King County GIS ROI Study

29
Greg Babinski, MA, GISP Finance & Marketing Manager King County GIS Center Seattle, WA URISA President Summit Chief Editor Using ROI Methodology to Document the Benefits of King County GIS Esri Annual User Conference San Diego, California - July 24, 2012

description

This presentation describes a Return on Investement study of King County GIS in Washington state, covering the period 1992 through 2010. The study was conducted by Dr. Richard Zerbe and Associates from the University of Washington School of Public Affairs.

Transcript of King County GIS ROI Study

Page 1: King County GIS ROI Study

Greg Babinski, MA, GISP Finance & Marketing Manager King County GIS Center Seattle, WA

URISA President Summit Chief Editor

Using ROI Methodology to Document the Benefits of King County GIS

Esri Annual User Conference San Diego, California - July 24, 2012

Page 2: King County GIS ROI Study

Agenda

Introduction & background to the GIS ROI Study

GIS ROI Documentation Studies

2010-2012 Oregon/King County GIS ROI Study

Preliminary Results

Next Steps

Discussion

Page 3: King County GIS ROI Study

ROI Estimates & Benefit-Cost Analysis

Page 4: King County GIS ROI Study

Common tool for analyzing & configuring development plans

Typically result in an estimate or forecast of business benefits

ROI Estimates & Benefit-Cost Analysis

Page 5: King County GIS ROI Study

King County, Washington

Microsoft

Boeing

Paccar

Nordstrom's

Amazon

Starbucks

Port of Seattle

Weyerhaeuser

Univ. of Washington

Google

Skype

Population (1,931,000 (14th most populous US county)

Area: 2130 square miles (sea level to 8,000‟)

39 incorporated cities

Viable agricultural and private forestry areas

Remote wilderness & watershed lands

Page 6: King County GIS ROI Study

King County GIS – 1992 GIS ROI Estimate

Page 7: King County GIS ROI Study

King County GIS – 1992 GIS ROI Estimate

Page 8: King County GIS ROI Study

King County GIS - Development History:

Originated with 1992 PlanGraphics study

1992 Benefit Cost Analysis

PlanGraphics identified 126 business applications and a $22 million capital cost estimate

1992-1994 King County – Seattle Metro merger

1993 joint King County – Metro GIS scoping plan – reduced $6.8 million scope approved by King County Council

1993-1997 GIS capital project executed

1997 KCGIS O&M begins

2002 KCGIS Consolidation implemented

Page 9: King County GIS ROI Study

2012 KCGIS Development:

500+/- desktop GIS users

100,000 annual internal web based GIS user sessions

2.2 million annual external web based GIS user sessions

50 GIS professionals

GIS use expanded from 12 to 35 county departments and offices

But where are we really on the optimal development of GIS in King County?

What was (is) our ROI?

Page 10: King County GIS ROI Study

GIS ROI Documentation Studies?

Why are they not required?

Why are they not performed?

Page 11: King County GIS ROI Study

GIS ROI Documentation Studies? Baltimore County, MD

Page 12: King County GIS ROI Study

GIS ROI Documentation Studies? Baltimore County, MD

Page 13: King County GIS ROI Study

Why GIS ROI Documentation Studies? State of Oregon

Page 14: King County GIS ROI Study

Why GIS ROI Documentation Studies? State of Oregon

Page 15: King County GIS ROI Study

GIS ROI Documentation Study Breakthrough New Zealand

Page 16: King County GIS ROI Study

GIS ROI Documentation Study Breakthrough New Zealand

Page 17: King County GIS ROI Study

Oregon/KCGIS GIS ROI Study Project

Conceived during 2009 URISA AC in Anaheim

Approach finalized during 2009 ULA in Seattle

State of Oregon & King County joint funding

KCGIS 2010 Priority Initiative

Managed by KCGIS Center

Page 18: King County GIS ROI Study

KCGIS GIS ROI Study

May 2010 RFP sent to targeted consultants

June 2010 consultant selection

August 2010 contract signed

July 2010 work began

September & October 2011 Preliminary Results Released

March 2012 Final Report Published

Page 19: King County GIS ROI Study

KCGIS GIS ROI Study

Consultant Team from UW Evans School of Public Affairs:

