 74604.

Additionally Mr. Wheeler may be contacted at [email protected] (405) 443-7531.

7. Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Elsie Whitehorn - Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians - 8151 Highway 177 Red

Rock, OK - [email protected]; [email protected] - 580-723-4434 (ext: 202)

Details: The Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Indians requests that the complete FCC Form 620 including the cultural resources

survey be submitted along with the $500.00 research fee for every TCNS notification within the Otoe-Missouria areas of

interests and $650.00 research fee for PTC notices. The Otoe-Missouria Tribe will then conduct research and complete

the Section 106 Review process and submit a letter of concurrence or non-concurrence for each proposed TCNS action.

Mail or email requested information and fee toThe Otoe-Missouria Tribe THPO Elsie Whitehorn 8151 HWY 177 Red

Rock, OK 74651, Additionally, the THPO can be contacted at 580-723-4466 ext 202 [email protected].

We do prefer documents be sent electronically if at all possible. Thank you.

8. Chairman Earl Howe III - Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma - 20 White Eagle Drive Ponca City, OK -


Details: Mrs. Halona Clawson, THPO for Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma, is the point of contact for all TCNS notifications and

correspondence. The mailing address is 20 White Eagle Drive, Ponca City, OK 74601 and the email address is

[email protected]. The Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma will participate in pre-construction review and government

to government consultation regarding all proposed communication facilities that have a potential for affect on historical

properties (undertaking) as defined in Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act as amended. The Ponca

Tribe of Oklahoma requires that each applicant submit a copy of the FCC form 620 application preferably electronically

as a component of Tribal pre-construction review. After review, the PoncaTribe of Oklahoma will submit to the

applicant a letter of concurrence, non concurrence or request for additional information. The Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma

will charge a fee of $500.00 for completing this component of Section 106- Pre-Construction Reviewas described in the

FCC Best Practices Agreement and $650.00 review fee for PTC notices. The Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma will respond to all

proposed communications facilities applications in the manner stipulated by the Best Practices Agreement.

We do prefer documents be sent electronically if at all possible. Thank you.

5

9. THPO Specialist Ashley Brokeshoulder - Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma - 2025 S. Gordon

Cooper Drive Shawnee, OK - [email protected]; [email protected] - 405-275-4030

Details: Details - THIS IS YOUR OFFICIAL NOTICE THAT THE ABSENTEE SHAWNEE TRIBE of Indians of Oklahoma THPO IS

INTERESTED IN CONSULTING ON ALL PROJECTS IN OUR AREA OF GEOGRAPHIC INTEREST.

Information required in order to complete the Review Process are as follows:

Tower Site Information

SHPO Response Letter

Cultural Resource Report or Archaeological Survey Report

Site Aerial Photographs

Photographs in the Contour Directions

Topographic or Quadrangle Maps

Site Plans or Construction Drawings

The Complete FCC Form 620 or 621

NOTE: Our review period/time WILL NOT BEGIN until ALL information is received by the Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of

Indians of Oklahoma THPO office.

ATTENTION: As of October 1, 2013, the Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma THPO will charge a fee of $500

per tower project. Fees in the process cover the research, data processing, handling and other activities required to

provide you with a timely manner for projects.

Please submit your payment of $500 in the form of a check and on the memo line write all TCNS/PTC numbers. Send all

correspondence for the Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma to:

Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma

ATTN: Cultural Preservation Department

2025 S. Gordon Cooper Drive

Shawnee, OK 74801

10. THPO Gary Loonsfoot Jr - Keweenaw Bay Indian Community - 16429 Beartown Road . Baraga, MI -


Details: The KBIC THPO reviews all projects within historic homelands for the presence of cultural resources with

significance to the Anishinaabe. Your request will go through a preliminary review by our THPO/NAGPRA Technician, the

review consists of relevant studies submitted by the applicant regarding cultural resources documentation, in house

literature search, database search and GIS search for further information. If any cultural resources are identified during

this process, the file will be turned over to the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer in order to make a determination of

effects.

Information required in order to complete this process are as follows:

Project Name

Project Location

6

Physical Address

Latitude and Longitude

State, County,Township, Range, Section quarters

Brief Project Description

Existing studies for archaeological sites, and cultural resources.

As of June 11, 2014 the KBIC THPO will be charging a fee of $500.00 per review/collocation unless the review covers

more than one section of land in which case the fee is $500.00 per section. Fees in this process cover the research and

other activities required to provide you with a timely response so your project can stay on track. Please submit payment

of $500.00 for each project application submitted, checks should be made payable to KBIC THPO, 16429 Beartown Road,

Baraga, Michigan 49908. Any questions can be directed to: Gary Loonsfoot Jr via email [email protected], or by

phone: 906-353-6623 ext. 4108. (Please note thatMinogheezhig Sandman-Shelifoe is no longer a contact within the

KBIC-THPO office)

11. THPO Jason S Wesaw - Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians - 58620 Sink Road (PO Box: 180) Dowagiac, MI -


If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians within 30

days after notification through TCNS, the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians has no interest in participating in pre-

construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder,

however, must immediately notify the Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians in the event archaeological

properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide

Programmatic Agreement and applicable law.

12. Tribal Archaeologist/THPO Kade M Ferris MS - Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians of Minnesota - (PO Box:

274) Red Lake, MN - [email protected] - 218-679-1691

Details: -Red Lake Requires TCNS number for all correspondence. As of 6/20/2014, all requests are subject to a cultural

resources review fee. The cost per review is $300 payable to the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Archaeology Department.

Please send a copy of all pertinent maps, archaeological reports, correspondence from SHPO, or other information that

will assist the Red Lake Band in completing your request in a timely manner. Email correspondence is preferred.

For more information, please contact Mr. Kade Ferris at (218) 679-1691, or by email at [email protected].

Mail can be sent to Kade Ferris, THPO/Tribal Archaeologist, PO Box 274, Red Lake, MN 56671

If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians of Minnesota

within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians of Minnesota has no interest in

participating in pre-construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder,

however, must immediately notify the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians of Minnesota in the event

archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the

Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law.

7

13. THPO and NAGPRA Representative Giiwegiizhigookway Martin Ms - Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior

Chippewa Indians - E23857 Poplar Circle (PO Box: 249) Watersmeet, MI - [email protected] - 906-358-0137

Details: Effective January 2016

ELECTRONIC TRANSER OF MATERIALS - The Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa (Getegitigaaning Ojibwe

Nation) will go paperless.

To enable us to participate fully, Lac Vieux Desert (Getegitigaaning Ojibwe Nation) fee for such services is $500. The fee

must be submitted so that the research can be done. This will be the only item received in our office via regular USPS

mail or other appropriate carriers.

At that time we will review and make our determinations with the appropriate information that we have on file with our

Tribe pertaining to this area and an email response will go to the designated person at that agency.

All Collocation Projects will be handled in the same manner as new projects UNLESS the Getegitigaaning Ojibwe Nation

commented on the original project.

The following information shall be emailed for each project to [email protected] . The information must contain

summary of the proposed ground disturbing activity, legal description of the Area of Potential Effects, (APE), Topo maps

identifying the proposed area, and copies of any studies that have already been conducted regarding cultural resources

and archaeology in their full format, including reports on archaeological andcultural sites identified to the email address

below. All responses and tower project closures will be emailed back to the appropriate contact person for your agency.

Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 906-358-0137.

Miigwetch,

giiwegiizhigookway Martin,THPO

Fee can be sent along with the requested information to:

Make Check Payable to:

Getegitigaaning Ojibwe Nation THPO

P.O. 249

Watersmeet, Michigan 49969

Office: 906-358-0137

Fax: 906-358-4850Email: [email protected]

14. THPO Michael LaRonge - Forest County Potawatomi Community - 5320 Wensaut Ln. (PO Box: 340) Crandon,

WI - [email protected] - 715-478-7354

8

15. Tribal Historic Preservation Officer William Quackenbush - Ho-Chunk Nation - (PO Box: 667) Black River Falls,

WI - [email protected] - 715-284-7181 (ext: 1121)

Details: As of April 4, 2016, to enable us to participate fully in the TCNS program, the Ho-Chunk Nation does now require

a fee for service charge to conduct research and archeological records review for the amount of $500, payable by check,

made out to: HCN Cultural Resources Division

Mailing address of:

HCN Cultural Resources Division

P.O. Box 667

Black River Falls, WI 54615

The fee must be submitted to us via mail. Once we receive your correspondence and payment, we will begin our process

of conducting the research necessary for Section 106 compliance on our part.

All Co-location Projects will be handled in the same manner as individual new projects.

Please note, the following items need to be received by us, before our 30 day review process begins:

. Payment check - by Mail

. Archaeological Survey Report (via email)

. SHPO/THPO concurrence letter (via email)

. Map with description of location (via email)

Please send all email correspondences to both [email protected] and [email protected].

Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 715-284-7181 or [email protected]

Thank you for your time and consideration with this matter.

16. THPO Larry Balber - Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin - 88385 Pike Road, HWY

13 Bayfield, WI - [email protected] - 715-779-3700

Details: THPO & NAGPRA representative Larry Balber- Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians-Bayfield WI

Details: Effective August 16, 2015, the Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians has established a cultural

resource review fee of $400 per consultation.

Please provide the following information and reference the TCNS # in the subject line:

-Summary of the proposed undertaking;

-Legal description of the Area of Potential Effects;

-Topo Maps identifying the proposed area, and

-Copies of any studies that have already been conducted regarding cultural resources and archaeology in their full

format, including reports on archaeological and cultural sites identified.

9

Please submit Hard Copies of requested information, including feepayment to the following address-

Red Cliff THPO, 88385 Pike Road, Bayfield WI 54814

At that time we will review and make our determinations with the information we have on file with our Tribe pertaining

to this area.

17. THPO Sheila M Bird - Cherokee Nation - (PO Box: 948) Tahlequah, OK - [email protected];


Details: In an effort to expedite the TCNS process, on March 23, 2016, the Cherokee Nation has updated their FCC

Telecommunication Procedures.

If you have not received a copy of the updated TP's please contact the TCNS Coordinator at

[email protected]

Wado,

Sheila Bird, THPO

18. TCNS Coordinator Travis Patton - Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma - 70500 East 128 Road Wyandotte, OK

- [email protected] - 918-666-2435 (ext: 1860)

Details: The Cultural Preservation Office of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma requires the following information

and fees regarding all proposed FCC projects.

Please do not email documentation; it will be deleted without being opened. Mail one printed color copy of all

documentation to:

70500 E 128 Rd.

Wyandotte, OK 74370

Please submit by US postal mail or other parcel carrier all of the following information for all FCC projects:

1. A 1-page cover letter with the following information:

a) TCNS number

b) Company name

c) Project name, city, county, state

d) Project type

e) UTM coordinates using WGS84 (G1150)

f) Total area surveyed in acres

g) Contact information.

10

2. Professional cultural/archaeological resource survey report.

3. Aerial and color USGS topographic maps locating project area within the state, county, and local area.

4. Aerial, color USGS topographic, or planimetric maps locating tower site, APE, access road, utility easement,guy wire

locations surveyed, surveyed staging areas, and known archaeological/historic sites.

5. Project site plan map depicting labeled shovel test locations.

6. Shovel test log.

7. Site photographs.

8. A copy of the review letter or TCNS e-response from the State Historic Preservation

Office and all other state-mandated review offices for projects involving ground disturbance.

9. Please submit a fee of $550.00 per/TCNS project, for administration, data processing, handling, research and review.

Make the check payable to the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. On the memo line write all TCNS numbers. This

includes new build towers, collocations, PTC poles, and projects in previously disturbed locations.

10.The Eastern Shawnee procedure document is available by email and is highly recommended for guidance. Send an

email to Travis Patton at: [email protected].

19. THPO Diane Hunter - Miami Tribe of Oklahoma - (PO Box: 1326) Miami, OK - [email protected];


Details: The Miami Tribe of Oklahoma has instituted new NHPA, Section 106, consultation procedures for cell towers

effective 9-15-2010. For an updated copy of these procedures (10-31-11), which you will need to follow to complete

Section 106 consultation with us, please contact the THPO Assistant at [email protected]. Thank you.

