Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

15
RINGS CHOSEN BASED ON CORNEAL ASPHERICITY PAULO FERRARA EYE CLINIC BELO HORIZONTE MG PAULO FERRARA

Transcript of Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

Page 1: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

RINGS CHOSEN BASED ON CORNEAL ASPHERICITY

PAULO FERRARA EYE CLINICBELO HORIZONTE – MG

PAULO FERRARA

Page 2: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

RING ARC Q K Cyl

140

160

210

ASPHERICITY x KERATOMETRY x ASTIGMATISM

Page 3: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

• Corneal asphericity (Q) – corneal shape;

• Oblate …………………….Prolate;

• “Normal”: mild prolate;

• Keratoconus: hyper prolate cornea;

• Normal Q value: - 0.231

ASPHERICITY

1. Yebra-Pimentel E, González-Méijome JM, Cervino A, et al. Asfericidad corneal en una

poblácion de adultos jóvenes. Implicaciones clínicas. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2004: 79:385-392

Page 4: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

Q (asphericity) variation according to ring thickness

Page 5: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

Q (asphericity) and K (keratometry)

variation according to ring thickness

The range (in ∆Q and ∆K) refers to mean preoperative values to mean postoperative values.

Single Segments (µm) ∆Q ∆K p value

150 - 0.07 0.78 D 0.042

200 - 0.31 1.82 D < 0.001

250 - 0.34 2.74 D < 0.001

Paired Segments (µm)

150 – 150 - 0.57 3.40 D < 0.001

150 – 200 - 0.73 4.35 D < 0.001

150 – 250 - 0.80 3.86 D 0.001

200 – 200 - 0.86 5.65 D < 0.001

200 – 250 - 1.02 6.27 D < 0.001

250 – 250 - 0.99 5.30 D 0.001

Page 6: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

NOTE: (THIS IS VALID FOR ALL MAPS)

The segment or pair of segments SHOULD not turn the expected postoperative cornea asphericity (Q) significantly below -0.23.

If this happens so it is advisable

to choose a pair of segments that

fits this condition even if the

achieved KERATOMETRIC

correction is smaller

than the desired one. AVOID POSTOPERATIVE OBLATE CORNEAS !

Q (asphericity) = Quality of vision

Page 7: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

ASPHERICITY: RING SELECTION

Oblate corneas (Q < -0.23) : single 140 or 160 (arc) segments

Moderately prolate corneas (- 0.23) < Q < -1.00) : single or paired160 (arc) segments

Hyperprolate corneas (Q > - 1.00) : paired 160 (arc) segments or210 segment if nipple cone

Page 8: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

CLINICAL CASES

Q = 0,13

Cyl = -5.2 D

K1 = 39.8 D

K2 = 44.9 D

PREOP

SURGICAL

STRATEGY??

Page 9: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

CLINICAL CASES

AF 150/140

Q = 0,08

Cyl = -2.2 D

K1 = 40.7 D

K2 = 42.9 D

POSTOP

IF THE TOPOGRAPHIC

ASTIGMATISM WAS USED

FOR RING SELECTION

(160/250):

OBLATE CORNEA

HIPERCORRETION

Page 10: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

CLINICAL CASES

Cataract + PMD

VA: 20/400

+3.00-6.00x85

Q = 0,34

Cyl = +10.2 D

K1 = 48.1 D

K2 = 37.9 D

PREOP

SURGICAL

STRATEGY??

Page 11: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

CLINICAL CASES

AF 150/140

Q = 0,65

Cyl = +6.6 D

K1 = 46.3 D

K2 = 39.7 D

POSTOP

VA: 20/30

+0.50-3.00x85

3 mo after ICRS:

Phaco + IOL

VA: 20/20

+2.00-3.00x85

Page 12: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

CLINICAL CASES

High Astigmatism

Amblyopia

BCVA: 20/80

-2.50-4.50x20

Q = -0.31

Cyl = -3.5 D

K1 = 41.2 D

K2 = 44.7 D

PREOP

SURGICAL

STRATEGY??

Page 13: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

CLINICAL CASES

AF 150/140

BCVA: 20/30

-3.50

Q = -0.26

Cyl = -1.5 D

K1 = 41.4 D

K2 = 43.0 D

TO BE

FOLLOWED

BY PRK

POSTOP

Page 14: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

RESULTS

Q variation (∆Q) from preoperative to postoperative, according to

the ICRS type (160 / 210) and thickness implanted.

Q variation (∆Q) from preoperative to postoperative, for the 150-140 = 0.023

Page 15: Keratoconus Rings chosen based on asphericity

- The asphericity should be the main factor to be considered in surgical planning;

- As the technique has an orthopedic effect, the postoperative goal should always be surface re-shaping (turn the postoperative Q close to -0.23) rather than corneal flattening.

CONCLUSION