Prof. Richard W. Zerbe

Danielle Fumia & Travis Reynolds

Pradeep Singh & Tyler Scott

Page 20: King County GIS ROI Study

KCGIS GIS ROI Study

Consultant Team from UW Evans School of Public Affairs:

Benefit-Cost Analysis Center

Page 21: King County GIS ROI Study

KCGIS GIS ROI Study

Scope of Work:

Literature Review

Qualitative Interviews (n = 30)

Quantitative Survey (n = 200)

Final ROI Report

Revised Interview/Survey Instruments for future studies

Page 22: King County GIS ROI Study

With or without survey methodology:

How has GIS altered agency output levels?

Benefits associated with FTE reductions to produce the same (pre-GIS) level of output

Benefits associated with enhanced production with the same FTE levels

Three stage analysis:

Interview agency heads and key employees to assess the types of applications and business uses. Interviews were used to build an employee survey.

Employees and managers across King County responded to the survey to record their pre and current (or with vs. without) GIS productivity by output types.

Interview and survey results were compiled by output type, agency, and productivity levels. Results were then monetized.

Monetized benefits compared to detailed GIS capital O&M, and end-user costs

KCGIS GIS ROI Study: Methodology

Page 23: King County GIS ROI Study

KCGIS GIS ROI Study Results

Page 24: King County GIS ROI Study

“The most conservative estimate presented finds that the use of GIS has produced

approximately $775 million in net benefits over the eighteen year period from 1992 to

2010….

Thus a reasonable estimate of total gains is between $180 million and $87 million in

2010.”

KCGIS GIS ROI Study Results

Page 25: King County GIS ROI Study

Theoretical basis for cost and benefit calculations

KCGIS GIS ROI Study Results

Page 26: King County GIS ROI Study

Future Steps:

Article in ICMA ESRI Press Book of GIS for Elected Officials

Likely articles by Dr. Zerbe & colleagues in GFR, URISA Journal

Analyze detailed department results

Analyze detailed benefits by output type

Analyze detailed benefits by productivity type

Tell our bosses - great interest within KC government

Compare with Twin Cities/Metro GIS Parcel Data ROI study

Compliment & Inform Multnomah County ROI study

URISA ROI Workshop development

Refine methodology

Encourage/support more studies

KCGIS GIS ROI Study

Page 27: King County GIS ROI Study

Questions & Answers:

At what stage is KCGIS in the total potential business use of GIS?

Are the KCGIS results „good‟?

How do we know?

Do we need similar studies of other large counties?

What about a single „latitudinal‟ study of 10 mid-sized cities in Washington & Oregon?

Are government agency officials not now compelled to pursue full GIS development?

KCGIS GIS ROI Study

Page 28: King County GIS ROI Study

Acknowledgement:

State of Oregon GIS and Cy Smith, Oregon GIO

KCGIS Technical Committee

Richard O. Zerbe & UW GIS ROI Study Team

KCGIS Center Interview team:

George Horning, Manager

Greg Stought, Enterprise Services Manager

Dennis Higgins, GISP, Client Services Manager

Debbie Bull, GIS DBA

Greg Babinski, GISP, Finance & Marketing Manager

Questions, Comments & Discussion Learn More: • ArcNews: Summer 2012: http://www.esri.com/news/arcnews/summer12articles/king-

county-documents-roi-of-gis.html • Access full report on King County web site: www.kingcounty.gov/gis

Page 29: King County GIS ROI Study

Greg Babinski, MA, GISP URISA President-Elect SUMMIT Chief Editor Finance & Marketing Manager King County GIS Center 201 South Jackson Street, Suite 706 Seattle, WA 98104 206-263-3753 [email protected] www.kingcounty.gov/gis