20. EPA Cheryl Stafford - Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma - (PO Box: 110) Miami, OK - [email protected] -

918-541-1902

Details: NEW INFORMATION: ALL FINAL COMMENTS ON TCNS TOWER SITES WILL BE IN WRITTEN FORM AND SIGNED

INDIVIDUALLY BY Cheryl Stafford, WHICH WILL ALLOW FUTURE AUTHENTICATION BY COMPARING COPIES WITH THE

SIGNED, FILED ORIGINALS. THE OTTAWA TRIBE DOES NOT PROVIDE VERBALFINAL COMMENTS. The Ottawa Tribe of

Oklahoma has developed procedures for cell tower construction projects. Please contact Cheryl Stafford for a copy of

those procedures at 918-541-1902(phone) or 918-542-3214 (fax), or visit our web site ottawatribe.org. As you will see

when you obtain a copy of our procedures, we require photos and a topo map for EVERY proposed site. The Ottawa

Tribe of Oklahoma has listed its geographic areas of interest on this web site. We consider this listing to be official

notification to all those proposing to construct cell towers in those areas that you need to contact us. For those states

where we are interested in all counties, we have listed just the state. For those states where we are interested in only

11

certain counties, we have listed the counties. The Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma, in concert with its historic preservation

consultant Algonquin Consultants, Inc., is pleased to assist you in complying with your Section 106 requirements. We

do not handle any consultation or inquiries by e-mail.

21. THPO Sherri Clemons - Wyandotte Nation - 64700 E, Hwy 60 Wyandotte, OK -

[email protected]; [email protected] - 918-678-6344

Details: Greetings from Wyandotte Nation.

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT AS OF TCNS NO. 126800, ALL COLOCATIONS AND PREVIOUSLY DISTURBED TOWER LOCATIONS

WILL BE $200.

ALL RAW LAND NEW BUILD SITES REMAIN AT $600.

EACH PTC POLE IS STILL $100 (PER NON-EXEMPT POLE, NOT PER TCNS).

The following information is provided automatically via the TCNS web site. Additional information may be provided in a

second email that we send for each tower that is logged into TCNS. However, as we have been unable to use theTCNS

website reliably to send our second response email since early April 2014, this very likely will be the ONLY email that you

receive until the technical issue preventing us from using that feature has been addressed.

NEW INFORMATION- From this point forward, please send the required information for our review by email ONLY. Send

the fee and a cover letter by hard copy to the Tribe, but DO NOT send review information by hard copy. Doing so will

delay the review.

We are interested in consulting on this tower or broadband project, just as we are interested in being consulted

regarding all federal undertakings in our homelands. This consultation is one of the activities required by the National

Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) for such federal undertakings.

Please follow our archaeology procedures (9-9-13) and our general NHPA procedures for consultation (6-1-13), both

available by e-mailing the cell tower program archaeologist, Rebecca Hawkins, at [email protected]. These

procedures supersede all earlier versions of our procedures. All further correspondence regarding this tower should

also be directed to that email address. With questions, you may call Mr. Lamont Laird at 918-533-2212.

AS STATED IN OUR GUIDELINES, AN ARCHAEOLOGIST MUST PERFORM THE FIELD WORK AND RELATED ANALYSES. The

Wyandotte Nation will object to any tower where field work/analysis was performed after 9-9-13 and where a trained,

experienced archaeologist did NOT conduct the field work. The National Park Service defines Essential Competencies for

the field of archaeology at http://www.nps.gov/training/npsonly/RSC/archeolo.htm. Minimally, a "trained, experienced

12

archaeologist" has at least a BA in Anthropology with a focus in archaeology and two solid years of field experience in

the region where the field work is being performed.

The fee for all collocations and towers built in previously disturbed areas is $100. The fee for all other towers is $600.

Please make sure to provide your archaeologists witha copy of our procedures PRIOR TO the time that they do field

work. If archaeology reports do not provide the information requested on the last 2 pages of our archaeology

procedures, which you may use as a checklist, the report will be rejected. Pleasedo not send reports that you know are

deficient, as doing only delays the response process for your tower and those of other applicants as well.

Tizame (thank you),

Sherri Clemons, THPO

Wyandotte Nation

22. Special Projects Manager/NAGPRA Logan R Pappenfort - Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma - 118 S. Eight

Tribes Trail (PO Box: 1527) Miami, OK - [email protected] - 918-540-2535

Details: Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Tower Consultation Procedures

Beginning April 21, 2015, the Tribe will require the following for tower consultation:

1. Materials are to be faxed, mailed or shipped to our tribal office. We will not handle tower consultation

electronically.

When you receive the FCC response that lists the Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma for your area, YOU HAVE BEEN

OFFICIALLY NOTIFIED OF OUR INTEREST.

To initiate consultation with the Peoria Tribe please submit a brief project summary via U.S. mail or other carrier with a

per-project research and filing fee as follows:

Project Type Filing Fee

New tower-any type, cell or PTC $200

Co-location $100

DAS Nodes in Right-of-Way $100

Checks should be made payable to Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma with the TCNS number in the memo line. Please

note, this fee is not for determining our initial interest, as we have already done so by defining our geographic areas of

interest through the TCNS, but for providing specialized information unique to the Peoria Tribe. Please use the TCNS

number in any type of communication with us.

2. With the consultation initiation letter, please include the following:

13

a. Contact information, including phone and fax numbers, physical address, and e-mail address for the person

to whom information from the Peoria Tribe should be sent.

b. A copy of the review letter from the State Historic Preservation Office for the state in which the tower is

located for both new towers and collocations.

c. These portions of the archaeological report: research methods and findings for both the historic archives

review and the field survey. Please do not send us the architectural survey information, unless it is embedded with the

archaeological information. We would appreciate 2 or 3 pictures of the project area.

d. A copy of the portion of the USGS quadrangle map, on which you have noted the project area.

e. Please fax or mail/ship materials regarding tower consultation. We will not handle tower consultation

electronically. Call 918-540-2535 with questions.

PLEASE DO NOT SEND THE ENTIRE FORM 620 or 621, OR PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PLANS. We request only the items

listed above.

3. Please use only the following address and contact information.

For U.S. Postal, Priority & Express Mail please address:

Peoria Tribe Historic Preservation Office

Attention: Logan Pappenfort


PO Box1527

Miami, OK 74355-1527

Or to physical address:

Peoria Tribe Historic Preservation Office

Attention: Logan Pappenfort


118 S. Eight Tribes Trail

Miami, OK 74354

23. THPO Kim Jumper - Shawnee Tribe - 29 South 69A Highway Miami, OK - [email protected] -

918-542-2441

Details: THIS IS YOUR OFFICIAL NOTICE THAT THE SHAWNEE TRIBE IS INTERESTED IN CONSULTING ON ALL PROJECTS

BUILT IN OUR AREAS OF GEOGRAPHIC INTEREST.

ATTENTION, NEW INFORMATION: Our procedures were updated on 14 January 2008. Please call Kim Jumper, THPO, at

918-542-2441, so that she can send you a copy.

If your tower is a co-location, please fax us this information to let us know. We cannot always tell from the TCNS web

site that a tower is a co-location. We require a written response from you to let us know that it is a co-location. If a co-

location project includes some new ground disturbance (such as from an expanded compound or access road, or

14

construction of an ancillary structure), the Shawnee Tribe treats such a project the same as any other non co-location

project.

Our correct mailing/physical address is: 29 South Highway 69A. Our correct phone number is (918-542-2441) and our

historic preservation fax line is (918-542-9915). THPO Kim Jumper manages all cell tower consultation.

As of 26 June2006, all of the faxed responses of our final comments on a tower site will contain an original Shawnee

Tribe signature. Each final comment fax is signed individually. Copies may be compared, for authentication, against the

original in our files.If afinal comment fax does not contain a signature, it is not valid. ALL FINAL COMMENTS FROM THE

SHAWNEE TRIBE ARE WRITTEN; FINAL COMMENTS ARE NEVER PROVIDED VERBALLY. IF THE SHAWNEE TRIBE IS

CREDITED WITH HAVING GIVEN A VERBAL RESPONSE, THAT RESPONSE IS NOT VALID.

If you receive notification through the TCNS listing the Shawnee Tribe, that is an indication that the Shawnee Tribe is

interested in consulting on the tower for which that notification was received. Please consider that our official

indication of interest to you. The Shawnee Tribe considers the Tower Construction Notification System's weekly e-mail

to be the first notification that we receive that a tower will be constructed in an area of our concern. We do not view

the TCNS notificationas completion of 106 consultation obligations.

The Shawnee Tribe has developed streamlined consultation procedures for cell tower developers and their

subcontractors. If you do not have a copy of the procedures - most recently updated on 14 January2008 - please contact

us, as you must follow these procedures to consult with us on cell tower projects. Call us at 918-542-2441 or fax us at

918-542-9915. It is the tower builder's responsibility to make sure that you have our most recent consultation

procedures.

PLEASE DO NOT SEND US INFORMATION, QUERIES, OR COMMENTS ELECTRONICALLY. SINCE 1 DECEMBER 2005, WE

HAVE NOT HANDLED ANY CELL TOWER CONSULTATION, INQUIRIES, OR CORRESPONDENCE VIA E-MAIL.

24. THPO Alvin Windy Boy Sr - Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation - 9740 Upper Box Elder Road

(PO Box: 230) Box Elder, MT - [email protected] - 406-395-4700

Details: The Chippewa Cree Tribe has established a procedure for FCC TCNS review. Online submissions can be

completed at http://app.tribal106.com. Please include/upload the Archaeological Survey report, site plans, aerial

photos, topo map, and the correct coordinates for the proposed project.

According to our tribal elders, historians, and archaeological/anthropological evidence, the Chippewa & Cree Tribes have

a long and storied history throughout Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, North

Dakota, and Montana. That history includes major sacred events, encampments, medicinal plants and other significant

markers that indicate our footprint throughout this entire region.

Based on the location of the proposed project and the poles that you will be constructing as part of the Section 106

process in this particular geographic location, we are REQUESTING TO BE CONSULTED on this proposed project.

The Chippewa Cree Tribe, through the Cultural Resource Preservation Department,has established a fee schedule for

consultation services. We are only accepting checks at this time please make checks payable to i-Response.

15

Please utilize the consultation processing system on our website: http://app.tribal106.com

If you haveany questions, please feel free to contact Alvin Windy Boy Sr., THPO, at [email protected] or phone

(406)395-4700. THANK YOU!

25. THPO Melinda J Young - Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians - Tribal Historic

Preservation Office (PO Box: 67) Lac du Flambeau, WI - [email protected] - 715-588-2139

The information you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct

and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning.

You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to

construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic

Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section

VII.A of the NPA.

26. Chief of Staff, Deputy SHPO Theodore Hild - Illinois Historic Preservation Agency - 1 Old State Capitol Plaza

Springfield, IL - [email protected] - --

27. SHPO Robert E Carter Jr - Department of Natural Resources - 402 West Washington Street Indiana Govt.

Center South, Room W256 Indianapolis, IN - [email protected] - 317-232-1646

Details: If your APE (Area of Potential Effects) includes a portion of the state of Indiana, the Indiana SHPO will need to be

notified of the project.

28. Deputy SHPO Jon C Smith - Department of Natural Resources - 402 West Washington Street Indiana Govt.

Center South, Room W256 Indianapolis, IN - [email protected] - 317-232-1646

Details: If your APE (Area of Potential Effects) includes a portion of the State of Indiana, the Indiana SHPO will need to

notified of the project.

29. SHPO Brian D Conway - State Historic Preservation Office, Michigan Historical Center - (PO Box: 30740)

Lansing, MI - [email protected] - 517-373-1630

30. Amanda Terrell - Ohio History Connection - 800 E. 17th Avenue Columbus, OH - [email protected] -

614-298-2000

16

"Exclusions" above set forth language provided by the Tribal Nation or SHPO. These exclusions may indicate types of

PTC wayside pole notifications that the Tribal Nation or SHPO does not wish to review. TCNS automatically forwards all

notifications to all Tribal Nations and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal.

However, if a proposal falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any

additional process with that Tribal Nation or SHPO. Exclusions may also set forth policies or procedures of a particular

Tribal Nation or SHPO (for example, types of information that a Tribal Nation routinely requests, or a policy that no

response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre-construction review).

Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above opened and reviewed an electronic or

regular mail notification. If you learn any of the above contact information is no longer valid, please contact the FCC. The

following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above:

Notification Received: 09/27/2016

Notification ID: 143449

Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: Horvath Towers, LLC

Consultant Name: Janet Roeser

Street Address: 105 SW 131st Ave

City: Beaverton

State: OREGON

Zip Code: 97005

Phone: 503-726-9351

Email: [email protected]

Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole

Latitude: 39 deg 8 min 38.9 sec N

Longitude: 86 deg 33 min 37.4 sec W

Location Description: S Weimer Rd.

City: Bloomington

State: INDIANA

County: MONROE

Detailed Description of Project: 6116004086; Proposed construction of a new telecommunications monopole and

compound resulting in ground disturbance. Please see Attachment 4 of this filing for project design details.

Ground Elevation: 223.4 meters

Support Structure: 59.4 meters above ground level

Overall Structure: 60.7 meters above ground level

Overall Height AMSL: 284.1 meters above mean sea level

If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic mail form

located on the FCC's website at:

http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/notification/contact-fcc.html.

You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all

telephone calls are recorded.

Thank you,

Federal Communications Commission





FCC Form 620

Attachment 7. Historic Properties Direct Effects a. List all properties within the APE for direct effects.

On October 10, 2016, EBI completed a review of the available records as required per Section VI.D.2 of the Federal Communications Commission’s 2004 Nationwide Programmatic Agreement to identify historic properties in the APE for Direct Effects. Based on this review no Historic Properties were identified within the APE for direct effects.

b. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each property

in the APE for direct effects, not listed in part “a.” (above), that the Applicant considers to be eligible for listing in the National Register as a result of the Applicant’s research. For each such property, describe how it satisfies the criteria of eligibility (36 C.F.R. Part 63). For each property that was specifically considered and determined not to be eligible, describe why it does not satisfy the criteria of eligibility.

The Subject Property is improved with a residence, shed, and three other structures. The area of the proposed facility currently consists of a landscaped grass field. There are no above-ground structures, objects or buildings present within the APE-DE as defined above.

c. Describe the techniques and the methodology, including any field survey, used to

identify Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects.1 If no archeological field survey was performed, provide a report substantiating that: i) the depth of previous disturbance exceeds the proposed construction depth (excluding footings and other anchoring mechanisms) by at least 2 feet; or, ii) geomorphological evidence indicates that cultural resource-bearing soils do not occur within the project area or may occur but at depths that exceed 2 feet below the proposed construction depth.2

Appalachian Archaeology, LLC completed an evaluation of the proposed Project Site for the likelihood of containing archeological Historic Properties. Please refer to the attached report documenting the findings of this project review by a qualified archaeologist including a description of the techniques and the methodology used to identify Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects. This report concludes that archeological resources are not expected to be impacted by the construction of the proposed tower and installation of associated support equipment at the Project Site.

1 Pursuant to Section VI.D.2.a. of the Nationwide Agreement, Applicants shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to identify above ground and archeological Historic Properties, including buildings, structures, and historic districts, that lie within the APE for direct effects. Such reasonable and good faith efforts may include a field survey where appropriate.

2 Under Section VI.D.2.d. of the Nationwide Agreement, an archeological field survey is required even if none of these conditions applies, if an Indian tribe or NHO provides evidence that supports a high probability of the presence of intact archeological Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects.

1

PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE PROPOSED BLOOMINGTON TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER, MONROE

COUNTY, INDIANA

By: Kiristen D. Webb

Submitted by: Appalachian Archaeology, LLC


Prepared for: EBI Consulting

21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803

2

PHASE IA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE PROPOSED BLOOMINGTON TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER, MONROE COUNTY,

INDIANA

By: Kiristen D. Webb

EBI Consulting 21 B Street

Burlington, MA 01803 Contact Person: Aniela Travers

Phone: (707) 208-6410 Fax: (781) 425-3627

Prepared by: Appalachian Archaeology, LLC. PO Box 984

Wooton, KY 41776 Phone: (606) 279-4569

Email: [email protected]

______________________________

James C. Pritchard, RPA Principal Investigator

October 20, 2016

Lead Agency: Federal Communications Commission

i

ABSTRACT

At the request of EnviroBusiness, Inc. (dba EBI Consulting), Inc., Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, conducted a Phase Ia archaeological survey of a proposed 0.18 acre (0.07 hectare) Horvath Towers, LLC telecommunication tower lease area and access/utility easement. The proposed access/utility easement intersects the north side of South Weimer Road in Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana, by Sudburg Lane, an existing gravel drive. The proposed utilities will fall within the proposed access easement route. The access/utility easement consists of an existing gravel road and a proposed new build segment totaling 0.69 acre (0.28 hectare). The project’s Area of Potential Effect encompasses 0.87 acre (0.35 hectare) and was surveyed in its entirety. The project area is located within the city limits of Bloomington, Indiana. The proposed tower lease area is located on terrace at an elevation of 733 feet above median sea level. The tower lease area measures approximately 30.48 meters (100 feet) by 24.38 meters (80 feet). The nearest bodies of water are an unnamed stream that intersects the gravel drive portion of the proposed access utility easement and Weimer Lake located southwest of the project area. The objective of the project was to identify and document archaeological sites in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and evaluate their eligibility for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places and the Indiana Register of Historic Sites and Structures. In addition, the regulations and guidelines of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources - Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (IDNR-DHPA 1998) and Indiana Code (IAC 14-2-1) guided this investigation. There is one cemetery present in the landscape within 1.6 km (1 mile) of the Area of Potential Effect. However, this cemetery is not located within the immediate vicinity of the project area. The cemetery will not be disturbed by the proposed development activities. The entire Area of Potential Effect was visually inspected during the archaeological survey. Systematic shovel testing supplemented by pedestrian reconnaissance were employed at the telecommunication tower lease area and along the proposed access/utility easement. A portion of the Area of Potential Effect is situated within a designated flood zone. Deep testing was employed by utilizing a bucket auger in the bottom of every other shovel test in this portion of the project area. It is noted that a 25 foot (7.6 meters) buffer area around the perimeter of the proposed tower project area and a 10 foot (3.0 meters) buffer area along both sides of the proposed access/utility easement corridor were also visually inspected as part of this investigation. The proposed tower lease area and the new build portion of the access/utility easement has been mechanically stripped, most likely due to activities associated with an abandoned limestone quarry located north of the proposed tower lease area. No surface features were discovered by means of the visual inspection and the shovel tests were negative of cultural materials and subsurface features. No further archaeological work is recommended.

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1

II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ................................................................................................................ 10

III. STATE SITE FILE SEARCH, PREVIOUS SURVEYS, AND BACKGROUND

RESEARCH ................................................................................................................................. 12

IV. CULTURAL CONTEXT .......................................................................................................... 15

V. FIELD METHODS AND ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES .............................................. 22

VI. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................ 39

VII. REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 40

APPENDIX A – CV FOR PERSONNEL ..................................................................................... 46

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1. Project Location within Monroe County .................................................................................... 4 Figure 1-2. USGS Topographical Map Showing Project Location ............................................... 5 Figure 1-3. Bloomington, Indiana 7.5’ USGS Quadrangle Showing APE .................................. 6 Figure 1-4. Aerial Map Showing APE ............................................................................................... 7 Figure 1-5. Survey Map of Proposed Tower Site and Access/Utility Easement ........................ 8 Figure 1-6. Survey Map of Proposed Tower Site ............................................................................. 9 Figure 3-1. Previous Archaeological Surveys within 2km of Project Area ................................ 15 Figure 3-2. Previous Archaeological Surveys that Cross the APE .............................................. 18 Figure 5-1. Survey Map of Proposed Tower Location Showing Shovel Test and

Pedestrian Transects ...................................................................................................... 24 Figure 5-2. Aerial Map of APE Showing Shovel and Auger Tests and Pedestrian

Transects .......................................................................................................................... 25 Figure 5-3. Graphic Demonstrating Shovel and Auger Tested Landform Areas

Designated as Zone AE and Zone X .......................................................................... 26 Figure 5-4. Shovel Test A-5 ............................................................................................................... 32 Figure 5-5. Shovel/Auger Test A-5 ................................................................................................. 32 Figure 5-6. Shovel Test A-2, Showing Disturbance and Metal Culvert Associated with

Road Construction ......................................................................................................... 33 Figure 5-7. Shovel Test C-1 ............................................................................................................... 33 Figure 5-8. Aerial Map Showing APE and Abandoned Limestone Quarry .............................. 34 Figure 5-9. Looking North Across Proposed Tower Location ................................................... 35

iii

Figure 5-10. Looking South Across Proposed Tower Location .................................................. 35 Figure 5-11. Looking East Across Proposed Tower Location .................................................... 36 Figure 5-12. Looking West Across Proposed Tower Location ................................................... 36 Figure 5-13. Proposed Access/Utility Easement, Showing Existing Road and Proposed

New Build Segments, Facing Southwest .................................................................... 37 Figure 5-14. Proposed Access/Utility Easement, Showing Existing Road, Bridge, and

Landforms Designated as Zone AE and Zone X, Facing East .............................. 37 Figure 5-15. Proposed Access/Utility Easement, Facing South ................................................. 38 Figure 5-16. From South Weimer Road, Showing Existing Road Segment of

Access/Utility Easement, Facing North ..................................................................... 38

LIST OF TABLES

Table 3-1. Previous Archaeological SurveyS within 1.6 km (1 mile) of Project Area ............... 13 Table 3-2. Archaeological Sites Within 1.6 km (1 mile) of Project Area .................................... 14 Table 5-1. Shovel and Auger Test Table ......................................................................................... 27

1

I. INTRODUCTION

This report describes the field methods utilized during a Phase Ia archaeological survey conducted on October 5, 2016, and the results of that survey. At the request of EnviroBusiness, Inc. (EBI Consulting), Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, conducted a Phase Ia archaeological survey of the proposed Bloomington 0.18 acre (0.07 hectare) Horvath Towers, LLC telecommunication tower lease area and access/utility easement. The proposed access/utility easement intersects the north side of South Weimer Road in Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana (Figure 1-1), by Sudburg Lane, an existing gravel drive. The access/utility easement consists of an existing gravel road and a proposed new build segment totaling 0.69 acre (0.28 hectare). The project’s Area of Potential Effect (APE) encompasses 0.87 acre (0.35 hectare) (Figure 1-5 and Figure 1-6) and was surveyed in its entirety. The project area is located within the city limits of Bloomington.

Project Sponsors and Regulatory Authority This study was conducted to comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (as amended), the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s implementing regulations (36 CFR Part 800), Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation (1983), Indiana Department of Natural Resources - Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (IDNR-DHPA 1998) and Indiana Code (IAC 14-2-1) and Appendix B of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of effects on Historical Properties for Certain Undertakings approved by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC 2004). The project was classified as a federal undertaking, as it required a Federal Communication Commission (FCC) license. All aspects of the investigation summarized in this report were conducted in accordance with guidelines of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources - Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (IDNR-DHPA 1998), and outlined in Consultation Procedures for Telecommunication Projects (Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Cultural Preservation Department 2014), Telecommunication Consultation Procedures (Osage Nation Historic Preservation Office 2014), and Archaeological Field Work and Reporting Requirements for Cell Towers and Other Section 106 NHPA Projects, Wyandotte Nation (Algonquin Consultants, Inc. 2013). Purpose and Scope of Work The objective of the project was to identify and document archaeological sites in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and evaluate their eligibility for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and the Indiana Register of Historic Sites and Structures (IRHSS). In addition, the regulations and guidelines of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources - Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (IDNR-DHPA 1998) and Indiana Code (IAC 14-2-1) guided this investigation, which was led by James C. Pritchard, an archaeologist registered with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources – Department of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (IN-DNR/DHPA) and Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA).

2

The archaeological surveyors were prepared to shovel test areas of less than 15% slope that were not previously disturbed and to visually inspect the entire APE. Principal Investigator and Field Crew Kiristen Webb and Shawn Webb conducted the fieldwork over the course of twelve person hours. Mrs. Webb has an M.A. from the University of Florida (2010, Anthropology). She is an archaeologist registered with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources – Department of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (IN-DNR/DHPA) and Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA). She has over 9 years of archaeological experience. Mr. Webb has a B.A. in Anthropology (2009) with a specialization in archaeology from the University of Kentucky. He has over 8 years of archaeological experience. James C. Pritchard, M.A. Sc., RPA, who served as principal investigator for this investigation, meets or exceeds the qualifications described in the Secretary of the Interior’s “Professional Qualifications Standards” (48 FR 44738-9). He has over 25 years of archaeological experience and is an archaeologist registered with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources – Department of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (IN-DNR/DHPA) and Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA). Kiristen Webb served as field director and authored and prepared the final report. Shawn Webb prepared the maps and formatted the report. Description of Project Area The project location is in Monroe County, Indiana (Figure 1-1), part of the Mitchell Plateau physiographic unit of southern Indiana, and can be found on the Bloomington, Indiana, U.S.G.S 7.5’ quadrangle map (Figure 1-2 and Figure 1-3). The proposed tower lease area is located on terrace at an elevation of 733 feet above median sea level (AMSL). The tower lease area measures approximately 30.48 meters (100 feet) by 24.38 meters (80 feet) (Figure 1-5 and Figure 1-6). The nearest bodies of water are an unnamed stream that intersects the gravel drive portion of the proposed access utility easement and Weimer Lake located southwest of the project area. The site for the proposed telecommunications tower is located within the city limits of Bloomington, Indiana. Sudburg Lane, the gavel drive by which the tower will be accessed, intersects the north side of South Weimer Road, 0.6 km (0.4 mile) north of the intersection of West Tapp Road, that intersection being 0.9 km (0.6 mile) east from State Route 37. The access/utility easement consists of an existing gravel road and a proposed new build segment totaling 0.69 acre (0.28 hectare). Vegetation along the proposed access/utility easement consisted of grass and typical hardwood trees. Surface visibility was 10 percent at best due to vegetation and gravel. The tower lease area is located in a mown field and ground surface visibility was 0 percent due to grass cover.

3

Summary of Investigations A Phase Ia archaeological survey was conducted for the proposed Bloomington Telecommunication Tower Site in Monroe County, Indiana by archaeologists from Appalachian Archaeology LLC, at the request of EBI Consulting. There is one cemetery present in the landscape within 1.6 km (1 mile) of the APE (Figure 1-2, Figure 1-3). However, this cemetery is not located within the immediate vicinity of the APE. The cemetery will not be disturbed by the proposed development activities. Based on the results of this Phase Ia investigation, the proposed construction of the Bloomington telecommunications tower will have no effect on known archaeological and cultural resources. Records searches revealed no previously recorded archaeological sites within the project area, and no archaeological sites were identified as a result of this investigation. No further archaeological work is necessary within the APE.

4

Figure 1-1. Project Location within Monroe County

5

Figure 1-2. USGS Topographical Map Showing Project Location

6

Figure 1-3. Bloomington, Indiana 7.5’ USGS Quadrangle Showing APE

7

Figure 1-4. Aerial Map Showing APE

8

Figure 1-5. Survey Map of Proposed Tower Site and Access/Utility Easement

9

Figure 1-6. Survey Map of Proposed Tower Site

10

II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

This section provides a summary of the environmental setting of the project area, including information on the physiography, geology, soils, climate, and vegetation. This information is provided, with a historical perspective, to illustrate how the environmental setting of the project area may have changed over the course of human habitation. The information is intended to provide a description of the modern and prehistoric landscape. Physiography Monroe County is located in the Southern Hills and Lowlands physiographic region, which is divided into 10 physiographic units. The current survey area is within the Mitchell Plateau physiographic unit. The Mitchell Plateau is south of the Martinsville Hills and bounded on the east by the Norman Upland and on the west by the Crawford Upland. The Mitchell Plateau is a limestone plateau characterized by major, deeply entrenched steam systems and a deep karst development. There are three physiographic aspects of the Mitchell Plateau. First, the section north of the East Fork of White River is deeply dissected by several large streams. There are steep slopes and limestone edges, and most of the upland is in the form of irregular branching ridges. Second, south of the East Fork of White River are areas of rolling hills underlain with thick red clay. Finally, in western portions of the plateau are large of karstic environments characterized by sinkholes and caves (Gray 2000:9). Geology Mississippian age deposits consisting of shale, sandstone, siltstone, limestone, and gypsum underlie Monroe County. The project area is underlain by limestone from the middle Mississippian Sanders and Blue River Groups (Camp and Richardson 1999). Soils Soils in the project area consist of Crider silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes (CrC) and Haymond silt loam, frequently flooded (Hd) (Thomas 1981). The Crider silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes soil is found on narrow and broad convex ridgetops of the uplands and is moderately sloping, deep, and well drained. The surface layer is typically about 7 inches thick and is dark brown silt loam. The subsoil is about 58 inches thick. The upper part of the subsoil is brown and strong brown silty clay loam. The middle part is yellowish red silty clay loam and the lower part is red, firm clay (Thomas 1981:20-21). The Haymond silt loam, frequently flooded soil is found on bottomland and is nearly level, deep, and well drained. The surface layer is typically about 10 inches thick and is dark brown and dark grayish brown silt loam. The subsoil extends to a depth of about 60 inches and consists of dark brown and yellowish brown silt loam. In places, the soil is more than 18 percent clay (Thomas 1981:34).

11

Climate Monroe County is included in the humid mesothermal climatic region, which defines the southeastern United States. The region’s climate has changed substantially since the arrival of humans. During this time, the region was much cooler. However, with the onset of the Hypsithermal period of the mid-Holocene (8,500 – 5,000 BP) the region experienced a warming trend followed by a cooling trend with increased precipitation (Delcourt and Delcourt, 1985). Currently, the climate of Monroe County is temperate and humid. Winters are cold with snow with averaging temperatures of about 32° F. Summers are hot and humid with an average temperature of 74° F, and precipitation annually averages 40 inches with over half of this falling from April to September (Thomas 1981).

Vegetation Monroe County is in the Western Mesophytic region. The dominant forest type is the Beech-Maple association. However, due to agriculture and development, forested areas are restricted to steep slopes and heavily dissected topography. Selective logging has changed the original forest composition (Petty and Jackson 1966). Currently, principle woodland crops include upland oak, tulip poplar, black walnut, and pin oak (Thomas 1981). Current land use The project area is situated on private property that has been well maintained. An abandoned limestone quarry is located approximately 50 meters (164 feet) north of the proposed tower lease area (Figures 1-2; Figure 1-3; Figure 5-8). The quarry is depicted on the 1956 Bloomington, Indiana, 7.5’ Series Topographic Quadrangle Map. However, it is not indicated on the 1910 Bloomington Topographic Quadrangle Map. Sudburg Lane, the gavel drive by which the tower will be accessed, intersects South Weimer Road and runs adjacent to the quarry. This road was likely associated with the quarry.

12

III. STATE SITE FILE SEARCH, PREVIOUS SURVEYS, AND BACKGROUND RESEARCH

Online and print resources such as historic plat maps, county histories, and the State Historic Architectural and Archaeological Research Database (SHAARD) at the Indiana Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology were consulted prior to fieldwork for information regarding cultural resources located within and nearby the planned project area. Based on this research, 14 previously conducted surveys were carried out within a 1.6 kilometer (1.0 mile) buffer of the current survey area. Nine archaeological sites have been recorded within 1.6 kilometers (1.0 mile) of the current survey area. However, none of these sites are located within the immediate vicinity of the current survey area. Table 3-1 summarizes all of the previous investigations and the archaeological site information, based on the archaeological reports and site forms, is presented in Table 3-2. Historical Documentation A review of historic maps was conducted online. Available were the 1910 Bloomington Topographic Quadrangle Map and the 1956 Bloomington, Indiana, 7.5’ Series Topographic Quadrangle Map. Sanborn maps for the years 1883, 1887, 1892, 1898, 1907, and 1913 were also available. No historic structures were indicated within the APE on the topographic or Sanborn maps. However, there is a limestone quarry, located approximately 50 meters (164 feet) north of the proposed tower lease area (Figure 1-2; Figure 1-3; Figure5-8), indicated on the 1956 Bloomington, Indiana, 7.5’ Series Topographic Quadrangle Map. Cemeteries There is one cemetery present in the landscape within 1.6 km (1 mile) of the APE (Figure 1-2, Figure 1-3). However, this cemetery is not located within the immediate vicinity of the APE. The cemetery will not be disturbed by the proposed development activities.

13

Project Sites References

Research project - Unknown 12Mo0061

Site Form (date recorded: unknown) – Recorded by Glen

A. Black Lab, Indiana University, Archaeology Department – No

associated report Proposed State Road 37/45 and State

Road 37/48 intersection improvement areas

12Mo0665-0671 Pace 1979

Research project - Unknown 12Mo0924

1984 Site Form – Recorded by Glen A. Black Lab, Indiana

University, Archaeology Department – No associated

report Records check for: Proposed Phase I of a multi-phase development of the

Thomson Community Park in Bloomington

None Kearny 1991

Archaeological reconnaissance of the Phase I development of Thomson Community Park in Bloomington

12Mo0980-0983 Kearny and McCullough 1992

Proposed Bloomington Land Trust Subdivision Associated with the Thomson Community Park in

Bloomington

12Mo0988-1000 Kearny 1993

Proposed cellular phone tower in Bloomington None Stillwell 2005

Proposed Tapp Road and Rockport Road roundabout in Bloomington None Snell 2011

Phase Ia survey of I-69 Section 5 (from SR 37 to SR 39)

12Mo1387-1416, 12Mo1430, 12Mg437-446 Hinks and Lombardi 2012

Mill Creek development in Bloomington None Stillwell 2012

Second addendum to Phase Ia survey of I-69 Section 5 (from SR 37 to SR

39) 12Mo1468 Lombardi and Seymour 2013a

Third addendum to Phase Ia survey of I-69 Section 5 (from SR 37 to SR 39) 12Mo1474-1478 Lombardi and Seymour 2013b

Wapehani mountain bike park section 4, mitigation site for I-69 section 5 None Lombardi and Seymour 2013c

Fourth addendum to Phase Ia survey of I-69 Section 5 (from SR 37 to SR

39) 12Mo1479, 12Mg518-520 Baltz 2014

Fifth addendum to Phase Ia survey of I-69 Section 5 (from SR 37 to SR 39) 12Mo1497-1498 Baltz and McCord 2014

Addendum to Proposed Tapp Road and Rockport Road roundabout in

Bloomington None Giedd 2015

Table 3-1. Previous Archaeological SurveyS within 1.6 km (1 mile) of Project Area

14

Site No. Type Component Management Recommendations

NRHP Recommendations

12Mo0061 Workshop Prehistoric – indeterminate

Research/grant project, site was recorded as completely

eroded, no recommendations recorded,

no associated report

Not assessed

12Mo0665 Lithic scatter Prehistoric – indeterminate No further work Not assessed




12Mo0791 Lithic scatter Prehistoric – indeterminate

Site was recorded as being disturbed, no

recommendations recorded, no associated report

Not assessed

12Mo0924 Lithic reduction, Lithic scatter

Prehistoric – Early Archaic

Site was recorded as being disturbed, no

recommendations recorded, no associated report

Not assessed

12Mo0981 Lithic scatter Prehistoric – indeterminate No further work Ineligible

12Mo0983 Camp Prehistoric – Early Archaic No further work Ineligible

Table 3-2. Archaeological Sites Within 1.6 km (1 mile) of Project Area

15

IV. CULTURAL CONTEXT

This section summarizes regional prehistory for Indiana and provides a historic cultural background of Monroe County within the general framework of Indiana settlement and history.

PREHISTORIC CONTEXT The prehistoric cultural chronology of the eastern United States is divided into a series of periods that broadly correspond to major shifts in subsistence and procurement strategies, social organization, and settlement patterns. These periods are linked to distinct material culture styles, especially in projectile point morphology and in later times, ceramic vessel form and decoration. The periods form a general framework for discussing the prehistoric chronology of the project area and eastern North America. Paleoindian Period The beginning of the Paleoindian period is uncertain. However coinciding with the end of the Pleistocene and the beginning of the Holocene, the period continues to circa 8,000 B.P. (Maggard and Stackelbeck 2008). The exact date of these earliest inhabitants’ arrival in Indiana is unclear. It is important to note that, to date, Indiana does not have any radiocarbon dates for Paleoindian sites, and chronological assessment is dependent on dating of similar material from surrounding regions (Hicks 1992). Current research suggests a process of colonizing migrations during the Early Paleoindian period (prior to 11,000 B.P.), initial regional adaptations and settling processes during the Middle Paleoindian period (ca. 11,000 to 10,500 B.P.), and subsequent regionalization and adaptations to the emerging Holocene environment during the Late Paleoindian period (ca 10,500 to 10,000 B.P.). This process resulted in an increased emphasis on local chert, plant, animal, and other resources through time, which helped diversify the tool kit and hunter/gatherer subsistence strategies. The emerging picture of Paleoindian lifeways suggests small, mobile hunter/gatherer bands exploiting locally available resources over relatively large territories (Anderson and Gillam 2000; Tankersley 1992; 1996). The Paleoindian hunter/gatherer toolkit consists primarily of projectile points, knives, and scrapers. In addition, this toolkit probably included a variety of, bone, ivory, antler, wood, and fiber plant tools. Likely as a result of changes in subsistence strategies, the diversity of the toolkit increased through time. Chipped stone knives and scrapers manufactured primarily from prismatic blades derived from prepared polyhedral cores are the most common tools associated with the Early Paleoindian period. The most diagnostic Early Paleoindian tool is the long, lanceolate-shaped, fluted Clovis or Clovis-like projectile point. During the Middle Paleoindian period, core and blade technology was replaced by bifacial lithic reduction, and spurred end scrapers became common. Diagnostic tools include small Clovis variants and Cumberland projectile points. Late Paleoindian projectile points are

16

stylistically diverse, consisting of Agate Basin, Dalton, Quad, Beaver Lake, and Hardaway Side Notched forms (Tankersley 1996: 77-81). Archaic Period The Archaic period includes the span of time between 10,000 and 3,000 B.P. Important cultural changes took place likely in response to environmental changes at the close of the Pleistocene and during the Hypsithermal climatic interval (Jefferies 1996). It is generally accepted that Archaic cultures evolved out of late Paleoindian traditions of the Southeast and Midwest (Funk 1978). Based on temporal, technological, social, subsistence, and settlement criteria, the Archaic period is divided into three sub-periods designated as Early, Middle, and Late Archaic (Jefferies 1996). The Early Archaic (10,000 to 8,000 B.P.) cultures in many ways resemble their Paleoindian ancestors except for the adoption of new projectile point styles. Otherwise their tool kits are nearly identical. However the types of animals they hunted and the plants they collected differed (Jefferies 1996; 2008). Due in part to a shift from boreal forest to an eastern deciduous forest, many of the modern species of fauna appeared in Indiana. Subsistence procurement activities shifted from hunting larger game to focus on deer and smaller mammals and the gathering of plant foods and nuts probably increased as well (Jefferies 1996; Stafford 1997). However hunting was likely still the major subsistence activity due to the scarcity of tools associated with the preparation of plant foods and fishing (Dragoo 1976:11; Jones and Johnson 2003). The general absence of substantial features, middens, and burials, as well as the few artifacts that compose most sites, suggest that most occupations were of short duration. The high percentage of projectile points made of non-nonlocal cherts suggests that groups were highly mobile. Social units were most likely small, highly mobile bands comprised of related individuals (Binford 1979; Jefferies 1996; 2008; Stafford 1994). The Middle Archaic (8,000 to 5,000 B.P.) occupation of Indiana lacks in site data. Most information from this period comes from other regions and from a sequence of comparable artifact forms (Kellar 1983). This period saw the development of regionally distinct cultures as indicated in artifact inventories and the addition of new artifact classes and projectile point styles (Jefferies 1996, 2008). At the onset of the Middle Archaic, forest environments had shifted to deciduous communities, similar to those today (Williams 1974). Near the onset of the Hypsithermal Interval (ca. 8,500 B.P.), plant communities began to further differentiate. Pollen records from the Midwest demonstrate an increase in grasses and herbs (King and Allen 1977). This period is marked by the introduction of groundstone artifacts, many of which are interpreted as tools for plant processing, indicating an increase in utilizing plant food resources. A wide range of plant food resources were exploited, including nuts, especially the hickory nut, starchy seeds, and fruits (Jefferies 2008). The presence of deep, rich midden deposits and burials, along with a high diversity of tool types implies that sites were intensively occupied on a long-term or year-round basis. An increase in group size and/or longer periods of occupation is also suggested by larger accumulations of materials than those of earlier periods (Conaty 1985; Jefferies 1983; 2008; Jefferies et al. 2005).

17

The Late Archaic (5,000 to 3,000 B.P.) witnessed the continuation of Middle Archaic trends and also included some important changes. There is a marked increase in the number and size of sites, suggesting population increase or aggregation and more permanent settlements (Jefferies 1990; 1996; Jones and Johnson 2003:6). Dragoo (1976:12-15) argues that this period was a time of growing complexity and continued cultural expansion. In contrast with the Middle Archaic, there are hundreds of Late Archaic sites in Indiana that vary by site type. Sites types identified by Jones and Johnson (2003:8) include “shell middens or mounds, fishing sites, semi-permanent villages, and cemeteries.” A more complex form of social organization is apparent during the Late Archaic. This is suggested by an inferred increase in mortuary ceremonialism and the presence of copper and marine shell artifacts acquired through long-distance trade networks (Dragoo 1976:17; Jefferies 1996; Kellar 1983:30; Winters 1968). Late Archaic subsistence, as during the Middle Archaic, focused on hunting and collecting native animals and plants. There was an increased dietary significance for certain starchy seeds, such as goosefoot and lambsquarters in Indiana (Jones and Johnson 2003:6). Although not a major contributor to the food supply, cultivated squash appeared in the archaeological record by 4,000 B.P. suggesting the beginning of horticulture (Kellar 1983). It remains unclear if it was an introduced tropical plant or a native cucurbit (Heiser 1989). Most researchers believe that, despite the presence of cultivated plants, Late Archaic subsistence was based primarily on wild resources Woodland Period The Woodland period includes the span of time between 3,000 and 1,000 B.P. with ceramic vessels marking the beginning of the period. The appearance of ceramic vessels may suggest changes in subsistence procurement strategies and settlement systems. However, in many ways, Archaic and Woodland cultural boundaries are indistinct. Societies became more politically complex while settlements became larger and more permanent. The same domesticated starchy-seeded plants utilized during the Late Archaic became more prominent. Long-distance trade networks intensified with regions of the Midwest for materials used specifically for burial offerings. The Woodland Period is divided into three sub-periods – Early (3,000 to 2,200 B.P.), Middle (2,200 to 1,500 B.P.), and Late (1,500 to 1,000 B.P.). Early Woodland pottery technology surfaced at different times. This may be a reflection of the variation of cultural adaptations. Baskets and squash/gourd containers may have been more practical in areas of rugged terrain as ceramic vessels would have made travel more difficult (Carstens 1996:10; Applegate 2008). Pottery types of the period include Marion Thick, Fayette Thick, and Early Crab Orchard (Bergman et al. 1998:27-28; Kellar 1983:36; Maxwell 1951). During this period, conoidal vessels with roughened exterior surfaces, as well as cord-marked or fabric-impressed interiors are found (Railey 1990:249). Groundstone tools such as nutting stones, hammerstones, pestles, and atlatl weights that were utilized during previous periods, were also utilized during the Early Woodland. However this period marks a shift from grooved axes to ungrooved celts, and a shift from chipped stone end scrapers to bone beamers (Applegate 2008). Early Woodland projectile points have a variety of large bladed forms: Adena, Cresap, Cypress, Dickson, Gary Contracting Stemmed, Kramer, Meadowood, Motley, and Robbins varieties (Jones and

18

Johnson 2003:9; Justice 1987). Tomak (1983:73) also lists Tureky Tail, Morgan, Black Creek, Lone Tree, and Crooked Tree projectile points. The Early Woodland displays an increase emphasis on mortuary facilities, such as ceremonial sites and burial mounds. These structures suggest territorial boundaries, increasing social stratification, and regional coherence of social and labor organization (Clay 1991). The Middle Woodland period witnessed an elaboration in mortuary ritual and long-distance exchange networks in many portions of the Midwest and Southeast (Railey 1996). Most of these developments occur within the Hopewell Interaction Sphere, a network of people that traded goods and ideas (Caldwell 1964). Hopewellian settlement patterns reveal that society developed into a complex network that included a variety of nondomestic sites, such as bluff-crest cemeteries, mortuary camps, as well as floodplain mound groups that variously served as local or regional transaction centers promoting the exchange of various goods. There were distinctions between various ceremonial centers and many occupation sites were positioned near a waterway that provided access to several resource zones (Struever 1968; Struever and Houart 1972). There are changes in ceramic technology, lithic technology, subsistence, and settlement practices. Ceramic technology displays a higher frequency of decorative styles including complicated stamping, rocker stamping, incising, and a distinctive pattern of zoning (Kellar 1983:42). Diagnostic ceramic types include Havana, Scioto, Late Crab Orchard, Mann, and Allison-Lamotte (Jones and Johnson 2003). Projectile points include Robbins, Snyder, Steuben Stemmed, Lowe Flared Base, Chesser Notched, and Bakers Creek types (Jones and Johnson 2003:11; Justice 1987). By the early Late Woodland (ca 1,500 to 1,200 B.P.), large earthworks are no longer constructed; burial mounds in some areas are not as elaborate and serve as general cemeteries; exotic raw materials from trade networks are nearly absent; and craft specialization diminishes (Kellar 1983:48). Ceramic vessels bore little or no decoration beyond simple surface roughening. These material changes may represent changes in household organization, community social organization, or patterns of interaction among households and communities (Braun 1991; Braun and Plog 1982). Most assemblages of artifacts lack the decorated ceramics and exotic items indicative of the Middle Woodland (Railey 1996). Despite this lack of characteristics, the Late Woodland has two new traits: the appearance of the bow and arrow (although the bow and arrow might appear earlier in the Late Archaic) and full-scale, intensive agriculture (Jones and Johnson 2003:14). Diagnostic projectile point types include Madison, Fort Ancient, Levanna, Hamilton, and side-or-corner notched forms such as Raccoon side-notched and Jack’s Reef corner-notched (Jones and Johnson 2003:14; Justice 1987). In addition, “commissary knives, large triagluar knives, and hoes (for agricultural purposes)” are part of the Late Woodland artifact assemblage (Jones and Johnson 2003:14). The terminal Late Woodland (ca 1,200 to 1,000 B.P.) exhibits much greater variety in terms of ceramic decoration and styles, subsistence strategies, and possible levels of social organization (Railey 1990:257). The introduction of the bow and arrow caused a change in

19

the technological organization of lithic reduction strategies and possibly in the economic organization of households and communities. Small triangular projectile points begin to occur during this time period (Railey 1990:257). Corn became an increasingly important crop during the terminal Late Woodland time period. Late Prehistoric Period The Late Prehistoric period dates from about 1,100 to 300 B.P. (Lewis 1990). This period is distinguished by two different cultural traditions — Mississippian and Fort Ancient, each characterized by distinct settlement patterns. Whereas Fort Ancient society is characterized by a non-hierarchical social organization, Mississippian society had a distinct hierarchical social organization. Mississippian peoples occupied southwestern Indiana, along the Ohio and Wabash Rivers, and are closer culturally to the Late Prehistoric inhabitants of the southeastern United States. The Fort Ancient culture is present in the southeastern corner of Indiana (Griffin 1978; Kellar 1983:60). Some Mississippian sites consisted of large ceremonial centers with some being built around platform mounds on which the house of a local chief was constructed. However, evident of a complex settlement hierarchy, some sites have mounds while others do not (Kellar 1983). Settlements were relatively permanent with evidence of town planning in their distribution of houses, preservation of open plazas, and arrangement of flat-top mounds. These mounds were used as elevated platforms for large community buildings. Some larger settlements are hundreds of acres in size and had populations of over a thousand people (Kellar 1983:51). Mississippian farmers cultivated maize, beans, and squash; hunted wild game; and gathered many wild plant resources to supplement the cultivated diet (Lewis 1990). Fort Ancient sites consist of large villages located along larger drainages in valley bottoms and smaller sites located throughout tributary drainages. The smaller sites are considered to be resource procurement activity sites and seasonal camps (Graybill 1981). Village sites often are comprised of a central area used for communal purposes as well as storage areas. That area is surrounded by dwelling areas, with a greater emphasis on smaller, family-sized features such as smaller storage pits as well as hearths. Mound burials are typically not occurring during that period in Indiana. Rather, burials were often placed in the dwelling area or at times in the central area; these burials rarely contain substantive grave goods. Many of the villages were surrounded by some form of stockade protection system. However, similar to their contemporary, Fort Ancient peoples relied heavily on the cultivation of maize, beans, and squash. Still, hunting was a very important means of subsistence as deer made up 80 percent of the game consumed. Ceramic styles are often elaborate, mostly tempered with mussel shell, with some tempered with limestone or grit (Griffin 1978).

20

HISTORIC CONTEXT

During the 1400s through the 1700s, there was a decline in Native American poplulations in North America, largely due to the combination of European diseases, famine, and warfare (Hicks1992:58). By 1700, Native American tribes, including the Potawatomi, Wea, Miami, Delaware, Wyandot, Shawnee, Chickasaw, Kickapoo, and Piankashaw, claimed most of Indiana (Hicks 1992:58). Most of these Native American populations had been displaced by Europeans or competing tribes from their original lands before settling in Indiana (Barnhart and Riker 1971). The first European to explore the present-day Indiana region was the Jesuit missionary Father Jacques Marquette in 1675, who reportedly traveled along the shores of Lake Michigan. In 1679, LaSalle portaged near South Bend and led an expedition through northwest Indiana (Lockridge 1980). The first European settlers in Indiana were French traders, missionaries, and trappers who established trading posts in the 1700s near the Indian villages of Kekionga (Fort Wayne), Ouiatenon (near Lafayette), and Chippecoke (Vincennes) (Parker 1997). By the 1740s and 1750s, the English interest in the fur trade fueled tensions leading to the French and Indian War. The Treaty of Paris in 1763 gave the British control of Indiana. In 1783, the British lost control of the region to the American Colonists (Parker 1997). After the Revolutionary War, Indiana was part of the larger Northwest Territory, which extended north of the Ohio River to the Great Lakes and west to the Allegheny Mountains to the Mississippi River. The Indiana Territory was separated from Ohio in 1880 in preparation for Ohio’s statehood in 1803. Vincennes was designated the territorial capital and William Henry Harrison was appointed the first Territorial Governor. Harrison passed several treaties between 1801 and 1809 that acquired the southern part of the state from Native Americans populations and opened the area for settlement (Parker 1997). Another 50 tracts were acquired over the next 31 years before the entire state was obtained. Indiana was granted statehood in 1816 and had a population of over 60,000 people (Barnhart and Riker 1971). The fist capital was Corydon, however was later moved to Indianapolis in 1824. The primary industry of Indiana during its early years as a territory and state was agriculture, producing surplus amounts of wheat, corn, cattle, swine, mules, and horses (Carmony 1966). Wheat was ground into flour for export, along with sugar and whiskey. Most of these products were shipped downriver by way of the Ohio, Wabash, White, and Mississippi Rivers to southern markets. Throughout the nineteenth century, agriculture remained the primary industry with over half of the population engaged in farming, with the number of farms increasing after the Civil War (Thornbrough 1995:439). Post Civil War farms produced oats, wheat, corn, rye, hay, tobacco, potatoes, apples and pecans (Baer et al. 2003:19-20). During the early twentieth century, the onset of the Great Depression caused many people in Indiana to lose their farms due to delinquent taxes or unpaid mortgages (Parker 1997). The federal and sate governments obtained many of these lands, converting them to National and State Forests. By World War II, Indiana transitioned into an industrialized economy with large farming operations.

21

Monroe County Monroe County was formed in 1818 from a portion of Orange County and was named in honor of James Monroe, the fifth president of the United States (Baker and Carmony 1975). The county seat is Bloomington. Hunters living in the area around 1810 were the earliest known Euro-American serrlers in Monroe County. These settlers included Samuel Dodds, Bazil Brown, John M. Saddler, Mr. Tarkinton, Solomon Green, William Lowe, James Slocum, and Henry Batterton (Baskin, Forster & Company 1876:273). More settlers arrived after Arthur Henrie and William Harris surveyed lands south of the Old Indian Boundary in 1812 (Goodspeed 1884:372). From 1814 to 1818, settlers built several commercial structures in Monroe County. Enos Blair built the first gristmill in 1816. Several more water and saw gristmills were built soon after by other settlers. Samuel Dodds opened the first Tannery in 1816 and William Hardin opened the first tavern in 1817. Joshua Howe opened the first store in 1818 (Baskin, Forster & Company 1876:273). The fist commissioners were Bartlett Woodward, Michael Buskirk, and James Parks. The fist sheriff was John W. Lee and the first county clerk/auditor was William Lowe (Goodspeed 1884:375). The fist county commissioners selected Bloomington as the county seat and they sectioned off lots for public auction. The fist townships in Monroe County were Bloomington, Clear Creek, Bean Blossom, and Indian Creek. The first Indiana limestone quarry opened in 1827 south of Stinesville in Monroe County (Hill 1998). The New Albany and Salem Railroad reached Monroe County in 1854 and provided a way to move the stone. The fist steam driven limestone sawing mill opened in 1855. After the Chicago and Boston fires in 1871 and 1872, limestone was in demand for building material. There were 15 limestone quarries in the state by 1870 and by 1900 Indiana produced one third of the nation’s commercial limestone (Hill 1998). In 1913, there were 50 quarries and mills in the Bloomington and Ellettsville areas. With the popularity of American Stone Architecture, the limestone industry reached its peak during the 1920s. Demand for limestone has fluctuated during the Great Depression and after World War II, and there has been a slow decline in the industry ever since (Taylor et al. 1989). One of these quarries is located just north of the current survey area and is indicated on the 1956 Bloomington, Indiana, 7.5’ Series Topographic Quadrangle Map. However, the quarry is not depicted on the 1910 Bloomington Topographic Quadrangle Map.

22

V. FIELD METHODS AND ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES This section describes the field methods employed, reflecting conditions encountered, during the course of the Phase Ia survey. The Implemented field methods conform to the guidelines of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources - Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (IDNR-DHPA 1998), Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma (Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Cultural Preservation Department 2014), Osage Nation (Osage Nation Historic Preservation Office 2014), and Wyandotte Nation guidelines (Algonquin Consultants, Inc. 2013). The APE consists of a proposed 0.18 acre (0.07 hectare), Bloomington telecommunication tower lease area. The access/utility easement consists of an existing gravel road and a proposed new build segment totaling 0.69 acre (0.28 hectare). The project area was located by the presence of surveyor stakes and flags. The proposed access/utility easement was located by the presence of surveyor flags. The fieldwork took approximately twelve person hours to complete. The elevation of the project area is 733 feet AMSL. The physical setting of the entire APE is shown in Figure 1-2 through Figure 1-5. The soil data for the APE consists of Crider silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes (CrC) and Haymond silt loam, frequently flooded (Hd) (Thomas 1981). There is one cemetery present in the landscape within 1.6 km (1 mile) of the APE (Figure 1-2, Figure 1-3). However, this cemetery is not located within the immediate vicinity of the APE. The cemetery will not be disturbed by the proposed development activities. Pedestrian Transects A pedestrian survey was conducted over the proposed location for the telecommunication tower utilizing transects spaced at five-meter intervals totaling seven transects (Figure 5-1and Figure 5-2). Ground surface visibility was 0 percent due to grass. It is noted that a 25 foot (7.6 meters) buffer area around the perimeter of the proposed tower project area and a 10 foot (3.0 meters) buffer area along both sides of the proposed access/utility easement corridor were also visually inspected as part of this investigation. A single pedestrian transect was placed along the proposed access/utility easement. Ground surface visibility was 10 percent at best due to vegetation and gravel. Systematic Shovel Testing Systematic shovel test probes (STPs) were excavated across the entire APE at 15-meter intervals, since the entire APE offers a less than 15 percent slope. Shovel test probes were a minimum of 45 centimeter x 45 centimeter, straight-sided, and were excavated to a depth of 1 meter below surface, to sterile subsoil, or to the water table. All excavated soils were screened by soil horizons through 0.25-inch mesh screens. The profile of each STP was recorded by measuring the stratigraphy and referencing a Munsell soil chart. Three representative shovel tests were photographed. T w o excavated shovel tests were positive for cultural materials, however consisted of modern trash (plastic and aluminum can

23

fragments) associated with the public right-of-way of South Weimer Road. Furthermore, these materials were recovered from disturbed context associated with road construction. A total of 25 shovel tests were excavated across the entire APE. Seven shovel tests were excavated within the proposed telecommunications tower lease area and 18 shovel tests were excavated along the proposed access/utility easement (Figure 5-1 and Figure 5-2). The majority of the shovel tests within the proposed tower lease area, as well as a portion of the proposed access/utility easement, showed signs of mechanical stripping. This is likely a result of activities associated with the limestone quarry located approximately 50 meters (164 feet) north of the proposed tower lease area (Figure 1-2; Figure 1-3; Figure 5-8) (discussed in Chapter III and Chapter IV of this report). Aside from the modern plastic and aluminum can fragments recovered from two STPs placed adjacent to South Weimer Road, all STPs proved to be negative of cultural materials or subsurface features. Sterile subsoil was recorded at between 2 and 40 centimeters below surface (cmbs). STP A-5, shown in a photograph in Figure 5-4 and Figure 5-5, serves as a representation of the natural soil stratigraphy encountered within the project area. STP A-2, shown in a photograph in Figure 5-6, serves as a representation of disturbance associated with road construction. STP C-1, shown in a photograph in Figure 5-7, serves as a representation of the soil stratigraphy encountered within the proposed tower lease area and a portion of the proposed access/utility easement and demonstrates mechanical stripping. A summary of the STPs is presented in Table 5-1. The soils encountered in the STPs matched the mapped soil data and consisted of Crider silt loam and Haymond silt loam. Deep Testing A portion of the proposed access/utility easement is located within an area that has been designated as a flood zone. This area is depicted as Zone AE on the project survey map (Figure 1-5). The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) defines Zone AE as a flood hazard area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. Zone AE designates an area that “will be inundated by a flood event having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeding in any given year. The 1-percent annual chance flood is also referred to as the base flood or 100-year flood” (FEMA 2016). The remaining portion of the APE consisting of the proposed tower lease area and a segment of the proposed access/utility easement is located in Zone X, which is outside of the flood zone. This area is located at higher elevations with the proposed tower lease area situated on a terrace. In order to assess the potential for a buried A horizon, or deeply buried cultural deposits, deep testing was employed by means of utilizing a four-inch diameter bucket auger in the bottom of every other shovel test (Figure 5-1 through Figure 5-3; Figure 5-5) in the portion of the APE designated to be within Zone AE. No auger testing was conducted in the portion of the APE that is within Zone X. Prior to auger testing, all shovel tests were excavated into sterile subsoil and to a minimum depth of 50 cmbs. All excavated soils were screened by soil horizons through 0.25-inch mesh screens. The profile of each auger test was recorded by measuring the stratigraphy and referencing a Munsell soil chart. All auger tests proved to be negative of a buried A horizon, cultural materials, or subsurface features. A summary of the auger tests is presented in Table 5-1.

24

Figure 5-1. Survey Map of Proposed Tower Location Showing Shovel Test and Pedestrian Transects

25

Figure 5-2. Aerial Map of APE Showing Shovel and Auger Tests and Pedestrian Transects

26

Figure 5-3. Graphic Demonstrating Shovel and Auger Tested Landform Areas Designated as Zone AE and Zone X

27

STP# Location Levels Soils Results

A-1 Auger

Proposed Access/Utility

Easement - Zone AE

0-40 cmbs

Dark grayish brown (10YR4/2) silt loam - modern trash associated with public ROW (plastic, aluminum can frag. - discarded in

field) - Located between road and creek, close proximity to creek

Positive modern

trash from public ROW

40-50 cmbs Brown (10YR5/3) silty clay loam - B

50-61 cmbs impasse at 61 cmbs

Dark yellowish brown (10YR3/4) silty clay loam - C, gravel lens, rock impasse at 61 cmbs

A-2


Easement- Zone AE

0-7 cmbs Dark brown (10YR3/3) silt loam

Positive modern

trash from public ROW

7-18 cmbs Grayish brown (10YR5/2) silty clay loam -

Road disturbance, 50% gravel, piece of metal from culvert, modern trash - plastic, discarded

18-39 cmbs

Grayish brown (10YR5/2) silty clay loam mottled with yellowish brown (10YR5/4) silty clay loam - Disturbed B, associated with road construction, modern pastic discarded in field

39-57cmbs Yellowish brown (10YR5/4) silty clay loam - B

A-3 Auger


Easement - Zone AE


Negative

28-42 cmbs Yellowish brown (10YR5/4) silty clay loam - B, Increasing with clay


Yellowish brown (10YR5/4) silty clay loam mottled with gray (10YR6/1) silty clay loam with concretions - C, bedrock impasse at 70

cmbs

A-4


Easement - Zone AE


Negative


44-56 cmbs Yellowish brown (10YR5/4) silty clay loam mottled with gray (10YR6/1) silty clay loam

with concretions - C

Table 5-1. Shovel and Auger Test Table

28


A-5 Auger


Easement - Zone AE


Negative 38-78 cmbs Yellowish brown (10YR5/4) silty clay loam -

B, Increasing with clay


Brown (10YR4/3) silty clay, gravel lens, fractured bedrock impasse at 85 cmbs

A-6


Easement - Zone AE


Negative




A-7 Auger


Easement - Zone AE


Negative




60-70 cmbs Grayish brown (10YR5/2) silty clay with concretions - C


Grayish brown (10YR5/2) silty clay with concretions - C, gravel lens, fractured bedrock

impasse at 82cmbs

A-8


Easement - Zone AE


Negative 17-36 cmbs Yellowish brown (10YR5/4) silty clay loam -

B, Increasing with clay

36-50 cmbs Yellowish brown (10YR5/4) silty clay loam mottled with gray (10YR6/1) silty clay loam with concretions - C, high density of gravel

29


A-9 Auger


Easement - Zone AE


Negative


51-62 cmbs Dark yellowish brown (10YR3/4) silty clay loam - C, gravel lens


Dark brown (10YR3/3) silty clay, gravel lens, impasse at 73 cmbs

A-10


Easement - Zone AE

0-16 cmbs

Dark brown (10YR3/3) silt loam mottled with yellowish brown (10YR5/4) silty clay loam,

approximately 25% gravel - Road disturbance, next to gravel road

Negative 16-29 cmbs

Dark yellowish brown (10YR4/4) silty clay loam mottled with yellowish brown (10YR5/6)

silty clay loam - Disturbed



A-11 Auger


Easement - Zone AE


Negative 22-40 cmbs Dark brown (10YR3/3) silt loam mottled with

dark gray (10YR4/1) hydric silty clay loam

40-52 cmbs water table at 52 cmbs

Dark gray (10YR4/1) silty clay, high density of gravel, water table/innundated at 52 cmbs -

next to creek

A-12


Easement - Zone AE


Negative

11-23 cmbs

Dark yellowish brown (10YR4/4) silty clay loam mottled with yellowish brown (10YR5/6) silty clay loam and gray (10YR5/1) silty clay -

Disturbed A/B, next to gravel road

23-36 cmbs Yellowish brown (10YR5/4) silty clay loam - B, Increasing with clay and concretions

36-51 cmbs Brown (10YR5/3) silty clay loam mottled with yellowish brown (10YR5/6) silty clay loam and gray (10YR5/1) silty clay with concretions - C

A-13 Auger


Easement - Zone AE


Negative 19-25 cmbs impasse at 25 cmbs

Brown (10YR4/3) silty clay loam - B, bedrock impasse at 25 cmbs

30


A-14


Easement - Zone AE


Dark brown (10YR3/3) silt loam, approximately 50% gravel, located next to gravel road - Bedrock impasse at 14 cmbs,

located on rise above floodplain

Negative

A-15


Easement - Zone X

0-5 cmbs impasse at 5

cmbs

Dark brown (10YR3/3) silt loam, approximately 50% gravel, located next to gravel road - Bedrock impasse at 5 cmbs,

located on rise above floodplain

Negative

A-16


Easement - Zone X

0-7 cmbs impasse at 7

cmbs

Dark brown (10YR3/3) silt loam - Bedrock impasse at 7 cmbs, located on rise above

floodplain Negative

A-17


Easement - Zone X


Dark brown (10YR3/3) silt loam - Bedrock impasse at 12 cmbs, located on rise above

floodplain Negative

A-18


Easement - Zone X


Negative 4-19 cmbs

Brown (10YR4/3) silty clay loam mottled with strong brown (7.5YR4/6) silty clay loam - B,

area has been mechanically stripped

B-1

Proposed Tower

Location - Zone X


Negative 3-18 cmbs



B-2

Proposed Tower

Location - Zone X


Negative 2-14 cmbs



B-3

Proposed Tower

Location - Zone X


Negative 3-13 cmbs



C-1

Proposed Tower

Location (center) - Zone X

0-12 cmbs Dark brown (7.5YR3/4) silty clay loam Negative

12-32 cmbs Strong brown (7.5YR4/6) silty clay loam - B

31


D-1

Proposed Tower

Location - Zone X


Negative 2-11 cmbs impasse at 11 cmbs

Brown (10YR4/3) silty clay loam mottled with strong brown (7.5YR4/6) silty clay loam - B, area has been mechanically stripped, bedrock

at 11 cmbs

D-2

Proposed Tower

Location - Zone X


Negative 2-13 cmbs



D-3

Proposed Tower

Location - Zone X

0-10 cmbs Dark brown (7.5YR3/4) silty clay loam Negative

10-28 cmbs Strong brown (7.5YR4/6) silty clay loam - B

32

Figure 5-4. Shovel Test A-5

Figure 5-5. Shovel/Auger Test A-5

33

Figure 5-6. Shovel Test A-2, Showing Disturbance and Metal Culvert Associated with Road Construction

Figure 5-7. Shovel Test C-1

34

Figure 5-8. Aerial Map Showing APE and Abandoned Limestone Quarry

35

Figure 5-9. Looking North Across Proposed Tower Location

Figure 5-10. Looking South Across Proposed Tower Location

36

Figure 5-11. Looking East Across Proposed Tower Location

Figure 5-12. Looking West Across Proposed Tower Location

37

Figure 5-13. Proposed Access/Utility Easement, Showing Existing Road and Proposed New Build Segments, Facing Southwest

Figure 5-14. Proposed Access/Utility Easement, Showing Existing Road, Bridge, and Landforms Designated as Zone AE and Zone X, Facing East

38

Figure 5-15. Proposed Access/Utility Easement, Facing South

Figure 5-16. From South Weimer Road, Showing Existing Road Segment of Access/Utility Easement, Facing North

39

VI. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary At the request of EBI Consulting, Appalachian Archaeology, LLC, conducted a Phase Ia archaeological survey of a proposed telecommunication tower location in Monroe County, Indiana. The site for the proposed telecommunications tower is located within the city limits of Bloomington, Indiana. The proposed access/utility easement intersects the north side of South Weimer Road by Sudburg Lane, an existing gravel drive, 0.6 km (0.4 mile) north of the intersection of West Tapp Road, that intersection being 0.9 km (0.6 mile) east from State Route 37. The proposed tower lease area is located on terrace at an elevation of 733 feet AMSL. The nearest bodies of water are an unnamed stream that intersects the gravel drive portion of the proposed access utility easement and Weimer Lake located southwest of the project area. The access/utility easement consists of an existing gravel road and a proposed new build segment. The entire APE was visually inspected during the archaeological survey. Systematic shovel testing was employed across the entire APE supplemented by pedestrian reconnaissance. A portion of the APE is situated within a designated flood zone. Deep testing was employed by utilizing a bucket auger in the bottom of every other shovel test in this portion of the APE. It is noted that a 25 foot (7.6 meters) buffer area around the perimeter of the proposed tower project area and a 10 foot (3.0 meters) buffer area along both sides of the proposed access/utility easement corridor were also visually inspected as part of this investigation. The proposed tower lease area and the new build portion of the access/utility easement has been mechanically stripped, most likely due to activities associated with an abandoned limestone quarry located north of the proposed tower lease area. The soils encountered during shovel and auger testing were consistent with the mapped soil data and consisted of Crider silt loam and Haymond silt loam. No surface features were discovered by means of the visual inspection and the shovel tests were negative of cultural materials and subsurface features. There is one cemetery present in the landscape within 1.6 km (1 mile) of the APE. However, this cemetery is not located within the immediate vicinity of the APE. The cemetery will not be disturbed by the proposed development activities. Recommendations Based on the results of this Phase Ia investigation, the proposed construction of the Bloomington telecommunication tower will have no effect on known archaeological and cultural resources. Records searches revealed no previously recorded archaeological sites within the project area, and no archaeological sites were identified as a result of this investigation. No sites listed in or eligible for the NRHP will be affected by the proposed construction. No further archaeological work is recommended.

40

VII. REFERENCES

Algonquin Consultants, Inc. 2013 Archaeological Field Work and Reporting Requirements for Cell Towers and Other Section 106,

NHPA Projects, Wyandotte Nation. Miami, Oklahoma. Anderson, David G., and J. Christopher Gillam 2000 Paleoindian Colonization of the Americas: Implications from an Examination of

Physiography, Demography, and Artifact Distribution. American Antiquity 65: 43-66. Applegate, Darlene 2008 Chapter Five: Woodland Period. In The Archaeology of Kentucky: an Update, Vol. 1,

edited by David Pollack, pp. 339-604. Kentucky Heritage Council, State Historic Preservation Comprehensive Plan Report No. 3, Frankfort.

Baker, Ronald L., and Marvin Carmony 1975 Indiana Place Names. Indiana University Press, Bloomington. Baltz, Christopher J. 2014a Fourth Addendum to Phase Ia Archaeological Investigations Section 5 (SR 37 to SR 39) Monroe

and Morgan Counties, Indiana. I-69 Corridor Tier 2 Studies. Project No. 13-43505. Gray & Pape, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Baltz, Christopher J., and Beth K. McCord 2014 Fourth Addendum to Phase Ia Archaeological Investigations Section 5 (SR 37 to SR 39) Monroe

and Morgan Counties, Indiana. I-69 Corridor Tier 2 Studies. Project No. 13-43505. Gray & Pape, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Baskin, Forster & Company 1876 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the State of Indiana. Baskin, Forster & Company, Chicago. Bergman, Christopher A., Donald A. Miller, John F. Doershuk, Ken Duerksen, and Teresa W. Tune 1998 Early Woodland Occupation of the Northern Bluegrass: The West Runway Site

(15Be391), Boone County, Kentucky. North American Archaeologist 19(1):13-33. Binford, Lewis R. 1979 Organization and Formation Processes: Looking at Curated Technologies. Journal of

Anthropological Research 35: 255-273. Braun, David P. 1991 Why Decorate a Pot? Midwestern Household Pottery, 200 B.C. – A.D. 600. Journal of

Anthropological Archaeology 10:360-397.

41

Braun, David P., and Stephen Plog 1982 Evolution of “Tribal” Social Networks: Theory and Prehistoric North American

Evidence. American Antiquity 47:504-525. Braun, Lucy E. 2001 Deciduous Forests of Eastern North America (Reprint). Hafner Press, New York.

Originally Published in 1950, Blackiston, Philadelphia. Caldwell, J. R. 1964 Interaction Spheres in Prehistory. In Hopewellian Studies, edited by J.R. Caldwell and

R. L. Hall, pp. 133-143. Vol. XII. Illinois State Museum Scientific Papers, Springfield.

Camp, Mark J., and Graham T. Richardson 1999 Roadside Geology in Indiana. Mountain Press Publishing Company, Missoula, Montana. 1991 Adena Ritual Development: An Organization Type in a Temporal Perspective. In

The Human Landscape in Kentucky: Past Site Structure and Settlement Patterns, edited by C.S. and C.K. Hensley, pp. 30-39. Kentucky Heritage Council, Frankfort.

1998 The Essential Features of Adena Ritual and their Implications. Southeastern

Archaeology. 17:1 pp. 1-21. Conaty, Gerald T. 1985 Middle and Late Archaic Mobility Strategies in Western Kentucky. Unpublished

Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.

Delcourt, Paul A., and Hazel R. Delcourt 1985 Quaternary Palynology and Vegetational History of the Southeastern United States.

In Pollen Records of Late Quaternary North American Sediments, edited by V. Bryant and R. Holloway, pp. 1-28. American Association of Sedimentary Palynologists.

Dragoo, D.W. 1976 Some Aspects of Eastern North America Prehistory: A Review 1975. American

Antiquity 41(1): 3-27. Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Cultural Preservation Department 2014 Consultation Procedures for Telecommunication Projects. Wyandotte, OK. Funk, R.E. 1978 Post-Pleistocene Adaptations. In Handbook of North American Indians: Northeast (Vol.

15), edited by B.G. Trigger, pp. 16-27. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. Giedd, Alycia 2015 Addendum to the Phase Ia Archaeological Records check and Reconnaissance Survey for the

Proposed Tapp Road and Rockport Road Roundabout in the City of Bloomington, Perry Township, Monroe County, Indiana . ASC Group, Inc., Indianapolis.

42

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 2016 Floodzones. Webpage on the FEMA website. Electronic document,

https://www.fema.gov/flood-zones. Accessed on October 20, 2016 Goodspeed, Weston 1884 Counties of Morgan, Monroe, and Brown, Indiana, Historical and Biographical, edited by C.

Blanchard. F. A. Battey and Company, Chicago. Gray, Henry H. 2000 Physiographic Divisions of Indiana. Indiana Geological Survey Special Report 61. Indiana

University, Bloomington. Griffin, James B. 1978 Late Prehistory of the Ohio Valley. Handbook of North American Indians: Northeast (Vol.

15), edited by B.G. Trigger, pp. 547-559. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. Heiser, Charles B. 1989 Domestication of Cucurbitacae: Cucurbita and Lagenaria. In Foraging and Farming: The

Evolution of Plant Exploitation, edited by D.R.H. and G.C. Hillan, pp. 471-480. One World Archaeology 13. Unwin Hyman, London.

Hicks, Ronald 1992 Native American Cultures in Indiana. Proceedings of the First Minnetrista Council for

Great Lakes Native American Studies. Minnetrista Cultural Center and Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana.

Hill, John R. 1998 Indiana Limestone. Webpage on the Indiana Geological Survey Website. Electronic

document, http://igs.indiana.edu/geology/minRes/indianaLimestone/index.cfm. Accessed October 19, 2016.

Hinks, Stephen J., and Kathryn M. Lombardi 2012 Phase Ia Archaeological Survey of the Indiana I-69 Evansville to Indianapolis Study, Section 5

(From SR 37 to SR 39), Monroe and Morgan Counties, Indiana. Michael Baker, Jr., Inc., Moon Township, Pennsylvania.

Jefferies, Richard W. 1983 Middle Archaic-Late Archaic Transition in Southern Illinois: An Example from the

Carrier Mills Archaeological District. American Archaeology 3: 199-206. 1996 Hunters and Gatherers After the Ice Age. In Kentucky Archaeology, edited by R.B.

Lewis, pp. 39-77. The University Press of Kentucky. Lexington, Kentucky. 2008 Chapter Four: Archaic Period. In The Archaeology of Kentucky: an Update, Vol. 1, edited

by David Pollack, pp. 193-338. Kentucky Heritage Council, State Historic Preservation Comprehensive Plan Report No. 3, Frankfort.

43

Jefferies, Richard W., Victor D. Thompson, and George R. Milner 2005 Archaic Hunter-Gatherer Landscape Use in West-Central Kentucky. Journal of Field

Archaeology 30: 3-23. Jones, James R. III, and Amy L. Johnson 2003 Early Peoples of Indiana. Indiana Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology,

Indianapolis. Justice, Noel D. 1987 Stone Age Spear and Arrow Points of the Midcontinental and Eastern United States. Indiana

University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis. Kearney, Janis K. 1991 Proposed Phase I of a Multi-phase Development of the Thomson Community Park to be located

1700 ft. East of the Intersection of South Rogers Street and Rockport Road, Southwest Side of Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana. Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology. Indiana University, Bloomington.

1993 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proposed Bloomington Land Trust Subdivision

Associated with the Thomson Community Park Located on the Southwest Side of Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana. Reports of Investigations 93-9. Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology. Indiana University, Bloomington.

Kearney, Janis K., and Robert G. McCullough 1992 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proposed Phase I Development of Thomson Community

Park Located on the Southwest Side of Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana. Reports of Investigations 92-29. Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology. Indiana University, Bloomington.

Kellar, James H. 1983 An Introduction to the Prehistory of Indiana. Indiana Historical Society, Indianapolis. Lombardi, Kathryn M., and Brian R. Seymour 2013a Addendum II: Phase Ia Archaeological Survey of the Indiana I-69 Evansville to Indianapolis

Study, Section 5 (From SR 37 to SR 39), Monroe and Morgan Counties, Indiana. Michael Baker, Jr., Inc., Moon Township, Pennsylvania.

2013b Addendum III: Phase Ia Archaeological Survey of the Indiana I-69 Evansville to Indianapolis

Study, Section 5 (From SR 37 to SR 39), Monroe and Morgan Counties, Indiana. Michael Baker, Jr., Inc., Moon Township, Pennsylvania.

2013c Wapehani Mountain Bike Park Section 4(f), Mitigation Site for I-69 Section 5. Michael Baker,

Jr., Moon Township, Pennsylvania. Maggard, Greg J., and Kary L. Stackelbeck 2008 Chapter Three: Paleoindian Period. In The Archaeology of Kentucky: an Update, Vol. 1,

edited by David Pollack, pp. 73-192. Kentucky Heritage Council, State Historic Preservation Comprehensive Plan Report No. 3, Frankfort.

44

Maxwell, M.S. 1951 The Woodland Cultures of Southern Illinois: Archaeological Investigations in the Carbondale

Area. Publications in Anthropology, Bulletin No. 7. Logan Museum, Beloit College, Beloit, Wisconsin.

Osage Nation Historic Preservation Office 2014 Telecommunication Consultation Procedures. Pawhuska, OK. Pace, Richard B. 1979 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proposed State Road 37/45 and State Road 37/48

Intersection Improvement Areas. SSI Earth Systems Division, Bloomington. Petty, R.O., and M.T. Jackson 1966 Plant Communities. In Natural Features of Indiana, edited by A. A. Lindsey, pp. 264-

296. Indiana Academy of Science, Indiana State Library, Indianapolis. Railey, Jimmy A. 1990 Woodland Period. In The Archaeology of Kentucky: Past Accomplishments and Future

Directions, Vol. 1. edited by D. Pollack, pp. 247-374. Kentucky Heritage Council State Historic Preservation Comprehensive Plan Report No. 1. Frankfort.

1996 Woodland Cultivators. In Kentucky Archaeology, edited by R. Barry Lewis, pp. 79-125.

University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. Snell, Samuel P. 2011 Phase Ia Archaeological Records check and Reconnaissance Survey for the Proposed Tapp Road

and Rockport Road Roundabout in the City of Bloomington, Perry Township, Monroe County, Indiana . ASC Group, Inc., Indianapolis.

Stafford, C. Russell 1994 Structural Changes in Archaic Landscape Use in the Dissected Uplands of

Southwestern Indiana. American Antiquity 59:219-237. 1997 Prehistoric Peoples of Indiana. In The Natural Heritage of Indiana, edited by M.T.

Jackson, pp. 360-367. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis. Stillwell, Larry N. 2005 An Archaeological Field Reconnaissance of a Proposed Cellular Phone Tower (Project # IN-

0622) in Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana. Cultural Resource Management Report 05FR76. Archaeological Consultants of Ossian.

2012 An Archaeological Field Reconnaissance of the Proposed Mill Creek Development in Bloomington,

Monroe County, Indiana. Cultural Resource Management Report 12FR46. Archaeological Consultants of Ossian, Muncie.

45

Struever, Stuart 1968 Woodland Subsistence-Settlement Systems in the Lower Illinois Valley. In New

Perspectives in Archaeology, edited by Sally T. Binford and Lewis R. Binford, pp. 285-312. Aidine, Chicago.

Struever, Stuart, and G. L. Houart 1972 An Analysis of the Hopewell Interaction Sphere. In Social Exchange and Interaction,

edited by E. Wilmsen, pp. 47-80. Anthropological Papers 46. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Tankersley, Kenneth B. 1992 The Archaeology of Early Paleoindians: A View from Indiana. In Native American

Cultures in Indiana, edited by R. Hicks, pp. 7-12. Minnetrista Cultural Center and Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana.

1996 Ice Age Hunters and Gatherers. In Kentucky Archaeology, edited by R.B. Lewis, pp. 21-

39. The University Press of Kentucky. Lexington, Kentucky. Taylor, R. M., E. W. Stevens, M. A. Ponder, and P. Brockman 1989 Indiana: A New Historical Guide. Indiana Historical Society, Indianapolis. Thomas, Jerry A. 1981 Soil Survey of Monroe County, Indiana. United States Department of Agriculture. Soil

Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. Tomak, Curtis H. 1983 A Proposed Prehistoric Cultural Sequence for a Section of the Valley of the West

Fork, of the White River in Southwestern Indiana. Tennessee Anthropologist 8(1):67-94. United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1910 Bloomington, Indiana, Topographic Quadrangle Map. 1956 Bloomington, Indiana, 7.5’ Series Topographic Quadrangle Map. 1992 Bloomington, Indiana, 7.5’ Series Topographic Quadrangle Map. Williams, Alice S. 1974 Late-Glacial-Postglacial Vegetational History of the Pretty Lake Region, Northeastern Indiana.

Geological Survey Professional Paper 686-B. United States Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.

Winters, Howard D. 1968 Value Systems and Trade Cycles of the Late Archaic in the Midwest. In New

Perspectives in Archaeology, edited by Sally R. Binford and Lewis R. Binford, pp. 175-221. Aldine Publishers, Chicago.